HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.91.04
PITKIN COI7N1'SC
BOARD OF' ADJIISTMEPT
,+
DATE / ~~ / 7 ~~' CASE # /
APPLICANT ~i12 ~Gd 1°iS ~ti PHONE c123' ~ ~y~
MAILING ADDRESS
OWNER
MAILING ADDRESS ~-~C
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
Applicant Signature
(To be completed by'"the Zoning Department)
Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official
to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and
reasons for not granting a building permit.: ,.
~"~ Zone District
Requesting: Lot Size
i
~S ' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ,iUO ' is required.
' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required.
/~c ' L''~ side Yard Setback Variance, where 3 ~ ' is required.
' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required.
' Height Variance, where ' is required.
Square Feet where a maximum of sq_ ft. is allowed.
Other:
Hardship•
.._ ~-_ o. ,..._ ..
,_. _ , ,.,.;.<<a
Zoning Official
Application filed 1~"~~-~~ Date ~• __
Notices mailed ~~ -.26-%O '- / "~
Parcel ID # ~(pl-~.~-Q~at~®O~ Secretary ~~
Resolution to Building when Completed ~ _~ Yes ~ _ ~ No
add es n tf contain all tYeefac"tsai: ague t rnl this.. applic tion if
n ,r~
NOTICE OF LIC HEARING
BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE DEBCR BED BELOW AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED, ZONING OR USE
Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as
amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers,
filedewithtthessaidtBoardeofdAdju tme toreque tingaauthoritytfor
variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to
state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to
such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of -surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
ASEFOLLOTWS:~RS OF THE HEARING 'AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARB'
Date and time of meeting:
Name and Address of
Applicant:
Property Location or
Description:
January 8, 1991 at 5:15 p.m.
City Council Chambers, City Hall
Hansen, Tom
Box 8243
Aspen, CO 81612
4074 River Road
Woody Creek
Requesting approval for an 85 foot front. yard setback variance
and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and
30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-i""zone"district,
for construction of a second floor above a garage. Granting of
this request would place this addition 15 feet from Hansen's
front yard property line and 14 feet from Hansen's east side
property line.
Duration of Variance: Temporary
THE
Permanent X
COUNTY BOARD
tensen, Secretary
ga~aF. xa~°.
. 3~~:..:: wA
Rbt)131;'.f ~}(),rti,}:JT, 1?Pi~,,.,. Rt)t)P7. .....
')a-•:1 a^.r, E3ayak°d. rs1 Act.j za^a,s- r <~, . .... ..::... ,. ... I.
Wa. <;~,~~ ite a..rw y~rt~ t,Yi:%t3 )+te;e^t.;~Yag' Pica. ~7~tt~x^nv:~;:n9^ wS~axy~~k3'ae ,~rra<~ ns~t:: :L n,ny iat9~1.
tt 7 t.^...(<: 1"i rl c. ;(: C?i'1 ].^, Cl Ctllt r11;1t)Cit?.:.:., 1; 11t? C7 x3Y lCJp;' '(. ('iii :;:. k ..<". t„tr Yr'. 1'1 t; :1 ~' t.lll(.lC':Y.'
~ }tnd ~ 7.rrr< xti di rvt. Iii C~ht
real r~17:I r"9 (ezpS ,.[Y, a11,3r rr r t. CJ C^Ylt"Cx. I°t TnT2 ~"Cfi .., ~~`~~ c ~: t-y~ 't:',l'iH
7<Irc.t ~':tt.t.n.r, 't:'he q;~•zr`i:texe i~x!r~7t<;~:,)'at'<fi, gcti1:7;Hn. tzrtxi.~x^ wa :J;aa,t-ti¢a~;:r, ,
tr~iava>rzkrt'it,c: Viand: c.r>...t c7-~rr„tk:vcnt.;~ rr:E dc~inc~ zt. <~t tier ssr-rrtte` f:i,aiiM
}lat. ,^z°,<:>m wa3;:l e=,.~~^irt,1.~11.1.,y 1,~t-^ rztag* largr.-s ,rr<ratv`, f'rsr <t ~inq jai>nry/`~?c>r.>t
Lriblc, :a N1~~ctz;. wa-tc.t^r.. ~tha^ ~".~'iile~t^r.=°nt +~a~t.'j:rlay ur;ct~ ~tYz#'aia<; la~~t+,_
a.a ,YA. T1..:, r1 i'a CJ i".:c':t r.`.z cY St d:' t.C.'}f)j'i(~...., ri•,.,w~;rll ii; xi.~~)1'F:tr.,c" Jr rk.. F, Ll tt.x'tcl}n,~ .. ~.... ., ,.
'Plkta bia:>L1.,>e., <.,~:rrtrrzt3, :a<=2:;' Y1a>wltr•~r'rr t;l'az7t, c.3za kar~ tz.T~d.- t:n f'IIaY.'
l"Pac :l:cat L_s s:c`aiaau F1;i~1, wli.i~;'ta r,-i,~!„-; t:PiaL tl•ir ..ixt-, raft: t11r-^~_ ltr>t7,rn i. r`,
tint r .:'t-x a c. t<:sel. s ct t";1.,, .x r.r . ~ a.l ^zr va.tar.Ctx'r..R;<'arir7; ""tl'r~t t tti a ~, i:s ri
ntszasrrn~c,a'nvtrtrr lx',1: a!'aT t-Paa4:' i1 t<° rrnl.y 1/3 +a i_ <xt1 ~Yt rt- irt;; to adr.7C'
JlJ tau.a;?_.., 1/~J. ul vah.ir•:pi, ].., t. }ter }?taa{~kncf 1rrX.':tC I2.t.~,>~°~r: T t:ti'kttrr„tt~ad.
thrat tvTy tit>z.gl'it ar ~>t;r t~,#.T,::i>^<, rza~<= 28 .iq t~t:< .1-ti~ `~,rts~aa.,*c1 t ti'z::sl',u.
tia^i~rhtt ref `J;hcw ct~tvlJ:ila ~t„c1 ,Lr't;4rt;n~rCs wi}{I. Sir; viral ~ ?fa >~a r; 6. °' 7lTa, a^inct
"t)i!a'Ii:VJ':ill t2clVH {; lxt'^,c rlatlf„ ~:: e:sa>t; }:)Y`:'L a1 1, tit^. t,s,.a t, :11 X1i't1a'~n{.:.. a~ t; Pla'x CJ x~7:'r'1~(-{'
,s> ttJe-:rCfir.>i~~~ tPie^_~;xnflle„ r;yMt,k)tza~k;£N cvr1.P. Crti7~.L~. P1+,tr;~.>., 1,:>,:~12t<~ i^asr~k
ws l l ~~t t. l1 c'c,cigh t tte~:: "iz^r.'<~ . tlira t ~a z ad.<~c d' T~' i' lTC, is f i i s e iJf,rty " ,
l'flr° ^ix:ffta-rr-- ~'Sn r:y.~._-~i~sl l<- pr'sa bFi'i~.ly'1yrd_~ta t^r~%~~i.,.azitra`, :°^ fr. xt.tcj`e~ !,)a ~.,e>•?"' ~. .. Ct t]r~ trs. i.lit, L:~a i. ..4Pli::lt t, ~l1e`>.:: xara rift .i::; ta.zt TXt'~t.o-d, .wt~.cA~ ~t t'e~ cs:t't .k.c.ts wri :t.."t.'.
1 ]'iC'i'I ~'L)(< rt?l.c>r ii t.o: cl: t<> ~~, ,::r..r>iYt ~.T~ r, is t~'ar~ t S~i~; ~Srrris It71": wwl rivl t,']'i, rr,'iac: ]~~
wr,i.l }. t.tanve} ti µ. t ra:raix t.t~a r3r~la^ri~.~,.' <'~iid ~za^tya: ~.
`C'i'it:: Pac>iz e rta;i"rtant.:ly ;t,TS ~;:38D syq- te~ci: C~~ i,5v:i.iag` ~l-r~~, 't: tie q'r~rc~~
;.K ht:=~~.rat.~ tirld.trd. a :;. <z~krcatit:' $:(1'(3 :;q ft-af'~'t, ~~t:F~re~t: rlstatti raz3a'~t`C a'C~>
t
btr p}'~t,v7't. 8[)tJ n 9'C.M<C. 't w~~s f:c>T:d t7'i<i{y (~'T?"~~.c( ~ cif .<tYr _",c~`.icYCYi I[:
<t cJtiaPrtclt-- hY:i'tlir>u9: .`t,~latr'i~c.ti:anq i'i^a>itx i.trr'.^ ,-t11+'z+~rz.i1~l.a^' azvtratxk77 rid 1~'v'tiali
ixt.::r `t'Yl>1 t a.".t~St<77d ~)F^^ a~d.C7r"C~.'~~c> 't: ~1b:: ... •, t, S.'t.l t^}~T,U}fx <lr>'~FTC~~."~~ "~t.' LV'tt a.~: ;3~t
~h>k°r,t:rc~ta~t 'Cra av1y tii,t;d~skitl.a7i1- tlaa~t' :E a1'zv*a;le9 ~kt~a. r~llt,,wc~z:C' Lao' r£rtcl~"liv.i.n~
tzt ~ ttl~ 1: r, 1.j3 r,.>f t.Pir- e,?;cl~;taalc~ Lx'vxa~~~ ,ara~~r wh.ir.]T i.; ~t ~~re tt;~
t.}t,.'s„: ';(' lx$l.li ei"~{ l,f:~ exj'; ~~+~I,~~.. 1.a ~Q{}~ . `?~"]'CF:..,2?'t'" .("fit„'ltr'<il"r: i14ryt. Lrd~4:L.i1(
i i7 a. r> <zar:rr, t.zi'a'G, tYi~t t: wa_ >lYae 'C rt 1. [circa r-~t kir.>u •t: r'~r=-' A7.+'l. zranr^ci l.~afi tna ~l. `,'c
dt wrt «ne'c7 -s7i7e>. 7 we:ttiX-.ri al:?;r .lz k~ ` 7;t kzlr,.owi'i t.Pz~:tt, aivy r'Ca vtr•i:ta::c~
wi t t ~e~ >.tz' k:;4;Yac~-inz~ a,zi ~JxF. ~+}r~pr'r^ty 1i.nt: ~,~„i°;` t.~4F~n ~i;<3rc.^nt <iwri~;_rs
... .
,tauc,i:viiFa, cast the~.~;kdtt 'lra<.zta ,r:~:y-:n.
] lir:~;e~ iti, G tLTk , i)a~arrmr~ta:nn hart" t)rrn hsl~)~xsl lii c:r~'~tcaivtzaling k t"~ i°
lia aqu d: br .~1:1.t>w'c'>ri t.r, ,wd- CYha_; nt3.tt ~'d _,-..'?'ia<^e tiF ; ~~ t'r'r tr"r.~",x, ,, .., ~ - ,.
' k ~' `rlt .t t7t7 -acid. tic.'~.C!~'.
a,f t i-r„fee ti7 r,^t i;t, itt ~+ ~'te.at.i ;t«~ ,: _ - ..
1'kiank' yr>tt f Ci:i;• ~rr>u~;' '4 .lvtc <-
`.1.':<::,i11 'wJ'~t:t CikSe=YTi
~. ~.
I:S`b' i~F ADJACENT PRCrPER~`Y C3w~~NERS
1: Jerry M. & Judith M.'Gerbaz
P-'. t1. Box 1964- "'
Aspen, CO 81612
2: Aspen River Valley Homes
Ronald F. & Janice L. Koch.
42Q0 E. Quincy
Englewood, Cd SD 110
3: Geo.€€rey T, Williams 50~ int.
Rabin G> Riggs 50~ int.
P40. Box 5228.. ,' i
Snowmass Village, CO $1615
4; David S. Swersky 1..- ,
P.O. Boti 7b9 i,
Aspen, CO 8161!2'
5: Denver & Rio Grande Western._Iailraad Ca.
P:O. Box 5482,. ,.,
Denver., G(} 80217-5482 , ., ,.
t'~ '~~aa,zva,~,
~ ,~"~
„'.
~~~
i
r{
4M
i
4
J
,.
`` 5F d r i"r , f.J
~
Rs(6ded M o ikid4 M 1
R<trytron No. q
5 ns~.wrn~ 'B~ T^wv'_,^<
x.
...,
R'ARRANTI'bEED. ,._.,. ~ .. . °
` a~ I
~' "„
T rt ~
287924 ~
?'~
iiLSDEED,Madelnu 16th dayM April IgBT
e' ,
^
;'
~""~" ASPEN BAYING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION .
;
~ ~ ~` "";' ,
. '~
PIiK1N COUNTY CLER&
,,
~ .
a~ -
>, :
,
, ~~,:r .7rt~
w . ;
of the
Cmany of Pitkin S/LV/A DAV/~' ;
Slaw ofCulondo gnrllun•l and, ¢
,'~' y•
~
THOMAS A. HANSEN pND NANCY"P HAPY5EN~ ~
as 3oint~ r~ r
4t ~ g~
OZ
~ 2U
tenants with right of survivorship ~ :i
_
,
whoz kgd adgrtisn P.O. BOX 6243 ,.
' L
F.; t
ASPEN, CO. 81617 " ~
al{ ~4'q. a a~:y.4
Of lll< 5^1 ~~
Cmrmy of Pitkin. .Snk of Cohxado
gnrme(s)
(. 4 a ~
WTI7VES$ETN, Thal lM1<gnminlsl, fnr anJ in <mrsidemion of the mm M ^.'i.. °- ^ ~ ` °. ~ ~
TEN DOLLARS AND tlTH$R~~COOD ANl)~VALUASLE CONSIDERATION ~~ 4 DD ~'~~~
IhertttipandsufgckneyofwM1leh rdierchl oskn mleJR<d, hag ~-"- -~~~----_ LLARS. i
gnmed. bmgained, sold aM eons<y W. ami by Ihez pezmn Jo
. ~ ~ ea gram,
bvgain. z1i, aenw.y. and confirm, um,. Tr granwmsl. [he i L Beira and msigna lon:ien a8 the rtal pop<rty, bgelher with rmpnaemew,
if rny, ainaw, lying aml bang in the ~ County of Pitkin '
Oewibeam PouowdA tract of land situated in Lot 7 of Section 6 in Township 9 Sou° h;.; ~I
Range 85 West of the 6cfi Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center of the
Roaring Fork River and W.~sterly of Chc Westerly line of the Denver and ~I;io Grande
Western Railroad (Aspen 3ranch) describetl as follows: '
,, ..;a;
Beginning at a point whtnce the Northwest Cornet of said Section 6 bears N 53°50'~
228 W 1,649.95 feet; thence N 51°22'52" E 6.33 feet to a point on the Westerly ~~-'
ri ht-oF-wa line of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad• thence S 27 46 l3
, rr
4152 8E 107C231fee1: tto aepoiatyin lthecenter ofnthefRoarinRaForkaR, thence S SI°
thence N~ 3p7 4t~5~c W 147,2r feet along the center of said rives; thencevNr51°22'f52r'
~2>EXr1td81~I:dlNeat>faltmYO73[he ~oint of beginning.
TOGETHER wirli ell andEsdin(JgGulKar ih M+eJnnmenk and appunrnenca IM2m 6ebnging, or in anywiz appenaining, and the rtvenion and
res<rsisnrs, zm<inder aml rcmarmkn rem.. i um anJ pnims lhemsf, aml all the evnk. dRht. Ink inrertsl, ela,m and demaml whelseen<r of tlc
gransm(xt either in lawor eyuny M ix aM I ihs ahwe NryarrxW pmnises, wilb the hercdhamemx and appurknarrm.
TO NAVE AND'ibH6LU the v~d rrtmi vahne hargarnd amt d<scnhed with the urPurknanm.nnm the gramepsk [heir heirs and
resigns forever AnJ the grammisk grc iCa wl f heinaM prwmal rcpe,enurises, do e8 cmenam.gnnl, bargain. and
agrcelwM wnh the gnnled<I [he ificinand asagnz, rhala the lmle ohhe en.ealing anJ J<hseryofinezpeznn• iC i8 will
xized of the prtmizx above amveynJ. ha a lnxxl, ours perfnl, alw,dule and imkfeasible ealeh of inherimnc<. in law, in f<e simple, aM
he g. pxal nRhr.fuil pw.er anJ aurhimryl grans; hargmn sellaml<sm.rtY•ihe a<mein manntt end fiwm ax afixen(d. anU lhal the xemearc free
aMelem fnxn all fomgi sml mher gram..lvpnm. vlm, lirn< Imm, axskxsmenG, encumhnnm and rtgrkl'wnx of wharcverkiM rrc nelurc eo<vet
seep U.S. Patent reservations recorded in Book 198 at Page 342; rightaof way andll
~,agements for pipeline, ditches antl transmission lines including but not limsted
o Eli Cerise Ditch, Brush Cre"eli Ditch, Snowmass Divide Ditch, Snowmass Ditch as
hey affect subject property, and Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc., Trans- '
iisaion line as shown on Map filed in Ditcli Book 2A at Page 272; Condit ions .and I,
ovenanta and restrictions es contained in Deed recorded (Continued onreverse)
The gnnlnrlal shall amlwill WYRRANT AND YOREVTR"bl~`N"6"Iliei7xm hmpsirnd gemisesmlhegai<raml p`zNbk pnxn~bn of lh<~
gnnhelst hl hernanJ,o.igm agnmxl all antes<ry personnrpenons lawmllyeleinfngdl<whokareny pmthemuf. '
IN'WITNESS WHEREOp, Ike geamorfsl~ha mecuwdthi, dxJ sm dse'daz xm Fnh ebinT, ^';~+
AEfiea Aspen Savings and~Loan Association
By:
i _ °. "~
., t••~~
» a~ ,
' _ _ ~. ., ~ ~ r „ ~, ~,
gl~~,
°
~. ... STATE(>K ('ULORAI)n I ~ ~ x, E rc $
cnumy,d Pitkin r`~~, ''s'+ `++'.
The faegning imaumrnl wm xkraavkJgeJ hhxe me lhlx / ~j s'S' dry of ApTiL.
by. .Robert A. Stale na Vice Preside
t` £
A '~. } `ro67 r ~
~
My armrmizkm <apircs n
or
spen Savings and Lo an Aasociatioa ~ ~•. ~
~
~'
Hilness my M1<nl aM ofikial aNl. _ .".. , • _.
,,;,
s r.,'' R'Mll:IiRAELNIlRT u; ^`w; ::
r~E ~ r.. ', My tor'mlaelas naµr,w !-~M1R7g ~~~/%~, ,g;, '~- .
<t. S. ~. ~/~...~,...~
l~lllin Ilener Imen rnp aml I! yy IRII G 0 t~p7
Nb.9JjrRkwl-0g, NaaRAVtYnllPlhrn,;«y,yer,MrM,' Naanaaraal°awi.la:lWMAy 1 "."," '..
x
.. ~`t
m ;~
,
{~P n r <
i
t
ra e-
i
.~
1s
A Y
i
v~
O
2 ~ I L~
1
~~
~
Q ~~
f
G .r
~
~ ~
~ ~ WI F-$ o
j
~ ~ ? ~ ~
~ w
} ,
s 3 ~-
~ ro X N N m~ o
OC O ~ ~ 1 ~
. !
~
~
x
,~v~~
o~ws
,z
,vs --~ o\ .
i
J .,,
27 C 07 D7 .~ N w \
Sa 6 ~+ O O b~:.C ,C a 1~
~
f3 c0 O a ..1 c3 J~ +~ O O ¢~
~ ~
A G
X ~
Q ~ \
3 ~
s~o~.,C y,
f ~
U O a~ ~ a, ~ r, v ~ f'
~ t
~ ~
av.c ?ao N z
'o
w ,"
v
~~
~~ m~~
to>
v
v
~s
' 3
~ ~Z
,
,
v
o
~ w ~Z
<f X
•~ N ~ N S+ G''•-+ U ~ N
~ N O G ,C +~ v A +~ r ~ ~"
~ u1 ~
N ~ ~
~
N ~ 0 ~
1L
v
tT'O ~
'
~
sa ~ ~ V
Q ro
O U
.i N 'O
~
.~~+~,x'~~~~a
' ~
v
•~A~ c6 ~'~ r+~
U1 .+ N O % fiS <N N
rtf C7 S+ v v ~-- ,C ~
~ ~
~~
mooaa~s: Iz! 3
~ ~ ~
~
~
~ 1
°
,~
7a
.•xx~~
.~ ~ .
~
a
o
ro ro~
~
+~"
n
.
v
x
' d
v v s~ ~ ~s
s; .ca +~ ~ u
~~O ~ •
~~•
N U.c;OCO
co +~ .ti w ~ :~ ~ ~
?~ ¢; Cfi O1 J A
~o v a' --ova v
x a o~ m w~
Sa ~~ U ~- S+ O C1. U
N N ++ N G
.
~
~
ft3 O 'C3 O
~ 'zi
~ O .C v ~ f
_ ,~ - ;
,;
._
.:,, ..
f-_ BEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE ~^ ^
130 South Galena Street '
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-6090
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
City
00113 -63260-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL
-63270-136 GMP/FWAL
-63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL
-63300-139 SUB/FINAL
-63370-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS
-63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123 -63340-190 HOUSING '
00115 -63340-i 63 ENGINEERING
SUBTOTAL
County
00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL
~
-63170-127 GMP/DETAILED
-63780-128 GMP/FINAL
-63790-129 SU B/GENERAL
-63200-730 SU B/DETAILED
-63210-137 SUB/FINAL
-63220-Y 32 ACL 2-STEP~APPLICAT(ONS
-63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ ~
~ `~ CONSENT AGENCA7TEM$ ~-
J
63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REFERRAL PEES:
00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00723 53340-790 HOUSING
00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING
PLANMNG OFFICE SALES
00173 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE
53090-t 23 COMP. PLAN
53140-124 COPY FEES
-69000-145 OTHER
SUBTOTAL
TOT
AL ~
'_ 1~ '
Name: ~C`
yY/ ~:~H ~'+~ /
~
Z
Phone: f
'-,~,.! -7
~/
y~
Address: 2
Pr ' ct: !1'~ ~ !
~...J~~~_ ~ >l ~ ~~
Ci ' ~'
Check # / -7
sue. / Date: / ~~
Additional billing: #of Hours:
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING
State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITRIN COIINTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
The undersigned,
follows:
T,
'~ ~S E'w
being or
representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that3 f ~~aid sign was posted and visible continuously
from the '"' ' ` ~ " day of ~ /~!? ~ .~,.-- c~~,,
~ 19~,
to the __ g ~ day of . / ~z ~: „~_ lg ~p .
(Must be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the
hearing date).
~, ~~-
Applicant's Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 3~~t day of ~~F.rti'~~~-i ,
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
My Commission expires:. 3 ~ ~ ~ ` ~3
Notary Public's Signature
Address
being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
~~~~x~~ rye. ~ ~ ~ .:-
~ ~~ ~ i .~I ~ `'t "'•'.'i~'"~ '~ G ~4~i ~ ~ R~ u ~ +~eiii ~"^r§`"-~}ri.33i 'F ~~. ~ E~ a ~' ~~ ,
.~ ~c.rh~., i„ :fir.. +~ 4. € - 5
i
~_ _ _ .f2701 4/15/91 15 "3'9 Ree , E+FC b46 F'G 398
*' w- ' Silvia Davis, ~itk~. Cnty C1erF, Doc'~.04
RESOLUTION OF THE PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO' `
BOARD OF ADJiTSTMLNT ,~, ,
GRANTING SETBACK j~~, EF FOR TOM HANSEN
3:+r ~ fwa S+ir«WeY+ d vn .w +Y/ ..1. ~A.
RESOLUTION NO. 91=04
Ri~erAce aand a o16 foot eastesidetyard s tba k vari tncear hereb100
feet'and ;30 feet, respectively, is required in the AF-i,zone
district for an addition of ;a second astory to a residential
garage; and
WTiEREA$', the subject property is witin the unincorporated area
of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit "A",
attached);' and, -'
WHEREAS, the Board of„ Adjustment is vested with. the„power to
grant or deny such variances_by virtue of Title II; Section
16-1.;3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised
Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and,
WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment
makes the 'following findings:
1. Proper notice procedures, including the
notification of all adjoining property
owhers','has been shown by the applicant.
2. The required hardship cr practical difficulty
has been established.
3. Granting such .relief will not cause substan-
tial detriment to the public welfare and will
not substantially impair the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the
zoning maps.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 'by the Board of Adjustment, that a
48 foot front. yard ..setback .variance and a' 16 foot side, .yard
setback variance for construction„ of a_ proposed second story
addition on a single family 'residence,'-per the plans marked
"Exhibit B", be granted due to topographical hardship.
WARNING: Any violation of the terms. of this resolution may
result in rehearing and possible revocation.
#"~'7G1 05/15/91 15:24 Fec $.,~""' BF=: 646 F'6 399
S...vi~ Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cle , Doc ~.GG
Resolution Ho. 91-Oy'
Page 2
The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of
the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
DATED: April 2, 1991
The Board of Adjustment
of Pitkin County, Colorado
ATTEST:
`'v
Cin L. Christensen,
Secretary
Kandi~ Shaf ran,
Chairman
::' °~C
a>~ +y
~"
:.w...
i
R°eaaw>, ~#. "7bi 65%i5/9i''i.°,:'~9 Rec ~~ BK `646 P6 400 - ~_
] L
via Davis, PitF.•ln Cnty C1E. r„ Doc $":Ob ~ ...
r Pick i.: .Swell Cokndo, gnmeelsr ~. r .
ri17'NPSSEfN, Tlw de grammlvL fur aid in consiJeruwa of rlie'imn of ,,. ~. ~~
TRN nniT eoc"~rrn nmvrtn' ,,y,
w.d..G. ...- ...v ... x5ui4v*JZ i~ ,. .x.,,.. .~
WARRANTY DEED i
TfilS GEED, Made m,s 16eh dq or April ro 87 , '~
it ~M°c" ASPENSAVI:IC"'AND LOAN ASSOCfATION """ ~ ~ '
' of the • _
Gaony of Pitkin ,SUne °fCubrado, gmnuxy;l and '~1:
I THOMAS A. HANSEN AND NANCY P. HANSEN,•~as~join[
tenants with right of survivorship
wbase kgai addnxs h P.O. BOX 6243
~ ASPEN; CO. 81612'
TOGEfIdER wish di and singular rh. M1eminamemx adapporrenareer., ~hrTro 4knging, ar k anyw(re appertaining; ad Ne n:seninn aM
reremims, mmaiadcr and rermindcr%. rant%. i%Ye% aml pnffirx deaarf, ad as de cxram. AgM. rick. kunesr, claim and demand Y'harneeyer DCtle
panrdrx; eider k law areyuky. M, in and u 11x. shove kvgafned parrdub wish ere herdiramears aM appnrrenbeea. '
,;
7'O~}IAVE AND 7'O HOLD rhe%aid prcn~nsv al+YCharpaiiwd mJdesmTeJwh~tr`Ihe ` •.' ''
appnrknYrees; unm the &rsmeelsA their leha and
asdpnfarcsrr. And the granrmrµ Hn its sel f heir andperaual nPnxmalisn,do el eorrnad,pam,bargain.ud
epee roans wNh de grankslxA theineinamiavgm,rharathe rimeofrlietn%edingaddeliseeyofdese prtsew, it is well
aeizedof the premixes above arasryeJ. ha a gad. sure. perks. ahxdua and indefeasible esmk of iderirai,ce in taws in fee'~aimpl<, and
ha 9 Rmd dgM.fullpmerand audxriry to gnnr. ha~gain. sellaml cn~njey the samein manneraad fortnnaSaemW, and sae lM1e carte am fn~e
aMekarfmm all fmmeraMmlergmau. hargaim,xaks, lkm,ma~s.aasessrrrenla,aeumhrancns. and muiankmdwha4mkindnr was anesR:
exeep, U.S. Patent reservations recorded iri Book 198 at Page 342;righta of way and
easements for i elina ditches and trananis
p p r Sion Linea including but not limited
to Bli CeriaeDitch Brush Creek Ditch, Snowmasa Divide Ditch, Snowmass Ditch as~~.
Y
the .affect subject property, and Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company,Inc., Trans-
mason lineal shown on Map filed in Ditch-~BOOk 2A aC Flage 272; G`onditiona and '
:ovenanta and restrictions as contained in Deed recorded (Continued on reverse)~.:•
The prMlgial shill and will W,1RRANTANDIOR~VER'~ "" """'
DP.~ENbTiK'iMne•bardained pemirca is the W kr aM peattabie poaeaskn of Nc"
pankenl, hishelaadar%ipn, agnimrallaMaaerypenorraperxorralawfuaychdniingdewMkaranyp.rtderm[ ''•~'
IN WITNESS WHERFpF. me gnnael%r ba e~ecukJ dda deed on tle A+le utFM ibo"va. .` ~ ~ .,.
i "
,A[{ek , Aspen Savings'and Losn~Association
bw n. sell. wn and avnfirm. umn, ''- -.-- ."-.-- ••.••••°•••.•~•, °y n.cacpnxnaw es 8M•.I
E+i Y.y. he pameN%1, their heirs and aargm fortxr, all die rod pioperty, voider with emgmemtMa,
.. .~,:,.
Harry, rimaa. lying aM being in de .. County of Pi.tkiR ~ ' ,Sole ofCoiordo, ~
dessdbedpfollows:. A tract of Land situaCed in Lot 7 of'Section 6 to Township 9 South,
Range 85 West of the 6th PrineipSlMeridian, lying Easterly of the tenter of [he
Roaring Fork River and„Weesteriy of the Weatei•ly Liae~of the Denver gnd,Rio Gtaode
Western Railroad (Aspen 3ranch) described ~qs follows '^~"'~` - ~ '
. ., .':..
8." 8 point whence the Noethweat Cotner of said Section 6 bears N 53'50'
41"~W 1,649.95 feet; thence N SI°22'52" E 6.33 feet to a point~on the Westerly =`'
right-of-way line of CfteDenver qnd Rio Grande Western Railroad; thence 527°46'13
E 149.86 feet. along the Westerly rigFit-of-way line ofsaid Railroad;"[hence S SI"a.,
22'52" E 10.23 feet CO a point in the center of [he Roaring Foik River; thence ~:?
thence N 37 45 W 147.21 Feet along the center. of said rived thence R SI°22'52°~~~
E 1 6.8 ~t__to ~icint of beginning. , , ~~
gv{ • I
,E ` `~~
Ma •ia R Rietal~, Sec etar ---I~
~ By: Robert d
_ l,a ~ ~ ,
' ~
eg f d' y "
~ .
~.. SLATE r)p CiNl9GA1%7
r~ ,. ~ ~
~
' ` ;c0
""' u,rwy.d Pitkin ~
~.
'`
~~ The faegnin6 imwmnm was x#mnvkdgN'F:l~ne me rAn' / (fi'n' ~ ~. ~ • ({p
b},. Robert A. Slade as Vice President` For Aspen Snvinga
My aemniuhrrl expias Nunesa mj hand andofrkw'w
~. e,
+. :: , l e •; dthllEN A. 1lIElIPIRT
a°E ':c ~ ~''~ hty earaNaaldK'7:`.'o>wY p-1M1A~
,,
~
' Y
S
-~
•~ 4
~Ifln fknver
in.e
"Cit
.ad-
~.
~ ,
n
y
.
''d;
. e ...
r
.. ~ L 0 ~O J
>:
,~~Y
:. I~ .
''
1 rl 3
~e
,r''
-v.~ v ' '>
,{I ~ #~3~~61 c75/ 15/91 15: ~^`~ ~iec ffi. pU Ftl: (~qE, Pg 401
Silvia Davis, F'itk:in rty Clei-•k, Doc $.C~Cj ~..
v ~ ._
EXHIBIT "B"
a ; z? -->
,,
~'----~------.y_ .i
O ;~b o ;4 i o-,1+ I O;5 i O
0
J
"I~
M
h
W
N
~'~ T
~~~
J
~a~
O;
- ---
i
D' i
''
J
i I
~
i'
_ -- ~.
j
41
~N
.1 ~
___.-~~
+i I
o ;
.~ MI
,
~
~)
! ~;
_
'
,
~~: I
~i I
0
J
8 4 'I~ pig ~, ~~ b
o ; z2
~v
I
Q.
O
.~
I
n
~1
~'
BEFOR
TO ,ALL
Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of ~7une'5, 3955,
as amended, a Public Hearing 'will be held in the District
Courtroom, Pitkin County Court Hou$e, Aspen, Colorado, (or at'
such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned) to
consider an application filed with the. said Board of Adjustment
requesting authority for variance from the provisions.'of "the"
County zoning Resolution.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at .such meeting, .then you are urged to
state your 'views by"letter, particularly if you have objection to
such variance, as the hoard of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
DATE AND TIME OF MEETINGS January 8, 1991 at 5,:15 p.m.
• City Council Chambers, City Hall
Stanwood Homeowners Association: requesting a 98 foot front yard
setback variance, where I00 feet is required in the RS-20 zone
distri
firehoct, for the construction of an addition to an existing
'use and garage. Property Location: Lot C-1, 'Kessler
Drive, Stanwood Subdivision.
Lavery, Frederick: requesting a 25 foot front yard setback
variance, where 30 feet is required in the R-30 zone district,
and a 45 foot collector street setback variance, where 50 feet is
required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of
a proposed garage. Property Location: Lot 69, Block 3, Red
Mountain Subdivision.
Yarber,'LarYy & Shirley: 'requesting a 55 foot front yard setback
variance and a 10 foot north side yard setback variance, where
100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone'
Pro er ct, for construction of, a single-family residence.
p ty Location: Lot D-12, Filing 2y Redstone Ranch Acres,
Subdivision. .. .., ,..:..., . ..
Nininger, Robert H'.: requesting a 4 foot 6 inch height variance,
where 12 feet is required for accessory structures,' pursuant to
the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for an existing barn. Property
Location: 0800 Snowmass Creek Road, Old Snowmass.
Hansen, Tom: requesting an 85 foot front yard setback variance
and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and
30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-l zone district,
r'~
!'"_'~
for a second level addition to a residential garage. Property
Location: 4074 River Road, Woody Creek.
Liss, Victor & Darlene:, requesting a 14 foot rear yard setback
variance, where 30 feet is .required in the AF-1 zone district,
for an existing single-family residence. Property Location: Lot
8, Block 7, Filing 1, Brush Creek Village.
Cheever, Eddie: requesting a 45 foot front yard setback
variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district,
for an addition to a single-family residence. Property Location:
Lot R-57, Starwood 8 Subdivision.
Submitted to the Aspen Times on December 24, 1990.
To Be Published in the Aspen Times on December 27, 1990.
County PO # 49553
Members Present: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman Rick Neiley
,,.~.. ,~, ~-:.w,., . s ...~~v,
Stan Mathis Evan'Gull
Ted Guy John 6stwald
. ;: ;
(The tape:, recorded for ,..this ,meeting was defective, therefore,
there is no recdrded material. for this meeting.)
...
Francis Krizmanich of the Pitkin Count Zonin Office wa
rest .. ~'recominendations.and comments wg ~ s
p nt wi~~i~~staf, p
p g p• _ d
Shaffran d tined the meetin at 5.2'0 att. and.. introduced the Boar,.
to those present.
and 'a b`.
front yz
where l0
1 zone
issue da
a single
,
sed with four
from the vote'.
~,~,
~ 11, 1991 sit~•'v:
iy made a mon i
e and a 16 foot
respectively, are
plans submitted b}
1, for the proposes
Mathis seconded
apprbving, Neiley
-
g t
Lde raard var ance•
,. Y ,
'equired in tYie AF',-
Labyrinth Design,
second addition to
the motion. This
opposing 'and Gull
l:dSC' 9f71-11 34CW6i V JVllll D. LVI. / Dcvcaa vu»~ ~+wuauvas.~
John B. Stewar"t 'was ~SYese7tt `° requie'sting a 45 foot rear` yard
district for a prop sed addition to arsingleafam ly residencezon,
Stewart ave a brief des'eription of where the prdpo5~ed' addition
g
would be; 'placed and who it would impact the most. No one is
located behind Stewart'S property -- it is common property owned
by the subdivision. ,_.
Shaffran asked if there was any"public comment and there was
none;" Stewart submitted a, ,petition" signed by' most of the
homeowners in the subdivision approving Stewart's'request.
After further discussion, Shaffran 'made a motion to grant a 45
foot rear yard setback 'variance, as per the plans submitted, due
to topographical "hardship and downzoring. Guy seconded the
motion and all were in favor (with Neiley abstaining).
1
Robert L. Walker was present
setback variance and a 15 foot
where 100 feet and 50 feet
district, for construction of
family residence.
~--~
to request a 21 foot front yard
west side yard setback variance,
is required in the RS-20 zone
a proposed addition to a single-
Walker gave a brief discussion of what was being requested.
There was no one from the public present to comment on this case.
Ostwald made a motion to grant a 21 foot front yard setback
variance and a 15 foot west side yard setback variance, as per
the plans submitted, due to downzoning. Neiley seconded the
motion and all were in favor (with Shaffran abstaining).
Case #91-10, Dane11, Dick & Robin. Lorton Tract III
Scott Lindenau, architect, was present representing the Danell's.
The Danell's are requesting an 8 foot height variance, where 12
feet is required, per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for
construction of a detached residential garage.
Lindenau briefed the Board on why the request was being made and
presented a model of the proposed residence and garage (pictures
are included in the file). Lindenau submitted a letter from an
adjacent property owner, Erik O. Giese, approving this request.
Shaffran read the letter into the record.
Shaffran asked if anyone from the public was present to comment
on this case. Bill Hegberg and Bruce Hazard, representing
Wildcat Ranch, were present with comments. Hegberg showed
pictures to the Board as to the location of the proposed garage.
Both Hegberg's and Hazard's concerns were that you could see the
proposed garage from the Wildcat Ranch area, but both would be
willing to reconsider their opposition if they could be shown the
site and the proposed residence and garage.
Lindenau stated that the Danell's had to go through 1041 Hazard
Review and that the proposed residence is within the building
envelope.
Neiley stated that he has no problem with the design and feels
comfortable with the request. Mathis understands the design
philosophy but cannot find a hardship for the request. Guy
suggested a site visit since he also cannot find a hardship.
After further discussion, the consensus of the Board was that a
hardship could not be found for the request that was being made.
Shaffran stated that the Board could deny the request based on
lack of demonstrated hardship, or the Board could table the case
until the next meeting on May 7 where another design could be
,. ~ ~ ~
presented., Lindenau agreed that he would like the case to be
tabled until May 7'.
Guy made a motion to table Case, #91-10 until the May 7 meetin
g•
Mathis seconded the motion and all were, in favor ,
The minutes_of the March 5 meeting were approved as written.,,
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
:/~
Cindy L. Christensen, Secretary Kandi Sha ran, hairman
3
Minutes
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Pitkin County
Board of Adjustment
Site Visit
JanuaY~y li, 1991, 8:00 a.m.
Kandi Shaffrah, Chairman
Stan Mathis
Rick Neiley
Evan Gull
John Ostwald
Ted Guy'
Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkin County Zoning Office, was present
with staff recommendations and comments.
82.
the visual
the•addition would have frgm Highway
David Swersky, .Hansen's neighbor, was present. Swersky felt
comfortable with the proposed location being on the north side of;
Hansen's house. Swersky is the neighbor`to the south of Hansen. '
Guy suggested that the.., proposed addition be placed above the.
existing house as opposed to above the garage. This would create
less of an impact to the neighbor on the south side, and less of
a visual "wall" as seen from the highway.
After some,. discussion, Guy moved to grant a 48 foot front yard
setback variance, a 16-1J2 Foot east side yard setback variance,
an 8 ' foot ,west side., yard setback variance, 'and 2 feet variance,.
over the top of the bank for a second story to be placed over the'
following noted within the red on the plans marked "Exhibit A",
This `addition is not to exceed°`more"alien i'0 'feet in additional
height. Swersky was in agreement.
This approval is subject to renotification and approval of
revised draiaings to be presented to the Board at the February 5,•
1991 `meeting.
Ostwald seconded the motion. The motion carried with four in
favor and Neiley opposing the motion. ~ ~~
The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 a.m.
Respectfully Submitt~d,
• /~, / `/ t
Cindy`L./ hristensen, Secretary andC~ i Shaftran, Chairman
„ .. ~>
Minutes
',Pitkin County
"'~ Board `of Adjustment
.7anuary 8 , 1991 '
Members Present:
Members Absent•
Kandi Shaffran;
Stan Ma"this
Rick Neiley
Evan Gull
Chairman `
.John Ostwal'd
Ted Guy
Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkn County Zoning office, was preseht
with staff recommendations and comments.
Shaffran opened the meeting at 5;20 p.m. and introduced the Board
to those present. Christensen informed the Board that cases 90-'
53, Collier, and 90-55, Davis, received no objections and `that'
their' ,_ _... ..
' approvals from last month have; `therefore,: become
effective. Case,_ 90-48" 'John' Walker, was tabled until the
February 5, 1991 meeting. Case X90-47, Thomas Gardner will be
reheard at `'the February" 5, 1991 'iieeting.
~, ,. .. ~s , ... ...,
Architectural Review Advisor, were present to request a 90 foot,
front, yard setback variance, where: 100 feet is required in the'
AF-1 zone district, for construction of a proposed addition to an'
existing firehouse' and garage. _
Taddune explained the need for this addition. Taddune stated
that"'adjacent land is owned by the Association., and. therefore has,
' pact on any indivic~ual!s private property. Shaffran asked..
if anyone 'from the pu' h~lic was present to comment on this case;
there',were no comments. ,..
After ,a brief discussion, Mathis moved to grant a 98 foot front'
yard setback variance as per the plans submitted, due to'
topographical hardship. 'Guy seconded the motion and all were in
favor:' _ ,
collector street setback ~. ~~ quired per
resident inl C au at e hand Use rCode a for econstru ti n 5oP ea proposed
g 5
1
NF ~.. L~.
Lavery explained that 1041 approval has been granted by the P&Z
and that he was then informed that setback variances would be
necessary for his proposed garage. The proposed garage is to be
located underground between the house and Red Mountain Road.
Schaffner was questioned over the determination of the front yard
on this parcel. The current 'access located on the east side of
the lot will be abandoned through an agreement between Lavery and
the County. The new access will be' taken from the road on the
north side of the lot. Hence, the current side yard will become
the future front yard and visa versa. Although this vacation has
not 'yet occurred, Zoning Administrator, Krizmanich, approved of
referencing the future front yard as the front yard for the
purposes of this variance request.
There was no one from the public present to comment on this case.
Guy made a motion to grant a 26 foot front yard setback variance
(side nearest Red Mountain Road), where 30 feet is required,
and/or an 11 foot side yard setback variance, where 15 feet is
required (depending on how the front yard is determined, to
enable the garage to be 4 feet from the North property line), and
a 46 foot collector street setback variance, where 50 feet is
required, due to topographical hardship, as per the plans
submitted on the First Plat Amendment and 1041 Review for Lots
5A, 6A, Block 3 (Revised) Red Mountain Subdivision). Neiley
seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Case #91-02. Yarber. Larry Lot D-12 Filing 2 Redstone Ranch
Larry Yai
variance
100 feet
district,
'per was present to request a 55 foot front yard setback
and a 10 foot north side yard setback variance, where
and 30 feet, respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone
for construction of a single-family residence.
Yarber stated that the rear of the lot is very steep. He
continued that if the house was placed anywhere else (or if the
building envelope was changed), large trees on the property would
have to be destroyed or moved. Yarber wants to retain the trees
and vegetation. Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision covenants,
require a 10 foot side yard setback and a 25 foot front yard
setback.
Guy stated that he is in favor of this request because it does
not encroach into the setbacks designed for the Subdivision.
There was no comment from the public.
Neiley moved to grant a 55 foot front yard setback variance and a
10 foot north side yard setback variance, as per the plans
submitted, due to downzoning. Guy seconded the motion and all
were in favor.
2
Robert Nininger was present to z
variance, where a maximum of T2
structures per the Pitkn County
an existing barn."
Snowmass Road- Old Snowmass
lest a .,.4 foot 6 inch height;
is required. for accessory
zd Use Code', for approval of
Guy mentidned to the Board that he had done work with, 'the
a1conflictlontthsacasebuNo one protested on th sl~ssueld create,
Nininger stated that the barn was built about a year ago 'and that
a topographical map was not done prior to the excavation of this
site..',., The height is being calculated based 'on the surveyors best
guess'of natural existing grade prior to excavation.
Y g
thataitewashl2'feethtp'thelm~dpoint~and 17bfeet tocthefpeakstated`
Guy
also wanted to know how a barn was defined, and Schaffner read
the definition of a""barn° from tf~e~"Code`.'
with man 12 nfoot hheight lim tiffi Shaffrand agreed th t a o12 foot
height limit was not enotYgh for expected barn uses, i.e., hay
loft,' Nininger mentioriec~ that he could bring the barn into
compliance'if he removed"the roof and made it flat.
There was no one present from the public to comment on this case.
Guy made a motion to grant a 4 foot 6 inch height variance due to
topographical hardship, as per the plans submitted. Shaffrari
" . _.,
seconded tTie motion and aTl were in favor.
Case #91-04, Hansen. Tom, 4074 River Road Woodv Creek
Tom Hansen was present to request an 85 foot front yard' setback
variance and a 16 foot east side yard setback variance, where-lOQ
feet and 30 feet res ectivel qu' ;
district, for construction of a second'fioorr above„a garage. zone
feetgabbve cthe existing 'house ~pSchaffnern tat d rthat Hansentis
requiresna secondereview fortapproval.rie setbac~C, "arid t"~ere'fore"
situat dew th n the se back aso Mlosel next to a larget structure
,. ~, y existing large
setbackg 15eiley1agreed with Guy's concernsso located within the,,,.
.--,
Shaffran .asked if any members of the- public• were present and
Hansen's neighbor, David Swersky, was present but had no comment
to Ostwald's motion. Swersky then left the meeting.
Ostwald's motion was voted on with Ostwald being the only member
in favor. It was decided that a site visit was needed to see
what visual impact this addition would have. Hansen agreed to
erect sticks indicating the proposed height.
Shaffran moved to table Case 90-04 until Friday, January 11, at
8:00 a.m.; Guy seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Attorney, Mickey Herron, was •present representing the Liss', to
request a 14 foot rear yard setback variance, where 30 feet is
required in the AF-1 zone district„ to bring an existing~single-
family residence into conformity.
Herron mentioned that the Liss' want to legitimize the house that
was built within the required setbacks in 1979. Shaffran read
County Attorney, Tim Whitsitt's letter supporting approval of the
variance request.
There was no one from the public present to comment.
Guy moved to grant a 17 foot rear yard setback variance, for the
existing structure, due to existing conditions. Mathis seconded
the motion and all were in favor with Shaffran abstaining.
Case #91-06,•Cheever, Eddie, Lot R-57, Starwood 8 Subdivision
Architect, Jack Miller, was present representing Eddie Cheever,
to request a 45 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet
is required in the AF-1 zone district, for an addition to a
single-family residence.
Cheever received approval for an addition to his home in Case 90-
36. Schaffner stated that the proposed changes to those plans
result in an increase in the encroachment of the required
setback, therefore, needs to be reviewed again Eby the Board for
approval. Miller explained what the proposed changes were.
Ellie Brickham, member of the Stanwood Homeowner's Association,
stated that there were no objections from the Association to this
request.
Guy made.a motion to grant a 45 foot front yard setback variance
for the building, and an additional 2 feet of variance for the
roof and overhangs for the entry and stair tower, as shown on the
plans submitted, due to downzoning. Ostwald seconded the motion
and ali were in favor.
4