The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.90.23 PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE April 9, 1990 CASE # 90-23 APPLICANT Christop her Sommer PHONE 925-5385 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 4953, Aspen, CO 81612 OWNER Christopher Sffittmer PHONE 925-5385 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 4953. Aspen, CO 81612 LOCATION OF PROPERTY Lot 7. Ardmore Sub_dv (138 Ardmore Dr. Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant Signature ~-~~vw~2~^~ "~^ ~'~ C'~r~r:~ ------------------------------------------------- (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: Requesting: ~ (a) 20' R-15 Zone District 7992 Lot Size ~ b 10' Front Yard Setback Variance, where 30 ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. 90 Added Square Feet where a maximum of 986.24 square feet is allowed. *NOTE: House is currently 1529.76 sq. ft. over the allowable floor area of 986.24 sq. ft. The allowable FAR for this lot, were it to be located in the R-6 zone district, would be 1,849.24 square feet. Other: Hardship: Nonconforming lot_size Zoning Official Application filed April 9. 1990 Date Ma 1 19 0 Notices mailed Parcel ID # 2737-181-05-007 Secretary d, ~ (a) Variance necessary for proposed addition. ~ (b) Variance necessary for proposed entry. UUUUUI s-~\ 2 ~ PITKIN COUNTY p,~ ,L, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE ~1 ~(L. ~'^ 19~•e~lJ CASE # - ~~~ /~~ APPLICANT {.il~PN~~2 ~„'~K-PHONE ~~LS ' S3~ MAILING OWNER CL-11215'~_f~,~ ~~~ PHONE ~/LS -`" j MAILING ADDRESS ~ ~~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY ~-m'I- ~ A~lG7'Q.t121E. ScdB~VlSib1.J ~fa ~~. Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts innqu~es~ti-on. / Applicant Signature~_~,~-~r~s~ (TO be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: ~"~J Zone District RHO esting: '1992 Lot Size C~~~O~ ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ,Z% ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. ~lO ~ Adi(~Square Feet where a maximum of~~ sq.ft. is allowed. Other: ~ - Hardship: J Zoning Official / 'J Application filed /`C) Date o~"~ ~ 7 i~~ Notices maile~~d~~, Parcel ID # cam! x3 7J r - - d~ Secretary C~ a~ll(,u~aklfS~ FAQ (~~- 4-c'^~ (~~- L+,~V`e ~~ ~~ ~ /o o_ ~,( i/! ~'- ~o Zc n ~ Cit., f Z,, C j Gc c « ~~ ~ i'- ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ o}~,; Novs~ ~~ e~.«~~~ /~~~~7~ c ~ a F{OG~ ~~~~-'0. }~-va~•~nc~ necess~y ~o~ ~ro~oS dadeC~IO~~, ~h=.~;gc~iCxriCE. l1L'CCSS'c~rY ~cr ~,~rc~cs~~-R.~n7~ry D~~~Q~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District CourtRoom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and other affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: May 01, 1990 at 5:15 PM Name and Address of Applicant: Christopher Sommer P.O. Box 4953 Aspen, CO 81612 Property Location or Description: Lot 7, Ardmore Subdivision 138 Ardmore Drive Requesting approval for a 20 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required for a proposed addition, a 10 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required for a proposed entry, and an additional 90 square feet of floor area where a maximum of 986.24 square feet is allowed. The granting of these variances would allow the addition to be 10 feet and the driveway entry 20 feet from the Sommer front yard property line. Duration of Variance: Temporary, Permanent• X THE PzTKIN COUNTY B~ O~-.~' STMENT /'/ t ~`1~1j/I ~' ~' Cindy L Christensen, Secretary 000003 SOMMER RESIDENCE HARDSHIP DESCRIPTION April 6, 1990 A variance from the F.A.R. and setback requirements imposed on the property by current zoning is necessary so the existing structure can be made into a safe, energy efficient, and useful single family home. Hardships exist due to the original design of the home and the inherent nature of the pan-abode construction. A primary safety hardship is caused by the existing sub-code stairway which is so steep and narrow that movement from upstairs to downstairs is difficult for adults and unsafe for small children Our first child is expected in October and future children are planned. This stairway makes it impossible to use the house efficiently. The entry to the house is also difficult and unsafe in its existing form. These hardships will be remedied by moving the stairway to the only part of the house where it can provide safe and convenient access between the two floors and by relocation of the entry to provide the same results. The second major area of hardship is the lack of adequate insulation. The walls of the present structure are the original pan- abode material (approximate value R-3.5) and all of the windows are single-pane, aluminum frame style. In addition there are numerous small holes in the existing walls. These features make the house cold and drafty. This hardship will be remedied by the addition of new insulation, siding, and windows to bring the home up to current energy standards. The third hardship is the interior design of the house which creates many small spaces unsuitable for family use. This hardship will be remedied by removing some interior walls, enlarging the upstairs bathroom, and expanding the house to provide a bedroom adjacent to the enlarged bathroom. The result will be an efficient three-bedroom home for family use in which all interior space is useful. Approval of the requested variance will allow the existing house to be made into a safe, energy efficient, and well integrated single family dwelling which is consistent with the neighborhood. The appearance of the home will be enhanced by the removal of a bulky front porch and external storage shed. OOOOO~s April 6, 1990 Dear Board Members, The following is a list of all property owners adjacent to the residence of Christopher Sommer at Lot 7 Ardmore Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado: Lot Ardmore Subdivision Gregory & Helen Blaze P.O. Box 9241 Aspen, CO 81 61 2 Lot 8, Ardmore Subdivision Gary Jess & Lee Ann Graber P.O. Box 10688 Aspen, CO 81612 it~a~ l~W / ~ / ,~,e, ~t+( ~,~v-~~7 ~;yl~P.rn. CJ//b/ ~/ ~%hh SSL°nJeh Lot 3, Aspen Grove Subdivision Irving Shecter 1794 Winterwarm Road Fallbrook, CA 92028 Unsubdivided land to West of Lot 7 John J. & Kathryn S. Snyder 210 Midland Ave. Aspen, CO 81612 ~~~~)Q EXHIBIT "A" The legal description of the property of Christopher Sommer is: Lot 7, Ardmore Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado Respectfully submitted April 6, 1990. OOOOL~6 CHRISTOPHER SOMMER LOT 7, ARDMORE SUBDIVISION Lot Size Easement Lot Area Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Allowable Floor Area (AFA) Current Floor Area Over AFA Remove Additions Proposed Over AFA R-15 Zone District 7,992.00 sq. ft. -1,827.00 sq. ft. 6,165.00 sq, ft. x .16 986.40 sq. ft. -2.516.00 sq. ft. -1,529.60 sq, ft. + 180.00 sq, ft. -1,349.60 sq. ft. - 270.00 sq. ft. -1,619.60 sq. ft. OOn~nr CHRISTOPHER SOMMER LOT 7, ARDMORE SUBDIVISION Lot Size Easement Lot Area Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Allowable Floor Area (AFA) Current Floor Area Over AFA Remove Additions Proposed Over AFA R-6 Zone District 7,992.00 sq. ft. -1,827.00 sq, ft. 6,165.00 sq. ft. x .30 1,849.50 sq. ft. -2,516.00 sq. ft. - 666.50 sq. ft. + 180.00 sq. ft. - 486.50 sq. ft. - 270.00 sq. ft. - 756.50 sq. ft. ~~~UU~ o ~, ~ ~~ W U ^ ~ ~ ~ li" ~ O Q d~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z=~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ 2 N ,1I `11 I. ~ \1J ~ ~ e s~ ~I O M4 ~F 1 - _ ~ ~ N a ~ s ~~ ~ A ~ ~/_1{Ikli ~ ' _ q n 11 ~ N T I ' ~ ~ A l ~l ~ ~ ~ ~: '~ O A N ;~ ~ N N ' Q O ~ ^ ~( ( ~ h 1p - ~ J ~ti ~ u~ ~ -- ~ ~. ~ ` _ n ~,. ~ : ~ N AVE. r ~ ~. t ~- 1 a N\o~PNO ~ 4^~ .- e ~' _~ 11 H ~ ~ ~ P N ~ '~ w -~ W „ ~' N 7 ~ ~~r..-AVE. ~-~....____~i ~ -Ri ~ bd PP Z ~ V ~~ f~ ~ O.O O J ,~ ` ~'J ~ I ~~ R1 . ~~ SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 87611 (303) 920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES city 'I 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL ~ -63270-136 GMP/FINAL I, -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL ' -63300-139 SUB/FINAL I~ -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS I, -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS '~ REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH '~ 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00715 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL '~, -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED b3180-128 GMP/FINAL I~ -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL -63200-130 SUB/DETAILED -63210-131 SUB/FINAL I -63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ~, -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDAITEM - ~ -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMEyT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE -63090-123 COMP. PLAN -63140-124 COPY FEES -69000-145 OTHER ~~ Name:i~~. YI~T/7~b~J" _ ~,j.,.•..z.{,. Address: ~~-~= ~~ ~~. Check #.7 ~~ ~-' Additional billing: -_-_-__ ~"' ,t7~ SUBTOTAL ~.~";-.~ TOTAL ~~* ~ Phone: ~ i ~°~.J -'-~ ~ J"..-- Project: j ),%~ ~ -- ~ - ~ ~ Date: #ot HOUfS: 000010 • MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SE~ ssion expi~s: /l~- I • • County of Pitkin ~ AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY )ss_ POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY State of Colorado } BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, C v~~~5~cmin~' ~• ~Y~w~e/' , being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the id sign was posted andlvisible continuously from the C day of ~ ( I , 19~, to the I ~ day of 19~. (Must be posted for at least (09) full days before the hearing date). ' A 1 cant's Si ature ,~ i_ ~-''n 2`-? ;.16/0-~'/qQ 16: ~.=iii iti2C ~r) c, ~ Df'" 622 PG 580 . .v:i~~. Dewzs, F'i.tl;~ir; C;r~ty Ci.erl<, Dac 2.~irr RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING SETBACK RELIEF FOR CHRISTOPHER SOMMER RESOLUTION NO. 90-23 WHEREAS, Christopher Sommer, owner of Lot 7, Ardmore Subdivision, requests a. 20 foot front yard setback variance and a 10 foot front yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the R- 15 zone district, for a proposed addition and proposed entry, respectively, to a single-family residence; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 20 foot front yard setback variance and a 10 foot front yard setback variance be granted to allow for a proposed addition and a proposed entry, respectively, to a single-family residence, as shown on the plans submitted, Exhibit "B", due to downzoning. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. ~~DU1 #3'-;:7.,^q ;'a,:.;/ia;'/qia i6:6ir Rec $. c?ia Bt:: 622 F•6 581 ~i.2 v~i a. Da•:-; s, Pitt-in Cnty Clert~r Doc $.~ii; Resolution No. 90-~? Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: May 1, 1990 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: Ci y L. Christensen, Secretary ~~ ~J ~ ~ ~~~.~:~ Kandi/Shaffran, Chairman 00001'3 ., -~. ~<, ~, . ,;.a I)a~_~.•_ r_.. ~ ~, Bf: 622 Pr _ 4r 582 EXHIBIT "A" The legal description of the property of Christopher Sommer is: Lot 7, Ardmore Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado Respectfully submitted April 6, 1990. ~~~Q~~x EXHIBIT "B" {.;.~_tq~9 ilb/(ii/9(. ihAfjr_} w ao 0 n t vi Davis. ''mac ~'. Oc-r Ltk 622 .r-•G SB3 F•i_t.4,in Cn*ir C.er~ n„_. _ _ ~~ lD e\ ~~~ .lb~)b ._ . 1 ~-~~~ \ - ..__.S-~2 /`C l /> \ / \ \ ~ ~ ~ ' 4~ a~ •~ _~ r~' z`" / ~P ti `{ / ti~ J~ J (.~ J /~' / 7 u K _ ~ A 9~ Dom. S~NIay3B .fp SISy 'r ;C~ ~ j B J G8 <8 - 6£ ~69 ~' 00 52 6 ~ N • e~ bl . 44Q ~l 0 ~ , OSb W Z ~ 3~~H ~ yy77 ~ {r 3 O[ ~ 2~ w I .W. o ~ b .Ji -is~ F . ~ ~~30 0 _ p. W r W N ~ ~ Q u N J ~ n /~ \~! / / >~ . M° `` ti ~~ / ,:N ° , T J n -6. a -e~< .O~ ~ ~~( ~ VP // ~ ~ c \ N= z a / Nq ~ p8Q[ V H ll~~ ~ a ~o ~ 'a L 2 ~ / Q ~ ~C. U ,~, H .J. - OJ t- r ~ z W ~~ i D £ Z W L a rn ~ ~ a N W H Q W ~ V Q W U 6 1 1 w V 3 Z 3 i 2 S 5 ooOl~~G NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin'County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. DATE AND TIME~OF MEETING: May 01, 1990 at 5:15 PM. Wiley, James and Kathy: requesting a 59 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Lot #33, Holland Hills, Pitkin County. Van Domelen, Peter: requesting a 30 foot south side yard setback variance, where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot 4, Block 1, Third Filing, Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision, Pitkin County. Kittle, Wyland: requesting a 10 foot west side yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for an addition to a single-family residence. Property Location: 24150 Highway 82, Pitkin County. Summer, Christopher: requesting a 20 foot and 10 foot front yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a proposed entry and proposed addition, respectively, to a single family residence. Property Location: Lot 7, Ardmore Subdivision (138 Ardmore Drive), Pitkin County. Submitted to the Aspen Times on April 17, 1990 To Be Published in the Aspen Times on April 19, 1990. County PO # 46817 ~D~~~U i • Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment May O1, 1990 Members Present: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman Rick Neiley Ted Guy Member Absent: Stan Mathis Evan Gull John Ostwald Buddy Lucero, Acting Pitkin County Zoning Administrator, and Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Technician, were present with staff recommendations and comments. Shaffran opened the meeting at 5:22 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Tom Smith, County Attorney, addressed the Board regarding Case #90-16, Hillary Ossario. Smith reiterated that the Stouffer's, through Nick McGrath, their attorney, are requesting a rehearing regarding the variance. Smith recommended that the Board deny the request for rehearing, but may reconsider the issue after the Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z) and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) have reheard the 1041 review. McGrath stated that the main issue is the relationship of the BOCC's determination of the 1041 envelope and the Board of Adjustment's (BOA) duties in granting a variance consistent with the envelope. Gull stated that there were no grounds upon which to treat a variance which has been approved by the Board to retract it temporarily via tabling. There were no irregularities in the BOA's approval process, but apparently irregularities preceding this process. What McGrath is requesting is that the rehearing be granted subject to what the BOCC and the P&Z decides regarding the 1041 envelope. Smith suggested that the Board draft the resolution granting the 80 foot front yard setback variance on Case #90-16, but table approval of the document until after the 1041 review has been reviewed before the P&Z and the BOCC in July. Shaffran moved that the Board table approval of the resolution until such time that a decision is rendered from the rehearing by the BOCC and P&Z later this summer. Guy seconded. the motion and it was passed 5-0. Case #90-19. Wiley James & Kathy Lot 33 Holland Hills James and Kathy Wiley were present to request a 59 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. 000017 Shaffran commented that the house is as centrally located on the lot as possible. Guy stated that the size of the lot relates to R-30 zoning. Shaffran asked if there were any members of the public to respond to this case. Neighbor Jeannie Wilder, owner of Lot 33, stated that she will be building a two-story dwelling across the street from the Wileys. The Wileys stated that this was not a problem with the location of their house as sited on the plans. Guy made a motion to grant the requested 58.5 foot front yard setback variance as reflected on the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Gull seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. Peter Van Domelen was present to request a 30 foot south yard setback variance where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence, because of topographic hardships. Van Domelen mentioned that this lot has gone before the Board of Adjustment previously, Case #89-32, and a variance was granted. Once Van Domelen started to excavate, he found that the hillside would be greatly scarred and alot of fill would have to be brought in for the house. By changing the angle of the house, there is less disturbance of the hillside and less of a road cut. There was no one from the public present to comment on this case. Guy stated that this is a i acre lot, comparable to AF-3 zoning where setbacks are 50/20/20. Schaffner requested that any approval be based on the condition that the height not exceed the maximum height limit. Discussion ensued if the Board should be considering the height of the house. Lucero commented that if the height is to remain the same as when the case was first heard (Case #89-32), there is no need to renotify. If the height does change, then the public has to be renotified since height was a major concern in Case #89-32. Denis Cyrus, architect for Peter Van Domelen, reiterated that the height of the house would not change. Ostwald made a motion to grant a 30 foot south side yard setback variance; with the condition that there is no other change to the original submission, due to topographical hardships. Gull seconded the motion. The vote was approved 5-0. Case #90-21 Kittle Wyland, 24150 Hiahwav 82, Basalt Wyland Kittle was present to request a 10 foot west side yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for an addition to a single-family residence, because of a non-conforming lot size. 2 ~D~n1Q - ~ • Shaffran asked if anyone from the public was present to comment. There was no one present. After a brief discussion, Guy moved to grant a 10 foot west side yard setback variance due to downzoning. Shaffran seconded the motion and it was passed 5-0. Ostwald added than any overburden from the excavation cannot be dumped into the river without approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Christopher Sommer, and architect Al Byer, were present to request a 20 foot front yard setback variance and a 10 foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required in the R-15 zone district, for the construction of a proposed addition and a proposed entry way, respectively, for a single-family residence. Sommer was also requesting increasing the FAR, but through extensive discussion it was found that there was not going to be an increase in the FAR with the proposed changes. Lucero and Schaffner both agreed. Sommer submitted photographs of the house and the area. Byer explained how the outlay of the subdivision and how entry is obtained to Sommer's house. The Board asked Lucero whether this area was going to be annexed into the City. Gull, who lives in the Ardmore Subdivision, stated that there was an attempt to annex this subdivision some time ago, but there was some opposition so it was dropped from consideration. Shaffran read a note from Mrs. Blade, a neighbor, who called and stated the Blade family has no objections and, in fact, favor the Sommer's proposed plans. A model of the house as it would appear after the remodeling was presented to the Board for further clarification of the changes as explained by Byer. Neiley stated that the Pitkin County Land Use Code makes reference to all sorts of exceptional hardships not caused by the applicant. Neiley continued that a house built in the 1960's, was not designed to meet current code standards, is inefficient with respect to energy, and may be considered a hardship to allow modest increases in FAR to rectify those conditions. Guy made a motion to grant a 10 foot front yard setback variance for an entry and a 20 foot front yard setback variance for a proposed addition to a single-family residence, as shown on the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Shaffran seconded the motion and it was passed 4-1 with Ostwald abstaining because of the prior discussion regarding FAR. Neiley made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 3, 1990, meeting as amended. All were in favor. ~U~~~9 3 _ .,~ ..... _ ..e. .~ _ _ _ _. Lucero advised the Board of an Association of Code Enforcement Officials (ACED) workshop to be held in Vail on June 22. A major issue that will be discussed at this workshop is the land trade issue presently occurring in Vail. Also to be presented will be zoning and land use problems in mountain resorts. Lucero will make arrangements if any Board members want to attend, the County may pick up the cost. Ostwald expressed an interest in attending the workshop. Neiley moved to adjourn the meeting; Guy seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ;J ~~- Cind L. Christensen, ecretary ~~ ~~~ Kan Shaff n, Chairman ~~~VnO 4 PEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFIC~ 130 South Galena Streel Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -- -63270-136 GMP/FINAL - -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL - UB/FINAL -63300-139 S STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 2 - -63310-140 - STEP APPLICATIONS/ ALL 1 -63320-141 - CONSENTAGENDAITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING -- 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL -- County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL - -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED - GMP/FINAL - -63180-128 SUB/GENERAL - -63190-129 UB/DETAILED - -63200-130 S SUB/FINAL - -63210-131 -63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - STEP APPLICATIONS/ LL 1 -63230-133 - A CONSENT AGENDA iT~M~S --+~- OARD OF ADJUSTMENT' - -63450-146 B REFERRAL FEES: NVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00125 -63340-205 E 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING - 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING -- PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63060-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE _-- -63090-123 COMP PLAN COPY FEES -63140-124 -69000-145 OTHER SUBTOTAL O o ~ ~ ~ 1 TOTAL ~_ fl i - ~ , ~ ~ - ~ . ,7„ n~r;r Phone: i ~ " _ - - Name: ~ . _ ~~' ' ~ I .! <~~ i - Address: - _--~ f ~ - Check #, 'T ~ ~ ~ Date: Additional billing: #01 Scanned 11/14/07 File Finders Box #15 LARGE PLAT(S) AVAILABLE TO VIEW AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AVAILABLE TO BUY AT CLERK & RECORDER