Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.246527301001 (3)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL ®F THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOR'ING ORIDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) ., 3:.:. ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF TfiE COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OF PITKIN COi7NTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE NAGLE I04I HAZARD RI'rVIEW AMENDMENT Administratdve Decision No. ~ 2005 RECITALS 1. Pursuant to Section 3-200-080 of the Land Use Code, Connie and Marl: Nagle ("Applicant") have applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County,'Colorado ("Director") to amend the prior approval to realign the driveway to lessen impacts on steep slopes and irrigated areas, and to provide an adequate turning radius and passing space for emergency vehicles ?. The parcel is referred to as Parcel 1, Sopris Mountain Ranch, and is more specifically described in L--xhibit A. 3. "fhe property is zoned RS-30 and contains approximately 37 acres. 4. The Board of County Connnissioners ("BOCC") originally <~ranted 1041 hazard review and ~~eneral submission approval, pursuant to Resolution No. 95-7. The 1041 site plan was recorded in Plat Book 36 at Page 47. The BOCC subsequently ~ anted extensions of vested rights pursuant to Resolution Nos. 98-58 and 107-2001. The vested rights expired on .tune 13, 2004. 5. The approved driveway allotment camtot be construpted in complivtce with the County's driveway standards,, given the steep slopes, artd the driveway crosses directly through the middle of the irrigated pasture. 6. The County Engineer and the Basalt Fire Marshal have reviewed and approved the proposed amendment. The Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowners Association also supports the request. 7. The Director finds that the proposed amendment will not change the use of The proposed development or the basic character of the (and, is consistent with action taken during The original review, does not increase off-site impacts w'the allowable floor area, and will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 8. T'he Director further finds that the proposed amendments will not create any additional impacts on 1041 areas, and that the encroachment of the proposed driveway on slopes in excess of 30°/<, complies with Section 3-80-OSO.C.1.c.ii.e, as the driveway encroaches on slopes of 30-40% for less than 100 linear feet, the driveway is not within an avalanche, landslide or rockfall hazard area, and there is no alternative aligmuent on slopes ofless than 30%. THE DIRECTOR DOES HEREBY APPROVE the Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1. All conditions of BOCC Resolution Nos. 95-7, 98-58 and 107 2001 remain in full force and effect, except as amended herein. I I~IIII IIIII ~IIII~ I~~II IIIII~ II I~IIII~! III VIII IIII IMO 0 ~E1D O J 03: 461ry, ~ ~-.. ,,~~,,,Q,.~.t"t.d~"ar.".~°" ~~QLt~1 ~j Acfrveinislrazive Decision No. ~-?005 Puge 2 2. Within 30 days of the date of this approval, the Applicant shall submit a revised 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan to the Comnnmity Development Department for approval and recording. The mylar copy of the site plan nmst be sigtied by the owners prior to submittal for recording. 3. The Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowners Association shall review and approve the proposed driveway and irrigation ditch realignment, prior to construction. 4. The Applicant shall adhere to all material represeirt~tions made in the application. APPROVED by the Director, this ~ day of ~~> 2005. ~.~Q~ ~e ~%~- Cindy ouben, Community Development Director PID #246527301001; Case#P227-04 I I®~III iIIII I~II~~ II~I~ I~I~~~ ~~ ~~i~I~III III ~~II~ III ~~~I 0 02g 04 D20 00 3:451 SILVIAD ~ ~' U®®®1.1~ ~aROM ~i PHONE N~l:~' "~ ~! ~~ ° Dec. 1 111111. V. LUVT IL~JTIIn I ,... '~UVUHYI fI ILL ~, nV. VV o~r~~~i~u~t~m~r~ as Between RICHARD FIUPPW! n ,~ of the County of;<'~~/~k-- SYdta of U!'f" . GRAN'roR, AND MARK NAGLE and CONSTANCE J. t3AGLE, ctzAnITEE whose legal address is :1070 SPRING LAME„ LAKE FOREST, 1L 60045 of the County of . ,State of ILLINOIS 0~ -2-c~'S Attachment 2 ~a.~ I ~„ . ~NITNESSETH. That for and In eonsideratlon of the sum of ten dollars end other good and valuable oonsid®ration, the receipt and'sulficienoy of which Is hecaby edcnowledged, ttie grantor has granted, bargained, sold and cpmreyed, and by these presents does grant, ba aln, sell and conve and contlnn urdo the grantee, his "heirs and assigrr® (Drover, ail fhe real property together wr~Ur improvements, it ayiry, situate and lying and being in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO, described as follows: A parcel of Land being part of Trail 75 and located in Section 27, 7ownsh~ t3'South, t2ange 87 West of the 8th Principal Meridian. Saitl parcel is mere fury des&rbed as follows: m Beginning at A.P. of said Tract 75; `^-- thence S Ei3°a9.38" W 302.13 feet along fine 1-2 of said Treat 75 to the southerly right of way fine of Nso County ~" '-Road: QQ' thence S 59°20' W 674.10 feet along said right of way, -~. thence South 1695.t3 feet; thence N 76°08' E 918.49 faetto Gne 1$ of aatd Trail 75 !c the polnf of beginning. ^^~ Said parcel being known as Psrca{ 1, Sopris Mourrtain Ranch. ' t`-i- TOGt1'tiER wRh all and singular the hereditamenta an appertaining, and the raveraion and reversidris, remain right, ffile,interest; claim anddemand whatsoever aftli bargained premises, vlAit the heredtaments and appur above bargained and desrrl'6ed, with the appurtenaneE Grentot,fbr himself, his heirs and assigns, does coveni heirs and assigns, that at the time of the enseaFng and pr9miaa® above conveyed. has good, suro, perfect, ab: simple, and has good right, full power and (awful auttwi and Corm as aforesaid, and that the same are free and 1 liens, lazes, assessments, enambrances and restrw-6C wiEl WARRANT AF of the grantee, his part thereof. The s ' appficn3ble to alt gc Pnge' 1 of 3 I ~ I 05/20/20Na 31 :a7A S1~_V Io I)6v15 P7iKiiJ COIIAITY [:4 R 16.00 D"309.00 VIlA~RANTY DEED on and assigns, Ir number she apputlenancas thera{o belonging, arm anywise !rs, rents, issues and ~praflts thereof, and aR tfle astute, grantor either in taw et equiy, of, in and to the atrova nances. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises unto the grantee, tits hefts end assigns forever. Arid the t, grant, bargain, and'agrae to and wkh the Gnerrtee, his s6rrery of these presence, he la wail seiz®d of the lute end indefeasiple estate pi inheritance, in law, in fee fto grant, bargain, soh ardconyey ttie sanre'in manner to and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and hove bargained premises in the quiet aria peaceable possession and every person ar persohs Iavrfu0y olaiming the wf,ole pr'any he plural, Me plural the singular, and flee use ofgendershall be 497418 TRANSFER OECLRRATIDN RFtiC£IVED 051101x004 ~ ~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~V~d U ®U lJ.t~ e3 ~~~ ~~I~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ 9 ~ 2~ 5 @3:4614 _.. R._0.00 D 0,..: A9 ._ ~_ ~-- '" ,. APPLICATION ~, Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment 22 December 2004 ~,. ~. Applicant: Mark Nagle Location: Parcel 1, Sopris Mountain Ranch ,Zone District: RS-30 An application for Amendment to Development Permit to Alter Driveway Alignment Represented by: Stan Clauson Associates, LLC 200 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-2323 00000¢ ' N CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning • Urban Design Landscape Architecture Transportation Studies Project Management 200 EnsT Mnm Sraeer Aeeew, Cow oagno ffi6ll TFiEPHONE: 9]0.925.2323 Fnx: 970 920.1628 E-Mmc infoC?scaplanning.com WER~ wwwscaplanning.com 19 January 2005 Ms. Suzanne Wolff, Senior Planner Pitlcin County Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Parcel 1, Sopris Mountain Rancla -Driveway Relocation Dear Suzanne: (fin behalf of Connie and Mark Nagle, we are forwarding an amended site plan far the proposed entry drive to the single-family residence on Parcel 1, Sopris Mountain Ranch. The architects recently staked the initially proposed design, and it was determined that the design intruded too much into the meadows and occurred on excessively steep slopes which were not included in the current survey. Therefore, a new and improved design has been developed where the driveway would impede less into the flood-irrigated fields and avoid the steep slopes. The new design should prove even more effective in complying with the County's current regulations and the goal of protecting public safety. It is our understanding that you have tentatively approved this new change as part of a site visit. Enclosed are two 24" X 36"copies of the new design for your reference. Please let me know if you need any further information in order to process this requested amendment. Ver trul urs, Stan ,use , AICP, ASLA STAN CLAUSON ASSOCiATES,LLC UUUUUJ .,,. PIhNN1NG AND DF_SIGDr $OLp7lONS RJR CC 1U~MSlNITIES AND PXNATE SEC20R CLIENTS OM PHONE N0. Dec. 17 2004 05:11PM P1 L6l. ii .C.L1VJU u. Jig ~i LVr. tlnylt JC nyY .11 LV LJn A . !p,?,7r ^.~ PITKfN 1:00NTY COI19NtWdITY aEVECAPti~ENT oi;aertrrdE~T , PITKIN COUNTY {hrareiriefter COl1NTY) and __ _~cnnie Name (Ilerainafter,4PPWCRN7) AGILE AS POLLOIAIS: Perrnit f. {PPI~; ,, ~ pR l1 j~C04JN~1' en appicaafian for MinorAmEndment io a Develoomen4 2. APPLICANT understands' and agrees that P'itlern County'C~dlnartCe Pio. 018-2004 ®stabfishas a fee structure for land use eppiicatlons end the palmtent of all prooaaeing fees is a eonditlon preceUant to a determtnatlon of appGaetion ccmpletaneae. The fee structure is based on fife County's pottoy fhat development chat! pay, in full, the opaF of deveCapmenf ievkw in t~dn County. f=ees have been set to b® consistent and fair to the public and tq"reflect fire expense inclined in providi~ such services to the public. ~. . .r , ~_-.. 9. APPLIGAfIT and COUNTY agree that bacatiea of"the size, natiirp or scope of the proposed project, tt may not be possible at ttre time of applicafion to ascertain the lull exEent of fhe ~stv invotved'm processing the appiii:ation. , ~! RPPL/CANT and COUNTYagee that fees charged forthe processmf ofland use appl~tiona shat) accumu/ate ryan`app!lratla~ Includes more then orre type ~Oantl use r®vraw. 5. COUNTY and APPtJCAM furtr~r agree that it is imprecticabie for COUNTY staff to'oomplete proeessinp or' preeerrt auffwient irrfortnation to the Plann[ng Comm~eion and/or Board of County Commissioners to enab-m tf,e Plannfnp Ccmmissbn and/or Hoard of County G`onlrttissrOners to make legally required flnctliQs for project approval, unless currerrY trllings are patd In full prior to decision. S. Ther®fore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration d the COl,1NTY's waiver of its'rigttt to collect full lass prior tc a Cetermtnation of application OOmpletenaea, APPLICANT shall pay a base tea in the emourrt of $ Bd5 wh~eh is based on 3 hours of staff tkne, and ff aetusl'time spent by staff to process the applieaflon exceeds the average number of hours by more tlran 204/0, then th®COUNTY vrt11 bql the APPtlCANT quarteNy for the additrone! time spent. Such periodic payments shall be madegwithin 30 days t#,e billing daft. APPLICANT fi~r(her`egret3 that failure bo pay such accrued ousts chat! be rounds for suspension of'pt04E9sng. PITlQN COUNTY APPLICANT `/~ Cindy Nouben cement Dinaotor Na r .. ~ Comttglni Deval Sipnatun Date: M~ilEng Address: O I ~ r La.r,Q_ Ln ~' ~~r s-t F I~~~ o®®~(~~ ~° ., Attachment 1 Project Overview The applicant requests a minor amendment to their previous 1041 Hazazd Review Map land use approval. The property is located in Sopris Mountain Ranch and consists of "' approximately thirty-seven acres, which will become the site of asingle-family residence with a barn The applicant would like to relocate the driveway that was approved with the original 1041 Hazard Review. The approved driveway cuts excessively through slopes over 30% and goes in a direct path upslope to the site of the single-family residence. Tlie proposed alternate route starts ."" at the. existing road from a cul-de-sac and runs along the least slope possible beside flood- ~- irrigated fields. All measures will be taken to mitigate any negative impacts which the driveway may cause. As required for the RS-30 zone district, road development will be `"" located outside of irrigated lands. The proposed driveway runs along flood-irrigated fields but the design will incur minimal impact on the fields and slopes while the least number of trees possible will be removed All efforts will be mane to minimize total impact of driveway construction, and cuts and fills will be revegetated with native plant materials. ~, After a meeting with 13ud Bylaz, Ptkin County Engineer, and Bill Harding, Basalt Fire Mazshall, the design has been adjusted to meet the fire marshatl's requirements. The ,,,, turning radii of the curves along the driveway and the road wiclth~have been enlarged to allow fire trucks to the residence. The fuming radii now meet the County minimum requirement of 50 foot radius. It was agreed that the alignment shown in the attached drawing wilt suffice in meeting the County and Town of Basalt's'road requirernents. The width of the driveway will start at 16 feet and neck down to 14 feet, as the road approaches the residence. The fire truck turnaround and staging area will occur on the ~., pavement near the barn which will be located in the accessory building envelope. The proposed driveway relocation will provide a safer, ]ess impacting alternative as compared to the driveway originally approved The design further proves to be the more desired alternative by meeting the Sopris Mountain Ranch Desigr Guidelines. p y, guidelines Attachment Se e~ifi~calfollow the natural contours of the stermeanedering around tree and signifies g y cant land forms. Therefore, this request not only benefits the owner of the property, but also the community at lazge. Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment ~., 22 December 2004 Page 1 ooooo~ ~, ... ~ ! z, .;,~ Land Use Code Standards Report Offered below aze responses to relevant standazds as identified in the Land Use Code: 1. Resonses to Section 3-200-086 Minor Amendments to a Deveioament Permit A minor amendment to any development permit (except minorand major amendments to final plats), including AF-SKI and PUB mastea plans and special review approvals, intended to change an element or condition of a development permit maybe approved subject to compliance with the standards in this section. `" " A. The amendment must not change the use of the proposed development between residential, commercial and tourist accommodation uses. Response: The property has been approved for residential development, which this request supports. No change of use is proposed B. The amendment must be consistent with action taken during the review of the original development and does not constitute a new land development activity. Response: This amendment is consistent with the original residential development and ^-^, does not constitute a new Zand development. The request to relocate the driveway that was approved with the original d 041 is to create a safer and more code compliant road access to the residence. The new driveway design will avoid slopes of over 30%, ?^ minimize any required tree removal, and avoid the flood-irrigated fields as much as possible. The driveway approved with the original 1041 goes straight up through slopes over 30%, which could Zead to potential hazards. ~- C. The proposed activity does not: ""' 1. Change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs including basic visual appeaance and method of operation. °" Response: The request to relocate the driveway will not change the basic character of the approved residential use, and the new design will improve the safety of the driveway leading to the residence. The proposed design will minimize any negative impacts on the """ basic visual appearance of the landscape. 2. Increase off-site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood; Response: There will be no increase in off-site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood. 3. Endanger the public health, safety, or weifaze; Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment ~" 22 December 2004 Page ~oaoa~ ~. Response: The request will reduce potential natural hazards along the driveway to the residence and thus minimize endangerment that might occur to the public health, safety, ~, or welfare. 4. Violate any Land Use Code standard; Response: The request will not violate arty Land Use Code standard. In fact, the request ,,,,, supports the Land Use Code by proposing a driveway that can dnd will avoid slopes over 30% as much as possible whereas the original design as approved does not. n 5. Substantially increase the need for on-site parking ufilities, or affected affordable housing generation; and Response: The proposed changes to the development plan will not affect traffzc or employment generation. 6. Increase the. floor area of the use by more than two percent (2%) or decrease the open space on the site by more than three percent (3%). Response: This request to relocate the driveway will nat increase floor area. Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment 22 December 2004 .Page ~ ®O ~~20M mni. u, tvv~ it,v7ini ~ i S u~PHONE N0.` Deo. v~ Attachment 2 4~7~'(8 ~F-1 -I~r~ .. II II II III III VI II Nll lif ill ! I lll il li I iI II lll l f il i9 z ~a l e ST'..VIo poV JS pTTKit J QOONTY ~ f.4 - R - 16 ; , ~ r a~A .00 ~ 100.00 ~nrARRAI~TY OEEo 7H13 DEED, made May 8, 2004, Bettnreeh RICHARD FIL.IPPINI ~°'^ ~< ~ib/~.~--> Stsia of ~ .GRANTOR, of the County of , ANb MARKNAGIE end CONSTANCE J. t+iAGIE, GRANTEE »w» whose legal address is :1070 SPRING LANE, LAKE Fp12tST, IL G0045 oFthe County of ,State of ILLINOIS 4VITNESSETtt; That for and' in oorraideretian of the sum of ten dottars end otlrer good end valuable consideration, the receipt and sulficianoy ofwhieh is (+eneby adiitoviledged.'tha grantor has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by itraae preserMs does grant, bargain, sell and convey and eonArtn unto the grantee, his ~ heirs and assigns forever, all the real property fogatlier with improvements,' i< any. si(uate antl tying and being in the County o} PITKIN, State of COLORADO, described as folbws: ,;.', A parcel of rand tra&tg part of Trail 75 end Iacated in Section 27, Townsh~ 8 South, Range 87 Weer of the BdT '"" Principal Meridian. Said parcel is mere fully descrbed ae folkrws: Beginning at A.P. of said Tract 75; `--- thence S tt6°ag~3g^ tlV 302.13 feet alortg fine 1-2 0}said Tract 75 to the Southerly right of way Bhe of rho County ~ `R~ thence S 59°24 W 674.10 feet along said right of way; -~ thence South 1B96.t3 feet; thence N 7.6°68' E g1S.49 fee} to rrne t-6 of said Tract 7S to the point of bag~ning. ~ Said parcel being known as Parwl 1, Sopris Mourrmin Ranch. // +^. t--}- " TOGETHER with ap and singular the hereditaments end eppurtenanc~e ttferel0 belonging, or'm anywise epperiglning, and the reversion and reversions, reritalnders, rents, issues "and profits thereof, and aR Me estate, e above 9re~ ~ b• of, in aril to N ~ s p bargained prem~se8, v6Mt the hered'~hame urtenances. TO OV'E AND TO HOLD tHe said remises nt s and a PP ~ ~ above be aired aril dests'bed, with the rtenances, unto the rahtee, hts heirs and hs forever. And tare ,,~ Grentor, for himseff, nis heirs and assigns; deal revenant, grant, bargain, and spree to era wkh the Gremee, his heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ehseaFng and delivery ofthese presents, he is wall seized ottee premises above conveyed, has good: sure; perleet, absolute and indeteasibie estate of inheri~noe; in law, in fee simple, and has good rSght lull power and lawful authpriiy to grant, barpein, sell and convey the same in manner w, and farm as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from att fomter and other pranffi, bargains, salon, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrx:60n3 of wh"atever kind or nature soever, except those mallets as set TortN on Fachibit "A' attached hereto and inoarporated herein by retereno0-The grantor stra[fand wip WARRANT AND FORtV~ft DEFEND the above bargained Premises in the quiet and peaceable possession "^^ of the grandee, his heirs and.ass~ns, agaetsf all and every person or persons Iavrfu0y otaiming Ure whale or any ' part thereof. The singular number shelf include the pluia6 tfie plural th® singular,, and the use of gender shall be . applicable to att genders. '" 497418 TRANSFER pECIARATION RECEIVED 05110!2004 ~. I11r¢ 0000.0 FROM 'MAY. b. 1UU4 PHDNE N0. Dec 17 20 - , IL, 54YM ~IIA i.VUIVII Ilt~~ ~ 0G 93:33PM'P2 ~. ~ I ~~~~~~ ~~I~~ ~~~~~ ~1~~ ~i~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~! ~~~~~ ~~~I i~ 0 9 A 40 g 11 4~A Si~~_via DRV tS o1TK1N ~CC~JNTY Co R 16.00 D 100.00 PAGE Z - WARRANTY DEED ,~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has exP,cu~d thls deed. R(~ CFQ-RD FIUPPINt STATE OF ~ ~ 1 ss COUNTY OF ,. ~~t )- n~ The fur~oing instrument was acknowiwiged before me ibis ay of r `i ~ ~ , ~ ~2~0Q4, by RICHARD t=1LIPPlN1. C/.~~ WITNESS my hand and official seal T ~`~ mycomrniaaion expires: ~~/ ~~P , NOtnryPubiic ggp 1U: EACH£fiON Csmmiswonbt3°5329 ~ x Hoary Pu61iC - (;atY,-ornivt ~ San4a f3arb>er0 CourKy MIy~Gmm.Ewpit®AuC ?S, 2006 a~ «~ PCi'1 t3713L ~~l$ ®o~Q~.~ FROM IVIH I. PHONE N0. Dec. 17 2004 03:34PM P3 V~ 1VU4 IL. J411V1 111 .lu VVUivI l I11LL nv. uuvv ~. r~r iu e~° 'VI' ~ EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the year 2004 not yet due oT payable. 2. Right o1 the proprietor of a ve(n or lode fo extract or remove his ore therelmm. should. the same be found to penetrate or intersect the prnrnlses h®reby granted ea reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at ' Page 180. 3. Thoaeterms, condiYwns, provrsiona, obligations, eaeements, resttidions, elssesaments and all matters as set ~, mber 23,1982 in Book 4~7 at"Page 7A8, forth (n Protechva Covenants far Sopris Mountain Ranch recorded Oe me First Amertdmanf thereto recorded November 19, 1987 in Book b51 at a 259, Second Amendment 1heTato recorded January 21, 1993 in Book 701 at'Page 347, ThiN Amendment thereto rewrded January 21,1993 in ~„ Bootc 701 at Page 408, Suppkmentel Restrid)ve Covenants thereto recorded January 21,1993 In Book 701 at ~areto recorded February 3,1995 in gook Y02 at Page 731, Suppiementei i 9 ~ ~ 733, Fourth Amendment thereto to recorded February 3, 1993 in Book 702 at P" nts ti~re R frictive Cov~ra Reception Fro. 419234, Frtfh Anendment th recorded February 4.1999 as ereto recorded FabNary 4, 1998 as ~^* Reception No. 413233, SBdh Amendment thereto recorded May 28, 1988 as Reception No. 417416, Severdfl Amendment thereto recorded March 8.11108 ae Reception No. 41x335, Eighth Amendment thereto recorded February 22.1989 as Receptlon No: 427991, deleting ttrsredrem any restrictions indkxting any preference, limrtadon or disuiminatbn based on race, Dolor, religion, sex, handicap, tainillat status or national origin. », a. Terms, candition8, provl5hns, obligadone and all matters as set north in the Articles of Incorporation of 3opris Mourtfein Ranch Homeowners AseoeiaGOn rtxorded in Book SQ7 at gage 1;89; end t3y-Laws recoiled in Book 607 at Paye 683. 5. Easemema, righfe of way and aQ msltere as OtBClosed on Plat or subject propartyrecorded in Plat Book 36 at Page 47. 8. Terms, wndkions, proYisiorrs, obQgations and aU matters as sat forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded February 15,1995 in Beok 774 at Page 35 as Relsolution No. 857. ^^ 7. Terms, conditions, provisions. obligations end aN matters as set forth in Resolution of tlia Board. of County Commissioners recorded' April 9, 1898 as Reception No. 415416 as Resoluton No. 9858. J ~~~~, ~ . m ZyrD "T - 3nm o c~~Sr ~ Orz~x ~ m~~o rn= m m ~tiA3 ~ z ~ m N m N ~ s aN nO C ~~ "I ~~~It~ I~~II IIII,~~ II~~ I~IIIIi 1I~I IIIIII II~ III~I IIII III P60/ 10/2 084 11 :4~ta Sf VIP DPVI$ P. TKIN COUmTV „o R 16. 00 D100.00 13}I g oooo» .. .... .. ..::. x .:. .... .. .. .. m .:.:... il.. Attachment 3 Parcel Number: 24fi527301001 Legal Descripfion: -- SUB:SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH LOTi I ___ _ - _. DESC: AKA PARCEL 1 _. -- ----- SECT;TWN,RNG:27-8-87 TRACT:75 DESC: IPARCEL 1 PARCEL BEING PART OF TRACT -~ ---~---- 75 3N SEC 27-8-87 CANT 36.95 AC MIL ~~~; DESC BY MB BK 376 PGS 664-665 BK ~C333 PG 204 BK 499 PG 862 BK Sbl PG 1139 SAID PARCEL BEING KNOWN AS PARCEL 1 SOPRIS IvIOUNTAIN RANCH BK -- --~ ~~_ ,573 G 6 ®®®Q~,~ Y% h ,gq~c>'.Yh~~L n~+.. pr}G'1, Fwx1 '~~~CIC'~4Aµ'n~%" +'t#" C _. C~ C s v Q Q ~~ ~~ ~g '~„^"F+_ .f." ) ,W", k ~~„A°RR.'t~',.yY(.^v,.,:~"~'~ rr' .,..' ..r ...,.,. ...w «I~'Id ' sw ~ ~0` .,~ a: *4 ~"i,, ly mmwammxwn,=..vu m __. ~.r ~ . ~ ~' ~ ~w -' ~~ ~ ~ "i ", ~. o .: ,.. ~ ~ ~~~ a I i ~ V -' ~ N O y a ~ ~~ ~ a •~'` ~~.a ~ . __.__.__.__._ I,.` ~ gq ~ ~~ ~ 8 ~ {~ 4 t} y ¢ 8 ~ ~ ~ y '~5 ~ ~ 1' f \ ~ ~ h 3 ~W gqQ D Q~ \ --J ~ \4 I \ * ` ~ ~ ~+ e5 q p5 ~'ti '~Y ~ 3~ I I"~y ~ ~ p~ ` b qr~ © k 1,, ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~' ~ w ~ ~ <F N fA~ ^ti ~ H ~' ~~ \ ~ t 4 N ~.) r.y 0 ~~~, ~- 7a ~ I 1 n~ / I \ iTt/ _$ a° s`2 ym 4R6 1 /' SfJf r i µ~n i '\ ' ~ i~ \ I e ~`. ~. l~ ~, 1 i~ 1 ~, n ~1 1, \~ ~~j { <.~ (~~J [\l \k i \ ...., ~~ 3~.~,s J.` E~~ ~S o W~ ~~~~ wge n ~ ~~ $q AtY+ ^~ Vi ~h~$ B WRY( A 0 ~c 4~ ~ ' \ gF4 e6 ~m l.. ryj Q; yo'^M1~^ >g ~ > C~ G ` Y Sod R., n~ 3 p e~R ,~ a s~~ ~~.. a g ^z~° iPg~~^^$B`` ~ , a h Y~~~~$ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~pp~ 5.F g¢°.a g~~ ~~ ~ k gKyi ~ d~ 2 a.3~~ ~~ .~ y~ ~~~ a~g~~e ~ ~ ~ ~§ r"c~ a I ~. \\\ \. i ~ // i i `~k"~~ Ry ~W 7,4 W~~ }~ l~ ~~C4~' 2E~Wi ~n"~o h5 W~Y~d ~"o-0U ~~tt^~z' eFnh> ~~M b ,y N' 8 ~~ ti ~ Y c ~C a~, y4 S ~ ` a a , s~ ~ & gggga~F~yy'i., &g g' 0g ~3 ~o a~ d~~ ~~ ~~ Y a ~r ~F~+ ~~ ~S ~ o a a'~. ~ .g . s ~~py £C c~ 4~ N sa ~~ i sr n I ~ <' ~ ~ , of i i i ~'@. ~ !~ 1 'Na~~'4r Q~,l ~ / i ~~ i ~ ~ i ~Qr.W ,. ~~ ,~,. , , ~; ',~; ~, ~, ~~ ~ ~~ 1~; ; , ~ ; i ~ 1 1 ~ ~ i ` i I i~ ~ i ` ,l m _T ~ I ~ \ V ~1 ~~ ~~, ~~a z i ~ ~ v W ,. , ~ b !~ 1 ~ ~ ~ .r~ 16 ~_ ~~ ~ ~ v~ ~ \~ ' I' '; Q ~~ ., +-i ~~~~~~ o ~~ v p V C r~ ~; ~~~ tea. 5 ~~ a v 0 ~; , ~a~~~a~ ~~ ~5 a~$~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~€~ ABfI fE ~50':I (1 uef riui t9NYt119\MM\ i. y`7 en c a~ t v / io ++ ++ Q ~. '1 -~ ~i, ~~ , 3 ~~~ ~_~ ~~ i i ~~ ' / P ~ ~ I ~ / I / ~ / I / ~ ' 'I ~ I ~ ~ / \ l\\\ ~ _ _-_ "___ ca .--~ 0 co 0 ~, i,~. ~'~- r ~„ i „ ~ ; / / / / ~ ~~ / ! ~ / / ~ ~ I / i I ~ 1 / i ~ / ~ ~ I / / ~ / ~ I ~ ~ / /~ ~ /p~ / {~ ~i~ I ii l \ /, / _ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ - ~ / \ I \. \~ .~ // _ / ``\ `Jf /J ~f/ \\`~ ` r ~i// // / __ i/i~ // ~ +A ~ ~ __ 1 ~/i ~i i / ~ / ~ l '11Y ' ~~ "~ ~ ~, o i J ~i 11"" ~ ~ I+ i; ~~; ~~ ' `J/ \~ l I /' /~/ y~'p _ ~ //// ' % _ .'~~l'~J// ' .~~ ~,//p ~/i •~/ %/' .,; ~ l ~/ i% / .~ /.~ ., ~ --, A $~~'• /,, i i i \ \ a c a 0 ~! Attachment 6 ~- SOPRIS H MOUNT~.~N IZAN d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s ~,. A p r i l 1 9 9 6 1111111 IIIII 111111 IIII~ Ilfll Illil Illill III IIfllilll fIII °^ 413234 02/04/1998 03:38P RMEND CO DRYIS SILYI 3 of 32'R 281.00 D'0.00 N 0,00 PITKIN COUNTY CO .,, `' 00~~'' l^. SOPRIS MOUNTALN RANCH __ d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s t o b l e off' c o n t e n i s I. INTRODUCTION A. Intent Of Design Gaideliaes ...................................................... I _ B. Relationship To Protective Covenants ..................................... 1 II. TAE DESIGN COMMITTEE - REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Design Committee Responsibilities .......................................... I -- B. Review Process, Submission Requirements, and Fees ........... 2 t. Pre-planni o eetiy : ...................................................... 2 2. Schematic Design Review ..................... .......................... 2 -- 3. Final Plan Review ............................................................. 3 III. SIT£ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT -' A. Development Zones .................................................................... 4 B. Permitted Uses ........................................................................... 5 - l. Critical wildlife Areas ......:.............................................. 5 2. Driveway and Utility Corridors ....................................... .. 3. Buil ina Envelo~ ........................................................... 5 _ 4. Natural .open Space ......................................................... 5 IV. DESIGN STANDARDS A. Site Planning Standards 6 1. Driveways/Access Roads ................................................ 6 2. Gradina ............................................................................ 7 3. ti l'ties ............................................................................. 8 _ 4. P ti a ............................................................................ 8 5. Ponds ................................................................................ 9 6. Pools ................................................................................. 9 -- 1~~N~ 1'~~~ ~'I~'I ~~~~"~'~~ f~~~l ~~~"~ ~I~ "I~I ~I'I 11'~ 413234 02/04/1998 03:38P AMEND CO DAVIS SILVI 4 of S2 R 281.00 D 0.00 N'0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ,^~' 7. Lightins ............................................................................ 9 $. a ci ~ ............................................................:.....:........... 9 y. 'e oe ...............................................:............:................10 10. wldtire ManaQement ......................................................10 B. Architectural Standards ............. ...................10 r., 1. BuildinP Location ........................................................................ it 2. ~uitdina Farm and Massine .................................... 11 ................... 3. Roof Desjgn ................................................................................. I ] ~.. 4. Exterior Walls and Surfaces .........................................................12 5. Foundations ..................................................................................12 6. C'himnevc. Flues and Roof Vents ........................:....................... 6 .~ V. CONSTRUC716N REGULATTONS .....................................,.......................... 13 ~.. Appendix A .......................:....................................................................15 Recommended Plant List .. APPendix B ............................................................................................ t9 .Approved Fences 111111 IIlII Illllllllll IIIII 11111 INIII III IIIII IIII IIII 413234 02004/1050 03:36P AMEND CO DRYIS SELVI 6 of 62 R 261.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COIptTY CO ~,z,~> ; . - .. ~ ~~~~~~s~ ~.. -~ Before a home is constructed, the Design Consultant must review each own- __ er's plans to ensure their compliance with the Design Guidelines. The Guidelines are intended to protect the wildlife, natural beauty, character, val- ues and views of Sopris Mountain. These Design Guidelines have been writ- ten to encourage individual expression while also achieving the development standard appropriate to each site. The Design Consultant will: L Review proposed construction projects for conformance with Sopris Mountain Ranch's Design Guidelines. 2. Conduct appropriate communications with applicants and their repre- __ sentatives. 3. Explain clarify guidelines to applicants. 4. Approve proposed plans for construction after they are in compliance __ with the guidelines. B. Review Process, Submission Requirements, and Fees The three steps of the Design Consultant Review are as follows. The fee to be paid by the homeowner is strictly to reimburse the Design Consultant for review, recommendation, and meeting time. Additional meetings other than the three described below will be an additional expense to the homeowner based on $65.00/hour (fee subject to change after 8/3I/96) for consultant review, recommendation, and meeting time. All fees are due with the sub- mittal of the application to the Design Committee and upon attendance at the Pre-Planning meeting. Pre-planni~t;, Meeting -Discuss the concept and the intent of the Design Guidelines, the philosophy of the construction anticipated by the homeowner, and the submittal requirements for the Schematic and Final Design Review with the Design Consultant. Review Fee: Please see the attached fee schedule for design review fees associated with pre-planning meeting 2. Schematic Design Review -Review schematic design and site plan for conformance with the guidelines. Applicants are requested to sub- mit the following two weeks prior to the Schematic Design Review Meeting with a check for the associated fee: a. Schematic Design Review checklist b. Certified survey with two foot contours i i~i~~i iiiii iiuii i~iii ruii iii~i iiiiii iii iiii~ ii~1 iii 433234 02/04/3si88 03:36P gMEND CO DQVIS SILVI 6 of S2 R 201.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ®®o ~ +-t 1 _,_~- I. INTRODUCTION A. Intent Of Design Guidelines ~, Sopris Mountain Ranch is an area of remarkable natural beauty, unique in Pitkin County. In order to maintain the Ranch's unique character, to preserve the natural beauty and balance of the site and maintain the quality of open space, Building Envelopes have been identified for each Lot. These envelopes have been defined to maximize each site's best features with con- sideration for natural terrain, views, privacy, vegetation, orientation, access and relationship to adjacent sites. These guidelines have been prepared to provide guidance and direction to the owners and professionals involved with the design and construction of homes within these envelopes. The underlying goals of these guidelines are to: 1. Protect the natural ecosystem. 2. Minimize the visual impact of site development on roads and other homesites. 3. Preserve the existing character of Sopris Mountain Ranch. 4. Preserve the view corridor to Sopris Mountain B. Relationship To Protecfive Covenants The Design Guidelines established herein are supplemental to restrictions and processes established in the Declaration of Protective Covenants for "" Sopris Mountain Ranch. Owners of each Lot are encouraged to review both documents together. II. THE DESIGN COMMITTEE REVIEW PROCEDURES ~. ~ $ .. A. Design Committee Responsibilities ~ j> e i o The Design Committee and its review process is an internal procedure to =w ° ensure conformance with the Sopris Mountain Ranch Design Guidelines. ~g w This process is additional to the buiidina permit and approval requirements ~ $ d '"" of Pitkin County. The Committee's primary consideration is to aid applicants ~ ~ ~ and their architects in maintaining the high quality standard set herein. In ~ m 'te order to do this the Committee has retained a qualified Design Consultant to a review al! documents submitted for the review process and wilt solicit an z ~, =~ ~ objective recommendation from the Design Consultant as to whether the ~ • m ~ applications have conformed to the Sopris Mountain Ranch Design ~ o Guidelines. It is from this recommendation that the Design Committee will ~~ ~ base their decision of acceptance, rejection, or acceptance with modi5cations ~": of the proposed plans. mom .an ~m~ n v~ ~ ~ O®~U~l . = u - .. =v r .-, ,,-,, c. Floor plans (]/4" = 1'-0" scale) d. Elevations of all structures (I/4" = 1'-0" scale) c. Roof plans _ (1/4" = 1'-0" scale) f. Exterior finish schedule g. Site plan with landscape intent including existing topography _ at a two foot contour interval, proposed grading at a two foot contour interval for al! disturbed areas, limits of grading, dri- veway alignment, proposed planting areas, and proposed hard- _ scape areas. (1"=20'-0"scale) h. Utility line location and detailed revegetation plan i. Proposed entry gates or signage plan and elevation j. 8"X10", or larger, black and white photos with the proposed house and improvements superimposed at an accurate scale. _- The locations from which the above photos should be taken shall be designated by the Design Consultant at the pre-planning meeting. Review Fee: Please see the attached fee schedule for design review fees associated with schematic design review 3. Final Plan Review -Review contract documents and site plan for conformance with the guidelines and approved schematic plans. Applicants are requested to submit complete construction documents including all proposed improvements relative to elements identified by the Design Committee at schematic design review two weeks prior to the Final Plan Review Meeting with a check for the associated fee including but not limited to: a. Completed Final Plan Review checklist b. Certified survey with two foot contours (1 „=20,_0„) c. Floor plans (I/4" = l'-0" scale) d. Elevations of all structures (1/4" _ !'-0" scale) e. Roof plans (l/4" = I'-0" scale) f. Exterior finish schedule g. Exterior lighting schedule h. Construction details and specifications for all architectural and -" site elements ll `` ll ff I~~~II'~III ~~I"I I~II~'I~~I III~I ~II~~I II~ ~~I'I I'~I II'I 3 413234 02/04/1998 03.3EP RMEND CO DRVIS SI~VI B of 62 R 263.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITttK~~InN CrO~UNTY CO ®tJn®n~ . 11111111111111111111111111111111 iiilll lil IIIII 111111.11 w~ Y1of~92 R/261300gD Qi.00PN~0.~ PITKLNxC00NTY CO ~»~ r. k. k. 1. m. Site gradittg plan including driveway grading and all proposed grading at a two foot contour interval with spot grades for all disturbed areas (1 "=20'-0" scale) Site layout and materials plan including all handscape layout (]"=26'-0" scale) .Landscape plan locating proposed planting areas and identify- ing all proposed plants (I"=20'-0" scale) Imgation plan for all areas to be irrigated (1"=20'-0"scale) Utility line location and detailed revegetation plan Proposed entry gates or'signage plan and elevation Applicants shall have corners of primary structures staked on-site for the Design Consultant review prior to final approval. Review Fee: ' Please see the attached fee schedule for design review fees associated with ftnal plati review Any architectural or site design changes that occur after final plan review and approval must be resubmitted to the design review com- mittee for final plan approval. All plans or portions of plans not completed within one year of approval must be resubmitted to the design review committee for approval prior to construction. Design review fees for additional review time will be based on the hourly rate specified in the attached fee schedule. III. SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT A. Development Zones - In conformance with the structure of the Sopris Mountain Ranch develop- ment, virtually al! of the Ranch shall remain as open space. Therefore, each Lot is comprised of our cones: 1. {'rieical Wildlife Areas - No development or fencing permitted. 2. Driveway orridors -Activity limited to necessary improvements for driveway construction and utility services. ,,,,, 3. Building Envefo{Ze -All structures and major development including, but not limited to residential structures, accessory buildings, and paved recreational facilities (pools, tennis courts, etc.). q, Niarnra QQen Soace -Limited recreational development activity per- mitted on the portions of private lots outside of Building Envelopes and Driveway Comdors 4 ®®Ot~[°.~.' ~, ,-~ -; _:~ B. Permitted Uses Critical Wildlife Areas No constmction, development or improvements other than as approved by the Design Committee, the Division of Wildlife, and Pitkin County. 2. Driveway and Unity Corridors These areas were determined based on Pitkin County 1041. Review relative to wildlife and geological concerns. Permitted improvements _ within these comdors include, but are not limited to, limited vegeta- tion removal, road bed grading, drainage improvements, erosion con- trol, mechanical retainage, utility service extensions and paving. __ Refer to site specific 1041 Review plats for additional limitations on specific access corridors. Building Envelope These areas were determined based on an extensive review pursuant - to Pitkin County Sand use regulations and 1041 1-Lazard Review rela- tive to wildfire, wildlife and geologic concerns, as well as specific planning ohjectives (i.e. ridges and drainages, imgation ditches, exisE- -. ing vegetation, views, privacy, and visual impact) and have been approved by Pitkin County. Permitted uses are single-family homes, barns, caretaker units, accessory buildings and other uses as allowed - by the Pitkin County Land Use Code and approved by the Sopris Mountain Ranch Association. All structures within the building enve- lope shat[ preserve the unobstructed views of Mount Sopris. - 4. Natural Oken Space: a. Low impact permitted uses are: - Hiking trails - Cross country ski trails - Pastures - Picnic areas - Equestrian [rails I I"III "III "I"I IIII' II~II'I1'~'II"I III llllll I'I II'1 433234 02/04/3898 03.36P AMEND CO DHVIS SSLVI 30 e{ S2 R 263.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PTTK3N COUNTY C6 .~4ot 00002`'' _. ~. b, prohibited uses include: Any site work, grading or drainage improvements without the approval of the Design Committee. Lighting (except for one low-level light fixture at each parcel access driveway to illuminate the address sig- nage). Vegetation removal or defoliation. permanent structures or visible alteration of the land- scape. IV. DESIGN STANDAflDS The Design Guidelines address residential development at two levels: Site Planning and Architectural Design. Site planning standards refer to overall improvements in the Building Envelope and driveway access corridor. Architectural design standards `~ refer to structures in the Building Envelope. A. Site Planning Standar~rls ~» Every Lot at Sopris Mountain Ranch has its own unique land form features and chazacter. Whenever possitite, these features should be preserved and reinforced by any level of construction and design. The objectives are to fit the improvements to the site in a way that leaves the natural features of ~ Sopris Mountain Ranch intact, treating buildings and roads as an integral part of the site. The following key ekements of site development for each Lot shall be addressed. ,~, 1, Driveways/~ccess F.oads Access drives in most cases will have the greatest impact on the site. Consequently, great care should be given to their planning and design. The approved access drives generally follow the natural con- ,,,, tours of the site, meandering around frees and significant land forms. During final design, each access road should address the following: Maximum grades shall be 8% where practical, and in no event mare than l2%o. Cuts and fills shall Cuts and fills to be topso~led and r' not exceed 2:1 slopes. evegetated with native plant materials (Appendix A). Maximum total vertical exposure of cuts and fills shall not exceed six feet. Approved cribbing to be used where total vertical exposure of cuts and fills is greater than six feet. Maximum total vertical exposure of approved cribbing shall not exceed eight feet unless approved by the Design Committee. 111111 11111 111111 11111 11111 lllli 111111 111 11111 111 1111 """ 413234 02/04/1998._03:3ia AMEND CO DRVIS SILVi (~ ~ ~ ~,`), ~j 11 of S2 R 261,'00 D 0.01D N 0.00' PITKIN CDUNT1f CO .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. r. .. .. .. .. .. .. r-~., ---. .. Driveway width shall be sixteen feet of driving surface, except where traversing slopes greater than 30%. In these areas a minimum width of 12 feet is required and slopes are to be sta- bilized using mechanical devices where necessary. These widths are intended to provide adequate snow storage and a passable driving lane in heavy snow winters. All efforts shall be made to minimize total impact of driveway construction. Asphalt shall not be used. Gravel or Chip and Seal are.recom- mended for driveway paving materials. All surfacing to be approved by the Design Committee. --- ++~~ - ' „n Typical Access Road 2. di Typical Access Road with Crib Wail The intent and goal of Sopris Mountain Ranch is to preserve the nat- ural existing topography and maintain the delicate system of natural drainages, structures, washes and creek beds. Any proposed improve- ments should be carefully planned to minimize disruption to the exist- ing ecosystem or alteration of the topography. The prescribed envelopes have been located to minimize grading and avoid primary natural drainage systems. Specifically, new improvements should respond to the following: No grading shall occur outside the Building Envelope except for erasion repair and meadow repair approved by the Design Committee. Cuts and fi[]s shall be maximum 2:1 slopes unless mechanical retainage is utilized. Within the Building Envelope, no exposed cuts and fills wilt be allowed, including exposed drainage ditches, to minimize the visual impact of new construction. Intense}y developed areas will occur on graded platforms or ledges. Areas requir- ing level changes will be accomplished with cribbing or retaining walls as architectural extensions of the building. These walls will be subject to the same criteria relating to color and materials as the building itself. i ii~iii ~iiii ii~rri i~iu iii~~ i~iii iiiiii iii i~~iii iii iiii ~ r~ nr~ 123of462?R 26300 D 0 00 N 000 PITKINSCWNTY CO ®U ®tJ c .~, - Alt disturbed areas which are. not paved of graveled shall be revegetated with appropriate plant materials from the recom- mended Plant List. (See Appendix A). - Major natural drainages that traverse the Lots shall be main- tained in t3~eir original configuration. Eroding areas must be stabilized and revegetated. - Existing irrigation ditches that traverse Lots shall not be dis- turbed without approval of the Design,Committee. _ g - p building envelope shall be onstructed without the approval of the Design Committee. " 'es .~. Sopris Mountain Ranch recognizes the responsibility for supplying utilities to each Lot. The applicant shall provide an engineered system which encompasses the following: - All utilities shall be underground and contained within the dri- veway corridor or Building Envelope, unless approved by the Design Committee and Pitkin County. - All above ground appurtenances shall be approved by the Design Committee and be appropriately screened from view. Satellite dishes shall be non-reflective black. If utilities do not follow the driveway comdor. owner shall revegetate disturbed areas eo standards included in,the Design Guidelines. Any utility line location not buried within an approved driveway must be presented at schematic design approva€ along with a detailed revegetation plan. - All well and septic systems shall meet Pitkin County and State standards. 0 U 4. l no ~~ ~ Existing vegetation is one of Sopris Mountain Ranch's amenities and f the following t i ~ ~ o nten an integral part of the natural ecosystem. The _ ~ H z Quidelines is to protect and enhance the existing landscape and vege- b (r 7 M mgr tation. Preservation is paramount and improvements must respect '°o a ~~ existing vegetation types. More specifically; emoval of planting will be allowed outside of i ® ng or r - No plant ~u~ m the Building Envelope and access comdor except for reasons z of landscape restoration, wildlife enhancement. agricultural ~ ~~ m improvement or the enhancement of trails. ~; ' ~ - Landscape scale and overall landscape design shall be ~ ~ o designed so that new vegetation is integral with the natural =m m ~~ w mountain landscape and the local plant communities. New ~e N planting shall compliment existing plant communities and be ~'°~ ~sn ~a N 4 _~ - ~ ooc ~~ _~~ F.~ ~,.....~ - 1111111 IIIII111111IIIIIVIII VIII 111111 I(I II1111111 NII 413234 02/04/1998 03:38P AMEND CO DRVIS SILVI 14 ei S2 R 261.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITIfIN COUNTY CO -- located to extend existing vegetation edges or planted in nat- ural looking groups. Approved species shall be appropriately selected from the Plant List (Appendix A). Homeowners are encouraged to utilize plant materials that require little water other than initial periods for establishment. Planiing within the Building Envelope in areas immediately adjacent to the house which are not visible from neighboring homes shall be relatively unrestricted and may include orna- mental plants. Manicured or groomed yards shall be confined by buildings, fences, walls or other edges so that the visibility of these areas is limited to adjacent buildings. Trees within the Building Envelope shall be selected from the Plant List. (Appendix A). 5. Pon s On site ponds shall be permitted where ditches allow adequate water supply. To prevent unnecessary water loss, all ponds shall be lined. __ 6. Pools All pools will be constructed in the building envelope in areas not visible from neighboring homes, building envelopes, and roadways. ' htino Outdoor lighting will be carefully reviewed to assure thaz neighboring -- properties are protected from bright light sources and that they have every opportunity to enjoy the night sky. All exterior lighting must be approved by the Design Committee prior to any installation. Separate - exteriorlighting detail showing source location, wattage and fixture specification, and building or landscape area illuminated by such lighting must be submitted to the Design Committee prior to any - installation and final approval. Specifically: - Lighting outside the Building Envelope, visible light sources, and exterior up-lighting are prohibited. One low-level light - with c hidden source is allowed at each entry drive for the sole purpose of locating the entry and address identification. 8. Fencing In an effort to maintain the greatest level of preservation of the natur- al character of the Ranch, the Design Committee does no[ recommend the use of fences. Specifical]y; - Two basic fence types have been approved for use in provid- ing security or livestock containment designated within the. Building Envelope (Appendix B). ®~Q~~~ - Where 1041 approvals allow for dogs, all fenced dogs must be "°° restricted to the Building Envelope. Fencing containment for dogs must be approved by the Design Committee. 9. i a e in order to minimize the visual impact of foreign intrusions on the Ranch, large signage "statements" are prohibited. Specifically: - Signage will be permitted only for the address and name at the driveway/road intersection and shalt be subject to approval by the Design Committee. Maximum allowable text area shall be four square feet. "No Trespassing" signs wilt be posted on the perimeter of Sopris Mountain Ranch. and maintained by the ~„ Ranch Manager. Other types of signage visible from road- ways or other homesites is strictly prohibited. ,~, 10. Wildfire Mangggment Sopris Mountain Ranch contains three predominant fuel types: Oa1c/Sage, Aspen and Conifer. The highest fire potential occurs when ~, these fuel types are combined with a dense understory. In order to minitize increase in potential wildfire occurrences, the following ,,,, guidelines are established: - Roofs will be made of fire retarding materials. - Chimneys shall be equipped with approved spark arresters. ~, - Structures shall be surrounded by a zone 10 feet wide that is substantially devoid of trees, shrubs, weeds and talc grass that are considered high in fuel content. Trees and shrubs without ,,.q ladder fuel reaching to the ground are permitted. - Parking areas shall be kept free of tall grasses and other com- 6usGble materials. Within 30 feet of all structures, existing ~.-, trees and shrubs should be thinned to minimize fuel. B. Architectural Standards Sopris Mountain Ranch Association recognizes the need for an owner, through his architect, to design with as much flexibility as passible to meet the owner's needs, ^~ taste and individuality. The intent of this section is to encourage individual expres- sion and outline basic and simple criteria. These criteria have been established to govern building massing and color, to reduce visual impact by conforming to the surrounding topography, and to minimize damage to the existing landscape. In essence, the architecture should reflect the natural, quiet mood of Sopris Mountain Ranch through its massing, choice of materials and colors. Due to the low density of ^'*' Sopris Mountain Ranch the Lots are for the most part viewed from a distance suffi- cient to eliminate any perception of small scale elements and details, it simply becomes a system of three dimensional shapes. The following standards are applica- ~, ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi t~ OOOt'~t~ t6, of 62 R 261.m0 D 0.00 N 0.00 PItKIN COUNTY CO ,~-, (~,, ble to any structure visible from primary roads or the Building Envelopes within Sopris Mountain Ranch, or when otherwise deemed appropriate by the Design Committee. Building Location _ - Buildings are to be located within building envelopes so as to pre- serve the view corridor to Mount Sopris from existing homes and common areas. 2. Building Form and Massing In the landscape at Sopris Mountain Ranch the major elements of building __ mass reveal themselves textually at the medium range view. It is essential that the buildings disappear from the distant views, roads and other Lots. Therefore; _, - Minimize exposed walls. The maximum continuous. exposed wall height along a building face shall be ten feet high except that 30% of each building face may be higher up to a maximum of twenty eight __ feet. - The maximum building height shall conform to Pitkin County stan- dards. __. - Minimize use of continuous flat planes. Provide variety through step- ping of building faces where possible. - Eave lines to project a minimum of three feet on the downhill sides of _. the building to minimize glass reflection. - Owners are encouraged to establish close visual and design ties between all structures through clustering to minimize impact within -- the Building Envelope and to reduce the potential additional impacks on the wildlife at Sopris Mountain Ranch. 3. Roof Design Visually, the roof is probably the single most important element in overall design. Designs for roofs within Sopris Mountain Ranch shall adhere to the following: - Pitched roofs shall have pitches not less than 6:12 and not greater than 12:12.4:12 roof pitches will be accept- able for attached shed roofs or sec- ondary roof planes. - Roof materials shall include fire retar- dant wood shingles, composition shin- gles. slate, or dark non-reflective metal. 11111111111 ililil IIIII IIIiI IIII1111111 Ill illllllll IIII 4!3234 02/04/19!8 03.36P RMEND CO DpYIS SILVI ~r nn nn 18 of S2 R 361.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO o U ~ 1' 3 ~ w Form, Massing and Roof Example - Roof color values and hues will match the est values in the immediately adjacent landscape. - The following roof types are not permitted in Sopris Mountain Ranch: a. Mansard roofs b. Curved roofs c. Domed roofs - Roof designs should reflect, where possible, the character of the adja- centlandscape (i,e., steep pitched roofs in areas with tall dense [ree stands, or tow pitched roofs in lower valleys, flat grasslands and on ridges). 4. Fxterior Walls and Surfaces -, m. - Allowed exterior materials include painted, stained or natural wood, stucco, stone, shingles, and logs. Additional materials proposed will be reviewed by the Design Committee. - Exterior walls shall match the medium color and values fram. the immediate background landscape. 5. Foundations - Exposed foundations must be masonry, colored concrete, stone, split face block, or stucco. No exposed posts or cross bracing shall be per- mitted, since it tends to be unsightly, especially to neighbors, and pro- vides no visual connection to the ground. 11111111111111111 VIII VIII VIII 111111III 111111 III IIII 413234 02/04/1990 03:38P AMEND t:0 DpVIS SILVY 17 of 62 R 261,00 D 0.00 N 0.00 pITKIN_COUNTY CO t2 r __ 0~00~2 Inappropriate Foundation Treatment Appropriate Foundation Treatment. 6. Chimnevs Flues and Roof Vents - Chimneys must be enclosed in stone, brick or stucco. - Flues and roof vents shall be black if exposed, or enclosed in struc- tures compatible with the building. V. CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS fn order to protect [he wildlife community within Sopris Mountain Ranch and to minimize disturbance and damage, the following guidelines are established for activ- i$es specific to construction. A. The area within the Building Envelope affected by construction shall be fenced during construction with snow fencing or chain Link fencing to avoid Landscape damage outside the envelope. The disturbed/fenced area must be minimized. B. Building materials may be delivered directly to the construction site via existing ranch roads and approved driveways. Construction staging and stor- age of building materials shall take place only within the Building Envelope. -- All staging materials shalt be screened from view from off site, and be stored no further than 300 feet from the construction activity area. C. No firearms or domestic dogs shall be allowed within construction areas. Possession of dogs or firearms on Sopris Mountain Ranch results in a $1,000 fine to the owner/contractor/employee and permanent expulsion of the --- employee from the Ranch. D. A fugitive dust control plan is required for approval by Pitkin County and the Design Committee prior to obtaining building permits or beginning construc- tion. E. Construction activity shall be limited to a period of time commencing at 7:00 a.m. and ending no later than 6:30 p.m. each day, with no construction activi- ty permitted on Sundays. In addition, Sopris Mountain Ranch shall have the ability to limit construction start and end times during critical wildlife sea- sons. F. The speed limit on the Ranch is 25 m.p.h.; traveling in excess of that speed may result in removal from the Ranch. G. Access to the Ranch is available only to workers employed on the site and for travel to and from the job. Absolutely no access is available for persons 11111111111111111 IIIN VIII Illlf 111111 1111111111{11111 41323a 02/04/1998 03:36p fiMENO CO AfiVIS S2LV1 t3 d 0 0 h 3 3 18 of S2 R 261.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 1 not employed on the site; nor is access allowed any employee during evenings or weekends except to accomplish specific tasks at the site. Violation may result in permanent expulsion. H. A road impact fee will be assessed to homeowners and must be paid to the Sopris Mountain Ranch EIomeownets Association with the final plan submit- tal to the DRC. Road impact fees for remodeling will be subject to review by the Design Review Committee. No final plan approval for construction will be granted prior to receipt of road impact fees from the homeowner. 6 Illill Ifllllli111 II{Il IIIII illll Ilflll II{ (11111 fll II{I l0 of 92 R 263.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO t4 ODOU:~ r__ _ T ,-~. Appendix A I I!'~I14"tll ~'I'~I IIII"I'e~'~I'I'll"I~III "VIII I~ II'~ Recouunended Plant List 20 of S~ R 2!3.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PIl'KIN COUNTY e0 Recommended Trees, Shrubs, Ground Cover and Vines The following list of plant materiais is recommeded for use a[ Sopris Mountain Ranch. Deciduous 'f`rees: Botanical Name Common Name: Acer glabrum Rocky Mountain Maple Malus hops Hopa Crabapple Malus "Radiant" Radiant Crabapple Malus "Spring Snow" Spring Snow Crabapple Populus augustifoiia Narrowleaf cottonwood Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen Sorbus aucuparia European Mt. Ash Sorbus scopulorum Native Mt. Ash Evergreen 'Nees: Botanical Name Common Name: Abies lasiocarpa Subatpine fir Junipents osteosporma Utah Juniper Juniperus scopulorum Rocky Mountain juniper Picea engelmanhii Englemann spruce Picea pungens Biue spruce Pinus aristata Bristlecone Pine Pinus contorta I:odgepote Pine Pinus edulis Pinon Pine Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir Shrubs: Botanical Name Common Name: Alnus tenuifolia Mountain Alder Amelanchier alnifolia Serviceberry Artemisia tridentate `Wyomingensis' Native Sage Cercocarpus montanus Mountain mahogany Chrysothamnus nauseosus Rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus spp. Rabbitbrush Cornus stolonifera Redtwig Dogwood Juniperus chinensis `Pfitzerana' PfitzerJuniper is ~Q~~~3 ~, Juniperus Communis Native Juniper .~ Juniperus Sabina `Buffalo' Buffalo Juniper Juniperus Sabina Tamarisafolia' Tam Juniper Lonicera Korolkowii `Zabelli' Zabel's Honeysuckle ~, Potentilla fruticosa Potentilla Prunos bessey Western Sand Cherry Prunus virginiana Chokecherry Quercus gambelii Gambel Oak Rhus glabra asmontana Rocky Mt. Sumac Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant ^^^ Rosa `woodsii' Woods Rose Rosa harisonii Harison's Yellow Rose Rosa rubrifolia Red-leafed Woods Rose "" Rosa rugosa Shrub Rose Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry Spiraea bumalda 'froebel[i' Froebel Spirea "" Symphoricarpos albs Snowberry Syringa vulgaris Lilac Yucca filamentosa Native Yucca Vines: Botanical Name Cammon Name: Humulus sp. Hap vine '" Lycium haiimifolium Matrimonyvine "'" Ground Cover: Botanical Name Common Name: b n "~" Achillea tomentosum nana Wooly yarrow i o '« i= Aethionema spp. Stonecrest ~ N Alyssum montanum Mountain alyssum m~ n Antennariarosea Pussytoes Nm ~~ Arabis alpina ~ Alpine rockcress . .. ~~ ~~° Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikkinnick or Bearberry Armeria maritima Common thruft m ui Cerasdum tomentosum. Snow-in-Summer m$= Dianthus piumarius Cottage pink or Grass pink zg Dianthus spp. Maiden pink ®z Duchesnea indica Mock strawberry m°® Euphorbia spp. Spurge ° O PR! Juniperus horizontalis Creeping juniper i0~ ~ a~ Pertstemon spp. Creeping penstemon =o`~, p AAo ~• C w ~ qH K n~ 16 n t ((~~ QQ iI i F Saponaria octmoides `splenoens' Sedum spp. Sempervivum Teucrium canadese Grasses: ~~ Rock soapwort Stonecrop (sedum) Houseleek American germander Seed mixes and seed rates should be adapted to specific locations and micro-climates. Elevation, aspect, slope, application method and mulching aze critical to successrui revege- tation and selection of grass species and application rates. The following grasses are approved for use at Sopris Mountain Ranch. Botanical Name Agropyron cristatum Agropyron desertorum Agropyron intermedium Agropyron trachycalumm Bromus inermis Dactylis glomerate Festuca ovine duriscula Festuca rubra Lolium multiflorum Lolium perenne Phleum pretense Poa compressa Common Name: Fairway wheat grass Crested wheat grass Intermediate wheat grass Slender wheat grass Smooth brome Bunch Grass Orchard grass Hard fescue Creeping red fescue Annual rye grass Perennial rye grass Timothy Canada blue grass Wildflowers: Some wildflowers that will do well and are often available through seed companies in a variety of mixes are: Botanical Name Aquilegia caerulea Aster alpinus Campanula rotundifolia Chrysanthemum leucanthemum Echinacea purpurea Epitobium augustifolium Geranium viscossissimum Iris missouriensis Linum perenne Lupinus azgenteus Lythrum salicaria i Illill Ilill Iillll illll 11111 llll1111111111 IlIIIII111111 413234 02/04/iliDB 03:38P AMEND CO DAVIS SILYI 22 of S2 R 26'1.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Common Name: Rocky Mt. Columbine Alpine Aster Harebell Oxeye Daisy Purple Coneflower Fireweed Native Geranium Native Iris Blue Flax Native Lupine Purple Loosestrife ®l3lt~~~ 1 Machaeranthera bigetovii Mahonia repens Mertensia ciliata Penstemon strictus Polemonium caeruleum Solidago occidentalis Wyethis amplexicaulis Sticky Aster Mahonia Colorado Bluebells Royal Penstemon Jacob's Ladder Goldenrod Mule's Ears I111111IIIII VIII! VIII Iltll BIII IIIlII8111l1111 II IIII 413234 02/04/1>i9d 03:36P AMEND CO DAYIS SILYI 23 of 32 R 281.00 D 0.00 N 0.0'0 PITKIN t"Ol1NTY 60 ix _ _, ~~~~~~. i - -- -~ ,,-., Agpendex B Approved Fences Sopris Mountain Ranch Type A Fence Y2' minimum center to center i:l7c _ .`.~ . ~ ~_ 6.5"-7.5 a ^t-t Sopris Mountain Ranch 9s Type $ Fence 5' io ~ 9.5' m 5" 10' m ZN ..` ``` 1111111 IIIII 11111111111 Illl! IIIII 111111 ill 1111111 111111 433234 02/04/3998 03:30P RMEND CO DRVIS SILVI 24 of 52 R 263.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO . ,9 00(303 ---- ~ 1 ~. ~ SOPRIS Design Review and Imapct Fee Schedule ,,,~, April 1, 1996 Ail fees within this fee schedule are subject to change by the Sopris Mountain Ranch Design Review Committee. Pre-planning Meeting Review Fee $75.00 ,,,~ Due upon attendance at the pre-planning meeting ,~ Schematic Design Review Fee $150.00 Due with schematic design submittals to the DRC. Final Plan Review Fee $275.00 »~ Due with final plan submittals to the DRC. ~- Road Impact Fee $1,500.00 Due with final plan submittals to the DRC. „~, All review time required of the design coasuitant and not outlined in the Review Process portion of the Sopris Mountain Ranch Design Guidelines shall be Ehe homeowner's expense ahd shall be billed to the homeowner at the rate of $75.00 per hour. ~-* lillll IIIII 111111 IIIII Illll lull INIII II I Illl~rl II I II I 413234 02/04/I0>i8 03:3eP gMENO C0 OAVIS SILV2 ~.., 2S of S2 R 201.00 0'0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN'COUNTY CO ~~®~~kQ~ ,~. .--~, ,-, SOPRIS Schematic Design Review Checklist To be completed by owner and submitted with documents two weeks prior to review with the Design Consultant ^ Completed Schematic Design Review! checklist ^ Certified survey with iwo foot contours _- ^ Floor plans - (1/4" = 1'-0" scale) Elevations of all structures (1/4" = 1'-0" scale) Roof plans (1/4" = 1'-0" scale) 111111 IIIII 111111 IIIII IIIII IIIII 111111 III 1111111 II IIII 433234 02/04/3liY8 03:38P AMEND CO DAVSS SILVI _ 28 of 02 R 263':00'D-0.00`N-0.00"PlTKIN COUNTY CO Exterior finish schedule Site plan with landscape intent including existing topography at a two foot contour interval, proposed grading at a two foot contour interval for all disturbed areas, lim- its of grading, driveway alignment, proposed planting areas, and proposed hardscape areas. (1"=20'-0" scale) ^ Utility line location and detailed revegetation plan ^ Proposed entry gates or signage plan and elevation -- ^ 8"X10", or larger, black and white photos witfi the proposed house and improve- ments superimposed at an accurate scale. -- ^ Review Fee: Please see the attached fee schedule for design review fees associated with schematic design review _ The locations from which the above photos should be taken shall be designated by the Design Consultant at the pre-planning meeting. ®~~~14 A .,. ;w++ SGPRIS To be completed by owner and submitted with documents two weeks prior to review with the Design Consultant Completed Final Plan Review checklist Certified survey with two foot contours Floor plans (1/4" = 1'-0" scale) Elevations of all structures (I/4" = I'-0" scale) Roof plans (1/4" = 1'-0'° scale) ~` ~ l1 I; Exterior finish schedule ~ ~"~~~ ~)~~~'gq/~~I9p8lf~' ~I~I30<11M'1'I~'~I I~~ ~~~'I~''~ I~!I 27 of '32 R 261.00 D'"9.00 N 0.00 PiTKIN COUNTY CO Exterior lighting schedule Construction details and specifications for all architectural and site elements Site grading plan including driveway grading and all proposed grading with spot grades at a two foot contour interval for all disturbed areas (1"=20,_0.. scale) Site layout and materials plan including all hardscape layout (1"=20'-0" scale) Planting plan locating all proposed plants with plant list to include quantity, botani- cal name, and size of all proposed plants (1"=20'-0" scale) imgation plan for all areas to be irrigated (1"=20'-0" scale) Utility line location and detailed revegetation plan Primary structure corners staked on site Review Fee: Please see the attached fee schedule for design review fees associated with 5nal plan review ooaa~~ _ _ . _. . i Final Plan Review Checklist ~, ~: SECOND AMENDMEN'I~ TO DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH This SECOND AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH ("Second Amendment") is ~, entered into by the Lot owner(s) executing same and shah be effective upon its o recordation in the real estate records of Pitkin County, Colorado. "~ C m RECITATIONS A. On the 23rd day of December, 1982, a Declaration Of Protective a m Covenants And Dedication Of Easements For Sopris Mountain Ranch Pitkin County, n Colorado (the "Declaration") was recorded in the real estate records of Pitkin County, a Colorado, in Book 436 at Page 74$. B. The Declaration encumbered and affected the real property described o therein, which real property is commonly known as "Sopris Mountain Ranch." The ~. Declaration has previously been amended by that certain first amendment heretofore recorded in the real estate records of Pitkin County, Colorado. ~ , that it may be amended by in paragraph 9 (b) C. The Declaration provides , , the consent of seventy-froe percent (75%) of owners of the total number of Lots. The recordation of this Second Amendment shall contain the signatures of seventy-five ° percent (75%) of the owners of the total number of the Lou subject to the Declaration. The purpose of this Second Amendment is to ardcufate design guidelines which shall govern the construction of improvements on the Lots located in the Sopris Mountain Ranch subdivision so that all owners (current and future) of Lots shall be bound by the provisions contained therein as hereinafter provided. N i; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the undereakings herein contained, which constitute a good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitations. The above recitations are true and correct. 2. Defined Terms. AIf of the capitalized terms herein contained and_not defined in this Second Amendment shall have the definitions ascribed to them in the Declaration. •^ I c:Mlh~onifial\2nAmm6 I II~III l~lll "I"I Ilill tl~ll III~I II~"~ Ill ~II'I III{ IIII 413234 02/04/1998 03.38P RMEND CO DRYIS SILYI 1 of 62 R 261.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ®~Q~ii~4J .~ 1~ ..... 3. Second Amendment. The Declaration 'rs hereby amended to provide that the design guidelines attached hereto and made a part hereof as Ext-ibit "A" dated April, 1996 (the °Design Guidelines") shalt be binding upon the current and all future owners of any of the Lots subject to the provision of the Dedaration and located in the S®pris Mountain Ranch subdivision. The construction of any improvements on any of the Lots and all other activities required by the Declaration to have the approval of the Design Committee as a condition of such consuvction or activi~ry shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines may be amended from time to time by either the Design Committee or the board of directors of the Association, without the necessity of executing. or recording a further amendment to the Aeclaration. Ali owners (both present and future) of Lou in the Sopris Mountain Ranch subdivision are hereby put on notice of the provisions contained herein relating to the Design Guidelines and are regained to inquire of the Association in order to obtain a current copy of the Design Guidelines. 4. Miscellaneous. a. ding Agrgement. This Second Amendment shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. b. Applicable Laws. This Second Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the caws of the State of Colorado. ,,,, c. Countervarts. This Second Amendment may be executed in severaC counterparts and, after execution and as executed, shall constitute an agreement binding on ald of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart. d. Effect. The Declaration remains in full force and effect except as "" amended herein and previously amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Second Amendment on the day and year first written above. SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES ~A c:1n~Wnmanznaamme I Ifllll Illil illlll NIII1011 Iilli 111111 NI full Ifll IIII P, 433234 02/04/3988'03:36P AMEND CO DpVIS SIL11I / 2 of 32 R 283.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKYN COUNTI' CO ®~ ~ ~ "& /~ T „_ ~:.,. FROM PHONE N0. ~~ Dec. 1 Dt~.xr.~~ea c:u~rri e@ ~ rvHxiv si NsNtiv .u u~H _ •u.za Attachment 7 ,.. _. Connie Nagle do Steven Coxig.•er 417 Mafn Street ~+ Cebondale, CO 81621 17 December ?004 Ms. $u~aae Wolff' °" pith (busty Community l?evelopment 130 9. Galena St. ~-+ As~ea, CO 81511 „~ Doer Ms. tYoiff; This lettra is to eeetify first I, Connie Nagle, owner of PffireI I, 9oprls Mountain 1? nth give Stan Gleason Associates, I.LC anal its sraff ""` with Pitkia Goon re ~ to represent us as discussia~ns ry 8ardiaQ the app&azdoa for a minor emeaclmeat to a developtneat permit sad a '1'Dlt for Parcol 1, Sopris Mountain, Ranch We have i+elained this firm to represent as is the applioaaoa for this project: If you should have nay questions '""' regarding this matter, please ooatagt me. Their coutsct information is as follows: Stan Clawson, AICP, A3LA. Stan Clavson Associates. r t r ,,,, 200 E. Mafia St. Aspen, C0 81611 Tcl(970}9a5-2323 Fax (970)920-1sz8 Very Taxly Pouts, ~. Comps Nagle ~, ®o®o~J~ ~, L Attachment 8 ~- PITKIN COUNTY PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY ~, PROJECT: Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment LOCATION: Parcel 1, Sopris Mountain Ranch PID#246527301001 APPLICANT: Tvlazk Nagle q,,,, REPRESENTATIVE: Steven Conger k DATE: October 8; 2004 PLANNER: Suzanne Wolfl; 920-5093 Type of Applicafion: Minor Amendment to a Development Permit Description of Project/Development: Applicant proposes to relocate the driveway that was approved with the original 1041 and shown on the recorded site plan (Book 36 at Page 47). Land Use Code Section • 3-200-080, Minor Amendment to a Development Permit Review by: Community Development Director Public Hearing? 'NO. Staff will refer to: Engineer TOTAL FEE: $971 (make check payable to "Pitkin County Treasurer") ~" - Planning flat fee: $645 (non-refundable; based on 3 hours of staff time; if staff review time exceeds 3.6 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time in excess of 3 hours at a rate of $215/hour) - Engineer referral fee: $326 .• Staff will refer to: Sopris Mountain Ranch HOA To apply, submit 2 copies of the following information, unless noted otherwise: 1. Summary letter explaining the request and addeessing compliance with the Cote sections listed above and prior approvals. 2. Amended 1041 site plan (guidelines attached) 3. Proof of ownership of subject property +*a 4. Pazcel description, including legal description and vicinity map 5. Total fee for review of the application 6. Signed fee agreement (1 copy -attached) 7. Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the representative (1 copy) 8. Copy of this preapp form (1 copy) NOTES: - ALL MATSS SHALL BE PO~DEDCOPIES OFALL APPLICATIONMATERIALS (IFPOSSIBLE). - Thls pre-application conference summary is advisory in nature and not banding on the County. The information provided In this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's interpretations based upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon a complete review of the application. .~ ~~~~~Z~ `~ WCM - 84 hillcrest drive t: 970.927.4403 po box # 1539 f: 970:921:0777 basalt co 81621 e: wanatch~compuserve.eom ,January 14, 2005 Pitkin County Community Development .130 South Galena St Aspen CO 81612 Re: Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot # 1 (Nagle) Driveway realignment Referral letter. Dear Pitkin County Staff Planner The Homeowners Association has reviewed the application for the driveway realignment for lot #1 Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision and wishes to approve it based upon the following conditions: 1) The drive way must be gated at the existing fence lines in order to provide unbrgken pasture continuity for equestrian or other Ranch activites. 2) The driveway and irrigation ditch realignment must be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the ranch manager. 3~) A cul de sac or other conforming turnaround must be constructed before any gates. If you have any questions regarding this matterplease contact me by phone or at my new email address wcmarch@comcast.net Sincerely William C. Maron RA>vcARR Sopris Mountain Ranch Architect RECElVEC JAnI 14 2005 man a~nyaooairl~ , ~~~?4? S~ ------~- . Bud Eyler, 12:52 PM 2/2/2005 , lle Access Drive revisions Page 1 of 1 Reply-To: <bude@ci.aspen.co.us> From: "Bud Eyler" <bude@ci.aspen.co.us> To: "Suzanne Wolff\(E-mail\)" <suzannew@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Nagle Access Drive revisions Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:52:07 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Suzanne, I have received revised drawing for the above development on Sopris Mt. Ranch. Bill Harding and I have reviewed these changes with the applicants representative and find them acceptable. Bud Printed far Suzanne Wolff <suzannew@co.pitkin.co.us> 2/2/2005 F "A y... ..... _ oooo~ PITKIN COUIv a I' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L~,PARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439 December 23, 2004 Mr. Stan Clauson Stan Clauson Associates, LLC 200 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment (PH) 2465-273-O1-001; Case P227-04) Dear Mr. Clauson: The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application maybe requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly. If you have any questions, please call Suzanne Wolff, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5093 . Sincerely, Janis Taylor Administrative Assistant Q~~~4 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAI2'I'ME~NT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: Sopris Mountain Ranch HOA FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Community Development Departmc;nt RE : Nagle 1041 Hazard Review Amendment (PID 246x-273-O1-001; Case P227-04) DATE: December 23, 2004 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by MarklVagle. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review the application. Please return your comments to me by Friday, January 15, 2005. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEEA OF THEM. Thank you. OOOi'S~ _k , f ~ t C ' "~ ~ r, .~,.. , ~ , P, i ~, , _ ~. Rt7NITY D~ ~E,C~°~IGl"E , DEl~Api';'`~y ° ~~ 130 a 1 South Galen S ,~~,- +~„_+~ '- =~.n rry<~ ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 5526 -:: ,_. ..~ .." T'a~k~in County ; . ~ Land Use: I72 Board ofAdjusfin ~ ~ ~_ 159 ent ,County Land U `~' ~""~` I73 se Code _ Deposit ... " . ~ °" ~~ I74 Flat Fee ~ < , ' t # ~~ . , _ -""~ Zoning and Sign -. h - :w n ..,Axblie Notice '` } ~. h~ Planning Enforcement "` ~'~ 175 ~ ~"~ +saxr.4o-tyr Hearing Of&eer ~~ . Referral Fees: ' ' ~ _..,.•~.,~'~ ~ ; ::. 210 Airport ~' LUCOl County Clerk ^i~~"1 ~,r.. 1 Count ~^~- 194 Y Engineer ~~? r':~~ ~--~-- ' Environmental Health `-"~4' ~ ~ Historic 198 , is Housing " ° ' ~ R 190 Land Management ` 209 Redstone HPC 206 Waldlife `Officer A. -~~'~ °,._' Fees: . ,,,,pk,~,~~„~.~~,BoardofAppeal s I ~,1~Bnilding Codc Sales ~" B [ ~ ~ ~`' ~ . uilding Permit ~ " -~_ '~""',`" 1~ Contractor License- ~ ~'~"~ ~'"'" „«i~,: ( , , 120 Electrical P "" "'"~°1 ermit f 185 Energy Code Re te ~" ^' y w ll5 _ Meehan„ical Per "' mit 150 Plan Check , - --, ~"~"i _ 110 Plumbing permit ~~ .fi "~~`a "" .~.."~i"; 1 130 . Refnspection' . .~ ~ ""~""~ '"'` f 151 ASpen Sanitation . .:. .'=rva,e "'".., 152 AVFD Fire Marsdi -.;~ay al - 158 ~ BFD Fire Marshal ~ ~ ~-`- ~ ~ ~ Other Fees: --- -. "' . :_, 155 Use Tax , I65 COPY _ ... ..,..~. PZ005 Master Plan C -~-- ,. ~ ; opy performance De _~ posit ' 185 Park Dedication " r 1S6 Parking Cash in r.rP„ '~ OTAL ~f i /~ ~~ %~ ~ \ ~~ \J ~~ i i i / ~, ,- '~ . i I \ /~ `~ '~~ \ //. ~~. `~ -~~.Q, '~~~ .j;: ,, a4 l i i ~ i / ~ / ~ \ / ~ ~ / / ~ /~ .~ ~ ~ .y i'\ i ~ i i ~.. !~ ~ ~~/~ ~~ ,,~-' ~ ~~ g~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .$ i~ ,~ ,. ,~ ~~ .... .... 1. .. .......... ..w ~ ~ n~ ~ ~'~R ~~ . i ~F, '' ,% ,, .. "t ~a F i i e'. ~i <°) z' ~ =.I I° -- - I-- A~+ ~`"~" /~, ~ $~~~ ~ ~ ~ / ~~~ ~ '~ / ~ a i ,"` _ ~' ~ ~ g ~ ~ X ` V ~ ~ ,, \ \ ~ ea i I I i I i i ~~ ~, :~ ~~ I° I ' 0 3 -'~i I ,` ~ , ,, ~ ~ ~"^ , J I I I I ~ i _~ ;, --~ ~"' / ~ '/ ~~ ,-_ \~ ~~ / -' _ / ~~ _~ "`-~/ ~Q ~ i / ~ \ / _ / ~ i ._ _- __ _____ ~- ... .. I / ~-' ~ I. ~i /~ f / ' / ' / ~. _ _ ..____~ / /, ~ i~i ' ________~_, ~//~/i ~ % % /% ~: ///. 111 /f / / i' ~ J / ~ ~ I I /~ / ~. ~ ' I I I I e.t~ ~ ~ i l _, I _ _ / / / / ~// ~l l I I l ~ - VI S/ lam' _/ / / l :~ ~ II/~ I ~ I ! / l ~ _ i '~ ~/ ) _ ~ ~ ~/ ~ , r i ~ ~, ~'' I ~. '.~t~ + ~~~ al~~ta 8~" ~~ I, 3 ,i I r ~~~~~~ q a d ~4 / ,~ /~/ _ / i !~ ~ i i' % I ~ i ,~ / ~ ~ ,- ~- ' ,. / .- ~,, - /;/ .~, ~~ -; ~ ;~/ / %/~: .~ ~" / ~ ~'" ~ y ~,; ' i '~/~ i ,, e' y~ ~~ p '' ~ ~ ~ _ _. __ . ~ ~~ g m ~~ ~~ _ . ,. ' ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ,~ i ,'~' r ' t~' ~'~~ ~~ i ~i t. ~r ~ ~~~ .Fi,~ / / / ' i / ~'"~ '~~ ,, , , ~ a ;: ~~ ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ / ^J ~s - - ~~ s~'ii --~ ~ ~~ ire '^~ F/ ~ ' ~ / i ,, a ,_~- <r ~ ~~ s,. J~.. i l ! '/ // d ~ ~l-~ ~ /tea`/i i /' /~ f q ! '/ /~ , ' :r ,- p /p // '}Sypy~h Zaq j4 S~ ~ ~ ~ { J 3@ ~ Vi Y~g 44i ~tl ¢ tlpp a a ~.i ' ~ ~/ ~'' 600 W~ ~ 6v 3av ~ #s §o It `k ji ~:epp t ~d e .« r.g SS 3 §Ig§~-gat FS Eq o~~la '~'.'3 ~,~' R_'-8 a~ ~i 11 s 8 Y §~ ~;J :.;,:7 v~ i I ~ ,. pin. .. ..... /~ // ./ ~~!i ~~ ~ ~ s~~~~k~ ~ a ,. ~, ~' ~~ i Vic: a L. ~ ~-~~ ~ , ~~ r ^~~~ ~~~ < ~ ~~ '~ ~ '.5' i i r- ~ F _ e I ~~~ „' -- i~ i ~ - .~ ~ ~ ~ _ - _ __ _ I ~ / _ ( i ..._ ..T~~..: "% // _ i _~~_ ~ .,_ F a~ ~ o l ~ ~ ~~ G ,: ~,: :~ ~g, ~~ -~ t -- ~ ` ~ ~ f -- ~ __-- - 1 ~. ./.~ a ~- / m,r , ~, -- _ _ _- _ __ ~~ i ~ ~ ~~ -- ~ . ~ st f x ~ ~' ~~ .,.,.. ~ ~ r~ ~__- r ~. ~`I` , _ ~ „< 5 y ~ _.- r ~~ ~ } +' 1_"-~-~~ mow' A ~ l° ~- /'"';r ~~_ ~/~ "' - i ,-F ~' ^~ ~ - ~ ti ~ , ate' ,' ~~ ~~~ „ , -: ~ ~, -u ~ ' ~ ~= ~ p. ~ ~,yq: ~ ~ ".. . ~ v KS ~I~3 AI ~~c g~° ~~ i n I~c t ~ ~_ ~ygV`Y / ~88Q o S ~~ ~t~ ~~$ ~ ~ ~p~ r a~ ~~~ ! ~ ~~ ~~ ~}§ 'Y~`. ,~ b3 x ~ Y ,~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ry;~ ~: ~ ~~ ~:~ ~-, J O O Parcel .0? 0 LINES IN SPACE LAMP SUAVOYS t 4 1 I'll I'll I . , I �' I "I I'll, 11� w ( ill � I ql!' I NAGI ILdE 1041 HAZARD p"m *w IV as ^sa .0 COUN Ty 0 00' $0 I C OV le eellee leloe Rafzz�l"A(40 -e)v v4w lie 01pe 9 0.410 , 0 6 40, 6 N) e4 ce4r4ly S 47)? 4v RAT VeZ OAe OIJ9 "*f ""00,00 IV DVS s� �4 (ZIRKeWaf 1' ON` VeZ 0^e . .. . .... 11 Av r C e I Y�'w T -i TE P 1. 1 - wL— E - 4� THIS $11E PLAN AMENDS fill" ORIGINAL SIFF PLAN RECORDED IN PLAT B06K 36 AT PAGE 4'7. AND 1HIE F1f,)RPO$E Of THE AMENDMENT IS To ESTABLI Sfd A DRIVEWAY ENVELOPE', "s, A PARCEL Of, LAND BE I NG PART` OF I RAC F 75 AND I. OCA-up I N SKI I ON 2✓ . TOWNS1,11P 8 souTFI, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE O t h PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PIJKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, SAID PARCEL. BEING MORL PAR 11CULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING Al ANGLE POINT NO. I OF SAID IRACr 75: fffENCE 8 88049'30"W 102, 1;3 F[ :,ET ALONG LINE 1--2 OF SAID IRACT 75 TO A POINI ON IHE SOUTHEJ"4.Y RI Cal -0 -OF WAY LINE OF A 60 1,"OOT WIDE COUNTY ROAD AS BUILT AND IN PIACE; THENCE,� 5 59020*w 0✓4.10 FE ,ET ALONG, SAID SOU'lHERLY RIGHI-01:�-WAY LINE: ]HENCE SoUTI,I IOQ51 OF SA.13 FEET: THENCE N 76008'(- 91549 FEE.[ TO A PO NT ON LINE 6-ID TRACT 75: I'l-IENCE N 00" 115'02"W 1825.73 FEET ALONG I INI 6-1 OF SAID TRACT 75 TO TFiE POINT OF BEGINNIN0, CONTAINING 36�95 ACRE1,3 MORE OR LESS, i k€ 104 1 ENV I RONMEN [AL HAZARD AREAS EXI 51 THAf MICH I- AFFEC I IIIIE PROPER I Y , ANY I MPROVFMENTS, AND I HE USE AND OCCUPANCY rfl[,��Rf:OF IIJE PROVISIONS 01, Il'ILSE REOULAT IONS DO NOT IN ANY WAY ASSURE OR IMI)[,.y IHAf AREAS OUISIDF-,, OF IDt:,SI GNATS D HAZARD AREAS WILL. BE F R E E P R HAZARDS. 0 R THAT APPROVE WILL GUARANTEE T,IL' 5ANVIY OF ANY PROIPERTY OWNER OWNER MAR AGI r C 0 ImIm V E L 0 P M E N T IRE T P C OR PR�OVA AMENDLI) 1041 HAZARD REVIEW SITE I'l-AN FOR NA(3LE HAS BEEN REVIEWE.J) AND APPROVE.[) BY 'I'- H 151 HE D PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNI'ry EVELOPMEN- DIRI CIOR A, DAY Ol' -W APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDED 10-11 HAZARD RI 'V w SITE MAN IS SUB:��, T�RMS AND (X)NDITIONS 01' ADNAINIST'RAT,vic bki�,,to NO, 06-2005 RIF.CORDFI) AS REC '�PTION NO, 50678� IN' D-11' I 11K I N (',OUN'Y'Q,'C'R K AND `RLCORX R'S OFF I'C[,:* I 11 0141K. pZZ-1 -04 4w pwloO I D"k Z4 l05 - 1-13 - 0t - ()( )/ A C C E PT A N CEq, 4r;'1'i,'C0RD1NQ- IHIS AMf,-NDED 1041 HAZARD RE VIEW SITE PI AN HAS) BI N ACC, UPf[j) [:Oft I-11 IN(3 !N [111 OF ICI OF CL FR -' "OR, ER OF P I T K I N COUN T Y (';OF K A N 1) R I, C Of d 0 R A 1) 0 ON I I S DAY A i. ?. 2 0 OA 'jL-'A � ........... IN PI AT BOOK . ..... I PAGIZ NO AS R 1," CE P I 10 N 6/10/20 6 of 2 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ill 1111111111111 12:451 LVIA OPTCO 0.00 EVUEMA "Y'LINIESIN �14r'[T ...... . .... .. ........ 5 Y DM, Y VII: `:- LIMA. AI II . ..... .... .. .... ... ....