The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.93.03 PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJIISTMENT DATE ~N. ~ f~~y CASE #/y~~~ J~3 APPLICANT MRI,~I~s ~IfIFII r~~,fA(4, PHONE 9f?S~~- MAILINGCADDRESS ~ ~, ~/ A~ f Ata-~/ (`~ p/E/` ,OWNER ~J~~~ /1 PHONE a~ MAILING ADDRESS '~ A(~~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts iA question. Applicant Signature r (To be completed by the Zoninq Department) I fIO VSO C~'Ara9 e Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: ~/ _ Zone District Requesting: I ac. Lot Size ~'U~ /~~ ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where OU ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. Other: Zoning Official ~,tx~ / /(`~NN~fY~O r Application filed ~ ~~ 43 Parce~ ID No. dN~~ -/7`~-(~/-d!/ Date of Meeting z z ~ 3 Notices Mailed ~ 3 Secretary ~~d'`,~'/, Refer Resolution to Building Department ' ' Yes ' _ 'b'N~o - :~,s -~ ~ 0~2~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: owner: Name and Address of Applicant: Property Location or Description: February 2, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. Commissioner's Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse Stephan and Heather Isberian Stephan and Heather Isberian 308 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 21, Holland Hills Subdivision Requesting approval for a 36 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing single family residence and a 70 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a garage, where a 100 foot front yard setback is required in the AF-1 zone district. Approval of this variance would allow the proposed addition to be 64 feet from the front yard property line and the proposed garage to be 30 feet from the front yard property line. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD HE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ~u,,a.r,r~sz ~ w Suzanne L. lff, Secretary Stephan and Heather Isberian 308 South Galena St., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-8062 January 9th. 1993 Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, Aspen, Colorado. Ref: Lot 21, Holland Hills, Pitkin County, Colorado. Dear Members, We are submitting for your review and consideration this setback variance request because of the non standard lot setback of approximately 31 0". The required setback, as we understand from the planning office, is 100'. However, this building was built prior to the implementation of this setback requirement. The need for expansion of the subject residence is a growing family and the inadequacy of the present residence to accomodate their needs. Otherwise, all requirements of height and area are complied with. We trust you will review this proposed addition favorably and grant us the setback variance. Sincerely, Stephan G. Isberian -~ ~,i~~~(Aa BUY ~J~+'~'y"~`U Heather Isberian • To: Pitkin County Board of Adjustment From: Stephan and Heather Isberian Ref: Lot 21, Holland Hills. List of adjacent homeowners to be notified. 1. Helen Bart a, P.O. Box 184, Basalt, Colorado 81621 2. Bob and Ginny Dyche, P.O. Box 5199, 5nowmass Village, Colorado 81615 3• Frank and Alice Glatz, 1255 5. clay St., Denver, Colorado 80219 4. Clay McDonald, P.O. Box 1861, Aspen, Colorado 81612 5. Kent and Dee Schuler, Box 10514, Aspen, Colorado 81612 6. Alan and Allison Scott, P.O. Box 3411, Aspen, Colorado 81612 7. Alice Vagneur, P.O. Box 1055, Basalt, Colorado 81621 ra~,,:,.~f. ~) ~ «~3 ' '~ JpN25.~ ,;1111 i `, NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPER' OI3DTERS ''~JJ ~~ BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUS'TMERP~J TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Owner: February 2, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. Commissioner's Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse Stephan and Heather Isberian Name and Address of Stephan and Heather Isberian Applicant: 308 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 s '~' ""'' `"'""'olland Hills Subdivision yard setback variance for ' ~ y residence and a 70 foot :.,,_. tion of a garage, where a 1 ) _~ in the AF-1 zone district. ~/ a proposed addition to be ° ~ e and the proposed garage V j ty line. j ~ TED COIILD BE GRANTED. Alan and llisor~~cott, Permanent X P.o. BoX 3~ r Aspen, ~ OUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SCQT42i 826121002 l ~~ C of or o 81612 SCUTT Bf]?t CLOSED ~JNAB{..6 TO F[IR zanne L. lff, Secretary FcETURN TO SEN nt...n...,.i~„n,.r~,,,n,,,n,,,u,,,~~~ui~ , : ~, ., ~ P: ATELIER HAIRABEDIAN ARCHITECTS Aspen Airport Business Center P.O. Box 3586 Aspen, Colorado 81611 TRANSMITTAL Joanna Schafner T0: Bldg Dept ATTN: 1/13/93 DATE: Isberian Addition SUBJECT: Lot 21 Holland Hills We are sending you Under separate cover ®X Herewith ^X Prints Shop Drawings Specifications Tracings If enclosures are not as listed please notify us at once. General Remarks: As reouested nleage f;nd a a he~1 ccc r; of the above nronoaad add' ion Yours truly, Varouj Z. Hairabedian Copies to: Sent by: ~ Messenger lst Class Mail Air Mail Special Delivery .. ~, ~. :.k sr.. ~lrCtNiN M/~P 5u~~-T' PRvPk1~'r`t ,.~pCA~1bt~1 OF ~S'('EP S16t~1($`'f JPW 23~ V~ ~~V r~ f3uREqu L+SC.ENG1.lC~ ~~ r v D~ To y~NWdBD H 1l~hl WAY 8~- ~~~+~~,~V~t ~S1t~ENC~ To ASpE ~, t: jYp. LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: -63250-134 -63270-136 -63280-137 -63300-139 -63310-140 -63320-141 X3330-150 -63432-157 -63432-157 -00100-00000-31070 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 -63336-152 -63337-153 -63338-154 -63339-155 COUNTY: -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190.129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63240-149 -63450-146 -63235-148 REFERRAL FEES: -63360-143 00115 -63340-163 00123 -63340-190 00125 -63340-205 PLANNING OFFICE SALES: -s3ofio-122 -69000-145 Name: - ~ i ~-~ LC..~I. ~l~ ~ D ~ S ~ ~? A Address: C(-GrQ~Y~ Check#: fr ~' -~ Date: GMP/Conceptual GMP/Final SUB/Conceptual SUB/Final All-2 Step Applicatons All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Permit Use Tax for Sign Permits Exemption Minor Major Devel. SignB. Devel. Demolition GMP/General GMP/Detailed GMP/Final SUB/General SUB/Detailed SUB/Foal All 2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Checc Engineering -County Engineering -City Housing Environmental HeaRh County Code Other (Copy Fees) TOTAL Phone: c r,G ~G- ~U is Z C( Projea:~i3 ^0.3 L No of Copies: d: 'r ~~(s~~, County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: . n _ _ ,. 1 I, being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance !~ hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was ~`-" day of _~~ day of at least nine (9) posted and visible continuously from the ,1 ~i~ 7 19 ~ .~ to the ~~V~ ~7 , 19~,. (Must be posted for full days befor the hearing a e . ~. pplicant's Signature Subscr~i~be~%d and swo~,n to before me this ~,~ ~u day of~.L~2ct s2 , 19~ , by '_ ~ka~'{~h r~ .~1 ~ 1~L.c~C.~~ .,~ . , -- ~ ~ :. .-~'.. ~~~ t~~..~. ~; ,~ ~~~k ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ,z ra ~.k 4.1 4. 1 a b WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My Commission expires: J `~~ • ~Ar~ 2 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPER'~'Y QS~TNERS 'i-_^ __ _ _ .._ BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTP TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council (:hambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: owner: Name and Address of Applicant: Property Location or Description: February 2, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. Commissioner's Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse Stephan and Heather Isberian Stephan and Heather Isberian 308 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 21, Holland Hills Subdivision Requesting approval for a 36 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing single family residence and a 70 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a garage, where a 100 foot front yard setback is required in the AF-1 zone district. Approval of this variance would allow the proposed addition to be 64 feet from the front yard property line and the proposed garage to be 30 feet from the front yard property line. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Suzanne L. lff, Secretary 000010 -~ I 1 a~ U .,-{ 4-a 4-i O 4q .~ N (~ 0.' N [ [tl ~'' ~ i~ „~ O ~ ~U2 ~~ a,op,. N(h N O ci ~ U O lni :J U .1. 1 N ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~, .-i i '~ o 0 ro ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ,i a; ~ v #334114 i~C/~ >3 14:34 Fec S+.i~~i bl~ 704 11 Silvia Davis, FitF::in Cnty Cler4;, Doc ~.Op RESOLUTION OF THE PZTRIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT #354114 i~C/~ >3 7.4:34 Fec ~.tici &1~ 704 11 Silvia Davis, Pit4::in Cnty Cler4::, Doc $.On RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING 3ETBACR RELIEF FOR STEPHEN AND HEATHER ISBERZAN RESOLUTION NO. 93-03 WHEREAS, Stephen and Heather Isberian, owners of Lot 21, Holland Hills Subdivision, are requesting approval for a 36 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing single family residence and a 70 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a garage; and WHEREAS, a 100 foot front yard setback is required in the AF-1 zone district; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 36 foot front yard setback variance be granted for an addition to the existing residence and a 70 foot front yard setback variance ~ be granted for construction of a garage, due to downzoning, as per the plans submitted (Exhibit "B"). r; WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. 000012 i #354114 0/19/93 14. Ftec x.00 $F: 704 F'G 12 • Silvia Davis, Fit4::in minty Clerk, Doc $.~)~? ~3~~~ Resolution No. ''~2-- Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: February 2, 1993 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: Suz~ ~ f, Secretary /I Ric. Chairman I' I 000013 Y #354114 t7~/19/9 :34 Fec $.0~~ Bk:: 704 P6 1~ Silvia Davis, F'itkin Cnty Clerk, Doc 'b.U~~ EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for property owned by STEPHEN AND HEATHER ISBERIAN Lot 21 Holland Hills Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado r -t~~LS "~~ _. - ~~ ~ ~x~t~a,r "gar • _ .~ m ~ . E~'f ~`~~ #354114 02/ 19/93 14:34 kec ~. tji~ bk: 704 FG 14 1 !y- Silvia Davis, Fitk:in Cnty C~ Doc $.pi~ ~~ liKhas 6~\~ll' - \.~ ... y \~ ~ ~ ~. _`~ __~~ iii 9,~~ ~- ~ '. `"'`\' ... \ ~~`~ 1 _ ' ~ ,\ `1 ~_,~ ~ ~ ~ `~ .~ „~, ~ ~ ~ ~~„` . ~. '~ \ \ \ F~9 ~' \ \ 1 X95 ~4 „n: 1 ~ \\ ,~- ~.- ~ ., ~ , - ,. - N;,;~,. ~,~.~,. - ~ - c,o"". ~ ~ ~~ E~M1[i5 ~ ~ ~, ~ _ ,•_. ~ c P! f?+D \ ~ / ~ ~ \` i \=<. ~` ~'d~'~Lr~ ik.ir l~ h'T /'iK. OKSI_. '~~. \ / ~p ~ .~ -'/`\..` \.., L~.\ ~.:. n'i .r p. 1r. 111111 ~ ~ 1` ~ ~ 1 C' NE,N ~,l '2`.',~~~ \~ ~x15Trc~RFhIDE.hIc;K II `\ ~~~ ~ ' ~ i t I ...~ - __. ~ .- ---- ~'~ - - ~._ ~ ~ aricE yrwzsa,E 1~NUOwkE 0 ~ 1 ~ r'------i - __ _ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF AD]USTMEN"I' TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideratwn to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: Tuesday, February 2, 1993; 5:15 P.M. Commissioners Meeting Room, Cou~4house Donnie) Hecker: requesting approva- fora 92.5' front yard setback variance and a 42.5' south side van) setback variance, where 100' and 50' respectively are required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Lot 2, Block 3, Filing 2, Gateway of Snowmass i\1csa Subdivision. Gary Carlston: requesting approval fora 7.6' height variance, where a maximum height of 20' is allowed for an accessory building in the RS-160 zone district. Property Location: Homestead 6, Wildcat Ranch. Stephan and Heather Isberian: requesting approval fora 36' front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing single family residence and a 70' front yard setback variance for construction of a garage, where a 100' front yard setback is required in the AF-1 zone district. Property Location: Lot 21, Holland Hills Subdivision. Submitted to the Aspen Times on January 19, 1993. 'I'o Be Published in the Aspen Times January 22, 1993. County PO if211111 ~Qn~~~ Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting February 2, 1993 Members Present: Ted Guy, Acting Chair John Wheeler Rod Dyer Michael Cooper Members Absent: Stan Mathis Evan Gull Rick Neiley Staff: Cindy Houben, Planning office Guy opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Case 93-01. Donniel Hecker. Lot 2. Block 3. Filina 2. Gatewav of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision Donniel Hecker was present to request a 92.5 foot front yard setback variance and a 42.5 foot south side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are required in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of a single family residence. Hecker noted that the steep slopes and the lot's location below the ridgeline create topographical hardships, and that only one building site is available on the lot. He also noted that there are many non-conforming lots in Gateway, and displayed pictures of several. The structure he is proposing will not protrude out farther than the structures on adjacent lots. Hecker stated that the Gateway Homeowners Association gave him a verbal approval, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved his Ridgeline Review at their meeting this morning. There was no public comment. Wheeler asked about the design of the house. Hecker responded that the house was designed to pass the ridgeline review. The house will be kept low (23-24 foot maximum height) with a flat roof, and natural colors will be used. Guy noted that the structure is on a secondary ridge. Guy stated that he had been to the site previously, and that the footprint occurs naturally and that the house is in the only site that can be reached with a vehicle. He noted that topographical hardship and non-conforming lot size were obvious concerns with this lot. ~~U~~~ Wheeler moved to grant a 92.5 foot front yard setback variance and a 42.5 foot south side yard setback variance, due to topographical hardships, based on the plans submitted. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case 93-02, Gary Carlston, Homestead 6, Wildcat Ranch Bruce Hazzard of Design Workshop, and John Wolfe and Tom Lyons, the architects, were present, representing Gary Carlston, to request a 7.6 foot height variance, where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted for an accessory building, for construction of a caretaker dwelling unit above an agricultural accessory building. Hazzard stated that each 500 acre parcel at Wildcat Ranch was given multiple building envelopes during the 1041 Review process. Once one 10 acre envelope is selected, the others are no longer developable. The envelope that was chosen is at the widest point of a narrow valley at the upper end of Wildcat Ranch and Wildcat Reservoir. Hazzard explained that various physical constraints affected their choice of a building envelope, and their choice of the developable area within the envelope they chose. The County Land Use Code requires that they maintain existing drainage ways and patterns, in order to minimize sedimentation of the lake and minimize disturbance to wildlife areas. Within the l0 acre envelope that was chosen, the developable area is restricted by the major drainage way that goes through the bottom of the valley, which has been identified as a riparian and waterfowl habitat in the Wildcat Ranch wildlife enhancement and managment plan (internal restrictions). The requirement for a 20 foot setback from Wildcat Creek also restricted the developable area. The envelope also contains bands of trees that they would like to maintain, and much of the remaining area of the envelope is on 20-25~ cross slopes. Hazzard also stated that only two houses are currently within a quarter of a mile of this structure, and the structure will not be visible to them, or from any of the private roads in Wildcat Ranch. The owner is currently requesting a new access on an old irrigation ditch, which will keep vehicles out of the valley floor, thereby creating less of a disturbance. There was no public comment. Guy noted that the height limit for accessory structures only recently increased from 12 feet to 20 feet. He asked what hardship required that this structure exceed the 20 foot limit. Wolfe stated that the structure is very slender and only one room wide so as to fit into the surrounding aspen trees, as well as to respond to the physical characteristics of the aspens. He noted that the structure would not create any negative impacts. The caretaker unit is only 700 square feet, and they decided to minimize the footprint and build a three story structure. 2 ~,, "`~`']g Hazzard noted that they considered locating the third floor over the garage area, but they were concerned about fumes from the garage, which will be used for equipment and materials storage. Wheeler stated that he did not see the hardship involved, and noted that design alone is not a hardship. Guy added that 25$ slopes are not considered a topographical hardship in this county. Wolfe stated that the Board should consider the context of the lot; this structure is being built on a 500 acre lot, which creates different relationships which would not be found elsewhere. He added that the structure will not harm anyone. Guy read from Section 16-1.3 of the County Land Use Code, concerning the Powers and Duties of the Board of Adjustment: "Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of enactment of zoning regulation, or by reason of exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary or exceptional physical characteristics or condition of such piece of property not created by the applicant subsequent to the adoption.,of these regulations, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardship upon, the owner of such property, then the Board shall have authority upon an appeal relating to said property, to authorize a variance from such strict application so as to relieve such difficulties or hardship, provided such relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without substantially altering or impairing the intent and purpose of the zoning district regulations and the policies and regulations of this Code." Hazzard asked the Board to consider that there are extraordinary or exceptional physical constraints or conditions on the property that relate to topography. Guy noted that the structure causes no detriment to the public good, but that being limited to only 3.5 acres of a to acre building envelope for development is not a hardship that would require exceeding the height limit by almost 30$. Cooper disagreed, noting that the developable areas available to the applicant were limited by the topography, and stated that he felt the lot displays the "exceptional physical characteristics... not created by the applicant" that are referred to in the Code. Guy stated that there are ways to achieve the same feeling with the structure without three stories. Wheeler agreed, noting that there are also ways to site this particular structure in order to lower 3 OOf101 `~ its height. At the applicant's request, Wheeler moved to table the application to the March 2, 1993 meeting. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case 93-03_, Stephen and Heather Isberian. Lot 21. Holland Hills Subdivision Stephen and Heather Isberian and architect Varouj Hairabedian were present to request a 36 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing house, and a 70 foot front yard setback variance for a garage, where a 100 foot front yard setback is required in the AF-1 zone district. Hairabedian stated that the existing residence has become too small for the family. Isberian noted that they need the garage for storage space because everything is now stored outside. He added that the owners in Holland Hills approve of improvements, such as garages, which improve the appearance of the subdivision. Guy stated that AF-1 zone district requires a l0 acre lot, and that the lot is closest in size to conforming lots in the R-30 zone district (30,000 square foot lots), which requires a front yard setback of 30 feet. There was no public comment. Cooper moved to grant a 36 foot front yard setback variance for an addition to an existing house and a 70 foot front yard setback variance for a garage, due to downzoning, as per the plans submitted. Wheeler seconded the motion,•and all were in favor. The January 5, 1993 minutes were approved as written. The meeting was adjourned at 6:3o p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Suza a L. Wolff, S etary 4 000020 SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE ~ 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 • (303) 920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: -63250-134 GMP/Conceptual -63270-136 GMP/Final -63280-137 SUB/Conceptual _ -63300-139 SUB/Final -63310-140 All-2 Step Applications -63320-141 All 1 Step Applications -63330-150 Staff Approval -63432-157 Zoning Plan Check _ -63432-157 Sign Permit -00100-00000-310 70 Use Tax for Sign Permits HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 Exemption -63336-152 Minor -63337-153 Major Devel. -63338-154 Signif. Devel. -63339-155 Demolition COUNTY: -63160-126 GMP/General -63170-127 GMP/Detailed -63180-128 GMP/Final -63190-129 SUB/General -63200-130 SUB/Detailed -63210-131 SUB/Final -63220-132 All 2 Step Applications -63230-133 All 1 Step Applications -63240-149 Staff Approval -63450-146 Board of Adjustment `" -63235-148 Zoning Plan Check REFERRAL FEES: -63360-143 Engineering -County 00115 -63340-163 Engineering -City 00123 -63340-190 Housing 00125 -63340-205 Environmental HeaRh PLANNING OFFICE SALES: -63060-122 County Code -69000-145 Other (Copy Fees) - fl00021 TOTAL _ .Z~~r / Name: ! ~~~ ~{~ - L i 4.. L'1 , ~ ~-~ I ~c C ~ Address: t~ L, ~ (_ ~ ~.... Phone: cC. ~ ~~ t CI ~T3 ^C7 ~ Project: . i ~_ ° ~ may, Check #~ ~ - Date: ~ ~ j ' ~ ~' No of Copies: ~~., Scanned 3/27/08 File Finders Box #18 LARGE PLAT(S) AVAILABLE TO VIEW AT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AVAILABLE TO BUY AT CLERK & RECORDER