Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.90.15 PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE -1/ g 19~ CASE # / `-' . /~/~ APPLICANT rVl < ELV' ~tn/tU/" f MAILING ADDRESS 30X 6 y OWNER ~/fM ~ PHONE 92-G>- 7_ ~ 3 3 K(~t~ ~p ~'1G~f! - Lv ~3'/6i PHONE S~9.yz C MAILING ADDRESS Sf}M~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY ~~ ~ ~~ S-~ /Cf~S 3 Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may retu his application if it does not contain all the facts in que ^ion Applicant Signature --~ -^--~ ~ON/aL3~ G, /~i9.~/~~ (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: _ S ~'-JZone District Requesting: Lot Size ~' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ~UU ' is required. Other: ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where 5 0 ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq.ft. is allowed. Hardship: i'1 G(1 -CGf~~O~ rv~~rG IO~ ~I Z ~ l~Nl CI 7oF~6(\~CG-P~IC Zoning Official .~ ' ~ .P,~L~ / q Q i ~ J Application filed Q/~GG~ / //~/~ Date~~ I"U Notices maile,~d 8 0 Parcel ID # ~ '~~ Secretary 0`JJ001 0-~ ZZ • i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District CourtRoom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and other affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: April 03, 1990 at 5:15 PM Name and Address of Applicant: Ron Kanan c/o Snowmass/Gateway Ventures P.O. Box 649 Aspen, CO 81612 Property Location or Description: Lot 3, Block 3, Filing Gateway of Snowmass Requesting approval for a 70 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district for the construction of a single-family residence. The granting of this variance would allow the house to be located 30 feet from their front yard property line and 40 feet from their rear yard property line. Duration of Variance: Temporary, Permanent• X THE PITKIN COUNTY BOAR OF ADJUSTMENT Cindy Christensen, Secretary Ot1JOO2 ~-~_~~.~~I~`~.N CONT. ~~ !F. RON KF.NAN Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Co. 81611 ,_. ~, ~k E~. 3-9-90 Variance ReGUest• Lot ' Block 3 Filing # Gateway Sub. Dear Sirs, A variance is requested to accept setbacks required by Gateway of Snowm~ss Mesa Subdivision covenants. In article IV sect 9. setbacks are as follows, 30' from front line 25' from side street and 20' from interior boundrys. A home will not fit on the lot with the county's required setbacks. Sincerely, , i. R ald C. Ka an Pres. g~ ODUU03 -.r ~;~.~ P.djacent Land Owners ~~nt 3 rloc: ~ _ilinr_. 3 U~~C.~ "~,-._,ic;l':t tlil.l Road a~~;:mas" ''o. David ~ ~..~.:ri,_ -tee f l" ~ -.. .; r - t- ~~'1 (o~~ ?o C:d03) J20-2:.3~ .:-' G j~l /~ *^a {'" .'S ~L. ILr IN °~'" ~~G~.. i~C1'^Y (,f f'=- ,.. _ _.__ - _ :,~ . - Ir `~ -- ~.c,x ~,,~a~ ~,~;;F~F~i. co e~ e . OOOU04 `~ 1~ C-~^ • '~~1~ ~~ _~ \ .~ . .. f ~ ~ S7 \ \\ i, i 0 \~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ OO Indicates Found Rebar A' Cap L.S. 3317 • b- opal ~. , ._ l6~ /~ Curve Dais \\ ~= 8/°30'00" R= 87.54' ?= 75.45' Ch. _ //4; 29 ~' i '~ \~ ~~. ~ / ~rl ~ V~9r f~ Curve C~ t~..' jF= 4°5i` T- /4.3 ., Ch.° Z3.v~: -'-` _ clock 3, G.a:-:;.; nr ~ili~~g, Pitkin County, ~oiorn. . ~. , I ~: ~r:~;y certify that on Piay 24, 1939 a sur~.°y .. ;r .,ei ~~~ ..~,_ u.:-:ar riy ~1i reg. , supervision on the above described I,arcel : _,. i i Fa~~~.r~~~;ts, t.n- croachments and rights-of-gray in evidencr~ ~~:~ kno~,n; .. .~_ ~ she~:;n, ibis sur- vey is true and correct to the best of my kno~~rl^~lu= acid beiir~F. ~i , 5yunc3y-LinCicorne ~:L~~f1-- ~#,~ ~our~dat y SurvVy Lola. B/k. 3, GatewaU o{ Snow~ss Mesa, 3 Fi/in (- gY~ L/NO'S /N 5~~.-~~~ SYDNEY L/NC/COME (L.S. /4///J oouoo5 r,~~_~ 121CAk80N0ALE COLO. 303-963-3852 „ _ ~. i - _ . .SCa/e l"=50' /V 89°3/'05"E ^' 329.9 Set !Z ~C ~------TL-_75' U/rlity Esmt (Typ.) ----_---~ ~ ~ I ~ \~ Block 3 i ~ II `~. \ . Lot 3 i s i c~, ~ , r ~. .;~~~, ~ a t ~ ~, ~ N o ..... .... ~-_,t., ,, _~- `~ . V i ~~ i - ~~ ~~. ,, \~'~ ~! ~ ~~>~~~~'4` { , ~' ~D ~' CUrD'e G'al'`... y'~~~ ~ fig. ~ ~ _ ~3/°30'Oc;'' _ _. ... ,~~Q1} r``~ E' T= 75.43' k Ch. _ !/4.29 f~ Curve Data ~F = 4° 57' 52 ° R~ 330.96' T- /4.35' Ch. ° Zd 67' Ch Bn~ = 5 49' 28' 56' W Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 3, Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision, Third Filing, Pitkin County, Colorado. Eby cFr;, _ ''a~ ,4, 1989 a survey was performed by me and under r. - d?~.~ribed parcel of ].-r-. ". '. easements, G~- ~. i;,. ODUUUB t ~ ~, F/L/NG / ~ F/L /NG 2 F/L /NG i i d 3~ tO 9O B ACK ~ C' _~, 1 ~ ~ ~ e i 1 , Cl // 0 ` ~ Y ~ O O C I ~ ~\ O ® ~ ,a. O ~ 5 O O ~ ~ ,/ o ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~~ o // o ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ F'A i ~~ v Y , ,~ ~ BLO ~ U © O / / ~ ~ ~ e Acs O o C'K ~i ~ O sQ © ® i0 O - B~C ~ ~ n O ~ OBL K ~ O ~i ® Q F/L /N 3 F/L /NG t ~ F/L /N6 / ~~ z~ ,^ I~~i 'c,l ii ~~~I ~. ~:~ SCALE SCALE/ ~20D' DATE AEYIS~ONS i PUPPOSE F- HOLY CROSS DETAIL MAP '~ ELECTR na Nirrwc » nre s IC ASSOCIATION 6ArtwAr OF SAGWIL(TS •ao'ie/.oa' o' iso' •y, - ~ Awwa ~,neerr ___ c so uwrorE GIENWOOD SR2SIGS, COLORADO MESA SUBO/Y/S/OW scar COLORADO 34 EAGLE e a eaMrr rowxWn U•r PD. onarnnc oen .cnott eLecrP¢asw.. ixc COLO. T.B. 7/ o"^'"M~-~-- .pPO~eo e. R.B6.M: ARE4 '.,.F •~;, •• ~-~"-5..e 9 // P/TK/N SEC.SI Jf £':'~TEWAY TO SNOWMASS MESA SUBDIVIS1011! UUUUU7 "'PEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920.5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES Clry 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -632e0-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63300-739 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 X3160-126 GMP/GENERAL -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED -63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL X3200-130 SUB/DETAILED -63270-131 SUB/FINAL -63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS {i3230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 63360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 E3080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE 63090-123 COMP. PLAN -63740-124 COPY FEES -69000-145 OTHER Name: ~ ~t.LGCv~ Address: ~'~ ~ ~ Q Check p / OO~I- Addifional billing: %:i SUBTOTAL TOTAL Phone: ~C -'f> >=~~ Project: ! j~ -`~ ' L~ _3 ~ ~~ . ~ _ ~,-. ~d -~ Date: - ~ /r? ~t~ # of Hours: uouuos County of Pitkin State of Colorado r~ u AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY )ss_ POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY ) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: ~'~/ I, Y_~'~~Kl-t7 C-~C?~`'`~ being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted ann,~d visible continuously from the 2J~°'l day of / "( ~yzc-~O 19 , to the 3'"17 day of ~}i'2~ 19 6~ (Must be posted for at least (D9) full days befor a eating date)- . ~ ,~C~, plica is Signature n'~C ••~ ,'Ic 1 ~ ~~k - .. 251@ ,,~, COURTROOM JN_ _ .---- ~.`_ 'A VARIANCE FOR OWNFR , FO~! " ' ~6~ Subscribed and sworn o before me th~~ day f , 19 by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFF L SoEAL_ My Co fission expires: n Public's S 0'~II OOOOQ9 1,~ ~.A d A • • , /-~ e~a~ Ei~U +~as. ...~ ''; ~ ~ ~ J J RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT S;L\'IA DAEi$~7'rING SETBACK RELIEF FOR SNOWMASS/GATEWAY VENTURES PITKIN CNTY RECORDER RESOLUTION NO. 90-15 Nl,r ~ II 5~ ~II'90 WHEREAS, Snowmass/Gateway Ventures, owner of Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 3, Gateway of Snowmass, requests a 70 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the ,evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 70 foot front yard setback variance be granted to allow for the construction of a single-family residence, as shown on the plans submitted (Exhibit "B"), due to downzoning and topographical hardships. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. QQQJ11 Resolution No. 90-/ S Page 2 eons ~~~ ~:a~: ~~ The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: April 3, 1990 ATTEST: /~ ~ / , J Cindy L. Christensen, ' ecretary The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Kand'i Shaffran, Chairman 000012 eooK ~l~ ~s~ ~' Exhibit "A" Legal Description for property owned by SNOWMASS/GATEWAY VENTURES Lot 3, Block 3 Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision Third Filinn, Pitkin County, Colorado 00~~~n ~ N~ J _ _ ~ ' r I 800fS ~ ±~r~ ry{~ l~: Q : ; ; ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~7 i, ~ ~ .`~' R . ~ . ~,~- / ~ J 7I~ '~ J ~ 7c Z J r ~ ~ / t 1 .\ x / r ~r-~~~' iii ~., ~ --a~ - - ;1 t~ _ _ n~ -i " ~~ e a : ~_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I _ .2 r ' ~ ~ I ,. _ _ . -}- _ I ~ I ~ ~ y i I n' ~ \~ Q V I I i ~ ~ p Jlj ~ ~ : ` c~' "~ O N' U F- ~ ~ ~-~, ' O _ ~ ' . .. ~ ~ g~i /~~ .'~J i 1- ~ ` ~ ~__- v ..... _ t , _ f ~ ~ ~ ~. - , S ~ ` 4 % i 4 EEES ~ u I ~ ~~~ ~ ' ~ Y[~ ~ ~t -1 ~ ~ ~ 0 Q ~ Z b Z ~'SI d - ~ 0 I l8 - -- \ M \ ~=~ ' it U1 O --- ~ \_I ~ I a rY ~ . A .. , . .. '.I .... -._ _ I tv '!~ ~ _ - _ i- _ b J n9/ Vy Y~'i i0 'i~~' O ~ o o ~~ • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: April 03, 1990 at 5:15 PM. Hansen, Tom: requesting an 85 foot front yard setback variance and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet respectively are required in the AF-1 zone district, for an addition to a single family residence. Property Location: 4074 Lower River Road, Woody Creek, Pitkin County. Philosophos, John and Roules, Oren: requesting a 5 foot rear yard setback variance where 20 feet is required in the R-30 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: 0260 Wright Road, Red Mountain, Pitkin County. Harper, Bryan: requesting a 55 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 100 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an addition to a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot 40, Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision, Pitkin County. Snowmass/Gateway Ventures: requesting a 70 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district for the construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 3, Gateway of Snowmass, Pitkin County. Ossario, Hillary: requesting a 60 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Lot 14, Section 20, T10S, R84W of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County. ODUU15 Scott, Allen: requesting a 15 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot 32, Holland Hills, Pitkin County. Submitted to the Aspen Times on March 20, 1990. To Be Published in the Aspen Times on March 22, 1990. County PO # 46814 000016 1 Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment April 03, 1990 Members Present: Member Absent: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman Rick Neiley Ted Guy Stan Mathis Evan Gull John Ostwald Francis X. Krizmanich, Pitkin County Zoning Administrator, and Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Technician, were present with staff recommendations and comments. Shaffran opened the meeting at 5:22 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Shaffran moved to take Case #90-09 off the table from the meeting held March 6, 1990. Tom Hansen (Case #90-09) was present to request an 85 foot front yard setback variance and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet is required, respectively, in the AF-1 zone district, for construc- tion of a residential garage, because of topographic difficulties and a nonconforming lot size. Shaffran stated that she visited the site and agreed that there is a topographic hardship. Hansen submitted revised plans where Plan "A" indicate an encroachment close to the river. Plan "B" is preferred by Hansen. No one from the public was present to comment . Guy made a motion to grant the 85 foot front yard setback variance and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance as requested on Plan "B" submitted, due to topographic hardship and nonconforming lot size. Neiley seconded the motion with the condition that the use of the garage not be sanctioned because of the granting of the variance for a commercial enterprise. The Board agreed. It was passed 5-0. Case #90-14. Harper. Bryan L40 Bl Mtn Valley Subdivision Bryan Harper was present to request a 55 foot rear yard setback variance where a 100 foot Highway 82 setback is required, per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for the construction of a single- family residence, due to downzoning. The placement of a rhtaining wall was questioned. Krizmanich stated that excavating into the hillside is acceptable; however, if the wall is above grade, it becomes a structure and needs a permit. The Harper retaining wall is allowable as presented on the plans. 1 OUOU17 Shaffran asked if there were any members of the public to respond to this case. There were none. Harper presented to the Board a letter from neighbors Richard and Ginny Haberman, which stated that they do not object to Harper's request. Neiley made a motion to grant the requested 55 foot rear yard setback variance as reflected on the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Shaffran seconded the motion and it was passed with a 4-1 vote, with Guy opposing. Case #90-15, Snowmass/Gateway, was tabled until later in the meeting as the representative had not yet arrived. Tom Stevens and architect David Finholm represented the applicant who was requesting a 60 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required along Highway 82, per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for the construction of a single-family residence, because of topographic and geologic hardships. Stevens stated that there were possibly two other locations on the site that could be used to build, but they would require traversing 30g slopes to get to those sites. A model of the house was shown to the Board to grasp the nature of the steepness of the slope. Shaffran questioned the legality of the parcel as a building site; a letter was included in the file from Tom Smith, County .Attorney, stating the legality of the lot. Also, the lot has undergone a 1041 review and has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners and the Pitkin Planning & Zoning Commission. The opinion of both of these Boards was that the location of the house, low on the site, would have less visual impact then if it were located higher on the site. The Board agrees. The building envelope that resulted from the review was shown on the plans submitted. It was noted that a landscaping plan was not included in the general submission and 1041 review. A discussion ensued as to where the boundary of the parcel should start and whether the .boundary should be from the highway or the right-of-way. The setback variance was measured from the highway and not the right-of-way, which is how it should have been measured. Shaffran commented that the proposed house is just so huge and nothing had been done ,to mitigate the impact, but Neiley stated that it is not excessive for the size of the lot. Finholm stated that the house was designed in pieces so that it would not look so large and it would blend into the site. 2 ~~~01~ r Marty Stouffer, a member of the Aspen Bike Lovers East (ABLE), was present with concerns of the Aspen East Scenic Corridor and the homes being built within the corridor. ABLE is trying to get the- Highway east of Aspen widened, and this would situate the highway closer to the house. Ostwald suggested an 80 foot front yard setback variance. Schaffner asked if the Board wanted to table this case until the Board's next meeting to discuss the case with County Attorney, Tom Smith. The Board decided it was not necessary since a motion can be made with conditions. Gull made a motion to approve an 80 foot front 'yard setback variance due to topographical hardships without any conditions. Ostwald seconded the motion. The vote was 3 to 2 with Guy and Shaffran opposing, therefore, it did not pass. Guy then made a motion to grant the 8o foot front yard setback variance, due to topographic hardships, subject to submission of a landscape plan by the applicant. A portion of the house will also be changed to accommodate the variance granted. It was decided by the Board that Tom Stevens will give a landscape plan to Krizmanich and the Board to review. The acceptance or denial of this plan will then be part of record. Gull seconded and the motion passed 4-1, with Shaffran opposing. ~a~c 7~-15 Snowmass Gatewa Ventures Lot 3 Block 3 Filin 3 Gateway of Snowmass Ron Kanan was present to request a 70 foot front yard setback variance and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance where 100 feet and 50 feet is required, respectively, in the RS-30 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence, due to topographic hardships and nonconforming lot size. Kanan submitted a topographic plan of the area showing the grade of the land. Kanan stated that he removed the deck so that a house yis situated willlcause lthe leasteamount ofe scarringrtoothe land. No one from the public was present to comment. Shaffran moved to grant a 70 foot front yard setback variance due to downzoning and topographical hardships. Guy seconded the motion and it was passed 5-0. Allen Scott was present-to request a ol5afo tl rear year setback variance where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. 3 ODUU19 re. _a. Scott stated that the proposed house is to be located close to the back side of the lot and he does not want to displace the trees and vegetation already present. Scott submitted photos of the trees and vegetation. Scott also stated that he is trying to place the location of the house as far from Booth Plumbing (a business in the Holland Hills area) as possible. Gull stated that the setbacks for a comparable zone district for this lot size should be 30 foot front, 20 foot side, 20 foot rear. Gull believes the extra 5 feet being requested should not make a difference to the location of the house. Scott reiterated that it was to save the trees which would have to be destroyed. The house has been staked out and if moved, the vegetation would be destroyed. The Board decided to table this until an on-site visit could be made which was set for Friday, April 6, at 8:00 a.m. A decision by the Board will be made at that time. Mariano "Buddy" Lucero then introduced himself and Krizmanich and Lucero explained the changes in the Planning and Zoning Department and the role Lucero would be playing. i Gull made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 6, 1990, meeting as submitted. Shaffran moved to adjourn the meeting until Friday morning, April 6, at 8:00 a.m. Gull seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Cindy L. Christensen, ecretary Kandi Shaffran, Chairman 4 OOOU.20 • Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Site Visit April 06, 1990 Case #90-17, Allen Scott, Lot 32, Holland Hills Members Present: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman Evan Gull Rick Neiley Ted Guy Member Absent: Stan Mathis and John Ostwald Francis X. Krizmanich, Pitkin County Zoning Administrator, and Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Technician, were present with staff recommendations and comments. The Board reconvened at 8:20 a.m. on Friday, April 6. John Ostwald was not present during this meeting, but did arrive later to review the site. Shaffran moved to take Case #90-17 off the table and it was seconded by Neiley. Allen Scott, the applicant, and Susan Furr, architect, were present representing the case. A discussion then ensued on where the house would be situated and where the stakes were located. It was noted that if the house were moved any further north to remain out of the setback, the vegetation and trees would be destroyed. Furr submitted revised plans of the house. It was also noted that the rear of the house would be against BLM property and that no neighbor would be affected by this decision. With further discussion, a motion was made by Guy to grant the 15 foot rear yard setback variance, as submitted on the revised plans, due to downzoning and for keeping the trees and vegetation presently on the lot. Shaffran seconded and all were in favor. Ostwald called the Planning Office at 11:00 a.m., April 6, and told Cindy Christensen that he was also in favor of the 15 foot rear yard setback variance requested. The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, 0 ~y/ Ci dy L. Christensen, Secretary Kandi Shaffran, Chairman 000021 ~'EN/PITKIN PLANNING 130 South Galena Street OFFICE Aspen, Colorado 81611 LAND USE APPLICATION FEEg (so31 szo•soso Cary 00113 00125 00123 00115 County 00113 00125 00123 00113 -63250-134 -63270-136 -63280-137 GMP/CONCEPTUAL GMP/FINAL -63300-13g -63310,740 SUB/CONCEPTUAL SUB/FINgL -63320-141 ALL 2-STEP APPLICA710NS ALL 1-STEP R APPLICATIONS/ CONSENTgGENDAITEM EFEggqL FEES; S -63340-205 -63340.190 -63340-763 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63450,1gg REFERRAL FEES -63340.205 63340-190 -63360-143 PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-722 -63090-123 -63140,124 -69000-145 GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENEggL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP gppLICgTIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENTgGENDAITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ENVIRONMENTgL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP, p~N Copy FEES OTHER Name: ~'` O O 0 ~ ~ ~~S or ~i Check# f,~ .~~ ~ ..• AdWtional billing ..1 '~ SUBTOTAL ~= TOTAL Phone: ` I, Project: ~ ~ '~ ~ ' ~a -,~. Date; ~ #of Hours~_ ' f ~~ Scanned 11 / 14/07 File Finders Box #15 LARGE PLAT(S) AVAILABLE TO VIEW AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AVAILABLE TO BUY AT CLERK & RECORDER