HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.011.2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITKIN COUNTY
TO APPROVE THE 2001-2002 COMMUNITY SERVICE BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
Resolution #2001 0
RECITALS
1) The Department of Local Affairs requires that upon assuming the responsibility for the
administration of the CSBG program, the Board of County Commissioners will assume
responsibility for the establishment of and planning for local priorities that achieve the
objectives of the program and for the efficient management of individual projects to
insure that local priorities will guide the program.
2) The Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners wish to support the Community
Service Block Grant mission to make a measurable and potentially significant impact,
within the federal resources available, on the causes of poverty in communities
throughout the State or in those areas of communities where poverty is a particularly
acute problem as a means to remove obstacles and solve problems which block the
achievement of self-sufficiency.
3) The Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners recognizes that the following are
significant barriers to citizens achieving self-sufficiency in Pitkin County:
• Unplanned Pregnancy
• Untreated and delayed treatment of communicable diseases
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin
County, Colorado.
SECTION I.
1. The Pitkin County Commissioners wish to support the plan as outlined in the
Community Service Block Grant application:
A. $8,140 to Community Health Services to provide:
1. $4,070 toward providing birth control devises to those at or below 125%
of the federal poverty level.
2. $4,070 toward prevention, education, and lab tests for communicable
diseases for those who are at or below 125% of the federal poverty level.
2. ADMINISTRATION
The Director of Human Services will take full responsibility for the administration of
this grant.
SECTION 2:
This resolution shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate
as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the
ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed
and concluded under such prior ordinances.
SECTION 3:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is
for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 4:
A public hearing on the resolution shall be held on the 24th day of January, 2001
in a Pitkin County Courthouse Annex, Aspen, Colorado.
k1PP OVED AND ADOPTED ON THE ! DAY OF
2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI RS
OF PITKIN C O /
U BY: `� 1
tT:
J a ette Jones Mick Ireland, Chairperson
D uty Clerk and ecorder
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: MANAGER APPROVAL:
John Nilary i >
Co ty Attorney County Ma ager
RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION:
1 `O.u� (-� 0
Nancy N. Sun en
Director of Human Services
2001- 02 CSBG APPLICATION and PLAN
GRANTEE: Pitkin County Health & Human Services
ADDRESS: 0405 Castle Creek Road, #7, Aspen, CO 81611
CONTACT PERSON: Nan Sundeen
TITLE: Director PHONE: (970) 920-5235
E-MAIL: _naps@co.pitkin.co.us FAX: (970) 920-5558
COUNTIES INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN: Pitkin
TOTAL CSBG ALLOCATION $8,140
PROGRAM PERIOD: 03/01/01 To 02/28/02
At any time,feel free to attach additional pages if more space is needed.
V I3 r
� .� !
1. Employment $ $ $
2. Education $ $ $
3. Income Management $ $ $
4. Housing $ $ $
5. Emergency Services $ $ $
6. Nutrition $ $ $
7. Linkages with Other Programs $ $ $
8. Self-Sufficiency $ $ $
9. Health $8,140 $ $8,140
I O.Other(define): $ $ $
TOTAL $8,140 $ $8,140
1. The "Other" category should only be used for services that are not covered under
Federal Objectives 1-9. It should not be used to reflect administrative/indirect costs.
I. FEDERAL OBJECTIVES: Check the Federal Objective(s)your agency activity(ies)will be
addressing. For each activity,LIST ONLY ONE Federal
Objective.
II. BUDGET FORMAT: Complete your budget in as much detail as possible utilizing the
following format. This information will be used for
monitoring and performance evaluation.
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Indicate the CSBG dollar amount allocated to each position(s) funded including fringe
benefits.
Indicate the percentage (%) of the person's time paid with CSBG funds.
B. DIRECT OPERATING COSTS
Direct program costs can be identified with delivery of a particular project, service, or
activity undertaken to achieve an objective of the grant program. For CSBG, these
purposes and eligible activities are specified in the reauthorizing statute and reflected in
the national ROMA performance measures. Direct program costs are incurred for the
service delivery and management components within a particular program or project.
Therefore, direct costs include expenditures on some activities with administrative
qualities, including salaries and benefits of program staff and managers, equipment,
training, conferences, travel, and contracts, as long as those expenses relate specifically to
a particular program or activity, not to the general administration of the organization.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS also referred to as INDIRECT/OVERHEAD
Administrative costs are equivalent to typical indirect costs or overhead, As distinguished
from administration or management expenditures that qualify as direct costs,
administrative costs refer to central executive functions that do not directly support a
specific project or service. Incurred for common objectives that benefit multiple
programs administered by the grantee organization, or the organization as a whole,
administrative costs are not readily assignable to a particular program funding stream.
Rather, administrative costs relate to the general management of the grantee organization,
such as strategic direction, Board development, executive director functions, accounting,
budgeting, personnel, procurement, and legal services.
D. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Please itemize the equipment you intend to purchase. For any Capitol Equipment costs,
you are required to submit a narrative to describe equipment needed and your
procurement process. The State requires that bids and final equipment invoices be
submitted to the State.
E. SUBCONTRACT COSTS
Those dollars allocated out to subcontractors to provide CSBG related services.
F. TOTAL CSBG FUNDS BUDGETED
' � ag of 69 69 69 GA £H
T
L
W
Y
N
O
e y
33 a
oe
fie; t
9
W
9
W
� V
W
a
y
Y
u
m
C7
W U
C7 °'
A
0
Y
H
�3
u
L
C
u
7
V
o C
Lli
I�
O Q
RM
47,
Y
2�
NI
`�� l,Yl�� � ai'y R5 % 4} � 9( I�t4 4� ��,� fi 9 �•'d��4
5
Il.ali:% y U
U L
U a
'O
U U
yi M BET
�: N h
: i:i!� � tC
L
i O G
E
ty a
e,aitS 73
L td p N
.&'&:i iliI �
FF ! 0 `'
k t�,f N E€I! w F9
a ti
z1 Elly
FMON x
WPIS:!ii C
W/Myp pp a
gry
U O
�e U
i V v
.+ v
g W
I�
�a!pl E 4 iii� ",,,sH a 3 9, rE4 'x ii � t - ifn lS sxP4 S � s krkfs{ F� va� �y
v d ° 'Ay t EEt t c t 3S 5+r{p 9 9 3 9 a"tI 1. A P'S+ry! t SiA
N 3
E.�
o 3 !id; tfs1v'k dpk ia �3Et1 ; ,31�is t' s� sr ° ryhS'
IN 1
R '{�;i
III. COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN:
As required in the reauthorized CSBG Act, please answer all 5 questions.
Answer each one on a separate page.
1. Community Needs Assessment (including food needs): Our State office must secure from each CSBG
eligible entity, as a condition to receipt of funding, a community action plan that includes a community-
needs assessment for the community served. This community-needs assessment may be coordinated with
community-needs assessments conducted for other programs.
2. Service Delivery System: Please describe the service delivery system for services provided or
coordinated with CSBG funds that target low-income individuals and families within your service area.
2. Linkages:
A. Describe how linkages will be developed to fill identified gaps in services, through the provision
of information, referrals, case management, and follow up consultations.
B. Describe how linkages will be established between government and other social service
programs to assure effective delivery of service to low-income individuals and to avoid
duplication of such services
4. Coordination with other Public and Private Resources: Please describe how CSBG funds
will be coordinated with other public and private resources.
5. Innovative Community and Neighborhood-based Initiatives: Please describe how CSBG
funds will be used to support innovative community and neighborhood-based initiatives related
to the purposes of CSBG, which may include fatherhood initiatives and other initiatives with the
goal of strengthening families and encouraging effective parenting.
(.Community Needs Assessment is attached
2.Description of Delivery System: Communicable disease screenings will be provided by appointment and
include exams, necessary lab screening, medication, education and follow-up case management, as well as
providing necessary referrals to a physician. Nurse Practitioners will provide birth control injectable hormones,
education, free pregnancy screenings, follow-up education and referrals in an effort to prevent unwanted
pregnancies which further poverty in Pitkin County.
3.Linkages:
A. Community Health Services meets monthly with other human service agencies to case
find and share information to eliminate gaps in service and case management. CHS, Inc.
staffs bilingual educators and nurses to provide care and referrals. Clients are sent referral
reminders and lab test results as follow-up services. Referrals are made to assisting
agencies and providers.
B. Community Health Services, Inc. provides staff education for Medicaid eligibility updates
and coordinates with Pitkin County Social Services to assure effective delivery of service
to low-income individuals. A meeting with other human services agencies in the region
prevents duplication of services.
4.Coordination with other Public and Private Resources: Funding from the CSBG is coordinated with funding
from the City of Aspen and Pitkin County along with private donations to provide these services.
5.Innovative Community and Neighborhood-based Initiatives: Providing birth control devices and education
enable low income families to plan their children and eliminate unwanted pregnancies which further poverty
levels. Prevention and early detection of communicable diseases with early treatment and screenings along with
preventative educations create a health community, which encourages community revitalization. CSBG funds
eliminates the financial barriers to service for the low-income population of individuals and families. Access to
these preventative health services offers individuals an opportunity for empowerment, self-sufficiency and
family stability. CHS In., expects 100% success from these measures of preventing unwanted pregnancies and
communicable disease control.
e*top
• •100 5 dWO age
,GWftoodSprugs -
c.rboodY: �
Healthy Mountain Communities
Community Health Profile
Parachute to Aspen
Includes the communities of Aspen, Woody Creek, Snowmass Village, Old Snowmass, .
Basalt, Emma, El Jebel, Glenwood Springs, New Castle, Silt, Rifle, Rulison,Parachute
May 27, 1993
*It is very important to acknowledge the social and cultural issue:
surrounding teen pregnancy.
PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS TO UNMARR-LED WOMEN*
Region
1987 1990 1991 g
I
Colorado 18.9$ 21.21 23.6%
Garfield 9.7% 14.0% 15.4$
Eagle 10 .0% 11.6% 13.5$
PitkIn 12.6% 14.4% 16.98
*Percent of total. births that were to unmarried women--------------
Source: Colorado Department of Health, Health Statistics and Vital
Records Division
Existing Conditions and Trends: unmarried women is
*The percentage of total births that are to
increasing in all three counties, and is less than the percentac
statewide.
Issues: act on t
*The birth of children to unmarried women can have an imp
social well-being of children, and female-headed households are
more likely to be poor.
PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS TO WOMEN WITH LESS THAN 12 YEARS OF EDUCATION*
Region 1987 1990 1991
Colorado 17. 1% 17.8% 18.8%
Garfield 11. 1% 18.1% 17.2%
Eagle 5 .4% 12.4% 14.0%
Pitkin 3.9% 10.7% 6.5$
*Percent of total births that were to women with <12 yearssoof educatic
----------------------
Source: Colorado Department of Health, Health Statistics and Vital
Records Division
Existing Conditions :
Strengths
*The percentage of births to women with <12 years of educat:
is less than the state rate in all three counties
Limitations
*The percentage of births to women with <12 years cf educat-'
has increased since 1987 in all three counties.
Existing Conditions: '
Strengths
I
*The infant mortality rate has decreased dramatically.
Limitations
*The infant mortality rate in Garfield County is still too
high.
i
i Trend#The infant mortality rate has decreased in Garfield and Eagle
Counties and remains at 0 in Pitki.n County. The rate in all
three counties is less than state rate.
Issues:
*The United States has a very high infant mortality rate for an
industrialized nation (9 . 1%) , primarily because of the relativel3
high number of preterm and low birth weight births.
*Most health professionals agree that prenatal care and lifestyl:
and behavioral risks can have the greatest impact on reducing
in£ant. mortality.
i
PERCENT BIRTHS TO MEDICAID CLIENTS*
Recrion 19_ 1991_
Colorado 20% 30%
Garfield 19% 323
Eagle 7% is%
Pitkin 4% 73
*Percent of total hospital births in each county.
i -----------------------------------------------
Source: Colorado Department of Health, Family and Community Health
Services Division
Existing Conditions:
Strengths
*The expansion of the Medicaid program in Colorado has
enabled more low-income women to receive prenatal care.
Limitations
*Medicaid reimburses area providers at a rate of approxi-
mately 50% of their cost for providing care.
*Medicaid is consuming a huge portion Of state and federal
budgets.
Trends:
*The percent of births to Medicaid clients has increased dramatic
ally both zatewide and in all three counties.
` Issues:
*Medicaid reimbursement is approximately 1/2 st c delivery.
a
Trends:
*Demands for mental health services are increasing while availaby
funds are decreasing.
*The Garfield County clinic only serves Medicaid clients due toi
lack of other revenue sources. Many residents in need are not
receiving services. This trend will continue in the near future,
*Revenues for the Pitkin County clinic are decreasing while the
i demand for services, including the demand for services for the
growing Hispanic population is increasing.
Issues:
*How to meet the increasing demand for mental health services wiy
decreasing revenue, particularly as the stress of everyday liviy�
increases for most residents due to commuting, lack of affordabi,
housing, two wage-earning families, etc?
i
COLORADO RESIDENTS LNDERINSURED
15.3.%. Colorado. residents are uninsured -
13.0% Colorado residents are underinsured
28.3% Colorado residents are an- or underinsured
60.8% of uninsured are children and young adults
` 87.0% of uninsured residents live in families where the
i head of household works at least part-time
-------------------------------
Source: Colorado Department of Health, Division of Insurance,
Department of Regulatory Agencies
Existing Conditions:
Strengths
*72% of the state's residents are insured.
Limitations
*28% of the state's residents are under- or uninsured.
Trends:
*As the cost of health insurance continues to rise, employers
having to require that their employees increase the percentage
they contribute to their health insurance.
Issues.
*As a result of the predominance of service sector employment is
all three counties, the percentage of under- and uninsured ma;'
actually be much higher.
*It is difficult for the under- and uninsured residents of this
region to obtain medical care.
*What role should local, state and federal governments and busine`
have in ensuring that all Americans have health insurance?
38
*The west end of Garfield County is experiencing difficulty re-
cruiting physicians.
Issues :
T. .-cess to health care for all but the insured or the wealthiest
residents of our area is limited. Access for low-income reside
is extremely limited. Funding for programs that serve low-inr.01
residents is unstable.
f
PHYSICIAN:POPULATION RATIO - 1992
Recion Ratio
Garfield 1: 11369
Eagle 1:2,249. _
Pitkin 1:2,076
Source: Colorado Department of Health, Community
ty Health Nursing
Existing Conditions:
Strengths
*Physician:population ratio is high for a rural area.
Limitations
*Physicians are not distributed evenly. For example,
there are only 2 physicians who practice in Rifle
full-time.
;f Trends:
*The physician:pcpulation ratio will likely remain high due to
the desirability of the area. The uneven distribution will
likely continue in the short term. Rifle has just lost a famil
Practitioner and has had difficulty recruiting physicians.
Issues:
*The uneven distribution of physicians.
r �
fi a I � F
� � F
� m
= � 9
id gi R
£ E
E
3
H
A
sg s s � E !� • :' �- 1
F
» e a
m V M
O _i' =sir�—� � �i.i._S'�'"' •- \�
32
17d . .. !
fn A F
y
s � 3
N
ry
Ll
VIL CERTIFICATIONS:
The grantee assures that activities implemented with CSBG funds will be:
used to accomplish the State CSBG Goal and Objective stated in the State Plan; and
within the requirements set forth in the Community Services Block Grant Act, Title IV of the Civil Rights Act, the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law 103-227, Part C, Environmental Tobacco Smoke,
also known as the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (Act), Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements,
Certification Regarding Lobbying, Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primary Covered Transactions, Office of Management and Budget(OMB Circular A110 and A122), and the current State of
Colorado CSBG Plan.
The grantee also assures that it will:
specifically consider, in a public meeting the designation of any local public or private entity to carry out the county
community service activities under contract with the county, any local community action agency (CAA) which received
federal fiscal 1981-82 funding;
consider, on the same basis as other non-governmental organizations, religious organizations to provide the CSBG services,
so long as the program is implemented in a manner consistent with the Establishment Clause of the first amendment to the
Constitution. Grantees shall not discriminate against an organization that provides assistance under, or applies to provide
assistance, on the basis that the organization has a religious character. (Please review Sec.679 Operational Rule in the CSBG
Act);
provide for coordination between community anti-poverty programs and ensure, where appropriate, that emergency energy
crisis intervention programs under Title XXVI (relating to low-income home energy assistance) are conducted in such
community;
provide, on an emergency basis, for the provision of such supplies and services,nutritious foods,and related services, as may
be necessary to counteract conditions of starvation and malnutrition among low-income individuals;
coordinate, to the extent possible, programs with and form partnerships with other organizations serving low-income
residents of the community and members of groups served, including religious organizations, charitable groups, and
community organizations;
establish procedures under which a low-income individual, community organization, or religious organization, or
representative of low-income individuals that considers its organization, or low-income individuals, to be inadequately
represented on the CSBG board(or other mechanism)to petition for adequate representation;
in the case of public organizations, have a tripartite advisory board which shall have members selected by the organization
and shall be composed so as to assure that not fewer than 1/3 of the members are persons chosen in accordance with
democratic selection procedures adequate to assure that these members (a) are representative of low-income individuals and
families in the neighborhood served, (b) reside in the neighborhood, and (c) are able to participate actively in the
development,planning,implementation,and evaluation of program funded.
in the case of private non-profit entities, have a tripartite board that participates in the development, planning,
implementation, and evaluation of the program to serve low-income communities. The board shall be composed so as to
assure that(a) U3 of the members are elected officials,holding office on the date of selection,or their representatives, except
that if the number of such elected officials reasonably available and willing to serve on the board is less than I/3 of the
membership of the board, membership on the board of appointive public officials or their representatives may be counted in
meeting such 1/3 requirement; (b) not fewer than 1/3 of the members are person chosen in accordance with democratic
selection procedures adequate to assure that these members are representative of low-income individuals and families in the
neighborhood served, and each representative of low-income individuals and families selected to represent a specific
neighborhood within a community resides in the neighborhood represented; and (c) the remainder of the members are
officials or members of business, industry, labor,religious, law enforcement, education, or other major groups and interest in
the community served;
prohibit the purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase, co^struction, or permanent improvement (other than low-cost
residential weatherization or other energy-related home repairs)of any building or facility with CSBG funds;
prohibit, including subcontractors, (a) any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or any political activity associated with a
candidate, or contending faction or group, in an election for public or party office, (b) any activity to provide voters or
prospective voters with transportation to the polls or similar assistance in connection with any such election, or(c) any voter
registration activity.
2. prohibit that persons shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with CSBG. Any
prohibition against discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act or 1975 (42 U.S.0 6101 et seq.) or
with respect to an otherwise qualified individual with a disability as provided in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.) shall also apply to any such program or activity.
3. participate in the Results-Oriented Management and Accountability(ROMA) System, and describe outcome measure to be
used to measure performance in promoting self-sufficiency,family stability, and/or community revitalization;
make available for public inspection each plan prepared as part of the program planning process. The grantee may, at its
initiative,revise any plan prepared for CSBG funding and shall furnish the revised plan to the Director of the Community
Services Block Grant under the Department of Local Affairs. Each plan prepared for submission shall be made available for
public inspection within the county and/or service area in such a manner as will facilitate review of,and comments on,the
plan;
cooperate with the State,to determine whether grantee performance goals, administrative standards, financial management
requirements, and other requirements of the State, in conducting monitoring reviews including(1)a full on-site review for
each grantee at least once during each 3-year period, (2)on-site review for each newly designated grantee immediately after
the completion of the first year in which funds were received,(3) follow-up reviews with grantees that fail to meet the goals,
standards, and requirement established by the State,and(4)other reviews as appropriate, including reviews of grantees with
other programs that have had other federal, State, or local grants terminated for cause.
make available appropriate books, documents,papers, and records for inspection,examination,copying, or mechanical
reproduction on or off the premises upon reasonable request by the U.S. Controller General,the State,or their authorized
representatives should an investigation of the uses of CSBG funds be undertaken;
in the case of county governments or subgrantees which receive a CSBG award in excess of$100,000, comply with the
following three certifications related to the "Limitation on use of appropriated funds to influence certain Federal Contracting
and financial transactions(P.L. 101-121,Section 319 and USC Title 31 Section 1352)":
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal
contract,continuation, renewal,amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of
Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant, loan,or
cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LEE, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instruction.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award document for
subawards at all tiers(including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative
agreements)and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
The grantee certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
b) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
c) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against
them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a
public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement,theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
c) are not presently indicted for otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State or local)
with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(b)of this certification;and
d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions(Federal, State or
local)terminated for cause or default.
(Ifyou are unable to cerlify to any of the statements in this certification,please attach an explanation to this application)
CONTRACTOR: ✓r, �, r , ' r1
If County Grantee: Chairman of the B and of County Commissioners must sign
If Multi-County Service Agency: Ch irman of the Board of Directors with delegated contracting authority must
sign.
POSITION TITLE: C— fA I ii C DATE: -Z 6'L
V. CSBG BOARD LIST:
Representatives of Private Sector:
Name: Mary Ellen Secrist Name: Carolyn Kane
Address:174 Larkspur Dr., Aspen, CO 81611 Address: 130 Primrose, Aspen, CO 81611
Phone(970)925-2091 Phone: (970)925-8233
Name: Chuck Torinus Name: James Moran
Address:PO Box 2125,Aspen,CO 81612 Address: 688 N Spruce,Aspen, CO 81611
Phone: (970)925-8558 Phone(970)925-7489
Representatives of Public Sector:
Name: Patti Clapper Name: Dorothea Farris
Address:530 E. Main St, Aspen, CO 81611 Address: 530 E. Main St.,Aspen, CO 81611
Phone: (970)920-5154 Phone: (970)920-5158
Name: Mick Ireland
Address:530 E. Main St.,Aspen, CO 81611
Phone: (970)920-5155
Low-Income Persons or their Representatives:
Name: Sasha Randal Name: Ceci Salas
Address:PO Box 4327, Aspen,CO 81611 Address: 5387 County Road 154#27, Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Phone: (970)920-1011 Phone: (970)928-7010
Name: Alicia Telles Name Maria Acosta
Address:2505 Nicholas Lane,Aspen, CO 81611 Address: 801 W. Bleeker,#1, Aspen, CO 81611
Phone: (970)544-5010 Phone: no phone