Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.291102100004 (3).:DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (llxl~ _ ~~ .per.-...~y~..y',` '-,~.~;`..e... ~t :'_.t.~....' %~.-.-,m~i.v:."i.µ,tp:w.'~_:'Sf."'T.~!,Y~~^~^.r':.~`w0!'.'": :bY".M"~ PARGELIO 291-1-021-00+0-04-' DATERCVD. 6/15/1998 ' #ICppiESc~B ;.,"4Aa^E P1.41iAE: Katr Ellen of VR 1041 H R Amend &CDU PROD ADDR: 0226 Conundrum Creek Rd ~'~° ~ ", _"~ rywtirltiPb~•KnI'il Anne P.1..1in ~lY[.ix~Tbl~''..t.~"M1~-....• REP: Davis, Alice ~n:~ADR: 215 S Monarch Street ~`ti ~ §iZ: Aspen, CO 81611 ~~ Pf ..' .: FEES.ObE.. 1110 + 110 Cler '; ::. FEES t2CVD. 1110 + 110=1220 ;` '.- ~ ~~-.,~-:_.;_", ~:~'`' ...~~"~ "": . ~. ..: ... ...e -.... .p.: . ~ ... .. ~ ~ .i ... ,r. ..,...K3 ..., ' mot.' .s." ::„~..: k> ~ a!e`~OVEP .,: Y Y ~ ~ ' REFEkRACS Count Attorne ~~ ~~ '~ Zoning, Housing, Env Health ~~ ;. REh''' 6/18/1998 ~~.,_'.:'«..:,~,,...'_.__^',... , ._...«..... „.._... ,, :'.. ~.. '.: 1. : ~ .,B, SH ~ Y ' t7UE:T 8/7/1998 r::: I'~".. R~-. ... ~, '... :'~:, .~ .. - . w .. ..... ~ -~-:a~ ,. ^._..:, '..,tk~ ~~.. r~.:; , _.,.. t;~ gip. ~, '. .. M7G D'ATE'" ~~ EV BODY " Ptl ~":~ ~ o'TICi`fICEb"~?°; `" C?;4't'~"CxF Ft7dA1; AC`f~O~'#: .W.v :~A: .: 9/23/1998 BOCC ~~~ ~~~ ~:;:.:.~'~ '"""^.. , ^tl- No 8/22/1998. '~~`=~<: '" "~" ""~•`"' No ~ '~.~ M~.sy;~'~ ~~,DC2`'Ffesb? ' 98; ~-~-°--- ~' -zx.. _ No ~,~t;; ,,, BOCCOrdi ~~'12EMARtCS "fi".vr...x%: ;I;::~~ :. ~.., . ;cm „ OSED: 9/25/1998 "BY: TKT ~. .. ,..~ ~- ;:: r .. , ~, . .. ... :~ ,. ~ ., , L..""r.rAUPdEN. ~. .. .. .a 'i .; ". ..... ~... ' ::.. "i. ,3 .... :.. : - .. :... .. .. 'i:: ~~ ",' ~ P(,AT RECORb"S"D 5/21/99 PU4T {BK;PG); B49 P99 i/431382 ~" _:AiSMIN 1NUEJC ,._ ._. e" .~-s~~: ..._~ ~_XRAPPROI%ALIIATE: ':= .:,-',~ i'. 'CASE TYPc ~ Ellen of VR .:.`°~;-,z,;;<., ~,:P~^~ :~.:~ ,A,~ .. ::~ CgSE'`1`YI?3~ 1041 H RAmend ~...~.~..y:...bG:;: ~€~~~`.. '~` ~ ~` .n ~.ri.~.+.u~ .::... ~ , "~„ CA5E TYP3: CDU - ..... ASE TYP7``' ., : ~.- :s",..CASE~7YP4: ` ., Scarufed y ~~~~ ~ `~ 23/08 _~.. , x.: '~} w ... :;,. ,. . .<.... .. :....r. .. ::~ - `. r.x. ' ~~«.'. ~. u i '.. r.~.. "i " !'e ~.. `.'. .. .. .._>>:.x ... s.. ~.... ~.'iz' ..1 ~~ "::.#R .. e. .~ f ~' ~ ~~''~:.' `5=: 1,: g J - .:_.. ~~ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS OF PTTHIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE I';r1TZ EXTENSION OF VESTEb REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 1041 HAZARD REVIEW AMENDMENT AND CARETAKER DWELLING:UNIT Resolution No. 98- 183 Ann and. Michael Katz, (hereafter "Applicants") have applied to the Pitkin County Boazd of County Commissioners (hereafter "Boazd") to consider an extension of vested real property rights pursuant to Section, 4-140-30 of the Land Use Code (hereafter "Code"), an expansion of the approved building envelope pursuant to Section 3-80, 1041 Hazazd Review, and' for special review approval of a detached caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3- 150.130(B), Caretaker Dwelling [Jnits, and Section 3-210.10, Special Review, 2. The property is. located on Conundrum Creek Road, and is more specifically described in Exhibit A. 3. The pazcel is zoned AFR-10 and contains 2 acres. 4. 1041'Hazard Review approval to construct a single family residence was granted by the Pitkin County Hearing Officer pursuant to a site plan recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 82. The Boazd reviewed the request at a regulazly scheduled public hearing on September 23, 1998, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 6. The Board determined that the proposed development, as revised by the conditions of this resolution, generally complies with the applicable sections of the Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin Coutiy`Boazd"`ofCoumy ~., ommiss~oners at rt doe-..ere y grant approval of the Katz Extension of bested Rights, ? Oh'1 FIazard Review Amendment, and Caretaker Dwelling Unit, subject to the conditions shown on the 1041 site plan Resolution No. 98- i $'3 ~ ~ _ ""' ~ " ~ ' Page t recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 82, except as amendeti below, and the additional conditions included herein. 1. Condition #8 shall, be replaced with the following: Any windows on the west side of the residence and the cazetaker dwelling unit shall utilize safety. glass and shad be certified as blast resistant by the azchitect. 2. Condition #9 shall be replaced with the following: The applicants shall provide a 2 foot high earthen berm on the west side of the residence and the west side of the caretaker dwelling unit to divert snow and mud flows away from the structures. The berms may be located outside of the building envelope. A licensed engineer or surveyor shall certify that the berms were constructed, prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the residence and the caretaker unit. 3: Conditions.#10 shall be replaced with the followings No development, including grading, landscaping, vegetation removal or disturbance, septic system'and well shall occur outside of the approved building envelope, except for the driveway and as may be necessary to implement the wildfire mitigation measures required elsewhere in this document. 4. Condition # 1,1 shall. be replaced with the following: Prior to issuance of a septic permit or any building permits, the applicants shall obtain an access permit from the County Engineer. 5. All conditions shown on the site plan recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 82 shall >le applicable to the cazetaket dwelling unit in addition to the:principal residence. 6. The applicants shall. submit an amended 1641 site plan to the Community Development Department for approval and recording, prior to submission of an access permit, septic permit, or any buildingpermits. The site plan shall also be submitted in digital format suitable for iategration into the County's GIS system. The site plan shall be modified as follows: A. Expand the building envelope to the south to incorporate the'additional flat area ffiat is outside of the hazazd areas. B. Specify in the title that this is an amended 1041 site plan. C. Amend the signature block for the Chan of the Board of County Commissioners. D. Include a signature block for the owners. For any free market residential structure of 5,000 gross square feet ar greater, the applicant shall comply with Section 4.01.01(B) of the Pitkin County Road Management and Maintenance Plan, . M.~ ., which requires the applicant to provide constmction trip and residential trip genezahon studies. The _.:_, . the satisfaclrion of the County Engineer un as it is in effect at the time of Building permit issuance to 8. The caretaker dwelling unit shall be limited to 700 nef livable square feet, and the kitchen shall contain a minimum of a two-burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. 4: Prior to issuance of a building permit for the caretaker dwelling unit, ;the applicants shall obtain `and n.,:~_.. ~._. ~.... . ,,,,~., . ,. the Housing Office shall record a caretaker dwelling unit deed restricnon. wFloor plans oi't"he unit shall be provided to the Housing Office prior to'issuance of the building permit. k. c~.. .a,. __ry.. 2 Resolution No. 98- ~ g3 Page 3 10. Housmgand _. ., ..._._ _~ _ __. ----.- ' Community Development staff shall inspect the unit prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. The applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in public hearings and in the application. 12. This extension shall expire three years from the date of this approval on September 23, 2001. NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING PITBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TII~3 ON`THE 22nd DAY OF AIIGIIST, 1998. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 23RD DAY OF 5EP1'EMBER.1998. 41°STC4 Rl~HrSNer/ct l°t~~/s/seDi.~~71l~'IPSRr.V T/Af4f dV cc:TOQe2 a/~ /fyP BOARD QF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PITKIN COUN'i1', COLORADO By ,» ~ _ ~~ ~, ~ ws. s Dorothea Farris, Chair ATTEST: ,Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: y Houben Community Development Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOml LI~_ County Attorney P86-98 PID #2911-021-00-004 suzannew\pidcin\cases\vreVcatz\reso.dac r ` I I"III "III "I"I IIII~~ II'I' I"II II~~I ~I ~I'~~II ~"1 _ _ 423830 10/2875998 10r03A RESOLUT2 DAMS S,I[17I 3 of 4 R 0.00" D 0.00 N 0.00 PI'7KIN 'COUi4TY"DfS" ` From ~'?O 925 5180 Sep 24-9H 09-OlA,_Yuser~"""'*,.. ., ,.>_ .~. EXHIBIT A A tract of land situated within the boundar?ee of x E S 112 in Ran a 85 Wast of'the SiXth Principal..._ Townships 10 and 11 South, 4 Mexidian descra.bed as fellows: •E•S• 'No• 112 bears Beginning at a point Whence Corner No-.1 of said N a'7°29'30" E fi53.53 feet, thence S 1°3g' s 143.43 feet; thence S 27°27' W 96.06 feet; thence S b°57' W 93.30 feet; thence 5 71°57' E Efi431~90efeEt; thence ITT 1°43'30" nt of beginning. thence S 82°53' W X19.00 feet to the poi TpGETHER WZTx an easement for ingress and egress: as set forth in Easement and Right Of 47ay recb~'ded September 14, 1979 in Soak 375 at Page a55 and Hoak 375; at Page 859 died as shown on the Plat of carter-Goesarc~ Tracts recardsd in Plat Sooic -J at Page ig COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting -September 23, 1998 THRU: Cindy Houben, Community Development Directo~(~ FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planner RE: Katz Extension of Vested Rights, 1041 Hazard Review Amendment & Cazetaker Dwelling Unit REQUEST: Pursuant to Section 4-140.30, the applicants are requesting a three yeaz extension of the vested property rights for the 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission approval granted by the Hearing Officer in 1995. The applicants also propose to expand the building envelope in order to accommodate a proposed detached caretaker dwelling unit. APPLICANTS: Ann & Michael Katz REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn LOCATION: Conundrum Creek Valley ZONING/LOT SIZE: The lot is zoned AFR-10 and contains approximately 2 acres. BACKGROUND: 1041 Hazard Review approval was granted by the Hearing Officer in 1995, and a site plan was recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 82. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Comments from Environmental Health, Zoning and Housing are attached for reference. STAFF COMMENTS: 1041 aRn R vI w: The applicant proposes to extend the approved building envelope on the north side of the property Geologic In 1995 Nicholas Lampiris identified rockfall and avalanche as the two geologic hazards that impact the property. He noted that the building envelope was set back fifty feet from the base of the hillside, and, therefore, that development within the envelope would avoid any rockfall hazard. In addition, Hydro Triad provided an avalanche evaluation which mapped the "red" and "blue" avalanche hazard zones; the approved building envelope and the proposed addition to the envelope are located outside of the mapped hazard areas. Jeffrey Hynes of the Colorado Geological Survey concurred with the findings and recommendations of the Lampiris and Hydro Triad reports. The 1995 approval required the applicants to minimize the width of and utilize safety glass in any windows on the west side of the residence and to provide a 2 foot high earthen berm on the west side of the residence. Staff recommends that these conditions also apply to the proposed detached caretaker dwelling unit. The required berm must be located within the approved building envelope. In addition, a licensed engineer must certify that the berm was adequately constructed to mitigate the hazard, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Joanna Schaffner, County Zoning Officer, questions how "minimize" is defined in the condition which requires the applicants to "minimize" the width of the windows on the west side of the residence. Staff suggests that any windows on the west side. of the. residence and caretaker unit be no larger than the minimum size required by the UBC. Wildfire: The parcel was previously determined to be in a low wildfire hazard area. In his 1995 comments, Kelly Rogers of the Colorado State Forest Service states, "The combination of low hazard fuels, close proximity to a fire station and adequate road and driveway access make this proposal a very low risk from wildland fire." The prior conditions of approval regarding wildfire mitigation are consistent with our current standards. These standards shall also apply to the amended building envelope and the detached caretaker dwelling unit. CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION: Water/Sewer: The applicants have drilled a well and propose to install an Individual Sewage Disposal System to serve the residence and caretaker dwelling unit. The prior' approval required all development to occur within the building envelope, which would include the well and septic system. Lee Cassin of the Environmental Health Department is concerned that the building envelope is not large enough to accommodate the well and septic system for a large residence given the required setbacks from the well to the septic system. The building envelope could be expanded to the south to incorporate additional flat area that is not impacted by hazard areas in order to provide the applicants more flexibility in siting the residence, septic system, etc. This additional area is depicted on the reduced site plan included as Attachment A. Access: The parcel is accessed directly off of Conundrum Creek Road. The residence and caretaker unit shall utilize a shared driveway off of the road. An access permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer prior to issuance of the septic permit(s) or any building permits. vP,STED RIGHTS ExTENSroN: The Board shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria in reviewing a request for an extension ofvested property rights: 1. Compliance with conditions of approval: The applicant recorded the 1041 site plan following approval in 1995. The other conditions are not applicable until permit submittal or issuance. 2. Progress in pursuing the project• The applicants have drilled a well on the parcel. Construction of the residence has not yet been pursued. 3. Nature and extent of benefrts received by the County: No benefits were required to be granted to the County as a result of the previous approval. 4. Needs of the County and the applicant that would be served by approval of the request: The extension process allows the County to update the approval to be consistent with the current standards of the Code. There have not been any substantial changes in the Code since the original approval was granted. T-- -- , ,~„ ,~ cAxETAxEx DwEU~xG UNTT: A caretaker dwelling unit is listed as a special review use in the AFR-10 zone district, and therefore must comply with the special review standards in Section 3-210 of the Land Use Code. These standards require that: • the use is consistent with applicable master plans, County Land Use policies, the intent of the zone district, and the character of the surrounding area; • the location, size, design and operating characteristics of the use are in harmony with the surrounding area and minimize adverse effects; • adequate public facilities and services are apailable. Response: The use is consistent with County Land Use policies, the intent of the zone district, and the character of the surrounding area. The caretaker unit can provide housing for an employee of the community. The Housing Office recommends approval of the unit. The cazetaker unit will be provided with the same geologic hazard mitigation that is required for the principal residence. The applicants must install one septic system of adequate size to serve the residence and the caretaker dwelling unit, or must install two sepazate systems. Pursuant to Section 3-150.130(B) of the Code, the Boazd may permit a detached cazetaker dwelling unit not to exceed 700 squaze feet on any lot in the AFR-10 zone district under the following conditions and limitations: 1. The total floor area of the principal and caretaker unit shall not exceed the allowable FAR of the applicable zone district; Response: There is no FAR in the AFR-10 zone district. The residence and caretaker unit may not exceed 15,000 square feet of floor area without special review approval. 2. There shall be provided one off-strzet parking space for each bedroom in the caretaker unit. Response: One parking space per bedroom will be provided. 3. The applicant shall deed restrict the unit to comply with the caretaker unit deed restriction pursuant to Section 3-150.130 (C)(3) of the Land Use Code. Response: The applicant agrees to deed restrict the cazetaker unit in accordance with County regulations. The deed restriction must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the caretaker unit. d. The dwelling unit deed restriction may only be removed upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Response: This requirement shall be included in the deed restriction. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 4-140.30, staff recommends that the Board adopt a "motion to approve the Katz Extension of Vested Rights, 1041 Hazard Review Amendment and Caretaker Dwelling Unit, subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution". Attachments A. Revised Site Plan B. Zoning memo C. Environmental Health memo D. Housing memo . ~. 4 - ._ M E M O RAND U M TO: Suzanne Wolff, Planning FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner,, Zoning DATE: August 3, 1998 RE: Katz Extension of Vested Rights, Caretaker Dwelling Unit and Amendment to a Minor 1041 approval Parcel ID# 2911-021-00-004 I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the following comments: ZONE: AFR-10, ten acre minimum lot area This parcel contains two acres and is non-conforming in size for the AFR-10 zone district. SETBACKS: The required setbacks for this parcel are: 30 foot front yard 20 foot side yard 30 foot rear yard The proposed building envelope lies outside of required setbacks, however, the original envelope lies within the required front yard setback. Development will not be permitted within this area without the approval of the Board of Adjustment. FLOOR AREA: The total- allowed floor area for this parcel is 15,000 square feet. This amount may be exceed by Special Review. All structures are included in the calculation of floor area. HEIGHT: Building plans have not been submitted at this time. OTHER: 1. No development is permitted outside of approved envelopes unless specified by the approval of this or another land use application. This includes landscaping, 'entry or ranch-style gates, and septic systems. 2. The 2 foot high berm required to mitigate geologic concerns must be located within the approved building envelope. - - , 3., Condition #9, pertaining to the berm, should be reworded to more specifically locate the berm, and to require that prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a licensed engineer'or Dr. Lampiris certify that the berm was adequately constructed to effectively mitigate the hazard. 4. The Deed Restriction should be required prior to issuance of 'a building permit for the caretaker dwelling unit. 5. Will the single family residence and the caretaker dwelling unit shall a single access? Is the access existing? 6. The lot size should be indicated on the site plan. 7. The following changes are. suggested for the previous conditions of approval listed on the site plan: A. 'Condition 5a "Brush, debris and non-ornamental vegetation shall be_removed within a minimum 10 foot perimeter around the structure." NOTE: If the "clump of trees" identified in the area between the existing and proposed building envelopes is to be preserved, the building envelope should be modified to avoid this area or the trees may be lost in compliance of condition 5a. ' B. Condition 8 "The applicants shall minimize the width of and utilize safety glass in any `, windows on the west side of the residence." Please specify what "minimize" means. , C. Condition 11 "An access permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer prior to building permit submittal." NOTE: Access permits are' required prior to issuance o'f a Development Permit. MEMORANDUM To: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Department From: Lee Cassin, Environmental Flealth Department Date: 7/22/1998 Re: Katz Request for Caretaker Unit, Amendment to 1041, Extension of Vested Rights Parcel ID #2911-021-00-004 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Katz application under the authority of the Pitkin CountXLand Use Code and has the following comments. We have not been able to visit the site, so our comments are limited to the material presented in the application. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-17 and 3-1104: "It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prioi to approval of the use. The County shall require lahduses to hook up to existing public systems & service is available." Unfortunately, the well has already been drilled. Its location may severely limit the size of the house and the location of the septic system(s). Its location is not shown on our map, so we cannot tell how much of an issue this will be. Please refer to the discussion of setbacks below. This Department needs adequate information on the quantity and the quality of water available. To do this, the owners will need tests of on-site wells done by a water engineer or well driller.. There must be enough water' to serve the main house as well as the caretaker unit. The applicant must ensure that the water quality is acceptable by having it tested by a lab such as the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District or Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Before this department can issue a septic permit, the owners must drill the well to ensure that the well will meet the required setback distance from the septic system. Pitkin County Land Use Code requires that the well site be within the building envelope. A condition of approval for this application is documentation that the well(s) meet setback requirements and that quantity and quality of the well water are adequate. The County cannot issue septic and building permits until the applicant meets these requirements. ~+m~ a o~ accv~~~m r.,p.., 1 SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105: °lt i5 the pnacy of the co,mry to ensure that adequatesewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and neiv~[teveTo`pments. Pu~ilic and private sewage disposal systems and connections to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County's Sndividual Sewage Disposal System Regulation." Lots in the Conundrum Creek. area have individual, septic systems. All such systems installed within Pitkin County require septic permits issued by the Environmental Health Department, and must comply with the County's septic regulations. Owners should realize that the engineer can perform the soils tests between April 15 and Nov. 15 of each year. The County cannot issue building and septic permits without these soils tests. To receive a septic permit, the applicant will need to submit a septic permit application through a Registered Professional Engineer who will design the system. The packet must include several items, including percolation test results and profile hole information.. It must also include a site plan with pertinent physical features. A floor plan for the dwelling and caretaker unit and a copy of the County's land use approval are needed as well. Once we receive the completed application, this Department will analyze and review the proposed septic design. Addition of a detached caretaker unit will require more septic system area, either in two separate systems, or one larger system. It is possible that the septic systems for these lots might require a state permit, which is more costly and time-consuming than a county permit. The owners should determine that and allow sufficient time to get this permit before their building permit. The applicant should know that it might take from 2-6 weeks to obtain a well permit (required before septic system design). It may take some time to have soils. tests performed and additional time to have the system designed. The owner should carefully evaluate this schedule to make sure all steps have been taken to make the permitting process as fast as possible. It will not be possible to fit a large house, detached caretaker unit, well, and septic system in this building envelope. Here are some examples of required distances between wells and septic systems. (The greater the sewage flow, the greater the distance must be between the septic system and the well. Sewage flows are a function of the size of the house and the number of rooms that these or future owners may use'as bedrooms as their family size and situation changes.) A 3-bedroom house smaller than 2,000 sq. ft. must have its well 100' from the septic system. A 3-bedroom house smaller than 2,000 sq. ft. with an office must have its well 104' from the septic system. A 3-bedroom house with one office that is 2,400 sq. ft. must have its we11132' from the septic system. A 4-bedroom house with one office that is 2,400 sq. ft. must have its we11160' from the septic system. Primed on Recycled Paper Z ,. _. _. :~ , A 4-bedroom house with one office and one playroom, of 2,400 sq. ft. must have the we11188' from the septic system. A 4-bedroom house with one office and one playroom, of over 6,000 sq. ft. must have the we11238' from the septic system. A house with over 6,000 sq. ft. with 5 bedrooms and one office in the.main house and an attached 2-bedroom caretaker unit, must have the well 311' from the septic system. The building envelope is not 311 feet long. The type of soil will. determine exactly how large the septic system must be. The owners will need to obtain site specific soil data. The leach field should be in an area of no traffic, the owner should plant the field area with dry land grass, and residents should not water the leachfield area. It is desirable. to locate the. system below the house so that the system can operate by gravity. From the information in the previous application, it appears that high ground water will be a factor in constructing the septic system The well permit may state that the septic system must be of the non-evaporative type where the water returns to the stream system adjacent to the well. If so, the owner cannot install a completely lined field, such as an evapo-transpiration bed, without a new well permit or a plan of augmentation. A condition. of,approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the septic permit before issuance of a building permit, and the applicant's understanding that a large house with caretaker unit, well, and septic system will not fit in this building envelope. The size of the house will. have to be determined, by the. available space between the septic system and the well. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14 and 3-705 and 3-710: "It is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no land use be initiated which would adverselyaffect the quantity, quality; or accessibility of the County's water resources;'or which would occur at the expense of established water-dependent agiiculturai acHviries; or which would result in increased salixuzafion of water resources, loss of rnuumum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistkibute major water resources. It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human acrivities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands." The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application should not impact down stream water quality if the setbacks rrineN nn aecydN raper ~;' between the septic system and physical features comply with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations. between the septic system and physical features comply with the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations. The Environmental Health Department's mission is to preserve and protect the quality of Pitkin County's water resources. Since a large percentage of the population is dependent upon water from wells, elimination of groundwater pollution, and protection of aquifers and their drainage areas are of utmost importance. Roofs and asphalt areas can be nonpoint sources of water discharge that can contaminate water supplies. This Department recommends that nonpoint sources of discharge be retained on the property of origin. To accomplish this, the owner can use landscaping, drainage patterns, detention ponds, and/or dry wells for water runoff from buildings. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602: "Only that development is permitted which will not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. Developments may not cons8tute an indirect or duect air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations." This site is in an area not amenable to service by mass transit. This project should not contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County because of its small size. FIREPLACE The less densely populated parts of the county like the Katz site may have two devices per building. The owners can install no more than one wood burning fireplace and a second device that can be either a gas log fireplace or a certified woodstove. In addition, the owner can install unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances. Occupants may not burn coal in any device. The owners cannot install fireplaces or woodstoves in barns or agricultural buildings. A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the fireplace/woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department. This is a condition of building permit issuance. CrUNN(~KMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-7' °lt is tke poiicy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permittedwhich is in violation of the laws of the County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America." This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. r,m~m o~ acyd d aap~ - _.. .. .,, ._, .:_ ,,.., .. .,x .u...~,: na.o. wnr .~ ,.mow- J~ 05 '98 12~08PM ASPEN HOUSING 6PC P.~ ~-~MO~-ru©u~ TC3: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Department FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office PATE: August 5,1998 EtE: Review for a Caretaker Dwelling Urrit / Katz Parcel ID fJo, 2911-02'I-t~O-lDf}4 ~~: The applicant is proPceln9 ~ oonstnxt a detached caretaker dwelling. BACKGROUND: Accorrfirlg to the P'itkin t;ourtty Land Use, Section 3•t50.130 B, "CJther Caretaker" units, the Board may parrnit one Caretaker tAHeuing Unit not to exceed 700 square feet, to be located within a property approved outbuilding on any lvt within the R-3(}, AFR-10, AFR-2, 85-20, RS-30 and RS-f60 zones. All such units may he approved under the folkmring conditions and lirnetatirn'rs: t. The total floorarea of the ptinciisal and caretaker unit shall not exceed the allowable FAfi of ttre applicable zone district. 2, The applicant shall by deed restricAion ar other permanent commitment running with the laced, guarantee that the caretaker urrtit shell hat be required to be rented; not be candominiumized or ,sold; not be occupeed try the owner a<epotYS9; be limned to occupancy by rent more than two (2) adults. and related ti}ildren, who qualify as (and have been found by the Ftouaing Authexity to be) arnployees of {he comnwn'dy under such guidelines as may be from ame to time established by said Aup'rority: be rented for terms not less than siz (8) marrths if rented. The c~areiaia<t dwelling uno~ may be ocd3pled by members of the immediate family even ttrwrgh they may not qualeYy as employees of the comnwnny. "immediate Family" &hsli mean a parson related try blood or marriage who is a first cousin (or ciaser relative) and his or her dlldfalr. R~C.3O, MIYIENiM~tON: Staff recommends approval aalang as the fdlowing conditions are met: 1. the urrit is less than 7t70 square feet; 2, a copy of the floor plans far the caretaker dweAinq unit be provided ti4 the Housing Office prior trs building pemvt approval; 3. the kitchen contains at least a two•bumer stove with, oven, standard sink, and at least a 6- .. oubic frotrefrigerator plus freeziar, 4. a Garetakae Qvuelling Unit deed resdriction be recorded krefcrre building permi4 approval (this document shah he obtained through the Housing~"ice); `anii" 5. inspection by the Housing Office Prior to Certificate of Ocr~apancy. ___,_ 1. An amen~meri~~ a approve `Sit:e-P an; 4' Davis Horn~- PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING May 12, 1998 Suzanne Wolff Aspen-Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Ratz Property - Request for Approval for an Amettdment to a Minor 1041 Approval; Extension of Vested Property Rights and Approval for a Detached Caretaker Dwelling Unit. Dear Suzanne: Davis Horn Incorporated represents Michael and Ann Katz (hereinafter "applicant") who own a two acre lot in the Conundrum Creek area. On March 2, 1995 Pitkin County Hearing Officer Tim Malloy approved the Katz Minor 1041 Environmental Hazard Review.,. Please refer to Attachment 1, the approved 1041 Site Plan which lists the conditions of this approval. This current application seeks approval for an amendment to 1041 approval in order to expand the approved building envelope to include an area for a proposed caretaker dwelling unit. The application is also requesting approval for the proposed detached caretaker dwelling unit and approval for an extension of vested property 'rights. The Katz property is located approximately 6 miles from Aspen up the Castle Creek Valley. It is in a residential area built out with other single family homes, duplexes and attached residential units. It is located in the AFR-10 zone district and is a legally created substandard sized lot. Access is via Conundrum Creek Road, a country road improved consistent with County standards. The two acre subject site is virtually flat. The toe of a steep hillside borders the property to the west. The applicant intends t~ approved in 1995 and caretaker dwelling unit the approved envelope at A short access drive to will be located within will comply with Pitkin > build the single family home originally now also proposed to build a detached (CDU). The CDU requires an expansion of an area to the north end of the envelope. the caretaker unit is also proposed and the building envelope. The new driveway County Road Standards and Specifications. The applicant therefore seeks approval for the following: 1. An amendment to the approved 1041 Site Plan; 2. A proposed detached caretaker dwelling unit; and 3. Extension of vested property rights. ALICE DAVIS, AICP S GLENN HORN, AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. SUITE 104 ASPEN; COLORADO 81611 970/925-6587 • FAX: 970/925-5180 Your Pre-Application Conference Summary sheet requests the applicant to provide the following: I. A summary of 1041 concerns which were initially reviewed and mitigation measures which were approved; II. A summary letter explaining the approvals requested and addressing Pifkin County Code Sections 3-80.50 (geologic hazards), 3-80.70 (wildfire hazards), 3-150.130(B) (caretaker dwelling units), and 4-140.30 (extension of property rights); III. Information addressing how the 1041 standards affect. the additional portion of the building envelope. Each of the preceding issues are addressed in the following sections of this application. I. Initial 1041 Concerns and Mitigation Measures The Katz Minor 1041 review initially dealt with two environmental hazards, wildfire and geologic hazards. The Code requires that development take place in a hazard free area if such a area exists. The subject site is affected by geologic hazards, however the proposed building envelope is free of geologic hazards. Nick Lampiris completed a geologic report for the original 1041 review and indicated that the two geologic hazards on the site were rockfall and avalanche danger. Hydro-triad also did a report on the avalanche hazards and the 1041 site plan shows the boundaries of the red and blue avalanche zones. The building envelope has been located outside of the mapped avalanche hazard areas. The approved and the proposed building envelope avoids all the geologic hazard areas identified. There were two conditions of the original approval which were related to the geologic hazards. These conditions, listed as numbers 8 and 9 on the approved 1041 site plan, were as follows: * The applicants shall minimize the width of and utilize safety glass in any windows on the west side of the residence. The applicant shall provide a 2 foot high earthen berm on the west side of the residence. The applicant agrees to these two conditions (and all other conditions of the original approval) being applied to the new, expanded building envelope and the caretaker dwelling unit. The entire subject site is subject to low wildfire hazards. The 12 conditions of approval for the original 1041 approval are listed in Attachment 2 and are also noted on the approved 1041 site plan in ~. Attachment 1. The conditions include standard conditions related to the wildfire hazard which the applicant will continue to meet for the expanded' envelope and for the caretaker dwelling unit. II. REQUESTED APPROVALS This application will now address the Code sections referenced in the pre-application conference summary sheet in Attachment 5. Section 3-80.50 of the Code addresses 1041 geologic hazards. As neither the approved or the propose expanded building envelopes contain any geologic hazards, develo ent is proposed for the least impactive sections of the site, as s required by the Code. The building envelopes boundaries were located to avoid the blue, avalanche hazard zone as can be seen on the 1041 site plans. There are geologic hazards on the site, but none are found within the, envelopes. Therefore, geologic hazards should not be of concern in the expanded building envelope. The applicant will continue to abide by the conditions in the original approval which relate to geologic hazards, specifically conditions 8 and 9 listed on the approved 1041 site plan. Section 3-80.70 of the Code addresses wildfire hazards. The subject site is in a low wildfire hazard area. All standard' conditions related to wildfire mitigation will be met. Should there be new, standard wildfire mitigation conditions required which were not placed on the original approval, the applicant is willing to adhere to new standard and reasonable wildfire mitigation conditions as well. Section 3-150.130(B) of the Code addresses 11other caretaker dwelling units". A 700 square foot caretaker dwelling unit may be permitted on any size lot in the AFR-l0 zone. The unit can be attached and detached as long as the unit complies with the following: 1) The total floor area for the principal and the caretaker units shall not exceed the allowable FAR for the zone. 2) There shall be one off-street parking space per bedroom for each bedroom within the principal unit and one off- street parking space for each bedroom in the caretaker unit. 3) The applicant will guarantee through a deed restriction that the caretaker unit shall not be required to be rented; not be condominiumized or sold; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two adults and related children who qualify as employees of the community under applicable guidelines; be rented for terms not less than six months, if rented. 3 The caretaker unit can be occupied by a member of the immediate family eventhough~~~they do not qualify as employees of the community. 4) The caretaker dwelling unit restriction may be removed by the property owner upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Michael and Ann Katz plan to house a caretaker„in the caretaker .~ .. dwelling unit, should it be approved. They will abide by the above restrictions including limiting the floor area for both the principal and caretaker dwelling units to the total FAR allowed for such a two acre lot in the AFR-10 zone district. They also agree to meet the off-street parking requirements. This section of the application demonstrates compliance with the standards in Section 4-140.30.. of the Land Use Code which must .be .~.~_ x.,w., .. satisfied for the extension of vested property 'rights. Thee following addresses these standards,. i. The applicant's compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the date. of application for extension of vested rights. The applicant was required to record a 1041 site plan prior to the submission of an application for a building permit. The site plan has been recorded at Deed Book 38, Page 82, though an application for a building permit has not yet been submitted. All other approval conditions identified on the 1041 Site Map will be complied with prior to issuance of a septic permit or building permit, whichever is applicable. 2. The progress made in pursuing the project to date, including the effort to obtain any other permits, such as building permits, and the expenditures made by the applicant in pursuing the project. The applicant has not pursed construction of the approved single family home and a building permit has not been requested. The applicant has, however, designed a house and drilled a new well on the property in reliance on the ability to develop the property consistent with the 1041 approvals. 3. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the County as a result of project approval, such as impact fees or land dedications. The County has not received any benefits or impact fees from this project. 4. The needs of the County and the Applicant that would be served by approval of the extension request. ~"" The Applicant will agree to reasonable conditions imposed by the County to comply with new 1041 Environmental Hazard Review standards adopted since the March 2, 1995 approval. If the vested rights are extended, the Applicant will be able to proceed with building plans and obtain a building permit. As the site was analyzed extensively in the original review, it would not best serve the County or the Applicant to repeat the process and begin a new land use review. This would waste the time and money of both parties. 5. An extension may be in the form of a development agreement duly authorized and executed by the applicant and the County. Reasonable conditions may be imposed by the 9oard when granted any such extension. The Applicant will agree to reasonable conditions imposed by the County to comply with new 1041 Environmental Hazard Review standards adopted since March of 1995. IZI. 1041 HA2ARD3 AND THE E%PANDED 1041 BUILDING ENVELOPE;, The proposed building envelope expands the approved envelope to the north to include a level area where the proposed caretaker dwelling unit is to be located. The proposed building envelope does not contain any geologic hazards and the low wildfire hazard will be mitigated through extensive mitigation measures, therefore 1041 hazards should not be of concern. All conditions from the original approval (including wildfire and geologic mitigation) would apply to the expanded envelope and the caretaker dwelling unit and the applicant agrees to adhere to these conditions. SUMMARY This letter addresses the concerns identified in your Pre- application Conference Summary Sheet. If necessary, we will be happy to arrange a visit to the site at your convenience. The following list of attachments has been included to facilitate your review of this application. Attachment 1 - Michael and Ann Katz Minor 1041 Environmental Review Site Plan; Attachment 2 - Katz Amended 1041 Site Plan; Attachment 3 - Proof of Ownership from Tax Assessor; Attachment 4 - List of Adjacent Property Owners; Attachment 5 - Pre-application Conference Summary Sheet; 5 ,, Attachment 6 - Letter of authorization from property owners authorizing Davis Horn Inc. to submit this land use application and to represent them in the review .process; Attachment 7 - Fee Agreement; Attachment 8 -Land Use Application Form; and Attachment 9 - Addressed envelopes for the four adjacent property'owners. Please call if you ave any questions or if we have inadvertently neglected to address any of your concerns. Sincerely, DA IS HORN INCORPORA ED I GLE HORN AZCP ~~~J ALICE DAMS AZCP 6 -- ~' U S 'i t :y \' i e eYd` ~ r i; __ m l!'> =% 4 ~f° /~~`' ~ ., \~ 1_ . J / _ _ \ ~~ ~ r y~ ~ ~~ ,5,~ a ~ y ~~ ~~ Nc ~q g~ Y ~ > ~ ~~S ~ ~ t ~~~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ' }~~;~ a e~ tf ~ 48~~Z ~ dt jF J ~~~s?3 §~ eke ~e~:~¢~°`~~` ~G ~ . , ; Ys`~r ~~(~) I \r a. '~ ,~ ~ v' ~. / ; ~ ~~ ~~ /~ < 1 ~~ ~ I I --- _ ~~ -MSS I i y ~{1 \~ 4 R, . 4~~., ~ a 1 {('/}~ ~ ~~~ ~~' i /1 / ^ ~ A '- f r 1~ 1', ~` > ~. = ~ ~: ~F ~! ., ~~ r~ e~ Y~ s N __.___ _ ct_.... ............. ~.. .+"' ~ _ _ _ 1- '' /~ ;. '~'.'";: ~, ~ "i.= 5 ~.~. .. .. .......: "...0. \~ :~` t :~ :6 QZ ; 5a z ~A :: 0 ~. <. ~F x.. r((N i~ ~~~ http://ww~v.aspen.wnvbi...ac4talvalt=&acwalvaeq=. Pitkin County Assessor - -aspen snowmass - - pitkio county - There were 1 matching records found. ~~~ >~ Locate all Sales of this Property 1 ~ View Pronerty Details Tax Schedule # R003571 Tax Area 007 Pazcel# 291102100004 Name KATZ MICHAEL D KATZ ANN O Mailing Address 3584 ST GAUDENS RD City MIAMI State FL, Zip 33133 Street Legal Description Total Actual Value 550000 _ ,,, . _ ,.;. - aol - -.mailbox - -index - -ci of - itkin asnen_ county A n Snowmass Online is a subsidiary of Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. P O. Box 1~Oe, Aspen, CO 81612, Tel. 303 920-1176. Send responses to info(a~a n com Copyright© Aspen Interactive Media, Inc. 1997 lofl 04/16/98 14:08:55 '~, k .; .. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER LIST AiTACFWENT~_ MICHAEL D. KATZ ANN O. KATZ CUNUNDRUM PROPERTY Parcel I.D. No. 291102100004 A tract of land situated within the boundaries of H.E. S. 112 in Townships 10 and 11 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point whence corner No. 1 of said H.E.S. No. 112 bears N 87°'29' 30" E 653.33Feet .. . PARCEL 1 Parcel ID No. 2735 354 00 006 Sol J. and Estelle Launder 4415 Romero Drive Tarzana, CA 01356 PARCEL 2 Parcel ID No. 2911 021 00 023 Walter H. Birk Rosemarie D. Birk. 38 Nonohe Place Paia, HI 96779 PARCEL 3 Parcel ID No. 2911 021 00 003 Luetta Whitson Linda K. & James A. Hamlin Box 105 Aspen, CO 81612 PARCEL 4 Parcel ID No. 2911 021 00 009 Geroge P. Mitchell c/o Alan P. Vitale 2002 Timberlock Place The Woodlands, TX 77380 ,_ _ ,.: ~ ,.. ,.~.._ ~-.. .,~ ...a,ri- W'R-09-1998 17:19 FROM ASPENiPITKIN COM DEU TO 9-9255180 P.02 `> ]PIT[Clfl COUNTY ``~"' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY A1TACfWEMT J DATE: Apri19, 1998 PLANNER: Su~aitne Wolff PROJECT: Kau Extension of Vested Rights, 1041,Hazard Review Amendment & Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review LOCATIONS Conundrum Creak Valley OWNER: Ann and Michael Katz REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Davis PHONE: 925-6587 Type of Application: Katz Extension of Vested Rights Description of Project/Developmeat: Applicants requests an extension of Vested Rights for a single fami ly residence approved by the Hearing Officer on March 2, 1995. The 1041 site plan was recorded in Book 38 at Page 82. The applicant is also requesting approval to expand the'approved building envelope to accommodate a detached caretaker dwelling unit. Land Use Code Sections 3-80.50, Geologic Hazard Areas: Avalanche & Rockfall Hazards 3-80.70, Wildfire Hazard Areas: Mapped low wildfire hazard 3-150.130(B), Caretaker Dwelling Uniu 4-140.30, Extension of vested Rights 4-50, One step review procedure 5-50, Submission Requiremenu Review by: BOCC only Publie )bearing? YES. A public notice sign shall be posted on the property at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Referral Agencies: Attorney, Zoning, Housing, Environmental Heaitb Planning Deposit: $1,110 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $i85Jhour) Referral Agency Fees: $I 10 (Clerk) TOTAL DEPOSIT: $1,220 To apply, submit $ copies of the following information (unless noted otherwise): I. Proof of ownership of subject property 2. Parcel description, including legal description and vicinity map 3. Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the represenutive (1 copy) 4. Signed fee agreement (Z copies) 5. 'Total deposit for review of the application 6. Summary letter explaining the request and addressing the Code sections above. Summarise 1041 concerns which wero initially reviewed and mitigation measures which. were approval, and how the 104! hazards affect the additional portion of the building envelope. 7. Approved Site Plan, showing the addition to the building envelope. 8. Originat approvals (ie. resolutions) 9. List of all adjacent property owners (1 copy), and an addressed cnvplope for each owner, with the return address ofthe Community Development Department. 10. Copy of this preapp form. TOTAL P.02 May-12-98 O3cD7P y~se~ horn 97 25 5180 P.O4 0 ~~~~~ 4TTAG'WENT Cc MICHAEL AND ANN 1CATZ 2699 SOUtA BaysAOre Drfve Suite ?00 Miami, Florida 33133 May 12, 1998 Suzanne Wolff Aspen Pitkin Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Kate Extension of Vested Property Rights, Amendment to the Katz 1041 Environmental Hazard Review and Approval for a Caretaker Dwelling Unit Dear Suzanne• This letter authorized Davis Horn Incorporated to submit a land use application on our behalf for our property located in Conundrum Creek. We also authorize Davis born incorporated to represent us in the land use review process. You may contact us at (305) 442- 4524 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincereiy, Y~ Ann Katz rtichael xat~z nary-12-98 03:07P yusBm Horn F41G-01-1397 0816 FP.SPEtb'PiTV[tl CtYa DES! ~U ASPEN/PITI~I comm~nvrr~t PTPKIN cour>zY (hereinafter COC3NTI~ and K a-f ~ _ (he ..remafser .~PPL7 970 925 51H0 '~-`_1G3J~CYJ 1. APPLICANT bas submiRed ro COUNTY ats (hers:inafter, THE PR03EC'1~. r, u~ P.02 4TTAtGiMIENT As >:o~.tows: for O~Jltrsg 2. APPLICAi~'I' uaderstands and„agrees fiat Pitlcin County Resoituion No. 95-?26 estxblisi>es a fee suventre for Planning applicacons the payment of ail processing few i& a coz~sion precedent to a da "on of anplicadoa compicteness. , 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree chat because ~ swpe of die proposed project, is is 'aot possible art this time eue~ of die cogs imol~ccl in processing dse applcasion. COUNTY fiuRher agree that. it is in the interest of tl APPLICANT m make paymera of an initial deposix and additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT_ On a ttsomlriy k agrees he will be be~fits:d by retaining greater cash ligts' additional paymetta upon nottficadon by fie COUNi"Y when ~ costs aze incurred. COUNTY agrees it will be kienefi certainty of ts:eovetiIIg its fWl costs [o process APPLICANT'S 4. COUNTY and APPLICANT furtver agree that it COUNTY staff m _ cgmpiete processing or prewar Pianniag Commission and/or Board of Coumy Cc~mmss"vo~ Planning Commission and/or Board of County Cotnntissc"oae retluired findings for project appr+OV2l, umiess current billings a m decision. the size, aatuse or i ase`ztain the foil APPLICA~i2' and parses co allow thereafter permit as. :~PPLICA~'VT tY and will make ,y art necessary as ¢ossgb. the greater impracticable for dvrntation roo the t0 enable rise to .mab~e legally paid in foil prior hPay-12-98 03:07P yusgm horn 970 925 5180 P.03 r7c~~•w ~.v~ cAPrbl-1597 Ut3: lti FkUl9'~'`~'EI VPI'1V IN i.Ul1 ilE'~ (U `,.,,,, i ATTACI~IMENT_ 5. 'merefore, APPLIC~`tT agrees ryas in cap COU~iTY's waiver _of its ~ ~ ~~~ full fees Prior to licarivn ca>aplett~oss, APPLtCANT~~ PvY an '~ of S~((Qwhich is for ~ hoots of PI staff rime, and if exceed the initial deposit, ApPX.ICANT shall pay addition COLJISTY to ceinnbinse the COUNTY for the processing mcndoned above, istcivding post approval review. Stich peria made within 30 days of the billing dare. APPLICANT fiatisc; pay such accttrei{ cosy shall be grcnmds for stts~nsion of proc PTIKIlV COUNTY ~~~? I^ Cindy Houheu Commttttity Development Direcsor APZ'LZCa,~nr .Signature Dare: ~ 1 ! y ~ 4 ~ 5~. G~~joca.s ~?? ~Ococ+~f ~~~ ~ cG3 a ~~ TOTA(_ P.C~2 detatian of the dctecmiaation of sic in the am+ovmt sal iecorded costs lotahlq billings to ~f the application payments shall be tees that failttrti. m GIP.~'k ~: ~ 1 r0 ~.: r~ro_ .t~~ _ Subd_r_~ion Review Planned Una Deveioo-ent ~"" AiTACHME)VT $ i PITKIN COUNTY' LAND USE APPLTCAT~O`1rT `F`O~V1 OWNER'S NAME _ IYl OChRrd I ~jpl ~/ry~ ~/Q~, ADDRESS _ Zlo4q S l~~ sfwrp C.1~-i -e m;axsr i=Z. 33 !33 PHONE 3d.5 r{~n/ -2~4U REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME UGLV(3 {{jrn ZnG ADDRESS ~~~ ~~7 _. ;. . PHONE PROJECT NAME KQ-t r O ! U ~ . PROJECT LOCATION " C-~11u/I~irt~n ~>rC(G ~ /tp q~j~yy ~{ (SUeet Address and Legal Description) PARCEL ID NUMBER ~4!/ -sj~-_~~_~~ LOT SIZE Z. QLKS PRESENT ZONING AFR.`Ib EXISTING USES PROPOSED usES " Slna/o -Fen.v~ hems t ~~~~- ~(~,~ ~~; (Indude appropriate square footage) DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: /Q ' /~ ro Pa rt g kt--s , ct p pro txtl et c~ aaK~Eaf~Er uA[ll - etttfadte~t ;n AFk.• ~D. All information above must be completed and a copy of the pre-appli tion conference sheet included otherwise application will be deemed incomplete. All blueline mans should be folded. Typebof A pmlPcat on: by the Planning O£fice: .~: ,: T _ EDU (701-15'00 sq. ft.) General Submission _L Ca ~ teake ¢ Dwelling Unit Scenic Overlay (700 sq. tt. or less) Other Dwelling Unit (A~ or A-t5 Zone District) 1041 Inv. Ha and Review ~m~¢notwne-,.~- _ Subc_rision Review Cc:-:c_ _ Special Revieo~ _ Subdivision Exemption _ GMQS Exemption Planned Unit Develc~.^..ent ;_ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELO`P2$ET~P A`P~PRC~7PL (Pursuant to Section 4-90 the Pitkin County Land Use Code) State of Colorado) County of Pitkin SS. The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows• I, Glenn Horn being or representing an applicant before Pitkin County, personally, certify giving Public Notice of the Board of County Commissioners hearing for the Katz Extension of Vested Property Rights, 1041 Hazard Review and Caretaker Dwelling Unit review by posting notice containing the information required in Section 4-90 which posting occurred on September 4, 1998 in a conspicuous place and that said sign was posted. Applicant: Micha ,& Ann atz By Gle n Horn The foregoing Affidavit of Public Notice was acknowledged and signed before me this 23 day of September, 1998 by Glenn Horn on behalf of Ann & Michael Katz. ,e~ ~r+PI~+~T,ESS my hand and official seal. ?"~f~~,~jnission expires: /o-6-a~vo ~ c~ ,. ' ',."~~. ~ ~ - ,o:.,p-o- • ' = NO RY PUBL ~ ~~G :~ ~ _•,d,~., tIB ;,r,, .. .~f, qa i' _ ,. ~r ' PUBLIC NOTICE RE: KATZ EXTENSION OF VESTED RIGHT5,1041 HAZARD REVIEW .. . AMENDMENT & CARETAKER DWELLING iJNI'I`REVIEW __ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September23, 1998 at a regulaz meeting to begin at 3:00 PM before the Boazd of County Commissioners, Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St.; Aspen to consider an application submitted by Ann and Michael Katz, requesting foran Amendment to a Minor 1041 Hazard Review Approval; Extension of Vested Property 72ights and Approval for a Detached Cazetaker Dwelling'Unit. The property is located in the Conundrum Creek Valley and is described as a tract ofland situated within the boundaries of H.E.S. 112 in Townships 10 and 11 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. For further information contact, Suzanne Wolff at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department (970) 920-5093. Copies of the proposed ' p p g gul ness hours in the Office Resolution are available fox ublc ins ection durin re ar busi of the Clerk and Recorder, 530 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611. Phone. (970) 920-5180. Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk s/Dorothea Farris. Chair Boazd of County Commissioners Published in the Aspen Times on August 22, 1998 Pitkin Coun A.. ~ _,. . ,..., ~. ..a,- .... ,:w... ~. _ ...._ ty ccount O~T2.~2' _. "~ sep-za-9s o~:oap: yusem horn Sao 925 5aao P.o2 ~'I'TACH~tEPl1" __ ~ Ru - -_ CONIIVIXTME SCHEIIULEIA IN5IJ1tA1vC'E_ ~,. P.ffective Date:: x9/41/'94 at 08:30 A.M, Case No• PC'S'-9255C2 2 . Policy car Polf,ces to_ be issued . ,, t „ (a) ALTA Owner'8 Policy-Form 7.992 Amount$ 480,040.44 Premium$ 1,233.DD Prt~grosed Insured: Rate:STANDARD A'f1CHAEL KATZ and ANNE KATZ {b) ALTA Loaan Folicy-Form 1992 Amount$ 454,444.44 PYemium$ 50.40 Proposed InsuY'ed: Rate: RAILRCIAD SAVINGS BANKy,.E.S.B., ITS SLTCCESSt3R.S AND/aR ASSIGI35 Tax Certificate $24.04 3. Title t4 the FEE SAMPLE estate or interest an r_he land described or _ rtmitment zs a£`""the effect~.ve crate hereaf referred ko i[i this Co' "~A"'~ ~~ vested inc RIC;f3ARD F. LONG anti LOSS LONG 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described, as follows: _, , , , Bee Attached Exhibit '°A" _ounter'Slgned at: PITICIN c0U1~TTY TITLE, INC. Sahe ~ 641. E. HoPKYNS Ttzis, ule A-PG.i Commitment is inval3.d ASPEPS, CO. 81611 unless the insuring 3D3-925-x765 Provisions and Schedules Fax 343-925-6527 A ancl'B are attached. Sep-24--98 ®9:OlA ,yus~m learn 970 925 '5186 P.03 ~J''~`"~ r` "f a r -'S r E7SHIBIT A A tract of land situated within the boundaries of tl E.S. lit in Townvhips 10 and l1 South, Range SS West of~t`he Sixth Principal Heridian described as follows: Beginning at a point whence corner No. l,of said 3.3.5. t7o. 132 bears N S7°29'3" E 653.53 feet; thence S 1°39' E 143.43 feet; thence 9 27°27' W'-~.~.b6"feet; thence S 6°57' W 93 .3Q feet; thence s 73.°57' E 253.00 feet; thence N 1°43'30" E 431:90 feet; thence S 82°53' W ?39 bb feet t0 the poi-it o>: beginning ~,.. - ~ TOGETHER W2TH an easement for ingress and egress as set forth in Easement and Right O£ Way recorded September 14, 1979 in Hook 375 aC Page 555 and Hook 375 at Page 559 and as shown on, the Plat of Carter-Oossard Tracts recorded Zn P1 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OP COLORADO. q .... . ~ ~ v 1~ _ Y i. ' ~~ T k'~ ~ I CS. :. ~ ~. . - - l~ i i 'if, -d~°fl~ ~ .~ ^ ~ V • ~ ~ ) ~ ~! ~~a. ~ a , ~Or -.-. ' 0 G a \ \ 'Y v G~'d ri~i2 y' ,?E~.~i .: ~, x... as ~y~i. dt^ 73: ii''~i'' R ', ~ ... xr F,e affil ~t a-' C r~J ~ ~~ ~ s ~ i -,~ ~ r t.,t t sn; ay-i Ya i~8 b y • ,a,~n : ~ ti. ~.. 4 ~ e~ s~- ~ :;er .> _ - ~ is r T :L. ~+ Y aE i„ Xu. - i < 7- f ;~ `~ i ,,_` ~. .y` t . __ _ ~ ~ r . ~~_ 4 ~\ a'~._ _ ..~-....,...r ~ __. ~ _ ~ ~ I .~ V ~'. ~~:.i:.., F li r....: .l ~`(. .. / M ~ ~ .~ ~ .t / `I 1~ q I ::~ ` . J~ 4. ' •~~ ^'}~ Y;`~ \. _._~ ~ \ ,' :. } _ `~~ `~ yam t .! .:. a h ^ ~ ~ .~ __.. ~.~:Yya~'!j1M1'y yyyy V ~i $YY,aa ~~..:.4f r ~~ ± ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNT7CY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO.. Zoning County Attorney Housing Env Health FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Department RE: Katz Extension of Vested Rights Patcel ID # 2911-021=00-004 DATE: June 18, 1998 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Michael & Ann Katz. The Board of County Commissioners will review this application: Please return your comments to me no later than August 7, 1998. Thank you. _. ASPEN/PITHIN COMMUPTITY DEVEI:OPMENT'DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 FAX# (970) 920-5439 June 18, T998 Alice Davis 215 S Monarch Street- Suite 104 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Katz Extension of Vest Rights, 1041 Hazard Review Amendment & Caretaker Dwelling Unit Case #P86-98 Dear Alice, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this applicafion is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner m charge of the review will request the information from you directly. We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Asperi, on Wednesday, September 23, 1998 at a meeting to begin at 3:00 P.Iv1. Should this date be inconvenient for you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After That the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office: Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject property with a sign at least 15 days of- the public hearing and to remove it from the property within one week following the hearing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting as proof of compliance with the Code prior to or at the heating. If you have any questions, please call Suzanne Wolff, the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5093. Sincerely, o ~k~~YL ~P,~L7~2cAi>2 Sharon Hirman Administrative Assistant