HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273717300022 (3)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x1'77
w, ~. ~ ..a .~ .. ~I~ F ,,.~.,..3ti
--- - ~-
tt ~w* v+~ ~+.~
,..
Y.~y. ...
~. ......
;,
,,.; ,.
~, ,
~< .~
Claudia Aspen View 1041,Hazard Review and Scenic '
Page T of 4
DETERMINATION OF THE REARING OFFICER OF THE CONIl~IUNTTl' DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF PITI~IPI COZJNTI', COLORADO, A'1'PROVING THE CT:AUDIA .ASPEN
VIEW itl41 HAZARD REVIEW AND SCENIC OVERLAY REVIEW
Determinat,on No. 99-
RECITA`LS
I. Claudia Aspen View (hereafter "Applicant") has applied to the Pitkin County Hearing Officer
(hereafer "Hearing Officer") for 1041 Hazard Review and General' Submission approval to expand a
building envelope for the purpose of a garage addition to a single family residence. The application also
includes a request for additional landscaping. and a new access alignment.
2. The property is located at 43051 S.H. $2 and is: more particularly described in Exhibit A.
3. The property is zoned AFR-10 and contains approximately 2.8 acres..
4. The Hearing Officer heard this application at a public hearing on November 23, 1999; of which time
evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application.
5. Thz Hearing Officer finds that the application complies with the applicable Code sections.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Community Deveropment `
Department Hearing Officer, thathe hereby grants approval to the Claudia Aspen View 104 T Hazard
Review and Scenic Overlay Review subject to the following conditions which shal(nm with the land and
be binding;on all successors in interest:
1. The Applicant shall submit a 24" x 36" mylar 7.041 Hazard Review sife'plan to the Community
P P PP ~ :-- w . ,,a
Depvelo ment be artmenf fora royal and iecorilmg prior to~tlie submittal of any building-permit
a lications.
2. The site plan shall be submitted in digital format sortable for integration into the County's GTS system.
3. The following Disclaimer shall be placed'ori the Site P7ani' `~Y'U'd7 erivir'"o"nmenidr7tcriar'd areas ersl
. .; w,;
that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use anc~occupancy thereof `'
4. Prior to submission of a building permits, the'A,pplcant shalli'
A. File afireplace/woodstove permit withthe Community Developrnent`Department
B. Obtain an access permit from the County Engineer for the new access.
5. Prior to issuance of any bui]ding permits the applicant shall obtain approval of an TSDS permit from
the Environmental' Health Department: The septic system musYcomply with all minimum horizontal
setback requirements between its components and physical fePturges, must be desipnect by a quPlified
professional engineer, and shall be located within the landgca m /wastewater dais osa[`envelo e.
1
. .,
Claudia Aspen mew 1041 Hazard Reviewand Scenic `" _ ' "'"` "`
Page 2 of 4
6. Prior to the issuance ofseptic or building permits the applicant must document to the )environmental
Health Department that the well meets setback requirements and that quantity and quality of the'well A
water are adequate.
pplicant shall comply with the following st6elow t~he~t:'ina~ eiadeanains~thlogic hazard area's:
7. The A. The foundation-and wall construction " w ' ~" `" ` e hillside slial]'be
_ g g ..
dest ed and constructed to withstand
gn the toad of tfie fill, and adequate drainage along the
foundation of the existing structure rtiGst be positively connected to and extended
southeasterly past the proposed addition to assure that drainage is adequate. '
~.
B. The building envelope sha1T'not extend any farther into tYie~s(ope tliah t'~ie trajectory coming
from the retaining wall in the back of the existing residence. "'
C. The house shall be designed to preclude the accimulatioii of radon gas.
D. The. foundation for the residence shall be designed hy'a Colorado registered professional
engineer and approved by the County Engineer.
E. Buildings shall ba desighed' according Yo fhe Seismic done"?'guideline's in the"CTBC.
8. The following wildfire mitigation conditions shall be app[i,cable to all`structures on the property: -
Defensible Space:
NOTE: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the
natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions The owner of the propertyis
responsible for creating and inaintaining the'defensilile space as required below.
A. Brush, debris, and non-ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum of a 10
foot perimeter around all structures. Vegetation ifi this area shall be at 6" or less (i:e.
mowed grass, low-growing perennials, and ornatrrenfal vegetation that is non-woody).
B. Trees shall be placed so that the perimeter of thea`rees in their mature stage will be of feast
I S ft. from all structures.
C,. The Applicant shall lie responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible. space
vegetation requirements.
Structural Design and Construction Requirements
A. Roofs on all forthcoming structures and/or additions shall have a Class A, non-combustible
roof system. Wood shake/slvngle roof coverings and t7at'roofs (up'to~a 3:12 pitch) are
prohibited in all wildfire hazard areas.
B. All vents on all. forthcoming structures and/or additions shall be screened with corrosive
_.__
resistant wire mesh of one quarter inch inaximam:"
_~
Maintenance:
Al Roofs and gutters sfiall be kept clear of debris. '
w ....,. ..,.~.,.. ,: _ _-
B. Yards shall be kept clear of ali litter alas~and flammable debris.
G; All flammable materials shall be stored on a paralle~`contour a minimum of I S' froinany
structures.
2
d- - ,
°. i.. _
- .. :: .. .. ..` a _N
1 7
~„
Claudia Aspen View 1041 Hazard Review and Sceriic
Page 3 of 4
Miscellaneous:
A~ Firewood shall be stacked og a parallel contoura minimum of 15 feet away from any
structure.
B. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards arid on a contour away
from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation aroundany above-
ground tank. Any wood enclosures around the tank shall be'constructe3 with materials'
approved for 2 hour fire-resistive construction on'the exterior side of the walls,
C,, Fences shall be kept cleaz of bntsh and debris. ~ '" "
D. Wood fences shall not be connected to the structure.
E. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container.
F. Each structure shall have a minimum of one YO 16. ABC fire;extinguisher.
G.' Addresses shall be cleazly marked and,visible with minimum 2" non-combustible letters and
shall be clearly visible at the primary point of accessfrom the public or common access. road
and installed on a non-combustible post.
H. Any outbuildings or additional buildings shall adhere to the same standards as structures.
8. The Applicantshall comply with the following wildlife impact mitigation conditions:
A. Prior to the recordation of a k 64l site plan or addi't'ional land use appGaations for the
property, the Applicant shalt submit a landscape `plan. approved by the County Wildlife
Biologist to Community bevelopinent#hat inclades restoration of the riparian corricCOr of
the stream where it has been altered. A $3600 bond as a guarantee for performance of this
condition will be required prior to 1-041 site plan recordation.
B.; Commtinit) Development will require written evidence tha£the Applicant has fulfilled the
requirements of the Aimy Corps of Engineers (fines, mitigation, eta before recordation of
- the 1041 site plan or additional land use applications for the property will 6e accepted by the
C immunity Development Department.
C Gu deli~esuFenc~ne shalhbe prohibi`te~ within the l6 foottsfream~ et(iack o:rrrry Fencing
D. The owner shall maintain a 20 foot setback from the Fii~h water mark of the stream to
protect riparian vegetation as per Section 3-50.040(B)(5) ofthe Pitkin County Land Use
Code.
E. The removal of live vegetation in riparian areas and disturbance of bround cover adjacent
to streams shalC6e prohibited'
F. Dogs are prohibited on the property as per Sections 3-80.80~B)(~ of the Pitkin County
Land Use Code.
,.
G. Native vegetation shall be maintained outside the building envelope as per Section 3-
80.$0(A)(3).
H„ Installation and use of approved bear-proof trash containers'shall be requiredt.
9. No development, including grading, landscaping'; vegetatiob removal or disturbance, and septic.
system shall occur outside of the approved development envelopes, except as maybe necessary to
approval..,. ~..,_
implement the wildfire mitigation measures required elsewh'ere` in this
A bear proof trash container must be a fully enclosed, steel container of any size with a steel lid that has a two step opening
mechanism. Approval is granted by the Pitkin County WiIdliJe $iologist or personrie(of`{he Colorado"DiVisiori of4V1dlife~.
,.
.. . .
~.
Claudia Aspen View 9041 Hazard Review and Sceriic'
Page 4 of 4
10. The Applicant shall comply with the following Scenic Overlay conditions:
A The exterior ofany of the propo"sed additions to the existing residence shall be finished in earth
tones that blend with the colors of the surrounding natural environment. Roof materials shall
benon-reflective.
B, Lighting shall comply with the Pitkin Countylightng regulations at thetme of hgitirig
installation.
C.' In the event that the trees in the Highway82 right-of-way are ever removed, the owner of the
property shall replace them on his/her property.
11. Prior to the recordation of a 1041 site plan, the applicant shall provide a chain of title oT other
evidence to the County Attorney that this property has not merged with any adjacenf properties.
12. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the'applicafon and public
meetings.
13. The vested rights for this. approval shall expire on November 23, 2002,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISFIED IN THE ASPEN fiT1C%TES ZVEETCLY'on the 3rd day of '
~ ~ "`
October, 1999
NOTICE OF VESTED RIGHTS PUBLISHEI) TN T'I3E ASI'ET~'T1MES ~EKLY on the`~~_
day of Y~~~~~~ ,1999.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON TIIE 23rd DAY Of NOVEMBER, 7999. "
ATTEST: COi~IMUNITI' 17EVELOPNIENT'
DEPA12`I'M'ZJN'I"T;iEA~12"I1~G~0~'~'IC~R "` "
OF PITI~TN"COUNTY, COY;ORADO
_
-~. ` ~^,\
~/ ~)
Tenley Tayl r, Administrative Assistant T.ancel`Clarke, hearing Officer
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM_ APPR2IC'ED ~S'~I'O"COl~*'Y'~NT""
------
,---
ly .,-
John Cindy T-Iouben `' -
Y
f
~oun A torue
Community DeveCopmenY bir`eceor
PI30-99
2737-173-00-022 '
4
b
A
Z
'~'
A~
~a
~ b
N ~
Exhibit A
~ m m m~ m 3~.C ~~p
'C m~~ ~m tD C.~ ~
~e p C Q ~ wrnW(p
:i3`~~ 0-w,~~~
ma-=~v,tUdap(NTI
~~mZ~w~omn
O~~O~~VO~p ~lAQ
O rt~ oo~ --~~ y~~
am ma ~'c°.-. om
°~~v'o~p=~N
~~ v
O ~ ~'p+~ y Q m ~'~' '~
-wAfD 01,p`E -pe.w(ch
i'T .r w G. '"' ,~ 01 ~G
~30~,~~iy~p .,a
p CD {D '* ~" Rp S 01 01
(n O 'p"' O" ~ D p (~(pnp
C7~~C>Q+.~fn
N„pw_.~"~ O ~ CT
V"•7Nt7OfAW'
w~.N ~OCOI O ?
t17N?~p'4~
A~~ ,p,O ~~«K
a n ~ ,.-
~p CL.~S~p q~~o p
GC ~ i .~
,y. ~y ~fl~' ate. al ~e
su`~ ~ ° ~ e 3
m ~~
O ~~ ~
~ ~
~~~
`C ~ ,p
N ~ m
a, a
~' .s N
~~~
s
~ ~~
o'a
O~~
~ n
~ =' m
''~ i
!D A
~~
m
~.~P
.0
~~
O p'
3 ~
V
~O
O
O
m
a?
O 'p
m O
Q p
x
ego
ate"
N
O
R
A~
uo
p
r
0
i
.>~
~ ::
O
a_
,„,rxisen tr~pkm...~c 1 ~ -
~ ~~? 17.3-G?CS-~ «~
RESOLUTION QF,TAE PI:ANNING AND~ON[PiG CONII~YTSStO1V'
OF PITKIN COi7NTY, COLORADO, GRANTING AP~'ROVAT O)H Tt
CLAUDIA ASPEN VIEW LLC SCENIC FOREGRlUi1Nb Q'VERL~SY A1V'D A 1041 '
HA?ARD'REVIEW EXEMPTION
Resolution No. PZ-98 i
RECITALS
1. On February 17, 1998, the Pitltin County Planning and Zoning Commission, hereinafter
referred fo as the "Commission", reviewed a requesf'by Claudia l~speri View LLC, hereinafter
referred to as "Applicant", for a Scenic Foreground Overlay Review and a 1041 Hazard Review '
Exemption fora 6,500 square-foot addition to an existing single-family residence.
2. The subject property is located at 43151 State Highway 82; more specifically described m
Exhibit A, attached.
3. The Commission found the proposed development to be consistent with Section 3-60.40 of
the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
4. The Commission further found the proposed expansion to the building envelope "to be
consistent... with Section 3-80;20, in that the development will" not create additional 1041 '
Environmental Hazard impacts.
5. The Commission also requested that the"Applicant consider` the inclusion`of'a Caretaker
Dwelling Unit within the residence..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT'RESOLVED by the t~itkin County Planning-and Zoning '
Cosnrnission that; it hereby approves the Claudia Aspen View S'ce`nic "Foreground overlay Review
and 1041 Hazard Review Exemption, subject to tte followingconditions:
1. The Applicant shall adhere to all representations in the application and in the public
meeting.
418877 O'3114I'13i9g 0~y'~?tP RE~OLUTI Di~VYS SILV2
2 of B R 0.0~ Q 0 : iDfb '(1 9 ~f~ l~°'Y1klN' C2itlw7'V C0 ..
Resolution pZ-98_
Page 2,
2. Prior to the issuanee,of,a building permit; the Applicant shall plant fifteen (15) 10-12 foot
evergreen trees in the southwestern corner,of the properly, behindfhe`extsting 6etm. A
., ,., _.
performance guazantee shall also be submitted to the County' Attorney's Office to assure
the success of the tree_plantirigs, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall record a 24 x 36 inch mylar 1041
Hazard Review Exemption Site Plan which meets the approval of the Community
Development Department and County Attorney: The Site Plan shall also be 'submitted in
,.
digital format on a 3.5" diskette to the Community beuelopinent `Department, prior to the
issuance of a building permit. The site plan shall include the following 101 Hazard i2ev`iew `
Warning and Disclaitner:
"The provisions of these regulations do not in'arry way assure or imply that
areas outside of designated hazard areas wiZl;be free from hazards, or that
approved mitigation measures will grtarantee the safety of arty' property. "
a. The Site Plan shall depict the location of the fifteen. (I5) additional evergreens in the
southwestern corner of the property; in relation to the existing berm acid evergreen
trees.
4. Wildfire mitigation shall be as foil®ws:
a.: All vegetation shall be removed within. 10 feet of proposed structures. This
"defensible space" area shall be~,` maintained in mowed grass or non-flammable
material, such as decorative rock or gravel. '
b. Standing dead or dead down trees shall be removed within a 50-foot
perimeter of all proposed structures fo break up the vertical and horizontal
continuity of the fuels.
c. All branches from trees and brush within. a 30-foot perimeter of all structures shall
be pruned to a height of 10 feet above the ground.
d: Tree crown separation within a 30-foof perimeter of all structu_re5"shall have a
minimum of 10 feet between the edges of the crowns:
e. All branches .which extend over the roof' eaves shall be trimmed and all branches
within 15 feet of the chimneys shall be removed.
f. Roofs and gutters shall be kept cleaz of debris.
. I II~nl11111~1~1111111(~I 111 I~III~ (II~I~1Cf ~f111~l111`IIIC
436877 0J/14/ 1858 02 g4P RE50LUTL DAMS SILV'i `
3 off S R ; 0:00 D~ 9.00..N` 0,, 0~' P'~,~r~"$~U(~?°~"DD _,
Resolution _,PZ-98_
Page 3
g. Yazds shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and flammable debris..
h, Firewood shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from
any structute:
i. At least one ten pound approved ABC class fire extinguisher shall be placed '
in a visible and accessible location for each structure.'
j. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
k. Wood fences shall not be connected to the structure.
1. Fuel,tanks shall. be installed underground with an approved container.
m. Roof construction shall be Class A, non-combustible material with no flat..
roofs.
n: All vents shall be, screened, with corrosive resistant wire mesh of one quarter
inch (1/4") maximum. ' .
o: Addresses shall be clearly mazked and visible with miY~itnum 2"letter"s."
p. ?viaintenance of the "defensible space" shall be required in order to retain if's, value
as wildfire mitigation.
q. Any additional buildings shall incorporate wildfire mitigation measures
5. All development included gradmg, septic system, and landscaping sha1T occur withuu
the building envelope, except for the landscaping required for screening. Vegetation shall
not be disturbed. outside the building envelope and vegetation wuthin the envelope shalt be
preserved as much as possible, except for t'tte ~sturbaiice required for wildfire mitigation
measures.
6: The Applicant shallutilize the same exterior build'ang materials, architectural Techniques,
.. __.
and colors as the_exsting residence. Any metal used on the exterior of the structure shall
. ....,
be non-reflective.
7. AlI structures shall be designed to preclude the accumulation of radon gas, sHould it be
present in the soils.
i C6
416877 03/14/1908 02:B4P RE50CUTI DNVI5 SILYE
4 ef3 R 0,0~~~"0:00''N 0:~0'0"f~I7KIN ~OG~ITY CO-_~.~ _ ,,
ResoluEion PZ-98_ _„
Page 4
8. The residence shall not exceed 10,600'squaze feet of floor azea, as defined an the Pifkin
County Land Use Code. ,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE iTTH DAY O~''FEBRT7AR'1;`1998 "~ _ " `
,, ,. ,. ,,
PLANNING, AND ZONING COMNQSSION,
OF PITKIN"COUNT'Y, COLORADO
az Ila Larsen, Chait~ax-
Date '~ 4- f `t;5
ATTEST[': _ ..
.~ 1Z~r1L1~7~mpa~t~
Sharon I~hrnan, , .. .,. rv ......,._. ~ _ ,. ,... ~ . ~.. ,
Community Development Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:.
John Ely, Cind Houben,`
rn~~~ Y :,
County Atto Commumty Development Director
case no. Pl'35-97
parce[no.2737-173-00-022 `
TO: Pitkin County Hearing Officer
FROM: Gabe Preston, Planned fj
RE: Claudia Aspen View LLC 1041 Hazard Review and Scenic Overlay
DATE: November23, 1999
REQUEST: The Applicant requests approval of a building envelope expagsion and scenic~reJiew for an
addition to an existing structure, associated'landscaping, and' a new access alignment.
APPLICANT: Claudia Aspen View LLC
OWNER:. Claudia Aspen View LLC
REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Horn
LOCATION: The property is located across from the Northstar Preserve of 43051 S.H. 82.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Comments were received from Zoning; Attorney, County Wildlife Biologist
Geologic Consultant, and Colorado State Forest Service.
ZONING,: The property contains 2.85 acres and is anon-conforming parcel in the,AFR-10 zone district.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Wildfire: Vince Urbina of the Colorado State Forest Service visited the site and his chief concern was that
the 1. udscaping plan depicts spruce trees too close to the proposed addition. The perimeter of the mature
spmces should be at (east 15 feet away from the structure. He also suggesteil'that the owners plant low
growing vegetation and maintain it ata 6 inch height maximum fora 10 foot radius of all structures. See
`Attachment A' for his letter. ` ''
Wildlife: Pitkin County Wildlife Biologist JonathanLowsky (see AttachmentB) reviewed this'application
and made the following observations;
... >
• The are4 immediately above the ex~sting~residence her within critical el~c winter range.
• The property lies within an elk migration pattern. ~ a
• The property is located in an azea of significant black bear activity.
• The stream channel which the applicant has denuded of vegetation, excavated, and lined is a perennial
stream and is therefore included in Waters of the47nited States and falls.urider the ~urisc~iction of the
Army Corps of Engineers. The Applicant may be in violation of section 404-ofthe'Cle'an~ Water Act.
' Gabe Preston has a M..A. in Geography and two years of planning experience with Pitkin County.
,' 1
- _.
~~
E:~.~iH"2't' A
A parcel oz laid g~uatd~ i.^_ the, SE? /?5'riI/~ o£ Sectior. i7, Towns~:i~ iq
w- . ,. _
C_oraCC aP. as West Of C h° 5ta.,.,~?rincigal Mer4dian, pit~t_P COtY^~tY,.~
C ut.., ,Ttarcec beinc moz_ _*"u? ty ciescri:~ed as ~:o`T'?oi~'s. `. ~"."~'~~~~ '°~"
„._ _ I
9e~-_Zni:_g at tae Sn cor:se= of sa• d SEI/aSY71./4, as esta~iishe^ by t °_
3a-'=: Surrey (?d;8°); c's'en^° $ 8p°34.'~.,0``~..~Ma,,. _:. ~..
.,.__ ~~~`:"~'~ feet acne tY'e
Sputae__y acx: da=r line oL saiu'" ~ci/4S~/a to the Easte±-Zy ,,rat o_
wav l:.ne of C :lcradc Stat_ ~~ ghway H2;; thence I63 . fi~ feet aloac sa_c
r_cat of wav ?'. :e the arc,. at a cs*-se to the~~cht haviac a ra~us'af
r
5~~ 00 lee*_, 'tae chord, of wn:ca beers N z9°~~t~4" 42 Ifi3:'00 a°t•
tae^.ce V 2i ° 08' T/~' ~? 90 ~eeT along Sai Q "'7.C~it~ OL W3V ~2 e; G~e.^_ce
dera=tirc sa'_c ~ cAt a~ way ire N fi4 °~40 ~n EY 4fi~ .'i'i ` l°et 'to the newt
C:. '~t_rSe^ »~n W~ta. t}'° ~35~°"'1V bCt.LiS~a"`J I.S..° C.L~ 5a.'~C `~'"(''~J"aS'w_~c_~
_ __~u
... .-.
taEn^O S QiaG i' ~ 30" i. b' 2. X01 3bL along °,. ' ..... i~ T' _
___ saic ~ast__..y acs.Yca_,^ w= tc
t:e goi.»t a= aec=.... c;
COL'~T '_' Or' 9'"".~~I;' S~'~2i3: 0=' .COLOR.~O. .'
~ irriii rri~i rri~~~ iiiir~ rrr ~«~r ~~~rr~ i~rrrEri r~i~~crri . ~ , . _ .
415877 07147998"02'i34P RESOLU7I dAVT5"52LVh'
B eC"S R'0.00 !D 0.0Qi 8' 0.`00 P27KiN~~CbUN~TY~'C~D"
Mr.. Lowsky makes the following wildlife impact mitigation recommendations:
1. A 20 foot setback from the high watermark of the stream to protect riparian vegetation as per Section
3-50.040(B)(5) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code,
2: Prohibit the removal of live vegetation in ripariap areas and disturbance ofground coveradjacent to
streams as per Section 3-80.080(G)(3) of the Pitkin CountyZand Use Code. This includes, but is not
limited to, cottonwoods, birch, alder, red-osier dogwood, and willow.
3. A landscape plan should lie required that includes restoration of the riparian corridor'of the stream
- _ ....a
where it has been altered. This plan should require the approval of tEie T'itkin County "~khife "
Biologist. A recommended plant list is included as `Attachment C'.
4. Fencing outside the building envelopemust comply with'Section 3-$680(A)(1"l)'~oft~ie Pitkin County
Land Use Code. Fencing hould also 6e prohibited within the 2`0 foof stream setback:.
v
5. Prohibit dogs on the property as per Sections 3-80.80(B)(5) of the Pifkin'County ~and~CTse Code ~
6. Native vegetation must be maintained outside the building envelope as pe{Section 3-80.80(A)(3).
7. Installation and use of approved bear-proof trash containers shaiiYd 6e' required2.
In addition#o these comments, Kevin Wright of the D.O.W. also made the following recommenda`'~ns
• The applicants shat] fence off hay stacks to prevent elk eating the'liay.
• Avoid plahting fruif and berry prodicing trees and shrubs to avoid~attracting bears.
• The D.O.W. is not responsible for damage done to landscaping by animals
Staff Comments on Wildlife:
With regard to the disruption oftheperennial stream, staff recommends that the Hearing`Offi'cer require a
revegetation plan forthe disturbed riparian Habitat to 5e approved by "the Pif tcm County~Wildlife Biologist.
A bond would ensure the completion of the revegetation depicted in the plan. The Applicant has already
begun addressing the potential Clean WaterACt violations by hiring awetiands consultant t`o contact the
Army Corps of Engineers. Staff will require eeidence that the Applicant has fulfilled the requirements of the
Army Corps (fines, mitigation, etc.) before building permits for the proposed addition tb tie single family
home wiIl be accepted by the building department.
Geologic;
.. ..._ ~_
Slopes:.The proposed building envelope expansion encroaches into slopes iii excess of30"/o. The Code
prohibits development on such slopes and so the building envelope on the site plan shall not include those
. , . ~,,
P PP Y
~" ,..,, _
t aoeoctoo ~com e fromcthe retain nt wall n the back o envelope any farther mto the slope than ttie
ry', g g f the existiri'~-residence see Attachmenfb~:
Other Geologic Hazards: Maxim Technology's geologic report and Bruce
indicate no other significant geologic hazards exist on site Debris` flows'a
given the slope, aspect, and constitution of the slopes abo: e the site. GeolZ
possibility of earthquakes and so buildings should be designed according tc
the UBC. "Mr. Collins also suggests that the foundation and wall construcfi
..;:
the hillside be designed and constructed to withsfan3 the load of tfie'till; an
_.~, _..,
ZA bear proof trash containez must be a fully enclosed, steel container of any size with a steel
lid that has a two ste o ehin mechanism. A - '""" " `" ~ ""`
p p q pproval is granted by 'Elie ~Pitkin~COVnty 4iil~~li.'fe
Biologist, or personnel of the Colorado Divisionof Wildlife.'
foundation of the existin structure must be ositivel connected to and extended southeasterly past the
P Y
ro osed addition to assure that draina a is ad uafe. ' '
P P g e9
SCENIC OVEI2I:AY
The properly lies within the mapped scenic overlay and is therefore subject to the standards in Code
Section 3-b0-040. __ _ .. .:-
Notes on the Scenic Code Standards: The mitigation standards in the'Code focus on three types of scenic
mitigation; Site location (mostly for new subdivisionsj~ site design, and architectural design: 'This review
will examine the proposed development in light of the latter two of these mitigation techniques.
Site Design: Code standards discuss the usage of natural topography to locate the structure(s) fo minimize
the scenic'impacts.
Staff Response: The development proposed in this application consists of an addition to an existing
structure and landscaping. The addition will add to the bulk of apse-exi§ting scenic impact rattier than
creating new scenic impacts, and as such'is a desirable site design.
Architecture[ Design: T1ie Code standards refer to adjustments To building'height and"bulk to reduce visual '
impacts and ridgeline encroachments. The Code also discusses the redu"cCto'ti ofvisualimpacts by asing"~
materials that blend well with the surrounding environment, while avoiding other negative Impacts from
architectural features such as lighting and landscaping: Landscaping is suggested as a means of reducing
visual impacts.
ing the s'ati'i'z material's andilesign scheme
StaflResponse: The applibants propose to huild the adhe~existis
as the existing buildings, thus blending the additions tti ng development. Theproposal"
includes non-linear, native landscaping, which will screen the scenic impacts of the existing and proposed
development on passers by.
Summary: Staff recognizes that this is a constrained site. The visual impact has been minifnizeci`to a"
reasonable extent. With the application of some standard scenic mitigation conditions to this approval, tfie
development will meet the standards of the Code. " ~ ` '" '
)2ECONIIVIENDATIONc Staff recommends that the Hearing Officer approve the Andi Ranch 7041 Hazard
Review and Scenic Overly Review subject to the conditions in the attached Determination.
ATTACI-MENTS ,
A. Colorado State Forest Service memo
B. Wildlife Biologist memo
C. Recommended. riparian plant list `
D. Illustration of the AcceptableBxtent of BuildingEnvelope
E. Geologic Report
F. Resolution
" 9Etachment`A ` " "
L.tJl , ... _.
FOREST
SERVICE
State Services Building
October 29, 1999 zzzs: 6u, street: xootn `a7
,Grand Junction: Coloiado'81501
Telephotie:(970)2i8-iJ25
Gabe Preston
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. '
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO.81611
Re: PID#2737-173-00-022 Wildfire Hazard Review
Gabe,
I visited the site with Glen Horn the owner's representative on' October 27th In the
application I am to address a new driveway access point, an amended building
envelope for a garage addition and proposed landscaping forthe east side of the lot.
Access to the parcel w1f be from a new driveway shared with the adjoihing property fo
the west. The new driveway was under construction at the time of the site visit. The
orientation of the new driveway from Highway 82 wil( provide adequate emergency
vehicle access td the parcel.
According to the garage addition landscaping plans sul?mittecf with the application three
new conifers will be planted within 20 feet of the garage. I advised fhe IaridScape
architec# who was there. the day we visited the site to move the~two closesf'evergreen
trees fb the addition so thattheyare a least"10-15 feet away from the structure
measured from the outside_edge of the branches. In addition the vegetation within this
10-foot perimeter around the garage should be maintained af6 inches pr less by using
grass or low growing perennials. Woody vegetafi'ori Should not be part of the'
landscaping. within this perimeter. The rest"of the proposed landscape plan around the
garage addition does not create any wildfire hazard problems:'
Feel free to call me with any questions: '
Sincer
y~
A. Vince Orbina '' _
Assistant District Forester
Cc: Glen Horn "
... .. t,_, , ... .:.
MEMORANDIJNL
TO: Gabe Preston, Pitkin County Community Development
FROM: ' Jonathan Lowsky, Pitkin County Wildlife Biologist
SUBJECT: Claudia Aspen/Andi Ranch
DATE: 11/16/99
...:.
J•v
e v act. ~. -,„ .n`S { {, '
The slopes immediately above these properties are'eritical elk winter ranse°and severe winter 'arse and lie
within an elk migration paitem. A site visit fo"the properties revealed thara perennial stream that runs
through the property has been siboriificantly disturbed. The channel has been, dug out and all riparian°
vesetazion'remobed. Since this is a perennial stream, iris Waters of the United States and falls. under the
junsdiaion of the US Amry Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The work done. to the stream channel is likely a
violation of section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Representatives of the applicants have been informed of this
likely federal violation as well as the violation of Section 3-80.80(G) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
Restoration of this unnamed stream must be required as weIl as mitigation to be determined by Pitkin County
and the USAGE. It'is important to note Ghat this propertyis directly across Highway 82 from the North Star
Nature Preserve where dogs are strictly prohibited. Black bear actiyityin this area is very high and human-
bear conflicts are common. " "
Given the above, the following conditions should be applied to m;n;m;>e impacts to wildlife:
1. A 20 foot setback from the high water mark o£ the stream to protect riparian vegetation as per Section. 3-
50.040(B) (5) of the Pitkin County Land'IJse Code.
2. Prohibit the removal of live vegetation in riparian areas and disturbance of around cover adjacent to
streams as per Secuor. 3-80:0$0 G i of the Pitkin County Land Use Codeb This includes but is not
_( )( )
limited toy cottonwoods, birch, alder, red-osier dogwood, and willow. '
3. A landscape plan should be required that inrludes restoration of the riparian comdor of the stream where
it has been altered. Thisplan should require the approval of the Pitldn County Wildlife Biologist. A '
recommended plant list is attached.
4. Fencing outside the building envelope must comply with Section 3-80.80(A)(11) of the Pitkin County
Land Use Code. Fencing should also be prohibited within the 20 foot stream setback.
5. Prohibit dogs on the property as per Sections 3-80.80(B) (5) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code
6. Native ~esetation musrbe maintained outside the building envelope as peYSection 3-80.80 A 3 .
(,)( )
7. Installation and use of approved bear-proof trash containers should be required.
;ranred ba• •he Pitkn is
~ S bear proof gash coCnor ry Wildlife Biolouisc or persomel of ~Iie ColoradoDivition of Wildlife har ~~ ~ ~b`nep opening mechanism. Approval
76 3ERVIGE
PHONE; y
.. ,.. a .u ' u:...: .~ .„. w"xt...u.~+=<~M-d+,-u~zh.^-r~+L.y~kb'.1ige unendma-~.. ~..ar acw+ u asv*~eix
,W i ~ < ~ .
8. No more than 3 horst,..nould be allowed on this property at any giv e, When on the property
horses must be corralled These corrals must be collapsible or removable and should be required to be ,
height of the elk. rrus gration seasons). log and June 15~ and between October 15~h to November i5~h (the
,,..
2
r a ,,..k .;,~~ k., ~a~. ..., ., :.
C
GRAMINOTDS
Alopasnis alpaucr
Calamagrostis carzaderzsis
Csrlmru~ostis shida
Cmez agrrati(is
Carex rmiaiZ~aa
Desd~mrrpsia cespitosa
EZ~xnis pakestns
Iur~ amass (aka baltiaa)
Jurraa aa+fuszrs
I~rs longisrylis
I~+srne~tauimrzrs
Jzara+arss saxnrroiumiru
Luzsrla pariflora
Phlaan aem,uuatran
Poa lepto¢vna
Poa palrrmis
Poa mflexa
FORBS
AZZiwn~~ri
Alluan srlraropraszon
Cmzlcoranre omG~iZia
Genavsia rhxfioirln
Delphirrnun bzrltyi
Erzgerorzratuv
Frasera spaidsie
Galizan sepzauiiorwZe
Galizmz triftdivn
Geranirar vismsrssvmon
HeracZeum spborzdyZium
Ins missormieiisis
Lignstiaam poneri
MicrantlxY o~onioZama
Paiiaelais g~rlmrdicz
PgZiarizns prtepra
Potaznlla~zryE~emica
Rudbeckia hna
Serzecio Serra
Serecio triangrsl¢ris
Tl~rrmpsis montmiit
Palenmra oii+lis
I/a(enmra oxitlartalu
I/evpirirasnxcn serpyllifoluan
Vida m„encmur....
shortawn foxtaiI
bluejoint reedgrass
slimstem reedgrass
water sedge
beaked sedge
tufted hairgrass
common spike-rush
arctic (aka Baltic) rush
Colorado rush
longstyle rush
Merten s Wish
Roily Mountain rush ,
smallflowered wood-rush
alpine timothy
„bog bluegrass
fowl bluegrass
nodding bluegrass
Geyer's onian
w1d chives
,heartleaf bittercregs
queen's crown
tall larkspur
subalpirte fleabane
monument-plant
northern bedstraw
threepetal bedstraw
sticky purple geranium
cow-parsnip
RockyMottatain iris
Porter's licoriceroot
brook saxifrage
elephantella
giant lousewort
Pet;nsylvania cinquefoil
black-eyed susan_
tall ragwort
arroadeaf groudsel
mountainthermopsis
edible valerian
western valerian
thyme leavedspeedwell
American vetch
v. 1. n n. _..s.
-.., _ ., -... ::... u, i~,. ,,,, .. „ ..
Z The dominant species aze in bold type. Native species are strongly recommended: Non-nauves will only be approved under special
ciramtrtances. Please submit your revegetatioa plan as soon as possible so any changes necessary-can be aside. Reyggetatioa plans
must be approved by the Firkin County lsTldlife Biologist or Laad Manager prior to iuscallauon. '
3
>a lx, +AF. Y«l'm1. r}. ". s x, {1 anpv a~R
.. 1
TREES AND SHRUBS
Abies Zasocarpa subalpine fs
Acerglabrum Roc Mountain maple
~~+~ .
Acerrregrordo box elder
'filnzrs irzcar:a thinleaf ormountain alder
"Betula occidentalis water birch
~Conars stolirafera red-osier dogwood-
Ca-ataegus rzud~ms river hawthorn
`LorziCeYa Zrz'U01r[Crata [winberry houeysucWe
PentaphyR"oirTes floribunda shrubby cinquefoil
Picea erzgelmarzrzii ` Engelmann spruce "-
°Picea purzgerzs 'blue-spruce
~Poprslrss arzgustifolia nanowleaf cottonwood
Populus tremuloides
'P
•
u quaking'a§pen ^`
naws
oirgiri
ma
black chokecherry
Pse:rdotsuga menziesii
,
Douglas fir
Ribes Zacz~stre prickly currant
^Ribes morztigerzrrm '
Salixbr _.
°~~~
booseb
o errycurrant ' '
'"Salix dnemmor:diarza barrenground willow
Dtvnunorid's willo
::Salix geyeriarza w __
Geyer's flow
Salix lizcida shining wr~Cow
Saliz morzticola
_ mountain willow
Salizplmzi~alra planeleafwllow
Salix rrn~ Wolf's widow
Senphidznzr nmzerz silver sagebrush
4
;.. . ~;~
' ~e' Attachmen;°'
a
~\\
/ ~, ~~ ~ ~
\\ \ \
~ ~~ ~ \\\
/ / 4
7 \\
~:
~ .i 1 L1
~±
,~ ,~~
~•~ ~o
/ ~
~ pos. 07~ u ~ C •.--~
p ~ 'JDo _ joa' \
~th95tateWak "~ ;x4 \ Q
/F~iTNG ~ \ ~ -. ~ ranch ~ •, ~'~~ ~, ~`ay '
'STINGY. "~ T012EFAAIN~ ~ ~ ~ •~~•'%-~~•i. G~ It~t
` _ ~
~jt ~ ~ ~ z`'h~ 'n -.ea ~'4 10p
/ % . 45 c Sara ddrt on 'o
i ~s`~` /A
rr
• x y
:'~- ::': ~: ': Y,i!:* :;.: ..v: ~ ~ l.X frs Lxa A~~+' m ~`.Sr.' J ~rh
~ i mr •x..t-' t.
'i::::•~~-'~:::•'::.:~''. 4
,. ~ ~_, ~\1917 ~ L ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ $ t` gyp,
........:• 'r
f /
.....:.::.. ~M1
':.::.:: ~. .~ ~ .f f i.
.'.
Y': ~ : X ~ SY
i!it.
P 1
J'r. v
~.rY~'::::y,'•;_.ii?;{1::':'.;Y.y:i;':%':.y:iS;i~Y..{~;;:~}ii;•:i% .1y ~..-*.4Y. ~. •.
..
~~~ ~ k
t~ ~
.. ~ zy"'y ;4a~r
7IY~'~/V/-1.
T ECNN6L0 G`I~`5 '~1'H"C_ ;"- w.X..: .. ,. ~... ~,.: ... .
Attacfiinen~" E .
March 17, 1997
. 96 Soutti zwriStreet ~.
Denv'''^"•olaado 802231292
Telephohe:(303)744=7106 { '-
Feceim~e:(303) 744=0216`"'~~ `°
Mr. Michael J. Herron
Garfield & Hech, P. C.
601 East Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado' 81611 ', _. .. ,: _ ..
Subject: Geologic Hazazds Assessment Study for the Meets & Bounds Parcel 'at 4315
Highway 82 in Aspen, `Pitkin County, Colorado ` ' "` " t ~ ~ `
Ma,-cim lob l~Tumlier: 5009 70 "0~~"9 ~~'' .r` .~ `~ ,''~~ ,. ~ ~~~ ~`~ ~.
Dear Mr. Herron
At your request, ~e have conducted a geologic hazards assessment study for the project area.
The work was done to identify potential hazardous conditions and other conditions which should
be considered during planning and design o~ dLLevelopmegt rir the area.
The srudy has shown that no landslides or debris flows were abserved to be present that
represent an immediate potential hazazd to the site structure or the proposed addition.
Other geologic conditions: representpotentlal hazards and should be consrdered duringplannitig
and design, are cdnstruction related slope insta~ilrty; earthquake related ground shaking, and
snow avalanche areas. Adverse impacts associated with, these conditions can be mitigated by
engineered designs.
The report which follows summarizes our fmdings and presents our conclusions and
recommendations. It is important that we provide continuing consulting services as project
planning and design proceeds so that the geologic and geotechnical condtons,aze corr$ctly
considered in the project design.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted, ~p0 Rf~/s
' O~ •••-,•. T
NIAXL~I TECHNOLOGIES,`hiC. ~ ~,_ ~> . • .~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~e~'~g. k~~o'~yo
~!~~ 7
_f/~,, i ~ 31599 ~:
~" ~~0 3z•-sr.~~
~~lfton ~V. Pope, Jr. Frank D. Kinder, P. Fps ••°'••~~~~
Senior Geologist/Cert~ed Professional Geoloa st Project Engineer S/~NA~ E~
CWP
Enclosures
' ~. ;:ms n-Se xn.aa ~c .....y,~_Ani. b.w~n sl.z.r~~r,r r. .ir,.inw ... ad 'x,,:
Austin Research Engineers .Chen Noilhern ., Empire Soils Investigations
Kansas City Testing . Southwesfem Laboratorie§ Twin~City"Testing.
any
~M
-_.__._..-.._ ~..-~--T.~.._.__,._,.._.. ~..
.... `kc-~:.: rn~*k., ~,+5 {:?-mE~':y~~. R„T7.'r d+eM w ~Y'~Ft. -~.-"d x"; `..:
ASPEN/PITKIN
CONIMUI~TI7CYDE~ELOPII~NT'1)E~`AR'I`MI/l~"T-.' ,: . , _..
130 Soixtb Galena Sfreet "" ''
Aspen, Colorado 8I6T1
Phone (970)920-~090`FAX (9'~0) 920-5439' ' "
MEMOR,ANDU'M
TO: Attorney
»~ ,..,
.. ontng' _
Engineer
DOW ., ..
CSFS
Wildlife Biologisf
.- Floodplain Administrator
FROM: Gabe Preston, Community I~evelopmentDepartment
Cl~~a °
RE: PID# 2737-173-00-022~~~
P130-99
DATE: October 15, 1999
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an apphcahon by Claudia Aspen view,
LLC. This application will be reviewed by the Pitkin'C~ounty Hearing Officer on 1V~oveinber 23,
1999.
'-'
i
Please return your comments to me no later thin No76ember 5, 199
~!-Y-.
~.. _=--- ~ ~ . _ ~j. ~ ~~~
Thank you.
'`~- It - y ~q 9
-.~ .. .~ .... t.i .. ~ v. rat kMx wr. ran-.nib. !. a's uMn•a••4 ~.
~. , .
_, .~,
3. ~, h Aa~~ .. M1
ASPEIV7PITI~IN
COMMUNITY DE`VEIlOPMI;IVT DEP~iRT1'GIE~'I`
_.
130`Soutli Galena Street
A.. ,. ,_
seen, Colorado 81611
.. :,..
Phone (970)` 920-5090' FAX (9'~0) 920=5439
ME1ViORANDUM
TO: Kevin Wright, CDOW
FROM; _ Gabe Preston Community Development Departmeri~f
RE: Claudia Aspen View, LLC 1041 Hazard Review &~S"cenic Overlay
PID#2737-173=00-022 ', . '"
P130-99
And Ranch, LLC 1041$azard Tfeview & Scenic Overlay '" ``
PID#2737-173-00-Oil ""
P129-99
DATE: October 26; 1999
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application by Claudia Aspen View,
PP
Officer on Nove ber 23L 999. ese a lications will be reviewed by the PitTcin bounty l~earirig '"
:..
Please return your comments to me no later than November 12,1999.
Soery I think these-were the referrals tliat went to`~egasY`
y. .... .. w..z. .... rvv. w.. v....~ ~. ... ...
Thank you.
4 .. - - ,
FOREST'
SERVICE
$t£fe Services Building
October 29, 1999 zzz s. 6th street, xnnm nib
` Grand Junetiori. CoTorndo SYSb"i'~
Telepfione: (970)218-7325
Gabe Preston
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. ''
130 South Galena ' ''
Aspen, GO 81611 _, _ ;.
Re: PID#k2737-173-00-022 Wildfire FCazard Review ''
Gabe,
I visited the site with Glen _Horn the owner's„representative on October 271h. in the
applicatipn f am to address a new driveway access, point, an a"mended 6uildmg
envelope for a garage addition and proposed landscaping for the east side of the lot.
Access to the. parcel will be from anew driveway shared with the adjoining property to
the west.,. The riew driveway was under construction at the time of the site visit. The
orientation of the new driveway from Highway 82 will provide adequate emerg'ehcy
vehicle access to the parcel.
According to the garage addition (andscapirigplans submiffed'with the appiicatian three
new conifers wily be panted wit~in'20 feet' ofthe garage. wf advsed`the lan~sc~ape' ' `'
architect'who was there fhe day we visited the st`e to "move the two closest evergreeh
trees to the addition so that they are a least 10-15 feef away fir,'om fhe'sfructure
measured from the outside edge of the branches In addition fheyegetation within this
~..
.. _,-
10-foot perimeter around the garage should be maintained at 6 inches or less by using
grass or low growing perennials. (K/oody vegetation should not be park of the
landscaping within this perimeter: The rest of the proposed landscape plan around the
garage addition does ndt create any wildfire hazard problems.
Feel free to tail me with any questions.
Sinter y,
A. Vince Urbina
Assistant District Forester
Cc: Glen Horn
~-
~,!'
September 5, 1999
~~~;
~ _e
Nick Lelack
Aspen Pitkin Community Developmen£ "'
. _..,,. ~.. __.w _,
130 South Galena"Street
Aspen, Colorado 816I1
._
Re: Claudia Aspen "View: 1041 Environmental "Ha2aYd aa~" Scenic
Overlay Reviews _ ~. .
Dear Rick•
Davis Horn IncorpoYated represents Claudia Aspen View LLC
(hereinafter "applicant'}: "i~laudia Aspen View LLC` owns;`'a'"'mete's `'
and bounds lot located east of 1L'spen"~'at~ 430.51"' State ~Tighway $2. "~
The 2.85" acre lot is improved wit~i" a "single faatly house.' ' "'
Pitkin County previously granted 1043`and Scenic Overlay approvals
for building and landscape`envelo'pes on the subject site.:
SITE VICINITY AND ZONING '"
The subject site is zoned AFR~1/Scenic Overlay Zone and bordered by
BLM land to the north, a vacant lob"to the east'~o'r~h"Saar Nature
Preserve to the south and single-family house to tkie' west.
Attachment 1'is a 8 l/2" x 11" Vicinity Map depicting the 1`oaation
of the subject. Attachment 2 is the first page of the site plan
depicting:. the property (8 I/'2" x 7'~ and`:24''r x'"~6'r) . _. ,:.. ,
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
This application seeks Scenic Overlay and 1041 Environmental Hazard
Review approval to establish:
* an amended building envelope for a garage addition to the
east side of the exstn
g house;
* an amended landscape envelope to install landscaping on
the east side of the lo£ and
* new driveway access point,..
. ire ~~..... i~ iY, . ...... ..~ .. .....:.....
The Site Plan. (Attachment 3': "$ 1/2 "x 1'7 and 24" x 36 ' } "s'~ki`ows the
existing house, proposed garage additional and changes to the
driveway access'. °The existing driveway wliic"Fi will"be removed and
reyegetated is shown on Attachment 2.
.LAND USE'REVIEWS. _
This section of the application demonstrates compliance with the
ALICE DAVIS; AICP Y "GLENN HORN, XICP"' ~ ° ' " ." " ' _. .. ... _..._ „
215 SOUTH N10NARCH ST. SUITE'lb~~~"J15`pEIV;`C251'C)~R}ltiCt'8'1~1Y`'~`~`I"~Y9'~"~-`Efi~°g~`":'~ef>`~'~~"~`f~Yd`4'~5°ikf~"`~ ..'." ,` "'""s".
'r:~
": ~
'. ~~ ~ 1„ .
N ... .. .,... .. .. e3
,'~ , a
~~ d
°i
Nick Lelack
September 5, 1999
Page, 2 ~ !.
Land Use Code standards identified in the "P£kn County Pre-
Application Summary"Sheet (see` ~£tachmen't 4) and listed below.
* Section 3-60 Environmental & Aesthetic S,tandards;, "~,
* Section 3-70 Water Resources;
* Section 3-80 Areas of Local and State
_... _
interest/1041 Environmental Ha,ard Areas; and~~~"`
.~
* Section 3-110 Improvements .and Services.; '.
a
Environmental & Aesthetic Standards
(section 3-60)
.,
The Environmental & Aesthetic standards are addressed in this
section.
Section 3-60-020 Air Qualtp'
There will not be any change in the impacts on air quality from tfie
proposed land uses. ,_
Section 3-60-03:0 Preservation of Natural Landscape ' ~?,
The applicant will comply with t4~e `standards of `this section. Tlie " ' .."'
site will be revegetated with native horticul"tural"material during
the first planting season after canstruction, Topsoil"'will be M'
,.. , „
stockpiled and utilized for. site revegetation.
section '3-60-040 Scenic overlay
1. Whether the proposed development has utilized existing
W ~. ~ „_ .. _., .i
topography and natural vegetation, such as ridges end"hills to
screen buildings to th4 maximum extent possible.
Response - The proposed a
State Highway 82'"'at "tfie""bas
the west side of the propeY
approaches the property f:
Highway '82. "The ridge on
screen's the property from'
2. whether the
complement t
2
.he west on°~ east boui
.djoiiing property to
bound'State""Highway 8
from
lqe on
is one `
ku
Stake
east
i
;d `. to m~
;ding, ,'
1
i
I
y
Nick Lelack
September__5, 1999
Page 3 '
whenever
innovative
de"~ign, nai
clustering
site.
:. .
appropriate; the utilization of
L te6fi-iques such `as earth sheltered
s ana°"`c`olorinq, none re~lectaDiity and-
_.~ _o~
r on t'he leapt `visifTe poY~`ions of the
Response - The proposed addition will utilize the same '
building materials and arefiitectural techniques as the
existing structure The exterior walls will be constructed of
cedar color wood with;a`greeri asptiaY~ shingle roof. some non-
~,, .. ..
reflective metal-will 6e used': "` "°"_
3. Whether the ~
proposed development's height and bulk"has b"een
designed to avoid, to theme` maximum extant possible; the
visibility of buildings ~~`on "th"e""""h~q°hway `and public
viawplanes`.
Response - The proposed garage is as far away from SH'"82 as `
possible.
4.
5.
,. .
The proposed structure shall Se placed"so it $oes not break a
rid
lotgeline; unless t]'iere"'`a"re'iio"alterAate bu'ald"inq sit®s "a'n the
Response -The proposed addition does not break,.a ridgelne.
_...
Whether the
uses-on the `
as 'viewed....
identified
Response - The proposed addition is not located on the highest
point on the property. Instead, it is located at the base of
the steep hill.
6. Whether the proposed development has been'locate8 outside of
th~~esignated gd`enic Ovetlap, or on a suitable site at tie"'
greatest distanC~e ,pox"sable from 8ta£e " Highway ' 82 aiid '
identified` ri~geli"nes. "`~ ~~ ~~"
Response.- The structure is located within the Scenic Overlay
,. „, .
as far as possible" from State "fIigtiway s~. "`"'The strucfu"re is at
the base of a steep"slope and can `not be "moved any' further '
away'from,the Highway. '
7. Whether the .proposed. d®velapment` has been lan'dsoaped'"""in
3
,:
~~~..~
Y
Nick Lelack
September 5, 1999
Page_ 4
accordance with the adopted State "Highway 82 Corridor
landscape quid"alines and"`has ',preserved natural"veget'aton, to
,.~ ~. __
the maximum extent possible," inc~u~t~ng the avoidance of
development within irrigated: mea$owa "`"Existing vege~atioa
shall be"maintained "to' thA``_inaximum extent possible, while
using existing vegetation' to screen"'"develbpment. A
landscaping plan shalS `be" submitt~ed""~y~"`£he `applioant and
approved by the" Planning and''ZOn`inq"~o`mmesoa.
Response = The property is .densely vegetated with mostly
cottonwood and aspen trees "aridscattered"'conifers: The
P
si nificant screenin in the are so dense they`" provide
cottonwood and as en tree, winter without leaves, however
the scattered conifers"improve the screening"particularly on ~'
pP ~ P State Highway 82'.
- ,.
The a slcant willh i stall the lands ark ng depi'cted' on the
Site Plan.
8.
Response - All lighting will comply with County guidelines.
There will not be any landscape `lighting. All light sources
shall be screened.
9. Lahdforms and earth moving shall q®nexally not be acceptable'
as the sole measure of compliance with"'these .'regulations.
However, they ma°y be utalized in conjuncton~witti other `site
techniques"designed into the development plaa TDese methods
~,~
ma be acre table when"' °° "
Y P utilize as one of"""several methods ~'o"
complement and enhance development, 'rather than"as the single
.~...~.w~~w .~,.,., - , „~ . ucx
device for screening development "f~=om v=ew "From the State
Highway 82 Corridor and;as mappeg.
Response - Landforms and earth,movng are not proposed for
screening.
10. Whether the ro bsed d'eveiogpmeyts~a~o~be~e`~ designed sb as tb
P P ~,
avbid, to the maximum extent ossible any Scenic Viewplane
_..„
identified on the State Hi wa or Master"Plan and
Dbwn Valley Comprehensive Plan. ~;` "
4
s
~"- ~ :~' r
~~::_ .,, ~ ._ .1 ., .'... ', .,, .. c ~ ..,
Nick Lelack
September 5, 1999
Page 5 ,
Response - The proposed addition avoids Scenic ViewpYanes.
11. in the car@' where'""3041 'hazed area93 aiay be in conflict }with
pros@rvhton of scenic areas,'the Board acknoarleQges that 104'1
issu@s take precedence ov@r"'scenia.conc@rnsi These issues
shall be reviewed on a Case-by-ca§e. basis.""'
Conflicts with 1041 environ
mental hazard"' areas are`aot an
issue.: __
Quall~y,.TM..„` .
Section 3-6'0-050 Scenic ~';""
As indicated in the preceding section"and shown 'on Attachment"4 the
site shall be revegetated with nativehorticultural material Yto.,
blend with the surrounding vegetation. Lig~iting shall comp~y~with
the lighting standards of Section 3-110 11Q Additionally,
,.. ~, . ,.x. ~., .. ~.
driveway (runway) lighting will`be'"'prohibited:`"~°Utlties skialT be
placed :underg'r`ound.
8ection;3-60-060 Solar Access '"
The existing house take advantages of passive solar energy to the
maximum extent possible.
section 3-60-0"70 Reduction in Density for steep siop'@'s ` `'
islonltaonersinsle~fampllldwe"Tlin~ unitsubject site because there
Y g Y 5..
Water Resource Standards
(Section 3-70)
water Resource Standards are addressed in this section.
section 3-70-020 Encroachment or Channeling
This Code standard is not_,applicable to the subject site.
Section 3-70-030 Drainage
PP drama
ahelacaton tashaY~,submit a,_ Pitkge plan with the building permit
PP ~ quired by in County. Historic on-site
drainage will be maintained.
Section $_-70-040 Erosion
5
.`.. ~ „: .L ... .:. r
r. ~ 5 ~~
~.{'~.- : I' ~ ws ~: a6n. i -:.. .
w i ny
Nick Lelack
September 5, 199'9 '
Page 6
~, .>a ~... .,.. }.. .
Existing vegetation shall`be mantaine3 "to "the maximum extent
~r ..
possible to minimize erosion. Standard"erosion control measures
shall b'e utilized during construction.
Section 3-T®-050 Grouh3wate~""' r"' `
The
proposed development shall tot interfere with' groundwa£er
recharge areas. Construction shall not be initiated during the
high runoff period.
Section',3-070-060 Irrigated llreas" "'
The subject site is not irrigated by a flood'irrgatiori system.
There is a sprinkler system:-
Section'3-070-070 Irrigation Ditches
There are not any irrigation ditches on the subject site.
Section 3-070-080 Sedimentation
Standard construction practices shall be utilized to reduce
. ~..-. ..
sedimentation. 'The site shall be revegetated in the~"first growing
season after the completion cbf construction.
Section 3-070-090 Water Quality
Water quality shall, not be_mpacted by the proposed development. `
Section 3-o70-oDO Water Supply
The subject site is served by a private water well.
Areas of Local and- State' Zxitere`st ~ "
1041 'Environmental Hazard 7~,r~`h"s"" `" ' " "
Section 3-80 '
This section demonstrates compliance with ~'loodplain, Geologic, `
Wildfire and Wi~ctlife standards. 'TTe staff requested~t~e appl"acant
to address they ~.u..
e Code standards in tfie'preapplcatioa conference.
Section-3-80-040 Floodplain Hazard Areas"
The subject site is proximate to the Roaring Fork River However,
a review of the Federal Emer en ""NT"aria °e~erlt "~1` enc '" ""
g cl' g ~ ~1 Y (~F~1A`)`"Flood
6
K'
t. '„~~' e I. _.I :'~'.~ ~ v .. ..
Nick Lelack
Segtemler 5, 1999
Page 8
Attachment 2 - Site Plan Page ~l (8/12"'x 17" and 24'r x
36ti.'
Attachment 3 - Bite Plan Page 2 (8/1210 x 17" and 2410 x
3b°~ ;
Attachment 4 - Pre-application Summary Sheet;
- red,
Attachment 5 Bruce4CoYlinsGP~logOic'Report prepa' by
Attachment 6 - "Geologic Hazards Asses~m~nt'Study,"'Meets
and Bonds Paresl at' 4315" Highway 82,
Pitkin County Colorado,!'. prepared by
Maxim Technologies Inc
Attachment 7 - List of Adjacent Property Owners;
Attachment 8 - Proof of Ownership;
Attachment 9 - Letters of autYibrization from" pr'ope'rty
owner authorizing Davis Horn Inc."`to
submit this 'land use`'app3cation and`to
represent him in the review process; and
Attachment 10 - Agreement to pay Fees..
Please pall if you have any questions or if we have inadvertently
neglected to address any o~ your'conceris.'~ `
Sincerely,
D HORN INCbRPORA`TBb
_.
~"GL HORN AICP
Potamkin.6
8
,. . .Yi L: s.a...:.u~k.YHywl, t. w.•yiT 6M+....- maw M.tiY.wi~i.
~- v . :. .
A1TA(;Hi1'~NT
:inity Map
._. m~
~spen '. ~'~'.~ _ ' ' •`'. tl; ~` ~ ~'~cw r Shaft •.
BM 7~p1) ~ • \ I '\
- _ ; J ; S~ a A. •'s 4 Cowen oven ~r ~ 1 I s.. J O oh ~ 1 I ,. ,! ,
• ••• ; .. .' DiCj7A~~l C..7'~i,junne I 5~}i ~( 1~ '.7u ~!. ,~ ~{rr~,'~ oa )
~ ..ys.`i . ~1/ ~. ~ ,• Trdifl~ ~'~t41 F~ ~1 gOrw• ,..~ \' ,\~ ,1•i ~ I
{ 1/. bi i . i'. I° • ~• ~ tYafj; ,. ~1 ~ , 1 ''1.`+QOI 1 I '" ll ~, 1, ~ ,
•i i •~j.tl •t 12• p~•!1• , •1 ~ r~ '~ I~ {I'I ~I``~`, .\ ~ ~~~II ~~
~•4~• ~ ~ •• / • " { a>di (1Q_1j ji. •~,.~ r ( l ( 1 . 1 I I `\ ` \ tfJ • \ I I~ 1
1^J _~ ~' II ~~, ~. +,~ t.. ~'-~ Step o : • S 1 ,\ 1.1'I 1 '~t' 1 ~~) ~' ` `. ~~ \ii ~ ~ i
.• ~~r •t~t~ ~.,.••N•.. ~ I. d- p-:: ,. ~ ~ 1 ,liJ 111 ..
Q~ ••~ ~ •1,1 , •• U~ (~ • • • s `! ~ 1 ~ J ~ 1 11 ',.
r,, i;~ r:. ~ - a~ t •.:Ii ; := Z „ •' , , I 1 •~ ,•` 1}'11\, ~-'~'
~ ~t ` ~`~j~! , ;,
'~•r~• •/• f~,• ~ •i ~w A~ '!' ~ '. `fit ••~' •.•~.~• ~ '.:\ , '\ . ::. ',li•~
K/ - f(/ ~ ~1~,
1 ~1tVater ~. I ,.... ,~, ~ . v
. _ ~ { [`.~ ~ •\y~,Ct 1rr \~ ~,\ ~,•.~~~ .~...' L. •fY. lip i' `l ~I\I\ , ~ I. `' I
. . ~ C \' L i
i
.` ~\ • * ,• 4 ~~•, !\' -a 'Zia •~ :~~r•,••~l, 1
\ ~
~•
_' ~=
. •.
~ .~
_' . , ..
~,
i'
_ r
;}I it ~ ~ !1r I- ~•' ~ ~~n .'. << ~ •" ~ \ \
_ ~pt 1
i \ ll ~
~• / (
~ ' ~ ,
• / •
• .. r
. 1
~l
~ ....~,i ~II / oo y ~'. \\`~~ ®a ) Y ~,;CifaOt'I Plts• ~';\ ~ ~ i'(
) ~. I
J. • 1 .. _ .. 1111\Z ~ ~~., ,
~~! .C) i)~'...~~... ..~'~.. ~:\:,.. ,,~\ t~ll~~= 'y~ (,i~l`1~ ,~~~`.~\, NorthStaDrlve ~
)1.)1 I il' it I~X, ,` ''`1~ ~\\ \`~1"~-~~\\\\\ \{' ^'~j~ 'i
I 1 `~ l . \ o \•~ \.
1. ~•~ I~ IJ/' ,-~~/ ~\\ ~: ~ - ~~\\ = `~ ~\\\ ~\\ 1
l~ ' ~ /`"/ ~\\ ~ \ `: ~~, ~ • \; ~ ~ `~`.~~ North Star '
' \ . f ~ . ~, .•! ~ \ ~ ~\\ , \\~: Neture Preserve
Imo' ~ 'li' ~ ~. \~. ~ww\ a
1 ~~ ~~~ ~,
1/~yy~VV 1/~ ` . ..
~ : „ ~ ,;r,, , ~` .{ ~ ~o~,. ~,~~ ~} ~1~ ~>»>>>~>~' , 1. ~~~,,
~, .. r
, ..
Vicinity Map
,. ATTACFWENt
Prlect Site - - ~" I°-~•-0°
_ _9MZ/fOE N ~ e
_ .
1
\ T,
6 ~
1
\ ~~ i
_Waiver d„
a Appppllcams acknowledge that they have been IMormed by
''~ PRkin Coumy of the existence of "7041 Hazard Areae"
~` that mlpM effect the property,:any Improvements, end
' the use end occupancy thereof.
Hearing Officer's Approval _
';.~_f'ursuam to sectlon3-801 (B) (2) of the Pttkln County land
oee code, the Pttkin County Community Development
Department Hearingp OHlcer hereby approves this
--1041 Review ShePlen this day of 1998
HeeringOtticer -~_
Protect Stte: -
43151 E. NWY82
1.5 Mlles from IMerseetion of
original Street and CooperAvenue)
.e j.. ;q' ;O`~µ
~~ ',~.
-_m
1 • ~.
R . ESSO
r ~ a. ~«•E
,u~
~~ •r
a~ ~ ~•
+•OM1 i.
aE
WpN
North
l a~ <
iw~wy.~knoa: ~.
1
/E~
Clerk & Recorder's Acceptance
Thla 1941 Review Stte Plan Is accepted for
recording In the oTNce of the Clerk and Recorder of
Pifkln County, Colorado on this day of
.19991n Plat Book at Page
es Reception No
Clork and Recorder
SxSheet2 for Eslargemeot of Site
Legal. Description A
Aparcai of fend sttusted in the SE 9/4SW7/4 of sectbn 77, township 10 south,
range 84 west of the 8th principal meridian, PNkln Coumy,:Cobredo, and being
more tatty deecrlbed as folbws:
Beginning et the SE corner of said SEt/43W1/4, ea establlehed by the Haapin
Survey (1978); thence 5,89°34'30"W, 321.38:teet along the southerly boundary Ilne
of said EI/4SW1/4 to the easterly rlgMbf way line M Colorado State Highway 82;
thence183.84 feet along said rlpM of way Iind the aroof a curve to the right
hevin a radius 01533.00 feet, the chord of which bears N,29°55'49"W, 183.00
.-....~..,~e u~tww~ur_ 7a_oo feet alone said rWM of wav Ilne; thence departing
GREG MDZIAN AND ARSOCIArRa, INC. Ihgetof2
111 Sotl 9erie, 54eK 9e610[ A,py foW,b B1tli
Fk ryltll@SBl0.l_ Fu 14A1@YIZV i+tlt P~'°1'b 3
SEP-01-1989 ,WED 03:13.,. _„ „FA~{„NO 9709205439 P.` 01~~
M GOhntUNITY DEVELOPEMENT
PITKIN COUNTY
PRE-APPLICIC'i`t~ON1=1l~E~Ci'"~l`1'lill'1GI'X'I~`f , .. , _: _,.,- ,_
PLANNER: NicR Lelaek
DATE:. ' August 30, 1999
PROJECT: Claudia AS eri vew LLC 1 Scenic Overlay '
p 041 Hazard`t~eview &~ __
.. __. .
LOCATION: State Highway82, adjacent toAndi`F~anch LL'C
REPRESENTATNEi Glenn Horn
Tei.925=6587.._..
Paic 9'25=5180 ""
OiAMER/ Claudia Aspen V
APPLICANT:
t. Type of Applicationd 1041 Hazard
,~:,~_ Description of Project/Developmeri`t: Appiican~ proposes"to estali~sh building envelopes?or 'r ~- "
9 P PedY.,,, , .
a gatage, a dtiveway, and' landscaping. There is an' existin house do"th'e ro~ "" '
3. Aroa3 in which A ' linnt has b@en re uesfed Lo res and ty y" p " ' ° _ "' "` '
PP 4 (~ pes of re oils: Lan
.. .. ,,.. ~. , . `d"Use
Code Sections:
• Section 3.60-040, Seenic Overlay
• Section 3-80, 1641"Hazard Revievu' ' `
• Geobgic, Slopes
• WiFdfiie
• Wildlife
• Floodplairt' '
Section 4-50, t step review '`° `"
• Section 5-50, Group 1'DevelopmenfAppfications _ `
4. Review is before: Hearing Officer"
5.
8. Will be referred to: Aftomey, ,Ern
County Wildlife Officer, Floodplan
...., _ ,
,w e, .". ~, , , . - -
Plannin Office de
g ( posit) $1,1Q0 (additianal hrs are,6iiled"at a,rate of $185/hr)
Referral Fees reiauired:
Cotirify Engineer $160
Total Deposit: $f;260 '
8. Application fee and the "Agreement to Pay" form: (2 copies) shall be sulimitteiJ with the
complete applieati6ns. ;
9. To apply, please submit 9 copies of the following information:
^ Letter explaining the request, addressing Code Secfrons listed above, providing
..: .
background information, etc.
^ Site Plan (please see attached).
~.
d Proof of ownership of`subiect°property "(Title Company or attorney), including legal
description.
Please also submk 2 copies of the foliowirig information unless otheryvise noted:
^ Letter from owner authorizing the representative (1'copy).
^ total deposit for review of the application.'
^ Copy of this pre-application form (1 copy}.
^ List of all adjaceniproperty owners (1 copy). `
PLEASE NOTE: This pre-apphcahon conference summary is advisory m nature and not bindirig
on the County. The irtformatioh provi$ed` n t~iis mmary is: based orY current iohmg stardards
and stafhs"rote retatiorts based u n re ~ '"" ""~ "`~" ~Po~ " ' '
rp po pr+rs'eritations of the'appUcan~°` Xd~itionaf information
may be required upon a complete review of the application. '"
September 4, I999
Glenn Hotn
Davis Hom Inc.
215 S. Monarch Suite 104'
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Mr. Horn:
I have completed my
extend northeastward into to the hillside approx
structure about 20 feet. The property is within
Colorado'
RE: ClnunWASpe~rVrcwAnDlrioN,4315Cow.
AWY 82, PITk1N CUi1N'IY '
STUpY, MEerSnxDBOtn~bsPniici'a.xr4315~HtUHwAY~$2, Aar
~....
by Maxim; Technologies Inc., Denver, and dated March f 7;'
the area described in the Maim report, the bazar"ds to vvhic
described therein, and thelwiigaiions c~`escn"e' '~"t~ie'rein
additional harards to w}nch the addition might be exposed
specificity"that the foundation aml"wa'~l oniiitctei~'geiow"`~t
designed and constructed to withstand the load "ot' the .~
foundation ofthe existing structure rt-ust"be positively corm
• .f r 1-a .. . h [ lu.
the proposed addition to assure that botli`sit`rlace and salisu
It is necessary for me to state that while design and construe
with UBC'gttidel"nnes for Se~srmic~._ane; as snggcstea`4 iku
acceptable! so long'as it does not include tiv¢ig"quarters, I clef
Rogers (1481, p. 1260 regarding compliance with Zone 2 g~
If ouhave_
y arxy gr~estions or require any further assistance`in
at the base of the
east ofAspen.'The
;xtshtig garage and
~'&om the existing
le, "Pitk`ni County,
z.4RnsASSesst~rrr
,~~.. u .
'oh >s exposed are the same as
'tot proposed additwn I found no
however, "i would add far'purposes of s-,.
naf "`grade` agamsi tle`"lii'1'Isrdemu~t be
n~, ... ~~ ~~.~ _ ~ ,..
and tliaf adequate dzemage along the"`
~~ ,,
'Kirkham, RM., and Rogers, W.P., 19$1, Earth ales ental' in Colorado:
43, H71 p. ~. ~ _.. ..._
a
_ _ ~ ~., _
Derwet Colorsdo 8b~1231292 '
- A'Rlka~drr
T E G N N O t O c 1 E 5 I N t ,_ ,. - TelopBorw: (303( 744-7166
' Psesim8e: "(3~3J ~"~=X29"0" .
OGIC ~A~A~IibS`"A`5~~5~fV~;l
MEETS AND~~Oi~' PA~2~C`EL ,~ .~.~ . ,. ... ~,. ... ,_.._ ,. _ - t .__
AT 431513'~GHWAY 82"° ~ _ _.,. _... .; .. ~ ..
ASPEN, PTTK~N ~~C1iTN~"Y; COLbRAiTO"'. , u ~ ~ '"
JOS NO: X009 70 0289
MARCH b7, 1997
MR. ALAN POTETGII~IN_ _ _ , _
.&
GARFIEL"D & I~ECHT,~P:C: , .., . ~_~t.~. .~ ,~, ~y.. M.,.,_ W
601 EAST ~I'11~A1~Y'A'VE1Vi)~" "'"
ASPEN, ~ .~. __... „y ~~..... ~ .,,. ,_,~~ __-
CQ~C~~~~~.w :.,n... r
ATTENTION:' MlC~A ~.~~ON:= ,~ .~, ,a~wv.~~:~~~.~~W„ ~. ~.~ >,~,.. ~...«:~•~~~a:4
Austin Research Engineers . "Chen-Northern Eittpire Soils Investigations
Kansas City Testing .Southwestern Laboratories . Twiri City Tes4mg"" `"'°" "" '°` °"
~ ',...
vp
TECH NO LO~fl ES'1~'`b~......
~Mazcfi 17, 1997
"y~"c South ZuniStreet
Np'..~'~, w _ ,...
i ., ~ .~ s a~ 17a",i"ve% ~.``d`o`raifo ~ $7532'3'=Z9'L~... , .. ... `....,....`...
.,. .._. k. n ~ ~~. i.
ep~ione =l3'oSfi'Ida'~'I~Y'~`" .~~ . .._. ,... ~,
"xeesim'"aei t30~1"Y44=7f2`'7t)'~-...".," "`- ..
Mr. Michael J. Herron
__ Ga~eld & Hecht, P.C.
601 East Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81ti11
~- Subject: Geologic Hazazds Assessment Study for the Meets & Bounds Parcel at 4315
• Highway 82 in Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado
Maxim Job Number: 5009 70 0289
Dear Mr. Herron
- At your request, we have conducted a geologic hazards assessment study for the project area.
The work was done to identify potential hazardous conditions and other conditions which should
be considered during planning and design of development in tYie area.
,_ The study has shown that no landslides or debris flows -were observed to be paesent that
represent as immediate potential hazard to the site structure. or the proposed addition.
Other geologic conditions represent potential hazards and should be considered.during planning
and design, are construction related slope instability, earthquake related ground shalang, and
snow avalanche areas. Adverse impacts associated with these conditions can be mitigated by
',;t .,
engineered designs. -- °-
The report which follows summarises our fmdings and presents our conclusions and
- recommendations. It is important that we proWide continuing consulting services as project
P g g P g g~
considered ip thelprojetc~t dedgrio that the eolo tc and geotechnical`conditions aze correctly
If you have anv auestion.c reQardinQ this rennrt n1PasP rnntart „g
Respectfully submitted,
iV1AXIlVI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
~,
/ ,, = ~ -
c ~~onL
`' .Senior Geologist/Certified Professional Geologist
CWP
Enclosures
Austin Research Engineers . 'Chen=Noi
Kansas City Testing SoutTiwesterti
~ s,
..+
~"' r
Frank D. Kinder, P:~
Project Engineer
31699
3-~~•-s
ms
..
- ~:
TABLE' OF CONTENTS":. ,. .:.. _.. ,:
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STi7b~'' `...... ':................. -....: , 1 _. _ _:
PRESENT SITE STRUCTTTRE AND"PRbPOSED"ADDTrC~N~ .. `~" ' .' '', `, ~ <.,
SITE CONTII'TIONS .. , ........ , ......... . .........,.. , ~ .,,.,:.~,..ti .:,~ ,
GEOLOGICSETTtNG .............................~....;.,
ROCK 1~ORMATIONS ....... ` ..:.......:....: ...... . . .. . .. ::., 4
Precambrian Rocks ..................:.. . ...... , :..:: > 4
Older Alluvium (Qom) ... .:......... ..........::::....:.: 4
Younger Stream Alluvium {Qys) ...................:....:.. --S
Younger Alluvium (QYfl.. .,.,.. . ~ _...'.. _.......:." ...... .
. 6
o uvium (Qcw) ...................... . .:r.-....:.. _n ,., .,., nz ~M.
SNOW AVALANCHES ..... , .... .....,..~ ...-......:.: > .. ~.~,_.,. g
GEOLOGIC'~iAZARDS ASSESSIv1EN'I'": m ~ ,~ ''"' ,"
..... ~~ ,. _.. ...~~. 9
LAN755LIDE HAZARllS' ....~ ,
... .................... 10
DEBRIS FLOW HAZARbS ... . ...... . ......... „.... _, ,,.... , .....,,,,~ 10
SNOW AVALANCHE HAZA`T2DS" ~ ;' . 10 _ `
i7 A D^~`LTi1YY ~bY?"yY"~ s ~ ti?: n. ' ~ ,,..u-.~ ... , w ., .,...~.,r ., ~ .
LINIITATIONS ......
APPENDIX`A .
FIGURE 1 SITE 1":OCAT
FIGU~tE 2 PRELIMII~AX
APPENDIX B
PHOTOGRAPHS
... ..;~:.,.~ n,..,. ,,;12
~a.,.. 4.. __~~ .<. ,.,...,~M.... .~ ~ ....~~...
_. , . ,..,:~wu
APPENDIX C
REFERENCES
APPENDIX D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
r _ ..
~-
I
PURPOSE AhTD SCOPE Off' S'~''CJD'Iy: `~ . , . ~ _
. - vu _M j < zw-vt^..'+s!E-.kY wJ a»u.. hmv. .}.. , W „xr..l .. ... e ~.: ..
This report pYesents the fmdings of a geologic hazards study r`or the Tvleets & Rounds `Parcel at
. ~.. ,, w.. ... ,. ~ ~~ .. . , ,..... _. ,,...,..
4 51 Highway 82 in Aspen, Eagle County,- Colorado. A site location map is shown on Eig. 1.
._. a
The purpose`of the study was to observe the general geologic conditions at the site"and t`he
a lommg properties located up-slope of the site and to identify conditions which` could"be "
potentially hazardous to the existing structure and fhe proposed development or which should
be considered in planning and.. design of xhe new addition: 't`lie work was prei°ormed in
actor ante with our propose dated February 2'g, 1997"'and the""signeih agreement fora
,. . ,,,.. u , . ~~.., ...... ... . ..._ , ..,
Geotechnical Engineering Services witfi Garfield &~Iecht, P~C:
A field reconnaissance of the development area was made on N2azch 7, 1997 to observe the
surficial geologic conditions. Based on this reconnaissance; review 'of published geologic
information, aerial photograpliinterpretatons, and our general experience in the area, potentially
hazardous conditions and other conditions, which should be considered for the site azid the
ro osed addition durin ~ "' ~ ~ °°~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ °~ ~~
P P g plaiuung and design, have been identtfied.`-This regort~~ias been
prepared to summarize our findings and to present our conclusions and`recommendations.
PRESENT SITE RTRT~C'1 ~1"ND PROD`$ET~~~~I~'O""~~`~"~'~`i "` ' .y.'~ ~` ~~` .~.;`~`,
The site has been developed by a private residence including attached garage, asphalt driveway,
and two small ponds. An approximate 1,800 square foot addition to the existing structure is ,_
planned to be constructed along the northwest side of the existing structure.
1
The site study area covers about. 2.$56 acres ands locate~'in'the"~~~"1I4; `$ 1~~"of'~Sec. ~7~rz:~'- s ~ ~ ~" ""~"
Township IO South and Range 84 West of the 6tti`Principal Ivleridian,+Pitkin County,~Colorado.
The site is situated within the Roaring Fork Valley along the east side of the Roaring Fork River
and along the west-southwest flank of Smuggler Mountain. The historic business district of the
Town of Aspen, Colorado is located approzimafeiy 1.5 miles to tiie~ northwest. T~e general
,..__.. ,i- .:
topography in the ama is shown on Fig. 1 Elevations differences on-site, where the residence
i ~.~.ti~ _...~ ~~.~,,,t_~_ ,~. 9~ .,o,~~a,..~
- ,~, ..~ ,.y„- . „~ ~... ,.. _._..-~.i~.
and developed portions of'the lof "are`tocated; vary approximately 15 feet with a base, elevation
of approximately 8,040 feet above mean seal level (1vISL) where the residence is constructed.
Elevations to the north-northeast and east of the site rise from 8,040 t'o greater khan 9,000 feet
above MSL. No natural perennial streams are present on the site but a shallow northwesterly
trending irrigation ditch cross throu h the west side of the site. The ditch and the majority of
the ground for the site was covered with approximately 1.5 feet of snow during the site visit.
Slopes along the Roaring Fork Valley sides vary from less than 5% (3°) to 70% (35°). The
more gently sloping terrain is located along the Roaring Forhltiver floodplain and river terraces
and is typically less than 5 % (<3") 'Natural slopes along the numerous alluvial fans, 'upon
which the site and many surrounding residences, have been_ constructed, vary between 5 % (3 °)
to 10 % (6°). `Slopes to the north-northwest of the. site, along the Ranks of Smuggler Mountain,
commonly range between 10 % (6°) to 7Q % (35 °) `
2.,
,., ~ .m ,~.~.
_~_ ,., -~ ..~ ,..,~,„.~ ..,~, ~.., ,..art ,.~ .~.,;
...:: ,..., .. ,,, ,...-..„.~„pW..nc,w,»w.,p.. » e w w y.,,vn ... :.ow«s w,,,ry a.~ ,.,... ~: ~ ~ i"
i
' I `. i. .. _ F J ~ ~.., i
Vegetation at fhe site consist of relatively dense aspen and conifer forest intermixedµwifhhrge
cottonwood trees, and-dense thick stands of scrub oak and brush undergrowth. The small and
shallow irrigation ditch,. crossing through the western portion of the site, was`not visible at the
time of our field reconnaissance because of the snow cover. Based upon our knowledge of the
Aspen area drainages, the near surface soils appear'to be we'll-drained':' There area few areas
,, ~;
of marshy and poorly drained ground on the adjacent properties locatei~ off-site to the west and
southwest along the modern Roaring Fork River floodplain as shown on Fig. 1.
GEQLOGIC 51';TTING
The site is located on the northwest flank of tfie Sawatch Rage"where the Roaring P"ork`~ver
cuts through and drains the western side of the mountain range. Smuggler Mountain, located
adjacent to the site, is situated within the Sawatch Range. The'primary'geologic structure m the
region is the north trending and north plurigutg Sawatch Range aziticline`which?genera~`q"~dees~~ „~~ ~ ~ s#F m ~c~ A
the north trend of the' mountain range. Rock formations in the area are the Precambrian (Pre ~'
. ,. r~.~..., ~ ~_ .. - . ,., -
age quartz mgnzonite overlain liy either (Suateiriary age O~oer AIluvium (Qo) 'consisting of
glacial moraines (Qom) or Younger Alluvium'(Qy) consisting of alluvial fans~(Qyfl (OIand'e'r and '
et.al 1974 and Tweto and Others 1978)." The ~kecamliiian rocks are igneous rocks
and
outcrops are found off-site to the north along the steeper portion of tfie~ gully, along a road' cut
~w .:w, tr.4a e=A4.,....i .. .. .,__s created by Highway 82, and more than 1,000 feet'north-northeast anc~~east of the $ite. The
Quaternary rocks are sedimentary formations and were forme'd.by a combination of glacial and
stream activities.
3
a
~.._ ,.
,~. ..
i x•..,.~~,P ..a, ,~..;.~ ~, .>
,.._ ,,
y g
ort erl trendin fault traces have been,inferred to cross through the52oaring Fork Valley bet
they are not vsible'in the area. There was no evidence of any movement along the faults and
they have been considered geologically inactive for thousands of years (Bryant and Freeman, ~'
19'7 Noe'vdence,of'orlandshi~esdepo~~.~~~ max' ~ n < ~..du~ ~' `
~ ~~ ,A~.u~ sits were observed on-site and°none have been mapped
in the area of the site in revious en 'eerie °`" " " ' ' °-
P ~ g geology studies (`dander anii et.al., 1~7~):~ The
principal geologic features at the site and in the surrounding properties .are shown on Fig. 2 and
discussed in the following sections.
ROCK FOR'1~IATIONS,.. ._ _. .. .... ...,.. ,.:,,
Precambrian Rocks (Pre C~
..... ,.
g.. ._ quartzmonzo:,; ... _ ... _ ~ ~ .~ ...,. «P ~,.... .._
recambrian i neous rocks ~ Hite, are present and make-up Smuggler Mountain to
the north and northeast of the site. In the vicinity of the site, these rods are typically covered
with glacial moraine. deposits except for outcrops located north-northeast and east of the site.
(Fig. 2). Quartz monzohites are intrusive, granitic rocks consist of approximately 10 % to 50
feldspars with the remaining portion consisting of quartz, and minormafic minerals. The rocks
aze very hard, often jointed, and very resistant to weathering processegy
Older Alluvium (Oorril _. ... ... ... ,:
The Older Quaternary Alluvium consisting of glacial moraine deposits cover the majority of the ._
properties adjoining the site and overly the Precambrian quartz monzonites• The glacial deposits
4
derived from valley glaciers that left deposits as lateral and end moraines as the glaciers
advanced and .retreated, within the: Roaring Fork Valley. The depth of glacial moraine'deposits
is expected to be quite variable. over relatively short distances, where it could range from less
than a foot to several ten's of feet.
For the purpose of this study, the glacial moraine deposits have been mapped as Older Alluvium
(Qom). The glacial deposits observed along the-flanks of Smuggler Mountain and to the north-
northeast and east of the site appeared to be stable. Thick stands of scnib oak, pine trees, and
bushy undergrowth have helped stabilize. the deposits. No evidence was observed during the
site visit to indicate that soil movement or recent eolluvial deposits were forming along the"
slopes above the site in these rock formations.
Younger Stream Alluvium (Ovs)
The Younger Quaternary Stream Alluvium consist of stream deposits that"cover a`Tmited gordon
of the south-southeast. side of the site and adjoining properties`located to title sout~i, southwest, '
and southeast of the site along the Roaring Fork Valley. Tlie~ stream deposits are
;..
unconsolidated, moderately to well sorted bysize, and'poorly fo moderately sfrafified "Tfie large "` ~ "` ~ ~"~~
~'. a ,aiY c+-.v 4 i1i'.n-: u,v k.. W.Y"il Y~`5#-.. ..z . ..vx !.. ._. ~.:
rock fragments are typically angular to roundest ranging from gravel to clay size sediments. Tlie
stream deposits are derived from sediments created by Roaring Fork River and-can lie mixed
-5
~, ~ ~
with alluvial deposits and coliudial deposits wititin and along the 12oartng'Fork''Va11ey. Tie
„_ ~, ,.:.
depth of stream alluvial deposits is expectec( to be quite variable over relattvely short`distances,
where it could range from less than a foot to several ten's of feet.
For the purpose of this study, the stream alluvial deposits have been mapped as Younger Stream
Alluvium (Qys). The stream alluviai deposits are limited at the site to the south and southeast
sides. No evidence was observed during the site visit to indicate that soil movement or recent
stream deposition was occurring on-site. Recent deposition appears to' be limited to the modern
floodplain and channel`of the Roaring Fork River.
Younger Alluvium (Ovfl '
The Younger Quaternary Alluvium consist of alluvial fan deposits and `cover the majority of the 1..
site and adjoining properties located to the. immediate north-northwest, west, and southwest of
the site. The alluvial deposits are unconsolidated, moderately to well sorted by size, and poorly
to moderatel strat~ed. The 1 ~_. _,. n _ u ,, y
y arge rock fragments are typically angular to rounded ranging from
gravel to boulder size in a mixed-clay, silt and sand matrix. The alluvial deposits are derived`
from side valley drainages and can be mixed with stream deposits and colluvial;deposits within
and along the Roaring Fork Valley. Tfie'deptli~of alluviah'deposuss expected to be+'quite
variable over relatively short distances, where it could range from less than a foot to several
ten's of feet.
6 <, ,; ..,
,. . ,.,. ,.; . ~. ....... v
'. .. '..
~, .. r p.~ „ I .. k..' ,fl -A
dom.
fi'
,:
c: ... ~ ~ I
s' _. ~ ,_ is ~ I ~:( ',
~. r ~~ r.., .. ...+ ... ~ ,., ., tr. _ .v. r,. _ _. _, .... ...
For the purpose of this. study, the alluvial deposits Have been mapped as Yoanger Alluvium
_ ~ ... I.,
(Qyf). The alluvial deposits observed, upon which the site structure is built, appeared to be
stable with no evidence of recent depositions from the gully to the north. This gully is the
principle source of the alluvial fan deposits. An abandoned channel of the fan is presenf on=site
to the north of the site structure and the active channel of the gully is located more than 325 feet
to the north-northeast,. Thick stands of aspens, cottonwoods, pine trees, and brush undergrowth
cover the fan;deposits and have stabilized the deposits. Nq evidence was observed during the
site visit to indicate that soil movement or recent deposits were forming along the alluvial fan
_, _
in the vicinity of the site acreage.
Couvium (Ocw)
The only modern Colluvial (Qcw) deposits observed in the vcinty of the site were restricted
,_
to two areas. One area.. is found along the gully located norfli of the site, where colluviim is'
being deposited, and should have no impact on the site. The area where clluuvium is being
deposited is more than 500 feet from the site where the gully'has cut deeper into the north`sde
of the gully and has been undercutting the igneous rock outcrops and glacial moraine deposits.
Angular, cobbles and small boulders (less than 2 feet in diameter) were observed on top' of the`
snow present in the base of the gully during the site visit. '
Additional colluvial deposits were observed along a road cut, located north of the site, created
.. v~. .~,,. a~ ~ ,~. ,..~„..~e....
by the construction of Highway 82: This area is located more than ~OiS wfeet north-nort~iwest of ~~ ' `~
the site and should have no'impact on the site.
7
' :Y
LANDSLIDE & POTENTIALLY UNSTABT.~'5~,~'$" _"
No landslides and Suspected landslide areas' w'ere'"identified in the vicinity of the site and rio
known landslide areas have been mapped duringprevious studies (Bryant, 1972 and Olander and
et.al, 1974). Potentially unstable slopes are defined as steep slopes overlain by relatively thick
unconsolidated deposits that might slide or sluatip; if undercut. The only areas identified as
potentially unstable slopes are located along the gully to the north of the site and in the,-area of
the Highway 82 road cut. No potentially unstable"slopes were observed immediately up-slope
from the site structure or the proposed addition, in aerial pfiotographs reviewed for' 1963, 1'9'19, "
1991, and 1996: No potential unstable slopes were mapped immediately up-slope during
revious investi afrons _,- .. .,. ~ . ~ n~,", ...~~ N. :. ~ .,.. ,..:.,:..
p g (Bryant, 1972 and t7lander and et.'al, "1`974)`"' Igo deforrn'e~ trees or
damaged trees, often indicative of soil movement, were- observed duffing the site visit and no
rock shut or'run-out areas were observed.
SNOW AVALANCHES
The properties located. immediately to the north-northeast, and east of the site 'Have been
identified as'potential avalanche azeas (Olaniler and`et. al, 1974.' Tfiese areas are defuie~"'by "'
Olander as: "Areas. with a slope of approximately 45% or steeper"where avalanches could
possibly occur under optimum conditions". In general, open slopes hold'sribw'the poorest and- ~
g ~ north and ~u,ti. ~`'ing slop'e`s would"more _.,,~.,,,~
wooded slopes hold snow the hest. The hi her"``~ `~ " ~~ ""east fac
frequently developed favorable conditions for smallavalancheswhereas the Tower'soutYi and west ..
8
e,,:_ .,~ m, rxi1; ,i:,. e.,.a ~im!¢~ esrs%4m , ..kk4~ x~4~a~weruiw.
,:^~... .. A.y. i. 1 .:~ ..
:.~ o>~w ua ~ 5.v.. :M:p~ 9 x~.'rvs.4v::...r...+v.g:
` r. ..a ~. ww. ~i ~ .'... .. .t ';. .. ~ .~ 1 V.. .i .v I ..
facie slo e's would seldom if ever have avalanche Condit "
> ons (B`ryant, 1972). 't'fie `slopes
above the site are south and west facing and do not meet the criteria for avalanche conditions.
,_ .. , ,_ .
No avalanche shuts or deformed trees indicating potenfial or past avalanche conditions were
observed during the site visit. According to the current owner~of the property and information
obtained from the Town of Aspen, no lrnown;avalanches have been reported in the vicinity of
the site since 1981 when the structure. was built at the site.
axon has reviewed the Pitkin County Avalanche Ilaiard maps'~and observed potential
avalanche conditions in the site vicinity. 'According to ,the ,maps reviewed and published
geologic hazard studies, including t~`he site"'and adjacent properties, it appears that the existing
house and the proposed addition are not located within the avalanche moderate or high hazazd
zones as defined within the Pitkin County I:an`d use Code. ~ ~" ' ' i'
GEOLOGIC FJ'A`LAliD~"~~ra'I~N~''~~~. , ,,...,~~,....,.. n ~ ,, e . ~.<,~.
Based on the fmdings of this study, we have not identified current conditions which aze
immediately hazardous to the site. We did identify potentially.hazardous conditions that should ' ' '
P g g. p p
be considered in the tannin 'and desi~ n of ro osed addition to t'he existing structure. Our
assessment of these conditions their anuci ated likelihood of causin roblems and.
' ~ P g P possible
mitigations az~ discussed in the following sections. ad. .P ~' "~ ~ -~
9
.. ,,
da wa. ~w.~z,euu,..n. i",....r'k +..nw.4 3.awrr~~zn+3..~~-0.~repm*~rr'r~i
'i~ , h P r i
Based u on ublished eolo 'c hazards ~ :" ` " ._" `°`'"'° °w'"°`""`" "~`° .". `.°,°'
P P g Sl reportsand°the`Pit~ui~ountyAvalazichel~azarit~maps,
it appears that the existing house and the proposed addition are not located within the avalanche '
moderate or high. hazard zones as defined by the Pitkin County'"Land°Use Code. '" """" " " '
,.... .:: , n ..._., ..
EARTIiQIl`AI~ FIAZAIiD~'~, .w
There is a potential for low to moderately strong earthquake ground shaking in the Aspen area,
but the potential for severe ground shaking is remote during a reasonable service life for
residential construction. During the last i~3'J years of "historic record, the Aspen area has been
_E~ ., , ~~~:.~ ,,, .i. ~u.,~a, ~,~ subjected to occasional earthquake groiind shaking with i~1o"`died T~~erca`lli2nterisity~of'VI andp
less ,.. - __ ~ _.v::
(Kirkham and Rogers, 1981 and 1983}.
Intensity V and VI ground shaking is usually felt by most=people, but results in negligible
damage to buildings of good construction 5liglt damage'~can occur in buildings of poor
construction at intensity VI. In ouropinion, it is likely that the residences and~other structures _~.,,. ' .,..rn~.M~,,,,:
could ex erience mtenst V and `VI' "round sIia~Cino durin~'a reasonahle cervix ~ x ~"''~"~"k ~~ "'" "~ ` n ~"`s' `~"
P Y S e;fr
Earthquake resistant designs commensurate with the regional hazard should be used ui the design `
:~~ ,eP, i~ __.,~,... ..< .. .,.,..
of the residences and other structures. The Aspen area is in the Uniform Binding Code Seismic
Risk Zone 1
'(TJBC T991 Edition) which corresponds to minor damage. Based on our current
understanding of the earthquake hazards in this park of'Colorado, we'see ii~Ye~S°on to iricYease'°
the commonly accepted seismic risk zone. ' '
11
-_~., w -..~ w•~' ~
We do not anticipate majorproblems with construction related slope instability near the proposed
residential addition.. Grading' plans and foundation design for fhe building addition should be.,~ ~ ~ ~ ' ..,'r_.~
~ y.>N^' '4n4c..,."vs.i..snrtim+h~fi~.,dMYwC:/a.;^ti,'wy*^n,*kyw.:C.~%*~':eA'39 R>m.~l}vnXG'"k
based on site. specific geoteehnical investigations"'wlricli mode subsurface exploration.
Good surface drainage should. be provided around all permanent cuts and fills to direct surface
runoff away from the slope faces. Fill sl'opes,'cut slope's and other stripped areas should be ~ ~~
protected against erosion by re-vegetation or other means.
LIMCPATIONS "
This study was conducted in accordance-with enerall acc ted en~iiieexin eolo 'c ractices
in this area to provide the client with an"identification and assessment of potential geAx' .._.-,.u- ~ __ ~_,a.yP,~.
ologic
azards and other conditions which should be considered. as project plaiuung and design
proceeds. The opinions and recommendations are based on a field reconnaissance, aerial
photograph interpretations, and review of ,the regional geologic literature. The. opinions and
recommendat}ons presented-are suitable for preliminary project plannrng aria"design, but'siie~ ~' '4 " ~ * ~'
specific design recommendations_shoul3'be~°tiased`on additional geotechriical studies.
12
WI
OM•M
OITCM-.~//
ao -
/ / Ober Osr
'RRIOGE pD gu'IA'"~ t~56.U
'~
1' ..
~/. •I
~a
~`
% j
Qnm+
J/~` /ne
Q~ ~ i ~ , 1
J
r 1 /
i
,,.~~.~~
1 ~'~
r
~ Orcw
zrw ~
i `y/
s.~ _ _ , :,
`, -~~ / /
.. `~ " ./
I~ " DlOE /~ ^ /
IIOaIS' // '~
..~ ~ ~1 ,`\\\
1 ~~,
.~ 1
I 1 ~~~
.~
,~ ~ Qis'cw \1
~I e
I \
`~ ' I
~ \ \\ I `\ \j`v//
\ ' /
~\ ~ \
it \
II I
~~ \
// II / \
p!1/ I \
U \ I
// \
p0' I//~
.110 I ~~I . '//' .
u, ! '+'i~
ne '/
"~ ATfIEN I' ., , "1
State of Colorado ) ` '
ss AFFIDAVIT'OF JANET RACZAK
County of Ptkin
state as follows:T RACZAK, Affiant, beingof lawful age and duly sworn upon ttty'oath, do depose and'
1. On September 1, 1999, 1 visited the Pitldn'County AssessoYs Office Website to review the
records of adjacent Land owners who were to receive Notice for,the Claudia Aspen View, LLC
land use application.
2. Based. on my research the most current list was provided to. Glenn Horn of Davis Horn,'
Incorporated, reprepsentative for the Applicant, for submittal to the Aspen/Pitldn County
Communrt Develo ment Office.
3. I made a good faith effort to obtain an accurate list ofthe names and addresses ofth
eland owners
adjacent to the subject parcel (see Exhibit "A"), property assigned Parcel IDNo. 2'73'71"7300022 `
located on the maps at the Assessor's Office..
4. The submittal also includes. a copy of the mapping obtained from the Assessor's Office (see
Exhibit «B" = mrt : , .:.> . .._
)~
FURTHER, AFFIAIVT SAYETH NOT.
~ .~~~
T t L. Raczak
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged and signed before me on SepterrGber 1, 1999~6y
Janet L. Raczalc.
WITNESS myhand and official seal.
My commission expires: ~ -a4~'Zoc~ ~.
(SEAL)
a. G1i' .~-~--
._
NOTAR'~ PUBLIC _ _
Andi Ranch,LLC
c/o Garfield & Hecht
Attn: Mickey Herron " "
60Y E. Hyman Avenue
Aspen CQ 81611
(2737173000]1)
Julie E. Shield
1570 Homestake Drive
Aspen Cd %1611
(2737201000Q5)
Pitkin County
530, E. Main Street
Aspen CO, 81611
Bureau ofZand Management
50629 U5`Highway 6"and 24"" ` "
Glenwood. Springs,. CO 8160'1 ` "
f
_070» ~ .~` ,~ ~.
~
,'7"k~
r =- '
i i_
0:70 L•
t~
~\~\ - ~q
~ '!• S l{ f '~ F!
.b .r , .,
~
.., -
~'? \ ~
,
... ; .err 4 5~. ,.,, ~ .
. .
~~ ~.
' =r+ ry
~~M „
..~
.
r r r ~ r iy ~ t
,
f z,
=
~~ `, {: ,'.p. w tax"-y-µ ky.'^.
/
• T `~~~
r r i ~ r rr ,
Jey~~` ns ~~ ,~
_ Y~3
~s
`~~ uuu333 a u.
~
~
f~~ ~~
~
~
~ 5.,. 1 ~~1.._ 1. ~ ~.:<-:
~ ~V ~.
v iii ^"r ~ i
•
~, a~-z
~xT 3~y[~Sy ~
~
: ~ 'fit
~ `T~'
~
'
~`~
);
7 7 0'0.2 yy~.
?
.+
's?$+r
-
'
i'
1
, F i~'V ~,3 4fYeYTi
~
~rY F'YL~1''yYS r i3
r
}V
~
.~ i /. '.T i
:.stiM'+
_ ~
7T 1 01 2 -~ ~'
~ N~~j
~~ ~ .nr~ Kq~~•1 ~~I.~+•~ fi?
i / \ tel: ~ 5,~~ '±-~1~~~ ( 2 rY ~t,yr~
. 2 1 711 1 5 eP '"`)) ~ yY ~. n! .c. f ~ A ,:
4~l~~Y P"~( 3
~
A
;
y
C Y
3
'
}}~ z r K'., ~k
..,
T T~
~,f"„ ~ ~
.G
.e
JN
' ? ~ f. ~ ~ ~4 i~ ~S f.}
•
~. ~
_..~. ~ G
.s.2a~ ~F < ~, ,i 1 .Y.
x
~g ~
t
i -
j"
w
r
~ 'e S
•'~5 rYr
3 r
s
`
y
Y
ifcs
y
a '. f',oy .r i `-.y.~.
:
-
U•:".:
1 ~
To'
5.,...
J ?'~.
'..... i.
i ...:
~a
[~.;r tr:
1 1
Pitkin County Assessor SeercTi Resiilis
tl
loft
~~, http /Yaimwebdomain.aspen com/~ peer.
.. ~, 9+~.. r:
Results of Your Search:
Updated May 28, 1999
Locate all Sales ofthis Property
View Property Details
Tax Schedule A# R~03~8§5 ~;~ ~ ` ~ ~ - -_ ..e.~,~._ _.; , .. ....._....
Tax Area 054 "
Parcel\# 273`777300022._>. _: ,_ ,_
Name CLAUDIA ASPEN VIEW"lT~C°
4675 SW 74TH ST
Mailing Address
City IvITAMT ,,., , _ >_ .:
State FL `
Zip 33143
Street T-1'(~Y 82 ' ` `
Total Actual Value .. . .:....::.... .."r..nia.w<... en ,. ..:,:.+.4 .,v.,r...r v1u'-.e M... .~:..:..h+."~..... a.e:., "«ri.
"2~5°7'60 ~a'°
_ . ,, ,-µ~. ~,
~.~.~c,e ~ ~~.: ~r~~ .~~.~r~:;
~... <_~ ~ , _ .._,~ a. ,.,a ~e...,~ m.,, ,m.x,. ~,r..~ ~~~
tl~:'o ., .. ..,... ,
== aoT == -mailbox - -index - 'c~ of - dkin'
asnen" , co7YNty"
~,.
Aspen Snowmass OnLmeis a subsidiary ofAspen 7nteractl"ve7~C1"e`~ia,"~nc ~ '"'"'
.~ .-~.~.:. , ..,.,.. ~a. ~ ...,,...
O: Box T0; Aspen,"CZ7'81612; 1'e'T". 3 `3 §26=7176: `Send ie§~"onses to
iitfi)(C1~aspen.C61i1 ... ~..
Copyrights Aspen Interactive Media, Tnc. I9§'7° '' ` " """"" ` ~'""" '~ _"""" "~'
Sep-02-99 09"": 38A yusem horn 97°°925 5T8O p 02 •.
+ FS :. d ~ w :, t .~ . y ~ ~ .~ s
w. ..
• .. -
AiT/-CNWIENfi•~1
Alan Po~amkin
Claudia Aspets Viex''LLC '
4475 8ii 7< BtreeL _ , „
Miami, Florida
33i{3
September I, 1999
Nick Lelack
Aspen Ptkin Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street `
Aspen, Colorado 81611
ne: Cinudia Aspen view 10f1 Exeidption For Nev Driveway and Garage
Dear Nick:
This letter authorizes Glenn horn of Davis Horn Incorporated to
submit a land use application for the p'ro'perty owned by Claudia
Aspen View LLC and represent the LLC in the land'"use'appro~al
process. The application seeks approval 'f or anew driveway"access,
and an expansion of the building envelgpe to accommodate a new
garage.
Please contact me at 305-665°9600 if you have any questions or if
I can be of any assistance.
Thank you.
sincerely,
ALAN
CLAUD
Lelack.2
.. _ .. ~.
Sep-O1-99 O5~.O6P yusem horn 97,:x25 5180 P.O4-
,..., A~PENlPITI~" ~~rr~~rr~..LO-
GOMMT~NZ.,. ,. n W~,,at.a#..~ M ,,_., v..
TY DE~E~,OPM;ENT ti1~pe n~~,.fT
PIT'KIIv'CbUNTY (herenafrer C{? '~ ~ ~~ r:,. ~J~ ~~:~;
L>T ana C i ~ ~..
lLL~ ~ --
{hereinafter <°~PPLICAN'1~ AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I- APPLIC~,NT`has submitted to CO
~l I' 1= ,-~", ~„n ,,~ r ~.~.~~ 1 UNT'Y an application for
t~-l~~ z ~ . ~(~
(hereinafter, T~ pRp;~~
-'• APPLICANT' understands
an a ees that
No. 96-52 establishes a fee structure for Piatuting applicPItiun County Resolution
all processing fees is a condition precedent to a det~ trmination of appl aiion
completeness. _
3. ~ APPLICANT' _, ,. ~.. , ,-
and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it pis not pog ibis at thi~ titae to asc,
e.~ctent of the costs involved in rocessin the a ern the fi~II
COUNTY' fiuther agree rhaz xt is in the interest of the ~estto APPLICA Tang
make payment of an aortal deposit and to thereafter permit additiona! costs,to_ be
biIIed to APPLICANT'~on a monthl basis. ~'pLICANT
benefited by retauun agrees he will be
• , g ~~. cash ti uidi
ugon notification b the CO q y are necess~e addtuonal payments'
Y LINTY when the
COUNTY agrees it wiII be benefited through the ~' ~ cysts are incurred.
full costs to process APPLICANT"s ' Beater certainty of recovering its
aPPlicazion.
4• CO[JI~1T'Y' and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
COiJ1`iTI' staff to complete processing or present sufiicieat information to the
Planning commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the
Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make Iegally
o a~redofindngs for project approval, unless current biIIings are paid in full prior
_---~.
Vi'n,i,.,~ ~ as».,~~.
Sep-Ol-99 05:07P yusem horn 97'`'325 5180 P.05
,., , , ~'~: ~: :4""Ai'T~A~WENT~,O
S. TTteretarc, APPLICANT agrees that in, consideration of the
Cnf,'NTY's waiver of its right to collect fall fees pridi• to a determination of
application completeness, APPLIC`ANT' s~'ail pay an initial deposit in the atncunr
~ hours of Planrun staff time, an
of ~ 1 ~ which is for ~ g ri if actual recorded costs
exc~~ti the; initial deposit; APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly biIIings to
COC~tTY to reimburse the CQUNTY ~ for the processing of the.,. application'
mentioned above, iztcludin~ post approval rsvte~N. Such etiodic payments shall be
made withitl 30 clays of the billing date A.ppLICAN`I' homer agrees ttraz failure to
Y. ~.r .. .. 1:: ~ ... ... i.
pay such accrued cows shall be grounds for suspension of processing.
FIT`T~IN COL:VTY _ APPLI'C.~NT`
(;~'r"~ ~ ~~~. ~~~
Cindy $ouben
Community Development Director
Mailing Address:
I_LL
`~~~75 S w ~~1 ~~trN~T-
~ i
uate: - ~ 1 ~ i `~tvr
~. ~ ~~
A'~'~ACtWENT,~._.
f1
Legend
E~yt6~g Evergreen Tree
ErJStMgDedduoue Tree
~ Pro~weedEvm'9rcen Tret
tub
`~-
- - Propored Deckllou~Trce
5oA
',
j.
® Claudia /'Ashen
NC
('.AEG MOZIAN AND ASSOK ~dTE~.m ~m
~~r aeyY 9o•wl 3DM 6~Ie Nt atlAmM^t~~
~d Riwiew Site Plan
Dsk: Jely 14,1999
~~. Soak: I'•=Sp•-0^
~' Page 3 of 2 North
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
(Pursuant to Section 4-90 the Pitkin County Land Use Code)
State of Colorado)
88.
county of Pitkin )
The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I, Glenn Horn being or representing an applicant before Pitkin
County, personally, certify that Public Notice of the application
for the Claudia Aspen View 1041 Review and Scenic Overlay Review
was given by posting notice containing the information required in
Section 4-90 which posting occurred an November 6, 1999 in a
conspicuous place and that said sign was posted.
Applicant:
Claud' pen View, LLC
I
By _ b
Gleam Horn
The foregoing Affidavit of Public Notice was acknowledged and
signed before me this 23 day of November, 1999 by Glenn Horn on
behalf of Claudia Aspen View LLC.
WITNESS my hand and offici 1 seal.
My commission expires: -~ f ~~~~1.p~-ff~
6E~~CpN ~ I . t ~..~ _ ~ ~ ~ F
;ti ~ ~ +
~"
~ ~ ~ ,t
-~ ~ ~ ~
{' ..~
., x P ,
,. ~ .
i
t, ~, r.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public that on November 23, 1999, the Hearing
Officer of Pitkin County granted approval for the 1041 Hazard Review & Scenic Overlay
application for the Claudia Aspen View property located at 431 I Highway 82: This site specific
development plan grants a vested property right pursuant to Title 2`4, Article 68 Colorado Revised
Statutes. ,
s/Lance Clarke
Hearing Officer
Pitkin County; Colorado
,, ,:
Published'in the Aspen Times on December 25, 1999
Pitkin County Account 002.02
12-C The Aspen Trmes • ,ScztrrrdUy~Sunday, Octvberl,3-l4, 1 JJ9
PUBLIC NOTICE
PORitplNr 1b C.R.S., 37-92-302, AS J11~®, You era notified that the
following pages comprise s resume of the applications sad ametWed
eppiieatione tiled with the Hater Clerk far Hater Divieioo 5 during the month
of SiP17rIB~ 1999.
1. 99CN177 (92CN321) CJIRFIBLD COUNJT - LICie11'R NO. 2 DI'ItCH lROM POUR MILH
CRIISA, ROARI1iG PORT RIVER. 81mer Arbaney; 2585 Midlsnd Aw.; Glenraod
Springs, CO B1S01 970-945-5808, Ax~baney Dand 111 - Application to Make
Absolute a Conditional Water Right. Decreed: September 16, 1993, 92CN321.
Location: in Lpt 17 Sec. 22, T. 7 S., R. 89 N „ 6th P.M. at a point 325 feet
from the Booth Sec. line and 800 feet Crom the Haet 6ec. line o! said Sec.
22. Appropriation: December 30, 1992. Amount: 8,0 af, absolute. Uaa:
domestic, fish culture, livestock, aasthecict, wildlife habitat and wetlands.
The applicntion contains a detailed outlina of the work performed for
completion of the appropriation sort application at the rater co beneficial
use. (2 pages)
5. 99CIf181 P.277CIN CODiffY, ItARR31'Y CRBBK, 17LINt71'ARY TO RQARING ir'ORE.
APPLICATION 10 MARH A PORTION OP Tf18 NATBR RIGHTS AH$DLllre AND POR H8K6NNIAL
PINDIN6 OP R6116(INABLH AILIGHNCH. James P. Hunting, c/o Petrick i Stowell,
P.C., 730 HaeC Durant Ave., Suite 200, Aspen, CO 81611, {g70) 920-L028.
Hama Ot atrueturee: Kuhrie Pond and Kuhns Pond Ditch. Description of
The
2D and B!
rune in e
County).7
Warren Ct
South, Re
The.
aacGlOn LV IrlCxln 6YJUnty). Source: Narrea Creek, a
Rork River. Appropriation date: Pebruary 25, 1987.
0.4] a.f., condicionel.Ae to KAltlne Dand Ditch: 0.25
+: Ae to Ruhne Pond: Piscatorial, irrigation,
~ 4nd aesthetie burmeen. as to rnhna once na t..w.
. of rater. The Applicsnc ie continuing to
Kuhns Pond Ditch has been ct7apleted and is
Kuhns Pond. Hoth the Pond and the Ditch are
--_-- r appriep co oener ici.al use: atnreture:
Kuhns PW1A. Date: Jut.v l5. Loon n... na .,,..,...a ,,, ~____., __ __.
25 a.[. of
k0 be aad4
r rs reQuescea co De continued es a conditional rater right. 17ie entire
aaqunC der:read to the Kuhns Pond Ditch, 0.25 c.P.s., is sought to be sleds
absolute. Por both the Pond and Che Ditch, piscatorial, recreation, and
aesthetic uses are sought to be made absolute and ^tockratering and
irrigation are requestW to be etaltinust! as conditional vas, as shorn helot.
Kuhns Pond. Amount: 0.025 a.t., absolute, 0.405 a. t., conditional. IIse:
Piscatorial, recreation, asd aesthetic, absolute. Stockwsterilg and
irrigation, conditional. Kuhns pond Ditc-h. Amount 0.25 c.t.s., absolute. Usa:
Piscatorial, recreation, and aesthetic, absolute. 8tockraterilg and
irrigation, conditional (S pages)
B. 99C9rlBa 6ARPIIIa COWRY OmOtHRl Ip1'tpt 79tIAQ1'ARY TO ?ItR RQ11RIlp POAL
RIYIR. Alan L, and Jill Scott, c/o Lori J.M. Sstterlield, llerldy M. Nelael,
Balcamb i Green, P.C. Dreyer 790, Glenwood Springs, N 81602, (970) 945-6546.
Application for Change of Natar flight. Daereed NattAe of atrveturee Por Nhieh
C39ailgee Are Sought: Rowers Nall Ro. 1. Inforelation Prop Previous Daerest
Date 8ntared: May 6, 1992; Gee No.: 91CN223; CourC: Mater Court, Divtsian 5. '
Decreed point of Diversion: g61J4 of ttus tiMi/~ o! Sec. 19, T. 7 8., A. a7 N,
o[ tde 5th P.M. at a point 1,498 tc. Sast of [hi Neat Seq, line and 2,498 Lt.
South of the North Sec. Line. xnnr~r,u;.,;.,., r,.... .._-~~__ -_ -___
X
public of
a/Kathryn 5. Koch,
City Clerk,
City at Aspen
The Aspen Times an October 23,
North
nepth:
oms t
with E
and p]
1ao, c
and
ere
co a
1lept., isu ~. Galena St, Aspen.
7) 92D-5090,
s/Kathryn S. Koch,
City Clerk,
Cny of Aspen
The Aspen Tlmea on October 23,
c of
den,
pur-
ng Oftice~ suant to the L+
sober 23 and Title 24,
, Stahrtes, pert:
property: 1590
Block 2 otthe
D15TR1CT Ordinance No.
and loning C<
W natural lion contact
received Ashen/Pitkin 1
l Dlstdct, 130 S. Galena
r.,+,...a,. 5090.
may be obtained from RWS
iy, 791D Ralston Road N4, Ot
le equipment ur substitute Notice Is h
nt moat be de)ivered by the approv:
and the ere
0; 9?(7~51;;7 PUBLIC
.1e:u+elte Jnnre, Notice
i+.,,,,,f„ [ ,,,,,.+„ r+,..+, Notice is hereby afven
s/Robert Blalch, Chair
Aspen Planning and 2oning Commlasfon
Published In The Aspen Times on October Z3,
1999.(52223)
LLC reque
Overlay
to three individual reeidentiai sites. Structure to ha augatenteQ: iiahelmail
itsll d9'. 7. Water rights r:o be used for augmentat i.on; piLtk Di[eh aa~
R9aEL'1t41t Comoaav. The Applicants are the oAmere of en option to perpeC.ually
lease 0.3 acre fopt of hiatnrir conau7tWCive use decreed in Case No. 79CW097,
Water Division Nn. 5 (hereinatt:er eowetiwes referred to as 'CLDC rater"1~
'iha tl.3 acre font. is derived from rater rights decreed to the Dark Ditch and
Reservoir Cnm)+any. The Perk Ditch and Reservoir Con4wny diverts rater from
Cattle Creek under the tolloritu~ refer xlghGa:
nirect or oars one u er t e s tea n e ark Ditch and-itdsirvoir
Cowpony era supplemented by releaeee Ernm Consolidated Reservoir. This
- tlWI80L711t*TRD MIIRSittt1a01:it NhTRR Itrrinl'S
{trocnre reereed Prlorl t2 to. tenets Wjodl!er.noo -pp[gr[Infn f.-.
Yen tut+t ion tree Wte
tae, tl,
T l f.,
t 171.
tarflrld Ca.
Ca. 1e1. 9!).t Af 11 Itfri 1(19/1171 1l1(IDt riN
Gee. let. 211.1 lr tit Itirl 6!7111951 i/I/D11 {its
Ca, tn. III 1 i/ fi1 Ith1 Ili!/1971 f/7/7fa1 st11
uc ng t e wont a o y t. rouq t r, nc us ve C e irrigation
seaeon't, rater rill also fie diverted under thew tights Tor irrigation of up
to 4,500 eryuare [set of lawn and isndscape irrigac ion. Water wLll also be
diverted for rataring of six head o[ stack, Historic use: The historic use
associated rite Applicants' 0.1 acre foot oP historic conevriptiw use raa
adjudicated and determined in Caae No. 79CN097 in the DSstrict Ct9urt in and
for rater Division No. S. Auedi Reservoir, Hy contract dated September 30,
3.999. up to 0.1 acre feet of water has been sacurefl by the Applicant from the
Basalt Hater Conservancy District's rater allotment contract xith Che Bureau
o! Reclaa9ation for Rued1 Rewrvoir rater. ituedi. Reservoir ie an on-charnel
reservoir located in the Mr5d+81( of 6ecGion 18, Township B South, Range 84
teat of the 6'° II.M., in Beale and Pickle Cpmr1.. a...nA v....-..,.a .. ....
six mesa or stock. This plan ie
le-family home ie estimated co
'1, tlaeed upon 3.5 persona using
e 151 of diveraione; taste rater
tiaid system. Livestock wa ter
or d6 OPD total CoK six horses,
m irrigation dewarul is 2.33 acre
le methodology, ssruming an sot
me are assumed t.o 7ta 1,87 acre
;ra case an99ual ly, tiro a projected annual eoMUtt87tive use of 0.461
It9d9ibit A hereto to a table suawarisir9g the contampleted morRhly
+rtd depletion amountr. The 6sheleun well No. 1 nears tde criteria
Sup D of tM 19tfCD delayeQ depletion categories, as decreed in Case
S, Natec Division fro. i. 8xhibit B hereto depicts the tnorsthl.y
and delayed return floc factors for cell grwp D. A pro acted
an schedule taking delayed depletions into account is 8xhibiC C
le projected augmentation reQuirement Crag the Ct.UC water is 0.225
a
, ens prewnc injury to other vested a~ decreed conditional
rater rights. (6 pages)
YOU ARR NRA1rBY NOTIPIeD .THAT Y00 RAVQ until tae last pay oL. N09~BeR 1999 to
Lila with tale Mater Clerk is quadruplieate a verified atatener9t o[ opposition
setting forth tact^ as to why a cenaia at9p11catit9e shot+ld not be granted or
why ii: rhnulA be ~ sntaad poly In pa ci. or pn rertsin coe9ditione. A pe
'such sAatemamr. ci! oppr9wtt ion u:::at giro t.a aerven upon tae ~appl ioaiat~. oar t.aa '. ~i .
• ioanc'e sbnoawey sop an a[ridavlt or certificate of such prvica shalt t9s
filed vita the Hater Clerk, as preecril9ed by Rule 5, CACP. (piling Pea:
545,00) VHDDY JORDAn, hater Clerk, Hater Divieim 5; 109 8Ch Btraet, Suite
3.04; Glerrrood Springe, CO 81501.
Published in The Aspen Times Octot9er 23, 1999.
?UBLiC NOTICE envelopes for existing atruclurea and tc~ a nr
Nt9'T'iCE OF BUDGET uses. The oronerty la Inraeed n9 A?n.; c ~:...,.. ,
1RS9c1~7a[ taa:~cs ~wA.x3aaal ixzc~#rrlg,.
~~
titel rrtteed Idaritt ru netreM Yjudintlot -ppnprinira C.-.
-arrrt Loe+tire Wte hte
sec
L ~ L.,
1 I7 1.
6u[ield co.
t+d ling 9.e m- nrsr!st luunu Ihlpla uv
PuA Aitt1 9.1 117 Nlfi(S4 rl9llla 7/717917 117.
IerA litcb Lt 71n nl9lSt Illfll9ll 7:17h99t u71
Pi[k Iltd 7.1 732 rNISYISI 115/uu ":!': rll- ~ _ 197°.
inous[rial, piscatorial and stock watering uses. 9ubaequantly, in
'-7B9-Td. Hater Division No. S, the amount of rater der read to Ruedi
roe reduced Cron 1.40,697.3 sore teat to 102,369 acre fart.
of plan for augmentation: Water x111 be diverted from [he 8ehelmdn
ae nn aiternaGe point of diversion for the Basalt ~.onduit, on a
I basis for doseati.c use [or three single-tastily dwellings on a
3dentiai site. During the months. pf Nay through October, inclusive
gat ion uason'), water x13.1 also 71e diverted under these rights [or
of up to 4.500 arnra re ro.r .,e t...,, ...w ,..,w..,,.__ ,__, __.-, __
The Aspen Tlmea on Octuller 23,
Aspen t0 ron-
1 Andl Ranch, Pllk)n
few & Scenic PuL)Ished in The Aspen
sh building 1999. (52229)
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS Hf•.REBY GIVEN THAT the Aoard of
County Commisaloners, adopted at Its regular
meeting on September 22, 1999, and after aduly-
noticed public hearing published In the
Weekend Edition of The Aspen Times on
October 2, 1989, confirmed the following
Emergency Resolution 157:
AN EMERGENCY RESOLUTION OF THE. BOARD
Aspen,
Deputy County Clerk
Published In The Aspen Times on Oc[ot/er 23,
1999.(52228)
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice Is hereby given to the general public o!
For turther.lntormatlon contact Julie Mn
Woods, at file Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St, Aspen,
Colorado (970) 9205090.
s/14athryn S. Koch,
City Clerk,
City of Aspen
Pttbllshed In The Aspen Times on OCtotler 23,
Notice Is hereby given to the general ~'°~'~{ of
the approval of a site specific developm an,
and the creation of a vested property rignt pur-
suant to the Land Usc Code of the City of Aspen
and Title 24, Artlcle 68, Colorado Revised
Statutes, pertaining to the lollowing described
property: 701 South Monarch Street Unlt k3(i.ota
16,17,18,19, and 20 0l Block 1, Connors Addition
to the City and Townslle of Aspen, by adminls-
trauve decision of the Community Development
Director.
For luriher Information contact lulls Ann
Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Dept„ 130 S. Galena St, Aspen,
Cdorado (97D) 920,9090,
a/Kathryn S. Koch,
City Clerk,
City of Aspen
Published In The Aspen Times on October 23,
Title
to
at
property; Little Nel! Hotel at fi75 East Durant
Street of the Clty and Townsite of Aspen, by
adminlatrative decision of the Community
Development Director.
For further information contact Julie Mn
Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St, Aspen,
Colorado (970) 9205090.
a/Kathryn S. Koch,
City Clerk,
City of Aspen
Published In The Aspen Times on Octot9er 23,
touo ra~otm
• a/Kathryn 5. Koch,
City Clerk,
City of Aspen
In The Aspen Times on October,
0)
16. 99CN392 (93CNI62) GARPIIer.D COt1R7Y - AOAR774G irORl[ RIV®t Jean h Alue
and Des Blue; 0404 Road 104; Carbondale, CO 81623 970-963-2651. Buhnyside
Snduetrial Nell No. 1 - Application for Pfndinq of Reasonable Diligence.
Decreed: DecambeY 1, 1989, 87CW165. Locatl.dn: SN1/4561/4 Sec. 25, T. 7 8.,
R. 88 w., 6th PM at a point thence the 86 rnrner of said Sec. 25 bean South
•62033 a distance of 1B65feat. Appropriation: October 26, 1967. Amount:
1.0 eta. Use: le+dustrial, mining, duet suppression and manufacturing
purposes in a grsvel pit. The Application contains ^ detailed outline of the
wrk partorwed during the diligence period. (2 pages)
22. 99(Nt.Oa - next..,, .....~ __' _'____ _
December 2526,.1933 • The Aspen Times 23-D
- w ra tr t4rt7JC.E
1 (aka no5be mat the hoard a colrrlty corrrrasaioners or PNkin Courlry, cokxedo, t laa adof%ed on I>ecember
i5, i999, the bblwkp resollAiorc
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOND OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY.
COLORADO, SETTING INITIAL AIRPORT FEES AND CfiARGES FOR 2000
The tblgrllr,g tatrla aurrrrlarkas the akpat rake, Ices sd charges ttrl0ptad try tt+e rewkrtlo rt tom 2000 tar each doss d
atport+aterand stttrws Ole ri,artge eom 1996 rake:
Tvoe d coos- foe a blame GWss~vLua9[ 240!1 ]'~fl.lc GhdmJa
iarrakp fees (per i,aoo pour,aa): signarory f .fit E ee 2a% decrease
Mu1G-aeaaonal - f t.^.1 51 38 t t % decrease
Seasonal it.79 51,57 4%dacrealte
I.ocaay-based G.A, none none no Change
General Avistilxt (7.25 51.95 7%dxresae
Fuel b's'aDe fee (Per gallon): l ocalty-booed G A.
and General Aviation S . f 0 E 10 no chenga
Aksns fermk,sl exCWelve and 9lgnatorylPre-Sig. (31.24 $30.+15 2.8% ir,Gea6e
pratararrtlal apaoa rent Mu10-aseaonal (31.24 f30 ~5 2.64y increase
(par aQuare foal) Sanwtd t:48.B8 E45 88 2 0% inr-cease
Oulslde Co»red (10.41 f10 15 2.8% increase
Outside-Seewnal (15,82 E15.23 ~ 2.8%increase
Ak9rle termYlal altarsd-space rent All aklulea f31.2A (30.45 2.8% k,crease
Copies d the hA fora a(thk resCk+Ua+l area»ilsbte for gable napeabri M me oflicte of tM Ckrk and Records, 530
E IRSIn 5ti, Asprt, Colorado, pftorr B2D-5180, dung regular backless hours.
Published In Th+
(CaNlnued from preceding page.)
pass. ,. I W. W/moo
U, Night Owl Special (4 -7 p.m.)...l.W
6 I..ost Tkket Fee...7.50
F Special Events Pasa...3.W/day
G. Access Replacement Car...lO.W
II. Commercial Care Pay Parking Fees.
Between the hours of 7 a.m~S p.m.ELQWhr
Between the hours of 6 p.m.-3 a.m....free
RL Residential Permit Parking Program Fees.
Aspen Times Decemlx:r 25, 19!)9 (,566,75)
Sectlon 16
That Sections 25.iG. OIO(b), 25.1fi.022, and
25.16.060 0l the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen, Colorado, which sections set monthly
rates Inr metered water service, late payment
fees and water service and disconnect charges,
are hereby amended to read as follows:
25.16.010 Monthly rates for metered water ser-
vice.
(h) (:onstruction acawnts shat) pay demand
Residential Day Pass Fee...fS.W and fire prrrtectirnl charges at the same rat
Parking up M 2 hours w/o a permit... free above Inr metered customers. Varlablc
Resident PermiL..free pumping charges will tar. waiver) fur a maxi
Resident Guest Permit.., free of nine (4} months, ur the durahat of the
lodge Guest 1'ermit...l.W/permit stnn•tion project, whichever Is
High Occupancy Vehicle Permlt...lree Constn+cfimt account ECU's will he based
6 mos pert<xl
Host Guest Permit Fee... 'l5. W
The Realdentlal Permit Parking Program
restrlctkma shall be In effect Irnm R a.m. until 6
p.m., Monday thrwtgh Friday, (official holidays
excepted), ante-as otherwise xpecllled.
Two 6monlh periods are eslablLShed Cur
the Business Vehicle Permit:
Wln[er Season, November 1 thrv April
30, and
Summer Season, May 1 lhru Odober 3t.
1V. Mlscellanerrus Packing Fees.
Service/Dellvery Vehicle Permit...
El W.Ob/yr. plus E2.W/day for each receipt
Cnnslnactinn Vehicle Permit
In Residential Permit Patking 20.W
Handicapped Parking tree
Permit Replacement Fee 25.W
Tow Tntck Cancel Ere 25.W
meter fee 35.0()
77rat Section 12.2(1.070 of the Municipal
Crate ul the Cfty n! Aaj+e:n, Colorado, which sec-
tktrt sets forth the tees for Rquor Ucenses. Is
hereby amended to read as follows'.
2)2.070. lJquor Ilcense application lees.
(a) For a 32. Percent beer permit, ten dol-
lars (EIB.W).
(b) Fnr a special event permft, twenty-five
dollars (325.W).
(c) For a new license, three hundred dol-
lars (s3W. W).
(d) For a transfer of location or member
ship, two hundred dollars (f2(N).W).
(e) For a renewal of license, tatty dollars,
(fSO.W).
(t) For rm optional premises license, Rhy
dollars (f50.W).
(g) For a temporary permit, one hundred
ddlars (EIOO.W)
(h) For a late renewal application tee live
hundred dollars (ESW.W)
Sectlon ll
That Chapter '1.12 nl the Municipal Carle of
the Clty of Aspen, Colorado, which seGkrn sets
miscellanetn+s Fecs, is hrrehy amended to add a
new section 2.12.080 to establish certain Parks
Department Fecs, to read as follows:
2.12.080 ParksUe,}rartment Fees.
(a) Tree Removal Pennll ................E55.OD
(b) Permit to Landscape In Clly'RightoF-
Way .....,_35.W
Sectlon 12
That Section '1.5.OA.1'LO of the Municipal
Code oI the City of Aspen, Colora[ka, which sec-
tion sets service charges for electric service and
disconnect charges, Is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 13
That Sectinl 25,(14.120 of the Municipal
Code W the City of Aspen, Colorado, which sec
tMn sets service charges for electric service and
disconnect charges, Is hereby amended In read
as Follows:
That Chapter 13.20 0l the Municipal Ccxte
ul the Clty of Aspen, (:Wurado, which ('haptrr
regulates tree removals, shall tae amended by
the addllion of a new section 13.20.030, wMc•h
shall read as lolbws:
13,20.020 Fees.
The applicable administrative ices for tree
removal permits and permits to landscape in the
public rightol-way shall tae as establshed in
Section 2.12.080, Parks Department
Adminislrative Fecs.
Section 14
That Section 14.2(1.070 0l the Municipal
Corte of the Cily of Aspen, Colorado, whlcA sec-
tlon sets tees Inr spedal events perm{ta, la here-
hy amended to read as lo{lrnvs:
14.20.070 Fees.
Prior to the issuance of a special event {ier-
mit pursuant to this chapter, the applicant shall
pay the permit processing fee set. forth In
Section 2.12.050 (h) and, In addition to the pen
ceasing Fees, all estimated charges rnr city ser-
vices, property, and equipment requested by
the applicant or determined to he a requfslte
ctxWi[lon ref approval try the special events
coordinator.
SeeUoa 15
Thal Seclfon 25.04.120 0l the Municipal
Code of the Clty of Aspen, Colorado, which sec-
tion sets service charges for electric service and
disc[xrnect charges, Is hereby amentletl to read
tom (oliowa:
25.04.120 FJectrlc service and disconnect
~~A service charge of thirty dollars ($30.(MI)
is hereby established for each new account that.
is setup for electric service. If a discmmectinn is
made in accordance with section 25.U4.OfN)
because of non-payment of electric srrvlce
charges,the disconnect charge of sixty dollars
((60.00) shall be due prior to reconnectiat of
electric service.
Late
for wr
the city by the due dale,
'cast due charge of one and
However, to a minnunn cnargr of three dWlars
($3.00), Balances of less than Clue dollars ((5.00)
shall not be suh)rct to Ihls chArgr.
25.16.060 Water Service and disconnect
charges.
A service charge of thirty dollars (F3D(NI) is
hrrehy esWblisheVl Inr each new account that is
setup Inr water scrWCe. Il a Alsconnection Is
made in accordance with section 25.If.1150
because ut norr•payment nl water service
charges or utlllty Investment charges, the dis-
connect charge of sixty dollars ($fiO.IX)) shall be
due prior to rrcanneetion trf water service.
Section I7
'that Section 2fi.11A.f1{ill nt Itte Municipal
Corte of the City of Aspen, Colorado, which sec-
hoo establishes innrl oar a{>plfcation fecs.~ is
hereby moeuded to re«t as follows:
IL'lfi.U4.lXi0't6.04.Ofi11 hand use applkatinn
fees.
(n) 7-hr categories of review processes
and base fees inr the procrsshiq of land use
applications shall be as lolluwa:
Category Base [)eposit
Fee/ Hours
1. All Major Applications 12 E2220A0
2. All Mhu>r Applications 6 1,I IU.W
3. Staff Approvals 4ti0.(10
A. Flat Fee 'L55.(10
5, Referral Pees-Environmental Health,
Housing, F:ngiurerhtg
a. Minor Applications E15(LOIT
b. Major AppOcattnns E3L000
G. Publie. Right ~rl-way Cnnstn+ction
License $270.(X1
The pubOc right-+aFway t•onstrurrtion
Ilcense fee ma. x• waiver) or reduced in the dis-
cretion of the (:nrnunu111y fk:velopuu: nl Uirecl ur
upon a showing nl ilardshlp ar in situations
where the fee may be excessive Inr the work
proposed In he performed In the public rightol-
way
(b) 'the Comuwndy Development
IN:parrment slat( shalt keep an accurate record
al the actual time required for the processing of
each land use application anti additional billings
shall be made commensurate with the arlditirnl-
al costs incurred by rhr city when the process-
ing of an appllration by Ihr Community
l)evelo{nnent lk:partmen[ lakes more time than
is cnverecl by the base fee. In the event the pni-
ceasing of an application by the Cornnnmity
tk'vrhgmlrnt IMTrutmrnt takes less tBue than
provided fur in subsection (a). the dgrartnu:nt
shall refund the unused portion of 1 he base lee.
(e)'1'he Inlluwing guidelines shall he used
fur Ihr aclministrbtlon of [he ter structure set
forth above:
(I) Fees charged Inr the processhrg nt
applications which tall into more than one cal[r
gory shall he rnnndative; while the fees charged
for the Irruc•rssinq of rlpplicntluas within the
some cntegury shall nut be cunndattve. hr the
event that the Tres which result Irnm cumulation
are found by the Community Development
Department to be excessive In relation to the
Horologic of hours it IS arrtlcipatrd 10 require hr
process the application, the Cor,amuaity
Development fk•partment may waive rhr cumu-
lation requirement.
(2) Addltfonal billings shag tar based Soko-
ly on processing tinge spent by members of the
Community Development Department nr Its
designee in Ihc• processing ul an application.
(3) Additional bllhngs shall be compared
al the rate of nor hundred eigldy-fFve dollars
($IH.S.(Nl) per hour of additional Cnnnnn+diy
fh:velupmenl Department staff lime required.
Refunds of unused briars shall be made at Ihr
rate of one hundred eighty-five dollars ($ IR,S.(NI)
per hoar of Ilme.
(A) "the Cmm~uudty Ikavelopmrrrt Uirector
shall establish appropriate guidelines for the
collection of adtlitiunal billings as required.
(5, '1'hls fee stricture shat) be reviewer)
annually as hart of the Ci[y of Aspen's budget
hearing process and should any atljustmenls tie
necessary, they shall he changer) to bet:nme
effecflve on January I.
(fi) 7 he Cnnununlty Develnprnent
I>+!partment shalt Idrnllly, prior to nr al the tiu,r
nl submission of a land use appliralinn, whctttcr
an applicatlnn is br br referred to rhr
F.nginecring, Housing, or F:nvinmmrntal Health
Departments. '1'hr Community Ikvelrrpment
I7eparlnlenl shall also Menllly whether an appli-
catlun constitutes a minor or a major referral,
based nn the nuneher of hours which will be
required to review the appllration, and charge
the applicant for' each referral accordingly.
Addltlonal billings and relunrls shall not apply [o
the atrnputation of referral fees.
section tR
Thal Srcainn Z6.M07(I Wthe Municipal
C'rxle of Ihr City of A_a)teve, Colorado, which see-
tinn rstablishrs Idslork' preservalkm applica-
tion fees, is hereby amrnted In mad as IWlows:
621i.ItLf170'Lfl(M.07f1 Historic preservation apfrli-
cation Iers.
the types u) ap{alicalirms and fees fur the
pnaeessiup nt histnrtc presr_rvatkm oral land-
mark designation applications shall be as IW-
lows:
I. EXrmplinns rout Insuhslanlial
Moditicalinns f fii.INI
Example: Exh•rior changes that do Hal
alter the character of landmarks or strocturrs
within historic distriels, or technical changes to
previgasly algttovett plans.
'l. Minor Urvclupntrul and Partial
Demcrlttlons fl'15.W
F:xamp{e: Minor ilewlo}ttnenl means exte-
rior changes (in comhinatlon rd nn mate than
the City of Asl+en on the 13th of December 1499.
Rachel E. Richards, Mayor
AT7'F:5'1':
Kathryn S. Koch,
City Clerk
fhrlalishect in The Aspen limes [>ecemlier "LS, r` r
1994,(56671) !yt
.f PIJit1.IC NU'1'ICE
°I NOIICE iS HEREBY GNFN to the general public
that nn Novemtarr 23, 1944, the Hearing Officer
u( Pitkin County gran[c:rt approval Inr Ux• I(IAI
Hazard Review !4 Scenic Overlay applic:dfon ktt
Iltc Andi Ranch LY.C pro}x`rty Incateri at 43051
Flighway 82. This site specific development plan
grants a vested property right pursuant to'Fitle
24, Article fill, Colorado Revised Statutes.
s/lance Clarke, Clearing Officer
Pitkin County, ('u6iradn
Publi_;hc,i n, ~Ih,• A•.Iren :inl<•ti Ilcceuilnv 2:.,
19lPJ. iS1iF6Y1i
s/Bob Blaich, Chair
Aspen Planning an[I Zoning Commfssinn
Published in The Aspen Tiimes rot December 25,
1994.(56665)
PUBWC NOTICE
NOTICE. IS HEREBY GNFJV to the general public
that nn November 23, 1999, the Hearing Officer
of Pitkin County granted approval for the 1fN1
Hazard Review dF Conceptual Submission appli-
rlUon for [he General IJte LLC property located
a1 7461.i1tle Wendy Crcr~k Rrrad. This site specif-
ic development pion grants a vested pro}tarty
right pursuant In Title 24, Article 68, Colorado
Revised Statutes.
s/Lance Clarke, Hearing Offcer
Pitkin County, Colorado
Published In The Aspen Times on December 25,
t999.(56fr43)
marks or structures located within hkslnric dfs-
lrlc[s, and/or additions W less Than two hundrnl
flfly (250) square Icr* u) landmarks or structures
located within hisrorlc districts, and mirror
changes hr designated sites. lTtese are consid-
ered tare-step applicallals and gc) trekrre the
HI'C. A public heart is nW requirr[t.
Example: Partial Demolition means ttta
remodel of a Irortlrm of the a(leded fxdlding.
3. Significant f)eveloi»nent ((/otter 1,000
aq. Ft.) 3312.00
Example: Multiple exterior changes, addi-
tions of less than one thousand (1,000) square
teat (between ZS(L-i,(Kq sq. hJ, oral srxne par-
tial demnNlicxls. These are Comte-slop applica-
tions that require a puldic hearing before the
tlF'C al Conceptual Uevelnpment (-irst step).
Puhllcatbn, pnsling and malling are required for
all HI'C public hearings. A trrxrcl or linancfal
security may t)e' required..
4. Significant lk:veha}rmenl ((firer 1,000 sn.
ft.) tli'14.W
Example: Major remrxlds involving partial
demolitirm, additions over one thmtsarxl (1,0[10)
square legit and uo-site rekacations. These are
two-step applications that require a politic hear-
ing before the HPC a1 Cnncephlal Urvrlnpment ~~1///
(first step). Publication, prrstinq and mailing are Y
requirnt for all HPC publk- hearinlts. A Ixarxl nr r\
77CE _ P
F15T BUTTERMILK l he Silver Queen
T evening [or prlvat
following dates: F
that a puhllc hearing 'l(NXI; March 4, 21
fi, 2(NN) al. a regular 2lN)(1; March 25, 2i
1 lielorc the &+Anl of 'LW(1; and for pu
aza Une Conference 1999; January 13,
Ipen to consider an I5, 20W; April 5,
the Clty of Aspen, Published in Thr
Ring UoR appruvai. 1999. (56555)
on West Rutterndlk _ _
1 I,
21,X
of
infer
Clerk
In the
Aspen Times December 25,
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: KAMINS MAIOR AMENDMFJYF TO A SPE-
CIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT
NUTfCL' IS HEREBY GNFJN that a puhllc hearing
wall be held nn January 26, 2000 at a regular
meeting to trrgln at 3:W PM before the Board W
County Commissioners, Plaza One Conference
Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen to consider an
appllcatlon submitted by the Kamins Family
-Crust, requesting approval to amend a previous
dance with attached caretaker dwelling ur
garage. The property Is located at 148 Dar
Dr. and is drscrlbetl as Stanwood SubdF
Lo[ R-93. The appllcatlon/resolution are
able for public Inspection in the Comr
Development Department, City Hall,
Galena St.. Aspen CO 8161 L Fnr further in
tan, eontact lance Clarke at (970) 920.54
tines that require a goalie hearing before the Jeanette Jon
HP(: :Il (./lllr'e{a111A1 Ik•Ve1DImIP,lll (Rrs{ step). Boarct of
I'ubllration. gosling and mailing are require[! for s/Lance Clarke Published in The Aspen
ail HPC public hearings. A flood or Onancial Hearing Officer )yyg (Slifi40)
srcuAty may t)e required.. Pitkin Craunty, Colorado
The examples lister) for dilterrnl types nl I'ublishe<I in The Aspen Tlmen Ik.•cember 25.
applications are Interxled solely as a gtrirle and 19!19. (Sfi6A 1) y PI7BLIC
are not bindin u wn the Communtt
g I y >
i UBLIC NOTICE n RE: l.A!.Y CLfiN MOBILI
[hveiupment Department in assessing the pmv
Of Sk)N PLIU FINAI. PLAT I
/
'
-
er fee for processing any particular historic
l
d
UF:VELUPMF:NI' API'ROVAI' ICE IS HF:RF.BY GIVI
NO
I
will be held nn Januar
prrservatttm nr
an
mark desigrtatirm appRca-
lion. Notice is hereby given to the general public of mee[Ing to begin at 3:0(1
Sectlon 19 the spprma) of a site simctfic development plan, County Cnmmissioners
That Sra-lion 26.M.080 0l the Municipal and the creation of a vested pro}aerty right pw` Room, 530 E. M»in St-,
Code of the City o! Aspen, CnMradn, which sec- suant to the land Use Code of the Clly of Aspen application submittec
lion establishes ztming fees, Is hereby amended ' and Title 2A, Arttcle fill, Colorado Rrvlsed
Homeowners Associatir
to read as follows: Slatutrs, pertaining to the lolluwing descrltred approval. The property
lfi.OA.OR11'J.oninglms. profrcrly: 1(195 Ilte Avenue of the City Alll1 Glen, and IS described
!nning shalt tar charged fhtr lollnwinq has fownsite of Aspen, by xlministrativr declshm of Tract 65, Srctinn 2 I, Tc
(or the services listed: the Community Uevrlopmem Director. Fnr her- pg West of the 6th P.M.
I ttuildin clan chrxk_c h rosin ,-
g I Y Y parr inlurn+alirm contact Julie Aun Woods, at the
'
lion are avaiiat>lr for i~~
_
A. IiF51UENTL'11., AGRI('ULfURAI., ANU /tis ce++JPitkin Cnmmnntl i
k,veiu .mr•nt 1)w i
i Y t P
' (',nnnulnhy llrvelupnun
I'UBt.I(' IISFS WIT711N Tt1F: 1'0171X: %ON£ INY
- 130 5. Galena SI, Aspen, Colorado (970) 9
lLL
'
tom 130 S. GAlena St., Aspn~
fRI('
f '
' information, contact 'Fat
f. Manufachan-d Hnrsfng without base- s/Kathryn S. Knch, Clty Clerk, 5103
mrnf $5111X)
'L. Manufachrretl hcwsing with basement
E75.W
3. New Wurk anal Majcx Repair/itemodeling
Charge (Irders
lip Tit 500 sl. ESf1.fN1
;dll - 3 5W s.l. f IZ/s.l.
3,5(11 - 10,(NNI s.f. S4Z0 plus E.27/s.t. for
each adrliticmal frx)t over 3,501 s.l
10,0(X1 . s.l. d1.51N) plus E.32/s.f. Cur
each additional hint over 10,1X10 s.f
A. Minor Repair /Krnuadel and Change
Or<lers E:d).IXI
(Note: Minor applications request no
changes to floor aroma, use, hefpln and/err hrW-
print. 't'hose applications which are not Minor
are rnnsidcr Major)
B, NON-Rt:SIDF:NT1Al.
L New Work. Malor Repair/Remodeling
and Change Orders
l.lp To :)iX) s.l. ESO.IX)
:+OI - 5,0(X1 s.f. f.24 s-1.
5,W I •!0.(100 a.l E 1, 2 0 O
plus f.54/s.l. Inr each additional font mar 5,W t
s.l.
10,01!1 . greaser s.l ( 1, 5 0 0
plus $.fi4/s.f. for each additional Itxat over
10,W1
L. Minor Rem«iel/ Repair!
Change Orders. f75
(Note: Minor applications request
nn changes to flrror arrn, usr•, bright and/or fool
print. 'Ihnse applicatkms which are not Minrtt
are consider Major)
C. ZfiNING FJVFORCEMFaYf FT.Fti
1. Projects constntclyd wllhuut }iermits,
Errs are daublr•tl az a Ix•nalt;:
'L. I'I{NAI:IY PR(IVISI()N
A prmalry tee for enlorcemenl actions
rn{airing a land use
approval ffdp-110
a. Sign permits
Processing and code rnmpliance for all
sign permits f110.W
A. Board of Adjustment Fees:
Proc-essinq and application Ice Inr all
Roan) nl Adjustment ap}reats f150.W
SecNou 20
That Sectirm 2.12(1!-i0 u( the Municipal
fade of the ('sty of Aspen, Coloredn, which sec-
tion establisl'les misceuaneous lees, is hereby
amendeA by Ihr addition of new subsectirrrts
(h) and (i) which shall read as Iollowa:
(h) Parks Oel)arlmrnl ter tar installation W
flags on Main Street ..... f6.(XI/Ilag
City of Aspen
I'ublishetl fn The Aspen Times rot f)ecenlher 'l5,
1494. (Sfi6fi8)
PUBLIC NUl1CE
of
DEVF:Lf1PMENT API'RUVAt.
NWice is hereby given to the general public of
the approval of a sift specific develoiament plan,
and the creation nl a vested property right pur-
s+tatri In the land Use Code of the Cily of Aspen
and Title '14, Article GR. Colorado Revised
Statutes, tx-rlaining to the lulluwing described
properly: 21.1 West Hopkins Avenue, lhd[ ri5 of
rhr coy and T•nwllahe oI Aspen, by Resolution
No. 54, Series of 194!1 0l the A5}N`n tllsruric
Preservation Commission. For further informa-
tion contact Julie Ann Woods, at the
Aspen/Pitkin Community Uevelopme.nt Dept,
i:t0 S. C~lena SL Aspen- Cabrado (970) 92(~
.iOrX).
s/Kathryn S.,Koch. City Clerk,
City ul A-epen
PuWishe[i in The Aspen Times nn [>ecem)xrL5,
1499.(56667)
PUILtJC NOTICE
OI
UF:VF:LOPMEN-f APPROVAL.
Notice is hereby given to the g[•neral public of
the appnaval of a site slrecitic devrlopmrnt plan,
and the creation of a vested pm{x•rty right pur-
snanl to Ihc land 1lsr Corte ul rhr City of Aspect
and 'I'iUe 2A. Arricfe 6R, Colorado Revised
Statutes, )x•rtaining In Ihr (otluwing descrilmtl
prutxa ly. 419 Past layman Avenue of the Cily
oral '1'ownsde of A.aprm, by Krsolutiun No.:)li,
Sr:NrS of 1994 ul Ihr Aspen Hislnrle Prrserval Ion
Ctmnnisshm. Fnr further information contact
JuIFe Ann H'ocxls, at the Aspen/I'Ylkbt
('omanmity Development IhgN., 13(1 S, Galena SI,
Aspen. Color«lo (970) 920-51nIU.
s/Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk,
City ref Aspen
14rWished in The Aspen Times nn Ikr:endx•r 25,
1499. (56669)
Pt1RLIC NOTICE
Oi
UFVELOPMENT APPROVAI,
Nn(im is hemby given ro the general pubfic of
ttxe approval of a stir. sliecilic devekgament plan,
and the creattnn of a vested property right pur-
suant to the Land Clap Code of the City of Ashen
and Title 24, Article 6R, Coioradn Revised
Slah+lrs, pertaining to tNr following dcscrllred
on
H()MF. PARK SUBDNE
EVIf.W
N that a public hearing
' 26, 21X10 at a regular
Plaza One Conference
Aspen to consider an
by the lazy Clen
t, requesting Final Plat
is located at IU! lazy
Jeanette .tones, Deputy County Clerk
Rovd of County Cnmmissioners
Published In The Aspen Times on December 25,
1994.(56637)
PUBLIC NOTICE
COIIN'FY COURT, PITKiN COUNTY, COLORADO
(.use No. 98 DR 30
ORDER FUR PUBLICA'f10N AND CHANGE OF
NAMF•,
1N '1'HF. MKi'TER OF THE PETITION FOR THE
CHANGE OP NAME' OF:
.Iudith Prochaska Merton, Petltianer.
ORDER FOR PlJB1.ICATION
T'he Court having read and considered the
Pe[itfort for Change of Name and the petitioner's
affidavit and the Court ~ being sulliclently
advised,
FINDS: That the allegations made in said petition
and affidavit satis[y all statutory requirements:
AND THE CUt1RT FURTHER FINDS: That U+e
desired change of name is proper and not detri-
mental to the interests of any other person.
I'I' IS THGREFORE ORDERED:
L'Fhat pursuant to statute, petitioner shall give
pnbllc notice of such change of name by publF-
cahon of Public Notice three (3) tlmes in The ~~
Aspen Times, a legal newspaper, publisher) in
said.county.'I'his publication is to tae made witFr-
in 211 days of the date of this Order. Proper proof
nl publicatiot shall be Illed with the Clerk of the
Court upon final publication.
2. 'I'h:u upon proof of publication being filed
with the Clerk of the Court, the name of Judith
Prochaska Morlou will be changed to Judith
Ellen I'ruchaska.
DATED: 10/27!44
Fitzhugh Scott III
County Judge
Glenna Melnick
Clerk
Published In The Aspen T{mea [~cember 18, 25;
194(1, .lanuary 1, 'l0(X). (56272)
PUBLIC NOTICE
N077CF: OF FINAL PAYMENT
Notice is herelay given that the Board nt (:aunty
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado ,
hereinafter the "Board," shall make final settle-
ment for the work contracted to be done an the
project known as the prcx;uremenl purchase.
and installation of Aeroware SoRware ai the
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, hereinafter the
"Project" to Aemwarr Software. hereinafter the
"Contracror" on or about January Y5 2000
(+) FJectric (krytartmeru fee for inslallatiml
and removal W banners art Main Street
25
W prt+perly: Lot O Alpine Cottages Sul)divis{on of Any {aerson, cnpartnersfiip, assoclatlon of per-
~
.._.
.
Section 2t the Ci[y ancF Tnwnsite 0i Aslmn, by Rrxolutint sons, company or corpcttution that has Fur- '
`
The ellective dale of this onfinance shall No. 43, Series of 1949 0l the rls}ien Planning and
7aminp Commission
Fur lurlfter inlunnarinn niched labor, materials, team hire, sustenance,
rovisi
n
th
d
li
d
he January I, 2(100,
Sectlon 22 .
contort Julie Ann WIxxIS, d) Ibe Ashen/1'il kin p
o
s, proven
er, nr o
er supp
es use
or
['crosumetl by Ihr COHUACUIr Or h{5 aUtlCOrrVOC-
This onltrtance shall Hell have any effect on
eXistlllg litigati(xl artd Shall n)f fr})el'alr as art Community Development lk~pt. 1:30 S. Galena SI,
iisprn, Colorado (970) 920-5(140. tors in or about the performance of the work
contracted W he done or that supplies rental
-
ahatement of any articxa or prcx:eerling now s/Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk, machinery, tools, or equipmont to the extent
{aendinq under or by virtue of tt+e onlinances
amended as herein pr>vid+vl, and ttte sum? shall City of Aspru
1'datishM in -Bar Aslten'limes on Det'ember 25, used 3n the prosecution nl the work, whose
claim therefor has not been paid by the
be runslrur[1 and ecxlduded under snch prin( ~ t 199' (5fi6fi6) Contractor or his sutreontraetors shall the with
ordinances. ~
S
H
23
P ~r 1'I1R11(: NO'I-ICE
~
' the Board written verified notice of such claims
at any Ume up to and includin
rhr tim
f fi
l
cxt
ec
4 1 RF.: ASPEN MUUN1
AIN DRAfNAGF. M/(•STER g
e o
na
y any section, snhsrction, sentence, 7'hAN N(1"17CF'. IS tIF.KFIIY GIVEN Ihut a pubOr: settlement Ilrst stated above ur forever waive
clause, phrase ur Ixxtl[at nt Ihls onlbtance Is Inr hearing will Ix• held oo 'Tuesday, ):unary 11, any and an claims, wOhuu! IlmlU+Oon, pursuant
any reason betel invalid err uncriastifulirxlal fn a Ltgll at a mtrtinq In i+cgin at 4:"X1 p.m. lielure Ihc lu LI7:1 CRS 3i3~2(i-1117, as amended, against Ifte
court cd cungrelent jurisdirikan, .ouch p[xlirxr
shall Ix• d
rm
[I a sr
l
dl
ti
t
l i
d Ashen Planning and %nning Commfssinn, at the Board of County Commissioners, Pltkln County,
Colorado and the I'r)ject
r
e
para
r.,
s
rx
ora
n
c Asfren Fire Drllartmrnt Meeting Roum, 420 F.. .
pendent pr{rvision and shall not affect the valkl• Hrrpkius Avenue, As}tell, to consider an applica- All claims must be addressed as follows:
sty of [he remaining Ixrrtions t+ereo[. tool submitted by rhr City of A-efx•n rrrryesting Board o[ Cuunly Cnmmissioners
A pubic hearing ore lire uidinance sha111ar _
adrrtrtion of the Aspen Mountain Drainage C/n Sue Parker, Contract Arlministrator
held ten the ilNh uF January 2000, in Cllr City Nagler P-an. the property is commonly known Aspen/Pltkln Cuunly Airport
Council Chamtrers, Aspen CNy HaN, Aspen, as Aspen M[wnlain. Fur further information, 0233 E. Airport Rnad, Suite A
Colorado. ctmtact Nick Adeh at rhr Clty of Aspen As{aen,CO SIGIt
INTROUIJ(:ED, READ AND (J42DFRFD PlR7 Engirteerinq Department, 130 S. Galena SL, Published In The Aspen Times December 25,
LLSI tEl) as provided lay law by the City Council W Aspen, CU, (97f/) 92()SIMiO, nickaffcl. aspen. co. 1949. (5fiti58)
.. , ,~
. ~.. ..
PIJBLIC'NOTICE
., ~ ... ._ . m ,.... ~,~.. . , w„ s,
NOTICI/ IS T~ER~BY GIVEl~ to the generarpub~ic that on November 23, 1999 the Hea_ ring
Officer of Pitkin County granted approval for the 1041 Hazard review & Scenic O verlay
~.~.
application for the Claudia Aspen V levy property~located at 43I~ 1~ ~I`ighway 8~."This~site specific
development plan grants a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised
Statutes.
s/Lance Clarke
Hearing Officer
Pitkin County, Colorado
----
Published in the As en Times on becember 25, 1 X99
Pitkin County Account 002.02
I, Janet Lynn Raczak, do hereby certil
N. .
Postage Prepaid; on October 22, 1999, a cop:
View, LLC 101 Hazard Review & Scenic Qv.~
Property Owners, also attached heieto.
I placed ui the~LTntecl States Mail, First-Gass
e attached Pubhc r7otice for Claudia Aspen
to uid"ividua`"~"s fisted on~the List of Adjacent
ate.. /~ ~~~~..
Janet LynnE12aczak
w . a;x ,, ,.. ~ ~ v. ~. 'r =. , . . . ; ~, ~ . ..,~', ~ ,., 1 ,
.,,!~t: ,
OCT-29-199 TUE 02~5i1 PN
~,
I2E; CLAUDIA ASP~N~IE
NOTICE IS f1rEY21r$"i' G'i
1999 at a meeting w begin at 3:00
Room, Aspen City Flail 1 ~0 rS•~G
Aspen Vicw, LLC requesting 104
development envelopes. for the c
located at 431St Flighway 82 and t
1/4 o£Scc&on 1'7,"Township 1~'So
contact Gabe Preston at the Aspenf
sll,ance Clarke` "
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Published in 17ie Aspen '£imes on
Pitkin County AccounfNo. t)02~02
fAX N0, P'. 02
,.
~,
s , ~,~ . i
'; , . ,
P~BI,IC i'1TOTTCE
'W, ~i; 10"1$A~A'`Y~D ~~ & SCENIC OV>;I2LA'Y
.: { ~, ~„~
t at a ptib to Dating an11 ba held on Tuesday, November ~3,
pm before the'Pitkin County Hearing'OfF`icerintlie Sister Cities
alena fit., Aspen to constder an application submitted by Ctauda
1~Hazazd Revtevv~& Scenic ~3verlay approval to amend
onstructon a gar8~e, a driveway and landscaping: The properly is
mga 84 West of the 5ih F' M ~or further information
Community Development D
epartment, (970) 9~0-5092
r 23,1999
~~:,~~w
.~"
,_
._ ~ .. ~ ~ s ~ ~,,., ,...
T.IS'C OF ADJACENT` p'RbPERTY
OWNERS TO CLALIDIA ASP~N ~, LL~.~
;~ a, ~ - ~, ..... 4..
Parcel: No 273717300022 ` "
._.. , ~.~.rt< _ ,, ~ ,.
Address: 43151_Highway 82, Aspen Colorado $11'1
Andi Ranch,. LLC
c/o Garfield &, Hecht
Attn: Mickey Herron
601 E. Hyman Avenue„
Aspen CO 816:11
(273717300011)
Julie E, Shield
1570 Homestake Drive
Aspen CO 81611
(273720100005)
Pitkin County
530E Main Street ,
Aspen CO 81611 ~^
Bureau of Land Management
50629 US E#ighway' 6 and 24
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
~,
..~- „M.w
- -_ ,
,~. ,: ,
Pi7I3LIC NOTICE - ,
RE: CLAUDIA ASPEN VIEW, LLC I041 HAZEiRD REVIEW & SCENIC OVERLAY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pubiic hearing will be held on Tuesday;l~Tovember 23,
..,w,,.. „..,..,,
1999 at a meeting to begm at 3:OOpm before the Pitkm County Hearmg Officer in the Sis
Room As en Ci Hall 1305. Galena St:, As en fo consider an a licafiori submitted'bter Cities
P tY P PP Y Claudia
Aspen View, LLC requesting 1041 Havard Review & Scenic Overlay approval to amend
development envelopes for the construction: a garage, a driveway and Landscaping. Tlie property is
located at 43151 Highway 82 and is desenbed as a tract of land situated: m the SE°1/4 and the SW
.... ,.. . ~,,,~, .. ~ . ~ .. . ,7 ...,..,.
1/4 of Section 17, Township SO South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. For fiu~dier information
contact Gabe Preston at the AspenlPitkin Community bevelopment Departrnent, (970) 920-5092
s/Lance Clarke
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Published,in The Aspen Times on October 23, 1999
Pitkin County Account No. 002.02
.. ,,. .. ,.r .. ..
ASPEN/P~ITKIN
vIlV'<[JNI1"i' DE~EY;OY'`MENT ~~PAR1`MENT . _ . _ ,.. _ ~_~ .~ . ,.....
130 South Galena Street
Aspen; Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM ~~~
TO: Attorney
Zoning
Engineer
DOW
CSFS
Wildlife Biologist
Floodplain Administrator
FROM : Gabe Preston, Community Development Deparfinerif
RE: PID# 2737-173-00-022
P130-99
DATE: October 15;1999 '' ' ` °'
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application by Claudia Aspen view,
y {he Pit`kiri County l~eanng CSfficer on November 23,
1999. This a hcation will be reviewed b
pP
Please return your comments to me no later than November 5, 19Q9.
Thank you.
October 15, 1999
Glenn Horn
215 S. Monarch, #104
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: ;Claudia Aspen View; LLC 1041 Hazard, Review. & Scenic, ,Overlay
#P130 99
Dear Glenn,
The Planning Office has completed its prelimin~ty review of the captioned: application. We have determined
that this application is complete. After a more detailed'review of the submittal information, additional
a f licaion. sThefllanner incharae1of the review will re luestahetinformatioen frome ou directlcess the
PP P g q Y Y•
We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Pitkm County Heanng Officer on
Tuesday, November 23, 1999 at a meeting to begin at 3:00 p.m. in the Sister Cities Nleetmg Room m Aspen
. ~ .. a
City Hall. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date~of~
this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and. changes to the schedule or to eti g~ date,
application will only be allowed for unavoidaEle technical problems. The``Fnday before the me~m o~ the
we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning`
Office.
We have forwarded a copy of this application to the Colorado Statg Forest Service for refearal comments.
Please contact them dzrectly at (970) 248-7325 to arrange for payment of their fees. Comments will not be
,.. .., _ ~
released until payment is received,.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post a public notice sign on the property at least fifteen days
prior to the hearing (and remove it within one. week after) and to mail notice to all adjacent property
owners at least 30 days prior to the hearing with the return address of the'Community Development
Department (copy of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names',,
and addresses. shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared. no more than 6®
days prior to the date of the public hearing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting
Mailing as proof of compliance with the Code at the hearing.
. ,;
If you have any questions, please call Gabe Preston, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5092.
Sincerely,
Tenley Taylor, Administrative Assistant
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5090 F.AX# (970) 920-5439
- ..~'~. ~..I, A.m ~',~ .:.'~+4.as~`~'.w:"~t..,'M'.~+r~~.~,y„^~k°A~:~M.,r».
„~ '~}_A~+y~ j~ - - ,. SIC -,_ -. -
,..., _. _
:' •2 out, __ae ~,a ree -;,~.~.:<e,~-,4t._w..,. '
.. peit;'Coloiado,,~61 ;, .
t1s
5 0
Pi 0) 920 .w..~ ~.
-~,... L ~' bunty
,. i
,
aiid Use..
n .... d ushne ,. ,.. .
172 - Board ofA j' nt, ~„
159 _ `County Land UseCode ;
173 "Deposit- ' " '~ ~~"~ «M
~..:. '
174... FlafFee <``.._:, ``_ ,:
162. .; 2oning'and.Sigri_,. _ ~, ~:'~:°.~%r, w.=uvws„.~-.~,~.:.:.-.
..
169 Public No'tice~ - )`''" `~
., ~ ~ ~~,
.' 1.60' -„-_PlanniiigEriforcemeri _, .,,
..~ ~ .. ._
ai'Fde`si..
Refer; .........:: . ... :. .. ....,., -..,:-,..,,-w..,......
- R$115 Access perm,~t ,. c, - .,.,~.>,~--~,q.~,r.<4-. ,aawrrt-:.. . '
"179 County Clerk
," '~ ' :
193 ' CouiiYy Engineer '
194 ' Environxryental Healt)i - ~ '
- -'`198 -.. Housing r -, .... _ .- ",, ~"
-, .t ,.
- 190 ',' Gagd~Mariageifient. - -
19B a1~17dTi3e Officer ' ~- . ~ ~ ~ .
,. ,
Building ffee8-. ,.. ..: _, '
_ , . Board of Appeals
I70" "
135 $ufTdln y:v„ . ,. _
g Code Sales ' . ... .. , - '' .:.. .-
lb5` `' Bui(dtn Permit ""
TOD. Contracgtor License $~"'"'~"u`'~ "i'~°``~'
~;~,.
120 El'ectrlcal.Pei?ni, _
1`95 , Energy Code Rev,~ew„ - - ' '
115 rr'flt
» '
Mechanl~aT"~e~"
r ,'". ~ `
° xy
„
u
,,
15(5 .. Plan Check ;
_ ,. ,,,.
...
,~„„„„, ~.
,.,...... -
1 T
0' Plumbing Permit
,
,.130,;
, :,
.. _
:Reinspecfion ,
,... ' _'..~~µa.. _
'''
,,
151 ~
Aspen'Sanltaffon ,~.«..;.
152 AVFD Fire Marshal ~ `
- ~M _.~-.
; '
h ..~ ..
155 .
-
Use Tax '
~
,.,...~ ............
.
' .,, ...
.,.
16$
-. -
Copy' .. ;, :
.. ,
-
,
. .
Performance'Deposit"" ~ ~. _
.,._y..,,_,:a.j. :.c:
_ .,:- : -
f. ~ ,-
...,..".Y85
~ Park'bedicon ~ .'_
~
a
~r,
w ,. " `'
>
ov~s
~
_
- -, - r
, r,w..o-..
rnw.mz .
, yK
-hr,K.~.c.»~m~wa
e ,
'186 Parking Cash to LYeu„_, '' ' '
~ ...~y~~-;rte„-,H,, Fv
166: _GIS;1V,Iaps
~" ~ ~~ - ~ ,_,,,,_
,. '
IS' ',' GiS Requirements
-
RB1'16 . 12oad'ImpabtFees
w 3- N
'CHECKH~' k
.. v. e~,w_~: :w o:,
- CASE]PER"ffitlTd:~,~~;
~,.a5'~' 4q.
.. ... .:..... ...~., :::,. .;y;ia.u, r
;~~
... : :f,.
i:~., ..,~,I.~,.. .
sn;.an .'r r- .. ~-..