The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.93.19PITRIN COUNTY HOARD OF ADJUSTMENT //-- p /e -° q DATE ~J I I O 1 3 CASE # ~ l ~y/ APPLICANT ~ ~ ~ e.fv f~~ 2 ~ f q ~~' PHONE ~ Z ~ ' ~(--OCR °L MAILING A~DD~RESS L-i ~l+ ~ ~~ ~~/' D M4 CC% ~?~65~ OWNER ~ YIL~/lA5 ~ . OC.SS /r / PHONE ~ Z 1 ~ 3O5 MAILING ADDRESS (73(~I Li9G1'f" ~i~~~ IZlxto~ SJidi.J~'~I~SS ~,~) S'IFiS~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY C..i K Qd ~/l \ ~, C iJ_ .16~_/L. ~t?(aCk ~ ~ $~~.~.tir~c, 7~ l c2~<it'~'~~ t~,ltClt'kti~;t_a:1 /)~C~~`/ .~ Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this a ation if it does not contain all the facts in io Applicant Signature (To be completed by the Zoninq Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: 530 zone District Requesting: Lot Size ~(U ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where IyG ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Height Variance, where is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed. Other: Zoning OfficialC ~)~c;~.tA~~,, /c~';~,~ A lication filed r, ; L ~+ ~+ `~ /' ~ ?~ L~$_ L'Z' ~ pp ~ Parcel ID No. ~ /14 ~ -~ ~~- Date of Meeting ~l ~~ ~~ , Notices Mailed ~ 3 Secretary ,~~~~-~`I"L~-~~ `'~~~"'/~ Refer Resolution to Building Department ; _ , Yes ; _; No ;s Ut Z~ i ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERB BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Data and time of meeting: Owner: Name and Addrsss of Applicant: Property Location or Description: July 6, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. Commissioner's Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse Thomas J. Roess Thomas J. Roess 0341 Light Hill Road Snowmass, CO 81654 Lot 10, Block 1, Filing 3 Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Requesting approval for a 40 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required, in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of an addition to a single family dwelling. Approval of this variance would allow the proposed addition to be 60 feet from the front property line. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COIILD HE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Suzanne L. W ff, Secretary ~. „t r June 10, 1993. Pitkin County Board of Adjustment. Re: Roess Residence, 0341 Light Hill Road, Snowmass, CO 81654. This 40' front yard variance is requested to enable the property owners to add a small storage area to their house. The owners are not the original owner/builders and find the size of the house insufficient to contain their belongings. The house was built long before the subdivision was zoned and the proposed addition will follow the lines of the present building. It will not have a signifigant impact on the appearance of the present structure and will not interfere with any adjacent property view plane. The site of the planned addition is flat, adjacent to the garage and would facilitate easy lass expensive and design approprate construction. To attempt to add on to the house at any other wall would be very difficult, expensive and more obtrusive. Sincerely, ;> . , AWACENT BIIBJECTS Filing 3, Mark & Heidi Steffels 452 E. Alpine Street Altamonte Springs, F 32701 John M. Bruegger 0047 Elk Range Road Snowmass, CO 81654 Gary Warren Morey 10652 Boulder St. Nevada City, CA 95959 Stewart Moss 200 Basalt Center Circle Basalt, CO 881621 J. Robert Weien Box 3506 Aspen, CO 81612 Kristen Hughes 322 Light Hill Road Snowmass, CO 81654 Robert Blackburn Ann Smulka 175 Alvarado Rd. Berkeley, CA 94705 Susan & Stanley Furr P.O. Box 11300 Aspen, CO 81612 PROPERTY OWNERB ROE88, THOMAS J Blook 1, Lot 10 ~> June 10, 1993. PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. To whom it may concern, George Draper is applying for a variance on my behalf as I will be out of town at the time of your next meeting. He is doing this at my request and I have absolutely no objections. Sincerely, Thomas J. Roess. ,i 60 a >/ ,SQ . '~ sO Sig F N ~~~ ~,oo ~oN~ ~ 21 b' i r,~ 0~ U 2y = ; . 0 ~~Q ~' ~~ %~ m ~ h ^~ J,~v d qua a, m ~-~ fc~P z° 200 ~ ~ ~ 1 zy y0 r ns ~ .o ~• ~ `B,2~ :~u~N ~n ~1~1 ~~ n ~~ ~y ~Z~•y0 1F~,yn£ a C O 11 ~~ s Zy y° L ~ e.Z~ N •~ R .N O~ - yi.i `~ r ~,, L o ~-- n ~a 4` '.n In °a n ~ ~ ~ p a --- at p v ~--_ _ _ o _ _ .. _ Q ^~ J J ~,~ J ~ ~ 2/4. 53 ~ Legal Description: Lot 10, Block 1, Gateway of Snowmass Subdivision, Third i-. I Filing l~~ Notes: ~ The real property described hereon does not lie within the limits of `~.i a 100 Year Flood Hazard Boundary. I hggreby certify that on 1993 a survey was performed by me on the parcel of land described hereon. A -story house was found to eon said parcel as shown on this plat. All easements, encroachments and rights-of-way in evidence or known to me are shown. This survey is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Sydney Lin come P.L.S. 14111 - ~ .nu~uo~,,,,.:,y:, ,,;,,,.. ~M P RO ~S EM E u ~ S V R~ E `c;°h" = SNu w M A S S, CG/o F~I~S+~ 'J u ~ a a '~~F" ~° 7= BY' L/IVES %N SPACE =~~ ~.•~ .> .~ ~ `• SYDNEY L/NC/COME (L.S. /4///J p,'n3 ;. ~n it C ~~~ ~~~~~ ~"4` BOX 121 CAkBONDALE COLO. 303-963-3 5 - Z - 9 SCALE~1~~= ~, Roess residence, 0341 Light Hill Road, Snowmass, CO. \~~ ~' t t i S G R7E6,)r4~ 1e1~ f I GIB 7 h~l bll j~C~iUEI-I,INF DOWIJ ~~tu.Eh 0r'J ffW'1 rS2~ 7rtl~.<- A t_-C-~7 CAN SnJOI.J.v~/+SS C~C-E~ nG'A'- t` AT TItF C(~NOCa~ ~O(~..oW ~I+I S RD ~ C/~CSS TttiF ;r;,Ri17GE ~U~2 SNGUnnt4sS C,2~e~ f}rv~ r~3t~C H (~I~t+7 ~7 ~- sfc-,fN s~~~ttN~- G~~7~w,w~ GSA ~ "fH~IS IS G--f~TEwAa-~ rzl~- t'0t-~-UW T1fIS 12~~/}~ r~}~-c- 'l-F~ w,'4'`% ~P r'~'N'+ T~k-C- 7i~ -~N~ Ri~1+7 - ~--IGHr ~+ru. izDA'D . -nt~ pia=1Lrt~ I ~ ~Ur=S7t oN ~ o34-I UC-:tt ~ I+~ L~ N~ t I S orJ ~- Tct~ C~ R,N EtL 0 ~ LI ~.(-~T Ff-(, t,t. r2~ ~'~ a ELF ~f17~ ~, C ~ ~-! U f_ ~ OG~ (I-F~- C.EFT NOTI t%I u~Zt oYJ SIG- Id iJ I l.~ ~~ f~~~D ~ N 7r1~ ~~t-0 n1i- 0~ i ~ f'RC-°~l~'`7 ~iASPEN/PITKIN PLANroNG OFFIC - 130South Galena Street Aspen, Cobrado 87611 cam) 920-t~o9o ~ 3 ~(3 - e ~-oo I a i~~- LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: -63250.134 GMP/Conceptual -03270-136 GMP/Final -63280.137 SUB/Conceptual -63300-139 SUB/Fnal -63310-140 All-2 Step Applications -63320.141 All 1 Step Applications -63330.150 Staff Approval -63432-157 Zoning Plan Check -63432-157 Sign Permk -00100.00000-31070 Use Tax for Sign Permits HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 Exemption -63336-152 Minor -63337-153 Major Devel. -63338-154 Signif. Devel. -63339-155 Demolition COUNTY: -63160.126 GMP/General -63170-127 GMP/Detailed -63180-128 GMP/Final -63190.129 SUB/General -63200-130 SUB/Detailed -63210-131 SUB/Final -63220.132 All 2 Step Applications -63230.133 All 1 Step Applications -63240.149 Staff Approval -63450-146 Board of Adjustment -63235-148 Zoning Plan Check REFERRAL FEES: -63360.143 Engineering -County 00115 X3340-163 Engineering -City 00123 -63340-190 Housing 00125 -63340-205 Environmental Heakh PLANNING OFFICE SALES: -63080-122 County Code -69000.145 Other (Copy Fees) TOTAL -~! ~.~- ,i' Name: / %"'~ u. ~ ~i/ Phone: Address: ~ ~ / Project: ~- ~r i~.d~ !ice-ri~.a~ ~'l1J _ '~ X13' Icj Check #: ~~~.Date: '~~__ No of Copies: / I te_ • • County Of Pitkiri } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing -on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that ~K- the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~~D ~ L-+ day of ~ ~ ~Z I'1 ~ , 19 ~~ 3 to the (o day of J ~ _- , 19 ~ 3 (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before e e tin ate) ~5 Signature pPl ca a~, swot to before me gubscribed and , this ~ day o ~~, 19 Q~ r by SF,AL . WITNESS MY AND AND OFFICIAL ~ -~-~"~- '~ r ~/~ Paz. J #359450 ci;/~~; ici;CB Fec $.i~i~ Bk: 719 F6•46 Silvia Davis, F'it4:in Cnty Cler4::, Doc ~.Oi> RESOLUTION OF THE PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING SETBACR RELIEF FOR THOMAS ROESS RESOLUTION NO. 93-19 WHEREAS, Thomas Roess, owner of 0341 Light Hill Road, is requesting approval for a 40 foot front yard setback variance, for construction of a storage area adjacent to the garage; and WHEREAS, a 100 foot front yard setback is required in the RS-30 zone district; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a 40 foot front yard setback variance be granted for construction of a storage area, due to downzoning, in accordance with the plans submitted (Exhibit '!B"). /;I WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. 000011 i #359450 lj; ~~93 lcj; ~B Rec ~, cji~ Bk: 719• 647 Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Cler4::, Doc $.O~j Resolution No. 93-19 Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: July 6, 1993 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: I ~fJ 1 ~V Suzan e L. Wolff, retary t o~n~~~ #35945q 07/~9/9•.0:~8 Fec ~.0~? Pk: 719 F6 • Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for property owned by THOMAS ROESS Lot 10, Block 1, Filing 3 Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision Pitkin County, Colorado 00001? #3594.5(1 0./29/93 1~?r• Fec ~.nl~ Bk 719 FG 649 . Silvia Davis Fitk:in ~ntv Clerk:, Doc ~.0~? $.;': QQ~)~1/. N ~~ :~ o~ ~ ~~~T 1 bQa 0 z~'' .a ~ a ', ,~~ N N ,O 4,Z~4Y ~IF~TS. 4.t N `a O C '- yyz', t z'• z O ~ /ir _ .~ O >/ SQ . 0 ~D ~ D 2y ~ ~ 9 ~, m D~ 1 , '~ ? J`~v d Ada °~ m fo~'P zO ~ood~ ~ ° N v /~ ~a .~ , ,^! a N ~ ,, ~n I.DO~' ~ ~ V i J` ,n~ V °, J 1 ~ 2/4. 53 ~_ I ~ Legal Description: Lot 10, Block 1, Gateway of Snowmass Subdivision, Third - Filing 1~~ Notes: ~ The real property described hereon does not lie within the limits of a 100 Year Flood Hazard Boundary. \`I h reby certify that on 1993 a survey was performed by me on the parcel of land described hereon. A -story house was found to eon said parcel as shown on this plat. All easements, encroachments and rights-of-way in evidence or known to me are shown. This survey is true and correct to tVhe best of my knowledge and belief. SydnetY Lin come' P.L.S. 14111 =MPRU~EP'IEUt SIJR~E J~l/ r,4 D0~ O ~~• ~ ~~ 00 Pa h ~0 ~- r~ ~ ,. 11 r' /~ D1~03 3 LoT /U I r SNU vJMASS Co/o 1°s By, L/NES %N SPACE SYDNEY L/NC/COME (L.S. /4///1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held in the District Coumoom, Pitkin County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Boazd of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County caning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appeaz personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DAVE AND TIME OF MEETING: Tuesday, July 6, 1993; 5:30 P.M. Commissioner's Meeting Room, Courthouse Roess, Thomas: requesting approval for a 40' front yard setback variance, where 100' is required in the RS- 30 zone district, for construction of an addition to a single family residence. Property Location: Lot 10, Block 1, Filing 3, Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision; 0341 Light Hill Road. Howell, William & Barbara: requesting approval fora 79' front yazd setback variance and a 32' east side yard setback variance, where 100' and 50', respectively, are required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a detached garage. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 2, Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision; 1591 Gateway Road. Smith, Peter & Catherine: requesting approval for an 85' arterial highway setback variance, where 200' is required, for construction of a single family residence. Property Location: Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6th PM, Section 12, in Government Tract G0. Swersky, David: requesting approval fora 100' front yard setback variance and an 18' NW side yard setback variance, where 100' and 30', respectively, aze required in the AF-1 zone district, for relocation of an existing carport. Property Location: 4076 Lower River Road; Township 9 South, Range 85 West of the 6th PM, Section 6, part of Lot 7. Doerr, L. John & Annie: requesting approval fora 23' front yard setback variance, where 30' is required in the R-30 zone district, for construction of an attached one-car garage. Property Location: Lot 37, Ridge of Red Mountain Subdivision; 52 Nighthawk Drive. Baker, William: requesting approval fora 35' front yazd setback variance, where 100' is required in the AF- 1 zone district, and a 100' arterial highway setback variance, where 200' is required, for construction of a detached garage. Property Location: Lot 10, Holland Hills at Basalt Subdivision; 0028 Holland Hills Road. Submitted to the Aspen Times on June 22, 1993. To Be Published in the Aspen Times June 25, 1993. County PO #301003 000015 t 1 Members Present: Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Regular Meetinq July 6, 1993 Staff: Rick Neiley, Chair Michael Cooper Bill Lukes Rod Dyer John Wheeler Evan Gull Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Gull opened the meeting at 5:25 p.m. and introduced the Board to those present. Case 93-05. Robert F. Leonard. Lots 10. 11 & 12, Block 5, Kistler Subdivision This case was tabled at the April 6, 1993, May 4, 1993, and June 15, 1993 meetings. Gull moved to table this case to the August 3, 1993 meeting. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case 93-15, Andrew Modell. Lot 5, Block 2, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Subdivision This application was tabled at the June 15, 1993 meeting. Glen Rappaport was present, representing Andrew Modell, to request a 26 foot front yard setback variance for an addition of the north side of the single family residence, and a 42 foot front yard setback variance for a deck addition of the east side of the house, where a 100 foot front yard setback variance is required in the AF- 1 zone district. Rappaport presented photographs to the Board. Gull stated that the proposed addition would increase the encroachment into the front yard setback and would exceed the 75 foot setback. He noted that either he could approve a 75 foot front yard setback, based on the AF-2 zone district requirements, or he could accept not complying with the 75 foot setback, if the addition did not encroach into the setback any more than the existing structure. Rappaport stated that he wanted to improve a specific area of the existing house, and, therefore, did not consider putting the addition on the other side of house, where it would not encroach into the setback, and added that he was trying to put the public space away from neighbor's property. 1 OOf1(~~ ~; There was no public comment. Cooper stated that he was an adjoining property owner, and asked if anyone objected to his voting on this case. There were no objections. Cooper moved to grant a 26 foot front yard setback variance for an addition on the north side of the existing house, and a 42 foot front yard setback variance for an addition on the east side of the existing house, due to topographic hardship and downzoning. Three members were in favor, with Gull and Lukes opposed. Motion failed. Discussion of the two separate front yard setback requests ensued. Gull stated that the topography of the site did not provide enough justification for the increased setback encroachment. Lukes moved to grant a 26 foot front yard setback variance for an addition on the north side of the existing house, and a 35.5 foot front yard setback variance for an addition on the east side of the existing house, due to topographic hardship. Neiley seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case 93-16, Calvin Daks, Lot R-45, Block 5 Starwood Subdivision This application was tabled at the June 15, 1993 meeting. Calvin Daks was present to request a 24 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a detached garage. Daks noted that the application was tabled at the previous meeting pending receipt of a letter of approval of the variance request from the Starwood Homeowners Association. Neiley read into the record a letter from the Starwood Homeowners Association, stating their approval of the variance request. There was no public comment. Dick Fenton, a neighbor, stated by letter that he has no objection to the request. Lukes moved to grant a 24 foot rear yard setback variance, due to topographic hardship. Dyer seconded the motion. Four members were in favor, with Gull opposed. Case 93-19, Thomas Roess. Lot 10 Block 3 Filing 2 Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision George Draper was present, representing the owner, to request a 40 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the 2 ~DU~17 RS-30 zone district, for construction of a garden shed attached to the existing garage. There was no public comment. Schaffner clarified that the front yard is considered the east side of the lot, and that a side yard setback variance was not required. Gull noted that the lot is approximately 1 acre, which is inconsistent with the zoning. Neiley moved to grant a 40 foot front yard setback variance, due to downzoning, in accordance with the plans submitted. Gull seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Case 93-20, William and Barbara Howell. Lot 3, Block 3, Filing 2, Gateway of Snowmass Mesa Subdivision At the applicants request, Dyer moved to table the application to the August 3, 1993 meeting. Gull seconded the motion, and all were in favor. ' Case 93-21. Peter and Catherine Smith. Township 8 South, Ranae 87 West of the 6th PM. Section 12, in Government Tract 60 Peter and Catherine Smith were present to request an 85 foot arterial highway setback variance, where 200 feet is required, for construction of a single family residence. Catherine Smith stated that their lot is a 4 acre lot, 2 acres of which are located on the river and up the bank on the opposite side. They received Minor 1041 Hazard Review approval for the building envelope. She noted that complying with the arterial highway setback requirement would put them in violation of the slope restrictions and in the river. There was no public comment. Gull moved to grant an 85 foot arterial highway setback variance, due to downzoning and topographic hardship. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. John Wheeler arrived at 6:05 PM. Case 93-22. David Swersky, 4076 Lower River Road David Swersky was present to request a 100 foot front yard setback variance and an 18 foot NW side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district, for relocation of an existing carport. Swersky stated that he is proposing to realign his existing carport 3 ~o~{~~~ to accomodate a new access to his property. The Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company issued a residential yard lease to him, which permits him to lease the land from his property line to the center line of railroad tracks. He also received a direct access permit from the railroad to cross the railroad tracks from Lower River Road to access his property, which is more convenient than the current access. The carport is located in the only flat spot on the property, so he would like to turn it and leave it in the same location. There was no public comment. Swersky noted that the carport will have less of a visual impact after it is turned, and that he will no longer need to use his neighbor's driveway to access his property. Dyer moved to grant a 100 foot front yard setback variance and an 18 foot NW side yard setback variance, due to downzoning. Gull seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Wheeler did not vote on this case. Tom Stevens was present, representing the owners, to request a 23 foot front yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required in the R-30 zone district, for construction of an attached garage. Stevens stated that an application for an administrative scenic overlay review is currently being reviewed by the Planning Office. He stated that a variance was granted in 1991 to allow an 18.4 foot front yard setback, but the proposed addition was not built. The current proposal is to construct an underground attached garage to accomodate two cars. The Ridge of Red Mountain Subdivision requires off-street parking for four cars; the owners currently have four surface parking spaces, which are all visible to the neighbors. The drop in grade on the side of the house is such that only the garage door would be visible and the garage would disappear underground. On the only other buildable space on the lot, the garage would obstruct the view from and the solar exposure of the residence. There was no public comment. Neiley read into the record a letter from the following neighbors, all stating their support for the variance request: Ann and Jim Goodman, Kenneth Gutner, Albert and Shirlee Kay Myers, Donald P. Weiss, Joseph Honnberger, Heidi Bookout, Dorance and Mary Ryerse, Salvador Valencia, Maria Luisa Garza de la Mora, Edward Calesa, Plato Foufas, and Arthur Rosenstein. Gull moved to grant a 23 foot front yard setback variance, due to o~n~~n topographic hardship. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Neiley did not vote on this case. Case 93-24 William Baker, Lot 10, Holland Hills at Basalt Subdivision Bill Baker was present to request a 35 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, and a 100 foot arterial highway setback variance, where 200 feet is required, for construction of a detached garage. Schaffner noted that Baker received a variance approval from the Board of Adjustment in February of 1992 (Resolution No. 92-15). Before granting the variance, the Board asked for additional information as to other setback variances granted along Highway 82 in the Holland Hills Subdivision. Research showed that a 100 foot arterial highway setback variance was generally being granted, and the Board granted that amount to Baker. Baker did not build the garage that was approved. Baker stated that the currently proposed garage is in a different configuration than the one previously approved, and was designed to take advantage of the new accessory height limit. There was no public comment. Neiley moved to grant a 35 foot front yard setback variance and a 100 foot arterial highway setback variance, due to downzoning. Dyer seconded the motion, and all were in favor. Gull did not vote on this case. **************************************************************** The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Suzanhe L. Wolff, cr ''~! ;j ~. R3~ck eiley, Chairman 00(1`'0 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: -63250-134 -63270-136 -63280-137 -63300-139 -63310.140 -63320-141 -63330.150 -63432-157 -63432-157 -00100-00000-31070 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 -63336-152 -63337-153 -63336-154 -63339-155 COUNTY: -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63240-149 -63450-146 -63235-148 REFERRAL FEES: -63360-143 00115 -63340-163 00123 -63340-190 00125 -63340-205 ~l ~ j ~, GMP/Conceptual GMP/Final SUB/Conceptual SUB/Final All-2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Permit Use Tax for Sign Permits Exemption Minor Major Devel. Signd. Devel. Demolition GMP/General GMP/Detailed GMP/Final SUB/General SUB/Detailed SUB/Final All 2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Check Engineering -County Engineering -City Housing Environmental HeaRh ~ ~-oc/ PLANNING OFFICE SALES: O O f1O ? 1 -63080-122 County Code -69000-145 Other (Copy Fees) ~-- - _-__ ~_ TOTAL ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ Name: .~ F. :.~ Phone: Address .~~/ / _ .-fi' ~: ~~ ~ Project: f/` --5'3 - Iq_ Check fl: /~~i .-- t]aM: -~' ~ / No of Copies: