HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273707366800 (2)
, -; ..... v-..s. a .,:.;. .k-- c'+=A»x z'sNrap+_mgtuuror+§czbW^march+'h~'•FdC++.•'rkk^.~+~*nany-24
TI lI_~® ~~~ ~~i~ l I ~!!. y Box 1730
f Aspen
Planning • Design • Surveying • Engineering • Construction Colorado 81611
and Management of Land 303.9252688
TOP OF ASPEN, INC.
SMUGGLER MOUNTAIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
RE-ZONING APPLICATION
February 28, 1972
_ INTRODUCTION
Top of Aspen, Inc., owns approximately 226 acres of land on
Smuggler Mountain. Tri-Co Management has been involved in
master planning this area since 1966 and has done several
plans and development studies. We are very familiar with
the property and for the last 6 years we have surveyed it,
walked on it, driven on it, skied on it and had picnics on
it. We have spent a lot of time on this land. Our proposal
for re-zoning to enable a Planned Unit Development is no
fly-by-night get rich quick development plan, but represents
our careful judgment, formed over a period of several years,
of what constitutes the best use of this land, from the
point of view of both our client and the residents of Aspen
and Pitkin County.
We have requested a change in zoning because we feel that a
development based on the existing zoning would be disastrous
and do irreparable harm to this valley. A development of
single family houses on individual lots, would bar the public
A Subsidiary of Trico Corporation Offices throughout the West
,~ a
,. ~ ,k
„-,
a
5.. ~:. ~ .. .., i, ..
PITKIN COLi;~TY ,
~ir Mrrt~:r. ~t • BC1RJ .0~ C~,~f_tT~S?i~~P`.FS September 30, 1974-4
had subsequently conveyed fnur tracts of the sis into which it
had been divided a:ic had„l.ept two unjoined tracts ,. ~ Clark felt
this'was clearl a violation of the subdividioh regulations,
y
especially since the original owners, the Adams still own part of
the property. It was the consensus that a letter should be ,written
to tfie purchasers letting them knew that there was a violation of
the subdivision regulations and that they would not be able to get
a building permit - but this, of course, would not protect a
prospective buyer. McGrath felt the only way to protect the rights
of future buyers was to file a suit Co set aside transactions and
restrain further sales.,
Edwards moved that the County Commissioners should file
a suit as proposed by McGrath against the owners of the lots
in question; 2nd by Baxter. Unanimous. (Shellman absent)
Set Public Hearing Clark noted that the Forest Service has said that it wi
.. . ,~ 1
Sp. Review -
McEachen Kennels issue a special permit for the McEachen kennels= Edwards then
moved to set the matter., of special review for the kennels for
public hearing oh November 4, 1974, at 1:00 p.m. 2nd by Baxter.
Unanimous. (Shellman absent)
Elam Restoration Clark described the restoration work ,done to date by
Elam at the gravel pit site. Edwards noted that they still needed
to clear a path that is just as good as the path that they cut
through. Clark stated that the entrance area is the only area that
Elam is finished with at this time. Edwards added, however; that
if they are through taking gravel from the slope, if should be
revegetated this year and that Elam should be reminded of iEs
obligation in this line
Silver King
landscaping Clark gave a written report to the commissioners which
was a review of landscaping improvements in progress at Silver
Kinp,. The commissioners, noting that 1'2" arf gravel can not be
construed to be "l:andscaping," asked Clark to check and find out
what their obligations are under the agreement that was made with
them,
r^`
-----
afi
Rt_=!ii.ar MecC.i~
s
'a ~. v. tl ..,
P1TxIN couriTY
BOARD OF COx4115SI0NERS
1 !. /~_
gust 5, 1974-4
write a contract that. defines performance. He further noted that Public
Health and Social Services should have access to services on a cost,, .r>.
., _. .. , :., ..s:, ., .a. ..:, .basis.
He suggested also that the service plan be accompanied with a manual insert.
Edwards said he did not feel that the County had been handling the
p hellman that, the
ublic health function adequately, and agreed with S
commissioners should probably contract with the VNA_as,a private group
for its services.
ilver King Gary Hyer and Bill Morris, residents of the Silver King Apartments,
problems a eared be
pp fore the commissioners to protest the recent "steep" rent
increase inwhat they termed was supposed to be "employee housing" at
,_ P ex.
Silver King as well. as the lack of maintenance and services at the com 1
Shellman noted that the Commissioners have no rent control authority
....; _ .. ~ ..., . ., ~ .. .._ t ,. ,.
but do have ongoing communication with the develo er. Baxter asked the
P ,
complainants to remember that everyone in the Valley has the same problem.
Edwards explained that Silver King had initially been endorsed and
helped through the rezoning by the Planning Office believing that this
would be low cost housing for employees, and Herb Bartel went along with
it. Probably, it should not have been allowed. The problem is with us
now because in the,. granting of the rezoning no strings were attached with
regard to agreements on rent. Result - the owners are a private land
owner with private apartment buildings, and the County has lost jurisdiction.
All the development did was to add to the growth problem.
ke everyone else.
It wAS noted that the owners have rising costs 1
Reser, representing the owner, stated that this was true and that. the owner
did just not have the cash flow at the moment to complete the landscaping
as had been promised. This is why the rents were raised.,
Baxter suggested that perhaps the tenants could do their own land-
soaping under an arrangement: with the owner or that the tenants might have
to go to their employers and ask for a raise xo help cover their rent so
that they can remain in Aspen.
H er and Morris both contended that their elected representatives
y ..,,.. ,., n .
should be doing something to help them and the. other tenants get the
service and benefits that were promised to them, and it was explained to
them that the County has limited authority in such matters and that it,
caa not stop inflation, though it has tried to stop the building boom.
, .. ~. ,__ a°f_ o
,.
,~.~ ~ ~ ,'
~~~ ~
__
~°
,, .
;,
,_
v r ~
n
,' ~ z r: m^~~»=paa
,
_i
4 .. _
}`.1 arv i~:$
PITRN CJ~t~$Tv
uia.r ~'~~ ~'n^ _, BOSP,~ OE C' ~~ [S5'OS];P~S April 22, 1974
Present: C'i>iamissioners Joseph E. Edwards, Jr.; J'. Sterling Barter; County
"Attorney Leonard Oates; County Manager A11an Blomquist
~rry-over Edwards brought up a problem of road drainage do Maroon Creek
items
road by Islen Park and ,the new High School running track.
Blomquist discussed the plan for behind the courthouse, and suggested that
the Ccunty file a pettign for vacation of the alley and part of Galena Street.
Oates r~gnestezl that a more is-depth description of what is involved be
prepared.
Donna Baer presented a letter from Holland & Hart explaining that the
North Star Ranch had withdrawn their,,application for subdivision.
Gerbaz Donria Baer reported that Planning and Zoning had. recommended approval
Exemption
of a subdivision exemption for Mike Gerbaz. Gerbaz wished to deed 6 acres of
land to one of his sons who does not plan to develop at this time and is
prepared to meet all regulations at the time of development. The deed was
prepared by Oates and access was not incorporated in said deed, however,
Gerbaz showed one access to the Board. Baxter moved approval of the rec-
commendation by Planning and Zo-~n"i'n~g if an access ea,~ysement is provided.
Edwards, second; Unanimous. rtl2vl~l~"I~ 6~.~~Q&~,
Law Center Baer reported that Planning and Zoning recommended approval of the Aspen
Subdivision
Law Center Subdivision Sketch Plan. Planning and Zoning approved of this reso-
lution partly because of the way it contributes to the self contained nature
of the unit as a functionning resort type of complex. Baxter moved for
acceptance; Edwards 2nd; unanimous.
ilver King Silver King submitted plans for the new parking lot and to abandon and
dFevelopment
Plan restore another area presently being used as a parking lot: Blomquist asked
if this, would solve the problem of parking on the street so the street could
be left open for the bus and was told that the recent enforcement program is
keeping cars off the street. Zt was reported that there cµrrehtly are 1.4-1.5
cars per unit and that .the new parking lot and enforcement should eliminate
the existing parking problems of Silver King. .Baxter moved for acceptance;
2nd Edwards; Unanimous.
,rc C
•
¢ 'ae
PiTF:T?: Ct~',Jti~'PY
. ~ ;~i °'T (~l' (' ~..`~~l~ST~`1DP~ A ril 23, 1~i4-?
afar Mea~tinK A.., ~ ~ ~ P
,, ~
ser King Dr.nra Baer r.`orn:ed the (,~r.mi.ssii~ders of the. status of. this project; that
>e IV ^,
Planning and 7_on,im~ wc•.re inakinF; a special review by special agreement and tliat ,
the sub-dYVision sketch plan had been tabled. There was no action required
on this matter but only informational requests. Edwards asked for Planning
and Zoning assurances that all plans including those for walkways, lighting
and recreation are to be•followed up to assure that all the plans are actually
implemented.
er Tap
emit
guor
tense
Bus
:rvice
and the 5Yudge disposal difficulties being encountered. Blomquist recommended
a 3 month temporary permit to use the dump contigent upon the development of
Clint Sampson presented the problem of the limitation of the sewer tap
a permanent solution to the problem. Roack said he was certain the dump
could be used on a permanent basis. It was agreed by the Commissioners to
allow a 3 month free permit to use the,_dump, if the City concurs.
The Commissioners approved the renewals for the 3-way, extended hour
liquor license applications for Philppe's Restaurant and the TimbermlY Znn.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
They also'approved the transfer of name of applicant from Snowmass American
Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, to Philippe's,Inc. Oates suggested
new forms to assist liquor license applicants and to transfer this matter
from the clerk's office to the Building Inspectox's office. of the office
of the County Manager, No decision was made on the matter.
tical report on the
Edwards and Baxter asked for a financial and statis
down valley bus service.
i
PITT IN CCi i?N T~'
B~--,ru l.ar vi <. *. i~,~Fg 30APD nr CO"4MI;>,SIO"Ji
~,
February 11, 1974
Sob Child of the P & 2 Commission noted that there. was
a nee/1 immediately to speed up the. process. He suggested
(1) interim solutions such_as management tools like flow
charts, check -off lists, etc.; (2) routine cooperation with
the city and P & Z; and (3) systematizing the assessor's
office so that up-to-date information is available.
' Edwards suggested ROMCOE could develop check-off lists,
to go along with the new sub-division regulations.
Bartel, City-County planner, mentioned that it was
going to be necessary to come to grips with the work-load
problem. Guy expressed a concern about there being more of a
technical job as the P & Z regulations are not in order.
Edwards said that hopefully ROMECOE wily alleviate some„of
these concerns.
Baxter noted that there is a need to get the city input
as well as the county ahd'ROMCCE.
Hal Clark said he felt the work load problem was directly
related to the regulations problem.
Bartel, Clark Blomquist and Guy were directed to set
up a series of continuing dialogues.
BREAK,F~R LUNCH
Top of Aspen Jim Reser continued the discussion, of two weeks ago
Agreement
concerning the Agreement with Top of Aspen and there was
conversation relating to various details of the Agreement,
e.g., the assessment formula, option to build or not build
all of the 28 units. Oates suggested that it might be better
to work'the whole matter into the new PUD form rather than
to do it as a contract agreement - a procedure which would
be dependent upon the good faith of both parties. The„
County Manager was instructed to go ahead with the negotiations
with Reser. Commissioner Edwards will. read the agreement as
now proposed and direct feedback through BYomquist. '
Exempt: from Donna Baer of the Planning Office 'introduced two requests
Def. of sub-
Division - ~ ~ ' ~ '.
Kassler
- 3 -
', i .. Y.RN?A: t,.. ~n .,. T_ n.: v~ Yt ~"si^~r%~"fiG", v. a,avT ;...H)FMi 'RP!'~.. !I?av#m`n:~N ., r...w `~~ AS. Ar Y( ~~'Y~a ~ :.:.bi
~: N:'• f r ~ ar
PtTR~IN COUNTY. ~;"'~- ': .: .~.. :~::...
Regular Meeting BOARD 'O£ COMt2'ISSSOV:fi RS. ~~, ~ Ja n,uary ~28, 1974
Edwards suggested that perhaps the regulations should
Yre changed to clarify 'this point. No one has'ever been ,
charged the 5$ on the basis of value of the improved property.
Oates brought up the question of the appraised value of,
the land at this point as against when it was bought. The
regulations state "20~ of assessed valuation based on condition
of the land immediately prior to transfer of the land."
Shellman withdrew his motion.
'op of Aspen -
Contract
Shellman moved that the commissioners approve the
Sketch Plan of fhe Top of the Village - Phase 4 - subject
Phase 4 by current appraisal; 2nd by Baxter. Unanimous vote.
It was again mentioned that theme is a need to change
the subdivision regulations in order fo get appraisal for
to the satisfaction of the recommendations of the Planning
Office and acceptance by the County of a cash contribution
equal to 5% of the market value of the land included in
the contribution at the improved state.
Jim Reser, representing Top of Aspen, 'Inc., presented
a proposed agreement with the County outlining the development
of Top of Aspen and`the dedicating to the County of certain
lands and building bf_,28 units of "employee housing." Since
the commissioners had not had the opportunity to study the
proposed agreement, Reser spent most of the time going through
the agreement and making changes in individual instances
which had been recommended by the officials of his corporation.
I3e asked that the commissioners give conceptual approval,
but stated that he' was not ask#ng for signatures to the'
agreement until they had been obtained from Top Of Aspen, Inc.
He stated that Top of Aspen would like one year to 'get the
cost.
The commissioners then all agreed fo read the p'roposed'
plan in for PUD. The commissioners asked if it would be
'possible for preliminary PUb in six months, final PUD in
one year, and a 6-year buildout. Reser'said he would check,
and also agreed to check on the possibility of the county
'getting an aption to acquire "x" number~,of lots at preparation
rT
~
'
'
' ~
~
^
~ P ~ N
f ~ ~ - Mf N'>Sp+' Y 1. G+:rr M "i .fin
'j
-
~: 5
~ i
,v
SM
~
f +IL
~
1
Yi.Y n: +A#H ~tignr:~^. .\:'rrMffi,. CvI"„'fiti~~ v+ T ry" :p
1.
` t
July b, 192
RESOLfTTION
N;
PLANNING AND ZO ING COT"ATIS5
.
;,.. ;.,,
TOP OF AS~'E"TY'.T~~=ZONLNGIREQUE"ST :. „_
;
.
;'
. ,-.,
WHERE"~SS, petition„was filed by McCullough Oil-
p and`R-15 Residential
To of Aspen, Inc. to rezone land from R 30
~. , .
Districts to AR=2;Accomodatioris and Recreation District (PUD)
as shown on-maps on file in the Pitkin County Building
,. -
Department,and by reference incorporated herein;
AND WHEREAS, all statements in favor of such
,' .. i .,.. '
rezoning, as well as those, in, opposition thereto, have been ' .. ..
taken into account and the members of the Pitkin County Planning
r.
1
..
and Zoning Commission have met and duly considered said reque§t
,...
for rezoning, -' ~'
i.
AND WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning and ,Zoning
: , , , , .. ~, ~... . ,... , w,.
Commi§sion;does hereby fins::
,
,
1. The applicant has failed to shota that adequate
z._, .,,.....- . ,
sion for sewa a dis o
prov g p sal is•available for a pro~eet the
size of that proposed; ~'
~.
,_ 2. Tlie road ,and"circulation,. system in the area of
propos ... a ., ..,., ~ `
the ed rezoning is not adequate'to serve the proposed
project;
` ,°„
3. A need does not exist at,tYie
present time for
a: { ..
~
AR-2~zoning in the area as'described because
of~an abundance of
„.
... ` ' ~
undevelo ed land zoned for similar land uses'an~ densaty an ttie
p
f
~ .:
..,,
' ~ - . f. ' .. ~«..,4!... .. ~,^~ N$ty^~:M^jJn'~X'" hM+ : ur,~..~.p,l r~', - ., t ~'., 4:Y.h. i., w^>~ p,}
w. •,a e., . ~ .
a,^,a.i
-t . .:,
i
immediate Aspen area,`
4 The ts.ming for the project is premature because r
of the inability of the public sector to provide sufficient
~ e, ., r.%1 ~j(.... 6 ..'.d tit..,, ~ ki~.'+Skk +m
services to"already existing development,
- ~~
- ~ i
~ s 1
!K y ~ {~{~
"'ra ..,~.y(S+'..` ~F~^;T(M-SN.r~.kr ppg(.?.~.Hl YF~J'~.°:l'~'`~' ` ~'t~"i'S„16JO."Mw-u~! ~f'„ u t !~• Y.} ~r'' i' +h iC,~, ~s... Um Y`
_ hd~
i.
~. ._ . 1
i
K I '1,>
S. No social need, presently exists for housing'"
,:;.
i..
of the type proposed;
',
~_ 6. The applicant has an ongoing hoo7using development
in the imitiediate vicinity as,the, result- of a 1971 rezoning to
s -, ~ ;
AR-2 which is less than 1/3 completed and it would be premafux'e
;. ~ ~ ,.. i„ .. .
+• s.:~..
to 'g'rant additional AR=2 zoning unt~ta additional need can be
substantiated. ~ "
,;
.,,
.:
NOGJ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED "that the Plannin
~. , g
., ,,. . --
}-. ' , ,
and"Zoning Commission recommends denial of 'tEie` a~plicai~t's
„_~-
petition £or a change of zoning from'R-30 and ~t 15 Residential
Districts to AR-2,Accomodations and Recreatiori'District (PUD) ~
for"the forementioned reasons.
. .,
-.. ,,
,. .. y ;, .... ~ `' ~' ti.' S'torrs`~~sho' .; ,
Motion was made b Robert Bariiard• seconded y p,
Rol ~ y' j ersen' Aye; Storrs ' '
erCGuy VNae. RobertPBarnard " - lzeyno7.ds, Nay;
Pet ; ~, Y ''~~shop, Aye.
,S'
;
. _.
J ... ~
.., - ~ -
i
Augur"t 11, 1972
PI'TKIN COUNTY BOARD 0~' COMi'TISSIONERS REa
TOP OF ASPEN REZONING REQ`C7EST"
'~ ~~
.~r• ~• ,.
~~ ,
rnn
I I ~ :.1. C c:. p '. .. '.. ;Y
W~3EREAS, McCullough Oil- Top of Aspen, Ince
_. ~ < t ~ .
..,,
has filed an application to rezone the hereinafter described,,
lands from R-30 and R-15 Residential Districts to AR 2
Accomodations and Recreation District.(PUD) as shown o;n maps
..," ,.:
on file in the Pitki.n County Building Do"p"a~tment and by `-
reference herein,
a -
AND W~'RE~S, a joint public hearing was held by
;. ~,_
...
the P1a.nnng and Zoning Commission and.. the Board of County
., .. ,
Commissioners on February 28th, 1972,
.. _ ,,
AND WHEREAS,. the evidence, tesCimony, and exhibits
preseni.ed at said hearing and the recommendations and findings
of the Planning. and Zoning Commission have been'. considered, "
- - .-:-.AND WHEREAS, granting the zoning at this time is
not in the best interest"of the health, safety, and welfare
of tFe Citizens of Ptkin County, T
'' hOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the rezoning`
application of McCullough Oil- Top of Aspen,' Ince to rezone
,_
from !R-30 and R-15 Residential,bistrcts to_,AR-2 Accomo,dations
',
and Recreation District (PUD) is hereby denied"for the following.
described Zands: { see attached )
Y ro..
YY tl'~~°.aL M
'^.tA+-r ~~. ....i....%; Ate..- ..I ~. J~xr o- a~~.r ...~Y~~
1
~ ~ l«~
lO.o4 ~'C.~ __
1i rSM~G~~~.~R
MpcJi~ T,tt N
i~f*RrFI 3
~.
~~...::.
PARGF~- 1 ..; . ...
1~9ti P~ . ... :._
' ~ v ,
TRI-c0 Management, Inc. B°Aspe°
Planning • Design • Surveying • Engineering • Construction Colorado 81611
and Management of Land 303.925.2688
July 24, 1972
Board of County Commissioners
Pitkin County, Colorado
Re: Top of Aspen
Re-zoning Request
Gentlemen:
At your July 10, 1972 meeting, you requested that
Top of Aspen reply to the resolution concerning
its re-zoning request passed by the Planning and
Zoning Commission on July 5. It is our under-
standing that you also wanted written confirmation
of verbal committments we made at the July 70
meeting concerning the density and timing of our
proposed development. The enclosed comments con-
stitute our response to those requests.
erry r y yours ,
Michael assma
dob
cc; R. P. McCulloch, Jr.
A Subsidiary of Trico Corporation Offices throughou4 the West
----~-
:, . ~
~J
Top of Aspen, Inc.
Re-Zoning Request
Comments on Planning and .Zoning Commission Resolution
INTRODUCTION
Top of Aspen, Inc. applied for re-.zoning of 226 acres of land
on Smuggler Mountain in order to permit a form of development
not allowed within the existing .zoning classification. This
classification, R-15 and R-30, permits single family homes on
individual lots; the same as on Red Mountain.
It seemed to us that rather than spread houses, roads and cars
all over the entire 226 acres it would be better to restrict
building to the land at the bottom near town. Roughly 23 acres
would be used; the remaining 203 acres would be open and un-
developed.
We outlined the advantages of this plan in the original re-
zoning application, a copy of which is enclosed.
On July 5 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that
our application be denied. We feel. that the reasons given for
this recommendation, while certainly serious considerations,
are not sufficient reasons for denial of our request when all
the benefits of re-zoning are taken into account.
In most cases the reasons given refer to problems of the Aspen
area in general rather than to specific problems connected with.
re-zoning this land. The reasons given for the recommendation
to deny the re-zoning request and our comments on them follow.
1. '°The applicant has
for sewage disposal is
that proposed."
Page 2
failed to show that adequate. provision
available for a project the size of
We are not proposing a project
under the existing zoning. Lf
available for a development in
zoning, then they must 'also' be
velopment. The impact of each
is exactly the same; the sewer
zoning district the sewage come
of any greater size than allowed
sewage disposal facilities are
.accordance with the existing
available for the proposed de-
on the sewage disposal facilities
plant doesn't know from which
s.
If the existing sewage treatment facilities are :hot adequate
to handle any additional development, then all development will
have to be stopped as in 1965. This moratorium would apply no
matter what. zoning classification is in effect on Smuggler
Mountain.
We contend that in this. case there is no relationship between
sewage treatment capacity and zoning. Reference to sewage dis-
posal problems indicates neither a reason to accept nor deny
the rezoning proposal.
.`` ' ~,,
Page 3
2. °'The road and circulation system in the area of the pro-
posed re-zoning is not adequate to serve the proposed' project."
The type of development which we propose will not have nearly
as great an impact on the road and circulation system as that
allowed under the existing zoning. A subdivision of dispersed
single family houses forces people to drive cars to the center
of town and throughout the development. Our proposed concen-
trated development would enable everyone to live within walking
or bicycling distance of town. In addition it could be served
by several possible forms of mass transit; a conventional sub-
division cannot.
We feel that we have demonstrated with the Mill Street-Hospital
Bridge improvements that we are capable and willing to expend
sufficient time, expertise, and money to solve transportation
problems.
1
~~
Page 4
3. "A need does not. exist at the present time for AR-2 zoning
in the area as described because of an abundance of undeveloped.
land zoned for similar land uses and density in the immediate
Aspen area. °°
The density proposed in our application is not comparable to
AR-2 densities, since we are requesting only the number of units
allowed in an R-30 zone or 350 units on 226 acres.
Since there are no official guidelines having to do with the
density of developments on hillside land, we have followed the
recommendations of the Aspen Area General Plan of 1966. In
general the plan provides for an increase in lot size as the
slope of the land increases. It'also proposes that the concept
of averaging lot sizes be used in areas of hillside development.
we utilized a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet '(5000
square feet larger than the minimum recommended by the Master
Plan) and a maximum lot size of 40,000 square feet. The average
lot size is 36,500 square feet. There are no lots`on slopes
greater than 40%. A tabulation of lots allowed', with this sys-
tem is attached.
we are requesting only the number of apartment units equal to
the number of lots which could be developed on this land; name-
ly 350. It is important to keep in mind that we are not re-
questing AR-2 density which would allow 6565 units. The impact
of our proposal must be compared to an R-30 development on the
same land and not to an AR-2 development.
Page 5
4. °°The timing for the project is premature because of the
inability of the public sector to provide sufficient services
to already existing development."
The proposed development will require substantially fewer ser-
vices from the public sector than would a conventional subdivi-
sion. Police 'and fire protection, snowplowing, road and util-
ities maintenance, school bus expense and many other public
services are obviously simpler and less expensive in a develop-
ment of 18 acres with 3000 feet of roads than in one of 226
acres with miles of roads.
The taxes paid to the community are roughly the same in either
case.
..
Page 6
S. "NO social need presently exists for housing of the type
proposed. 01
As the Aspen area grows it becomes more difficult and expen-
sive to preserve remaining undeveloped open land. If Smuggler
Mountain is subdivided' in accordance with 'the existing zoning,
200 acres of open land immediately adjacent to Aspen will be
lost to the public forever. We oontend that the preservation
of such open space is at least as great a need as the "social
need" for a type of housing presumably different from the
housing we propose.
There is no way to preserve open land near Aspen, without build-
ing dense, compact housing. We feel that as open land becomes
more scarse, the stigma presently attached to apartments and
condominiums will disappear.
Page 7
6. "The applicant has an ongoing housing development in the
immediate vicinity as the result of a 1971 re-zoning to AR-2
which is less than 1/3 completed and it would be premature to
grant additional AR-2 zoning until additional need can be sub-
stantiated."
Top of Aspen agrees not to begin construction of the Smuggler
Mountain project until the Silver King Apartments are. com-
pleted. This will probably be in three years.`
In addition the project would be phased so that completion
would take at least 5 years, with no more than 80 units con-
structed in any one year.
It is important to keep in mind that. the two projects are not
of the same type. The construction of the Smuggler Mountain
project will actually complement Silver King with the develop-
ment of a park and greenbelt of approximately 8 acres immediate-
ly adjoining Silver King.
Top of Aspen
Re-Zoning Application
Calculation of Number of Lots allowed
Based on Aspen Area General Plan
Percent Slope Area Lot Size
acres) (Sq. Ft.)
~.
Page 8
Number of Lots
0%-l00 40 20,000. 87
10%-20% 35.5 20,000 77
200-25% 23.4 25;000 41
25%-30% 24.3 30,000 35
30%-40% 27.9 40,000 30
Greatex than 40% 74.2 -
226 acres
270 lots
P.U.D. in-
crease 33% 89
359 units
average lot size = 36,461 sq.ft.
,_I .. x,,...?:+ .a~. ,.-.~ i ,,4rr~t' d~..k~, ~s'""'~"'.,::~.`"`c+i,`.C?*i'"" .h,j xr"` -5~-t
~~ . „ . 1, f
TRI ~ CO Manage .. .~ . s , „ .~,
rent, Inc.
__ ;.
Planning • Design''• Surveying • Engineering • Construction` ',
and Management of Land;,
TOP OF ASPEN, INC: t "
SMUGGLER MOUNTAIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPM'8NT PROISOS~IL
RE-30NING APPLICA'SIdN ~ '~ ~ " ~'~ ~`'
February 28, 1972
INTRODUCTION
Box 1730
Aspen
Colorado $1611
303.925
X2688
.~ .
Top of Aspen, Inc., owns approximately 226 acres of land on,
Smuggler Mountain. Tri-Co Management has been involved in
master planning this area since 1966`anfl haS done'several
-> ..
lans and ..,
p ,development studies. We are very familiar with
the property and for the last 6 years we have' surveyed it,
~.• ~ i
walked on it driven ~on i`t • skied on it andry~ha~~ picnics o
n
it. We have spent a lot of time on this land.,. Our proposal
for re-zoning to enable a Planned Unit Development is no
fly-by-night. get rich quick development plan, but represents
i
our da'reful judgment, formed over a period"of several years,
of what constitutes the best use of this land, from the
,,, ,
oint of v
p iew of both our clien`t' and the residents of Aspen
and Pitkin County. '
We have requested a change in zoning"becau~s's"w~"'feel that a.
1 :.
development based on the existing zoning would be d'isastr
ous_
_,: ,
and do irreparable harm to this ,valley. A development of
single family houses on individual lots, would xba"r" thepublic
A Subsidiary of Trico Corporation ~ Offices throughout the West ' ~'
_..
,_ ...
,... , . ,
,..
from one of the largest tracts of open land remaining close
to Aspen. Our proposal provides great benefits both to the
residents of,ASpen and to the eventual residents 'of the de= '
velopment, by eliminating the drawbacks of a conventional
subdivision development. Some of the advantages of our pro-
posal are outlined below., '
Economic
1. A P.U.D. development in this area, would increase in-,,
g ,......_ ~ requiring a small: ., ,, -.. ; .... .
come throw h taxes while er expen- `
diture for community services~tl~an a conventional ,
Subdivision. Expenditures for snow plowing, bussing
of'school children, maintaining utilities and roads,
and, providing police and fire protection would all be,
less. The extension of existing utilities to serve
the development would be, at the developer`s'eXpense.'
~-
2. The proximity of the development to downtown Aspen'
would reinforce the vitality of the existing business
district'.
Transportation
.. ,
1. The impact on the existing transportation facilities
would be, much less than for a conventional subdivision.
The entire development~wduld be'within wal
king or
bic clin
g distance of the center of town, ;thus reducing
.-i.. ...... ~..x ..~.. x T. kiM` {'~~'~o~+~{~.'v^~. I~'°~A" $: v~..'I. l' °l ` "c.:wfm'^9. '~ }+~, t`~P ."1t v.
":':. ~ -..N~v {V
d.
3
2. The developer is willing to participate n~~'olutions ~ `
for the existing transportation problems s,n this ar~~.
We are prepared'to offer a great`deal of background.`,.
~.
.
material and surveys in addition to poss"Ible financial
.,
.
participation., We also have the design and engineering I
capabilities to work out solutions to road and bridge
problems.
.:
r ._
J
3. A concentrated, compact development such 'as we are ';
proposing is ideally suit8drvto"be ser`vecl by~ariy kind
..y ~-.e x. ,~ y.
station would
of future mass, transits Stem:. On y
' y
1
even
be nec
essary to connect„it`with and tual trans-
„
~'' ~
`~~ lion does not
portation route. A conventional subdivi ~ '
have this capability aril at~tIie present time tTere ~ '° `'
.. .. .,
appears' to be no way. to economically serve ~ dispersed
area of single family homes.' {
4. Small chldren`will be within walking distance of
school, thus reducing both automobile and bus. traffic.
i r
Envir
onmenfal
... ,
r
:, .. ... ,. ,4
1. The development is iri the right place. It is clo`se'to
the center of town and would reduce the need for other
,~.n
developments furtlier`away w$ch would sncrease`traffic _y ~ ~., :..1
1
ahd congestion': ` ' '
~-
~
,-
.
+ ,.
_
2. It would not alter` the existing v'i`ew and„ use of Smuggler`
., `
~
Mountain. This is in `line with tT-ie pr`opgsed city view ,,
,, <. i
rdinance.
°
., _ ~ ,~_ ~m ~_
. .. i
~,
_...r.
I ~r ~ ,. 1. .. .. ' J .F
~I
fi
.,. .., ..u. .. .. ., {.. 19:: 1
. n .... r.. .r . r....... .. ~: n ... ,
I I tai„.
:.. _. i
i
..
9 I
^: t` __
': ~ ,-i.. ~ ,.:1' of ._... ,..' ~ t,..~ ~ i i 1
i A
.. -
- ~ ~ ~,
3. A Iarge park would be created for,. the residents. This
>~
park would border land currently leased by Pi~kin County
as a park and the combination, of the.. two parks would,
as$ure that nearly all of Smuggler Mountain visible
from towf~ and much of the land on the ;top of Smuggler
Mountain would always be, open space.
4. A pedestrian walk would.be. provided through the deveY-
opment which, if easements were obtained. from other '
landowners, could eventually be'' art, of a continuous
pedestrian path from one side, of, town to the other. „
~. , .
5. The land on which we propose to build ,is currently
' nk. This, land would be; ''"
occu ied b mine dum s and u ~" ;~
P Y P 7 ~.. ,
rehabilitated and some of,it converted into a park.
_ _ ..
6. The, proximity to d`owritown; tYie southern exposure, the
P P ~ nd bicycle traffic and they"~ ''
em basis" on edestrian a
imaginative design of the buildings will result in a; '
good place to live, an example of good urban planning
and a credit to the,cortimunity.
,.
I
,-
~- .
~._
i
:~::
i
:,'
j:,, ,
..
.,
.. - , ;,
r y
/`v ~,
°~ d p i
J °~ i - - ~ .
r1EMORANDtlM
,. ...,
I
i
T0: Joe Edwards
.,".
FROM: John Stanford
SUg:JECT: McCulloch Properties on Smuggler°Mounfain """
,, , . 1
DATE: October 21, 1974' _.. ,.~.. .,
;,.
There are ,several planning considerations regarding the 50 to '
75'unit proposal by McCulToch'. T3iese'consderations"are included
in our plan update for the'Smuggl'er r"oun£airi vYc~nity.
- om~ the ~ ', .... „ .. „ .. ..
1. Access and circulation"' the area fr
hospital to riountainValley Subdvis~on'has"" '~
serious vehicular circulation problems --
narrow paving and right-of-way; dangerous r'
r/
intersections, substandard alighments''aiid
inadequate bridge access. It will be di~f-
ficult to support any High density develop-" /,
ment,in this general area unitl these di`f-
iciencies are 'emedied:, The access to'the ,
McCulloch site will also Piave to be~~care-
full desi ned to aGoi""d :deleteriousy';~" "~" ".` ~'~'"." :__....'~°"`...'.~:...,.`.~...,`°.-
y g _ _ efi`ects
on the small pockets of single-family homes. '
N~.._ .,.:,,
.:..factors "the McCulloc :.;......., C . ,' . ~" _ .
2. Environmental
- "site is
located in an area where, sloe ~ `""
and wildfire co "
nstraints should ~beecon~sideredil
The C.S.U. maps designate the land atioJe'a
r
line located just below salvation di~cli as
i
non-occupant "
y ~- best, suited fo,r range, forestry
and other uses not invloving human occupancy."
I would recommend that if development should
occur here that firepl ~"" ... .,: :..,.:,.....::.._,
,aces be` proh b~iaed ,from '
. ~,'. ~ ,"
u".W' ~
Joe Edwards
Oc~'tober 21, 1974
M ... ~ M1. ,
Page Two
,-
Kmnnerh iv. ~.. B. lVioore
B¢~x 640.
Aspen, Colo.. $1611
July 4th, 1973
Peter Guy, Chairman
William Mason, Chairman
Pitkin County P&Z
Pitkin County hoard of Adjustment
Aspen'; Colorado
t.. wv `+tiu:.r a~ %'~+n•+=t~' w .M,.-a~rvMa...~m vAd+.rt^»Aabm~ i« -a.~„e»~~,...Ae
.. c .' ... t.,~ _
. ,,
Gentlemen:
Please excuse me from attendance at meetings o£ your
respective boards to be held between July 5th'"to the 15th.
I will be out of town bareboating in the Canac~iam Gulf Islands.
Sin~ly
GCB MooX
cc: DKS
~.__ .. _ . :.:~, , .__ _ __..:_ . ... u ,
._, y
.., ... .. v w~W t N
r
ant ": Sr
~c.•,-.u'vs~:<v ^'€~F~.nr.£°. ,., a,,a..,.<sw.w.az"~+,~,5'-,ti~iuaalp'=~iv8bk~~^~r•~«;. b nom. -:p r ~.~i)
t
~..
lo. G hC'~
g'AFZCF,_L. ~
trn.88 f~t2C=
SPAN
PARCl=1- i
I~~ P
€_ .
I`.
i
I
;
,
.
... y' Yang „ «
.. s.
,.
x, a ~ w
:s..'
w
+ n a
a.~ [ r~.Y ~'yy,~, 7..;
ar,;
,1^2k, n°rc- ~ '~3 ~".,aY.t .a-"~,+Et
..
{
} t hF ~ >
+L.A 3 '~+'=
~
r
v.
.,... tn.r
~, ~
{ t.. .~ v~:~.
s. ~
--- u.n -.
.... ¢
k`~~
u ~.~
r h n Y
a
W':.
5 i ~. i.
v ~.
~
a k'~5
~
~V ~6
r
n
..
R
.
. _;. ~. M ,. ~~ n ,_ r.,._ a
~, 7~. i
~ i
< <'
~ ,5
_ ~
~.
i. ..~ ~. P.t .~.~ CFe.._ I ~ E ~ Y
:: .. ~.,
mX ~x a'.i c 1'.F t .ci ..u.i i~vn ul .
~Nrb~_G a~..
vI:1 A ~ ~a L wR ~M
S ,'., 7 ..
its
~. '. '+H
` ~
July s, 1~a2 ...,
PLANNING ,AND ZONING COMMISSION RSS07~UTION
TOP OF ASPEN RE=ZONING REQURST
WI~REAS, petition was filed by'"McCullough Oil-
Top of Aspen, Inc. to rezone Land from R-30 .,.and R-15 Res;dential
;_
Districts to AR-2 Accomodations and Recreation District,(PUD)
as shown on maps on file in the Pitkin County Building
t
Department. and. by reference incorporated herein,
AND WHEREAS, all'statements ip;fa~or.of such
rezoning, as well as those in opposition thereto,`have been
taken, into account and the members of-the Ptk:j.n County Planning
and Zoning Commission have met and duly considered said request`
for rezoning,
. ,..
AND Wf~REAS, the Pitkin County'Planiing and Zoning
Commission does.. hereby find: `',' '`
,,,
1. The applicant has failed to'show that adequate
..,.
" provision ,for sewage disposal s•ava'Iable for a project the
,;
size of that. proposed;
_:,
2. The road and crculat y
ions stevi in the area of~~
h.
the proposed rezoning is not adequase to serve the proposed
,;.
,.. ., ..
project; , ..;, ..., ,..
3. A need does not exist. at the present time for
_..:..
~,:.
AR-2 zoning in the area as described because of an abundance of
,.~.~ ~
undeveloped land zoned for similar land uses and density in the'
immediate Aspen area;
4. The timing for the project is premature because
of the inability of the public sector to provide sufficient ``'
services to already existing development;
-_._ ..~fi
,.~ .: - v..,i .~-~. . gib. x u ~ a - " '. .L. jl i'^ _.cz ,.... .. ,. __ 1 ..,!°i 'S1
~~
`\
r'
r
•Ep .
RECOi;13 O= I'ROCk'~ l36i'dO5 100 Leaves
fOr:.I •E C. 1'. CIO CGM C~ 9. LL. tt L. L'0.
Continued Meeting Aspen Planning & Toning Commission February 22,7.972
Meeting was called to order by Chairman P.obin Mo1ey at 5:10 p.m, with Vic Good-
hard, Jim Breasted and Jim Adams present. Also present were City/County Planner
Herb Bartel and Assistant City/CounL-y Planner, Fred Wooden.
neaky Lane Sub Sneaky Lane Subdivision - Bob Star.odoj and Sob George
were present to question the recommendations made by the
Commission at their last meeting. Fred Wooden read the
r motion made at the meeting of February 15th concerning
the Sneaky Lane Subdivision. The Commission told the sub-
,. dividers that they preferred the foot path along the east
bank of Castle Creels to the 4% cash fee. The City Manager
had told the Planning Office thai: i_f the utility easement
were available the water WOilld 'UE there in time for hookups
'- ' and would not be necessary to dri.11 wells. Ttxe Commission
asked that there be a pedestrian casement on the south
side of one of the 7_ots going towards Castle Creek, the
easement being 5' wide and that a 6' easement be along
i:he east side of Castle Creek, The City Attorney is to
furnish the subdividers with the legal wording that is to
go on the final plat which would include the easements, if
possible; if n.ot, the ~F% cash fee would be required at the
time the bui7_ding permits were issued, Said fee to be used
for purchasing easements if feasihle.
Bob George said he was opposed to the ~+% cash fee for only
a two lot subdivisi_oa. Felt subdividers were penalized
just to dzvi_de land. Asked if they are the first subdivider;
to be charged the 4% cash fee.
Lower Hunter Creek Lower Hunter Creek Acquisition (Area 26) - A map of the
Acquisition area was presented by Herb Bartel showing the 1750
{approximately) acres being offered for sale by 'the present
owners, McCullough Oil to the forest Service Lor 3 1/2
million. dollars. Money could not be budgeted for purchase
until July, 1973. Felt that if the City and County were
interested they should make their wishes known to the local
Forest Service before their recommendations of priority
went to SL'ate level.. Rcbi:n Molny, Chairman, asked that a
recommendation from the Comn,issi:on in the form of a res-
olution be sent to City Council and to the County Commiss-
ioners with a copy to L-he Forest Service. Said resolution
to show that the consensus of opinion of the Commission was
in favor of acquiring this piece of'land and placing'.t.
within the boundary of the White River. NaL-ional forest.
Motion made by Jim Breasted, seconded by Vic Goodhard to
authorize Robin Molny and herb Bartel to prepare a res-
olution to be sent to City Council. All in favor, motion
carried. •
County Re-7.onixlg County P.e-Zoni_ng Requests - The County P7.anni.ng and Zoning
Requests Conuni.ssiun bras asked for comments from the City Planning
and 7,oninp, Commission on land within~,a 3 mile radius of
the City before their pub7.i.c h.eari:n~.
M:ichac7. Gassman from Tr.i_-Co Management: was present to
present maps to the Commission ott land they hoped t:o have
y ~ w
I-
4"
... rv+. M+..:::a rrx~~tix".~.rva.",Sww~kflvA:~is:P.4f Y'a.mrxew'a^«n. wa
Fc~COI;i~ C)E' E'C:Of;p.~i3Ef'dt~5 700 Leaves
new+ •.o c. .'. eacan n. n. a a. eo.
~onti_nued Meetang,'Aspen P & Z, 2/2.7./72
re-zoned, located on t-he side of Smuggler Mountain. Present
zoning is R-30, R-J.5. Under existing zoning the land could
be divided into 351 lots, with County PUD they would be
allowed 467 lots. Access would be from existing Smuggler
Mountain Road. 'Tentative plans fora 400 unit apartment,
6::or 7 houses, possible shopping center, tennis. club. Plan
to use the Salvation Ditch as a pedestrian easement-.
' `his could be~ tabled for. 6 months due
y P~
c~rculati.onsarndJtranspor[.ationC1M~chalelC~ay as far as
ssman said that
McCullough was worlcir.~g on transportation possibilities
that would be feasi_b1e.
Robin Molny commented that he felt Some of the land to be
dedicated as a earl: was undcvelopable land.
Jim Adams commented that the taxpayers within the City
limits would bear the burden of the cost while the develop-
ers were making clot of money. Felt that- Main Street 'was
bearing a]_1 L-he traffic i.~ could manage already without
any additional burden.
Robin 1`4oJ.ny questioned what- the population increase might
be from this subdivision. A conservative estimate was 1600.
The general consensus of the Commission on the continents to
be sent to th.e County P1_arrni.ng and zoning were timing,
population incr_cr.~sc, transportation, impact on other
Facilities, in.clusa_on of conlinercial area in developmeizt,
Neighborhood shopping requ.remeuts. Would recommend to
County Planning and zo>,::ing that the 'developer be asked to
meet with both City anal County Planning and Zoning Commiss-
ions to iron otrt the various problems.
Jim Breasted stated lie }.lad a conflict of interest due to
the fact that- h,e does worts for the firm involved. Chairman
Molny stated that- since they were under t-he Charter it
wouJ.d be permissable for Breasted to discuss the subject,
of which he lids a conflict, but would Have to abstain from
any voting on the subject.
The t:wo subdivision by t-he hospital (Mocklin-W1Ti.ams)
would have L-he same concerns as the Tri-Co Management
subdivision.
Discussed theloline subdi_visi.on, relt that ii zolne had
not gone P.-30 T'1JU the Commission would not.- have favored
the previous pJ.mi. Asked that the entrance to the highway
be J.imited i:o e5:.sti.ng Country Toad,
herb Raarte7 sufl£;rsted that: a group made of both rnerahcrs
from clre C:i.ty end County P1ar~ni.ng and Zoning Commi_sson.s
meet: to consider changes i.n the Aspen Area Gener~aJ. Plan.
County Suhdi_vision County Subd'ivic:ion P.oguJ.at~.ons - Tal.>j_cd. To h~ put on
Regulat'i.ons next agenda and <^.slc h.hat• Comm:i.^.son members study
-2-
rv .~... ::...._ r. .~ .. tM ^ : ~ .iS~....ll:.
_ . ~« i1R.v~JI'?y'0'!~'kM""y"A~~l+MR ~ rtr H tY- .«..r„hxxgry~'
F ~~
T0: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Herb Bartel, Regional Planner
SUBJECT: Rezoning Application: McCullough Oil - Top of Aspen, Inc.
DATE: February 28, 1972
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Base of Smuggler Mountain, north of City°
of Aspen and east of intersection of Red Mountain Road and Gib-
son Avenue.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: Approximately 226 acres.
PRESENT USE: Vacant with some mining.
PRESENT ZONING: 209 acres R-30 Residential'
17 acres R-15 Residential
PROPOSED ZONING: AR 2 PU'D AccommodatonJRecreation
PROPOSEb USE: Multi family residential, private tennis club and
common open space.
WATER AND SEWER: City of Aspen Water Department and Aspen Metro-
poltal Sanitation District. Both agencies, have facilities in
the immediate area.
ZONING HISTORY: The present R-15 and R-30 zoning was applied
in 1955 at the time of original zoning in the area. In 1971
approximately 22 acres adjacent to (west) the applicant's property
was zoned AR 2.
PLANS FOR THE AREA:' The 1966 Aspen Area General Plan recommends
a separation of land uses within the area where AR 2 zoning"a
requested using the Salvation ditch as the dividing line for
these uses. Concerning the area west of the Ditch and its Resi-
dential High.Densty the Plan recommends the followings "'
A designation established to promote creation of
housing available to permanent residents in close
proximity with the commercial core of Aspen. Such
housing is also envisioned as an integral part of
planned unit developments in outlying areas`. Prin-
cipal uses include multi family housing of an apart-
ment, row or patio house character, mobile homes,
parks, schools and churches.
The mine dump area beyond Gibson Avenue contains
42 acres of relatively level land presently zoned
for residential use with a 15,000 square foot
minimum lot size. Fo3lowing restoration, it is
recommended that the .and be replatted for High
Density Residential use as it is a convenient lo-
cation for multiple family housing to 'meet the
.., .,
1
- 2 -
housing needs of service people in the area.
The relationship of lot size to dwellings should
be 2,60b square feet of land per unit: This
density would allow row and patio 'housing suit-
able to the needs of .permanent residents.. Char-
acter of this area is envisioned as that of a
planned community with a school and park site
in a central location.
In regard to the property on Smuggler Mountain and that area
east of the ditch, the following statements from the General
Plan apply:
On the slopes of Red and Smuggler Mountains a
designation of Residential land use with an
average lot area of 40,000 square feet per
dwelling unit is shown. The pattern is shown
encompassing what is considered the develop-
able land with topography characterized by
meadows and knolls surrounded by slopes up
to 40 percent in gradient. There is additional
land presently zoned R-30 on the steeper slopes
of Smuggler Mountain and in the high meadow on
Hunter Creek which is not shown as Residential
on plans as it is felt that the land will proba-
bly not be used as zoned unless circulation im-
provements are made similar to those rejected
during preparation of the plan. Character of
residential development for all land in the
30,000 square foot and 40,000 square foot lot,
designation is envisioned as following the
planned unit approach with variable Iot size,
a mixing of multi family structures and preser-
vation of the landscape with open space for
common use.
Furthermore, the General Plan recommends the location of a
primary school site in conjunction with any redevelopment of
the mine dump area (see page 26):
Site acquisition is the recommended initial
implementation step. To create adequate sites,
a minimum of five acres each for primary schools,
which are integrated with neighborhood design,
the appropriate timing would be during prelimi-
nary planning of precise subdivision patterns.
At this stage, the developer could work with the
school district to select a site with convenient
circulation access and related to dedicated open
space and. trails in the vicinity. This procedure
would link the provision of school facilities
with development progress in the urbanizing por-
tions of the planning area.
,..: :. ,„_ :., .. ~ ~.. , :a.r.^n9e u.np ¢e4r , n 5'An l xmsv. w. m.ayea. nvg
i. ~ `~R.iw~.... ~'y'6. ~ .. ... ~_
- 3 -
The General Plan refers specifically to its own legal status
and to the matter of timing for rezoning ri th'e following
paragraph:
Any zoning regulations, including amendment
to existing laws, considered subsequent to
the adoption of this plan shall generally be
in accordance with the plan. Thus zoning
regulations must be based on the Ceneral Plan
but need not inlcude all the provisions of
the plan relating to land use. In the matter
of timing, land presently controlled for low
intensity of use by zoning may be retained
in that character, even though a Higher nten-
sity use is recommended in the plan. It is
the duty of the planning commission to deter-
mine at what point in time a particular sec-
tion of land should be rezoned for intensive
urban use; using the guidelines contained in
other portions of this report to aid 'in the
decision making process.
COMMENTS: Consideration of the applicant's proposal must be
viewed in light of the General Plan recommendations for the area
and the applicant`s committment to leave the bulk of land as
open space. It is probable that some of the land on the slopes
of Smuggler could not be developed as presently zoned because
of access, soil and topographic considerations; but it is cer-
tain that if the remaining areas were developed in accord with
R-15 and R-30 district requirements, there would be created a
very spread out, highly visible project that would be more ex-
pensive to serve.
Prior to making its recommendation the Planning Commission should
consider ,the following based on available or obtainable infor-
mation; `
1. Need at this point in time for the. type and density
of development proposed by the applicant.
2. Impact of AR 2 zoning for the applicant's property
upon the community at large with regard to the
following:
a) The precedent this application may establish with
regard to the remaining private land in the Smug-
gler Mountain. area;
b) The presence of radiation and subsidence on the
site as a result of past mining operations;
c) Pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation
in an area presently restricted by accute trans-
portation problems (the ongoing Transportation
,. .., .< ... L, P .. ,.x t v. _ '.
.,
... ~ ~
~~
- 4 -
Study should be consulted prior to any Planning
Commission recommendation);
d) Gommercial needs of future residents of the
Williams Addition and how tfis relates to exs-
ting commercial areas and to City and County
policy with regard to future commercial devel-
opment;
e) Definitive school site requirements as dis-
cussed. in the General Plan;
f) The effect of granting additional AR 2 zoning
in the Aspen area when an abundance of zoning
in this same density and use category already
exists in an undeveloped, vacant state;
g) The relationship between demand for additional
community facilities and service created by the
proposed development and the ability of the
development to substantially pay its own way in
providing said facilities .and services and there-
fore not placing that burden upori the general
taxpayer.
There should be an understanding between the applicant and the
Planning Commission that if AR 2 zoning is granted for the sub-
ject property that it shall be incumbent upon said applicant
to include within any Final Development Plan for PUS the follow-
ing provisions for Planning Commission approval:
1. The protection of the Salvation Ditch. and control of
any effect seepage or failure of the ditch might have
on future development. Access to and along the ditch
must be preserved;
2. The preservation and maintenance of open space;
3. Provisions for landscaping and conservation of existing
trees and vegetation;
4. Vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle circulation within
said property to include a pedestrian easement along
the southern boundary for future access to schools;
5. The placement of all utilities underground;
6. The ensurance ofaccess adequate to minimize conflict
with traffic having the hospital as a', destination;
Z. The phasing of construction of the project'to corres-
pond with City and County ability to solve the con-
cerns mentioned above with regard to need and impact;
W _,
,. ~.., ,
- 5 -
8. The designation of building locations, setbacks and
heights;
9. The establishment of a final density for the project
not to exceed recommendation`of the General Plan;
10. The provision of adequate off street parking;
11, The provision of the type of land use cal ed for in
this area by the General Plan.
... j
- - ..
_ ... ..
.. ;.
i ~ - <.m,..",~..i~'x.~ .....,..vCtf'4:'a-.:i :r.:vw~`~.~,_n:rn~4,K8eM~'"'^"'Ir.~Riv.3e'~~.>?~L 1,.. f ~,~
T0: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
~- .
FROM: Herb Bartel, Regional"Plan`ner
SUBJECT:, Rezoning Application: McCullough Oil - Top'of Aspen, Inc.
DATE: February 28,'1972
LO,CATION,_OF PR6PER'TY
of Aspen and-east of
son'Avenue.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:
PRESENT`USE: Vacant
"Bas~,;ofM_Smuggler Mountain, north of City'
intersection, of -Red T%fountain'Road and Cib-
APproximat~ely :~2~ ac~~e's~.~.,.»,,...,,,,:. .. .. ,.,...... {
.. ;~. .
with soma mining.
1
PRESENT ZONINGc "209. acres, °R-30 Resderitia {
17 acres R-IS-Residential
PROPOSED ZONING: AR 2 PUD Accommodation/Recreation'
PROPOSED USE: Multi family residential, private tenriis''club and
common open space. " '
WATER AND SEWER: City of Aspen Watef~''~epartment and"Asperi"Metro-"
polital Sanitation District. 'Both,.agencie's have facilities in '
- ._
the immediate area.
ZONING HISTORY: The present R-=15 and R-30'zoxiing was' applied `
in 1955 at the time of ,original zoning in the area In 171
approximately 22 acres `adjacen't `to (wesat) the `applicant's property
was ;zoned AR 2. - _.„, p _ .. i
a LseSarationEofRland useslW66hin ttieAarea~w'herelARl~ z ecommends
requested using 'the Salvation VDitch as~`t"he `dividing"Tine for
i
these uses. Conce'rn'ing `the area-we's't of the Itch and its `Resi~
dential i h ~^ .,....~.~ -- ah _ r . ... , .... _,
g 'Density tTie' Pl n~"_ ~ „`
. a rec~mme~'ids t ~ e X0'1 owing
..'.:»......-aic.~,.:_._.,..::uxw,er^akar.~.:.a-..,n:.a.:x.,ra,.,.-,m..,;:.P-.c...r-:w..;a:r,~aE~mC"#~S's't,^,..»....,~ -.... a..- ;.+:;
A designation established to promote creation of "
housing avail~a ~Te to -perm'a'nent residents' in
,.. _...,. ~* .... close
proximity with the commercial core of'Aspen:`"'"'Such
housing is also, envisioned .as an integral part~of " `-
,planned unit developments in ou~Iying`areas.' grin=`
cipal uses, include multi family`IZOUSing of~'an'''apart-
ment, row or patio -house character`, mobile liome,.s;
parks, schools aiid cl}uYChes. „ ,
The mine dump area beyond Gibson Aveni.}e._contains
42 acres of relatively Ieve"1'land""presently yzoned '
,for residentiaT"us`e with 'a "150(Sd`'square foot
minimum o
' t size. Following restoration; it' is
recomineride " "`' `
d that the.lancT b~e rd Tatted f gh
.... L .W ~,.,.~k ,~:~ venie~... ~ ,, .,
;Density Residential use as it is a c .~.o, "
cation for multiple~`family`~fii"ousing to meet the
' '.,
s ~ ~ ~ •-n"-tttif h ~~4 " ~ +
k
r n~» .. ,.
~. ,.q
2 _
3zousing-needs of service people ixi the atea..
:
.
The relationship of" Tot size to dcSellings should.
be 2,000 square feet of land p'er unit. This;'"
density mould`.allow row and'' ~"~~ ~" '
patio housing suit=
able to the needs of,._permanent residents'. Char- `
oned
as thaf of
enyis
a
acter of°this area is
,
.,
"
y
planned community with a schogT and park site,.'
in a centfal location. '0..
In regard to the. property on Smuggler Mountain and that area,
east of the Oitch, tfie'followig stafements~'from the General'
Plana 1 !_ r
PP Y=
r
Dn the slopes of Red and,Smuggler`Moti3ntans a ..
-designation of Residential land use with an
average lot area bf"4O;ObO`"square'fee`t per '' `
dwelling unit is shown. The pattern~is'shown
encompassing what is_considered the develop
able land with topography c'haract~rized by" "
a_~:
meadows and"~LriOl1S surrounded liy slopes up
to 40 percent in gradient. There is additional
land presently zoned ;R-3'0 on the steeper'"slopes `" '
of Smuggler Mountain and in the tigh`meadow on
.,
.:Hunter. Creek which,.is.not shown as Residential ,
on plans as iti is felt that the land,taill proba-
-bly not. be used as zoned unless circulation im= '
_,
_..
provements are made smilar`to" those rejected
during preparation of the plan. (:har`ac'ter of
residential development for all land ein the"~",~ " " ' " ~ `
' '30,000 square foot ax~d,40,000 square `foot lot,
__
designation is envisioned as following the
_
l'anried vriit a roach with yariab~e lof size,'''
P PP ~`
a mixing of multi fam'1y structures`~nd preser- `
vation of, the„Iaridscape with operr`sp"ace for
'
common°'~5~. --w ",~ _ . ".,,, _ .~ ,,,
_~ - ~
Furthermore, the General Plan_recomme~tids the location o:f a
primary school site in conjunction with any redevelopment of
the mine dump area (see, page 26}: "
r ~.
Site acquisition is the recommended initial"'
. ~ ,.
implementation step'. To~create adequate sites,
;a minimum of five acres each for primary sbfiools,
~._
which are integrated with neighbor. hood design,
the appropriate- timing would 'be duririg'preiimi= ' ''
nary planning 'of precise subdidision patterns. '
At this stage; `the developer could, work with the,.
school district 'to ~seµ7.ect a `site wfli~ convenie'rit '
circulation aCC~es's and related tn~'dedicated.open
space and trails in the vic
nity. This procedure
_
mould link tlie''provisori o'f"school`"facilities '' "`~'"'" '
with development progress in the urbanizng'por- ~`
tions of"the planning` area. ~ ~°
...r,_, - "`°
r
i
_ ~_.
~...
....,.
~.
,.
- 3 -
The General Plan refers; s,pecifidally to its own legal" status'
and to the matter of timing for rezoning in the follo'wing'"
paragraph:
t,.
Any zoning regulations, including'aine`ndmerif
the ado t` ~ considered sub$egvent to
"..
to exisplion ofsths~"p"tan"s'fiaT'l generally be '
in accordance with_tlie plan. Thus zo"ning
regulations must be based on the'General Plan „
,but need not inlcude,all_the,provisions of
the plan relating to land'use. lri tl~e matter '
of timing, land presently controlled 'for low
intensity of use by zoning may be retained
in that character, even-though a Higher inters-'
sity use is recommended in the plan. It is "
the dut of ttie .. _ ....„~......~,,:.. _...ua,,,......... -,..~.
y planning cammission to. deter-'
mine at what point in time a ~""~
particular sec-
tion of land should be rezone2T for iritensv"" """ ~' ` " " '
e
'urban use; using the guidelines dontained ri
P p ........ ....:..
other ortioxis of this re ort'to aid 'in 'the
decision making 'process. '"-" '
COMMENTS: Consideration of the°applicant's proposal must be
viewed in light of the,General,Plan,,:recommendations_„for,,, the area-
and the applicant's.,committment.to, leave,_ttie,hulk of land as
open spade, ht is,proliable that some 'of the land on the slopes
of Smuggler could not b'e,debeloped as presently zoned because
s ~ soil and td.~ . .... ... ......:mow-s~ .,...._ .- . ~ ...::.., :..;._ ..:. .
of acces " pograp`hic considerations', but it is cer-
tai .r:.• .,Y g ,.... .,.... _: ~ ". ord with '
R-15 andtR130tdistrictnf~ uirementsTetherefwouldlbeacr'e~'
Q , ated,a
Y P ~ g Y P J .... ~ more ..
ver s read out hi hl visible ro°ect that would be' ex=
pensive to serve.
•„. ,._ ~ ~:~, ,rte ~-, ' ..,.,...,...
Prior to making its recommendation the Plaririirig'CommissYon shou'ic~
consider the following 'based on ayai`labYe or ob tainab„le infor-
mation; `
1. Need at this point in
of development propos+
2. Impact of AR 2,zoriing
-'upon 'the- Commttn`ty at
following:
time fo'r the type aril""density
.d by the applicant.
for the appficant's property
large with regard to the'
a) Thg recedent this ':a Iidation may establisFi"with
P PP
re and to `the remaining private land in 'the Smug- '
gler Mountain area; `
b) The presence of radiation and subsidende:'on the
site as a resu,lt.of.past mining operation"s;
c) Pedestrian and vehicular ,access and„circulation
in an area presently restricted b'y add~tte trans-
portation'problems (the ongoing T'ranspor''ta'ton
'.. .;..
i; ~- - -
i..
.. ., .
y .. nsulted prior to-;...any" Pla ..:..::::... .~..,,.,. ,..,..::
nnin
Commissionlrebommenda,t n); ~ y,.,,,,-g.
d) Commercial needs of future residents of`theryF,'
Williams Addition and~~,how rvthis'~ relates to' axis' " ` " ""
ting commercial areas. and, to.G~:ity and ~ouii;ty"
policy with regard, to future, `comisTeYCial ,level-, ;
opment; ,
e) Definitive school site.,requiremerits as'dis-
cussed ,in ,the„General.Plan; '
f) The effect of granting additional AR 2 zoning
ning
in the Aspen area when an abundaxice `o~~ zo'""' '
in this same-density and use category already' '
exists in;ari undeveloped; vacant {state';'
g) The relationship between demand fo`r additional
community facilities aril service 'created"b'y the
pxoposec~ development and the ability of"the ` '
develo meat to substantiall ~a 'its own way in
P Y„ Y
providing said facilities and~se~vices,an~",there- '
.:.. ..
p g upon the gene"r"al'
fore not Y' lac`n tkiat fiuY~`en' "' " "
taxpayer.
There should be an, understanding between the applicant ,.and 'the
Planning Commission fhat`f AR 2 zoning is'granted for ,the"sub-'
ject property that it shall be,incumbent,u~on'said applicant "'
to include within any Final Development Plan for PU~7:'the follow-
„ . ,. ,
ing provisions for''Planriirig"~oinmission app>•ova1:
i
1, The protection of the Salvation Ditch, and control of
any effect seepage or faalu`re of tfie `ditch might have
on future development. 'Access`~to"'and along the ditch
must be preserved; ,
i
2, The preservation and,maintenarice of open space'; ''
3. Provisions for landscaping and conservation of, existing
,trees and vegetation;
4, Vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle circulafion:witliin
said property 'to include a pedestrian easement `along
the southern Boundary for future ~'ccess to"`schools;
~,
5. 'The placement.of all 'utilities underground;
6. The ensurance_;of access ,adequate to minimize conflict
with traffic Having the hospital as a destination;`
7. The phasing of construction of theA~projec~ t`"""co -
w, P y y .. ,<MY. ,..Y, .,, . -,..4~"tie„con-'
cer~i ~mentionedand Count abg%t' to ,s'olve` _ ~` ~"
move with re and to need and impact;
. try' ~a'+A }>;,~ i.. .k".N..~1 . ~,i ' .r a )~ ~ .'.~ ~ .'^
-J ... <:fa .3N;'", F. ,} y _a.g.n"r, ~v y I,~,ty r „~ u w
a3""y'MG~5 ~u1 .. ..~ Eyy, ~~~'. (Yi Y.Y .`~SiP r.l .9
1 +` i ~
-.:... _ .
.. ,.
,..
,..~.
.. - ,, , ., .~.... ... ' .. ~ .. w
,- .,
.. ,.
..,
- 5 -
g ~` ba ;
8. The de g set ,._,
heights; of,;bixldn locations`; -`"' ,cks and,
si nation ,,, ,..„ c.
9. The establishment of a,fnal_density for the `p'roject
not to exceed,recommeridaton of the General.,Plan;
10. The provision .of adequate `off street ;parking;,"
11. The provision~of the type of land use called for in
this area by the GerieraT PTari. '
._
" . ~ .,'
,,.,
;_ .
i- ,',
,,
j.
~.
4
.~!.! h.. Ih"
4 " ~~~-.+
w~ j. ~ ..
P100RE' NIEN_0 fi0 GUY H. 'n~00DS-
,_... _,.. ~..~..r.avG,
sr 15.1972
SUBJECT: JOURNAhISM_IN DEPTH (~ ~
Dear Guy, ~~ "C- ~J i~
' ~ . Y P _.
I am sharing the following re..earch.ttiith ou in ho es that
you will be able continue„the type of article in depth'`tfiat
Greg=Baby Lewis did... on the. Sub, Div Section 36, in your Oct ? issue...
Such.;~.rticles are very time consu~ing and expensive. to re e2rch.
,5. ,.
And yet this sort o£ information ~s necessary for an educated`
responsible,cit~zenry, and just as neC~essary'for an informed ,;
responsive local government.
This research was started and not completed on the hunch that.,
_. ,. ~-..,.-~-,~ . ~d..<.,~.~, ~~~,ro _ ...
a comparison between the",Pitco P&Z I~~ notes and Resolut_ons on the ,'
.. ~».m ., n w..<awn:.....wrti-F~,wwaa.~„t4w.nru.n,..~.+,wz¢~wY.nar~+,.w~,5atrpt~+~2~:'m~4~e +..~~-~, tl
Woody Creek housing project and the P;c;Culloch re zoning reque$t
for Smuggler T"Itn would reveal Baxter and Baraynard's gonfhct of
4 ~~"~''Inbm~v.h .#n V<~ruh--<1f
interest ,problem. __, ., _: ...
withou
And this,s what I, of into and I of rn reall dee
g - g .y P t
even reading the 6doody Creek stuff...
A published list of your founders includes Commissioner Baxter,
Councilman Comcowch, and P&Z alternates Dr Barnard, Irv Shecter'
and Yr1. Koster Tfie financial and/or moral support of these Paper
,...
Tigers presents some problems for your editorial in3ependence.""'
. ,..~,
Thus; the following research"brsngs°up`the responsibility of an
editor to ,disclose these associations when commenting on City ~
., .,, , ,.
and County business.
I cannot use"all this stuff",for ,my column which is a fable on
our human foibles.. I find that when I use facts I am accused of
NNW _. y,. .u,c..I *x, ., cn. .nr*T n1*1;yx~.¢,. ,tt"
,._. .,u w.. ,~_....,.
mud slinging, and when I, use comprehensive thinking I am accused
of confusing.
Dunaway has never. responded to my ideas on jeurnali~m in depth
_. . , i
because of the fact ttiat,it doelf~t make money and investigative '" `
.w ..,., .. ~...~. ..
reporters are no,t available.. ,_,
r
_ ,I I
BACKGROtTND: __
,.. ~ , .
:.: :...___ .., ... ., .,-, r.. .,1 ~-.+.r,e v. ..w,'~,Fr~ .+.. »A ... w.^.is~ vue r r?x5 x. ~. L
. ~:,
~m ~ ~n ~, a
.. ,...
After three visits to the Courthouse I got part way thru the
.._ ., ~
quest £ile. It consists
P&Z file on the MgCulloch re zoning reM ,
of these official docum,ent_s:
ginal a _ ,, y Tri-Co. 2/28/72.
A. The on ppl~cation for NYcCuh och made b
B. The Pitco,P&Z Resolution denying the application. 7/6/72.
:, ~ ~ ,.
C. The Resolution of the Bd of Chanty Commissioners denying the
application,. 8/11/72.
The P&Z Minutes,covering this period were not readily available.
~~.
And the County Commissioners Minutes ditto To cover these hiatuses~~~
,..~~ .~..~ ~ ,_.t~~~~
.,
I macTe several discreet nquiries to confirm,;,my impressions. ''
... .
I have every confidence that,_my sources are. correct and sincere,
I records when they
but it remains for me to, examne the off~cia ,~,4 .,..a„
become available. "
y rnard moved the motion to
Well m hunch was oorree't. Dr Ba .w.w. ur,.. n, p ,,~ ,
~- .. ,~..ti~~.,m..,,~yra,, ~,,.,..
y ~ ~ g q r. Baxter approved the
den McCulloch s re-zon_n re uest. Dy
y~ Irv Shee. P ga• p 'P _.
Count s denial, ter s oke out a inst this ro osal'for
permanent res~dent,,~;ous ng. - .
r ntial conflicts o,f
Nowhere do „find any disclosures of pote' ,.
interest on the part of these officials AIl'are concerned with
u~.,a.., ..,
housing in the immediate Aspen area.
The criteria for conflicts of interest set by Dr. Comcowich
._, ,..a.=N.~ uxwwx..,,w.w,. amM~a+xwx+wgt.~~kan w.~:^k8~"~"+~d'.~+"-"b+ ~m6:1y"„'~;',~.wa.~v.. _ .,
and Barnard. in ths_Robin Molny matter establishes that,a conflict
~._n._~~. ..~ ....~:. ~,,.. ,.,. ,:: .~.
of interest. may. exist if an offcia_1 has an:'n6estment in a
~ ~ five ,acres for,
lsr~e sub-dv dealing-in sites of more thar~
sin le fam~l dzaellin s within ~ seventeen.mle of,As en.'
~,.
This established standard ~s obviously more than broken by the
`f o u °t~'rcas.wwKq r
.... .o .... i.
parts played by your three assgciates in•the,McCulloch case
.ut ~, ,
-* .. ,. x, _~.{.
Broken Hell it is ra ed. Well we all have'eur crosses to bear !
But this research is only a scratch on the surface, for as I
.,..
read through the file and chased aroundythe,Courthouse I realized
. _ tin .. , - ~., ~ ~,,. .,
Y 0. . _.... .... ~ „ ,,. u
had found ans
that I had found man more ueStions than ,I r veers,.
,..
. _.
,.
_W
3
GREAT SCOTT ! IS THERE MORE ??. Oh, Yes, Baby, there's too much
Moore .
Following , in no particular order 2re the rough questions I
uncovered in running thru the file. Ask yourself how long it
will;. take., your inquiring reporter to get at he answers.
1. Conflicts of .interest.
Where is the code of ethics for
4mo regularly checks the public
uniri'tentional violations?
Why don't we have a set phrase
local officials? '
.~ ... ..~,. . ~ ,F-.. ,... , a~. ..x
record for undisclosed or ,,
Eor all chairmen to,'use at the'
' y official actions?
start of all discussions and on all votes on
This'disclaimer should be automatically read by the Secretary
... ,w .o ..k, ~ ~ ,,._
before all roll call votes.. , ~ ., .., :..
2. headership
In order to get the benefit of the best talent in a smalltown
~.+-~ •:
it is obvious that we must make allowances forrconfhcts of interest
~ ,..:,:
All the most talented and e.b1e people will be involved in many '
activities. To deny the community its best brains would be foolish.
~+lkiy don't we ask the Aspen Bar Association to come up with
Resolutions on a code of ethics for all local bodies to adopt
!; _ ~ ~ .. ,
3. Official Minutes
Aspen has a long history of difficulty iri producing and '
._..
maintaining Mi_hutes. In addition to having a mailing list of
ZXer'ox copies, Wkiy not keep copies of copies in one file readily
available in one place ? This v~ould keep up'the pressure to keep
Minutes current which is_basically a budgetary"pri5blem: It would
make, research much easier on allrc,oncerned,rIt is_rather akward:~
.,
to go into very busy govnt offices and ask for Minutes when
they are scattered around in pieces.
4. Housing. '"
The file discusses housing timing and social need, but nowhere
to my knowledge is there .any housing study or official policy'."
What has happened to alI'the old housing surveys conducted in Aspen?
_. .. ~.
°... ... ,. .,..a ... ..Y av .e.r .- .r~~ ...e ~ ( FS f-~~
t~
~~ .;~-.
~- ~ < .;.
~. ~.
Why hasn't the Inventory Plan data on hous Ong 'been"updated?
Harve wHaletre ort=oyee to guest ratio determined ~n 1965? 1
.. ., . ..` p .w. ~.. _ .., ,i
y p edly had difficulty finding Highway employees,
~ z.... .. , ... , ..
unty F&Z know what„
Co
who lived close enougs ex Aspen. Dogesn t the. p ,
,....k.
problems the County periencin ~ All public em loyee'housing
should be surveyed and needs projected to meet the„officialWry}{x
..,~ . ,~
plans for„gro*ath in all~~public depts and,a?led districts,
authorities, etc.
5. Timing
This need.is completely m~ssed.by the P&Z. Re
to McCulloch!s short and long term housing plan
the PPxZ is :ignorant that_,the Master Phan,~~p,~?
The capital improvements„„budget for~Crculatiori,
Utilities and Public Facilities shows nothing be
next twenty years. And this plan is ignored!comF
denial.
'r7hy don't we use our official Planpwhenwe sf
proposals?
6. Social Need.
The denial states that no socal~need
applicant. 'rlhat social needs does Aspen Y.
...,. «, x .a..
... .,,~.,~-.~_. ~ .~:.ws~:xa..r~aa~._ „ ham..
Task rorce social costing mechenism„eves
applied to_Aspen proble~is ? Enyironment4l
is used based. ,upon this evaluation,techn~
even begun to grasp what it means, ;
ding the denial,,
liscloses that
growth
re=zoning
the ''
~ScHa'rg°s whol'e' inventory
ze~ and 'the P&Z_ hasn t
7. A~~ Zoning is in abundance, (AR-2)
Denial lists this as a reason for turning doen Mc Culloch but
there are, no otmership naps and location,and density studies to
hese other
pp P ,.{ ., and holdings are
su ort the ~m licat'on tha , .
suitable or planned for th s u
. , se ~.
Why doesn't the P&Z_,reahze the need for these important
~4 ~.. -.~
supportive studies ?
,. ;:.
8. .Sewage Toad.
,,; ~~ ~ u
.....,, .,.~_ ~.~,._.w~m .~., ~»~
-~ ,.K ~, ,
~ , ..
..,... _. ..., a,..-:,.« .ru-.F~«s~.u..u.,. ~ a-:.v .~.i' iY, ' ?^~a~4. ~awu~zaass..~wi n.o.:wwsa~. r^~;`.,~+--,~+'vP a~ a . -ra x:~r,2,~ .. ,:..
_:y ...,.:~~ ,
i
The P&B denla,l F7as partly based upon inadequate sewage. in F
• ,_. ,~ _ the '
Smuggler are2.. ;
where is the ,P&Z's Publ,~c Utih ties Plan for the next 20 years
o „- ...,.. .. ,,,., a ...w.
:.,~>v xe+,yy~t^~r, m4.,»~e~k3Nk~d.SWfn9om.a.JWaa~,PA r.F=mc.,. ~a'i! ^.u v,;~~=_:..
The existing official P&2 zoning for the area is for R-,1.5
density which is the density requested'by the appl_caht on a firm
,..
zonin is
contractuq,l basis.__T~us, the P&Z s own..' g "iiadeauate" if {
' 1~
they can prove the~Tc^point. 7hch they,don t because the, Metro,.
• serves the area, `
San plant is slated.•for, groiath to 47,500 and ~ Y- N_
Why doesn't the P&Z refer to. the rietro Plan before making ''
~.,r., ~ ,._.
. < •~ ~ q~. .. ~~.~.~, ,~,„.~ „~,
decisions and check orzth the District on capacity and timings ?
. n.aw. ... nuw.x..yw.m .Jrv.W~a/ ~nwwr*~ L: Yw4MT.}o-Y. `I.. v
9. Circulation and. Transportation.
P&Z claims roads In the Smuggler area,are,,,inadequate for the
.;.. _ _r ~ ~_~, project. Of course this would make them inadequate for the P&Z's ,
own rZ-15 plz.ns for the, area,
wYiere is the Circulation and,nTransportation Plaa'for-this area?
The City has the speoiic legal responsibility for a Plaster
Road Plan extending three mile's beyond its borders, specifically
for the purpose of approving or disapproving sub-divs oh its fringe.
,., ., , .,~, o-.
1~Thy hasnt the City adpoted such .a Plan?:Why wasnt~ the~City
consulted by the g County P&Z on this proposed development well
within the ~hree,mle l~mit~ s ~~ ~~
` 3.. i:~. fi .. L n ..
The whole policy and concept of P.`fT:D type development is ~ba:5ed
P ~• g Y t they°may'be served
u on desi in densit concentrs.tions ~o tha
by transit systems and to save money on building and ma~ntangng
roads that are spreadout by cookie cutter sub-divs.
This is ,also true of clusters and public utilities.`
..
Doesnt the PFFZ have any understanding of the'merits"of P.tJ.D:
zoning.? ,
10. Public Financing.
The P&Z-.has no concept of the. plans, problems and timing of
major"public utilities and facilities.,. The financial requirmehts„
and timing for public expenditures of._this magnitude are based
upon, long range .growth to`rep~.y the bonds.. '`
_ .:..
Why hasnt the F&Z brought all the districts together to discuss
the heeds in financial plaxining a:rid timing? ~ `` ~
,._ _
,_ __...
' , ..
a...,. a.
., . , ~, ~ ..~~:w~~~.
There is a great x~ misconception currently held by 'the Planning
De t. It is m ossible for a communit to purchsse all the RO
p _ p ~, Y W' s
it needs at once ei~There is no need to .Stampede the taxpayers by
claim_n'g that~publc lands grill be lost forever , of we do not buy
_s axt of the law of the land that offi^H
them at once.... it ~ p cial
plans should sho~r future lands needed for rods, damns, schoIDls, `
utility ROST!'s,airport extensions,etc,etc. This is done with maps
backed by comprehensive planning. Any gainer of private land
building on or near these reserved tracts has no recourse for
compensation.
Why hasn't the P&Z done this necessary planning It is indicated
clearly in the General Plan but not off~cially~backed up by the
nation plans and ro rams'.
necessary studies and supporting coord'~ , ~„ p g
_.., . _
12. Open Space.
The present official PAZ R-15 cookie cutter Sub-div'plans for '
'the Smuggler area reveals a lack of understanding of its own '
official concept and policy on open space. Public opinion in
P~lspen has demonstrated its belief in open space...
ace'
47Yiy doesn't the PF~Z~ have 'an evaluation yof the overall open sp
throughout the Count, and particularly in the high d2nsity Aspen
urban area ?
15. Real Estate T•;arket.
R'he present trend in Aspen area real estate is toward higher
prices and more sales. The over 80 real estate,sales people are
very definitlely churning the market and inflating comm9.ssions
based upon the P~cZ's actions that make land develop~erit
increasingly difficult and expensive. The P&Z's policies have,
a wider implication than lining the pockets`of'salesmen.
What social mpLcations are there in the P&Z'S policies
that increase private profits 2nd increasingly zone out the
people who cannot afford the Aspen prices ?'
____
°"I ., a.
1
I
i T
4.
~-
~.. _E ~ is ~ f. ~.. r.
17. State.. of the ,Art. "''
The problems Facing Aspen are very common throughout the
s on these problems, experience and possible
U@A,' Pubh,cation
-the knowled e ex lo$ion
solutions ire a part of g p
Who on the P&Z regularly rev~evrs current trends and reports
on them ?
4Tho on the PAZ t~.kes, field trips and interviews on this
information that ,has application in aspen?
~ p _ d travel, spent?
How are the bud eted funds for ubh cations an
,g g Y ~ P this?
What is ,the bud et for the bbm'n ear. V~hat Tans on
Budget. _ .
With all the-obvious holes in the P&Z performance- '"` ""'""
rw ,.
5Tlat provisions are being made in the depts budget requests
,,. ~ .v.. _. .,., ,..~., ~ ,.., ,._ .,
to sm~x~ provide the manpower and money neec~ed`to raise the
level of P&Z performance to the need of a rapidly expanding
urban resort area? ~'
.. i
DeaT~ Guy, ~. .. ,, , -
I really don't expect many people o get excited about all these
., ~: .: r ~. ~ ..,
questions. Trl'nat I do belLeve is that the people need and a"re ~ " '
look~n for leadershi that can uietl and continually work '
g p q y , , :,,
at this level, `
' e coming County Commish election '~
The basic issue I see in th,
is this need for a high'"level Leadership tb,fill the obvious
vacumn.
Proper executwe leadership would find ways'to help and
encourage research into govnt affairs: It is tb our own best..,
,; .: r
interests as journalists to get this type of leadership
,,;; .~., ~ ~ , ,; r
„:. ..t ~. ~, r n.. c~
because it will ,save us time and money and also develop a
.. „... ,,
better audience for artcles,,,in depth.
It's really no mystery why I say after all this
- , _ , _ „~.. ~ ,.,,,., _.., ,,,_ .,.~~ s ._ ~ ,.
.,,, ~ ,-~~.. ~~- r..~+~ ..,.h r,.
BE BRAVE CCI~D~E EI>`tTdR° ~~ ~~~`~
'! .. ~,:, ~.. , , ., . ~. ~ ~ .r.
knebX~
... ~ ~ ,_
. ~.., ,,,_ .. ..;a~ ....~.~. .A,~ ~,~ ems„ ~,. ..- ~ ~ - ~,.
----
~a {~ g' »'-*_ Z. '^, «.' ~ ~~~ f ;,"7~ t»f , °P°n, ~ y, ~..s : ~' •<r Hrr i ~ ~ , ~ ~- f Y ~ ~ .. ,
s YR r r f di'rn s .~u `Swhy+ A' ~ d /~ a.~.. ~,(J f•.1 (, -r, i
°;~ B' ' ,.'r; ~ ~.•~ a.i ~,. q7M+'..3 x»s ' t P : ~,a~t ~ G.>U „,mac f t ~ . ~„
r~ _ j' y$'v 'gra4 ~ A s\ ~ ~'
e~~^ ~s<~ ~'la'~. L;S BS "..~:^'ri .e' 4 A~, Rx~`k'~ r.~ .i'~- ~""•~.3'~.'-6'.•', S:Jt F."~. -~'~ ~~, ~-+.~ J~ fi` `sa ,. i ~, ~ „
-~. ~, 9{ d ~.'~„-R'.x,..,s~ ~°i.$t•:; a %.c..Y~:° ~ ~"...1,^°~y`~' ~"~.~, d%Ge, '- ~'4. •'a~a., i, r i~# +` :~.<w e.~s,~' ~;
/ @'.~..C..d.~++,;,..j r+~Y°J~.y.~ ~ t..u'a.,t,..yn S, ,. vk .~P ~,:fi/+~+''ua.r . %'a. 4.. w-~.~^k ,.fi. ~, `°" K'"W , G°,'.n'i":,.51nn! F(~" ~ ~~
F%`,.~ u c gyp'!';:-°"u"e. • w'.s„) ~a-'~`s'p ~ c.-`~ ~ ~~?. f.~a. c,: ~.-ts'>.x' '~~`r4 ~~~, ~a ~'t';.:"'LEr~~,,,$.'t~ ~t~ ~~
"~ t y~
~ ~ p r.. l i F
t ! 4»
i,'..4 c K x:=-+..:..~ ttttti ^ ~,'~ ~k`~it~a G f kM1 ° ^ s .~.t~:. ~ r - . •' r5~ y ~ 4 ' /~ r3 ~.',
k.f:'~:.1 ,~ „C ,..c 'fC - i -,vr`-r ~ '^ r'p ~,t?.o '1.4n aa',4 ";t (,F ~~ ,
~ %fr~ f r~r s, . ' F,~'€' f ';'•,ra ~F„3 .:a+ 6° fit:.'. ~ .a ^" f` ~ , .Nr ~.p•...~t ~Py a .y, r~.• ^}..~y',~ ~ ~`
^-•~ k-, -
x'i ^. ~R .,.~,t^'i"~. ~' +` as ~ is f :r^: ~7~r) e^'F ^4~ ~G~r'iw-,: fl'L.. ,u~L.RY «~~ -~Lt.P 4 i M'+.,. '~ c~4' ;^ '' F" ~`
,l d" r f i rpy m `F : s, ~ q i
t.~; ~, ~~t.;{`,."'P.v `y r-~'-:~.~;, it ~f, f..~~°~4, ~C f s_~Y?` t `d :.`r ~-~} P'p [` a d~ ~w. P'~ i ~,...~ F
r « a + f ;"`^'K t-~~y8&i•. w~rb.. ~ i='',a.t~. ~ "~ .^.x. C'$~ i.{.n6 ~ t t.t i" er `' r . _. 1~ ~ , , . ~, c
`~~ ~' - i ` ~ Y ~t ~ ' ~ t.~ ~ .C at ~~ ''• / ~"' -' s ~ w... i ~,,.{p f i„.~ .t F"`~ ~ ~B!^ r ~ d ~: u
R'J' GL.t "°f~`t,~°C:;s u. :,- V~.%,i c-..~G "'r"~C ~` ::s-, ~.i t,~'.d, t. ~ C`~av.e~~_^~ ~'.'t .(~ >'t..« tI w r'
ggi°_"''i„p, .+..,.' ~ j/, ~ ~%~'•e.., C,.<Y_~r ~, ~3 c-t . wy j~ -,.y~~ r~h","'tFf~,; 4' wa F, f.~f`e~, ;~„~q- o ~~ ~ ~,,
`pr`~ j '""f ~<i- B /`I:. ...f~'`~ d ~ "P'S,t "r.,.n," ',, ;f 'f F i,~` ~' yfMS `w ~r-.*-d ~d.4 it r C,_ r i h'x f~4~ G n°~ ~ ~ •'
`'`,.w .,.. ~' .k 1 ~
1 4y} ~.. "'pc.'. {:i ~ ;.^C .f %'~~C A ~ ,rs ? rf').„;1a i~ ' aw~w'tr) ~ .~. .'~' ~.ne°: •;, IC' 'i~t-`t'r~~
`~ Hg~~ *,T'..'~ pF,., $rp, p° d`)'_ ~,t :b .. ~.rr',i'1, 1"- {~•'µ_if ~`p..a.: a. ~"~„.G ij~ - `c:
~ < , d4 ~y
r7 a n .a' xCr ~. (~ir. fp ^4 ~'i>"..{ ,~.^'~: di r'~
;'
k F 2 ylg ,,^~ g, `
a x.~.e ~.f s:4'.~e «~~s ~ ~•~'-8f ~i„,. C'~,;~x ,? (''eo•b. e~•~Mi a~~~2-t`.4r'1,. i/'+-7,F;+"..~':; •;r•,°.•eaf /'~.. . i•h"'7'i...t,,,P:a:y
,9q ...". ~ ~ 45 ~.f
~~~t''k ~~t%' ~$ /".~'' ^&' .r` F"~°5 ~rfrf° ~~'`~ +i ~,+. .a ,^ ~.'.d u l r. : ~ " L' C'°, '~~ pd m, ;r a" ~•
p .~ 6 1 ..*
(~4 +~w~:d,R. ~f^ ~ ~i v";`..o (•^;, ~„y~~~'..5, t,.•.(d~:. ~i`.$.'":~;~~i-.'-k".-~6nt~,.. i.~',•.a- +:wwp.-:.. k.r7, ~a@~.%7.e*:~ L:f'"w:.
wt"«4^v~,p ~,.n ~'.~"d~'~ a ~x't4 ~, jd GoF~ ~ i Ma, ~'„.~ry. >pj'4"'-.'i- w~oiw,.a:'~:'^vi ~%.,..^~'P+.s:* C,.y~. j s a t~t
~~.'.e°(~'J «Zh..~- K; `r: {J "6ty' i./i""'.,.~ Mtg°'2;.~ i+.-t5l (i'a".,.•w.~~ ~°~~p.C,+~r"tf. rte,, ~.• ~~a1 .-3 r3 ~}•, `ArS+i s~',p
l~..E.`i~(>vp~.<:.. ~ ~t„ ~a°'W i;w ~' °~"-S?,-~:,~ '~ G`.s *1 .+'` +'^»'- ~:'~'~.', 4.,:.e ~fyrb, w^~.~9~. #~a'wi. ~,; " /p.) ~~-~ ~^~'~..,~'r
~+, S;. e !
tv.~p Fg:~yv ~"~~.~~ ~rn~. ~~i (".:.5."'t~ 5" Y4, "'V Aft F < ; ff f (.~ f •f.'. n. .
K t F
1L~-~ eG`~ R`~~_~aj~,,rf,~.!~.:_ y~'.,fs t'•t w ~',~ ~ ~~e+"~ ~~'~ ^W-9~ ,!s"6 %~'~.nl~ J"<! a'n ,
I
„ _~
.,, ,..:._ ~ fp .
/~ ~,y e
.. ~• • ~ .
r4 `"
a
/ ~I ~' ,
{ .
.r-, .,,. ...,.,.._.
-...
~Ii e, a _, e, .. ~ ,
y/ i O _ ~/ vrr~ 1"
1.04 a
w.:... bit ~,.
Oi
r
e
s e ~ I
t.,
~~. _ - . .. /~~ eA
~ e • e
~ - -
~, ~
+,
{~ a..
3, ~
~ ~ ~ w..
~ '
.,,.. .,
-.y.-, _ ..- ._.._~--..
-:,a~
~ "tH ~cl i r5~ t "4 'r''iiEG{ *`N mi i. t, M N~ Ktiu*J. v+se I'y r, ~~ wJG
,. ,z .~. >;,;
V ~ I' ~... .....ems. ~~f.
® y~. r
4.. ,.,- : ~ y I
w~
1 _ ~.
.. .. i.
<.,
•.
.._ • ~ ... ~. f ~~
I
.. .. .... ..~.. ,._a...,,,,
_. . . ,.
w..
°/~~
.~//~~.I ..~ .
~ ~ ~ ., - M ~
(`mow//
-~ ~ h 1 . .~ - .._.- - t, ,..,..,~ ....-, ..,, . _..~,..,.. .... ~ ....., . .
`d
i { +o a F '4:~
MNi4
1 I , ~;,, - ~'d
.~
:
~ .;,,.»
i ~, _.~ _ -
r .. aR'`IY.. _'Y'. .. _
~I i
-..--+r-.~ur.
I
... Y ~ , ' . ,_..._ ..__
i ~ ~ - .-
y ,. _.:.. ~ _ __... __ ~ I
r.
.
r
,.. ~ .~,~
1 ,,. u ~
.7_ i 1 ~_-., I ~ y.,:. ~'+,o, r v; i! wi +.;, ^,e- - ~: yr ^fi'''ttl"^"'S1^' '6 °' S ~'+^`~ r-~f~'~s ~ .en
.I j ~ I .. - ~j~." ~,' a i~.
., , . ;:
,
, ;;:~
,. .
. •4
~, . ..~._.,.~.w,._~.,,,.
_.
:.x , r.,.
.~ 1 ~ _ orb N ~':
,~ ~.a
~. ~., .; .
:y .....
°a
i'Y a
7
1
r i
...~
r w+~ ~ . '
l+d.•K el
F~ '. ..; ~' ~ 4 n ~ • $Y^YMm 4~^`W'n ..eerrv^eyy,wr yqF, v,
i, ~ ~ _.
,.~ : a: ,.:~::.
~. .. ,. _ ._ .,.p: .~...
.~
/z'
d
k - ~
' li~„ r _ ~ ~ ~,0 ~,S ~~n ak'kv Ae 4,e 4"h~a- ~*~k.ch^
7 .., '~ cM .+.v irvx.ys. h,na x r '..,~~k~mR>..,v j~ ~& F
r ~x 5~
t s «w
.. ... .. r,.v. Y~rY._ ~ -.wy.y,y, C; ktxmi
~ i y}
I ~3
3 d -~ ~ }i"" Asi ti kk ~"`»ar d„v,;,'~ s^ix'".i't,^+~
i i ~- ..
F, r
.v - 4 ._ ~~ ..,
1 ~~. ~ ~T~CFF'~F~ "~%"W - ^"~ `c m.-r- JY Y rig ..gym ^NSr~a~^^'a^~:'a M~^~:t
6 - z"3'~ cM" '"eb §ns+sxsy~; a - Ca"--'< ~~ N '4`'` x ~F mi r.i ~ ~R"~~,w:'~s.'u's
t 1 ~. { .1 k,. .~..t wn „u ..p, .uu..z ~ ~ m...y A:. ,mow m
f
y~`r~~~V ~ d~
F
from one of the largest tracts of open land remaining close
to Aspen. Our proposal provides great benefits both to the
residents of Aspen and to the eventual residents of the de-
velopment, by eliminating the drawbacks of a conventional
subdivision development. Some of the advantages of our pro-
posal are outlined below.
Economic
1. A P.U.D. development in this area would increase in-
come through taxes while requiring a smaller expen-
diture for community services than a conventional
subdivision. Expenditures for snow plowing, bussing
of school children, maintaining utilities and roads,
and providing police and fire protection would all be
less. The extension of existing utilities to serve
the development would be at the developer's expense.
2. The proximity of the development to downtown Aspen
would reinforce the vitality of the existing business
district.
Transportation
1. The impact on the existing transportation facilities
would be much less than for a conventional subdivision.
The entire development would be within walking or
bicycling distance of the center of town, thus reducing
the need to rely on the automobile.
,, ~ ~ : , i.
~~~ i ..
2. The developer is willing to participate. in solutions
for the existing transportation problems in this area.
We are prepared to offer a great deal of background
material and surveys in addition to possible financial
participation. We also have the design and engineering
capabilities to work out solutions to road and bridge
problems.
3. A concentrated, compact development such as we are
proposing is ideally suited to be served by any kind
of future mass transit system. Only one station would
be necessary to connect it with any eventual trans-
portation route. A conventional subdivision does not
have this capability and at the present time there
appears to be no way to economically serve a dispersed
area of single family homes.
4. Small children will be within walking distance of
school, thus reducing both automobile and bus traffic.
Environmental
1. The development is in the right place. Tt is close to
the center of town and would reduce the need for other
developments further away which would increase traffic
and congestion.
2. It would not alter the existing view and use of Smuggler
Mountain. This is in line with the proposed city view
ordinance.
~-,
3. A large park would be created for the residents. This
park would border land currently leased by Pitkin County
as a park and the combination of the two parks would
assure that nearly all of Smuggler Mountain visible
from town and much of the land on the top of Smuggler
Mountain would always be open space.
4. A pedestrian walk would be provided through the devel-
opment which, if easements were obtained from other
landowners, could eventually be part of a continuous
pedestrian path from one side of town to the other.
5. The land on which we propose to build is currently
occupied by mine dumps and junk. This land would be
rehabilitated and some of it converted into a park.
6. The proximity to downtown, the southern exposure, the
emphasis on pedestrian and bicycle traffic and the
imaginative design of the buildings will result in a
good place to live, an example of good urban planning
and a credit to the community.
o..
~. ~ _ ... ,_ f. _.,~ a...~..x~,
,.,
„.
.. .w ., _.. .. ..,~sw.v., wa.. w;~~u uwu-.j.nwP' ,.«..,_w... ~.p..w3+., a. n~.a.»w<, ,e~'+2^u<xx-~-y!., .. ,,..'a ~ .+ccea rr g.,un .vE.is.~S~u,:tiu2~:~,
~-
_ _ ~`~
` .e...i•. ..:, .,.
~v°`u.+... 1 1. ... ... ~.:... ... . .. ...... . .. .. y.-, i i:. E ..- .~ J ^..
I.
l
B`
~~, ~ _
,•.€ T~~¢~~~ ~~,Yc`i~~'^~`aVtu~~~~~~.~ ~@~.£m oX~1730
span'
PI'anning • (?e~sigri• Surveying • f-:ngineering • Construction Colorado 81611
and Managei-nent of Land 3iJ3.925 2688
,,. ,.
~~
January 24, 1972
Gentlemen:
Ptkin County Planning and Zoning Board
Sincerely, /,
.'" 1 f
~~r1.~~ .. ,L
George W. Nelson
President
This letter ca7:I constitute an applration to
'rezone several tracts ofland on Smuggler'
`Mounta.i.n owned by Tod of Asoen, Tnc. A de-
scription and map,show:ng these tracts'is
attached to this"letter. ' '
These tracts are"prpsentTy zone3 R-15 and R-3b:
The requested zoning is ~i12-2.
This change is bEing requested so as t~? allow
-the concentrzted use of building'sifes at~the
base of Smuggler Prountain in a planned'unit
development. Only a smal_t portion of ~he'total
land 'will be, utilized, and' the ultimatg dens~_ty
'will ,not exceed that allowed by the preseri"t
zon9.ng; R-15' and It-30.
dob
encl.:
~. ~iibsidiary of Trico Corporafidn Offices
ff~ ~ '//~
~.. A
~.1 ..._ J
_;. ..._:.. a,..,..: , .. r .,.,. .,, :T:
Request for Rezoning
McCulloch Oil Corporation Smuggler Mountain Property
Description
Parcel 1
All of the following described mining claims:
Alma M: U.S.M.S. 3944.
Alpine U.S.M.S. 6642
Bushwacker U.S.M.S. 6642
Ballarat U. S'.M.S. 4438
Last C~iance U.S.M.S. 6936 A.M.
Della S. U.S.M.S. 3939
Rainstrom #2 U.S.M.S. 6318
Snowstbrn #2 U.5.vLS. 63'18
Fossil U.S.M.S. 6910
Fossil Fraction U.S.M.S. 6910
Cascade #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Contraband U.S.M.S. 4471
Iowa #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Jay Gould U.S.M.S. 1794
Joplin' U.S:M.S. 5914
Joplin #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 1~.M,
Lizzie U.S.M.S. 4702
North $tar U.S.M.S. 6145
Park U.S.M.S. 3935
Rainstorm U.S.M.S. 6270
Regent' U.S.M.S. 3936
Result U.S.M.S. 6044
Robert Emmett U.5',M.S. 6044
Snowstorn U.S.M.S. 6270
Tiger U.S.M.S. 3937
Pride of Aspen U.S.M.S. 7883
All portions of the following described mining claims lying
northerly and easterly of the Della S. - Smuggler compromise
line as the same is described in Book 97, Page 77'of the'
Records of Pitkn County, to wit:
Smuggler U.S.M.S. 1656
General Jackson U.S.M.S. 3941
Glendale U.S.M.S. 6859
Arkansas U.S.M.S. 8394
Chatfield U.S.M.S. 1462
Part of Chatfield U.S.P4.5. 1462
J.C. Johnson U. 5'.M.S. 1436
__.____
.., .
~ti, ~~
.-, ~.
Excludin th
the Rec rds of PitkndCountyed in Book I77, Page 3T8"of `"`
Parcel 1 contains 199.4 acres more or less.
Parcel 2
10a041aacres,tmorerornlessCedescrsbed~aslfo~.lowsontaininq
Beginning at corner No. 9, M.
Thence running N 0°28' W 1215
Thence N 89°59' W 120 feet"to
Thence S 21°09' W 1302.6 feet
Thence S 89°59' E 600 feet 'to
the place of beginning.
S. No. 15047,
feet to a point;
a point;
to a point;
said corner No. 9,
Parcel 3
That part of the Emma Lode, M.S. 2120, the Mollie Gibson
Lode, M. S. 4281 and the Lone'Pine Lode, M.S. 1910
described in Book 234 at Page 48; that parcel described
in Book 219 at Page "271; and that part of the NO'S.. 1/4
of the S.E. 1/4 described in Book 218 at Page 471 that
lies northerly and easterly of the centerline of the
Salvation Ditch, al,l in Pitkin County, Colorado, con-
taining 16.88 acres, more ar less. All of the above
described parcel 3 is situated in the south 1/2 of`
Section 7, T.'10 S., R. 84 W, of the 6th P.M.
r
n ~ i *y. t
T~I®~ 1 V IG~I1G~gPrI 1 IE~I1~' I~Ca.
Planning • Design • Surveying • Engineering • Construction
and Management of Land
January 24,.1972
Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Board
Gentlemen:
This letter will constitute an application to
rezone several tracts of land on Smuggler'
Mountain owned by Top of Aspen, Inc. A de-
scription and map showing these tracts is
attached to this letter.
These tracts are presently zoned R-15 and R-30.
The requested zoning is AR-2.
This change is being requested so as to allow
the concentrated use of building sites at the
base of Smuggler Mountain in a planned unit
development. Only a small portion of the total
land will be utilized, and the ultimate density
will not exceed that allowed by the present
zoning; R-15 and R-30.
Sincerely,
{ i"
~"'f
George W.
President
dob
encl:
t f ~ •.
Nelson'
A Subsidiary of Trico Corporation Offices throughout the West
Box 1730
Aspen
Colorado 81611
303.925.2688
Request for Rezoning
McCulloch Oil Corporation
Description
Parcel 1
~~--~
Smuggler Mountain PYOperty
All of the following described mining claims:
Alma M. U.S.M.S. 3944
Alpine U.S.M.S. 6642
Bushwacker U.S.M.S. 6642
Ballardt U.S.M.S. 4438
Last Chance U.S.M.S. 6936 A.M.
Della S. U.S.M.S. 3939
Rainstrom #2 U.S.M.S. 6318
Snowstorn #2 U.S.M.S. 6318
Fossil U.S.M.S. 6910
Fossil Fraction U.S.M.S. 6910
Cascade #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Contraband U.S.M.S. 4471
Iowa #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Jay Gould U.S.M.S. 1794
Joplin U.S.M.S. 5914
Joplin #2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Lizzie U.S.M.S. 4702
North Star U.S.M.S. 6145
Park U.S.M.S. 3935
Rainstorm U.S.M.S. 6270
Regent. U.S.M.S. 3936
Result U.S.M.S. 6044
Robert Emmett U.S.M.S. 6044
Snowstorn U.S.M.S. 6270
Tiger U.S.M.S. 3937
Pride of Aspen U.S.M.S. 7883
All portions of the following described mining claims lying
northerly and easterly of the Della S. - Smuggler compromise
line as the same is described in Book 97, Page 77 of the
Records of Pitkin County, to wit:
Smuggler U.S.M.S. 1656
General Jackson U.S.M.S. 3941
Glendale U.S.M.S. 6859
Arkansas U.S.M.S. 8394
Chatfield U.S.M.S. 1462
Part of Chatfield U.S.M.S. 1462
J.C. Johnson U.S.M.S. 1436
.. I
Excluding that tract described in Book 177, Page 378 of
the Records of Pitkin County.
Parcel 1 contains 199.4 acres mere or less.
Parcel 2
That part of the Brown Placer, M.S. No. 15047, containing
10.041 acres, more or less, described as follows:
Beginning at corner No. 9, M.
Thence running N 0°28' W 1215
Thence N 89°59' W 120 feet to
Thence S 21°09' W 1302.6 feet
Thence S 89°59° E 600 feet to
the place of beginning.
3. No. 15047,
feet to a point;
a point;
to a point;
said corner No. 9,
Parcel 3
That part of the Emma Lode, M.S. 2120, the Mollie Gibson
Lode, M.S. 4281 and the Lone Pine Lode, M.S. 1910
described in Book 234 at Page 48; that parcel described
in Book 219 at Page 271; and that, part o£ the NSA°S. 1/4
of the S.E. 1/4 described in Book 218 at Page 471 that
lies northerly and easterly of the centerline of the
Salvation Ditch, all in Pitkin County, Colorado, con-
taining 16.88 acres, more or less. All of the above
described parcel 3 is situated in the south 1/2 of
Section 7, T.10 S., R. 84 W. of the 6th P.M.
m.,ac.
_ ~.xte a.wX. ..nmY;.!y.aagw~ ~~'- '4~" r.+.o- 7...s... 1- s.,.,
.'
, .. - .. .. ..- .. t ..
'r ., .,,
e:b.
n:i~+`d
ML". CrE'i~4~SY'~'~ ~`e~.~an, ~r_C S'~C @'cf ..- ..> ,.., .. ,...,.. ..... t J,
t i
'Tri ~~>~ .tagemets~, ono',,, . .. + _, ,-
$tsx 1~(3
AspetY, Ca$ora~ta _ ~ __: ~,
,,.
~' arB ~$Xi tBC~ipC`,'d5f ~Cru!°~~~Yp~iCa ~Xtill~~'t%~Y"E~$Y$~`S" ~ C'~aC~~ o£ '~'-~ ,~ .. .~~/~~
tanct gg~ex ~unta~n arassec~'~iry `s"~rp=of ,1~p~t~, Vic. ~'rar~ i~'~5; ~ °.#fl .
to AI2, 'f'lip .iain3~t^tq`~7; ~§`~°2"issue n£ As~s~ Times ~~"1`~' d'a`rYy't'~se "
requir d"' leg`a"`l" tscrtioe a~ the ~re~aning F'ubtic FCe~tx~n~ setse~uled for ~~'~-
rssaX"y'~ 8, 237, st: ~`'" ~} °'~.; - "fin ~'~'fia~e~i:e~Lin Cnuzstq Cao~t~Laa~se- ~ " ~ - -
-' b ..M ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~ ,;,.. - ' ' '~-v's' '~k fl z cUk. e zz + i ' .5sd ~ s' ,t '
c~.as~est you ce9f.I fisad ~ espy a~ 'LT~`T"'~~~t~k~+~;-.~~.~ ~r ~ i ,.. . - ~ ,.,
2oaing'L~tismri~e~~~katssffi ~-'~a~ regsiizement~~ ~eSati~tg ~a"~~r~zbng~a£'artd.
`YacR wi"~I sl ta'aubmit'"klse ~`o`li~ririg azt~'i't"i~, Sxif~sxtss~ti'vsz"en, tlZe,
Pla'smitig Ctms~r~ssicm i~tt a3cl't~se~~.zi making ,a +#poisian a~ u~~f
~tThe~vteits~ty i' ~~'"`s'atb ~~~ ltttu#~ ~r+~n~'Iate~,a~ t~s +ao~t~^~s~,.a.k >..r.:,., i... .
iP
~gen~z~e 1 ~ nsY~reuxsd in
2,~ TEae',;tY2~ ~tf~ a~'..t'~`~, ~"eig"tom ~~~ F;G~`4a~cta o~~t~ Eli=~.awra' ::,i " -..~,1
r~s~uirtti~ts, ~ ~ ',,;,,~
~~: A stat~s}~~ ie'~eear~ec~ ae to awaila6i~i~y o'~ ~ex,attcl ~~.~ :~v'~.~ {{
s .. .:. y. x 3-r 2 ,Yf m"-"'y •'`.4"'. ^~,'.. -~t>~,t ', -.~+~,.-.,,~~ sx pPo~- r~, ~- p -n: ~I
G. As quix~d by CSse $2ariYiSng' end 7atiirt~ C"tx~i~~La~s'~ gani~tg ,sY ~. ~t
sa~tet~aY! Se~~on ~? 2, 3!oLY mrx~3t ~L~„~ I3:at,4~,e prcwp's'rtp'
aarsie~s s~itl~ixt ~ ~flf3 '~ai~'t,x~adiLt~ ~s~` t~Le~`at eu~~ect tp t~~~iSolg. ~'
tL~ ehe BerSldixt~ ~e~ez+ ~~'atia~ Tie~bury~ ~y ~~t>iaq 11, `!~~'~. 'Rise °,
ilcfisig ~aeTsttieez~ w3'~'i i~ l~tte~ta st3.f~ing""~~Sie ; Ifst e~ property ~
oaer~ of ttg~ re~;ani ~p'pl"icatiis~,
n8 t
Z~ ~P#SuleT be aP~Tec~a~d if'e11 ~£~±the a$~ve i~i'ata~a £~Y1t~`~Y~ttt'~
etrhzniCt~3`'"'tct t` Fit~in+CodL~1ljr gaf.Td~Lig ~pa'Ytnttt ~'~ ~~a'§ ~i5'ihte, at~it
iLi zia c~~e iat~r t'CsaL~ ~'~~Sx~uar}+ 11, I972, ~a thst~a°"iifis~fng grape~rtp ot~Yie~'~
uazlr t+et~er u'~td
~8, "1'$i-tAiit~ aii'~" YLD't. ~, ~ ~', yr, .. ..~
Thank gall £fyg"~SSL"'"LF _., a. t, x .+~> +~;~ c f yak wY~u 1v~`.,F"i~t c, ,'i .. ~, at 'w~:..
- t~.~t. fn t `cs xit8t'~~~' ~ ~ ~ 11
I
'` ( m r,
s- f: J t t J
93tacet'eig
- F - I• 2 ,L. 4 4 -
,, y
4 ~ : s I
' r ~ y-fig t y t ~ t .gyn. w~y *2.w ~ ~Y'" ~ v s x~ .
- .- FMd l ~v1aF. K \ °~` °: ~ p ":" ~ 4 ~t~µ~ 4 1'~ .Yr+:,> ~
' ~ c 71 ~. ~ nSC~rtfR' ~ ~ ', - t
~ ,.~: ~ I , , r ~
a.d_ ,.v„s......v.~ dstu.vv:rox..~..,ex. re r~4^ 'te'a , 2-. ... , ... ,.-.-.`d r ) . .~ ~ 'r ._ _,. ..> .. >! . - _ . ., o. t.
~~ G,_S ~ s`iJ J;
~.
1
:, Gyt}.~ .,
3.. ~
.. ~ i
.~
~Z.S~ L
9
~. ry
Top of Aspen (McCulloch)
<,
_.
,. ,..
Smuggler Mountain
_.,;;,,, approximately 216 acres
R-15 and'I~-30
.:. i.
AR-Z
-
_ .:: _
,, ~,
Multifamilq residential'°l'~~°' ,.,~ ~.,. .,.,,-. .... ~.~.~~., ~ ~_ , . ;w.. ....
„..
.. ~ ..~._ . _
.:, ..
;.r.. ~ ...
,.
_ ~-
, ,
~.
~, E - :,
6
I?:
•, ..
:, _
i
.i
..
- _ .:
: i
,
- ~ ,_ ~ ;
„,
!
„~
~ ~ t J~ -wa~>~ .s~"rB'f^^s ^~ na Fwrr„ ~ w:.ro. e+. y ~7 u€ ~ ~~ * i .yk;9 y..,a ~ t y r 'fl`x..
#{ 4 1 ~ +f
t
$ I ~ f a V F~ l i I 1.
Ip may{ h ~ N ^W' v-M+~ A S!' ~°P
1 +Y
`~» .. I „ .. I' } I ~-s z b. A`I ~C° .{..tom e W at^~ra
r . ~ ....n .~ ~{{.~ rr . x, ir, • rnl ..o `C ~"t+,.t .er.. M~'.'~;~~,b:~,»xr
.. ~ ,~
I _ I i.. .r- I. M.. )vs n:4 n' Fd Jr. ~ii...fyyµnw
I
j.
~0
~~
ii
~. s L. ~/ ^\ ~~
.1L v / (r'1~ l
~~ ,~o' ~U
//
~.. 1. ~~ ~^ ... ..
~z i1
j 5 M v, G „'~. ~ rz. n.,
~= I
' ~ Movr~ T 1 a ,~
'< 5nciGcitR'. :~ n ~~~ n ..
_ ~,. ~,
~ ,R,aI~ 'mil n ~ ~:RCF~::."t' .~~~...._.....<I-~...,_ .,~~,~s~....._,b~
~ ~~ 1, ,;:,.. , . .
PARCFI~ ~3 ~ V ~ ...'' P~ 'I N
y1' o~
I j P ~ ~, _ _ ., _., _
I !i
G ~~~R MCXiNiAiN.F~_ ,. .;-
;. .. ~.
~'~ -
j r wn f4f4
I Yt" ,
I "
r ~~.
f , ~ ~ ~ ., t ~ j a .. ~ ~, d - rwwgrba,efq • '..,,~wr~ Xe^>r'y
- ~ , 1 - .
I ~ _ _ i .~.. _ .._..-21'LL, ..iFy..
. ~ ~.
~.. •~ weNrt ro
. ..,_. ,.
~ ,
~ -
q
- ~ ' ~ ::' I ~
~ ~- ~ ~ - i
~^^-.,. M'..av. .k n.m .. SUake'4µ:6'+'.: r.f. lv..:. .4 ~
~W; »:W+R+"~a.'M k+ifM'~.+N µs ,1
{uJ~kc+~~• p, Wk.+(~ Y~C. gY ,"W i?r*«ki"{at'1M %.-.§tak JS 5+'~'4'kiH :~
Rezoning 72-4
McCullough
i _.
LEGAL NdTICE
-.. ..
NOTICE OF .,PUBI:IC:HEAItSNG K .....,..,;,.< .............,-~-.:.,,..,:,. .__~.,,:.....--. .,F>„ ~,.-
Notice _is hereby given
... that a„"Publ'ic'"Hear,i',g ,' scheduled in the-
_.-,..a_._ . n is I
District Cou~Ytrotlm Count Courth
.
ouse 'Pitkin Co '... . ,
Colorado-
As'pen.
unt` ,
'' .
.
°n
.
, 4
. :,. _: .x
,,.
, . ...
Februar 28th 1972 at 7830 P,M,,
Y ~
to cd'nsideY"'the
.
.. ~ -
ent
owin
foll
the
to
,
.,~,,.~,. T Y
'Y
the
PiEkiri Count'" Zonin Ma" for area'described as follows:
, ^
?" .
Parcel I- All of the following described mining
.. claims': -
Alma
M. U.S.MaS
. 3944
"
, .,,,~,
,-
`., .,_.-:,~
,
,:„.. ..... .
,...
Alpine U:.~,.M.S.. ~ 6,642
Bu'shwacker
U<S.M.S.
~.. ..M.,.„ . ,
""'6"42`
. _.., .,..__ .,w.,,.._.~ .~..._. ...
„~
$allarat U,S'.M.S, 4438
__„ ,, .: , :
,,,.
:.
...,......
.... .,
Last Chance U.SM..S.. ry
,.b935 A:M':
Della S. US;.M,,S,. _ 3939
Ra inst6Ym°"~k2 U'.S .M.S, ~ ~ 6318
..
Snowmtorri"~,F'2 U.$.M.S,, 6318
Fossil U.S.M.S. 6910
Fossil Frac'tion', U:S.M.S. .,. .. ¢5.T.6 ,
Cascade ik2 U:S,M.S. ;_6948_A,:M.
Contraband' U.S,.M; S. _ . .. .. . . ........... .. .~4:~.1 .,,... ,,,..., .., ... .....:.
Iowa ~k2 ., "U,5':M':$":"..:.,M. .. 694$"2i.:.M".,.. .,. .~.;.w.,.~,.v, _.~,.~:,-"...
:
.
Jay Gould U.$.M:S.. ~ 1794,"
Joplin U.S.M.S, 5914 ~ ~ '
tin ~k2
Jop U,S.M:S,
-
~ M...
6948 A.
- _ ~ . ~ ~ ..._....
Lizzie U.S.M'.S. .... - --. ..,~7tl2 ,.,_ ~ .. „
North Star U:S,M,S. 6145
Park U.S,I~LS. 3935 -
Rainstorm " U,S,M.S. 6270 '"'" "'"
Regent U.S.M.S,.- 3936
Result U.S.M,'S, ""6044
Robert Emiiie£t"' __:.: -._ .. ~."S:M.S. 6044
Snowstorn
U.S.M:S.
6
..270 ,"
"" ,A
Tiger U.$.M.S. 3937
b... ~ '-. .. - ._"
Pride 'of As en U:S,M:S. ~ '7~$'3"'
,.. ....
i "
=~
I ..
.
--
' ~ , ..
,--. , .,
yyy$i
"
`am~
"'
-
'~
~
'
'
~
~
1"
£, vT
~,9
~~N„
'
y_y~, ~.~R~. y~4a. a"i ~ ••'^'~ 't~ ~. _w.`~a OaKN.r''' > ~'45~~%~~ ~ '~^S3 W"/l dla`yKN` ~.'4tli Z."~,.~'~~f'~AT~' y.
--
~~ 4
~~' ,=4+'4i~''~g-mss °" ', - - . .. -.
,-
;
' - ~ ~ ..
Page 2 ., _,. -
Rezoning 72-4
,.
,. ~,..
...,-- :,
' McCu1,l~ough - ~, t,;-> .;.u.; ~; ..m'.t:"~:;~-9$~54k '.,.."`"`' A;~~..~~',:2'l~.
. a,... ,. .~
' Al,l pnrtions', of the following described cniiting''clairn's Syrig$ ~t~°rtR'er'ly a'rid'
easte~r~ly of ,the Della S.,.= Smuggler compromise line'a5"th'e s`ame'-is described
,: .a
. ,
,:i
f, the Re'cbrds ,of Pitkin County; to tbit:
'
xn Book 97, Page 77.0 "'"~
~
a.° `.c=.° USMS ,. ,..h;„, .,. 1656
Smuggler' ::z
'"b
:
;
' General Jackson USMS 3941
_. ..., ~,
Glendale USMS
., 6$59
.
Arkansas UST1S 83 94
Chatfield US.MS .. i 1462
Part of, Chatfield USNjS .,' 1462
. i
J~ C. Johnson USMS,,..=, 1436
Excluding that .tract ,described in Book, 177 Pa e 378 of ,the Records of
g
Pitkin County. .,.. , ,.~^,•,.:. ... ~ , ., . M. .. _ ~ ,,.
.4 acres more or less. "'
Parce contains ~"
u,~,~•-.,.. , ,
^~I
Parcel II-.That part
of the Brown Placer,.M,.S. No. 15047 , containing
'
_
,
_. ..
10.04T acres, more
or less, described
as„fo"llows:
„
K "
Beginning at corner No. 9, M.S.._Nol. 15047, Thence'~unning'
N 0°28' W 1215 feet to a point; thence N 89°59~ W 120 feet to a point;
Thence S 21°09' W 1302.6 feet
to .a point; Thence S 89°5
9' E 600
,
i
;..,.,: , x
feet to .said corner No. 9, the place of beginning: ;'
»
a i
~.r". _.,_... _ ,
.
Parcel III-That part of the Emma Lode M.S. 2120, The Mollie Gibson Lode,
M.S. 4281 a~d,the,Lone Pine Lode, M.S. 1910 described in Book 234 at Page 48;
that 'parcel_descr.ibed in Book 219 at
Page 271; and that part o'f the N.W. 1/4
M
of the SaW, 4 described in Book 218 at Page 471 that lies northerly and
easterly of the centerline of the Salvation Ditch, all in Pitkin ;County,"
Colorado, containing 16.88 acres, more or less. All of the above"describ'e'd
~
•
( r3fiM."A.Od~Sw+. wv.-i.TM'h w. ~ ~ . M i\'" ~ ' ~ e .. ... ,. i . ~ n.P ~ . n r ' ~ _,. ~ ~ .:4 - - ~ ! ~ - YY
parcel III is situated in the south i o.f Section 7, T.105., 1.;.84 W. of the '
6th P.M, from
R-15 Residential and'R-30 Residential t'o A1I-2
"Accomoda£ion§'
,
,,
v.. - .R~Fa~.htY"~~ '"~ ..~. ~~ ~ .. - S' j y
`/
and Recreation as indicated on a map on fLle in the office of the Pitkin
. .%L a:uln.Ff-s4rc3. .. - ., .. .r.~w.. t,4„F .: :. 1- .q ,.. I~
County Building Depart-ment,. The Map may be examined during regular business
hours.'
The Hearin is scheduled as a """
g joint hearing of the Pitkin County '"'""'
Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of County Coiranis'sioners of lsit[cin ~ " .`w.,<
County, Colorado.
At's'uch Public Hearing, al.l persons in interest'may appeaY and "_
a ~,
be heard eXpressin~ their obje'c'tions" tir opinions r_____ ~, ,,,,;_,-_ _z ,,, „_ ._
pH~?i•'..^'i^=.'me. .".,~T`:>C F".. .'i""i'~ .. -."'_~-e ~.~ ntlf' i.~'"' `~'-:~°$,.;'~?'~a~(„'~3,..,s"~c:•+r ..•"R~"~S"~?~ „~"Y"5 c-Y`.,:'~„" e~d"~'w ~'+'k~~,'~'"`5 .. r .v'~
d ,
`---°:_~ Rezoning- 72-4 ~ . .. .. ...:. .... ....:. :,
McCu~fough ,
LEGAL
NOTICE
~;,..,
NOTICE OF FOBLIC HEARING
' Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is scheduled in the
i _ .. ,... :..... .. ..i it
+'
_.. f.
District Courtroom "Count Cour£house 'Pitkin CounE'; Aspen, Colorado on
y y
. . .. ~ ...5.'.:'Y'.a.^.~{s e.v4,.,v ,e, S"r..M".,1: . :. J.-~, .•... .. r ,
February 28th, 1972 at 7:30. P.M. to cori'sidei' the 'followin g amendment to the
Pitkin County Zoning Map'for the area described as £ollow se
E Parcel I'- A11 of the' follow`ing` deacribed mni.ag' claima:
Alma M. ....,.'
U':'S.M.S'.
, .
3944 ,
,,
lpine ,
U:u.M.S,
..:"
! "
•..
6642
Bushwacker U.S.M. S. 6642
Ballarat U.S.M.S. 4438
Last Chance U.S.M.S. 6936 A.M.
~.
-Della S. US.M.S. 3939
Rainstorm ~~2 U.S.M.S. 6318
Snowmtorn 9~2 U.S:M.S. 6318 '
'*., Fossil U.S.M.S. 6910 "
Fossil Fraction U`:S.M.S. ¢97.0 '
Cascade ~'~2 U.S,M.S. 6948 A.I~I.
,r Contraband U.S.M.S. 44.71
Iowa X62 U.S,M.S. 6948 A.M.
Jay Gould U.S.M.S. 1794
Joplin U'.S.M.S. 5914 '
Joplin ~R2 U.S.M.S. 6948 A.M.
Lizzie U.S:M.S, 4702
North Star U.S,M.S. 6145
Park U.S.M.S.' 3935 "
Rainstorm U.S.M.S. 6270
Regent U.S.M.S. 3936
Result U.S.M.S. 6044
Robert Emmett U.S.M.S. 60/+4
Snowstorn U.S.M.S. 6270
Tiger" U.S.M'.S. 393J
Pride of Aspen U.S.M.S. 7883
i °'zz
j
y} - ~ ..~
.^!..A~S,,r.,-~'• .^a. ,-~WS <, ~ 1 .N ' r-a..:.~ ~ wr ~, :.rv x~,,r%e~, ..r ~s Y: y,~7fr vw„g+ `W °2u''~F~ ~: T' far tl^ wwr !^;^£4.~j" tv" 35~., T -~ ° r~ ~:.
Page 2 ;
Rezon,i,ng 72-4
. McCullough _'
p rtions _of the,", ,_ _ g ~ g ~ lying northerly an
All o followin described minin claim d
easterly of the Della S. -Smuggler compromise line as"the same, is described'
• •.
. ~ . .
in Book 97, 'Pa e 77 of the Regords of Pitkin, `Count ` " tb'`tait; ""
g y',
Smuggler USMS 1656
., .. I
• General Jackson" U$M$ ~ 3941 "i ~ "„
_...
Glendale USMS ~' 6859 ~
~,,
" Arkansas USMS 8394
I'
Chatfield USMS 1462 ~
Part of Chatfield U"
SMS_.. , . ", . 1462 . ,, .
~- '.. I, ,
s;
" J. C. Johnson USMS 43
...
" " .~ _. din t
Exclu hat tract described in Book 177, Page 378 0~ the Records of
Pitkin County. i- ~':
" Parcel 1 contains"199.4 acres more or less.
' '" . ' ..
Parcel II- That part of the Brown Placer, M:S. No: 15047 containing
10.041 acres, more or less, described as follows: ','
Beginning at corner No. 9, M.S. Nol 15047; Thence running
N 0°28' W 1215 feet to _a point; thence N 89°59' W 120 feet to a point;
Thence S 2,1°09' W 1302.6 feet"to,a point; Thence 'S 89°59' E 600
feet to said corner No."9, the place of beginning.
~.
Parcel III-That part of the Emma Lode, M:S.'2120, The Mollie Gibson Lode,
4 at Page 48•
M.S. 4281 and" the Lone Pine Lode M.S. 1910 described in Book 23 ._ ,.
that parcel described in Book 219 at"Page 271; and that part of the N.W. 1/4
of th'e S.W.''~ described in Book 218 at Page 471 that lies northerly and
easterly of the centerline of the Salvation Ditch, all in Pitkin Count,
Colorado, containing 16.88 acres, more or less. All of the above described
parcel III is situated in the south i of Section, 7, T.lOS., R.84 W. of the
6th P.M. from'R-15 Residential and"R-30 Residential~to AR-2 Accomodations '~
and Recreation as indicated on a map on file in the office of the Pitkin
i
County Building Department. The Map'may be examined during regular business'
hours.
" The Hearing is scheduled as a joint';hearing'of the Pitkin County '
_.
' my Commissioners of Pitkin '
Planning and Zoning Coimnission and Board of Cou "
i,
.,k
' County, Colorado. ' I
At such Public Hearing, all persons in interest 'may appear and ~
~, :
~ i ,
be heard ,expressing the?.r ob~ec,.ions or opinions. M'klic"fi" ~77erT~'gc~zltecofder .
v,;,:w,,,.,..tr', =.,x,~;..,.,~•~w~s:z~..w.. ~~~~s ed 'Januar
°. :. ",.... .. w. , ..
f!* ~
.... , . ::. ,.. ~. ,o-y~ r~,o: xsa4 d;~.:~__ 'qc' - «n»e^z^~.~- ,.prv^,+~.: z"
^.
y
Pxoperty Owners'?aithn 500 feet of Proposed Rezoning 73ouridary'
~~
Mary Schumacher ~I
Bbx 168 Harley Baldwin ~„~~
Grand unction, Colorado 8150.1 Box`745
Don Randall t°'`
2540 S: Ocean'Blvd., Dap d,Mic'h redo 81611
eel, Jr.I+''
Palm Beach, Flori~8.33480 Bb~"N_274
Aspen. Colorado
Smuggler-Durant Mining Corp
-pia--~._Ba~r ,A~~~~a~ ~ ~ wahter~Sa"r`ad Imo'"'
$.,,~~i~-°S~.i~,5a`('~Tb'7 ,~ ~_ 1165"0 G7 24th `Circle place
~ozrr-E~fi~,s-C58tL~:._Stre~t ~~ `Des`~r~"'Colorado 8021µy
New York, New'YOrk 1-0019
1~,,,'P.
Fredric Benedict Top of Aspen, Inc. Lir'p°
Box 40 ~ ~ ~ ~ `"coo Tri-~o'Maria'~etieht, Inc.
Aspen, Colorado 81611 Box 1730
,,._ ~:~ ~, ~ r w . ..,_ _
' Aspen, o 'br`ado $'111" "'
John Schumacher /"
Box 168 Raymond Auger ~ ~/
Grand Junction, Cblorado 8150'1 4~r6=°er~'~ -3~3r~.~~`~~
New''~ork, Neta"'Yor7t 1002.7 ~°~j "'"'~
Herbert Bayer`,,...
Box B
Aspen,';Cblorado 81611
John Baird..
c/o Home Owners Assoc,.
Block 4 Red N1t Ranch
,~~.e„~ ..~ ., , _ ~.,,.. ._ ... _, _,.~ ~. ,,,
r ~a~„
Aspen, Colorado
The Congressional Corporations
7979 Old Gebrgetowri Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20014
Anthony Berumeri Estate
c/o Mig'el BerUineli '
302 Laramer Drive _
San Antonio, Texas 78209
Luke Ahthonp
Box 1271
Aspen;°"Coloradq 81611,
Smuggler Trailer Park, Inc, ~
Box 505
Aspen ,''Colorado 81611
Home Owner's Assoc. /r
Blbck 4 T[ed Mt: 'Ranch
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Brooks Smith /'
` 8 0 g "E 71V e~.:
Roohe5teY, New Ybrk 14507
Jan Cho~nacki '""
IS'70,0 "hdtims Ave.
Harveyy 11~-inois ~~5042~
"Olivia Dunaway '~,,.r' ~" "`"
Box ' 1575
Aspen, Colorado 81611
nre~renr rrtta-rF147lFIE® MAiL-30{~ (plus pc
a:
`~~
\~
'Apr.
~
~.
_ ~
s
v~ . ,. ~:
~~
-.
i
" A V..+n.V6 t 1 YY ey:a L
_ `~ +.
~4.~A .u14
Ross Reimer
R.E. Reimer
4463 Biookview
Dallas; Texa"s"
Mrs. Gertrude.
_.....
Box 17$
Aspen, Coloraao
Arne Marthinsson
Box 2103 -
Aspen-, Colorado
i51 b 11
Eddie Vaughn ~+*^
~ ~'ox.,; 6~.g.
1-Sspen;~ CYo"]brado 8I6IT
81611 _ __
Thomas D. Kassler ~"'
Douglas Larson i~"" n ~. ~,., ,, ..
~~1135 Pennsylvania Ave:''
365 East 5th Street' Boulder, Colorado 80302
American Fork, Utah 84003 ""
~ .
" i ~~ r
~.,. .;
~_ .
Stephen Naumberg
Ralph Woodward /" Box 3085
Box 1922 ~ pen, Colorado 8"T 6'1.1
Aspen, Colorado 81611
. n .~ M~ _ ~ , _....,, . ,.
~
Andrea ScTi*aaighofer
Suzattp Jacobie /r Box 1438
Box 187 `' Aspen, Co'l`orado '$1611
Aspen, ,Colorado 81611 __ ,~ti„_,_.. _, .._ ~.,. ,
~ ,r
City of Aspen
Box V ' ; ..:,.,~..:.,
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Richard ""B~'ownellbrr'°
Box 147T
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carla Cutting
Box 1065
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Bob Kopp ° /W
Box 10'Q
Aspen, `Colorado 81611
Joe Candreia~/"°
Box 509
Aspen, ,Colorado 81611,
Charles Maple
Box 1959.
Aspen, 'Colorado'8161`I
~° 't
,lf
Sa~iiel App"letori'
c/o"T-tome Owners AssocM
~:._,~ . ~.__>u
Block ,4 l~ed~:" R"anoh' "`~
Aspen, Colorado "$1:611 ~ ~~ ~~
Miss Gay 19cNaughton
c/o 'lame Owners Assoc ,
Block ~ 72eci +~. stanch
Aspen';"' Co> orac~o '"8"l6Y`i'"
Gerald E: NTorse ,~"`"
Box ~75b3
~ pea, Colorado 8111"
~s ~• ~ ~
/' ... _ ...Edwin Vare _
Box"'I7~7...,.
Drive. Aspen, Colorado 81611
W~~j.; .*-~.:e^A^m~vw,r~.+..4a@L `a3~+'., ~''s.. ~R ~.xaH,~yt yy,.. .....~';ar?{~: s.:,;~.
_~. .
M
Robert L. Christopher , 4„"'"'~ ,,,,, ,,. , ., .
642 Maple Street : ~ ....., ,. , , ~... _. ,...
Wirine£ka, Illinois 60093 ",~!
Greater Aspen Development Comp'any!/'
Box 40
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Charles H. Sanford ~
Box 767. ,
Littleton, Colorado. 80120
Arthur Horowitz
_. ; _.
44$5 Adam's Ave.,`
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Marion L. Gibbons ~~~°"- {
Hilltop Place
Rye, Neer York 10580
Selma L. Feldman ~'°"~ ~ '
Box 1497
Aspen, Colorado 81611 `
-~
oT `olm ~'a v I ~
3 ala
i~
I
~ C7 ~ 9v
-et
~rwm
m
IA N bi~
W voi ~ a~ O ~, IS O ~ Y 3 ai I n
° pp
m -
r
ml
~ol~'
'o a
O I i9IY
T~O 2 V2I H1 ~ ~ O'i, ON
O
~ ~ ~ ~ ° `
~
m Ni
>n 9 ~ ~ °
O I
x ~
x N
z NH
~ =F"~F~~lo O ~ ~ o x
z
°
•
^°
VI ~
yCy
'fi W C
Iti
?~ F vl I
4~ ~~
°~ O.O H
2 ~
b
a
~ .
rt
c 3 3 0~
' M N
1 ~ A ~ I £
°
e
i ,
l ~ I
O
~ '^ a m
~
3r
me-.
o a `° ai e
i e =
v
l n. CPB aca c
-
'i
I C7 ~ m ...
.-,-. a I ~£ i z
i
I o
c
on
g I
q
^
~ Aq ~ n
a ~1D£y
ry ~:. YF~=~N' ~ i
--
om ~
'
fin ~ 1' n
~-.C ' T
a
o m _
I I
m i O ~ ° I ~
o aNU'
wwa.al p
l
w ~ m
mm m.
a a ~°
oa C °
o O 0O ~ O 41'
N
j.
O
u ~ aU+
j~
y
° O
w
a ma
z rt
OI ° >
~ u ,
u
a
az
O
n
O
a~
b N
~
I
(n O Nam ' y
~m
I
N~
y~
".
rC IC<j C O y
m I Z PQS Y N
3 o
a
H~
~ ylN p o e3
m I I
a
v
°~' I~ v .
l ~
o
I rr °~ °o
~w 9I ~
„`I ~ r
~ x
;~ ~~
°
z ;
o o~fh BFI H o ~
a
'
'
~
s S
o.
z rt
~'
:
j ~ ~
a 3
of
°
I ~ ~ z
~
"' ~
p~
c
' I
~~ I O °A ~
z
y
~~ a »=In
o_~ I ~a
° ro ~
a o
I
w ~ ~
zm
°+I. W
N
® ti
n
=
a
l ~`{
~ s ~
c
i t i q„A=.~n as
a ~
I a m
c ' I
~6~lS
C m o
T
a
3G n
_ - w
t
~~ [~ Z
^'O
a i E
o
AT
~°
~ .. o
rTC
® am
I
,, ~
u
a
'o 'n
~ _
o
W O
o aO a f°
~
° ~
i q3 y _
v° o
m a
S ^h °° S
m
O'
m ~ QQ
'o
'n
. ~
~/ v G'
.__ v U
~. of a i a
.,.. l ~
.~D m m= o L = ~
a
~ a
2 nc Y~ a I Ci92 n r~-I Wp
~
K 0. ~
W 0 O~ I
m N p r•
G
(D
~. v
o
~
'-( ° of o
~ O o "^~'
rt.. K N ~
1
O'•
~[ ~ o t-' O
~ o F
F
o v W G]
N
O C•S o ol
m ~
~
' ~
~
ti
~
'
. o K ~ N O
'
~
R
.
7 E Fa£I n I O ~
a~
' ~
~.
7 c K3 o0 N
D ~ °e9 T '.
~ i
a ~
j m cz
o. '
°. o
v
9~6
Cd1 zs°c ~
~ as ~ A
i
ra F °
I ~ am g
q ~
~ ~
n AV lo
___
~
r
o
' (
v
l
e„~ ~- o I O
® I N W Ot ~I r
~~ 4 jtUivNi.~tNi
. -a
~
,
_ a c c
O N r~
A
AO a 0 D
b3 y
S L4
0 ~
a ~
b Ve
~ NA
a A
~ ~ ~ T
m
m
2m 9
~ c ~
n ~ N R1 ~° °~ me
<
~
° ~~
pp
9 .. 3
z .
,w ~ s
a
~ v y .6
w pqy
N
~ ~ ~N
I m ~
~
~ ~r`
~
w ~ ° ~~ O
I
q ~ = °
~ ~
°
H "4'8 v
a v ~~~ ~ Q x "~ s a
° ~ z
.. o~£
H
g ~£
.._ c o 0
' ~ ~
CN ~
~ £
a
~
~ ~ ~ W ~ ,..vo q Fn£
,.°£ H ,~ ~S on o,.
3
l ~ .ep a, a ~ a 3
3 a ~ ~
m
' ~
a '49 Z
mn m
a. l
-
_
W
W
!! ail ! .
.-.
P
~ O N
y _ m"
II 9 0
O ° ~
C1 0_
pQ m
m N
~ ~-i o
N z (t .~
In v ~• ~
a ~ H"5
~ IK ~
£ GS
~ r, ¢'s
e`~1
~ N ~
gzg I
I
T
N
C
0
U
N
T
Y
OFFICE OF BUILDING INS PECTUR ~ ~ ~~~N ~~"'"
P.O. BOX 694 l0
ASPEN, COLORADO Btfi~~i-<.~.,_:~..~-,~ •,..,, ~~~///~~'~~•___~~~
r yi. -r ~~.._.
~~ i..U
f ~e,!
~''nc _,. ~~ ,...
:r:,,.
Spay
Bqx
Aspe
`! `
?`-
3
~
~, ~ w S
"l `
~` O ° ~ E .~ iP li
Y~ .. a
z o g y
a "o
'
~
N a
c
9A
` ,.t .n
~
4 o
~ ~
s » m o 3
N
t ° ~ i
~
aa
~
I~
O
~.J
o
w'
Y
w {{eeyy
._
u°IXM ~
Wu
Z'
sa
~ Z a o -„
,.,, m w ~ aw z
~
1 R.' o
, ~ o ~ ~ ,'~N z ,
G
1 w o W
o y 3LL ° Z
_ W N
J
O- W v u
3c o -
°
O
z ~
^~
°a ti
O ~.
~ o
O j ~
~
~ ,
`
Z
O m
¢ o
a
m Z
~ ~
v° °
r u,
~ J Z V V ZOO
O,oZ > S v
O ~ Q
U~ ,~ Z
~ D ~ ~ y - ~ ~ Z
~
o ~~
a" IJ
u a w
.~ gyn. ... .. , M..,:~ ~,x> , .~,.yti, .., ro, r a:r-. a w ~ .... ~ , ,. .v_ , ., ,..~ r. -;..
e
OFFICE OFBUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 694
ASPEN, COLORADO 81677
~~E .
RE -~-` //~~/~
Atl .. 'u -
~, R ~ ; ~i'-,
Pf.: rcat A.+R~ess ~~
~ such '
sC°sRf`
~•
S ~ ~ ,. R;:Rgy
U~ 6p Cn:U~
It 1' L) J.
t
'
L
•)I BIJ IR i;
~
~~
iC
,
Home~p(Siune Association
Red Mount Ranch ~k4'
Aspen, C t o do
OFFICE OF BUfLDMG1NS PECTOR
P.O. BOX 694
ASPEN, COLORADO 87677
"_"^~.
.. ~,
f r . ._..
~_ _///~///f`
'~ ./ ie(
..--.. h~'mr--,- '
„~
Gay Nccl~"~ug n
Aspen, Co r do
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 694 „, . _
ASPEN, COLORADO 87671
6
hCAS~3~J ~;,~ .~ 4L..,,i
UJM~t~fri
etl
~r ~; Esc., ~- 4~.4;,,~-
.
,~~. _.:
:_~' "n4:
'-'i c.. _ _ ~
,~. , ,
Jo1m R' ur y
~
~ c/o Home ners Assoc.
~ Red Mtn nch ~k4
Aspen,Co o ado
d
z
~T^T`~M,9r
C~~~
,,. ~~~ 2 7-~,g~
,~ . ~ -
~t ~~-,r ~ 972
S:c ~>:.zares~.B .,~~
f ~ ~
.. ~ _.,
DEB ~ 2 197`
--=-aa
FEB
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 6940
AS,P,EN, COLOf2AD0 S'
4, ~,
~, `
~ J
` 4' ~\?
\P
art! r.
E M1 ~y - ~
lil l I ~ 3 °',r° ~:
~~ . ~~ i=
i "'~' ...~' ~ v e~ o:
_ ' .u
~ 0 ~•-
!'~ z,;
i~~ SJ I,,
\~
~,\'\~ Richard~B wnell
Box 147
Aspen, olorado
,I
S. ~"~
a> m
S
~s1 ~ _
•4y
4 ' ~~f~/'`
~ ~ !/
OFFICE OP BUILOINGINSPECTOR
P,O. BOX 694
w'w »,.
ro
~. 1~,
, .-
Smuggler Durant ;Mining Corp;
c/o Eva B. Baxter, Secretary
Suite 1101 ;
Four West'S8th St. ',
New York; N.Y. 10019
0
z
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 694
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ga'^,
6V
0
Z
~,'~. C~~eued, left Igo at~~ ~~~ ;
r [~ iJo such nu9'st'$ ._...~
:~~ ~~ E~~oueo, 6-~ot 6orv~ur~Sab .,._.
ACT: i~4 DiRECTpR1K.~ p„ `~~"'
RI`,~?~ CITY STA`fF4N' ,~., ,
___~`\
c
~ ~
J
~;
~ ~!
~ f_--~ o ~ ;~.
Rvr.
.
j
Leh
/~, ~ Lr„i
PG
c tA`'
~
c eos
s6c
h s4
:,:C~ ~_..A
hf:
s~a5 c;Fa ~ --n:~r;par
.
-~.
Oa not
n sL
;
,
re;, ,,.
1"d
.~aH;~s ~
c/o Home' ers Assoc.
Block 4 Re Mouta~n Ranch
Aspen, Co o ado
F - ~ ~ »lz
'~! XLL°
lair 1972
Rifkin Lounfr~. O~uiCd~n$ ,~napecfor
Bax 694
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
~ifhin C'ouuf~ O~uilctiura J'aapecfor
Box 694
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
80302
.,... ~~_ .3 f-t
_---_.
a
r:
J r r
II 1 r~~l~~l1u)
DEC 12'59 ~;T !~ C ~ C
~ `{ ~! V
~-~ ~_ ~'~
Uhcl; Cq ~~?! ..
M Vpf~Cl.J). ~ r~`~
Oyt~ ltlj / fvyC ~,
Qo,yY~~y7 L~.ttlt ~r~l ss A. Pe
~++i~ fd/ECi `'°~ \ Aspen,
~ t2!!s A-Q~"~
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 694
ASPEN, COLOgAD081611 ~'-rl T'~
O :,
AGepi- ~~~ cJ~ 1~
a~ ! \ ,
/nS~ 1'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
N s /~'ti / ~•,
.Oo eel/ ~.; "
~~tr ~'%'~, ~ ~,.A ~~
/q Nr
,~ -_
4Hn\
N(a
jY-
Y
/ ~~~
hristensen ~ ,°~0
1603
l
-'
r 1
~~C
1
1
t,
s.... r x , C I '~;
,fr ~~ ~
~,.
! '+~ E 4
JL 71 /6 ~~r ~:. ~>tUPM~I ~.
-.,.r . _., ~ 1 .
Andrea Schwa
Box 1438
Aspen, Colo.
~~~~~~
_,. .F
--"N~AM~ _.~
~St ~O~IC~: 7 ~'_
r [i 1~0`16C0'
.,,
~~.>
~'S
CAD
! ~..~.
,~ ~ / ~ o s
~'" j ~.Z (',.
.._,
/
u't'~1i8 _~~._.
"llr
R
>, , 'Nir
i PY.
Rm
-:~ ::
,, .
-,.l~v vt~1~ ~~a~L«
DEC 12'69 j;>~a:~a~ e
/~~~ . 3 6
c o•%Y.,•E.Ea K
~~~ ..,
~~~`.
~~
'" ~eiwt;cg..
9
~ 3 o A
m y Z
N J
Iu ~~
w
~ m
~
~
o
f ~
a rt g
Fj
0 W°
~ '4$
~
o I o 9 ~ {T
<
.°v
u - F-'W N '11 m
~
l ~ i f2 r K ® ~
o
a m w
m H y .- I rP OW v
~ 3
,x m z r+ d '
c
8Z
O
Z F E
~
~
6 ~
W
~ G
H `~
~
Oy
R ra
..n
O O o
~'~'
(~ W
m
m
k-~
m ~. : •'e d m rt t'$ "~ ~
-min n
a '
! ...=.
o°' a
oo ~ N•
p a
1'Yp °.
zm gnu ~ N p ® zz
° 0
as ~F °a a A W ~. ~'c
am
fD
C] a
D ~Z
a
y rt O Ica
r
a -
- N H fl ^'
_ ~
p0 ~ I :6C
^~ ® AA
ff
q w'' R!i f?'n ~ zS
O r
9
c
y
o~ a
c ' > y
~
mA '
y.
U q
c
~ ~
m 6p
V O p
l~ V ~ o
e ~'
y q
Y N 9 ° y 7D .,. ,,,... ~
n en
z p '
F' O m
n ~ A {~ m O y
°3
'AH°= ro
~, N'm ti
d
m
°
w N
~
o a ~a
-+
'^
o "~
y
o ~
~
- = O
a N ~
~
a°o .W
v V1o r
P+
A N y ~A+
a
H ~
S7
a wjml a sNa ~ .'19
~ , o
~ o F~ <~ fD ')y C~9
;;o w
9i a ~3 ry ~
n
A
p" ~ ~
m ~n~
r• C r "n
z v = 'oa a m
zs ow
~ v
6
~
Zm ! 1. 10 'm `°~`o~-. W ~Y
~ ~n~nmp
~ ~
3.°c
ao
r
c
c [
Wfu Oyu r
QA QY?
p
~ __
y
A
j. O
3 O
Q ^ m 7'
S Tw
O ~
v
gg
l
mAm a ri m ~
e ~ m .~. ~
_
"'S ~ O *~ R1
w ~
D a
Z
~ °
~
~
N N ! n (~
= o W R' ~e'7
o
F» ~» s~
_.^ '~ '~ O. pt7
'
~
~ `~' j ry ~
-
i° M -~
a3 `3
l o ~'3
a
l
n
~F
q ~
ai
__ _ y
W
vw m..
aw w
" ~ ""3.~ '.
•
..o
. .
.
H
a 'CS
u
a
M
9
mS
.~
~ u.
1'
y N O N A A y y ~•
~3 > m~~A
A
a ti y ,~,~ ~
N D W 1`{O
y ~' ° t m b m
o
~~
o o
c
9 m
'
j" a
'fD
~
~; .
m ~u ... .i
? V
,
n ~• Q
a
x!
m > ~
~ n. n o
:'~.
~ ° I
o. FN F~ al ° p
p ry C7
Zz
~ y
~ a3o JOl.
:<
~ c r.1
~+
971
G n?a N N ~
A
~x
~ a
A3-3'
o a
f+.
'~
..
m N O 1y' .
~~
tiQ R
o.l ~ nG b. ~
~ L I A
zm u ^
_
~
as
=n
I F. m°°~°
zm
~
:
m' ~ `
, -
^~ I m
n nlH
3t A
~' o .'o W
° I:° ~j
~ ~.
c '~
o ~
o H y
io
I ~ .~ ~ o s°O S3
R
0 O
K I ° A
I Z ~ P
y
a
.. 3 ~- m z G]
.`!: W
~ I ~
gay O l p.
m
x !@
®9
° ti
oa ~ o H Al
09 C
O
~
m
o °
~ ~ n
m ~. ~
fp
G ~ T O Y
a
~G
.. v
YIry
I p 1J ~ ~~ . ~:.. . ., vs .~~.. a. i...
.., i. .. :: ~..~. .~.
A
O
D N
.-ply N N
~n
9
.
ry N
yIrt
~
~
~
~ oFf
„
a
~
<~• 5 t7
_
z z ~..
..
°g ~ ~~° o~n W
n rn
~ A~°~. "'O p' F3
a°z 'c m3A3 o0 y '~
m _ 'ti"1
Z d ¢q
m~ NO
I
~ n
m
£~6IZ
T_
D
-~
IA
Om
~ no
~ -A~y
y
l
I °
ao j
;
n
~
~ ~w°o~..~ ..,;
IwI.aA..~n .~
a
n .~
o~ N
o .o
c ~- o -i Q
• - mn
x rp.
d
.
^ ~ Y „ ~ ~
Y Z a y
O N
~G C
$~
S h
Q ~G { O G ORO 0 `' ~ 00
~ i° a n y °~
y y y
` a
~
~
o ¢ ° ~
` db
C
p MN
r. :.. "ra ~w~n
A Z. v,
~
® ~ °a M
~ °' I
I o~ I
~ J
W a_-C
'. C~
s$
_ acm
a U
~ m o ~.
WL
Q
I a
N°' oo
° wz
.. oldy3m I~ as ~ Y ~ m ow ~
®
o .
w a
~.~I d °i w
W
~°
~
° ~ ®~ l
x'
. ,~v w'
I,D ~ ~~ + F-I o E
_~ o' dn
zo
3
° • a
~ ~ °
3°=
i a6 ~ ~ ~ 310
3 o z
LL&
~
zs
I w
p H =
3 C3
~
~
'
I
3 s3lw o ~ 6 u, Iw a s
y
m ®
c '^ N ~O U' ^' `n ~v ~ >- ~
/.p •r1 a U
IW
N ~
. r
b =N ~ G °Ia o ~
I ~ U1 °; ° o
l ~ ao ~
o o n 8a1
60., oN aO a W ' °~ ~ ~ C~q y l a m. ~~w a E IS1 a
wW
~
Ia
I w o oo.W w U i
I
>
cU¢
EP N i H LLd
w e
o m
. i aaln to
ti y LL
I 111 2 ~
°
~
~
HI t . _
t
L o
O ~
N
y 6
.. a
a
~V'
g
m Y
llp
~ W 1a
O
`
~ ~a
i m
i
i II og
l i-'
W I>v:d [ a
~ ly~cm cmo
i v3d wa
9
w
o 9
~ ^y vi
-
t
°a z
o ~ I v z@
I
f ~ O
~ 3 m ~
C
,,F I° e l .::
z ~ o
xz
is 3
3 u
~
y 8 o
p
'
p
H
y ix
m z
3
y z
o ~ N ~
3
{
l
N
0 °a ~> o
~ O° M
a N
~. iQ av a E ~-
O 'J V > ~ O p ~
x
o
u~+wa~
°} :
m-
N a a ON a
d 6
°' > e
m'm
b e y io .cm ° .-~ v_ a
lC rc C ~ o °n W r
ar a~ C. oo m bA v
y Eo ;m. m ~ l0 a
p Ha m n° y .n n !+ aQ O ~
y `u G' {y oo vi o
..`~ b ~.~ ~ b~°ro 2 " as
G J J
gy H " a j a
o~ ~ i wz ~ wI I. of
Warm I
W m m w~ 1~ ~ ~z _I
a 3m ~ WK ~ • Q~ Ip ~ ~ • Ili ~ I~I u+Z
C1 ~ orzi 18. ,. fi' N Ia I : :~ ~z ~ d.. ~ O of ojr
~ ° ~~ ~F H f~' O. aIE E ' a. zac N ~Nlo~ ~ I"o z
_ a °I a z H, .0. ,'` .,~o F~ O o~, im w~
4a. of Eal ;'P ~ ~" ~ N °.3 39> m y~ ~ U ~ ~Io~ E'I IP zoo
o ~ Fa ym
1... ; v ¢"' S.2 N ~ g ~~ 30 o zz ~" ~.. L' ~'"~la a '.a =w
1de SN `O :4 'LL zo W U I i.K o F° ~+ pp Teal c'o< „m. zg
~ Qwo a~~ ~ao 0 oz ~ ~ rl ~ ~ z ° ~~'l~ z N~.~, m ~ O~~ ~~W I;333 ~~~« o
~ O6 u, ti H m z R2.. O4.^i n O N ola 8.9 rn N ~~'^la c IN m
Q ~ z Iw l` ~ ~ q~j of<= o ~• N U` y „x o ~j
~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ O n' F O ~ O $1 I wa l~ ~ Ad. G~ oHl~lo NI uII^ N °~> O
q~ ° ¢, ~ 6G0 ° H H P7 ~' z R z a_ o
~ }./.~!v ~ °o M CJ w I - o >>~4 oa ~ U oO il:~ N°if °r o. "~
~ ~ Ctl ~$1 ~ z °. ~ a E r. ~ ~ a a rc ~w eL ,: ~L. a~ a ~ a as E ti
C'.$ `z ° p '~..o.°. Qom. IN ~ I~~N C ~ d'g$ °~ ~-Or+I`IF' N Im°>>IJ m~
~ a w~ o ra., LL ~ R I.N_ ~ a v w o. ,
a
ti IN w ~ wH y~ °i Iczu~IolWUai ~G
.: ~ ° I
~, .,~ ,.
~, _ au m a ~~
°~° Qw h Yo s ° as
i o 8 ~ a4 ~' ---~.
® F~ p ^ Q. oo v = ~ a.m
O. oo m a y ~'.° q~¢
r, o
y o ~ a Q y¢ m m
~N ylo ...~ mwim ~ 0 r o
1®'Y o a i ~ o.~ O ` ti m
1 ~•.^c ~ d <7 ~e, a
ai- ° x ~.. ~: .p
I~ F 3 as ® ~I v c~i- ~ Ol a / c', ~ ~ ,aa
~ p Q ". z 6i ml~ I ~Q zo dgg '4 ~ ~ / ~ ~ a.Q
1Y N alE '` ._ z~ E o aw a. y !o/° 3 /:~.C~O
~ ~ 13~ a ~` z~ ~ vlg ~ 'I.«.zo ~ ~ v//~(p~ is/°°IIa°/ ~'vR
~ ~~ 3 ,- Lit '~ I w O lal 3 3 o v z ~ N '~/ /^ ~°~:/c // o C
~ .~ > z ~ za C8 p .-~ i 3 3 w: o N ~ tyd o' '+a ~! i w~
~ 7 °.. ~a si s3~~ `x z° CK 'i r+ dU ~~' IYn'i ~ z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 3m .~ /:!~ U ~
~ ~ ~'a "... ~ G N Iti- io o'p ~' W /~,+~ N ~ >/Or 3o/~•m. 4~p.
® b ~ c wl~ I.6. 6 off z ('. aI °a~J O ~ 4 ~ ~4~3 ~/2 m hr~
4A. pG o ~ °a o. ~,'.:.. N z ¢_pl lol o. ao 4L 6t <U/,~ y 33>'0.~ ~9
N a w
~_ o ~ ~ ~ o = a>'U n ~ a ~~ a6 11=o WI'IQ LL Q ~ ~o~~~..~/~ /p/^ N /~/o r
181 ~- Wi ~- ~~i a aal c /a/ ~~~ 2
L3 z i o 41 a z H-o ,•. O o' a
w N N D_ aa'N IOV ~ ~. ~ W ~ W Q V W WM/^q O O
I h ti Q C~ ~~ ~;p
l ~~NI
~
\ p
~ W
.~ ~.
~ o 0
o~
._._
~ ~.
~ •-
b a
N J
y ~ 6 O ~ `y.
'tee ~ F ; N
_ b
is
r m
oe_
a o.
~
~ ~
3 .y..f
m
,- a
~ ~ ~ ~, o
_,_ ~ ° S ~ ~
'Y ° m
°
m e
~
O
i
..
Q
FO
Z 9 ~ ~-j rw C4Y
Q 0 T '.,d t !p
1 ~ rc
a
w 0 i,
. ~ lO
O S
a ~' Z W
O a p
a ~-
>m -
= ~ o
0
g>
xJ
~ s
N
~e
-
rO ~ c
~ w
w 0
°
o °
s ^ - o
a > ~ a o
._.__~Jv .. ,. ~. „...
1 T
J v ~~
v
,v
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l
~ ~
h~, •
~~
1.~
~~~
Y
~ ~
I\ '.
m P ^;
b 4
~Q pw ~ Yw
C ~o s ° H fo
C 6 oz o °n
m n O
G 00
a
N
~ ~ a N
m ~
O. I a _
L7.
~
~ ~
I V
.n
O M
4
a~C
a
..d ~
a ~
~I
~_
cm o _
~
a s
b
'a~'-
wz cam'
~ yl
9 OW C~
689 I
°
a v ~ ~
c
m
b
~^ 1 ^.
6
>.
°IE U4'
69...
~ Ea co
m
$ ~ 3 ~ r v ~- C6"
649
~ o •-A~ 3•~
i w ° U 'L
~ ~
" c
O
v G
a
. y
J
..a
O F.a rn
n
°- ~ ~
V
z w l" ~ ti
~
~
N ~
o a O
~ ]
•~ <
o
l ~p old
W O x
C6.
~ ,
o
w o 6^ O
p y
a p lo
~ M G.. }•i
647 I-O wW Qi Ixo. iwa En iBJ°W
Z =
¢ . O~ ~
"' O
nn a . U
I
wd Iy w
I m w to ` ¢ ~" y J
-.- -
a
v
a
0
Y
E
K
O
Q
F.a
s~
0. G
a &
m 0
O n
v
_ `6 a _I ~ I m RI
~~c.~ p °o °I~<mCl Uzi C7
°•w'~°n I v3 a a mq.•z ~ ~ ~ti~ ~
W A f' O °
' dv ~° x y ~ `• O ol'~ r7 ~
p Ta z m11~f F^~o a n.~~p
O qO m 'D U[- QN X16 °, ~ ID PV
~ OI N '.5 A g 'ey rt F{ ^'I
Ta O)
olE Eu ~o. z~ 9~ ci 3 3~A~ ~ III 1'1
3 '•+~3 J.'I m ~ m~c ° of ~ ~
2.. Ial p.:. Iz ~ iz zc g~ ICI m % O
i .!o ~~ 3~Wo o z I ~I n o ~y
am f z
.{JIti zo °j 1c'p aro o r
NI°z °°Iw o ro nin I!.
w a
~j a` ~o M rc I s Q ~.
wwwl ¢ En ~ o u~N~ i~•.
w V
~ } >I O ti A Q.fi.w
0
i Iz c.n p~v ~ o ~
'~--~.~. 2 o.. H. N
m AN
o s°p n H
Ad
o~
~ r
4 y I ~
b O N A 9
m
~ -(~. p m O A' Y
O O C C O
b -
a A a~
9
"z a
(D x
O° R7
>
~7
M
d ~:S
w n
° y
tll
Tb ~•
" .~. I
~ b ym cl Am A SI 1 fn r
W
?
~ O
G
p
2~
ID
~
0
O~ 4
G IpnC O m
Z
~ a~np
AP
.J ~
d
'a= a o m° ° ~ O b
'P7 3 a A~ mti ~
z b
l r~~ ~
~ kRl
w
w o 0
m
b z
~ ° G
z £ Q i' O n Na ~
'
~$ m.v
~
o
a
...i m
y .
l v
a
N
w
~
° ti
°
•~ m
~z
~^°
N
rt
p
'~
N i 3' r-
a z m
x a ut
ci0 rt.
~~ m
g p .Cj a O
x
O lm N oF-•Q1 Ij 0 o
G' ~ a K
® ..~ Cw ` E E
°
~ ~ 't
m H
I ((i ~ .
i rv
w~
L9.7
lD
v 2
U O .
m' z
~
K
m w
a ~
~ .m
l
'y x I
c ~
CA Q
4a. •
N
ql
al
: I~
~ tia
C
v >+ m £ F •n
W N
. 2
a# % y C] °
°
N W
t{'
' ..
~ o
I E
E .~ .m
u ~
~° a m
° O
3 3
~ m o
... ~ml
m E EI
f 10
° rt °
7,.^ d : O ; T c ~z f
'+ O za
~ iz p W g4
p
~ Vl ~-I ~
9c ~ y Zo
a v '"A F'• ~ MG rv Kl g>EI< a,, a'
. v . -
i C9
~ 8
I a~
~I ® ~
(a N ~ oN m ~333 o 0 a< : I:=I ~ rt oZ m l3 3 p~0 C1
N•
~
n
O °
F-1
I
h t
v o Zm
Z ~~
~ ~: o ~
E ~~~ ~+.
O A~
~ m c
I
~ a N
> 1--`
t7 T
n j :
6 ° ~
` U °O x ~ Q w O !"'O 4N 7
P2'T Nl p~ (
• ~ ¢ ~ ~ '
7~n .C ^ w ~ O WO C
M p W O I'a ~
"
~ N .nn .7+ x _I > a ~ .,- a O
CS z ~ a _ v oo~ i ~I
woo
r
s
a
m
W
w
N
N O
S yI
C C O N I tOi 'A..R AEI o
_
~ AO W
I 0. k S r 6