Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.01.02RESOLUTION OF THE PTTKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD AND COLLECTOR STREET SETBACK VARIANCES FOR TOM LEWIS Resolution No. Ol-2 WHEREAS, Tom Lewis, owner of 112] Red Mountain Rd, is requesting front yard, side yard and Collector Street setback variances, for the construction of a driveway that exceeds 30 inches in height within the setbacks; and, WHEREAS, a 30 foot front yard setback, a 15 foot side yazd setback and a 50 foot collector street setback are required for this .86 acre parcel in the R-30 zone district; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is described as Lot 1-A, Block 3, Red Mountain Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the applicant proposes improvements to an existing driveway pursuant to Boardof County Commissioners (BOCC) resolution 1662000. The applicant is also requesting an alternate driveway alignment that has yet to be approved by the BOCC. If the alternate driveway is approved by the BOCC, the existing driveway will be regraded and revegetated. Both driveways exceed 30 inches in height within the required setbacks. WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 7-10.30, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Boazd of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shownby the applicant. 2. The required hazdship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substantial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boazd of Adjustment, that front yard, side yazd and collector street setback variances be granted for improvements to the existing driveway OR for the construction of the alternate driveway as presented on Exhibits A-C, due to a topographical hardship. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Boazd of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Cdorado. DATED: Apri14, 2001 ATTEST: Ezra Louthis, Secretary Pitkin County Board of Adjustment ~~DUIJl The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado Mich Coop hairperson Pitkin County Board of Adjustment I IIIIII I 454820 IIII IIIIII III 05/25/2001 III III II 08:296 III IIIIIII II RESOLUTI I "III IIII IIII DiiVIS SILVI _, r~^ 1 of 4 R 0.00 D 0. 00 N 0. 00 PITKIN COUNTY CO iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiii~iiuiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiii 454820 05/25/2001 08:29p SOLUTI DRVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO W O /, /~ ~~ 1 !A I )y/ •••) m Z .I // / / / /,~ // i; .I i , ~ / ~/,/ / / / /~ ____ / 1'~ / /// ~r ~~/~~ / / /~~_/ice/P ~i/%/i//// j~~! 7 /' ~~ ~ ~/ // /~/ ~/ /' ~~ ~/~\ , 4 / ~~ ] m ~. ) ;jam J l ~ /// // / _~ / C\ .~ ~ O ~ ~~ ,,~ ~ ~~ %/ ~' ~ i ,~. ~• o v"' o •> / ; ,v/ 0 s / ~' CY ..,-, -., / }. , 0 F RA~RRAi ~p~3~~ oL°~~ ~~~~~b ~~~~~E al; 8~~~a~ 4m ~°~ ~~D~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~~ N 0~~~~~ ~g am 5 R Y moOm Z<r-3 mm JAZZ _cPz ~o~° jm F ~Af~ vIn=r -1 ~ Y 1 ~, I rZ'tO ~ __ n 1', / m m '~, ~,~ •`i ,~ -- I -. ~, L) CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ©~ 610 FA4 HYAW. AVF. A9YfN, CO 81611 • IRE 9]p933-5590 (AR: 9)093P{331 ~~ 303 AWN Si,' SOlif 3l1 • CM9ON[MIf, C0 !1611 Iflf:9)096]-6391 • 3Ai; y]tlY61i)99 330 E COl0RAO0 AVf. • TllIURIOf, [O tl1313 IfLE: 9]ryR9 ]>3tl fAY: 9)p93B-936] • NUS ID1VNp1 VNI.•Gf 91W.11! YUS EgV~MII{CU 91.15 Ill[.9)IYi)G 41Y0 IN: Y)4Ylt 65e5 ~ i~ii-~ ~~i~i iiiii~ iiiii~ iii iiiii ~ii~i-i ~~i~i iiii ~~ii 454820 05/25/2001 08:29q RESOLUTI DgVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO -----------.-.-. PROPERTY LINE ENVELOPE _ _ _ENVELOPE • -. ---- - ~~ ti ^~7~~ ~~ ~~ pp 1~ _ -_ _ _ - PROPERTY LINT -------- ENVELOPE .----.-.-. - I PROPERTY LlN! ~~~ m~~ ~•m k,m mOom o~~ ~~~ ~n f%zv ' ak ~ rol~ ~i~ o~~m ~rn ° ~ ~ F ~rn 4m ~? ~rn m ~ ~ --.-- PROPt/7TY LINE m n p 00 -z h D ~ ~_ ~~ m ..1 ~ r~ g~ ~ ~ ~ a 000003 z i CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCH/TECTS ~© llp fASi NYAIW AVf. A{PEN, CO 1161] t0.F: 9Jp9])-9590 • fAM: 9)p910.1))J SW MUN SC • SDIR 111 GRyONpµf, [O 016ll iD[: 9)090-q91 • Ppf; y)0Y6yf199 ©^ 13f1 E. COIOpADp AVf. • TFIWPIDF, CD OIOE 1flf: 9)gylp-))30 ' iN{: 9NYlID-956) Np! fgVMp9 VIIIAG( IlWrl)I NOS • IpWAN;[O NUI ifl41Jp914f190 • fN.9Jp994[)ll ~~ ~_ m :n --~ X10 454820 05/25/2001 08: RESOLUTI DfiVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ~ , / J~ // ~/~ ~ l~ ~ ~~~ I/ Ill 7` c/ i ~ I I I C I ~ ~~/ ~~~ ~ / /~ // I I ~ ~ ~~ // / / g/ /~ r~ I I I ~~ l 1 I ~ ~ // // //// /I I I / / // I ~, / / / / / I y // / ~I / / ~/ / / I ., / f // t~l ~ /~ / / / ~ II I ~/ i / / /. ~~ ~ 1 / l / / / /.~ // / ~ I / // I // ~ ~/// / /~/ ~' / lll/ 1 / I I //,~~~~/ // l o~N // / //// I / ~ / / / // `gip ~ ~. / / / / / I I ~/ / / / / // ~ / l hl ,\\l / / / ~ ~ l `~ I I I I/ ~/ l/ j ~.~- ~.~ ~l /l=~~1 ~I I I I / / / "PO ~ \ \ 9~+ ~Z'2 1 / ~ U , I II II I I /l //l /l l / / l =y ~ ~~m $ I ~ 1 1 ,, o 1, >~ I I I I I ~~ ~~ ~,~ .i I l r ~ ,~ ~-- -- '~~, I ~~ l i l I I i~ ~~ 1 1y I I I / 11 1 I1 / / / m 1 ~ ~ ~ '1 I I 1 / m / / ~ ~,11 ~ / ~// ~ / `~ X111 11 ~ ~N4~ I ~1~~ ~ V,1 `~ I~ ~ ~~ I I ~, 1 ~,~ /3'I I I ~~ ','y `;Y, I m~ 1 ~. I o I I T r °II 1 '~~~~~ ~I \ ~' y , I ~ I ~ V ~~ I I ~ Pp o ' ~~ ` , ~ ~ T ~~ I I ~ 1° ~~ ; ~ ~° V I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t . ~O1 1 ;y ~1'` I I ~~ 1 I ~ a , ~ 1 ~I~ \ 1 ~ ~ \ ~ i ~ ~ ~. , ~ j~,~j ~ ~ 1 ; ~ l ~, '~ ~. I y ~ 1 ; , ~. ~,I I ~ ,~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1~ ~"` 1 ` 1 ~ , 1 ~. S' ~/ Y / /' / /~ / ,/ j~ i ~ j% i ~a iP ~ ~~ QoY ~"~' G /ip~ ~m f `' ~ ~N ~ ~ i .~~ a «° oF.nn~nnn-n ~m ~ cJ~ o~~ FRP ~ ~~ `so ~.. ~,~ PITHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJiJSTMENT Application Form DATE l ~S /G'/ SASE # O l - a. REPRESENTATIVE ,So~_ s/~1-jyl~o/~,r,~c; pHONE ~p - ~~ MAILING ADDRESS ~, o, /3q~ /gY ` sQ~p,.c/ ~~ ~%~/ OWNER ~~ ~~i~ °~ PHONE -3Df Spa -?/`(`{ MAILING ADDRESS ~~ /~°k / ~}~ .Qs,O>t+, ~d 5!/G/~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY // Z / ,Q~,rJ ~Uci,'b~l ~%J /Ic P~/ ~~. ~/6/, Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of thi: Case. The Board may return this application if it does not contain alt the facts in question. Owner's or Representative's Signature (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forwazd this application to the Board of Adjustment, and reasons for not granting a building permit: Requesting: 3~ 'Front Yazd Setback Variance, where 3d ' is required. 'Rear Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. ~ ~ ' _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ~' is required. ' _ Side Yazd Setback Variance, where ' is required. 'Height Variance, where ' is allowed. Squaze Feet where a maeimtun of _ sq. ft. is allowed. ~ ,~ ` ~" Zone District ;> y I % Lot Size Other: ~, ~l f,~. ~ 5 /~cf i,M, ~ ,~ ~ :i D Application filed ~ 1 b 0 Refer to t~„d, c, Date of Meeting 'a, v ~ Notices Mailed Pazcel ID No. ~ 7 3 ~ ~ (~ ~ y ~~ UU ~ Zoning Official-"~`' ~-t/L Secretary ~ ~d~~~rJ MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Pitkin County Courthouse Members Present: Michael Cooper (Chair) Rick Head Jack Hunt Joe Krabacher Deanna Olsen Bob Throm Members Absent: None Staff Present: Joanna Schaffner, Pitkin County Zoning Officer Angela Rishel, Recording Secretary Cooper called the meeting to order. Old Business: Amending BOA case 99-32 (Blechman) Lot 18, Block 1, Red Mountain Ranch, AKA 0196 Hunter Creek Road Schaffner gave a brief summary of the application, noting the location of the property on Red Mountain. She stated that this application was previously reviewed by the BOA in 1999 for a variance from the 50 foot Collector Street setback. The applicant received approval to exceed 30 inches within the setback for a retaining wall and driveway improvements. The applicant has redesigned the retaining wall to make it less impactive and allow for greater landscaping and the retention of more native vegetation. Schaffner explained to the members that they could require the applicant to make a complete application for public hearing to amend the previous approval, or, if they believe the changes aze minor enough, they could reflect their approval through the minutes of this meeting. She added that in terms of wall design, she felt this to be a minor amendment. The conditions on the site are the same and the BOA had previously found a topographic hardship. Michael Moore, the applicant's representative, referenced a map provided to point out the retaining wall, regrading and the areas that are left undisturbed. He specifically noted the changes in height stating that the wall needed to get higher. Moore stated that they have slightly changed the shape of the wall and brought landscape elements azound to integrate the wall into the landform. He noted that with this concept they aze retaining most of the existing vegetation. He referenced the elevation showing that the wall is behind the residence as that it isn't, therefore, visible from Highway 82. There was discussion on the overall height of the wall. Head suggested that the decrease in disturbed vegetation was more significant than the minor increase in height. Motion: Bob Throm moved that the plan as submitted is acceptable, because of less intrusion into the natural site. Hardship remains topographical. OOOU(?6 MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, April 3, 2001 Rick Head asked if there were any objections from neighbors. Schaffner responded that there were not. Motion Continued: Rick Head seconded the motion. Members Throm, Head, Cooper, Krabacher, Olsen and Hunt voted unanimously to approve the motion. Ol-5 Boland, Marjorie: Lot 5 Block 1 Mountain Valley Subdivision AKA 42701 State Hwy 82 The applicant is requesting a Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of a new duplex. Schaffner pointed out that the applicant was not present for the meeting. She stated that there were people from the public present to speak on the application. She suggested that one option the BOA had was to hear the public, in case the applicant was just late, instead of tabling until the next meeting. Krabacher noted his disapproval that the applicant didn't show for tonight's meeting, and noted his sympathy for the neighbors that did take the time to show up. All members present appeared to be in agreement with this. There was discussion on how to appropriately proceed. Krabacher suggested that they simply deny the application and make the applicant come back at a later date. Schaffner pointed out that if they did that the applicant would be unable to bring this application back for a year. Julie Wyckof, an adjacent neighbor, stated that she would just like to go on record and stated that she opposed the application. She also added that there has been no communication between the applicant and the neighbors. Richard Haberman, from the Mountain Valley architectural design committee, was also present for this meeting. He noted that he would be in favor of the application being denied because the applicant didn't show. He also asked if the applicant had had any contact with anyone. Schaffner noted that Stan had called her to let her know he wouldn't be there. Krabacher pointed out that they don't typically approve an application if there are opposing neighbors. He also noted that he realizes it's difficult for neighbors to keep reappearing for the application. It was felt that applications shouldn't be repeatedly continued. There was further discussion regarding the appropriate process. The members agreed that the application should be tabled. Haberman stated that he had no problem being present for the next meeting and noted that he hadn't seen any additional plans from Stan. OOOU07 • MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, April 3, 2001 Motion: Krabacher moved to table Case Ol-5 until next month. Michael Cooper seconded the motion. Throm suggested that they note if the applicant doesn't show the next time the application should be denied. Krabacher accepted the amendment. Members Krabacher, Cooper, Throm, Olsen, Head and Hunt voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Ol-6 Pitkin County Airport• Aspen/Pitkin County airport 0233 East Airport Road Aspen The applicant is requesting a 125 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the West Highway 82 right-of--way, for the construction of 18 patio aircraft shelters. Cooper noted a possible conflict with the application in that he is a pilot, flight instructor and 1/8 owner of an airplane. He stated that he is unlikely to be a beneficiary of the patio hangers. Cooper stated that he would participate in the discussion but that he wouldn't Chair this portion of the meeting or vote. Cooper appointed Olsen as acting, temporary Chair. Schaffner summarized the application and pointed out the location where the applicant wishes to place the patio hangers, a portion of which is in the 200-foot setback from the highway. Shaffner noted that the applicant has received approval from the BOCC to place the shelters at a height that will be measured from the new grade. Typically, the height of structures is measured to the most restrictive grade. The grade on this site was significantly raised with the extension of the apron. Gary Ross, the applicant's representative, stated that the height at the high end (down valley end) of the property is proposed to be 18 feet from the new grade. Gary noted that historically there has been a modification of standazds to allow aircraft to be parked closer than 400 feet to the runway centerline. With a change in policy the FAA has rescinded that standard to get everything behind the 400-foot line. He discussed various options the applicant considered and stated that this was the least intrusive way of covering the aircraft. Regarding landscaping, Gary stated that they've minimized the structures down to the thinnest dimension possible and angled them slightly towards the highway. He stated that they've modified the corner several times to provide screening. Shannon Murphy discussed the native shrubs and trees that were approved by the BOCC for screening. Head asked why the applicant wasn't using evergreens, which could provide screening all year round. Shannon responded that they've chosen the vegetation that's native to that area, which is the really dry vegetation such as scrub oak, serviceberry and sage. She added that the BOCC has asked the applicant to work with Jonathan Lowsky, County wildlife biologist, to come up with a plan that maximized screening and is appropriate to the Eco system. 00000$ • MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 Throm asked if the patio structures were for rent. Gary responded that technically they were for rent. The County has made an arrangement with the local pilots association, which is more like along-term lease. He stated that this isn't a revenue generator; the County is simply trying to recover the cost of putting the structures in. There were no public comments. Motion: Throm moved to approve the application as submitted due to topographic constraints and FAA down zoning. Head seconded the motion. Members Throm, Olsen, Head, Hunt and Krabacher voted unanimously in favor of the motion. Cooper did not vote. 01-8 Swerskv, David: 4080 Lower River Road Snowmass The applicant is requesting a 30-foot front yard setback variance where 30 feet is required for this .38 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district, for the construction of asingle-family residence. Schaffner summarized the application and noted the location of the site. She stated that the applicant has received 1041 approval. The building envelope is situated on top of the slope and to the front of the property. The applicant must cross the Rio Grande right-of- way to access their property and is requesting a zero lot line for the proposed residence. David Swersky and his representative, David Panico, were present. Panico stated that this is a topographic hazdship based on the fact that the 1041 established a building envelope that has a zero lot line in the front. The applicant is subject to the County's 30 foot front yard setback requirement, which, if applied, will essentially cut the building envelope in half. There were no public comments Throm asked how lazge the proposed house will be. Swersky responded that it's about 3800 square feet, and that it is consistent with all of the other pazcels on that stretch of the river. He stated that the site is constrained by the 100-yeaz flood plane as well as a 50 foot setback that controls where the septic system can be. I{rabacher asked if this was a vacant lot. David Panico responded that it was. He stated that the lot had a funny shape and that it is angled towazds the middle of the river. He stated that the septic system encroaches more into the building envelope because of this. Motion: Olsen moved to approve the variance request based on hardships relating to 1041 and railroad setback requirements and general site conditions. Throm seconded the motion. Members Olsen, Throm, Cooper, Head, Hunt and Krabacher voted unanimously in favor of the motion. OODU09 MINUTES • of the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment Tuesday, Apri13, 2001 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Angela 'shel, Recording Secretazy S i3d1 ,cool Date Approved as submitted, Approved with noted changes(s) Michael per, Chair ~/~ ,ZOOI Date 000010 CHARDS CGNNIFFE ARCHITECTS fiI0 E IiYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 TEL 9%0 • 925 • 5590 EXECUTIVE FAX 9]0 • 925 • 50]6 ARCIi1TECTURAL FAX 9]0 • 925 •455] W W W.CUNNIFFE.COM January 16, 2001 Lewis Residence 1121 Red Mountain Drive Variance Request: ~^ ~© CIIARI.ES L. CUNNQ"PE. AU PRINCIPAL/CEO fANVER C. DERRINGTON, AIA PRINCIPAL Applicant requests permission to exceed 30" maximum cut along driveway as shown on accompanying plan view and section drawings. This variance request is necessitated as the existing grades of the driveway right of way relative to the grades of the approved building envelope are excessive and impose hardship in interfacing the building and the vehicular access. Legal Description: The property is addressed at 1121 Red Mountain Road and is referred to as Lot 1-A, Block 3, Red Mountain Subdivision. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS o ~ Q ~ i ~• ~EN CARBONDALE TELLURIDE VAiL NOU-.28-200~J 10:45A FP.OM~ C Rond Tr1:925~?77 P:2~10 ' I (11111 Ilill 11111111111 11111 illl 111111 III 11111 II11 IIII 419111 ii/ /2816 03:47P RE'SOLUTI DRV35 52LNI 1'ef ®R 0.80 D 6.80 N 0.66 PITILIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COiJN1'y COMMISSTONE138 OF PITKIlV COGT'TX, COIARADO, PARTl4LLY DENYRYG AND PARTIALLY APPROVING THE DIMATTE0IROND DEVELOPI4IENT CO1~A~~IY, LP A]?'P$AL OF A BBARLNG OFFICER DETERMIPTATlON Resoluiian No. (~ 2000 RECITALS 1. AJMatteeBaad Dev~lopmmnt Company, LP ("Appellant") has applied !ti the Board of Coumy Commissiauere (`BOCC") to appeal a Hearing 4f&cer Deterrrrinatian pursuant to Seadtme 3-300.020, 4-160 and 5-210 of thoI.and Use Code f~ the foUawing trasons: A. The Hearing 015cer's determination of `Sninor" 30% slopes. The Lead Use Code doe9 sot define "miner", therefore rho Appellant rnaiatEias that the Hearing Offxccr has no standards to snide his determination of "arirrot"; H. Tire changes made by the Aeariag OlHcer to the proposed bwldiag eavekrpe av part of Determination No. 22-2000; and C. Tire Land Use Cade Section 3.80-OSO(Cx2) allows developmem on slopes in excess of 30% whrn "the slope is due to the'presence of s minor nafarral arman-ptado chmrge in the gradi®t of a continuous slope." Tire Appellsrzt asserts that the w!ttd " taiaor" modifies the wend "natural" not "man-macid' end disagrees with taro Hearing Officer's dotermiaalion chat rho term "minor" modifies both natural and man.mada slaps, 2. The property is addressed at 1121 Red 1ldouutain Road and is referred to as Lot 1-A, Block 3, ]Zed Mountain Subdivision. 3. The Hearing Officer g<mded 1041 Hazard Review, Concepntal 9rrbmisaion and Scsmio Overlay Review agpr~val to rice property an 7uly 18, 2000, pursuant m Hearing Officer Determination No_ 222000 recorded as ]iteoeQdon No. 446771, 4. The $OCC heard the appeal at a regular meeting on Oetober 25, 2000, at which dine evrdeou and teatim~y were proseoted with respect to the application. S. Tho $OCC has made the following 5ndings with respect to the Appellant's appear A. The building envelope shall be podified to avoid development oa etry "natural" 30°i6 slopos; B• The modified building envelope which contains slopes that have been idenfified as "man-msde" 30% slopes may be disbubed_ The BOCC finds that theme slopes are due to a minor man-made change in the gradient of a continuous underlying natural slope and the proposed disturbance of these slopes will not cause instability or increase the potential of slope L§thrrm; C. Tire ward "minor" is meant to modlt~ both "natural" and "man-made' slopos. D. The driveway as proposed by dre Appellant is inappropriate~and dre existing driveway stroll he utilized; £. The Appellant shall seek Beard oP Adjustment approval for reIinf for arty setback variances required; F. The building envelope shall be modified as deoidod upon at the October 25, 2000 mooting; and 000012 NW-27-2000 MON 04: 11PM ZD:D 8 C Bond• • Pfa(~:2 NCV-F~-26796 10:49R FFCM:~ C Bond rvv, tr. Euuu ~, i[rnl rl Inrn Resolution No./66-1000 Page 2 TC:~253977 F:'~16 ~VUIVI 1 UICRR RIUVIlVII! ~ .~ Irv. J4 i~_i ~ ~!` IIIIf(ii(II tl((II liilll ({III 11(t 111ii1 lil Itlll IIII IIII 448215 22/Y7/2000 03r47P RlOOI.UTI OgV18 SSLVI 2 a{' 0 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 pITKIN COUNTY Co NON, THEREFORE, BP 1T RESpLVBjy try the BOCC that it hereby partially dcniea and partially app;oyes the Di MatteolBaad Developme~ Compaay, LP appeal of the Hearing Officer Determination, enbjact to the following conditivxis, which shall rue with the land atSd be binding aln all sueceseors In interest i. The Appellant shall comply with the provisions of Hearing Officer Dtkmminatiou No. 22-2000 (Exhibit A) ttnIesa othmviae replaced yr stncnded by the conditions of this approval. 2. Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications, the Applicant shall record a 24 X 36 inch mylsr lOdi Hazard Review Site plea in accordance with Section 570-040 of the Laad Use Code and es amended by the BOCC at the October 25, 2000, regular meeGog in accordance with Exhibit B. 3, Development of 30 inches above or below grade within tare required property setbacks rnquin:s approval of a variaace bythe Board ofAdjuatrneat, iacludiag driveways. , 4. Stahttary vested rights for the approval corttaiaed herein are granted pursuaat to the pitkin Couaty Land Uao Coda mtd Colorado Statutes, subject tb th. exr.,eptiona set fn:th in Firkin CwrrtY Land'~G`ae Codo, § 4-140 and CR,S., § 24-68-105• The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire am October 25, 2003. APPROVIt,D va the 25m day of Oetabor, 2000,, V &' ~'~ /~%R/MT.Y•HdT)C~ Qp~/,/,r~GD ~ ~>~P•t'T/•dleS O/~/ D d~ ~ pp~, ATTEST; e R Dean C et9t to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jobe ~~ ~'~ unry Attorney Case #P58-00 273706304001 000013 ~~ BOARD OF COUN'T'Y COMNIISSIONEIiS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO C 9bellie Roy , Chair Date; // ~ 2~' -Av APPROVED A9 TO CONTENT: p1 ,22. ~ Cindy Houbeq Community Development Director i _~ t_1_ -_ ._~ _-- _• __- __.--_-__-.__ LEWIS RES/DENCE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ff11 mo usr Fle.4N•vE • .lvw,m mm~ Fee 9m9ss.ss9o • rw 99o91ous9 O 1 fi O ~ ~ ~ 501 MVN Si.' AIIFE 3l] • f:V9gipy( (p mfiS3 •1EIF:9T19fi3.619a' FK 9)p36}fi)99 V 1131 RED MOUNiNN flp. 3M E cOlOgaOp ~w. • 1FLLVUpE CO nfi35 • iF1E; 9]Mtba]Je • FAV: 9N'nB-95fi1 ASPEN, CO opt wv!m F+1.Sx uw,m aws ~ wvw5. m mm raz. rmn...~ .. .............. ~^ ©© 0 0 0 k'~ v7 Cl~ ~m 0 - -o Z .~ ~ - - I / /~ ~~ ~ ~~ ; i %% %~ ,~ 9tl /i // ~ /~ / /~ ~ ~/ a~ /~ ~~' ~a ~%" a / i~/ i% ' / / i ~/ ~~/ii ~~/ i ~i `~ i i ~D~ ~~~"`y ~ ~ i~~ ~ i ~ tip, aye ~ i~ , _ ~~ ~° ~~ ~ ~~ i ~ _ s ~/ ~~~~~i O~~i ~~ ~ ~i ~ ~ / ~/ / ~ / ~ ~i I / / -' / / / ~~~~ / / /~~ // j~ / j-' ~~ j~j ~ jai ,~/ ~i ~ it ~ ~/ /~ % ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ a' ~ ~~i~ I( l ~,~ ~ I I~ i '~~ ~ / i ~ i 'j / i i / ~% ~• ~ ~ ~~ •.~~~ ;% m yry;`~' x 5 > ~a~ ~ /' ~~~~ / ~ % • a/ ~ m~ SM %~ , S c m m w' ~ ~I ~ ~;.. J °~~RN,°~ ~ ~ ~o~mmm N~~om~ mm"m'~~§ g $ie^ 1~'~~ ~~~mAi 3 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ° IV m /~. ~~ j ~ ~ ~ / ~ o ~ I /.~ ~ ~/ /,~ 2 ~ 092 /, ~ ~~, ~~ 0, „\ 21 ~ o~ ~d ,'~ od CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 FAST HUMAN AVE. • ASPEN, CO 81611 • TELE: 9]0926-5590 " FAX: 9]0920-0657 502 MAIN SL • SUITE 232 ' GRBONDAIE, CO 87623 • TELE: 970963fi394 • FAX: 970963-6399 220 E. COLORADO AVE. • TELLURIDE, CO 81435 'TELE: 970728-3]38 ' FA%: 97NR8-95fi7 N06 FDWAR06 VILLAGE BLVD., SlE A206 ' EDWARD6, CO 81435 ' TEIF: 9)ry92fi-fi590 ' fA%: 9)p936-fi525 O O O C F-" i .. ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPERTY LINE ENVELOPE _ -ENVELOPE __ _ _ _ PROPERTY LINE _ _ _ I~~Y ~- _ _ ENVELOPE i• ~~~ m~~ ~;rn ~,rn ~n ~In ~~ zm oc~n mac`"„ ~° ~° 1 #~ ~rn ~,- 0 PROPERTY LINE m C7 O z / PROPERTY LINE ~~ ~~ ~ ~I~ "SIN ~~n din ~, ~ ~' ~ o~ (~ m ~m 0 m n ~_ O z g _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° O ° m ~ ° ~ ~ . r ~ ~ i ° - i i CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 FAST HYMAN AVE. ' ASPEN, CO 81611 • TELE: 970928-5590 • FAX: 97p420-4557 502 MNN ST.' SURE 232 • GRBONDALE, CO 81623 'TELE: 970963394 • FA%: 970963fi399 220 E. COLORADO AVE' TELLURIDE, CO 87435 •TELE 97M2B 3738 ' FA%: 97ry729-9567 0105 EDWABOS VILLAGE 9LVO., STE A209 EOWgROS, CO 91435 'TELE: 9)09266590 FA%: 970916-6525 .rn nw ..~..,.:: of ...~.,.. , lTa..u DCA•Cr 1 1 LrCiif A iTi'i• l1Ti 1~TATiI"ryp O_ n+'1~iYAill Vl' 1\V 11VL \lf. T 1\R ~ ii \,~T!'~ Tiii]OiT • I<,TT T!'~ ~ ,~~ P1A~UL\V 1 Ul~0UA1\1 13 State of Co12!'?ii^_ 1 PTTKnv r(1TTNTV T.nN_Il iTCL' COLE: SE4`TiON ~ f! T~ ` "~ ""' °" s ,being or representing an Applicant to the P~[Irin County Iaevelopment Permit, persvnahy certiky that I have campiied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 4.90 of the Pitkin County Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at least 30 days prior to the public hearing to all owners of property adjacent to the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the -day of 200__ (which is days prior to the public hearing date of __ ). 'Ihe names and addresses of the adjacent property owners shalt be those on the current tax records of Fiiiciu Coruiiy aS iiiey appeared uv utorc iitauuv" uays privr iv iiie public iiearind. 2. 13y posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest pub/li~c way) and that said sign was posted and visible continuously froth the l7 day of 7'r ~ , 200(to the~_day of i7i?~M/,~ 200 (Nlust be posted for at least fifteen (15) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attacheld hereft-o. /, e....i.,.~.>s ^.ame rr•-- Signa*.ure (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this~day of 2001by I ~l~m~0 cs, r WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIBi)?,•SI_rAI:•,"•; ~~, `_ My commission expires:_ ~j- ~. o" ~~ n 1 1, ^ ~~, , No Public - ; • ,,., o Public's Signa re 000017 N O N bA RS a o~~~~~ O M a ti 0 0 U d .~' c~ 0000~.~ = U~ II ~4 m 0 -O z ~~ // ~// ?~/ i ~~ // ~ /, ~/ // as ~i~ / i ~~ -;~ a ~ ~/ !~ / %/ / / i i / / /~ - o~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~ /i 0 /~ ~i /~ ~, , / / /r ti~~ 4° ~/, // j ~ - ~ ~// / // 0~ / ~ '~// '/ // ~~ ~ ~~ ,,, ~/ I_-~ / / / , / /l' I /// / // / i / ~ ~ // ~ ~~/~~/ /~/~///~~/~~ /~ ~ / ,iii ? / / //-J j~/~ o//°/ ~ /i/ // ' / / / ~ / p3/ I I II I ~L~ ~1 /~ , _~ ~I~ ~I ~•/ / / /// // ~ / _DO ' \~j / ~ / T /' ~ ,~ (~ . a . ~~ i %/ ~ ~ a m~ ~ ~~ %% mn r~/ ~ I E / ~ o• ~/. ~_ ~tl T / / O ~ida f / d' /pad A ~ / m~ / $m S n a 33gR33 t~N~~o mm~~imm ~o>o~~~ cmm~t~ n ~mim~$ w ~~~~s~ 90 / ~, a ~D~ O N o -DI m ~ X01 D _ o ~ H ~ n 00(l~l~~ ~•/ ~o ~' 2 / ~; >< `~ ~ / / / / / •. r ~l~ GnVI~ m O O_ m m1~*1rD m~zz ;i1 D Z G r=O ~ Z N ,~ O ~ ~;O~D -~ r ..N=r 0= rz*I O (7 m rT O / ~ // / ~~'~~J// //• ~., /~ / ~,,... / ' 4 `.. tl'005 ~y O~ ~ ~~yS .~14~py d~~ (~0~ ~,~ ~d 241 ~~ ~~\ ` / ~ ~~ ~d0 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 FAST HYMAN AVE. " ASPEN, CO 81611 " TELE: 9]0925-5590 ' FAX: 9]0920-055] 502 MAIN ST.' SUITE 232 " GRBONDALF, CO 81623 "TELE: 9Ip963-6394 • FAX: 910963-6399 220 E. COLORA00 AVE. " TELLURIDE, CO 87435 'TELE: 970?18-3738 • FAX: 970728-9567 0105 EDWAROS VIDAGF BlVO., STE A]05 • EDWARDS, CO 81435 • TEIF: 9J09P6-6590 • FAX: 9J092fifi525 ._____________ _ _ PROPERTY LINE ENVELOPE ENVELOPE CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS _ _ _ _ _ENVELOPE r i ~iV; ~\i O~ ~~ ~~rn Z'rn ~I~ ~I~ I~ ~rn ~rn m_ I 0 D ~i o O PROPERTY LINE O o m o ~ . ~ ~ o ~ ~ N ~ ~ o H n ~ o ooUV4~1 _ PROPERTY LINE / I -- PROPERTY LINE __._._ ~'W f~CO mOOm z~r=~ T -UI ~ S'CI' v A A Z ~ P z O n~ n l v° f F ~I rn ~ Z V ~ i g L ~~ O m I o a ~ C m rn rn ~ ~ °' ~~m\) II ~ / op -z g 610 FAST HYMAN AVE. • ASPEN, CO 81611 TELE: 970925-5590 ' FAX: 9]p920-4557 502 MAIN ST.' SUITE 232 • GRBONDALE, CO 87623 'TELE: 970963-8394 • FA%: 9709fi3-6399 220 E. COLORADO AVE. • TELLURIDE, CO 81435 "TELE: 9 7042 8-3 73 8 " FAX: 97p?Le-9567 0105 EDWARD9 VIDAGE BIVD., STE A205 ` EDWARD9, CD 91435 `TELE: 9)ry916-6590 • FAC: 9)p9346525 1-16-281 4:3-PM ROM LEWIS PROPERTY INV_ 3859 ;1333 ll. ~®R7Yb~.~" it ~• d1tQ'i~S4~711~ -~ ~ ~ ~y-,~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ .-~r;~ ~f °~~~ 00002 P. 1 8925 SW 148th Street, Suite 218 • Miami, FI, 33176 • 305/969-1444 • Fax: 3 051969-1 3 3 3 R8C8~1`%8d T~I(nA J2fl•16• ~;4~PMiil:lewislwnecrus.netc • i AGENDA/MEMO PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT March 6, 2001 5:15 P.M. Commissioners Meeting Room Pitltin County Courthouse New Business Ol-2 Lewis, Tom: requesting a Collector Street setback variance where 50 feet is required from theRed Mountain Road right-of-way, and front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 15 feet respectively are required for this 37,480 square foot parcel in the R-30 zone district. Property Description: Lot 1-A, Block 3, Revised Red Mountain Subdivision, aka 1121 Red Mountain Road Ol-3 Andersen, Chris: requesting a 70 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required from the Brush Creek Road right-of-way, for the construction of a driveway that exceeds 30 inches in height within the setback of this 35+ acre parcel in the AFIt 10 zone district. Property Description: 0800 Brush Creek Road Ol-4 Hosier, Gerald: requesting a Collector Street setback variance where 50 feet is required from the Red Mountain Road right-of--way, and a front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required, to construct a second story addition to an existing three-car garage on this 31.7 acre parcel in the AFR-10 zone district. Property Description: 2020 Red Mountain Road Ol-5 Boland, Marjorie: requesting a Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is required from the East Highway 82 right-of--way for the construction of a new duplex. Property Description: Lot 5, Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision, AKA 42701 State Hwy 82 Minutes Please be prepazed to approve or make changes to the following minutes: January 4, 2001 PLEASE CONTACT EZRA LOUTHIS AT 920-5442, IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. 000024 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PI TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED By~E ~ UNTY BO QUESTED ONINGAVgJRIgNCENT DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Zorrin be held to consider an a g Resolution of June 5, 1955, variance from PPlication filed with the said Board as ended, a Public Hearin the provrsrons of the Coun of Adjustment requestin g will All persons affected b ~' zOnrng Resolution. g authority for or objections. If ou ca Y ilre Proposed variance are invited to a letter, particular) yif snot appear personally at such meetin , pPear and state their views, protests, Y you have objection to such variance, g then You are urged to state your views by consideration to the opinions of surroundin as the Board of grant or den g property owners and others affected ~trtent wrll give serious Q~S~ynthe request for variance. A VARIANCE GREATER m deciding whether to ~ COULD BE GRANTED. THAN OR LESS THAN THAI. DATE AND TIIVIE OF MEETING: LOCATION OF MEETING: Tuesday March 6, 2001; 5:15 P.M, Connnissioner's Meeting Room Pitldn County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspen, CO Andersen, Chris; requestin from the Brush g a 70 foot Arterial Highway setback variance where 200 feet is required height within the setback of this 35t+ acre ~ for the construction of a drivewa Property Description: 0800 Brush Creek Roadelin the Y that exceeds 30 inches in AFR-10 zone district. Bouton, Garrett; requesting a 29 foot front variance where 30 feet and IS feet respectively atesrequired to~oe foot parcel in the and a 12 foot East side yard setback R-IS-A zone district. trstruct a garage on this 31,238 square Property Description: Lot 75, Mountain Valley Subdivision, AKA 93 Mountain Laurel Ct Hosier, Gerald: requesting a Collector Street setback variance where 50 feet is required from Mountain Road right-of--way, and a front yard setback variance where 100 feet is required, to construct a second story addition to an existin the Red Property Description: 2020 Red g three-car garage on this 31.7 acre Mountain Road Parcel in the AFR-10 zone district, Lewis, Tom: requesting a Collector Street setback variance where 50 feet is required from Mountain Road right-of--way, and front respectively are required for this 37,480 square foot par el intthe R 30 zone distr cue 30 feet the Red Property Description: Lot 1-A, and 15 feet Road Block 3, Revised Red Mountain Subdivision aka 1121 Red Mountain Marjorie S. Boland Estate: requestin the East Highway 82 right-of-wa 8 a Major Road setback variance where 100 feet is re Property Description: Lot 5 Y for the construction of a new duplex. quired from Block 1, Mountain Valley Subdivision, AKq 42701 State Highway g2 ~~ou„nea to the Aspen Tunes on Febma To Be Published in the As rY 20, 2001 pen Times on February 2q 2001 OOOOv5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be held to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed vaziance are invited to appeaz and state then views, protests or objections. If you cannot appeaz personally at such meeting, then you aze urged to state your views by letter, particulazly if you have objection to such variance, as the Boazd of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether [o grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: March 6, 2001; 5:15 P.M. Location of Meeting: Commissioners Meeting Room Pitkin County Courthouse 506 East Main St., Aspen, CO Owner: Lewis, Tom Subject Property: 1121 Red Mountain Rd., Aspen, CO 81611 Requesting a Collector Street setback variance where 50 feet is required from the Red Mountain Road right-of-way, and front and side yard setback variances where 30 feet and 15 feet respectively are required for this 37,480 square foot parcel in the R-30 zone district. VARIANCES GREATER OR LESS THAN REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X For inquires please contact Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer, Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen (970) 920-5105. 000026 ~`' 0 0 c r.~ i v ~~ v, 2 `` < ~ ~ / / / ~ / ~ ~ U~ / / / / ~ I I / ' N co i / ~ / 1 ~ I /~ // / /~ ~~ / l I / / // i / / ~ /~ ~ i// I ~~ // /// /// ~ ~ / / / / ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~~~~ // ~/ // I II / / / / ~ ~ / / / ~~I ~ ~ / / , ~ ~ / / / ~ / ~ •.~ ~ ~ ~~~j I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \\ ~~ \, ---1 ,~ ' I ~ \ \\ ~ ~ :~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~i ~1 rm 14,1 , I 1 / ~ / ~`~, ~ ~~1 ~ r ~ ,~ 1~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 1 `, ~ ,11` I I N I 1 z 4 1 I I ~ I ,~ ,,~ X41/) I I ~~ ,, 1~ 1 I I 16'-0' DQae,Oa^I ~~ 1~ ~ 1 /~I ~ I g, m1 ` , y ~$ I I I Ism ~~ `11 I dal ~o~ \ N ' ~ ~ ~~~~, I ~~ P~~ o ~ 1 g l ~ ,., ` 1 I I ~~9 m 0 ~~ ~ ~ 1 `~ y1~ 1 ~m 1 t m 1~ I I i4 1 0 , t ~ ,~I 1 ~~, ' 1 ,1 ~~ ,1 I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~i 11 ~ I ~ I , 1 , ~'~ ,1 11}~~ ~ i 1 ~ ,~ I I~ 1 1,I 1, I (,1 ~ ~` /, ~ 1 ~ ,1~_ ~, , / ~_ ti ,~ / / / ~ / / ~ / r~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~lI ~ /~ / I i~ / / / / ~~ t / ~ 1 / /~ ~ ~ l l // ~// //i /~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ / / ~ / / / // a ~, ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 1) / 2~ 1 ~ , ~N v \.;~ ~ 'ROPERTY LINE ENVELOPE ENVELOPE PROPERTY !WE _ _ _, _ENVE(OPE \PROPE RIY LINE - --- - = r ~~~ m a A ~ ~n R _~ ~n vp~F z,rn `~~.. ~ V I 7 ~~ ~ ~ ICS m ;R1 'ROPERTY LINE ~_ m ~~ c~ . -~ z W OOOU48 8 ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~~ o ~ ~$ 0l0 Dz D CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 FAST HYAW! AVf. ASPEN, CO 81611 TfLF:9]p921-1590 iNf: 9]6910.955) 503 MAIN BT.• SURE 333 • LeR90NDALf, CO 81611 • TFlf: 9)q%3~fi199 • fA5:9]p9fi1-6199 120 E. COL00.9D0 AVE.• TELLURIDE, CO 81935 • TELE: 916T16-3)30 • FA%: 9)6]28-956) Yi05 FOWMpS VIWLE B1W~51[ AEpS • F~N'AILS. CO 91919 •iFlf:9)p91F6F90 ' F.V1: 9109F6i5FF SEL99 [60(6'AY3 . W599I6OL6'9131 • SLYIB W'RInMg3 . 50ry 31['Ml! 3~JYIIIA LptlYMpl LOb LBB6-BZ(~p(6 ~ri3 BE(F-BZGO(6 ~3A1 . SE618 OJ'3OMLIT31 .3AY OOYYOIOJ 3 OLL 66ETf96O(b ~MY3. Y6E¢C96O[63131 . f[9W OJ'31YON(RNYJ. ZfL 3LOB .'1E NMV LBS (b5Y-BL6O[b ~W3 0655-SI6O[6 3131 R91B W'N3ASV . '3AY NVWAN lA3 Ol9 S1~31/HJ?JV 31~1NN~7~ S37?JVH~ i ~~ _N ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ a N r~.~ 666 ~W~~~a g~~~~~ g,a~~a 6/ 4°'^ y ~Y~YddY~ / /~ ~ ~&&:7b fit. -,,. ~ ,:,~: .. w ~ /' I- w ~ ¢ m U ~ ~ S 5 OO Wy£Y~ / . ~-Lea a ~, s ; 33or ~+, i Nz~ % o a WW O ~ ~d>z / ~ ` .p woow Le v3o> ~ ,%~ ~ ~ r` / a ~ v3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ / / /` ~y5 ~ r - a ~ ~ n~,i,r. / , 1, ~ /. 4 /" /, / ~ ~ / ~ eti~ //~/iii ~~ _~ ~ ~~)jl~l I '%_>'~,~i//l~ 'Wz /~/ / / / /~ / / / ,~_i ~ , / / I~. / / /I/ / / // / // / /: i i i i / ~_~____ / I I __ / / / i ~ i ~ ~ Ao / / ~ I ~ // ~ / ~ ~ / / / i, i / / / ~ , - - -ice /~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ i ~ ~ / r / i i , r Qz ~ ~ bb ~~" Q / // / ,/ yy ~~~ w ~ ~, ~~~~ ~ / 000029 COMMUNITY`DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 Sout~i Galena Street Aspen, C ~ lnra&~. 8161 1 (970i 930 51190 Pitki><t County Land Use: 172 Board of Ad~uslmcnF ~~ ' ~U 159 Cmmty Land Us~~ Code _ _ _ ]7a Dcposil __ 174 Fla( Fee __ 162 7~ning and Sign _ _ 169 Public Notice __ 160 Planning Enforcemvnl. Referral Fees: RBl 15 Access F'ermil _ I,UCO1 County Clerk 198 County F;nginccr _ _ 194 Environmental Hrallh ~~ 19A Housing _ 190 Land Managemcul _ _ _ 196 Wildlife Oflicer Building Fees: 170 Board of Appeals __ 135 Building Code Sales _ 105 Building Permit ~ _ ~~ 100 Cnnlraclor License __ _ 120 Electrical I'ennit _ I95 Ener,gV Code Review _ ~ ~ ~~ 115 Mechanical Perrnil _ ___ 150 Pian Check _ 110 Plumbing Pcrmi( ~ _- _ 130 12einspection _ 151 Aspen Sanitation 152 AVF'D Fire Maishul Other Fees: 155 Usi~ Tax _ ]65 Copy I'erlormance Deposit _ _ _-~~ - ItiS Park Dedication -~ 186 Parking Cash in Lieu 166 GIS Maps _ -~ ~ ~- IS GIS Requirements RBI 16 Road Impact Fces B1202 Road Impact Fce __ TOTAL ~ OO -'-`~- NAME. A6DRES5/PR(7J3('T~ t1HF;CKq -~ -- -. CASE/PERMI'1'q~_, kn['('.OPIEti. DA'FE::~` _ INITIAL. .-.-:f-_ _. -