HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.91.17DATE APRIL. 15, 1991 CASE #
APPLICANT PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PHONE 920-5200
._ w ... ,~,.y,~ .. . ~__ ... .a~.,-. . ..., .. ~,~„ „~. , _,_., ,
MAILING ADDRESS 530 E. MAIN ST., 3RD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611
OWNER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE 920-5200
_ ~ _, .. „,„ „~_ ..~_~ .... ,:~x, .. .~ ,_u,
MAILING ADDRESS 530 E.'MAIN ST., 3RD FLOOR ASPEN; CO 81617
TACATION OF PROPERTY. 0205 REDSTONE BLVD., REDSTONE, CO 81623
,. _ _. ,._ ~. ~. _„ ~s -ri,~ ,~ 4,.w:~~.,. ~6...~,~
Any pertinent data must accompany this•application, and will be,
made part of this Case. The Board may return this applica~ n if
it does notcontain all the facts in question. ~ //
Applicant Signature
(To be completE~d by the Zoning Department)
o£ the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official
Provisions
to forward this, application to the Board. of Adjustment, and
reasons for not granting a building permit:
R-t Zone District
Requesting: 0.6 AC. Lot Size
~' Front Yard Setback Variance, where 3~ ' is required.
' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required.
7 ' NORTH Side Yard Setback Variance, where ~,~' is 'required.
Side Yard Setback Variance, where is required.
' Height Variance, where ' is required.
Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed.
Other:
Hardship: HISTORIC PRESERVATION FLOODPLAIN IMPACTS
Zoning Official I/~'Xh•-fl=,~JfCC~""-'~-'
Application filed ~ ° -:Date _]~„~ ~ C/
Notices mailed -- ~oZ ~~~ __
--__-G~(_=~~~
Parcel ID # ~~7~-q-~~`~ a3 ~-~ secretary G ~'L~~zP
Resolution to Building when Completed ~_~//Yes ~_~ No
__ da ~~,. ~c~ ~.-,.
,:
NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD, OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED tBY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: '
Pursuant to Pitkn County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended,
a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers, City Hall,
First Floor, Aspen, 'Colorado (or at such other place as the meeting
. 7 ) PP
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of 'the Count t Zonin 1 Res lution.ication filed with the sai
Y Y g e
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views., protests or objections. If you cannot
appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your
views by letter, particularly if .you have objection to such variance,
as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the
opinions' of surrounding property owners and others affected in
deciding whether to grant or deny the request f'or variance.
THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS
FOLLOWS:
Date and time ,of meeting:
Name and Address of
Applicant:
Property Location or
Description•
May 7, 1991 at 5:15 p.m.
County Courthouse, Commissioners
Meeting Room
Board of County Commissioners
530 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
0205 Redstone Boulevard
Redstone, Colorado
Requesting approval for an 8 foot front yard setback variance and a 7
foot 'north side yard setback variance,` where 30 feet and l0 feet,
respectively, are required in the B-1 zone district, for construction
of restroom facilities at the Redstone Park. Granting of this request
would place the restroom facilities 22 feet from the front yard
property line and 3 feet from the north side yard property line.
VARIANCES''GREATER OR LESS TAAN REQUESTED COIILD BE GRANTED.
Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X
THE /ITKIN COUN Y)B RD OF ADJUSTMENT
l ///
Cindy Christensen, Secretary
~4
".:~ ~'
h
April 15, 1991
Mr. Francis Krizmanich
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South"Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: SIDE-YARD VARIANCE REQUEST FOR_REDSTONE PARK
Dear Francis;
Please accept this letter and accompanying enclosures as a formal
request for variance of the. side-yard setback for the above
listed property.
The owner, the Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, is
requesting a 7-foot variance from the allotted 10-foot side-yard
setback to place public bathroom facilities at the park, The
Redstone Park is located at 0205 Redstone Blvd. in Redstone,
Colorado. The property is approximately 0.6 acres in size and is
bordered by Redstone Blvd. to the east, the Crystal River to the
west, and 'private properties to the north. and south.
The bathrooms are being built by the County and consist of a 7'-
3" x 16'-7", one-story building (approximately 120 square feet)
with associated walkway. The purpose of the requested variance
is to place the bathroom structure so that it is in_character
with the historic siting of outbuildings within Redstone. At
their April 11, 1991, meeting, the Redstone Historic Preservation
Committee supported the submitted site plan for the bathrooms and
requested that the County seek this side-yard variance. The
siting is also preferred as it will not encroach upon ''existing
park uses (such as the children's play area, picnic lawn, mature
cottonwoods and parking) and will not impact the effectiveness of
the existing levee which runs 'the length of the park along the
Crystal River. The design presented shows the proposed siting
for the bathrooms.. The structure will sit approximately 3-feet
from the north side-yard property line adjacent to the existing
museum building.
Thank you for accepting this application. If you have any
questions, or need more information concerning the requested
variance, please contact me.
Administration County Commissioners County Attorney
~ Personnel and Fnance Road and Bridge
530 E. Main, 3rd Floor _
SuiteB Suite 1' Suite F~ -`~ ~ Fleet lCAariageinent
Aspen, CO 81611 506 E. Main Street 530 E. Main Street '530 E. Main Street 20210 W. Highway 82
(303p920-5200 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO`815i1 Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611
FAX 920-5198 (303) 920-5150 (303) 920-519$ (303)920-5220 (303) 920-5390;, r , ~ ~(.~~~r
~
' '
~
printed on rec yc/ed paper '
~'
r ~.
~ ~ ,. .,
Manager
a _ ~ariv"n e..- e~- _ ...~ ., a.. „x., i. ..w s:; «^r ~~2d~r~aiWdv+w@'r"CKr~F?r`{ txHndr"f~s'~a~~kF4
~,~;
i
% . ... ,
s_~:., _ '
~~ .:" ^r." _.
1
,.,
' y,•
,r
'"
. ...
c
....
.,
_
z v -~ z
c'~z a'n `
~"s"'a w~
n'x :
`~a'~ a`:
s ~ i
5> 5 9
c A`
_'"S"_r. r.: -
. ~o s,
: z c a
_s~s_
¢° z z
e s z
.,J. $.. ~~
'
' " ~ P 'fib,
r m m 1 ma m :~..:.% .,.. ,:;a^
'
.~y.. o.,,.. :_.,a. .,xy ~ .,waY m z%~.:• n ~'""'`-- .:rva ,~kY,
y'.
~
~
A D ~
~' JM' Z. ~ i
`
'~'1
~. O
J A
O " H O W .xix)' :.ektt ~ ~' JM
~~'
~. C y.k„
M.: ".w,
d
'...
U
O _ r%r 4 C y
:3N~r
1 :,.Yr l
v~:~ej'.
C.Y O ..N - ~;, Orr
rvvF ~ ,vC N
,Q
~, W ... K O Fn
,,: C W U W x~ F l'~ g
~
~k"" ~'
~ r
. ~
.,
.~„wro-
6..
U
i.W
~Ow
O
O
O
", ~~"Z
O
.:.. ~^:O'~
;~~
O .
~
:~:z
vi C J'
.~~ ;
a ~a
J
'
'r
m
'
<
::
,~:.:.,
.. rfi";Si
: w
", < K ~~ O W v
C .`J
:Jl, -
.
~
wW
-~
"
-'
'~
%~'~
<+~':
z
-may.
<¢
g
p Md
"~ i ~
2K~ .t`,7'' .y'kl'Y. : i... .
' Z F Z .;. T '^.i. y~+k,
. "
~
y ~
~
<
W N O b ~ L w' m .: C •., ~•it
1
9
ZW f
.i
'vi/-. '
.< .- O
? u
:
.. a 4 ~
J
gl .... 4% i+ ~n
~ ~ ~. ~ l+ t 1.. ."
:<r r~
Z irn`^<_.1 q ' C _
1" O
- M ' W ~ n Z Y' r ,
U W 'K„`.' Z p F • :
Y Y 1
F~' Y ` ~:, 6' % .,:~~ :'. %~,~ .
^
'
r' _:{;r w,..~ .:' ,r~M ."
a0` .
d
y M "~," p %
?.. f x~ .,
w W~'~ <.,. % .;a', va O ,.W Y'Drc~ ~
SS'Pr":
„" .
.
•
g w "W'
Z z J ':ut
~
M~.
~ W LL`s:'
2 w'"'
Y N W
w O
m
O Z
> J
w 4
O ~:;
".3a
y `:
~.
`.
'
~
a'M O Z U 1 ~ ^rY i" m H .w w
~
nKK
~ .
>.
,~
.
.. '1."Z Y O'~' J O 2 C ' W Y 6' ^ ~ .
~
,
C w "; m M r%r O- U M
~ C Z • 4 -~ '!~.•'}~ q~
`~ntET
~
'.m• W N (C< C O ~O O % Y O VSY ` r
;.Y;:
v.~0: C' Z r•.r < O O W • C < J O N ,
y ,
,
y`Z $.. 2 W Od. O 6 L• r J H
" F S ..,. '
'
o ., D x o'
' ~ mx m z Y< x xu
f Z ''m
O %wri
W %~
d .+
pp "°` „
J,
•+
~
N W
~ V O M N W •0 < 2 M , " _ " <. ~
•
'
r~-'-
ii m~ =w "4. m OLL % M y. ~ ry ~.-r :Y*
. ,q;:a" `
;A
2 ~ O %.r;,, X f- MI b M w % J 6 P
W M %F M~ J I-• ~ `~
~
Or' 00 D OJ M r
W 60f r d 00 '
'YS
5
}
~
~
<.~
~ ,.:
!
w
': 6•
''
'
b pYr
"
%6'
.+%
Of
A p'
%C
U
O
tl
%C•
%Z
OfI
O%
~CC
ZU
~
OV
Otl . ••. ••
JCC
J2U ~..4
w#- r
r
•\
O
O -~C
r~Tri
'' W
' Z
J O"
W U'
V W %U
Wm
C W
00 O%
IW
C C
00 O
IW
C C
OC yyU
%
W O
O _
" %
W%
C W
Op 1 'W3
C O
O IW
M
O T.%
O W
O
e d
IW
OG
1 C ^%
' O W
O
/J
.. i
'
~'t~+,'~
{dt
W O
O C %
4 tl! p
<J 1 O
A6 ~
1 O
{
J" p
<J 1 O J
<2 _^ J
2J ~
2J ,~
r r
-' j
6
'{"'
'
' 20 NZ"
1 N
1111 I
ZO
~~~1 W 20
F- W
~ 1 ZO
F- O N
1 Om
O W NZ
~¢ F i00
' C W r
-
-}~~
O Y("
.~
~J W
-
~ ~'"1 H W
CJ r
PC 1
P
J
CJ
C<
P
4J
P
<J .
1"
Z
= ;
-p'
' W
' n j~
~3„ N
~ ^ N
N n
N
r
4 .awrk ~.~
a'~
'•-I`i1'
p. .N
. % ~( N
-
~
+ ~
~ ~
i
• ' " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
" c
~
r- ~ _
~
~
- " F
%
• _
~ _
' 9
~ v
~
. { a -~.
.: R a a R
x v
C
3 9
Y Y
R
. c c _ z
a
Ate:. Y
.
A
R :. a
a F G
W
.^. ~
- . ~ ..
^
; __
I
~;~ ~:
EXHIBIT °A"
Redstone Park
A parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of Section 20,
Township 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6tY Principal Meridian,
more fully described as followsi
Lots 1 through 9, Block 2 of the Kistler Subdivision..
Containing 0.60 acres more'or less.
,_ ,
x341 \7. ~'~ 7819
:, i
I
~ ~O,'i I I ~l\~ I ~ I j I, ill ~ / 11 ~~ ~.
\~ _ ~ / l ~n I yl .. O Y 1 /i' ~/
:/// J ri,q /~ / 'I _ ^'LA,/ I )~/1' I' I ' 11 to I,
~'~ ~ '~ / ~~~~~ ~ Yi % l ~ i'~~ i ~' it Ii "/'- ~0 ~ ~~I
~..~ ~~ ,rI i 'r i. ~:~ ~~-._ , I I I I //~ ~ I 'il Ili
~~ ~ / ~ ~~~~ / JII ,~ r/i2 I. ~.' ~ Il li/ ~/ ,' i
'~ I I
~ ~_'~ ~~~..:.' /il r~%/J~/ ~`~VI~ ~~ ~/ I ~,I ~ ~/ )1~l Sri/~~~~ ~/ *+./,li !~~/ ~..
4340 L 14 p_ ~ i/ i N I~ i I ~ I% i~~~ l° /~~ / `\\~\,\\
- \ .,:_ ~ '' OO ~}? III / ~/O ~ 1 i} 1, I'il i_J~l'-. .
~\ CJ ~ 1 i /I nrO _ v I f ~~ ~ /%~i
2ti ~-- 0205 REDSTONE \ I '~~/ /~ ii ~ J' ~' (, ~ ~
~U BLVD. ~~ l~ I ~i' ~ ~/iI I I 1 \ ~~~ ~ ~r\ (.
C i '': ' '
`~ I Ili ~~ ~/~~~j~il ~~~~~~~ ~\ ~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ '~, m i ~' _ ~..1 ~ i ~ ~~ ~' 1 '..
~ -~' --/ `~ / ~I ~ ~ ,~ , ~~ ~ `900 ~~~~
\~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ III ~~\~~~~.
~I~~ ~~~~ KePg ~~ ::fib //l~ llri ~ I ~,~`~A\ tV ~~~~ A~ ~'~A
~~ ~---~~. X11 vA~~
)i , ili~~`'~) I~/1 ~ 20 111 1'I~ ~~j"' /-~ ~% ~~ .~ ~~
,; 1 (, /~ a i 1 /~,
/
~I~, '.~ n ~ tr /i I r~'~ ~ ~i ~~ ~ / --'~
~ / // II )~ ~/~ ,
~_"' 1 u / ~ ~ / ~'~ ~ V I
_Jl^~J I ~ ~11`~ i ~;, ' I' ~ ~r~J I ' ~~ti°°I/~i ~ 'i ~~~~ 000 ;~~~. .
4338 ll I~._._-// /l rI ;f-_i ~ ql. O / /~-?_` ~I~i ~ ~ I(/~ ~ (~/ ~/ ~ ~ ~,/~.- '\ \~ `1 \\ ~~ I
i \ „ \\
.~ r„
~ '
1 ~ ~ ~_ o
~~,~./// ~ t;V ( '` ~' moo`
r
' r ~ ~-
x337 ~ I ~ ' ~ i i , (r 11 -,.- ~V~ ~ ~ _ ~ -~ ~~~ , ` 8~/i- % I.
~~:
~.,..
a .;
~~~
-.~
~~
~~
~~~ ~~
~-
~ s :r
e ~ ,. -~
~~~
~ ~...___
/~.. ~,
,: ~~ ,tl
:~
:r
5
~'
,d'
y ~ ..~
c' `~ ~~
~J3
~J
~ /'
s
~r
-,
c~J.
,~,
.J
~~, .
.`~ -~
~~ Is %~~'~M ~ - .. .. C G~ G t p ?~~ gam-.
.e ~i :' '~. ... _ ~J
.. .. ..
,~
Pit lc
April 15, 1991
Mr. Francis Krizmanich
A~spetJPitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Francis;
This is to affirm that the Board of Commissioners of Pitkin
County, Colorado, are sole owners of ]2edstone Park. To the best
of my knowledge, there are no mortgages;' liens, judgments,
contracts or agreements affecting this parcel. `
As owners the Board of County Commissioners have a demonstrated
ri ht to ~ 1 for the 'apopve mentioned Dev acTministered through
This side-pard variance`s lication will beelopment Application.
their representative, Tom Newland.
Sincerely,
PIT N COUNsTY
`a
T' Wh is tt,
ATT OFFICE
County Attorney
Administration County Commissioners County Attorney Personnel znd Finance Road and Bridge
530 E. Main, 3rd floor Suite 8 Suite f Suke F FleefManagement
Aspen, CO 81fi17 506 E. MaidStreef 530 E. Main Streof 530 E. Mairi Street ` -"'.." " °26210 W. Highway 82 '
~ Aspen, CO 8161 f Aspen, CO 81619 Aspen, CO`816f1 ~"~ ~~ - As~'en; CO 87617
FAX 920-57
98 (303) 920-5150 (303) 920-5290 (303) 92d-5220 ` ~ (303) 920-5390`''"'y 8 „q{~,~.
printed on recyc/ed paper
... ,
Nostalgia Shop Antiques
0306 Redstone Blvd.
Redstone, Colo. 81623
April 26, 1991
Pitkin County Planning Office
130 So. Galena St.
Aspen,Colorado 81611
Cindy L. Christensen
Dear Ms. Christensen:
NR 29
- .- -. In response_to your ,,letter regarding the variance for the
new public restrooms in Redstone, we heartily support any "~ "_"""""'
measures necessary to get this project commenced. The
summer seasoh is fast approaching and we really need this
facility operational.
Very truly your
Bob and Sylvia rrison
r a, ~n ti,~y~~ y~'
TO: Pitkin County Building Department
Planning Office
Planning & Zoning Commission
RE:
ature of Application
Please be advised that the Redstone Historic Preservation
Commission met on ~QQ,a~ ,i 199 ! to consider the above,
application. The Commission, pursuant to motion, duly seconded,
and', acted upon, took the following action:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE RECOMMEI7DED FOR:CS~~ ~~~0~1)
( ) Approval
(_) Disapproval
(_) Be 'Tabled for Further Study
6~LVI~.
WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS, SUGGESTT~I~fS; AND/OR CONDTT'~ONS"
'\l~./.~ i~~Tr.~ni~ t~~E~ ~PdS~~A ~fl1f ;%r Gl~ Rf Co ~n~~,iD~
~~ ~ r,~ u 1~ e ~cl ~ T LI I !3 L d~xi !t. !~ '(t! y~`/~~. ~ sF i 51 D ~ r ,~ JC( p
<I~ ~U~LY ~ i~,Ai~~ dtiD CY:0,4R, 4Zoo~ '.o iNa-~{~ T-r-l~
f7 UG Pi r, M r ILI ,~fl-l ~~i,ll ~,Ll~''i Y ILA ,~.~ci F~ I ~~ f~)/ ~'~~ ~R, ~ Nl
~Dr ~i NP, Ski ~h~K Per. So~~~-I-~
_.. _. .. _._:.. _ .._.,. :...., ,.. a..vue; ,.~ .n..
DATED: ~..~[~ /l /Q~ / ~ ~ ~. /~;~'C..i
Secretary & $~~~+M~
} ;.;~~ Y ...
..
.... .. r:. m}`t.. ~ ns'Sy `o^,i'-y.~S.~~,< t r : ~ ~,~' <.~ t C "C < S"5 ,n, a~"~.. '' ~C*,.
d .,, r. _in , ,..x! ,_
'a 925-3775
uVil(u utiVlVt. i.l. V'~.
lements should be handled
~' .e zoning d'epartments` and
E..:.red the cases to inspector
Bill Drueding.
While the IIPC members said
they were pleased to see a'sub-
terrainlevel being utilized, they
denied Ernematm's submission
~a.~ymuc ..>, ~..c uG1 ua muc w ytu v(u4cwa uauucm u( ..
the term" be need for building for the ID?C's p
RF`1~A ~" office and Iock
er apao. >~lson 8i Reno
Architects are'ia charge of the
Pro)ect.
PSnally, architect Sven AhH
from of C Welton Anderson and
Associates appeared before the
on the basis that development I3PC with several clarifications
review standards were not met. and, an amendment on the
The arehitect may return with Sportsfalkei li'iiiTding.
an amended proposal in the IthastakenXlmoatheforthe
future. arohitetdilral firm to i+eceive all
- :;
public no~i~ce
~~
zrG~
~F this cozy log home in
n. This two-story, 1,908
ta5, sad a 132 sgoare foot
nklin woodbtlrning stove.
1 ~
~.
Pull-Out Car Stere
• Thalt•aeshtro~t ~ Fades
• 70 Writs oAuto-Rarer
• Doltir~ a Nn . M Prese
WEEK
lalamute is
rt the aspen
en you see
ttl beautiful
1"t be ~ able to
azo-x410
:..'
,~~&~-
o~ ~~
Hasa .t
r. t.
4-Head~VCR With F
• 6 HearJS for Ckar Speci
• Oa-scrsen Programmir
• 179-C1L CiON•COmPatll
:Mess Answerer j
~eassettas... ~n9~. s
Tray
~~t73 4f
. za
/89.709 • L(
Ft
w.,r•
e9t
Str
.............
iee Apes 25;1991,
rESA suBDrvrsr~
s.
i~
/ O~
~ ~\
i ~
~ Q
/ / ~J~ 02 ~9
02 T ~
!~~ 6
~~ 4
/~ 3 ~4
/ `~ /
,/'~)
/}~I ' 1
~~/
i
03
005 '
/ 01
2.9 qC.
O 4
'~ ILy.
/ .~y 3,
2,
/~
560.
i / //
/'\ O ~ OG
REDSTON~is~
~~zICE H?JUS~ SU~ /~
~i ~ i
,' i
/ iLOT I /
O ~ 001 /
~„~A ~ 04?5 AC. / ~
~~"' LOT 2
n
. \9°' 002 /
0 AC/
i2j2s is
/ vj 262
004
?~`
.~
~'S C
\C
)c =~
~Q
3 ~'-'
'aC
2 ~ ~ ~3 ~S
/ 002 OS'4C
00~ OsgC
s2 ~ OSgc
/~!~\ 4
38 ~
~qC
o \
• 00/
40
4c
R~
Pp
~ SITE PLAN
/ AREA
( (` /S C
~g .
9 ~3
34c
21
oia
1.3 C
< (~9 /~N6A. n
03 ~~
a°j d
Pp 2
~ ~
~~4
9p
'4C
/~
02
43
'QC
°0s
3p
°2~
Fg
4C
- , -..
._ e w .
-, ,..
~,.
.. ~ ,u
. ,„... -
- _: - .. „
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFI~CE;~~ r
.. ..,.,_
130 SouthG~aYena Street
Aspen, Colorado81611
(303) 9ZU=5090
LAND USE APPUCATIONLLFEES,
city
00113 -63250-134 _ GMP/CONCEPTUAL
«,. , .z, r . ~ .,,, ,:,
63270-136 GMP/Fl"~JAL ' ~-" "' "
X3280-137 SU'8/COt7~E~'TUAL _ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ -
-63300-139 SUBlFINAL
-63310-140 ALL 2-ST~P APPLI"i;7fTIONS
-63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/-;; ~
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ,_,
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -63340-205 ~ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.. '
OOT23 -63340-190 HOUSING
00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERIt~~ ~ - ~~
` ~ ~ SUBTOTAL. ,. `.. ,. -....
Couniy
00113 -63160-126
' l>3170=1`27
-63160-128
-63190-129
-s3z0o-130
-63210-131
-53220-132
-63230-133
', -63450 146
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -63340-205
00123 -63340 190
00113 -63360 143
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113 •63060-122
-63090-123
-63140-124
-69000-145
`i t ~ t~ I~t'1
Name:
Additional billing:
.. ~.
VT AG~NbA ITEMS '- --~ '.?-%"~
OF ADJUSTMENT ~~--.~ v
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
HOUSING _ ~- ' _
~ENGItSEERING~ ~ ~~ ~'
SUBTOTAL ~ --' :;%'
TOTAL ---~ ~
- CITY/COUNTY CODE ` ~ "
COMP.'PLAN `". ~ ~_
COPY FEES
OTHER
Y
~ i\
`~"
{'
V
r
y
~ .
t
~~~c
3 ` by p J_H &
c'''
,x~_ .x.c,r A:^ :.. i_al~t- rvnu;,i Sti nero e4-.
. . . a b- r ~Zb^N
..
r
.. f
,
r
~ ~~~ M. ,.: ..~.
_.a
Vy
~ i'
~~
t
~'
ti~ t t ~-
~ ~:
re .r
r,
d.J..
FG
1J
.~
(ta
.. ~ ~. e
,: _ ~L~
,,~~ -
SeA++d.
J ;
h
~lO~ I~I`p' Id ~~~~
.::~
..
~. ~ ~.,r .,~ N6 : - .
~.
. ~~ ;
~._
__ '_ _.
I -~~,~.,
~- °' I
.
_
~
~
~
~ ~
_ ~
~
.~
- ~ t
_
;'
~~ ~ ~
.
~ ~
,~
~ , ~
,
, ~
~ ---
ter., ~ ~ - ---
--- ---
~~
I ~ ' ` J- . - m y .«.rru .a 11 cn.
r ~4~ ...- W mr~ .a,.n .wn {Y,.L+v ~ rv ~s:N FavA rtY nn.}~S"a r.Cw.p. ~~~~~
~ ~r~
. ~
~
~
C' ~'
`~~~~
_
~~
.
'"^•
_..___
. . ~~:`
j
••, uq
~\ ~:
',/,
~~ ~"~
1'~1
~ 4~
.,~ a gtax4 ;.:
..q ~
4 1
County of Pitkin
State of Colorado
The undersigned,
follows: _
I
~ v~1
being or
~ ----~--
Board of
representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County
that the attached photograph
Adjustment, personally certify
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously
l ~ , 19~.
from the ~~ ~ day of ~
day of 19~
to the
(Must be posted for at least nine (9) ful~ ys b ore the
s
.. ~~;
.;
'~-i~
'~
} AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} SS, POSTING OF A VARIANCE HF-ARING
} BEFORE THE PITRIN COUNTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
~~ - Subscribed and sworn to before me
• ~ this ~~ day of ~~~'~~ ---~
.> ; ,
~ by ;~ ~ CL1~~-(.~-
~'
^, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICI .,L~ $EAL.
~ x
~?~. Commission expires
~.
1 ;~ r ' ,~~'W =
~~~ ~'
-_ ~` *r., a,-~~ lies Signature
f !' I i 332988 6..,1.$/91 ib 1U het t~U ELK 647-D~
~~ a ilvaR Davis,' Pitkin CrityerF::, Doc ~ P~ 38
RESOLDTION OF THB PTTKIN CObNTY,"COIAR2iD0"
BOARD OF ADJIISTl~'+NT
DENYING SETBACK RELIiIEP`' " „` • .«~""
F0~2 A'~D b'
1{„*C;(7B'Y~'CU~IISSIC')'N"ER:S'"~ ~
RESOLDTION NO. 91-Y7
WHEREAS; the Board of County Commissioners, owners of a
tract of land situated at 0205 Redstone Boulevard, Redstone,
requests an 8 foot front yard setback variance and a 7`foot
north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet and 10 feet,
respectively, are required, in the B-1 zone district for
construction of restroom facilities in Redstone Park; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated
area of Pitkin County, Colorado, (as described in Exhibit
"A", attached); and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to
grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section
16-1.3, Pitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado
Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and,
WHEREAS, based on the evidence .presented, the Board of
Adjustment makes the following findings:
1. Proper notice procedures, including the
notification of all adjoining property
owners, has been shown by the applicant.
2. The required hardship or practical
difficulty has not been established.
3. Granting such relief will cause substan-
tial detriment to the public welfare and
will substantially impair the intent and
purpose bf the Zoning Resolutions and
the zoning maps.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED' by the Board of Adjustment,
that. an 8 foot front yard setback variance and a 7 foot
north side yard setback variance, where 30 feet and l0 feet,
respectively, are required, per the plans submitted marked
"Exhibit B", be denied for construction of a restroom
facility in Redstone Park.
WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may
result in rehearing and possible revocation.
.~.._,~ . , .w :,~. , . , , ..,.
,~ y .«~~ we as ~kf~t~ '~
rrti r;r-
~~ #~~~9BB ~7.°,/~B/91 16:10 F'~: ~•t~C~ Bh`. 647 RG 39-.,
Si 7. via Davis, Fitk:in Cnt, Clerk, Doc ~.t~C~
Resolution No. 91-~
Page 2
The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of
Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
DATED: May 7, 1991
ATTEST:
The Board of Adjustment
of Pitkin County, Colorado
Cindy Christensen, Kandi Shaffr nab,
Secre ary Chairman
-.
~~
n3i~'S'88Davis8,/Fitk~niCntyCCrkgBDo~4?~.FG 40
EXIiIBIT "A„
Redstone Park
P
Tocroship ~ 0 So thlo Range 88 West o the t6thaPrincipaleMeridiao~
more full described as follows- n'
Lots 1 through 9, Block 2 of the Kistler Subdivision.
Containing o.6o acres more or less.
m ~
#~~2988 05/"''/41 16:10 Rec x.00 Hk' 647~'~ 41 'O
Silvia Davi •F'ifk:in Cnty Clerk: Doc $.
ti -ro+l- -ri, ,
EXHIBIT "B" E~-1~~' ~ ,
_ •'~..
:"~'~•
~._
~ q~i
fi ~-11«I 1
- - -- - - -- - -- - - - ~ ~.4-I~ e~
~~
_ (r,Y.
~L
L-_.
1
~ ~ ..
I W
-. ~ ~ n'-~'''.--
~;~.
-~,
~~'~
-~
~ •~
J c~~~ ~~
_\
SITE PLAN for
VARIANCE REQUEST
a
W
P
._ ~ Y. ~. _
1 is .... i
Minutes
Pitkin County
Board of Adjustment
May 7~ 1991
Members Present: Kandi Shaffrari, Chairman John Ostwald
Stan Mathis Evan Gull
Ted Guy
Members Absent: Rick Neiley
Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkin County Zoning Office, was present with
staff recommendations and comments. '
Shaffrari opened the 7ts'eetinq at 5:20 p.m: and introduced the $oard'to
those present.
~:ase ~yi-i~, uanell. Dicx &
This case was 'continued from
architect, was present repri
the. Board with reviewed arcl
requesting a 2 foot height v,
Pitkin County Land Use Code,
garage.
Lindenau briefed the Board c
meeting:' changing the four=~
the breezeway from 20`feet"tc
-+. .+, a~~a ut~~u. ~.tly• el ...V ~. \r Lllll.(G114 LL,
~ the Danell's. Lindenau' presented
cal drawings. The`Danell's are now
:.,,;
where 12 feet is required, per the
is£rucbion of a detached residential
it
a
A ~u~ .
Lindenau had the house and garage stake' so t~ia'
could visualize the proposed structures. Linder
what was requested at the April 2, 1991`meet
were 'made to the plans for this meeting. '
3 feet.
also showed the Board
and the changes that
Bruce Hazard from Desi n Worksho re resentin the ad'acent nei hborls
stated that they have rib problem with the request being made and fees
that the trees that Wildcat Ranchwere concerned with are to be
preserved.
Shaffrari commented that she still cannot see a hardship on th'
s request;
that it seems more of a request for design rather than hardship.
conformanceoandaliindenauasfateddbetweeno6mtoe8efeetthng back to be in
After further discussion, the Board stated that they still could not
find a hardship for this request.
1
,~...~ ~~ . ,~; , , ~ ... i_ ~ b.. W
Guy made a motion to deny the request for a two foot height variance,
where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, due to
lack of hardship. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Case #91-18 Dickinson Jeff & Priscilla Block 2 Lot 22, Crustal River
_.,,~
Country Estates -
Jeff Dickinson was present to request a 28 foot front yard setback
variance for construction of a single-family residence, and a 78 foot
front yard setback variance for construction of a proposed detached
garage, where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district.
Dickinson briefed the Board as to why the request was being made by
showing the topography of the land.
Four letters were submitted into the record: Noel J. Minor, Tom
McBrayer, Roger Zastrow, and the Architectural Control Board. All these
letters were in favor of the request, except for the 78 foot front yard
setback requested for the garage.
Gull asked if there were any covenants that Dickinson had to abide by.
Dickinson stated that there was just an Architectural Review Committee.
Tom Newland, Assistant to the County Manager, commented on the problems
of drainage that occur in this area.
Shaffran asked for public comment; there was none. Dickinson also
mentioned that he had met with all the neighbors about his request.
Dickinson stated that he would.. be willing to drop the carport (garage)
from the application. Gull stated that he would be willing to grant a
50 foot variance.
Guy made a motion to grant a 28 foot front yard setback variance for
the construction of a proposed single-family house and a 50 foot front
yard setback variance for construction of a detached residential garage,
with the condition that the garage be built within the building envelope
as shown on the approved Minor 1041 approval plat filed in Plat Book 26,
Page 30, due to topographical hardship and downzoning. Shaffran
seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Frank LaGeoia was present to request a Highway 82 setback variance for
placement of an identification_sign. LaGeoia stated that he did have
a sign up that was too big and'was illegal. LaGeoia submitted a copy
of the proposed new sign, which is in compliance with the sign code of
the Pitkin County Land Use Code. The new sign will be placed in the
position that the old sign was located, and will be eight feet high from
the existing grade.
Guy made a motion to grant the sign permit as requested and to grant a
67 foot Highway 82 setback variance for placement of this identification
sign. Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor.
2
,_.
..a~C ~F71-~4 merman xoQer l,oc r:-4 Reastone Ranch Acres Subdivn #3
g
variance erman 'was present to request'a" 5d' foot front yard setback
where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for
construction of a single-family residence.
Sherman reviewed the plans for the proposed location of the single-
t - _ .,
family residence. y ,
I
Shaffran asked if anyone from the public was present with comments and
no one was. ,_..:,. ..
After a brief discussic
setback variance, where
for construction of a s
topographical. hardship.
favor.
~:ase ~y-1.5, ~renxo,
Vance and Ellen Grer
were present to reg
required per the Pi'
accessory structure.
Oates stated that th
problems, hillside pro.
right-of-way, which he
be preserved. Oates al'
approving this request.
Vance Grenko went into
Board the site plans
accessory structure is
Shaffran asked how larg
36 acres. Shaffran a'.
Schaffner distributed
Pitkin County Land Use
i, Ostwald moved to grant a 54 foot front 'yard
100 feet is required, in the AF-1 zone district
ngle-family residence, due to downzoning and a
_...~.
Shaffran seconded"the"motion and"aIl were in
,~ r.
, ..u... ucaaaaY vaa.co, na. a.vLltcy iVL l.i1C dppllGanLS,
>ti a 7 foot height variance, where 12 feet 'is
ni County Land Use Code, for construction of an
ins area has floodplain problems, vegetation
b ems, and the additional .problem of the railroad
elieves is a topographic feature and needs to
s stated that'there are many letters in the file
further detail for the request and showed the
~ h show that the proposed location of the
theconly place where 'it can be_,built.
e4 the,, property was and Grenko stated that it was
L o asked why this was not considered a barn.
_.~ ., „~ ~ ~;,a ,, ,.
t e definition of a' barn to the Board per the
rode which states:
Barn. A building use
feed, or field egui
operations; provided,
space be applied to re
Oates stated that this
fall within the guidel9
variance. Oates referi
showing the steep cliff
which is not accessible
Shaffran'stated that
accessory structure,
to shelter or enclose livestocR, poultry,
meat accessory to existing agricultural
de tial uses, in no event slalY; any fYoor~
~.- ~.
> an accessory ''structure because i
_ t does not
es of a barn, therefore, they would need a
d to the photograph submitted in the file,
Zat goes up to a mesa on top of the property,
~ar''rbund.
s structure. Gull also stated
.. - - i -.-:: g ...
3
_-~
f"i. F'. .
that the crux of the issue still comes down to that the Code prohibits
accessory structures to exceed a limit of 12 feet and that the Code is
very specific in its intent. Guy stated that he can't find a hardship
to this request.
Oates stated that if this structure were moved, it would encroach on
the historic railroad right-of-way and should be preserved. Ellen
Grenko stated that there are also three large conifers on this land that
would be ruined if this proposed structure were moved.
Shaffran asked if anyone from the public was present to comment; there
was no public comment.
Grenko stated that his intent is to build a beautiful structure.
Shaffran stated that if the Board voted on design, then it would be
unfair to any applicant if the Board imposed their taste on their
design, therefore, the Board goes strictly by the guidelines in the Land
Use Code, which states a hardship has to be proven (i.e., topographical,
downzoning or solar access).
Shaffran stated that the Grenko's could argue the interpretation of a
barn or an accessory structure, but that is the only other recourse in
this request.
Grenko asked if an orchard is considered an agricultural operation.
Schaffner stated that just because there is ah orchard on the property,
does not necessarily make it an agricultural operation. Schaffner than
read into the record the definition of an agricultural operation.
Grenko stated that he does not plan on using the structure for a
residential use. Gull commented that office and hobby uses are
classified as residential uses and could not accept this structure as
a barn as it is referenced on the submitted plans.
Guy asked for Schaffner to read the part of the Land Use Code which
states what criteria the Board of Adjustment can grant a variance.
Oates stated that the Board is seeing hardships as the topography of
the lot, as he is seeing other features of this lot, i.e., the
floodplain area, the existence of an historic railroad right-of-way and
the existence of an orchard and vegetation which should be considered.
Gull stated that even if this structure were to be built on a flat piece
of ground, the Board would still not be able to find a hardship. The
point is that the Grenko's want a two-story accessory building, which
the Land Use Code does not allow.
Oates asked if the Grenko's are permitted a barn. Schaffner stated that
being in the RS-30 zone district, they are allowed a 28 foot high barn.
After further discussion, Shaffran moved to table this case until the
next meeting on June 4, 1991. Guy seconded the motion and all were in
favor.
4
.; ~
Mesa Subdivision (Old Snowmassi "' """"'
Kitty Boone and'Michael Thompson, Architect, were present to request a
30 foot 'southwest side yard "s"etback variance and a 30 f®ot`"northeast
side yard setback variance,, where 50 feet~for both is required, in the
RS-30 zone district, for construction of a single-family residence.
Thompson briefed the Board on the area Thompson stated that this
the 20 re is to be a two-bedroom home; one story high and fits within
structufoot setbacks that_are required in the'subdivison plat: '
Shaffrari aske"d for public comment. Bill Landman aril Leo., 'Huber were
present as adjacent homeowners. Landman requested "the Board t'o conduct
ans the vGateway Me"sa garea; ' anc~ f a~lnareaty "ryhf miliar wittia tkie esitut
e.
therefore, feel that a site visit is not warranted. Shaffran suggested
Boone stake out the house and meet with the neighbors who are concerned.
and thatted that because of dealing with this subdivision many times,
Gull sta this is a classic application of downzoning, he would not lave
an objection to granting `it right away. "
Gull also stated that Boone is subject to an architectural review
committee in this subdivision, and that would 'be the more"appropriate
way to address the concerns of the neighbors. '
yard setback variance and a 30 foot northeast side and setback variance
After a brief disgcussion, Guy plans tsubmitted.3 yMathis oseconded s~de
due to downzonn as on the he
_.
motion. 'All were in favor"with Os"twald"abstaining.
Tom Newland, Assistant County Mariager,'iaas present to request ari 8 foot
front yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required, and a 7 foot
north side yard setback variance; where 10 feet is required' in the B-
..N_:
1 zone district, for construction of public res~room facilities at the
Redstone Park,
Newland spoke briefly of the history on
received approval from the Redstone'"Histar:
There is an existing County dike that runs
Crystal River is behind that dike. Thee"1
proposed where it is because of the exist
playground, picnic areas, and general opet
restroom design is to make it appear as a
existing museum. Newland further"explained
the project.
~cauon ror Lne resr.room is
.. _.;,. r _, . __
_ng'~uees of~~ the "park; i. e. ,
space: The intent of the
typical outbuilding to the
the' design of the`"restrooms.
has
Shaffran asked if anyone was present from the public. Herb Klein,
adjacent property owner to Redstone Park, stated that he was opposed "to
the variance as it would be"too close to"his property line., and that
this is less than a pleasant type use.. "Klein stated that he felt
putting the restrooms within a couple feet of his property lne'is not
- , w ._:..~,. K.., .~. _. ,.
,-,, ~,
right and could possibly diminish the value and enjoyment of his
property. Klein is the only property owner that a restroom facility
would affect (no matter where the location of the restroom).
Guy stated that because there are other possible locations, and given
that the single property owner that this would affect has a problem with
this location, cannot grant this variance. Shaffran agreed.
After further discussion, Guy made a motion to deny the variance as
requested due to lack of demonstrated hardship. Mathis seconded the
motion and all were in favor with ~7stwald abstaining.
-- w,._
Gideon Kaufman was present to request 'an 88 foot front yar se ac
variance, where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for
construction of an addition to a single-family residence.
Guy commented that his ,office did the structural engineering for this
applicant. He stated that he believes that this should not create a
conflict since the work is already done and would place an unfair
hardship if Guy and Mathis disqualified themselves (since there would
be no quorum on this case). It was decided that there was no conflict
and both could vote on this case.
Kaufman stated that this is an existing non-conforming lot (7/10 of an
acre) which the County downzoned to AF-1. The Molasky's want to place
the addition under the existing deck and want to add about 400 square
feet to an existing 1,700 square foot house.
Kaufman submitted three letters of support from the neighbors into the
record.
There was no one from the public present for comment.
Erin Hazan wa
Grady property
25 foot north
respectively,
of a proposed
s present representing the Radom's as purcnasers of uie
to request a 52 foot front yard setback variance and a
side yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet,
are required in the AF-1 zone district for construction
addition to a single-family residence.
Mathis commented that Guy and Associates was approached by the Radom's,
potential buyers, on being their architects. They were not hired, but
Mathis did speak to them about their property and gave them ideas. He
believes there is no conflict and the Board agreed.
6
After further discussion, Shaffran moved to grant an 88 foot front yard
setback variance and a 5 foot side yard setback variance, as on the
plans submitted, due to downzoning. ostwald seconded the motion and all
were in favor.
;:
Hazan stated that some of the hardships are that this is a very small
house to begin with. One side of the property has a 30 inch culvert
that restricts building on that side, on the other side'is an
irrigation ditch that has historical value and is 8 feet deep.
Therefore, the proposed location is the only location for the
addition. Hazah also submitted into the record letters from the
neighbors supporting this request.
Mathis has been on the site and so has Ostwald and realize the
difficulties of this site. Shaffran asked if there was any public
comment and there was none.
After further discussion, Shaffran moved to grant a 52 foof front yard
setback variance and a 25 foot north side yard setback variance, as
showh on the plans submitted, due to exceptional physical hardships
and practical difficulties. 6stwald seconded the motion and all were
in favor.
om u requested a 13 foot front yard setback variance, a 30 foot
south side yard setback variance and a 20 foot north side .yard setback
variance, where 100 feet, 50 feet and 50 feet, respectively, are
required in the RS-30 zone district for construction of a single-
family residence.
There was no one. present to represent this case, but t&~e Board felt
that this was a typical downzoning case for Gateway to Snowmass.
After a brief discussion, Gull moved to grant a 13 foot front yard
setback variance a 30 foot south side and setback variance and a
foot north side and setback variance as due
to downzoning and topographical hardship. pGUytseconded themitted, 20
motion and
all were in favor.
The minutes of the April 2, 1991 meeting were approved as written.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Resp2ctfully submitted,
f ~~ ~~
Cindy L.' hristensen, Secretary
7
Kandi Shaffran, Chairman