The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.92.30PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT a~~l~l ~~~9~. DATE~A`'1 1~. 199~TT n CASE g =``/ ~~w APPLICANT C o t,lN I E ~ J ~M 1..Q1.A(J~~~l PHONE C' )~ 133~f'' D 19 MAILING ADDRESS PHONE~1~,3,)3~~•1D) 9 MAILING ADDRESS LOCATION OF PROPERTY ~ 1 NT t Y V i Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the fac s in question. Applicant Signatur (To be completed by the Zoninq Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: F)F-~ Zone District Requesting: . Sac.,s~.~~yLot Size ~~, ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where /O ~ ' is required. /G ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where L~ is required. ~S~ ' ~ Side Yard Setback Variance, where ~~ is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq, ft. is allowed. Other: Zoning Officia Application filed 'Jr~~~"~~ Parce~/ID Date of Meeting ,q Notices Mailed "I Secretary Refer Resolution to Building Department 000001 0~' z~ _; Yes ~_~ No . LJ/~C , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERB BEFORE THE PZTKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Owner: Name and Address of Applicant: Property Location or Description: June 2, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. 1st Floor Council Chambers, City Hall Jim and Connie Calaway Jim and Connie Calaway 1923 Enterprise League City, TX 77573 Crystal River Park Subdivision Lots 9A and 10A; 210 Chair Mtn. Dr. Requesting approval for a 70 foot front yard setback variance, a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, and a 15 foot west side yard setback variance where 100 feet, 30 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a single-family residence. Approval of these variances would allow the proposed residence to be 30 feet from the front yard property line, 20 feet from the rear yard property line, and 15 feet from from the Calaway's west side yard property line. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD SE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X TH ITK COUN Y QA OF ADJUSTMENT Cindy Christensen, Secretary 000002 '' Ms. Joanna S. Schaffner Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Schaffner; ~~ May 11, 1992 The Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Requirement List requests an explanation of the need for a variance for the property on which I plan to build a residence. That piece of property is in Pitkin County, Redstone, lots 9A and l0A within the Chrystal River Park Subdivision. The Pitkin County requirement for setback is 100 feet from the frontage line. Lots 9A and l0A of the Chrystal River Park Subdivision face onto a large common area, however the lot is only 100 feet in depth. Therefore there is need for a variance to allow for construction space for the residence.~._ .,..... _"~ With all good wishes, ~~~ Connie Calaway 1923 Enterprise Boulevard League City, Texas 77573 00UU03 LIST OF ADJACENT PROPBRTY OWNERS Mr. and Mrs. Harry A. Bostron 0122 Chair Mountain Drive Redstone, Colorado 81623 Mr. Joel Hunter C/O Hunter Laboratories 440 North Beach Street Daytona Beach, Florida 32014 Mr. Patrick Gleason 0048 Chrystal Park Drive Redstone, Colorado 81623 C.R.V. Properties 117 Redstone Boulevard Redstone, Colorado 811623 Lots 6, 7, 8A Metes and Bounds Parcel Lots 30A, 31A Lot 32A Mr. Bob Davis, President Lot 15 Chrystal River Park Subdivision Home Owners Association 0312 Chrystal Park Drive Redstone, Colorado 81623 00000 / ~ / /, / ' A~ ~ T , I ~ , . e, 1 2 !'f. Contour /nterva/ ~ pad, ~iokq ,~ -~~, -a. y''tt ' , ~ ~ 'f ~ °o qyQ ~ 11 n "l 7 ~ ' ~ OD' o`'\ \ ° 'Ec ~ p N 2 ~~~ ~ ~~ Q x .~ 065 3~ l$ ,, -~ O ~`~!~ c. 6 /~.. ~ , c- ~, . . .~ o \ G / %... \ ~ O.. \ k i ~ ~~ k~ ~ ',, L~ I ~ IZ .h ~ N -g~ 226,6 ~~ _N S , O e 0 "I ~ Q ur c O ~ ~ , r , °~ ••. O O ~Q~ 2oy~(/1~0 I I ~I ~ ! c ~ ~~ _ ` ~ S,nike~Assumed E/eu.> /DO.OZ+ 1 ~, • /ndic~tcs Found ~f'ebar g, x 90.1 Spof E/ovations ~EYI~ED 6X~41~...~IT ~ -. _ --- (P-2-q2 NOTE: No portion of the parcel of land described hereon. lies within the limits of the,100 year flood hazard boundary. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: j Lots 9A & 10A, Crystal River Park Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado. I hereby certify that on April 21, 1992, a survey was performed by me on the above described parcel of land. All easements, encroachments and rights of way in evidence or known to me are shown. This survey is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Boundary ~. Topo 5'Lrrvey Gots 9A ~ /OA C~ ste/ River Pork subd. Pitkin Count Co/orado BY L/NES /N SPACE SYDNEY L/NC/COME (L. S. /4///) BOX 121 CAkBONOALE. COLO. 303-963-3A52 /Y92 ~ SCALE~1~~= OODUUS ,• .'~' q~. . ' ~{ 'F ~ •' Jgl Scale ~ /"=40 . • bra 2 ff. Contour /nferva/ ~ pa d, 'IOk?I '~, - f .~ o qya , t ~ 2 ~ •, ,•' ~E ~(- G o ' ' N o~~ \~ . - ,+~~ \ / ;.. 6 i.._ Sp/ke~Assumed EYeu ~ /00.02+ • /nd~cafes Found ~t'ebar ..r~~' ~, x eo.i 5pof E/ovations VF BUILOINto FDO!'1~IZINT?cDDED S-lo-q2 p•~( NIAI~Y V•h. SMITI~{ /dz.cF+iT~T NtTf' c6>z-TiFiEj~ ~iY UuFh IrJ 4~PhC.E NOTE: No portion of the parcel of land described hereon. lies within the limits of the,100 year flood hazard boundary. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 9A & 10A, Crystal RiverPark Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado. I hereby certify that on April 21, 1992, a survey was performed by me on the above described parcel of land. All easements, encroachments and rights of way in evidence or known to me are shown. This survey is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. a~~ ~XNI~IT C'~ s-~d-~2 ~ Boundary ~. Topo 5'~rvey Lo~S 9.9 ~ /OA Crusts/ k'iv~r ParL~ Sigh./ aY• L/NES /N SPACE SYDNEY L/NC/COME(L.S. /4///I BOX 121 CAHBONDALE. COLO. 303-963-3852 /992 ~ SCALE~1~~= 40 MARITAL & FAMILV LAW REAL PROPERTY LAW WILLS ESTATkS 8 ESTATE PLANNING April 24, 1992 Ms. Shari Novasad 0304 Highway 133 Carbondale, CO 81623 Dear Shari: 501 East Church Street Orlando, Florida 32801 Phone (407) 843-5690 Fax (4071849-1749 RE: McCORMICK/GALLOWAY TRANSACTION Bobby aske3 that I Fax you a consent, to be attached to the Galloway's application to the Pitkin County Board of Adjustments for a variance on the lots they are purchasing from my wife and me. Sincerely, `r ~^~--- ,`~ohn M. McCormick JMM/ifw John M. McCormick Attorney and Counselor at Law P.O. Box 3323 Orlando, Florida 32602 e _zy'r7Z D Q~L~i,s7 john M. McCormick Attorney and Counselor at Law P.O. Box 3323 Orlando, Florida 32802 MARITAL & FAMILY LAW REAL PROPERTY UW W ILLS, EST RTES & ESTATE PUNNING April 24, 1992 Pitkin County Board of Adjustments Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen, CO RE: 501 East Church Street Orlando, Florida 32801 Phone 1407)843-5690 Fax (407)849-1749 VARIANCE ON SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Gentlemen: My wife and I, as the present owners of real property located in Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described as Lot 9A and 10A, CRYSTAL RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION. We aware that the Calloways, who are prospective purchasers of said property, have made application before your Board for a Variance in order to construct a single-family residence. This letter is to advise you that we have no objection to their application. Respectfully, John M. McCormick and Doris E. McCormick hn M. McCormick, Owners cc: Shari Novasad Crystal River Realty OOt)Ot7~ CRYSTAL RIVER HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE We, the Architectural Committee of the Crystal River Park Homeowners Association, approve Jim and Connie Calaway's foot-print layout of their home on 210 Chair Mt. Dr., Redstone Co., with the road set back of 30 ft., South set back of 15 ft., and meadow, or East, set back of 20 ft.. The natural wood color and size of home of 2100 sq. ft. is also approved. We do need to have the plans for 2 weeks to notify homeowners and lot owners to give their comments. ~~.~~ Marie Willey-Chairman Architectural Committee m Q ~' R- ti s~ ~ ~ .a ~~ s~d~-n~ -~ ~~ ~ o ~- ~ ~ ~,~~ P ~'~ _C _i ~~~ ODUui.fl ~~ ~i H I~HwkY 133 ~1•~`N~Y ~~IbEN~ LoT5 qh' ~ IOA Gl~'(tTlrl. W ~/QZ- PhWL SlI6D1~/l51(7h4 ~~ 0 N z N~ e ~g I-1 U <~-~ ~` ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~. ono. ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~ -o ~~ cam'-8U~4taact.E, cct.d~ltDv ~I(o3-?3~3`I Iq'- o° l U7fS 9A ~ IOA GtzY~fAt, IZIVEIZ PhRJc- Sl.~l~/ibl0~ N 0 s N N~NGY V.A~, SM I-t"I~ -~PGN IT~LT G, ~ol.C~zhDU X163- 233`1 - - - - GC~I.~W~-r DES I I~~N~E t.~ 1~ ti tom G~YsTal. ~N~iz 1'Acj2-IC_ ~bNlSloF~ "' NON ~`f v,~. SM i TN - ~~.ck-}i TEc,T Q N ~-sdz~'~LE ~ ~Cx.ol~Cx~ 103- 239 1 Q . • • . -_ O ` ` ` y 8 1 a ~ . o ' o N A w o ~ g ••I ~8 g o A U o '~o W _ N N ~ 'J ~ 8 'iQ N •1 O,WW OOp op .O : ~qy• g ~ p N p•: O G~ to ' O ~~ h O .6 ~ S 'q Opo'•O s. pp O p ~ •. Q, O 0~.~ Oy ~ A N m MO•,~.•• v W p9i ' O '4 p~ O J , O V ~ ~ 8 `F. `' 8 .9 8 ~ 4 ,r+ o w . ~ .'•,. ~. p pp O b . -~i ~ v 0 • 60i ~ r ~ O O Oi ? • .e ~ w O 'Iti~ . \ IoW, 8_ N ~ d ~ p p O. O O ~ .. C OO, y~y , O ~ ' W OR/L , Oj O *W - ~O ~ .o C~zO~ tJ1 F N ~ n1 O 4 a w ~ ~.+~p2 8 ~O w 'p z A N ~ .p ~ O. Q4i~ A r O ~ ~v o ~ u1Oi s~-,OOL -O~ ~ i cn u o. m ~ _. o ' v ~ Wit. z o 'O•• ~• o ~ ~ j- °°-o • o w. m pN : '9 ~ N ~ ~ , ' O ~.y N w ', .b ~P ~ O .~ v O ~ O •~ r •N 1 I ~ 'C O N fT .. '.b. ~ ~ mom' O9~L o - O w' - - N ~ ~] N~ NOn V ~ N m ~ r m ~'''~ 5Z `o N m ~ ~ s ~ r.N. ~omz ai z n y o. v ~ z a ~ 0 T o •~ O~'~ DW`/E ~~N '~ ~ rpm ... m . •~ a0 ~ -._ .. ~ a /33 m .. .. m oooui~ ~ I G~~ A y 13 3 ..; , `;PEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE ~ T30 South Galane Street- -- Aspen, Colorado 81611 ', - (303} 920-5090 - _ - ,. ' ,LAND USE APPLICATION FEES ~ ' City . 00113 ~ -63250-134 ~ ~~ GMP/CONCEPTUAL ~ ~ ' -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 - SU&CONCEPTUAL -63300-139 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS '~ -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ - CONSENTAGENDAITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 63340-205 00123 -63340-190 00115 -63340-163 County 00113 -63160-126 -63170-127 $3160-128 X3190-129 -63200-130 E3210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63450-146 REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 00123 -63340-190 00113 $3360-143 PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 -63090-123 -63140-124 -69000-145 Name: ~ ~ G-~ PS Addre/ss~: ~ ~ C~ Y / fS°. hUN ,.~L~E. Check # Cop7es received: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING J ~7-- CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP PLAN COPY FEES OTHER SUBTOTAL TOTAL Phone: -y~6/ Project: 'JCJ ~ 1 ~e Date: _. "-~~' ,~~ 0UUU14 County of -~~~ State of Colorado The undersigned, follows: I, being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign~w^as posted and visible continuously from the ~J - day of--~\' \ J~`'1 19 ~~, to the ~ r.> r day of ~~ ~.t wee 19 ~ (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days b ~e the hea 'ng date). Applican Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,day of , 19 ~' ` , by C.nNN24: CaLf147k'~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My Commission expires: ~~ - 3 " ~- Nb a y Publ c's S' nature ~~i-lWY~~ ~'A~,~, ,~r~,4Cf. co, N16~3 Address } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE BEARING } BEFORE TBE PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT being first duly sworn, deposes and says as ~~l~~iJ ~~ r; .'~' '!YF ~ at ~~ll'x ~ it E '! '7i"A ~ ~. ~ I ~('.. ~j. ~ 'f ~ ? 9 i ,. i .,~ ~ . ? r ~ ~.- - 'f4~~ ~~+i+lc K~~ '! ~ ~ t.~ ~ Y~ J R a IL a Y. 1 ~ ~'~I1 1 11 - 1..~ ~! 'Y•f i ~ '~' b .~ _~q -if ~- ,~~ ,, ~ '}, ~i~ ~~ , ~. , ~, ~~.. ::~ K ~ ~~ f. ~; j ~ ., ~ , •. ~ .. ~+ ~.. 1 ,~ '~` / ~ 1 ~ ~~ -1 i .. ,, , _ . si ~~~ ~~~~.' ~~~~'- 1 .. i s . ' }a ~~ t` ~~<: ~• ~.~,~ ~. . ". %~ ,`~ !..~1 a. ~,t .i i "~~s ^+`~~~ €. Y f 1 1 ~, 1 ". j rl _~ fy s lf~ t. yI 'r 11 1 ~ ~~ i,,, ~_'~ ~~'~ ~ r "'je :. .°.~ Y ~`Z ' + (. Z ~" O o ~ ~ ~ d, w ~3 ~N ~~~~~ oc~:~~~ ~ J F~ #347378 ~>ei i X79: 45 F:ec ~. CCU bk: 685 , ~ 3 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $. ~ RESOLIITION OF THE FZTRIN COIINTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT GRANTING SETBACK RELIEF FOR CONNIE CALAWAY RESOLIITION NO. 92-30 WHEREAS, Connie Calaway, owner of Lots 9A and 10A, Crystal River Park Subdivision, requests a 70 foot front yard setback variance, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 70 foot front yard setback variance, and a l0 foot rear yard setback variance, be granted due to downzoning, pursuant to the revised plans submitted (Exhibit "B"). WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may I result in rehearing and possible revocation. ,' ~nnn~~ ~ ~` #347378 OB/U4. _ • 4.°, Fcec ~. OU BK: 683 FG Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk., Doc S.UU -~ + , ', 'moo 2 ff. Contour /nferva! Rp2d, 'i~.q r - ~ -4• 'F 6 'OO 95a S9• .ti G~~nt~~''Z Boa 'o~ ~~ \ •' ~ ' , 6` _ r~ ' D E \~ ~~~ 0 \\• Q o i+~7.6 ~~ I/ ',',. '',ii `• ~YISED GXNIP~IT ~ ~~~~ i U i }-- (v-2-'12 NOTE: No portion of the parcel of land described hereon. lies within the limits of the, 100 year flood hazard boundary. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 9A a 10A, Crystal River Park Subdivision, Pitkin~COUnty, Colorado. I hereby certify that on April 21, 1992, a survey was performed by me on the above described parcel of land. All easements, encroachments and rights of way in evidence or known to me ere shown. This survey is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. --~- oouu~o ~ lS G' r~ ~ ~F \ ~~ n~!'" ~L ~_\ ~ ~ ~ ~ •5~' ~ ., I 12 l -g 226,5 g I ~ ~ ~ 1 a I P 1 w1 ~ ~ Spike-Assumed E/eu~/00.02+ • /ndicafes Found Rebar x ear 5pof E/ovations ~ Topo ~ B" L/NES /N SPAC~ SYDNEY L/NC/COME(L.S. /4///J ,~~ h 40 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Prtkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Boazd of Adjustment requesting authonty for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appeaz and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appeaz personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particulazly if you have objection to such variance, as the Boazd of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: Tuesday, June 2, 1992; 5:15 P.M. 1st Floor Council Chambers, City Hall Aspen Village/Kerr, Cathy: requesting approval fora 15' front yazd setback variance and a 7' rear yazd setback variance where 30' and 10', respectively, aze required in the SR zone district for placement of a mobile home; and a 6' reaz yazd setback variance and an 8' side yazd setback variance where 10' and 10', respectively, aze required in the SR zone district for construction of a shed. Property Location: Aspen Village, Lot #131. Boyd, Constance (Heatherbed Lodge): requesting approval fora 30' front yazd setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone district, for construction of a barn; and a 15' front yard setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone district for construction of an employee dwelling unit. Property Location: 1679 Maroon Creek Road. Lackey, Mary Ellen: requesting a 12' height variance, where 12' is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing ranch gate. Property Location: White Staz Ranch, Lot #5. Cretti, Clark: requesting a 2' front yard setback variance and a 6' north side yard setback variance, where 30' and 15', respectively, aze required in the R-30 zone district, for construction of an attached garage. Property Location: Redstone Subdivision, Lot #13. Calaway, Connie & Jim: requesting a 70' front yard setback variance, a 10' reaz yazd setback vaziance, and a 15' west side yard setback variance, where 100', 30' and 30', respectively, aze required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of asingle-family residence. Property Location: Crystal River Park Subdivision, Lots 9A and 10A. Glick Family Trust; requesting approval fora 150 squaze foot increase in floor azea where a maximum of 3,118 square feet is permitted for this lot in the R-30 zone district, to cover an entry. Approval of this variance would allow the existing structure to exceed allowable floor area by 150 square feet. Property Location: Lot 8, Block 2, Filing 1, Meadowood Subdivision (75 Bluebonnet Trail). Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 19, 1992. To Be Published in the Aspen Times May 22, 1992. County PO # ~~~~~~ • .. ~. Minutes Pitkin~COUntp Board of Adjustment June 2, 1992 Members Present: Ted Guy, Acting Chair Evan Gull John Wheeler Rod Dyer Mike Cooper Members Absent: Rick Neiley Stan Mathis Staff: Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Guy opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Case X92-31. Glick Family Trust L8 B2 F1 Meadowood Subdivision Guy read a letter into the record from Cindy L. Merrill, Secretary to Andrew V. Hecht, who is representing the Glick Family, requesting that this case be tabled to the July 7, 1992 meeting. Dyer moved to table Case ,~92-31 to July 7, 1992, Wheeler seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Jama Parker was present, representing Cathy Kerr, to request-a 15 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 10 feet, respectively are required for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 8 foot side yard setback variance, where 10 feet and 10 feet, respectively, are required for construction of a proposed shed. Guy read into the record the letter from Patrician Dickerson, Manager of Aspen Village, that they are aware of the request being made and approve of this request. Guy asked Schaffner if this met the standards as far as the Code for mobile home parks, and the request does meet these standards. It was mentioned that this is a double-wide lot. There was no public comment. wheeler asked why the shed had to be so close to the property line and asked if it could be moved closer to the mobile home. After further discussion, it was agreed that a 5 foot variance would be more acceptable than 8 feet, which would leave 7 feet between the shed and the trailer (instead of 11 feet). 1 ~~UU~~ Dyer made a motion to grant a 15 foot front y~rd setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, for placement of a mobile home; and a 6 foot rear yard setback variance and an 5 foot side yard setback variance, for construction of a proposed shed, due to downzoning. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #92 26 Bovd Constance tHeatherbed Lodael, 1679 Maroon Creek Road Guy stated for the record that he has done work previously at Heatherbed Lodge, but is not currently doing work on this property and believes that there is no conflict. Jim Curtis was present to represent Constance Boyd. Boyd is requesting a 30 foot front yard setback variance, where 75 feet is required in the AR-1 zone district, for construction of a barn; and a 15 foot front yard setback variance, where 75 feet is required for construction of an employee dwelling unit. - - . Curtis briefed the Board on the history of the lodge and the layout of the land. Heatherbed Lodge has already received approval from the Board of County Commissioners for an employee/manager/owner dwelling unit and an accessory barn. Curtis stated that there is an existing structure where the dwelling unit is proposed to be built. The new structure will be incorporating some of this existing structure. The intent of the setback variance is essentially to allow both structures to be up against the hillside, further away from the floodplain, and minimize the visibility from Maroon Creek Road. There was no public comment. After further discussion, Gull made a motion to grant a 30 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a proposed barn, and a 15 foot front yard setback variance for construction of an employee dwelling unit, due to topographical hardship and pursuant to the plans submitted. Dyer seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case 9Z-L i t,ac:xC ,•.a~ ••~~~.. ---- - Guy turned the Chair over to Dyer as he was the architect of the remodel on the Lackey property, and stepped down from this case. Mary Ellen Lackey and Gary Combs were present to request a 5 foot height variance, where 12 feet is the maximum permitted for accessory structures per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing ranch gate. Schaffner stated that at the time of posting, Lackey was requesting a 12 foot height variance for an addition of a pagoda to the top of the existing ranch gate. The applicant has dropped the pagoda from the plans and is only asking for a variance for the existing ranch gate (which is presently 17 feet high). 2 000023 The ranch gate has been in existence for over one year and does conform to the setback requirements. Dyer asked what the Planning office's view was on ranch gates. Schaffner stated that the Board of County Commissioners are not willing to support a change in regulation or policy to allow for ranch gates in the County. Zoning believes that if they are kept out of the setback, they need a height variance because the accessory height limit of 12 feet conflicts with the Fire Department requirement of 14 to 15 feet for their emergency vehicles. Combs stated that the gate was indicated on the approved building plans. There is a•letter from White Star Ranch Homeowners' Association. giving their approval for the existing gate only. Gull stated that he finds it difficult to oppose what are clearly privileges that have existed and have been granted, especially since this existing ranch gate is outside the setbacks. Wheeler stated that if this had come before the Board before being built, that he would have denied the request. Guy stated that since he is not voting on this case, to get an approval, it would have to be unanimous. Guy asked Lackey if she wanted to table this request to the July 7 meeting and she stated she would. Gull moved to table Case 92-27 to July 7. It was seconded and all were in favor. Case #92-29. Cretti. Clark Lot 13 Redstone Subdivision Clark Cretti was present to request a 2 foot front yard setback variance, and a 6 foot north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 15 feet, respectively, are required in the R-30 zone district for construction of an attached garage. Cretti stated that the Redstone Historical Society granted approval for this request. On their recommendation, Cretti moved the proposed structure back two feet. Schaffner stated that the applicant is going through a minor 1041 hazard review and that the Planning Office sees no problem with the variance request. Cretti stated that the proposed garage will be back into the hillside where there has already been some excavation. This is to be a two-story structure. There was no public comment. 3 OODU2~ After further discussion, Wheeler moved to grant a 2 foot front yard setback variance, and a 6 foot north side yard setback variance, due to topographical hardship and pursuant to the plans submitted. Gull seconded the motion and all were in favor. YaL"JC auuu vaaivaa Connie Calaway was present to request a 70 foot front yard setbac variance, a 10 foot rear yard setback variance and a 15 foot west side yard setback variance, where 100 feet, 30 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Calaway stated that there is a change in the request. The adjoining neighbors, the Bostrons, at Lot SA, asked Calaway if she would move the proposed residence to 40 feet from the lot line. The Bostrons have agreed to honor the same agreement -from their side of the adjacent lot line. Therefore, a west side yard setback variance is no longer being requested. Wheeler stated that this is a clear case of downzoning. There was no public comment on this case. After further discussion, Gull moved to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, due to downzoning, as shown on the revised plans submitted. Cooper seconded the motion and all were in favor. Steve-Smart was present to request approval for a 45 root rear yaLu setback variance, where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a proposed single-family residence. Smart stated that a 40 foot rear yard setback variance was already approved on February 4, 1992, but that the footprint of the house has been changed. The elevations and the footing of the building have been changed due to cost. Guy read the February 4 minutes into the record. Wheeler stated that with the reconfiguration of the house, he felt this was too close to the property line. Whereas a corner of the house was close to the property line in the first request, the whole facade of the house would be 5 feet from the property line per the present request. Smart stated that the owner of Lot 4, who would be most affected, has walked the site with Smart and suggested the change. Moving the proposed residence back further, a tree might have to be removed. 4 D~~UL~ . ... . After further discussion, most members had difficulty supporting a 45 foot rear yard setback variance, but would support a 40 foot rear yard setback variance. Gull moved to grant a 40 foot rear yard setback variance, where 50 feet is required, due to downzoning and topographical hardship. Cooper seconded the motion and all were in favor with Wheeler voting no. Motion passed. The May 5 minutes were approved as written. The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~ 7D ~~ ~~%~~t.~- Cindy Chr' tensen, Secretary r ed Guy, Acting Chai 5 0~~~~® LAND USE AppLICATION FEES city 00113 00125 00123 00115 County 00113 00125 00123 00113 -63250-134 -63270-136 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63280-137 GMP/FINAL -63300-139 SUB/CONCEPTUgL -63310-140 SUB/FINAL -63320-147 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP AppLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: -63340-205 -63340-7g0 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH -63340-163 HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-12g -63200-730 -63210-131 -63220-132 X3230-133 -63450-746 REFERRAL FEES: -63340-205 -63340-190 -63360-143 _. PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 -63090-123 -63140-124 -69000-145 GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP gppLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP gppLICATIONS CONSENTgGENDA ITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP, pLgN COPY FEES OTHER i Name: ~ r' ~~ ~._.r} Pte; {j-. Address: (~ ~'~~~ , _ / ~:, Check q ,a. ~, Copies received: PEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81617 (303) 920-5090 SUBTOTAL TOTAL _ Phone: ~ ;'( ~ _ J ~~. <'._