The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.01.06 RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT Resolution No. 01-06 WHEREAS, Pitkin County, owner of the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, is requesting a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance for the construction of aircraft patio shelters; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3-050-020 A and C of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, 200 feet is required from the Highway 82 right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Boazd of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Boazd of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hazdship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfaze and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boazd of Adjustment, that a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance be granted for the construction of aircraft patio shelters as depicted on the plans on file in the Community Development Department file, due to topographic constraints and FAA downzoning. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: Apri13, 2001 ATTEST: The Boazd of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ~ --- ~- c Ewa Louthis, Secretary Pitkin County Boazd of Adjustment 000001 ~ 3~ Micha oper, Chairperson Pitkin County Board of Adjustment IIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII046095 eeea.zaa PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Application Fotm DATE 3 jl 2 ~0 ~ REPRESENTATIVE C-t~2Y l<o~,s MAILING ADDRESS ~n lAJ OWNER ~l f"fG N CdUIuT"Y Q.l 2l'bR T MAILING ADDRESS LOCATION OF PROPERTY Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. ~-j Owner's or Representative's be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not g<atttin~ a buildins pennit: Requesting: ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. 'Rear Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. 'Height Variance, where ' is allowed. Square Fneet where a maeimum of _ sq. ft. is allowed. Other: ~ a5 t I A ,~n~t n ~ `~Y.i~ t ~ .,n~ _. /19'~-ft~n. ,. ~i PHONE R2D -6~~7d ~ 8'l61 ! PHONE Q -53 ~ L' B Zone District Lot Size aa~ Application filed 3 1~2 ~ 1 Pazcel ID No. c~,6 y ~~Y ~ (J p g s I Refer to Date of tileeting _`/ ~ ~ l Zoning Official ~-~ ~~~ ~A-.~._ Notices Mailed 3/> i /~ Secretary r CASE # ~ ~ - ~16~ i ~~~~~~~ ---~-- -- County of Pitltin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING } ss. OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE State of Colorado } THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADNST~NT The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: I, Cr"TQ RY 055 ,being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personal]y certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~ ` day of I'l f.12C1+ . 20~, to the 3 day of ~P21C._ , 20Q( (;Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the hearing date). _,y ubscribed and s~vom to before me this ~ ~ ay of ~~, 20D1> by ~_Q ~S ~[Y HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Commission e~cpires: -1 `ay I1pp~ otary Si 000003 Draft: 1st Members Present: Members Absent: MINUTES of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Pitltin County Courthouse Michael Cooper (chair) Rick Head Jack Hunt Joe ICrabacher Deanna Olsen Bob Throm Staff Present: Joanna Schaffner, Pitkin County Zoning Officer ~~ Angela Rishel, Recording Secretary "~ ,, ~ y..~;~' N" J Cooper called the meeting to order. ~ , ~v Old Business: Amending BOA case 99-32 (Blechman) ~`' Schaffner gave a brief summary of the application, noting the location of the property on Red Mountain. She stated that this application was previously before the BOA in 1999 for vaziances from the Collector Street setback, which is a 50-foot requirement from Red Mountain Road. The applicant did receive approval to exceed 30 inches within the setback. They have redesigned the retaining wall to make it less impactive and allow for greater landscaping and the retention of native vegetation. Schaffner explained to the members that they could require the applicant to make a complete application for public heazing, or, if they believe the changes aze minor enough they could reflect their approval through the minutes of this meeting. She added that in terms of wall design she felt this to be a minor amendment. The conditions on the site are the same and the BOA had previously found a topographic hazdship. Michael Moore, the applicant's representative, referenced a map provided to point out the retaining wall, regrading and the azeas that aze left undisturbed. He specifically noted the changes in height stating that the wall needed to get higher and still grade back to the property line. Moore stated that they have slightly changed the shape of the wall and brought landscape elements azound to integrate the wall into the landform. He noted that with this concept they aze retaining most of the existing vegetation versus cleaz-cutting the lot. He reference the elevation that shows the wall is behind the residence as therefore isn't visible from Hwy 82. There was discussion on the overall height of the wall. Head suggested that it was the decrease in disturbed vegetation that was more significant. Motion: Bob Throm moved that the plan as submitted is acceptable, of less intrusion into the natural site. 0000~~¢ MINUTES of the Pitkin County Baard of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Rick Head asked if there were any objection neighbors. Schaffner responded that there were not. Motion Continued: Rick Head seconded the motion. Members Throm, Head, Cooper, Krabacher, Olsen and Hunt voted unanimously to approve the motion. Ol 5 Boland Marjorie• Lot 5 Block 1 Mountain Vallev Subdivision, AKA 42701 State Hwy 82 Requesting a Major Road setback variance where 100 Feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of a new duplex. Schaffner pointed out that the applicant was not present for the meeting. She stated that there were people from the public present to speak on the application. She suggested that one option the BOA had was to hear the public, in case the applicant were just late, instead of tabling until the next meeting. Krabacher noted his disapproval that the applicant didn't show for tonight's meeting, and noted his sympathy for the neighbors that did take the time to show up. All members present appeared to be in agreement with this. There was discussion on how to appropriately proceed. Krabacher suggested that they simply deny the application and make the applicant come back at a later date. Schaffner pointed out that if they did that the applicant would be unable to bring this application back for a yeaz. Julie Wyckof, an adjacent neighbor, stated that she would just like to go on record and stated that she opposed the application. She also added that there has been no cornmunication between the applicant and the neighbors. Richazd Haberman, azchitectural design committee, was also present for this meeting. He noted that he would be in favor of the application being denied because the applicant didn't show. He also asked if the applicant had had any contact with anyone. Schaffner noted that Stan had called her to let her know she wouldn't be there. Krabacher pointed out that they don't typically approve an application if there aze opposing neighbors. He also noted that he realizes it's difficult for neighbors to keep reappearing for the application. There was further discussion regazding the appropriate process. The members agreed that the application should be tabled. Haberman stated that he had no problem being present for the next meeting and noted that he hadn't seen any additional plans from Stan. Motion: Krabacher moved to table Case 01-5 until next month. Michael Cooper seconded the motion. Throm suggested that they note if the applicant doesn't show the next time the application should be denied. Krabacher accepted the amendment. OODU05 • MINUTES of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Members Krabacher, Cooper, Throm, Olsen, Head and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Ol-6 Pitkin Countv Airport: Aspen/Pitlcin County airport 0233 East Airport Road As en Requesting a 12~ foot Arterial Highway setback vaziance where 200 feet is required from the West Highway 82 right-of--way, for the construction of 18 patio aircraft shelters. Cooper noted a possible conflict with the application in that he is a pilot, flight instructor and owner of 1 /8 of an airplane. He stated that he is unlikely to be a beneficiary of the patio hangers. Cooper stated that he would participate in the discussion but that he wouldn't chair this portion of the meeting or vote. Cooper appointed Olsen as acting, temporary chair. Schaffner summarized the application and pointed out the location where the applicant wishes to place the patio hangers, a portion of which is in the 200-foot setback from the highway. Shaffner noted that the applicant has received approval from the BOCC to place the shelters at a height that will be measured from the new grade. Gary ?, the applicant's representative, stated that the height at the high end (down valley end) of the property is proposed to be 18 feet from the new grade. Gary noted that historically there has been a modification of standazds to allow aircraft to be pazked closer than 400 feet to the runway centerline. With a change in policy the FAA has rescinded that standazd to get everything behind the 400-foot line. He discussed vazious options the applicant considered and stated that this was the least intrusive way of covering the aircraft. Regazding landscaping, Gary stated that they've minimized the structures down to the thinnest dimension possible and angled them slightly towazds the highway. He stated that they've modified the corner several times to provide screening. Shannon? discussed the native shrubs and trees that they've chosen for screening. Head asked why the applicant wasn't using evergreens, which could provide screening all yeaz round. Shannon responded that they've chosen the vegetation that's native to that azea, which is the really dry vegetation such as scrub oak, service berry and sage. She added that the BOCC has asked the applicant to work with Jonathan Lowsky, county wildlife biologist, to come up with a plan that maximized screening and is appropriate to the Eco system. Throm asked if the patio structures were for rent. Gary responded that technically they were for rent. The County has made an arrangement with the local pilots association, which is more like along-term lease. He stated that this isn't a revenue generator; the County is simply trying to recover the cost of putting the structures in. There were no public comments. 00006 MINUTES of the Pitldn County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Motion: Throm moved to approve the application as submitted due to topographic constraints and FAA down zoning. Head seconded the motion. Members Throm, Olsen, Head, Hunt and ICrabacher voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Cooper did not vote. O1 8 Swerslcv David• 4080 Lower River Road Snowmass Requesting a 30-foot front yard setback where 30 feet is required for this .38 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district, for the construction of asingle-family residence. Schaffner summazized the application and noted the location of the site. She stated that the applicant has received 1041 approval. The building envelope is situated on top of the slope and to the front of the property. The applicant must cross the Rio Grande right-of- way to access their property and is requesting a zero lot line for the proposed residence. David?, the applicant's representative, stated that this is a topographic hazdship based on the fact that the 1041 established a building envelope that is zero lot line in the front. The applicant is subject to the county setback for front yazd, which will essentially cut the building envelope in half. They aze asking for relief from the county setback. There were no public comments. Krabacher asked if the setback was a 20 or 30 foot requirement. Schaffner clarified that it is a 30 requirement. Throm asked how lazge the house is. David? responded that it's about 3800 Sq. Ft., conforming to all of the other pazcels on that stretch of the river. He stated that the applicant is constrained by the 100-yeaz flood plane as well as a 50-foot setback that controls where the septic system can be. Krabacher asked if this was a vacant lot. David? responded that it was. He stated that the lot was shaped funny and is angled towazds the middle of the river. He stated that the septic system encroaches more on the building envelope because of this. Motion: Olsen moved to approve based on hazdships relating to 1041 and railroad setback requirements and general site conditions. Throm seconded the motion. Members Olsen, Throm, Cooper, Head, Hunt and Krabacher voted unanimously in favor of the motion. o~fl~~~ • MINUTES of the Pitkiu County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, -- Angela ~shel, Recording Secretary S i3o1 ,ZOOI Date Approved as submitted, Approved with noted changes(s) Michael per, Chair ,tool Date QDUQ~~ March 12, 2001 Tamaza Pregl Aspen Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Variance Application - Encroachmentinto 200' Highway 82 Setback -Pitkin County Airport Patio Shelters Tamara - In accordance with the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Requirement List, this letter is provide to describe why a vaziance is requested to allow for the construction of Patio Shelter Roof Structures within the 200 foot highway setback at the Pitkin County Airport. This application is a follow-up to a variance application made last yeaz that relocated the pazked aircraft to the same location (resolution 00-06) and I believe that the intent to submit this application was discussed at that time. Project Background/Description: In 1998 the Federal Aviation Administration informed the Airport that it was their intent to revoke a modification of standards that had historically allowed aircraft to be parked in areas closer than 400 feet trom the runway centerline. This area within 400 feet of the runway center line is referred to as the Runway Object Free Area (ROFA) and is kept cleaz of obstructions to provide a clear safety area for arriving and departing aircraft. Also in conjunction with this action the distance between the runway centerline and the taxiway center line was also to be increased to meet FAA standazds. The result of these actions was to compress the available area for aircrafr pazking between this ROFA line and the setback line for Highway 82. To accommodate this action a project was undertaken in 2000 to relocate the general aviation aircraft pazking ramp to the east so that all of the locally based private aircraft could be pazked in areas meeting the FAA ROFA standard. This resulted in the easternmost row of aircraft and the airport security/wildlife fence being located within the highway setback. In eazly 2000, land use and vaziance applications were submitted and ultimately approved for these changes. The relocation of the fence has been completed and the construction of the replacement aircraft ramp will be completed in the Spring of 2001. Historically over the years, there have been repeated requests by the local pilot community to develop a program to provide hangazs for the locally based aircrafr. In addition to the maintenance issues related to keeping aircrafr in an uncovered location, there are safety and environmental issues related to the build-up of snow and ice on the aircraft during the winter months and the need to de-ice those aircraft prior to flight. There were concerns about the visual mass of a lazge number of enclosed hangar buildings so it was determined that the construction of carport type patio shelters would be pursued as a alternate solution. 00009 THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C ARCHITECTURE & PROJECT MANAGEMENT ^ 60 West Airport Road, Suite A Aspen, Colorado 8161 I 970 920-6980 Fax 920-6994 email trp(r~sopris.net Tamara Pregl - 3/12/01 -page 2 of 3 Design of the structures was begun in mid 2000. The design philosophy used was to minimize the structure to the greatest extent possible and to step the structure down with the slope that exists on the aircraft ramp. The roofs were also sloped down towazds the highway to reduce the visual mass of the roof plane since a person's angle of view from the highway will be from below the elevation of the structure. The design was submitted for special and scenic review and approval was recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 20'" and approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 28'" of this yeaz. Per the direction of the Community Development Department submission to the Boazd of Adjustment was not made until the project had been reviewed by those entities. The project proposes to construct roof structures, without sidewalls, over 53 of the 88 aircraft tie down locations. This application requests a variance for the eighteen spaces located at the eastern edge of the aircraft parking ramp. At the southern end of the row a maximum setback variance of 62 feet is required. As you move to the north the required variance reduces to approximately 40 feet. Hardship: The location of the airport between the hills to the west and highway 82 on the east results in minimal flat topography available for aircraft operations and associated airport development. FAA regulations with respect to minimum distances between runways and aircraft pazking and between runways and structures further limits azeas for these functions. There are a total of 88 aircraft tie down locations currently approved for locally based aircraft at the airport. Although it would be desirous to cover the majority of those spots, the 35 tie downs located closest to the runway cannot be covered due to their proximity to the runway. Aircraft can be pazked so long as they are no closer than 400 feet from the runway centerline but structures are covered by more stringent regulations. The next double row of 35 aircraft located to the east of the first row are proposed to be covered and do not require a variance since they aze beyond the 200' highway setback. The remaining 18 aircraft in the eastern row all lie within the setback as noted above. Due to the eastern row being a single row it provides some necessary flexibility in accommodating aircraft of different size and type that cannot be accommodated in the double row so covering those spots is extremely important. Although it might have been technically possible to relocate those aircraft outside the setback by continuing the double row ftirther to the north it was determined at the time that the aircraft pazking was approved that the location within the setback would be of lesser impact than extending the pazking ramp another 600 to 800 feet to the north. It also resulted in a more efficient use of the limited land azea since the double and single row both utilize the same access lane. ~DU®~.~ ° THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. ARCHITECTURE & PROJECT MANAGEMENT ~ ^ 60 West Airport Road, Suite A Aspen, Colorado 8161 I 970 920-6980 Fax 920-6994 email trp~sopris.net ,J Tamara Pregl - 3/12/01 -page 3 of 3 Impacts: Although the structures will be visible from Highway 82, various measures have been taken to reduce the visual impact to persons traveling along that route. It is also noted that the roof structures will provide a certain amount of organization to the aircraft that aze already approved to be located within the setback. As noted above, the thickness of the roof structure has been minimized to reduce the visual profile. The eave thickness will be approximately 14" and the total structure depth will be approximately 22". The roofs aze sloped in the same direction as a person's angle of view to also reduce the mass that is perceived. This slope also results in the lowest eave heights being closest to the highway. The roofs are stepped down at regulaz intervals to both keep the height down and to break up the line of the fascia. No lighting is proposed to be installed anywhere on the underside of the roofs so these structures will be dark at night. Finally, a landscaping plan has been developed to provide some level of screening between the highway and the structure locations. A number of cottonwoods groupings aze proposed to be planted adjacent to the highway right-of--way fence. With these located relatively close to the highway, they will provide screening of both the structures and aircraft as one looks up to the aircraft ramp. Behind the cottonwoods on the slope, groupings of sage, serviceberry or similar native plantings will be used to draw your eye away from the structures and will provide some screening of the aircraft. We thank you in advance for your consideration of this application. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely. ~/ .. Gary Ro AlA attachments ooooii THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. ARCHITECTURE & PROJECT MANAGEMENT ~ 60 West Airport Road, Suite A Aspen, Colorado 8161 I 970 920-6980 Paz 920-6994 email trp@sopris.net }toss • From: Peter Van Pelt <peterv@ci.aspen.co.us> To: <trp@sopris.net> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:52 AM Subject: Representation Authorization Gary Please accept this email as your firm's authorization to represent the Aspen/Pitkin County Airport before the Board of Adjustment for the Patio Shelter Application. Should you require any additional expressions of authority, please advise. Peter Peter J. Van Pelt, AAE Aviation Director Aspen /Pitkin County Airport 970.920.5384 ~~0®1~ O L j 11 I ~tt a _~~ ~ ~ _J I ~ ~ 1 m ~~ ~1 _,I ~, I I ~ ~ ~. I I ~'' a\ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~~ ~i ~ ~' ~ v ' 'I I - Z iI I I .. '~'', ~~ a ~ r` I' II~~~ Zvi I d' I ~ .. '' ,; ~,~, ` ~ ~~~ ~ I I ~ , ~ y ~'k P- i 00013 I~ _~ 1 ~ ' I ~., W ~~~, {` =_ Ir.I~I ~ ~~ I~ ~ 1 r , ~ ---~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 '°~~' 1 ~ ,~ al ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ _ ,~ I ~ - '' r ~~ ~~: ~- i l o III w I '' ~ ~ I' I ~ ;,'til = z ~ .L ~' I Q ~ ~1I w ___ I I ? v '~L~ s ~ , ~ 3 ` ~ ~ ~ ~~~ i f IN - ~ I ~ ~ - ~- ~I Q ~ m ° I v ~ 1 ® 0 ~ ~ i ~, ~o ~~ ~[ o Z w Q ~~ } ~ __ ~ ~ rn .~ t6 V ca J O O .i N t6 3 S ~l L 3 a~ } 00001 t i la N N .Q l6 V J N N O Q O L s s s rn O L 3 } 000015 0 0 c o I I ~iS i~~ ~ = I t tip ~ - ~ ~ - ~ x I --------- --- im I -` I ~ I ~ nn~ r C R1 I D D Z7 -1 p I m I I -< D n ( ~ ~ I $ $ 5[ 25 o I l ~ I 1 \ ti A // L -~ / / I PRO6R69 - ]/S/Oi NORTH RAMP THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. PATIO SHELTERS ARC~T6CNRH k PROIBCT WNwGEIIBNT PIT~7 COUNTY 1NtPORT ~~iw°mmw uw ne ri min f ~wu u b b ~ ~ o r. = Q dQ ^^ 1(yJ l l o 7 V .. .? zy o ~. ~+ b 0 ~' 5' oa r s b V n'1 `G C . N d N O O O a b O n 'b b n I 0 N 0 } ~ I ~"~ .I1 ~,,,~_ .; H ~r; ~ MME z ~ ?,.~~°~~ t ~ ~~ y~~ z ~ 1~ ` 4 4.} ti O L e I I m r. ti (J k {III r I ~ ®V ~' ~ E ~ I n ~~ \ \ ~ T ~~ 71i4 - ~ ~~z+ i ~~ ~ ` ~'~=L \~ `~ ice/ \ /// i / \\ / ' '/ i ~ ~ _ J~~ ~ t ~ i ~.. .n ~ ~ ~. I. ~9 ~ ~ _{ ~I ~~ ~ . . ~ I ~ j _,~:.n ~_' I fr !~I' ~_ . I ~ ' 9 4 ~ \ ~ ~~ / `n R 1 J c nI -. L I j' w ~ i ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ p i~g' ''* I , I ~ F' t~ I '~ ~-I ~ I J R'-' 1° ~ ~ i~~~ ~ jl~~'~, ~~- t 1~ `~ `I ~ ! „ ~ ''' ~__ - - ~~- . a z ~~ 1~ y, ' ~i`~ n` _ 1 erg' ~ ~ -~ ~ I e ~ I AJ~„ . x ~ >>.~ ,, _~I ~~ `~ - - ~ ' ~~ -_ ~~= =~ -:g ------~ ~- ---~\ .~ °'~ -,~ " ~_~,= J ~`"~~ i rl~~ ~ ~ 'k.~_ '__ ~ i i \ _~ JP ~ ; F E~ I ~ ~~y ~ ~~ ~ ', ~ ~~ - I I ~' L ~ ~ J ,' r D d Ov ~ Ga r e y i'~ o ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~.s .r A ~ o ~' G II ~ ~ ~~ ~~ v ~ ~ I~ I ~ II )bye I \_ ' I ~~ i I p _ I ~ ~ ~ ~ > 1 \ ~/ C r~ /I 1 k' ~ ~I ~ - ~ ~ -' ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~ -__ ~ r ~ i i ~ ~ ~ . 1 r~ ~ ~\ O 1 Q \ ~ ~ n ~ T .~ \\ ` \-~ r~l •a i~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~ i' _ _ 5 1= J d w Pitkin County Airport Plant List: North Parking Lot (approved 2000), and Patio Shelters (application 2001) Prepared by Shannon Murphy Landscape Architect 2/]2/01 North Parking Lot Plant List (approved 2000) Botanical Name/Item Common Name/Notes n Size Amelanchier alnifolia Servicebe 60 4' BB Amelanchier alnifolia Servicebe 20 #5 Prunus Vir iniana melanoc a Chokeche 20 #5 Attemesia tridentate Mt. Sa ebrush 50 #2 Irri anon Fine radin area disturbed lantin and irri anon Seeding and hydromulch disturbed areas PbSTlO SNP~TF.i~. {'t,s.n(T 1,1ST ~Zmo 1 Botanical Name /Item Common Name /Notes n Size Po ulus an us[ifolia Narrowleaf Cottonwood 20 2" cal Amelanchier alnifolia Servicebe 80 4' BB Amelanchier alnifolia Servicebe 40 k5 Prunus Vir iniana melanocar a Chokeche ~ q0 qj Artemesia tridentate Mt. Sa ebrush 100 M2 Irri a[ion Fine radin area disturbed lantin and irri anon Seeding and hydromulch disturbed areas 000010 i Pitkin County Airport Seed Specification: Disturbed Areas Adjacent to Patio Shelters Prepared by Shannon Murphy Landscape Architect February 12, 2001 901-2.1 SEED The species and application rates of grass, legume, and cover-crop seed furnished shall be those stipulated herein. Seed shall conform to the requirements of Fed. Spec. JJJ-S-181. Seed shall be furnished sepazately or in mixtures in standard containers with the seed name, lot number, net weight, percentages of purity and of germination and hard seed, and percentage of maximum weed seed content cleazly mazked for each kind of seed. The Contractor shall furnish the Engineer duplicate signed copies of a statement by the vendor certifying that each lot of seed has been tested by a recognized laboratory for seed testing within 6 months of date of delivery. This statement shall include: name and address of laboratory, date of test, lot number for each kind of seed, and the results of tests as to name, percentages of purity and of germination, and percentage of weed content for each kind of seed furnished, and in case of a mixture, the proportions of each kind of seed. Seeds shall be applied as follows Western Wheatgrass, Pascopyrum smithii Slender Wheatgrass, Elymus Iriticoides Arizona Fescue, Festuca arizonica Mountain Brome, Bromus marginatus Green Needlegrass, Stipa viridula Mt. Big Sagebrush, Aremisia tridenta[a vaseyana Seed Species PLS/Acre Mixture PLS Rate Min. PLS Min Rate of @ 100% (%) per Acre (%) Application Westem Wheatgrass 15 20% 3 70% 4.3 Slender Wheatgrass 10 20% 2 70% 2.9 Arizona Fescue 6 20% 1.2 70% 1.7 Mountain Brome 15 20% 3 70% 4.3 Green Needlegrass 15 20% 3 70% 4.3 Mt. Big Sagebrush NA NA NA NA 5 Actual minimum rate of application shall be based on the specific seed supplier certification for percentage of PLS (Pure Live Seed) contained in the individual seed types or the mixture. If the PLS is less than 70 percent, the minimum application rate shall increase accordingly. The mix shall contain less than one percent weed seeds total, with NO noxious weed seed content. 00001.9 ~_9 ~ ..... :: -__-0 .I.. ~~ ~ I ~ Cn Y~, 4. I ~. j ' ~ I~ 8 ~ 0j 8 \ f ~~Y ~ ~ ~>Z3I ~ `>2~ _ __ '~ 1 1 ~ Ply _. ~ `' ekg~ O J _l ^ 1y NQ ~ ~\ ~ ,. ,Q. J ~~$ ' ~ '. I 1 ti - I\\ \AO r\ I , I ~ •~ ~~~ 1 Z n 1 ~ / ' n A CT If it ' ,~ I ~ ~ ! I 11 1 1 1 ~ A __~ I~ ~~ 4 ~ 4 ., I.i _ . Lti .~ __ _ .__ , ,- 1_ 1 l~ i a . i~ f ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ . I h ' ~ , 1 ., I 1 ~ I ~ ~ _ ~$~ ~~ i ~__ ~ ~ P ~ € > , 1 ~~ 1 ~ Y'' p _ p In og ~ 1 ~ -~~1 ~\ ~$fe• ~- :~ ,N . ~i 1 I, 1 ~ . I 1~ /: , ~` i ,, ~ I ; L. :' 1 "Ir' ~. _~~ 1 ' _ 1 ;1 1 .'11 1 1 ~ ` ~ ' ' __~ .~. .i_.__ ~`-r.__. _._... _ __.. I F~~ , I ' ~ l 11 1 1 i I 1 t-- 1 n 2 I 1 1 1 " J I ; L ', 4 .I . ~___ . I 1 1 --- I Fi_ ! ~ ~ < 1 1 • --1 ~ I I 1 J, 1 ' J ~-~ L •T \ ~ ~" . ~ ___. .. ~.t... _ _ ...... I 1 I ---~ ~~~ ~ s I In ~ 1 ,, 1 _i ~~ ~ ' ~ I•. r~~ 11 I ' 11 v..a :1 ... !_.. _.. .. _ ...r_.... ..._ ~.._. I ' ~ '.F-- I ' •. 4 ~'N" 4 ai mx ro~ = z L~ \ O 4v ~~ .a~ jl ~n_ \~ i~ of yO vil \~~ o i \o I A i ,, ,- ~~~~ 0 4 o ... o' `~ I ,1 I I~1~ I' • III j$ ~ 1 ~ O 1 a ` `~ a ~! I z !~ _ 1 ,y `~ I 1 r~,'C jA, I I F < I~ ~4 ~. ' ~~ i ~~ • ~^ ~ ~ . ~ y . ~ Y"I .: ` ' y~ o ~ N a ~' ' ' 1 'Im '. ~ '~ ~ \ m 1 ~~ ` I 1 1 ~, i ~~~ \V 1F \ \. \ 1 ip':jlz ~ v o \`b\~~0 11 t ~o >~ 4= :m ~ ;~ N V ~ „ r 1 ~ a P I I c D . ~ I I II -~ x ___ ... . n 1 ~. o ~ a 1 II 1 I I 1 I ' I ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ z 1 I 11 I I / ~ I, I J ~ I i I I _.. ~ , I ~ y \ I ~ I' II 1 ~ 1 xli, I / ~' x 1 ,o 1 ' ~ < 1 1 ~1 1 ~ ~ A 1°~ 1 ~ ro ~ 1 1 11, ~, 1 1 ~, 1 .~ 1, _ _ . ____ _ __ ~ , ,,,111 s 1 1 ,' ~f . _ I I.1111, ~,\ ~ cs.,{ Q ~~ \'., I\ ',\, ~ \ \ x ,\ I 1 1 ~~. 1 1 \ ., \~ ' ` .1~ t _. _.._.._..... __.... .. ...._ __.._.. .._ .. .. ' ~ i. ~ -~ ', ~ I \ 1 ~~ ~: ~ 1~ . I \ ~ e;~ P \ ~ , I i V ' ~ p ~. o 1 ~~, Fa , ~ I ;, ~ i.. _.. `I i __ ~' ~ I 1 1A i i ' •• •.i . t I nntI I 19 1 1 ~ +i I ~ 1 I ~ 1 ~ ~U I ' ~c ~ 1 ~ II ~~ I ~ 1 I I I I ~ a I a ~. 1 1 I :•::•~. . 1 1 ` ~ ~ $~jj '1 '^ 11 h , ~ ' -Di 1 ~~ v R € ~ < 1'. ~ 8~ ~ $ \ 1 1 I ~ K A m , ' \ I , Vim' I~ N~ ~ ~ I ~ { ._ i 1. ~ . ~~.. _.... I I .'.. J •. ~ • . I , 1~ • •.1 •a_ ~ 1 1 t 1'. 1 1; .1 ~ _ r~ I~ I ~- - I , ~` , _ 1 _. A C ~ ` L -1 1 2 zox _z a: b ~h n ', V r ~ ~Q ~.. -'_ -.. -p. \ a ~ O O y'. 1 ~ . Z ~~l r ~ 1 .~ D Z a 0 0 0 n 0 PITKIN COUNTY AII2PORT PATIO SHELTERS -BOARD OF ADNSTMENT Adjacent Property Owners Bidgle LLC 303 E, AABC Aspen, CO 81611 Chill Ltd. 476 Westwood Drive. Denver, CO 80206 James Gordon Trust 900 N. Michigan Ave, # 14th Chicago, IL 60611-1542 Katherine Mc Bride 303 E AABC Aspen, CO 81611 John McBride c!o Petrol Aspen Inc. 121 AABC Aspen, CO 8161 I BMC Holdings Inc. P.O. Box 70006 Boise, ID 83707 Colorado Mountain College District P.O. Box 10001 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Dudley Hawkins 10879 Cnty Road 311 Silt, CO 81652 KN Retail 370 Van Gordon St. Lakewood, CO 80228 John McBride do Stephen McDonald/Thurston 2920 6'" Ave. Denver, CO 80206 Obermeyer Trust do Klaus Obermeyer P.O Box 130 Aspen, CO 81612 Walter Paepeke Life Ins. l-rust c/o Holland and Hart 600 East Main Aspen, CO 81611 Arthur Pfister P.O. Box EE Aspen, CO 81612 Plaza 1 l7 LLC c/o Hanson Cons[. 310 AABC Aspen, CO 81611 Ralph Woodward 105 Woodward Ln. Aspen, CO 81611 ~oV~~1 THE ROSS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. Owl Creek Homeowners Assn. c/o llouglas McPherson 514 F. layman Ave. Aspen, C~) 8161 I Peter Mc Bride Trust do Lester D. Pedicord. Trustee 1720 S. Bellaire Denver, CO 80222 Pioneer Real Estate 2950 S. Havana St. Aurora, CO 80014 Mrs. T. J. Sardy c1o Mrs. Ted Hellums 4946 Woodland Forest Dr Tuscaloosa, FL 35405 • ARCHITECTURE & PROJECT MANAGEMENT • ~~ ~ fin West Airport Road, tiuiic n ~sprn. Colorado R1611 970 920-6980 Pac 920-6994 email 1rp(nlsoprisnet -M ~> o ~~ ~N f -M ~ ~> o ~QU -o - z -M M SHY ~~ F =JH ~Od N ~Wm K e -1 m ~vz ~mm ~mm m ~N~ -gym ~10m ~m -gym -a ~mrc ~ v eo _~ ~~ o -v.. li~;SULI}.iON UN' "1'kir: Y1'1'K11V Cl1U!V'1'Y, C 1...-UKAllI,t BOARD OF ADNSTMENT GRANTING ARTE GHWAY SETBACK VARIANC~OR RELOCATION OF A FENCE EXCEEDING SIX FEET IN HEIGHT, TEMPORARY PARKING FOR CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS' AND THE COMPLETION OF EARTHMOVING FOR THE APRON RELOCATION Resolution No. 00-06 WHEREAS, Pitkin County, owner of the Aspen Pitkin County Airport located at 0233 Airport Road off of Highway 82, is requesting approval of Arterial Highway Setback Variances for relocation of a fence exceeding six ft in height, temporary parking for construction trailers and the completion of earthmoving for the apron relocation; and WHEREAS, 200 feet is the minimum allowed setback from the Highway 82 Right-of Way and 6 feet is the maximum allowed height for a fence within a setback; and ` WHEREAS, the Boazd of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and. WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Boazd of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures. including the notification of all adjoining property owners. has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hazdship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment tc the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment that Arterial Highway Setback Variances be granted for the relocation of a fence exceeding six feet in height, temporary pazking for construction trailers and the completion of earthmoving for the apron relocation as shown on the attached plans (Exhibits " A " & "B"), due to FAA down-zoning. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. y The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Boazd of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin. State of Colorado. DATED: Mazch 7.2000 ATTEST: Tenley T !or, S retary Pitkin Co ty Bo d of Adjustment ~~~~ry7 / / 6v / Paul Rullttick, Chair Pitkin County Board of Adjustment O O O O ~J W ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ f~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~li ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~0~~ 24e033 R40 00ZD00.00~NI0.005PITKIN COUNTYICOI ,_.._. _~ i_ ~ `~, r.. ', i ~~V`1 VJII II ~ ll --- ~f ,'\ ; , l /, li ~ ~ ~\ ~~ --- ,.,q. ~~/ ~ D 1~ Z~ ~~ 1 1 ~ id 1 i _- -' -1 __^- ._ - . I ~ r ~- t~t~ ~I`•`I~~~ - ~ -.b ~ ~ ~ ~( ~~ ~I '. ~ i __ -.._i ____ - ~_ i i _ I i_. °~. II i L~ ~ ~~ l __- N ~~_ . E ~`< w 0 o \ \..\\\ __... __..._ ._.__ .__ ~ 442034 04/06/2000 02:41P RESOLUTI DRVIS SILV O 3 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO N x~~~b~ 1- v,, \ k. ~'~ ~ ~ t \ ~ \y : ~ ~ I I ,~ ~ ~i ~;~~' =_ a I , r. ~ ,t.. ~ ; - i ~- ~; I~ r ~~J ~ ~ ~, ~~ , Y I I• \1 1 I .` ~+7 ' ~' t~ `~ ~~: » ~ ° ~~ -~_ Q -- ;I~ i~j I ; ;, t ~1. ~-_,, ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~' .~.Y I ll ~~ v +~I,, ~ . (1 ~ I~ \~I~\ .r ~ (/ ~II~ I 1~ypFL_I _ _ _I'\I rl~~ \ I ,~1~,, t>; I n °~', ~I-l n ~P 9 \ 7- ~1 \' ~ _ ~, ~~ ,r, _ .I}A i HII ~.II~{.If' ~ ~!~ lY ' I ~' I I I Il.a i .~~ tr - t ' III I~ ~~\ ~ a "~ I t E ® ,i ~ '~ .. I\ 1 ~ I ~\ ~ I r I \ 0~ ~ I ~ I \ 1\ 1 I ~ ~ I 1 ~ '1 O \ \~ly ~f 1~ `_ Y n 11 ~ F ` 2 G I P ~ 1 4 ,4 \ \~L I~ I \,\ ` \ _ _ f 1 f Y `\ I 1 r-, u .: W RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING SCENIC OVERLAY AND SPECIAL REVIEW TO THE PITKIN COUNTY AIIiPORT FOR PATIO SHELTERS Resolution No. - 2001 ~~ D RECITALS l . The Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County ("Applicant"), as owner of the Pitkin County Airport, has applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ("BOCC") for the following approvals: 1) Scenic Overlay and Special Review approval for the construction of covered port strrctures ("patio shelters") over the privately owned aircraft parked on the north ramp area of the airport. 2) Approval to allow the temporary aircraft pazking area approved pursuant to Resolution No. 043 2000 to remain until the patio shelters are constructed This area will provide a location for the temporary relocation of the aircrafr during the construction period. 3) Approval for the location of the 5,000 square foot T-Hanger to be eliminated without eliminating the approval for the square footage. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") at regularly scheduled meetings on February 6, 2001 and February 20, 2001, reviewed the application, and a recommendation of approval was forwarded to the BOCC with conditions. 3. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on February 28, 2001, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 4. The BOCC finds that the Applicant's proposal complies with the Pitkin County Land Use Code and the Airport Layout Plan Update, provided that conditions of this document are adhered to. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grant approval to the Pitkin County Airport for Special Review and Scenic Overlay for Patio Shelters, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Resolutions No. 99-79 and 043-2000 unless otherwise replaced or amended by the conditions of this approval. 2. The Applicant shall receive Board of Adjustment approval for development in the 200' highway setback. 3. The one (1) additional light to be installed on the south end of the middle patio shelter structure shall comply with County lighting standards and be attached to a motion detector system. This light and the 39 lighting fixtures, approved pursuant to Resolution No. 043-2000, shall be on a timer that will completely deactivate between the hours of I ] :30 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. 000025 Resolution No. _- ?001 Page 2 4. The Applicant shall be allowed to maintain the right to construct a T-Hanger limited to a maximum of 5,000 square feet and a maximum of 18 feet to the top of the roof in the future. The ultimate location of the T-Hanger shall be determined through the Special Review and Scenic Overlay Review process. The existing T-Hanger shall be removed, prior to final approval of 5,000 square foot T- Hanger. 5. The temporary parking area north of the apron expansion area shall be maintained until completion of the patio shelter construction. Within 30 days of construction completion, the temporary parking area shall be removed and revegetated. 6. The patio shelters shall not exceed 18' feet in height as measured by the Land Use Code at the time of installation. The patio shelters shall not extend beyond 814 feet in length. The patio shelters shall incorporate earth tone, non-reflective colors. The patio shelter roofs shall be pitched toward State Highway 82. 7. The Applicant shall obtain all required Federal, State, and local permits before he commencement of construction. 8. The Applicant shall comply with all codes and requirements of the Aspen Fire Protection District and applicable NFPA Standards. 9. All material representations made in the application shall be considered conditions of approval, unless amended herein. 10. The Applicant is not required to submit annual reports attesting to conformance with the conditions of this approval, nor is the proposed use required to commence within 12 months of the date of this approval, as would otherwise be required under the Special Review provisions in the Land Use Code. 1 1. Additional vegetation shall be incorporated on the landscaping plan reviewed and approved by the BOCC on February 28, 2001 to provide maximum screening. Any modificatio~u to the plan shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department. 12. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24-68-]O5. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on February 28, 2004. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001. VESTED RIGHTS NOTICE PUBLISHED ON THE DAY OF , 2001. DRAfT 000026 • ~~ Resolution No. _- 2001 Page 3 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Lyndee R. Dean Michael C. Ireland, Clerk to the Board Chair Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John Ely, Cindy Houben, County Attorney Community Development Director Case #P 165-00 264334200851 000027 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: LOCATION OF MEETING: Tuesday, April 3, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Commiccioner's Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspeu, CO Bouton, Garrett: requesting a 29 foot front yard setback variance and a 12 foot East side yard setback variance where 30 feet and IS feet respectively are required to construct a garage on this 31,238 square foot parcel in the R-15-A zone district. Property Description: Lot 75, Mountain Valley Subdivision, AKA 93 Mountain Laurel Ct, Aspen Pitkin County: requesting a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the West Highway 82 right-of-way, for the construction of 18 patio aircraft shelters. Property Description: Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, 0233 East Airport Road, Aspen Swersky, David: requesting a 30 foot front yard setback where 30 feet is required for this .38 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district, for the construction of a single family residence. Property Description: 4080 Lower River Road, Snowmass Submitted to the Aspen Times on March 20, 2001 To Be Published in the Aspen Times on March 24, 2001 OOOU28 -J AGENDA/MEMO PITHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADNSTMENT April 3, 2001 5:15 P.M. Commissioners Meeting Room Pitlcin County Courthouse Old Business Amending BOA case 99-32 (Blechman). New Business Ol-5 Boland, Marjorie: requesting a Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of a new duplex. Property Description: Lot 5, Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision, AKA 42701 State Hwy 82. Ol-6 Pitkin County Airport: requesting a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the West Highway 82 right-of--way, for the construction of 18 patio aircraft shelters. Property Description: Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, 0233 East Airport Road, Aspen Ol-8 Swersky, David: requesting a 30 foot front yard setback where 30 feet is required for this .38 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district, for the construction of a single family residence. Property Description: 4080 Lower River Road, Snowmass Planning and Zoning Conference Minutes Please be prepared to approve or make changes to the following minutes: March 6, 2001 PLEASE CONTACT EZRA LOUTHIS AT 920-5442, IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. 000029 G C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITICIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADNSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OW?tERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 19», as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to gran[ or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: Location of Meeting: Owner: Owner's Address: Property Location: Tuesday, April 3, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Commissioners Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East 1Vfain St., Aspen, CO Pitkin County 0233 E. Airport Rd. Aspen, CO Pitkin County Airport Requesting a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the West Highway 82 right-of--way, for the construction of 18 patio aircraft shelters. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X For inquires please contact Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer, Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen (970) 920-5105. 000030 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 Soutl+ Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 92U-~i090 Pitkin County Land Use: ~~.~OG 172 Board of Adjuahnenl _ 159 ComiLv Land Usc Codc 173 Deposit - - 174 rlal Fee 152 7~ning and Slgn 169 Public Nnlicc - 160 Planning Enlorcerncnl _. Referral Fees: RB115 Access Permit _. LUCO1 Countv Clerk -- 193 County Engineer 194 Environmental Health 198 Hou sink 190 Land Managemcnl - 196 Wildlile Ofliccr _ Building Fees: 170 Board of Appeals 135 Building Code Sales 105 Building Permit 100 Contractor License 120 Electrical Pcrmi[ 195 Encr~V Code Rcvie~w 115 Mechanical Permit 150 Plan Check 110 Plumbing Permit 730 Reinspeclion 151 Aspen Sanitation l52 AVFD sire Marshal Other Fees: 155 Use Tax _ - - 165 Copy - Perlormance Deposit 185 Park Dedlmtion - 186 Parking Cash in Lieu - 166 GIS Maps - IS C;IS Requirements ~_8.8_~-~ --- RB1.16 Road Impact rtes B 1202 Road Impact I'ce / ~ ~.A TOTAL ~0 V" - NAME. ADDRESS/FHOJF.CT CHECKk CASE/Ph:RMIT~~ ^~ ' ~ >f OF COPIES: DATE. INITIAL. _