Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.246532301001 (4)_.. _,. .___ DOCI7IV~ENT LAYOUT THIS FILE LISTED B OW Il`T THE OLLOWING ORDER RMATION Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance four the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice,. Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (llxl'~ ~..~ RESOI:T7TION COt7NT~', C`OI;QR 12esotntionNo. jtjQ-2003 RECTTALS IIII 494593 P®~: 1 or a 02!17/2004 03:25P 0:00 D 0:00 1. Candace Resnick ("Applicant"} has applied to the Pitkin County Boazd of County Commissioners ("BOCC"} to amend a condition of approval far Lot A of the subdivision in order to allow the option of building on-site affordable housing rather than mitigating by paying a Gastrin -lieu fee. 2. The property is located at 5353 West $opris Creek Road: 3. The Lot is zoned RS-30 and is 31 acres in size. 4. The Planning anal Zoning Commissioq recorninended denial of the request on June 3, 20'03, by a vote of 4-l. 5. TI1e SOCC considered the application at duly noticed public hearings on July 23, 2003, and December 17, 2003. 6. The BOCC finds that the application is generally consistent with the applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOI'.VED by the BOCC that it does hereby grant approval of a major amendment to a development permit for Lot A of the Resnick Subdivision, subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be'binding on all successors in interest: i. The Applicant shall adhere to all representations made in the application and in public meetings. 2. Condition #r'1 of BOCC Resolution No 95 186_ is amended to read `Prior to, or at building permit ,. SAP ~. _. -. p y ` PP submission for a free market umt on Lot A the hcant'shalt`` a the a livable cash-in-lieu fee for one Category-1 employee or steal! provide on-sete affordable housing mifigation subject to all Land Use Code and Housing Guideline, provisions in effect at that time. If the Applicant chooses the cash-in-lieu, option, and if the fee is paid in full by December 31 2005 the fee will be $234,08'7. In order to take advantage of this "frozen" fee; one half of the fee shall be paid by December 31, 2064, and the remainder by December 31, 2005. If the fee is not paid in fuII by December 31, 2005, the cash-in-lieu fee shale be as required by the AspenlPitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines at the time it is paid. a- I ~ •-f~4 ~i`t fir: s.~& r.~ '~ C. r~ ~i: Resolution No.~~-2D03 I I~lIII ~III1 IIIII~ Ilfl IIIII l~l~l III I'I III I~ III ~ 0 94583 20a:2s ~, ' ' Page 2 ( II I` ~I I ~ p SFLVIRDFlVFSPFTKIN COUNTY CO R 000 D 9.00 If the Applicant opts to build an on-site deed restrFCted affordable housing dwelling unit, the unit shall be constructed and deed restricted az the Category-1 or Cazegory 2 level prior to any occupancy of the free market house: "I`Fie Applicant shatI in additio .r+t - dne half the required fee for a, Cate ~ ~ pay a'castrin-lieu fee equal to ,.. bony-2 unit. The fee must be paid at the time of building permit ?$suance for the free market unit. If a complete building permit for the deed restricted unit is submitted by December 31, 2045, the cash in lieu fee will be $97,927. If the fee is not paid by December 31; 2005, it shall be as required by the Aspen/Ptkn County Affordable I#~~using Guidelines at the time it is paid. 3 cfaretake punit (CDil) on tthe aiparcele deed: restricted unit, the Applicant forfeits the right to apply for a June, 20030TICE OF PUBLIC 1~EARING P't7BT;ISI~D FIl Tfi`e Astien Times Weekly on tfie 21st day of APPROVED AND .q,DppTED on the l7th day of December, 2003. BOARD OF COUNTY' CO'MAZfSSTONERS OF PTfHIN COi!:TN`f~, CO~,OIfAiiO . BY k~,.f~s ~ ~~ < ATTEST:, ?°^r.~;-;d, C a r % / ~~A( . / Jeanette Jones Dep(~ty County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORMa APPROVED AS'TO CONTENT: John El ~'-~_ ~- ~ ~ m C dy Houben, ttomey Communi I)evelo tY pment Director Case #028-03 PID #246532307001002` ""` Lancec/cases/7tesnick reso2.doc ~~~ . , ~ ,~..- ,,r - j:.. AGEND A ITEM SUMMAI2'' TO: Board of Co-~u~nt~~y Commissioners FROM: Lance ClarCe(~,-Assistant Director Community Development Department RE: Resnick Subdivision Major Amendment to Development Permit, Request for Reconsideration DATE: January 14, 2004 REQUEST: The Applicant proposes to amend a condition of approval for Lot A of the Resnick Subdivisioyt related to required affordable housing mitigation to allow mitigation ou site rather than cashin- lieu payment. APPLICANT: Candace Resnick, Owner LOCATION: Lot A, Resnick Subdivision, 5353 West Sopris Creek Road (near Dinkle Lake turnoff) ZONING: RS-30, Lot Size, 31 acres.. ACCESS: Legal access is provided via West Sopris Creek Road. BACKGROUND: On December 17, 2003, the Board approved by a 3-1 vote (Roy opposed) an amendme~rt for Ms. Resnick that provided optidns for providing the required housing mitigation for Lot A of the Resnic$ Subdivision. Ms. Resnick is asking that the Board determination be "reconsidered"; specifically as it relates to the requirement that if housingis`built on site it be CategoFy 1 or 2. Ms. Resnick would Like the option of Category 3. The Board mast take a vote ou whether or oot tq "reconsider" a matter. A motion to reconsider can only be made by someone who voted on the prevailing side in the original decision. ATTACHMENTS A. Resnick Request for Reconsideration 1 ancec/cases/resnickboccmemo3. doc Request for Continuation of RESNICK SUBDIVISION LOT A APPLICATION FOR MAJORIMII~lOR AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. To the. Board of County Commisioners: Attention: Jack Hatfield As you will recall, at the DecV 17, 2003 meeting. of the board, several. of the. issues an the docket took up mare time than anticipated, resulting in a very lengthy meetin.~ which. was. cut. short becaiue 2 of the commissioners. had prior social commitments. I felt at the time that. it was very rushed, particularly in light of Commissioner Roy's parting comment about Category 3 hoasirig. Oii her advice, I would like to appear one lasf time before the board to request that rYay amendment be written to allow tine option to build either a Category Y, 2 or 3 Unit. If possible, I would like to be put on the schedule for your San. 14, 2004 meeting to wrap this matter up. Thank you in advance for your tone and attention. Sincerely, ~~ ~---._ Candace Resnick AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners e FROM: Lance Cl~e, Assistant Director Community Development Deparhnent RE: Resnick Subdivision Major Amendment to Development 1?ermit, Continued Public H, eating DATE: December 17, 2003 ., „,., . , .tiw;,s ., ,aai'n V~4ti ~ w,.b ...wv~x rea:a~ ~.w.m. se.u-.. REQUEST: The Applicant proposes to amend a condition of approval for Lot A of the Resnick q ' g g g on site rather than cashin- Subdivisionrelated to re uired affordable housm mdi ation to allow m}ti anon lieu payment. APPLICANT: Candace Resnick, Owner LOCATIQPT: Lot A, Resnick Subdivision, 5353 West„Sopris Creek Road (near Dinkle Lake turnoff) ZONING:' RS 30, Lot Size, 3I acres. ACCESS: Legal access is provided via West Sopris Creek Road. BACKGROUND: The item was reviewed, by the P&Z on Tune 3, 2003, and the P&Z recommended denial y j 'Ty q 'g p t setting and that it was a b a 4-1 vote. A ma on of the P&Z felt that this re uest mi ht be receden fi»an, an a land r, It that affordable, housing should be built exclusively cial issue rather th ise issue. Some also fe in the UGB rattier than rural areas. The BOCC considered the application on July 23, 2003, and continued it to allow the Applicant to respond to some innovative ideas discussed at the meeting. I have attached the minutes from that meeting. Some of the ideas that came out of that meeting were that perhaps an arrangement could be made for paying the cash in- lieu fee over time; the unit, ifbuilt oh site, could be a Category I or 2, but that then Half the cashin-lieu fee would be required to be paid; if the unit were built Qn site there would be ono future availability for a CDLJ on the parcel; any condominium documents would have to he, approved by the County. The Applicant has listed her understanding of what the Board, was requesting (attached) and Staff has prepared proposed amended resolution language incorporating the Board's direction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BOCC adopt a motion "to approve the Major ...., Amendment to a Development Permit for Lot A of the Resnick Subdivision to change the condition reAted to required' affordable housing mitigation, subject to the attached resolution, which shall nm with the land and be binding on all successors in interest " ... i... i i ATTACHMENTS A. Draft Resolution of Approval B. Mimrfes of July 23, 2003 C. Resnick AmendedProposal 1 ancec/cases/resn ickboccm emo2.doc 2 AGENDA TTEM SiTMMA12Y TO: Board of Count((y~~,,Commssioners FROM: Lance Clarl~i~ssistant Director Community Development Department RE: Resnick Subdivision Major Amendment to Development Permit d DATE: July 23, 2003 - . -. =aMx .. o-.arn. ~ *ta~;~ r + u., x;y .~., ., »» nw.vr N.e xroma..~s1 ."~_~ ,.d- ~ s. , ."s:«;~,: :. :_ _ r i REQITE$T; The Applicant proposes to amend a condition of approval for Lot A of the Resnick o required affordable hou'si}g mitigation to allow mitigation on site rather than cashn- Subdivisionrelated t, lieu payment. APPLICANT: Candace Resnick, Owner LOCATION:. Lot A, Resnick Subdivision, 5353 West 5opris Creek Road (nearDinkle Lake turnoff) ZONING: RS-30, Lot Size, 31 acres. ACCESS: Legal access is provided via. West Sopris Creek Road. BACKGROUND: Staff has recommended approval of the request (see attached memo to P&Z). The item ._»..~ . , was reviewed by the P&Z on June 3, 2003, and the P&z'iecdmmended denial by a 41 vote. Minutes are not yet available from that meeting. A majority of the P&Z, felt that this request might be precedent setting and that it was a financial issue rather than a laixl use issue. Some also felt that affordable housing should be built in the UGB rather than rural areas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff continues to recort Major Amendment to a Development Permit for Lc to approve the g g _ Y PP> .~. ..a__.~ affordable liousin miti ation to be satisfied b the a licable cash-m lieu fee or by providing the required housing on site, subject to the attached resolutipn, which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest. ~y2 ~ ~j Y ATTACHMENTS A. Resolution of Approval B. J'&Z memo C. Past Resolutions lancec/cases/resn ickboccmemo.doc .,... ii=, m.n~..a..n+exasw m~.«,arY n+sss4.nrh:9~&3:e WS,p1;y{{,uyq."~'' 'p'; ~~,~,~d4f~'~s^.,a"~S~~n?:'•• TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Lance Clarl~;7assistant Director Community Development Department RE: Resnick Subdivision Major Amendment to Development Permit DATE: June 3,.2003 REQUEST: The Applicant proposes to amend a condition of approval forLot A of the Resnick Subdivision related to required affordable Housing mitigation. APPLICANT: Candace Resnick, Owner LOCATION: Lot A, Resnick Subdivision, 5353 West Sopris CreelCRoad (near Dinkle Lake turnoff) ZONIlVG: RS-3Q Lot Size, 3l acres. ACCESS: Legal access is provided via West Sopris Creek Road BACKGROtiND: Resnick Subdivision: The Resnick Subdivision contains two 31 acre lots created from a 62 acre parcel. The subdivision was approved in 1992 and the development right for the "new" lot was created through an allocation as a result of the ] 991 Non-Metro Residential Growth Management System competition. Lot T3 contained a residence and outbuildings at the time of the subdivision. Lot A is the lot that received the Growth Management allocation through the GMQS competition. It is still undeveloped. Affordable Housing Mitigation: The subdivision /growth management approvals required the Applicant to mitigate for one full-time Category -I employee. `The approvals specifically state that the Applicant is to pays cash-in-lieu fee for aCategory -1 employee at the time of building permit for Lot A. At the time of the approvals this fee would have been $35,000. Today it is $234,087. The Applicant is seeking to amend this approva(to allow the option of acash-in-lieu fee or providing the required housing on site. Such change would constitute a major amendment to a development permit"which is a two-step process. REFERRAL COMMENTS were received from Housing, Environmental l-Iealth, Zoning, and Sopris Mountain Ranch (this subdivision is not part of Sopris Mountain stanch). STAFF COM111ENT5/ ANALYSIS: There are no specific standards in the Land Use Code for a major amendment to a development permit. The Applicant was asked to respond tothe standards for a minor amendment to a development permit. A) The amendment must not change the use of the development between residential, commercial, or tourist use. There is no change of residential use. B) The amendment must not constitute a new land development activity. An additional unit would be created on ,rfte, but the essetztial land development activity remains residezitial, and the Code allows for the addaton of a deed restricted unit. The proposed unit would nn{be more impactive than a CbUon the site. C) The proposed activity is not to change the basic character, increase impacts or affordable housing needs, endanger the a'~ , ~$ public, violate Codes, increase infrastructure needs, increase floor area by more than 2%, decrease open space by more than 3%. Staff feels the basic character of the area would not change, road impacts would be mildly impacted the public would not be endangered, Codes would not be violated jZoor area and open spacewould not be affected: The neighboring Sopris Mountain hanch Homeowners have objected, primarzly bused on'irnpacts to the area. The Land Use Code allows a Density Bonus for Deed Restricted Category 1-4 Sale Housing T.ocated " p -the greater of one O ditional dwelling un't tithe totall num5er of unz"ts necessary fortany required mitigation - to be exempted from Growth Management onany lot or parcel outside the AH zone districts, subject to special review and consideration of the Citizen Housing Plan, even if the resulting development on the lot or parcel would not conform with the underCying zone district's minimum parcel size for each dwelling unit. A special review use A.) must be consistent with: 1. The applicable County Master Plan; 2. County Land Use Policies in Article 2; 3. The intent of the Zone'District in which it is proposed to be located; and 4. The character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response:. The applicable master plan is the Down Valley Comprehensive Plan. The DVCP does not specifically deal with the issue of location of regttir'ed mitigation housing. It does speak to preset-Jing the rural character in the areas outside the metro area. Required mitigation housing has been allowed in rural areas in the past. It does not seem that one Categoi y -I unit on a 31 acre lot iii the rural area would significantly compromise rur°al character. The majority of the Land Use Policies in Article 2 of the Code are not applicable to this application, with the following exceptions: • 2-60, Compatibility with Existing Adjacent Neighborhoods: There have been concerns expressed by neighboring Sopris Mountain Ranch that the increased density will have unwanted impacts and perhaps set a dangerous precedent for increased densities. One Categorv -1 unit would not be unlike a CDU, which could be considered on any lot in the County. • 2-190, Impacts on Road System: An additional unit will generate additional traffic. The increased impact is not significant The BOCC has recently been engaged in discussions about Land use policies. With regard to appropriate locations for affordable housing, they'have generally agreed that the Urban Growth Boundary is the proper location for development, including AH development with four exceptions: 1) EDUs and CDUs; 2) Job related on-site housing; 3) Conversion of existing locally servnng housing; and 4) On-site required mitigation housing. The Aplilicant's proposal would constitute on-site required mitigation,housing. . ~}._ta The zone disirict N~ould allow a CDUby special review. brie category-7 unit would be similar in impact and shoz~ld not unduly negatively affect the character of the area. B.)The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed special review use must be in harmony with the surrounding area and minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Response: One category- 1 unit would create minimal adverse affects on szrrounding properties C,.)There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve the special review use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fare protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. Response: There. are adequate public facilities. D:)An application for a special review use';must demonstrate to the Board of County Commissioners that the proposed development will not: l . Materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare; and ?. Substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting property. Response; The proposed unit shottld not endanger the public health or injure surrounding property values. The Citizen Housing Plan states that development of citizen housing ispreferred in, metro areas/CTGBs, near employment centers, near public mass transit, and in areas where sprawl will not be promoted by its development. Response: This proposed unit is not in a UGB, or near employment centers or mass transit. It would not, however, promote sprawl, and it does offer the opportunity for a high quality of life, which is another criterion of the Plan. The BOCCin its discussions about locations of affordable housing (mentioned earlier) has expressed the desire that there be some limited opportunities in the County for deed restricted living that is diffei•e'zzt from the norm of multi family stt°uctures in the metro areas. This is evidenced by their calling out four types of non -metro AH development that shozald be considered The A licanf's ro 0 pp p p sal would be consistent with this policy, as it is on-site required mitigation housing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commissionrecommend approval to the BOCC of the Major Amendment to a Development Permit for Lot A of the Resnick Sii$division to allow`the'requied affordable 6ousintr mni ation to be satisfied ti "the a 1 a ~ g y pp icable cash-in-lieu fee or by providing the required ` housing on site, subject to the following condition, which'shall'run wih the land and`lie"binding'ori`ah successors in interest: 1. At building permit submission for a free market unit on Lot A, fhe Applioant shall pay the applicable' cash-in -lieu fee for one Category-1 employee or shall provide required on-site affordable housing mitigation'subject to all Land Lfse Code and Housing Guideline provisions in' effect at that time. "~ ,~ .. _ ., , ATTACHMENTS A. Housing Referral B. Read-Jaffrey Letter C. Clasen Letter D. Resnick Letter E. Application 4 APR. 14.2003 2~51PM ASPEN NOUSI'N6 0FC ' MEMORANDU1Vl 'm: srian Melvollis, Comsn+usity Dovelopa+ant FItoM;; Cindy Christaasen, Housing t')Pflce 18ATE: April l t, 2A03 ` N0.978 P.1 i 4 r ". 2... ,.~ erc ..: .~ en ~.. .v.. 18E: RESIVIQCMAJOR/Mll`iORAMLNllMlrN"i iVA171SVlSLVi'MUl~rrluuvui PsrcellUNo.246S•323-01-00/002,~ase#~02~~~3~ f '~. _ :. ,-~._ ~ ~ .,,:- ~ . ,. , ~h u. _, .,: ... _,: s , r a 34-yearresiaent fee. The ootulitioi The applicant is re At not. allow forany rental omployee case. The applioant states that she is unitinstead of provide a ca~hin-lieu f tiga~on ~ feo owed would be $234,0$7. A Category 1 studio'', unit would also satisfy the mi uiYesnau under the Citiidelines. REC01-iMENDATI01-Tt " Should the BOCC agree to the above proposal, Housing would recoms~lettd four addi$onsl caaditioasa a 7. To iitrther rogulate the rend rata of tho deed-restricted unit, 1/10th of 1% ownership shad be deeded tD tix Noising Authority. 8. A deed ;catriction for the speafl4c unit shall be recorded with all oondidons slated and agreed upon by the owner and the Aspen/Pitidn County Housing Authority prior to aqy furtberdcvelopment _....,,_ _ .., . ~,:, ~ , _.,. 9. The govctsattg dooumenta shaD be roviewed by the Aspen/Pitiari CountyHousing Authority to assure that sot lart"h~in 41is A"ffor`dable 'Housiiigt3uidelina~;ia no way conflict with any roguTagone 10.,At any time any owner would wane to lifttbe dead restriction $pm th®uuit, th®payment-ia- hen fee of one 1"F'TE shall be satisfied in a?ccordance a S~eo-st8nding frea~market at that time mid tha3ahould the deed-reatrkted unit rbmaiti aswitix the C3}udelmes in efTect unit, that additional mitigation would be iequired for that spcci$c wait. 9 -. Manager: Greg Hunt 3708 W. Sopris Creek Rd. Basalt, CO 81621 Phone /Fax: 970-927-9826 Email: smranchCurof.net March 31, 2003 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH Brian McNellis Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 Accountant: Gay Lewls 1802 County Road 102 Carbondale, CO 81623 970-963-3653 (Days Only) Fax:970-963-4631 Email: somedayCarof.net RE: Resnick Major/Minor Amendment to a Development Permit PID# 2465-323-O1-001/002 CASE# P028-03 Deaz Mr. McNellis: As president of the Sopris Mountain Homeowner's Association, I represent the 42 homeowners of Sopris Mountain Ranch and, as such, we are strongly opposed to the above request for'furthei development of the Resnick property for the following reasons: :,,.~ ,. .. ire .._~~.•_. _. .,,6~ ,. .„ ~~ ~~:_ 1. There is already a rental or care-takers unit in the Main House on one of the parcels. Selling a unit on the Second Lot, condominium or not, is the equivalent to subdividing the lot. Now there are two families on each of the 31 acre lots where the zoning is for one family on each 30 acre lot. 3. Some of the homeowners on this Ranch were denied an unattached guest house and this was only for minimal occupancy. 4. Neither of the Resnick. lots,. have adequate access for trash pick-up. 5. There is no information on the size or price of the proposed new unit. 6. Road impact is a concern as we already are at the end of the Pitkin County list to resurface the West Sopris Creek Road in spite of the fact that Pitkin County tore up some of the paving that the homeowners of Sopris Mountain Ranch co-opted in paying for (this pavement was tom up in error and then ;...:,: neverr'eplaced).. _ ,,.:. ,; _. M. ,., ...._.:.:.. T ~-~/ 7. We are very concerned about the impact on wildlife in this area, especially the elk population which, due to development on the Crown Mountain side of West Sopris Creek, has had a major reduction in its available feed/migration areas. p y q y der consideration when making a I res ectfull re uest that our take alH this concerns un decision as to whether or not to grant the Resnick's this development request. Sincerely yours, ~j~., Sandra Read-Jaffrey lJ " President, SMRHA Brian McNeelis 130 So, Galena St. Pitkin County Planning Department Aspen, CO 81621 March 31, 2003 Deaz Brian,'. $ y $ B_,_ g Y y fo man ti ears and rest a tetliem as ne mborsh. I3o vevier~ after Dora discttsston and re have known the Resnick's Y Y P ~ ev~ew of the: Ttesluck's application; I am concerned this coo„1d set a dangerous precedent. My fatintty was d°emed tfie"sametling years ago and zoning was altered to eliminate thts sort of thmg at that time. The reason stated was that it`would add increased dens and additionp road traffic to tfiircs azeapwhpl~was dee' y County as undesirable. Tn ` med t, ' th8' fact, the Coun tore out achi -sealed roact'ff`i'at we he9` ed a `for to ~noe tome their point that this. should remain a rural and remote area. ' ` The Sopris $Qountain Ranch Homeowner's Assoctation, which governs where we live, has since worked with the County to reduce density. The 54 original lots"here haee been reduced to 41` wit7t a laige~ainount ofthose lots dedicated as conservancy lots. This application sets an entirely different tone and in my opinion could leave the door open to others in this azea to`apply for additional units in the, future', We believe Candy should pay her fee when her lot sells rather than what is proposed. This sort of thing serves no desirable' purpose for this remote area other than to serrie the Resnic~:§. ` Sincerely Norm and Laura Clasen 160 Spring Creek Road Basalt, CO 81621 970-927-3043 .~ j~ . „ v ~. w:_ .. , _ .x ...n. o 'L:. .u.. . .m- ,,. ~.. - ~ ~ T, . ~ k~, . _. ~ ~ _w ~ ..~~,~ ~~_~ .~ ,~ ~r . M :~ ~ ~,~- r,, ~, May I5, 2003 Sandra Read-Jaffrey President, SMRI-IA 0607 W. Greenfields Basalt, CO 8`1621 _„ RE: `Resnick Major/Minor Amendment to a Development Permit PID# 2465 323-O1-001/002 CADE# P028-03 Dear Sandra I atn writing this iri response to your letter dated, March 31, 2003, which you'put to the attention of Brian McNellis of the Ptkin Co. Community Development Dept. I will be sending a copy of this communication to Brian as well as to Norm and Laura Clausen who also wrote a letter of concern to Brian regarding my application for a deed restricted employee housing unit. It is my intention to clarify some possible misconceptions held by a few of the ranch residents and to reiterate several of the points that you and I discussed in our recent,phone conversation. I am asking, in my application, for permission to substitute my right to build a caretaker unit (which is already granted by my subdivision conditions and my 1041 approval) for the right to build a deed restricted employee housing unit on my 31 acre lot known as Lot A of the Resnick Subdivision. In essence, if I were to build a main dwelting umt there, as well as a caretaker unit, there would be two families living on the property. Building an employee housing unit INSTEAD of the caretaker unit will not increase the density on the lot. The existence of a care taker unit attached to my residence located on the other 31 acre parcel known as Lot B of the Resnick Subdivision is a separate issue, in that it is a legally permitted use, and is irrelevant to my current request. The fact that some of the homeowners on the Ranch were denied an unattached guest house in the past is, in my view, also irrelevant. The Ranch was never required to go through the Pitkin County subdivision process in the first place due to the fact that there was enough acreage to divide into 35 acre parcels automatically. The two situations are entirely different and trying to draw parallels is like comparing apples and oranges. In res onse to our concern about tras P y h pick up, we haul our own garbage to the dump,now and will continue to do so in the future until such time as Lost Basin Ranch is developed to the point that a commercial company will come further up the road to service us and them. I wish to thank you for having allowed us the convenience of using your dumpsters for several years, it was a very neighborly gesture and was greatly appreciated. T realize however, that nqw there are too many people living on the ranch and, when requested by Norm to stop using the facility, I immediately complied. .. .. .~ r + x t w x!g =.". a. .}a' +. T.wESS{EA. f ". 4 fa. The Housing Authority will determine the size and,price of the unit if permission to build it is granted. This isa complicated process, butT have been told that I would be required to build something in Category 1 or 2 which would be anywhere from 400 to 1000 sq. ft. I have not yet discussed a sales, price with them but I am swe that they would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding either of these issues. In my preliminary discussions with them they have verbally approved my concept and have expressed enthusiasm for myoffer to build a unit which could provide an alternative lifegstyle cphpice for s pmeone wl~ pewopuld like to live out ley to experience the beauty and on nal a lication, resumabl o l~ move to this val f town. As I pointed out in my grandees of natwe. However, it has become so expensive to live here, most people of average income aze relegated to small apartments in town or trailers. Some of these people hold very responsible positions in ow community and it would be to ow advantage to give them a few more opportunities like this so that we can keep these ~ p _ y for 24 years, longer valuable people here. I have lived at the end of this beautiful vane than'a "of the So "ns Mountain Ranch homeo~buers, and have se"""""`" . " ha n here. I have Y much interest as any of you, rfg of more, m keeping thisgvalley PPe beautiful as this ism full time home. However, thou h I have been a Colorado resident for 35 years, I originally came here from somewhere else, as most of us did, and I don't believe that we have the right to shut the doors on others who wish to come and enjoy this beautiful state, just because we got here first. Yes, there need to be some controls. Yes, we need to limTgrowth, but we also need to provide opportunities, within limits, that will keep vibrant, creative people i;oming here, even if they aze not rich and famous. The road impact, in my view, is a moot point. Last summer, the county built a brand new, very large parking lot at the Thomas Lake trailhead. This summer, Lost Basin Ranch is digging up the road for a new electric line that Holy Cross tells me would be capable of powering a small city. With all due respect, how would my deed restricted employee housing unit (which I reiterate, would replace my permitted caretaker unit) appreciably increase the traffic on this already heavily used road to the point where anyone would even notice? Lastly, regarding the impact on the wildlife in our area, my response to that issue is similar to my answeraddressing vow concerns abouf increased road usage. All things considered, especially since I am essentially only asking for a change of permitted use, not permission to increase density, I can't see that the granting_of my request would impact the wildlife population in any adverse way. Having lived here as long as I have, I have had the unique opportunity to observe the cycles of the native animals. The fact that I have seen masses of elk sheltering from hunters in the safety of Sopris Mountain Ranch (increasingly during the last 10 years since the ranch has begun to be developed) leads me to draw the conclusion that people (without guns) don't necessarily drive animals away and, in fact, they might make them feel more protected. As for the bear population, when I first moved here I had one who liked to "set a spell" on the bench outside my kitchen window. For years I haven't seen evidence of any around but during the last two summers I have been delighted to note (in spite of increased traffic and more neighbors) that their scat decorates my driveway daily. In our phone conversation, you stated that only two or three of your members had contacted you with questionsand/or concerns re: my application. I have also mentioned the situation to other members who, were either neutral, unaware of the issue or unconcerned. I would like to suggest, that based on our, discussion, the implication in your letter that all your homeowners were strongly opposed to my request may have been overstated. That you are the president of the T-Iomeowners Association (numbering 42) is not in doubt but, based on my research, it certainly does not sound like more than one or possibly two of your 42 members are even concerned about, let alone; "strongl}~ ' opposed" to my application. One last point needs clarification for your complete understanding of my situation. If I am not permitted to build the deed restricted unit in place of a care taker dwelling, I will be required to pay an'in lieu of employee housing fee to the county. That fee the last time I checked a year ago) was $225;OOO.Oi1 When I subdivided my ro erty approximateY"y 10`years ago, tTie fee~was $35;6b0.Olj:' t at Ume, I requested an installment program so that I could begin paying it off but the county refused to consider it. Since then, the fee has'increased exponentially, (no formula, logical progtdssion, or cap in si`ght). It is becoming increasingly difficult to imagine haw I would ever be able to afford to build on the property myself, which I would like to do in an attempt to simplify and downsize, IJnfortunately, instead it would appear that I am .,,... being penalized for having kept the property undeveloped all these years and the longer I wait, the higher the penalty will become. I would hope that in the interest of being the good neighbors we have been th®ugh out these many years, that you will carefully consider the impact of your letter, however well intentioned. As per our conversation, Sandra, I don't really anticipate any 1Fuither objections from the group,. now that I have clarified the issues and addressed your questions, however, feel free to contact me if I can be of any further assistance. In the event that I don't hear back from you, I will assume that I have allayed your concerns. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Candace Resnick 5353 West Sopris Creek Rd. Basalt, CO 81621 927-3045 £. ~. i i RE: RESNICK SUBDNTSI6N LOT A APPT~ICATIO~'OT2 ~' MAl"gR/1vIINOR ATvIEI~?D`1vf~~T"~`T'd'D1r~E'I.~O~~v1E~T'T'~p] . a ," :; Applicant wishes to request perrrrission allowing the construction of an affordable housing unit. in substitution for the cash-in-lieu requirement pursuant to Resolution PZ-91-48 and BOCC Resolution 91-42, condition No.~l: In Reference to Pitkin County Land Use Code, Section: 3-2~0-0801Nf%nor Amendment to a Development Permit, Applicant wishes to address the following points: _ ' A. Constructaon of an affordable housin unit does not c of the ro osed develo menf between residential co 1~ange the use p p P mmercial and tourist accommodation uses. B. The review of the original development allowed for an attached caretaker unit with the understanding that special permission would be granted to build a detached~unit if applicant so desired. Applicant requests permission to build a deed restricted unit .. instead of a caretaker unit. This would not constitute a new land development activity. C. The proposed activity does not: 1. Change the basic character of the approved use of the land on on which the activity occurs: Unit will be located within the designated building envelope on ~ Lot A of the Resnick subdivision and will be situated in such a way as to visually protect the privacy of the unit from the single family dwelling unit proposed for Lot A of the Resnick g ; ~. - ;, .... unite stin on Lot1B of the Resnicstuig single family dwelling k subdivision 2. Increase off site impacts iri`t`he sun ounc~mgneighbor'hood'. ~ Technically, the already approved caretaker unit (whether attached or detached) would introduce comparable vehicular, visual and population density to the neighborhood and surrounding properties as would the proposed employee housing unit. It should also; be noted that, due to the remote and p suruts on surrounding propert es is nonexist,t to the dwelling ent m either case. 3. Endanger the public health, safety or welfare of the surrounding public or private property, ... w. .v :~_ , ,. ..~: a .. ..; ;_~ ~~ -,, ,-- Page 2 4. Violate any Land Use Code standard. 5. Substantially increase the need for on-site parking or utilities: The permitted caretaker unit would necessitate comparable additional. on site parking and utility requirements which can easily be providedwithin the approved 5 acre building envelope. The affect on affordable housing generation: Would be the same whether acash-lieu of payment is made or a unit is built. However, in response to BOCG's concern that the interest's of Pitkin County be served by the granting of this request, applicant wishes to point out that this unit could provide a very desirable affordable housing alternative for a residents who prefer rural privacy to town living. This seems advantageous in a commwuty comprised largely of people who came here to enjoy the natural beauty and vigorous outdoor lifestyle our area provides. 6. Increase the floor area of the use by more than two percent (2%) or decrease the open space on the site by more than three percent (3%). (Ord.99-6 part): The unit would use approximately the same floor area percentage and. would decrease the open space on the site by approximately the same percentage as the already approved caretaker unit. Being fully aware that approval is subject to recommendation and conditions. set forth by the Housing Authority, applicant wishes submit the following: Asa 34 year resident of'the valley who has owned and resided upon the property known as The Resnick Subdivision £or the past 24 consecutive years, applicant requests permission to build an affordable housing unit located on Lot A with the following conditions: 1. Applicant or applicant's heirs or assigns retain full title to affordable housing unit as part and parcel of existing Title to the property currently known as Resnick Subdivision Lot A. 2. Applicant agrees to comply with Ptkin County Housing Authority GuidelinesPart IL, governing qualifcations and restrictions applicable to the renting of affordable housing units. Page 3 3. Applicant or applicant's heirs or assigns retain the right to condominium~ze and sell_the umt at any time, and at their N,.w~.. discretion, should they so choose, provided the sale„complies with applicable qualifications and restnctions set forth m the. , , , Affordable Housing Guideline Parts IIL, IV., and V., regulating the sale of affordable housing units. 4. In conjunction with the formation of the,condommaum documents governjng the affordable housing unit, the Applicant or the Applicant's heirs or assigns retain the. right to regulate and restrict certain activities and permitted usages of the ,~~.r dwelling unit to the extent 4iat said activities could be construed to have an unfavorable impact upon the primary single family dwelling unit on Lot A. Said condomuuum .M..e .. . ,. ~ ~~ documents may in no way override or conflict with any regulations set forth in the Affordable Housing Guideline Parts IIL, N., and V. and would_be subject to final approval by the How g Authority. 5. Applicant, applicant s heirs. or assigns or a third party buyer, retains, as a condition of this amendment, the right, in perpetuity, to pay the cash-in-lieu of fee, the amount of which shall be determine by the applicable rate for similar property at such time as applicant (etc.) should decide o exercise said right. 6. In the event that Lot A of the Resnick Subdivision is sold to a ,:. ~, .,, _.« ..o-.r ~. W ~w. ~~~G a- r :; r ,,, _ third party buyer, the Housing Authonty may at it's~sole discretion allow the new owner to retain the unit as a rent .v.x. n. w»+ca •..u vl Y . •o~ .:.~ w ld"Y+~.~l. ~ ••. • rf i. :,-.. 1, i .,. controlled dwelling. However, if the Housing Authority decides not to allow the unit to remau- a rental, the new owner .., , will then be offered the choice to either sell the unit under the .. ,w,, .~. ~ 4 ~..., . ,~ ,.. _ conditions, regulating the sale of affordahle;housing units. or pay the cash-in-lieu of fee in the amount equal to the fee being charged to comparable properties at the time of the conveyance" of title. r .. ~ x. rre~ph+w ..MSYdxiF.m. ;~ in .. „ .... .. ~s. ~ .,y..p n...,.., .,ye, i.y, e. ,..yw... p, + ~, :,z ~. f „ -nr I~f;: ,,. ~j s. sb s,6 1 a. rz ., nt~.. ~. To: brianm@ci.aspen.co:us Subject: Resnick CUR Hi Brian, We have rio objectiohs to the change in developmeht from a CDU to employee housing, however, I did come across a land use review done b Lee Cassin several ears a o. A arentl , at tha time there were someissues wfli t~he`size of the building envelope. I have atta hed those t comments: Let me know if you need anything else from me. Nancy is about to go on vacation and ran out,of time (sorry we missed,the deadline) -but if I need to look into this in more detail I can do that. cb ;_; 32301001.doc Carla Block Environmental Health 970-920-5438 Printed forBrian McNellis <brianm@co.pitkin.co.us> 1i, MEMORANDUM ;:. ,. ~. ~' To: Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department From: Lee Cassin, Environmental Health Department Date: June 11,1998 Re: Resnick Extension of Vested Rights Parcel ID #2465-323-01-001' The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the'Resnick application under the authority of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and has the following comments. ADEQUATE PROVI510NS FOR WATER°NEhD5: "Sections 2-17 and' 3=] 104: '4t is the policy of the Coimty to insure the avaffability of a water supply bf adequate giaaliry, quantity', pressui~ewld depemtahility for fire ~' protection ani9. support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shalIrequire landuses to hook tip to existing pulilic systems if service is available." ' This Department needs information on the quantity and the quality of water available. To do this, the owners will need tests of on-site wells done by a water engineer or well driller.l`he applicant must ensure that the water quality is acceptable by having it tested by a lab such as the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District or Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Before this department can issue a septic permit, the owners must drill the well to ensure that setback distances between the well to the septic system can. be met. Pitkin County Land Use Code requires that the well site be within the building envelope. It will not be possible to fit a well, hoixse and septic system within this lot's building envelope. This is because the Uuilding envelope is very small, and webs must be at least 100 ft.'from septic systems (farther for larger houses). We recoxrunend low water landscaping (xeriscaping), with the timing of any sprinkler systems decreased for low water plants; to minimize depletion of aquifers. Contacfthe Colorado State University Cooperative Extension office or Denver Water Bard for more information on xeriscaping. We believe the building envelope is too small to accommodate a well (and house and septic system). We recommend the well be allowed outside the building envelope. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105: °It is me poh~y ~f the cou„ty to ensure flint adequate sewage h~eatment facilities die available"to`si~ive existing and new`deve"lop'm'ent's:`Pu"blic~andprivl"te sewage disposal systems Pmm~.l nn F,ayole~ P poc /^' ~. .r*'. , __ %~ ~. 4 E and comiccHons to such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of PitkinCounty's Individual Sewage Disposal. System ' P.egulatloit" ~. ~... "' Lots in the West Sopris Creek area use individual septic systems for sewage disposal. All such systems installed within Pitkin County require septic permits issued by the Environmental Health Department, and must comply with the County's septic regulations. We are assuming the well can be placed outside the building envelope, and are using the small rnap provided. If those are ' correct, it will still be difficixlt, if not impossible, fo fit a house and septic system in the Building envelope and meet the required setback distances.. Here are some examples of required distances between wells, streams, and septic systems. (The greater the sewage flow, the greater the distance must be between the septic systern and the well' or stream. Sewage flows are a function of the size of the house and the number of rooms that these or future owners may use as bedrooms as their family size and situation changes. Applicants should carefully evaluate this information so they can ensure the house they want to build' can ', meet these setbacks. A 3-bedroom house smaller than 2,000 sq. ft. must have its we11100' from the septic system, and the septic system must be 50' from any stream. A 3-bedroom douse smaller than 2,000 sq: ft. with an office must have its we11104' from the septic system, and the system must be 54' from the stream. ' A 3-bedroom House with one office that is 2,400 sq. ft. must have its we11132' from the septic system, and the stream must be 82' from the. septic system. A 4-bedroom house with one office that is 2,400 sq. ft. must have its we11160' from the septic system, and the stream must be 110' from the septic system. A 4-bedrgom house with one office and one playroom, of 2,400 sq. ft. must have the well 1$$' from the septic system, and the stream must be 138' from the system. A 4-bedroom house with. one office and.one playroom, of over 6,000 sq. ft. must have the well 23$' from the septic system, while the septic system must be 188' from the stream. ' A house with over 6,000 sq. ft. with 5 bedrooms and one office in the main house and an attached 2-bedroom caretaker unit must have the well 311' from the septic system, while the septic system must be 261' from the stream. The building envelope is a triangle with a base of a little over 100' and a height of about 300'. The house and septic system will each have a certain footprint, and the house and septic system must meet setbacks from each other. The stream is less than 100' from the building envelope. Therefore, if a septic system can Ue fit in the building envelope, it will have to be in the NW corner of the r~;m~~a „„ r.~.,ya..a r,~p~:~ r -, i .., ,, ~.;. triangle. The soils would also have to be quite good, and the house would have to be small. In other woxds, we believe the building envelope will need to be larger. The type of soil will determine exactly how large the septic system must be. The owners will need to obtain site specific soil data. As a caution, owners should realize that soils tests can be done onlybetween Apri115 and'Nov. 1E of each year. Building and septic permits cannot be issued without these soils tests. To receive a septic permit, the applicant will need to submit a septic permit application through a Registered Professional Engineer who will design the system. rrlcluded'in the packet must be percolation test results and profile hole information, site plan with pertinent physical features, floor plan for the dwelling and caretaker unit and a copy of the County'slanc3 use approval. Once we receive the completed application, this Department will. analyze and review the proposed septic design. The applicant should know that it may take from 2-6 weeks to obtain a well permit (required before septic system design). It may take some time to have soils tests performed and additional time to have the system designed. Since soils tests cannof be done all year, the applican#s should carefully evaluate the schedule to ensixre all steps have been taken so the permitting process will be as fast as possible. The leach field should be in an area of no traffic, planted with dry land grass, and should riot be watered. It is desiraUle to locate the system below the house so that the system can operate by gravity. Depending on the exact soil percolation rate, it may be irnpossible to fit a house and septic system within the building envelope. If it I$ possible; the house will almos# certainly have. to be very small. Since this information was apparently not available when the original application was approved, we recommend that the possbilifiy of slightly expanding the building envelope be explored. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14 and 3-705 and ~=710 '9t is the policy of the County to preserve nd protect its present water zesources: To this end it3 initiated which would'advexsely affect the quantity, quality, o"r accessibility of the County's Ovate of established water-dependent agrictiltural5eHvitics; or whicH would result in increased salmiz flown, further destruction of wildlife Habitat, or major expendifures to reacquire or redistribute County to maintain a iiatm~al vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and by land uses or other Human achvities'wliiclr could cause deterioration of water quality or impai meadows and wetlands." j s the polcy of the County that iio land use lie r resources; or which wouldoccur at the expense ahoii of water resources;'loss of nuniinum sh~eam major water resources. IL is also the policy of uz grouridwatcrs of the area are not encroached upon r tHc natvralfrcatment processes provided by The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts on downstream water quality. The Department's mission is to preserve and protect the quality of Pitkin County's water resources. Since a large percentage of the population is dependent upon water from wells, utmost importance. Roofs ant~oasphalt areascan be nonpoint sourcesdof water dis barge that can m,ni~~i ~~~~ a,~,ya.•a rar,~~~ 3 ..,. i , m .' .: - . ii contaminate water supplies, herbicides can contaminate wells, and fertilizers can impact surface waters. This Department recommends that runoff from buildings and paved areas be retained on the property o~ origin, by landscaping, detention ponds, or dry wells. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602: "Only that developmciit is pcinutted which will not contxibukesigmhcanfly to degradation of air quality iit PitP.in County. Developments may not constitute an ~ndrxect or" direct aii~ pollufion souYCe under Federal, State or County regiil'aHons." Because of its small size, this project should not contribute sgnificantly_ to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County. FUGITIVE DUST Activities such as road building and landscaping require a Fugitive Dust Plazi. This plan will need of adjacent axed roairnited to, fencing, watering of haul roads an P ieturbed areas, daily cleaning to m Nude, put is not ids to remove mud that has been carried out, s eed limits, or other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust fromcrossing the property line or causing a nuisance. of the fugitive dixst ontrol plancontain g enough measuresnto ensure th t dust doesnt no't become a nuisance or blow onto adjacent property, if road-building or significant ' landscaping occurs. FIREPLACE The less densely populated parts of the county like the Resnick site may have two devices per building. A maximum of one wgod burning fireplace is allowed and a second device can lie either a gas log fireplace or a certified woodstove. Tn addition, unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances are allowed, Coal may not be burned in any device. Fireplaces and woodstoves may not be installed in barns or agricultural buildings. A condition of,approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the fireplace/woodstove permit by the Environmental Health Department before the ' building permit can be issued. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEAo TH WAWS~C3e~ itoi s2t ~f ~ t ~s a,e p~hcy of the County to ensure t~iat p p Colorai9o, or flee United States of t-lmertca." This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental hea1t11-laws. Pdnmd un wpdgl Riper ~, I PITHIN COUNTY COMMiJNITY,DPVELOPMElVT' DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 92U-5526 FAX (9'10) 9~0=5'439 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Housing Office Environmental Health Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowner's Association FROM: Brian McNellis, Community Developmenf Department " ' RE: Resnick Major/Nlinor Amendment to a Development Permit PID# 2465-323-OT-001/OOZ CASE# P02$-03 " DATE: March 19, 2003 Resnicl~ Th~P'tkin County Planning and Zoning Commis onpwill review~the applcat on one Tuesda , Ma 6, 2003. Please return your comments to me by Friday, April 1 I , 2003. Y'DEVE`I,OPNT IF`~O'[Jw" HAVE Nd Fi7RTlN-IER NEEb OF THElv1. RIA)/S' TO C07GI1~IT)Nr'1` Thank you. ~,~~~~~ 5 ~~ ~~ .~? Commissioner Agenda. Comr yea voted. Cor moved approval of the Land Use Consent Public Hearings ier Ireland seconded the mof6on. Motion passed with four finer Clapper not present. Commissioner Farris moved approval of the Commissioner Roy seconded the motion. 'M Commissioner Clapper not present. LAND USE PUBLIC HEARCNGS: sT~~%t_U~Of31ilCCSB1C)T5'.- . ,. ._ ~A`TAKCNGS AfV~D . _ ITN~.AND`RBMB"DI"ATING A THE?AKtNG FCdR'fHE CCINCEP7UAt MOTION TO Ai~PROVE 3 REVIEW OF YF-E' HOLY ` )N LAVE -STAFF PB~3S01~: ` Consent Actions Agenda. ed"wi4h four yea votes. Chairman Hatfield opened the public hearing on this matter. Lance Clarke gave a presentation on this item as addressed in'.his memorandum contained in the BOCC packet for this meeting. He recommended ffiat"if t}i'e Board approves the resolution that it be amended to i`ead that `at the time of building permit the owner would have the option of a cash iri I'ieu fee or providingMa category one hat a lownng appaffordable housing nit of is deatheduban grow£h boundary areaemight leave to other approvals down the road. Candace Resnick, a licant said she would be ha fo answe concerns that comm ssion members' might have about her app r any questions or lication. She said she. BOARD OFCOUfJ7Y COMMI`5'SfbNEFtS 5 REGI~LAFt 11AEE'T1NG ~ JUL'1ti 23;`2003°" ~..." ~ w,.,_ aza-ZpSG~ t'~x thinks it would be a great opportunity for someone to be able to live up there rather than to live in a unit ih town. Chairman Hatfield opened the hearing to public comment. There being no comment, he closed the public comment portion of the hearing and brought the mafter back to the Board. Commissioner Roy said this Board has decided that the appropriate way to make sure that the county has a policy of affordable housing that applies all over the county is to adopt a policy that would say dense affordable housing will occur within the urban growth boundaries. And that affordable housing needs wilt be met outside of the city in the form of EbU's, caretaker dwelling units, where you buy down existing units and on- site affordable housing. She said this application is very consistehf with the new policy. Commissioner Ireland said he would be willing to do a compromise. If the applicant would be willing to forego any opportunity to create a caretaker dwelling unit, which is what the neighbors concern is, and build this unit in lieu of the caretaker dwelling unit, and sell if under the guidelines, then he would be willing to reduce their fee in half and use that cash to build a unit in the metro area. Commissioner Hatfield said he would be wilting to compromise under this condition Ms. Resnick asked if the Board would be willing to freeze the cash in lieu fee at what it is right now? Commissioner Ireland said told Ms. Resnick that he would agree to this if she paid the fee in a certain amount of time. It was agreed that Ms. Resnick would work with staff and make a proposal to pay the fees. Chairman Hatfield opened the hearing to public comment. There being no comment, he closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to the Board for action. Cend nlsthe ar I lecantworkin twith staff`onhthe details of ~ tember 24, 2b03 p g p'i~ ~ g omniissoner Ireland's suggestion. Commissioner Farris s~conaied the motion. Motion passed with four yea votes. Commissioner Clapper not present. ~..~. Lance Clarke gave a presentation on ~ contained in the BOCC packet for this as addressed in his memorandum BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 6 REGULAt2 METING JU~X 23; 2003' RE: RESNICK SiJBDIVISION.~,OT A_„APPLICATION FOR Applicant wishes to revise her request for the mitigation of the required cash-in-lieu of employee housing fee pursuant to Resolution PZ-91-48 and BOCC Resolution 91-42, condition No. 4. Based on the„concerns voiced by the members of the BOCC during the July 23, 2003 meeting and being fully aware that final approval is subject to recommendation and conditions set., forth by the Housing Authority, applicant requests that the commissions consider the following: 1. Applicant requests permission to build an EDU on Lot A of the Resnick Subdivision. This unit would be subject to the Pitkir County Housing Authority Guidelines Parts III., IV., and V., governing qualifications and restrictions applicable to the construction and sale of affordable, deed restricted housing units. 2. The EDU would be governed by condominium documents formulated within guidelines put forth by the Pitkin County Housing Authority and subject to their approval. 3. Minimum requirement for unit would be a Category 1 with the. option to built a Category 2 if applicant so chooses. 4,. If applicant exercises the option to construct an E,DU to mitigate the employee housing fee, the right to build a caretaker dwelling unit will tie forfeited.. In other words, the EDU will be allowed in lieu of caretaker unit. 5. The cash in lieu of fee will be reduced to half and will be frozen at the _. __.. current figure. fora 2 year period of time.. If the fee is not paid within this time period, applicant will be required to pay half of the required fee current at the time applicant applies for a building permit. 6. Applicant, applicant's heirs or assigns or a'third party buyer, retains, ition of this amendment, the right, in perpetuity, to pay the as a cond :full cash-in-lieu of fee at any time, the amount of which shall be determined by the applicable rate. for similar property at such. time as applicant (etc.) should decide to exercise said right. Full payment of said fee would carry with it the inherent right of the original conditions, ie: to build a caretaker unit instead of an EDU. ,,, r ,s. .,.~ , ., . , ~,.. , `..~1 `" RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Off' PTTIQN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING EXTENSION OF VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR THE RESNICKPROPERTY Resolution No, 9&CZ/ RECTPALS 1. Brad and Candace Resnick (hereaftet ` :4pplicants") have applied to the Pitkin County Boazd of County Commissionets (hereafter "Boazd") to consider an extension of vested read property rights pursuantfo Section 4-140.3b ofthe Land Use Code,.. 2. The Applicants were previously granted the following approvals: • £stension of Vested Real Property` Rights (Resoltitioa No. 95-1$4) • Forwarding. the 1991 Non-Metro Area Residential GMQS Scores to the BOCC (Resolution PZ-91-96) ~ g Review (Resolution No. 91- • Lot Line Ad'usanent and I041 Geo[o is and Wildfire Haeazd 48) • Awarding Residential GMQS Allotments for the Non-Metro Area applications as forwazded to the BOCC (Resolution No. 91-146) • General Submission (Resolution i+io. 91-142) • Detailed Submission and Final Piat (Resolution No. 92-384) 3. The subject property is located at >53 West Sopris Creek Road, ana is described as Lots a and B of the Resnick Subdivision. 4. The Boazd heard this application at its regularly scheduled meeting on July 8, 1998, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application: 5. The Boazd determined that the proposed development meets the criteria established in Section 4- 140.30 of the Land Use Code, and therefore found the extension to be apprpriate. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grant an extension to the vested property rights until July 8, 2001 of the Resnick approvals, subject to the following conditions of approval and the condirions of previous approvals: Resolution No. 95-186, Planning Commission Resolution PZ-91-48, Resolution No. 91-142, and Resolution No. 92-384: Bear proof containers shall be utilized on the subject parcels. y gr q gre pplicant shall 2 cortipiy with Section 4.01 A i (B) of the P'tic`m CountySR.oad ivlanagement and Maintenance Plan, which requires the applicant to provide construction trip and residential trip generation. studies. The Applicants shall comply with this provision as it is in effect at the tune of building permit issuance to the satisfactionpf the. County Engineer. iitiiiiiiiiiri~~i~iitii~iii~~~~iii~'sii 419704 0772i%i9'98 04:28P R1=50L1JT2` '~ . ," R~` ~ Resolution No. 98-L~ Page 2 3. A fireplace/woodstove application must be filed and approved by the Environmental Health Department prior to the i nuance of a building permit. 4. Prior to issuance of building permit, the Applicants shall submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan to the Environmental Heaittr Department The plan shall include measures to ensure that dust does not become a nuisance and blow onto adjacent properties. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 6TH DAY OF N.1TE,1498, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 8TH DAY OF JULY,1998. ,urr~ce of vesre.D k1GHTS"pvB.ufXGD ~.u T7+r gs~it/ :JiAi~ oN'T//e I ~2qr of if-~6't.csT ,~~~+ ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMIvIISSIOTTERS OF PITKIN COUNT/Y,~COLORADO ~. ~~,. ~~:~.~eo !mot-- . _ . _ J e 3ee~es .C)'.vtee Dtirotl~ea Farris eputy Clerk and Recorder Chair Date:. f-~?/-9 APFROVED AS TO FORM; APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ... - - -- --~~ 7 ~ ~ , ~ ~ John Ely, ~ Cindy Houben, Counrv Attorney Community Development Director Case #P50-98 PID J'--„-., Boa ,,.._..,. f~l'%JJ'l VT-VL VV~ 7. 4 6S - 323 - o) - oo (~~> ILINI 11111 111111 111111 IIII I I IIII IIIII III IIII IIII IIII 41970'4 07/~1/iJ98 04 281+ RESOLUTI,DRVIS 52C.VI 2 of 2 R 0:`00 "b O.~Qitil 11" 0."~0 PTTK`!1V""'C`dllN'f`lry'` CG " BiLVIR DAVIS P1 ~KIN,CDUN7Y4CLERYFB f2~`r`17RD~ .'.'_ ~~~~~ LOC .. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSTONEI2S O~"P~`TKIiv COUNTY, COLOR?~DO, GRANTING EXTENSION OF ~?ESTED REAL ~'ROPEY2T1' RIGHTS FOR THE RESrTICK PROPE1tTY Resolution No. 95-i RECTTALS 1. Brad and Candace Resnick (hereafter "Applicants") have: applied to the Pitkin County Board of County Commssoners (hereafter "Board") to consider an extension of vested real property rights pursuant to Section 4-140-30. 2. The Applicants were previously granted the following approvals: • Subdivision of a 62 acre parcel into two 31 acre parcels, one of which was already developed with a single family residence and outbuildings. • One residential GMQS allotment for the new lot . • 1041 hazard review approval for a building envelope for the undevelnpedlof (Lot A). 3. The subject property is located at 5353 West Soprs Creek Road, and i described as Lots A and B ofthe Resnick Subdivision. 4. The Boazd considered the request at its regularly scheduled meeting of September 27, 1995, at which time evidence aad testimony was presented with respect to this application. 5. The Board determined that the proposed development meets iEe criteria established ink Section 4-140.30 of the Land Use Code, and, therefore, found the extension to be appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE fT RESOLVED by the Pitkin CountyBoazd of Couaty Commissioners that it does hereby grant a three year extension to the vesting period for the ~ Vi„S ~Z.~bl-~D i ,lvf ~ w. ' Resolution No. 9~ 7 Page 2 ~ ... ~. f Resnick approvals, subject to compliance with the follpwing conditions of approval and the conditions of the previous approvals: Planning Commission Resolution No. PZ-91-48, and Board of County Commissioners Resolutions. No. 91-142 and No. 92=384. 1. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall pay a housing mitigation fee for the equivalent of 1.0 full-time Category I employee in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines in effect at the time of payment of the fee. This fee shall be paid to the Pitkn County Finance Director. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 27TH DAY OF SE;PTEMB~li; 1995. BOARD OF COUNTY COIvIiViISSTONERS, PTTKIN COU~NTY/, COL/%ORADO ' BY ~~'t •?7.'l~~~ Michael C. Ireland, Chair DATE / i~ 3/ .S~ A~TEST: ~'~ ~' i ~ i~~ Jeanette Jones, Deputy Clerk & Recorder /: ~ V APPRO~fD AS TO CO INTENT: APPROVED AS TO FDRM: -r •- Tim Malloy,., John Ely, County A ey Acting Community Developme u•ector - .~,: ~~>.,.>> ,w. ~. ~., - , ~. ~ a Y. 2 9. 2 0 .r r 'S, ,~v r ~ ~ ;;r ~~. • ~1 r ( ~~ ~.; ', .. •R ..~ t •,, .• •.r ~ i ,~, v. • . •', •,~. .•.r 9:17A ,, ,;,PION COUNTY CLERK RECOR,DER,~, ~rv~NO. 414~P• 1 ~ rv~ ~`ik~ti7'30J9`t fIIril~ ~ ~~~ d6•~ p +~`4r ~ r u ~',.s ~avf a~~tltf rE ChbY C'i ah 1 '~• Q} ~Y7Cii1Y~i~pMYi~~C(S~Q~~ ~~~1~.~Z~ 1,4 _:~ ~. A!'!RO'91tL !~D i'f~ fvafr!!'t 1~filli~rt~lgt'~~,~r' y"' ' r N i ' `r ( P. ~ ,• irasasAs, ~ Gndiea and Brad ilesniotc Clursinartar M-p~rriioanl •..baw agpiiad to e1-n anard of of 8ii~kin raw MiLtty Coa~afsstaear~f , opiorade, (hst;aiaattar r~~"3 !or aanarelAdtibaiasien;Mpproba~ . •. a 'Ewe lat anbdiviaien pnrauant t+a' Brak3dns ~~+i and, i-3a idt3 P3Lkin CoeuiGy "Land. ttaa coda{ a+at '. ,• ~'' 1 :, , rr 7 i~~a~ ~t'~ .~ ~, ,°:: r N~lIW~ tiba Ratniade p:teai. to ieosead,at ,593! New ,~', ` ~~ °; " w ; ; ", Ctaak Read, aditi +Ilpaailie9aliy daacribad• ~b lxAibit "1w-s' and w ~x~` ~` ' ;`;~ +.• E wY~~ ~'ii~ ~arY•i.~i li aW~R ~W~~Q~ ~af/1R' ., .. i 4~ { :~ } '. 16 ~`, ~ '.4 ~tµ . ... ~' • r I TRW. ~tha ay~iiiearti y~repaaas tar auRdirrids a 6I iedri atrial y .;F` ~"'`; ._w. w. _..s i~ . ~ •, 1 ' ' . o! iat'!d iota atw iS aura paraalat and ~ ~•.•"~` `~ 1 •, i i ~1 ". .. .. a •~.. • wR~~, '~ _~ ~n azi~eeinq rasidsflrra am! entbttiltliMeri .~ '' ' t`.~4a ' i- it wsdavateead~ at~d , . ,rr 1 > , < Y. •. , • :~: .'. 9aaleril/~ ~"at a,r~YrriY aohadalad pubiis haasing•1sn JlYgnrt•rf~ ~ u' ,°.•; .. ~ •,, ac...• ;. •, . `. 199i~ tha Piafining and lening Coaimi'aaien grar~tad itl~i~i~aele{~iCr i~, +. r'. . . , ,. ,;' .. tiiidlira and teiidllts Haaard apprevai ter'tt-a nadawiepad 1eC~°luid , ; . "~ ..P,• ' -• ,• ~~r the Coa~aiNSan arse granted' aDpra~-r bt a ida 3ina • , , , ;',s ' x t .. ~, adgaatasriE,.batwaan t1~a 1laaniolc and ~'est+bul pNira~lss• and ~' ' •, ' .., :•• ' 1fJ~Rl3l~ ' thi Cdrunfswie~ syooaandad ZtaMrti, snsntieai~on ~ ~. approvai et kHa anbdirtrian to the serr+ls and "~s . ' ,~.:. '. •~ • M!l'1RRe3y ~!!!a tlolmiai9on dae-rad tria a iiaation• in ttla i!!ti ~4•t,'• , :: •' - , ~' !t ~ ~a ~Pa =hand ind3vidu~atlnithbp~ tbraatta2da -~~ ~ 14 ` ?~+ ~ ' , ' ~ Ma~asxa~ ~ kbs C'aaniasSen ;;r+eaaapandad aAat ~ 3 . ~ ,~ ,, ,. , £ 1-• ~„S,'~. ~ f Y J ii,7 ~ *~A. h 1 ~ *t I ~t'•'. ~~ 5 _ C i. ~" ~ A F ~1. ~•~ T 1N Y• Y aYyM YI Y ~• ~~b l 1 '9 4~ /~ ~ rl 1. 1 Y i x jI >a r '' x .x ~'{{{Y i. V ' 'x" 1 ~._ A rxp*, .. ~ ....bit. '. 4~.,'••"•~.1'a ~.x ;A s~ , Y T 1 S a.. , ~ a,~ YcF;:~ t w ~. ~:'~r r,r!'.,. .a p~S ~. ~ _~,•. .t YI s 1. ;~d.tl sd<~ix'~ i•~ . t .. .. )~ 454 MAY. 29. 2003' 9 •~' • I:, y~ .~, ..,~, t,~ ~` t +rt = ,'w' ,~^ ; i; , ,,'~, ~ } S, ]~ '~ C 4 sY Q e • r. a k ;, a .. ~ .s -. ', ,I, ', :: H~ ,.. , 17AM~""'~PITI(IN COUNTY CLERK RECORDER~['~.'~r~ 14p q~'`" NO 4 !,"~A9t ias.l5 ir` 6i~vfae a..via~ Pttkfn Cuter a~t~G 8I4' b~ P~'i3* ` ( Y CYarka DeG a,,pp #ob~tviaioe rec~kive vne growth sax+egaaent allooatioga an8 , s~ tNe ,. •. , ~. lbasd ravfewed the • :"` ' ~, appiieatton a't ik dutiy noticed` public haari.ng os Oetobbs 24 ~ iRi~i, at vttioh avidaisee and ~stiaenyl vas ,'prsssntad with x'eepect tp .,this appiioatien~ bled ,,',~ ~ M'~l~kEU~ the soard ti:+da thbt• the vitk~ Cads criteria. !ar ~araT 1lppiieatttft Kav! obmpifal! _ =ip» ane s'ubdi~lbion. ~Ye by the soars 'that !t does hereby gxsr-t ces~erai gubxzissie» dpprov8! to the llpplctpt subjse{ . to the leliwing eerditiansx c~ !SffiZON ~ ~ ~~ T• 'll sewage Qispo~tal syst.m and water shall be regiavad and a pr'ovisien ter the site ~'tPai'tsenC b3' the Envifetsiantal tiaalth pries tq isanaxiee o! ¢ bniidiag pmt, ~' ~° applicant shall reveyetats all arean distarbed ~onrtructioix vitbiri ors grewtng scares, o! eo:-.stsuctiOn. ~ a. outaide illomi~aatian shall eemp1Y yith"'pitxin ~ a t~epulations in effort at thg time er! buiiidinq txsrmi~i sngrgpg ' 4• 111 develepment, viith the exeesytien of the aeeeab droa emeitts, shall: `bp fooated w thxt, the buiid'inq ettwelops ~s desiq»atad on'tha site pica. 5• Prior to issngxroe of a bnitdi dlflaia as aac°trs' ~l peermit the applicant ahail permit frem th® Cou:1tY. ~+5Sa9xaefMs tSffice. 6• ~w ±tnb,~lestwt !shall x ~~`~_ ~ ~ ~1P with l+itxia Oennty ais quality -~ •lteot at the time of'bniidixy 7. g perxeit issaanoh. ~ line! Pint },he appYieant.ehail gift a ntilitirplan to ~ d~Iy "1Q~sce ~*a slaetir'i."e` xsbeciatiert fqr aripreva e! i. ~t final Plat the applicant dthaii stabait ~n°'~~• swbdiv~iainh . i• At F3Aa1 Plat a statement of .' . re2iavinq tlitch om+ers .o f~ ~nrdarstaadinq shall bt sited ctevslopmpnt asnsad Y seditiiinaibilitp fos dat3hge to . psebie~s r`esu3tfn ~' the ltdnnt PCprib dtteh ar shapega ~ previded ~ mom the Hitch. xeaeds td the eliteh shall hY the applicant to the ditch ewnaray . i ., ,. • yy ~,y1 , :,~.. ~ . ..r Ni i ~. t . '.a . v .v `vn .>0 ~ M _ ~ 'f :: ...,. .. ...:.. . . 0: ~' nl ~~,.. MAY. 29. 2003 9 18AM PI~IN COUNTY CLERK R3CORDER N0.414~~• ~~P 3~~~' 4t3SP4B+F• 3t1r"Star9! l2t1 ~ s.o4 5K 660 'wa waci 'f3li~rta ~"lavf~s, PStkin.Cncy CYe*k~ Des SE'S ' ~ ~" ,, 3. 71t xinel' >biat the apPlicaat shah 1~Y +~ P~ dadttstitla !ss ';'' ; '".. ~ '~ ti' '. based oa phi! Cnuaty rie ierrtied'oa f®e fef~snis 3tf sills! rt : ' ` "''~. , , ~I. Yt tht ties o! ti++s~ plat. _. ..~;«.~• .••,•.r; ,~~, fDribr to issftafloe of aaq buildie~q petfrib, tha'appliaatit shall r ~ , ~~ [~Y to the f>itkisf, ~cnntp liaaffoe Dirna~OSC ths.squivaleeft mt ,~, issabre` lspivyee iffdaxad Co ~rlii °~ouslpq guidsiiifefy if , , astfsct at ssaaaoe a~! N buildiaq pai~ftit. , ' A ~. ~ . ~t piaalr . ' ;a fOr use ~ ,''~ ' currentlp s. s. ~. a Coauty aebfrdiaat an saa~:^` Ior' al made by th® 'nppl3cant ift th! a~plieatiefft ':. fgfs eha11 bpi sdhartd tb. ; x;r~t0oa1! by tl}o Hoard at its xagutar feasting ar ~xi affil f7ctobar 24, 1!141. f ~' soum of ttoD1~M ,oa~IC'o'si ,. tir rrrxxer°'aott~rs, cotaxwa T : A~.: ,. 1~las aths a ' 4~- bsisfe^fn , ,.,;', -~+ ~. ,. ,, ' ~*;. ;: ;, •, r.• ' ,~.~ is ,: 7Ff'131t0VL-b ~A sb C~d1C'1'all'1"t ,~ , Plaasi~t~~ ~~ y~/!~~ / , ~~.~ Yom, r~,,,~,g ~~ ~.'~'. ~~ ' .~S'"•v~un ~ .. ~ . ' k~-.9Y. ;;, .,. ,:: ~;°„~ I .. t. ,,, ~; :, . ., .. ,. , .~ ~. .;, >`, `, ,:~.; . , • . ~; ::z ,` ,~ ;g~ ~s-'., :M . . ~^ , r ~ ~~. ~:, ,' ' y•,3 . l !, . .` ~j^I ~ Y}(~," ;~~ ;'h dJ 'x, ~'R wN;'.:a~?~.t ~' ~'~:4.C•~~~Y~~, ~~, r~ ,. ~~i Y: ~ '.~'i.i; ~. )'. 'T N'~ i::v,..; i~?( ~ia:e "iqT_ p'M~,,.'y/Iwf+' iM a~'^,~~F.~yFCV, vy~ ~•%Y.~ .. s t .,;y,~"' ~ . ti n, ~~~^PA'-N~ RF•.,~•~ ~ t x • 1 ~ I ' .... ,. ~4. :,,5 _ abw:h. •,;.. . ~:~..,;. • ` ~. OV1lb Xs ?0 tblt~Cf / ~--- ~ 1/1/91 lb:~~n Fec ~ 0~~ g ~~6g_F~v 586 #3387Z~* 1 Cl er 4. , Silvia Davis, f'itkin Cnty RESOLUTION OF THE PYTRIN OOUNTY PLANNING AND ZONYNG COMMYS$ION GRANTING A LOT LINE ADJIISTMENT AND 1041 GEOLOGIC ,AND WILDFIRE HAZARD REVIEW APPROVAL TO THE RESNICR APPLICATION Resolution No. PZ-91-~ WHEREAS, Candice and. Brad, Resnick, hereinafter "Applicants , e ,., r: a:, ...,~,,,.,-~, have applied. to the Planning and Zoning Commission of Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter "Commission", for a Lot Line Ad'ustment and 1041 Geolo ~c and Wildfire Hazard a royal ~ g ~ ,..., ,......#. PP Pursuant to Sections 4-2.2(x)(2) and 5-400 of the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Resnick. parcel is located at 5353 West Sopris ~ p y xhibit "A"; and Creek Road more s eclficall described in E WHEREAS, the parcel is zoned.. RS-30; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to subdivide a 62 acre parcel of land into two 31 acre parcels; and.. WHEREAS, there is an existing residence and outbuildings on one lot, and the second lot is undeveloped; and WHEREAS, only one new lot and, building envelope will be established as, a result of the subdivision; and ' y pes exceeding WHEREAS, the undeveloped lot is encumbered b slo 300, potential avalanche areas and wildfire hazards; and WHEREAS, the site is outside of any mapped wildlife areas bu .. ~~ t is within.. 1/2 mile of an elk, ..migration corridor and near an elk production area; and WHEREAS, in 1989, ten acres of land owned by the Resnicks were illegally conveyed to the Turnbulls (adjacent property owners); and 1041 HAZARD REVIEW ~. ~. ~, ., .. •• ,!~^. ~: F•G 587 ' #~.=87^4 i':_`^1/91 16:00 fiec $.Dn ~~` 6 :> Silvia Davis, Fit4:in CnEy Clerk:, Doc $,00. v` .. AHEREAS, the applicants are requesting a lot line adjustment ~4, '~ -. • g Code; `~.:,~. in order to brn this transaction, into compliance with the, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard the application at a duly noticed regularly scheduled meeting on August 20 1991; and WHE1rEAS, the Commission determined.,,, that the applicant can ` ~ .. ,.._ ade atel mit ate identified. 1041 hazards' an ~, "y g ~ ~. _...4, d WHEREAS, the Commission determined that said ,application complies with Lot Line., Adjustment criteria, in the Land Use ,Code; and WHEREAS, the Commission forwarded a Growth, Management score, ~ g nimum thresholds) to the of 51 meetn overall and individual m„ _ n.,, ~, b4A,, , ,,, _ Board; and WHEREAS, the Commission recommended that, the proposed ' ion receive one„growth management allocation; and subdivi§ WHEREAS, the Commission determined that the .application complies with Subdivsion,and General Submission criteria in the ,. _., .,.,.<y< ~...~ ,„, .., .. u, ~ b Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT I$ESOL9ED by the Commission that it recommends approval of the Resnick„Subdivision General Submission to the Board of County Commissioners. BE IT FDRTHER RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby q ~ 41 Geologic and Wildfire Hazard . rant a lot line adjustment and l0 Review approval to the Applicants subject to the following conditions: 1041 IiAZARD REVIEW . ~';' #338i34`-'1.%~1/93 ib:b0 f,Yc ~ C~O'F:k.~ ~~2 F6 586 r Silvia Davis, F'it~:in G`nt C3erk Doc ~.C~O '; '.. :: ~' 1. The applicant acknowledges that he has been informed by Pitkin Y ~ effect the tproperty eand any „improvement -areas""that might >° , and the nse and occupancy thereof. 2. The following wildfire mitigation measures shall be adhered to• a. All roofs will be kept cleared of debris b. Oak brush shall be thinned for a distance of 30 feet from the home. Thinning shall result in patches of vegetation within 10 foot spacing between the crowns of remaining patches. _ Dead vegetation within 30 feet of the home shall be removed. All vegetation within 10 feet of the home shall be removed with the earce ton of 'Yow '• ""` plants. p growing grasses and c. The applicant shall ppovide a 2,000 gallon underground water reservoir or a and with at least a 4 foot depth with a d °" h drant~. °~The ~ ~ ~ `~""" r'Y Y pond shad]. be capable of providing no less than 2,000 gallons of water for fireflow; d. Firewood shall be stacked on a contour away from building(s). e. At least one ten pound ABC class fire extinguisher shall be placed in each structure. f. All power and telephone lines shall be undergrounded. g. Roof materials shall be of non-combustible materials such as tile, metal or asphalt. h. The applicant shall install a fully automatic residential .•_.., sprinkler system"with a reserve water supply to be provided as specified by the sprinkler"contractor. 3. Development impacts on wildlife shall be mitigated as follows: a. `All dogs shall be kenneled. b. All fences are to be .a maximum of 42' in height, 4 strand or less with a minimum... kick space of'12" from the top wire. c. Native vegetation outside of the building envelope shall be maintained. d. The a licant shall lace a 20 foo the east of the intern ttent stream hick lies to setback on the ~. ,,. _ ,. w #~38~D4 _ai/DS/91 ].6.O~J ft _ Silvia Davis, Fitkin Cnty CTer4t, "D"ow"`$.O~? building envelope. The setback shall be reflected on the Final Plat. No development shall occur within the ~" ~, setback and vegetation shall be preserved. °< ~. 4. No development shall occur on slopes exceeding 15~ in grade. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1. Development density potential of the Turnbull property shall be based on the acreage 'of the Turnbull property prior. 'to the boundary adjustment. 2. A subdivision exemption plat shall be recorded upon final approval. _ GENERAL SUBMISSION 1. A sewage disposal system and water pbovision for the site shall be reviewed and approved by the 'Environmental Health Department prior to issuance of a buildng'permit. 2. The applicant shall revegetate all areas disturbed by construction within one growing season of construction. 3. Outside illumination shall comply with Pitk,in County Lighting regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4. All development, with the exception of the access drive improvements, shall be located within the building envelope as designated on the Site Plan. 5. Prior to, issuance of a building permit the applicant shall obtain an access permit from 'the County""Engineer's Office. 6. The applicant shall comply with Pitkin County air quality standards in effect at the tme_of building permit issuance: 7. At Final Plat the applicant shall submit a utility plan to be reviewed by Holy Cross Electric Association for approval of a "looped" service line. GENERAL 1~ covenants. Plat the applicant shall submit subdivision 2. At Final Plat a statement of understanding shall be executed relieving ditch owners of any responsibility for damage to development caused by the Mount Sopr'is ditch or seepage problems resulting from the ditch. Access to the ditch shall be provided by the applicant to the ditch owners.. 3. At Final Plat the applicant shall pay a park dedication fee based on the County park dedication fee formula in effect at ~_ ,.1-. "'~` ""'° F'G 596 .< e~:' #3.=Ji.:4'e`1/91 16:~aiJ F:ee ~.CuJ ~+~G_C~i~ Silvia Davis, Fitf:in Cnty Gler4, s,t` °~~' the time of Final Plat, .~ ~' 4. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall pay to the Pitkin County Finance Director the equivalent of 1.0 low income employee. indexed to the housing guidelines'in effect at issuance of a building permit. 5. At Final Plat the applicant shall provide an access easement for use of the Dinkle .t"ake Road by tTie `public. ~ There is currently no final determination as to whether this road is a County or Forest Service Road. The: applicant. shall coordinate with the County and the Forest Service and provide hn easement to the appropriate entity. PP 5. consum tionn toletsutandZ the lar assisted water heating, low P _,, rural insulation in excess of building code requirements in construction of the residence. 7. All. representations made by the applicant 'in the application and in public meetings shall be adhered to. i8. All material representations made in the public hearing and in the application shall be adhered`to.' APPROVED by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on August 20, 1991. PITRIN COIINT'Y~PS,ANNZNC' AND ZONING CO23M2SSION sy ~%~C~~~ /iJ~'m Reser, Chairman C ATTEST: ~p~.e- Deborah Skehan, Administrative Assistant APPR AS5 TO O C• Timo h E. Whitsitt Coun y t rney ELS RESO resnick 1041 APPROVED AS 't0 CONTENT':' su nne Roi Chan, Deputy Director ..~.._..v ,., m:. -.,.~ xw fl .Jk~ .. Can . „ ,~o ~ ~ .t.L t ...ac .... PROJECT: Resnick Subdivision Exemption for a Major Plat Amendment LOCATION: Resnick Subdivision, Lot A " APPLICANT; Candace Resnick PHONE: (970) 927=3045' PLANNER: $rian L. MoNellis PHONZJi (970)'920-5042` DATE: June 25, 2002 Type of Application: Major Amendment to a Development Permit Description of 1?roject/Development: The applicant is requesting a Major Amndment to aDevelo~ment Permit Plat to allow the construction of on site affordable housing in substitution of the cash-in-lieu requirement pursuant to Resolution P 91.48 and BOCC Resolution 91.42, condition No. 4: . _ ~ ~ ` " y , Areas in which the Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: • Seclion 3-200-080, Major Amendment to a Developrttent Permit Staff wip refer the appticatiotr to the following agencies: County Zoning, Housing, Environmental Health and Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowners' Association. Review by: P&Z and BOCC. Publio Hearing? Yes, at BOCC. A public notice sign shall be posted on the property at least 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Section 4-90 of the Land Use Code. 'The Applicant shall mail notices to all adjacent property owners of least 30 days prior to the hearing with the return address of the Community DevelopmentDepartment (a copy of notice shall be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County'as they appeared no more than 60 Says prior to"the date of khe pulilic Bearing. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the adjacent property owners with the complete appIications.'" What fee is the applicant requested to submit: • Total Deposit: #1~{7m t7at fee Please submit: A list of adjacent property owners and 2 copies of the `Agreement Tq Pay" forms don t include with each packetcopY)~ Please include fourteen l_9) copies of the following in each packet unless otherwise noted: • Summary letter eitplaining the request and addressing all Lanii L7se Code statidar"ds listed above. ~ ' . • Consent from owner to process application and authorizing the representateve,'z"~applica"ble ~1 copyD; • Copies of all previous land use approvals; • Docu~nfauon of how and when the. parcel was created (2 copies); • Proof of ownership from a title company or attorney licensed in the State of Colorado (1 copy); • Total deposit for review of the application; • Copy of this pre-app form (l copy). NOTE: All applications must be submitted in digital format Acceptable formats are ixf, .dog .wpd, .rtf, jpeg, .pdf. NOTE: This pre-application conference summary rs advisory en nature and not binding on the County. The information provided in this summary is based on current zor?rng staridard~s and staff's iirterp'retdlrons Eased upon re resentaribns o the a licant Additional information ina "tie re ulred 'n`on corn fete review o~ the a `licaion. P f PP .T , Y 9 P P 1' PP .._ COMMITMENT FOIL TITLE INSURANCE ` SCIiEDULE A 1. Effective Date: July 19, 2000 of 8:00 AM Case No. PCT15454C2' 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 2,500,000:00 Premium$ 2,335:00 Proposed insured: Rate: Re-Issue EDWARD HANSEN and JULIA HANSEN (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 ` Premium$ 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate: $10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: BRAD A. RESNICK and CANDACE J. RESNICK 4. The-land referred to in this Commitment is situated ih the County ofPITKIN State of COLORADO and"is described `as follows'. LOTS A AND B, RESNICK SUBDNISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded March 15,,1993 in Plat Book 31 at Page 11. PITMN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 6oi E. xorxllvs This Comrriitineht is invalid ASPEN, Co. s1611 unless the Insuring 9~o-9zs-1755 Provisions and Schedules 97o-v25-6527 FAx A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT ' ,V _.. ~,.. ~. ' ~ '~ ',. i _._ :' .,: ,.,:..... _ ,.~...oa~M ~ > SCHEIDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUiRETvIENTS The following'are therequirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured: ~" ITEM (bj Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be inst?red must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of7rust from :BRAD A, RESNICK ahd CANDACE J. RESNICK to the Pu61id Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of :BETTY RESNICK original amount : $ 200,000.00 dated :January 29, 1993 recorded :February 2, 1993 in Book 702 at Page 579 reception. no. :353578 2. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of trust from " ~' BRAD A. RESNICK ahd CANDACE J. RESNICK tb the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : EUGENE :1:'RESNICK original amount : $ 300,000:00 dated 1 February 5, 1993 recorded :February 12; 1993 in Book 703 at Page 550 reception no. :353939 3. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from :BRAD A. RESNICK and CANDACE J. REShtICK to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of :BETTY RESNICK original amount : $ 300,000.00 dated :May 5, 1997 recorded :April 21, 1997 reception' no. :403569 4. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from :BRAD A. RESNICK and CANDACE J. RESNICK to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of `: CHERRY-CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC: original amount $ 975;00000 dated :December 23, 1998 recorded :December 31, 1998 reception no. :426044 Duly acknowledged Assignment of the Deed of Trust recorded $eptember'20; 1999 as Reception No. 435662 assigning the Deed of Trust to AURORA LOAN SERVICES INC.. , -_ l SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS -Continued Duly acknowledged Assignment of the Deed of Trust recorded June 26, 2000 as Reception No: 444537 ' assigning the Deed of Trust to MORTGAGE ECEC"TRONIC REGIS7RA7(ON SYSTEMS, TNT.. 5. Duly executed and acknowledged Deed, From :BRAD A. RESNICK and CANDACE J. RESNICK ;.. ,_ To :EDWARD HANSEN and JUGA HANSEN 6. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is hot required to be recorded) 7. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrurrieht is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 8. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Reaf Property ih-the ~tate'of Colorado. (this fnstruiheiifis'hot requf~ed to be. recorded) _.a ~ .. _,.. ~,W ..t The policy orpolicies to be issued will contain exgeptions to the following' unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts iri boundary lines, 'shortage in area, encroachment's, any facts which a correct survey and inspectToh of the premises would disclose and wfiich,are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the"public records, '` 5. Defects, iiehs, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters,;if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured m ... ~. acquires of record for value the estate or irterest or mortgage thereon covered 6y this Commitment. ' ,.,..._ w_... ,W~, 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed'for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the ro rietor of a vem or lode to,extract and remove hos ore therefrom, should the same be fou td enetrate or ntersed the remises tiereb '' ranted and ri ht of wa for~ditches or canals constructed nd the authority of the United States. as reservedn t7ni#ed States Patenf recorded September 12, 201"0 iri by Book b5 of Page 181. 8. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States and reserving to the United States all the coal and other mmerals m the lands together with the'right to prospect for, mine and remove the same as contained in lTn~ed"~~ates$atentrecordedyJanuary 5; 1935 in Book 162 a ge »,.,~,, _ tPa 412. 9 7 8 at Page 436 eandrApriN12~1961n n Bookr193 at Page 479. eels recorded December 31, 1956 in Book 10. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Underground Right-of-Way Easement granted to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc:, a's'a"et forth in instruments recorded "May 5;.19$5 in°Book 5i0 at Page 203 and Contract for Electric Association, recori3ed`Nlay 5; 1986 in `Book 510 at Page 205: 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded October 30, 199'(`iii Book $60'at Page 41$. as Resolufion No. 91-142. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded November 8, 1991 in Book'661 at Page X32"as Resolution `No. "9`1-146. ' 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission recorded November 21, 1991 inBook 662 at Page 5$ti as Resolution No. PZ-91-48. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board, of County Commissioners recorded November 17, 1992 in BooC<694 at Page 674 as',Resolution No. 92-384. 15. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plats. of subjecf property recorded March 15, 1993 in Plat Book 31 at Page 9 and in Plat Book 31 at Page 1 L --- ~'; e~. SCHEDULE B SECTION2 EXCEP'C'TONS - (Continued) 16. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions, assessments`and all mafters asset forth in Declaration of Covenants for,Resnick Subdryis~on recorded March 15, 1993 in Book 705 at Page'120 y ~ ',712 at Page 75~, deleting and Amendment to Declaration of Covenants recorded Ma 20, 1993 in gook therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, IimiEation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. " ' 17. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded March 15, 1993 in Book 708 at, Page 124. 18. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligatiohs asset forth in Memorandum of Understanding recorded March 15, 1993 in Book 706 at Page 129. 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all mattersas set forth in Resolution df the Board of County Commissioners recorded November 2, 1995 in Book"79$'atiPage 5`18 as Resoluton No: 95-85. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and al( matters'as Set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded July 21, 1998 as Reception No. 419704 as Resolution No. 98-121. .. ~ r ti ~ w w i ~~ ADDTTIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy td be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section t - (2) Water rights; claims dr title to water. (NOTE.THIS E7CDEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OVV<~ER'S AtUD MORTGAGE POLICYTO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an pwher's title insurance policy fdr a single family residence (including a condominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of ah exception or exclusion to coverage relatirig'to unfiled medhanics or materialme,ns liens, except when said coverage or insurance isextended td'the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics` bef a nishedrto the Company Updndrece pt of these ifems aend'any othters~requ7ements td' be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer fo prdviiie mechanics`or matenalmens lien coverage. "" ` NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents'from said transaction, the Company will lie deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage": Pursuanfto Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of'the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; ' (c) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Dlerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A taz Certificate will be ordered from the Coun Treasurer b the Com an and the costs'thereof tY Y P Y charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the dompany prior to the'issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT15454C2 A and B are aftaehed: ERHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL 0F' LAND LYING .A~.,: `~~TNG''~I~N "~~ ~5~1 /4"'"O~' TI~E~ ~"'. ~~ ` ~ _ SEl/4 OF SECTION 7, 'TOWNSHIP 8 "SOUEB, b`Z`b1NOc, 86 W~`ST"' OF THE'. 6TH PRINCIPAL TDIAN, EAGLE COUNTY, COL,'bI~ADO, ` DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO "W"I"T;" "" ' BEGINNING AT A POINT 175'~'~~T WE~r OF'""3`EE S'~ "~`ORNER ~'OF " ~ ~ "~~" ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ RANGES86/WEST OFJTHE~6TH p~E~'CTION 7,"TOWNSHIP '8'`"SOUTH, THENCE` NORTH 150 'B`EET;" " THENCE,_.WEST 64 FEET; THENCE' SOUTH 150 FEET; THENCE', "EAST 64 FEET`TO THE"""PLACEW'O~' "BEG~INrfh~~`~~ "°'~ _ ,-.~ _ ~ .,, „ SAID PARCEL IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS""`FO'L'T:OG7"S:" "~` '" ~' ` A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN' TRACT 45 , Tbt~NSIP 8 SOUTH", ' "' '' ~ RANGE '85 WEST OF THE" STH PRd~C`I~~, 1~fERIbIAN ~` ' ACCORDING TO TFiE INDEpENDEN'I RHSUE70"E~1 TOWNSHIP 8 SO(ITH, RANGE 86 WEST, 6TH ~P:2d:LL`DA~'j""`~`"~"30, 1329, BEING $+IORE PARTICTjLARLY DE~CRIBE$` AS '~~"LI,04~IS:"" ' ~~ ~ ~ `" ' BEGINNING AT A POINT 175 FEET CHEST 0~' A R'~tASS~ CA~p~""'FOUND' `' ' ' ZN PLACE AND PRd1~'ERLY Id'FiR~ F~'OR'~`"P;I~GI~E'"""POINT 1~O 3 " OF TRACT 47 , TOWNSHIP 8 50''H, R`A~fCE~'""e~ W''"SNT '~`~' THE ' 6TH P.M. , (SAID ANGLH PO'~I~T~`NO 3' B`"E~`~5'G~"' "I'~~CA~ TO THE' SE CORNER OF THE S~f 4 OF`~~'~'fiE SE~1. ~4 O'~'~'SEC~TION ~ ~ ' 7, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH,...R°A2~`h ~8g'"W"E~S'~° oF` ~~ ~'~~"~P~ F%I.""~'ROi~~ _y "~ a' ' THE SUSPENDED'FCEN(HERLY'~s`G'~'~''"`"~'~°"'I'$~`zj;>._ ..~ _ THENCE" f~ORTH 150 FEET`, ~~"~ ~~ ~ THENCE WEST 64 FEET THENCE. SOUTH 150'"F~ET~ _ ~ THENCE EAST 64 FE&`T TO THEC -FOTN`T ~bF BEG`I2~NI2~G COUNTY OF EAGLE, STA ~ A °` ,. ~ _ TH OF" OOLORA"D~ _ ., , ~~ I p"'~, ~, ~EG~ L`F: AP62 011999 WPTEk aESw~E= STATE RESNICK PROPERTY DESCRIPTION' That i+a rt of the Eol loving described prop¢rcy lying within Tract 85 of Sete'ions 31 and 32, and vtthln Lots, 2, 7, 8 and Clae SW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Seet ion 32,' sll in T. 8 5., R.. 87 W. , 6cU P."M. _. ~ ., ... ~. TSeF,inninr ac a point [romyhence the Southu,eat Corner of said Seel ion 32,,,bcars, S- 00°05'34^ w. 642,59 Leer and ?T. 89°5$'30 W: 13'18 4b ~'ee; tliapce "N: """""'"" 00°05'74" E. 1991.09 Peet; chgne«a N. 00°08`00" E.1407.O~leet 'mo're+''or'less Co „. the centerline of of codn'ty road kgoan as ctia Dinkl¢'tiake 1toaCl asconscrucL'ed and in p7aec; `c l~cnce a1„o ng [tie eenterli na of acid Digkle Lakei,ROad ehe L-olloving courses and die tarides to 'l'he "jYbint "oF ~egi$'tiing, ' . 3'2 °37'36"~W. 103:55 Fccl'; S. 24°52'25" W. 273.84 tee`[; ' ' S. 37°01'29" W. 196.06 fen£';" '' `' S. 23°42`46" W. 520..:64 fnnt; S. 24°58'35° w. 3¢5:21 £eec -' S- 34°51'4fi" W. 361.41 Fee[; 5• t8°57'-18"W. 2G ti':56 Peet; 5. Ot,°59'23°'W. 1fi9:12 feel' ' ^u. 13°43'06" W. 180.96 feet; ' ' v. 1G°23'75" W. 20fi .14'ferl ~ ` v• 79°41'47"'W. 454":49 •Pc e't;~- '' ' S. U8'14'7U^ E. 405.60 fees,''..: .._ ,. S. 2G°10.18"' w. 66.83 feet; S. 52°37'U3" w. 159:73 £eeC; ' ' S. 04°00'56" E. 48. G1 Feaa',: S-~74°39'17" E. 124.10 feet; S. 57°09.47" E. 9II.18 P¢et; S. 75°51'26" E. lOG .99 leer; N. 54°41'01 "~°ti. 108.7 feet; ~ ~ ' N- G4.4G'ti0^ L'. 100.77 feet; N. R9°27'37" L•'. 74.fi6 feat; S- G9°52''OU° E. 199':33 feel; ' N. 8@°38'57" L'• 239 25 faee~ ~' S. 83°59'27^ L'. 153.45 feat; ` N. 63°07 "54" H. 151.04 £ant ' 'S• 87°52 ^59" E. Llfl.2G feet, . cone atni ng G2.03li ne ree me rd or les se _. ,_ ~ ,~.. .. o.v `„~ ASPEN/PITKIN COM~1tiNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMElVTT Agreement for Payment of Pitkin County Development Application Fees PITKT_~' COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and Ci9~~fl CE ~~~~~ C/~ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLO`VS: ~ ~~/ ._. - PP l • for _ _. 1. 2LICANT has submitted to COUNTY an a lication -~ (hereinafter, TIi-t PROJECT). ?. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinances No. 98-7 and 99-37 establish a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and COUNTY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties for APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to ,APPLICANT. APPLICANT_ agrees he will be benefited 'by retaining ~m_~ greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. COUNTY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. COL~ITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to deoision. ~. Thuefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the, COLNTY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to COUNTY to reir~.burse the COTJ~TTY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. PITIiIN COITNT~' APPLICANT Cindy I-~ouben Community De~-elopment Director gatupportlt`orms\agcpaypf doc OS/O5/00 ~}~t/~.4CC ~~~ir1/ C~c Pri ~.Nam~:. ~ ,: ~d~ Q-:~- / -- ,. . Signature Date: /l ~/ ~ ~ Mailing Address: 5353 GtJ. So p~ ~ s Ck~ ~~ , _ ~ ,~ ~.. w> ...~ ,. ~~ s/fiL Co ~'/~ 2~ m ..nax n a,.u Asx a_x.~ va ~l~n +, x•„w~.ewx.K+we. U+~"~+~sk+N:mgPo^b.mxt rz a-n5}Rx?NLN MRR.19.U7~4 12~43Pt1. RI2 CRRLTbr~ &IRL f~.224 P.1 .. a ~ y j Cf.9A2MTtri[EN'I' FbR'1'x7'LE I1Q$t71iA1oT 9CTil~bvi:8 A . 9. Effective Da~+; F.ebruary 17; 2083 at e:00 AM Gsae No. P¢T16S57F 2, Policy cr Polioiea to he fasUed; (a) ALTA t5w11Er's Policy-Fprni 1992 Ar•tount5 0:00 ,Premiums o.oa Proposed Insured: Rate: ~ (b) ALTA Loan Palley-Form t992 " ' Amouiit$ 2t90,000,OQ Premiums 372:00 Proaosedlnauretl; Rate:r~e-lsaua PAUL W; JABOTS, N!S SfJCCEuS~RS A:f~bobR ASSIGNS Tact Certificate: $10:00 ,... i,.. 3, Title tothe FEE SIMPLE e6tata or interact in th®larid descnbed or refemad 4o jn thla Comrnitnxnt ,s dt the effeativ~ tlate hePeofveated in; CANDACE J. RE,SIVPCK ~4. Ttt~e land referred to In this Commitment Is situated In the County of PlTfCIN State of COLt?RAbC3 snd is desdrl5lad ae IbII0VJ6: LCTS A AND 13, RESNICK SLOBRIVISICN, aCOdrdinp tb the Plat there®f resmrded Marsh 1 b, 1999 6n Plat Book $1 at Pape 11. ' riixaN csat)vaY xrrt:E, uvc. r,:n a. xomazas t~'8.~i,CY7. 87627. sro•4asz~sc>?aa~e 5TY875-6E27FAX __..." E77-237~YS8'xoriFrze r+usxoxiz~ acs snhadula A-PG.1 `This Commitment is invalid `"unles¢ tn® lesuring Pr'oviaions and Soheduisx A and B sro attachsd. "_ t g,~ s ~ ~•#a» s + tax ~ ^. ~' ".t/.~ r ,u~ !i 'k^.:1~y F '^~' ~ ~ ~:Y r S,. +~ ., _ {. N0.224 ~ P`. MRR.19.2004 12~43Fh1 RIT'y CRR~TON 6JRL .,_...::, ~., n, ..., ~r:n .... ,. _s ,. .. ,., ,,; ... a. ~r ~~., .' ~;' ,.. 1. ' st;Ilsta,:rGS 8 - sacrlON 1 RBQI3IR8Nt~111'I'5 The Potknuing a~ she roqulrerttents to ba oomplJad With; )T6AA (a) Payment to or for t)se acgoun* af.the granters or mortgagors of the itil0 canslderation fnr the. estate or interest to be )nstlred. ~ ~~ ~. M_ STEM ("b}'Proper 6natruinen s) area ng a `es ate or interest to b9.insured Moat be executed and,d,~ Hied Far rtcord ba-wit: 1. Rdl®8$6 pY Ehe Publie Trustee of the; to tNe for the dated `' : Janpary 29, 1993 recorded. : FapPUary 2, 1993 in Bogk 702 at Page 879 r*:oaplion no. : 353?`i7B_ 2, Ralaas'e by gJe Pubtio Trustee of the, Deed'of Trust from N[GK J, RESN!CK and BRAD A RES CANDACE ,~ ~,. ;. . „ .df the County of P~CIN ' to the Pub1lc Tna~teE 4orthetiaseaf : EUJ86NE,.J, RE3NICK Original SRJWrt4 :$ 300;OOa.00 dated ;February 5 1983. raced®d :Feb"rusty 1a, 1883 in Book 7113 at Page 650 receptian no. ; 3~~$~9 3. Rele~e by the Puell Deed ofTrust from BRAti A, R~SNICK to the Pubi+e Trustee for the'use of original amount °` lobed recdrdeo nzcepG'on no. 4, Proper Wthdrawl of Notice of EteoUon and Demand for Sala by ttie Publ~ Traetae demanding the sale of ti~ . ,~- w_ the BubjeoE propertytlehor(betl ~:n"~ruat~~e`~fe~i~srl'1~ecamber~3,1998, ai5 haoeption No, 4280A4. Ndttce'of Elention and Demand recorded Februe 1, 2002'a`g' piton No.d634J31, 5, Duy executed and acknowledged Deed, Erom ' BRi~"b.S1""~ICK ~ , To : CANDACE 7; RESNit:K (Conti,,^ued) --._,-.--..-..--.... - , ,.u x'.,, .yu , n .. , ~.... r.~w t., *++'rtkf;: i^: lxa,..._e'z '&..u ..9, ~:i'*"Y~.' x- ..~ fie., ..~ MAR, 19.20©4 12~~3PM RITZCARLTOK WRL ...~. .x .~., a.. r.. ~, WJ.224' 'P.3 SCI~DULE H • 9EC!'ION 1 EHQiJ TRffiVCEIVTQ - Coztt3atued 8. [Seed of Trask from : CANdACE J. RE3NtCK" to kha Public TMastse of the County of PITKfN for khe use of i THE L~Nd~R TO 8E ItV8t,JRED HERt;UNbIER' to sacure ` : $20~,CCi0,d6. _,:.. a ._ .. ,.~:.~ ,i ,. ti .:x _ ~ .~_._:r.s . ».n,;.,~, r a~~ .~ .m. t x.;. ~..... ...: ~: ..., . MRR.19.2004 12~43PM RTZ CPRLTdN WpL ~" N0.224 P.4 y _ i ~. Mr ~ ., .,,>.~... ._ 9Cf3EDULIE)~`9~t~TCS~V"2 SXCBP'i'IONTS The policy or policies to be~asuyed wilt contain exraptiona to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satistsction of the Com an 1: Rights or claims of parties in possession not sFrown by the public retards. a. Easerr~ehts, or oiaims a} r~asgrnenm, not shown 6ythe public ratprda. 3, Disoraparsci~, confltcta in boundary lines, shortage in`area; encrdaohmants, any }acts which a tarreot aunroy and inap®otioh of the prem1seewould d~acioae snd whwh are not shaven by the public records. 4. Any liars, or right tc a lien, for servlcea, labor; ormatieriarheretot`ore or llerea"fi±~ furnished, Impasdd`tiy law and not shown by the public rooisY~s. b, Cefect&; liens, ehcumbrantbs; adverse claims or ofher matters 'rf any, createtl, drat app~ring 4n the public record's orattachl subsequent to the oft6c8ve data hereo}'but prior to the date the prodoaed Insured aGquiras of reocrd~r value the estate or in'teraaE or tndrtpage thereon covered by this Commitmelt4, 8. Tares due and payable; and any mx, speoist assoasmettt, oharpa or I'~eri imposed for water or sewer aarvioe,dr for any dther special taxing district, 7. 2nd half of a0D1 ~sr~`a due In the emcurlt`of $9;884, ~8. 8. Rs! td the Bc 8, 1t). Reservation, minera~ressrvatbns snd matters as'"get fortll m DEeds 178 at Page 488, and`i~pril`12,"~`86i in 9ool-C° i'at papa479. 11. to'ths nlns and ' Page rmcordad'Dedambsr3l, 1g5s in Esook" aa3 12. Commias~onaran~orodedp~ber30,f891nBook 8d ~Pa'p 4'~"$e~~t®5Tu4on~foh9B9,eZ-ofCounfy' oondldona, provisions, obligations end an matters ea set forth in Resolution of the Board of Couniy 13 Commisstoners'raccrdetl November 8, 1'dY'linoli~at'~®ge"t~~ ae f~esclution No. 91-148. 14. Terms, condRiona, provls(ons, oblipatlons and ai! marten as set forth in Ro:solutlon of the Pianrtingg' ano Zoning ccmmtssidn rcoord`ea7~lovemberal; 1891 in~Booli$~t a'R~ape'~BC as R(6oluticn Kra. PZ•81=48. 15, Terms, condniona, pro~iaiona, otNigations and all matters as set forth in Rtaolution of the Board of County Commi~ioners recordetl November 17, 1881'in 8oo(<8e4 attsa®c"874 as Re~otutlon M,o. 92-884. (Continued) _ - .,. ... . ~ ^.tin+axu, ~ . 1.an ,r AY+' cMi. ~'A':: ,} f.,sl f..,a..,i. ..'t ~''>Y. .._ MF~R.19.2~4 12~4ztPNi ~I'1"Z"CARL70N°'ti11~L °.""„" .< _,.~ ~,r„„ ~ ".:. N0.22~1 P.5 sc~prns s sEC~raor~ a sxxcee7la©rrs:~cont~„te~J~ _ _ _ , 16. Eaeamen~, Mghts aiway and aA matters ~8 disclosed on Ptats of subJeM propar~y raCgrd6d March 16,1963 iti , Piet Book 37 at Pale B and In Plat Bobk'3'~ at Page 1 f. "' 17, Tho66 terms, eonditiors, provlsiona,'obl~9e4ions, eaaem~nt, teatriotfona, aaaeaamertts and aii matters as set forth in Declarattori bf Covenarfts nir Reaniok Subriiv'cslon recardad larch l'3 `1'98'$ (n $ook 70b at pa®®120 ahd Amehdmant to t~l'ar~~tien e~ `L`evpnah"~"r"ar'tr," ir~nrfxA„~ ~k h~stC ems,. ~rh . ~ ~ ~.... .. _, p 18. B~rtkvs7,~ ~~ IFtleo6naa,1 zroviaipns and obligations as sat forth in Easement Agreement recorded March 15, ^, 993 ir; 16. Terms, conditions, provisions arrd obligations ea set Forth in Memorandum aF Under3tending n?earded March 15, 1693 iI) hook 748 al Page X24""~ r. 20. Terms, coridifaona, p^o~sions, abiiaatians and eU matters as set fonh ir, Resolutlbn of the Board of County Commisaidri®rc record®d November 2, 1968 itti Bab~k~'7$§'ef Pege`51~ as~bsa~uEion No, 86-@g, 21. Terms, condttinns, provisiorts; abtigatlorte and all mat®rs as set Forth in RasoCud®tr of the Hoard oi~Ceuci{y ~ ~ Commiseirrrrsre recasrded July 21 1989 aa'Receptiori No. ~18't"l as Resolution Nb `98:121. , 22, Terms, corid3tions, proWsona, obligations and a9 matters as, sat forth it Resotutioit of th® Board o{Couriy Commfasibrters reoorded~l~ecdrrrb®r 12, 200.1 ws h~ecdptt"on No. ~9'1'79`3"3~Re5cTu`tio`n"hfp,~1S1-`20~4~1. 23. Far~Bhe use of ~~~EFFRY ~ aE p dIRNTGAGECCb, ~ ~SN(CK Ongmal Amount . $978`,000.00 Dated :. Decemter23, 1988 Raoordsd :Decemoer3l,'f668-_ Reception No. : 4Z64d4 The The beneficial interes# of the above 1?eed of Trust was assighed to AU~tf}RA LO regarded S®ptember 94,` 1999: as Reception Nc, 495882. AN S6R~'ICl$ by ?natrurrtant Tha beneflctaP interest aF the above Creed of°Tt"u®t was ass ned ~o MC~~CT""CA"~E~~i3`~1iC' ~ ` ~'~ ~`~ ~ ~~ ~ .` ~" ` ~: REOtSTRATlON°$Y~T~IVfS; "41~~: by inssntment recRfrd~d ~una 2B, 2060 as R~captlan hlo: d4493~. (Contfnuad)'` - ..~,. r:,,~~•,, ,,,, ~.: , .,. ,.. ...... _ ,, .. >.. ,.., ,. e ~ MAR 19.2004 12~4APM RITZ"Ci~RLT73N ~IF:L ~ t~IQ.224 'P.6 ' ,.. . _. e,. , . ..., :: ~ ~ ~ SGHEDCILB 8 88CT~Id1iT.2 _',, _ _ . . EXC61''9'IONS'~'(Conttnue~j° 2A, Deed of Truet from: CANDACE ,i. RE9N(Cf~ "°' Tokhe Pu~lfc'Trustee of the Gb~nly~bfPT'TKiN '~ ~ ~ ~~ or the uao of : PRUC (~"T JhI~+Dl9 ~'ripinal d~oi_int ~2dd;Qt10 00` O ,_ ~ t)atad ; NfBrCh 2,`22162 ` .,_ _: _,_. ~ . .. i Recorded . Mt~mfi 38 2002 Reception No. ; 4BSb84 ......~ : :~:' c A:., .: ,. .. .. V .i.... ~n MAR 19.2"+4 12~%.34PM RITZ"CRRLTbA"V51~L M0.22~r ~.P.7 . , Af9171'i'II3'N.U:T1Y2?Cy~$TIJN..~ ~ ° '` Alvu~rsc~"rJtc~e~~~ . _ _ The t7wner°s Peslioy 4o be issued, ifany shad contain ttrefollowing kerns in.addi8bn to the ones set lbrtit aboya;' ' .., . .,.; ~Tt`"rHE OV~E~'i~""ANC7 ~ , NC NCTC: Ifi the Compatry Cdnd;aots the owners or loan Closing under oirourr~tanoes where it 's responsible for the recording or thing of legal d"ceumerils from said transaotian, the Gamperry will tie deemed to have provided "Gap CoverRga", Pursoantlo Senate Bit19~1:'14 CR8 9b: " ~ "_ ~ "'' party ma 6e located !n a jai The Sub ct Reel Prp yg ~ ~ ~ ~ 3peclal Taxl~ng i?istt'ict; b A Ce ~ cafe of Tdxea ®ue liatfi e~h taxtn " uriadletloh m be okitained form, the Cbuntiy freas.rrer bf the Chun fin3asurerrs ~uthonxed A n fc) f~ ®rc! of CourgiiyrComrnipaaeia~ers8 the Co nth® tscundaries of such r~ietriote mary be o6tainEd from the Sy L`ferk and lieC4rder, or the County Rsameaor, Pursuant ifs House BPI101.1d38 (CRS 10.1d~723~ ,~~_ , ~~ I sseae puralaa t ~ CRS 10~ 71 12~ (ffi8 Q BS) t}~i"s iepto advlaa~ a^ a~epd~ for minct'a!'snterests or (a) There there la recorded evidence°that a mineral estate has been severed, feeaed ar othenuisc aonveyed from the'surfaca estate end trattiiere its a autiataiitiaf'lkelifi6ed ttta~'~ third parley bottle solnebF"all kNevest rn or , (b) That su~cris'mineramets~ta e~rt~ y~;norlmue~e~ energy in ttta prt3per[y2~nd de the right to eritar and use the property without the surf2.ce owners' perm~ssibn. Thi9 oommrtment fa invalid uniasa Schedule e-Sscdon a the lnsurhtg prcvleiona and Schedules Commi#ment No. PG'T1$i357P A and 6 are attached. Putsuatrtlo @neuraeroe Re~ulatlcn 69,3 PITHIN CbUNTi' COi1'INIUNTTI' b~~Y:Ol~ltl~ b'P~R~°1'NT ~ *~ ,., ,`~ ' ~~ ~ , 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 ` (970) 920-5526/FAX# (970) 920=5439` March 19, 2003 Ms. Candace Resnick _. 5353 W. Sopris Creek Rd: Basalt, CO 81621 ` ~e: RESNICK MAJOR/MINOR A`M')NI~MBNT'`I'(~ ~ DE`~%~L(S~Iv1E1VT l'BvIITY„ ~ m ~'. ~ 4 (PIb# 24b5-323; 01-001/002; ~ASYE `#P028-U3~~ ' ` . ~ , „`~ ' ". ~ ' ~< ~ . Dear IvIs: Resnick: The Planning staff has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete After a more detailed review ofthe submittal infornation, additional information specific to the application maybe requested in order to adequately review'and process the application. The planner in oharge of the review will request the information from you' directly. This application has been scheduled for review by the Pitkm County Planning acid Zoning Commission on Tuesday, May 6, 2063 at a meeting to begin at 5:30 p:m. in Plaza One Conference Room, 530 ). Main St:, Aspen. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the dagte of thispeptter. After that the agenda date will be considered' fuial P d changes to the schedule or tablin of the a lication will onl be ahowed for unavoidable techtucal rolilems: If you haue any questions please call Brian IVgcNellis, the plannerassigned to your case, at 920-5092 Sincerely, Janis Taylor Administrative Assistant NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN tliat a priblic hearing will be ~ie~d oniWednesctay, July 23, 2003 at a regular meeting to begin at 3:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the conduct of business allows, before the Board ofCounty Commissigners, Plaza One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by Candace Resnick, requesting construction of on-site affordable housing im substitution of the cash m-lieu requirement pursuant to Resolution P7 91 48' and BO~(``I~"eso u nil 42"T~lie`property ~~ 1 is located at 5353 W Sopris Creek Road, and is c~escri~e~as a tract of land situated in Tract 85 of Sections 31 and 32, and within Lots 2,7, 8 ail m Toslup 8 S~out~, Range 87~ ~ ~ ry ' West of the 6th PM ~(~tafe isarcefl'~entificaiion dumber 24~5~ X23 01-00"1~ 00?): "~`he application/resolution are available for publac inspection m the Community Development ,~.. . - .. Department, City Ball, 136 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 81b11. Fon fiu•tTieririformation, contact Lance Clarke at (970) 920=5d~2. Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk Board of Count Comtsnss "" °' y oners Published in the Aspen Times on June 21, 2003 Pitkin County 002.02. Public Private CC NA.Cti~-Q.¢..C~ ~ ~-• ~ceJi~i't:.~it ~R - 1.~'~3 .~ ~.. ,~; ~w , PITKIN COUNTY COMMIINITX' DEVELUPMENT`D~PARTM~IVT' 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 816I1 (970) 920-5526 FAX# (~70) ~52`d=5~3'~ `' " ~ ' June 5, 2003 Ms. Candace Resnick 5353 W. Sopris Creek Basalt, CO 81621 Re: RESNICK MAJOR/MINOR AMENDMENT'TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PID# 2465-323-O1-001 & 002) (CASE# P028-03) Dear Ms. Resnick: We have scheduled this apphcahon for review at a public hearing by the Board of County Ju 3s 2003rat a meeon e to be i n at e 00 P M. Sh u d t"his~clate be iin onverrient o?Y~ IY ' g g you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. ease note that it is o y ur responsibility to post a public, notice sign on the property at least fifteen days prior to the heazing (and remove rt within one week after) and to mail notice to all adjacent property owners and mineral estate owners at least 30 days prior to ~w.~,. ~ . the hearing with tiie return address of the Community Development Department (copy of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeazed no Y P p hearing.an 60 da s Yot to t ge date of tge upblic hearingpPlease submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice b Postin & Mailin as roof of coin liance with the Code at the if you have any questions, please call Lance Clarke, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5452. Sincerely, Janis Taylor Adminstr ve Assistant Encl• Affidavit PTI'KIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DEPARTME1vT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (97Q) 920-5526 FAX (S70) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Housing Office Environmental Health Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowner's Association FROM; Brian McNellis, Community Development Department RE: Resnick Major/Minor Amendment to a Development Permit PID# 2465-323-01=001/002 CASE# P028-03 DATE: March 19, 2003 Attached for your review and comments aze materials for, an application submitted by Candace Resnick. The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission will review the application ori' Tuesday, May 6, 2003. Please return your comments to me by Friday, April 11, 2003. PLEASE RETURN_APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IF YOU,: HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM: Thai>Ic you. m+~.-; x ~~~~~~~ ~:~ ~~x ~, L j ~ ~ ~~ i. x. .. ,,,,,.,. ,. ' .,.n:.. _ ~..,,, ._ -..:..r., Tab"S'oufi~i'Ga7eria`St'r`eef..:..,,: .. ,. ._...,.. `.. .. _. ,w ..,:,,~ ::.. ... .... ..;;«;°1Lspeh,'C"oTo'r5d"o`„S 16 T ~,.: ._ .., .,,... .., ~ . ...7 (970) 92"0 5526 `"` r . ~~+.µaw ~ -. t~. F ' '"` ' Land Y7se. 172 Board of Adlustmeni -'~ " 15,9 C"ou3~fy Land USe Code ' 173 `Deposit "" "~ ~•.~.~~~ 174 F1afFee ~ ~ , ~~~~ ]62" _. Zoning'arid"Sign"" - " 7 69 ' Public Notice ~ ~' - ~ ~ -~, ,1 ' ~ 160 .Planning Enforcement Reieixai Fees: T , y , RB115 , ' Access~Pen~iit ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' j ~ .. LLICOl ~ County Clerk t s ; " '~ " ~ :>1~3 3" .~ < 1~ Coon}y Erigriee 1'94 Enin"`rorimenCa]'~~ealh "' `~ ._ 198 "Hooirsl"r"ig".+w:'n.,,.,:~-;~,,, _,;k-, . ....,.._._w ,. , _ I'90 rid 1Cnana"ezz"~n'} ""''" "'""" T;a b~ ,~; ~ '°~~ ~ 196 ~i Idhfe Officer '~ qq 4 ., '. ~ _ Building "Nees: ' ,. . u;t.. 1'70 Board of Aplyeals' ; # ~ I;35' A ,,,~ ~, Y ~ ,. ~fuildmg"Oo~e"8"a~s " ' w ~ ~ ' - ~ 05' , ..,._.. ., - ., $u din Peririff .. .: .,. 1 1 00 . ... .- .- Corit2acfor L'icznse ~ -- 'a , _ , °'TZ~` , , ~ .} ""ETecncal"Permit . ~...»'.,~ 195 µ M ` ~nezgj%'Coc1e,tteviet*i "" •. ~_.,,.,, . "° i 150 Plan Check ' ..; ; T10 Plumbirig'Peiiriif" """" "'""" . 130 , . 'Reifispec#ron' ~ s! , - "~ I5'I : ,. As en Sa4u}aflOn . _,,.~.,., .F ~ :.,..-., ..........:::.' ,.:,,«;,»:} , ,, .... , p ?1 152 ' _'AC~F15'Fn'e'Marshal"_.., _.~,,. .. ,,. .: ,..;... OtiierYFees~ .. - i:> ._w.;:t"i: :~. 165 'Copy Pgrformanc'e''D`epos~ t ^ ' ] 85 ParTr "~i"€"dicatian r `' " ` x ~ ' I8'6 Parking Cash ni feu ~ w ~.. ' ~,~ IS GIS"I2e 'uii-emerits """°" '' , . ~ , . . q :: R13I3'~ ,.."T2'oaeT7mpa t~`eese ~.~..,,.e. - .... ,..~ _.., ..._..~ w. .M,_,. BI202 c ""I2oac1'IZnpac`t'~`ee'„~ _ BT203 ' Sch'ooY"Impact`F"ee -.:u " °`" ""' j ~:~ ~ ~• ' ., J., y-y~"~`H„~. .M.a,A'M1%aa-~ewv.A o-4:a`, Md+4r~ p: F '~ ' ~~ ( Y 1 V1i'1!i r0. maw:' ~,~R ~yy M PHONE -:ex~f!A r `-".,dr CI!$Y~M1, ""'~'. : ~ IJ n5 ~ " CFIECK# ~ ~' CA5E/PE12 ~ ~ #OFCOP DA'I°E ~ "~~~ '~~'`^1° ~ ~ ~ -iNITTAL _~~ ~ i ~;~ r. ;4:.1Yd"'lad .. ,~ ; ~ . air,; 3.: ~. ~~~~ f 3~llON ~1'1~t1d t