HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.291102100023 (3)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
HE INFORMATION
THIS FILE MA~RD SEI.OW N THE OLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the SOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the SOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (llxl'n
:..
I I 4913~~
,. .. ~' . .... ,. .,...,~`~I~1I~~IIIPI ~~III~~iI III~l1~I llll~ll~III~I 11IlI lIIll1.0011%IBD 0 0012:25P...'::"
RESOLUTION OF TFIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSSON£RS OF FITRIN COUNTY,
• COLORADO, ALLOCATING 2003 Rll(2LAL AREA CMQS ALLOTMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL
FLOOR AREA (S~~OND"~OMI'E't`TITOl~
Resolution No. !3 -2003 .
RF,CITAIS
j 1. On September 9, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") held a duly noticed
public hearing. at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to Rural Area Growth
Management applications.
2. The Commission reviewed the following applications for the 2003 Rural Area. GMQS competition for
additional floor area (second competition):
• Mathys: requesting an additional 4,650 square feet of floor area for, a property located at 0299
Conundrum Road and described as a parcel of land being part of ILE.S. Ho. 112, Township l l
South, Range 85 West of the 6'" P.M.
• MillerlStalcy (Pit{dn Ezchangc holdings of Aspen, LLC on their behalf): requesting an
additional 3,000 square feet of floor area for Tract I, ].II. McCabe Ranch Tracts.
• Bay Oil USA, Inc.: requesting an additional 5,500 square feet of floor area for Lot 11, Castle
Creek Valley Ranch.
• Bay Oil USA, Inc.: requesting an additional 5,500 square feet oC floor area for Lot. ] 2, Castle
Creek Vailcy Ranch. '
3. There are 26,500 square feet available in the Rural Area for the second round of competition for
additional floor area (13,500 square feet were allotted in the f is~compctiton). Tiie applicants
requested atotal of 18,650 square feM.
4. The Commission scored the applications as follows: .
"~' Mathys: 46 points
• butler/Sta{ey: 57 points
• Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot I f ): 48 points
• Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot 12): 48 points
5. -The MillerlStalcy and both Say Oi] applications mM the minimum threshold score of 48 points AND
achieved the m~ntmum threshold score for each scoren cafe o as aired to be elf
allotment. The Math a liption d'id~not mat thehshold. g n'. ~ . gibte for an
Ys PP
6. Pursuant to Section 4-60.060 of the Code, the Commission's scores were forwarded by resolution to
the Board of County Commissioners'("IIOCC") on September 24, 2003.
7. No appeals of the Commission's scores were Glcd within the required 14 day appeal period.
NOW, TIIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the IIOCC that it dots hereby allocate a total of
14,000 square feel of floor area to be divided among the following properties as shown for the 2003 Rural
Area GMQS competition for additional floor area (second competition).
i
~f~zi430$iQ~ ri4p, g~i494C1 Ezi4XI0(3~AC~E3~'~~I$$ICi SS41~~~?~3'/c1~81i1~???..
a
r q~io3
Resolution No. ~ 3AFY:
rps~ a
111illcr/Staley: 3,000 square feet
Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot 11): 5,500 square feet
Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot 12): 5,500 square feet
This allocation is conditioned upon recordation of a coven~ntdocumenting the representations made in the
application for the additions[ square footage. This covenant shalt be reviewed and approved by
Community Development Department and recorded against the property, prior to issuance of a building
permit to utilise the awarded floor area.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON T'IIE 8th day of October, 2003.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John Ely.'`
Cou
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PfITCIN COUNTY, COLORADO
B Ja [field, Chain
Date ll /3 a3
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
to t/lt~.QC~tAIk~ ~Ctl C~~
Cindy Houben,
Community Development Director
g1Q) ''~~?a~~~~~~~~n0B1~~~
~II[III~~IIII>1I~IIIIIIIIIII~III~I[IfIII~II~IIIIIIII 49ig306 iz:z3n
. SIlV2R-Di1V25 PITKSN CDUNTr CO' R 0.00 tJ 0.00
I34ff?,34 ~~mz~as
Iillllllllllllllil~ll llllllllllllllllllll~lllll ~91z~~a azA
SIbVIR DfiV75 PITKIN`~COUNTY CO - R 0.60 D 0.00
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMNHSSION OF PITKIN COUNTY;
COLORADO, FORWARDING T$E 2003 SECOND COMPETITION RURAL AREA GROWTH
MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM SCORES FOR ADDITIONAL FLOOR AREA TO THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Resolution No. PZ-O~-2003
RECITALS
1. On September 9, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") held a duly noticed
public hearing at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to Growth Management
applications.
2. The Commission reviewed the following applications for the 2003 Rural Area GMQS competition
for additional floor azea (2"`~ competition):
• Mathys: requesting an additional 4,650 squaze feet of floor azea for a property located at 0299
Conundrum Road and described as a parcel of land being part of H.E.S. No. ] 12, Township 11
South, Range 85 West of the 6`h P.M.
• Miller/Staley (Pitkin Exchange Holdings of Aspen, LLC on their behalf): requesting an
additiona13,000 square feet of floor area for Tract 1, J.H. McCabe Ranch Tracts.
• Bay Oil USA, Inc.: requesting au additional 5,500 square feet of floor area for Lot 11, Castle
Creek Valley Ranch.
• Bay Oil USA, Inc.: requesting an additional 5,500 squaze feet of floor area for Lot 12, Castle
Creek Valley Ranch.
4. There are 26,500 square feet available in the Rural Area for the second tumid for the 2003.. GMQS
competition for additional floor area (13,500 squaze feet were allotted in the first competition).
The Commission scored the applications as follows:
• NIµaY}iys 46~ponts
Miller/Stake 5
• y 7 points
• Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot 11): 48 points
• Bay Oil USA, Inc. (Lot 12): 48 points
6. The Miller/Staley and Bay Oil (both lots) applications exceeded the minimum threshold score of 48
points and achieved the minimum threshold score for each scoring category, and aze, therefore, eligible for
allotments. The Mathys application did'not meet threshold, and, therefore, is ineligible for an allotment.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it hereby forwazds the 2003
Rural Area GMQS scores for additional floor area (2"a competition) to the Board of County Commissioners.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 9°i day of September, 2003.
~b te<"k..F,C» AT,4~,&LS~ tiig;P~" 11^ x:,`41 `~,°2~
I~III III ~I ~I (E~~II~III ~~I~II (III ( III III 491zO e9 i e : eza
SILVIq DgVIS PITKIN COUNTYC6 R0.06 7J0.~00
Resolution No. PZ- 2003
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
OF PI O Y, COLORADO
-....
~~
~-
Peter as, hairman
c k ~ Z .: ~ p j
Date
ATT ST:
~~
Janis Taylor
Administrative Assistant
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Cindy Houben
Community Development Director
DiID~Q~.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTACHMENT A
'I
;;~ ,~
GROWTH, MANAGEMENT COMPETITION FOR
RURAL AREA RESIDENTIAL
ADDYTIONAL FLOOR AREA
STAFF'S RECOMMENDED SCORING
NAME OFPROJECT: Mathys
DATE: 9/9/03
9-126~6~~ k)v~ilati ity ~tli~ id~lr~priaten`~ss o#"Feu'~11c";~nmr'"a4e,'~~clt~i'~_a" r "c~);erv"ic~s"
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider each application's impact upon public facilities and
services and rate each development by assigning points according to the following system (minimum
threshold score five (5) points; maximum score ten (10) points); no multiplier):
Score of 0 - Indicates one of the following: a) total impracticality of providing services due
to availability, quality, distance or route, and/or the development is detrimental to the existing
level of service in the area; or b) the introduction of public or private facilities and/or urban
services is likely to result in a fundamental change to the community character of the area and/or
a fundamental change in the type of historical use of the property; or c) the introduction of public
or private facilities and/or urban services islikely to result in a detriment to the environmental
condition of the property or adjacent properties.
Score of 1 - Indicates all of the following: a) an acceptable level and type of service meeting
the needs of the development and standards of the Code; b) the provision of services will not
fundamentally change the chazacter of the area in which the proposed development is located; and
c) the provision of the services will not result in a significant detriment to the environmental
condition ofthe property or adjacent properties.
Score of 2 - Indicates a level and type of service meeting the needs of the development based
on the requirements of the Code and ltelping to satisfy an existing need of the surrounding area.
Also indicates that the provision of services will not change the character of the area in which the
development is located or detrimentally affect the environmental condition of the property or
adjacent properties.
A. Water Service (0-2 points):
1. Capacity, quality and reliahility of the water system proposed to serve a development;
2. The demonstration of adjudicated water rights to serve the development; and
3. The capability to attain any necessary water through. an augmentation plan. G" elf
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 G
~~~'`~ ~
COMMENT: The Applicants have indicated that water service is provided by a private well with good
Staff finds that a score of 2 is not appropriate since the r~oposed water service will not help to satis an
existine need of the surrounding area.
000005
' -'" MATHYS GMQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
B. Sewer (0-2 points): The type and capability of the sewage disposal system proposed to meet the
needs of a development and to dispose of wastes without impact on water quality and in a reliable
manner. ~~~ ~~ /; 1
~ ~~
Maximtun Score 2 Score: 1
C. Storm Draina¢e (0-2 points):
] . The degree to which an applicant proposes to maintain historic nmoff patterns and to
retain the surface water resulting from development on-site.
2. If a development requires use of the County's drainage system, considering the
commitment of an applicant to install necessary drainage control facilities and to maintain the
system on a long term basis. n~
~~~~ d
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1
Staff finds that a score of 2 is not appropriate, as no improvements have been proposed to help satisfy
needs of the surroundine area.
D. Fire Protection (0-2 points):
1. Capability of the appropriate Fire Protection District to provide fire protection according
to established response standards without establishing a new station, adding equipment or
personnel, or making capital improvements;
2. The adequacy of water pressure and capacity for providing fire-fighting flows;
3. The commitment of an applicant to provide fire protection facilities necessitated by a
development, including, but not limited to, fire hydrants, water storage tanks, ponds and
distribution links;
4. The capability of the Fire District to provide adequate service based upon site design of a
development and reliability of the proposed water system.
OODOU~
does not constitute a scoring of 2•
i
.,_ ,.
- MATHI'S GMQS Scoring ~
September 9, 2003
E. Road Svstem (0-2 points):
1. Capability of the public road network to provide for the needs of a proposed development
within acceptable levels of safety and design, as defined by the Pitkin County Road
Management & Maintenance Plan;
2. Capability of the public road network to provide for the needs of the proposed
development without exceeding the capacity of the existing road network, as defined by the
County Engineer.
3. Applicant's commitments to finance necessary road system improvements attributable to
a proposed development; and
AVAILABILITYAND APPROPRIATENESS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FACILITIES & SERVICES
(Minimum Threshold Score - 5 points) Subtotal 6
5. The capability of a development to be aself-sufficient fire protection system in the event
response times from the fire district are too slow to protect a development.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 ~~
4. Ability to perform any necessary road improvements without resulting in a fundamental
change in the character of the area or neighborhood in which the development is propose 1dj.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 ~) ~~ c.-.
MATHYS GMQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
~. .;
9 Tad-433:, EffeclF"on the 1=n'vrdtt~Yerit' ancd l7e~irce Cotisertian..:; < ~«~~w ~~w
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider each application's environmental impacts and
resource conservation measures and rate each development by assigning points according to the following
system (minimum threshold score five (5) points; maximum score ten (10) points; multiplier of two (2)):
Score of 0 - Indicates adverse environmental impacts due to an applicant's unwillingness or
inability to mitigate impacts or inadequate mitigation measures proposed by an applicant;
Score of 1 - Indicates no adverse environmental impacts or an applicant's complete
mitigation of impacts or a development exceeding the standards of the Land Use Code.
Score of 2 - hrdicates vt improvement or enhancement of the existing environment by the
applicant.
A. Air Pollution (0-2 points): The effect of the development on the community's air quality,
including but not limited to whether:
V 1. Fewer or cleaner woodburning devices than allowed by law will be installed;
~. Existing dirty burning devices will be removed or replaced by cleaner burning devices;
i~ Dust prevention measures are employed on the unpaved areas;
I/4. Any special emission control devices are used;
~~5. Development proposed utilizes and/or promotes in design and location the use of public
mass transit or other non-vehicular transportation;
~6. Mitigation of PM10.
~,~~ a
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 x 2= 4
B. Water Resources (0-2 points):
U,IJ~U~4
MATHYS GNIQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
1. Extent to which the project will impact surface, groundwater and irrigation supply; and
2. Extent to which the project commits to maintain existing surface, groundwater and
irrigation supply for domestic uses, wildlife uses, vegetation uses and agricultural uses.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 2= 2 ~ ~~
COMMENT: An existing private well for domestic water and existing water rights with the Ditch will
provide water resources.
It is Staffs opinion that a score of 2 is not appropriate since the Applicant does not include proposals to
_u . ,. _... ., .,~, ....,~.
improve or enhance the surrounding environment.
C Hazards and Site Disturbance/Environmental Impact (0-2 points):
1. A proposed development is free from man-made hazards;
2. A proposed development completely avoids development within one-hundred year
floodplain hazard areas; high hazard avalanche zones; landslide areas; 30% s]opes; rock fall
hazard areas; and severe wildfire areas;
3. A proposed development commits to preserve or enhance natural vegetation and terrain
on the site and to reyegetate disturbed areas with native vegetation;
4. A proposed development commits to minimize the area of disturbance by limiting the
size of the building envelope(s), road/driveway cuts, etc.; and
5. A development commits to weed management.
D. Ener¢v and Water Conservation/Waste Water Reuse (0-2 points): The extent to which an
applicant proposes to employ:
1. Passive and/or active solarheating and cooling and thermal insulation measures beyond
those required by the Aspen/Pitkin Energy Conservation Code;
~U~~V~{
5
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 2= 2 ~l,c..~;
,~ . ~
NIATHYS GMQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
2. Water conservation devices and wastewater reuse systems within the development rather
than standard plumbing facilities;
3. Renewable non-polluting energy resources for the primary source of energy for the
development;
4. "Green" and/or high efficiency building materials and "green" technologies; and
E. Conservation Through Construcfion Management Plan (0-2 points): The extent to which an
. ~,. ..
applicant proposes a Construction Management lslan to:
1. Limit the number of trips to the site through carpooling, storage of tools on site and other
innovative measures;
2. Limit the amount of fill removed from the site through limited excavation, regrading and
use of the fill on-site; and
3. Control noise and dust generated during construction.
4. Minimize construction and material waste (i~.e.~reduc~e, r~e'cycle and reuse).
Maximum Score 2 P~ nr Score: 2 x 2 = 4 ~~
CONIlVIENT: The Applicant has indicated that conservation through construction management will be
achieved primarily via carpooling, and tools, materials, and equipment storage on the site to the greatest
M~_
be snecificsalle. All suitable material will be reused m the n`e`w construction. A construction coritr`acfor wilt
P
Iv selected with uroven nerformance m controlling and hmitmg the amount of waste nroduced on
site. Fill from the site will be utilize on site
s not Improve or enhance the existing environment vewpmenr exceeas cercam sranaaras or me ~.oae, i
OODOLO 6
5. Reuse of existing construction materials on-site....
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 2= 2 ~~ I ~/l'
' -' - °- ` M''~ MATHYS GMOS Scorizzg I
September 9, 2003
EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION
(Minimum Threshold Score - 5 points) Subtotal without multipliers 7
Subtotal with multipliers I9
~ ~~.K~_
9 '120=03~ ''W Ii dlit"e`~'an~lYiiil`c7(ife C~a~i~faf"~ro"~ec~ion _ .. "~I =T~ ~ . ~
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider each application in terms of its impact on wildlife
and wildlife habitat and rate each development by assigning points according to the following system
(minimum threshold score four (4) points; maximum eight (8) points); multiplier of two (2)):
Score of 0 - Indicates non-compliance with the policies and standards of the Land Use Code
and adverse impacts to wildlife and/or wildlife habitat due to an applicant's inability and/or
mrwillingness to locate the proposed development away from wildlife and/or wildlife habitat.
Score of 1 - Indicates compliance with the policies and standards of the Land Use Code and
minimal iznpact to wildlife and/or wildlife habitat due to an applicant's avoidance of wildlife and
wildlife habitat and capability to mitigate most impacts, but lack of total avoidance and lack of
total mitigation.
Score of 2 - Indicates no adverse impacts to wildlife and/or wildlife habitat due to the
applicants location of the proposed development away from wildlife and/or wildlife habitat
and/or the complete mitigation of impacts and a development exceeding the policies and
stahdards of the Land Use Code. Applicants with no wildlife or wildlife habitat on the entire site
shall automatically receive a score of two (2) for each sub-category.
A. Avoidance of Existnt Wildlife and Wildlife I3abitat. (0 to 2 points.) fihe extent to which the
proposed development, including the building envelope and other disturbed'areas, completely avoids
existing wildlife and wildlife habitat including, but not limited to areas mapped by the Division of
Wildlife on Wildlife Resource Information maps (1041 environmental hazard maps) or areas identified by
the Couuty biologist as: critical winter range; migration corridors; calving areas; waterfowl habitat;
fisheries; riparian areas; wetlands; and/or sage, aspen and oak-serviceberry Habitat.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 x 2= 4
COMMENT:
B. Canine Manaeement. (0 to 2 points.) The extent to which the proposed development commits
to prohibiting dogs where the building envelope is located within one-quarter mile from mule deer,
elk and bighorn sheep severe winter range, winter concentration areas, migration corridors and
production aeeas. Commits to kenneling dogs where the building envelope is located one-half (1 /2)
znile, but more than one quarter (1/4) mile, from mule deer, elk, and bighorn sheep severe winter
range, winter concentration areas, migration corridors and production areas. Where the building
envelope is located more than one-halk (1/2) mile from mule deer, elkand bighorn sheep severe
winter range, winter concentration areas, migration corridors and production areas, automatically
awarded two points.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 x 2= 4
~~~~~~
of zer ee pro uction, anT ose ui~se or~lc `ry pas u~ re 1Tt~T7~isg~t
-^''~' M.4THYS GMQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
COMMENT: The property is more than one-half mile from mapped wildlife areas as defined by the
Division of Wildlife and therefore receives an automatic score of 2.
C. Enhancement of Wildlife or Wildlife Habitat. (0 to 2 points.) The extent to which the
proposed development commits to enhance existing wildlife or wildlife habitat or to restore native habitat
to degraded sites (for example, creating or restoring wetlands and/or riparian habitat. On-site
enhancement is preferred, but where there are no significant opportunities for on-site enhancement or
restoration, a commitment to enhance or restore other sites in Pitkin County may be considered.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 x 2 =
D. Reduction of Human Influence. (0 to 2 points.) Consider the extent to which the proposed
development commits to cluster development and reduces the zone of influence on wildlife and/or
wildlife habitat.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 2 x 2= 4
CONIMENT:
receives an automatic score of 2.
WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT PROTECTION
(Minimum Threshold Score - 4 points)
Subtotal without multipliers 8
Subtotal With multipliers 16
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider each application's consistency with County Land
Use Policies and rate each development by assigning points according to the system in this section
(minimum threshold score five (5) points; maximum score ten (] 0) points); multiplier of two (2) or three
(3) as noted below):
A. Open Space. (0-2 points; multiplier of three (3).) The extent to which the development preserves
desirable undeveloped lands for wildlife, scenic and other desirable resource values, or preserves known
agricultural lands, including those which have been historically irrigated, used for food, hay, grains or
other feed production, and those used for dry pasture and rangeland, consistent with adopted
comprehensive plans and Land UsePolicies 2-1Q 2-3Q 2-]20, 2-160, 2-240 and 2-280.
Score of 0 - The application is totally inconsistent with adopted comprehensive plans and
Land Use Policies 2-10, 2-30, 2-120, 2-160, 2-240, 2-280, and does not preserve valued open
space or agricultural lands within a ptoperty.
t~ tr:~
000"1"
Staff has recommended a score of 2 as the property avoids wildlife habitat.
,.
` MfITHT'SGMOSScoring I~
Septensber 9, 2003
Score of 1 - The application is generally consistent with adopted comprehensive plans and
Land Use Policies 2-10, 2-30, 2-120, 2-160,`2-240, 2=280, and preserves the most valued open
space or agricultural lands within a property. _If a property does. not contain anv valued ones
-_____-
Score of 2 - The application is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans and Land Use
Policies 2-YQ 2-30, 2-120, 2-160;'2-240, 2-280; and preserves all valued open space or
agricultural lands within a property. ,^
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 3= 3 ~""~"'
COIVIlVIENT: The Apulicants have adequately committed to chisterin on the parcel as it is required by
the 1041.
B. Visual Imaacts (0-2 points; multiplier of two (2)) Considering the extent to which a development
impacts the scenic quality and visual character of an area as viewed from public roadways and the extent
to which a development is consistent with the Scenic Overlay standards (Section 3-60-40), Land Use
Policy 2-120, and the West Elk Loop Scenic and Historic Byway, notwithstanding the fact that the parcel
may be located outside of the mapped scenic overlay (i.e., within tributary valleys to the Roaring Fork
Valley).
Score of 0 - The application is inconsistent with the Scenic Overlay review standards (Section
3-60040) and Land Use Policy 2-120.
Score of 1 - The
(Section 3-60-40~`an
is generally consistent with the Scenic Overlay review standards
o i^~+-i ~
Score of 2 - The application is consistent the Scenic Overlay review standards (Section 3-60-
40) and Land Use Policy 2-120.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 'x 2 = 2
G~'i /lam-. 1-L~!
C. ( Develoomgent Below Allowagle Densi P ( ~2 points; ~ ~ ]ti ylier of two (2)) Consider the extent
to which the development proposed is less than the allowable densit m terms of numbers of dwelling
units not includin caretaker dwelhn units em to ee dwellin units or deed restricted_ affordable
housing dwelling units) penmtted m the applicable zone drstuct:
Score of 0- The application proposes development at a density of 76% to 100% of the
density allowed under the zone district, which maximizes development on the site under the
zoning.
Score of 1- The application proposes development at 56% to 75% of the density allowed
under the zone district. The applicant shall provide a covenant or other guarantee running with the
„„ t
O~,~U1~ g
Staff has recommended a score of 1 based on a findin that the a lication is enerall consistent with the
scenic overlay review standards
$ MATHYS GMQS Scoring 1
September 9; 2003
land, for which Pitkin County shall be a beneficiary, guaranteeing the representation of the
density reduction. When competing for additional square footage only, an applicant shall be
Score of 2- The application proposes development at 50% or less of the density allowed
under the zone district. The applicant shall provide a covenant or other guarantee running with the '
land, for which Pitkin County shall be abeneficiary, guaranteeing the representation ~he ~
density reduction. ~~~ ~~
D. Development Below Allowable Intensity (0-2 points; multiplier of two (2)) Consider the extent
to which the development; proposed is less than the allowable intensity in terms of the total amount of_ ~
square footage of floor area potentially available as an allowed use under the applicable zone district:
Score of 0- The application does not commit to reduce the square footage of floor area of
development on site.
Score of 1- The application agrees to limit square footage to 56% to 75% of the square
footage of floor area potentially available under the zone district. The applicant shall provide a
covenant or other guarantee running with the land, for which Pitkin County shall be a beneficiary,
guaranteeing the representation of the intensity reduction.
Score of 2- The application proposes development at 50% or less of the square footage of
floor area potentially available under the zone district. The applicant shall provide a covenant or
og`ther uarai~ee runpnm with the land, for which Pitkin Coun shall
g g ty be a beneficiary,
~aranteein the re resentation of the intensity reduction. l~ p cry ~.%
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 2= 2
Score of 0 - The application does not commit to clustering.
Score of 1- The application commits to limited elustering, but additionalclustering is still
possible. Ari applicant shall be elieible for a acnra of iinA ri ~ ;rap:.er,......,:_.: _ _. _~_ ~_ ,
specific property.
to be
Score of 2 - The application clusters development to the fullest extent possible.
UUO~~.tt 10
.a-~ , 4 .
.~;<~
Maximum Score 2 Score: 1 x 2= 2
E•. Clueteri~ (0-2 points; multiplier of two (2)) Consider the extent to which the development
proposed clusters the structures proposed for development, or, where applicable, clusters the proposed
development adjacent to existing or approved development on adjacent properties.
?""
COMMENT:
Maximum Score 2
CONSISTENCY WITHLAND USE GOALS
(Minimeem Threshold Score - 5 poi~its)
"~ NIATZ?YS Gtl%IQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
Score: 1 x 2 = 2
Subtotal without multipliers S
Subtotal with multipliers _II
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the award of bonus points as follows (maximum
score six (6) points; no multiplier):
A. Bonus points may be awarded only to development applications which achieve the overall
minimum scoring threshold in sections 9-120-032 through 9-120-035:
B. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the extent to which an applicant purchases
interests in land in order to preserve valuable undeveloped lands or creates conservation easements or
dedicates land located in the Agricultural Wildlife Reserve District (AWE) of the Pitlcn CouatyDown
Valley Comprehensive Plan: Future Land Use Map.
core o -
The development does not help meet the goals of the County as identified in the
agr ulturalnty Down Valley'Comprehensive Plan regarding the preservation of open space,
and wildlife lands.
Score of 1 - The development supports the goals and objectives of the Pitkin County Down
Valley Comprehensive Plan by preserving open space; agricultural ]ands and wildlife lands
located in the Agriculture Wildlife Reserve (AWR) designated on the Pitkin County Down
Valley Comprehensive Plan :Future Land Use Map. The applicant must preserve no less than
two (2) times the minimum lot size in the zone district where the development is proposed.
Score of 2 - The development aggressively supports the goals and objectives of the Pitkin
County Down Valley Comprehensive Plan by preserving open space; agricultural lands and
wildlife lands located in the Agriculture Wildlife Reserve (AWR) designated on the Pitlca'
County Down Valley Comprehensive Plan :Future Land Use Map. The applicant must
preserve no less than three (3) times the minimum lot size in the zone district where the
development is proposed.
Maximum Score 2 Score: 0
COMMENT:
conservation easements
C. Creative Bonus. Bonus points shall be available to the applicant to specify other creative
methods in which the proposed development will achieve the goals of each of the categories set forth in
0000.1
11
.. ,.
..
.. .4- _.' ~.~
:. ro ,:r,. Y ,.....: .R x:.n w^+.v. pwn„eb.r 13... msc~
•~ a~:W~ytto-iv ^.~..Y!^ trC.y
F n1
MATHYS GMQS Scoring
September 9, 2003
sections 9-120-032 through 9-] 20-035. To be eligible for a bonus point, the applicant shall specify in
which category the bonus point is sought and describe the creative measure which the applicant proposes
to further the goal of the category. Only one creative bonus point is available per category, with a total of
four possible bonus opportunities except to break ties between applications. At its option, an applicant
may submit for one additional creative bonus to be considered in the event of a tie between applications.
The Planning & Zoning Commission shall score the creative bonus points as follows:
Score of 0 -The development does not further the goal or objectives of the category.
Score of 1-The development substantially furthers the goal or objectives of the category.
Maximum Score 4 Score: 2
COMMENT: The Annlicants are reauestin~creative bonuses for the following four sections
L/
2)
3)
4)
b
D. OatimaLMitieation of Emnlovment Generation Bonus Points shall be available to the
applwant for the optimal mitigation of employment generation. The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall consider the provision of affordable housing in relation to each development application by
assigning points according to the system in this section (no minimum threshold ; maximum score three
(3) points; multiplier of two (2)):
1. Conversion of Existing Free Market Housing. Any applicant who commits to
convert existing free market housing located within the Aspen Area Urban Growth Boundary to
deed restricted sale housing pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded three (3) points. Any
applicant who commits to convert existing free market housing located within the Rural Area to
deed restricted sale housing pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded two (2) points.
2. Construction of Affordable Housing. Any applicant who commits to constrict
sale affordable housing on site for on-site employees pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be
®001 12
,..,a~~~,. nuwcvcr n ~s unclear now tms ro osat will actuall create a wetlands that
enhances wildlife habitat
~+ ~~cv~cw .-~puruvaa
L ' ~ MATFIIyS GMQS Scorizzg
Seplenzber 9, 2003
awarded two (2) points. Any applicant who constructs sale affordable housing shall be awarded
one (1) point. ',
3. Dedication of Land. Any applicant who commits to dedicate land within the i
Aspen Area Urban Growth Boundary pursuant to section 3-130-020 shall be awarded one (1)
point.
Maximum Score 3 Score: 0 x 2= 0 ',
COMMENT: The Aoulicant has not requested any bonus points in this caterzorv.
BONUSPQINTS Subtotal_2
oaa~.~
13
-,---.
`' MATFIYSGMQSScoring
September 9, 2003
TOTAL POINTS (with multiplier):
Minimum Subtotal Subtotal
Threshold (without (wiTh
multipliers) multipliers)
A. Availability and Appropriateness of Public and 5 6 6
Private Facilities and Services.
B. Effect Upon the Environment and Resource 5 7 14
Conservation.
C. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Protection 4 8 16
D. Consistency with Land Use Goals 5 5 11
E. Bonus Points (Maximum 12) N/A 2 2
TOTAL 28 49
Must meet minimum threshold in each category and obtain
__ a total score of 48 points (with mulfipliers)
to obtain an allotment
4Q0~1~ 14
c~n~m m^mS~D
0 0 ~ 3 m~,
~. ...,.E
a I ~
~ ~ N N G. N ~ ~,
~'
x^' N /
O ~ N.
C0
c o
o
N (D ~ N `
O--
~ N ~ ~e
_
~ O
X
D
$
C Q
v o
e
~ n N NG SN ..~ y N .-.
~
t~
V y ~ ~ ~~ ~
v.
F ~ O~'
N< 3
3~ m ~ x Z
(D n
°
~ ~~ `'
t o .
m
3~ '
c
'' t
m s ~~
m
a
O
~ ` n ~ m
~
F a ~ o N O ~
~
~ S
~
, <n ~ ~ ~ m .
n ~
N
~~~
~~ ~ 0~
~ ~
`
~ ~ 6I N O A y O
O
~
O ~ .
N fn
y ~ n v .. ~1
~ ~ N ac• ~ `. .C.', v
A'' ,
tU ~A
_ ` ~
d° \
'
'
^ 'fir
C1
~.4 S
~ ~ N
Y N r N
N
n .
e~ ,
o W
'. ,~
~.
O
n
g.
a
a
`x
u
.,
. .
$
a, .
.~
~, ~&..~~ ~v
~~
~ a ~.
~~
yfiE ` ''
n N
O ~'
3 ~
~ ~.~
~ /'\\
0
c
n
1
C ~
'-r ^^
\f
N
O
O
W
p
n
O
m
m
cn O
o Z
m m
~ O
s ~
~ D
T ~
O
1
O
Z
D
r
r
O
O
A
D
:U
m
D
°A F
C
a
0
3
0
[S~
D
m ~ m
x x
c e
3 < ~
~ ~
0 0
m m
A N
':
m ~ v ~ <' ~'~~~ ~'
I
O' 'S X N fD N 91 ..'~.
o ~ _
N O
V N
N
~~
~ C = ~ ~ ~ ~ i
/ ,
E ~ o ~ v ~O >
~ ~ ~ d X `.
F ~ ~ S ~ ~. .:
~
3 o ~ ~
a ~ ,
I
~ .
,
~ -
~ ~
N r
a~
~ a
y ~
~
=
v ~ ..
q
~
'.. N ~w,
y
(D
m
Sk
~a
~ N ~ '"
S
H
\ _ _
~ ~ ~ `n
'
P
r"`
Q Q1
~
~~
_
~ 01
~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1
nl
~
C
~
,71
4
u +' '
.. ...x'......+ ~ '..,i'.µt• v.... .:A.n'r r. yr ... s~... .. .,.~: vu[..rvWN4 mw.+Mk^-eo~brtv ~ kY 'rw.r:::~n:
~~~~ ~
¢.
w
O
O
J
Q
Z
_~
H
0
Q N
~ ~
Z ~
Q ~
h
W
a
O
U
C~
C7
M
O
O
N
G
O
~~
Qj ,G
r L
G O
z
~ ~ ~
~ ~
N ~ ~
~~ ' ~.
~
"`
~ ~ ~
~
a
y
~
N
a'~ ~°"~o<<~ X c c o n
N ~ ~ ~ m~ a E
> N - N CC
t.
~~ ~ I- ~ ~ o
C O ~ C ~ .0.. O ~ j '~
m%.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N US ~ N (0 U C O
O ' p G.
x T X
O Z E N
~ _
~
~
d ~ (0 .~
N > m.
.
Q1
~ X
G
N
C ~
. Q ~~
I = W v ~j
W > v (
~`\~`~~
~y
U ~/ I
_._
.. t.R3Pwa
S
c
~
~ ,-. 3 ~ C C
~ d 0 .
VJ
c
a
~
x•na
.
n X 7
N (D - ~
N v -
.
O 7 ~ O ,X
fD
N .
v
~ ~
°= ~ ~ ~
,. n
i v m
~ ~ o ,. j; m S a o .
'
C O v
fD -^ ,
~
~ ~
s
~
v
C
~
(D x
~
:. ~.
.
a
~ o
'a ~ <
Q .~-. ~
x ~ ~ ~ ~
E a -~^ co N S` ~
_ y
y ~
o v
o,
'
~
.
N ~ ~
d
S
N
µ.. r
`~}A`mx.
W
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..
,G
~~
T.. .`.
W
O
"^.C(
3 ~(
-(
C)C
~
G
~
~
,. .a
~....
pe
n n .. ~ m ^ m 2 ~ D .:..
~ o
111 ''~~N N In O 5. ~ ~ ~ .
a
~
v CC
N
~
~
C
q~ ~ N
~ N G ~
vN ~
N Sp
O .
~.
p
?. .fk:.
~ G
~ O
~ ~ fD < ~
~ .
O O
c
~
S N
'~ (~ _
~ (D C
n
~~'~
N ~ ~ ~ ~ :
? ~ O N 1
~ a N~
~ N
N O C
.. 6 N
~ $' 'eE'
v
~.
y cn
a
y
~
~
z
~
~
=
(~
~
~
X
N '~'
~.'.~~ V'
Y
~~JMT
\
\ ~ `
1`
\
\
~ m
O ~
j' (D
~ '
O
C
a
`~.
N
O
O
W
p
n
O
m
-i
to O
o Z
T
~ A
~ D
... ~
O
-i
O
Z
D
r
-n
r
O
O
A
D
A
m
D
w
O
O
J
W
J
Q
Z
O
F
0
a
~ U,
O a
z~
O v
h
W
a
O
U
d
M
O
O
N
r
.
~
1
~
w
~V
IQ T
1 T
1~ o
m J
3 '
f~
~.
~`
7. T
Z
"~ a
N
~~, ~
~ ~
~
N
c1 ~
A
„~
q
~
~ xs ~
°'
~
6
;G"i~. ~
~. w ~
(0 U
C
v~ i
N
B ~..
~ N
X _N rr
C a.
~
• ~ 'p G ~
o $
I
N N
~
0
W
~° ~ O =
0 9 m
C c
N
O ~
= .
3
i N N
U2 ~
c~
NN
ON
'c
o,,
~ $ ~. '
~ .w
.C X
~ x
3 X
~ ,
~ ~'~..
, a~ ~l = ~I
N
m
O
E
V
3
E
O
3
(6
Q.
W
Q
0
J
J
Q
Z
O
F-
0
Q a°i
~ ~
O ~
Z
O ~
r=
I-
W
d
U
C7
C7
m
0
0
N
3
~Y ~,
c
3
O
K
m
N .C
Z (n
~~~~~~
~~ ~,~
.~~~~
. „rQ
k
v ~
r.~
.~ ; .
£
v
,, ,
U
U
O ~'
R o
m J
5
.
~ ~
N
L
~
~
~
lJ
t6
.;}
,. ''~v:
~'
N
c
u: _
N
N d N
\ N
O U
O y
~
y ~ h
x y ~ M
c~ ~ E m ~ o
:' m E g ~
~ O
h O)
~ C
~
~ O
y
y
2 W .~ U d d
(n
~
~ N
O m
~ ~
~'
°'
E
~-
a E
E
~6 3
i ~ ~ o c
... ~ n ~i i. ~
A
N ~ ~ 11
N
~. '
m C
(a
a
N m
U ~ ~ ~
v X
n
~ c
O a
h .n
~
~'
~
I
~
C~ L
m. N
C
t
X .~ ..
. (6
N y O N
U ~~ y ,3
I ~ ~E ~ sm °~' ~
C O Q ~~ p G j `3
O N C
qj+ 'N (4 O
~ E m
J ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ X ~ ` _C O
p
~ `. O X m .,0, N
~
~X ~ ~
a
Q
~ m~ I
= W.~ ~,
W ~~. ~
UU h
~.
W
0
0
J
W
J
Q
Z
O
F
Q a~i
K ~
O ~
W ~
Z ~
O cn
F
H
W
a
O
U
C1
C7
M
O
O
N
...s
~..a :.
°'
C
'C
z Cn
~ '~
y ,. _
k ~ C
(4
i~
~
~
m
n'
H
N
~
. , i N
x U
~ C
. C D, n
.,. .l
,.
N
m Z
~
~
;
I ~ ~ c ~~ a
"~.'~`' X N O. O N
U O~ y 3
~
U ~ E N
N W' L (4
F ~
'~ ~
o
N ~ ~
„
Q 0 ~ j 3
" C
O O
~ C
«f N ?) +
.
t6 n O
~~ ~ ~ m
^^
rF ~ ~ N ~ ~ x Z ~
O ~ C
O
X
0
~ ` N
N
~ ,O
~
<. ~ d ~ `
N 1
N x
C C
> N .
. -, ~~wu.r. ~ ...:.., ..w.v4. v.. - un4>., w
w
O
O
J
LL
J
Q
Z
O
F
~ ~
2
~ U
i
Z
~_ U
F
W
a
O
U
C1
M
O
O
N
<. ~.
p
.. .
~
U
~
~"" ~ ~ ~ ~
IO P
I P
'
ld
m J
~`~
~.;;... .
~.
~
~
Q U
,:
v l4
2 c
~
n
o.
?
N N d' j
)
~ X _ ~ _ ~
C
N I C
N
Z ~
~ O
y C
3
~ i ~ ~ ~
W ~ ~ O = ~ ~
/ ..
~ ~ ~
c ~
a7
O 6
~
3
^
O = t6
~ E ~
~ c
~ N E
G m
O
_
'O = c x N ~ fn
' ~
a
~ w._. ~.,
,;,
b
~ r
N
V
d
0
E
L
d
.Q
3
.t.,
0
3
<6
3
Q.
W
Q
O
J
Q
Z
Q
H
Q N
~ ~
O
LL ~
Z ~
O ~
P-
H
W
a
O
U
C7
C7
M
0
0
N
9--~
~I~
a
c
0
i.
`-~ m
Qj C
~ `o
z cn
"~ C'e o
^$ Yn
P
"
~ ~
y
~
?Xw . ~4 :
~
~ d
~
~at
,. ..
i:~ ?
~ ~ !
~
~
i
u •F .
i5",~
4i~:~.
~3~~&
&1,
:>'2'
I'.
Y
3 ~ .'
a
U
U
~ ~
r \
~...
m J
ro.
~ m.
~' N N
N ~ ~ ~
T
t i ..,/
~
~ '~
n.
`
. .~ ,. ~ d
~ C N
i `
o N N .`v `~N
P
~ N
x C
~
Z
N Q O.
.
4 ~
O o ~ ~~. N h j
s a i2 ~..... ~~ i o~
,
r ~ _
~ E ~
E x
~ ,
~ Q x m n
U ~ a~ _
v
m
~
~
N i I ~ ^~"
CC ~ ~ ~ ~
. ,e. . C
.... ~. N. N H~ ti ~
. ~ O O ~ ~
` Z m ~ U ~ ~ O N O ~ "
' O
~ ~ D O ( ~ ~ - N
N X Z C O
0 .°$' ~~ N N ~ d ~ ~
~ ~ ~ O y p C
~ X ~ ..0. ` N
N N X ~ ~
a ~6 ~ ° ~ o e . d m N .
m c I c ~ o o ti
I
w
0
0
J
LL
J
Q
Z
F-
0
Q
K
O
LL
Z
H
h
W
a
O
U
Gc~
'G^
V
M
N
t ~
U~
u
V
1U
u.
,O
r
)~ r
m J
.~
¢ '
,
~
~.,.V
r T ~
~ .
1 I
L
~ t_
4
R
ala oa
~
~ ~ ~
~
. _ O C L
i
~ N w
V d
~ ~ ~
N . °~ x -o
E
N I
c
~
c
y
7
~
c
~
~
o
3
f
X ~ m S
W w ~
m O ~
2 i _
-
J
~~ (9
G C
N
O
j
`3
^~ coi2 ~ ~~ c ~ =°•
~ O
x O N G_ O
..~ Nw N~ c UX ~ . Q
.,, o, a ~ c r - o
Q~ U I c a~
. ..'.~ w.. ~..
' O
~ F
~ _
! ~
I ~
a
1 F
{ ~
{
O
~ U
a ~
3 ~
1
Y W
Q
w
7 ~?i -
y r v~
G'f ~
w -
'_ G d-
~ ~
i
M
,~
i
{ ~ N sue.
/ cy/ .-~ ~
~ 4 ~
i
1 U
1 ~.
1 y
{
~ 7
11 L
1
~
-o
i ~
3 p
0.
I O
7
1 ~ ~
m
i
~ ~
~ ~
.~.j
J L
llJ ~
Q
~ z
~
' ~
~
~~
i W
~ ~ w
:. L
~ ~ v >
a
1
z ~ ~
~ ~
3
~
~
~ ; Q ^~ C
I
ti
~ R. Q
-
-
~
-+~
~ ~ ~~ ~
^. N N N N N N N N
,i ., I .
S
MIN IN IN IN
11s ~I I ~ I I'r
' '
- b b 6 O
O O O O
L L ~; ~'
_
F H H ~
- ~ ~' r-1 ~ N rl rf ~ - - ,.-
^ ^ ^
C ~
O ~
U O N V
N
G
~
~ N
~
~
0
~ j cL ~ ',~ 0
N
~ ~ aLi
y ~~~rr c? ~
~ .~, ~'
~ c
C G ,
. ~ ^ ~ U ~
a :: .~ '.~ ~ ~ Q G Q U
~ cNC U UO n
~
'°
~
3
w a
+
O i¢
" W
O
U i
O~ .~
A ..0.
..O
t ~
N
~ ~ a
= c
O ~ c7~
~ ro ~ ~
~'
N
•~
O
~ ~
,
~
~ `
O
O
C O
R ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~
A ' N ~ O O
w A O
L y
b ~ E U p W
~ g Q ~ H b3 f o x ~ ~ ~, a~ w o
C ~ C L N C W ai "' W .~., ~ U a'' a+ ~
O
L
`~ o
o x ~° ~ ° c ~' ~ ° ° ~ ~ °
' ~ ~
a L ~o ~ .o c ~ ~
~ W O
~
x Y
L
w¢ N
3 ~
x N
r~ C
~
-~¢ ^
v .C
w b
r~ y N
~~o v.
~ >
g >
Q ~
U 0..
~ A„i >
~ a1
.~
~
vl W .-~ cV m 7 vi ~~ N M 7 U ^" N M V vi 0 ~,] (
) Q
Gn ,
GL~ U Q rte'
S
y~
Fl
W
F
F
~ f
I~ i}
~4
i i ~ 1
w~~~r~/ICI
n. .. rar,r ... :, ,u ~ , .;: , ~ ._.:_~,,,
i
- __
GUY AND HEIDI MATHYS
299 CONUNDRUM ROAQ
APPLICATION FOR
RURAL AREA GMQS COMPETITION
FOR ADDITIONAL FLOOR AREA
Marc Mathys
299 Conundrum Rd
P.O. BOX 4565
Aspen, CO 81612
(970) 925-2400
Fax 920-7991
larreauCc~hotmail com
~,
Rurala GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
INTRODUCTION
This application is being submitted for the Rural Area GMQ$ Competition for
Additional Floor Area pursuant to Section 9-120-031 of the Pitkin County Land
Use Code (Standards and Criteria for Competition and Scoring), adopted by
Ordinance No 023-2000. The.application is being submitted on behalf of Heidi
and Guy Mathys, owner of 299 Conundrum Road (hereinafter called
"Applicant") by Marc Mathys, their son.
Applicant is exempt from growth management for up to 5,750 square feet of
floor area and is hereby competing for an additional 4,650 square feet for a
total of 10,400 square feet. Calculable area of the proposed project, according
to current standards is approximately 3,400 square feet on the main floor, with
a 800 square foot garage, 2,000 square feet on a 2nd floor and 3,100 square
feet a lower basement floor. The extra,floor is being requested for fine-tuning in
the final design stages and for the future development of a small. (less than
1,000 square feet) barn. Total square footage is substantially less than
permitted in this zone (15,000 square feet) and applicant agrees to place a limit
to the development on this property at the requested square footage - (70%) of
allowable).
The property contains an existing home and landscaped yard area. The
existing residence was constructed in accordance with approval from the Pitkin
County Board of Commissionerpursuant to Resolution 77-80. Anew 1041
was recently approved as Resolution 041-2001. See attached resolution as
Exhibit C. The resolution includes a 1.041 Hazard Review Site Plan with a
defined "Building Envelope" that includes the existing residence and the
improved yard area around thefiouse. The proposed new house would be built
within the existing Building Envelope which was recently reviewed and
approved as part of the 1041 process. The building envelope is just over
50,000 square feet. See. attached building envelope as Exhibit D.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Parcel 291102100023 is a 4.378 acre parcel of land located at 299 Conundrum..
Creek Road in the AFR-10 Zone District. See Site Data as Exhibit A. Applicant
is requesting an award of an additional 4,650 square feet, which would result in
total development on the property of 10,400 square feet (Primary Residence of
9,400 square feet; future barn 1,000 square feet.) See attached plans and
elevations Exhibit E,F,G and Far Sheet Exhibit I.
Throughout this GMQS Floor Area Competition application, Applicant is
proposing to bring the development in further compliance with Land Use Code
standards and to improve and enhance the existing conditions of the property
and the surrounding area. Applicant is proposing to decrease the allowable
Rural r, ea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
intensity, cluster the development to the maximum extent possible within the
already approved building envelope, mitigate 1041 hazards beyond what was
required as part of the original approvals, enhance wildlife and riparian areas,
improve water and air quality, and provide services to the surrounding area.
REVIEW REQUIRMENTS
Section 9-120-031 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code sets forth the general
standards and criteria for competition and scoring, with points awarded for each
of five separate categories.
1. 9-120-032: Availability and Appropriateness of Public and Private
Facilities a nd Services;
2. 9-120-033: Effect on the Environment and Resource Conservation;
3. 9-120-034: Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Protection;
4. 9-110-035: Consistency with Land Use Goals;
5. 9-120-036: Bonus Points.
It should be noted that the GMQS Scoring Criteria is, in many cases, more
suited to a new development rather than a request for additional square footage
to ah already approved use. Many of the items, particularly in Section 9-120-
032, are somewhat redundant. Prior approvals establish the right to develop a
single family house and the related accessory structures on any lot that is in
this competition; no new uses are being created, and no greater density or
intensity is proposed. Quite often, as is he case in this application, just the
opposite is true; applicants voluntarily agree to limit the intensity, reduce the
impacts, and mitigate beyond what is required. The impact on the design and
safety of the roads in the area, for example, of a 6,000 square foot five-
bedroom house with a 1,500 square foot barn, is not any different then the
impact created by a 5,000 square foot five-bedroom house with a 750 square
foot barn. The site contains an existing residence with approximately 5,300
square feet without any garage or covered parking.
The following portion of the application identifies the review criteria and
Applicant's proposal to address each of these criteria. Applicant's requested
scoring is included in a summary at the end of the responses to each section.
- --~
Rural~ea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
GAMS SCORING CRITERIA
1. Capacity, quality and reliability of the water system proposed to
serve a development;
2. The demonstration of adjudicated water rights to serve the
development;
3. The capacity to attain any necessary water through an
augmentation plan.
Response: There has been an existing well on the property since
1977 and is currently producing 4 to 5 gallons per minute providing
adequate water to serve this development. See We11 Permit as
Exhibit J No work has been done on the well since the initial drilling.
Applicant has additional water rights if a 1/3 interest in the
Maddalone ditch for irrigation. See attached ditch documents as
Exhibit K.
Summary: Based on the above information, water service to the
proposed development is more than adequate for its needs.
Since water is more than adequate for the for the needs of the
project and since it is existing and does not change the character
of the neighborhood in which the development is located or
detrimentally effect any of the environmental conditions of the
property, it is proposed that water service to the property should
receive a base score of one (1) point.
B. Sewer (0-2 points): The type and capability of the sewage disposal
proposed to meet the needs of a development and dispose of wastes
without impact on water quality and in a reliable manner.
Response: There has been a septic system (ISDS) in place since the
existing residence was built. in the late 70s. See Exhibit L. The
system will have to be expanded in order to meet the requirements of
the proposed larger residence. Applicant has met with the
appropriate Pitkin County Health Department personnel and will have
a septic system engineered as required. The current approval would
allow for the construction of a conventional ISDS. Tests performed by
Pitkin County and yielded percolation rates which exceed the
specified range set by county regulations. Applicant will supply
suitable soils to slow down the percolation rates as prescribed by the
4
A. Water Service (0-2 points)
J:-Y,.
Ruraf~rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
controlling runoff and outflow through a `dry sump'; the properly
should receive a base score of two (2) points.
D. Fire Protection (0-2 points):
1. Capability of the appropriate Fire Protection District to provide fire
protection according to established response standards without
establishing a new station, adding equipment or personnel, or making
capital improvements;
2. The adequacy of water pressure and capacity for providing fire-
fighting flows;
3. The commitment of an applicant to provide fire protection facilities
necessitated by a development, including, but not limited to, fire
hydrants, water storage tanks, ponds and distribution links;
4. The capability of the Fire District to provide adequate service based
upon site design of a development and reliability of the proposed
water system.
5. The capability of a development to be a self-sufficient_fre protection
system in the event response times from the fire district are too slow
to protect a development.
Response: There has been residence on the property since 1977. The
residence contains two (2) additional units which have been separately
rented out for a number of years. The Fire District has served the
property continuously since 1977 with a higher usage than is being
applied for.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Applicant's representatives have met with
Aspen Fire Protection District personnel and been assured that capacity
exists to provide adequate fire protection without the addition of a new
station, equipment, personnel, or making capital improvements. Aspen
Fire Protection_Disfrict personnel have made a site visit to verify the
information submitted,in this response. See Fire Marshal Memo as
Exhibit O. In addition, there will be an Internal Fire Suppression System
with appropriate storage, pressure tanks, and pumps as maybe
required.
Applicant commits to an additional storage of at least 10,000 gallons, as
recommended by the Aspen Fire Protection District personnel, so that
pre crews will be able to pull water from is storage for fighting fires both
on the subject properly and in the surrounding area. Distances and
heighf from locations where fire crews can park equipment to draw water
from these ponds is within the head .capacity of the AFPD Pumps.
6
~ ~;
Rura~`N ea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Aspen Fire District personnel, during meetings have expressed that
there is, in general, a lack of easily accessible water for fire engines near
Conundrum Creek. In addition to the on site storage facility, Applicant
has discussed this with neighbors and has joined ih ah effort to provide a
water tap for the fire department at the Conundrum Creek Bridge.
Applicant commits to pay for the cost of the installation of such a water
tap along with several of the like minded neighbors.
As noted above, Applicant's_representatives have met with Aspen Fire
Protection District personnel and reviewed the criteria for access
including road grades, road width, provision for turnouts, provision for
turn-around space, etc., and have been assured that site design meeting
the required standards will allow for the AFPD to provide adequate
service. Furthermore, this issue was addressed and approved as part of
the recent 1041 review process.
The proposed site design provides for an access road and driveway
meeting all the requirements, a turn around area immediately in front of
the property adequately sized to allow fire fighting equipment to turn
around without backing, and hi§toric access to a cul-de-sac providing an
additional staging area, parking, or turning.
Applicant has adjudicated water rights for domestic use of sufficient
amount to ensure that the proposed self-contained storage facilities are
maintained at appropriate levels. In addition, the water in the storage
facility is available as noted above,.. The. proposed development will be
protected by an Internal Fire Suppression System. The primary
residence, will be equipped with at least three 10 Ib. ABC fire
extinguishers (kitchen, garage, and mechanical room). The future barn
will be equipped with one 101b. ABC fire extinguisher. Additionally, the
building's exterior is comprised almost completely of fire-resistive
materials; the roof is metal and the entire building facade is stone. The
only combustible material on the exterior will be the wood of the doors
' he structure is surrounded by a bandYof pea-gravel
and window frames: T„
at the eave line.
Summary: Based on the Applicant's commitment to comply with
all requirements of the Land Use, Uniform Fire Code, and the
requirements ofAFPl7; to exceed requirements for storage
capacity; and to provide access to water to fight fires in the
surrounding area thereby satisfying an existing need of the
surrounding neighborhood, the property should receive a base
score of two (2) points.
E. Road System (0-2 points):
.. _,. _ ..... ..._. _ i...
Rural }r;~ ea GMCQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
1. Capability of the public road network to provide for the needs of a
proposed development within acceptable levels. of safety and design.
as defined by the Pitkin County f2oad Management &
..:Maintenance Plan;
2. Capability of the public road network,to provide for the needs of the
proposed development without exceeding the capacity of the existing
road network as defined by the County Engineer.
3. Applicant's commitments to finance necessary road system
improvements attributable to a proposed development; and
4. Ability to perform any necessary road improvements without resulting
in a fundamental change in the character of the,area or neighborhood
in which the development is proposed.
Response: There has been residence on the property since 1977. The
residence contains two (2) additional units, which have been separately
rented out for a number of years. The public road network has served.
the property continuously since 1977 with a higher assuage than is being
applied for.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the project is served by Conundrum
Creek Road and an easement through a neighboring property. At the
time of the approval for the existing residence and the 1041 approval,
the public road network was assumed. adequate to meet the. needs of the
development as no conditions of approval relative to the road network
were included in that approval. The original approval permitted asingle-
family residence. In fact. the previous owner rented out two downstairs
units and lived upstairs with his family. Part of such an approval without
the imposition of additional requirements is the recognition that the road
network is adequate to provide for traffic appropriate to asingle-family
residence, the construction of that residence, and the on-going
maintenance of the same. Since the easement is already in place and
._ .
will not be modified, there is no change being proposed to the Pitkin
County road system. See the Vicinity Map, Exhibit B and the Approved
Building Envelope Exhibit D.
Pitkin County standards suggest trip generation of seven (7) trips per
day. Current use is an average of less then two (2) trips per day (one of
them on a bicycle during the summer). If the property is sold, there will
be a single family use most likely as a second home and should be
unoccupied for a significant amount of time even that number maybe
high.
Summary: Due to the existing residence, being. currently used by the
same occupants, the trip generation from this project would have not
have any impact. The additional square footage requested will not
Rura~ area GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
impact the design or safety of the road. No additional road
improvements are necessary. Applicant commits to pay the required
and appropriate impact fees associated with the development. This
property should be awarded,a base score of one (1) point.
A. Air Pollution (0-2 points): The effect of the development on the
community's air quality, including but not limited to whether:
~1. Fewer or cleaner wood burning devices than allowed by law will
be installed;
~. Existing dirty burning devices will be removed or replaced by
cleaner burning devices;
~3. Dust prevention measures are employed on the unpaved areas:
~4. Any special emission control devices are used;
~5. Development proposed utilizes and/or promotes in design and
location the use of public mass transit or other non-vehicular
transportation;
6. Mitigation of PM10
Response: Currently the existing residence has four (4) "dirty" wood-
burning fireplace ornon-certified woodstoves -two (2) in the main house
and one (7) in each of the auxiliary units. Under this proposal, three (3)
of these will be eliminated and the impact on Air Pollution will be
significantly reduced.
As noted above, approvals are in place for the construction of a single-
familyhouse and accessory structures limited to 5,750 square feet. The
additional square footage requested will not adversely impact our
community's air quality. The additional footage requested does not
change the number of bedrooms in the house, hence does not change
~~-
the number of people who would be using the house nor the associated
activities. In actuality, the proposed project has less than the number of
approved bedrooms further reducing the impact.
The project is located in the Attainment Area of Pitkin County. Current
regulations allow the installation of one "dirty" wood-burning fireplace
and one gas log or certified woodstove. Applicant intends to install only
those devices allowed by current Aspen/Pitkin County Fireplace and
Woodsfove Regulations. Applicant commits to constructing the sole
permitted wood-burning fireplace with a re-burner of flue gases such as
9
' Rural ~-+rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
R y 'g ~ _.
Pure A-Fire® models w 1 reduce emiss~onst to 5.73 sions. The standard
• ~ grams per hour, well
under the EPA standard of 7.5 grams per hour. See Pure-A-Fire info as
Exhibit R.
The applicants commits to utilize super eftrcient boilers that recycle
emissions for greater efirciency and to decrease air pollution. See Boiler
info as Exhibit S.
Applicant commits to dust prevention and control measures during and
after construction. Dust control measures will include regular watering of
the road and parking areas and/or use of appropriate dust control
chemicals. The driveway will be chipped sealed or paved fo prevent
dust. Applicant will use environmentally-friendly sprays of water rather
than the controversial chemicals. The improvements to the road and
aforementioned maintenance provide a significant enhancement of the
existing environment that currently sees no maintenance or
improvement. Applicant will comply with all requirements of PM10
mitigation at the time of construction.
Summary: Based on the commitments of Applicant to meet or
exceed all requirements of applicable codes and'to improve and
enhance the existing environment by improvement and regular
maintenance of the existing road and installation of cleaner wood
burning devices than, required, the project should be awarded a
base score of two (2) points.
B. Water Resources (0-2 points):
1. Extent to which the project will impact surface, groundwater, and
irrigation supply; and
2. Extent to which theproject commits to maintain existing surface,
groundwater, and irrigation supply for domestic uses, wildlife
uses, vegetation uses, and agricultural uses.
Response: The proposed project will be completely self-sufficient with
regard to water usage and will have no negative or minimal impact on
the surface, groundwater, and irrigation supply. The proposed project
will actually enhance the existing condition beyond what is currently
approved. No wafer dependent agricultural activities are or will be
affected by the development.
As previously described, during heavy rains, the runoff goes onto the
neighboring property below, threatening the residence below. Applicant
10
_-
. ,
Rurai'' 'rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
commits to improving the existing condition by having all water held in a
dry sump.
Applicant owns significant water rights. See Maddalone Ditch Rights as
exhibit K. Applicant commits fo maintain_these rights (0.033 cfs) for
domestic use. Additionally, Applicant commits to maintain and improve
the historic pattern of surface water to enhance the riparian areas and
enhance the wildlife habitat in those areas
Summary: There is aqueduct wafer to serve the needs of this
development. No negative impact on surface, ground or irrigation
water supply is expected. Wildlife use of surface water will not
only be uninterrupted and maintained, but enhanced due to the
improvements noted above. Because of there being no negative
impacts and the improvement and enhancement of the existing
environment by the Applicant, this project should be awarded a
base score of two (2) points.
C. Hazards and Site Disturbance/Environmental Impact (0-2 points):
.. ~ ~ ~ ~.. h: ~.. ~, via., ._ P„ ~-
1. A proposed development is free from man-made hazards;
2. A proposed development completely avoids development within
one-hundred yearfloodplain hazard areas; high hazard avalanche
zones; landslide areas; 30% slopes; rock fall hazard areas; and
severe wildlife areas;
3. A proposed development commits to preserve or enhance natural
vegetation and terrain on the site and to revegetate disturbed
areas with native„vegetation;
4. A proposed development commits to minimize the area of
disturbance by limiting the size of the building envelope(s),
road/driveway cuts, etc.; and
5. A development commits to weed management.
Response: There has been a residence on the site since the 70's. There
has never been any use on the property other than as a residence and a
research of the property shows no mining. agriculture or other use. Most
of these issues were dealt with as part of the recent 1041 approval -
Resolution 041-2001. See Exhibit C.
The Building Envelope is being completely removed from areas of slope
more than 15%. The project is not located within the one-hundred year
floodplain hazard area, high (red) hazard avalanche zones, rock fall
hazard areas, or severe wildfire hazard areas. According to the
Colorado State Forest Service the majority of this parcel is low. See
Denison Letter, as Exhibit N. As noted above, Applicant has committed
11
' Ruraea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
to improvements to the access road to improve and enhance the the
fighting capabilities in the neighborhood by providing a reliable source of
water and improved access. Community development maps for 1041
Hazards in the Upper Roaring Fork Valley indicate no other hazards.
Geologic Hazard Review of the property has been completed by O/sson
Associates. The report concludes that the potential impact from rockfall
and debris flow hazard is, minimal and the associated risk is low. See
Olsson and Associates Cover letter as Exhibit M.
An Avalanche Hazard Review_of the property has been completed by
Olsson Associates. The report concludes that almost all (all if you
consider set backs) of the property lies in the "Blue"- moderate zone.
See Olsson and Associates Cover letter as Exhibit M. As part of the
recent 1041 review -Resolution 041-2001- PittCin Country reviewed this
issue and concluded, as is supported by the code, that avalanche risk in
the blue zone can be mitigated by taking the appropriate measures as
delineated in the approval resolution. Applicant commits to complying
with all of these measures, the most critical of which is "F. All structures
on the property shall be built to certified engineering standards to
withstand moderate avalanche, impacts." See the Resolutions Exhibit C.
Attached also as Exhibit, hl. is the preliminary design of an avalanche
wall which will be built into the structure. All of the'structures built
pursuant to this application will be designed for mitigation by a certified
engineer.
Applicant commits to preserve native vegetation and terrain except for
the construction of the proposed house and driveway, and improvements
to the existing access road. Applicant commits to re-vegetating any
disturbed areas with natural vegetation and to increase the amount of
natural vegetation along the access road to shield,the improved wildlife
habitat surrounding the detention from human influence to the greatest
extent possible. All re-vegetation shall be conducted accordingly to the
guidelines and recommendations provided by the Pitkin County Wildlife
Biologist. The area of disturbance shall be minimized through utilization
of the existing access road. Most of the building envelope will remain in
an undisturbed state. This is beyond what is required by the initial
approval. The development is focused and concentrated on a small
portion of the approved building envelope. Applicant commits. to silt
fencing around the construction site to further reduce site disturbance.
Applicant commits to entering a maintenance program concurrent with
the start of construction. Disturbed areas shall be re vegetated promptly
thereby minimizing weed intrusion. Applicant further commits to
cooperation with the County Weed Control efforts where applicable.
12
" Rura Hrea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Applicant will underground overhead utility lines (the main power line for
the rest of the Conundrum Creek Valley which goes along the property,
crosses the property, and crosses the White River National Forest), that
,:
are currently above ground, enhancing not only the subject property, but
also the surrounding neighborhood. See Holy Cross easement and
documents as Exhibit T.
Summary: Applicant has committed to ensure no adverse
environmental impacts due to the development and to improve
the existing environment through improvement of the existing
access road, and addition of native vegetation along the access
road and surrounding the detention ponds. Based on no
anticipated adverse impacts, a willingness to completely
mitigation any which maybe created, and the improvement and
enhancement of the existing condition, this project should be
awarded a base score of two (2) points.
D.
use (0-2 points):
ucn an
1. Passive and/or active solar heating and cooling and thermal insulation
.._
measures beyond those required by the Aspen/Pitkin Energy
Conservation Code;
2. Water conservation devices and wastewater reuse systems within the
development rather than standard plumbing facilities;
3. Renewable non-polluting energy resources for the primary source of
energy for the development;
4. "Green" and/or high efficiency building materials and "Green"
technologies; and
5. Reuse of existing construction materials on-site.,
Response: The proposed structure has a southern orientation to
maximize solar gain. The majority of the glazing is on the southern side.
Interior floor surfaces are generally stone on a topping slab to provide
thermal mass. This aids, in temperature modulation and provides solar
storage in areas exposed to the sun's direcfrays thereby reducing
overall energy consumption. This project meets all requirements of the
Aspen/Pitkin County Energy Conservation Code.
Applicant will use high performance glass (tinted insulating glass with a
low E coating) on all windows so that in the winter, heat is reflected back
into the home and in summer outdoor heat is reflected out. Storm
windows will be provided for all operational windows - in effect providing
13
Ruraj`r~rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
triple glazing. Applicant will carefully design roof overhangs and/or
supply awnings which will limit summer solar gain and maximize the
winter gain.
The use of (SIP) structural insulated panels with actual R values far in
excess of those required by the code will be used for both the exterior
walls and roofs. The home, through the use of S/Ps, will not only by
supper insulated, but will also be much tighter than a conventional home,
further increasing the energy efficiency. See attached SIP info as
Exhibit Q. Ventilation will use natural ventilation chimneys to maintain
indoor air quality and minimize the need for mechanical ventilation.
The home will be built so, that it exceeds the Built Green Colorado
Checklist. The boilers will be 87% efficient and alTpaints and sfams will
be non-off gassing. See attached boiler info as Exhibit S. Certified
environmental or recycled and/or reclaimed woods will be used wherever
feasible -siding, cabinets, floor, trim, etc.
Applicant commits to use water conservation devices that exceed the
current requirements for flow/usage plumbing fixtures. For example the
plan specification calls forA Kohler San Raphael Powerlite K-3398 toilet.
that uses just 1 ~ 1 gallons per flush, .5 gallon less per flush than the
required toilets. See attached toilet info as Exhibit, U. As noted above,
Applicant commits to the construction of a Constructive Wetlands system
minimizing maintenance and waste removal from the site, and
maximizing the return of water to fhe local ecosystem. The site
disturbance with a constructive Wetlands system is less than with a
standard ISDS. "Constructive Wetlands systems have received general
approval in several Colorado counties fora 50% reduction in required
absorption area."See attached constructive Wetlands system info as
Exhibit P. Applicant has committed to the extensive use oflow-voltage
lighting within the home.
Applicant plans fo reuse, to the maximum extent possible, the materials
from the existing residence fo build the new residence. This includes
reuse of beams, timber, some siding, lumber, and the grinding up of
brick and concrete for base. Various other electrical and. plumbing
fixtures will be reused and well as most of the furnishings. Furthermore
applicant commits to reusing all excavated materials on-site for fill and
grading, and for using all cleared trees for firewood, thereby minimizing
the amount of exported materials_and the number of trucks on county
roads.
Summary: the proposed project has minimal impact on the
environment and any impacts will be completely mitigated.
14
Rural`h ea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Construction will meet or exceed all requirements of current
codes. Existing conditions will be improved and enhanced with a
Constructive Wetlands system. Based upon the above, this
project should be awarded a base score of two (2) points.
D.
The extent to
plan to:
-2 points):
riagemeht
1. Limit the number of trips to the site through carpooling, storage of
tools on site and other innovative measures;
2. Limit the amount of fill removed from the site though limited
excavation, regarding and use of the fill onste
3. Control noise and dust generated during construction; and
4. Minimize construction and material waste, i.e. reduce, recycle and
reuse.
Response: Several pertinent items will be required as part of the
Construction Management Plan. The Construction Management Plan
..,
will include provisions for limiting the number of trips to the site by
carpooling; storage of tools on site; coordination of deliveries to ensure
fewer, full trucks; and consolidation of tasks. Travel Demand Measures
(TDM) will be put into effect including but not limed to: (a) delivery of
material during non peak traffic periods (delivery 8 to 9AM and 4:30 to
5:30 will not be allowed), (b) parking plan, (c) maximum load/minimum
trip delivery, and (d) precise scheduling to reduce number of
subcontractor visits. Further efforts will be made to_ encourage on-site
lunches and discourage trips to town by providing a refrigerator and
microwave for the construction worker's use. A secondary secure
jobsite location out of a portion of the existing house will ~e provided for
these uses. The owner's son, who now lives in the residence will
personally manage the construction site and will do much of the work
himself.
As noted above, as materials as possible will be used from the existing
residence. Any excavated material will be used on site as fr11. The
foundation will be made from prefabricated concrete panels and the rest
of the exterior walls will be made from SIPs (Structural Integrated
Panels). The panels, both concrete and SIPs, are made to size offsite
and significantly reduce both the amount of material and labor that is
required on site which reduces multiple environmental impacts. See SIP
info as Exhibit Q. All chippable materials will be chipped on site. To the
extent material is exported, Applicant will minimize the number of dead
trips by filling trucks which are delivering material. Trees felled will be
used on site for firewood.
15
'' Rura area GTv1QS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Noise will be controlled to the greatest extent feasible. Temporary
power and space will be provided from the existing residence eliminating
trailers and generators. Radios will not be permitted on site until the
building is "dried in"and then only allowed inside the building. Noisy
equipment, to the extent possible, will be place so as to shield any noise
from neighbors. Construction hours will be Monday through Saturday-
7:30 AM fo 5:00 PM, with no work on Sundays or'Holidays. Contractor
will be required to comply with all Pitkin County Noise Abatement
Measures_required for construction activities Due to the pre-made
panels, much of the typically on-site building will be done off-site.
As noted earlier, Applicant commits to extensive_fugitive dust control
utilizing environmentally water on the access road. and as appropriate on
the construction site itself. Backfill of the foundation, finish grading,
landscaping, and revegitation will be'atrcomplishetl as quickly as feasible
to minimize the exposed condition of bare ground.
• eused, and/or recycled
Construction and material waste will be reduced, r
wrov ded foroma~enals that can nlormall Abe recco~ tainers will be
p y y d (aluminum, plastic,
glass, paper, etc.), reused (cardboard, wood, plywood, metal), or
disposed of. Garbage shall be separated from construction trash so that
it maybe secured in bear proof containers.
Preference will be given to those subcontractors who can go `above and
beyond" the requirements outline herein and who will strictly enforce
these provisions.
Summary: Applicant commits to utilizing every opportunity to
conserve resources, thought the Construction Management Plan.
As demonstrated above, Applicant is prepared to go "above and
beyond" normal construction practices to improve (reduce) the
levels of noise and disturbance throughout the construction of the
home beyond what is typically expected or required. This includes
the use of concrete and SIP panels, which are manufactured off-
site, are much moreenergy efficient, and reduce waste, labor and
the amount of materials_used. Based on Applicant's exceeding
the requirements of the Code and improving the existing
(expected) condition, the project should be awarded a base score
of two (2) points.
16
Rura`i Nrea GMQS Competitiori
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
A. Avoidance of Existina Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat. (0 to 2 points.)
. _ x...
The extent to which the proposed development,`includirig the building envelope
and other disturbed areas, completely avoids existing wildlife and wildlife
habitat including, but not limited to areas mapped by the Division of Wildlife on
Wildlife Resource Information maps (1041 environmental hazard maps) or
areas identified by the County biologist as: critical winter range; migration
corridors; calving areas; waterfowl habitat; fisheries; riparian areas; wetlands;
and/or sage, aspen and oak-senriceberry habitat.
Response: According to fhe 1041 environmental hazard maps, this
properly completely avoids critical winter range; migration corridors;
calving areas; waterfowl habitat, and sage and oak-serviceberry habitat.
The site was inspected by Jonathon Lowsky, County Wildlife biologist as
part of the recent 1041 review -Resolution 041-2001- who concurred
with the maps. The only habitat that will be disturbed is the,
comparatively small portion of aspen forest within the Building Envelope
itself. The Building Footprint is only about two (2) percent of the total
parcel
Summary: Based on the complete avoidance of all critical areas
as noted above and a negligible impact on insignificant aspen
forest habitat, fhe project could be deemed to completely avoid all
areas and should receive a base score of two (2) points.
B. Canine Management (0 to 2 points.) The extent to which the proposed
development commits to prohibiting dogs where the building envelope is
located within one-quarter (1/4) mile from mule deer, elk and bighorn
sheep severe winter range, winter concentration areas, migration
corridors and production areas. Commits to kenneling dogs where the
building envelope is located within one-half (1/2) mile, but more than
one- quarter (1i4) mile, from mule deer, elk and bighorn sheep severe
winter range, winter concentration areas, migration corridors and
production areas. Where the building envelope is located more than one-
half (1/2) mile from mule deer, elk and bighorn sheep severe winter
range, winter concentration areas, migration corridors and production
areas, automatically award two (2) points.
Response: The owners do not have any dogs, cats or other animals and
do not intend to have any. Applicant agrees that dogs are to be
prohibited during the construction process. In addition, the Building
Envelope is located more than one-half mile from mule deer, elk, and
17
- Rurai r,rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
bighorn sheep severe winter range; winter concentration areas;
migration corridors and production areas.
Summary: Based on the distance from critical area as noted
above, the project should automatically qualify for' a `tiase score of
two (2) points.
C. Enhancement of Wildlife or Wildlife Habitat (0 to 2 points.) The extent
to which the proposed development commits to enhance existing wildlife
or wildlife habitat or to restore native habitat to degraded sites for
example, creating or restoring wetlands andlor riparian habitat). On-site
enhancement is preferred, but where there are no significant
opportunities for on-site enhancement or restoration, a commitment to
..
enhance or restore other sites in Pitkin County may be considered.
Response: There are certain areas of the property which have been
g a neighboring property during heavy
ainseCTheasections will be planted with native grasses and shrubs, and
trees and kept in "maintained natural" condition, e.g., allowed to grow
relatively wild with the exception of noxious weed management.
Furthermore, there is a lot of dead fall on the property which represents
a hazard to the existing residence and the four (4) adjacent residences.
This deadfall will be removed to eliminate the hazard. The site will be as
heavily planted as practical to provide for maximum cover for wildlife and
to screen the property from the access road. Trash storage will be
indoors. Current fencing will be removed.
Summary: Based on the significant commitment to enhance and
restore a significant portion of the properly to provide for wildlife
and wildlife habitat, the project should be awarded a base score
of two (2) points.
D. Reduction of Human Influence. (0 to 2 points.) Consider the extent to
which the proposed development commits to cluster development and
reduces the zone of influence on wildlife and/or wildlife habitat.
Response: As part of the recent 1041 approval process -Resolution
041-2001, Applicant and the Pitkin County Planning Personnel created
an all-inclusive Building Envelope to further define the limits of
development and to reduce the zone of influence on wildlife and wildlife
habitat. As noted earlier, the Building Envelope and Building Footprint
were created to minimize the area of disturbance and clustering the
..
development as much as possible. The actual developmeht is clustered
and uses only a small portion of the actual building envelope further
reducing the zone of influence on wildlife and wildlife habitat. Applicant
18
Ruraf.~ ea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
will not put up any fencing, and the fencing that is on the property will be
removed.
Applicant commits to extensive native landscaping and heavily screen
_...
the building envelope fo reduce the zone of human influence.
Summary: Based on Applicant's commitments to cluster
development to the fullest extent possible, to eliminate fencing,
and to significantly reduce the zone of human influence, the
project should be awarded a base score of fwo (2) points.
19
` Rural n'Yea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
A. Open Space. (0-2 points; multiplier of three (3).) The extent to which the
development preserves desirable undeveloped lands for wildlife, scenic
and other desirable resource values, or preserves known agricultural
lands, including those which have been historically irrigated 1 used for
food, hay, grains or other feed production. and those used for dry
pasture and rangeland, consistent with adopted comprehensive plans
and Land Use Policies 2-10, 2-30, 2-120, 2-160, 2-240 and 2-280.
Response: The proposed development completely avoids and preserves
desirable undeveloped lands for wildlife, scenic, and other desirable
resource values. Aside from the required improvements to the existing
access road to comply with the requirements of AFPD and the Uniform
Fire Code, all development is limited #o a very small portion of the aspen
forest. Again, the Building Footprint represents only about 2% of the total
parcel. Most of the lot will be undisturbed open space. There are no
agricultural lands on this parcel
The corridor of Castle Creek is an important scenic resource of this
community. No development is ih the current open space -natural
aspen trees- which will be completely preserved.
Summary: Based on Applicant's commitment to completely
preserve those areas of open space as noted above, this project
should be awarded a base score of two (2) points.
B. Visual Impacts (0-2 points; multiplier of two (2)) Considering the extent
to which a development impacts the scenic quality and visual character
of an area as viewed from public roadways and the extent to which a
development is consistent with the Scenic Overlay standards (Section 3-
60-40), Land Use Policy 2-120, and the West Elk Loop Scenic and
Historic Byway I notwithstanding the fact that. the parcel may be located
outside of the mapped scenic overlay (i.e., within tributary valleys to the
Roaring Fork Valley)
Response: The subdivision is not within the mapped scenic
overlaylridgeline review area, however, Applicant recognizes that Castle
Creek Valley is an important visual resource of our community, enjoyed
by many through all times of the year. Applicant commits to preserving
20
Rurarea'GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
this visual resource as much as possible and limiting the amount of
visual impact from this development.
The current residence is an obvious,. eye sore from Castle Creek Road
and the adjacent area and has an unnatural blue gray color. The visual
aspect of this properly will be greatly enhanced by Applicant's building of
anew home out of organic materials. The exterior materials will blend
with the surroundings and minimize the visual impact. The home is
designed to be below the allowable height limit. The avalanche
mitigation will be incorporated info the structure of the home and there
will no be an unsightly avalanche wall as can be seen on some other
properties in the Conundrum Creek valley.
The Building Envelope is located as far away from Castle Creek Road as
possible; the eastern edge of the Building Envelope is located the about
one hundred (100) feet from the properly line (as opposed to the 50 foot
setback requirement. The nearest comer of the house is located
approximately three hundred (300) feet away from Conundrum Creek
Road and is on an elevated area, some fifty (50) feet higher than the road
and well screened by the aspen forest.
The home is to be completely faced with native stone further minimizing
the visual impact. The exterior lighting will comply with the Code and
may even be less than,allowed by the Code although the final lighting
plan has not been finished. Nonetheless, although not required,
Applicant has committed to extensive use of low voltage lighting
throughout the interior of the house to further limit the impact of those
lights shining through the windows at night. Additionally, except for the
windows on the southern elevation, the majority of the windows are
small (3X3 and 2X2) windows evocative of the smaller windows found on
old barns and houses found throughout our valley. Most of the outdoor
lighting will be on motion detectors, so they will be off, unless actually
used. The lighting will comply with the new county lighting standards.
Summary: Based on the fact that the project is consistent with the
Scenic Overlay Standards, this project should be awarded a base
score of two (2) points.
C. Development Below Allowable Density (0-2 points; multiplier of two
(2)) Consider' the extent to which: he development proposed is less than
the allowable density in terms of number of dwelling units (not including
caretaker dwelling units, employee dwelling units or deed restricted
affordable housing dwelling units) permitted in the applicable zone
district:
21
RuraArea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Response: Scoring criteria stipulates that "(w]hen competing for
additional square footage only, an applicant shall be eligible for a score
of one (1) if there is no opportunity to reduce density on a property." The
property is zoned AFR-10 and. is allowed one single-family residence
and .associated accessory structures. There is no opportunity for to
reduce density on the property.
Summary: Based on the scoring criteria, the properly should be
awarded a base score of one (1) point.
D. Development Below Allowable Intensity (0-2 points; multiplier of two
(2)) Consider the extent to which the development proposed is less than
the allowable intensity in terms of the total amount of square footage of
floor area potentially available as an allowed use under the applicable
zone district:
Response: Applicant commits to limit development to the total square
footage represented in this application (10,400) which is about 70% of
that which is allowed under the current zone district. The applicant shall
provide a covenant or other guarantee running with the land, for which
Pitkin County shall be a beneficiary, guaranteeing the representation of
the intensity reduction.
Summary: Based on Applicant's commitment to limit the allowable
intensity to 70%, this project should be awarded a base score of
one (2) points.
E. Clustering (0-2 points; multiplier of two (2)) Consider the extent to which
the development proposed clusters the structures proposed for
development, or, where applicable, clusters the proposed development
adjacent to existing or approved development on adjacent properties.
Response: Applicant has moved the Building Envelope to the south to
cluster the development to the fullest extent possible. As noted earlier,
there is an existing access road on the property and the building has
been close to the road to cluster all development on the properly. The
new residence is located further back than the old. residence physically
screening the development from Castle Creek to the extent possible.
Summary: Based on the relocation and defining of the Building
Envelope, Applicant has clustered development on this parcel to
the greatest extend possible and should be awarded a base score
of 72) points.
22
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the award of bonus points
as follows (maximum score six (6) points; no multiplier):
A. Bonus points may awarded only to development applications which
achieve the overall minimum scoring threshold in sections 9-120-032
through 9-120-035.
B. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the extent to which
an applicant purchases interests in land in order to preserve valuable
undeveloped lands or creates conservation easements or dedicates land
located in the Agricultural Wildlife Reserve District (AWR) of the Pitkin
County Down Valley Comprehensive Plan; Future Land Use Map.
Response: This subdivision is not located within the Pitkin County Down
Valley Comprehensive Plan which should be recognized as a
disadvantage to this subdivision in the scoring competition. Its location
notwithstanding, the development of this project is consistent with the
infent of the Down Valley Comprehensive Plan and the Agriculture
Wildlife Reserve (AWR) District. Applicant has committed to preserve
approximately 80% of the parcel by limiting development within the
newly defined Building Envelope. Staff has previously recommended
awards of one point in this category when a project is not within the area
covered by the Down Valley Comprehensive Plan, however, the project
is consistent with the goals of the Down Valley Comprehensive Plan and
is preserving more than the three times the amount of land developed
and should qualify for two points. Calculations show that 90.6% of the
properly will remain undeveloped (4.378 acres X 43,560 square feet/acre
= 190,706 square feet: development (footprint, terraces, and driveway) _
98,000 square feet). Score: two points.
Creative Bonus. Bonus points shall be available to the applicant to specify
other creative methods in which the proposed development will achieve the
goals of each of the categories set forth in sections 9-120-032 through 9-120-
035. To be eligible for a bonus point, the applicant shall specify in which
category the bonus point is sought and describe the creative measure which
the applicant proposes to further the goal of the category. Only one creative
bonus point is available per category, with a total of four possible bonus
opportunities except to break ties between applications. At its option, an
applicant may submit for one additional creative bonus to be considered in the
event of a tie between applications.
23
~~:.
Rura~ ' rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Rurarea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Response: Applicant requests Creative Bonus Points in the following
categories, believing that these creative methods substantially further
the goals of the related section.
Public & Private Facilities and Services: Applicant recognizes
that wildfire is a tremendous concern throughout the valley and in
the west, in general. Many areas of the Castle Creek valleys are
rated as extreme wildfire hazard areas. In addition to the.
substantial enhancement of fire fighting capabilities provided by
Applicant through access to a large, reliable supply of water,
Applicant proposes to make a $3,000 donation fo the Aspen Fire
Protection District for equipment geared toward fighting wildfire,
training personnel, or supporting an education program for
property owners through AFPD.
Score: one (1) point.
Environment and Resource Conservation: Applicant has
committed to a standard Pure-A-Fire® emission control on the
wood-burning trreplace thereby reducing the emissions to 5. 73
grams per hour, less than the EPA required 7.5 grams per hour.
Applicant further commits to installation of the deluxe Pure-A-
Fire® further reducing emissions to 0.77 grams per hour and the
installation of a heat exchanger in the flue system to capture the
heat generated in the flue to aid in heating the home. The system
is tied directly to the boiler thereby reducing the amount of time
the boiler is required to run and further reducing the amount of
propane consumed.
Score: one (1) point.
Wildlife and Wildlife Nabitat; Applicant has proposed a
Constructed Wetlands System. While this was first included under
the section of Public & Private Facilities and .Services in the
_.
scoring criteria, it was more by way of explanation for the type of
ISDS. It did not receive a score of two (2) because it did not
satisfy an existing need of the neighborhood, however, this
system impacts the ecosystem less by miriimizirig disruption and
would further improve wildlife habitat and is therefore submitted
as a Creative Bonus item for Wildlife & Wildlife Habitat.
Score: one (1) point.
24
Rural ` rea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Land Use Goals: In the interest of reducing visual impacts and
improving the Scenic Corridor in the Castle Creek Valley,
Applicant commits to participating in undergrounding utility lines
which are currently overhead through and beside the property.
This is the main line which serves the residences further up the
Conundrum Creek Valley from the subject property and includes
paying for the trenching and piping as well as the expenses
incurred Holy Cross Energy to actually laying the line along with
providing the necessary easements and access. Approximate
cost $30,000.
Score: one (1) point.
Additional Creative Bonus Point (tie breaker): Applicant
recognizes that noxious week growth is rampant throughout the
west and in Pitkin County. The negative impacts on wildlife,
agricultural, water and visual resources are enormous. In addition
to embarking on an aggressive weed control program for this
property, Applicant proposes to make a $3,000 donation to the
Pitkin County Weed Management Program for noxious weed
control.
Score: one (7) point.
25
b,f ;
Rural` rea GMQ$ Competition
299 Conundrum Road.
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Scoring Summary
Section Category '
..,
` Score Multiplier Total,,
Score:
9-120-032 .
Public & Private Facilities & Services
._ _,_.- _
A. Water Service 1 1 1
B. Sewer 1 1 1
C. Storm Draina a '" """ 2 1 2
D. Fire Protection 2 1 2
E. Road 5 stem 1 1 1 '
Subtotal 7
9-120-033 Environment & Resource Conservation "`'
A. Air Pollution ~' 2 2 4 '
B. WaterResources 2 2 4
C. Hazards and Sitebisturbarce/ Envirorimental mpact 2 2 4
D. Ener y & WaterConservation/Waste WateFReuse 2 2 4
E. Conservation throia h Construction Mana emerit 2 2 4
... _ . __~.__ _~ _ .,~ ~. ,. - :. Subtotal 20
9-120-034 Wildlife and Wildlife Habita"t Protectioh
A. Avoidance of Existin Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat 2 2 4
B. Canine Mana emeht 2 2 4
C. Enhancement of WildlifeorWildlifeHabitat' ~ 2 2 4
D. Reduction of Humari Infldehce 2 2 4
Subtotal 16 '
0-120-035 Consistenc with Land Use Goals
A. Open Space 2 3 6
B. Visual Impacts _ 2 2 4 '
C. Development Below Allowable Derisit 1 2 2
D. Development Below Allowable Ihtensity 2 2 4
E. Clustering ~ ._ 2 2 4
`" Subtotal 20
Total 63
9-120-036 Bonus Points
A. Overall Minimum Scoriri ThresFiold Met J
B. Comprehensive Plan 2
C. Creative Bonus Points
Public & Private Facilities & Services 1
Environment & Resoiar•ce Conservation 1
_ Wildlife& Wifdlife~~Habitat ~ ~ ~ ~~~ `" 1
Land Use Goals _ ," ,` 1
Total 67 '
Tie Breaker: Environment &. Resource Conservation 1
_ ~_ .. Total 68
26
Ruro~ Area GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
List of Exhibits
A. Site Data
B. Vicinity Map
C. Pitkin County Resolution - No 041-2001
D. Recorded Plat with Approved Building Envelope
E. Site Plan
F. Architectural Rendering
G. Floor Plans, Elevations, Sections
H. Avalanche Wall Design
I. FAR Summary
J. Well Permit
K. Maddalone Ditch Rights
L. Septic Plan and Compliance
M. Olsson Letter re Rockfall, Blue Avalanche Zone
N. Denision (Forest Service) -Letter re Wildfire
O. Fire Marshal Memo
P. Constructive Wetlands System
O. KC Paneis -SIP (Structural. Insulated Panels)
R. Pure-A-Fire -Fireplace Specs
S. Viessman -Boiler Specs
T. Holly Cross Utility Undergrounding Contracts
U. Kohler Toilet Specs
27
...
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Ezra Louthis, Planner
RE: Mathys 2003, Rural Area GMQS Competition for Additional Floor Area
DATE: September 9, 2003
,.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicants aze requesting a Growth Management Quota System
allotment for 4,650 square feet of additional residential floor area. There is an existing structure on the
.parcel that is intended to be demolished. The available exempt floor area on the parcel is 5,750 sq. ft., and
the Applicants aze requesting an aggregate square footage total of 10,400 sq. ft.
APPLICANTS: Heidi and Guy Mathys
REPRESENTATIVES; Marc Mathys
LOCATION: 0299 Conundrum Creek Road
ZONING/LOT SIZE: The property is zoned AFR-10. The property contains 4.378 acres which is non-
conforming in size.
PROCEDURE/PROCESS: Scoring of the Residential Growth Management portion of this application
is conducted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning Commission forwards, by
resolution, the ranking of the development applications. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission
resolution forwarding the scores or subsequent to the conclusion of all appeal hearings, the BOCC by
resolution allocates development allotments to the eligible applicants.
BACKGROUND: The property received 1041 Hazard Review approval on October 16, 2001, pursuant ',
to Hearing Officer Determination 041-2001.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Written comments were not received from the Castle/Maroon Caucus or the
County Engineer.
pd'` .
Mathys GMQS
September 9, 2003
Page 2
STAFF COMMENTS
y RURAL AREA GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM (GMQS) ALLOTMENTS FOR
ADDITIONAL FLOOR AREA (SECTION 9-120):
Additional floor area in the Rural Areas of Pitkn County for existing or approved development shall be
limited to an annuaPceiling of 40,000 square feet of floor atea.
Staff s recommended scoring for this project is attached. Please notetllat a development must receive a
minimum score of 48 points and meet or exceed the minimum threshold for each of the individual scoring
categories. The Applicants received a score of 49, and did reach threshold.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Staffs recommended scoring
Application and site plan submitted sepazately.
Rur~;' tea GMQS Competition
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Exhibit A
SITE DATA
Project Representative: Marc Mathys (970) 925-2400 Fax 920-7991
Owners: Heidi and Guy Mathys
Parcel I.D. No.: 291102100023
Property Size: 4.378 -Acres
Zoning: AFR-10
Setbacks: Front Yard - 100 Feet, Rear Yard - 30 Feet,
Side Yard - 30 Feet
Access: Conundrum Creek Road and then an easement
through the property below gains access to the site.
Electric Utilities: Holy Cross Electric.
Phone U.S. West Communications
Water Water is provided by well
Sewer (ISDS) Individual Sewage Disposal System
28
R
t U~ Y~, S~~ ~ A i
DETERMINATION OF THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE BIRK/MATHYS 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
Determination No.O~-2001
RECITALS
Walter and Rosemarie Birk ("Applicants") have applied to the Pitkin County
Hearing Officer for 1041 Hazard Review approval to establish a building
envelope that will encompass an existing single-family residence.
2. The property is zoned AFR-10 and contains 4.27 acres.
The property is located at 0299 Conundrum Road and is more specifically
described in Exhibit A.
4. The Hearing Officer heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on
October 16, 2001 at which time evidence and testimony were presented with
respect to this application.
5. The Hearing Officer finds that the building envelope avoids significant wildlife
habitat, has low wildfire hazard, and is located in the best location to avoid
potential avalanche danger on the property.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Hearing Officer
that approval is hereby granted to the Birk/Mathys 1041 Hazard Review for a building
envelope that will encompass an existing residence subject to the following conditions
which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest.
1. The Applicants shall adhere to all conditions and material representations made in the
application and public meetings except as amended herein.
2. Prior to submittal for any building permits, the Applicants shall record a 24 X 36 inch
mylar 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan in accordance with Section 5-70-040 of the
Land Use Code. The site plan shall also be submitted in digital format for integration
in to the County Geographic Information System (GIS) prior to submission of a
building permit.
3. The Applicants shall modify the building envelope to avoid all red avalanche zone
areas. A site plan with a modified building envelope shall be approved by
Community Development prior to recordation
4. The Applicants shall comply with the following wildfire mitigation measures:
4fiim98
I II~III VIII IIIIII IIII IIII IIIIII IIIIII III VIII IIII IIII O P1g20p 000003:13P
Hearing Officer Detemvnation No. 6}2001
Page 3
I. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
J. Wood fences shall not connect to any structure.
K. Any outbuildings or additional structures shall adhere to the same. standazds as
structures.
L. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container.
M. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour
away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation
around any aboveground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be
constructed with materials approved for 2 hour fire resistive construction on the
exterior side of the walls.
N. Each structure shall have a minimum of one pound approved ABC fire
extinguisher placed in a visible and accessible location.
O. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non-combustible letters and shall,
be clearly visible at the primary point of access from the public or common access
road and installed on anon-combustible post.
P. New utility lines shall be buried in the existing driveway.
6. No development, including grading, excavation, fill placement, berming, landscaping,
entry or ranch gates, and vegetation removal or disturbance shall occur outside of the
approved building [and/or] development envelopes unless otherwise specified in this
document, such as necessary wildfire mitigation. Utility and driveway extension and
maintenance shall occur within approved building, development or access envelopes.
7. The Applicants shall comply with the following avalanche hazard mitigation
measures:
A. If structural avalanche defenses are required to protect people or structures, they
shall be designed by a certified engineer to withstand avalanche impact forces.
Prior to submittal for any building permits, the Applicants shall provide avalanche
hazazd mitigation as recommended by a certified engineer or geologist. Such
mitigation shall automatically become conditions of approval for any building
permit on the property.
B. Clear-cutting or other large-scale removal of vegetation, particulazly within
avalanche path starting zones, shall be prohibited.
C. Extractive operations shall be prohibited within. avalanche hazard. zones during the
winter unless there is an approved program of avalanche control and defense
measures.
D. New utility lines or pipes that serve structures on the property and that cross
avalanche hazard zones shall be buried.
E. Warning signs of the potential ava]anche danger shall be placed along the
driveway to the residence.
F. All structures on the property shall be built to certified engineering standards to
withstand moderate avalanche impacts. The Applicant shall beaz all costs of any
avalanche control that may be required to mitigate the hazard.
III~~LIIIVIIIIIIIIIII046z 98003:13P
Heazing Officer Determination No ail -2001.
Page 4
8. Realignment of the existing driveway or further extension of utilities outside the
parameters of the existing driveway shall not be permitted without further review by
Community Development.
9. The Applicants shall comply with the 2001 Wildlife Protection Ordinance No. 010-
2001 for waste storage. Compliance with the condition shall be verified by the Pitkin
County Wildlife Biologist prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
10. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 022-2000, the Applicants aze subject to the Fair Share
Requirements and shall pay a road impact fee as calculated at, the same time as
building permit issuance.
11. Floor area shall be limited to 5,750 square feet exempt from growth management.
Floor area shall be calculated based on the definition in effect at the time of building
permit submittal.
12. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or construction activity, the Applicants
shall stake the comers of the building envelope and install construction fencing
around the perimeter of the building envelope. The fencing shall remain in place
until issuance of certificate of occupancy.
13. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the
Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set
forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The
statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on October 16, 2004.
ICI VIII!lIII~ I II~IIIIIIII IiII Il l~IIIII IIIIO 46 0Q9S003 SIP
SILVIR DPVIS PIT T CZ
I ITIQN COUNTY ~, .,
>'-APPLICATTO1~i CONFERENCE SUMM
DATE: June 4; 2003
PROJECT: Mathys Rural Area Residential Growth Management Allotmeht Application for
Additional FloorArea
LOCATION: 0299 Conundrum Rd. (PazcellI):291102100023)
REPRESENTATIVEp Mathys Tel: 925-2400, Fax: 0-7991
PLANNER: Ezra Louthis Tel: 920-5092
1. Type of Application: Rural Area Residential Growth Management Allotment Application for
Additional Floor Area.
2. Description of ProjectlDevelopment: The Applicant is requesting additional square footage through
the Rural Area Allotment. `
3. Areas in which Applicants have been requested to respond, types of reports:
• Section 9-120, Rural Area Residential Growth Management: Allotmehts and Competition
- Note: The application deadline dates for additional square footage are January I S
or July I
4. Review is before: Planning and Zoning Commission,
5. Public Hearing: Yes, at the P&Z. The applicait`shall post a public notice sign on the property at
least 15 days prior to the hearing; and shall mail notice to all adjacent property owriers at least 30 prior
to the hearing with the return address of the Community Development Department (copy of the notice
to be obtained. from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall lie
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appear no more than 60 days prior to the date
of the public hearing.
6. Will be referred to: Castle/Maroon Caucus, Engineer.
7. What fee was the applicant requested to submit:
- Plamring Office $3;780 Flat Fee (Special Review for TDR receiver site based on 18
hours of staff time)`
- Engineer$$25
Public Notice Fee $25
- otal Ree at Submittal $4,33 (Non-Refundable)
- If the staff 6me exceeds 21.6 hours; the Applicant wilt be charged at $210 per hour
beyond 21.6 hours.
• Entire Application is required to be submitted digitally (acceptable formats are:
.tat, .dog .wpd, .rtt, JPeg+ •Pdf, •jPeg+ .tifj _, .
8. Applicant shall submit eleven (11) copies of the following information unless otherwise noted
(please use double sided copies if possible):
1. Summary letter explaining the request and addressing the Code sections listed above;
2. Proof of ownership of subject property including legal description (1 copy);
3. Agreement to Pay Form (I copy);
4. Total fee for review of this application;
5. Copy ofthis pre-app Form (1`copy);
6. Names and addresses of all adjacent ptoperty owners and mineral estate owners (1 copy);
7. Consent letter from owner authorizing the representative if necessary (1 copy);
8. Copies of previous land use approvals and recorded site plans showing approved building
envelope;
9. Floor Plans and Elevations (if available);
PLEASE NOTE: This pre-application conference summary is advisory in Nature and not binding on the
County. The information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's
interpretations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon acomplete review of the
application.
Hearing Officer Detemrinaiion No. ~,-2001
Page 5
NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES
WEEKLY ON THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001.
..... x;
APPROVED ON THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2001.
PUBLISHED
THE ASPEN.
ATTEST:
Isabel Calderon
Administrative Assistant
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~- .
John E
C y Attorney
Case #P92-01
PID# 291102100023
VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN
HEARING OFFICER OF PTTKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
dames R. True
Hearing Officer
Date:~~~~
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Cindy Houben,
Community Development Director
iIIIIIII~IIIIIII~I~I~~II~III~I~IIIII~I~~II~IIIIIIIIIIII 4~ 0 098 03: I1P
00 D 0.00
PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM
~..~~.~,.~ ..~..., ....m> .~..,x
AGREEMENT ~'OR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION.
PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and ~ ~-
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for ~t4~ ~.ccral /~-U~cz
( ~fat.~e- ~-tahgje~-~- ~L(~'~V~2yCF (hereinafter, THE PRO CT). -
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees thafPitkin County Ordinance No. 32-2002 establishes a
'fee structure for land use. applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a
determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the County's policy that development
shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in_Pitkin County. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair
to the public and to reflect the expense incurred in providing such services to the public.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in
processing the application.
4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees chazged for the processing of land use applications
shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type of land use review.
5. COUNTY and APPLICANT fiirther agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of County
Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of,County Commissioners to make legally
required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of its right to
collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay a base fee in the
amount of $ ~f~ 3o which is based. on2/.6 hours of staff time, and if actual time spent by staff to process the
application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20%, then the COUNTY will bill the
APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of
the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for
suspension of processing.
PITHIN COUNTY
Cindy Houben
Community Development Director
APPLICANT
~~~~ ~~
Print Nam
~_
Signat re
Date: ~li~ f~ X03
Ma,il[[i/!ng Addresss: /~ / ~ //
Effective 1/27/03
i
l C. r 1 . rl `1 /"' '" r ..... ~.
s -z`
~_, w FETEaBN ~~F~T~ FlE~,! TE•E E}EFF~I~FFtcE€~F
PERMIT ~IUP~fBER REGE!"rT NUfr?E , -" "I r ; '
Owner Phone No. ~ ~-
VvdnefShrla4{!(~/w'dffreSS U-'~/ ~/'G..S ~„!/ y°-iL'(.' 1(-1:~/l ~? r r-+;
.~
Contractor ~~~~/~~ Phone Ne.
address
System's Go.otractar's Name
Address'
Legal Ceseripticn
_ _ ,
! of Size < r~ /' - Type of Building by :.fse/ /r~=~ E~ r ~J '~
!-~ ~/F
Number of Bedrocros,~;~~ Type of'~'Vater SupPIY ` `-' ` -
Olnmer'$ Signat;.'I'e 1`j ~ +J. ~ i ,/ ,./ '- er ~ . v i /
PLGT PL,c:N: ATT~:CHED r.S REQ;.°IRED
Type of individual Sewage Qisposai System L-ls~~ (~%~~~ c;~ ~ L' ~>~- ~
Type of Soii or Soil Classification ~ '~''~ ~~L 0 /9~~ /ICJ'/4F000~~~ ~~'/~/~/.~ /G'~fe ~'~~l`%~~~i
Proximal Location cf Bedrock -~'i I-~FO~*' ~%/~~c /~ J ~i~C~} % t./.~' T/~~/~ ~ l= T,
PrdY.lmial Lacaien of Ground lrJater Table ~t/L'` +" !sc / e-6L>%/n:`/,J '- (,/c~~/
+-ssw~r~+:~«ac+si:~a>+ax+s+~rx~xr+sr~sn+-;:xv~~~~a~s s~-~•arxa~u~n~a«xae~z as sN r-a~**~: ~x s~x~+*x r.~+:e+~xe*s+~++~s r.~~wwaw xis
~' - ~-h/inures Per Inch ~~ F~'~";
FercoEa~fan Tea Caie
f'~hinimum Preccmmertded ~,bscrptian System S;ze ~G>~ ~~' ~~ ~5~~ C// //'~~'%~/~ .S/!L.`; iES~
Minim:.'m Recommended Tani: Size ~/~'~L' ~A~`D//cS'
Spe^iaf Condltlcns of issua: NOTICE
n !j n -~ N:hsn properly sicned for issuance, this applicaaPn
~,^ ~~ flu • ~/- i / ~ peco nos your permit. pppliea9pn valid ORE ye@r trom
I> ~ ~Tr 13~~ S r~S .~_ r
_ __ date. ii an ind:vidua! sewage dispos@i permit is issued
l~~f'~ /~ `'~ ~ ~ ~ '=r ProPa.^.Y on w•hi<h no buifdinP Permit has tieen
issued, the. indivitlue! sawoae d!sPOSSi permit chat
~' ,~ azpi^e i20 dsyx s@ar iK issuance if construction~ha:
^' ~,~ ~' ~,G~S /L^~l`/ no; been ccmmencad. Fny chenpe in plans or sped-
ticstioris suer the permit has been lasued inval(tletes
the permk, unless approval is secured from the Neokh
_ .. O`. `icer for such chsnges.
~.;.prc~•ed for Issua'fce ay G ' 2G~ Gate
+:~c~+++Kxr ~r;.aa+j FV. ~~t: r+~+x~s +;>>.. *a r~++-sue*s:~~~t •r+;xaa+.ax~'a ~~~~=.:~::+:~~~~+.a:xri:t;~~r r+:~~s y~xr+. +exz~x-cz~x~
/ ' _}
/ /1 k
FE~l~~.(,a'E~+[Gf~.F. F'Q\/~:L,~'-LG-CW~ ..1~)''~,~o~e ~~~"1 y,~„a~~
+. L'r2~rv?nn _r G', tC-Fr: a:+ ~.,. .I
,.:
it e
y
i
~V
\~ / i
V
C. _J Y'
'
~ t
~
~,;,, -
~ F~_ F, f ~`J
~
~'~~
~I
~. , :.
'~ ~
October 27, 1977
m
m
Fitkin County E m~ircnmental Health Department
~' - 506 E. !/ai n Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attn: h1r. Beb Nelson
o ~ Dear Bob:
T
> ~
~
On October 27, 1977, I inspected the seepage bed constructed fpr
o Benchmark Solar Limited up Conundrum Creel: Drive. The 15' r, 52'
a bed that was installed complies H~ith the plans submitted by Eldorado
a o Engineerine Company.
o -
o ~ Sincerely, ~,/;
~; 1 i
~ (~~
~
~ ~
N nn
t
M1l C~. f~In~~'lella
~ O
O
~
¢ ~
3
W w P,E:/lkp
z
~ ~
~
W ~ cc: Big°I;wood Associates
~ m F.O. Box 3G21
o Aspen; Colorado 81611
J
~ X
O
N
z m
0
U 0
a
Q w
d
~
w
O
U ~
Q
~
z O
o
w ~
w
Z p
~
~
Z O
U
w ~
O
O o~
Q
O
O
J
W
C?~1.
4,
O L S S O N A S S O C I A T E S
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS SURV EYO ftS
14 June 2001
OA Project Number - 2001-0499
C/O California Stone and Bath_Design
303 East Main Street
Aspen CO, 81611
Attention: Mr. Marc Mathys
RE: Avalanche Risk Assessment
Dear Marc:
Enclosed for your use is our Geologic Hazards Assessment Report for the Birk property.
The report was prepared based on the terms. of our,le#ter proposal to you dated 30 May
2001. The results of our analyses indicate that the Birk property is situated in a Blue
(Moderate) Avalanche hazard zone as defined by Pitkin County. Expanding the footprint
of the existing structure to the north, west or south is possible without encroaching into
a higher (Red) avalanche. hazard zone. Furthermore based on observations made
surrounding the property it is our opinion that the geologic hazards associated with
rockfall and debris flows is low.
We hope this report provides you valuable assistance in your re-development efforts
with the property. I will be out of the country through the end of the month, but will
contact you upon my return to answer any questions you may have. I have also
included an invoice for the balance due, per the terms of our work agreement. Thanks
again:
Yours truly,
Olsson Associates
Matt Fuller R.G
Engineering GeologisUProject Manager
F:\Geotech\Ve~'~'7A~'~fi2'~Pfilhry~~~{~~t4~`~tla^-~119~0~~ ~ASpst~~r~P3°E~d~'~$~'IR~S~~cS~X'I)S~°,~Avalanche
Assesment\Transmi ttal letter.doc
June 15, 2001
Mark Mathys
c/o California Stove & Bath
303 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81615
Re: 299 Conundrum Creek Rd. Property
Dear Mr. Mathys,
',.. 'W~
FOREST
SERVICE
State Services Building
222 S. 6th Street, Room 416
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
Telephone: (970) 245-7325
I met you at your property at 299 Conundrum Creek Road, June 13, 2001 for the
purpose of reviewing the property for wildfire hazards.
Though the property is on a severe slope above the creek, it is still within the riparian
zone and has characteristic vegetation with a low wildfire hazard potential.
The access road may be a concern for structural fire engines in terms of the grade and
switch back turh radii, but wildfire hazards appear to be low.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal.
Sincerely,
John W. Denison
District Forester
1 ~ OCT-12-2001 FRI 01 40 PM
Memo
FAX NO
'I'n: IIrian McNellis
From; Aspen Pve Protection District
Subject: Birk/Mathys PID #2911-021-00-023; CASE # P92-0]
Date: September 4, 2001
Brian,
This project shall meet all ofthe codes and requirements ofthe Aspcu Fire Protection District.
This includes but is not limited to: the installation ofan approved fire sprutkler system, fue
department apparatus access, and provisions for the turning around ofdcpartment apparatus.
Please have the applicant contact the Fire Marshal's office for specifications on the above
requirements.
Please contact me if you have any comments or concerns.
P, 11
T ank you,
}
Constructed WetIar>c~s ~`~~ mater ~' uali ~ 1
' Rsidential Municioal/coaununitt~ Q `~ III2~3I'OVeI2leIlt
.4.~*icultural Industrial Stnrmwater
PRACTIC.4LITI' OF CONSTRUCTED ~~ETLANDS
Naturally existing wetland areas have innate mechanisms to trap sediments and break down a wide
range of pollutants into elemental compounds. These biological mechanisms have evolved over
geologic time in response to the physical location of wetlands -low lying areas which receive runoff
water azrd overflow from rivers and streams. Environmental scientists have made significant advances iu
the creation of artificial or "constructed" wetlands which can closely imitate the specialized treatment
fimctions which occur in these highly productive ecosystems.
Constructed wetlands are presen$y being used in many parts of the world for treatment of waters as
diverse as domestic wastewater, agricultural/industrial flows, and landfill Ieachates, as well as for
remediation projects at mine and toxic waste sites. Current estimates indicate that over 200 large scale
constructed wetland systems were known to be in operation for various treatment functions in the U.S.
alone. As early as 1988, the USEPA issued a design manual formally recoanizing constructed wetland
technology, and site-specific guidciincs for their design have bccn dcvclopcd in many states.
Constructed we8and systems are cost-competitive with other engineer-designed Individual Sewage
Disposal System QSDS) designs. In Colorado, the State Deparhnent of Health ISDS guidelines
recognize the technology as effective for providing high level treatment well beyond that of common
systems, when properly designed and constructed. Constructed wetlands have received general
approval in several Colorado counties for a JO% reduction in required absorption areas, which translates
directly into proportionally lower installation costs. There are also many oppor~~ties for resource
recovery, The treated outflows can often be used for landscaping, garden; ~ gree~ouses, water
features, or storage in cisterns for fire protection. Outflows from constructed wetlands can be used to
create or enhance pocket wefland wildlife refirges and outdoor research laboratories.
Municipal wetland filters can often be accommodated in areas with available open space or even within
existing lagoon/pond infrastructures. On an intermediate scale, or for sensitive properties ill-suited to
traditional package plant or above-ground designs, owners may find that constructed wetland designs
maY confer substantial savings through the dramatic simplification of on-going operations and
tnaurteuance. Site-specific factors such as high groundwater, unsuitable soils, proximity to sensitive
habitats, lakes or waterways, and steep slopes can be ameliorated by a sealed bed constructed wefland
without cosy and complicated modifications to fhe system.
Whenever possible, systems are designed to operate under gravity flow. Because there are no
mechanical pumps or aerators to break down, these systems. are extremely reliable in their operation.
T12ey are able to handle wide variations in wastewater loading, and can even be shut down or winterized
For seasonal use applications, Iu addition to practical and economsc advantages, the vegetation in a
constructed wetland can be creatively designed to become a landscaping or wildlife aznenity for any
some, school or municipality.
Received Time Dec.lB, 12:55PM
Exhihit 7
' -„ ~~ ,
PRINCIPLES OF COI~STRIICTED R'ETLANDS
' The effectiveness of constructed wetland systems is due to innate conditions that foster physical,
chemical, and biological treatment functio:.~. Physically, wetland vegetation serves to slow down flow
velocities, creating zones in which settling occurs. ChemicaIly, the organic and mineral composition of
the wetland media create desirable conditions which can be harnessed for the removal of excess soluble
nutrients such as phosphorous or nitrogen. Biologically, many of the plants and microbes that inhabit
' wetlands co-exist in symbiotic relationships, producing by-products chat are often useful to each other.
Many of these associations are uniquely suited to processing, transforming; and utilizing many common
pollutants, including oils, organic solvents, and high strength organic wastes. Multi-stage systems can
I be dcsigncd to foster specific living cnvironmcnts which promote microbial bio-rcactions, cffcctivcly
mimicking the natural nitrogen cycle by processing ammonia back into nitrogen gas.
' Though undoubtedly a combination of various factors, the majority of treatment is known to be
accomplished by the resident microbial populations. -Over time, self-customized microbe cultures
develop in response to a particulaz waste stream and physical conditions of the wetland. Integrating
process engineering and wastewater bioremediation techniques, the natural treatment "engine" has the
potential to be fine tuned to each unique application. This greater efficiency can be used to potentially
down-size flee amount of land required, even further reducing constnrction costs and site disturbance.
' Typically, the wetland basin is created to receive and treat pollution prior to disposal in an absorption
field or, following disinfection, discharge to surface waters. Actual construction of the wetland entails
the excavation or berming of a suitably-sized area to a depth of 2 to 3 feet. The bed area is leveled and
I lined with an impermeable material to prevent any potential contact with groundwater before advanced
treatment rs accomplished. For most systems, the basin is filled with suitably sized rock which provides
additional surface area for both the wetland plant root strictures and the specialized bacteria which
$uive iu flris environment. A final Iayer of pea gravel is placed to remaiir above the wastewater level,
insunng cleanliness, easy maintenance, and negligible potential for odor or unintentional contact.
The bed surface is then planted with a variety of suitable native wetland vegetation such as reeds,
bullrushes; willows, sedges, rushes, aromatic plants such as mint. and flowering plants such as iris and
chive. Planting options are essentially limitless, and as such often leave room for the creativity of the
owner. In cold climates, the vegetation is dormant in winter, creaiing a mulch layer that helps retain
heat. This helps to maintain the wetland reactor bed at the temperature necessary for adequate microbial
action to insure proper treatment performance. Ironically, deep snows that accumulate over the mulch
provide additional thermal insulation and treatment confidence in even the harshest environments.
Today, wetland systems are operational in many cold climates such as above the Arctic Circle in
Norway, several in Canada, across the i 7S, and above 1 Q;Ot70 ft in Coiorado.
Untreated rain sewage receives primary treatment (solids removal) in a sedimentation basin then flows
through the constructed wetlands. Organic and chemical constituents aze processed in a series of
fermentation, oxidation/reduction, hydrolysis, mineralization, and volatilization reactions combined with
uptake by vegetation. Wetland substrates and entangled root systems can be specifically designed to
maintain conditions which are ideal for chemical azrd biological stabilization, in addition to supporting
specialized microbial populations which perform a wide variety of biotransformation, predation, and
biodegredation functions. )n effect, a constructed wetland is a passive biological trickling filter which
maintains diverse environments supporting both aerobic and anaerobic orgatrisms to assimilate waste and
produce an outflow meeting municipal discharge standards. EAGLE EYE
Re~eivea Time Deo•18. 12:56PM
1-lOIVIL'&BUSINE.~.S
PANELS
S/PS - STRUCYURAL INSULAYED PANELS
A D/ViS/ON OF JANZEN CONSTRUCT/O N, LLC
P.O. Box 500 - 1 Mile Weston Hwy. 9 -Animas, NM 88020 Tel. (505)548-2663 Fax 2564 /Tucson Office Tel. (520) 481-2663
KC Panels -Structural Insulated Panels (SIP'S) - are a sandwich panel constructed of 15/32" oriented strand
board (OSB) facings with an injected, permanently bonded urethane foam core. KC Panels aze
environmentally safe, contain no CFCs, and emit no toxins or hazardous materials. The specially
formulated polyurethane foam core has a `Class 1' fire rating which makes it the most fire resistant SIP on
the market today. Panels are completely structural in nature and can carry almost twice the load of a
comparable stick frame wall. The urethane foam core also provides the highest `R-value per inch' of any
insulating material available, almost twice that of SIP'S with conventional polystyrene cores! Owners of a
KC Panel home can expect dramatic energy savings of up to 50%0 over conventionally framed homes.
Recent surveys show that there is a growing need for more energy efficient and cost effective construction
materials that utilize technological advancements. SIP'S have been used in residential and commercial
construction for over 50 years and were recently cited by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development as being the only building material currently available that achieves the conservation goals of
20]0 -- today! KC Panels offer an exceptional solution to the increasing cost and decreasing quality of
lumber by providing Beater structtaal strength, vastly improved energy-efficiency and reduced noise and air
infiltration.
Due to the low permeability/closed cell nature of polyurethane foam and the permanent bonding of the core
to the OSB facings, KC Panels retain they stable high R-value for thelife of the structure. This ultra-tight
material is superior to traditional fibrous insulation/stick frame construction because ofthe following factors:
• Eliminates thermal short-circuits at each stud caused by the low R-value of wood.
• Eliminates thermal siphoning created by fibrous insulatiat's need to breathe.
• Eliminates indoor drafts caused by voids in insulation, openings azound electricaUlighting
outlets and mechanical chases.
• Eliminates the gradual loss of R-value over time caused by fibrous insulation settling and
moisture absorption.
KC Panels replace traditional framing, insulation, sheathing, and vapor barriers for wall and roof structures.
Wiring chases are pre-installed in the panels according to your design. We provide complete custom cutting
that saves you money because of minimal waste and easier job site handling. All of these advantages reduce
your overall cost, making KC Panels truly competitive with outdated forms of construction.
Should you have additional questions or requve a complete estimate for your project at no cost or obligation
to you, usually within a matter of days. For more information regarding KC Panels, please feel free to contact
meat (970) 257-7803 or fax at (970) 241-2643
Si~ely
Dan Newton
Field Representative
KC°anels Adv~nta~e
• Improved Building Technology
SIP's (Structural Insulated Panels) were developed in early 1950's by the Department of Agriculture. The
goal was to have a product that is super strong, energy efficient for it's weight. The insulation core has
improved over the yeazs. KC Panels uses the "best of the best" with its Urethane Foam core. Today, SIP's
aze the fastest growing building material in the United States.
• Ultra-High Energy Efficiency
KC Panels save energy in two ways. 1) the R-27 in the 4° wall and the R111 in the 6" wall is 2-3 times better
insulated than standazd construction. 2) the solid, homogeneous material greatly reduces air infiltration or air
leakage in the home. These two items together can reduce the energy to heat and cool a building as much as
50%.
• Money in your pocket the first year.
KC Panels do cost more than standard construction. This usually means you will be mortgaging more money.
When you combine the utility savings and the tax advantage from the larger mortgage, you more than
overcome the added cost of the increased mortgage. Tn other words, you have more money in your pocket
from day one when you put your money in the right place (valuable assets) and aren't giving it away. (the
utility company)
Sample house saves $74.62 the first year growing to $288.84 during the SO`s year. That is a total in
your pocket savings of over $6,000.
• Increased equity in the home
The mazerial used in building a KC Panel home has a hieher "appraised value" than a standard built home.
This increased "asset value" will continue to increase as the home appreciates. Sample house has an
increased equity of $38 in the first year growing to $6,840 in the 30`" yeaz.
• Quality Benefits that you want
• Healthy -Less airborne contaminates, no drafts, control air quality.
• Safety -Increased protection from earthquakes, wind, projectiles and fire.
• Durable -Does not deteriorate, dryout, become loose, or creak with age.
• COmfOrtable -Quieter, fewer insects, solid feel of walls, stable air temperature.
• QUallty -Wails are straighter and flatter, insulation always uniform, no thermal shorts or voids.
• You can hang pictures anywhere - No studs to Erna.
• EnviroTnmentally Friendly -Green Building system.
• Costs Less than st1C1C-framing -Operational savings offset added mort~a~~e.
DISCLAIMER: This does not constitute any guarantees or warranty. The information provided is believed to be correct and
accurate for a standard set of conditions. Due to the variable house designs, external weather conditions and living conditions,
your results may vary.
RC PANII,S PO BO% 500 ANIMAS NM 88020 505-548-2663 WWW,g~pANII,S.COM
v
1rVHAT ARf SIPS?
SIPs is an acronym for Structural Insulated Panel. Joining high
performance rigid foam insulation to oriented strand board, (OSB),
produces these engineered wood building components. The result is a
building product that is predictable, resource efficient and cost
effective. SIPS are used as floors, walls and roofs on all types of
building .across North America and shipped around the world for use
on the widest variety of buildings imaginable.
WH`l A12;= SIPs St3 lytlCl~'~fTTE;3?
SIPS outperform other building methods in virtually every category
.because the insulation is a component of the system, rather than an
after thought, thrown in when everything else is almost done. Even 4"
SIP walls have been proven to surpass 6" frame walls in thermal
efficiency.
~a1/HY I3U THE'( OUTPER'~flRIN t)7HER HflilSfS?
SIP buildings are vastly more energy efficient, stronger, more quiet
and draft free than older technology systems, like stud framing with
common fiberglass insulation. Fiberglass is sometimes used for
furnace filters because air moves through so freely. Rigid insulation is
used as a solid component insulation in almost every industry for its
inherent efficiency and lack of air movement. These attributes are
built right in to the SIPS building. Less air movement or leakage
translates into less drafts, fewer penetrations for noise, lower energy
i bills and a significahtly more comfortable and controllable indoor
environment.
~:
HOW ARE ELECTRYCAL AND PLUMBING INSTALLED?
In commercial construction, wiring is pulled through laid out pipe
called conduit. There are actually "chases" that are built into the foam
cores that work like conduit. Electricians used a fish tape and feed the
wires through panels without compressing insulation or drilling through
studs. Plumbing is not usually placed in walls, especially exterior walls,
but through the floor into the bottom of cabinets. Where exterior wall
vent pipe are necessary, chases can be' formed in the foam cores.
Island vents or loops vents are also common practices and can be
found in the plumbing codes.
WHY ARE SIPs SO MUCH STRONGER?
SIPs are a structural composite, kindof like and "I"-beam. The skins
act like flanges and the rigid core is similar to the web. In short, the
three components work together, rather than against one another.
This composite assembly yields stiffness, strength and predictable
responses. Not only do test results show panels are stronger, but real
life natural disasters have proven it time and again. The Great
Hanshin (Kobe, Japan) and North Ridge earthquakes, Hurricane
Andrew, a Colorado tornado, a Portland gas explosion and an Omaha
fire, have done more to prove SIP strength to the homeowners than
the all of scientific tests.
HOW l?fl Sips REJACT TO FIRE?
Fire requires three components, fuel, ignition and oxygen. SIPs have
no "air" within their solid cores of insulation. The fire cannot, "run up
the wall" cavity even when balloon framed. SIPs have passed every
Standard fire test that is required of wood based or type V
construction. A key element of fire safety is protection of the SIPs and
any other underlying structure with thermal barriers like gypsum
wallboard.
WHY ARE SIPS MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE?
• Less job site waste means less landfill use.
• Lower heating bills translates to lower energy (fossil fuel)
consumption.
• Use of fast growth harvested farm trees rather than old growth
forest.
• Up to 35% less raw timber use in SIP buildings.
• Lower reported embodied energy cost.
Hi3'~+! T3O SIPS SAVE 50 MUCH LABOR?
The cutting is done on a factory floor. Determining what cuts to make
is done on a computer screen. The weather in a factory is never too
hot, wet or cold. Easily recognized components are shipped to the site
for assembly, rather than waiting for interpretation of blue prints. SIPS
also come in much larger dimensional sizes than other building
materials. The framing crew is more productive, the project is dried in
from the weather faster and other subcontractors can get a head start
on the work that needs to be done.
WHY iSi4'T EVERYONE USING SIPS?
Because better educated consumers' demand more for their dollar.
SIPs are one of the fastest growing segmerits ih the construction
industry. Like other engineered wood products, time and care have
been taken to evaluated and produced a complete systems approach.
Since the mid 1980's Major Model Building Codes have accepted SIPS
as structural building components .and systems. Over 20 years of
destructive laboratory testing to nationally recognized code standards
along with over 60 years of proof in real life homes and businesses
have proven that SIPS are the best choice for homes and light
commercial construction.
_. ~ ~ .-
I
POLYURETHANE vs POLYSTYRNE
The question often arises "What is the difference between Polyurethane and
Polystyrene". The review below is a general comparison and does not necessarily
represent a particular manufacture's ,product.
There are five main differences that need to be evaluated:
1. R-Value. Urethane has an R-value of 7.0 to 7.5 per inch, whereas styrene has
an R-value of 3.5 to 4.0 per inch. The R-value for both materials may vary by the
manufacturer and density of the material.
2. Chemical resistance. Urethane is resistant to damage caused by other
chemicals, whereas styrene is subject to attack by petroleum-based solvents
such as: gasoline, many types of insect sprays and common glues such as
"Liquid Nails". These problems normally would not affect a building unless there
is an insect infestation that must be treated.
3. Fire damage. Urethane is a thermal-set plastic, so it will not melt. It is not
damaged until the temperature reaches 700 to 800 degrees and then it "Chars".
KC Panels uses urethane that has been treated with a flame retardant, and has
been tested as a Class 1 foam. A Class 1 foam means that when burned, an
external heat source is required to sustain combustion. If left on it's own, the
foam will self extinguish. Styrene on the other hand will soften at 190 to 220
degrees and melt at temperatures of 240 to 300 degrees. Many styrene products
are also classified as a Class 1 foam. They will not sustain combustion, but will
melt at a very low temperature. There is much debate whether the Class 1 fire
test should apply to Styrene.
4. Dimensional Tolerances. Due to the manufacturing process, styrene panels
have the opportunity to have tighter tolerances for thickness than urethane
panels. Styrene cores are cut with a hot wire and then laminated to the skins.
This cutting process should be very controlled. Urethane cores are injected
molded into the skins. The expansion of urethane is very dependent upon
temperature, humidity and other factors. This expansion process is more difficult
to control resulting in some thickness variations.
5. Foam cutting tools. There is a difference in the two materials when routing out
the foam for modifications. Styrene can be cut out using a hot wire, due to the
low melting point. Urethane cannot be melted and must be mechanically
removed. This process requires a special router.
Reference: "Foam-core Panels & Building Systems" published by Energy Design
Update.
R
The rc-vame uI n whole wau can ue wnsluclaury iowei ulan
the R-value of the insulation that fills it due to "thermal
bypasses" These temperature losses can occur at comers,
around windows, and joints where walls meet roofs, floors
or foundations.
Insulation values can also drop significantly depending on the
type of wall assembly chosen by builders, For example, most
people realize that the framing in a 2 x 6 traditional "stick
frame" wall reduces its actual insulation value below the
R-19 label on the insulation.
The U.S. Department of Energy developed a system of
measuring the effective R-value of wall assemblies.
The chart to the right shows the effect of "thermal bypass"
on different building materials.
2X4 WOOD 16"OC
R-11 Batt"
2X6 WOOD 24"OC
R-19 batt*
3.6" METAL STUDS 16° OC
R-11 batt'
4" METAL STUDS 24" OC
R-11 batt'
4" POLYURETHANE KC PANEL
6"POLYURETHANE'KC PANEL':
Insulation Label = R-value of only the insulation material ~ INSULAnoN LABEL s
Clear Wall = R-value of a solid wall with no openings. ~ cLEAr 1raALL
Whole Wall = R-value of a wall with standard openings. R-VALUES
WHOLE WALL •oaA Ribga xanonai L.BOrMery oamwaio,~
A KC PANEL Tiome is an Investtrient'in tfie mature
A KC PANEL home will deliver up to three times the energy
savings in year 11 as compared to year 1 for conventional
materials.
Why? Many loose fill insulations lose a portion of their R-value
every year due to settling and other causes. Therefore, the
base energy rate of the frame house will continue to rise over
time. Loose insulation also loses R-value in high humidity
and under extreme moisture conditions.
KC PANELS' polyufethane foam is a closed-cell material,
will not absorb moisture and retains a stable R-value for the
life of the structure.
Actual savings may vary due to a variety of contlitions.
ENERGY COST OVER 71 YEARS
KC PANELS versus Batt Insulation
~ ao -- --
H
V 60 -__
V ]0 FRAME HOUSE -
i 60 w ~„",
u, '
60 PA EL H USE
x
40
~ 30
1 2 3 4 6 6 7 6 9 10 11
YEAR
$10 SAVINGS IN YEAR 1 WILL BE A ~ BABE ENERGY WBt KC PANEL
BABE PLUS RATE CHANGE: KC PPNEL
$30 SAVINGS IN YEAR ti' ~ BABE ENERGY COBT. STICK FRAME
'BeaeE on KC Panels'telwlalions. ~?'- BASE PLUS RATE CHANGE: STICK FRAME
ItAllAdds Up to Cost Savings, Greater Comfort and a Healthier Environment!
BUILD SMART WITH TODAY'SULTRA-STRONG
SUPER-INSULATED CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM
~` / ~ ~ €1
PANEL S
INC
S/Ps-STRUCTURAL
A DIVISION OF JANZEN CONSTRUCT/ON LLC
PO BOX 500/#1 THUNDERBIRD Rn:~D`
ANIMAS NM 88020
503-548=2663'`
www.kcpanels.com
I.
1
I:
•
0 "StO t5 2 0 2 3 0
3 5 '4046
p zooo xc ravels, m~.
~NVI R6 NMENTI7L MERLTH Feb-19-99 660
~niry [l.y~LOF~T:gn[ UeF1rRn Ent
t970~i 32F~.g7:0
FA,~: ; 7701 7..; ? I ii$
TuD (9)U) 3?s-e797
vnad: ca mdCvh~~UVa il.neL
f: ~r1+9~-X.E]y^IQ-COUIILY.COT
-
T'Ir. \daur,ce (;. 11~t,ods. Presitlcnt
(>. k3oa 2 I iR~1
'ear A I t. 1~'ood;:.
Eagle County building
r.0- Ecs 179
Soo aroadwxy
Eagle. Calcrxdc ~'to31-0179
ie:ccj nr~ ~nlr tele.phonc conversaUim litr. oth~:r day, I under::calid that you hxvr approached
~~cra1 larisdictions ti'ithin Colorado about the use of your P1 JRF.-A-FIR;= system as a clean
rain, 1'u-cpiaco aJten,attve: 1'rn Proyidin~ this letter per your request to expiam, the approach
nd ht;:c (iced b~' Ea~lc Caunt~• in addressin~> our local air quality protection strategy a)nn~~ with
r explanation of how your device obtained approval.
~Uu arc an•arz, Eagle Counly~ adoptE:d re~asanable regulations to cantrol pollution caused by
~od sntokr in i y~i 1, shortly after the State i.,ekislautre granted that spectiic authority to
utulnr} (',r,unuCS. L';aClc County's problem ~\'Ith R'ClO(i b11171111~, l]CY'ICCS R'ag primarily due io the
liferation of homes ~yith uncontrolled numbers of conventional, open hearth fireplaces ~~~hici-~
~e unc;nntrolled combusttort that result in si~In;ticant pollutrux emissions- Ea¢le County
:altzed that the State program .vas focussed on woad stove certification without regard to other
m bunvn~, technologies. Our logic ackno~yledged that many icchnologies exist which emit
less polhttants than FPA certified wood stoves,'and as such, these clean burning solutions
uld receive at (ease: equitable status in our local regulation. in addition, people choosing w
~)d homes here should have as many opUOns as are ayailaL(e to burn wood as'lon.g as its
otectiye of our local air shed.
~heve you have a copy oirour regulation in whichspuwi(1 notice the mechanism. through ._-.__
itch wE rzg;rlate wood burning devices. In x nutshell, we only issue construction permits if
~d burning devices are "new tuhnoloby devices". This is defined asa wood burning device
,ch meet-ti or exceeds the strrr:drzrd,~ for wood stove certification. Theretnre, in. addition to a1( '
rtified stoves, the PUltls-,4-FlJ2E, as well as several other tec;hnoiogies like several masonry
~ers and pellet stoves, can be considered simply by providing us with laboratory testing
iults which demonstrate that the aforementioned stanclard has been met. This was extremely
rtant in our resort community because most' people choosing to purchase real estate in the
~tains expect the ability to have a fireplace. We do allow for unlimited numhcr of nattual
> or gropanc devices but restrict the nunttier new technology devices to one per dwelling unit
~osC zone districts.
fr•on S286S49>485 8653 va9e 2i 3
Iby :ENVIRBNMENTRL HEALTH Feb-39-9fi i26bn
dir. r\9auricc• L~'oods
~ } ehruan ] 8. 1995
fron 52883a'q 0d8~"~~5460953 ' ~~
.._ oa9e .T,i
P:1~=r:
Alanv li~caJ iurtsdiciio+~s with similar a+r qutllih' contents have +rritien re,ulations which refer to
"'+vood or solid +i+el 6uming de+~icc;s approved by the State"_ 'They need .o mulerst:~t~d that the
~~atc prv grant cmh addresses the cc.rtitication of+eoed as ++ell as uellet stoves and that they ha~~e
htstorieall~• not provided a service of evaluating other clean hurnin~ technolo~~ies, especially it
die jurisdicuon is in anainment or'a»~tsicnt mr yuahr~~ 5landards.
7~hc PURE .=1-1~IRLnas been utilized in many recidcnti.7J du•eJlinas in Ea~lz County and I'ec
t+iincsseti the abihn' ofthe device to completely elia»nate risible emissions immediateis. Ifa
local jurisdiction allows the installation oCcertitied stoves. ++•hy not allo++• the use et a technology
n rich is ar least ten times cleaner hurnin~--? I +vish tl:e State Gvould improve their pmerzm to
pro+•idr for a technology-has~d slandarei. iJood fuck u:nh vnur endeazror and I hope other
iurisdictiuns +rill follo+i~ Eagle County's lead in the interes+ ofclean air. Ji'vott ha~~e am further
questions, dou't hesitate calling the at f5+?ii1 2S-i;'~'.
Sincervl~.
r
Rayrnon~ b'r . erry, RL-HS ~' ~~
-~_
GnciromnL~n~l -Health Di~isien'NIakiager
i
~"he comfort, warmth and
personality of open hearth
wood-buir'~tng fires is prohibited
in a large portion of the country.
Federal, state and local statutes restrict
wood fires on "no burn"days and in
some locales, completely eliminate the
use of open hearth wood fires. Until
now, homeowners who wanted a fireplace,
while complying with air quality codes were
forced to view their fire through closed,
thick glass doors or alternatively, had to
employ the use ofgas logs which attempt to
simulate a wood fire.
The newly developed and patented PURE-A-FIRE electrically
operated afterburner, allows the resident to enjoy the ambiance of an
men hearth woodfire, while completing the combusgon of the smoke,
reducing particulates to acceptable levels and comertiug carbon
monoxide emissions to carbon dioxide, water vapor aztd air.
EPA regulations require that a wood burning device, tested in
compliance with their procedures, emit no more than 7.i grams
per kilogram of fuel burned for afactory-built fireplace. The
PURE-A-FIRE is not a wood burning device and therefore has
not been fisted by the EPA, however, air quality tests conducted on
the PURE-A-FIRE indicate a particulate emission rate in
EPA equivalents of only .77 grams per kilogram of fuel
burned, ten times more efficient than is required.
The results of [his test were distributed to air quality officials in azeas
of the country affected by wood smoke pollution. Several air quality
offices have responded and the PURE-A-FIRE ltas now been
approved for sales and installation in the states of Arizona, Wtroming,
Utah and Idaho, m Missoula County, Monianaand the Bay 4rea Pollution
Control District in San Franciscq California
Eazlier testing results received acceptance in Eagle County, Colorado
,~~,
°' ;~ i
and the first PURE-A-FIRE has now= been insCt!]ed atop a masom~=
fireplace ht a htrge home in Wolcott, F.agle County, CO. This installation
inctudix a heat recovers s}stem which, when the fireplace is in ruse,
ws71 completeiv heat the 1000 square foot "`great room" in this beautiitd
mountainside home through a concealed fan coil receiving brat frcim
Sh P g 4 in.
Tlus~s<,st~canflbe~expanded to heat a multiplicit}~E roan sdandtcan
even provide hot water in mountain areas wfiere incoming water
temperatures, on the order of 35 degrees.; require the expenditure of a
large amount of energy in standard hot water r•essels to produce
acceptable water temperatures.
The PURE-A-FIRE -the only device in the marketplace
that achieves air quality standards while retaining the chasm
of Ute open hearth wood-burning Fireplace has been listed
by Underwriters habgratory (UL) as a firepktce accc~sory for use
with the Superior Fireplace Companys (SFC) model TM-4500P and
RD-3800A pre-fabricated fireplaces.
UL does not have testing protocols for masonry fireplaces; howeverUL
adtised our firm that most building officials normally accept the L4.
listing as proof of compliance with building codes when used with
masonry {The F.agle County building officials have accepted the
PURE-A-FIRE for use wide masonry fireplaces).
While dte PURE-A-FIRE has been tested byUL for use with the SFC
brand of pre-fabricated fireplaces, hundreds of hours of operation
have been completed on other brands and it is well established that
[he PURE-A-FIRE will operate effectively on any type of wood
burning device.
Although the PURE-A-FIRE operates at a hih temperature internally,
the combinafion of a stainless steel inner shell, a mineral fiber blatiket
insulation and a mild steel outer shell was found by UL to be well
within prescribed parameters in controlling the exterior temperatures,
thereby allowing installation in zero clearance chimneys with
only a 2" space to wood support structures. Because of this,
the PURE•A-FIRE does not affect the design or appeazance of
the home or office.
The PURE-A-FIRE can be retro-fitted into most existing fireplace
Ilues or alternatively, installed on the roof, so homeowners may enjoy
the special warmth and ambiance that can only be attained with. an
open hearth wood fire, while still meeting the requirements of clean
air environmental restrictions.
The PURE-A=FIRE is electrically operated, comptiter controlled,
completely quiet in operation and is entirely aummatic. When the
'~
homeowner lights a &re in the fireplace and the temperature reaches
100 degrees Fahrenheit, the information is transmitted to a small
pre-programmed computer. This computer then activates the
PURE-A-FIRE and in approximately hvo to three minutes, the utri[
reaches its operatng temperature. Once the operating temperature
is attained, the computer cycles the PURE,A-FIRE to maintain the
correct operating temperatures throughout the time there is a fve in
the fireplace. When the fire is allowed to die and the fireplace
temperature goes below 100 degrees Fahrenheit, the computer
automatically turns off the PURE-A-FIRE.
In most ueas of the country, a homeowner is allowed a few minutes of
opacity (smoke emanating from the fireplace) while lighting the fire.
An added feature of the PURE-A-FIRE is a momentary push
button located next to the computer, which provides a three minute
pre-heat cycle, much like pre-heating a stove before baking. This
feature completely solves the problem of a cold flue causing opacity.
ff the homeowner activates the push button and then is distracted by the
telephone or doorbell, a timer deactiva[es the unit and saves electricity:
The PURE-A-FIRE does not allow the build-up of creosote and
resins caused by the burning of wood, one of the primary causes of
flue fires. This sell cleaning feature provides an increased safety
factor and eliminates the need for expensive servicing.
The PURE-A-FIRE captures the soot particles on a stainless steel
ffoor, which then can be removed with a vacuum cleaner or a damp
cloth on apt annual basis through an easily accessible clean-out door.
Installation in a new home, ready for connection to the electric
service can normally be accomplished is less than four hours. The
lower portion (precipitator section) comes complete with pre-wired
electric juncton box attached. Upper pordon (afterburner section)
comes complete with all burners installed, the upper thermocouple
installed and with three male angle caps to be insetted into female
receptacles located on the exterior of the lower section junction box.
The 2040 Computer and Syrelec pre-heat timer (installed in
an 8 x 8 x 4 PVC junction bos) and the lower thermocouple
must be field installed as described in installation and instruction
manual (supplied).
Should you desire additional information, please call or fax your
request [o us. Prices of the PURE-A-FIRE are available upon
request. Our toll free telephone number is 1-888 BURN CLEAN.
-n,i
Vertomat
i~
eas•fired condensing boiler
Input capacities 187 kW - 985 kV!
638.000 - 3,361, 000 $turh
Type: VSB
VIE~MANN
Technical Data Sheet
S
' For prices, please sea separate price sheet
i
j ~•
Gas-fired condensing boiler kdvantages: _
with vertical "Inox-Crvssa l" heat exchanger surfaces • Optimized condensing boiler design
made from high grade stainless steel,
• Venical heat exchanger surfaces manufactured from high-
For operation without low limit on hniler return water alloy stainless steel, corrosion-resistant, in guarantee Ibng
temperature service life
For closed hot water heating systems with maximum • Seasonal efficiency ratings in excess of 95 % -
supply water temperatures of 49°C - 210°F fd~ a maximtim~ Manuta~turer°s efficiency statement. ''
operating pressure of 30 psi.
I
U
I ~
~
~\
I
N
~
~
erv
i
,
Received Time Jag 5
• Reduced NO, emissions tlue to combustion chamber
geometry
EXHIBIT
V
8:36AM _
viessmann Manufacturing Company tnc.
750 McMurray Road
Waterloo, Ontario. Canada N2V 2G5
Tel.: (579) 885-6300 Fax: (St 9) 885.0887
~'
a nc - ~
° xeE ~cco R
R
sE ~ i
,
° a:a ~
° ° A
•N
y $a
I oar .
N
- rpc o00
O
0
o
m
8 0
r.
l
x
W
V m
m _
W N h~ N ~~
^
'
N 1
~ c m 3
_
Q O m h
~ '
CC SS
Nm0
° n_
a
q
'~'`m mf b= b
y O
O P
O^ t0'1
N
irN~ d
E
L ~
m^ N P O N
Qotim
.Soo
i~
t9
n
~ S ~.F
Xrn NNCI m no '
y
~ S
m P a m
ba ,
i
7'
N m
O
,O
3 ~ln 0000
fp
ACO O O
~ ~ C
~ P G ~ it
pp
a
a
i° m tp p
NWN N° -N ~
i01~ 3 VOb
T n -'l'X P P N N n O O
~eE FO OO OO .. (v
mWNN
N
m ~
. y~df
ll
° _.a O~
m N
`°n
m g
H ~
$ ~~
W Sr ~ Iy
b'a
>
3nN
N
qaa NP 8m SSN'
°l
F m
~
a
°
Q
Q
S~bIO ~ NNN P N N
LOCO - - ' nn -`tA --^_C a m ^ O O m
mg
T
m I
m $ aeen ,
i
' m ~~`2 I
~ a, I
~
%
_
WW
3
aN ^ 1D IG O O O O O
R&°
m$ b N
` °
`^ W t-
°' r O '
R'
. S 85SR a am :ti _ .
as 3 ^^
X888 ~ 't{w lN.rv mo
)~ °c-~'m.. ^'R mm, _. pNP '° o;
Fd `°-V A $
C
o d~ ~ R T
~L G O G n V m P n _
n n8 x~~ N
_ as
3~ me ~°
~$ e ~ R ° ~
"~
nW
~
~ omn ~
.. - -N ~ ~ R ~
~
c
i ,
°a.~m aEEcooo n ~ an ~ ~" o
O P
m 0 N x P O
"
°
_ °
3VNb
°w y6 Vn °0 °
R
3
W
~ 0
b.~i F mC Vr O
1 ~
n
N 3 m~ .. _ ., -N ..
-
~'
° S~ vi ~ ~ o
oao
S
E _
~ ~e$
~
N
m q
O p~ _
~
M1 ICON
OPOi m
° °
3
m
O
O
00
I (7 q
~
° N
a
jj
6 ^
_
rA ~ m h
NN 3 0•~h .. _ _
~ v
<
~~~ ~< n n §
SA° a
^ _ N
~F8
ID
o
maxv~ q
-
=~
m~ maa x
~ 3
m ~ g
m°
~
~ ° ~ 8
~$ ~^~ _
P 8
;
~~ ~
~ eN - ..
C
i 3 }
'
L L
L f1 ` v 'L g y '
m •
sa ~ ~
~ ~
K ~
~~
~ 1 /Ti
~ m» ~ s~,
G
LL~ .. .. ~
~ ~~ - 01 '
~.bi. ~: b7. '.` eti"
" EEE EE EE FEE ~ W
f ~ Y ~
i W e N
_~
° a N m
E F F E E a F E ~
% ^_
° a
E i
°a
C N r t ~
a - G .
L < - m p
~ SS " = ~cl t~ s~ u
° o 5` s :$ ~$•
iA-YYY
E yyy r c
-
6 „i c
E~ E
as ~
` ~
O t p Pa ~~~ A °~~ R E '~ '4 y
E~ • g 4 Q a o 4 9 .~ ^ $ j~ 4 m d rn 8 A~ 2 g $
m ~ uaamaaq °°ma~ s- aa1 c8~3_ c~-33c~ ¢°s
.3~ 3 3 S z~ 3=~s -
. .
A
U
L
F
P,eceived Iime Jan. 5• E 3okM
Ag
0
Vc E
G V
a
WJ
~a
'c
i~
,_ ,
Technical Data E?s~; '~
~i
„'. _. -/
eoilei Model No. ~ VS8-a6 i
i VSB-0e VSB-70 V58-13
Max. input kW 56 88 176 143
BNfi 191,000 ~ 300,000 396,000 488,000
Comoustion efficiency "
at boiler supply - boBer
return temperatures Of
80160°C-176l1d0°F 86.8% 86.'0% 86.6°k 86.6%
70l60°C - 158+7 22°F 90.0 % ' 90.0°k ' 90.0%' 90.0%
40l30°C-'lOMB6°F 94.9°/ 94.9% 94.9% 9<.9%
and max. input
BoOer output at kW Btu kW BN kW Btu kW BN
80!60°C - 176'id0°F aE.S 165,500 76.2 260.000 100.5 342,900 123.8 422,400
70/50°C-158/122°F 50.a 172.000 79,2 270.200 l0a,a 356,200 128.7 439, 100
40!30°C - 104!86°F 53.1 181,200 83.5 284,900 110.1 375,500 135.7 463,000
Boiler stand-0y lass Watt BN °!. of max. Watt BN X of max. Watt Btu y of max. Weft Blu X,N max.
at max. inP11f input input input input
80l60°C-1761740°F 433 7677 OJ7 433 1477 0.49 547 t866 O.d7 663 2262 0,46
70/50°C-158!122°F 361 1232 0.64 361 1232 ~ D.a1 456 1556 0.39 563 1887 0.39 i
a0r30°C-104!86°F 1d5 d95 0.26 145 495 0.1fi 782 621 0.76 221 754 0.75
Dimensions - boiler she!!
~ergth^ mm -inch 1073 40 1073 40 1073 d0 7200 4i'4 '~,
Width mm-inch 575 224: 575 223', .575 22°i, 575 22~
Height mm-inch 1663 65'h 1663 65'¢ 'ibs3 65'k 1772 6Th
(ind, flange) I
Dimensions-jacket installed .
Totallength mm-inch 1084 a23: 1084 423: 1084' 42'4 1275 50Y,
Width mm-inch 686 27 686 27 686 27 686 27
Width incl.
Dekamatlk mm-inch 986 . 38'/n 986 38~ 986 3831 986 383'.
Total height mm-inch 1683 65'h i6b3 65'h 7663 65'h 1712 67'¢
Fecommended siz0 Of
foundation
Length mm -inch 900 35'fi 900 35k 980 37'h 1000 39Y.
width mm-inch 600 23q 60C 23'h 600 23'h 600 23'Fz
Height mm -inch 100 a 700 4 100 4 100 4
Weighs a( boiler shell
kg-Ihs 239 526 247 543 253 557 284 625
Weight incl. insulation
(less burner) kg -ICS 305 671 313 689 319 702 356 783
Boiler water content
(tr-USG 160 47,6 180 47.6 225 59.4 275 72,7
Heat exchanger surface
water cooled 'rn'-sq. h. 47 aa.i 5.1 54,9 5.6 60.3 6.3 67.8
Max. operating
I
temperature °C - °F 99 270 99 2t0 99 210 99 210
Max. operating
pressure kPa-Psi 207 30 207 30 207 30 207 30
Flua gas resistance
Pa -'w c. 50 0.20 60 0.24 70 0.28 90 0.36
Manufacturer's efficiency statements. Only'°" efficiencies OGA-certified
~' Less combustion chamber door
3
Received lime Jars, 5• 8:36AM
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE &
} ss. MAILING PURSUANT TO
State of Colorado } PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE
CODE SECTION 4-90
I, ~tC V -~ ~ e Sk'iL.+~, C ,being or representing an
Applicant to the Pitkin Co ty Development Permit, pe ovally certify that I have complied with the
public notice requirements pursuant to Section 4-90 of the Pitkin County Land Use Regulations in the
following manner:
1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at
least 30 days prior to the public hearing to all owners of property adjacent to the subject property, as
indicated on the attached list, on the ~~`day of ,~ , 200~(which ism days prior to the public
hearing date of 9 ~ 03 . The names and addresse of the adjacent property owners shall be those
on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the public
hearing.
By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at
least 30 days prior to the public hearing to the owner(s) of the mineral estate underneath the subject
property, as indicated on the attached list, on the -day of , 200_ (which is _ days prior
to the public hearing date of ~. The names and addresses of the mineral estate owners shall
be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to
the public hearing.
3. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from fine nearest
public way) and that said sign was posted~a,~nd~~v~i'sible continuously from the ~_day of
2003 to the 1'0 day of ~`~'~~,-, 200. (Must be posted for at least fifteen (15) full
days efore the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
~,~~ t ,
Applicant's name Signatu e
(Attach photograph here}
before me thi ~ day of
WITNESS MY HAND ~
My commission expires:
roon qm ~ :ra= fl a
k
~pyy~ ~ (/ rt
~.- 1'"~
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 2003 RURAL RESIDENTIAL GMQS COMPEI`TTION FOI2 ADDITIONAL
FLOOR AREA.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will beheld on'I~iesday,
September 9, 2003 at a special meeting to begin at 5:00 PM, or as soon thereafter as the
conduct of business allows, before thePtkin County Planning and Zoning Commission,
Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main $t, Aspen, Colorado to score.the following
applications for growth management allotments for additional floor area in the Rural
Area:
Mathys (P067-03): requesting an additiona14,650 square feet of floor azea for this
land beingrpart ofof H.E.StNo. 10129 Townshipnl l South, Range 85 West ofthe 6~ l of
P.M. The State Pazcel Identification Number is 2911-021=00-023. Foi farffier
information contact Ezra Louthis, at the Pitkin County Community Development
Department (970) 920-5092.
• MILLER (P070-03): `requesting an addifiona13,000 square feet of floor area.
The property is located in Old Snowmass and is described as Tract 1, J.H. McCabe
Ranch Tracts. The State Parcel Identification Number is 2645-505-40-00. For
further information contact Suzanne Wolff, at the Pitkin County Community
Development Department (970) 920-5093
(P )• q g
• Bet ofloor area fo SLOT ~e property srdescribed as Cdditi°na15,500"square
astle Creek Valley
Ranch, Lot 1 L The State PazcelIdenfificafion Number is 2735-264-O1-002. For
further information contact Lance Clarke, at the Pitkin County Community
Development Department (970)'g20-5452.
• BAY OIL USA, INC., LOT 12 (P069-03): requesting an additiona15,500 square
feet of floor azea for this lot. The property is described as Castle Creek Valley
Ranch, Lot 12. The State Parcel Identification Number is 2735-264-tl'1-bi)4: 'For
further information contact Lance Clarke, at the Pitkin County Community
Development Department (970) 920-5452.
s/ Peter Thomas, Chair
Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August 9, 2003
~,., ~.
,~ ~ _..
Pitkin County Accounf 002.02.
Public Private x
- Rural a GMQS Competitior
299 Conundrum Road
Heidi and Guy Mathys
Mailing List of Adjacent Property Owners
Heidi Houston
285 LLC.
P.O. Box 1188
Aspen, CO 81611
Ferd Bellingrath
PO'BOX 8905
Pine Bluff, A~71611
2 properties
~ ~ ~ fin, ~,~,~< R-~
George P Mitchel
C/O Alan L'Vitale
2002 Timberloch Place
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Michael D Katz
3584 S Gandens Rd.
Miami, FL 33133
Conundrum Trust
C/O Vectra Bank Colorado
717 17th St. Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
US Forest Service
28
~.. ;..
PTTHIN COUNTY
COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970):920-5526 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: CASTLE/MAROON CAUCUS
ENGINEER
FROM: Ezra Louthis, Community Development Department
RE: MATHYS RURAL AREA RESIDENTIAI: GROWTH MAN:AGI~IVIENT ,'
ALLOTMENT APPLICATION FOR AbbITIONAL SCZYtAIi~ Al2~EA
(PID# 2911-021-00-023 CASE# P067-03)
DATE: July 24, 2003
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by Guy and Heidi
Mathys. The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission will review the application on
Tuesday, September 9, 2003.
Please return your comments tome by Friday, August 15, 2003.
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO ~C(O1~11VIUNITI'
DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTI~~R~NEEb OF'THEIVI. "`
Thank you.
~' ' "9 E
PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
July 24, 2003
Mr. Marc Mathys
465 N. Mill Street
Suite 18
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: MATHYS RURAL AREA RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
ALLOTMENT APPLICATIONFOR ADDITIONAL SQUARE AREA
(PID# 2911-021-00-023 CASE# P067-03)
Deaz Mi. Mathys:
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We babe
detemuned that this application is complete. A$er a more detailed review of the submittal
information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to
adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request
the information from you directly.
We have scheduled this application at a public hearing before the Pitkih County Planning and Zoning
Commission on Tuesda Se temper 9 20b3 at a meetin to be
Y~ p g gm at Si00 pm before the Pitkin
County Planning and Zoning Commission, in the First Floor Meeting Room of the Courthouse, 506
E. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within
3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and
changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical
problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo
pertaining to the application is available for you to pick up at the Community Development Office.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post a public notice sign on the property at least fifteen
days prior to the public hearing (and remove it within one week after). You aze also required to
mail notice (you may obtain a copy of the public notice from our office) to all adjacent property
owners and mineral estate owners at least 30 days prior to the hearing with the return address of
the Community Development Department given above. The names and addresses shall be those
on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeazed no more than 60 days prior to the
date of the public hearing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by"Posting & Mailing as
proof of compliance with the code at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Ezra Louthis, the planner assigned to your case, at (970) 920-
5092.
Sincerely,
Janis Taylor
Administrative Assistant
Encl: Affidavit
JUN-30-2003 10 56 222222
Guy and Heidi Mathys
3350 WesfAluvial '
Fresno, CA 93711
June 30, 2003
Ezra Louthis
Pitkin County Community Development Departrnent
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Residentia] GMQS Additional Floor Area Application
Dear Mr, Louthis,
22222222222222222222 P.01i01
This letter authorizes my son, Marc Mathys, to submit a land use application for our
property. Mr. Mathys may represent us is the land use and building pcrniit process.
Thank you,
Sinerly, Gp,~n
Heidi and GuyMathys I ,
~ -~o ~ s
TOTAL P.01
,a, r ,. .,-» _..,,. ,.._ ,. _ ,_.
~_
T '~ • ~ ~
~.. I.
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS, 3rd Floor
ASPEN, COLORADO 8611
970-925-1766 1970-925-6527"FAX
~~D3
D er12;2001
GUY MATHYS AND HEIDI MATHYS
3350 WEST ALLUVIAL
FRESNO, CA 93711
ATTN: GUY AND HEIDI
RE: PCT14922C4
Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy relative to the above mentioned file.
Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin Couhty Title, Inc. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality
product which will serve your needs.
In the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments. regarding your final policy, please
contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly a§ possible.
We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the
property. If you sei(or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure
re-issue rates which may be available to you.
Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Title, Inc. the opportunity to serve you.
Sincerely,
RoiLynne VanBuren
Policy Administrator
Enclosures: COPY OF TAX CERTIFICATE
,. _ _ .r..,. _..~ .~ ~~,
»' ,
. ~., ...,~3: i ,:;: I ,.,;:,:,
SCHEDULE A OW1~E~i'S`POTI~Y
CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMO_UNTOF fNSURANCE, POLICY NUMBER
PCT14922C4` November 1, 2001 @ 4:17 PM ~ $955;0"0`.00""~ ' ~ ` 1312=2b°'6"938~~" ~~
1. NAME OF INSURED:
GUY MATHYS AND HEIDI MATHYS
2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS:
IN FEE SIMPLE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN:
GUY MATHYS AND HEIDI MATHYS
4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF
COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
See Attached Exhibit "A"
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE; INC.
601 E. HOPKINS AVE.
ASPEN,°COLORADO 81611
(970) 925-1766/(970)-925-6527 FAX
THE POLICYNUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET:
_ ._ _.
.. ,.r-e, .. , m.^_-.
SCHEDULE B-OWNERS
CASE NUMBER DATE,OF POLICY
PCT14922C4 November 1; 2001 @ 4`.1TPM
POLICY NUMBER
13'f2-2~~G~9~~~_ ,,.,_..,
THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS,OR DAMAGE. BY REASON. OF THE.FOLLOWING
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundarylines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore `or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Water rights, claimsbr title to water.
6. Taxes for the year 2001 not yet due or payable.
7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to
penetrate or intersect the' premises hereby granted and right of way for ditches or canals constructed. by the
authority of the United States as reserved iri United States PatehtFecarded Sepfeinber 6, 1922 in Bool(959 of
Page 142.
8. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Pitkin County Board of
County Commissioners recorded June 30,..1977 ih Book 331 at Page 229 as Resolution No. 135547.
9. Easement and right of way as set forth in instrument recorded July 5, 1977 in Book 331 at Page 390.
10. Any loss or damage resulting from any overlaps as shown on survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated
October 26, 2001 as Job No. 16349.
EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED.
.-
Rr ~; G.
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Parcel of land being part of H.E.S. No. 112, Township 11 South, Range 85 West of the. 6th P.M., described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point whence corner No. 8 of said H.E.S. No. 112 bears South 21 °11 West 41,6 65 feet, which point is
__ ~ ... ~. ~ m.~. .....,~. _.
also the Northwesterly corner of that certain parcel of land described in Book 189'at Page 254; then East along the
Northerly boundary of said 189/254 parcel a distance of 303.69 feet to a point of intersection with the Westerly Boundary of
that certain parcel of land described in Book 183 at Page 92; tfience along the Westerly boundary of said 183/92 parcel
the following courses and distances:
North 12°17' East 139.45 feet;
North 13°55' East 173.07 feet; and
North 04°00' East 80.88 feet to the Southwesterly comer of that certain parcel of land described in Book,185 at Page 191;
thence along the Westerly boundary of said land ih Book 185 of Page191 parcel the following courses and distances:
North 04°55' East 163.6$ feet;
North 02°15' West 177.09 feet; and
North O6°5T East 48:76 feet to the Southwesterly corner of that certain parcel of lantl described in Book 188 at Page 41;
thence along the Westerly boundary of said land in Book 188 at Page 41 parcel the following courses`and distances:
North 06°5T Easf 93'30 feet] ° "
North 27°2T East 96:06 feet; and
North 01 °39' West 143.43 feet to the Southwesterly corner of that certain parcel of land described in Book 196 at Page 59;
thence 04°20' West along the Westerly bouhdary of said lahd in Book 196 of Page 59 parcel a distance of3d:$7 feet to a
point of intersection with line 8-9 of said H:E.S. No. 112;
thence Southwesterly 1211.00 feet, more or less, along said line 8-9 of H.E.S. No. 112, to the point of beginning.
Report Date: 01/21/2000 o8:46AM
ASSESSED T0:
BIRK WALTER H
BIRK ROSEMARIE D
38 NONOHE'PL
PAIR, HI 96779
_ _ - `.._.
- - - - - - -._ .~..~ _i _..._.
r a~nOUN1`YTREA~SUItER... ,,. ..._ .. :.. Page:~l
VENDOR NO: 202
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC
60I EAST HOPKINS
---°
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF H. E. S. NO. 112, TWP. 11 S. R. 85 Rr 6TH P. M. DESCRIBED
BY METES AND BOUNDS;"IN $OOK'36'7 PAGE 462 AND 463, PTTKII:T"~(jYTsNTly TtECORDS. BOOK 384,
PAGE 331.
PARCEL: 291102200023 Srrlrs Ann At!ncwr
Aurnortty Mr7I Levy Amount Values AMtral Assessed
PITE]N COUNTY 3.101 _ 293.51 Laud 600000 58440
OPEN SPACE"& TRAILS 2.514 237.95 Exempt 0 0
COUNTY HOUSING DE$T 0,372 35.21 Improve 371800 36210
ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION 1.261 119.35 94650
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 8.265 782.28 Total 971800 ~-~
COLORADO MTN COLLAGE ~ ~" ~ - 3.655
.-_V.,.
COLORADO RIVER"li~ATER C" 0 ~ 345.95
24.69. .
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 1.500 141.98
ASPEN AMBUI;Al~(.`lt D~fSTRIC 0.230 21.77
PITKIN COUNTY LDIRARY 1.158 109,61
22.338 2,114.30 - TA7!~ES T+OR 1999
FEE FOR TftIS CERTIFICATE
10.00
nLZ. TAx LIEN sera; abaourrrs ARB suai~cr To cxA~rGB erne TG''~ivnoxsar~rrr oP cufz'tz>a7r~r.5~s HY rke l~srrlro~bari'.~~
OR TO ADVERTISING ANA~OI$TRAINT WA"'R12AY~IY''PEIr5; C~NG`i:'$'lvfAY OCC'fJR AI~'D THi? TREASURER S OFPCCE°yCV11.C°N1:1D'I`Q~E
CONTACTED P'R'C6R'1'O'IFEIvf[7TAI~TCE~AFI'~I1"f~'"FOI.I;OR'IN-G'D"A'TES:"'P~~F:S~AL PS"tO~~F~"1~TY'eIND MOBQ,B HOMES - SEI7EMBfiR
REAL PROPERTY - SEPFEMBE"R 1. TAR~L~I'~`h~~~(jjY`A~{p[b' ~°g~ {iA1D `BY CASTC OR CA5IIIER8'CRECR:
COMMi5S10NIERS, THS COl} CL,-O TI~B COC;O'jTI~TY"A~sT~Sp ~ MAY BE ON PILE Wf!'H THEHOARD OP ~COUNfY i'
This cerdficare does nor ittclvde land or improvements assessed under a separate schedule munber, personal property razes,
transfer tax or misc. tax coilectetl oa L>ehaif of other etniiies, spenial`or I`or91 improvement distritt assessments or
mobile homes, unless specifically mentioned.
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the entire amoum of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and au ~~~
outsgtdia sales for u ~.. ' -
g ttpaid taxes as shown by the rewrds in my office from which the same may sell be redeemed withtlte amoum
requital for redemption arc as noted herehi. In wiittess whereof, I have hereunto sew and std s nl tfiis 21 s f January, 7A0p. `
TREASURER, PIT$IN COYINTY, THOMAS CAlti: O`KEN, B / ~ i ~' <'
506 E. Main Sf. - S'te 201 ~ 7`~~ /~ ~
Aspen, Co 81611 ~/
(970) 920-5170 v `~
1999 TAX -. -- -- - "'•• "'••""'•` auv,rrlv,tvu~r: 'TOTAL DUE
2,114.30 0.00 0.00 2,114:30
TOTAL TAXRR
e
Report Date: 05/02/200108;10AM PITKiN COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1
..~.
CERTIF'ICAT'E OF' TAXES ~, _ . CERT'fh 20011021
SCHEDULE NOi It003522 _ „ ', ORD"8R NO: 14923C2
ASSESSED T0: VENbOR NO ",262
BIRK WALTER H PITKINC'C)UNTY TITLE, INC
BIRK ROSEMARIE D 601 EAST HOPI{INS '
38 NONOHE PL
PAIA, HI 96779 ASPEN, CO 81611
LEGAL DESCRIPITON: - ..w„.- ,,, ,.,,. ... e ,~,,v .a . .z, . ... ,. >F< , ~,-
APARCEL OF LAND BESNG PART OF H 8 S NO_112,'TWP. 11 S. R. 85 VJ. 6TH. P. M DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS, INBOOK 367 PAGE 462 AND 463, PITRIN COUNTI' RECO"[FT~'S BOOK`384;"PAGE
331. ...
1~ YEAR TCSARGE _ ... . TAX-AM0 7.92 ~00 _ 0.00 1.088.96 ETA 088.9b`
_ _
TOTAL TAXES ~ ' _ 1;08$:96 '..
L TA% BII.LING"FOR 2000
C 1 CF
TAIL DIS7 ~.~. . - ~..,,..,~~.
A ~~ ~
. -~ Amount Values Actual Assessed
PITICiN COUNTY 3.301 279:85 Land 600,000 58,440
OPEN SPACE & TRAILS 3.806 322 67 E
COUNTY HOUSING DEBT 0.376 318$ mve 270,400 26,340
ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION 1.068 90.55 -- -- -- , - -----
ASPENSCHOI?LDIS'1`RiCT 9.874 837.12 Towl 870,400 84,780" -~~
COLORADO MTN COLLEGE 3:997 338 87
.,, .,..,.
~.
- _
.
COIARADO RIVER WATER CON'S 0.282- 23.91 w ,
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 1.500 127.17
..
.....
ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRICT 0.246 _ 20 86
PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY 1.239 105.04
25.689 2,177.92 - TAILES FOR 2000
FEE FOR THIS CERTIFICATE _ .10:00. . _. _ . -,..
ALL T
OR TO
CONt
REAI.
2RICTS MAY Bfi ON EE.E WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DiS ,
COMMISSIONERS. THB COUNTY CLERK, OR"TI~-CO'IJN"fY AS'SPSSOR. ' .. ~ ...
Ibis certificate does mt include IaM or improvements assessed wider a separate accoum number, personal pcopnty taxes,
transfer Rtit ar misc. tex wllected on behalf of ottie5 modes, apxtaf`oi local irtiproY~8ilt'etit distriei asseastl'ten'is ar ...:
mobile homes, udess specifically mentioned.
i, tffi undersigned, do hereby cett+fY that the emire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and all
atustatding sales for unpaid taxd"aa slibtvn`bp t>;e~iecoids in iny`otllce frail l~!lilch the same ntaY sdE _.'iedeemed whh the amount '
requ'ved for redemynon are es rated herein. k witness wheieof, fbava fierettatu "set' and seal '02nd o Y, 2001.
TREASURER, PITKIN COUNTY, THOMAS CARL OREN, BY
,; '
506 E. Main St. -Ste 201
Aspen, Co 81611
1970) 9203170
t; .,_
3799 HIGHWAY 82 • P.O. DRAWER 2150
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602
(970) 945-5491 • FAX (970) 945-4081
June 3, 2002
Mr. Marc Mathys
California Stone & Bath Design
303 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Undergrounding of Overhead Power Line
Conundrum Creek Property
Dear Marc:
We have completed a cost estimate for undergrounding of the existing overhead on the above mentioned
location. Our facilities will be installed as shown on the attached sketch.
Total cost of undergrounding of
overhead power line $30,000.00
The above figures are only estimates. After the job has been completed, the actual cost of construction
will be determined. Your contribution willbe adjusted fo reflect the actual cost by'making a refund or
further assessment. Execution of this document constitutes agreement to pay any further assessment in a
timely manner.
Our power facilities must be installed on an easement. Please execute and return the enclosed document.
The following conditions are hereby noted:
Lot corners or other locations will be provided by the developer as needed to ensure that our
facilities are installed as shown on the attached sketch.
Holy Cross Energy has implemented a policy which requires that project owners provide all
excavation, backfill, compaction and cleanup needed for installation bf the underground power
system extension to serve their new development. The owner must also set all vaults and install
all conduits as specified by Holy Cross Ehergy's design for the project and the endosed
construction specifications. Holy Cross Energy will supply aII material which can be picked up by
the owner at the appropriate storage yard. The cost of this material"is included in the job cost
estimate. The attached Trehch Agreement must be properly executed and returned prior td the
start of excavation.
3. There is no provision in our estimate for revegetation. Revegetation, if required, must be
provided by parties other than Holy Cross Energy.
4. Secondary voltage available will be 120/240, single-phase.
5. Secondary facilities shall be installed in accordance with National Electrical Code and Holy Cross
Energy specifications. All meter locations must be approved. Any service over 200 amps or 240
volts must have prior written approval from Holy Cross Energy.
6. It will be your responsibility to extend underground secondary entrance conductors from the pad-
mounted transformer to points of power usage.
7. All underground services shall be installed in conduit ahead of the meter. All underground
services must be in conduitbeneatfi roads, driveways, and other areas of difficult excavation.
8. All residential services must have an outside disconnect accessible at all times to Holy Cross
Energy personnel.
9. It shall be the consumer's responsibility to protect their electric equipmehtfrom temporary aver
voltage or under voltage situations resulting from causes beyond the control of Holy Cross
Energy.
10. The above mentioned cost estimate does not include connect fees or meter deposits, if required.
Arrangements for payment of these items and for scheduling the actualmeter installation should
be made through the local Holy Cross'Eriergy office.
11 . We attempt to complete all projects in atimely manner. However, highest priority is given to
maintaining service to our existing consumers. This fact, along with inevitable construction
delays, will not allow us to guarantee a project completion date.
~_;,
v
Marc Mathys
June 3, 2002
Page Two
`:R
12. All Holy Cross Energy rules and regulations will be followed.
When Holy Cross Energy is in receipt of your check in the amount of $30,000.00, all necessary executed
easements, other permits, if required, a completed"Application For Electric Service" form, the executed
trench agreement, and the signed original of this letter agreement (below), the job can be scheduled for
construction. '`
Sincerely,
HOLY CROSS ENERGY
(>
Buzz Quaco,
Staking Engineer
BQ:vw
Enclosure
The above terms and conditions
are hereby agreed to and accepted
By:
Title:
Date:
W/O#02-18044:92-02:Conundrum Creek/Mathys
quaco\Mathys
t _ i
TRENCH, CONDUIT, AND VAULT AGREEMENT
This agreement is made and entered into this day of between GUY MATHYS
AND HEIDI MATHYS, whose mailing address is 303 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, hereinafter called "Owner",
and Holy Cross Energy, a Colorado corporation whose mailing address is P. O. Drawer 2150, Glenwood Springs, Colorado
81602, hereafter called "Holy Cross".
WHEREAS, Holy Cross has been requested by the Owner to provide underground electric service within an easement
traversing certain real property described as follows: A parcel of land located in Section 2, Township 11 South, Rarige85
West of the 6"` P.M. as more fully described in reception #460387 of the records df the Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen,
Colorado; and
WHEREAS, said electric service will provide power to a project known as: Conundrum Creek/Mathys.
WHEREAS, installation of such underground electric service will require trench and other excavations both within and
outside of the above described real property; and
WHEREAS, the Owner is required to provide all excavation, conduit and vault installation, backfill, compaction and cleanup
needed to construct the required underground electric facilities.
NOW THEREFORE, the Owner and Holy Cross agree as follows:
1. The Owner shall provide all excavation, conduit and vault installation, backfill, compaction and cleanup necessary for
installation of underground electric service to said project. Such excavation shall be located as shown on the
construction drawing and performed as specified by Holy Cross.
a. All excavation, both within and outside the above described real property, shall be within dedicated or conveyed
and recorded utility easements.
b. The top of all conduits installed hereunder shall be located 48" below the final grade of the ground surface.
c. The final ground surface grade shall be 6" below the pad of transformer and switchgear vaults and level with the
top of splice vaults.
d. A twelve inch (12") minimum separatidri will be maintained between conduits installed for the power system and all
other new or existing underground utilities. Wherever possible, this separation will be horizontal. The power line
conduit separation from plastic gas lines shall be greater than this minimum wherever practicable.
e. Holy Cross will supply the necessary conduit and vaults for fnstallatidn by the Owner upon completion of
contractual arrangements. Owner assumes responsibility for all material lost or damaged after such material has
been issued to and signed for by Owner. Alternatively, Owner may prdvide its' own conduit and vaults meeting
Holy Cross specifications for use on said project. After installation by the Owner, Holy Crdss shall continue as the
owner of the conduit, vaults and related structuresand facilities.
f. In the event that conduits or any other installation provided by Owner for said project are found to be unusable or
improperly constructed, irrespective of whether such discovery is made during drafter installation, Owner will be
responsible for correcting said problems at its expense as specified by Holy Cross and Owner shall reimburse Holy
Cross for all additional costs resulting from said conduits or other installation being unusable or imprdperly
constructed.
2. Despite the fact that Holy Cross reserves the right to specify acceptable excavation for work performed hereunder, the
Owner shall perform work hereunder as an independent contractor, including, liut not limited to, the hiring and firing
of its own employees, providing its own tools and equipment,' payment of all wages, taxes, insurance, employee
withholdings, and fees connected with its work on the project.
3. The Owner shalt pbtain all necessary digging permits and utility locations prior to excavation for work performed
hereunder. The Owner shall repair all damage caused during excavation promptly and at its expense. Nd excavation
will be undertaken within five (S) feet of existing underground power lines except under the on site supervision of a
qualified Holy Cross employee.
4. The Owner shall indemnify, save, and hold harmless Holy Cross, its employees and agents, against any and all loss,
liability, claims, expense, suits, causes of actidn, or judgments for damages td property or injury or death to persons
that may arise out of work performed hereunder. The Owner shall p~dmptly defend Holy Gross whenever legal
proceedings of any kind are brought against it arising out of work performed hereunder. In the event Owner shall fail
to promptly defend Holy Cross, it shall be liable to Holy Cross, and shall reimburse it, for alt costs, ezpen'ses and
attorney fees incurred in defending any such legal proceeding. The Owner agrees to satisfy, pay, and discharge any
and ail judgments and fines rendered against Holy Cross arising out of any such proceedings. The above
indemnification clause shall not apply to state and local governments or local service districts.. In lieu thereof,
9 P
tY ~ 9 9 p p Holy
CroslsevrequesO suchean Owner shall fumesfi a Cert'ieflcatedof Insurdancehverfpm ndemnficatiop da~se00~dfo~public
y' g the existence of such insurance
coverage.
5. The Owner shall repair any excavation settlement and damage to asphalt paving or other surface improvements
caused by such settlement resulting from work performed hereunder, both within and outside the above described real
property, for a period of two (2) years beginning on the date backfill and cleanup are completed.
6. The owner shall stop the growth of thistles and/or other noxious weeds in all areas disturbed by excavation performed
hereunder for a period of two (2) years beginning do the date backfill and cleanup are completed.
7. In the event the Owner shall not promptly complete all of the obligations hereinabove agreed to be performed by
Owner, Holy Cross may give written notice by registered or certified mail demanding Owner td complete the work and
obligations undertaken by Owner herein, and if such is not completed within 30 days after receipt by Owner, Holy
Cross may complete the work and dtifigationsfiereof. If Holy Cross shall b_ a required to complete the work, all costs of
completion shall be chargeable to and collectible from'the Owner. In the event that litigation is necessary to collect
such obligation, Hdly Cross shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs of suit.
8. As set forth in paragraph 1 a above, Owner covenants that the trench, and all faclitiess within the trench installed
hereunder shall be located within dedicated or conveyed and recorded utility easements and at the proper depth below
finished grade. It shall be the obligation of the Owner to properly locate and construct the facilities within the
p
located withintdedi atedtor conve edrand recorded'ufilid'aeas'emenits, or a ttFieat such facilities have not been properly
Y tY proper depth, it shall be the obligation
of the Owner to provide new easements for the actual location pf tFie facilities; or to relocate the facilities within the
easement, all of which shall be of the sole cost and expense of the Owner.
W/O#02-18044:92-02:Conundrum Creek/Mathys:5-23-02 Veda\Quaco\Mathys Page 1 of 2 Revised 1-02-02
..
~..
~ ,, ,:
9. It shall be the Owner's responsibility to insure that splice vaults, switchgear vaults and transformer vaults installed
hereunder on said real property are accessible by Holy Cross boom trucks and other necessary equipment'ahd
personnel at all times. The use of such access by Holy Cross shall not require removal or alteration of any
improvements, landscaping, or other obstructions. The ground surface grade shall hot be altered within ten (10) feet
of said splice, switchgear and transformer vaults, nor along the power line route between the vaults. The ground
surface grade at said transformer and switchgearbaults shall be six (6) inches below the top of the pad. The ground
surface grade at said splice vaults shall be even with the top of the pad. The man1to7e opening of said splice vaults
shall be uncovered (excluding snow) and accessible at all times. Improvements, landscaping or any other objects
placed in the vicinity of said transformers and switchgear shall be located so as not to hinder complete opening of the
equipment doors. The ground surface within ten (TO) feet of said transformer and switchgear doors shall be flat, level
and free of improvements, landscaping, and other obstructions. Improvements; Yandscaping and other objects will be
kept a minimum of four (4) feet from non-opening sides and backs of said transformers and switchgear. Owner
hereby agrees to maintain the requirements of this paragraph and further agrees to correct any violations which may
occur as soon as notified by Holy Cross. Said corrections will be made at the sole cost and expense of Owner.
10. The Owner covenants that it is the owner of the above described real property and that said real property is free and
clear of encumbrances and liens of any character, except those held by the following:
The promises, agreements and representations made by the Owner herein shall be covenants that run with the land
and shall be binding upon the successors in )nferest, and assigns, of the real property herenabove described.
Holy Cross Energy, a Colorado corporation
Richard D. Brinkley, GUY MATHYS
General Manager-Regulated Services
HEIDI MATHYS
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
by GUY MATHYS AND HEIDI MATHYS.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
20J
Public
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
ss.
Address:
by R cha d iDgBrinkley,eGeneralaManagertlgRegula~ed Serv ces of Hol yCross Energy; a Colorado corporation. 2D~
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
W/O#02-T8044:92-02:Coriundrum Creek/Mathys:5-23-02
Notary Public
Address:
Veda\Quaco\Mathys Page 2 of 2 Revised 1-02-02
Trench, Conduit and Vault Agreement
Holy Cross Energy
HOLY CROSS ENERGY
UNDERGROU;yD RIGHT-Of-WAYEASEMEN7'
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned,
GUY MATHYS and HEIDI MATHYS
(hereinafter called "Grantors"), for a good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do
ere rant unto Hol Cross Ener
9 g y gy, a Colorado cor oration whose ost officge address is P. O. Drawer 21 50, Glenwood
Sprin s, Colorado (hereinafter called "grantee") and to its successors and asst ns, the right of ingress and egress across
lands of Grantors, situate in the Count of Pitkin, State of Colorado, described as follows:
A parcel of land located in Section 2, Township 11 South, Range 85 West of the 6`" P.M, as more fully described in
reception #460387 of the records of the Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado.
And, to construct, reconstruct, repair, change, enlarge, re-phase, operate, and maintain an underground electric
transmission or distribution line, or both, with the underground vaults, conduit, fixtures and equipment used or useable in
connection therewith, together with associated equipment required above ground, within the above mentioned lands, upon
an easement described as follows:
An easement ten (10) feet in width, the centerline for said easement being an underground'powerltne as constructed, the
approximate location of which upon the above described property is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part
hereof by reference.
The rights herein granted specifically allow Grantee to install additional underground and/or pad-mounted facilities within
the easement describedby the attached exhibit.
It shall be the Grantor's responsibility to insure that splice vaults, switchgear vaults and transformer vaults installed
hereunder on said real property are accessible by Grantee's bopm trucks and other necessary equipment and personnel at
all times. The use of such access by Grantee shall not require removal or alteration of any improvements, landscaping, or
other obstructions. The ground surface grade shall not be altered within ten (10) feet of said splice, switchgear and
transformer vaults, nor along the power line route between the vaults. The ground surface grade at said transformer and
switchgear vaults shall be six (6) inches below the top of th`e-pad. The ground surface grade at said splice vaults shall be
even with the top of the pad. The manhole opening of said splice vaults shale be uncovered (excluding snow) and
accessible at all times. Improvements, landscaping or any other objects placed in the vicinity of said transformers and
switchgear shall be located so as not to hinder complete opening of the equipment doors. The ground surface within ten
(10) feet of said transformer and switchgear doors shall be flat, level and free pf improvements, landscaping, and other
obstructions. Improvements, landscaping and other objects will be kept a minimum of four (4) feet from non-opening
sides and backs of said transformers and switchgear. Grantor hereby agrees to maintain the requirements of this
paragraph and further agrees to correcfany violations which may occur as soon as notified by'Grantee. Said corrections
will be made at the sole cost and expense of Grantor.
Together with the right to remove any and all trees, brush, vegetation and obstructions within said easement and the right
to pile spoils outside said easement during construction and maintenance, when such is reasonably necessary for the
implementation and use of the rights hereinabove granted, In areas where vegetation is disturbed. by the above described
use of the easement, the ground surface shall be seeded using a standard native mix by Grantee. Grantor agrees that
landscaping or other surface improvements added on-said easement after the date of execution hereof will be minimized
and that Grantee will not be responsible for damage to said additional landscaping or surface improvements caused by
exercise of its rights granted by this easement.
Grantors agree that all facilities installed by Grantee on the above described lands, shall remain the property of Grantee,
and shall be removable at the option of Grantee.
encumbrances and liens of whatsoeverr charact rh except those held Iby abe f`olloh4a ntghe said lands are free and clear of
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said right-of-way and easement, together with all and singular, the rights and privileges
appertaining thereto, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever.
JN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused theseZOresents to be duly executed on this day of
GUY MATHYS HEIDI MATHYS
STATE OF 1
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
20 , by GUYMATHYS and HEIDI MATHY$.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
Address:
W/O#-02-18044:92-02:Conundrum Creek/Mathys:5-23-02 Veda\Qva<o\Matnys Revised 4-16-01
'"~` ~ ~
•,.
~~,~
w
ti
~~ ~~
~~
J
/ Q .r
j ~ fC
R
W
J
N W O
O A'Z-' W N
R'WJK ~
N d,w~ _
W /
O J O O J
2 O ¢. 1- -~
W ~
3 e'
~, ~ ~e
}
~ Y Q
// R6
Q ~
~ /
W N
F- W Lj i /'
r~ Q-' W i
W U ~ ~
_ ~
X Z (ll rl' i _
Fa ~ ~ OJ NUJ ~ ~
W
O K~ N
Z .~-~ U ~ oJa3 i
~t=~3 ~,
f,
w ,.
' - A
-'
Z
A.
~ ~'
~. , ~~,,
/ 1
~ 1 ~ ma
j' 1
i / 1j
/ ~ ®~
~ f
/• 1
i / 11
/• 1
1
// 1
/ ~
/~ ~
1 ~
/ 1
/, ~
/ ~
// A
N N ~
K\ ~ 00
~ M U
J
7
6
~rt
~N.r., r... , y ., , ~- > + ~" '` ' ~'xH~ M9DDAL~SNE `~' X"TC~I~~^ ~"
' STRUCTUk2E NO :1 ~ '~ .'•e. ^,_,,~
~.~--- .
. PR2ORI't'Y NU. .._L____1-~ ~ "
,.
't'ire claimants are: Charles hlaclclalone and Pat ltaddalone, of
Post ,Off ice 13ox fi35, Aspen, Colox•ado 8161.1_. _
~- 'Pho 1fa:dalone D.it;ch is 41'l.'?2 feet J.pn~; the d~ptll n# the
ditch is. 0.3 fool; doop; and the width o1' the ditch is 1.0 foot at
high water line.`' The ditch is oons'tructe.l on a grado of one Poc!t.
}zer 100 ~'eot. 'Phe hiaddalone T7itch is located at a poinC from vrhic.h
the Cox•ner No. 'l of tho H.I~:,S. 112, Townsnii> lI. South, R'angc~ 85
lYest, Gth P. lit.., be ax's North 29°~~3' East 1.6J5.62, PoF';.,
'I'he watex• diverted by the hiaddalona flitch is yupplled by
Castla Creek, tributary of the RUa.ring Fork River, a natux•al
stream n R+ater Dzstxa.ct No. 38. ~'aIYA/"ry°°"
'I'i:~ watex• diverted is usad :Cqr domestzc und,irrig;ttio!
purposes. Thrcc acres o.E land are lx•ri{;atad.
1'lork vaas r„oraneuced bg surv.~y Ind actual constructio•:: !!rl
September 1, l9c'7, 'the cottstruction was cnmr~le~nd .tn thar y"3r'.
fiy virtue thez•eof, claimants ax•~ on tit led to a px•iorit•y daC~3 of
kYI~~RN'1•'ORE; IT~ IS ORDEPEI3 ANn .pECREED that 1;ht!rca oc aliowec~ ~'i~ .%%.r ~,
to Plgw into tl!e 31acJdalone Dir,oh, out ni' the e'ratex•s of Castle
Cc'e±~k, :t ;;:c'ibUtary'~ OP the I2oari.ul; k'~ric River, a r.atui•a'. stri!a,n zn
ctiater LlsCr::ct No. 38; U,l cubic fcot,of water per second o,t tiri:e,
direct. flow, v, i.tka'a,„pric.~.rlty data of September 1., l'.157, Priox'it;.
No. ~~.-..[ ~ and Strur,tux•e No. ~~ „' ~`-- Tho priority hec~e~ i.::
awardPCi .is unGonriitional anti absolutb. ~~ /~f„~(/~14,~"~
n
~J
~~J L ~J {1J~ .1 LL~~ L~,11 VI ``nn ~~11 ~`L.J~ VL y1 LJ~ ~1 {~ L/1 ttrrff ..~~11 .~..JJ ~~11 {,y .yJ {,J W J~ - 3. ~ l't ~~~~~
N W CG P, h.ro Y <) ~ y~(D'P ll^4~i1 to µh1~N~J W "1 W W W W 4p1~I+~~NN N~'W ry~~ V'V r'"^°O t~ ~YJ l° + 5 ' I~
r ~~~ ~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~ ~1
f J ~r~~? y1 JL~M#- ~, ~
yy ~l Y u{~ ~n3'~RY~rP.S'~~:lua~~~.~..J ~-~
~~~o~v~l~v'~o'oo dZr~~Ly 2~'~~`~L~~v'a 3 ~ cxzxx xsxtsxsrr ..~.
~~~¢ F~~~~gt~~~~t;~~~~~~~ ~~~ a~Ax xnL_n~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,III
yy~~ pp ~~// gg J7 ~L x[11 ~ry ~q VJ yJ , , ,: ~~
,~. ~~~ e'. 'i ~+~ ~~x S ~ .J~ C ~X I^~ c n~ IL~ ~~ fi'~~~~~~ ~ oo~ ~f # ~S ~S v* :; ,~,
Qt r~f .. '~ x rg~,~,dW ~~'~~4 €+{~ 4ni Soy o~p~~~~ F~b? $'r
r ~J~( (R y :. %.:
.o !tr `~ yirov~; .j QQ~ww~Sg
,~~E bnb.. ~ ;
( L N s f
ro t C a, u c b q n C V p O C O t1 C b v C C C 4 L
p . W 'd
U .I 'L h J ! {{ O. ;T J. 1~ V• Jf IV fV W t` ~ P i ~. W W VI . O G ~ !' t_ Lr..J .~ .yp.~ (YIFj11 y. t ~ t1. r 1.:
~, ~ ~ ~ r; ~ t~(i ~ I ffp~' ~ 1~i,{ ~' ~ r~ fS~ y § c (ry]pµl~ (~~:)({ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ Y (~^{y(1 [pµ~}}~ -, ~ Z5 € :Z ~jj~f~ ~ ~ '~~,
yJ IIf 1..: S'! iY IC ~ ,LI ~ W 1 V .+) ) ~ Yl 4iJ ~ ~ M Tf j„ Sl A A_ ~ ~ - ~ R ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ rl
k Y a, r 'I
i^o- ', vi '~:~'<'I~c~c.f+JGS~+CIidY,'~.rov{,`obiL.`$7{t`,D'YlY'GC3`.3~3a~i/~171`.d'L.a'CiG"L~iKhl..:d y
_Yrl ~~+Ni3`?. Kls "jNi =..~wrA tiro. r'.)X'kJ ii _. -f,+2 L!tM vS:'X 4=X ~`"
4 a ~ '.:: O . ¢~ . ., c, r~ v /~ w L d -~ ••'{ + r., w n Ln o v ro m n, n J r.
v n '+ ~
1 V • 'r !r /, 4 V Y G .'1 T' "{ V, N N N N VI N N S N (V~, N~1 L~+ (f, Np + (y {.1 (J1 1~
. Ill C) ~xL O V ~ "J L,Ir (] iJ W ~ J nJ }I W W (O N ~ P. }yf+
p(ry@~"' i4. ~ b j a 1 ~~ J! ',3 F' 4 ?: ~? e2 E.1 .. ~ ~ 1 c~ ty:.. ~ yS ~ S/ X R -~ -• v ~ ~. a 1`y r r c a. r c t '[ i A
~,,~" { , i. C L *_ t" C C C G L >< we r: C C s L C G G C Y C S C C S r L r L C a: G c Y C V
.; V Jf rn rn V, %. N N V+ I. J) V: V. V, N N N N N V, !n N N N C C ~ ~ G a N Vf VI N Ir: <[n~ V: Ln Nj N M1 rr V1 V~ (F~ ~
y . f ~ ~y .... ~ .~ ~ C (A ~~ ry ,j r-, ^~ N f~ .~ O v N F.
J ll 1 '1 i l ^ L7 I `'.' .+ T V y ~ lJ vl Cln, Ui 1M
Iv, r ` i .
[::. r ~ r J `O fV (J ~g G 1 n .. v n 4S ~+p{ n '~j l g Y' c~ ~ ~t ~ ` ~ Y
:,~~~ ~ ~ ~~"r~~~rncR~"~~^`~~~8~~~£i~~8`ri~L"~~i'R8~5€33f ~~r~{{~~33 gg
u" .. a r e I r n v, + n n ~. r I+ n n r~ n n rr n T n n , r. r, Li n r -, n rl ~ n ~ +-,
•. n : ~~
n n n I'. r . ~ '~ n io - n ., .,, r> n '1 : , 0 4, .. yr a v, m
rr: N % J Vl 1. N 4, N N ~%, L) 41 fn N C: (,) Vr VI H Vf N N 4' O Vi O Lam. V "~ .r .)
ll (~ LJ (~ rJ t I'~t~ ry ({J~ ~ ~V 1+ [.) r`U~ F' CV Cb ^s \n ''
?4 sLX}(V rI~J` [71J E, 114R'~`J 1J Nl"L ~~~a~W hR~ l~Jl}~
~'r r it '~ '~' ~w~ +~ .+wCV Yj d(': rh N;: `.~'1~= L~~ ~ L ~
< '
.a `, K ~. .~ l'Fl ~~' ~;~l yyK ~S~'F~f~~~~. JIGr~+r~~~~~d~~~o o~~~~~Y~7;'~b'~'i~
v :J 1 t ~y 5~ r ,..c ncy ~y (~?vJS~- `$4i°QF%N a$ :J~`~~ \~LSS
PJ f;9Lr h b' ~I !' •.'.N?~Ei +~ ~a~ ~~ ~3~~~~a ~ ~:~ ~.; CY'.~~Wt?V~~~
..~ a ; + i ~ ~t.aw wl Zw
-~- J`C ~t, .z X
1 1 ~ h w r u tr a
N ` f 1 ~~a?~c ~E',, 9r ~i', `d` ~'4g `'>~~ JfJ'~ ~BE3 £~?9.$°0~~,
1?H .: s>5~ji ,}}c LZ~~x ~i x~z'?{ .rtj~~i `~~~?~~r'. ~1 ~q Z ~`J n~,~'~~.~ ~ p
f~,~+~'k~':'c, * J''y1.~:~'~!Ln~ln~J1~I~`,~-~~''i-'~2~nlC~L7~~~~31~~~~`~a~16~~~~~~~`'S
! { • .,
r ., ?8
1 ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~ ~~~ _~~~ ~~ W ~ . ~ ~
S. < f `: 51 { !,. 4L',~1 _ N ? ~O ~ y. r. v. ~ Pii tS
~~',I.~S^I iyF (. Hfd,y ~; ri 'r!. '•i ~:~~~1 . YS LgS v~~6~b5 b~2n~. 4
'77 L,; ,. ~+; {s, ' ^ Y Yfi ~ ~ `i ~ ~ ~i. i'i o ~ ~ XI ~ ~ fV 3;
W
_ J~ (_~,[ ~arn~
i..
n
W~ VC
~~~ ~s- r , <. ~ ~
w2 ~V
pp '~} I)
~
t T V~
W~`T f
r
~
v
'
J
'
'
1 3~
~tb~m
g_
~~~~
~~g J 1 !"j 1
~~~,i;lk5x~`~~;~.'rd~~~ ~"1P1~
~20.~~
,~ ~ . . .'. ~
~n
oDi
J
+„
,Y
~ r v
KJ
~~ 5 ~~~~R~~!~' « ~ ~ ~ ~ 43~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
u
~9 1
~'
S
?' J ~
'~ ~ ~
M
xx
Z ~
~
N
9 y
~
\
b n
~s
V M
?~ ~ .
y1
+ r:, := fir ~; G~ ~ A
~ r ~
u 1
~~
~ 1
~ ^'
~ ~ '° r
~
~
~
~J
c
`~~
~ ~
~
~
c
,V{
}YY+
~ r
~
C"r ~
N
~'
C ffLL
~
~ 15
VI {
.I
4
~ ~
~ ~
~ VU
+
V
~~
~ my
mu£~LA
W
~O
X
.. v ~~;-
~F"r. .~ N
~ "FAY
.
...
..
.. ..
..
.~.
_
:aa .~A
.. _
.. ~ : ~ ..
•~.
F .....Nw"
. ~ 4 .w
..
.
..~
._
:L
_.
. _.
- _
~ :.
.. .
.
.i,.
~ -
r
,<
<:
s ~'
[:
nh
7
0
~, 5
fu ~
3
s
i
uc
f7 ~'.
F '~
n
~z
>~
r
N
~;
0
C_
.f
n
r
~{
i ,... . ,.. ..:. .. .u. vt M`. u. .ni.Yma. A..4 vw .~{.,u -s.. ro..nrls a..,ew9v 4~,-.h:M G3:.
r
r..l.
II:,L1:` ,1 °i~,. 1 I'
.r I'p,
~JZI r\
`1a
~~
l
~ 1
r
;
nr h l 1, , ') ~ .. r 1 ~~
:
..~ ...
.. ~. nrl>: 3nzt
r I
''
ill
f I
?nllon, C~rlurad, la rill •' f
~ '
.~.'s PAIN
,,~„
'
..
I J
I
rrq 1 I r., r .r r , , ~ ... - ...
ALI
~ I
,. n.... r.Y. wbl^. n.r.
. ~,
I i .. .. I
r rl:.
..~~ .r :lr .r. _ra:.'.n
11l(\4\\'!'111, 'h.. r.. ..I l.x:'. u111 r. .r •. Iran. r.,r .r l.r.., , ..rr...r Itir. ..r ,..
~
.. ...1 I...;1 ..f rl.. (:•. I:r ... I:
..r,.l I.:.r.f '.. ....I ..
:..
r.
r.. ,. .. i<r...
.. r ~
u. .. r 1 I
r 1 p nr, ).„
.I lxrt I'.r
' . •.. nl ln: r' Jnn v.A >ra: (ar
Y".
e..r va :... 1...
. n+rr:y A..-. .rl n. rr pnrv., .., Lr
rl .., ..
.
,r of I ... ..I r rn I . . t
' rl r.. u'. ny .:9 r' H..
., .. ,.1` II IrY'1 ra: Yr
.1
..
.
1~ ..1 .. 1
. :
r r.. ~, il'
::
I. i... 111
.
.
"' I! IL :: .. '
..
'
' ~ L.
,..x
11
,
. 1 :.
.. I
,.,,.r 1.r ,, ._1 ...1 r ~. : ~
'Del
r
r F\''u--.h
e
'
I'U'
I~ l
r
..; ., r,
'Ir
.
.
.. .,I .. •.1
.. r
S
h
I
J ~rl
1 1„ :
i ..
r
Ir• i I
r dll
t, 1 .I
' I r II
I
I r. ill. tn.t4 1 ~
.
m 1
1. ,'I ..rr t' i r. I , nr ~
rty
.
w
. lur.fa'II LIt.:.. na n~.l r p.r r 'h.. Ir.n4~r,...r, .,
~... u„ q
•b n, 11Y., n I .,
l r .. ., li..~r•In '. a
u y
.
_,.r r
..I
Ib . .' ' I I" r, n f. 1X!1
n hl, I+ r ~ ~
•.r :,y .. ,,..I '.r IY ~ ' c'IV.: 1 n r.. 1' 11..~ I
r ... ~
r.. ~ ..1 .,. ~ ..
Irl Ill\'.. 1\h rU Ilul D J.' .mrl p•.u:
.
r ..
' r
.
.
... .
\..r M1VI cf 'Ir. .......q lc. r, r.. : r r:
.
rl".. ~ .. ..,~Y. Il:r vr, .r .,.. .. r r., the
r
n. .r
..
I r e.
..
\, !
.r. I.n .. r In
I
.. 1 inn. 'rJ l:a 1.... .
.r
x., ... 1 .r I ~
1 ..
'.
,a.
r.l.. r+lu 1.' f.nl: I .... f.. anl. x.11.. 1, .r.l
f
f
• •
Ir Crve, lXp: ur ..1 o^d
1 1~ r. n: .....
..
I ' .
...
.
I v. ' .h r 11
..
.
F ., I P
_
r f
,r'nl r! r
ran. ell ('r rt .I ql.•. 1, rl'.n .. t. v ..
r t
l. ,.
.r. ..
r4,1 of
r:a~rr .,r..v+:. :,.., fshi hit n'. n:'?:. ,i !Irlr~ ~.r:
'
r
`nr or
rcl.l Ir
l
l yrrn
I,p rate.! grvoir'.
'
.
,
l.
.
mJ IE. v. n'a ba ga.n•d Vn'Ir.: a ... rM p.: . a:rJ r .
1 •' P^~ r. p...e. r.n, 5'
rf Ih. vril Pul •y Irf th• vren•1 pXrl
Iv .ands „r,... allYM.... ryl•.,rn r
r
r
. .
rr In++ul;p rlu r,,. rtv rla:m lhr'.. L,rlr
r .
..
r .,. Ilv....r-I I x. . . .. 'I ,
:. P. ~
r
•Ir dn) u., .. .... 1 .. rrl.{ larl
/
i
~ / ( ~! ' r ~ ~~ i i L //
. ST ATC UY r ul.•11111•.J,
I:punll of (11 ::J
nr .•rY ..}. ..r. r. ..1 ,~ ... ..1 rrl.rr. rc. r.r.
IY '7 f ~~'1' alviJ.'i'I'R~!I. ' l l ..
i r.rmm: rgrn..
IFE.•. 1.1
. ~l:A I.I
~ i'.rJ '•. ryl nr,
G \\r'. n. rr nr~ hrW v.q r.f(.rnl ua
n prr lrp..r
.VO 111. v.YYan}l flffl, r.r tlYwrrrlY4 [wN tlnJtYr:• '
IvXlYplaY fe. Illr.xl XU.et 1. wt Unrrr r..r. n.Y
V
~~ _ _. ~~.
~ a~/
N ''. N
B
y ~~~ Zn
O 0~ N
~ ~ ° ;ice
~ ~ _ ~''~
Im
/~ wyv ~
"N
~, ~ "a PaL POD
O ti
~~ p" ENCROACHMENT ~ 'I t~ty
~° AL 9 ~ ALUM 9009
y
~ oI
BOOK 323 PAGE 629 ~'., g00
FF~~77 qq TTyy cc A
~DNDINR~IELDORNERS
13
~ '.:., ,2376 CAP
~~
/,, ~a~, / /~... m -t7
// ,r9
_ ~ a.
.... B$~205 .....
~ s'
/ `- -
o ~ z, ,.,., ..
~ __.
/ ® ,'~ // 746.,. '
N
/ ~~ 6 .~ ~ ~ RED PLASTIC CAP
i
, ~ A. ~~N..-~ ~
~_....__-.... 6~ .~
2T 3 as o 34 55 P`a ` ~ °° /
~~
~.i~ z29 >3 39 Z I
{p^' 207
6 v
v 43 ' Il ~
////d ~ p
t ~ G :... 45'~ 3. W
C?
! ~~ ~ ~44 ~ I~' /
/' A
46 47 j.. ~~ ,
G-
/ ~l
G,;
/~ QoQ SPI ~ ~~.
~ i` Or p ALU AP ~~03 BOOK 183
% o a o o ___
~ ,~
r %~,
,. ,
f ~ ~' O ~ 52 3 ~ N
i ~.~ ~ '. @
O
~(/ ~ ~ 6 iNG EN OPS`-"-~~ mP
/ _ t /
0 \ 1
~ ~~ e
m
Ji
/. POINT OF BEGINNING ~~ f~AT~INING Y23 6A
~ ~tEELL N 9'30620' N 38225 0"E ' x:62
` 2376CAP '
BOOK 189 PAGE 254' ~'
G
~~
,~~
~.
r
q \ /~
\ ~/ ae
.. i
,~ _...
~~~
w^
~r.-
a°"
w
..9^
~w
Yr^_
fJ
iii
wf+~
4
G
dt
r-
C
t'-'1
~"
~r
~xx
r,
S
/~
4
A~
,(4
!P/
---- ...
__~ ~
_~
_ _
~o~o oa
J~ =0 0
n
U~gU¢G Zrl
wp ¢OVZ~ Nm O d
~ O
3:°a~ap u, n
m ~
Z~O~0O v/r OF ~ iJr
~ zo~LLF~ i~N ~ ~i
F pNZaNm °o. o
O ~_~~'_~ aVw a.,
Z wmtt0-3 ~z~ ~ ~3
J °o°wgow mph ~ Qu
~ n`o iao~o a`zw o x?
3015 3tlO15d0
W ~ f tt. a o °o cO ~-1
C,7 _ rv n •• o ~ l~ Cl
CV\ C
RELATIVE ELEVATION DATUM IN EEET ~ r"
1.L' C
~ o .o N o
v U
f ~ ~ `(
t ~ \/
ft ® ~~
= ~ o
o
f O
0
i
°o
o?
~~io
<p
~y~
~~
~~
wO
/F
OW
-..ry.
0
®I
311
of
. ~
a~
0
w
3 N
~ O
0;2
h
_ _ ~
~ NU
___________
__ ___
_______ __ __ r
'
1 _
W
rczU pa
W
i
~ 9
G
_ ~ ):' W
n ~
I Z
io YY
[3
~~~ ~ i~ / 1~' I J
~
n
o 3
~-
~____<_____ a
- ------~ '--~
i
----~- -
L
a
______
~
-
~------ d -
zp I.
Uaw
ZOO
wv=i3
Z
. Z aQ
2
m OF
N Z~
O 46
O
00
~~~2yyyLL
W ~I
g ~ °
0
pz
V~
0
®I
°o ~
o - ~ ~ ' o
~ I rv
I
~
t ~
~ O
w
-
3
®~
3
O :-ow
ow
~
O
w
1 ~V whE
°
g
- ut
a
o -+..
I xis
~ rwx
~~.°~o
o~
0
¢i
~o
o~
U
w
U!
~~
u3~
~.~
n
4e
w~
o
0
133d NI WOlYO NOIltln3l3 3AIlbl3tl
" .~_ 4..5 .> ,.I. ',;. 5•r h~~r. +~:>uo:o,:. e~:Y ^e [~.9~:.. awed, ro•
... ~~. a~
~,
~~ _<
., ~.; w%
_ ~' V¢Z
(+Si 20Z
i ~~ ~K¢
I 1 C ~~ P
v~y ~6
4 ___ _ O }~
~ 1 a wlil o _ o i ~6 3~ F
v~ ! - . 6
.. -~-
`~~'
y ~.!
~' ~ o
~~ rv
2, I _ a'i
-a
~' s~ V o
wo
V V
O
rvZ ~
V
O V ®o
¢ p V A LL
jp h
V~ ® ®d O¢ I, ~..i
~'
;ti ~ a
~,
,~ t ~!
--- ~',
~,.
U \ 4''
V ~~I
~ ~"
O ~ Mµ
® co V W'.
p V O y^+,''..
o
~ @ 4!'.
i,.,
L ~.
3 ~.S'
~ ~ 4~1,
o ~ ~ ~.
iv 3 '~ '~
~ V
® p V
~W
S
~~~~
i ~ v
p 4 ~ n
w ~z
0
L.~ [onv ~. i 5.o. em .»~oa r a 4 ci-4j~~ a (IeT~r.. a .. .w oo e:a ...oc... ~ v .s w.
(Please read the attached definition of Floor Area before comrle[ing this firm.)
(All categories may not apply):
A. GENERAL:
Upper Level:
Main Level:
Lower Level:
Basement:
Garage:
6xistin~ Proposed Floor Arca
2G`~ 3 sera 'z ,~ rs ca
~a~4 2oar~
igo
tp _~C ~
B. OVERHANGS: Existing >5' Proposed >5' Floor Area
Upper Level: n ~ O
Main level: c ,: ~
Lower level: ~ ~ ~
C. DECKS: Existing>15% Proposed>15% Floor Area
a ~ ~
Existin¢ Proposed Floor Area
D. CRAWL SPACE:
>5'6" in height ~' ~~ ~''
E. ATTIC: 0
>S6" in height 0 ~-y
F. EXISTING STRUCTURES:
I. List all existing accessory structures and their Residential Floor Area (this does not include agricultural
swctures):
Total Accessory Residential Floor Area ~ sq ft
2. List all existing agricultural structures and their floor areas (ONLYif the parcel contains less than 20 acres):
...
Total Agricultural Floor Area ~"` sq ft
G. ORDINANCE 23-2000 - 1,000 SQUARE FOOT EXEMPTION
Allowance or Previous Balance: sq ft
Amount of floor area previously approved under this exemption: sq ft
Amount of floor area proposed for exemption at this time: sq h
Balance remaining: sq ft
r
TOTAL FLOOR AREA: ch _ q `~~sq ft
- n.„~
r~ ~
~, %'C=ton n:,;st
' i"~='-"tUle to whrre
r. ~ ola 7vae or
-~ NJ OvP .Iri F,Ei
rl'a_ vu
PLICA l
_. ~.T • mailing ad„re~,
;iuEEi ~!o Birk{,uod Assooiates ----
I=,;, -
C__PnOraEPdO °GJ-897__
~_ QN OF PAOPOSLD t,cLL
-'r -~-1~_~._~_
''~- c,
-~ tour, _~ {
~l.p ~_ _~_ .5 . (Sri^y _ b_,7 ~rr' H __.
i~; '',_TER USE A1VD'vVF~L_247A
n... u:~-e:: ~,e,~rs~uni porn ping :a~a ' ~ .
4:-?ray, 3n!^._31 amount of yo.: r,d wsr~°r
to ~a .:>'Rt.:nr~;tzd (a,re~tee'r -....-.--- 2-Z--
PJ .: r... ., :Cr ES !G h: .r ,brew. _ _ -_~"=3~Z-~'~9'-"~'[
ct.: ,er ;ro.:. ... ~_ rO be GCt;:nerf tr.,:~
_ - _.. ~ _._$rye.l _-- ___.__---.... .... __.
<_r__. _._ _ r ,.;SED FOR: i
t ~ _ n0 unyat~Gn tC! ~
_. ~.atc'
:'e~'~,.~ ~ R ~ i I l'JDtJ5Tn!AL 15;'
! I IGPICiAT!ONCI
. '
r ~~ , `a
iii t
,fWi' i''
%R `ICe ---_
FC Gtr Ojc ONLY' L'0 NvT ~~~ :p~- j -- --~-.
'E liy 7iilc CJ, i.. Ui~,'^2
~/
e ~- ,, - ~ -_ -.- --- - - - ---
CJNDITI~S_OF a?PRp`,~q~
i
no ,mater;~hall be used to such a --ay as to c.=.iaa
ssu;n Injury to c*'t!stu?c .va`.er rights. Th»
i} ce of the p;,m!t does not a<.=,;,a tp,e , ,~
:?ar nrr irJ~-;rY '.roill occur t0 another v21:EdM w;~ter
r'ght n~preci:,de cn Uth Er OVy (ter O~ ~ :fSiE:' L^:2;rr
AR'rR `
OJED FQR HOUSL'r'OLD USF~ONLY, Fbk`<~{~.
,;>(1! SINGLE FAp,71LY D1Nc"CLING AND ..*tOT ; Q ~E
USED FOR IRRIGATION. THE RETURN fiLGNi FR03<'
7HE USE OF THIS Yv'ELL MUST 8E REi URNEC .
T~f~ sA.M~ sT~F~rr s~sTEl~ u~ w~;1ch~ !i~~~ wr~~
IS LCCA7ED,
S ~ Iti1 /.~ ~,$C~Lv l o ti ~ ~'
J~~~
~~~ ~i~~-
A.PPL_CA T IC`,rJ_PPAOV ED
DATE iSSuEC' f 1 ~ f` l t _
-- -- --6''-~---- -- - --- - i ~ e - _a -._
,a ~ ~
(S~aie( is icl /~'-'ri1}1 AT/H-yE~ty'l Ci "~F EPJ____-_.-- ,..
- .~ _- -
C~~! ORA ~GC1V1Si0N CF 4'):-„ < ""'
r
7,1 ,tumbine 91du., '8<> Sh?-nan St., .Gan ~~'{,
_ _.,« 5
PEAh1i?gPPLICA71p~J FC,.,;;f
i I A FESr! r !r, u5E ~~aIJ°~~n ~. r a
,_, ~!1 4 PE R.tiiIT Tv CGti TFUC' A ~^+ELI
un. I x{ A PEAp~Ii r0 ;r,,_T ~ L A F1.0.1F
_ _ .=qR NC
I I OiHF4 ~__ ___
i_C~AT!O~V G~ IE ~d'"r`?FOS_CC tVcL_ + t:: ~ , =?
G :_uI Cd a u1~i C .'ih L~_,
I .`f^?%E UTE~ ~"eC ii1"v !' S '.Vr. 6'40 dC125, ipl Ot }.Ilh.~ r:n
..- ~ .. ._ _~ - _, _- _r_ __ i _. __ .._ ..r
1 M!LE, 52EG f~ET ---._. y~
< .- -
i _ 1
y hOR TH $EC 710N '=1NE -1- _ _ t
~ i T
I, ~ 10~~
' ~
_ _zl
' ~ - ~ - - I w
i I~
~~ ~ ~ ~. i
I m
i ie
wl ~r J
I .. I i
`'I _~ ~~~
__ r ~ I
~_~ _ SvV7H $EC7iCN i.INE -_ - -- -~- - -T
' ~
i i '
I
- ~- i - ,.... _ --l_ _ 7 - _. _ .~-
T. h.e sr. a:= ~. 'h'i diagram [ r.r pFl<, _ .ae
__ _ _____:_ach sms~` s~i.;are repres.rncs JC a
.__.__..-._I ______._
•~AT(~n {ice.. G _~. n dCI.Y I~?:.'O~nN Facer B5
No T[;a L;af [G=~~y 1 a.;e G e ' foot ',
i ceb.c tone per sec:.n0 Iclrl~ _S9 ga!,.r~~s guar m~,ln'J to '9F.T.
A t3n.lly 0! rh P.-:' „m•N O~, ! a..oaoot of ndter per y=-r
1 aue i;;ol J~d' cc~ ..p. ~4•e; •<5 E';0 w~:on s.
1 (.`!~.(; iC'T ~., ~eC :.~n t'~rv J'J a,ly rr; ln; .td'< Jr')::..~ n5 ~ .2 ac ~e 'f:l
~'I-j~`'_('L~ 11111~T C: ~.v':AI,_i_ =t ''
1033 ,r north
,. wr. __ .. srt:
;~uln cr sr.'.:~'nj
Uoa: cr rv..,~
LOCATED pwn'=r Rr=n~n Nit~~ 4r.'.-..
No of acres 4. ~ tr... ~ ~ tc
tFe ~ y .':eu un tt~ls tract?
18) FROPOSED_CASING _PRO^v_i?_griyl
P':aln Cas-rig,
~ ., ~)
i-„ !'
_-_/ --- in from -~-"~-- tt to-..w_...
--_ :n. from _ ft to _. .,.
{9j FOR REPLAC_EP.'tEP!7 YVELL.9Ive :,~'o,~:a
and directi6n from ol~+ v;e!I End plans for ply%; ;
It'
\j l t'
J_..__.
._.__.. ____ _. _._____ ...._.- __ _ . ._._~._._~~4:_.. _...
_.-. _.. ~...~.. Y ..~.
;' n) G, ~ r; ~. ~ ~! ~a~ H~ t' S~.Q.S~-,. ~ .N, F ~ v,'1~L._~F.~1L~ F 7~
'~..'.: ne'I;t _.'.<._~":.5.. !.~J~.?.L }S ~2~ '1'__1...i, 1....---.__._ .__..... PJO ~a a, ~z; ri _.... ..
i - -
r
r: a Ce.u ,l ~C "~ti` ~If'T(^~fl nr h. '.n Ct y u,n y~~~~; . ~Io J „ r ,. I _~ - e I _ ... .' ., -
_ __ -.. __ _ _..__ ~7 qnh:_.. ~. _e.1d
_~s:1:.
- ._------ --'-- -- -._~ I
.121 '~, iHER W27.c i3...F..1S~.k1LS ~.):z~ Cr *n s 'a:~,d, InGudinq wets
., cr nght ''J sed for few pesel '.le;u
.(~P. G'1 Cf land 9ti ',v h.,r!) .~<gi;
tion;:
THE APPL,CANT(Si STA"E;S`y i HAT THE 1NFOFNIa., ~ 10"! SCT F,~gT1-1 HEHECti !S
9;JE TC TH 6~ T O~l~iS y~~f (.1 Y'IL E'~:.]E.
`„~
--