HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.boa.91.51f .;~1 . t ,. V I W$i4+ 21~/ve~-'~~.q"~". c. .~ r ... .~ S. M°~ .:: I. ~,;:. "ol
., r C ~. ..
.~.
~`
.. PITKIN COUNTY' '
BOARD OF ADJVSTl$ENT _ ."
DATE September 17, 1991 CASE # ~~~
APPLICANT Pitkin County Airport PHONE 920-5384
MAILING ADARESS 0233 E. Airport Road, Suite A Aspen, CO 81611
OWNER Pitkin County PHONE 920-5200
MAILING ADDRESS 530 E. Main St., Aspen, CO 81611
LOCATION OF PROPERTY Pitkin County Airport
Any pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be
made part of this Case. The Board may return phis application if
it does nod contain all the facts`in question.
Applicant Signature
Scott E. Smith,
tion
(To be completed by the Zoning Department)
Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the ,Zoning Official
to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment, and
reasons for not granting a building permit: n
Y Zone District
Requesting.: Lot Size
' Front Yard Setback Variance, where .5 0 ~ is required.
' Rear Yard Setback Variance, where ~' is required.
' Side Yard Setback.Variange, where f~ ' is required.
' Side Yard Setback Variance, where 1~ ~ is required.
' Height Variance, where ' is required.
Square Feet where'd maximum of sq. ft. is allowed.
Other:
Hardship:
Zoning Officiall
Application filed9~ ~` Dat
Notices mailed ~f '~,Zc}~ ~
~ma3 ~~ oo-oat
Parcel ID #0'~61~=~-~d~-DV Secretary
Resolution to Building when Completed
~~~ Yes I_~ No
a ~ a x,s c ~F.~ x ~_
., .. a
BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTNTENT~ ""
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING 'bR USE ' '
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BEhONi:
Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as
amended, a Public Hearing will be held in City Council Chambers,
City Hall, First Floor, Aspen, Colorado (or at such other place'as
the meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an application filed
with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance
from the provisions of the,County Zoning Resolution.
All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to
appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to
state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to
such Variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others 'affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
ASEFOLLOWSULARS OF THE HEARING AND OF THE REQUESTEb V'ARIAN'CE f~RE`'A.,
Date anfl time of meeting:
owner:
Name and Address of
Applicant:
Property Location or
Description-
October 1, 1991
City Hall, 2nd Floor Meeting Room
Pitkin County
Pitkin County Airport
530 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Pitkin County Airport
Requesting approval for a height variance to allow for a 55 foot
g questin a 2 foot hei ht variance• a 3
~eontbe and •setback rvarianceg a Y 0 foot north side yard s0 foot
y ~ etback
variance• a 10 foot south side and setback variance• a l0 foot
ar yard setback variance, a 50 foot mayor road setback variance
andai
and 10 00 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 30 feet, l0 feet
'feet are required for the front yard, both side yards and
rear yard, respectively, in the PUB zone,distrct, and where 50
feet and 100 feet are requir
g y 'p ed for the major road setback variance
and the'Hi hwa 82 setback er the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for
the erection of an electric fence required to meet FAA
requirements. Property Location: Sardy Field off of Highway 82.
VARIANCES' GREATER "OR LE'88-`THAN IEQUESTED COVLD ~E""C,G1~,'~TTED: ` ' `"
Duration of Variance: Temporary Permanent X
THE {TjZIN COYTNTY O~F ADJUSTMENT
`// p j,
indy L. hristensen, secretary
Sardy Field
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
September 16, 1991
Pitkin County Board
Aspen/Pitkin County
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
of Adjustment
Planning Office
0233 East Airport Road
Aspen, Colorado 81 E1 1
3O3/J2O-5384
FAX 303/920-5378
Pursuant to the recruirement list for application to the Pitkin
County Board of Adjustment, item #3: the Director of Aviation,
Aspen-Pitkin County Airport, has formally submitted an application
for variances specific to AIP Project #3-08-003-10, installation of
rotating beacon and deer/security fencing.
The property owner, Pitkin County, hereby states that it is aware
of the application for variances and has no objection to that
application.
Reid Haughe County Manager
o ~Y aloe
d
sandy Field
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
September 19, 1991
Pitkin County Board of Adjustment
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
0233 East Airport Road
Aspen, Colorado 81 81 1
8O3/J2O-5384
FAX 3O3/J2O-5378
Dear Sir/Madam: The Aspen-Pitkin County Airport, pursuant to
directives from the Federal Aviation Administration, is planning
construction of an airport beacon and deer proof fencing at the
airport. Both projects are safety related and mandated as such in
order to maintain the airport's operating certificate, under which
air carrier service to the airport is allowed.
The airport beacon is required under Federal Air Regulation Part
139.311(a)(3), effective January 1, 1988, and although the airport
administration has requested exemption from the requirement, the
Federal Aviation Administration has declined the request and
formally directed the airport to comply with the requirement for a
beacon (see attached letter, dated October 26, 1988).
The deer proof fencing project consists of replacement of some of
the existing barbed wire fencing located along the airport boundary
with an eight foot tall deer/security fence, the design of which is
proven effective in wildlife hazard management at similar airports.
Such wildlife hazard management is mandated by Federal Air
Regulation Part 139.337, and the need for fencing has been
demonstrated by:
-consistent intrusion of deer and elk onto airport
property, including the runway and safety areas along the
runway.
-recorded incidents of air carrier aircraft actually
striking wildlife during take-off and/or landing
operations.
-recorded incidents of air carrier aircraft executing
"go-around" procedures to avoid contact with wildlife on
the runway (aircraft crew abort the landing operation
just before touchdown and fly away from the airport).
,.;
LETTER TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
September 19, 1991
Page Two
Although a wildlife/ecological study could be an intermim
alternative to the wildlife issue (instead of fencing), such a
study is usually implemented to determine if there is, a wildlife
management problem at an airport. In the case of the Aspen-Pitkin
County Airport,. there is clear evidence that such a problem already
fencing solution, is the pght one for the existing 1,pyroblem (s;e
attached lettersh dated Se t tuber 7 1 1990 and Februa io21th1991he
The plans and_specfications for both the beacon and ,.fence have
~.~,.....w,.,,;_.
been dragwn by an experienced, professional airport consulting firm.
The hei ht of the beacon and its supporting structure (53 feet)
requires a variance, and the 8 foot tall fence,_requires a height
and set-back variance. due to its placement. in relation to the Owl
Creek Rohd and Highway 82 right-of-ways. Please note that the
e installed l0 feet behind the existing fence along
p Nance between the n
. ~,._... ~.ti. __ _ ..
the bikek Road to rovide some dist"
OwlcCree~path and will replace much of the ex gew fence and
stin fence along
the Highway 82 right-of-way.
The purpose of this application is to obtain the above, described
_-
Certifics in or~dper to '(omppy with federal regulations go,erning
ated Ai orts air orts with air carrier service and
retain the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport's Operating Certificate.
Thank you for any consideration you may give to this application.
Sincerely,
T ^~-~ ~>
Scott E.'Smith
Director of Aviation
~,r ; ~ ~r~
_ R«AA RRP FRRR.TRµ.}.gIRR9YSY93RS:.9RRRFRRII93338:SSK.~--C
P EY's••: :'~ La: f ,... Mai
N .yl f ~ ` P ..1 nit w ,f~~-,•le' - n t>~;" O e h.~ N t~+xa M N „ ~ ..-
d ~. ~': .'gx'.. .s ~'<s
i
;. s:
' %P • r1": "a„ n fit..'., ^-;,~•;,:.
\ ~ /
•4 Fia ~.
O .i"' rts ~' ~'~"
\ % ,~.
W ,J P; % ~ X .11,
' 1- O r ~ r
4 ( F- p O O D O . ¢ .p 2 O O
Z •. I i~Y~tO O O O,-~. O O Z ~ D O J J O~
3 00' ! w J J J;. J J a J' O~' J •+ ~ J J ~ '
O W '. :'b6'- Z O O 1 O ~ O O „~ J ~9 U ~:;.I O °" w O
Y a :. o u u iu`.'lu u o u~l ',.~t..;~u ~"e n .
z w j,",g,~. 2
f o .• "1=:~~ 4 2 " I2"' I~ 2..' 3 ~ W ~- ~ ~~. 12 ~a ~ ~a ~Z
W W w IW W .) W >"'.1"'W U'"' 'M W~
•+ S P ,~i. " 2 d' d 1 6~ I d d W d~ Z i'rt' •"'; d ~ i-• d
6 Y ^;•*- ~ % 4 6 ~ ¢ I ¢ K Ix- 4~ O C~e~;';,. Q f U, q; , U , 4
tY a` e0 't~,'- -
iUi W ¢ M ~- -
fY d' (J \ • • '•
r O W w W '~' { :: ~ n
p •'• m 2 .~ .,•
•- 2 3 e, .. - ~ "~ Y, 1
f U a 6~ '' 4 ~ W W '
z ¢
4 . r . 'r 1- i
Uq O F4 M!S. .. p ..yi %' % ~ '
W 4 K 1 O'', ~ I '= ....,~ Z~ Y W
3 W 14 1 ., q O
Y 1 ~ 6 F 4 d v
r"
O ~20 W # I
H< ti 1 x ~k O W %~ # t
1- 1 'J ~ U Z -~y ., IL .-i
d a M I N A •+ J.
q I W J W
4 ,-~ 0 1 x' u ~ 2' d f + D ~~
W I LL O W ~ C1 W C 6 > f/> Q -i-1 % O~ H p O" I
Y 2 II ••• ' 1•- •? 2 W K W w x N w J 6 J ~ '
O 1 W +. ; ~ ~ ~ ;' % V W O w 6' J > .. C " ~' W ~I 2 ~ . ~ I ~ 1
Y I O`°' 1 W ~ ' 4!
W KIH UWJ O OW %' qm ITV W ~ . O~y{I ]GN Yy ~<
2 6 1 H Z % 7 % "~ H % x 0 W W 2 "y {.1 w+y~~ U M j 2 %~1~.
O Y 1~f/j"4!! 'w N2 'W"' K %y",, uo Cn K O y~"" dIC% aK pN~ '
IJ• IIW >"OW 2 O Wi+ 1-O Od O • 41 d'O'wN 40M
W K 12 ~~ 4 D> YI" d ~2 HO 6_1JJ{ O pWf OC 40 I'-M
K d IIJ a Y-„" 4 £O" rdi %J ~X% i~: ^I Z % S~M- ~6Z %.. - i
1- ( o z z Ikm 4 ~m o o tir` ee w' m o i
O 0 1 2, N ~ 444E .O-IY 1-~ - -`.a / f,p o ? o F 2 2 ~ N z n'.
d r l w" O J ~ O m f ~' F" o W 'M % W 4 0 4 n 0 .p~W
.O K 1 0 "M J O NS O M W K2 PcI .p G$ O 12 M P%K' M% >U
O •+ U 1 O 1v~ W G M 0 0 n rr M rti a N s.t" q' n •.• > D ;y y ly '
a %IiW -GfK 4.;µ H ~ o dY lol~ '04.~ oMhY bS dK% iOK eLL,
,My Y-I %iJ.. jj]K % % 'H M C2 LL '1011 IP iKZ d LL •
!d S W D 1 =% a% 1- w w ......- W 4'tJ
JJ lq~ W~ H %H AM m C N ~~W 14)~ mF=..
2 W ~ • p ,. l n M P MO,Y, .10 O% OVJ OO ~X 004 ~ 00 ' O%
~ O\ O CJ ~O 0 \w \ O
4' •/{ 2 j 1 N n p M; I% N U d d S 09 U J I U 6
\ 4 I i `-M, a f~) .}IIf
.• K4I it Ip N% % d% '%'" d% %K M%• ~p~ C~.~ pf% a'Y%C ION i0%'
\ 4q ~2 ~O% d% O% ~l~l% •O% $%2 O% O% O 2~ % d'%Z O% 10% i s {
P O JIO 1'W IIW /W 1W IW IW3 IIW IW 1 S IW fW~ 1'W IIW ~~~f,
o ••u w ru d~ qq~ oz oz oz ¢o os om 4ayJO ~~ dzo o¢ oK, li7]
W U I' W o p q p q 0 g 0' O p CIO O p~ 0 0 O g d O O O 1 o O o p.~
W O~ 4 1 v ..C ~4 .~+¢ ggqy < II R ^{¢Z 1~ ¢ -Z77 1 Q ~ppp2 S¢ M G2 1 4 1 6 I
1- U'D d l~ N M tC it II M M- M F{ n a~ t- M N 1- I M Mz ,
•I il~ !~Z o2 N2 2 M2 q20"M2C Nzj M p tl2 N2p 02 IoZ
p d w i 1 1- n I r 1 /- 11- n 1- 0 1 1- ~ 1 1 q /' ~ 1 1- 0 I r t 1-
Z O 41 gad 2 MSC ~K' ~S ~PQ IaK ~ 0 4 tVyis ~dQ ~M'y MK
C C? %1 d ry N ~, ~N N~ N N ~ N N~ ~~ ~~R m,`~A .: I.LD Irt`
_I ~ ~ ~ ~~
i I
~.,
. ni'a~, .,.. .n..,m,a~:e ~,
~°""~ ,:.
EXHIBIT "A"
APPENDIX A
Proof of Ownership and Legal Descriptions for the
Aspen/Pi~kn County Airport, Roaring
Fork Tra;isit,Agency, and Aspen
Metropolitan Sanitation District Parcels
;~;;
35
v ,a.~z„o~-7~
..
! \
G ~ ,
~~ . ~ _ ham' ~V°•. .. ~ ~ • ~ ~ f ~~
~~ ~, \ ~ ; Ali il~~~'~
i' 1~ \ ~~ I
~' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ V A A
~ \~~'~ I~~
~ , ~ l O ~ ` ~ it \~~ ` ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ r
i
i , ~, \ ~~
~ N ~ ~~ ,i ~ ~- ~-~'r. A ~ ,~~ .~
~ ,i i 1
_ ;~ tip - ~ ~ ~ ` ~. ~ ' %~ (' I , ~ - ~• ~ ~ii~~- ~ /~
t ~
y' ~ ~ _~- n i 11
~/ ~~ \ ~ ~~ ~i ~.~ \ ~ Ill ~ ~~
\ ,\~ _ \ / '.` f ~ r ~ I ~1 -xap, it II ~ ~ ` ~~.I ~~~ l~\ \ `\
I ` „~. ~~ ~ ~ r 'I v
._.
\ 1 "~ ,
\ \\~ \
`-h
~ ~' ~ \\ - \
,\~, j' j - -~J~ .\SAP~DY FIELD PARCE~`~~ ~\
\l • \_'
_;
~i - 11 •11 ~ - ------ `1\
-N-- -~ ~ u , ` .
,,~! ~ .., ~ _ ,.: ~, ~...''p «nr a `\ 4, ~~
\ ,;4. '8R'aa~,~,,~ ...~„ ~>w:~; ... ,, 3FY , !c_' //''~ y,` ~~^>`<t~ '-'`~`.*., ~ ,~ ,":b'~+A:'.'ezy... ..,•SY,' ~'..R ! ~r~F~
~ .. .., -..d"
•~-
J._t':CJ~'1L- ~V'_.`-`r,t-.~i~l''I l~th.i
t-`s {:rac'c o•4 :Land situated ir-i ih-~e 1"iouti~4•a~='st. c:Yne'-qc-c~:cr-tc=r' off'
Si=caic7n =S.a, l-own:ahi.i~ nr iaorath. kanc7r~ c3;; i:Je,i of tt-~c Yth t'.ht.,
clee>r_ri t.-,ed ;as '§ of l ows:
F..:F_(:~II~Ih,ITh.IG at. a pc,int cin 'the Sqc-cther:ty lime of the Joc..ltt-fwa_st
orie-quarter of Section 4 and the Westerly rir.Pub i~f wtiv
fenr_e? 'E car Clwl. (.,ree6:: County toad, whence the Sbu{:h one-quarter
cornc=r o't~ =><ai.d ec'tioh .3~4 hear<.s North £~~ 57'~^" E~~ist ':i'?.C;S
feet. ;
t.hE?nr..e tuor-tliWester-1y along 'tt-re UJestert'v right of wacv fence
for iJw:t Cr-eeii C:ac-rnty ~:oad as follows:
P,lor-{:;~i SC> .~,.~ ,.,9 ~, Wes.,i-. ^2r~'. _ _ feet
1`dc:rt.h :I.S :li'e' "4" ldezst :''=,'4. 1'i fec_t;
~-.., ,
i~lr~i'"th ei to _,.c .._ t\lect. 1:,x.:3 ,. f~_' -J'ef?t :;
Nrn'-'::I'-. .'.E:> =6ti"'"'"' Wes>{. ~'~ks.43,`-i fF?E:?'t.R
i'~tl r::.r"F:.L, ..., `? f'.;,-' 3 ~" ,~Jt:~!=>4:. 1I(.). :'~:`i f r.ei
p'.Ior-''c:.l-~ ='°3 :.=~i ' x};~" Wc+st i9. ~4^ f c.>et
fidori-.1-i n.;;` -i'~"E," Wr-._,_.{'_ F~9.~'6 feetr:
•.Ic:ir-'t:.l°i ~}3 1~~;' 1-1" West 44. $9 feet;
pdt::,rtt-~ „`;'i ~b4" S-.'"' We=:. 140.77 ';•eet;
i~.lor-{.h f-J8 ~i4"~;,',-r"' Wec_{': 17?.E,S feet;
{:.t-~~:=,nc:e 's...c_~avi.r'rc( s:>a.d FE?znce PJor-tti i?b i}~'^b" WE/st 1_7.':,7, feet,
r3.l qng to-.e tii .~=_>i:.er 1.,/ right o•f w=zy 1i. nE? 'q'or C,lwl Cr-eeR: Ccrurrty
Fio~.ad;
t.hF=ncar•' L-eaV:lP7r~ ;aid WestE+rly rir7Frt ov way Sinc fcr' Owl Cr-ec-F::
Cc,canty F?o<~i:t Sr?{ath iiY Old'<iE3" E=cast 1..11.71 fee'k along a fence
i:r_, « r-'oi.nt i:.~n 'tl-:F• 5au~th'ierly line o't 'l-I'if= SouctY'YWE?.t
nr~e--r.}~;;ir-iE?r c:rP' .:,ec{_i.o:-~ 4y
ths•nc-E? h'dc,rt:.h S:3~i .:~7'4^" k.a~>t 996.;..7 dcet along i:he Sec-cther:iy
linF+ cf tt?l-3 ;>CII.I't:J'~4Ve{: one-guar{=Bi'- of SE?CtlOn +~ to the f='oi.r~{:
r .
~eUarin.r-~q., cor:'k.~:cxr~~.nr.~ "~i.01 acr-E;?s (bgr'E? r'I"' lE'S.a.
:x1;~._„'j2~". ®....?i..' n'~~«„-m.~.?:.... ro x :1.. rvr x..x Mti„.,,~.: aa....;~- :,- ....dt..:.+~..~: ry, '!`
r.... .:., ro.xRYa~""~ 3' .i:~3
t •,,',yj::i C:1 i:i,... ~:'.
L..fii~dr-~l-. 1~ESC;~;:u=•r 7: i>>v
.. ... _.. ~:'k
F'r tracr.f. of ].anri siiaaai':ed ire th,,:. West sine?-.hai;lf of the ',3outh-
E+~esf': ±]n e--gt_tari_er of Sed{::ion '~7, the 1='asF one--half crf the
i-ast. one--I°~~J. ~f a4~ Sec t. i. nn M8y th~~~ IVor-tt~east r_~rre-nLtartel^ of
tl-)e-~ 1~.1or-theast sine-ciilar-ter of S'er_tian __+, srnd the West
one-.
half of Sectinri -`fir all in -township ~ 5rn-ltl-r, 1~ianc7e £3v 69es1•
of the E~th P„t'i,y descrihe:d as fallc~.rs.
E~Et.~l:1`Jftlltli:, ai-. the We t one-qt-tarter corner of Section .'4a
ta?e~ncg= h;orth ii:t ;?!i'~8" West Z:S4.? :~' feei= a1 r.+ng ia'~e We=.;t4irly
line:' of the 8out!'iwcst. or-~e-quarts-r of the p.lorthwesi ar-~e-
gu.:~rfcer of Section air to thte Northarest ry]r-ncar' of
- sa> d
guar~l-.r:;;r~--gc.carter ser_{.:i.on„
r.l ~,~,nr.:c.-, c:,ot_tth £37 ,_ _, :f..," bars t 7.3':<l ~;i:~
.~. fc>e{-. fiJ.anr7 t'r-~4= inu.tl;c•r-:Lv
:I. :Li~~e c:rf the ~ior-i_hr•a.s't onie--quar't.er' cif f:he h(or`I'_FiEZa=~i_ on
~~.
- ,. _. - -
i:jcuari:er o, f°ieca:,ion .:,;: to fiche s'
.. ,nor.rtl]ia~si:. cc;rner r_+~f sai d
ql-U.ii r"'t. !''r'--f.]ll;a 1"t43i^ SEdc't. i. i''nq
i':.i-,r.>rrct_* l+~lcir-'i_t-~ fs;l. 1.;1`1.7" bJe~_t 1_::';r..'ta feri'. aJ.rng 'the DJets't:er:i~y
l:i.r-~i= cif the hlortheas't nnra•-quarter- of ia-~e ~lortheas'L- cane:.-
cal-l:-u'-I::c_,r of 8r'cl=ian =':~ ici the 14Jori_hvres'k cornt.:.r a§ said
clt-lar"tc?r--r-µ-torte;+r- secti.t.;hy
t:h~>r„:e I'Jorii+ tiir ~;g'7;~" 6Jc~al- 1_~:rrfi feet
along the West+.•rl.~•
]. .tr-~t.~ of i:;-te Southr::'ast ane--gitar'i:er' o{` the Southeast or-~e-
i}facts-f:.4c•!'- of f_c.:;c-f:ion S_'8 to thc~~ No
-. rthwc?s't i:arht=_r- t5i sai cJ
!:7 La i31""1:: ier'--qu<~P...t[E?r S(:?C't1(]n~
t.i'rF;l')t-F=: i'dr~I'-til C;i; ~j~,r>r~~~ Wes'L 1.:"%i'7, q , F.,~~{'.
~_,1 ong the bJesto->r-:L y
:Line of tl~e 1'~lort.l7east one-gl.t,~r'tEr' of the Southeast one-'--
rac.c-:u''i.:e'i^ or" cc~•cf:.i.on "~~3 to the I~.lorthw4:+st. corner of said
t.-ac.c;:;r-ter--c7l-lartr~r section:
t:h,ri r-e h!~i 't~ tit-; rkE, r;~" We >t ]:'a2~i,;,~a ,''E~ei: iaong the 4Jc_ter7. v
1 i ii of i Ise' ;tottch~ ,~=st an e•-yt.tarter' of thca IJortheast. ont=--
qusa>"•'ct_~r" s.;f £;ie?t.:aisan '~.'8 i':o Lt-~c hdc;r't1-ua4==- -
- - --,t corner of said
c];-!<~rtr:=r---;:jo.art:er- ~-~t•i:'tian;.
tht:-~nr_=.: i',lor i:.h t>t:r tl.,c, •t-)~;~ Wt:=:a _ - ,..,.
t v7... t> {: f.:E.t rrc~re or les=,
~:Lo„q tl-;e GJc>=~tc-;i^).y ]. i.nt:= o; tt-~e i'Jor-l-hea=>t or7e-qu<~r•ter of the.
i'•.loi•-t.hF~e:,=>t. anr::=--r..lu-r,r-t:~~r of .Sect.i.nn '.8 tr ~t;he Wc~.•st sigh-t o~f ,v:-ry
:Line o;' Iii.ghw~;iY ','-a: (r=1,W. !-'ro-iect ^<>1:~'.--Eci (oats: St<:Ztc Highway
L~'t, Ct, IfJ, r-~r.3't ri;c;ru..tatentrd k:;y i7epi:.. cis o~f 1. ;'/£3"7>
I:.i-)rancca 8ot_rlcl'u?asterlY along tl-)r' We>st r:i.iit-rL- of way lir;~: .For.
E-!icii~~)aaay ;gr <::ts ~4~ola.:!a=;•
h 4 ~
._,~t i c .E3." t ,~I- ~r S'. f r~i iitr)i ,= or fir=
a,it:;iict + r_ur r+ to th,~ right h~rvint7~_..~ rrxrl.tu uf~~i'C,ijii ~ft/E_t,
a
coni ~ 3'l aug7"r.. o{ 1 1£3 +?Ci" y .,n ar r.: length of ^i.'~'.E~`3 fiat;
Sc;ttiY, .I. =7 :`.7'°-i1" E~r.i': 4'i~I.E,(i fe•=aE; -
::ilt;a';c,) a tnu'-ve •tn tl-u:? left having a r-zadi.ta<_ of 1A8,S'tj feet, a
.rent r.a. angle cri ~, >>=y tn:Y^y an arc ].er~gth of 788. :L ter 1:;
£iotlt.h ~9 "., 8" fast 12~,7~i feety
Sough 4i> v2'47" East 1;?._,,5~,fcetE
along a eurve to thre right having a radius of 1~,6~..°,C) feety"
central. angle of zb 2U'Q[l", an arc len th of $~6,~1 feetq
South ~C3 ~_ .'38" East 456.6Ci feet^ ' g
.
- <--,. --
', - --.-~
.:>'::.,t.ttf-; .•.,.; r~.l. 0E," E<..st 17'.".>3=;~ fnc=t rnor--r-• ;:,r- lc:r;as>,
thrs?nc;c~::a I_.et:?vint7 <-" ' - ~-...
.o ell ai WE.bt. Y"7. c7 t;'t o'}' W%ia'V J. ]. of-? '~i:ai" 1..11 CiftLJ i:3 ): ?~:'
~. r' "" ' ccr n
;,:, r7 t..tta; F_, -~ ...::L .~.~ West ^<y,.1 ,.],~~ ~r.n -
..?t firt7re OI" .1. E:? ~i~ TO pca:L 1"a'l'.
^Aii~?I'?i:[E? 'l: i"ie {nJl trl c?:is i_.ar ner- '~c7r the F; ~r. =..'E. ~'7n E?:.~q l..t l3 Y't eY"„c,i7P.
,~i:rc..r:.a.or; ,::.~ tacar=. NortFr O~ 4~"'!' a" -
~r Pf.,j
i:.;incc ;;or.rF.h "'_a 'C';~+' r-ast r..•1.~7,..:•a feet n _ -
..
i:. 7-ae (i9ot..rt t; ca r~,>._gt_tari:.e r' f~f mac: r_~t.i on ~4 be:;:~r.=.: ~;aut. l-, .,.,~ /'~'
e <_t!.t 1_t E7E ~. 1'J i'~er~t,
tt;c•nce Couthr :~:,(:; i.~'~~" F..a:,'t tiic~.<<^.7 feE=t t: c, t:.i"re i'~:tst.cr:Lv '
r ;,':it;t r.1f way fence for Owl Creek County +oadr, •
i.;l-,i:.?neF, h,lor{_hwest:erly along i:.he Easi;erl'v right o'4~ i,r~y -t:el"rr:e
f c;r CJ i.v.l Cr-i-_ek: Cot.a-~'ty R,;ad a=_; ~f ollo;.as,
P,Ic:7I•tatr.'ra ii;a'-;" West ^.`u
L. Ei:: , eef_ q
,.,
I'.1ar't.l"a J. JrJ~'PJ<^:" Wi-rs'c Y. 45 fo-=etr
l~.Icn lh ~;., ^1'~Ef Wt "t 89 h~ see{:
c;ra:.l '.}5 a5 ]. ..°,.} 1.7"~rc.._L11PS'} ~'~). ~ .•::. 'r eE)t7 ,^,
L-.Frenc_c~ I_.i;-<_r.ri.na raid F_aeter".ly rigt;t ci,° W,:ay fence fnr C?wa
:r'-e¢a6. f`_ot.tntY' F?o,:tr..l Cc;utt; f:iG 21.'f!.]." 6Jesi 7.1Cat_,,;j;l ',=F:•cti
i..hranc:e? PJor'th ,34 ..._ =:~3" WesL- a_'G'r.L-TL=7 '~r'.e'l. ti, t_t;e P:l(==t~rly .iine
cai ct;it; '.~ocr'thwcat cant-+-f~c.c'<~i~~ter of 8iecti.un `R :; -
tt;l IttcE: IVur"th cya,i 11 '.^..''r"""' West 1 ~''i3`'.Tarr`"Fe`et' alt~nq the bdt~~terly
l,i.nc; of tt;e ;>or.rhF;we_,t. one-q;_tc,rtn_r of ~;a;-cg.ion 'r'1 to the We=,+_
,:ani'_==....ga_tar'tE=r r_arn~r cif ~-~ ;" .,
'~1cJ ~r?rcton 4,
t:.hc= tt r* I'•.Ifar t.tr c)f R t> 'r; '..West ] 4? ~^ ~ eet al ~nq the Wester 1 y
l~n;~ „f L't;c~ I~iortF;wf_s-c Imc-?-gtt,r ter- e.',r ~~cetic,n =:4 to the Yai.n'E
c'~ ~ ;ia.r;nrh~:I; etar;trii.rrinq ^7F3 ~(j ,=srrF:•s rn~i='~ oY- less.
{ ',
M E M O R A M D U M
TO: Joanna Schaffner, Planning and Zoning
FROM: Scott Smith, Director of Aviatioxy~+r~
DATE: October 28, 1991 _~
RE: Airport Fencing Project
QGI Z U ::--:l
,a
.,,
Joanna., please find attached a copy of a letter from the Division
of Wildlife, State of Colorado, concerning the applicability of the
electric deer/security fence design proposed for' the Aspen-Pitkin
County 'Airport.
theOnecber Sy 1991, the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment pp'proved
essay variances for the fencing project at the air ort, on
the condition that the Division of Wildlife comment on the design
and its possible effect on wildlife.
g-
Aro os'e'be seen from the contents of the attached letter, the
p p d fence, as designed, "is an excellent alternative to
traditional woven wire fences."
Thank you for your help in the approval process, and should you
have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact
me at your convenience.
' u¢ td ~d",}~.''i ~~
L r. :.4„ ~
,. .. .. _. e e-a, .., .., h K, z, nr...w5S~4. :4 ".'.ar -.:, ~ .. i:~ 1 "~~,'1 .. .1 ., +. i~ vm.. .y+. ~a k,'~
w......,.,., 4......
K
Wz
STATE OF COLORADO
Roy Romer, Governor"
DEPARTMENt OF"NATURAL RESOURCE$~ '~
DIVISIbN OF Wf~DLiFE
AN EQUAL OPPO RTUNITY EMPLOYEii' ~~'"
Perry D. Olson, Director
6060 Broatlway' "
Denver; Colorado 80216
Telephone: 1303) 297-t 792'
REFER 70
_' Dan L. Baker
Research Center
317 `~5est P`r'ospect
Ft.Collins,CO 80526
October 16, 1991
Mr. Scott Smith, Airport Manager
Aspen-Pitkin Airport
0233 Airport Rd.
Suite E, Concourse A
Aspen,'Colorado 81611
RE: Evaluation of electric fence for holding wild elk in
confinement.
Dear Mr. Smith,
For People
I pam res ondin to g q evaluation of our
9
experienC withu hi yh t nsilest leectrico fence i is limit d kto My
a
research investigation where we evaluated the effects of different
densities of elk on Cattle performance: 'This research was
conducted in a sagebrush-grassland plant community near Maybell,
Colorado, during 1986-T99i This study required"the construction'of
an enclosure of approximately 1000 acres £hat would hold a
redete
p rmined number of wild elk inside and exclude other animals
such as such as deer, pronghorn, elk, coyotes, dogs, cattle, horses
and humans.
We evaluated the merits of hi h tensile electric fence rela£ve to
traditional woven wire fence and opted for the former for seveY~al
reasons. Electric fence was less expensive, required less
maintenance when properly installed, was more; aesthetic looking
than woven wire and, if necessary,°could be more easily taken down
and used at another location. Our enclosure was constructed of 15
strands' of alternately charged hot/cold high tensile electric
fence, 94 inches high. Wooden line posts were set 100 ft. apart
with fiberglass poles positioned 'between wooden posts at 10 ft.
interva
I ls. I can provide more detailed specifications of this
fence if needed.
Generally,in our situation and in the relatively flat terrain where
p
enalosur Towams sk ocked ewithu 50e 80 wild elk Beach winter sfor ffos
ur
Y Y nowledge, only one or two elk ever escaped the
facility, and no elk ever entered from the 'outside. Several
prop horn antelo a were observed on t
enclosure each year, but only a few (4-6') ever penetrated the
fenceed This usuall occurred in s, rin when ruhe outside of the
Y p g noff created"small
openings under the fence. We also found an occasicnal deer in the
enclosure but no cattle, sheep, horses, coyotes or humans. The
design and construction of our fence did not, however, deter the
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Hamlet J. "harry Ezecutrve Director ~ ~~~
WILDLIFE COMMISSION; William R. Hogberg, Chairman Dennis Luttrell. Vice Chai"rmah Eldon W. Cooper, Secretary
Felix Chavez, Member . Rebecca L Frank tvlember . Louis 1F:Swift, Member . George V2n Den6erg, Member : Carry AA. Wnght, Member
r .. ~:
~ _..
°.,s,.. ~ r.-
'~ .. ..` d
movement of rabbits (cottontail or jackrabbit). Decreasing the
spacing`of wires near the bottom of the fe'rice might prevent passage
by smaller deer or pronghorn.
There was some mortality attributed to the electric fence, but it
was relatively minor given the large number of animals in the area
cou lee expanse of this enclosure. We found a'few pronghorn and a
andpth of deer tangled in the fence over the four year period. I
would think that this degree of mortality would o"ccur with any type
of fence. Our enclosure was to large to efficiently patrol each day
and to check for animals that may be entangled in the fence. This
might be possible and desirable in your situation. An animal in
the fence usually grounded the" electric cuYrent until it was
removed.
Most of the mortality associated with the electric fence seemed to
occur when animals either,,an the inside or outside were disturbed
and frightened anpdp ran anto the fence. Often t Y frightened
re the hit
addedlvisual nscreenin r to see the fence befo and this seemed, to
g parts of the fence We
help some. ..
it was difficult
corners of thehfence so thatG at sthesanmalw cue) located in to
an follow the fence
line to It the
an exit gate would help this situation. If left alone, the
animals almost always found"these openings on their own. Trying to
force animals out of the facility did not work well and often
resulted in injury to the animal, fence or person doing the
forcing. We did see extremely frightened and Harassed deer and elk
jump through the electric fence.
In summary, we
purposes well.
enclosure, whc
As long as the
feel it is an
fences.. Tom Nesl
and construct o
feel that high tensile
Our objective was t
h is probably more diff
fence is oronerly cons
invaluable in the
problems tha"t occ.
His experience' ar
of our fence system",
:curred over the four
:, served our
inside an
ng them out.
lntained, we
arsise was
resolving
period.'
If you need more information or would like to see our electric
typeeofystem in operation, please let me know.., Regardless of the
fence-you decide to build, I (Division o~ Wildlife) would
be interested in the success or failure of your fence system. This
P
traffictare in conflict,ful in other situations where wildlife and
Sincerely,
~~ ~°~~~~
Dan L.'Baker
Wildlife"Researcher
y t • ~,r , ~ ,i.~,
~. ,
S`'.. '".
l h
i.
J
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
AdrninistraHon
Northwest Mountain Region t7900Pacitic Hghway South
Colorado, Idaho. Montana. C•68966
Oregon, Utah, Washington Seattle. Washington 98168
Wyoming
OOT 26 1988
Mr. Brad Christopher
Acting Airpdr"E` Manager
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
20292 'West Hwy.'"82
Aspen,''CO 81611
Dear Mr. Christopher:
This fis in response to your letter dated March 15, 19$8, to Mr. Barbo
requesting an exemption from certain requirements of part 139 of the"
Federal Aviation Regulations as applied to Aspen/Pitkin County Airport. 'In
your letter you requested the following:
1,. A temporary exemption from Sections 139.311 (a)(3),(b)(2) until
January 1, 1989 for marking and lighting. In our telephone conversation of
September 30, 1988 you stated that this requirement had 'been satisfied.
segmen~
effecttedAcircleneng urebeltef that itcwoutdlhav~2mini~alqus9ianda
iveness Burin hours of darkness does not ustif our ranting an
exemption.
3. A ermanent exem tion from Section 139.311(b) C3) requiring an
P p
airport beacon. Again, an exemption i`s not justified based on your belief
that a beacon would have minimal use and effectiveness because of
topography. As for the beacotY beaming into surrounding homes, this problem
can be remedied by appropriate shielding of the light fixture.
Please;be informed that Part 139 was amended October i8, 1988 extending the
date for compliance wit~i~ Sectioh~ 539.3'Y1""to danua~ry 1~; >;9~1.
As for the segmented circle, we will be amenable to Ciinsideration of a
temporary exemption, if you request one,~altowing a reasonable time for you
to install the. segmented circle.
Sincerely,
Harold'N. Handke
Supervisor, Safety and Standards
Section; ANM-620
4..
,: i:.
US. Department Northwest Mounteih Region tbo t Ltnd nveriuo, S. w:
Of TfCll'1Sp01'iCiYlOr1 Colorado, Idaho, Montana Renton, Washington 98058.4056
FedOa'cl AvFa110n Oregon;-Utah, Washington
Wyoming
Administrafion
FEB 2 11990 ..
Mr. Brad Christopher
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
0233 East Airport Road
Aspen, Colorado 81601
Dear Mr. Christopher
It has come to our attention that there have been several
sightings of deer on the Aspen=Pitkin Airport during the last
six', months. FATF"part 7.3"9; CeYtification and operations: Land
Airports"Serving Certain Air Carriers, states that each
provide for the co
ecologicalestudyeracceptable to the Administrator (when'
wildlife of a size or in numbers aapabYe of causing an air
carrier damaging collision are observed to have access to any
airport flight pattern or movement area. You, as airport
manager, must immediately complete a wildlife management study
or demonstrate how t'ou'can control the deer from getting on
the`airport. At airports similar to yours; the airport has
chosen to install deer proof i'encing. This negated the need
for a wildlife study.
We will be glad to work with you under either option but you
must do one or the other.
Sincerely,
~ , ~.,
Harold N. Handke
~ ",`` a, ~ ~ A'~,~
. - ..: ,
_, . ,:.,~ 1,
~... ~. r ..a•., .1. ,. .:...fib ~ F, a. x. It ~ ..x,lq::_ ~ i
~...
,.
.,...., .. .. ~., ,. .... , '6iiu ;., ,~ REFER t0 ~.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF~WILDL~I=E
AN EOWI OPPORiUNITVEMPIOYER
Perry D. Olson, Director
8080 Broadway '
Denver, Colorado'80218
Teiephone:`(303) 297.1192' '
Sept. 7, 1990
Aspen Pitkin Airport
Attne $rad Christopher, Mqr.
233 E. Airport Rd.
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Hwy 82 NE Realignment and Security Fencing
LptARgpO
o.
,.;
~~.y OF'~yo
._„
As you know, there is at times considerable wildlife use near tkie
North end of the runway. This actv~ty`is'Tiotti residential~~"and
migratory in nature, making it extremely difficult to predict what "
options may work to 1.).. improve ruritsay safety, 2) minimize. road
hazards caused by wildlife.
I think we have only two alternatives here.
1. Fence the entire perimeter of the airport and Hwy right-of-
way (including a box culvert).
2. Stay status quo with minor adjustments.
Alternative one would require extensive fencing, road underpass and
the possibility that an occasional animal will still get inside the
perimeter fence. I do, however, feel fairly confident that if the
fence and underpass are designed correctly; that most potential
conflicts with airport operations and vehicle wrecks will be eliminated
in this section.
Alternative two -- status quo with adjustments 1) Sterilize 20 yards
around landing area on north end by killing all vegetation, matting and
putting gravel of some sort as a surface. This would keep animals
from lingering near the required safety zones; 2) Increased signing
of wildlife crossing area for Hwy.' Perhaps lights could flash only
when animals are present.. Reep reduced speed limits as people come
into and, out of shale bluff curves, 3) Possible. salt baiting and
water stations (freeze proof) away•from road~anc~ ruTiraa~. This option
taut
could conceivably cause more. problems by acting as an attrac
~,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet. J. Barry, Executive Director
WILDLIFE COMMISSION, WIIIiam R. HeQberg, Chairman .Dennis Luttrell, Vice Chai?man • Eldon W. Cooler, Secretary ''
g ~ 'Larry M. Wright, tvtemher
DenBer9, Member •
Felix Chavez, Member •, RebeccaL Frank Member • Gene & Peterson, Member . Geor a Van ,,
i
~~
","w .ktarw ..,,2 ..:::"i '.^c++~',"~~~'.~".~~.~.uc..w.?:~w;:,.s.. ~"~3
-; I..
Aspen Pitkn Airport
Attn: Brad Christopher, Mgr.
Sept. 7, 1990
Page Two
My feeling at this time is to go
intense monitoring. By intensiv
authority, Highway Dept., Sherf
keeping a daily log on animal u
to two years. This information,
runway, crossing roads and other
this time conflicts occur at a r
authority and highway Dept., the
Sincerely,
~'
Randy Cote
District Wildlife Manager-Aspen
RC/lmp
Enclosure: Fence outline option
xc: Pitkin County Manager
Perske, Hig~iway Dept.
John Toolen, Grd. Jct.
J. Seidel
tatus-quo with
monitoring, I
s Office and D
of the airpor
ould include f
ustments and
for the airport
ion of Wildlife
r a period' of orie
ing, crossing
If after
the airport'
... ... . ........ .. .:e
..._....
__..
1
r P~
_ _
_
i
i W
't
~
- ~
- ~- air
' ~.-.-..-..-e-
~ . '
...
..,
. «~ 1~..
~ _
y (. a .._.. '~
1 _
~^--.~ "
rp:.
~.~~~
~ ~ c~.~.~
T-~
a
..... s
!P 1 //~ _ ~.
~~ ~S~ i~o / ?
,,. ,.. .q ,,.- _
~:
n
{;
.~.
__ ~ _ ..
//'~/ ///1 y / ,n
!i ~ 1 rte.-~...ai ~,l/ ~/1 rJ~ l ~ ~..A ~.. ~ _ ..~.~OO s~ ~, .-. ..,. .. .,. p6,
..
._ _ ~,.
~~= .:air ~ ~ .i ,~2 ... _ ..
~ n~rrir.•
>P.=,
'?AY1 J. }4. b.°
_: x,
p
i. F^ ~~.7.n,. y~,a.
.,»~ . ,::.. r
_ _.. ~_. z ~ ^. r_ *ArP f? AK
._
_ ~ i 7
5 -:. '
'i$a l..~.M~C
...
,i
~~
~R,. ~:,,
~.~..~
i . _ ,_ ..,
aa,
:. r. d 1: ~~::.~`~.T. ~':.
...... ~..., F ~3T ` a las~2 0#~..a.Ny ~~ ~d.F .i i~ y
9F ~. n ~ ~ r ~ R YodaR^F,R aR Fq[~~~'~'o EF ~2F2 ~E~ {p ~rj
k:a ~'" b° f. FpF 7 c a a_ T F t;°O~~ °yi R~"`. P,g~ I fiF
a 8 FF a n 3' ~ 6zz~ q} 1,,
o ° iiii GGnn
y '~ 8 E ~ ~Eqs (i{ ~ ~o o. r Rz< s<~ pme{E3 ~~'qtE ' ^~0c m+h
iN ~ ~¢ ~ }€ yTP .~ ° ii OIFTfrq r. Y o~SR M
~ ~~ .y - ~ a ~ E3.,, ~ °^ 4F~P3`L~A ~ i4^~A
~ n y yy P €~ ea a. I~~IF ' ~ L\
fi eE T'~ 3 SEC ~ ~ ~. R x Fp! ate S N6,~F i
\ §' fe i m~'^~~,.7~~•OL 33tcy a °o Ef"Ac~~ 8 z I
~<~x~sf= s fr ° ~ass~ t~ 3~E ~ R'~ E
rq~ yy ~~ k~e °~0=~~
'r € ac kB Tr l' ~~ i v~F ' 3~n .obi Ca E3~FI t°P 6 bn nr~
'~ ~ r a _ a3 i ~4F4eO
-, ~ ~ °nc°~ ~~`/ 3 43~ ~, G 1 °g= oa'~ 8 :€~~n!'~ 36Fz
L 6 Y6fC ~ [ n q' ~ 4 A
..i. ~ ~ ~ € FS '~' Oa a to lg~~u}i~ nR
R ° °
~~ § S. ~ o iF:FsF.Y o~~
E Ric o° ,~ r ; F~3 gg9 oF~ ~ ~F s8x ~E~ I~
.; ~ ~
T
°° ~,
^ nz ,..
-.4.as __~__ _. R ~-.~_. .. .... ., ... ..._. .~.u k`
QUIT CLAL1f DEED
of
^
__ - R C
C
SO .
___ .. .. C a.~- ..
~'
9T TY OY IpILPNOO
Mu m O ~
.,
.
.... __CrO~...... 1 F
1 Yntl Nh WI YY Wuur~ .u liy
.....
O~~ .. n
'
m,... .r.mn .~.._.. ~~, ~,.
.
•.'mL. Y _ ....
u.... _..... ~..
,,
IYn Me...... ~._.... WVtlae Ns _.
yy........ __....... ..... <<
TI :.
Yy - :.. a.. ~. ~~.,
°~.n+a~ t, . ,
_. ...
.
t
__ i
___~~
/.cNN`/ OAfES 1
I
~
8oe3XJ
.
LO e~b i/
FfSPF~J.
y dam m?~a.# e :: p s a . «n ..,„~ ,
y~
`
~- w~l
_
o'^ .o~ nqj
`c ">em
~m n
F~
1 06•) DO
~
~;
X'A'
° ~ eq ,
~ o
~
~, ^'n
o ~„ 9 .
n "..
J k-
~ ~
K a$ ^..
° ~~n
I
~ ~IS E
,
~ ~ 6 ~ °'6
~ , ;
C
d] y ° ] ±i
~` - °"j
n
"
~
s
!:O n
L
n 4
J
.... tl
n p S IP
CT
a::li d..
& f ~ L f
~~}} ~ ge ~~ ~4i~ x°a g0 a ~f~~ .a
~.~f~^^. x,.~D3~a ;~~~~jj
b`~ ~~. s~i~c gE:i,~9;9sae e~~~a^F ~f .'
~ f 33 tf ~ ,:•
iii ~ ¢ 6ib'a ae e~9~ aF• i~
~ ~ Es i ~^ f ~§a3L° {pWpWa FFi ~f~F~~
6 7aIa M_. 6t13~~ 't f
~i ~ ~ €~ Y '"-~~~~E~ 'seef4'~iFgg1E~liift~ -
r s; 111
c f'1 f
>~._ ~. '€~•~ a ~e~ s ~° i~6 $~~' eE~
-. ... a __ _ _ ~. - -- _
aa }-. ~>
~.:+..... C i ~ .. ': is i4 :C
.,
WARRANTY DEED ~~~~~ ~~ ~~?~~.
i;,' 8
} } yyr~ ~ .
} 0. g'~i 'AgggdAk Svc.:
..G..v a 1 ,f ~ ip "~ r„1
. tw~.y ..wr wumw...~... mr BCFR w"yA
.. MwwU r.mw uo. Ww ~.
u vw ....u wwy ...bra ~-, za°,r
_ A
C k
p y L ~ ~h
~' ~ ~ F.. ~
o b
(.yr MM1tu n4wsu
.a c ~r ~ '
* .. __.._ ~ ~ coca>~.
.. ,~ ,,
I~ "°
:.ao. .. lr'I~
'g~ ~ <~Jxra,
- - - -~ n~d:~x~f..
>. - , 4
~M.~ - .- S".3e
~.:
4~/ _ - xR ~~;a•
?~ ' ' l~
M y2
Q!ry ~.~Gi
"rv A!
r3 ~ ~ ~~`' { ~'~~1~" ~"~"s 3'q{~r~x Ei f.~!e " ~~F 4~i~
~+'"~ ,~~ ~~ ~~( a F~l 3~asg8 f~~~3Fx,fyfD ::~ x ~~~ ~ +
s.::~ ~ a0 3~ ~ ~~EL;R °a ~~.~~"Fi'$F~~pf ~ fy~l4„iii4j< ~ ~ ~y
~S gg
P ~Qa S i i~ ~.E; 6g sat°Fc3~ !>F f ~~~ l}}L~Tj.; ~ k ~~
~~ g ~a ~~ ~~ ~FF itl ~ ;E~Fp~fS ~ F t IRt ~~~t~~~~
[ a e~3V~ xFj~,s~ pe~.~ff~~TE$~~Eg pg +[[~~}p~,~q`=a~'~tt~
tt{ ~ ~E@s~K ~ ~: ~ ~~~~6 s~~$~~' fly ~f ]tff " ~~I~E~L ,'t""~gg ~~'~
~ ~ I " ~; .~' aft ,"~id.y~~~;~ ~ +~~F~ ,2 *„' ~':
~ r1F fa :e gl4~°_.c ae -..f P
g -~~Eg€€ § "' f£'~€3€cf ~5 fi f~f ~~• yiw '.~vr,;
i 5 a° '~~`_ f 4 'k"f17 Ft: j'~g F~~P i a'+_~
a ~ x S.e.Sfi +y ccF E< 1 y
`tt ;/7~{~'{'p°<e a" F. S ,~ ~ i f a pE F~ i F` p ~( ~ E W a ~}~~~ly`yr
o ~ 4 C C d~ ,.ao E~Ffd f?" f] ~ rR -~'~a'T
e
In / m ~
..« S~RIJy .~..
i CO q s N 'C W'^~'J .
f ~ n' <.
4
p ~y~ sra. ~
WARRANTY DEED }~ e~ a el~^1~SK'y~$~
a
g P a
~~ + ~~
.. 4 9 VSC `/.^~
X38 ~~ S }~ ~ 91,4 ~
rt:tr ar <owweo ~ _._ ... __.. .. ~ZS~ ',s 'fi't »'!~~' ~ i
W
w a .. !
'~ ', r~ ur ~xrr e. i qw asPG 1 .<.~ J~ter
. ..
r.. .. .ew uu .. , s e.» ~ w q h :V. S ~ ~..
. i
.,
w i«t,... x weir k.aa ~.9 are. 6Q~i'. ..'
< ~
Iu~ x ..~.."wvY x 5•
v~ ...~. C~l'GS .. r a ~ lii J~C `~'x~~l
IV.
,.
_ ~ rx a~q d `~~, *a~G
:~ ,.ti~ ~a ,.y
~~ ,.. ~ ~ < ~ . u
.... _...
'~(` " oar o,~
rl ~ <. ;~:
?~Z~i4inc ~< p ~~~a'~~
- a3p~~~a.g~ is
' ____ aL< '~~ f~
' ...... mF~~"-
_ ss" ~~
- _ a ~ ..
- sa ad '
_ _ ~4..'!
''i~~of gN
e g ~ .{
Y :, C kE p,8'. ~,~',
~;. E IG Y yy;
3 Y
# _.. ... wN ,rY
~':`,
1 E.7 i.r ;r ego Sq`EIrcE (~r }It
s~~ i..,~l°~r8e9"e°:flPi;laElE~t;.
I ~ 3 E`i
e. *°~ iii=~pRxE~6pt ~~ ~~ r~iY
b rr i rt 'HexeRSS ~g9~~ E
,. s~k~sa..e6;r~arg~e ~~$
die. ~:.i ~,F ,^ is}~"y• ~t ~
g ~ ea~a„B, e~ag~~ •~
s - - 'RF "w 3f if 6
.,.,y ~~k
;~~5~~~,~~r
,. ~'..,
v~.
i~ ,
-. .~[. wwr ....w r
.'. ...
F__l~~~sc._ _
h.a-!~/S
Y wu.m L` QA~Y _._...-
~ t. ~ *.~_
s -- ,
sir. ,efn
sg s. S
e ~~
ee
~'_.
~o S w"°°~Y~ F87,C°~~'
"m;u mCC,CCC CS CC 7:.F`~i '-3'
... ....... ...PZ 9 $ ~ .~'~~:
a ~ >a er.
6 ~<3y,#~
t ~ .-~`
~' ~ x ~. ;w3'~T,a
~'~
~:af.~i
~:_~t ~ .
x
~~~~e ~~~-o;
p i7~~~
~et~~3"ffis~
;;,<<~ 1 q ~;'e
'-:~11I6a~~x
4~Erai'PB
~~i a°~°
~i~~•~'
B ~
~~~d~~~
F~{{; f~ ~~
i3}~~F~
€~ g~~B
x...:`_ ?
~$ WARRANTY AEEA ~ i a a a~
n _.__., . k e ~i u, ~i"
_ i i
i` ~ ~rlrlA COwuDp' ~~§~ Z g° ~Mx ~~ -
~!°N °•uM1 Un ow wNxwyw rvr ~'e]4 E1 ; ^~°• 4.~z~''F•+ y
h~awNMfwW~.~...~.-41Y 3Y~B• F ~B '-A~ y~„~'.~I~ ~'~k ~.
u.~aa.a,. x., .,scour ~aa.i w ~ E ~ t ~l ~tt h•7'y§,¢.~
sw. K.--. ~a.~.w. x.._~_ ~~ ~ a d o t ~ 9 1 ~ ,i~yt.~$}y4,t^i~~t~~'~~s ~_s
._ e,~ i
alp s'.o~Y S~ar~;~~ o"
.,. _ % 73a .1c¢ ~,,~:
ne A OAr'j-3 8~v~ Yin '.e$ir f'+" ~ynt+~'~~Y
~_ ..
' -- s " > ~ •'..~ firs
_~ _ ~
m ~ ,„&~ R
M+
~~
~,
~, .
~ r r ~
S
~'i~ :u
x
.~7^% ~
F ~ S ° 8' ~ii~yy pnp
a ~ ~ i 4 E~ e. R q 3 ~. ~ R. d e p ~ ." ?'J~ s~ ^ ~4,
K R o i CR ~°°..05~:. '6.. K. L Y a k ~~ .~8p
Em sFSSd ssccs= ~~ ea oa cEdf g~g :~ ~'~ ,,
s° Esc s z as =~ EigrE f° ~~
R ~ 2 A' A ~ ~, is+' .v. .(r ~ u
" 6 a Y ii i .e i~ r~ r ~ 3':
' 4k ^Y Sg Pi S t3'"ZA rsab i;~ J
i .e § A L i 'Y'~v <~~'u~~zt.~4~.fl~ 7y®i
V$ ~~ Es ~~f~aw:
rr .o ~ ~ 7'yt .~ Nh~~~ ~ ty
-~ ~-~
,~. ~ -~crtp».:.~~, r t r ,t...C: C~ ggr44rp~ ~qk a(p( :. i.. ~,t'~"+' i}r-~' r y ~` IQ yy~
C=,~y7 I tsR Fdy~ 7 6R[rf k,~f}~ `r `'+a'~bp~~i~~ ~~^~ ~~,~.*~
r 77 ~ iq` ~ ~ !'
j rst r x k v f o 5~ 3 a r
r,~~~ ~ ~I nI° f~~ ,g a:acltP~..Cp6tpf~ • i ;~~~~ t~'L€9F rk ~a{~ ~`(.~
~,~ she ma~ ~ a ~ ~§kt7 t~k a ~9e~~~pl~t rF [t q k a KFa ~'~
:~;~ ~pg~ a. I ~p~¢Pr ~F t~;f~ t i{ ; r 4~
~~ ~ I i ~$ ~ as :t ~.k~i~~ ~~ 'C~*F# ~s t `',+i "zg4k~~ j i
~ v~~~f I ~ ~:F`t,.>er?&}`gp3t~~3f p e~A~.f~iFr~~!~`{86~ ^}B ~**::~
~i(i ~~t ~ I ~4~t y ~a o79~RY `]3~ ~ ~p ~4yk 1Q~~45;',~~•~~~~~',.
<Y.'t ;iR~' I fyB~~aF~s_~ ttttl7pFCC}2[~ ~ C }lttki~ a
i[ ~~a; "C1N fl ;EA tts~'~'~;a~~*S Lp Ftk ?xg k}[4 F1~(T gS~~ ,
:p ~°e"s: F k L k sr ! l F F q i`.ae
x :;1 ~R ~E s;~e; c~~i~~ p~~k~~ kk [~~e'F~ ~ ` ~gg~ :~".
RR e~iee f. t[ .
'.t ^'a ~ a C~ ~6 "o p3RpgC ~~Ft f~ f'C ~~ ~ ~3,n ~. ~l
:~` a °` '¢¢ 444 g of ~ L~ ~ ~ `~
;} a "~ ; a sF ~°'s 4~p~;`~ A~~t~~~§gk ~~` a '~`~ o as S `-.,v'!
' $~ t9f r i t`,~
's i„a^y._ _.~ L~^ _ ': La[ tplF ` :,. ~ ~`9.r
.... y F • ,6 ...,.
...
s....~.. ° jfr rr rv'J~ Gik -.. ~ °e r4i
~i~ x ~. .. .. ,. o`' A~; +hn'4 ant i Y `° a,1~1= § r/-."aP
'~ WARRAm ~~ ~ 9 B a ~r 2~~ ~ o~" >2k~II?i}F•~k`,t
.._,~.~...,.- -. .. _ xx gg
~ ! B py~i~ ` x ,.
...,.,. ad >a ~ r n tg ~~' E r rE~~t ~' g~~~~F,K .:
..,_ ~.-._._ ... g V y.,
__......_._ a k r a V" { E r e ice' r ~~ ~ ~. a k R Aa ~, '
ruts ov GOwWb ~ ''~k ,45v~ C, ~k '$py7~ ru~4 ggrg tRk°~k*Pk .,
r b+r .wo uu as a,w.. .:'a.r"' HLL ji
p. rwwla raew a4 _ mra C. 74~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ 5. ~~`~ ~7~L{g~ ;7'
u ._., ~i { g r ~,,
-+--.rw _.r. ~r,..,ma _R L mg.~6 R E A~~~ i"N.A Fx~t ' e7 i~p~4^~
y., FL 5r5pp a CF Y ~.i s.
'w'n~ a.'cu..n _ .... iG! <~ q E*d R{~~ fi~C~ i 2. •r7° ! ~,n~r i~p
# a cs9
b-- K.~~~~.r - c^t-Yr a>•'^~ ~A4 i'~a 6 p' ~ "FL
r .__N ~. ~'Yi}_ es Fa{ 4k~ s ''~ q i .. r3~€e ti~'k
%..~", "6:Ofrt'ss. ~~1 'rs"H i~F ¢ at' Y22e ., .~=isE~ ,~
_ ^°
... zg~ a., i e~ ~°~ ,>i
-. a p :, i S tt ,. F
_~ _ _.~
_.... ~ ,
,.
`a<" s -; s z ~Eaz a S `~~F4>R~~x:g=~ ~ ''. a ~ ~~~ `y ~`, ~.
e,y-. ~' Cf M~' S'_# SFB," "' o~ ~a€S~'o ~R ~8~ 'C-.a ~~
c ,.. ~ RN.. ~• ~•VR F," < ~.a YFO9 a:' .' B ySy ~~Y',
w 2:, ~P •,s~;~
. ~~~. _ _ e ~ ~ C y~ a a ~;
M"J.. m .. 9 E ' p ~'_2A~ f
q y~i'f'
~~~`~' ~, S o iYq' ~ ACA i t: 2 i tp.A.
~ _ a n~,. Y i. s~
*' s n
4N
k'.:
G.
a ^'
Q
eY
~~
Sn
:.r
~°
[~
n>
x"
Oq
~•!O
RRY
"o.m~°R. >T~
n c'c~..ao" n v
FXE"~.>SF BAY ia;
m an ~x oo°ian 4"n E
~^a~Ne ;[6es~`f Y~ RiS
„~(Fs.~~~~ Rs"
+n n~n~b'~m H:
"n ECG "i^
poi°n ~S
..; „;^
N:
^a 8'a RoMm
a "s .. " gn
'se GS; "a°K
a o;Y
n"aT x~ Bn>n~
»9RV6s' ?6 ~x 9i
~"mean e n
e&S"n~a"a g..°o$
o
Y:
n uartYn a i0
" z"an SGG
n.~SRn~ n°~a~
`S~RRS mbr~
smu°s~• ~;a]::
Ia4 4n^~ q^+J PV
q n D..PIM a~':
°.a
yaks^x
_,R~ aa"a
^' ~Om ERq"
A"° ~;s s;s
°'' ¢aa
0 Y
~d~~o"Ge Rn ao ~~
SR .oi "~AhFnY 6^i lal
Y0
zaSEm°~Sd°»,G~A
.i "nRna~o Guar :rn
G„•~ok3 "g nnQrv_Q
a~d
vo
x"~
m<n wp;,:;T^ ai
„ ~~a";a""~:
N, .
"n"nOM1Y•e i'f.
. •
•
nO~ae'w
a m '
~
~•:
"k '~i LJ.::
"°
a~Sg
., " ;
ndoB~dmS b~'
F~
'e ' `$~~ T
`a' ~:R '
i a
o AdA m R
~ G in°ry
~
2
^
P
' f
" 3 a ~r's
s
S
,.;"
R~ S. S~ . ..e"~"~ R sBe
s
o m° Y C> " o a° " ..R Sax 57
boaRNAN^n q
` °e'" no°:a" .. ~' ~
°
~
o
"
o
"
'"
.o 5 „
.,>
^m'n
~
° ~
m
n 6 .. :
.
c
.. m
F as~~>g~
~'"~ sir ax` a: .§ ~ma °
~~
~
^a,tl s " 3
~
.
"
T y ^~`xa: es;n
R ~
asa~
n
p
T
"
8 G 8
r
n a 3 v o^ 2 S `
a.
" C
n Y o C
h S
am 0'0 °0
O' p
4 -
gB~3K Se1 8
°S ^n
'6> a ~.
a y
r10-Y
o$3" k
~
on'nVexGG n n
nx0 x^
u 9 tOn mp
u^n a ~
1t ~ \ '~
Nn nOi '
G
a?i~ ~;E ;
a Fin
xT ae^ a ,~ ~
~g ~ ~ ~ ' e s ~ sr°•° ~.~px ^~
'~ $ff ~CC $03 y`RR n{mqq se. SyyC ~np yb 8: ~yy r~Q~j ~c( < yY
pI `. nYP yA~i b RYT~i ~f~.m YY e6 Ck~i s.. n6~. ,t ~ Y~
~,.; mso ZSS~p @ac>oRB4 g 5^m" Bwm S°RR ~ ngg,m- ' hl'h~
td~y ~ ~ ~R oB mod r"K ~i °R "m e~e...£~~~ ~ S.a° r p ~+v'-..
s., sog FC,~ .^~ 9R n € " ^o°o ~m3e~b'C"." ~ Cm~ r~ ~ F~'
' B :.°~C "eeR~« ([j' eagRS~ ".154 n R ~ °5.~ a r.,
~.~. `rt n0 FNR SY.d n'~ L " ~ pji ~~LRC ° :.:
Rar R'o `"r rCan=C k n'~ ° k,~°"`~,kg$ 9~~ -~ ~~v
~ "3.R c~'n~m° g°R~°.n'"on $ snRSA '~~8~sndSB ~ 'a"'~~ r. r~.,
:'~ o ® °9,~y`.C a^~ > "~ ~ o >. ~ CCo."~ S e4 a ~;
y gg ~$ ~ $5
`off 1i~ 3'g°g~8~ ~ $~sn"~R ~>65'v R"~'~ ® n ~.
S~5 Ym."m a on me.^.~5a s 6 ..
`~'~ ^3ga •.'~`°' C.~3Cn."'~A" `~" ~q " ~.. °n ae as 'ra ,,>'
a ,: Q $ g
Sa E m'C, V^ :b.d3dM3 R~RBo~s '.8 ~~ t,.
~~~ ° ° a..5 Cg u^ °< m t
apa $ 8 •~^ m "65 8K ~~ y
~r .: i2. R
t
i:Y~~.
R FReA 'i ;v'~~'.
a i u o. X x:
~ Y ~i~:.
a c;.a~ ~.. -•;
~ ~ ~- ~,
~ ° ~ ~ ~"~•
° n 6 F ,;,
~ :: r 6 ;
:' s q 5 >4 ,~
i ~ V~ Y^° R R a 7 $
qr ~
r. ~ m~tl ~,e ., m yR o~~
a:" ~m "p FS» ~ ~~.
U"
~~ oy r
~~~ ~ ~ "~ '
~o ¢
~~ ~°~ e~ ,Sa$
H~~o
v i.. _.._ a 5 u __..
i " ° 5
,Y F~ °
_, r ~ ~e~ ~' RV<
?~s ~ dI ~ n~^~m[ qe„
4/: ~ ~ ~ yi~ U F R~~
jhy 6
6' ~ ° „
"n~m
. r c~
F~~ I, .. 4S ~fl~ ~, Y Fr•~
4a I A °
L:: m ~ ~ .
<r
~~
Fr ~; i
' ..,. ... ._ .w a ^ ~`* „err}, ? .5~ + - ~ 1=. += -
r._ ~ ,,,.~. a~.~.e.~ _+s hF~.,,.a., ~~~s,~~,<~,~~~.«,.~i
'~`~;
^ confenaed from page 1
money because we already know we have a wild-
life problem."
A wildlife fence has been in county plans for
years, but has not been built yet because the
county is'waiting fora $180,000 grant from the
Federal Aviation, Administration for the project.
'Deer fencing the airport has tieen in the air-
port master plan since it was updated`iri'5984,°
Smith said.
The fence has been designed, a contractor has
been hired to construct it, and the needed land
use variances have been obtained, Smith said. A
request for federal money for the fence was sub-
mitted in April of this year. '
The FAA has delayed approval of the grant
request because of its on-going dispute with 1?ib
kin County over general aviation rnrfewa, acxord-
ing to'an FAA correspondence.
"M'e're waiting on the federal, money, or else
" we'd have been fenced already," Smith said.
Instead, airport workers continue to combat
the big game problem the old-fashioned way. '
"We're still chasing dear on foot," Smith'satd. ' t i,A~
~rn• i
-~+ ~
~j L. ~
7' W ~~
O ~, Q
~s~C7?
~a ~' V
O
s
~~pp
'C
~ ~ ~ C^
CO O c`d
.~ 3 X^^ ~p~j a
d~ O N C O
c ~ U d
oro ~ a
~~~~_">
oac~3~'d
'~•y ~ X03
~~ ~~~~
v. ~ OA
Q O ~ ~ K ro
w O w O ~
d O 6~sW
oc~~~~o
~.~~„3~,
~~~°03 3
o ra°~oyoK,' c~'~ ~ ~ ~y
N ~~~ o O 0 ...a % G R
a c46dw.°'r3rG od 'N a
q y%~,oycn ~' ~~m
~ ~ ccR~~^
N ~,eCg~ ~ro• ~. p O ~ C
Q ~'«'I a~C.~ >.O aiO~cg
a ~ ~ °'a°~>x~ ~~w o
0.8~3«.e.... y~+
V~ -d lC L G ~..~ ~ L 3
ro . ~ d ~ ~ o ' ~c o , ~ o p ~ ~
~euQ•3 "~~~'y~o~'oo
~~++ ro °ej w ... o0 w. «.
c3 CQat w°~O a~`~i t6 d
~ 'ppO ~ O ~ T
7 ~n~~0.~OOG~~~~w~
U p,•Fd S~ V ~ U 'S U
..
e
e
0
a
~'
3
~~
z
a
a
z
w
a
a
:;~
Li
T ~ ttl N ^~' aC _T ~L' C.
C U O ~ d O~~ ~J'O
~~Q7G O~' h "p~ yy~O .~~ye^y
V ~w•q WYJ ~~ro v,G V..
m ~ o ~•3 K ~a &~~~
N H
3~.~.~~~•n°3op3°yro
,~ a
~' ~a'a• °~d3°aroio
~ ~s~.°.~o.~3ovi°~`T°~b
o c~ v°' c~ v d .c 2 n ro
_ _ _ ..._
T.. ,
_:
_ .. ~,.,.
- - ;
-, ..
P'~~EN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 Soitfi G5lena'Slreet -~' `"
Aspen, Colorado 81617 "
(303) 820x090 '
LAND USE APPtICAT16N FEES ~~~ ~'~~ ~~
6ry
00113 x3250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL
-63270-136- .. GMP/FINAL4•,~ ,... ~::"
-63280-737"' ~ SU&CONCEPTUAL ~-
-63300-139 SUB%F(flAl' -~~ ~ "-- _
-63310-740 ALL 2-STEP APPLICAYIONS
-63320-14T ALL i-STEP tiCPPLICA'tTONS/`°~
C'ONSENTAGENDA 17E~§' " ~ " "~
REFERRAL FEES
00125 63340-205
': ENVfRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
-63340-T'96 T-fO0~1~tJG.. ~, g. ., .... -'
7~. Ob 1'15 b33'40-763` :.'.... "EK1G7N°EEA'fNG ~ "~ ~ ~ V. °"~:
SUBTOTAL
County
~' 00773 -63180-126 GMP%GENERAL
~, -63170-727 G~PIDE"'YA~L.~D ,.,. ,:~: .„•,.>°'
-631`90-728- GMP%FINAL
i -63190-729 SUBIGENERAL -~ "
-63200-130 SUB/DETAILED
i &3270-431 SUB/FINAL
'53220-732 ALL 2-STEP APPL(CATION$
- h -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPCIC'ATION§/
CONSENT AG~ENDA'I7EM'S~ ~'"--- -7~.y~"-
-63450-14fi 'BOARD OF ADJLIST(v1ElVY"` ~~"~ -~
" ~_;
.
F REFERRAL FEES:.
t ... ......._..., ... .;. -,. I;.
~- 00725 -63340 205 - ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH -
00123 -63340-190 HOUSING ~ ~~ ~'-
00173 -63360=743 E`NGINEERING~
r
PLANNING OFFICE SALES ` .,----
,. .~. _. .. .,: _ ~...
00113 - -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CbDE
-63090-123- COMP. P11iN
x3140-724 COPY FEES V-
-69000-745
_ OTHER'.•.:. _-.. .. -
/
SUBTOTAL ~~'~-~-
-
_
j~ (~ TOTAL ;.7C U
r Name: ~/~!}~` Phone:
'r
~ Address: Prolect:~u,~~'~ ~~ j
~~
Check # .~
Date: / - /"~- ~~
l Atlditional billing: ~ #of Hours:
-_. ~ -
Sa w.,.+w.r_bz"n. cr.,. MYi.d. L l?..•„..L d. ~~~,
emu.
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A VARIANCE HEARING
State of Colorado } BEFORE THE PITKIN COUNTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
I, Scott Smith, Director of Aviation ,being or representing an Applicant before
the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this
matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest
public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 18th
day of September , 19Q~., to the 1st day of October , 19Q~. (Must
be posted for at least nine (9) full days before the hearing date).
and sworn before me
this,~day of ~~cs~d~~ -~
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
Applicant's Signature
~~-,
+_ ~~n>>
9~
~~
~~
Y CU
f'~
a
V ~'
~ ~~
Y' ~
~~ G
-p ~
ft. Y
f1'
r }+
r Q`
~ ..
-~
n -~
r- T
~~
n
Y
~ ~!
V~
u ~
a :"
r o~
o~
cA O
-~
r
U1
,. .k n .: $. „ ~.~
H f Lal i VGJa] V e Gr nn v. . iv v ..fir... r` ^ ,„-.{.' ^ ;_ " -- ~••~•~ .. . _,.
ass :ay'eveing y J ey. p qta,, ~ „' ~,~az ~ .,,~,~.. „. A~µ~ ~,.. ,...
M .~ `
qj ::.
Me
~: ..~_„,;:,r,,~-~'~::r$'..^#,°a:.f~,..~ ~s ~.:_.~'_.,.W:$',;,'„~`e,., ~iv'i`":'mt~fieY'~itl&Of~~'il@.~Yl%YaiV''3y',a .G'etateY
•'''
~r~ giving airirort wo%~eera'v~ era P~I?ertY>" air'tiafficg,'i~n l1e tree , >san5tq earn, .,, ....... -- -`..
job,andaliakingcauntyoffteta"fsan?i~,~.~ea<'er~said„notin tY"iat.,.'espo2e~°' :-'~e"kiaveto"chase'thejn_afffirom
ous to insfalT a evil ife eisce. _ , d, near, the, ax-,; Lhat,arga a~~' ye''a-~''ir~$'{'ri`~i; but i~'s
.il FN~ a,lier o~"alNtutt'~ ` '~ ~o
_.1~ercts ar`e o£ten""+~?oi,e'd`"8"1i"~'tf87~,' IIYg ~rs"i'k`~tiVpr,ae _w-,,1ams$~e aa~,-w;., i~ro ia}{@nse t,14aa t1~t_T~im oaf y6ar,,
amend tie runway this,time of year, port Wednesday morning 1:C saa$
We m zero 1 th u"tw to
ai'cwrding to couiaty aviat;gn diarc~dC"" '"` A dnead~ay o . ' g,cal to e sol :,ai •- bie accord-"°
s e tl~`s'o a about elk` t , air- be"ta insta~l`a wa`Idlif
Scott.,5giaith ." ..... ~~ k, ~ ~ ~,;:;~ ~fean~ce,,
~._:,. ~,. • ~~~ ~ ~ €; 6'cn£it.:T5rxe'~"o.a~i a„ar,~alane's
T'o""predeut~aridiiig ptanes €igsttA': "port promp d"aFierss,, Ilisaon wi h an anrapal;
hitting etk, airport,'mainteritizsce ~ Brady to.~o try W ctiaa_e.ihe,animala. pieyigus''cR,.... ~,<.,„.,~~.,,.. ,w .z....
w"orlte'rs"check the.runway ai'~n'- . oa~,of harm's way; lint tlaoy w®ae .&'AA'regnlati'ons~eegnaXeei~er~era,~;,
°;`Lea[:iam~"ea~tieve~~in~Sm"rth,s~fd.,, 'ganew'[ign"Ece'arrived;Gradysaad. mgora,studytodetxrminewhet e,,,ra
"der peop"}e go Drat b°efoig ~ac~t ' _ ,~„GmssiAg a large e'll'S`.w~€b, a plane ivi~d~iE"e t"ence }~ ia._~~ar.9> tie~riotect.
~`r'onnier 'al~arrnval ag¢~tg~ da~~ axl?~ ., or caz'i~bv,~a~nsly~taazardons4~v r- , . 'fit wan~t~ lie a wo to t3tr~,year
cba`se tlakan o'3'~,"'las ss,'#~:;~rao~ al years age, one'animal was li°aE~y al;tady in'w~r~°h atrport pe""~s7i1; the
~~ tiait`and do,gir tti=peen w~• ~"ii'yln¢onait>~.~laue, Smilfa s'a5~, "I"he transportation ilepartxagnt, oounty
Durang the'-last;~szanth, elk airy" plaaae4ma`y Tiav~~e suff`erod mvaeh 'lo'ad & ~„~n~dge tdelaaitiiieYt'tT cell the
deerliavebearl;ahased awi< from the: -'. dean' bnl; tae anam'a`I d'ad `tae"saw sl" off~lce ~onld ,1}avde. JR-notate
~~ ~~
'_ "~"~`~=' `~` ' ~"~^~ ^' '- ° ' "" 'ii"se vaatianges ge l~een_obtained Smith, said, A --
iY' con,~,{nttedrom page? ,_-. .., - ~ '
,-~eq'beca'iise,we already know we have a'wtid `^regttest for te'dera'~inoneg+"#"or the fence w'as'sub--;
¢; hfe problem ` matted in Apnl of this year.
years, but 1"ias no~'bee "lt y t`~ae ati~esthe request be ease fits on-go ng d apute with P t-
~'~`co'~'ti i~'is'waztang"fo'r s~0,~0 Want fYom the ~~nCountyovergeneXa~aviatioriourPews accord-
?~~ ~'erfera~ Aviataon Administration for he pro)ect: ing to'an FAA correspondence,
"Deer ~enc"'~n'~"~~ie azrpo°~`"Tfha been an the azr "We're wanting on the federal money, or else
}:.. _ __r._ .r__ ..:..,... ;4 .,.ae .,..ate+o~'",,. idsl~` we d have beet fenced, already," Smith said.: ',
_ -,_,~
i#3'37892 "8/91 ib:4r Rec x.00 PK"6F~G 192
.~
Silvia Davis, Fitkin City CIerk, DoC'9f~.OC_i
RESOLIITION OF THE PITTCII~T COUtI'1'7C~ COLORADO ~'
BOARD OF ADJUSTIKDYI'~' ``° _ ~ _ .i.
GRA~iTING~ SET'Bi~DK {& HEI"G"HT "IfE~IE~O„`32 "~P`q'~1~~C ` ~ ' AIR... µ~ ~- ~~
REBQLIITION'NO. 9Y-51
WHEREAS'., Fitkin County, owner of a tract of land situated at Fitkin
County Airport, aka Sardy Field, requests a height variance to
allow for a $5-foot high beacon. Also requesting a 2 foot height
variance; a 30"foot front yard setback "variance; a 10 foot' north
si e a
` rd setback variance-, a 10 foot south side yard setback
roada ee~ a' 10 foot rear yard setback variance; a 50 foot major
tback variance and a 100 foot Highway 82 setback variance,
where j.ti,"feet, 10 feet and 10 feet are required for the front yard,
both side yards and rear yard, respectively, in the PUB zone
district, and where 50 feet and 100 feet are required for the major
road setback variance and the Highway 82 setback per the Fitkin
County Land ,Use Code, for the ereotion of an electric fence
required to meet FAA requirements; and
WHEREAS; the subject property is within the unincorporated area of
Fitkin County, Colorado (as described in Exhibit ~~A'~, attached);
and,
WHEREAS; the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant
or deny such variances by virtue of Title II, Section 16-1.3,
Fitkin County Code (Land Use Code) and Colorado Revised Statutes,
1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and,.
WHEREAS; based on the evidence presented, the Board of Adjustment
makes the following findings:
1. Proper notice procedures, including the
notification of all adjoining property owners,
has been shown by the applicant.
2. The required hardship or practical difficulty
has been established.
3. Granting such relief will not cause substan-
tiaY detriment to the public welfare and will
not substantially impair the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the
zoning maps.
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment, that a
height variance be granted to allow for a 55 foot high beacon, a
2 foot height variance; a 30 foot front yard setback variance; a
10 foot north
setback varia side yard setback va~iance; a 10 foot south side yard
nce• a l0 foot rear and setback variance• a 50 foot
#33~89L 1~]/2S/" 16:47 Fec ~.~~~? Btu 660 F'G -'93
Silvia Davi,., ~tl<in Cnty Cler4.9 Doc ~.~~~~
Resolution No. 91-~
Page 2
major road setback variance and a 100 foot Highway 82 setback
variance, be granted for the erection of an electric fence required
to meet FAA requirements, as per the plans submitted (Exhibit "B").
WARNING: Any violation of the terms of this resolution may
result in rehearing and possible revocation.
The Resolution was adopted by vote of the Board of Adjustment of
the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
DATED: October 1, 1991
ATTEST:
`7 ~
/ C• ° ~
V LL /~~//1/f
Cind Christensen,
ecretary
The Board of Adjustment
of Pitkin County, Colorado
Kan Sha an,
Chairman
BEFORE" THE "P]
TO ALL PROPERTS
ZONING
Pursuant to Pitkin County Zoning Resolution of June 5, 1955, as
amended, 'a Public Hearing will be held in the District Courtroom, Pitkin
County Court House, 1~spen,' Colorado, (or at such other .place as the
meeting may then be adjourned) to consider an 'application filed with the
srovis on d of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
P s of the County zoning Resolution.
,,._
All persons `affected
and state their views, p
personally at "such meeti
letter, pa~ticularlp ~f'
Board of.Adjustment will
grant or
LESS '1~H2-1
by the proposed variance are invited .to appear
rotests, or objections. If you cannot appear
ng, then you are urged to state your' views by
you have objection to such variance, as the
give serious consideration to the opinions of
rs a'tid others affected in deciding whether to
t for variance... A nARr~crr~E° GREATER ARAN :OIt
..~ ,
DATE T~FIE' ~~,...,l~L~ET~YNC$ ~. a:,. ,. _' ,_, <,. , , U _~~ , ~~..
October 1 1991 :~ . x.n,
8t 5:15 p.m.
City Hall, 2nd Floor Meeting Room
Dillingham, Dale & 'pharott: requesting a 37 foot front yard setback
variance, where 100 feet is re uired in the RS-20 zone district for
construction of a roposed addition to a single-family residence.
Property Location: Lots 2, 19 and 20 of Section 9, Township 9 South;
Range 85 West.
Lackey, Mary Ellen: requesting a 30 foot northeast side yard setback
variance,"where 50 feet is required in the RS-20 zone district for
construction of a proposed addition to a barn. Property Location:
Tract 5, White Star Ranch.
R.R.F. Corporation (Furman): requesting a 64 foot front yard setback
variance, "°where 100 feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for
construction of a proposed addition to a single-family residence.
Property Location: Parcel 3, Beatrice Placer M.S. No. 11426, also known
as 0960 Castle Creek Road.
Croft, Richard 6 Jennifer: requesting a 25 foot north side yard setback
variance
where 50 feet is required in the RS-30 zone district, for
Gatewaycto~n of a proposed residential garage. Property Location:
Snowmass Mesa, Filing 3, Block 1, Lot 8.
Gardner, Thomas R.: requesting a 40 foot front yard setback variance'
for construction of a proposed"addition to a single-family residence,
a 61 foot front, yard setback variance for construction of a proposed
residential garage, and a 50 foot front yard setback variance for
construction of a proposed gazebo, where 100 feet is required for each
in the RS-30 zone district. Property Location: Lot 16, Shield-O-
Terrace.
,. r.-,. .~ . ~..
sf,
~, „-~,
Brinkman, Deanna: requesting a 65 foot front yard setback variance,
where 100 feet is required in th RS-20 zone district, for construction
of a proposed addition to a single-family residence. Property Location:
Lot 9, Block..2, White Horse Springs, also known as •0653 Trentaz Drive.
Guber, Peter: requesting a 10 foot height variance, where 12 feet is
required per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for construction of a
proposed ranch gate. Property Location: 2100 Owl Creek Road.
Horning, Joe '$ .Lynne:- requesting an •80 foot front yarci• setback
variance,'where,100 'feet is required in the AF-1 zone district, for
construction of a deck. Property Location: Maroon Creek Ranch'
Subdivision, Parcel No. 2, also known as 2065 Maroon Creek Road.
Pitkin County AiYporte"~requesting a•height v8riancd'tb alYoW~for a 55•'
foot high beacon. Also requesting a 2 foot height variance; a 30 foot
front yard setback variance; a l0 foot north side yard setback variance;
a 10 foot south side yard setback variance; a 10 foot rear yard setback,
variance; a 50 foot major road setback variance and a 100 foot Highway
82 setback variance, where 30 feet, 10 feet and 10 feet are required for
the front yard, both side yards and rear yard, respectively, in the PUB
zone district, and where 50 feet and 100 feet are required for the major
road setback variance and the Highway 82 setback per the Pitkin County
Land Use Code, for the erection of an electric fence required to meet
FAA requirements. Property Location: Sardy Field off of Highway 82.
Submitted to the Aspen Times on September 17, 1991.
To Be Published in the Aspen Times September 19, 1991.
County PO #
Minutes
Pitkin"County ~`
Boa3~d' of `A4d justment
October"1, 199'1
....,. _ ,
Members Present: Kandi~shaffran, Chairman
.. N ,.. ,:.. , Evan Gul l
Ted. G'uy ~, ..,
Rick Neiley
John Wheeler
__ .,_ _.. ~ od D e~,,._ „_,a,.
Members Abs ,
ent: Stan Mathis R y r
Staffer:. . , _ m.r.. _ .. w. ...: , .w,,.
"`Joanna'Schaffner, Zoning Enforcement Officer
~. 4,,, _.. :_ ,~
Shaffran opened the meeting~at~5:15~{p.m. and introduced the Board
to those present.
Dale Dillingham was present to request a 37 foot front yard setback
variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS 20"zone district,
for construction of„an addition to a single-family residence:
Dillingham explained the history of the home. 'The home was built -
in 1950, beforej he zon~ p reg~ la~ions Dill'nghagm submitted two
Hoffersupporting his re rest t owners Howard Va near and~David
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none. `
Gull moved to grant a 37 foot front yaYd setbabk.vaYance Eor the
proposed addition, as per the plans submitted,"due to~dbCanoning. '
Shaffran sedonded the motion and all were in favor. .(Rick Neiley
was nb
t present during this case.j Motion passed.
Croft briefed the Board on the present location of the house and
the driveway 'and the. topography of the aurrouriding land. Croft
,. ~ ~,.An
stated that the `d`ouse was' built about 15 years ago before the
setbacks' 'were""required ~,,,Croft also stated that the .proposed
location for the gars e is the onl level spot on the property that
would riot require rem wing trees and ve etation.
1
.__.... ..,_~ .,.,~,4 fa_.. x.., ~~ J . ~.r, .., Aw n e4.:.r.MS,:r',i£Yi5 *~'vc_w.a~.:q~'fw s`aai a; i t ,
Shaffran asked if there was any public comment. Rob Weien,
adjacent neighbor, was present to comment on this case. Weien
stated that there is not a legal survey of this land and that he
believes the property line is not accurately shown. Weien's major
objection is the location of the property line, which the Board has
no control over.
There was further discussion on the location of the property line.
Shaffran stated that the variance would. be made„ from the legal
property line. If the property line on the plans is inaccurate,
then the 25 foot request would be from the correct property line.
Neiley asked Croft if the proposed garage would be any closer to
the north property line than the existing house. Croft stated that
it would not. Croft stated that he would be building on the
driveway that is presently on the property. Croft also stated that
he has already received approval from the Homeowner's Association
Architectural Review Committee.
Shaffran stated that., the Gateway of Snowmass covenant requires a
20 foot side yard setback variance.
Schaffner stated that no matter where the property line is
determined to be, the garage cannot be built any further into the
setback then what would be granted by the Board. Weien stated that
he does not see how a ,judgment can be made on the impact without
knowing where the accurate property line is located.
Weien had a further objection to what the garage is to be built
upon. Weien believed it to be fill and the garage would be built
too high. Jim Atchison, the builder, stated that what is to be
built on is granular road base that has been in place for over 15
years and the garage is to be 14 feet to the peak, which would
barely clear the trees in the back.
Guy stated that he sees what Weien's objection is, but that the
hardship the Board is looking at is that this subdivision was
approved years ago with certain minimum standards, the property has
been downzoned since then, and blocking somebody's view is not
grounds to deny the variance. Croft has a real hardship in this
case because of the downzoning. He is asking for a variance that
is less thane what the Board would probably grant under the
standards used previously in this subdivision.
After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 25 foot north side
y e where 100 feet is required, for construction
and setback varianc ~,,, ~,
of a residential garage, as~skiown on tkie'plans submitted and after
the north property boundary has been staked, or'the property corner
_.. .,.. ~,. as to
where the 25 foot setback should be marked" due t "~'oning.
Motion asked.
Wheelernseconded'the motion and allewerelin favor an oe downp~~'
2
. ~,,
For the next__case, Ted Guy had to abstain so he left the room.
-. x ~..'~.Lvrv.. ..ewr ... ~ Ya `N-.3} e ~ ~ 9 .d f':au. + w $VEA ls3s o.n... B k . L. . .. L
Case X91-43. Lacked.. Y+far'v""El'l'en. Tract's 5 F~hrte Star Raneh
Deanna"Olson was present representing Mary Ellen Lackey to"'request"
a 30 foot northeast side and setback variance, where 50 feet is
y
required in the RS-20 zone district., for construction of an
~~ ~ ., .M. r= ~.
addition to an 'existing barn.
Olson showed on the plans submitted exactly where the encroachment
would be and where the addition is to be constructed. Schaffner
stated that this is the barn that the Board did a site visit on in
1989 when it was originally built on Tam Scott's land.
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none. '
the sideayardtsetback Y are. eiicr"oacting an additional 4 feet into
A er further discussion, Neiley made a motion to grant a 30 foot
northeast side yard'setbaoTc variance, where 50~feet "is required,
for construction of an additio
p gr p n to an existing barn, due to
a hical considerations and the unusual narrowness of t
p p" r
tro a ~tpassed affran seconded the motion an~T` all" were n favohe
Motion r'
John Wheeler riad to abstain from the next case and left the room. "
Ted Guy'.. re=an`t`'eYed'theraoin , ., _ ~ .
MaSe X11426. R R F 'CortioYation (Furman)' Parcel"3 Beatrice Placer
Roy Parsons was present representing the owner to request a 64 foot)
front yard setback variance,'where 100 feet is required in the AF-'
,:,
1 zone district for construction of" a proposed addition to a
single,-family residence.
_ _r
Shaffran read to the Board the previous case requesting a 50 foot
varian
ce, which, was approved. Neiley stated that the
is stiteristics of the property have not changed and the toppgraphy
' 11 the same. This would be a sin le-stor addition and would
not be seen from the`Y~oa~:''~
Shaffran asked for public comment and there was none.
After further disquss:ion, Guy made a motion to grant a 64 foot
front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in 'the AF-
ilans~'"district, due to topographical hardships, as shown on the
p submitted. Neley seconded the motion and it passed with all
in favor.
John Wheeler Vie=entered the room for the rest of the meeting.
3
° r.. ^A
Case #91-46, Gardner, Thomas R., Lot 16, Shield-D-Terrace
Thomas Gardner was present to request a 40 foot front yard setback
variance for construction of a proposed addition, a 61 foot front
yard setback variance for construction of a garage and a 50 foot
front yard setback variance for construction of a gazebo to cover
two septic tank covers. The front yard setback requirement in the
RS-30 zone district is 100 feet.
Gardner received approval for a ridgeline review by the Planning
and Zoning Commission in September 1991.
Schaffner stated that Gardner is looking for three variances. The
Board can review them all together or individually.
Shaffran asked if anyone was present for public comment and there
was not.
Gardner stated that the angle of the garage has been changed to the
original position of what he had requested in Case No. 90-47. The
garage is to be parallel to the road.
After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a 40 foot front yard
setback variance for construction of an addition to a single-
family residence, a 61 foot front yard setback variance for
construction of a proposed garage, and a 50 foot front yard setback
variance for construction of a gazebo, where 100 feet is the front
yard setback requirement, due to topographical hardships. Gull
seconded the motion and all were in favor, with Neiley voting no
for the garage. Motion passed.
Deanna Brinkman was present to request a 65 foot front yara setpacx
variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-20 zone district,
for construction of a proposed addition to a single-family
residence.
A Minor 1041 Hazard Review has been completed for the proposed
addition.
Brinkman submitted additional photographs showing that her house
is not visible from the road.
Shaffran asked if there was any public comment and there was none.
Wayne Poulson, architect for Brinkman, was also present. The house
was built in 1972 and is very unobtrusive. This would be a one-
story addition.
After a brief discussion, Shaffran made a motion to grant a 65 foot
front yard setback variance, where 100 feet is required in the RS-
20 zone district, for construction of a proposed addition to a
single-family residence, due to downzoning, as per the plans
__
;_ __ ..
submitted. Guy seconded the motion and four were in favor with
Gull opposing. Motion passed.
Case #91-48. Guber. Peter 2100 Ow Creek Road
Marty Schlumberger was present representing Peter Guber, to request
a i0 foot height variance, where 12 fee£ is required per the Pitkin
.,
County'Land Use `Code 'f or accessory structures'f"or"construction of
a ranch gate. .. ..._
anot erelocatontedShaffran baskec('"ho'w it was built before with to
out
a variance.
Shaffran asked if there was„any public comment„and there was none.
Schaffner asked if what they were going to do'was to disassemble
the to sting gate and then relocate it Schlumberger stated'£hat
p part will come o~`~ an~"r""£hat tail~"'`~e`~ reused The stone_
pillars will be new. 5chlumberger 'briefed the "Moarci on ~ tkie `new
itcislto ber140 feet'ba ~ te. From the center of. Ow1~Creek Road,
It was her stated that this parcel is between 800 and 900
acres. Neiley stated that''he has no problem with ranch gafes.
After further discussion, Guy moved to grant a height variance-for
the new proposed ranch gate being no Higher than ~-he existing ranch
gate, and Wheeler amended this motion where t"YYe bottom of tYie "Y"
on the name of the ranch
(Mandalay) is 13 feet 6 inches from
natural
seconde grade, due to Code conflict with the Fire Code. Wheeler
d Giijr's Apart ' of "th`e motion, aYid `'Guy `se"" c~i~ided the amended
portion of the motion and four were in favor with Shaffran
opposing. Motion passed.-
--- --- , -.-2. ..c., a.~.,,y ~.aac nv.G itinCj S, LO request an
80 foot front yard setback variance where 10.0 feet is required in
the AF=1 zone'district,'for coristruction`of a_proposed deck,''
Warner stated that the Hornngs were given approval to build with
a 20 fciot setTiack, as"per Panning and Zoning Commission Resolution
No. 80-25. "Tt was discovered that-the applicant did not go to the
Board of Adjustment to obtain this variance.
Warner stated that they waht this motion to take care of. two
things. First, to be abler : ry bui~`d a dec~C and also,,. to ~es~ablsh
the 20 foot`"setback-t"ha"t eve a'~rte believed existed.
willlbe an above t ade deck.c1twwas H but a d fferentlshapeuilding
gY, This
5
Shaffran asked if there was any one from the. public to comment on
this case. There was none.
Guy made a motion to grant an 80 foot front yard setback variance,
where 100 feet is required, for construction of„a proposed deck,
due to downzoning and topographical hardship, as per the plans
submitted. Neiley seconded the motion and all were in favor.
Motion passed.
Scott Smith, Director of Aviation at the Pitkin County Airport, was
present to request a height variance to allow for a 55 foot high
beacon. Also being requested is a 2 foot height variance; a 30
foot front yard setback variance.; a SO foot north side yard setback
variance; a 10 foot south side yard setback variance; a 10 foot
rear yard setback variance; a 50 foot major road setback variance
and a 100 foot Highway 82 setback variance, where 30 feet, 10 feet
and 10 feet are required for the front yard, both side yards and
rear yard, respectively, in the PUB zone district, and where 50
feet and 100 feet are required for the major road setback and the
Highway 82 setback per the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for the
erection of an electric fence.
Smith stated that the FAA has made„it.mandatory to have a rotating
beacon on all airports that want to remain certified, „Without this
certification, no commercial airline will be able to land at the
airport.
Toni was present to represent neighbor Elizabeth._Paepke.
Toni asked Smith where the beacon was to be located. Smith showed
on the plans submitted the proposed location.
Shaffran asked Smith how wide the beacon is to be. Smith stated
p .~.
that the circumference of_the ole is 27" at the base, s4hape"~ Yke
a barber pole, with-the top of the pole at approximately i8".
Smith stated that the beacon operation will be tied to, the runway
lights, therefore, the beacon will not be on 24 hours per day.
Once the beacon is installed, the specifications call for the
engineers to do field testing so that shielding can be accomplished
to block the beams from intruding in the windows for. the people who
have residences on the ridges that surround, the Airport.
Gull stated that it was his understanding that the Board of
Adjustment does not have any jurisdiction in these regulations over
governmental agencies any way, and that a governmental_agency does
not have to fall under the zoning regulations of a particular
county.
Toni asked Smith if they could contact a property owner and locate
the beacon elsewhere. Smith stated that the beacon has to be on
airport nroberty so that aircraft can locate the airport.
.. L i;
Smith further stated that the beacon is for visual use by aircraft.
This is used if instrumentation features are not working. Wheeler
statedf Smith had gone in front of the '~F`CSc)C on the -beacon. Smith
., _.
. . ~ ...,~ " w, . ~.,_ .
that formally he has not. " ` Smitli stated teat `the beacon is
approve=d in the Airport Master Plan, in the last amendment. It was
requested as part of the Grand Application in~Apri1 byythe~~Chairman'
of the BOCC:
desilnhtlans ianc Y os allow for aebeacon,u w ~ PP he card tiongthat
weregiri favor.ndMotio passed srs ~ulleseconded theemotion andtall
ty of a fenc
deerrhave been h t S1 Smith state
last winter season, but that ever
to go out onto the field' to ch
Shaffran asked if the electrical
stated that the fence will just
Smith stated that the fence is to
powered), there will be less gate,
the question was
that there has 'b
electr`f
presently
e runway.
r.' `~ Smith
~ur't them.
.ed (solar
existing.
Guy stated that he doesn't think there needs to be so many strands.
Neiley asked if the Division of Wildlife reviewed the`plan design
for the fence. Smith stated that they have not, but that this type
of fence has been.installed'at"oche"r airports and has proved to be
effective and is less expensive.
Neiley had to leave the meeting during the discussion, so was
unable to vote.
It was decided by the Board to vote on the beacon and the fence
separately.
For. the fence Gull made a motion to grant a 2 foot height
variance; a 30~foot front. yard setback variance; a 10 foot north
side yard setback variance; a 10 foot south side yard setback
variance; a 10 foot rear yard setback variance; a 50 foot major
road setback variance and a 100 foot Highway 82 setback variance,
where 30 feet, `10 `felt and ~IU ~~eet are required for the front yard,
both side yards and rear yard, respectively, in the PUB zone
district, for Y e erection of an electric fence, as per the plans
submitted. Gu seconded the motion and all were in favor. Motion
passed: Smith will review the design of the fence with the
Division of Wildlife.
_, ..~ .s .._ x.s ~ ,uy a;r. i~,~ , ~ M.: ".i, n.y.. ksk "u . !. ,'<~'~ ,o,Iv stt+.+Y
~--~,.
,--,
Shaffran moved to approve the minutes of the September 3, 1991
meeting. Gull seconded the motion and all were in favor.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~L~
Cindy L. ristensen, Secretary
8
Kandi Shaf ran, Chairman