HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.91.33Any pertinent data must accompany this. application, and will be
made `part of this Case. The Board may return this application if
it does not contain all the facts n`question.
Applicant Signature _!U `~ "~
~~.~
(To be completed by the Zoning Department)
too forward o thine aonlicationl ~ ion requiring the Zoning Official
pp o the' Board of Adjustment, and
reasons for not granting a building permit:
Reguesting:
5~~~ ~~
~~"0 Zone District
~~ Z~b Lot Size
~' Front Yard Setback Variance, where ?f3 ' is required.
`~ Rear Yard Setback Variance, where D qureci.
' _,. Side Yard setback Variance, where ' is required.
' Side Yard Setback Variance, where ' is required.
' Height Variance, where ' is required.
Square Feet where a maximum of sq. ft. is allowed.
Otherr
Hardship:
Zon~in~g /Official ~~~~„~,x.-`
Application filed --~--~~ ~-1-- Date ~ 1 ~C(~
Notices mailed ~ °.~-`7'rp ~ _ T-
Parcel ID #aZlv~~ ~~~I- ~~-~~ 75ecretary -
Resolution to Building when Completed ~ Yes ~ _~ No
f~3m>x,~,~~,.y
_ ~;..
-^~ TICR OF PU~LIC H~AI~ING
BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBETS BEhOW:
Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as
amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers,
Cit Ha
y 11, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place as
the meeting map then be adjourned) to consider an application filed
with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance
from the provisions of the Countp Zoning Resolution.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests or objections. If 'you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to
state your views by letter, partcularlp if you have objection to
such variance, as the Bc~rd of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or denp the request
for variance.
THE PARTICULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE 'ARE "
AS FOLLOWS:
Date and time. of meeting:
August 6, 199.1 at 5:15 p.m.
City Hall, 2nd Floor Meeting Room
owner:
Name and Address of
AppS.ic'~nt:
Property Location or
Description:
Kathleen & Kirk Reichel
Glenn Horn
300 E Hyman',LL B
Asp'era, CO 81611
Lot 5, Little Texas Subdivision
Y
wherest100 eet has required in tthe~ AF-larzonet dai t lcriance,
t, for
construction of a residential garage; and an 89 foot front yard
setback variance and a 17 foot r2ar yard setback variance, where
100 feet and 30 feet, respectively, are required for construction
of an 'addition to a single-family residence. Approval of this
variance would place the proposed garage 8 feet from the Rechel's
front yard property line and the '`addition it feet from the front
yard property line and 13 feet from the rear yard property line of
the Rechel's.
VARIANCES GREATER OR L`E"SS''1'HAN"`REQUE$iP~D `COULD` BE GRANTED. '
Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X
THE PITKIN'COUNTY BO D OF ADJUSTMENT "
,1~
! L //
Cindy/ Christensen, Secretary
~5t ~r epVx<~;:
;.t
/'
July s, 1771
Amy I~Iarg'erum _ _.~- ~.
Joanna Schaffner
Aspen-Pitkin 'Planning Office
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Reichel Variance Request
Dear Amy and Joarina:
We represent Kathleen and Kirk Reichel who have recently acquired
Lot 5 Little Texa"'s from L:V: "Anderson. °'The'`site `is presently
im roved with an old huntin cabin which was constructed many years
g le Texas was developed by~C:C. 'date as a ~iunting c
all•ofLhis Texas huntin buddies. Pate sold Lot~5 to µ4L_. V. Anmp for
5 Berson
in 1946. "The original owners are ..,getting old `and in the past ten
reside tsny of them sold "their ,'property to local full time
Most of the lots in Little Texas including the subject site are
approximately 75 feet deep and 500 feet wide. The Woody Creek was
originally zoned in the~1970's and Little Texas is presently zoned
AF-1. According to the Section 3-2 of the Pitkin County Land Use
Code there should be a 100 foot front yard se£tack'and 30 foot side
and rear yard setbacks. The imposition of the current zoning
shallowness c of the asubjecficant hardshp'due to the`"excep'tional
t site
than 25 ears before the enactmentwhich was legally created more
Y of the 'regulations.
The front yard setback for 'the existing structure is 10 feet and
the rear yard setback is 18 feet. The Reichels are proposing a
major remodel and minor addition to the building. The addition
will extend to the south toward tTi'e"Roarng Fork River. A garage
is also proposed to the north "o£"'the existing residence. They
request approval y'r a 10 front yard 'setback an q a 10 rear yard
setback. A side and setback variance is, not re uired.
Mos of the n
ew structures'`in Little Texas have obtained similar
variances. The Reichels submitted a minor 1041 Environmental
Hazard Review application a few weeks ago. We anticipate approval
of the 1041 application prior to the Board of Adjustment hearing.
Please ive me a call if .you have questions. Thanks
9
Sincerely,
DAVIS HORN' INCOY2PORATED" ' _ ,`
GLENN HORN AICP
ALICE DAVIS, RM J GI~NN HORN, AICP Foy ~~ ~,r ~
300 EAST FI1'tv1P,l•1 •"5UIYE~$• ASP`EN;'Cb'C($~lFADO 8"'1611-• 303%975=3587" ,...,.... _.. ~,# a..f.
i
~~ ~.
A~
/~~ /
,~-~
_ _
m _ : "". i,
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY'OWNERB
Mark and Kelley Purnell
100 E. Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dick'Stahura
Box 875
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Bonnie and Don Rayburn
Box 1532
Aspen, Colorado 81612
G'.k. Ad'~J 3d~L:d~a3'.. .. ...
If ~°
:;
.~. ~~
,.,
a.,.
W~
~~
Q Q
NU
~~
~ ~
~4 ~
J
a
i
~e
~~_~~
m ,
i W A Z T L "j nV
6 ~ f ~ 2 [F
sd
~.
~.
:;
~,
~::
r_,.
f!' 7 W
Gtx:Z
~ o~w
C~ ..1G^
~~ ~ ~_ti--}-
`~' a
~
r
-
aw
E ~~~
f.~ dt
7 $
g
'L
U7
I
.~ .
~ r '. -
~'°
;. ~
~ k '~.
a
O ~ ~ ~~
\
~ -
u
S
~
`~ ~ 1
~
~ ~
~ r
" ~ /~ 1
.~:
s
~,
~
j
~
M ,
~'
f
~..i ~ J
d3>.xd'q r qy n~."
ti,~ .
~,
~-~_. -- -.~-..;--_'~-----~-___,.~-_.. roy.._r_ men or 'marker -~-_..~~. C "~
YNY. ~ i! purpose's of deacribina of iocwrlr... .:.:..a__.. . _ _ for ~ ,_ ,~i_
1~ M3 ~• r
... ~ Silv3~ nyviss,Pitkln4B Rac t10 po.~~~7i.'
' r, Cnty_C1ark~ goeit32:5
2~,_•~ STATE b! ~ :.r ,..i. 1
.. J Miry ., :1 I
/y~~~~ 1a :.. 1 ./ ~ y. YI r
::
{{,,.1.~~~ ~ ~rt/VltlJ< ~~ ''~ 'f~~ ~ 4 ~. }. r~ j~ r' 1 IIr~
'f.1G ~ ~rll.
11 V ~~
~: ,~2 daytot binq iristruaant~ wa ipDcnorladgad
i • 1991, 'bY ]U
f.. v.~,
, , . r .., •
~, ~ '~~ IaS' hdnd and ottipial sans ~ ~} $~z,:
+ +~ ' ` ,,~ ~ poauiission axryiraax ~ /S'- 9~+ C i~ ~;~
*: 1 rj 1(~
ti~ ~~ ~1f~~ i ` 5~: Is ~•/n 1 71ddLaiix 7~dr~}1
{ ++vy~
~ ~~ ri ` Y `~ i t .?'t 1{ rlf lf;)r`f ft ~ ,ili!+~.
}} r >y ~L
~l .. ~~/V }
~I 1 t
i
~
~
~ , ~
'
{
' ~
) I
l
4 t f
N
5 Y
,
°
a'
,
~ 1
1
~ a ll
l
1
,
1
;
~,
+
~ Yr
r] <
~'
d i
.~ ~
)
•X
• ~
L a`'
i ~
.4 ) 1 .
~
~
~
r~ a~
r
,1..
f ~ 1. xl a , ~+1.+
Wh
r ~
',,
i
i .
r..
,.
I
~ ~~u
.
1 p d ~ ~
~~ ~ 'r i rY
1Ft
' ~j
F
µ .) ~
. ~. ~ 11 ! r t
..
~
~ ~ip
~ .IiJ"
1.. Cy
i (
1 {, .. D N r )
1
,, ,,(~
j
* L
' y 1 (M ~ } M
' 1
~
`~ `
;
~1
~
~
Y
,. ,.
~
,
: ,
~
~r
;
a ~
it > r
~
Ri
))
t• }
,
~
. ~ ~
~ rt
) 1
=
1 r {~
n
11 '.
1 l
c
~ ~
C
r
I Y
1
~ `1 I 1,
.
t'
'x.r
F
I 1 I ~i +;
1 1
~ ';~
i.
; :r
ra,
~ ~ ri • b~4'
...
J .. ~
, 1
,L i.. 1
: ~., t+... -1., S "i
ri,
'
. ,
~ ~ R
~ t ~ 1 ~ ~ .r ~ n ~
1 1~" Y 3 F,
. (
~) ,
~F
(
~'
.. i
,
I ~ G i r:
:
;~;
.
r r~.
~ 1. ; 1 ~ ~
`
.. ~~.~
'
1~r
~e
; ' ~Z
f '~
;
.
1
c
i
r
~ t
t " `~
v
~
~ i ~ ~ 1 (k.
t
`11.
i 4 ~ ~
s
1 1S^~ , ~ i
fr'e
t
swtiw r guar f ~' 1 E
~ ~
,
~ ' 1 Y ~ .
~
`
OOVTgY~f IttlA YIY~y I
t h;
N~WrY~l ~elj' ~
1 I•
•IF~
~
' .
~
' . )
~~A
, f ~
1
'. i
ty
:+f
~ i
' F
,
~,
I; .
c. t i
~,
.. d~^.
r
' `t O
\`
k
r
~~ ,^ /
,~, pp'' ~
I~'
.. ''~ I , ,/
\ r ~ ~ ~~ '
_~' ~ » (
~ i• rr~^ ,
~, n ~ . Irv
_- ~\
/Crlg ).~ i
~. ~ III, . ~~ r
'ra..r.. ~~~ ~~1 ~'\ i II?~~ ..1 F-1 1Tl. I1~ V 11' \\Il hII
"\/ ~ r~ I I r I I u f i r ~.1 r~ 1 :~ G 1~ `t1 ~ 1 ` 1
I ` r ~I I ~ 1 ~ `~ ~I~ .~7 ~~ ~~~~ rl)
r~,.~ I I r,/ 11~ ,> tr/' }1 I~f'1 .,ir if~:llt. .,~\': `~f? ~1+ „1Woody(rtx.ke,i j'~~'
1 ' ~ ;\1 ' I ~ , r // ~/ I r r I ; r ' I 31~ '.; (\`\ 1 't : i 1' ~ ~ ,
i / 1 ~ '~ /
r / ;) ~ v 1.
///~ ,{ ~ 1,1i .a
"~ ~ _/ ~ / ,~ ~~ I ~ I , h. 1 ~ ~~~~ s O ~1',
~ ;I :' ~r ~ ~ ~ I ~'~ ~ 7a ~rl U\ ~ 11h
... ;~ \
k:
r ~,
DIRECTIONS ~ I'O S~I'I'E ADD `$l.'b`2J"~~'OCA'T'YON , - `` . , ~
1. Go downvalley on SK 82 and turn at the True Smith bridge.
2. Go downvalley on Upper River Road for about a mile and turn
left to go into the Little Texa
inefrontrof his property house a Subdivision. This is before
Palazzi has a big wood fence
3. Go upvalley in Little Texas.
4. The Reichel house is the one that is all toY•n up and looks
terrible. It is just downvalley from the Purnell's new grey
two story house.
5. If you cannot find it call me and Y will provide more explicit
directions or I will take you there ( H-92B~2167` or ''W-925
6587).
6. The sign Will be located in the front yard of the building.
p ~v Y5 b,~:~.~P,'
~ b
MEMORANDIIM
TO: Amy Margerum, Planning Director
FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner
RE: Reichel Minor 1041 Hazard Review
DATE: August 2, 1991
G ~ e,h vl
,~o ~ v~
~r
Issue: The applicant, Kirk Reichel, has submitted a request for
a 1041'Minor Hazard review for a substantial addition to a single-
family residence on a~lot approximately 22,500 square feet in size,
zoned AF-1. The property is a metes and bounds tract, in Section
9, Township 9 South, Range 85 West and is also known as Little
Texas Subdivision Lot 5, an unapproved subdivision.
Access to the property is from Upper River Road to a private road
easement serving the Little Texas lots: There is an existing
driveway on the property to the building ,envelope. After reviewing
the 1041 Hazard Maps, staff finds no 1041 Hazards within the
building envelope and driveway, except .for Elk Winter Range. The
property has slopes in excess of 30$ and floodplain hazards, which
are not being encroached upon.
The applicant has submitted an engineering report dated June 18,
1991 by Banner Associates which addresses the,. septic system steep
slopes on the property. J.'Dan Powell, a consulting geologist has
,,„
P
aeolo sc conditionsron the propert une i3,~~~ 19'9 `l, addressing the
g g~ y. The recommendations'of these
reports shall be adhered to by the applicant.
If the applicant locates the addition within the building envelope
as shown an'the site plan development will be outside of mapped
hazard areas, except for Elk winter Range. Due to the existing
residence on the parcel and the'"vicinity to other residences the
Planning office recommends standard wildlife conditions.
The applicant has sited the proposed building envelope so that it
does not. encroach down the hilTs:de beyond the elevation of the
neighboring properties. Attached is the site plan.
Findings:
1) The building envelope and driveway access are located in an
area which will not effect the floodplain. or steep slopes
hazards on site.
2) The building envelope is within mapped Elk Winter Range. The
ap'plicarit will need to meei~ the standard conditions of the
Division of Wildlife.
-,.
_ ~~~ ,
_, ,
3) The building envelope does not encroach down the hillside into
slopes of more than 30$, or'beyond the elevation of the
neighboring properties.
4) The County Attorney has reviewed the chain of title and
ownership information for the subject lots and adjoining lots
and has determined that merger has hot taken place.
Recommendation: Sections 5-400.3(b) and 5-400.5(b) of the Land
Use Code provide that the Planning Director is authorized to
approve a site plan and application for a Minor 1041 Hazard Review.
Based on the findings, Planning staff recommerids approval of the
Reichel Minor 1041 Hazard Review and that the planning Director
sign the site plan with the conditions of approval noted on the
site plan.
CONbITIONB OF APPROVAL:
1. All dogs shall be kenneled or leashed.
2. Native vegetation shall be maintained outside of
the building envelope.
3. Fencing shall be 42" or less in height, 4 strand or
less.
4. Utility extensions shall be placed under the
existing road and driveway.
5. No development is permitted outside of the building
envelope.
6. The recommendations of the Powell geologic report
dated June 13, 1991 (Exhibit "A") and the Banner
engineering. report dated June 18, ].991 (Exhibit "B") '
shall be adhered to by the applicant.
APPROVED•
~ G~~-_
Amy ICE gerum,
Planning Director
1041.M.Reichel
ti dv °6 G~':d?~.
_ , ~ .ti , ..~.t :~
.,
~; ;, .
y ~ ;;
:~ <;_
- OPEN/PfTKW PLANNING OFFhCE~ i
130$outFi Galeha Street
Aspen, Colokado 81617
(303j 920.5090
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
city
00173 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTU'AC ~~
-63270-136 GMP/FINAL.
-63280-737 SUB/CONCEpTUAL '
-63300.139 SUB)FfNAL ~~
-63370-140 ALL 2-STEP.APPLICATIONS
-63320-141 ALL 7-STEP APPLICATIONS/"
CONSENT,4GENDAITEMS '
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -83340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123 -63340-190 HOUSING
00115 -63340-763 ENGINEERING
SUBTOTAL
County
00713 -63160-126
-63170-727
-63180-128
X3190-129
X3200-930
-63210-437
-63220-132
-63230 133._ __~
/-63450-146,_..-~'~j
GMP/GENERAL
GMP76ETAILED ~ ~ '
GMP/F1NA'L ~ ~"'
5t7eiGENE~1At
SUB/DETAILED
SUB/FINAL
ALL 3=SYEP AP'P~L(CATfONS ""~ "'
ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
BOARD OFADJU5TMENT
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
AEFERHAL FEES: _:. -
-~ - - -..--;~ ' ~~ '.
00125 -63340 205 ~
` ENVIRONMFNTAL HEALTH '
00723 `
"`~
_-&3340.790 "'
HOUSING
_ 00113 -e:-== '-63360-143 E~1~GIN'EERING ~ '
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE ~~
-63090-723 COMP. PLAM
~3i40-124 COPY FEES
-69000-145 OTHER
Name: ~.2 L ~Eh~ glE~c~`r Q.ta,CS'/
Address:
Check # 1 ~'~~ J
Additional billing:
Phone
,_ ~ ~~_
~~ ~~
J
Project' ~.~~ %~~~
~ T`~-~
#of Hours:
s E `.:':r we e'F I " +~-, z
>s _ u:v 65 G,v/us:5(v ,e,)rb St>I rvlw. raar a` h .,wr,'_. ~;:"
Caunty of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A VARTAN~ HEARING
State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
' being or
representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously
from the _Z-`~ day of ~~ ~-~ ~ ~^, , 19 ~~ f ,
to the ~ day of _ ~~_~., ,-~, r~- , 19 c~
(Must be posted for at least nine {9) full days before the
hearing date).
{_ ~ ~
/A ~
pplicant s Signature
~'* Subscribed and sworn to before me
~..
this ~_ day of -" ,~~
- fl-~ -'~` 19 `~~ ~ by _ ~
~~;a~.-~~ - WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
F ,.
~s,
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;
~F # ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,, ' ~ My Commission expires: ~'f~~'~~
'~ ~ ~ # - ~`
k
~~~~
~ry Public's Signature
.. ...a,•,., -. -uvr:t w+~xrr.-ns~~baw,.+aya'.u_w`§~. 47&t'"nfl wn'sa't'n"^:...a£;.3.nn.!~,x_x.,,..7.w',Y~+`+7ne;»c?t~7v"`.-.:ra',`£°"sv3/5 ~'.'~.r!~~rn'.~:=`, ~.,, ,.
r'`a t o. f ! ~ it"a~" x~.y aM++i ^^. c ~; w t f
~ N - „ < - +r r .~ ,~°iy '~s.+.,f ~~~i'~-r~ ,Sk,.~ ~ 'a; a+~ - e _ a ~ ~a•~'+~
-s *~~ ,n4'"~.h~ '~ '~"~3A«Y~p.' {as" x a xaa ~ %aY"yiF., x i9u`Jf ~ ~, %i- fit
- _ - t +w ea ~y Y` ~ A }^ ~°•z mrk N t~ w C ~+-w~.'4.xro' f„ ~ z+ c Y''xx ~„"w' ~a s ^t ~7'' N`" ~'
. ' ' ~., „~+ e <. ?h `,~.*~ -.m?w"xd""~' ~~~~.*~-'~ k ~4~"w' ~~ r~ x ~- x'¢ 5 n~ q' ~~ ^5 +a.~, .,`,~' 4 s
v ,,. -k ,¢. wti+ o .mow s, _ nm.
~-~ 'T' ~~ F s}'e"'", 1h'S"_"~.d '°!c C 1 '~"' ~. ~w..~ `""9 *3~ -# k 'Y r
'a',.;a'x - y' a+r, C ~ texas w`'. ~'.h.r .w,t ~-,r~5kf...+'iaw,. :p,. ^4,~ ~k~?'rau~- ,n<, x" .. .x?~
i .e
. •. .may w i".r 4. f 2 r
! n v~ xr
~'S '"Cs„ ~ioC "` r :~-^~., uY~?sd .'~'~~' ''' ^.~,,•,. 're. n, ^.k'~.~`~',,k'.~...~#,3~E~t ~ ~,,
< N ix' q
. ._»ra r _
... ~~ - ..
8 C~8/^1/91 (74.6 f.ec ~ n~a""~ 654 F'G 54
#33$x"" ~ ' • - Y . ~, _ f,
'Silo Davis FitE:in Cn't"'" Clerk oc ~.i~O
RESOLIITIO2t OF THE PITKIN COIINTY~ COLORADO
BOARD. OF ADJIISTMENT
GRANTING SETBACK RELIEF FOR RIRR & KATHLEEN REICHEL
RESOLUTION NO. 91-33
WHEREAS, Kirk and Kathleen Reichel, owners of a tract of land
situated at Lot 5, Little Texas 'Subdivision, requests a 92 foot
front yard setback variance for construction of a garage, 'and an
89 foot front yard setback variance and a 17 'foot rear yard setback
variance for construction of an addtion_ to a single family
residence, in the AF-1 zone district; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is within the unincorporated area of
Pitkin County; Colorado, (as described in Exhibit; "A~', attached);
and, __
WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment is vested with the powez to grant
or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3,
Pitkin. County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes,
1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, '
WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented, the Board. of Adjustment
makes the following findings: -'
1. Proper- notice procedures, including the
notification of all adjoining property owners,
has been shown by the applicant.
2. The required hardship or practical difficulty
has been established.
3. Granting such relief will not cause substan-
tal detriment to the public welfare and will
note substantially impair the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the
zoning maps.
NOW, TTiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a
90 foot front yard setback variance for construction of a detached
garage', and an 89 foot front yard setback variance and a 17 foot
rear yard setback variance for construction of an addition to a
single-family residence, due to downzonng, be granted as per the
plans submitted (Exhibit B )~.
WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may
result in rehearing and possible .revocation.
R--~,..
#33. ~'8 08/21/91 09:36 Rec b.OG 1K 654 F'G 544 '`~' '"
Silvia ~Davisy F'itFrin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.~i0
Resolution 91- J3
Page 2
The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of
the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
DATED: August 6, 1991
ATTEST:
~ ~,
_~
Cind L. Christensen,
ecretary
The Board of Adjustment
of Pitkin County, Colorado
K di Shaffran,
Chairman
r
r~,~
_.; ,)
-~ 1
f
'i
F~.+
``•1
T j
(
%'-
~,'~x
..c„
*~ ' _ j
:. {
i
?~ . -
.:'
i.
r ...
,i..
~,_' .-~
~~,
~.:
~j..;. j
e,.
,...
~':
~'~ '
w', 3
.<„
chi.;:: '
<:`'
~~~~
/.•'! P
.:'. .y
`3',..
..,. ..
sL~'' ~
~s;
~' `' i.
.: ;.
1 '.'j
i; ::
q~ :.
N3330B9 O. .1/91 12x43 Rec f10.00 HK 647 P ~~~. 3 a
Silv1. De`, Pitkin Cnty C1 ~r`k Doc't~'2:3 ~: ~': ,..
.,, ,; _ • r
_1 u. .~..
9
m
a
u
a
D:
c
0
A
n
v
a
A
~~
oe
w
na
MC
a
~ h
l?o
l
~~
:~ o era ($10.00} and other good and wa
consideration, in hand paid, hereby aella and conveys to
I~ KTRTC RETC1iEI; and` Jl2tET R. HREW'ER-REZCfi$L; e• joint tenan
~~ right of survivorship, vhoae addreaa is Poet 6ftica~Box'-
Aspen, Colorado 81612, the following real property in t
I~ County of Pitkin, Stets of r_~1.,,-. a.. ..,...r..
L. V. ANDERSON, vhoae address is 6551 Clenvigw Drive,
~' Apartment 1715, Fort worth,"Texan 75180, for the consideration
;, of 'Ten and Ho%100 D 11
,. ...
A parcel of land situated in Section 16, Township 9 8outh~'~
Range E5 Weat o! the 6th P.N.""fSa`inq more phrticularly ~ '
deacrlbed as tollovsl
Beginnlnq at a point whence the N 1/4 corner of said: ,~
Section 16 bears N. 10•"Y`6~04N W. 2575.59 teetJ
thence N. 60.3E'00" E.'188:28tent to the SouthweaEerly '~:~
aide of the right-ot-way of the Denver4 Rio Czsnd•
Western Railroad; -~~ '~'
thenen 5. 10.0'2.09' F_ 75 8'S L' t 1 ~ - '
thence leaving the r
feet to thebank of
thence N. 34.55'21^
thence N. 60.36~OOw
excepting aright-of~
place
ee a ong the rig
t-of-way S. 60.18~OOe N.
for a county
COUNTY OP PITKZN, STATE O'F COLARADO`
with all its
subject to g
subsequent y
;~ y-..••.Qy. ~n inarrumont rec.
~: agreement for"eesement as
.; Hook 463 at Fatje`238; rigl
; and Rio Grande Weatel-ti Ra:
i adverse c:aims as to any
any change in the river bi
~, causes', or" alteration thra
avulsion of the center thl
'~ in the Roaring Fork River
-~-i)~ quaation as to the locatlc
;~ or channel as a legal dent
purposes of deecribing oL
interest, oreaaement'e in
'I state of Colorado, the Uh!
public, which exist, have
andover the waters and pI
~i Roaring Fork River; terms,
reservations, provisions,
~ ways for ingress and,egree
recorded in Baok 166 at Pa
right-ot-way and easelnentWf~
place; all as shown in the 1
Pitkin county, Colorado.
the title to the anms,
esmenta for 1991 and
eequent yoaraj
in State o1 Colorado
right-ot-way easemont
b2 at Page"'839j
trument recorded in
naeleeht for the Deliver
ation, dispute, tir
land as a result of
other than natural
reliction, erosion, or
~nel, or flow o! waters
ibject land; and any
jr thread, bank, bed,
it or marker fore
•t lender any rights,
~parien owners, the
voerica, or the general.
claimed to elciat in
and rights-ot-
in Deed
.+ ark nook boa at Pate 922j
y Road, as built and in
of the Clerk and Recorder o!
.. Signed and delivered _ -.~~-':..•. , 1991. '
,,,,,,,,,„~„~ '; I, Anderson
.v .a.rirnw.~
~°`W°-°° „ (Acknowledgement on Following Page) ~ - '
#33.°,698 ~]8/^1 /91 69. ~6 Fec ~. t~fj $K 654 GB 545
;. Silvia Davis, Fitkan Cnty Clerk, iJac ~. QCi
lVcste'~ 2a;iroLd ^'
~d pro Grade
er ° 5 ~ ~~OZ'~9 E ;4'esf R_0_'N Gne%.
76.85'
EXHIBIT "B"
M
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ,
` ~- ~ ' ' ~
~~ ~' ~ Vemenf)I
od l-0o
m Lounty Ra ! 'C .~ o x,
I
~I ~
~~~ * \ ~'POp- e
\ .CpWe/i atl In
i 4~ 'P 7 p9' oad i
+
and yen°+ Lop~t~
to ~
~+o
+oad
~oG
r r / end cLe/
.c ,, Fo+ I O
.~ '~ O'
an G ~ +
n 9 e /i
~• . S ; 0 ,
- -.-- ) LJ /~ /
- - s
' '.~- a-TO_.
I t' N ~~ , /~ ~ 99re j i
- `o.
i o" .-.I l , ~z
IIINI ll[
'---~ ~ s+r~ ~ - ~ - -
l ..
n ~ ~Qo ,
Z r~ ~~.rr., ~ qE
~,. ,e
~,
p'f~
~~\~ 7,4 ~^N 4p9 'LQ ~ Apparent underground
~+7 -tee/eclr.~ line
~~ 5~ e y/
2nopse~ / ~
' p• ..~ \°h / o~`~' ~ ~ '- `retaining
lye ~ \'-
~•\i
,awl f17 S
J Fi '~t: t sr~ n. .~
~ S •r \
#335698 ciB/.:1/91 u9: 36 Rec ~.0+~ Bf... \
' 654 ?C~ 546 ~urvF ilcu~
Si?via Davis, F'itL::in Cnty Clerk:, Doc ~.+]i~ I
_. r
~~ ~ ~ `.
FOUCd' irpn bar '1555 ~
2.4T off ;ine ~~
5 ~n
Minutes
]?t$in County
Board of Adjustment
August 6~ 19`91'
Members Present: Kand Shaffran, Chairman
Evan Gull
Rod Dyer
Rick Neley
John Wheeler
Members Absent;. Stan Mathis Ted Guy
.. ., .;.
Staff:, Joanna Schaffner., 'County Zoning Enforcement"Officer,.
Shaffran opened the meeting at 5:20 p.m. and introduced the Board to those
present. ''Two riew'inembers were introduced -- John Wheeler and Rod Dyer..
Reichel were also present. Th'e Reichel's are requesting a 92 foot front
yard setback variance, where 100 feet,',_is,required in the AF-i zone district
for construction of a detached. re"sidential garage; and an 89 foot front
yard setback variance and a 17 foot rear yard setback variance for
construction of an addition to a single-family residence.
Shaffran asked if the Reichel's had to go through a Minor 1041 Hazard
Review. This was completed and a memo was submitted by Horn to the record
dated August. 2, 1991, approving the bzl.ding envelope.
,.. ,.
Horn briefed the Board on the area and the lay bf the land and how the rear
of the house is near very steep slopes.
Shaffran asked for. public comment and there was none.
Gull and Neley both would prefer the Reichel's stay 10 feet from the front
yard prop2rty line. The ]3eichel's stated that they would 'not have a
problem moving the garage back 2 feety.
After further discussion, Gu12 moved to grant a 90 foot front yard setback
variance for construction of a detached garage, and an 89 foot front yard
setback variance and a 17 foot rear yard setback variance for construction
of an addition 'to a single-family residence, due to downzoning, per the
plans submitted. Neley seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Larry Yarber was present to request a 70 foot front yard setback variance
and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 10 feet,
respectively, are required in the AF=1 zone,distrct; for construction of
a deck to a single-family residence.
1
__ ._~
--
Schaffner stated that when the Yarbers previously came before the Board and
were granted their request, Resolution No. 91-02, they were under the
assumption that decks were not needed to be included in the setback
requirement. Therefore, the Yarbers are requesting additional setbacks for
the deck. Shaffran read the minutes of the January 8, 1991 meeting.
Yarber stated that the deck is still within the approved building envelope.
Shaffran asked if there was any public comment and there was none.
After further discussion, Neiley moved to grant a 70 foot front yard
setback variance and a 10 foot north side yard setback variance, for
construction of a deck to a single-family residence, due to topographical
hardships and downzoning, as on the plans submitted. Shaffran seconded the
motion. All were in favor.
Steve Swanson was present to request a 32 foot front yard setback variance,
where 100 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for construction of
an addition to a single-family residence.
Neiley asked Swanson if he received any variances when the house was
originally built. Swanson did not originally build the house and is not
aware of any variances granted.
Swanson stated that the house is about a football field away from houses
on either side. Gull stated that the proposed addition would have the
least impact on the setbacks and would have no problem with this request.
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none.
After further discussion, Gull made a motion to grant a 32 foot front yard
setback variance, where 100 feet is required, for construction of an
addition to a single-family residence, due to downzoning, as per the plans
submitted. Wheeler seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Case #91-36, Powell, J. Dan, Lot "M", Little Texas Subdivision
Dan Powell was present to request a 72 foot front yard setback variance and
a 16 foot rear yard setback variance, where 100 feet and 30 feet,
respectively, are required in the AF-1 zone district for construction of
an addition to a single-family residence.
Gull had a question as to how the numbers were calculated. The front yard
was established by the access. Gull stated that the same guidelines should
be used as in the previous case, Case No. 91-33, as the lot is about the
same size.
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none.
After a brief discussion, Shaffran made a motion to grant a 72 foot front
yard setback variance and a 16 foot rear yard setback variance due to
2
w-
down2oning and topographical hardships, as per the plans submitted. Neiley
seconded the motion with all in favor.
Philip Eastley was' present to request a 20 foot east side yara setbacx
variance, where 20 feet is required in the AF-2 zone district, for
construction of an additon,to,a single-family residence.
Eastley submitted a picture of the lot and a letter to_the file, from, the
Homeowners'Association approving his request. Eastley `also submitted. a
' pp g is proposal with conditions.
letter front Daniel J. Packard su ortn h
Eastley stated that they pried diffe is presently located: Every other
their home before buildin where it rent areas on the property to build
place they tried to dig, they ran into water which is still present on the
ro ert EastTe also stated the ro osed location for'the structure has
p P Y• Y P 'P
the least ,impact on the `view planes o'f the_other'property. '
Wheeler asked if it was all one level with Eastley stating that it is one
level and the garage and a bedroom is the addition.
Gull stated that his concern is with, the zero lot line requested and the
proposed addition being built oh the utility easement. Neiley had the same
concern .•
Eastley. again told the_Board of the water surface problem 'in the area they
want to build.
Gull stated that he has no problem with the proposed location but with the
zero lot line and the utility easement from which the Board cannot provide
an relief. Gull would refer to see EastYe " move the ro osed additthe
1o feet off the property line. Neiley stated that he does not like ion
zero lot line as he believes you should. be able to work on your structure
without leaving your property.
Neiley asked Eastley if he would have a problem moving. the addition 10 feet
off the property line and Easley stated that "he could work with that.
Wheeler stated that he does not see a'hardship to make it less than 20 feet
from the property line.
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none..
Eastley inquired as to how a utility easement is provided. Gull stated
that the utility easement is recorded by the subdivision and all-the deeds
utilit ea eyed with this easement. Neiley stated that to change the
are e ~ um cement, you would have to do a plat amendment.
After further discussion, Gull moved to grant a 10 foot east side yard
setback variance, where 20 feet is required, per the plans submitted, and
inclusive of the area marked on the submitted plans and signed by Kandi
3
~. -... .. ... f ...r r.. x +~ .+MY. ~ .r r. tb+i n x>-`nLx-l~~rx
Shaffran, dated August 6, 1991, due to topographical hardship. Neiley
seconded the motion and it was approved four to one with Wheeler opposing.
The minutes of the July 2, 1991 meeting were approved as written.
Christensen and Schaffner asked the Board if they still wanted to receive
the same information in their packets. After a brief discussion, it was
decided that everything is still needed in the packet, but that three sets
of building plans instead of eight would be requested of the applicant and
brought to the meeting.
Schaffner brought up the setback limitations that the Board has been
abiding by for additions to trailers. It was decided to use 10 feet side
to side as a standard. It was also agreed that with trailer parks, a plat
needs to be brought in (not necessarily a certified survey), but some type
of survey to show the distance from trailer to trailer.
Christensen brought up the fact that everyone's termination date is the
same, March 1, 1994. Temple Glassier, Administrative Assistant for the
Board of County Commissioners, has stated that according to Article II of
the Pitkin County Home Rule Charter, terms for all citizen boards shall be
for two years. It was decided by the Board that Rick Neiley's and Evan
Gull's terms will expire March 1, 1992, with Kandi Shaffran's, Stan Mathis'
and Ted Guy's expiring March 1, 1993. John Wheeler and Rod Dyer, our new
alternates, terms will expire July 1, 1993.
The date of the September meeting was discussed since it would be the day
after Labor Day. It was decided by the Board to keep it on September 3,
1991.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ n~~
~.~
Cindy Christensen, Secretary
~~ , ~---,
Kandi Shaf ran, Ch'a'rman