Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.91.32~.~' DATE APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS OWNER PITKIN COIINTY BOARD OF AD,7CT5'I'lRF.NT` MAILING ADDRESS '~'-~ LOCA'T'ION OF PROPERTY 1Z Applicant Signature (To be completed by the Zoning Department) Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official to forward this application to the `Board of Adjustment, -arid reasons for not granting a building permit: ~_ Zone District Requesting: Lot Size '.Front Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. ~' Side Yard Setback Variance where ~' is required. ' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required. _ .~. : - ~. ' Height Variance, where ' is required. Square Feet where a maximum of sq, ft. is allowed. Other:' Hardship: Application filed (' /~'`~ Date Notices mailed ~J Ql ,,, Parcel ID #~L/~i~,a1.3~6D 'G6~ Secretary , Resolution to Building when Completed CASE # _L 1~__~ /~ PHONE ~~~" ~ ~a- '~ ~ ~_~ No Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made part of this,Case. The Board may return this.. application if it does not contain all the facts in question. ~~v ~x A ',a ~i+,kirl C.o~n~~ 1~octrc~ a~ ctdJus~~eh~-5. n~~ e. SSc~r~ q UCIr i ciYlCe 15 C~'1 i ~ ~ r erl d'f' L. ~ r 2 52.1~~- (ivi~c~.~ir~ c1 room 1`+ -~e~~' 9 /z -~ e e~' . ~he~ 0.re o~row ~ r1J r~~id ty and res~l[y rl~eed, ~©re_ c~o a rcl , t ~1 e S o~ 1 ~c1 v~ chose r~ -~ o -~ cv ~ -F-~ e PCi elc~ i -I-ion ~ s -1-~ e rn o s-i- lb~~`cc~1 . 3einc~ on +he bo,ek Side l -~ W Ou ~ c~ r~o~' 1 rl'}2r ~' er e_ W i $h t^n ~1 o r ~~1 "~ ~ R~ i ~1 ~ S'~ ~ C 2 bpi n 0. p r~ I ~-~ Q I ~'r o h'~' J ~~~k ~OU -,~ ~ "y ., 1 ; a. Real Proper_y. Approximately 13 acres of real property located in Tracts 65 and 66 of the Independent Resurvey of Township 8 South, Range 86 Wes"t, 6th P.M. and Tract 64, Section 21, Township 8 South, Range 86 West, Gth P.M., all in Pitkin County, Colorado, L~~~~~h ~, ~s. } i ~,, f ~ ,. i i V ~ i .. r , ®_~ :.... w , .r , ~N, ..~ :--, ~ ~~. ,.-.,,~~u June 10, 1991 To the Board of Adjustments, Ptkin County, Colorado: I, Stephen C. Wade, have no objection to Mary Kenney building an addition on the adjoining lot to me at Number 15, Lazy Glen, Highway 82, Snowmass, Cotora~do. Mylot being Number 16, I understand it will be sixteen feet from my trailer. I again have no objection. Thank you.. Stephen C. Wade .. ~. ~"" ~'~. ;;~.. ; June 1O, 1991 To the Board of Adjustments, Pitkin County, Colorado: I, ~{c,-~. {-b~,~,,,- have no objection to Mary Kenney building an addition on the adjoining lot to me at Number Lazy Glen, Highway 82, Snowmass, Colorado. My lot being Number 1`~ ~, Thank you, ~~ ~~ ~ ~c ayss - -< - ,.: _ ., ''~'.SPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFIC~) 130 South Ga7en~ Street ' Aspen, Colorado 81fi1T (303)-920-5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES.. city ._. .... ... 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL. -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 SU&CONCEPTUAL t. -63300-139 ~SUBIFI'NAC I -63310-140 ALL 2STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL t-STEP APPLICATIONS/ ' CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING ~ ~ ~~ 00175 -fi3340-163 ENGINEERING kE SUBTOTAL County f 00173 -63160-726 GMP/GENE=+At. ~~ -63170-127 GMP/D~ETAiLEb -63180-128 GMP/FINAL r -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL ~ ~ ' 1' -63200-730 SUB/DETAILED ' -63210-131 SUB/FINAL ? -63220-132 ALL 2 STEP APPLICATIONS -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ -~ J~_ ~'"""" -`"`~~ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ~- ~ -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ti_--~.._.:_----_- _ REFERRAL FEESi ~ ' t 00125 -63340-205' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-f90 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING 'f PLANNING OFFICE SALES _ ' 00113 ~ -63080 722 CITY/COUNTY CODE j §3090-123 COMP. PLAN -63140-724 COPYFEES ;. -69000-145 OTHER ~~ . SUBTOTAL / ~"~ '^----' / T07AL ~ :J ,i `p ~ ( .~ Name: i ~r~ ~ ' -, /~~~`~ Phone: Address: ,.... Project: ~ ~+~~ ° ~ " ~r' i ~ ,~:-~-. ,.. Check # Date: ~~ F // ^ ~. Additional billing: #of Hours: ,' ~ar.F ~,f?P~~. County of Pitkin State of Colorado The undersigned, follows: being or representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the -= ~ day of `~~~t-L~~~~~~•~. , 19 "~ ~ , to the ~ day of~~' ~ ,~;~ 19~. (Must be posted for at least nine t9) full days before the hearing date). Applic is Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~ day f c.--~e~- , ~ry'~~/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. ~~ My Commission expires:, ~ ~' , j < ~~. Z' Notary Public s Signature ~G _ ~ ~_ } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY } ss . POSTING OF A 'VAIZT.ANCE HEARING } BEFORE THE PITRIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT being first duly sworn, deposes and says as A~~ ~~a„ ~ ~~;-tip' ~/,L~' C! ~~? -~ ~"~ ~ _: `~' _ .. , i F, 1i~ _~ ~~~ ~ ter ~ t~~ ~~' ~~.~~ ~_ ate ~o~~E~,~~~ ,°°r-,,~;,, ~~ :~~`,`~`'~" r'f°cr~~s °~r~~a ~F~.~ taus ~~c~~ t~-~~~.~``~~,;k, ~tr =, ~qL~t~ ~-W`~ ~ ~. .~ _ a~_. ., ~_ ~s i . ~.~ , ~€ ~..` . #334441'"'~?~7`lt~ 09e~fi" Fiec~ ~.i7~7~~ Ht; 65~i PG 4 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc ~.OC~ RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLC)RADO" """` "" `" BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT GRANTING:SETBACR RELIEF FOR'MARY KENI~EY RESOLUTION NO. 91-32 WHEREAS, Mari Kenney, owner of a tract., of land situated at Lazy Glen Mobile Home Park, Space #15, requests a 7 foot side yard setback. variance for construction of an addition, in the SR zone district; and WHEREAS ' Pitkin C the subject prop( ty is within the unincorporated area of ounty, Colorado, as described rn Exhibit "A", attached); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3, 1973; 30ounty Code (Land IIse Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes, Pitkin c-as-iis(a) (c); and; WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment makes the following findings: 1. Proper notice procedures, including the notification of all adjoining property owners, has been shown by the applicant. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty has been established. 3. Granting such relief will not cause substan- tial detriment to the public welfare and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zoning maps. 70footHsRde yard setback Svarancey f"ore o'nst ti ti' on oftannad that a ' dtion, be granted, as shown on the plans submitted (Exhibit "B"), due to nonconforming lot size. WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may result in rehearing and possible revocation. z _.,.,. ~..U...~ .~~~~.~. -w,aa #3344.. U7/1U/91 09:36 R~c ~.UU'E~iK. b51 PG 5 ! Silvia. Davis Fitk:in Cnt Clerk Doc $.6t_~ Resolution 91-~~ Page 2 The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. DATED: July 2, 1991 The Board of Adjustment of Pitkin County, Colorado ATTEST: ~~ / ~ ~~ - Cin L. Christensen, Secretary Kandi Shaf .r n, Chairman .w .: :._ ~ '. #34441 07/10/91 G9: 36 Fec ~.GG BK b51 FG b Silvia Davis, FitNin Gnty Clerk, Doc ~.OG EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description for property owned by MARY RENNEY Lazy Glen Mobile. Home Park Space X15 Pitkn County, Colorado ,~-, .~~ #~""~441 c77/1C~/91 c79:36 Rec ~." EcK 651 FG 7 Si_~ia Davis, FitLin Cnty Clerh, Doc ~.G~7 EXHIBIT "B" Shfv~ ,~ I i 1 h~ s 4 x o`~ ~e e'i y.,'1 7 ~''~ ~, rl NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD°OF ADJT7STMENT ` TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOWs Pursuant to Pitkin Count Zonin Resolution of June 5 1955 a amended, a Public Hearing will be heldgin the Distric£ Courtroom, Pitkin Y P e meetin moa r then be ad'ournedC~torconsider ants s lication filed w th thn g Y 7 ) PP e said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for 'variance from the _ .. provisions of the County zoning Resolution.. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests, or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to sucki variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of srantuorl den r the tre uest for varianceaffecA VARIA2dCE GREATER THAN Oo g Y 4 R LESS THAN'THAT REQUESTED COIILD BE GRANTED. '' DATE AND TIME dF MEETING; July 2, 1991 at 5:is`p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall Ziff, William: requesting a 45 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-20 zone district, for construction of a barn. Property Location: Lot R-53-A, Starwood Seven Exemption. Mayer, Chuck: requesting a 20 foot west side yard setback variance; where 30 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for construction of a resid Brushcreekential garage. Property Location: Lot 1, Block 1, Filing 1, Village Subdivision. Pojman, Raymond: requesting a 30 foot front yard setback variance, where 100g feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a sin le-family residence. Property Location: 170 Crystal Country Circle, Crystal River Country Estates, Carbondale. Pfister, Arthur: requesting a 16 foot height variance, where 12 feet is required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a barn. Property Location: West Buttermilk. Alcitore, Gaston: requesting a 10 foot front yard setback variance,.. where p30 pfeet is required in the R-30 zone district, for construction of a ro osed .addition. Property Location: Lot 10, Block 4, Red Mountain Ranch. Miller, Gordon: requesting a 90 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required, for construction of a single-family residence. Property Location: Newfoundland Lode Mining Claim, U.S.M.S. 5190. bonze, Donald: requesting three separate variances -- 1) 30 foot front yard setback variance for an existing storage shed; 2) 25 foot front yard setback variance, to foot east side yard setback variance and a 10 ~t- ~, .,..4..,.~;; foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a proposed shed; 3) 7 foot west side yard setback variance and a 10'foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a mobile home addition. Property Location: Lazy Glen #44. Rennet', Mary: requesting a 7 foot side yard setback variance, where 10 proposed add tion~tola mobile home e Property~LOCation ns Lazy Glen #15a Submitted to the Aspen Times on June 18, 1991. To Be Published in the Aspen Times on June 20, 1991. County PO #51706 ,: ~ ,; Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment July 2'3991 Members Present: Members Absent: Kandi Shaffran, Chairman Stan Mathis Ted Guy Evan Gull Rick Neiley John Ostwald Joanna Schaffner, of the Pitkin County Zoning. Office, was present with staff recommendations and comments. Shaffran ope~sed the meeting at 5:2p p.m. and introduced the Board .. to those present. ~ the motion and all were in favor: Vance Grenko was to request a 7 foot height variance for construction of an y structure. Grenko advised the Board that since t] several professional people to prove for this accessory structiire~ is the also submitted a letter from 'Jerome Michael Gainbh is a Water engineer"and submitted into the'record Verifying' structure can be "built is'tfe "one bei~ May 7 meeting, he engaged t the only buildable area "being proposed. Grenko .a a & hssociates, Inc. rep~red a map that Grenko t the only location this requested. Shaffran reiterated that the location is not the problem, but the height ~s the problem. Grenko again stated that the"floor`area,that is needed can only be nlthe vicinitylsupp rt his request and"that aYl of ~~he~'neighbors Shaffran asked for public comment. Gid Nicki Lee and Pat~Zollinger, neighbors of Lee and ~ghnger support this request. believes that the nature of this lot is ~ very prominen£ topographical constrain' steep slopes Kaufman stated that he hai 11 neighbors ~a£h "avPrvnn"a"y`iYnn~sr*,';;,. 1 >n Kaufman, representing :Yie GrenkoTS, stated that i~aufmari `' stated 'tTat he ry'site specific and has -- river, floodplain, spoken with~9 out of the > request: R.-~ Nicki Lee, a neighbor across the river from the Grenko's, supports this request stating that this would be nicely done, and be consistent with the look of the area. Ostwald stated that he passes the property everyday and you would not be able to see this structure from the highway during the summer months. After further discussion, Neiley moved to grant a 7 foot height variance, due to topographic hardships, per the plans submitted, as recommended in the letter from Jerome Gamba and Associates. Shaffran seconded the motion and all were in favor. Case #91-30 Miller Gordon Newfoundland Lode Minina Claim, Shaffran stated that she has a conflict with this case, so will not be voting. Neiley was acting chairman. Randy Wedum was present, representing Gordon Miller, to request a 90 foot front yard setback variance, for construction of a single-family residence. Wedum briefed the Board as to the location of the property and the proposed location of the barn. Wedum stated that Miller wants to use the existing road that is already cut and services two properties. Wedum stated that the proposed site is the only buildable site, therefore, the request for the setback. Wedum showed the Board the actual site plan, with the building envelope and the proposed location of the house. This site has received a 1041 approval for the building envelope. Neiley asked if there was any public comment and there was none. After further discussion, Mathis moved to grant a 90 foot front yard setback variance, for construction of a single-family residence, due to topographical hardship, as on the plans submitted. Guy seconded the motion. All were in favor. Case #91-24 Ziff William Lot R-53-A Starwood Seven Subdivision Joe Wells was present, representing Mr. Ziff, to request a 45 foot front yard setback variance, in the RS-20 zone district, for construction of a barn, on a 73.6-acre tract, adjacent to the Starwood Subdivision. Mr. Ziff owns both sites that this variance would affect. Wells _. ,~:__. also mentioned that an approval was just-received from'ttie Planning and Zoning Commission for a lot line adjustment. Wells further showed the Board what type of topography surrounds the proposed barn location. This area is surrounded by 30~ or greater slopes and they are trying to minimize the 'impact on these slopes. Wells stated that Mr. Ziff raises native plants, which he uses on his own property. These plants are grown in the area of the proposed barn S location, therefore, the proposed barn would be located near the work activity to be used b this "'° ` "' '" ` ` y proposed barn: Guy further clarified that Section 16-1.3 states, "Whereby reason of exceptional narrowness,"'shallowness or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of enactment of"zoning regulation, or by reason of exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary or exceptional physical characteristics or condition of such piece of property riot created"liy"tfie appTcant'siibsequent to the adoption of these regulations, the strict application of any' zoning i icu ies o, or exceptional and undue hardship upon, the owner of such property, then the Board"shall hate authority 'upon an appeal relating to said property, to authorize a variance from such strict application so as to relieve such difficulties or hardship, e .,.- .. , provided sucfi~ relief may be granted without substantial "cT`etriinent _. to the public good and without substantially altering or impairing the`intent and purpose of'the zoning district regulations and policies and regulations of this Code .~'; and this is certainly an exceptional topographical condition with 30~ slopes. Shaffra7 asked"`for public comment and there was none. approved these plans. Rock Cha '^"'~ nage`r, wasff resent a and lstated t that athe$tHo ~eowners~~~ssociationon had p have endin' the a ro s and have approved the location of the barn peviewe the Laval of the Bgard`af Adjustment: g pp After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 45 foot front and setback variance for construction of a barn fr 3 p xtreme to osraahicall hardship and unique conditions) toe the proper m the p g p ty not caused by the applicant,. specifically, the existence of a road. Mathis ,seconded the motion and all were in favor. .> Case #91-26, Maver Chuck Lot 1 `Block i ~'ilina i Brush Creek Village Subdivision Kevan McCloud with Charles Cunnffe & Associates, was present representing Chuck Mayer, to request a 20 foot west sideyard setback. variance, where 30 feet is required in the AF=1 zone district, for construction of a residential garage. McCloud mentioned that there are topographic constraints. McCloud briefed the $OdYCl on 'this property. The proposed two-car garage is'"to "be a 22' by 22' . _ ., .. .,„.. ,, A scenic overlay and ric~g'eline 'review was approved for this proposed garage by the Planning and Zoning commission. Ostwald commented that a garage cannot be ,placed anywhere else on this property because it is a very`steep piece of property. 3 _. . ., .u, ,.., .,..~..~ .x -~;, ~as~` h ! r~~ r Guy mentioned that the drawings are not true to scale and that a 21 foot west sideyard setback would be needed. Guy also asked if Mayer's had an easement through the adjoining property for the driveway and McCloud stated that they did. Shaffran asked if there was any public comment and there was none. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 21 foot west sideyard setback variance, where 30 feet is required, for construction of a garage, due to a nonconforming lot and a topographic hardship. Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor. River Country Estates Raymond Pojman was present to request a 30 foot front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of a single-family residence. Pojman stated that the lot is only 165 square feet, therefore, believes this to be a nonconforming lot. Pojman also stated the Architectural Review Committee at the Crystal River Country Estates has signed off on his proposed plans. There is a hole already dug on this property which Pojman wants to utilize for the foundation of his. proposed house. Shaffran stated that the proposed house would be centered on the lot. Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none. Shaffran moved where 100 feet residence, due motion and all to grant a 30 foot front yard setback variance, is required, for construction, of a single-family to nonconforming lot size. Ostwald seconded the were in favor. Art Pfister was present to request a 16 foot height variance, where 12 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a barn. Pfister mentioned that he has to relocate his ranching operations due to the Pfister Ranch%Golf Course development. This is an ongoing agricultural venture. Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none. Schaffner mentioned that in the .Board of County Commissioners meeting on Monday, July 1, the Board discussed changing the height limitations for barns on conforming size lots in the AF-1 and RS zone districts to 28 feet. This may be incorporated in the new Pitkin County Land Use Code. 4 . -, w .. ~ a ~~ Shaffrah"move3 to grant a 16 foot height variance fox-constructionv of a barn, as per the plans submitted, due to downzoning. "Ostwald seconded the motion and all were in favor. ' qu ..~....i .., wuc yicocaaV 1-cyl.cacnt,tng the Alctore s to re est a IO foot front yard setback variance, ._.",. where 30 feet is required in the R=30 zone dstrict;a~~for construction of an addition to a single-family residence. Brandt explained that the lot is a pie-shaped lot with steep slopes around the house. Additional pictures were submitted to the file. Brandt stated that the allowable $A12 for this"lot is 5,468 square feet; the finished home would bring the FAR u to '4,095 "'s p aYe ,,, k° . feet, uYell under Effie 5,4G~~"squars' feet. Byr'a61ndt submitted to ptpe record two lettersq one letter from Pat R er a nei hbor a' roving thisproposal; and a letter from ttie Red Mountain Ranch Homeowners Association approving the proposed plans for the addition. r"" V1.11Q11. original~housE was` of this noncpnforn that if this req approval for_the e Shaffran asked for Guy questioned discussion, it"w addition. in the why the ._ .,,~. e in a se ac s an cou fin no recor3s ,ty. After a brief discussion, it was decided Est is approved, the Boated will also grant fisting nonconformity. public comment and there was done. other, options on thins lot, but after further as sfiown tTa£ there ~is no other place to put the so mentioned that a Minor Scenic, Overlay Development ,.aw~. review was granted to the Alcitores from the Planning Office. After further discussion, Neiley moved to grant a 20 foot front yard setback variance, where 30 feet is required, for construction of an addition to a single-family residence and to grant approval for the existing nonconforming single-family residence, based upon the `plans submitted; due ,to topographical hardships. Mathis seconded the `motion and all were in favor. L~laca~.aa uwa~m was present to request a 30 foot front yard setback variance for an existing storage shed; and a 7 foot west side yard setback bariancE and a 10"foot rear yard sE~back variance for construction of an addition, in the 5R zone district. The""request 5 _.,~ ... ". , +....". art a. M .a. &i .t ran"~ ~ ~W~.p:~n aE NZ i i~,~ x v: av.- A for a 25 foot front yard setback variance, a 10 foot east side yard setback variance, and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance for construction of a proposed shed has been withdrawn per the applicant. The residents have just purchased the mobile home park. Guy asked what the future plans were for the park. Guy Gervae, president of the Homeowners Association, stated that they plan to go for a PUB approval and change the zoning so that more permanent c_anges can be made to the park. Gervae mentioned that the ,Homeowner's Association reviewed Donze's plans and had no problem with what he is requesting. Schaffner mentioned that the zoning for that area is for lots of 15,000 square feet or greater. None of the lots located at Lazy Glen fall within these guidelines, therefore, everything being added not meeting the setbacks will have to be reviewed. Shaffran stated that she would have no problem with the shed as it is a better alternative to having equipment and items spread over the property. Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none. For the first variance request, Guy moved to grant a 30 foot front yard setback variance for an existing storage shed, where 30 feet is required, due to nonconforming lot size. Shaffran seconded the motion and four were in favor with Neiley abstaining. The second request was discussed. Neiley stated that he had a problem with this request since it would cause a zero lot line along open space which should be available to the residents of the park. Neiley believes that a homeowner should be able to access the perimeter of their building on their property, not in open space. Donze mentioned that along the back lot line is an elevated berm e realized thatlltheure swoulda be •approx mat lyhefours feet from the addition to the lot line. After further discussion, Guy made a motion to grant a 7 foot west side yard setback variance and a 7 foot rear yard setback variance, due to nonconforming lot size, for construction of an addition, as per the plans submitted. Shaffran seconded the motion with four approvals and Neiley denying the request. Case #91 32 Kenney Marv Lazv Glen Mobile Home Park #15 _ Mary Kenney was 'present to request a 7 foot_ side yard setback variance in the SR zone district, for construction of a proposed addition to a mobile home. 6 .., _ y f tv. n.i. ~{~+m -. ;, Kenney submitted letters into the record from adjacent property owners approving this request. Also submitted were pictures showing the need for the addition. After a brief discussion, Guy moved to grant a 7 foot side yard setback variance, on the condition that at least 15 'feet remain between th 5 addition and the adjoining trailer, due to nonconformin lot size. Mathis seconded the motion and all were in favor. The"minutes of the June 4, 1991 meeting were approved as written. Dolan Ostwald tendered his resignation at the conclusion of this meeting. His letter is on file in the Zoning Department. The'mee,ting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Secretary Kandi Shaffr Chairman 7 . r ~