The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.90.45,. ~ ~ .. ~ .. w . d ,~ ~ _, ' . PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ~y~- ) DATE ~EY I ~ ~~ ~ 1 q90 CASE # Q ~'J L r APPLICANT ~ 1 LL IAA1 ~. O two. ~, PHLONE `{ Z"7-~`~~ MAILING ADDRESS ~~~ ~p~(e~ /• ~~(~j ~7/~QI~(f~~y~~5 ~ ~~~ OWNER _ LL JI LI lI,~AQ/L{ ~ • t~` i ~ PHONE % Z7~~ MAILING ADDRESS I,7 -f ~ ~TC.Ld~ti ~~~ /! ~~I~L LOCATION OF PROPERTY ~ t~-(jbJ~~Vl~l,Oy~ ~T 3 ~ $ LC~G. K 3 ~'!t-/Ilk z Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the fac/ts~ i}n q~u~es~t~io~n. Applicant Signature 4~V~e~~'~'N~~ ~~ (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: 0.C Zone District Requesting: S' G Lot Size ~' Front Yard Setback Variance, where /a ~ ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. -~~' ' ~ ~ Side Yard Setback Variance, where 5 ~ ' is required. Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. Other: Hardship: /1 ~ Zoning Official{yi~~sF~~"-~>~0~/ ~/cSltip~GGr.-'~y~~- ~ Application filed U ~(D Date1~%fL~],p~. ~, ~ //C) . Notices mailed "~ ~ Parcel D #~~/b7 3~3 ~~ 005 Secretary 00000 ~zi`,.,~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and other affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND~OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Name and Address of Applicant: October 2, 1990 at 5:15 pm William H. Howell 1591 Gateway Road Snowmass, CO 81654 Property Location or Description: Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 2 Gateway to Snowmass Subdiv. Requesting approval for an 84 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot southeast side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a detached residential garage. Granting of this approval would place the garage 16 feet from the Howell's front yard property line and 30 feet from the Howell's southeast side yard property line. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent• X THE PITKIN COUNTY/B/7OARD OF ADJUSTMENT J ~ ~( Cindy Christensen, Secretary ~O~~~o #6 Requirement Dear Pitkin County Board of Adjustors, September 11, 1990 William H. Howell 1591 Gateway Road Snowmass CO 81654 It is my desire to erect on my property (Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 2) a garage (one car plus workspace). It is my understanding that in Gateway Mesa Subdivision that most all building projects need zoning variances, since we are zonedfor 30 acres, which technically requires a 100-foot setback. Topographically, this is quite out of the question, given the narrowness and slope of our 1.1 acre. Where I have located the proposed garage represents a site about equally set back as my house and this site is not only the best location for my purposes, but also is, given the valuable and ancient juniper trees and the configuration of our existing house layout, the only location possible. Therefore, I am asking the Board of Adjustors for a setback variance so that I might build a garage. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~~ ~ ~~~~~ William H. Howell 000003 #9 Requirement LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 1, L1Tirhnl~ Frodo~: St it -~`tff~ ~l- ~T--*teu er i e ' d w~ eles r ~ g ~ pA U t.~ J • CcJAC.S ~-{ MA~I~~IJ-5u~ w~~5-E{ 7 Lc>2 L.6ZT~ LA a~.E c~N>~i -AL 15L1 P, N`( I hzZ 2. Lloyd and Gertrude Koenck David Koenck and Susan Murphy Box 8734 Aspen, CO 81612 3: os f~~r/~ RAZE-T1- n.,•-r°~°~'c~iT `Jt~E1~-Z KIJ~C-K-c~- 2 ~ sot;l.~iZ~C~ ~ l~l Z 4. r~~«~ ~~•H. r,r - ZANIES L. ~CcAN~ ~,~ex-339 SrEi~ A : ~EAN~. P. D , t3 arc= ~ y C~7 ' ,~5p~, Co B~~tZ 5. Joseph T. Zoline Continental Bank Trustee of the Erling Hansen Trust 6224 North Canyon Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Qi #3 Requirement List (VAE) LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6720 2467-343-05-005 14 JTI BF Howell, William H. Howell, Barbara J. 1591 Gateway Road Snowmass CO 81654 LOT 3, BLOCK 3, Second Filing Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision 5 00000 OI __ i ~_ ~~~~ 1µ f i /~lf'cl ~~'Y VV.Y'1 /~~ ~~J I~T~ \ I ~N W W, i =_ i ' I ~ i P I I I r ~ I ~s ~ ~ ~ .. Q I ~Qi x ii ~ I ' I (f I ?- ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~; ~ -\I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ II I •. I Y I~ I 2 WI ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 ;; I i ~, I I I ~~ I I ii I ~ ~_ I ~ , ~ , ~~ ~ i ~' I ~---I--------------~-~ ----~_--+- gi 13~ _L., K log _o. i `~ / IZ~ _6 X 1z' - k ~ z5 -o d ~yK ~ ~ 3 ~ v ~, LO S 1 0®uU~~ ~- ,. s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ M x T W 3 N P51> ~ ,~ ~ 1 U Q o g° >~ ~ o ~~ ~1 W ., L _~' 2 71 3 ti S N 1 J , ~ ~~ Y ~' ~ -Z ~ ~ ~, U ~Y ~ s J 2 ~ i~~ C! ~ ~Cz ~ ~:y z ~ ~ '~ .~ ,w 000007 ,~ °1 a~ Z ~._. Y M J \~ d ------- ~I----- o - ------ --- 0 0 0 =------_ __- ~ -- ---__f_. ___ _-_ __ -~ _ _ --~- 3 - J nkwe .~ ~ ~... `•~. ~ \ _~ o ~ 01 `~~ ~'~ zh' x t~'~ o~ ~- '' ~~fT ~ : ,~~ 4 ,`"' ~` ~! _ II ~ 'Q. ~ - \ ..` i /~ \~\ / ~~ % ~V... '.. .. J,. .,_ ~... .,. _., ,.._ ,_. .•r. _•~ - _..... `.. ,, ,~ "~~... . _. ~~~.~,_-_.-____._ ____ ~ - ..a-- -~ ~``~ ' ~ ,L,.--,.~ i' \~~ 1SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFIC 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 61611 (303) 920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION F EES city 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63260-137 SU B/CONCEPTUAL -63300-139 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES. 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 X3230-133 -63450-146 GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ l CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63060-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE -63090-123 COMP. PLAN -63140-124 COPY FEES -69000-145 OTHER SUBTOTAL - - TOTAL rX' ~ Name: ll`~"/~1. ~G.(/-P.~ ~ Phone: ~ Address: Project_ ~~ J I. ~ T Check # ~ --1-- Date: 7 ' ~~ ' Additional billing: #of Hours:_ 000003 '~ County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE AF'ARTNG State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITRIN COIINTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, ,~~~j~~l~ ~~~(_~ being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~~ '~ day of ~~P1E~~~ 19~~, to the j~~N day of (r.ZiY~~J~~l 19 (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the hearing date). _ ~~ APplicant~~ Signature "~ Subscribed and sworn to before me '~ ~ - -• ~~ this ~~ day of ~_ p~~~~~~.~ , ~~ .~~ ~~~+ ~ 19 °~1~, by ~.c~,co ~~s~.~c~~r~ ~~ ~ ~ ~_ HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. WITNESS MY ~` My Commission expires: 3 -\l~ 0.~~ ~ \/ s<a~< ~ Notary Public's Signature Address 0000.0 ~~ 4~WY T a • 0 ca 0 rn - u -~C o ~ -a ~~ o .9 ~ r CS E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: October 2, 1990 at 5:15 p.m. City Council Chambers, City Hall Shaw, Jenifer: renotification requesting a 30 foot front yard setback variance, a 40 foot north side yard setback variance and a 20 foot south side yard setback variance, where 100 feet, 50 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS-30 zone district, for a proposed addition to a single-family residence. Property Location: 1472 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass. Cheever, Eddie: renotification requesting a 68.5 foot front yard setback variance (3.5 feet more for overhangs), where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, a variance for the front yard setback to permit the proposed front entryway to protrude 4 feet from the front of the existing structure, for construction of a proposed second level over an existing garage and for a proposed addition. Property Location: 1054 South Starwood Drive, Lot R- 57, Filing 8, Stanwood Subdivision. Melberg, Tom: requesting a 90 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for the construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot P, Little Texas Subdivision. Fels, Jerry: requesting 46 additional square feet, where 2,208 square feet is allowed, in the R-15 zone district, for construction of an addition to a single-family residence. Property Location: Lot 1, Adams Subdivision. Howell, William H.: requesting an 84 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot southeast side yard setback variance, 00001 C~ C where 100 feet and 50 feet are required, respectively, in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of a residential garage. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 2, Gateway to Snowmass Subdivision. Welter, Colleen: requesting a 17 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to a single-family residence, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance for a fireplace and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance for a dormer, where 30 feet, 20 feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required in the R-30 zone district. Property Location: Lot 13, Block 2, Pitkin Green Subdivision. Submitted to the Aspen Times To Be Published in the Aspen County PO # 47990 on September 18, 1990. Times on September 20, 1990. 00001 s Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment November 6, 1990 Members Present: Evan Gull, Acting Chairman John Ostwald Ted Guy Stan Mathis Members Absent: Kandi Shaffran Rick Neiley Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkin County Zoning Office, was present with staff recommendations and comments. Gull opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Gull stated that four members are needed for a quorum, and four yes votes are needed for approval. Since only four members were present at this meeting, a unanimous decision must be reached for approval to be granted. Therefore, applicants have the option to have their request tabled until the December 4, 1990 meeting when more members may be present, or to wait for Neiley, who was expected to arrive later in the meeting. Barbara~Howell called the Planning and Zoning Office on Monday, November 5, 1990, and requested that their application be withdrawn. Case #90 48 Walker John Lot A Smuaaler Grove Jeremy Bernstein was present representing John Walker, requesting a 5 foot south side yard setback variance where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 4 foot height variance, where 12 feet is required for accessory structures per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for the approval of an existing, illegal ranch gate. Gull abstained from this case because he Therefore, with only three Board members, place as a quorum was not present. is Walker's neighbor. voting could not take Bernstein requested, and the Board agreed, that testimony from Ed Van Walraven, of the Fire Department, be heard at this time and entered into the record. Van Walraven stated that for a fire truck to pass beneath a structure, the minimum height necessary for the structure is 13 feet 6 inches. An additional 6 inches of clearance is suggested to allow for packed snow on the road beneath the structure. 1 OO~~q/ Guy made a motion to table this case until a quorum is present. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Tom Gardner was present to request a 56 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a detached, residential garage. Using a survey, Gardner showed the Board where the proposed garage would be located and the topography of the land. Lyn Hancock, neighbor, was present to state his objections to this request. Hancock's concern was that the garage would be too close to the road. Gardner and Hancock discussed alternative locations for the garage. Hancock feels that the garage should be pushed back further from the road's right of way. Hancock requested that a site visit be made and Gardner agreed. Guy suggested tabling this case until a site visit could be made. Guy made a motion to table this case to the site visit, scheduled for Wednesday, November 14, at 8:30 a.m. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. Darrell and Mary Wedam were present to request a 65 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a single-family residence. Darrell Wedam went into further detail of what he intends to do. Mary Wedam stated that the subdivision covenants require a 30 foot front yard setback. Gull asked if there were any comments from the public. There were none. After a brief discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 65 foot front yard setback variance as indicated on the plans submitted, for the construction of a single-family residence, due to topographical hardship. Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor. ~.a 5c ~7c-ou. carnet. Snlrley 102 North Little Texas Lane Shirley Carnel and architect, Roger Kerr, were present to request a 90 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence. There was no one from the public present for comment. Kerr presented photographs of how the house looks presently. 2 000015 After a brief discussion, Guy moved to grant a 90 foot front yard setback variance and a 20' foot rear yard setback variance as indicated on the plans submitted, due to nonconforming lot size. Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #90-51 Dolan Robert Lot 87 Starwood Subdivision Randy Wedam was present representing Robert Dolan to request a 50 foot front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence. The house was built in 1974 when the subdivision required a 50 foot setback from Eppley Drive. Dolan wishes to continue with the same setback for the proposed addition. Wedam mentioned that Dolan has already received Starwood Homeowners' Association approval for this addition. There was no one present from the public for comment. Ostwald moved to grant a 50 foot front yard setback variance as indicated on the plans submitted due to downzoning. Guy seconded the motion and all were in favor. Rod Tweet was present representing the City of Aspen to request a 55 foot front yard setback variance where 75 feet is required, and a 64 foot major road setback variance where 100 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a temporary structure to cover the James E. Moore Pool. Gull asked how the covered area would relate to the existing fence and pool. Tweet explained that the structure will be attached to the existing building, will be inside the existing fence, and will cover the pool only. Mathis moved to grant a 55 foot front yard setback variance and a 64 foot major road setback variance as on the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Guy seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #90-48 was brought to the table again, but Neiley had not yet arrived. Bernstein requested that the case be tabled until the January meeting since he was scheduled for court during the December meeting, but informed the Board that he may need to table the case until the February meeting if a January conflict could not be resolved. The Board agreed to table the case until January 8, 1991. ***************************************************************** 3 OOOIJ~ T) The minutes of the October 2 meeting were approved as written. It was also agreed by all Board members present that the January meeting be rescheduled from January 1, 1991 to January 8, 1991. The next meeting will be December 4, 1990, in City Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lc~eXu ~~ ~Gc~`(~=~u~.w-~ Cindy Christensen, Secretary vv~C"~""~" i Evan Gull, Acting Chairman• ~~~~~ 9 Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment October 2, 1990 Members Present: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman John Ostwald Rick Neiley Ted Guy Evan Gull Stan Mathis Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkin County Zoning Office, was present with staff recommendations and comments. Shaffran opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Annie Runyon was present, representing Jerry Fels, to request 46 additional square feet where a maximum 2,208 square feet is allowed, for construction of an addition to a single-family residence. This house currently exceeds the allowable floor area by 1,276.5 square feet. Shaffran read the letter by Dr. Barry Mink referring to Mrs. Fels' illness and the need for live-in help. The proposed addition is to accommodate Mrs. Fels' companion. Shaffran asked if there were any members of the public present to comment. There were none. Schaffner stated that some of the excess floor area is because of the cantilevered design of the house. Schaffner also stated that the only possible location for the addition is what the plans show. After a brief discussion Shaffran made a motion to grant the 46 additional square feet, for the construction of an addition to a single-family residence, as per the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor (Ted Guy chose not to vote to keep the vote at 5). .Barbara Howell and Kim Grassfield, representing William Howell, were present to request an 84 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot southeast side yard setback variance, where 100 1 00~()? • • ~ feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required, for construction of a residential garage. Grassfield explained that on this 1.1 acre lot, the terrain falls off greatly toward the south. There are also some large trees on the property that the Howell's do not want to remove. The Howell's believe that the proposed location is the best possible location for this proposed garage. Shaffran asked if anyone from the public was present; no one was present to comment on this case. Gull brought up the requirements for the subdivision. Gull believes that the subdivision covenants will not allow the Howell's to be as close to the road as the Howell's are proposing. The Board cannot provide any relief from the restrictions set up by the subdivision's covenants, therefore, the Howell's need to be aware of what these restrictions are and abide by them or go through the subdivision's process. Because of a lack of information needed to give an appropriate and correct setback variance, it was moved by Guy, and seconded by Mathis, to table this case until the next meeting, to be held on November 6, 1990. All were in favor (with Shaffran choosing not to vote). Case #90-43. Melberg Tom Lot P Little Texas Subdivision Tom Melberg was present to request a 90 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a single-family residence. Neiley stated that he did not have a problem with the request since it remains consistent with previous Little Texas variance requests. There were two neighbors present, Pete Godfrey and Dan Powell, to state that they had no objections with what Melberg is proposing. Shaffran made a motion to grant a 90 foot front yard setback variance and a 20 foot rear yard setback variance, due to downzoning, as per the plans submitted. Neiley seconded the motion and all were in favor (with Ostwald choosing not to vote). Case #90-46. Welter. Colleen Lot 13 Block 2 Pitkin Green Subdivision Colleen Welter, Doug Ryan and Denis Cyrus, Architect, were present to request a 17 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to a single-family residence, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a fireplace, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a dormer, where 30 feet, 20 2 0000 `] feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required in the R-30 zone district. Cyrus submitted a revised footprint of the house and floor plans. This does not change the setbacks requested. Shaffran asked if there were any comments from the public. Neighbors Justine Kirk and Sirous Saghatoleslami stated that they had no objections to what is being requested. Neiley asked Saghatoleslami if the Homeowners' Architectural Review Committee had reviewed the plans and he stated that they do not review the plans as far as the variance requested, but as to the design of the house, materials of the house and the height. Mathis made a motion to grant a 17 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to a single-family residence, a 5 foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a fireplace, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a dormer, due to topography and the way the drive enters onto the property, as per the submitted plans. Guy seconded the motion and all were in favor (with Gull choosing not to vote). ***************************************************************** The minutes of the September 11 meeting were approved as written. The next meeting will be November 6, in City Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Cindy L. hristensen, Secretary Kandi Shaffran, Chairperson 3 D~U~~WU ~SP,EN/PITKIN P 130 South Gal~enaN!~ir-' OFFI~ Aspen, Colorado 81871 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES (ao3~ s2o-Soso city 00113 00125 00123 00115 County 00113 00125 00123 00113 PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 -63090-123 -63140-124 -69000-145 -63250-73q -63270-136 -63280-137 -63300-139 -63310-140 -63320-141 REFERRAL FEES -63340-205 -63340-190 -63340-163 GMP/CONCEPTUAL GMP/FINAL SUB/CONCEPTUgL SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP AppLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENTAGENDA ITEMS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENTAGENDq ITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -63160-128 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-128 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63450-iqg ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING REFERRAL FEES: -63340.205 X3340-190 -63360-1q3 CITY/COUNTY CODE COMP pLgN COPY FEES OTHER ~f SUBTOTAL Narrre: _S~vz ,6,f,„, . ~/~ TOTAL Address. -~~1-/ V~~~ Phone: Project ° ;~/ ~, Check # ,,, s i, -1. ~~' ~,`-I r Additional billing: Date: ~ ~ j'L #of Hours ~~