Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.246327200004DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (llxl'~ PAt~EE.~'? 2463-272-00-004 DAT~.FiGVO: ~- tCpP~$; OASE 15A-66 ~. Pattison 1041 Hazard Review PLNR: r"'~"-`r-""~ ' PJ'R 6315 Hwy 133 1 . Pettison Jeannie ~~.-`°" ~Z:~ ,7-^~- AU_OG4TF7'f Nf1I IGC~~~ °o ~~~: ._ DWE:~......... OATE''Cd~` 'AL1i0N; ~ 7/26/1986 $Clt~Flrasa: 86-73 W. 8OO0Ord: ~~`-" Pz: (`~ HRC ar-F: ~- HOINDEX: ~`~"- ADM1N: ~- PLA'1"REiHp~~~~` PLAT (9K,POj,J"" ADMNN INDEX: ~--.~`.- ~~1'P: '~ 1041 Hazard Review CA$E7Ypr~; . 1, _,. .. .~~~ ~ . .., +':. :~ $s~nnedl ~`~`~" ~la/os . ~ ~ .:,.:~:-.;ct:::~ •r.,?x:`'~ .:':_,'~`;': '- Ffp! ~ FFBox144 :• t S r <:`, :',> . r+ ... . -..~'-' } ' ,.. MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Conrad FROM: Glenn Horn RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review DATE: May 26, 1988 ________________=====Ghd.~~'an nis =_______________________________ I talked with a lady seeking a recorded 1041 hazard review plat for the Pattison 1041. This approval was granted in 1986. We did not begin to require 1041 plats until the spring of 1987. Therefore, the resolution of approval is the only basis for memorializing the 1041 approval. Please call me if you have questions. Attached is a copy of the resolution. 000001 0-~' yp RESOLOTION OF THE BOARD OF COONTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVING THE PATTISON 1041 SPECIAL REVIEW FOR FLOODPLAIN Ah'D THE RIP.1IRIAN ZONE Resolution No. 86- 73 WHEREAS, Ms. Jennie Patti son, (hereinafter "Applicant") has made application with the Pitkin County Board of County Commis- sinners {hereinafter "Board") for a 1041 Special Review for floodplain and riparian zone on a 10 acre piece of property more specifically described on Exhibit "A" in order. to build a single- family home; and WHEREAS, on June 3 1986 the Pitkin County Planning Commis- sion reviewed said application and recommended approval to the Board; and WHEREAS, the Eoard found the application to be ;n compliance with Section 5-400 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code regarding 1041 special review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED that the Board hereby grants the Pattison 1041 Hazard Review approval subject to the follaving conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall: a. Obtain a well permit from the Division of Water Resources; b. Any landscaping to be installed shall be in accordance with the Section 8, Roadway I,ar.dscaping Guidelines, in the 1985 PitY.in Ceurty Road Standards and Specifications, wi~ich will shield (not screen) the home from Higlaaay 133; and c. An engineered septic system shall be approved by the County Environmental Health Gffice. d. A fisherman's easement five {5) feet above the high water line on the west boundary o£ the OOU002 • Crystal River shall be dedicated to Pitkin County for public access to the .stream s. 2. The driveway rust be upgraded to conform to the 1985 Pitkin County Road Standards and Specifications. APPROVED by the Eoard at its regular meeting on July 28, 1986. ATT Lev Scanlon, Deputy County BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PTTRIN CO hTY, COLORADO Y- Clerk len K. R1 derud, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO E'ORM: _~ T mas F. Smith, County Attorney CFI.715 RECOMI~iENDED FOR APPROVAL: J ' Alan P.ichman, Planning and Develo~ent Director ~~~.Ufl~ ~~a_l p.2sc'rtpt.l.ovt... A tract of land situated in Lots 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 of Section 27, Township 8 South, Range 88 west of the 6th principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, lying easterly of and adjacent to the Easterly right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway No. 133, southerly of and adjacent to the Southerly bank of Thompson Creek, and westerly of the centerline of the Crystal River, said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of said Highway No. 133 whence the Southwest Corner of said Lot 4 b=ars S 02°59'54" W 10.10 feet and West 367.40 feet; thence N 03°23'00" E 400.83 feet afnng said Easterly right-of-way line to a point on the South- erly bank of said Thompson Creek; thence along said Southerly bank on the following courses: 5 74°53'00" E 63.74 feet; thence S 89°06'00" E 114.90 feet; thence N 76°24'00" E 184.80 feet; thence S 87°06'00" E 1S7.20 feet; thence N 50°41'00" E 111.70 feet; thence N 14°27' 00" E 73.10 feet; thence N 45`48'00" E 186.08 feet; thence N 87°05'00" E 120.70 feet; thence leaving said Southerly bank on a course bearing East for 50.00 feet (record dis- ' Lance) 40.82 (calculated distance) to the center of said Crystal River; thence along the centerline of said Crystal River on the following cnurses:_ S 05°27'00" W 439.20 feet (record distance) 447.6b (calculated distance); thence S 11°19'19" E 67.30 feet; thence S 12°53'00" W 196.00 feet; thence leaving said centerline of the Crystal River on a course bearing S O1°32'53" E 6.48 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Lot 3 (also being the Northeast Corner of said Let 3); thence S 00°28'57" E 5.00 feet along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 8; thence N 89°35'22" W 708.29 feet; thence North 17.57 feet; *.hence S 89°40'54" W 195.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 10.63 acres more or less. ;~;. 0.00004 CASELOAD SOMl4ARY SHEET (~ y /~ ~ PITRIN COONTY DATE RECEIV ED• `'%' kC DATE RECEIVED//,,C/OMPLETE: ~~// PROJECT NAME~~EI~IC~I~a''~)'~ ~C~V~ l~l'?7Y1!~I:~ fl~~l,=~.1 ~ APPLICANT: l/. ^ /' fi ' ~ Applicant Address Phone:fi'~'~ a ~~. 'r REPRES EN TATIV E ~ ~~~~~~"I O~~ - ~i!~~`) Representative Address/Phone: Type of Application:~~'"~~~~~~~1~1~-~ ~~U~C(~~ ~ Unl~ I. GMP/Subdivision/PUD 1. General Submission 20 2. Detailed Submission 13 3. Final Plat 5 II. Subdivision/PUD 1. General Submission 13 2. Detailed Submission 10 3. Final Plat 5 III. All "Two Step" Applications ,~ 9 IV. All "One Step" Applications 5 V. Referral Fees - Environmental i Health, Housing, Engineering Environmental Coordinator $z,E3oo.o0 1,820.00 700.00 $1,680.00 1,400.00 700.00 $1,260.00 700.00 1. Minor Applications 2 (per Referral Agency) 2. Major Applications (per Referral Agency) 5 ~ ~~'`~~- 27- C ~~ --GC'~ E P70. !! STAFF: ___ $ 50.00 $ 125.00 '~~ ~l _______________________________________________°-_________________- ~~~~"7 P& BOCC MEETING DATE: Su"`-t.3 PUBLIC HEA I YES NO DATE REFERRED• a ______________________ P.EFERRALS: ____________ _____INITIALS - -- -------------- - -- ---------------- // County P.tty County Engr Aspen Consol. S. D. _ Mt School District Housing Dir. n. Bell Envir. Coordinator Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas Aspen Water Cit Ele t i Eloly Cross Electric _ State Hwy Dept (Glenwd) State Hwy Dept (Gr.Jtn) y c r c Envir. Hlth. Fire Marshall Fire Chief Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn County Mgr. Snowmass Village Colo. GeologicSurvey US FS Div. Wildlife FAA ~ Mt So ris Soil P Trails Dir State Planning Off. Div. Water Resources Water Conservation Bd. _ . Other: __ Other: __ Roaring Fork Energy Center FINAL ROUTING: -____ ____ 7N ITIAL - County Atty Housing Director County Engineer __ Building Dept. Other:~~(~~~ Envir. Eiealth Envir. Coordtr. Other: I MEMORANDUM T0: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office ~ / RE: Pattison 1041 Floodplain and Ripari(((an Hazard Review Parcel ID#2463-27-00-004 DATE: July 14, 1986 REQUEST: 1041 Special Review APPLICANT: Jennie Pattison LOCATION: Located approximately 4.5 miles south of Carbondale in the Crystal River Valley bordering the south side of Thompson Creek and the west bank of the Crystal River. SITS DATA: The site is 10.63 acres and is currently vacant pasture land. ZONING: RS-30 PUD HISTORY: The Planning Commission reviewed the Pattison application on June 3, 1986. REFERRAL COMMENTS: 1. County Engineer: A memo dated that the applicant has received a Colorado Department of Highways. applicant's driveway must comply Standards and Specifications and be requested. 5/28/86 from Tom Newland notes driveway access permit from the Mr. Newland also notes that the vith the 1985 Pit kin County Road a Fisherman's Easemenet should 2. Division of Water Resources: In a letter dated 5/22/86, the Division indicated that there would not be any problem with the issuance of a well permit for the Pattison parcel for domestic in-house use only, however, a condiiton of issuance of the well is proof that an evaporative type waste water system well not be used. 3. Environmental Health - In an attached memo dated 5/23/86, Bob Nelson comments on the following two issues: a. Water Supply - The proposed water source is a well which has a strong likelihood of being developed on site and which ~~DOQ~ meets the supply and quality standards. b. Sewage Disposal - The site probably has a high water table which makes the construction of a sewage disposal system difficult. An alternative system is an elevated mound which is expensive and will require site specific engineering. Mr. Nelson recommends designating an area of the building envelope for the construction of the system. This area should be the highest area of the lot. STAFF CO!lMEPTS 1. The applicant has submitted a map of the parcel designating the building envelope, access and setbacks. The building envelope is totally outside of the 100 year floodplain and within the setbacks for the RS-30 PUD zone district. The applicant commits to no structures or decks being built on or extending into the floodplain. 2. The building envelope is also outside of the riparian zone along the Crystal River and Thompson Creek. 3. The proposed building envelope is highly visible from State Highway 133. There is little vegetation other than several cottonwoods to the northeast of the building envelope. The Planning Office suggests that a condition of approval be that the applicants provide landscaping which will shield (not screen) the view of the house from State Highway 133. This landscaping should be done in compliance with the landscaping guidelines developed for the State Highway 82 Corridor (see attachment). 4. Since the parcel is along two (2) waterways, the Planning Office suggests that a Fisherman's Easement of five (5) feet above the high water line be granted to the County along the south side of Thompson Creek and the west side of the Crystal River. RECOMlIENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Floodplain and Riparian 1041 Hazard Special Review with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall: a. Obtain a well permit from the Division of water Resources; b. Any landscaping to be installed shall be in accordance with the Section 8, Roadway Landscaping Guidelines, in the 1985 Pitkin County Road Standards and Specifications, which will shield (not screen) the home from Highway 133; and c. An engineered septic system shall be approved by the County Environmental Health Office. OODU07 d. The Planning Commission requests that the applicant grant a note on the plat shall indicate that a fisherman's easement five (5) feet above the high water line on the south side of Thompson Creek and the west boundary of the Cry stal River shall be dedicated to Pitkin County for public access to the streams. 2. Prior to issuance of a Resolution of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan map to the Planning Office. This map shall be approved by the Planning Office and then filed in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. The site plan shall include: a. Building Envelope; b. Access; c. Floodpl ain boundary; d. Setbacks; e. Septic location; f. A vicinity map; g. The plat shall be titled Pattison 1041 Floodplain and Riparian Zone Sepcial Review and shall include a blank for the number of the Resolution approving the special review (e.g., Approved pursuant to Resolution No. 86-). 3. The driveway must be upgraded to conform to the 1985 Pitkin County Road Standards and Specifications. CH.10 3 ooaoas r SECTION VII ROADWAY LAN DSCAPI9G GUIDELINES 1,01 General Policies. Roadway landscape design shall relate directly to the areas through which [he roadway passes, including the composition and arrangement of all of the elements in the space along the route. To accomplish this, Pitkin County requires detailed landscape plans for all roads proposed for County acceptance. Existing County roads affected by new development shall be improved functionally and aesthetically at the developer's expense. 02 Design Criteria. Roadway landscape design incorporates every aspect of planning and design processes from establishing goals before route selection to completed working drawings showing planting design and material selection to construction supervision. The design elements, other Chan the road itself, include route selection, landform, planting design and material selection, structures, and maintenance. Each of these elements must be carefully examined with regard to safety, economy, and aesthetics. 03 Route Selection. The primary consideration in route selection is [he safe and expeditious movement of people from one point to another, but social, economic, and environmental factors must be considered. Route selection should be based on the capabilities of the land to support the roadway and on providing the best [raveling conditions for the people it serves. It should provide sufficient right-of-way for proper landscaping between curb lines and adjacent private property. Right-of-way widths should very to avoid the "tunnel" effect common to all linear elements. 04 Landform. The roadway should compliment rather than detract from the existing landform. Sensitive grading can mesh the roadway with surrounding land. Sever embankments and cuts should be avoided and slope tops and feet should be rounded to establish a more natural appearance. Special grading effects should be used to emphasize scenic views or deemphasize unattractive areas. Varying the vertical alignment of opposing traffic lanes of a divided roadway increases safety while affording creative landscape treatments. JS Existing Features. All existing features should be studies in terms of the total roadway setting. These features include existing vegetation, walls and fences, ODOOD9 building and vistas. Some features can be used to enchance the roadway design, such as an existing stand of mature trees or interesting buildings. Other features may need to be screened from view such as industrial storage areas, or construction areas. Preservation of natural features and plant growth is a prime objective. Additional tree planting or use of hedges can aid screening where required. Safety Features. Planting design should consider the speed at which the vehicle will be traveling along the roadway. High speed sections should have larger groups of plants to avoid confusion and maintain continuity. The use of a few selected plant varieties is more desirable than the use of many. Smaller plants are best where speeds are lower and, therefore, visual Impact more pronounced, such as near intersections. Dense median strip planting should be Introduced on curves to block the glare of oncoming headlights. at night. On straight-sways, medians should be planted with trees and ground cover, avoiding shrub usage. The ultimate growth of plan[ materials chosen should be in scale with the stretch of roadway and the environ- ment in which they appear. This is especially important with regards to sight distance at intersections. Planting Design. In order for a road to be a linking element within a community, it should have a continuity of character. Basic planting patterns and similar plant materials should be used throughout the length of the route. This does not preclude adapting certain areas of the route to different ecological zones in order to conform to existing conditions. Urban, suburban, rural, and wild areas along the route would call for very different landscape treatments although basic materials would remain the same. Plant Selection. Plants to be introduced must be horitculturally appropriate; that is, they should have proven themselves adaptable to the climate and soil and specific sun and shade conditions of the designated area. 9owever, overemphasis should not be placed on using native or naturalized plants. While they often have the advantage of being draught resistant and relatively maintenance free, [he exclusion of new plants with the same qualities severaly restricts the designer ability to select from the broadest range of plan[ materials. Plants selected are expected to be healthy, vigorous, and pest free. Plant material should be draught resistant, heat and exhaust fume tolerant, not soil sensitive, and preferably fast growing, although the dysigner must recognize the advantage of both fast and slow growing plants and choose accordingly. Tree planting should be primarily deciduous to blend with Che natural environ- ment and provide adequate sight distance and view plans. Recommended Plant Llst Trees Creek b River Bottoms Colorado Blue Spruce Douglas Fir Narrowleaf Cottonwood Aspen Ponderosa PSne Lodgepole PSne Rocky Mountain Maple IG 000010 Trees (Cont'd) Sage Flats Scrub Oak Western Juniper Irrigation Ditches Narrowleaf Cottonwood Aspen Douglas Fir North Slope Douglas Fir Ponderosa Pine Y.odgepoie Pine Aspen Shrubs ~. -+z_. _, ,, South Slope Western Juniper Pinyon Pine Scrub Oak Amelanchier alnifolia - Serviceberry Artemesia frigida - Fringed Sage Artemesia tridentata 'Vaseyana' - Mountain Sage Cercocarpus mountanus - Mountain Mahogony Purshia tridentata - Antelope bitterbrush Seeding Seed Varie[ Western Wheatgrass Slender Wheatgrass Green Needlegrass Upland Bluegrass Aard Fescue Creeping Red Fescue Troy b Bluegrass Mountain Sage Antelope Bitterbrush Wildflowers X By Weight 25X 25X 6-1/4X 3-1/8X 9-3/SX 9-3/SX s-1/BX 6-1/4X 6-1/4X 6-1/4X LOOX i~ G 000011 MSMORANDOM TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Planning Engineer RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review DATE: May 28, 1986 I have reviewed the application submitted by the Ms. Patiison and Ms. Rindall and would like to forward to you the following comments: Impacts on County Road System: The parcel of land is accessed by a rudimentary driveway that already exists for agriculutural use. Being connected to State Highway 133, the increase in traffic anticipated from the new residential unit will not directly effect the county road system. A permit for access has been applied for by the applicant and has been approved by the Colorado Department of Highways. Driveway Design: Because of the current condition of the present driveway, it should be upgraded for residential use. Therefore the application should be approved conditional on compliance with county driveway standards. These standards can be found in the 1965 Pitkin County Road StandardG and Soec~fications, and are available through this office. County Trails System: A fisherman's easement should be requested of the applicant for public recreational use. This easement should cover the length of the Crystal River and measure five (5) feet from the high water level. 00001? ~~ M E M O R A N D U M To: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health DATE: May 23, 1986 RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review This department has for compliance with local requirements, Land Use Code under review comments for proposal: 1. WATER SUPPLY reviewed the recently forwarded application Colorado Department of Health Regulations, snd those specifications in the Pitkin County our jurisdiction. We present the following your consideration regarding the referenced While there is no groundwater report submitted, the proximity to Thompson Creek and the Crystal River has led us to the conclusion that there is a strong likelihood that a well can be successfully developed in the alluvium underlying the site, and that there is a good probability that a water supply of sufficient quantity and satisfactory quality can be constructed. SEWAGE DISPOSAL The site is subject to periodic high water and most probably a high water table which makes the construction of a sewage disposal system difficult. The alternative, given a prohibition of the evaporative type systems by the Division of Water Resour- ces, is an elevated mound. These types of systems are expensive, and require site-specific engineering, but do comply to current county regulations. Minimum setback distances for all sewage disposal system components can be expected to be meet. The applicant would be wise to designate a specific area of the building envelope for wastewater disposal system construction to minimize the flood hazard and set aside the highest area of the lot for the mound system. QQ~~~1•) 1.' Y RICHARD D. LAMM Governor 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 !~_ Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 -' May 22, 1986 Ms. Francis Krizmanich Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 JERIS A. DANIEISON State Engineer I, ~l~~ Re: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review SE1/4 NWl/4, Sec. 27, T8S, R88W Dear Ms. Krizmanich: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal. It appears that a 10.63 acre tract was created from a 13.29 acre parcel. Our records do not show a well on the 10.63 acre tract. A well permit will be made available for the 10.63 acre tract if a well is not on the property. This well permit will be limited to use inside one single-family dwelling only. Outside use for lawn and garden irrigation or livestock is prohibited. Plat notes and covenants should reflect this limitation. The applicant should provide proof that an evaporative wastewater system will not be required. We could not issue the well permit if any evaporative system is required. Prospective lot purchasers should be made aware of the limitations on water use and other information contained in this letter. We recommend that a copy of this letter be given to lot purchasers and submitted with the well permit application. Sincerely, ~o~ ,~- Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Deputy State Engineer HDS/JCM:ma/7708H cc: Orlyn Bell, Div. Eng. Steve Lautenschlager ~UU~1/x OF.CO~ Fe~ ,~ N ~~* '~ X876 ~` OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office RE: Pattison 1041 Floodplain and Riparian Hazard Review Parcel ID02463-27-00-004 DATE: June 3, 1986 REQUEST: 1041 Special Review APPLICANT: Jennie Pattison LOCATION: Located approximately 4 Crystal River Valley bordering the the west bank of the Crystal River. 5 miles south of Carbondale in the south side of Thompson Creek and SITE DATA: The site is 10.63 acres and is currently vacant pasture land. ZONING: RS-30 PUD RSPERRAL COMMENTS: 1. County Engineer: A memo dated that the applicant has received a Colorado Department of Highways. applicant's driveway must comply Standards and Specifications and be requested. 5/28/86 from Tom Newland notes driveway access permit from the Mr. Newland also notes that the with the 1985 Pitkin County Road a Fisherman's Easemenet should 2. Division of Water Resources: At the time this memorandum was written, we had not received a written response from the Division of water Resources. However, in a phone conversation with Jim Hall on 5/28/86, he indicated that there would not be any problem with the issuance of a well permit for the Pattison parcel. 3. Environmental Health - In an attached memo dated 5/23/86, Bob Nelson comments on the following two issues: a. Water Supply - The proposed water source is a well which has a strong likelihood of being developed on site and which meets the supply and quality standards. b. Sewage Disposal - The site probably has a high water table which makes the construction of a sewage disposal system difficult. An alternative system is an elevated mound which ODUU1 is expensive and will require site specific engineering. Mr. Nelson recommends designating an area of the building envelope for the construction of the system. This area should be the highest area of the lot. STAFF COMMENTS: 1. The applicant has submitted a map of the parcel designating the building envelope, access and setbacks. The building envelope is totally outside of the 100 year floodplain and within the setbacks for the RS-30 PUD zone district. The applicant commits to no structures or decks being built on or extending into the floodplain. 2. The building envelope is also outside of the riparian zone along the Crystal River and Thompson Creek. 3. The proposed building envelope is highly visible from State Highway 133. There is little vegetation other than several cottonwoods to the northeast of the building envelope. The Planning Office suggests that a condition of approval be that the applicants provide landscaping which will shield (not screen) the view of the house from State Highway 133. This landscaping should be done in compliance with the landscaping guidelines developed for the State Highway 82 Corridor (see attachment). 4. Since the parcel is along two (2) waterways, the Planning Office suggests that a Fisherman's Easement of five (5) feet above the high water line be granted to the County along the south side of Thompson Creek and the west side of the Crystal River. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Floodplain and Riparian 1041 Hazard Special Review with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall: a. Obtain a well permit from the Division of Water Resources; b. Submit a landscaping plan in accordance with the Section 8, Roadway Landscaping Guidelines in the 1985 Pftkin County Road Standards and Specifications, which will shield (not screen) the home from Highway 133; and An engineered septic system shall be approved by the County Environmental Health Office. Prior to issuance of a Resolution of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan map to the Planning Office. This map shall be approved by the Planning Office and then filed in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. The site plan shall include: 2 000010 a. Building Envelope; b. Access; c. Floodplain boundary; d. Setbacks; e. Septic location; f. A vicinity map; g. A note on the plat shall indicate that a fisherman's easement five (5) feet above the high water line on the south side of Thompson Creek and the west boundary of the Crystal River shall be dedicated to Pit kin County for public access to the streams; and h. The plat shall be titled Patti son 1041 Floodplain and Riparian Zone Special Review and shall include a blank for the number of the Resolution approving the Special Review (e. g., Approved pursuant to Resolution No. 86-__). 3. The driveway must be upgraded to conform to the 1985 Pitkin County Road Standards and Specifications. CH.10 3 00001 "' SECTION VII ROADWAY LANDSCAP LIG GUIDELINES 17.01 General Policies. Roadway landscape design shall relate directly to the areas through which the roadway passes, including the composition and arrangement of all of the elements in the space along the route. To accomplish this, Pitkin County requires detailed landscape plans for all roads proposed for County acceptance. Existing County roads affected by new development shall be improved functionally and aesthetically at the developer's expense. 02 Design Criteria. Roadway landscape design incorporates every aspect of planning and design processes from establishing goals before route selection to completed working drawings showing planting design and material selection to construction supervision. The design elements, other than the road itself, include route selection, landform, planting design and material selection, structures, and maintenance. Each of these elements must be carefully examined with regard to safety, economy, and aesthetics. P.03 1.04 I•os Route Selection. The primary consideration in route selection is the safe and expeditious movement of people from one point to another, but social, economic, and environmental factors must be considered. Route selection should be based on the capabilities of the land to support the roadway and on providing the best traveling conditions for the people it serves. It should provide sufficient right-of-way for proper landscaping between curb lines and adjacent private property. Right-of-way widths should very Co avoid the "tunnel" effect common to all linear elements. Landform. The zoadway should compliment rather than detract from the existing landform. Sensitive grading can mesh the roadway with surrounding land. Sever embankments and cuts should be avoided and slope tops and feet should be rounded to establish a more natural appearance. Special grading effects should be used to emphasize scenic views or deemphaslze unattractive areas. Varying the vertical alignment of opposing traffic lanes of a divided roadway increases safety while affording creative landscape treatments. Existing Features. All existing features should be studies in terms of the total roadway setting. These features include existing vegetation, walls and fences, G 000018 building and vistas. Some features can be used to enchance the roadway design, such as an existing stand of mature trees or interesting buildings. Other features may need to be screened from view such as industrial storage areas, or construction areas. Preservation of natural features and plant growth is a prime objective. Additional tree planting or use of hedges can aid screening where required. Safety Features. Planting design should consider the speed at which the vehicle will be traveling along the roadway. High speed sections should have larger groups of plants to avoid confusion and maintain continuity. The use of a few selected plant varieties is more desirable than the use of many. Smaller plants are best where speeds are lower and, therefore, visual impact more pronounced, such as near intersections. Dense median strip planting should be introduced on curves to block the glare of oncoming headlights at night. On straight-sways, medians should be planted with trees and ground cover, avoiding shrub usage. The ultimate growth of plant materials chosen should be in scale with the stretch of roadway and the environ- ment in which they appear. This is especially important with regards to sight distance at intersections. Planting Design. In order for a road to be a linking element within a community, it should have a continuity of character. Basic planting patterns and similar plant materials should be used throughout the length of the route. This does not preclude adapting certain areas of the route to different ecological zones in order to conform to existing conditions. Urban, suburban, rural, and wild areas along the route would call for very different landscape treatments although basic materials would remain the same. Plant Selection. Plants to be introduced must be horitculturally appropriate; that is, they should have proven themselves adaptable to the climate and soil and specific sun and shade conditions of the designated area. 9owever, overemphasis should not be placed on using native or naturalized plants. While they often have the advantage of being draught resistant and relatively maintenance free, the exclusion of new plants with the same qualities severaly restricts the designer ability to select from the broadest range of plant materials. Plants selected are expected to be healthy, vigorous, and pest free. Plant material should be draught resistant, heat and exhaust fume tolerant, not soil sensitive, and preferably fast growing, although the dysigner must recognize the advantage of both fast and slow growing plants and choose accordingly. Tree planting should be primarily deciduous to blend with the natural environ- ment and provide adequate sight distance and view plans. Recommended Plant List Trees Creek & River Bottoms Colorado Blue Spruce Douglas Fir Narrowleaf Cottonwood Aspen Ponderosa Pine Lodgepole Pine Rocky Mountain Maple Q~UU19 Trees (Cont'd) Sage Flats Scrub Oak Western Juniper Irrigation Ditches Narrowleaf Cottonwood Aspen Douglas Fir North Slope South Slope Douglas Fir '.destern Juniper Ponderosa Pine Pinyon Pine I.odgepole Pine Scrub Oak Aspen Shrubs Amelanchier alnifolia - Serviceberry Artemesia frigida - Fringed Sage Artemesia tridentata 'Vaseyana' - Mountain Sage Cercocarpus mountanus - Mountain Mahogony Purshia tridentata - Antelope bitterbrush Seeding Seed Variety Western Wheatgrass Slender Wheatgrass Green Needlegrass Upland Bluegrass Hard Fescue Creeping Red Fescue Troy b Bluegrass Mountain Sage Antelope Bitterbrush Wildflowers % By Weight 25% 25% 6-1/4% 3-1/8% 9-3/8Y. 9-3/8% 3-1/8% 6-1/4% 6-1/4X 6-1/4% 100% oooo.~o MSMORARDDM T0: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Planning Engineer RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review DATE: May 28, 1986 I have reviewed the application submitted by the Ms. Pattison and Ms. Rindall and would like to forward to you the following comments: Impacts on County Road System: a rudimentary driveway that use. Being connected to St traffic anticipated from th directly effect the county ro been applied for by the appl' The parcel of land is accessed by already exists for agriculutural ate Highway 133, the increase in e new residential unit will not ad system. A permit for access has scant and has been approved by the Colorado Department of Highways. Driveway Design: Because of the driveway, it should be upgraded fo application should be approved county driveway standards. Thes availa s office. current conditio r residential us conditional on e standards can n of the present e. Therefore,the compliance with be found in the itions, and are County Trails System: A fisherman's easement should be requested of the applicant for public recreational use. This easement should cover the length of the Crystal River and measure five (5) feet from the high water level. 000021 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health DATE: May 23, 1986 RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review This department has for compliance with local requirements, Land Use Code under review comments for proposal: WATER SUPPLY reviewed the recently forwarded application Colorado Department of Health Regulations, end those specifications in the Pitkin County our jurisdiction. We present the following your consideration regarding the referenced while there is no groundwater report submitted, the proximity to Thompson Creek and the Crystal River has led us to the conclusion that there is a strong likelihood that a well can be successfully developed in the alluvium underlying the site, and that there is a good probability that a water supply of sufficient quantity and satisfactory quality can be constructed. SEWAGE DISPOSAL The site is subject to periodic high water and most probably a high water table which makes the construction of a sewage disposal system difficult. The alternative, given a prohibition of the evaporative type systems by the Division of Water Resour- ces, is an elevated mound. These types of systems are expensive, and require site-specific engineering, but do comply to current county regulations. Minimum setback distances for all sewage disposal system components can be expected to be meet. The applicant would be wise to designate a specific area of the building envelope for wastewater disposal system construction to minimize the flood hazard and set aside the highest area of the lot for the mound system. 000022 000023 ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020, 222 ME NDRANDU M T0: County Attorney County Engineer Environmental Health Division of Water Resources FROM: Francis Rrizmanich, Planning Office RE: Pattison 1041 Hazard Review DATE: April 24, 1986 Attached for your review is an application submitted by Jennie Patti son and Pat Rindall. The applicants are requesting 1041 Floodplain Hazard Review for the purpose of establishing a building envelope on a parcel located within a designated floodplain area. Please review this material and return your ref erral comments to the Planning Office no later than May 20, 1986 . Thank you. ~~ 1 ~ ~w ODUU24 VALLEY REALTY 1429 GRAND AVENUE, P.O. BOX 1051 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORAD081601 (303) 945-8601 April 25, 1986 Cindy Houban Pitkin County Planning Office 506 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Cindy, I hope you received the other check from Jennie Pattison in the amount of $1 1, which I sent you on the 14th of April. 2 am ondering if they have put us on the meeting sched le yet and if so, what date it will be. Please w ite or call and let me know. , Thanks very much. 1 ~. Sincerely, Uf ~~ ) , i,- Pat Kindall ,! lr RfA®a ~ THE BRAND THAT CIRCLES THE VALLEY IN REAL ESTATE 000025 O r Date Submitted pit kin county 506 east main street LAND USE APPLICATION aspen, Colorado 8'18'1'1 ITO 3E COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: (NAME JENNIE PATTISON $ Pa ADDRESS 6315 Highway 133, Carbondale, CO 81623 963-3879 (home) PHONE 945-8601 (Valley Realty) OF PROJECT 1041 F PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, locate on zoning map, showing boundaries of any natural hazard and resource areas, any other special regulatory districts, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate CSU/ ERA Maps any areas not covered by the above.) APPENGIX B I•ject Number • Section/Parcel O7AL XI STING USES 10.63 acres land PROPOSED USE(S) single family hnmP (approximate square footage for each) (PRESENT ZONING OF SITE (DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL 2.66 + 10.63 acres now owned y Aopl;cant lit i Pa a 0 BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING OFFICE TYPE OF APPLICATION: REZONING GROWTH MANAGEMENT P.U.D. SUBDIVISION X SPECIAL REVIEW 1041 EXEMPTION BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW 35-acre + SUBDIVISION 2E VIEW PHASE: PRE-APPLICATION X 3-21-86 DATE COMPLETED GENERAL SUBMISSION P.C. ACTION DATE BOARD ACTION DATE O Z s DETAILED SUBMISSION P.C. ACTION DATE BOARD ACTION DATE FINAL PLAT BOARD ACTION DATE PIii.1f~ wui+i+ tnnu SUPJIAP,Y OF FINDINGS REQUIRED BY REVIEW P}IASE Directions: Any applicant fora development requiring a permit under this code slwll be responsible for showing conformance with any ,applicable,policies of Section 2 as listed below. The applicant shall submit those requirements necessary to show confor- mance with these policies and the related general regulations of Section S• Upon ~- submission of the application and all submission contents, the Planning Office shall distribute same to appropriate referral agencies which shall indicate its certification or non-certification of the proposal as being in conformance with' policies and as satisfying submission requirements and review guidelines or relevant general regulations. Referral agencies shall also indicate whether further study in a later review phase is required and any further recommendations or conditions, attaching comments and returning same to the Planning Office. LOCAL REVIEWIf1G E TIf1CATlON NDITiOt:S STUDY PEQUIRED POLICY FACTOR STAFF YES NO AND ]t1ITIALS DATE RECOt•SPIENDA- . • TIONS n 1~ PA GS DS FP* ~ 2.PA GS DS FP 3.PA GS DS FP •* PA = Pre-Application GS = General Submission DS = Detailed Submission ~~~U~7 Not inconsistant with piaster Plan/ Rate of Growth NaZard & Resour: Areas _ Geological NaZards .__X.. Floodplains X Riparian Areas 1lildlife Itildfire Radiation Soils/Erosion Extractable Resources Mineral _ Vegetable Other Planning Office Planning Office County Ex- tension Agent Planning Office ------- ------- FP = Final Plat . STUDY REQUIRED POLIC'! FACT. ,' 4.PA GS DS FP Agricultural Conservation I S.PA GS DS FP Scenic Quality LOCAL REVIEWING CERTIFICATION .STAFF YES ~ NO ' 1NI7I S DATE Planning Office Planning CONDITIONS AND RE COh1h1[ N DA- TIONS X 16.PA GS DS FP }later Supply Environmental Health ).PA GS DS FP Sexage Disposal Environmental ' Health B.PA ~ GS •DS FP Nc`sr. 4.PA GS DS FP Air Quality lO.PA .GS DS FP Historic/ _ _ _ _ Archaeological Resources Environmental Health Environmental Health r }iistorical 11.PA GS DS FP Road/Trails County . _ _ _ _ Design 6 Con- Engineer struction Impact on Road system '_ Maintenance ' Provisions OOOU28. : ~ , 1 STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR Drainage Impact on - Transportation L REV] STAFF YES t10 INITIALS DATE AND RECOMh1ENDA- TIONS PA GS DS FP PA GS DS FP County Engineer County Engineer .PA GS DS FP Impact on Public Planning Office _ _ _ Facilities/ Services _ _ Solid Waste County Engineer - Disposal & ~ - ' ' Collection _ ~_ _ Fire & Police Sheriff/Fire . Protection, Dist. Response Service _ _ _ _ Sanitary Land Fills County Engineer Fills _ _ _ _ 'Hospital Capacity Hospital-Board Library Sub- _ _ _ Library _ station Site _ , Board _ _ Post Office Postal Service _ _ Substation Site _ _ ~ _ _ Extension of Rocky Mt. _ utilities, water Natural Gas and sewer Aspentlioly Cross Electric, Mountain Bell, Municipal 4;ater & Sewer Dist.s _ _ _ Public shops County garages, yards Manager _ _ _ _ Recreation Sites City. Recreation ,' Director _ _ _ _ General.Tax Cost) ~ County Finance Benefit Officer d t c. ., • LOCAL REYIE ', STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR STAFF IS ;PA GS DS FP Contribution to Housing _ _ _ _ housing Stock Coordinator ZERi+CATIDN •CONOITIONS YES NO AND •INITIAL DATE RECOFiMENDA- TIONS 6.PA GS DS FP Man-made Hazards/ Building _ _ _ Safety Official • l).PA GS DS FP 1lildlife Colo. Division Preservation of Hildlife '3.P/; GS DS FP Energy Building _ _ _ Conservation Official 1:.'~; GS DS FP hater Resources ~ District Nater _ _ _ _ Impact Court . 2O.PA GS DS FP Final Plat Contents County Engineer, Attorney, Planning Office 000030 re qu Llnp pcrmlC 1. Rcloning Y.$peeial ncvicw Use J. Ouilding Pcmil Rcvicw 4. Subdivision S. Planned Unit Development V Conrcr with SIa If 'Optional ncvicw by P d 2I Common Proc<dure S«tlon 6 Pre-Application Conference Slat( ncvicw One-step P d 2 Recommendation process under PubGC Hearing Section L-G Hozrd Action Rezoning Special Review Use Building Permit Review w Ouilding Permit Stall Review P L 2 Recommendation ©oard Acton Staff Review Board AGlion Y Subdivision PUD Building Pcrmil , PITf:Itd COUNTY PU3LIC 1707ICE RE General Submission ................. 80 - 90 days for review* Oelailed Submission ................. 60 - 80 days - for review** I REP1EIdTS Final PIaL ........... ... 20 - 35 days - ,~ for review Asa General Submission requirement, the Pitkin County Land Use Code requires the applicant to provide to the Planning Office a list of "names and (mailing) addresses of all holders of mineral estates (including mineral lessees) in the property, and of adjacent (contiguous) land owners (including those separated from the property by a public road or right-of-way)"(Article 6-3.1). These property owners will receive a copy of the public notice stating the hearing date~for the subject property no later than 15 days prior to that hearing. The applicant is also required to post a sign (on forms supplied by the Planning Office) on the subject property at least 15 days priot• to the public hearing (Article 6-3.4(d)(1)). * This time frame dors not include delays caused by requests for further information, tabling by the reviewing board, etc. «* A public hearing, and consequently an additional 35-40 days;~may be necessary.if the detailed submission is substantially changed from the general submission. 000031 J ~2y:,~ . ~/QLL~Y ~ `° ~:~ ~~ R E A L T Y 1429 GRAND AVENUE, P.O. BOX 1051 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (303 945.8601 RF®n April 7, 1986 Pitkin County Planning Office 506 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Sirs: I am applying for a 1041 Hazard Special Review for floodplain and riparian areas. According to the CSU maps, other than the floodplain and riparian concerns there are no other 1041 hazards on this land. The plat map I have submitted shows a proposed building envelope outside the 100 year floodplain. The applicant has no intention of any structure or decks being built on or extending into the floodplain areas. According to Cindy Houben, she has discussed the land with Randy Cote and there are no wildlife concerns on this property. Thank you. Sincerely, Pat Kindall lr ~Y'._...., e 'mr 000032 ' VALLEY REALTY 1429 GRAND AVENUE, P.O. BOX 1051 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (303) 945-8601 April 1, 1986 Pitkin County Planning 506 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Sirs: I am representing Jennie Pattison who owns property in the Crystal River Valley 4'~ miles south of Carbondale. The property is divided by Highway 133. Her home is on 2.66 acres west of the highway and the remainder of her property is 10.63 acres east of the highway. Mrs. Pattison requests your permission to subdivide and sell the 10.63 acres. She does not have use for it since her husband died recently. According to Section 7-2.3 of the code it is permissible. "'Separate ownership' in paragraph 7-2.1 above shall mean that a lot or parcel is not adjacent or contiguous to other property owned by the same owner. For the purpose of this Section, 'owned by the same owner' shall, when the form of ownership was created to avoid the provisions of this Section (or other provisions of this Code), include ownership by a business or legal entity in which the owner has a controlling interest or ownership by his or her spouse; or ownership by a business or legal entity in which his or her spouse has a controlling interest; or ownership by a business or legal entity in which the owner and his or her spouse together have a controlling interest. All multiple ownerships of preexisting substandard-size lots or parcels coming within the application of this Section shall be cumulative, the intent being that the common ownership of more than one such contiguous platted lot of parcel shall require that the aggregate square footage of such common ownership shall be considered as one (1) lot or parcel, and only one (1) lot or parcel, re- gardless of diverse times of acquisition thereof by _ the common owner, including after July 5, 1955. The provisions of this Section relate only to area or width of substandard-size lots or parcels, and in no wa_y shall be construed to waive or modify ®00033 op , T,.;~ ,-I~q;~t T~ qT UA'CI F' I ~i~"'PLLE~ IN ftCAL ESTATE :E~.tCR- ~~ .~ f Pitkin County Planning Page 2 April 1, 1986 any other land use or building regulation now in effect, or hereafter put into effect, in Pitkin County, Colorado. If a property owner of substan- dard-sized platted lots owns or acquires a suffi- cient number of contiguous lots (e.g., three) so as to own any multiple (e.g., double) of the minimum area and width requirements of the then-existing zoning, he shall be considered to have the multiple's number of standard-sized lots (e.g., two). For the purpose of this Section, lots or parcels shall not be deemed adjacent or contiguous if separate by a public or private roadway in place at the date of the adoption of this amendment (and meeting County specifications) over which access may be gained to each such lot or parcel." I have enclosed 6 copies of this letter, her warranty deed, the application, the survey maps of the subject property showing the building envelope, and Mrs. Pattison's application fee of $1250.00. Thank you! Sincerely, ~~~~'~!~~~~ Pat Kendall lr Enclosures 000034 ennie Pattison ENTRV N0.1_~ 1 M ~~ r t lT 11:J7,, ndoek.. ~.t..M., D°crmbrr _1.2._.,1962......,. EIIU°~~~~~_ IA6! ~'~)~I'. i - I VISIq PcKKY E ,. Cohlt ,,,_,. Reterdrr. Itrrrplbn No.... ,........._ _. _. .--_ _ _ - _. I _._., _ .. `rt11F nHF:U. \60l° Ihln 7th dq of DC In thr yrnr of ^nr herd our lhminnnd nine Aundrel RnA ~ i X 1-V' hrM,nn, AN, It, nLl.i,^,DPI_.. Unmly of PiLJk in e(lhn and Nl nln nt rnlrrndn, of thr flnl port. Rnd ~LOOEPT 1', I`nTTr SON and dCIJPi1C P/JTT~S( ----- I cnnnlr of rhr told of Ihr and Rlnln n/ rdlnrndn, n( Ihr nrennd tort: I FI7HhINlIF:TII, Thnt Ihr nnid port V of the flat 'l'f:1f Ix11.LA P:; n7D OTIiI:P VP LV/i fiL In Ihr told Pnrl .) of the }Int port In hood pnld by h.rvhy rvndr.nrd mul ncknnwlydRrd, hn n Rrnnlyd, h Rrmrl, hnrvnin, nrll, ennvey and confirm unto lho nhl pR In 4•nency In rmmmnn Intl In J°Inl tenanrY. RII the follow Rnd hrlnR In the 'nuglY rolnndn, in-wllt I n tract o! land ,,^~Ituated .~n ~8H ',J. of thr 6th I'. f'. am L end In rnnAblrrnllm, of lhdn-~m °f CO 7aiIil:Yn'1'I01 - - HxR.tRR7c ~ the rvarl t whrrenf IA ul pnrlh•n of Ihr rrcnnA P•rl, P Iv.A, rrlA and cnnrr>rd. en,l by lhr,e prrrrnln do r n , f lhF nrennd Pnrl, lhrlr hrirn Rod n.eiRnn~f°rrvrr, not dencrlLal Int m P•mrl of Innd, dlunlr. IYInR ' ['l tkin and Nlnir of ~ ~ 3 end 4, Gec~ 27r 1'. P •'~•+ P• fully cfcscri3ed ~s follow:: He i;inninp at the Southeas~/+.or kr of yiirl l.ot 4; thence 'd. 1100,22 feet to the .';outh~rht roar of ..^,nid Lnt 4; thence :I. 455.0 feet to the Sort arty ~atnk of Thomn^on Creek; thence HG°02' ~'. 3UU,6 fee t,~a onp th^ :~iuthd rlb h-Ink of'Thomn^.on C n!rk; th~mcc ". Tu°63+ !:i. 151 .7 feet along the Sou tharly bank oC '1'homnt. rnl Cr•erk; theinoellI ^. 9°06' F.. 114,7 fort slant thr Srutherl ;• bank of T mnsdn .:r ik.: thnnr.6 :1. 76°24' C, 184,8 feet slant the Srni tacit. ink Df Thomh^~hn Creek; thence ^. (17° OG' C, 19'7,2 fact loop :ne S utharly bank of'Thim~san CreeY,; thence iJ. SO°ul' '. 111.7 fork sloop thh Southerly bank. o' 1'homna on t'ree':; thnnca 'I. la° 7' C. 'I3.1 fret alone thr, :,outh- erly bank of 'f ocroson Crn_rk; ~Rh^ncr ~J• u5°uHt t:• IHC,tIH Irnt sloop. the i>outhnrly book of Itemnnen !:reek; thence .I, H7°OS' C. 120.7 feet sloop, the tioutherly bank oC 1'homoson Creek; [hence C. 50.0 feet to the center o1' Crucial Pi.ver; thence :, 6°27' 'A, 439.2 feet sloop th rent^r of ('rvstal Piver; thence 5, 11° 19` E. 67,3 teat aloe p~th^_ cantor' of C'rvaal °ivar; thence '. 1?°63' .J. 196.0 feet a onp fire cent^r of Crv~,tal Fivrr, tc tha South line of paid Lot 3; thencr lJ, 170,78 fart strop the South' line of said Lot 3 to Rho point of beginning, cants ini np 14.19 acres, more or less. I ' ExceDtinp+ however, 1.265 acres hr. rr.tofore (!redid to Thr Department of Hiphwav^, :,Tate of Colorado, h!• drrd rrcofolorado+ the office of the Clerk and Pecorder of ttkin Ciunivr as Document Mo. 110338 in OooY. 192 at Pape GS therecC. ~.~ 41 ' ~ I I I ( 1 ~ ~~l v. r .r ~~f~~~ i .,I-'`P`'`'~'~I,~ 1'&~~,".=9~~V, X14-,. l~r 1 fir =~-,-~ - Top F'I'il F.Il with dl end dnRnly rho haredltamenU and nppnrlaNnew tMnonto belonRlnR. er In Rn~wIM Rpp¢rtn6'mR. •nd the rrranion Rnd rcrenlonR, nmdndet Rnd remdndm, roofs, luoe• end proflb theredi R++d dr the enlnle, riRhl, title, InMrc•t, rldm end demand whntwerer of the odd p•rlV of the tint pull e1tMr ti 1•w nr envity, of, In •nd to tha •bew WrRRlned Dnmlee•, with the heredl4mrnb and nDpurlennnrM. NO. 7RR. w.tnn•nTr on[n-ir !•In r....w-enrturtRoH..,. i,1.tM LF.r`.r. tn~n R«.r nr...l p,.«,. c.b..4 ., _ ._ _ c' 000035 ennl ~f II i rdl.t ~~)~~ TO IM1'Ii ANII Tfl IIf11J1 lho /eld prrmin•e nhovr herlminrd .nd deeerlbed, with tM .ppurlnn.nrrn, unto the "ehl pvllr" of Ihr wrnnd pnrl. IhMr A"In and ."nIRn1 forever, And lhs /eld p.rt '/ of thn tlnl pnrl, for h i rv .rl! , 11 i'; hrlrn, rlleeulnrn, and ndmin6lrN ore, dnn~ envenenl, Pr.nl, b.rRdn nnA pRre! b and Ivllh Ihr rnld nn rlirn nl the rrnmA pn M, lhrlr hrln And n[rllrn", Chet .t LM lime of the rnrndinR •nd drllvrq of Ihnnr prr[rnlq rl r• {.1 Ivrll rrhrd of Ihn preminr" nhnve rnnvyed, nn of fend, /nrq prrlrrL Rhnnluln end Irolrfrnrlbir rnlnlr of Inhrrllnnro In Inw, In fee rhnplr, and hwl Rond rlRhl, full power and ^wlul pulhnrilp In Rrm,1, I,n rvnln, null and nmrrp lhn nnmr In mnnnrr and form nfnree.ld, nn,l lha lhn ume ^nr frq and eleer Irom nll fw,urr end ,•Ihrr ^, nnM, hnrpnlne, role", Ilrn", Inren, a"wen mrnU .nd Ineumhrnnrer a( wh/trver hlnd or noun, nnrvrn I Md lhn "hour hvR"lord pnml/e/ in Lha 0uls! and p/.os/ble pnn/re/Inn of the old p.rtlr/ of the nernnd psrL, lhelr Mir" /nd enrlRne, nRelnet nll /nA ewp perwn er penen/ Iewfuli7 rlnlminlt or to elnim the whole nr /n7 D/rt thereeL the rnld Pe rl :• of the flat port /Anll /nd wlll WARRANT AN[1 FORPVER DF.FF.NtI 18 O'ITA CAP R'IIF.RROP, the /old p.rhf e/ lh/ /lot pert h. ~. harrunte rrt h i ~ F/nd .nd /e/1 the dnp /nd )enr flr"l .hour wrllten. Almerl, 9edrd and Drllvrrnd In tha hrewne/ of ~ C ' ,r r r { I h ~,~~paduu„~ , a` Lint STATF. AF COhOItA DO, rnunlR et narf ielrl. }""' __. _.. _. _... . __.. . .... .(eF.ALJ O QQG~~~__ 'a•rR'IrrY 1^"Irument wn" /rFnnwirdRrd brfnn mr thlr 7th d/r of pn CC mbr_ r r ~~ OY'T'7...~y. P~ .. 'ell'. tl: AI.I.J^QN. ~(~4i1' ~11rLn mJyddn:.pln/ M.a rch 7) ~1{ N . In 6 5 , Nllnnr m7 h"nd /nd nMeld nrnl. ,l~~° r'• ~ _r.. :JU',.~~j0q . Ur '•. _ • , i O .- .' •` .....•• 7 ...... .............................. ....... r ~',,,r~QL..60~' d` n ,ed41• ~ rr,nen n,elk. .}LInvN~ ' ` ~ ' l11 Dui n b.J n,.n„ er ne,een" b,e le...r m„w sr en w; li 4r /n[n. [ ..un/ la'IMrrJnyll.e b MrkW aveap b . ~rknm,e.r..4 ~ nib Iw[n noon nr pr[o\ r..aYUW, .Ib[wr•l„rrN nr Ml,er bbn,t~ nrnn,errlrlFN: 11 A rflM n( brr„r.IMn. Inrr In[nl n.mr nr bnh efrlna er nfnem, p Wr r[,.IMnr .r nlh.r erflnn ar b[F nrnnnrlun, n.min/ I4 i d 7 ~j s I ~ $ ~ I 1 W I ~ .~ ^,i E; ~ t . r 1J' a ,, ( r, •„ ~ i U~ FI HI 1 1, ~ i 9 .- ~ H % a r.:: ., -0 7~ n.y I ~ ~ .. j / r.l ~ U\ u, ~ vl 'ayl 3 i 4I Ll: < e ~ c x C ~ u I .°^ y "1 ~, !~ ~ u, I ~ e : ~ ~ I I I~ t ' .I 1~. ~ , i ~ ^ I I ~ f .~~ s~ ~~ I ! , ., -- i 3 j e r l,l 000036 •PEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFIC~ 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020 6~ Ccti.~dnda2~. Co ~/G23 RE: Q~1i~Sn.. ~o ti~ l~Atia~~+J~~ Dear This to inform you that th P annin Office has completed its preliminary review of your application for complete- ness. We have determined that your a plication is complete. ~_ is not complete. The additional items we will require are as follows: Disclosure of ownership (one copy only needed). _ _ Adjacent property owners list (one copy only needed). Additional copies of entire application. _ _ Authorization by owner for representative to submit application. __ Response to the attached list of items demonstrat- ing compliance with the applicable policies and / regulations of the Code, or other specified materials. \, A check in the amount of S ~~ ~ - is due. _ A. Since your application is complete, we have scheduled it for review by the on We will be calling you if we need any additional information prior to that date. In any case, we will be calling you several days prior to your hearing to make a copy of the review memorandum available to you. Please note that it (is) (is not) your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you. _~. B. Since your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it for public review at this time. When we have received the materials we have requested, we will be happy to place you on the next available agenda. Please feel free to call ~ ~t~lo ~'"!~~!~^!~!~~? , who is the planner assigned to this case, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFPICE ~ ~ ~~~~~~ Alan Richman, Pla n g and Development Director AR:jlr 00003? i I hereby certify that on this ~ day of ~ ~- , 196(F, a true and correct w py of the attached Noti of Public Hearing was den sited in the ilni.ted States mail, first-cl ss nostaoe nrenaid. to the adjacent property owners as indicated on file attached list o;: adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Plannaing Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the public notice. ~, %/_~ Nancy C lli 000038 POBLIC NOTICE RE: PATTISON 1041 HAZARD REVIEW NOTICE IS HERBBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on July 14, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. ir. the Sheriff's Conference Room, 506 E. Plain Street. Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application submitted by Jennie Pattison requesting 1041 Hazard Review. The applicant proposes the construction a single family dwelling unit on a parcel located within a designated floodplain and riparian hazard area. The property is located approximately 4.5 miles south of Carbondale in the Crystal River Valley, bordering the south side of Thompson Creek and the west bank of the Crystal River. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925- 2020, Ext. 222. s/Helen R Rand ~d Chairwoman, Board of County Commis- sioners of Pitkin County, Colorado Published in the Aspen Times on June 12, 1986. Pitkin County Invoice No. 3~f.3/5_ N.14 000039 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES (303) 925-2020 Clty 00113 -63721 47331 -52100 -637 GMP/CONCEPTU 22 -47332 -52100 - 637 AL GMP/PRELIMINA 23 - 47333 - 52100 RY GMP/FINAL - 63724 - g73g1 _ 52100 -6372 SUB/CONCEPTUA 5 -47342 -52100 - X7 L SUB/PRELIMINA 26 - 47343 - 52100 RY SUB/FINAL - 63727 - 47350 - 52100 -6372 ALL 2-STEP APPLI 8 -47360 -52100 REFER CATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLI RAL FEES: CATIONS 00125 -63730 - 47380 - 52100 00123 -63730 -g73g0 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH _52100 00115 -63730 -47380 HOUSING -52100 ENGINEERING W~3 tY SUB-TOTAL - 63711 - 47331 - 52200 - 63712 - 47332 GMP/GENERAL - 52200 - 63713 GMP/DETAILED - 47333 - 52200 GMP/FINAL -63714 -47347 -52200 -63 SUB/GENERAL 715 -47342 -52200 - 63 SUB/DETAILED 716 - 87343 - 52200 - SUB/FINAL 63717 - 47350 - 52200 -63718 ALL 2-STEP APPLIC - 47360 - 52200 REFERRAL FEES: ATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS 00125 -63730 -47380 -52200 00123 - 63730 - 47380 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH - 52200 00113 -63737 -09000 _ HOUSING -52200 00113 -63732 -09000 ENVIRONMENTAL COOgp -52200 _ ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00173 -63061 - pg000 - 52200 - 63063 - 09000 - 52200 - 63062 . O900p -00000 - 63066 - 08000 - Op000 - 63069 - pyp00 _ 000040 Neme: Atltlress: _ Check # __ Atltlitional Billing: COUNTY CODE ALMANAC COMP. PLAN COPY FEES OTHER Phone: Project; SUB-TOTAL SUB-TOTAL TOTAL - r; ,- ~~ Date: # of Hours: I~