The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.boa.88.21ma*,r~~r t..d:;a a ~: (`f~ PITKIN COUNTY '~~~? ' BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ~. DAT$ J / ~ a ~ 19 OASE # 88-21 APPLICANT_ ' /pt~C~ Ll~C~S ADDRESS~~~~Q~ S,q~g~~je< OWNER_ ~ ADDRESS 1~ , LOCATION 0'F PROPERTY ~ y~j ~pc-l.b~\1~N; ~lLl_.C Any pertinent data must acco~np~~y this application, and will be made part of this Case # The Board may return fhis application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Applicant's description of proposed variance showing justification: ~S ~ F-~ Applicant Signature Provisions of the zoning resolution requiring the Zoning Official forward this application to the Board of Adjustment 'and reasons for not granting a building permit: Ste L~ f1L /vaT~CI_, Zoning Official Date permit rejected S/6 ~~ Board decision k-;~' ~ A filed 5ll0 4 pplication ~., Date Fj ~~ Notices mailed_ !~ ~}~„~ Secretar Y _ _ _ ~~ ...:. 1.~.. ._ ~ d..... ., '''i~vrc=^,^5^cscyfeS~X"TMY.rc'' i~"°t^c;a^..r' - .: t:. „m~~e{~c d`S:d'R' ., ~.y~~~•~`'~"~,~,^.>^~~ W .v~+: G~ I.- ` S 4 spsru~l-p'TKmi ~~Ga ~ L e~urLvr~ r~E~,~ii~rrc~rENYr `_ N"0'h~I'CE'"0F PUBT.IC HEARIP7Ca ' BEFORE THB..P'ITHIN COUNT B ARD Ok' ADSUS'IMEN ~. TO ALL.'PROPERT'Y 0 HERS AFFEC FsD BY THE TiEQUES'l~~D'+2:`ON't1~G'OR""QSE'; VARIANCE, bES~CR2 .~,,,,,, m.,, ~. , ,.. ~, , _ - .. ,t. ,to- Pztkin Cotx~ty Resolution -'o t,,~7ti~ne 5, 19x5, as Pursuaca „~.~ amendeii, a PubTac Hearing wi"11 be held ~n the,~bistri:ct Co r't ' M- gr~..+.i.y. T`n:T"~5 M'h.+SLS+9b AKdV Room, pitkin'County-Court House; Aspen,"Colorado, (or~at s~i,c other 'place.as;,the,_meeting,may then be'ad,yourne'd~'"'to`consider,wan . ~...„..,~ ...., ,.~ a , .. application ,f,i~.Iedmwith the said.BO'u d o~`""Adjustinent requesting authorYty far variance From the pro, isions' 'a _ ~"~"ie "b°oun"""Lo'ning " - ... .vyN ~-",h.r~h4hN ...~ i " ~ ~ Resolution. A1..1 persons 'aff'ected by the p`r'~sptssed varx~ance"ar,"~e invited to~ appear"and:~tate tt~eiY` views, protests or o"~'~ections:,, If, you ~~~~ canno,t,n~ ~ ~ g state 'aPPeer Pex"sonally atrosixvch meeting: ~he~uYiiaverobuection~to, your v~i_ews by ~et'~er', particularly i'f yo j such variange,'as the Board of Adjustment will give serious con`sid'erat}on to they apanxons o~ ;surroncCing p'risperty owners aitd ^ ww.~, ...,k„" , .. other :affected, in tec3zng'tiahether" to,`g'rant or,-deny t`~ie re`gixes£' ' for var.ianc~?. " ~ ~ .. .._. . ~ ....,... ..w.,w. u-M...,..„a..,.a ..._ .~, .~. w ~ .. .. . THE PAEtT,ICULAR'S OF THE,. HEARING AND ~OF 'SHE' RERT3ES'IED 'VARIAN E ARE Data and tip!?...of meeti~n,~: , MaY,,,31, "19$8 at 5 15 ;p. m. " ' Name a~'d Adt£ress ofw~.Ppiicant for Varzan,ce~ i Doug Lucks P .'0 Box 3 315' .,. u r ~ ...,~ ~, ., Aspen;"'C'0 $~812'~ ._.. ~, ~ ~ " Location of',P,"roper'ty nr Desari~tioq' '- Lot 43', `Ha1,"lan 1'~a ~Is a~ ~a„s~,1`~"'aizbd2visi p ,ro, .~ ~> - - =~w~: 1 Pitkin' County, C-olarado . ,_ Variance Requested.... .. ,_,., "' :: ~- ~_,,. :'. 25 ft: front yard setback,varianceand ~~2ft~ in sida'yard setback. variance,. v .._, :";,....:._, ;u .~. . ,~.. ,.m .,, ~ ,.~._ ,,~~.., ~...a,. Duration of, Variance: Perma~r'ent: X% ;Temporary` ' " FlM.,w- ' ., ' ^~ 4 VT~Mr""+WnrRMN.Y n'"}~+Cm r $~~s~'»tT"^eLf ,k"YxH Condition: - ' - , , ..,,-.~.r .anr~...v..-.a_ +?.,.s~.a.~. ~SUS..„»:t,~r~.x :e'ab~an,,w~~;1,;.'s;... THE PITKIN COD'N`'tT' B09RD b'F ADJ'TtSTA'IENT ' " _ . , ..... ~ .< ..~„'p..le`~.pSc~"t..'y%4i'':E~ .,,k- fiF~C^.w;."+m;"a:w~~,-^'ww+".-+m ..,_,.... ~. " ., - ', ~ ., - _ i.. _ ~ ~ Evan `~'u2'l, G"~"arrman "~ 5'17 Esst,H'opkineAvenue'„ ~ ` '~S"t~6 E'`as~ li7~airi"SE`t~eeb a Aspen',"~olowedo 8'1'1'1 303/95=5573, Aspen, 4~'o'Yorad"o'`~'~"" . . _ ,.: ~ ~ ~ ~ , , -- _... .,i~~. .. ..w ~.nr ~, ,::., .... ..:~a` _,Jl~awffi {a c+}rv&i~R,~h, 3.. ~".4: ,k .. f.~ ._~^,„'?f Bureau of Land Management 50629 Hwy 6 + 24 Glenwood Springs, CO ~~~ 9 1 ,F F USE ~ ~ A g~ a s ~iP rt- uch der an ting onng -~ :=.___."'^~-.ter. ~ Aspen, ColoracYo81611 } ited to ~~ you cannot appear personally at sucn meerrng, tnci. you ae~ ~r~ed to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment wi17 give 'serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding ''property owners and other affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. THE PARTICULARS OF THfi BEARING AND OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE ARE AS FOLLOWS: Date and time of meeting: May 31, 1988 at 5:15 p.m. Name and Address of Applicant for Variance: Doug Lucks P.0. Box 33;04 Aspen, CO 81812 Location of Property or Description: Lot 43, Holland Hills at Basalt Subdivision Pitkiri County, Colorado Variance Requested: 25 ft. front yard setback variance and 22 ft. 6 in. side yard setback variance Duration of Variance: Permanent: XX :Temporary Condition: THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 4~'a,,.,. c-~~tz,L Evan Gull, Chairman offices: mail address: 5'17 East Hopkins Avenue 506 East hAa~n Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 3'0$/92'S`-5973 A"span, ~olo"rac~o`~'1'~1`1 ' --, ,--~.. May 12, 1988 To those in concern: As a property owner adjacent to lot fr43 in Holland Fiills, I do hereby support Doug Lueks request for the attached variance review. 37 . ~ s .. . ~ . ,~ :;, ~. May 12, 1988 To those in concern: As a property owner adjacent to lot #t43 in .Holland Flills, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. d ~-~" i `' ~.. To those in concern: ,_. ~, May 12, 1988 Asa property owner adjacent to lot fi43 in Holland Flills, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. .~~ (3~?(~ ~4)'~ To those in concern: Asa property owner adjacent to lot X43 in Holland Hills, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. ~{?C3a~~')~ x i ~,. May 12, 1988 To those in concern: As a property owner adjacent to lot ~i`43 in Holland Hills, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. ~C, ~ vs 7 ~~~% _ ~~~ ()?''f~ ~;?9 --_ . , ,~ ,,, . , w ~... May 12, 1988 To those in concern: As a property owner adjacent to lot #r"43 in Holland Fiills, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. - ~ ' ~!~-z.,,, l~ y`~ s-~2 _ fi'g' ~~ ~~ „ ~ ~ ~ `il~ s _~~ ---- - ,~.. _ ,~...;,.__.. %. o- ~a '~,,.ii ..a~~ ~, ..~'."',~u.,~,..v.~d='~. ;~i„....,.x~R{x a ».-, ~.aast~;.3 To those in concern: i May 12, 1988 As a property owner adjacent to lot x'43 in Holland hliils, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance review. -~~ ~~~!-~C. S/~Z/~~ ~~ 3 ~ ~~~~~~ _~__ ,. ~~ „_, ,.. m. ~:. ~ _.,.,. /, May 12, 1988 To those in concern:. Asa property owner adjacent to lot ~r`43 in Holland Hi1)s, I do hereby support Doug Lucks request for the attached variance_ review. ~1r~~ /a, l;~~i ~' ~ Qf~~~f':~i2 ~'--a~fAr ,v'~~'"r ,. Jv w.:T.e.,. !R n n .:et''s.... ux ~... .1 .,~~k: A. 6. ~acl_91i~N4~"u.~.4w4Ei, k2,{„+, q ~y,~,eF' f- ,, ~-.: I ~'/ a~ III ~~ "~ ,-; ~y i i i I .~ a ~. , o (Q)~~ V r r ~~~ ~ I~ A ,' o '~. r ~ N. ~ ~ tt' .o . ~ • ~ ~ .. ~ ''~ e M 1, . • , ~, ~~~, ~' . ~ 3 \/ ~ N pV . ~- ~~ rt~ ~~~ ~~ Sr~' s ~~ ~ ~ /,~/ ~ 3s" ®~ ~ ;; '~~ '/,'s~ w~Ii~ ;- ~/~ a i ~s~~ _;.., 'i ~, .. r ,. ,~ !. '.; '% :~ ~. , i rt ~' 1 ,~'p ~~~ ' .; ' ~.' ~~ "~ 1. ~ ;' _ .~''~ ~° ~/ ~' ',, ~ ! ~ ~, •^ / ~, i ~, ' / ~ ~` ~ 3 '. r ,..: ~ ~1 j i / r'' ~~ o ~ ~ ; ,1 ~ ~ , W ~7 a fy ; ' . V ~ '•~~. ~~ .o , . d~ ~ ~~ to • ~ ,.. ~~ ~. ' .~ , i ' ~~ ~~\ , ` • , ~. i ~ .. ...~ ~ ,N O ~ ~.. ~ .. .1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ q1 ~~ 3~~ ~ . ,~ ~, ~ "' ~ r' .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' s, ~D- Rq ~ ~,. o ~ ~ '~ ~; . ~~ S I > .Q q ~ t. ~, ~. N`.~ tn~'. ~;~. l~. ~ ~ . .. ~,. ~~ p~'~ ~ ~~ D ~ ~, ~ I ~.,. ~ ' , i ~ t~ ~ ~~~ t ', ~ ~ ~,r~ . ~~ ai ~.~„ ~~ ~ --c ~1 ~~ ~S „~ ~ ~ '~' j~ -~ ,- ~, C?3 ~ /• ~l ' • 1 ,- V~.1 r~ `v ~- ~ ~ i / ~ ~' ' ~ " t ~ N~ .o ,,... ... ,.,.«„~ sv_eKD,x.., ....,.. ,..wg.... ,r. ~%~,+rv<..~w nS* .. uklau-~.k ..'des. '$~% s:.sh~~eu Lntw,~. ,.- E4a1.+#'aY"b~„ ;,, ~ ~ ..,y ,...,,. m I a ~ p ~ , ~~ . ~. s, ~~ s ~> ~ { `~ ~~- ~~ ~, _ lJ) ~,~ ~~, ~_ ~a ~. 6 ~ 7 ~~ a ~ ~ .~ , • , 0~ ~. >j `\ ~'„(}'\' \ ~ 1'`~ ~~ , P . , , N o «i ~o ~ ~ „~®p ,~ ~} I I. • ~ ~ ; h7 • ~ .C ;, ; • ~ s ~' ~ ~t~~ ~ ~~ Cn ~ . .~C ,~' ,rr~ G4~a i w.~. . 1 '~i,~`J ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ J ;. ~ Cb ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~~" 6w",,/ 4c' ~ ' , e / / -. ~ l" _ ~ •, iii ~ ~ i~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ J. ~ A ' ASPEN PITKIN RE~'101~~ ~:`~„~C"'!~L'~Cf~G D~P~kITIVI~NT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PITKIIr`COUNTY BOARD 0'F ADJUSTMENT" "` ~ VARIANCERDESCRIBED`NB'E"T,OW`: FECTED BY THE REQUES'TE11"~ ZOI~INGA~O$ iJSeE" "" ~ Pursuant to Pitkin County Resolution of June 5, 1955, as amended, a Public Hearing will be he Td in the District Court-""` Room, Pitkn County Court House, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may then be adjourned} to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requi?sting authority for variance from the provisions of the County Zoning Resolution. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and other 'affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. ASEFOLLOWSULARS OF TFIE HEARING AND OF THE REOUES~'E"D VA~FtIAIVCE' XT2'E"' ~' Date and. time of meeting: May 31, 198$. at 5:15`p.m. Name and Address of Applicant for Variance: Doug Lucks P.O. Box 3304 Aspen ,_, CO 81812 Location of Property or Description: Lot 43 Pitkin~CountyndColoradot Basalt Subdivision Variance Requested: 25 ft.'front yard setback variance and 22 ft. 6 in. side yard setback variance Duration of Variance: Permanent: XX :Temporary Condition: ~~, ,.~,: =r= , a ~. s.,. - ~ I ~ . THE PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Evan Gull, Chairman offices 517 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 8181'1 303/925-5973 - mail address: 506 East Main St Aspen, Colorado E 7 ' ~ .~ ~ r iP I ~ o- '. „ I ... r~.~ ....., i,a nearv .~ ti- .A-" ~ p. "I Minutes Pitkin County Board of Adjustment May 31, 1988 Members Present: Kandi Shaf£ran, Chairman Peter Dobrovolny Melinda Pearson Bob Miller C ris Co called t'nrad was present with staff recommendations. Shaffran he meeting to order. There were no minutes to review. There was. a letter from Evan Gu11 resigning as chairman 'and expressing interest in remaining on'the board as an alternate member. Shaffran mentioned that there had been two other applicants interested in serving on'the Board and she hoped they could be appointed by the neRt meeting. Diane Schweiner and Dick Rather were present. Conrad informed the Board that he had made a mistake in his earlier calculations, the sign was only 3.25 sq, ft. over what was allowed by`corle, not the 13.5 he had originally thought. There was some discus- sion about the fact that this was the third sign they_are requesting and whether a variance should be granted. Rather brought up the fact that the sign was not visible from the highway, in fact he didn't think it was visible from off the premises and showed the Board photographs to illustrate that point. Conrad stated that it was questionable whether they needed a variance or `n at, if the sign were not visible. Conrad s owed the Board a plan of th the awning in relationship toethelbung which showed the scale of Dobrovolny felt that most of the signkcodetwaseintendedlfornsigns visible from Highway 82. After discussion, Shaffran moved to approve the sign as submitted due to the fact that it is rrot visible from Highway 82 and s~all not be placed in such a manner as to obscure the vision of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and not constitute a hazard. Miller seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion carried 4 - 0. Steven Shute was present representing Rocky .Mountain Natural Gas. Shaffran moved to remove case from #88-1? from the table. Dobrovolny seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed 4 - 0. Shute explained as part of their safety and general upgrading program they were planning to build a new town I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ., '!~ r border station for Aspen and include in that one, facilities for Snowmass''Village. This station would measure the gas and reduce the pressure before it entered such highly populated areas. After two years of research they felt the proposed .site was the only possible site. Shute continued that they were precluded from the other side of Highway 82 because that was the most g phebable•ali n~ent of the enlarged highway. Shaffran asked about possibilit of a car hitting the building from Shale Bluffs. Shute stated that it was impossible from one way and highly unlikely, if not impossible from the other side. Shaffran asked about emissions. Shute replied that the only emissions'woizld be fram a flue; it is required to heat the gas before it enters the regulator. Shaffran submitted to the rec'or~i a letter from Suzanne Casket', Chairperson''of the Clean Air Advisory Board supporting the location. Shute explained that they had gone before tYe Planning and Zaniq Commission recently. He stated _. that the had found a 16 X 24 log''buildng that they thought would be more appropriate than any of the building designs that were submitted architect or a He continued that they would hire a landscape regular architect to make sure the building would be the least obtrusive. Shute continued that he had done much soul searching and could not recommend that the building be placed underground, due to the equipment. It would have the potential for a gas leak, In a room that size would only take a matter of seconds and quick exit from the building was important. If the buildin were laced undergroun • gg p Y d it would require two exits and a loo drivewa Shute was asked about the proximity to the highway. Shute stated that the present one was less than 10 ft. off the road and that most of the ones they had built are close to the road and they hadn't had any problem with them. He thought it was preferable for the station to be closer to the highway rather than close to a permanently occupied subdivision. Peter Van Domelan, representing Walter Milts was present. Walter Mills was also present. Van Domelan stated that Mills has agreed to''grant the easement. to Roclcy Mountain Natural Gas for 4 requestsrphatsthP buildin nbeobjection to the location. He visual im act be minimized. Theyswouldefeel most comfortablethe with a topographical map. Shaffran asked Mills if he still felt as he did last month. He stated that Van Domelan had expressed his feelings. Conrad stated that they had been working on this for a long time. He brought up the question of a public utility the fact that they were required to provide public service. Shute stated that the building would be located 88 ft. from the guard rail and 62 ft. from the right 'of way. Shute explained if they moved it further from the highway the building would be visible for 1/4 mile, in the proposed location the building would be visible for only about 3 seconds at 45 miles per hour. 5 affran f not the vlelt that public safety should be their firs concern, 'sual impact, but tucking the building in would help. Shute again explained that they-were limited by the location of 2 u .. --- ~, ,i: the existing pipelines. Pearson asked if this was just a em orar reminded the P.oard that a hardshi needed to be demonstrated. This hadybaenuaddresseduin aPletterthat it was not. Conrad Dobrovoln su to the Board from Tom Smith. Y ggested a site visit t'o determine it there were any sitervisitecouldsbe sche`duledmovDob'to,.table.Case ~$$-1'7 until a All were in favor and the motion rovolny seconded the motion. passed 4 - 0. The meeting was scheduled for Friday morning at 9:OD a.m. .Mills and Shute both said they would be attending. Coco iFOO_nn „ . _ _ ~. u Robert Snyder was present representing Rene Tornare. He was requesting a ~l ft. side yard setback for the constrcrction of a deck similar to 7 other decks constructed during 1987, ,;Only two units were affected by the setback. The lot line was determined to allow the project to be sold in phases,,.. Only 4 more decks could possibly be built. After they were built the plan was to amend the lat show the decks and r P stated sh ~~ emove the lot line. Pearson e didn t see what. the hardship is. Dobrovolny and Pearson suggested having the lot line adjusted, so a variance would not be necessary. Snyder explained that they only wanted to amend the plat once. Pearson mated to deny the request due to lack of demonstrated hardship. Shaffran seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion passed 4 - 0. Doug Lucks was present requesting a 25 ft. front yard setback variance and a 2'~ ft. 6 in. side yard setback. Lucks asked if the Board had received letters from all the neighbors. The following neighbors: Barbara Schutz., Arrita Glatz, Randy Troxel and Noel Kelleher, Sue and Joe Schoeller had sent letters g the su g from the Holland Hi13f~ran also read into the rePPodtiniether`ariance reque' is Home Owners Association su variance. Lucks explained that since he had submitted the application he had changed the orientation of the house, but. the setbacks would be unchanged. He wanted to be as far as possible from the other houses., He explained that there was an irrigation ditch and he wanted to place the house to avoid possible water damage. There is a history of irrigation ditch breakage history. He explained that the proposed location would obtain the best solar advantage. Dgbrovolny made the motion to grant a 25 ft. front yard setback variance and a 22-1/2 yard setback variance from the ft. side g north property line due to topography and downzpnin Pearson seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed 4 - 0. Case #88-22 - William Gerner~ 0287 Ao~tche Trail William Gerner was present, requesting a 21.1 ft. front yard 3 _ .-.. , w,~A.. , o ,~s,w v~~ ~ .1. ...._ I im- I ...e. n~...vvi setback variance. He exp~aneParkahihe wanted to build a garage. The area he had been usin to s cars was right behind the house and was in the front yard setback. He showed the Board pictures'of the area. He stated that', building the garage at. the 30 ft. setback would require remdvi q ~ 'ng many mature oak trees and re u re extensive excavation. Lerner sated that the lot sloped quite a bit and if he were to place the garage there it would q ~ ive cutting. Dobrovolny stated he was having' trouble seeing cohere there would be extensive excavation. Pearson agreed. Dobrovolny stated he couldn't really see a hardship. Lerner stated that you really couldn't see how steep pictures. Shaf Pearson feltrthetapplicant should groan suggested a site visit. ` vide a topo if they were q g re uestin 'a varianceyfor a topographical hardship. After discussion Bobrovoln moved to table Case #88-22 until a site visit could be made. Shaff'ran sec!ondedVEhe motion. The motion passed 4-- 0. Robert arid'Yvonne Davis were'preseh;t, requesting a 70 ft. front yard setback variance and a 15 ft. side yard setback variance due to downzoning. The Davis's felt they were conforming to what was consistent with the neighborhood. The downz~~~ng aadOttrfde the Davis s lot unbuildablP. Shaffran moved to t. front yard setback variance and a 15 ft. side yard setbac}: variance due anddtheznning. Miller seconded the motion. A11 were in favor otion passed 4 - 0. Conrad explained that this case had been withdrawn. Case #88-25 - John Ukraine Lot $4R' Starwood 14 Jim Columbo was present representing John_Ukraine, requASting a 40 ft. front yard setback variance.' The Tot currently has an existing main home and a detached caretaker unit. Both struc- tures were built iu 1974. Stice then the property has been downzoned. They would like to demolish the main house and replace it with a new hgme. They wanted to put the home in the same location to minimize the envirantnental impact to the property and._it would be difficult to`itiove the house back, due to the topography of the lat. Conrad stated that the Starwood Homeowners .Association felt that if they forced the new house to be built up slope tktey would have an even bigger problem than if the variance were granted. Pearson `moved to grant a 40 ft. front yard setback variance due to downzoning. Dobrovolny seconded the motion. All were in favor acrd the motion passed 4 - 0. 1 tW r ~~ Rory and Barbara Jane Balance were present. Mrs. Salance explained that they had come before the Board last month and a 25 ft. front. yard setback variance had been approved. Due to a small change in the building site and an erroneous surv'ey'"the setback granted was not adequate. They needed a 50 ft. variance to place site chostheir house where they wanted and still comply with the en by the 1041 review. Stewart Eagerly, Ted Flanagan and Lisa Olsen, neighbors, were present. Edgerly explained that he had talked to the Balances before they purchased the lot and it was ab'vious that a variance would be necessary. He continued and due tdn't realize that the original variance was for 25 ft. o t e fact that he was leavin for Aust daytjum eidn trattend the last meetin g ralia the next had ~ y g• Now that the variance p d to ~0 £t. he was ver concerned. He stated that he had granted the Balances an easemenf. He showed the Board pictures of the Balances lot taken from his lot. He explained and the Y posed the:.. lot as a of sorts pro used house was the lotPhbEdgerlyhsu nested tiag to be ,placed gnetheemiddle of $g hat £hey move the house up into a more harmonious part of the lot. Salance explained the allowable building area as determined by the 1'041 review. Flanagan and Olson pointed out that the proposed location was not a an advantage'cius site for solar gain.., Edgerly stated that he was opposed tq the 25 ft. variance that had been granted, so he was even more 'opposed to the 50 ft. variance. He felt it would totally block his view and the house would be looming over his house. Edgerly stated that. if there was no other place to put the house 'they should conform to the setbacks as closely as possible. The Balances aid not want to move the house, the plans had been drawn 'and if the house were moved the house design would have to be changed, she understood Edgerly's views, but they had bought the lot and part of that was the view. They wanted to place the house in the middle of the lot rather than on the side of a meadow. Rory Salance stated that he felt that they had tried very hard to accommadate Edgerly's wishes. After discus- sion, Dobrovolny thought the Board needed more information about the 1041 envelope. He stated he would be inclined to turn down the variance and they would have to go with the first variance. Shaffran agreed, and stated that the hardship was now of their own making.. Shaffran suggested to the Balances and their neigh- bors, that since they were neighbors, that. they should get together and work out a solution. There was some discussion between the neighbors about alternative, sites. .The Balances agreed to let Onsgard or Conrad know if they wanted to be on the agenda for the next meeting. There was general agreement that the Balances should met with their neighbors. Dabrovolny moved to table Case #88--26 pending the applicants providing the Eoard with more information. Pearson seconded the motion. All favor. The motion passed 4 - 0. The Saiances asked if they 5 were in .. ~, - ,: could build on the old variance. Shaffran replied that they could. Miller moved to nominate Shaffran as the new chairman, since Gull had requested that he be made an alternate member due to his schedule. UoUrovolny seconded the motan. A11 were in favor. Miller moved to adjourn. Dobrovolny seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried ',4 - 0. Respectfully submitte\d, Secretary'- ~~ "-x-'~ Chairman` __ ~'/i 9/88 Date E -- .,,. ~.,..._. ~. w . ,;. ~, ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ N~~ ~~ 'a ¢ rn ~ ~,~~~ C~ G d;. F ~~~~ Q r,.a W ~:; Z ?~ .~ m J Q Z _® W _z Q z a Q ~' {~ ~` `~~~ Y~ * ~~P,~~ '~ v ao O ~ .t m b N bA ~y } ~ a ~ a w ~~ 0 ~ x o aroirn3 ~ ~ ~ a~ o P r Q _o po Y$ L o. 61 d L C .~ 1s w w co 0 .._ .. .....~ :, ~ , n , . ,_ ~ ._ ~ , -. ~... , ,~ , ,,, ..~. ~s, ~~ . , .. y Kandi Shaffran moved that "the" f"ollowng '~ie~ ' """~ ' " '° adoptedi' BEFORE THE BOARD OF` ADJUSTM$NT OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN ' STATE, OF COLORADb ': ~ ,, RESOLUT'ION`N0. 88-21 `"" ' Doug Lucks., Lot 43, Holland Hills Subdi"vision WHEREAS, the subject property` is within the uninc'orpor'e"t"ed area' of Pitkin County, Colorado; and.,, `'` .. REAS, 'the Board of Adjustment is vested with the power to grant or den """~ ~" 16-1.3 Ptkin~;Countyrcodee(LandvUseuCode}TandeCo'I; Section 'lorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 30-28-118(2) (C); and, E AS, based on the evidence prPSented the Baa wing findings: '~"' "` ~ rd not Ac~justrient makes the."folio 1,. Proper notice procedures, including the ' notification of aIL adjoinng'property" !' Y P P ~„ „ owners, has been shown b the a licant'. 2. The required hardship or practical difficulty' has been established. " 3. Granting such relief°will not cause substan- tial detriment. to the ''"''" public welfare and wi7T ", not substantially impair the intent and purpose of the Zoning Resolutions and the zaningmaps. NOW, THEREFORE,'BE IT RESOLVED that the applican't's request for approval of 25 ft. front, yard setback variance and a 22='1/2 ft:°"" side yard setback variance was appro't+edrdue to topography and" ` downzoning. Additional conditions or restrictions: ' _ ~., WARNING: Any v,olati,on of the terms of this resolution may result an rehearing 'and possible revocation. ', y,., . Kan i Sha fran seconded'" -.,,... tzon. The, rolX hairin ~t'he ad`o tion of the fore oing Resolu- g een called! the vote wasgas follot~s: `' Kandi'. Shaffran - yes Melinda Pear's an - yes`j,_ ' Bob Miller -yes Peter Dobrovolny - yes was ado ted b ~ '~ the CountytofnPatkin, State o vote of the Board of° Adjus`tment~of~.. The Resole; f Colorado, DATED: Maq 31,'1988' The Eoard of"Adjustment of Pitkin County, Color'ad4 Attesf: "act-iC" C`"+/w C~ Sedretar `~ ' ~; c ~ B,~c•• ~•'~ .e ~o y ,~ ~ Q,P Np ~ r~ o ~, ~ ~, 2 ~F TR A 6 g'• ~ ,~ o ~~ ~ w ~I i W T ~O4 r2 Fs ~ o ~ J`.. ~ . m . •p a pt4,, ~1 ; 'C Q 6`. ~~` Cn i' ~~~~ Ng43 2'3g„E ~ =,Q ~(. I~ 1 '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 w IFS, ~S Q. 6 ~ . aQ• W .a ~ S~ `rc~ '~, .. ~~ n~ 2 :fig , p`~ w' ,. ~~ .. n ~ ~ ,' 3 v S•' ' ~ p `S' o~~+~ ~~9 '~,r'3~ ' N'0 S~2c~9'4Jr,~ a~A~p ~ $ vO$• ~ m ~. ~~Y . „_, o ,~. .6 :_~~ ,: 'S'ts ~ti~ \~~' ~ ! ZINC: p ~ r ~ S 3~°Sq ~, ~~~ •gi ~' rj X33.06 '' ~ f:~ ~ji ~ `, ~ ~ a, ~ ,.. . 1: r '•, ~ o U S52,oo~s ,.. :4 ~~ ~ _. ~PFS ~ . `s ., ~ ~ ~ . ;. ,. S . ' BO {~~~'. L.IIV~ .^. . N' ..1 ~ ,S3 _ .. '9 .. ._... _. .: .... ,. ~.. .4 .. n i ... ~.;_sa a _c, . i.~a r.,m~.,...K i ~..ui . S.}„- ...x. 1 i to v d ,' ......... .. ..