The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.01.12 RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING SETBACK VARIANCES FOR KARL AND MADELEINE CARSON Resolution No. 01-12 WHEREAS, Brad and Madeleine Larson, owners of Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village, aze requesting front and side yard setback variances for the construction of a driveway that will exceed 30 inches in height; and, WHEREAS, a 30 foot front yazd setback and a 20 foot side yazd setback is required for this 2.142 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district; and, WHEREAS, the Boazd of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (I.,and Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hazdship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the Boazd of Adjustment, that front and side yazd setback variances be granted for the construction of a driveway that exceeds 30 inches in height as is presented on Exhibit A, due to a topographical hazdship. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Boazd of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: June 5, 2001 ATTEST: Ezr this, Secretary Pitkin County Boazd of Adjustment The Boazd of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Pitkin County Boazd of ~~0001 p~ z2 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4609 0304:23P R 0.00 D 0.00 ,,~ti~ ~q 0 • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4609 03 04:23P R 0.00 D 0.00 ~~ ;~~ ~~~ ° v°. 4 r~ 1~ ~i/ I JV ~~o 130 I \ j0 O \~ ~ I~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ ~'~~ i ~ ~ - ~, i i ~ i ~ ~ i /~ ~ - l i i ~ ~ / i i J i i ~Y ~ ~ ,-~ ~ ~ r ~ i 1 ~~ /' i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i (~ \ ~ -- . / / \ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~--~~ ~ ~ ~~--- - - !-, s~ ~--~~ i ~ ~ ~ V _ /I ~o ~ j `-7 ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ \~r ~ ~l 1"/1C .' F~ON D~~ ~" O~A d0 O~Z i O i ~~. r::~ = ~- a e ~ ~\ ~~a.. .y y . ~ ~~ \'~ O~~ ~~~~ 1 1 1 t o 1 I m PTI'HIN COUNTY BOA12D OF ADJL6 TMF,NT Application Form DATE S•/t•Dl CASE# ~~-~~ REPRESENTATIVE B /iu. ~ '~~~~ PHONE 9~ 7- 9976 MAILING ADDRESS ~° boX 30/ aASd'~ ~D ~/La~ O~gt ~'L Ang M.riot ~ E-lNt ta/tGoi/ PHONE 4~ 3 • Go/l MAILING ADDRESS pU g°X ~'s-e 3 sYSPtrJ ~o f//G// LOCATION OF PROPERTY U/Uer~- 1~'-/vj, R4Ad 61LNSif G/iiL~ /ui/cd Any pertinent data must accanpany this applicatioq and will be made part of this Case The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Owner's or Representative's (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the caning resdution requring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Boant of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: !U Requesting. ' Frorrt Yazd Setback Vaziance, where -'IO ' is regtaired. 'Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ~o~~ ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ~' is regttired. ' Side Yazd Setback Variance, where _' is required. ' Hei~tt Variance, where _' is allowed. Sgttue Feet where a maximwn of_ sq. ft. is allowed. ZoneDistrict a .142 Lot Size ~C>^ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ G~h.~%UC,uz:cr ~~ fM lX .Q.~lX1Lk.P.~, Appficationfiled s /`~ ~~ ~ Refer to ,~j~ -~-- G Date ofMeeting_ G d Notices Mailed Pazoel ID No. a ~~~ ~ a, ~~o r vv ~ Zoning Official ' _ -~ "~ Secretazy _~-~ -.__. 0~~~)~~ MINUTES o[ the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, June 5, 2001 Pitkin County Courthouse Members Present: Michael Cooper (chair) Jim Rifkin Jack Hunt Joe Krabacher Deanna Olsen Bob Throm Members Absent: Rick Head Staff Present: Joanna Schaffner, Pitkin County Zoning Officer Tammie Bandersky for Angela Rishel, Recording Secretary Krabacher announced his resignation from the BOA due to his appointment on the Planning and Zoning Commission. ICrabacher left the meeting. O1-10 Coe, Nancv Bell: Lot 3 Filin¢ 2 Brush Creek Village AKA• 1261 Juniper Hill Dr Requesting a 10 foot side yazd setback variance where 20 feet is required to constmct a garage on this 2.09 acre pazcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Cooper noted that he resides in Brush Creek Village, that he is on the Metro Boazd, as well as the land owners association. He offered to step down if the Board so desired. It was agreed that Cooper would remain. Schaffner presented a brief summary as outlined above. She noted the location of the property. Schaffner noted that the applicant is proposing a detached garage, and stated that there is currently a 30 foot access easement that the neighbors aze working towazds vacating. Because the garage is located within the easement, the vacation must occur before a permit can be issued for the garage. Nancy Bell Coe introduced herself as the homeowner. Simon Elliott introduced himself as the applicant's representative and architect. Elliott presented a brief summary of the applicant's proposal. He stated that the reason for the proposal is to allow access to the azea behind the residence for constmction equipment and yazd maintenance, etc. He used photographs to point out the location of the proposed gazage as well as the mature vegetation in the area. He noted that if the gazage would be located outside of the setback and closer to the house, an egress window in [he house would be blocked. Rifkin asked if any letters from adjacent neighbors had been submitted. Schaffner responded that she has not received any. Throm asked if the fire marshal has seen this access. Elliott responded that he has not. Throm asked if the utility company had been notified yet. Elliott responded [hat they have not because the gazage does not encroach on their easement. Cooper stated that this would not affect anyone who lives in Brush Creek. Motion Rifkin moved to approve application 01-10, on the basis of a topographical hazdship as well as a hardship that presently exists if the variance isn't granted. This hardship is the window blockage that would occur and be in violation of the code. Throm seconded the motion. Members Rifkin, Throm, Cooper, Hunt and Olsen voted unanimously to approve application 01-10. O1-11 Johns. Dan: Lot 1 Navlor Lot Split AI{A• 26501 Highway 82 Snowmass ~~n~U4 • MINUTES of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, June 5, 2001 Pitkin County Courthouse Requesting a 5 foot, 130 foot, and a 67 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of an addition to a single family residence, barn, and carport, respectively on this 36+ acre pazcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Schaffner presented a brief summazy of the application as outlined above. She noted the location of the property. Schaffner briefly discussed the history with the application stating that the applicant had originally been before the BOA, who approved a large berm in front of the residence as well as a detached garage. Schaffner stated that this is a Board approved subdivision. She stated that there is no building envelope, and pointed out the general azea the applicant will be working in. Dan Johns introduced himself as the property owner. He presented a brief summary of the proposals stating that they have 36 acres. He noted the location of the river in relation to the residence. He discussed a previous property line adjustment and the setback lines. Johns stated that there was a mistake in the original survey. Cooper asked what the elevation is at the centerline of the road. Johns responded that the highway pavement is about 6 feet below the top of the bam ridge. Rifkin clarified that Johns also owned the property on the other side of the river and asked if there was another homeowner that would be impacted by this. Johns responded that there was not, because they are big pieces of property. There were no public comments. Johns continued with his presentation stating that they would like to build a storage bam. He noted the proposed location of the bam, which is in a group of cottonwood trees. He stated that the bam would be sheltered by the trees on either end and that they would add additional landscaping in the front for screening. He stated that they are requesting a 130 foot setback for the bam. Rifkin asked if there had been any objections from adjacent homeowners. Schaffner stated that she had not heard from any. Rifkin asked if the BOA could request a landscape plan if the variance is granted. Schaffner responded that they conld. Rifkin also stated that the color of [he barn should be consistent with the color of the home. There was brief discussion on colors and screening that would be provided by a berm and trees. For the benefit of the BOA members, Johns pointed out the berm and the existing and proposed trees on a map. Throm pointed out that he has known the owner for many yeazs. He stated [hat in his opinion it's better to see the barn from the highway than construction materials. There was brief discussion on the appeazance of the bam from the highway and the potential uses of the bam. Schaffner stated that pursuant to the definition in the land use code the structure is not considered a bam if it's being used for something other than agricultural purposes. Johns stated that they do not have horses, they need the barn for storage. Cooper asked if water and 240 electric aze proposed in the bam. Johns responded that they weren't. Olsen asked if [hey could locate the bam on [he other side of the road. Johns responded that there really wasn't room. Discussing the hazdship, Rifkin stated the applicant has built out to the extent they pemussibly can and the ~~UU~~ • MINUTES of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, June 5, 2001 Pitkin County Courthouse applicant cannot use the acreage unless the variance is granted. Johns responded that that was correct Motion• Rifkin moved that Case 01-11 be approved contingent upon the submission of landscape plans which reflects restoration of the cottonwoods to their current condition prior to constmction and that there be landscaping of 8-12 Ft trees to shield the carport as well as 12-14 Ft trees for the barn. Olsen seconded the motion. Additional Discussion Schaffner asked if the BOA would like to table this until the applicant can come back with a landscape plan next month. Cooper asked if this would cause any undue hazdship on the applicant. Johns responded that the only aspect he is anxious to proceed with is the addition to the house. He stated the barn probably would not be constructed this year anyway. There was discussion among the BOA on how best to proceed with the approval. The BOA agreed that they should vote on the house, and defer the approval for the barn until the landscape plans aze submitted. Amended Motion Rifkin amended his motion to approve the addition to the house based on the applicant's inability to build on the additional acreage without a variance. Cooper seconded the motion. Members Rifkin, Cooper, Olsen, Throm and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Schaffner clarified that there was a motion to table the rest of the motion Final Motion Rifkin moved to table the application for the carport and barn until the next meeting when a suitable landscape plan could be submitted. Cooper seconded the motion. Members Rifkin, Cooper, Olsen, Throm and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. All members agreed to meet again on July 11th at 5:15. O1-12 Larson, Karl: Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2 Brush Creek Village Requesting front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively, aze required, to constmct a driveway greater than 30 inches in height on this 2.142 acre pazcel in the AFR-10 zone district. For the record, Cooper reiterated that he lives in Brush Creek and would be willing to step down if the members thought it necessary. The members did not request that Cooper step down. For the record, Throm noted that he has been acquainted with the owners for a number of yeazs and offered [o step down. The members did not request [hat Throm step down. Schaffner presented a brief summary of the application as outlined above. She noted the location of the property, noting that it is very visible from the intersection of Highway 82 and Brush Creek Road. Bruce Barth noted that they have gone through ridgeline review as well. Throm asked if that review was approved to which Barth responded yes. Schaffner noted that some revisions had been made as a result of speaking with Lance Clarke, the Assistant Planning Director. She noted that although a Ridgeline review was required on this lot, per an intergovernmental agreement between Pitkin County and Bmsh Creek Village, the Planning Department had 30 days in which to review the application. The planner was unawaze of the restricted timeframe and scheduled the application two or three months out. Therefore, the ~~~UQ6 • MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, June 5, 2001 Pitkin County Courthouse County lost its ability to review the case. It was presented [o the Hearing Officer anyway, at which point Planning's input was offered, but no longer required because of the missed deadline. The applicant did take staffs comments into consideration and made some changes. Cooper discussed the difficulty of the property due to where it is located. Rifkin asked if there had been any objections from adjacent neighbors. Schaffner noted that she received a phone call from neighbors asking what was going on, and she thought they might show up today, but they haven'[. There was no other public comment. Motion: Cooper moved to approve Case 01-12 per the plans submitted due to a topographical hardship in that there is no other way to access the property. Rifkin seconded the motion. Members Cooper, Rifkin, Olsen, Thomas and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Minutes: • May 1, 2001 Cooper moved to approve the minutes of the May 1, 2001 BOA meeting. Olsen seconded the motion. Members Cooper, Olsen, Throm, Rifkin and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. • May 4, 2001 Cooper moved to approve the minutes of the May 4, 2001 BOA meeting. Bob Throm seconded the motion. Members Cooper, Olsen, Throm, Rifkin and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Approved as submitted, Approved ' h t ted changes(s) ngela 'shel, Recording Secretary Mich t o er, air ~, 2001 ~L7 , 2001 Date Date ~~~~~~ palominobartharchitects PC ~;,, anharAturc May 16 2000 Pitkin County Board of Adjustments Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Larson Residence Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Pitkin County, CO 81623 Architect's Job No. 2K-151 Subject: Authorization for Representation Dear Lance, This letter serves as notice to hereby authorize Jack Palomino of Palomino Barth Architects P.C. to serve as my representative during the development application review process for the above mentioned project. Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this authorization. care y, arl Larson Madeleine Larson BNB/bnb 2K-151 M10 coat office boz 301 174 miAand avenue suite 205 basalt colotado 61621 0 970 92'7 9976 f 9'70 927 9616 p~aaaing rnlcriucv oalominobmth.cpn 000'08 • ~ palominobalthc'irchitects PC ~:;a ashilh mr: May 14 2000 Pitkin County Board of Adjustments Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Larson Residence Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Pitkin County, CO 81623 Architect's Job No. 2K-151 Subject: Grading Variance Pi[kin County Code Section 7-10.030: The Larson Residence was approved by the Pitkin County Hearing Officer for Ridgeline Review on February 20, 2001. The site is a very prominent and difficult one, due to location and topography respectively. The height, massing and placement of the house has been determined and approved previously. There is only one point at which the site can be accessed, at the northwest comer, which is also the highest point on the lot. In order to enter the house at the top of the site (by a moderately steep driveway) and bury the house into the site as was required by the Hearing Officer during Ridgeline Review, grading 30 inches or more outside the building envelope/setbacks must occur. The site plan and grading strikes a delicate balance between the two ends of the house. This request for variance is due to the hardship of the site's topography and the requirements of Ridgeline Review. Than o r your time, ce Barth, AIA, Principal Palomino Barth Architects PC BNB/bnb 2K-151 M13 OOOOn9 iNenart poet once lwx 30I 180 fiou lane guile 201 basalt coloredo 81621 p 970 92'7 99'76 t 970 927 9676 palominobaM®soprie.net .~ • A~aK~6~- • + GOtt~~it'~• DETERMINATION OF THE HEARING OFFICER OF PITIQN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE CARSON SCENIC OVERLAY/RIDGELINE REVIEW Determination No.O~-2001 RECITALS 1. Karl and Madeleine Larson ("Applicant") have applied to the Hearing Officer of Pitkin Couny, Colorado ("Hearing Officer") for scenic overlay/ridgeline review approval for a new singlefamily residence on a mapped ridgeline within Brush Creek Village Subdivision, pursuant to Section 360-040 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code ("Code"). 2. The lot is zoned AFR-10 and contains approximately 2.142 acres. The lot is located on the ridge above the intersection of Brush Creek and Medicine Bow Roads, and is described as Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Subdivision. 4. The Hearing Officer considered this application at duly noticed public hearings on January 16 and February 20, 2001, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. 5. The Hearing Officer finds that the residence cannot be sited so as not to breakthe ridgeline/skyline as viewed from Highway 82 and Brush Creek Road. 6. The Heazing Officer further finds that the Applicant has minimized the height and bulk to the extent possible in order to limit the infringement of the ridgeline. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Community Development Department Hearing Officer that the Larson ridgeline review is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions, which were accepted by the Applicant on the record at the February 20 hearing and shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in public hearings and in the application. 2. The exterior of the residence shall be finished in earth tones, which blend with the colors of the natural surrounding environment. Roof materials shall be non-reflective. 000010 I ("III "III "III' IIIII"II "I') II'I"I III "I'I IIII I'II 482609 03/21/2001 12:87P DETERNIN DpVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ~. - - Hearing Officer Determination No. _-2001 Page 2 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the Applicant shall submit a landscaping plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. 4. Native shrubs and grasses shall be utilized for revegetation of disturbed areas. Alldistwbance caused by construction shall be revegetated no later than one growing season after completion of construction. Existing vegetation shall be retained to the extent possible. 5. Exterior lighting shall comply with the regulations of the Land UseCode in effect at the time of installation and shall be limited to the northwest side of the structure that faces Fat City Way. 6. The height of the residence shall conform substantially to the representationmade in Exhibit A. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING published in the Aspen Times Weekly on the 16~ day of December, 2000. APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 20th day of February, 2001. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weekly on the ~l l day of /L////'~" `' , 2001. HEARING OFFICER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: John Ely, Cou orney Case #P156-00 PID #26432140100( 0~~~~~3 By ~-^-~.._- Jaznes R. Tme, Heaing Officer Date zo 0 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Cindy Houben, Community Development Director "III' I'IIII'II "I'I II'I"I III "II' II'I I"I 21/2001 12:S7P DETERNIN DAVIS SILVI wwuuw PI1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: .. 'ct t N 0 Q C~ ~ ~_ ~ ~\\ . o .~ ~~~'~. 3giw.f,~ ~ ~~~``""' "~ ~rasnt` ~ .y ~s ~$~ ~o~ ~ z ~ D N N ~ ~ N 2 ~_ w _ w i.i F _M~ _Q V 1 ~~_ ~wY ~Wd -:r mom ~dm =m z -NB ~ e~ 0 =~+8 ~~ m ~N~ BNB ~N~ ~BK ~~~ N m =~ O ~~N • ~ palominobarth2rchitects PC ~_~ archnreWre May 14 2000 Pitkin County Board of Adjustments Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Larson Residence Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Pitkin County, CO 81623 Architect's Job No. 2K-151 Subject: Legal Description LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, FILING NO. 2, according to the recorded Plat thereof. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. BNB/bnb 2K-151 M10 ~®()~~.~ plamm~~ in0.•nun post office boz 301 180 fiou lane suite 201 basalt ooloredo 81621 p 970 92799'16 (9'70 927 96'76 palominobanheom ~QQ~~ 6~9 ~~ Sr ~n ~~ ~`m NT ~~ ~~ 0000'4 DEC-13-2D00 WED 05:51 AUGUST INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 1191 BASALT. CO 81671 HAHN GIDRA 721 SOPRIS DRIVE BASALT, CO 81621 WEBER JAMES D PO BOX 9218 ASPEN, CO 81612 PM ~,-, CHARLEY DAVID M P O BOX 1718 KAILUA, HI 96734-8718 KRAMER BRIDGET 70 MEDICINE BOW RD ASPEN, CO 81612 FAX NC. CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 61611 01 ~~~{r~. ~s~~aD LARSON KARL G 8 M MADELEINE P 0 BOX 6207 ASPEN, CO 81612 oono15 u NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITIQN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: LOCATION OF MEETING: Tuesday June 5, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Commissioner's Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspen, CO Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Co.: requesting a 150 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from Highway 82, for the construction of a gas line heater on this 58.6 acre pazcel in the RS-20 PUD zone district. Property Description: Southeasterly of the Hwy. 82/ Brush Creek Intersection. Coe, Nancy Bell: requesting a 10 foot side yard setback variance where 20 feet is required to construct a garage on this 2.09 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 3, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village aka: 1261 Juniper Hill Dr. Larson, Karl: requesting front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required, to construct a driveway greater than 30 inches in height on this 2.142 acre pazcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Johns, Dan: requesting 5 foot, 130 foot, and 67 foot Arterial Highway setback variances where 200 feet is required from Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of an addition, barn, and carport, respectively on this 36+ acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 1, Naylor Lot Split aka: 26501 Highway 82, Snowmass Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 22, 2001 To Be Published in the Aspen Times on May 26, 2001 000016 ~~ AGENDA/MEMO PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT June 5, 2001 5:15 P.M. New Business Commissioners Meeting Room Pitltin County Courthouse O1-10 Coe, Nancy Bell: requesting a ]0 foot side yard setback variance where 20 feet is required to construct a garage on this 2.09 acre parcel in the AFR 10 zone district. Properh Description: Lot 3, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village aka: 1261 Juniper Hill Dr. O1-11 Johns, Dan: requesting 5 foot, 130 foot, and 67 foot Arterial Highway setback variances where 200 feet is required from Highway 82 right of-way for the constmction of an addition to a single family residence, barn, and carport, respectively on this 36+ acre parcel in the AFR 10 zone district. Properh Description: Lot 1, Naylor Lot Split aka: 26501 Highway 82, Snowmass O1-12 Larson, Karl: requesting front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required, [o construct a driveway greater than 30 inches in height on this 2.142 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Propem~ Description: Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Minutes Please be prepazed to approve or make changes to the following minutes: May 1, 2001 & May 4, 2001 PLEASE CONTACT EZRA LOUTHIS AT 920-5442, IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. ~~~U1~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and fime of meeting: Location of Meeting: Owner: Subject Property: June 5, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Commissioners Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspen, CO Larson, Karl Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Requesting front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required, to construct a driveway greater than 30 inches in height on this 2.142 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary. Permanent X For inquires please contact Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer, Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen (970) 920-5105. oooo~$ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, of objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: LOCATION OF MEETING: Tuesday June 5, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Commissioner's Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspen, CO Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Co.: requesting a 150 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from Highway 82, for the construction of a gas line heater on this 58.6 acre parcel in the RS-20 PUD zone district. Property Description: Southeasterly of the Hwy. 82/ Brush Creek Intersection. Cce, Nancy Bell: requesting a 10 foot side yard setback variance where 20 feet is required to construct a garage on this 2.09 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 3, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village aka: 1261 Juniper Hill Dr. Larson, Karl: requesting front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively, are required, to construct a driveway greater than 30 inches in height on this 2.142 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 4, Block 1, Filing 2, Brush Creek Village Johns, Dan: requesting 5 foot, 130 foot, and 67 foot Arterial Highway setback variances where 200 feet is required from Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of an addition, barn, and carport, respectively on this 36+ acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: Lot 1, Naylor Lot Split aka: 26501 Highway 82, Snowmass Submitted to the Aspen Times on May 22, 2001 To Be Published in the Aspen Times on May 26, 2001 ~~U~~ ~ ~ ooo~~~o -~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this x day of :T~~~~ , 20~, by i~P.~~ t~~~~ County of Pitldn } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING } ss. OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE State of Colorado } THEPITHIN COUNTYBOARD OF ADJL6TMENT BOARD OF ADNS TMINT The undersigned, beingfirst duly sworn, deposes and says as foDows I, 6 ~ ~ b ~"~ , berg or representingan Applicant before thePitldn Courrty Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attachedphotograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the vaziarce hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the neazest public way) and that the said sigl was posted aid visible continuously from the ~ ~' day of ~" 20~, to the S day of d ~r/B , 2001. (Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the hearing date). (Attach photograph here) BRING TIIIS FORM TO THE MEETING ' SUSN'1 gCHIMPF ti WITNESS MYHAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My Term to Expires Commission expires: O~1J04/2005 Public's Signature Address 000"1 r R { C C0MMU1VITy DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street. Aspen, Colorado 8161 I (970J !120-5090 Pitkin County Land 172 Use: Board of Ad L59 juslmeu[ County Land U 173 se Cudr Deposit 174 Flat. Fee 162 ~mfng and Si 169 gn Pi,l~lic Notice 160 Planning Enf orcement Referral Fees: RB] 15 Access Permit LUCO] County Clerk 193 County Engineer 194 Environmen Lal Health I98 Housing 190 Land Managem 196 ent. wildlife Ofl icer Building Fees: 170 Board nl A 135 PPeals Building Code Sales 105 Building per 100 mit Contractor Li 120 cense Elec(riral P 195 ermit Energy Cod 115 e Review Mechanical p 150 ernlit Plan Check 110 Plumbing Per 130 mit Reinspectfo 151 n Aspen Sanitation 152 AVFD Fire Marshal Other Fees: 155 Use Tax 165 Copp 185 Performance Deposit Park Dedica Lion 186 Parking Cash in Lieu 166 GIS Maps IS GIS Requirements RB116 Road Impact Fees B1202 Road Impact F' ee TOTAL --1~U. o0 NAME: ~~ ~D ADDRESS/PRp r'C.T; 27j'~c.; ~ N - -- PHONE; C -- CHECK# l-c.Li q __ - CASE/pERMIT# ~ --'-__ DATE: y7«.~~ -~-#OF C'OPIES' 7`/~ ~_ ~ INITIAL- ~ /~_