The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.planning.273707410031 DOCUMENT LAYOUT_ THIS FILE LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING bi2bErRORMATION Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z; Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (llxl~ Y~ ~ i ~ ~. i . _. ~ .: ~ . a ..w .. a.,a,..>.. ~x .~.r ., .,.,ys~ t .....~., a... ~d.,, , a.;.r -:W .l,~m'..!sj m~ l.k~{'. =..~xJ,.. .~ ~ »..,~.; s1-k PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: S,L~~~~.r 4~~-""/h,~~.C~?/~~' rnone: REPRESENTATIVE: ~!'I)a,Cx f F~l"Sd'Y- Phone: 5 ~~~ 6 ~,. a~. r o- ¢ wry„ pax,. aM, P«~d: ~' r ~G '.. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (fee) I: GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (5 step) 1. General Submission ($2,630) 2. Detailed Submission 3. Final, Plat II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (5 step) 1. General Submission, 2. Detailed Submission 3. Final Plat III. SPECIAL REVIEW/REZONING (2 step) 1. 1041 Hazard. Review IV. SPECIAL. APPROVAL (1 step) 1. Employee Dwelling Unit 2. 1041 Hazard Review 3. -0ther REFERRALS: County Environmental Coordinator Water Conservation Bd. Other School District Mountain Bell ..;, ,. a Date Routed: FINAL ROUTING: X County Engineer Aspen Metro S.D. Col Div. of Hgwys. County Attorney County Sanitation Fed. Aviation Admin Building Department Water District Mt. Sopris Soils ~~Environmental Health Trails Director State Planning Offi ~Hou ing Director Holy Cross Electric U.S. Forest Service Fire Marshall Col. Geologic Survey Div. of Water Resou County Manager Division of Wildlife Rocky Mtn.Nat. Gas County Engineer County Attorney X Building Dept.. ~ Housing Director , ($1,720) ($ 660) ($1,560) ($1,310) ' ($I 660) p~b~ ~I~ ($ 660) Date Referred: Environmental Healt Environmental Coorc Other ~i. i ~. i RESOLUTION OF THE,.,, "~ ~ ' ~ o-.-. } .~ ,, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ~. a ,~ .. , .~.,a.... . ~ ~. r.. _..,r a~;~q~~,~~~~... ~a ..:~, . ~ u,, ~. GRANTING $~'ECIAL jR1;VI1;W APPROVAL FOR. TI3E ,. fl NG UNIT. ; COCHRAN ADDITIONAL DWELLI x, o~„ ~, Resolution No. 83 - -,_ WHEREAS, William W. Cochran, II (hereinafter the,."Applicant") is the owner of record, of the, following real property': "" Lot's 1 and 2 Block 10, Williams Additional to the Cit Townsite of Aspen,'County of Pitkin, State'`"of`Colorado and" and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners. (hereinafter the "Board") did consider the application of William W,. Cochran, II to legalize a "bandit" employee unit in April of 1981 aril again on September 12, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Board, acknowledges the non-conformity of the unit';Jand WHI'1~EAS, the Board notes"'that the structure has existed as,,,a dwelling unit since 1969 and. therefore preceded the current requirements; anal WHEREAS, the structure existed prior to FAR requirements; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the County to encourage provision' of employee housing and not `to displace currently housed employees.',' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant special review approval for the Cochr Additional Dwelling Unit subject to the following condition: ' \1 1. The unit shall be registered with the Pi'tkin County Housing Authority which shall verify the,'. qualifications of all applicants for housing in this unit. Approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado at their regular meeting on September 26, 1983'. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMYSSIONERS PITKIN COUI~ITY, COLORADO ~ By_ ; George Madsen ' Chairman ATTEST: Lewis Scanlon, Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Wes Light; County Attorney ` -- ~-- ------ _ ..,t: ,, .. ~, '. } • ,, j ; ~ DISPOSITION; ~: COUNTY P&Z REVIEW -General Submission: ,. _, ;, ._ . ; _,; r ;, ;. _. .: ,,, _~ . ;~ „> ;, BOCC REVIEW -Detailed Submission: • Resolution No. 'g3- BOCC REVIEW -Final Flat; {IpOrovcd 9I'~J$`3 R~rv®RD 4~ PR®C~£tTOtdGS eaw eves , ~~- ~ ~}i ~ ~', P~'L Minutes - 2/7.8/81 Page 2 i. Tkre nzotiozz I~as,zcri unanimuusly for the re_sol_utiun of denial for the Little 11n'lnie .Special Review "'pP ~ ~.. ., ~ :, .. _ ~ ,.. .,, i. _., _ ~ I ~ -Note. licaticn, Reamer asked that'the Chairman oll~~t'hc. alternate members for t eir Otto _ no - ~ ~~ '~ McCaithy - Yc's Reset - no Levinson -yes - acting as'alteYnate , Cochran Additional llwclliszg Unit ~ ~,~ ' trice presezted the application for the existinig Cochran Additional Dwell~irig"Unit. The unit is located in the GIilliazns addition in a shed that pre-exists $oniirg. The 'applicant also reque:;ted a code amendment to the, additional dw~olliuq uni£ 'reg'ulation to eliminate any requirement for, floor~area'~rati.o bompliance. The~lot is~7,50b'sq.~ft. in Elie R-1~"zone'and exceeds the F.~R; limit s•ab~tantially. There is 'a total of 2, 965 sq{. ~ ft. of ~~ improveme'xrts~. Other probl~.ms with the application are: the existing mater ,l~nes~wei'e Installed approx- imately 1892 and are ?" steel.~~' According to Markaluna's of~th"e~ASpen Glater~Dept., t'he lines leap considerably and water pressure is difficult to maintain.' He; is opposed to additions]. dwelling units in That area because of that. Another problem;indi~cated by trice ig the ]ark of. requirUd off-street parkini7.~ parking is eurre`'htlp'on ttie public right-of-Way.' trice referred to a Mat of, theprc:perty indicating that the shed used, for the dwelling unit enchroaches on to an adjacent lot which violates_setbacks on two Sides. Tjze'Planning Office recommended denial o the special rebiew re ue:~t and the proposed code amendment due to ~...~... •.:.. q _r ~ .~ i ~ Yero pa ' ~ the effects on the .quality of ]~ife,~~~•Gr'ice indicated that th^ two lots involved ~ eYmanently m~.rgod by .:onvig, nonconforming, >.n a prwwusly approve3~subdivision'. They is uni~ on each lot. Levinson questioned whether, previously appr.'oved substandard lots,cummulate. trice indicated that according to the ;Code they do. At this poin$, Guy indicated ,that Levinson would~ayain`bc~~a~dotziq~mem2~ex bn thi:s particular .application. trice indicated that- the Codc„$equires 3,000 sq.'ft. of oven space, not used for harking'which would bc. another noncogformity. Brooke Pete.rs~n, representing the applcan~ addressed the issues_ , .raised. He indicated that the property was previously used as a dwelling unit. ~13e indicated that th~~ .imh.rgvorzmrts On tlzc prroperty 'did exceed' PAR Lut the, tYnit5 were iin us,e before the PAR .regzri,r,~ments were e.stabti~hed. Peterson felt that the recluzrement of off.-street Parking does not say off. pu)j~ic riglit•iof}way parking`. '' He'indcate~~~,y"hat ~:he"Coc'hrasr's could supply five parKiny spaces; at the bae1: of t-he property. With regard to ~:he~watcr lines; Peterson' indicated that'the cv.iter lines mentioned by Markhlunas are"-hbt the same'wator line~• sex'vinq the Cochran unit Peterson indicated`that the unit was a nonconf~Zrming structure and ~thc setback requiremcrrts~ wcr~ not 'applicali'ie 'With"regar~h to they' erib"~iroachmezit on to„the adjacent property, there is an easement for_tlie ~structurc givi.nq ~~crmissicn for the enchroach- meri: to exist'.' Peterson indicated that. the unit z.s occupred`~by only•cne person,'an'employee of the Cochra71's at~the~rc-n£ah ratc~o'f~~$2~0'.~Od p"er mohth. •Peters'o'n asked'the P&Z,'to look _ at the naturo, pf tile', neighborhoo~:, an~' o.tder sUhdivision,_ one,- tnat~, wa.^„. utk.ili,zed long before the zoning code was established, Bill'Dreuding, Zoning Enforcemont i7fficer,~~ind~.cated that' if the unit was not gassed, everything that made it liveable;`-~roul~d have `tb"he removed. It coul<3 not i;e used as a living milt'. Grice',indicated,that for 'the, un.rt~ to~ be a, i noncanformirn7 ,u:;e, it must. have been a legal ucc to liugin with. trice i.ndi.cated' r.hnL Patsy Newbury of the :3ui].d;ing Dept. had t:hc, kitchen removed from the same izni.t :in 1976 and 1i97fi. Levinson rev.:w,od the chrorx,logy o£ thc~~uriit ~- 1974 the zoning c,E~as'passed, appro`ximat.ely 1976 tax records show the unit as a studio with no bui,ldinq permits being, issued~_maY,inq it an illegal unit. Peterson disagreed with the~~order of events and the"information fro the Assessor's of.,fice. 'Mr. Cochran presented pictures 'to the Commission taken~~in the,f_alT,of 1969. IIC ref'~~rrcd Co the unit a t}?¢ eugar ::hack. lie xndic~tec?,that ihc. pr'eviotis owrjer, after he purchased the property in ].969; comp~lotely renovated th~ main hou.e' and thG sugar, shack and inst;ailed new utilities. zifter further general discussion, Guy asked for the ._...~ . ,r ~., ..., x. -~ Conunission to~act on the application.• "Cas ~nah moved `t`o deny the application based on'the unit'. exceeding the FAR requirements, ,the ].ack~ of parking, anc3 the sdtback~s _ " Pot~c~'s°sori asked whether it would be ,appropriate for the Commission to examine the property'. Levinson ;sucunded tiro •motzuzz. Guy a:rkud if ~tilc~ memu~r,s would con zdcr a 4itc in~ pection 'and whether it would alter tlz~ situation. The member did not express an xn~er~'st iri~a site~'inspection. Wells asked that the members include in their motiori~the Planning Office's'concern about a, Lourth condition, the availa)jility of public+~watei fdcilities ''C'her'e'benFrig~no further discussion, tjnr. memk~ers voted to ,approve tho motiozi to deny the ~uchran Addi;tiorial Dwelling pp ~ ~ vor~'and thc~'motion ~ar~ed unanimously. Unit A lica'ign. All were in fa ~ 7 >-~ As~uen Highland Ski Area hiaster~>lan 5r~_ozal >Zrview Lt:rmit., , ,•• ~ ~,,, - Jack Johnson from the Planning Office presented the Aspen Highlands Ski Area Maeter Plan. Johnsen indicated that this application was submitted approxamately~a year ago but the r •- - un> tl now iT~4 I I.igh].andc; u1;,t; corp. asked for it to kc taUtrzc~" '• `'„s„,rtza~tez^.planlph`oarr s' im:rovc- ments in buxJling~, lifts Ind trails. The Al~,puze lick was dole edifrom t >J.icat;ian. ~_...-__ -__--r--- v-.., _-. ...,, .,.:~...~.~:.•., .,:..: ..e..~.......,,<.,>:a7..d.:ri~~«.L?av',~_;~,::..,~'~+:a:7~..:F-'.Ndli3:•~.: ~i~~x.~::M^i,~,'lL it^r ,..:~.~:~, _.. w~+..~'.,~.~ Na. :N v d~:'r sAY ~i$i`.. ... ~.9~°I e ~y eYpte•. i, ~ .~_. t~ 111E I '~'. BACKGROUND there was also discussion of a code amendment to alter Section 3- You reviewed thin apeliiirement1thatrthe~F~loo81A~reatRatao bemapplied~~ ~~ 8. 13 toppeter a y q 5 ~ ~,. ~, w..,.. .~, ,p , p ,,•, to the a royal of exstin caretaker units This ro osed amendment was never enacted. • ~ _ ,,, PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW i pp q g g zation of a bandit le ah The a lcant,is re uestin unit. The subject property consists of, two Williams Addition lots (7,526.2'5 sq. ft.) zoned R-15.. The size of the total. improiyements according to the Planning Office's calculation is ~,~6`5'+/ sq. ft. ,` of which 778.03 sq. ft. are contained within the bandit unit. The property ~,......w~ . is served by Municipal Water and Sewer 1` ~ ~~~~~'~~~ ,2 ~~~ non-conforming in that;. ?nes. ;T`he unit is very ' R 15 zone allows 1204 sq. ft.). d (the 1. The FAR limit is exceeded a ~ ~ ,,,; 1 ,,,i,,. i 2. Parking is nonexistent. 3~, q .k 'ntoethetadjacen't lotuirementsconctwoasideshanduencros~hesei The applicant submitted an affidavit in July of 181 which was. v.~w :. , _ _ . _ ,., u._ . from the previous owner (before the Cochr'aris} of the property, Thomas Kassler. He stated that he urchased the ro ert in 19 • extensive remodelin in 1969"and installed utility sprvpcesyduririgarious workers e~ployedyfrom 69, 1970, and used the ro ert for v 1969 - 1974 and for invited guests from 1970 -,.1975.. Patsy Newbury of the 'Building Department reported in a memor~nd~Zm dated February' 11, 1981, that the building had been cited twice for, illegal use as living space and that all kitchen applicances were removed at those times.. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ~., ~. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their regular meeting on February'18, 1981 and voted unanimously to deny the Special Review request. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION .. _~ _ ~. . . ~ ~~ _,, ~ ,. ~~ F. 1 The P1'anning Office recommended denial of this request throughout the pr'gcess in 1981., The memorandum from Patsy Newbury indicates ' 'ted, as being `legal. Thiel affidavit 'raises that the unit was ci some question of its occupancy as an employee unit, but also ,; _, indicates its service as a guest house. The non-conformities are i numerous and we con'~iiue to recommend denial of its •u se as an A. rrtx<..nvTe.«K W%Y+ ,auww~ {n additional dwelling unit th~rough~ Specia""~2evew. ' "' t ~ ,~ ,, !, ,. ', T__ ,r~ ~ ,.t ~t. .~ ~ a, s+ . , I~kN . ~~ ,. ~ ,,.; ,_,~ I 1p i ~ ~ { i i 0~ M E M O RAN D U M ;, „„" ' FF - ..<.; ._ TO; Board of County DATE: September.7, 1983. Commissioners RE: Cochran Additional FROM: Wes Light, /~~ County Attorney ` Dwelling Unit "Agenda In 1981, Bill Cochran requested a Special Review approval of,a second dwelling unit in an out4build~:ng `located on his property in the Williams Addition At-that time, ~.. ,, . the matter was reviewed,pby the ~oar~ of" ~"oun~y C`oininissoners. a decision was Conti owever", by Cochran's attorne of aclclinued pending the submission y tional",information..., Mr. Cochran wa,s alleging that the out building had been inhabited prior to his acquisition of the property and prior to the imposition of certain, floor area' ratio limitations iri that zone district 'The B~ciar~" o~ County ... .. t Commissioners requested~t~at Mr. C'oc~r'ari submit some evidence that the use of the 'out building 'as a secanc~ .... g ...,...~ w ..r„„ ~ <. W w. unit did pre c7aEe" the zoning 'code's "in question. Mr. h bm'tted the affidavit of Thomas D Kastler, r.,a p of~ the ro ert which is a~`tached to , these materialsrl P p Y ~,.;.~Y~ ~ s ~ .. r~~. ~,.: - The affidavit supports the allegatioris ` - ~ _ that Mr.~ Cochran was making et the 1981 hearing. ,. Also at issue in the 1981 hearing was a question of whether or not Mr. Cochrang ap thepyegg~ rightpfo~ anyen'rogchmen't~' of'the out-buildn u on a nei hbor s ro ert Mr. Cochran had submitted a co of an easement which Ives him such right. As far"as 7 can tell from reviewing the Minutes of the previous meetings (whic~i""are also"attached hereto), the submission of these two documents meet the. conditions„ imposed by the Commissioners a~"'tTie T'981 ' hearing. , . 4r a• ~, Y i ,; _... , 5 g A, M w ~W a 0 t LAW OFFICES BROOKE A, , P~TBRSOI°d ~O'R PO"`FY'At1'21°d1` a- .I _.... J i .~,.. :,~ i .. 1 A PROFESSIOTdAL C ~,. i { ~ '~ STREET- 611 WE57 MAIN ~ .., ~ , ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ 13031 925-8168 ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ -~ August 18, 1983 Wes Light, Esquire Pitkin County Attorney 506 E. Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Cochran Land Use Application Dear Wes, Pursuant to the request of Bill Cochran, enclosed please find a copy of the Land Use application submitted to Pitkin County in August of- 1980. After- numerous meetings with the Planning 0£fice and a meeting 'with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the matter was heard by ,g P _ ': r additib alsevidence~,einlthe'foseeof thetunitddwellinltaste former property owner of the u g a residential unit long before the imposition of the Land Use Coye. The affidavit of Thomas. Kassler was submitted on Jul 20, 1981. M client and I assumed at that time that this was sufficient information for the Planning Office and the Board, and that if there wire any additional concerns that we would be contacted. This did not happen until this year when ey client's employee'caas'cgntacted by Building Department officials. I feel that both by appearing at the hearing on June 8, 1981 and by virtue of the submission of the affidavit, that we have given all concerned everything requested. -" Hopefully this information will prove helpful to you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Yours eery truly, BAP:jl enclosures cc: William Cochran a- I O R , - ._ :. e LAW OFFICES IiROOI<~ A. PETERSON A PROFE SSIONAG OORPORA7i'O"N - ~ '~" ' 811 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORA0081'6T1 " 13031 925-8168 .August 25, 1983 Mr-. Wesley Light Ptkin County Attorhey 506 E. Main Street Aspen, Colorado 816"1T ` Re: William Cochran Dedr Wes, Enclosed please find a copy of the Easement%F,ncroachment Agreement between Mr. Cochran and the adjacent property owher Don DeLse which you requested. Please contact me i£ you have any questions. Yours very truly, BAP:jl ccc William Cochran f Enclosure . o _ _ V . r,Y. .. '. ~. ', MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: RE: DATE:. Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission Richard Grce, Planning. Office Cochran Additional February ll, 1981 Dwelling Unit - Special Review , ~. .. -. ..,. t. .n .i. . ,. ~ :: .. ~ r .., vP~ w ttV ~V ak,fi ,.,~ .~~ ~ i ~ :r.". ~'v.~d" ~" .. We have received, the attached application and related supp7er~ental letters •~ "° "~`~"~ aT for the legalization of a bandit unit. Since requesting ~peciaT"review approv ~'~~~~' the site is already developed in excess of the maximum floor area ratio, the application also requests that the BOCC sponsor a'code amendment for Section 3-8.13 "to deter any requirement that the Floor Area Ratio be applied to the ap`prova`l of~` existing caretaker units." The subject property consists of twq Williams Addition lots .(7526.25 square feet) zoned R-15. Thy size of the total improvements, according tb the Planning Office's calculation is 'L965 ± square feet, of which 778.03 square feet are contained within the bandit unit. The FAR limit for this lot is 1204.2 square f Referral Agency Comments tion of Jim Markalunas of the Aspen Wlater Department is opposed to the construe additional dwelling units in the Williamg Addition because the waterlines "are in very poor cohdtion" and the water pressure is chiron,ical7y low. "The Water Department never received the Plant Investment Fees, as far as I know." M .. _,,.,~._a ,- Heiko Kuhn of Asperr Metro Sanitation Dis$rict simply agreed that the unit is already served. No commept was received from the County Engineer regarding parking. However, it is clear from the plat that no parking is available on the property. We can only assume that cars are currently parked in the right-of-way. ,. The County Environmental Health Officer has no objections "as the dwellings are served b'y Municipal Water and Sewer likes." Planning? Office Recommendations This appiicatio,g does not meet the code requirements for. additional dwelling units in the followin ways: ~" ,. 1) The FAR lim%t is exceeded, 2) Parking is not only inadequate but non-existent,. , r facilities are already over-burdened in',, , 3) Public Ovate this area. 4) The shed-which contains this runiyt violates the setback requirements on two sides and in fact illegally encroaches 'into the adjacent Tot. Nothing in the regulation allows violatign of setbacks.. This violation invokes., life, health and safety concerns. " The Planning Office, therefore, recommends denial of this special review application. The code amendment proposes to eliminate fAR limits for, bandit units. The FAR Wend for~enou'ghdopenbspacenan~"I~ghtrto~maintaintqual~tyaoftlife.WeWe alsoorecomi~ae denial of the code amendment. THAT I am the former owner of Lots 1, and 2, Block 10, Williams Addition, Pitkin CouTYty, Colorado; '" ,. ~ .~. THAT I purchased the subject property in 1969; ~ a ~ ~ , r ._ ~ THAT I did extensive remodeling of the property after I purchased it including installation of various utilities; THAT ah outbuilding existed on lot 1 at'the time'I pur- ,. ,._. chased the subject property;" "" THAT T dia extensive remodeling of the subject` outbuilding in 1969. and 1970. - -- THAT I installed various utilities in the subject outbuild- ing during remodeling in 1969 and 1.970 including installatioh and improvement of water, electricity, gas and sewer lines; THAT the subject outbuilding was used as a studio and guest house with bathroom facilities; THAT on numerous occasions invited guests used the subject outbuilding from 1970 through 1975 when I sold the subject.. property; ., ,. THAT the outbuilding was used as a dwelling unit by various workers I employed in Aspen during T969 and 1974; -1- SHOMALL S.D ~7~reTU~ "ice . ~. ~~ . _ 1 THAT to the best of my"knowledge thexe here no restrictions on the use of the._subject outbuilding as ~ dwelling unit since,. the subject outbuildn was used as:a dwelling unit well prior 9 _, 'TM on the sub ect ro er to the enactment of R-15 zoning, j P P tY% THAT I have. always consdered_the•subject outbuilding to' be a lawful dwelling unit; THAT the above statements are true to the best of my know- .n,n, ..m~~ x.Y~, ..~. ...,. .~ ~ ,. ledte. Personally appeared before me~;.,t_,he above-named 'Thomas D. ' •g g g Y p dged 19811ewho simnedethekfore~oynlsi~ dresence dnd ack•nowle the same to be his voluntar act and deed. (SEAL) "Notary Public -2- FR0:41: BilarDruedner'ZonntyEnforcemeht Off'' g ~ _ g icer '~„'w' DATE: January 22, 1981 RE: 1Villiam Cochran, 548 Spruce Street Zoning Violation ' __ ; :, . .~ ., .,m~ . ~~ ,. , ~, ~, ~..I~ o- 1 n g 1 Cochraneiseattein 1980 I"sent a notice of violation to S7z1 tly, hadhbeen illegally converdtedetoaanliving dwe118nSpruPresenee pt ng to receive permission to use this dwelling as a caretaker unit. Onhadninformation8that thectwonmainnsaructuresadlocatedhon lott 1 & 2 and lots 3 & 4 Williams Addition were iYlegal duplexea.s Street~nged for an inspection of 548 Spruce Street and 584' Sp'ruce'' On January 22, 1981 I was permitted entry by the tennants. These two units were clearly single family residences and not duplexes.' If the shed does not receive caretaker unit apprdval I feel we should move for abatement. According to Patsy~~,whi,ry aha ..~ . - C1f1Ca11V adV1CPl~ ('.nr ~iran +ha+ +L,.. .. t....a .__ .__.._ _ .__ __. ~.. cc: .Curt Stewart Richard Grice a~~ E~~t RlS~6s1 Streets Aspen, CoOorsc3n ~'6~'4'7 i.t •~ .,„:,. ~ 5~:e4..±t.s~ Kt m~~~.~",~"-?~.r.. vkv`,~:',,5 nr~4.:tik~veh-vr+„b i. ..iq<.w;~,, i.,,': ~ e: . Y~. .;.•. SPEED i.ET7ER® .-~ ¢I d,.. ..u2 ,,. sc„ .„t°&, 1 New'' i~ P t " ` ~ ~ F sy a FROM TO Richard Grice ~ : ~.., Planning;,Dept Building t.,~~~~;~~,~ a, ~~ ~ 1. s AS+t ~~1"~CE~ ~~ . " I~r -. SUaJEC Kassler-Cochran Property _ «' ,.,: , . , ,~, ,.,~.<.....~.~at+w~r~a>7a*s~~~:~z"at^±*~mi~.~al.:, :~,~x~1~w~ ~ 1 ~~ ...~'i~i' ~~ to ~N0.9610 FOLD .Y MClAA! ' ~^ eb Use of the Chicken Coop behind the Big Homestead_House,(Scufka) Has never had a permit issued, for cohverSion to use 'as living space ,~, .~ ...~ ••. a al use as "J°ving'sgad~" ' ille fo w '" g r ice The building has been sitgd t have been iles s ~ d s y at h i F k e e w o all kitchen appliances were removed ve t°~e dates 'o have ° °`5 n v ie e s iolatio destro ed concerning these y _~ ~..,,. ...,.,.dam a •.,~aa~ ., .. ....ter, .~ r.~. • r than rli . e ar~gther ea been in midsummer 76 and 79 may ,have been 1 w that. ' J SIGNED - --' T c~'1 e ~ _ .f.-~. )wv:~kv i..r. Wi .vt xan 4.lmv~..ne JMW+Fr2r,$e$r eki.aexUF'4~v~4+:'+~Ya~f}~w-eNwwY++ it R E P L Y_ DATE 19 ~: :.. i .._... .._ ._.,.. ._ i _. _. ~ 1 .. ~: ~ I i~ I ( i ... I : :. p. a- _. ~. -~Iio. AFOLD + I, ~ ,a $ y V ~ >~ j _rvo. tO FOLD ~ ~ 9 .- .. RETAIN WHITE GbPY; R@' . .. .:,..., ,.._,:..a _ _ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~, , ~ ,~ r <.. ~ . ~:9 qY <~ 5 9C fk i ¢.~ r: k 4., ~ ~ F,~ R ~ A ~ I .3 ;: , ~.. .. ;~. - ' _.. !- J _ , _, r ~,,. - ~ r- DecemLer,8, I9$p ~~ `~ ~?~i13&1Q1'tAY~DUi~~1 ~ { I T.O: ~. t r pept. 1 Ja:m HamiltonasCounty1~Ilousin~ Director ~/A;pen 14ecro Sa.nxtation }3ot~ Nelson 7a'nvzronm~ntal IIEaIt?i ,, „. S'~ndy Stoller, County AttoraFy Pai; Dobi,e, County L,ngineer S'ROil4: Richard Gxic,e, Planning OS%ice RH: Cochran Additional Duelling Unit T1iE: a~t~~cl~cd application xeiluesi.s app"ov~.l for an e~ist~i.g adci- tional dwelling unit locatecd in the Ni71?ams Add t~or no~the~ ~.t ,e ,,; .~,~, _:,.~ . of l~;pen. Th:> ztc.„i is s~':eciulcd zo eomJ~ior~ 1~;e Pit7,~n County Panning and 7oring Commzss~o~ on Janaarp i",~""3"95~;""there- tox°e, mazy l havo your comments no ;later than ~D~'~errl~er 26, 1~'f30? ,,. i ~ z Than?s.' p L /~. s: A 1~ Y S C 2 Vt =c..1> p3 y 7' f1 ~ ®.3 > ~F ~-~- ~'~IJ l/ N l e / S ~" . ~~~y,p,,aN a+...t rq :. J a}-....e 2'Rtae ... ~/b~YK.e c:'~:. ~.. ~5~~' ?. ~+.Wo4.~.w, ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM T0: RICHARD GRICE - PLANNING FROM: JIM' MARKALUNAS ' ~ + ~ ~ SUBJECT: COCHRAN ADDITIONAL DWELLItd~ UNIT + >...>e ,. ~.. ~.~+ ~,. ~,, ,_, F... EMBER. 15, 1980 DATE• DEC.,, I gather from reviewing the application that Cochran cashes to subd~vide or legalize an existing bandit unit, and that he is presently Meng s~rviced by the existing water service line. Therefore, no additional load would. be w, placed 'upon the water utility in that area`. However, please be advised that should he wish to construct additional. units on the `property, it is my recommendation that he $e discouraged The wa~~r'line: in this. area (William's Addition) are in very poor condition. Water pressuYe _~ . ti .. in this area is chronically low.. The increased deman~ would only further gg Y „.. w a ravate an alread serious condition' Furthermore, if the unit in question is, in fact, a bandit unit, the Water, Department never received the, Plant Investment Fees, d"s fir as I know. .- ., ._.. ....~ _..~.. ..., m„ ~~ ..,..~ .. ..... .. ... ... . ... .. ...... .. ~, .. }.., _. ,,., lei L f: ., ,. - ~~~ mot FRONT: ; ~ , DATE : " I2E t ` ,4' ~ As these dwf , ~ i ~ , . ~er'12, 1980',. ~. r'- ..,~i_..W._'. i- i _.. +wmam.-.n/ww~w •tiw; .mq.e~aRagy„y w +ww { . w. e Mc-r~r ~4 ~'^~~ 'r n additional`"Tr~elling 17nit .- ; ~°~^^r.. .. ^o-raf..,~ ."w`,yj~q. w~ , g3` -r c, ~'~"J.w ro t' w .ings' are ~~ed by mtYiYiCipal wat~er'"and se,~be,~rtlines ~ and no"'other significant " ironmental e'n'6 impacts are ` app~ren , , . .• >~~... bjections to i~'e no h ' , the Coc ran t * ition' 1 Dwelling TJn~ c` , o a we `/` ~ ~ ~ oint ouY °stand rom and f recommen app , „ ' i - ; !. ,', ~ .~,.. j ~: ,,,.. - L, , . " ., .. ~,;,. ., _ " ..- .-~ -: r . m^..~ .rv.~. ..«...~....r." p.». q,;. x. ~.~.}~ ..t, i.:. #. ~3i..,J.n..... '-'"t 4..V ~...rv.' «,..~.. - ~. i ., ., - .- i -.. - . -.~, t . _ ~ - i J w... ~ ~ ' i .. - 1.,. r , . ~ - . r .u r~ . . ............ ....4. .. ~ n ~.. N f .. .. ...... . - .. _ N .. ~ ' '~. .. .n r, . a -. i i i . ~ ~ ~ y - ' `South Galena Street' '130 >3~15'11,; /Aspen, ~;olnrad<s 303/525 " 2'CI `" , , , ~ .. i , - ' .J:..a:svt'.:~..=:+.a:'~.;i <N.a.iilu:6''S:c.'...~-... n..d.::,~.~.,',.rbhw:;.:.>A:~ b wu4.sRt4: <'v~w.,`vw.:.wti.~#: ~..::ixs. h.~~.w..-':A.:, i.iiai'u'Sn r ::. ..._T ~ ~:..„F t~spen/I'll 130 s aspen greet 1611 MEMORANDUM T0: Jim Markalunas, Aspen Water Dept. Jim Hamilton, County Housing Director Aspen Metro Sanitation Bob Nelson, Environmental .Health Sandy Stuller County Attorney Pat Dobie, County Engineer FROM: 'Richard Orice, Planning Office RE: Gochr,an Additional Dwelling Unit The attached, application requests approval for~an existing addi- tional dwelling unit located in the Williams Addition northeast of Aspen. This item is scheduled'to come before the pit kin County Planning and Zoning Commission on January 7, 1980; there- fore, may I have your comments no later than December 26, 1980? Thanks.' ter- ;~. ~ ~". i December 8, 1980 _ ..-;n?^....'......,..,:. .n -~, -' y'd'kw+'a• meb~+"NYA#%aTf:Q'L. "' w Y`4 '\ Mm , }' - ~ ~, f.. ': 506 East Main Street ° BUILDMG,,P`ERIIT AAA~L C~AT~1~ ~~~~ General ~A~ an' L`o o ..dr'.axr> ~-. .~, s,,~. ;e tv.J- .vim a.x .:vww :-w ~ .. ~ ..4 ;rte ons {1st5' ..cm7,P< ' , r ~,.~ .ae ~,r.<.~„xdngt3t?EI~~F` f , - ' Yermtt _. . 303/905'5973 .,,..-" .. ' ... ~ ~ . „. jy~'~,"t#C"JILOtNt3 DEPA~ '~"^F:,~ ~ < ~'1.,~ U 5 ~ 7 1 ti ->~ ..n ' Jurisdiction of applicant to complete numbered spaces only. ' ~,Kg ~' "; y JOB~AtlORE55 -~ '~ -• Adjacent to the ~xistiri' _Castl e~Cl'ek d as $€,dutis,sTMG',~°".. a.. ,„,. ~` ~u`i~E n'i'~l'Ar"cl"D, „ BLOCK:. •• 'e% f d. d.{ ..?.. - A k+ }. ~.sti' .:..t LEGHL NJ~,'jrn / ed M NRy2" I}+I+.tOTf+€v x ..u ~. DE5CR v.4rrr'ZW518A EY^'.^°4. T'.' ye J?3P c ~__ -,.. :vCFVF?;GC vrMg1,L DDRES$ L ". i•"v~ xyu}pyy4.`nu d.n+, OWNER Ww`yndJfiygaf' rRP>. :' 'p 'd ; ~o~orado X161 .~.r.•n z. City of Aspen' T~0 S:" Galena' Street s ~r~a~,„ ~~w~e€~o. ,. ;. CONTRA<YOtt ga.~~~n" o - - '•"^" " 3, InC. Q.O. BOX rv74~~enWµJ ..P' .~.a+t.". r., w,^ ~LICeNSE;a.G. ~ ~ ..,.a,.' ; r Coreco Const". " " ° PRCHITE~'f'a"^RUG'~ESi +.u-,..w.-u... ..,..v..r...o..vw ... ... .v...., :.. +,_ .: NIA x "yf +'k x .,., -wJaA S',7M...v, c%,«rr:!^I s_.~,.sv"t'i .%z~/ Ort~'""~fk"#LiC Q. PH y~/~ ^' ..•-„n•+nvm v: aY n9<4Nas" ~ 'NA~.T`L q~OD~ I.QT Do ~oq~<l,yo 3/Yya I~ ~,000~ ENGINEER ~"~ n(,,~e'WDD M~~9-4428` 5. Richard H., C, ssens 43'8 S., Wtn ,e,, ,, ,..._ • ~ .,,.,yx..w„ USE OFB ~ an ~~ ~~ ~~ ~'~ s. " $v0 MAD Water-7reatme ....... ..:. . «. ..~ ~ '~ _.... A EW ...n,~. - . .. .......p .: Class of work: " --"^'~"' B. Change of use from .. NO Change - E~xis In a re~ Tan S1 a -- ToTgL FEE-""''"'"-" - PLAN CHE'CIX,~`~ ~ ~ '~ ~ PER/NIT FEE .. R ~.' o -~ 9 0 ~, 00 1°~ 0 .,.. „ . .:., .,..., ,.. 9912.4 q - .. ri.,M 'rie~~ D "sion~ V °^ O aneY Gr6u9'v ~~' S.Change of use to ~ 57~ C, _ <,- ,. - - ~' - e ot~COnsv_ uzeion"~, `AV, <cuo _ ..- Ivi eN o- Valuation of w ' M x. OCC LOatl REMARKS: ~. ~ ~ 78 QZ _ . , ..._ .. «,.,.r.„~ ~uu ., ~ ....._ No. of SC'Ones a .. _ .,.. ~° ~. CQ Sze Of Buatlmg ~ 'j '® fD, _ Qh. Total$ware~F ~. ,e<r \{ ~•~~ e e i ~ ~GJ u uze zo ~~ ' Frte sprihklersiRepuiieE` specia t^eview "°'~' v-, ^,» 'CRY 'B..P~W+W'~4} Fire Tolle • ^ V05 ^ NO~ spent' „, .. ... _... .,,.,.,..erwws.Ok~Sed; nYgAdr r ' ~~.: w y 3 D ~ ,.. PI Speoiai Approvals Rt`nUif ZONING _-~~~~~~~ - HEq LTH DEPT. ' ~ Ep ~~ gPPaoGED'"~bR, is"`sdA'b"cE „ . ~~~~+ R gPPLiCP1'10 ~~ f1RE.O~PT. 9Y _ _ 6Y~ SOIL REPORT°~:~~ BY ~(LJ DgTE DATE ~ ~~ '" .w•an pgRK DED1LYiTION Y DATE ^ .. .,.., ..............#+#xY°kYT' - ...-:- -..mww« ...<.v~l E WWTER TqP .. :.., .. SEPARATE ,PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRI~CAL._,~L~,„N,,G ~~ enc. qEP?,,,,,.~„~ EN'fILATING Op AIR COY1D1'YfCS`N'1"t~G.'"` _,,,,,~:, " G ' ' V ; HEAT(N RUCYION ~ Sj THIS PERMIT f3EC01vt~S,, n1UL'L A'0`I'~~P~'R~. ~'(~N 71~NCED WITNIN~fi~~ ORYi ' ' " ` ~~~i GTHER IspsrlPVl "- ~ ~ ~ ~~~µ l Y C I,S hliS F AUTHORIZED ~($R°A ~hE~'r0~ O tSED OR ABANIS'2SY~~. ' - M ~ N ' ' -,,,,m,.w.a;ww«a~•ror'«a -.C x ~r. , ~ C1RP TION OR VJ~FS~ TS CCJMWYETJ~ED.' 0`4r2' ~FT7=R V1 " " ' " .,,_ .. _ ~ r TY1v1E` T p N ~ DAYS A YHPS'APFLICATI'ON'm .. ~.-..:..T q tA~D" AND EXAAAI`NED ~"I ~ - W, _, ,.~ ' , S1~U5 I HEREeV CEPTIFY, T :AT I HAVE Rt AND "KNONf`7SIE SA.IN°e°"If0 EE.~SRO'£ 'AND CO<F1}i ECY: AL'C'"Pr51~'I~I~S~~~ L IS TVPE'O~F'~"0~/~WTII'HE; ~b'SCrtp21E'D WItRf ~ G~T h ` ~ ~ ^ ~ ., ,,. ,! *, 3 A ORM I F TH F• ( ~EWNf GO £S-N bT , PNO OR INANCES D°`AIERE~N'"OA iTOT'YHE~°Cfi~Ar1OY~C~~ d PER'~I~DO OF ~516~N5 * w _R w ~ , . rv. ~ . WHET SPECIFIE ` d PR ESU E TO GIVES~AIi~~'~,O' VIOL"ATE ~vI;A~~E~ YH ~"G C~iRlYCI'101~"Ot~vt~~~'~''~ ' ~ o F ` 1 ANV THER~5TATE,<°D~A,L~,LA„Rx~.~Yl ...._..,w.~x~, T PARKING sPPCES' UncovareE .Y Mc~ ai;kN*. ~ a 9 xs . ae'a" PERMIT VALIDAT ON ' CK, ^ ~~M.O ^ '. CASH d A"P A C .- „~~p - ~ , - .,' WHITE- INSPECTOR S~COPV~ ;~~L_LOW xm~As~,~S~s ~~,, :~ PINK- UI,L,D I'NG"DEPT M.O. ^ 1 ib`sFy„ba'A. call "'sye _" Y'US (OMtR v ;:.~ M ~eruw++xwn ,~wmp~arc.. mmv+}o-A~^r:,rv ~ ~: .. I >1 -t n„", Suss r.,y '< ' ,.` i~sa 31w;~`> t'( ~ a ^A'` £ 1..* ~ ' :~y„~ .=4s~~'+~wzw~Se.rn d ~.:'v~tiiw v.:wesiuf.`ntr a - { - T ~ d. .. ~# ~Y~`xm~+'~wa~"'~1'Lt'@u.~Wc-^6.~''CS¢K1t~xh~.*Wwn'.a:+aih~aw"~` ~.Ya' hs.4bZGY::e~tw } Y t i i.. ,~ < ~, + don( Rned to eccnmcdat dp"edc at rl pn aerux¢. Pete rq Pelt [hlk Vnq 'd city vidC ' ~' problem vhfrh alxiu ld Le adJ i-exaod ea au. h, Although she $pa rd felt [ho ' ~~ ,f ~ ~ [ranapu htat ion taaue, i ai•lud ins pa rk tot, fncliftlra, avt omnBl to "vaff lc dnd `~ ~ ~ ~~ ' `" .„ ` buses ah,•u lA ba addreaxeS~ Clit to aR reed that tlilp Vea nu[`'a majyu county ~iq¢un, He moved to annfinue the public Aepr ttiR on 2B Ap r11, 198"1 at 12;00 P,H. ~~ B inks seconded and the mot loo pna¢ad unen(mnuaty. y "~ --____---- ~' _ p Pub1Ac Richnrd (',r lrv oC the Pl anti(hg Office lot sodas rd f~+r epee to lrevtrv the Cochran ,r, ~;. k,~ Cochran appilcation for nn ndAtt lntial dvrlltng im it, ndt ing (fiat Che np~+1(cant vne unable 11 srP~at {t Rrvlev to attend codny'n mertinA and request ed that the hearing be eontfnued on 8 June, 19$1. f.., Child opined the hen slog for public conmu nr; there betnR nnne, he moved m continue ~~ t), the hrarlnR on 8 dtnm, 1981, at 10:00 A.H. Blake aernnded bed tfio mot inn (S~r passed n ~,, una nl.;wualy. ~,~_ Pint Cn ri Sievert tptroduced the fLrat YC a monthly antes of repnrtn trom him Readings t t SuPD Ie- disease log the county's ftnanclal end ndmfn is irattvn poet Plnn. Thr reps rt Renerplly ~~ mental _,,. .~` App rep, discussed a ehY rttnll (n revrnuex, noting that aalYa tax collect lone vats down, E t 6 ~y Depn rt- tedexn] Rmdfng tut P14T may be In Jeopardy, U.S. Fo text Se rvico shared revenues mental ® ~' Sta [un uses expected to hr 152 leap than fn the prey loos year, and Hlghuny Use r¢ texas '~ i; and Animal Cunerol revcrtue¢vero lover than antfrtpstsd. The Board had ea ricer i put a hold on vnrluua prujac to due tv the shoo rn+al ski ¢enpnn; S[OVATC recommended that the Bna rd out one hundred pod tventy thouxand dollar¢ ($120,000) of chase p rojecte to ofisrr as rxpocted trvenur ehortfa il, to addition to Chose, P1aaning ~' ~q Oft lcc ravcnue.a veer lagg tog duo the delayed Implementer ton of [he nev fee t ty "r schedule, build ln$ mat n[rnanrr vas over Fudge( an coot repptra and vfndov s replacemonts, the coat of housing prlaonero to ut her fxc ll Stlrp has L+r reseed ;~ eubatantlpl ly, and the Dlat riot Attorney's Office hea afgnlfirant ly oxreoded Budgeted ¢alary lpvela. Oua to turn ovor and savio nuns Gadget inR for the BOCC, .Iwvav. r, sevrnt een thous pod dollars ($17,000) v: s to ba nturoed to unapp ropy Laced (: fund balance. 6teva rt Snc laded a budget rYaoluttnn to addre¢n [boos items that k require budget transfn rs for cm,,x lde rat inn mt first teed iny,. ~ Blake requested that the County Na eager include a budRrt pumma ry led lcat ing aetual ~~ performance to date, Blake then moved app rnval of the rend lot loo nn [f rxt reading, Child eecnndad and the mntYnn pp pgad unenlm y¢ly, Publle The Board convened m ng p Naar ln$7 puhl tr hnarl to cone ides a 1061 s eclal revtev Paae app]!ce[(on fur [he ¢onat tact inn of a n(nglr family raa idanc,e and ~f' SDac1e) f.arage on a ~yC Raviev forty (AO) acre portal lnc ated otf line( Soprla Creak RYad ovtior by Dale Pnaa, f Cotamisolonert¢ Haet ing e r a 6 i7 Apr 11, 19R1 - 5 ,~ ~,~~ `qn.T' s, v°`~~fra"`kh?aa" nvxgv daY2*`°3".'4*w&S']f?~~", 1a^~`~ ;,,-c~am.F n+`+.'^04 r"M1C ~"+'+,M^'-.,.~n~'' `.~.d~a" ~x"ud~a*,s.~.twwKK~'~t".. ''S"a"w. ,iirar "r~Yx~' ,. i i t. i i ., ,.' °: r. C' t <i' ~i Coswiss SOner's lieeC ing ..3 the County are Che Dole ivo 1'--) out lt,4rn rr*Pona ihlr L.r .L.hn Yualckrx feeK. ~ ~'„ 'ahi 'Prrip•+xrd that fhr lfnard dlnaww iha Value u( th/w orgnntr.et inn avA 1ta (tiro rr; ft 'nnv hr va lunh lr, for Ins( mu c, fnr ]tsn Poar.1 to_,rri a/n mr,~berwhi p.. 1'n tby ~rRanf err[{on but vlthd av fh•tinr Hi auppa rt n,- iu. c:a _ „. a ~ Ynrt Strvart nrtcd that apP txtmat rl) rtbht ••rn tl. uaaad Jnllara (STP,000) .r ...... . . ....... ..... leas, been spent an Weudt rrtatrd v.rrk ss of 30 spell, I9d1; a total nE cvrrnt Y-f15o :. ,: ' tlnusdnd disllars (525,000) Aee been budgeted fnr Reudt 'or the eat Sre year. Thr Bpnrd )alnrd the Authority so that oth.a onNttts covtd share to they cssC~ of• _• opera Nunn; although the aRCeement stairs thaC the aunts are to hr gharrd equelfY by the tw•mher rot ft 4•a, thtu hoe not happened to date. ~ KinaleY proposed that tM• Faard most vtlh Musick fur nn update un the fnnetlon lnq • ~ ~ !, in vtthln ' of the or Gan iznt ton pod to advise hfm of the Board's d.•strt to rcma _ i buJget. -__ Public yTggqhr iSOard cant lnueJ the rub( tr hear iny. on the Cochran DveY7ing Unlt. Richard Gr tee,, grarlhgi and had Cnahran noted (!vat the nPplirnnt vas again unable in attend today's meet tot;, requester? that the mrtter br fabl rd. Chid opintd the hearing for public emanint; the n• bi1nR none, he moved to table the Item.. Biakr seconded and the owe~ton passed + ~ 'unanimous ty. ~_ he Process of droving uP a resolution Curt Scevart not rd that the stiff vs 1n t,_ Little y ~~- l '- cn tua R Y ~ ,(Seel/rnnc Mttla on he Little Annie issue eneral) addressing ten (21 iaeues• poll tanuea and teohn lr al tsaues. toltt Seal and coneepcusl issues, vhioh +ould Include public coats. rrmsin unresd ved and Stevan vanced sane clot if i<sk ion as [A Lhec he[ the ePPl Stoat shoo Td Pttsvfdu n•)at ed lnformat ion as apse if fed Sn Sett ion 5-20/..2 ... M • :ant ahouidhe of the f,and Use Wdi, Cht1J, Kt nsi rv and Klardcr id felt Cht strolls. , re9ut rnd M provide chta infnrrw t,l n•vhrrens Blake and Nadaen did na[ el ak<.. Gam: ..,! i vas contern~td that each any delay tl.e Pro]ect six (5y io r1Rht (RI months msd carry sole ercfous Cfnanc lal impl)cat inns as regards the arPllcanf. Klns lee felt the proposed devrlnpmcnt had the po[entinl fnr tmpa~'t.1nR Publ lc sere feces, perhaps to a greaceT escrnt than the comrun./fy ens ratable of arnosx,dat inR• If the aPpl leant can disprove this then Ktns]eyvnulJ he 'oat LSf Sed. Ff nnnc faI Plrr}ner Johr ElderC noted that the aPpltcant volunt cared at one time tn. con[ribn[e t5!nds ro eapital ,, •,. Smprovemegta for Public traneportat ton, and advi eeJ that the Board request these , of this t1me. As throe (3) rf the Board r{embers felt Chr aPrl icsnt should sJ~rrsa •Duhl i<' impacts,. ae a,.dreaeed under gecNon 5-204.2 of the Land t)se Lobe, such eau fl.acal ' , Ce be included fn Chc reaoluc ion. Klandvrud alpn tyok this npportunttY [o aPUloF,4ve A dune. 19P.1 - B 4' a y .. .. t t r .. a m._,. ,;, s...~+re~SY~wan .>..~.w-w:.. t..u'a ~-rr<.,r€b,~^a'ak„t.,n'S,t~=~ v; e.,'l.r`Cw.ar+~"~&'S'u~ _.,, ,. es °" b :' 8 rr A d ~~ ""r "y.~`k~°'1~~': "~"3" ^.r~ ~{a"'~ ~k."^'h. d .6~= ~ _ ' ' ~ .yF. '.~$3S ~° 9 ri ~ ~ ~ . i ~ .fan Yea .tA:t7ti{+L f.~F a• M ~,!Y^k~~i4~: `.a G :A'" ~ . . e I y f r ~' _ a • . -' .. ' is+x (dunce. Thp ,apl+lic~n[, vha ®eldoa in 9noVnutax Vf l7agr', tntmhds ima f ~ ry ont pr Agvare ~ '~ rho Pr [nc ipal Doti while pormlttinft , live {n the Proposed nddit ionaY dwelling t ` 4 __. xy , o reconwanded hta daugh[o r. The Plnmtl nR and F.onlnµ Corc®lea tnn d b f ~ ~' a y rastdeneq to he ocrup ~ apDraval aub)uct to an anRlnaorad nn-alto sevago dlspoanl nyst om•for the edAlt lone( unit dent Rnud by s reglatrraS ptnteaa[anal ungtnanr, 6actnClologfr~t and cbrmlcel ~ ~ q drift loon( Wel lln.,,, _ unllty teats pn the voter supply, and rho ante ri nR iota of an A,, o _, R .. • '~ ;, ~ ~ Un /t Agreement vlth rho County. The Planning Office, huvevrt, talc thanpplfcat ton _ _- a i , as to con[11ct with Cho intent of the mealu[1nn govern log such uttlta es they ~ :• v ~ ~ ~•• ~ ~ ~ P '~ ~ vl[h lox tn<omee. opporUmltfee Ior parsons rent al vi de add it lanai (..,,, • . , arc meant to ro p In th!® tnstancs, the apPl is ant fa Aa twiner o[ a hnma,,in SnowYatA V11)age and in •_ Cs ,_ fdanco end l ~ e_ Bnowmean Village ru retire to the Redatopet he fnt ends to Hell t6 v n '~ •~~~• ~. nc.n~-~~c p_. ~.,~ .,~ ,,e;, ~, a Plnnnl ng Offlem questioned whether the npplScani adrift fain] unit In Redstone. Th ' '' ` na a lnv inromo tend idnte fqr e~p lol ee hoes lnR enA, ne a coneequenca, lif -.. ,.. ~ y y would qua _,. .. ~.~.. ,.,m ~~~--n x „r. .. ~ ~ '~ ,. ~~ rocommendu[f dental. • j«; Thero was aamo disease inn aA to the all6fbtlity of Fl ockha rt [or such a unlit - o- . r. cn lo f h y e omp fic felt chat senior tit (sane vote inn laded within whc inte~c o l e Kt ~ ~ y ns ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,,,,, . Cor ormalfan th in d~ellin unit rogulatlone and St was nuggestad that the Board C B ~ the re being fate ro reference. ,Child then opened the hearing for Dub ltc <nmmeni; ', ~ ( .. „ ..., t+. ... t .. M.. ..x..,,. ~- ~~ C' none, the hearing vas closed. , ~ t'! Kinaley mowed approval of the eppt teat tun subJec[ to the conduit lone rncaamwndud ;, enmdoal and the mot ion pexscd unsn inwua ly. by [ho IlAnnfnR end Zont nx Cofwniss lcrn, Blake s f+.: (.. ;-:. ,. } ---- ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ nvonad a public henrfng to cons (der the, Carh ran Add ittnnal Ihra)IinR Un It d £; •, Public ro Tha tlonr R? 't+,/ Hea alt' C A ApPllcatton, nubmtttad for aPae dal rev lev. Rlahnrd Gcten submlitt ed to she rerotd'the x.. a< r p Addt'1 t t±'~ Dvall ~ [.and Vao Codu ae atwnAcd, the plannf nR Uf[tce Homo nt 3I April .1981 and attachments, ,^+ Onit Y 1981. Tho subyuct Peb teary, Plennf ng etw 7.gnfnR Cummfesion mina[ ea of IS d h ^" .. i. `,. , e t en ~.~ property cons data of two (2) /o to xfshinthu YSlltams Addltfan And the npPl (coot H i' ~ rmqueetn the legs ll xat loo of An, axis tlnR add t[ianal.dvel 3t ng unit sliest ed. on as id '~ property. Refezrel ARenry compants vartM; the Aspen Vntar Depar[mont oppasod the n* Donal tact toe: of Any antra wit hln chu Vitlteats Addit inn duo to daterfa~r amt ing water ru. • p ' 4 Ifnee nd chronically tau water proaxun; chu Vat cr Departmont also noted chat Plnnt , , w Cou}gty tnt,l namr did c lvod for [hc aub)oct tin It She Luvoetmant [aos were Haver rc. : ~. ~ _ ., ; .., .. , . mM a,MSN.Ta i was noted l tiwugh St s a [ n c t ~ ,n ', ,7 ~• ,~ nT ed that P lanelnR Ufftre~, furtftar n plntg Thr on the led tented vao nnne that bero t i ., ~ ~ ~ "` < s on two t2) skins . . la t;en eat back ra uiramm~t q the unit exceeds FAR ltmltet tons, vi ~ - * ;'~ l , . , .. crttefis, a dental of'.. ll laga7ly ancroschos Into the ad ac ant la[• boxed on thte and., t :; ~+ x .. this eppl teat tort vas rarmm~endod Thu apPf lc nnC also inc•I uded A pn,po+od ends amondmenC ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,? !ng Off lru , ~ ~ that vgdld ellmlm [e PAR Ilmtu when applied to ruts[ lnR units[ [to Plann ;t` 27 Juno, 1981 - 5 ,. Comnieeionnr'c Hoatlnx c ~ 1 .. _~ a -_~~ ., ~ 4' a • t ~~.. 4 i ~ a '. I E. 1. ____ .. ~,~: .. ~. ,. '. f .~~ k.,, v yq. felt anld timfta should o, mntnca.n ~,~ ~. ~ ,. a., ~ ~ ,.. wed the nppl lent ton ... r ,. .. donlal of ehts as wall. The plannLnR and 7.on1 nR Cammtsa Son raw e . „ ..... ~ :Io-nlaL .:,.. .. end unanlmouelY endorxedaenClnlA[h~nnPPl Kant ,Pex~a lnodl that`+this aPPl lrntton BTOOkO Patara<M, [ePTP g ' vas aubm[t tad in the xplrlt of the land Uae,..Cndt, although Potvt!aon ecknowlodRPd :. - .i, tho cxlatppce o£ tho euD}rct unit he notedchat tt d~~ka provido low ~ncome ltountng (ni Cochrefi omployooa and has done ao tax thr pea[ seven (7) years tetarcon ettonRly ~. rv... nt X+.na..n .n: 4 n, ~1 .. a disputed the appllcab tl ltY of the fluor Brea cat ion oo existing; unltd and supported s code a:ttendmont to t Ma end _,,. ... r . _. , ' 8131 Cochran, the eppl !cent. exple inod that the eub)o-ct epic lee on the property'" ~ when he putchnaod !e. Thn buUding we oi3glnnlly used as a blacleami ih shop although. thr previous owner used !t as aetudlo. Cochran dtaputad Che encranchmant ,Xenur ' noting that there is a discrepancy to tho- survey resole ; one survey, apparently ~~ ref loc5a nn encroachment uht le erotlwr does not. fn any even[,,Cochran noted Aa has an eaaPmenC right for~ho enrr~oachm~a~nt ant .Af ~4t~'sClanue ~vaa no longer t part inept. ~ he fol3ovlnA reda6na; Pexarson test the Board should aPPrnvo the apPlltat lop for c„,.` ,. a ' .»LL .y:-_-` "x~ie ,n • p "m°Ft7F"~ sFUr a Prtvaca nA..° ,~ ~re + .• ~ .~ ) .. , lnndovn¢r and Ls sublPCt [o ~a~n Pnaertant agrecmant bnrween cbPae par feo t ere is ads4uete room to provide park lag tae lit Sas off xtrref if needod_ n d cha -1nYUO oY rv t Natar presaurv Ss as ax4 at SnA vondit ian over which the apDY icanC fins no control. tt ..,.._,,, .:vz~`X'!t&"~."8+..%tivYYY^~P Yr .,.. .a ~ .: ., vas noted that should the Board deny this part Auler eppMcat ion, the subject unft is soil cQuipped with water tacilte fee,as they, have beau in exlstt:nec prtor to " 1974, Cricc then submitjed to the, [ecord a memorandum from Pacay Newbury of cha Bu tidfnR x ...,. „~ a:* ..,. ~i ~. Department varffy inR [hat the eub)ect ^q1t has never_ had n po-rmtC Cnr tOnvera loq ~, .,1~legal uao- se living to uad na 74ving apace s^d firer tt fins been Cwico cited for 1 ,,.. _ spate rssult iny. In chc removal of all kitchen nppl inn, ox Thdmemurandum,. dated ^ _. . _. _.. ..,.. ... . «. ,ice .+, , a.., II February, i9H1, .anted that. the dates of these prevfow vfulaC tone NPre In , , ,.. ,e .... ..._.. . 4a h. 1976 and 1978. Potrrson objected to xubmltt ing thaw mem.+ to the reeord as hs felt _. _ ....:.. J epPl teat ton as he this vas irrelevant. Cochran ezPla inod that hefnlt letod the t. Nas not tart stn ea to ChP Iagnlity of the aubJect unit nppnrrnt ly the 'unit vas,. .,... .,,.~~ t~. { xc ~ r~~,u. f napected three p) YPnra aRb ec which;ttme the kf tchen vas ~remwed Cochran t the ki[chan. Thi• f¢IC that. at that tfine,th¢ unit vas connf drred legal withot kdtch en facl lit tea were re-lnotgilled as_,a mntCar of nocaeal[y an es to acenmodeta .. . Ae: ..1,ti, ,t _... ...._. ,o, Chan. :-. .. • renew[. Cochran winh¢o tnlrRnliic the uni[ paw with a kit Chlid than opened the hearing tar pub: is rommetlt, Cochran nxpl alnvd that lAo merely ronavarod cite unit vas oxtat inR vhan he p~r~haaed the proM•r[Y and that ha. 22 .Tuna, 19A1 - 6 t + S 'a i t Camatiasloner`a He¢t lag J _ .. ~ __.a. ... _. ,.._. C ~, w • ti .. ~ ., ~ , z e ~ T V '.. ~Y ., _ ... iz..e ~ rx n r... Y .YN rt + rs'd r r. L .n x ~ F.::_ NYi~d~.xivf['/..r:~Ki{i+.~'V~'li+~:llr 'CFd$J wR4'nm...+rg )- .. m, `t rv4y/ r.. r p: Z ~.. ... .. ... ... w .. p. .. a . - i r ~ 1 ~ . 1 f ~' .. ~i r ~ Yt • }. y: p ' F . Klanderud not rd that although the structure vne on thr property st the ~> at rucfure f ° i ~ . ~u~,.s . ins., , ' ~ t Smn RC sale, St Y<R11f1 APPPer fhA[ {t MLA ROC Uard Aa a.. 11V!nR Uni[ AC Lt1AC [tm0, .. ~ • hC 0116 leer .URIC letnrd that h¢ had been tRld [hAt lhrtP V@rc hodx to t ez • P ~ i ~ p afl raCR : when CPChnn purchaacd the proprrfy; aA the purr Ywase prodatex the adoption of f t ` current toning r¢gula[ions and FAR ifmitaf ions P06ersan felt these Yerr both .. x ~ ~ ., ~ t ' i vero merely lnapprdptlate, Furthcimorc, Prtataon felt that thr FAR IimLtat taas ,. _ r - ~ y _ " ~ ' tmrnts has_dcemed impptopr fate, that erethec tc rP utat ions that [ho 8onrd of Ad]ux g ~ t , r . -- uddrraa aroAA lik Mountain Vallry and that [hey should not shay wore inaeltutcd to . a » auw*vy Y o ; r w .w~: a ~+~+ ^ . , , w .,~... .«~r . . , , ~ . w: ,,.. mo .. ~ ` peruto to extxc [nR of tvr[utea that predtca chaos regalnt ions. Eht• eub]PC ["unit vaA'~fh exi atcnc e: with ktt~chen fiat lif.cies -KinaYey felt that. if, ~ ,. ,: - ~ -~ ;. F w ,,, ,..:.,m ..,.. , dt -.~ ~ and used es a IiviRR unit prior to. oho adapt ion o[ the FAR regulat.lone, than ft :' ' ~. .,,.. _, . _.. .. ,w_ .. . ._ . ~.. .. ~ ,would be approvrd; the evldencP, however, ffifo the cane rnry. Child noted that, drsplte ` ouch a acenarlo, the sub]ect unit would atilt, wit late the setback requiremepte. ~ z, ~ Peterson then Agreed to auhmlt a crPY of the ngrePtwn^. to oho Board, regarding the .;, @aeement~whlch Cochran ebtn load fx the ae[baok, should th@ lfoardrPquoat the same. 1~ ed lnP, 2onlnA Rnforcea~¢nt f rota B(11 rJru Crice Aubmtcted to the record amemotandtm ~ A .... , :. ,, u.~ ~ , ~,i > > Of Cicer, dated 22 January, 1981, to vh[ch he nor¢d tkat A nut ice o[ violation had " ." ~~ bran sent to the appl leant regard lag rho sub]ect unit"; DruedtnR noted Chet Patsy t i ry Apeclflca]ly Advlaed Cochran chat this uniT Ysa not to be' it legallp Rewb . u converted'f Pr hab![A[ign. Cric¢ auFRested that Cochran dSd not loft lath the µ ~ ; ,.v _. n circa of eppl lcaklrm, rather, that the eppU.cant did so due to the sevezal, 4 ~,,, ,,,~ ,~, • ' ,, ,,. ; ~'> violet ton. Peterson czPlafned that the Drueding complaint vas filed after Cochran ~ ,. ,'. _~_ .. pracee,fed w1!h the LPhd Ux~ "ai'P[le et !oo and reaYitad Yhe-r Fro enpl',fed (nr an '., t {,,, i ctec[rlcal Pernit. "` `~ Child rhea moved to den the Cochrane ec1a1 review applicat Lori. due to the ~ r r; ~„ ~:~ reasons cited by the Planning Office; elk hough Ch11d acknMrledg'eQ the epee cal ~ °' ,, remeR[a of the condlt lone of this part lcular epplfcat ton, he felt that the requl '. { ' iscuas ton lattd Ude Code veto not sat lei fed. Klanderudseronded. There eneurd a d F .. V _. .:: ....f... ~, 5 .... i ~ ~.~~ ae to ghethcr a unit used as an. rmployre duelling, subsequent ly removed fromthc r,:~,_ ; ~, houaf ng pool at some puf nt in time, and once aRnfn placed back to the emplnyeP .. '; ~ 15 t would, atthnuRh houain pool, would yualt fy for leRl [lmvcy today. Ki nalcy frlt !., _ ,. ~' ' he noted that the Cochran unit had b, en afted Cur v[olac long prior fo thla apPl (rattan .... ..,v. e s u i. b. ~ • '~' ~ Ct uRIC vpuld rnRPt itu[e and dfaputed vlrect+qr the ext atencr of beds !n [he sub n ,, ' ,.,..,, ~ ;. a I~vto unit. . I~ . ' ~_ eSbSlt ty oC the unit PACPratlR„.then rrgtien4ed dt¢ opportunity a invent ign,te [te pna _. ...... ~.; ,`' being inhabited aA,a living unit prior to [he adapt [on'of the FAR tagwlat Long; 1C thta j, ., ' prrdated the adopt loo of goning regul at roar, rou7d de eubetartt loted, and ff kiie same ~~ , M ~. , .. - _. v. ,. n f ;v, then the FAR lfmitat inns would not apply Pet arson requratrd that the Board ,cable>t1rr ~~ ~~ ~ " .,. ~^...a.f «~,.-. ..-.. .,.., ~. 22 Juire, 1961 - 7 ~ ~. Commimalotier's Hosting ~ ~ r r .. asr, ,~~ ~ , _. ;f.. _. ~~, [ w, a . • l Y .. • ~ 1 ! 6 J n 6 r ; ~ i . ~ .. ... _ ,. , rpu... xn..+. ~, ~,- r .. ~kvr~e4~>c.:n+b+virsl,.w~ as,~sw R'v~" ~J~+x`~kM1:a,:.' . `."xo~n.+` `I.ms...,. ' F. 0. [ I Doati]e x Qunrtet Circia" ;r t appl fret ion to d1 T.iv tot th2».~ '~"~ K1[wlep <xplmfn<d [hut KFves'Jil]!ng to glue Peterson dhr'oppoetanit) 'to sddteaa ~ ~` tfw RAR requlremanta but rxpresaed ease con<em asto the <n<rtlachh<ot is»ue. 82alie "' 1lkev fee supported this paa T[;on aM muggestrd trot thm board gtitafn an opinion on k, .. ~ .. ` ., , , _.~ thle hotter troy the County Xf tornry. It va» [roi'kno4n for lnotanc<, Tn vAat vay the land Use Code vou2daddieaa enctioachmcnts'and ff there vas any"flc»i~bi t"ity !o the ' amtter. Crice cave loved that the Board cotolder thu safety factor ini[ereat inthe eocrwchx~t !¢su<-end hov this' wy effect adjacent 0uild inga`. The mot ton to deny the epp2tca[!on taoethe lees [allyd vitk oppos loan from xtnsl<y~ liadsen and Yilak<. Ktnsl<y then moawM to tal+le the applfcstfon, Blake seconded end [lie arof ion passed' Vii' "' ' vith opposer ton from Q+T1d a'S ~~xTarderud. ' r~ Y .. .. ,,. _.... . Ri Mrd G f intr d d~t l '°t' " ' • " "" .. _.~ c r ce o uce orde[at ed auAmfea;on )ie Double X t)i[ur c <r L t tc)r Subdivfulon application. "11c< praposel indolves the rexoning of a 61.6 acrr parcel ~ to PNN-PtID far duplex development on locs one (1) chrough eighk (B)' prov Ldtng [liar ~ `~'~ e all sixteen (I6) utlts arc-rest Meted to the middle fncohe'"guidelines. Bef<rrai' agesey coisoe[[[s were-generally supportive although tPn CovntyEngtneer r<questeA' a dxty (fi0) foot 'r ighc-ot-vay for the Watson Divide Road and else 'cTu private ac<enG eaxtoent for lots seven (1) and eight (b) he Snereased co thtrt~q (30} feet in of dth.. 1 ~emical and Dacteclologtcal tests on the yell vatersupply fur lot sine (9), the ' ` free vrkec unit, renatn fneomMusive Dut will De a<coxg.]tahed prfor'to final _. 1 ~~ i plat. The Plennfng. Off lt<, then, recoa®rnded approyeY aut+jact t'o tw (2) eondlt Sons; ~ ` 4 the d¢dlca[Wn of Waceon Otv The Road ase'sixty (60) iocf riythtbf-vay, and that' . the private accesseasement for lore seven (7) end eight (B), and for lots one (1) and [vo (2) be in<reused to Thirty (30) feet Ln vtdth. ~ leotard Qat<s, represent fng [he applicant, noted ghat the appll<anC did not ' want to Lrprove the Wmtson DfvfEe Roatl aiulauggeated that the Roard might`not ' 8' vent to, either. 71[ere vesaoma dls<usston 'ss to pres'erv'ing the hgrtcultural qua2l ty of the road and that the requested dedi<atfon, vhicfi vo.`,Id fn<lude th4iee'y (30) feet ~ ~~~~ either elde of tin center 1Sneof the raid fiplace, night adversely affect thief N[ereas the board enarall a teed that tfie size' (58) foot amt,. B. Y B .~,> ibest yes aDProPrfate. j Child reeoaaoe[ded that the actual alignment6e determined by ehe`~Coun'tyEnglneer ~" "'~~~ at a fucure dace. Xfnsley oovrd mpproval oC the appl feat Ion'. subject io cht tw ~2)'eondit Iona citeE I „i, , x= by the Pleating Of rice, vlth an smendmen t`!MC the. actual 611gnmcnt of sefdeaeexnt ..... i .,. fx determined h the Count En inset. blako se<o~[ded std `che moT;on paxsedmmn lmiwsly. r r s' '" ~' Cosoalsaion<r'a Meec ing ~ 72 June, 1461 _ g }&}- d #, 3 [. i a ` t ~ ~,. ~ - m ..., ------ ,..,., ..°^': ~.°'- n~ .-+ax.v a k.. ._. _ .. ,.,,..a!&,x,+~G.e.me.rw..k~ieh~ar ao~s ~,+;.Gr`..a~i'~*A.+rzb;,?K:~e «~ky'.~'.:"su~:'..~.~.r x.::F~`.~,',a.^~y~'"; 1 ~: , •-- rpx• r-~~r B • PLTd1~1`I vd~IN d b , , Section/Parcel ~e Fi• ,... ', aV`11i- LANp USE APPLICATION FORM DATE SUBMITTED ' •~•- ~ :.. :, p, ,: +.+ t vxu .: ~ /d '~{ . T Ea"+"^vitl$~C'3~1 '!Y i§ ks+°-K'-+1 a ~, a :. , - _ .. ... ~.... ~„n. -=a .x...,~en,n+rt rx_._. Jm ... ue~ .. .,,il~x~; ,,x .-1.~-.-W as a"ax „~ ,,:,.,,.» . 5u~,+'^.3"..v.,.~ A..dtY>., v,,... . v' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: " Y NAME William Cochran ADDRESS c/o Brooke A. Peterson, fill West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado ' ~ ,. ..a ~_. o c.. Yxu~ ..ehv WtiYw hw^~.y.4«F.dC v+F r a -. A- ~,. PHONE (303) 925-8T66 • a -. NAME of PROJECT Approval of Caretaker unit, at Lots 1 and 2, 'Block 10, Williams Addi ion, ity an Towns_te of Aspen;'State of Colorado PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, to^ate on zonxn ma , shawin boundari __. _ ~..• 9 ~~ p ,_ 4. _ yes o£ any natural haaard and resource areas, any other spec'al •requlaEory districts, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate,CSD/ERA Maps•'any areas"not covered by the above.) - . TOTAL AREA Inapplicable .' ExisTING ~5E(s)presently existing caretaker unit which is separate structure from.. principal unit. . ~ ~~ PROposEn U$E (s) U~ichanged ~ ` -, , (approximate square :xtage for each) Ps`tESENT ZONING OF SSTE R-l4 .. ~ 1- DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL approval" o C'arP{~k~'r `i~ni t at T,t~tG 1 and 2 Block 10, Williams Addition,. City and Townsite of Aspen, State ' of Colorado, also 548 Spruce Street. i S'~ .lJ d w r.AO'~aS ' TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING OFFICE ~• ~. TYPE OF APPLICATION: REZONING ~ SUBDIVISION ®. P.p ~~ ' [ EXEMPTION SPECIAL REVIE49 {~ IIILLL~_t~~_'J'It~ 35-acre + SUBDIVISION REVIEW PHASE• PRE-APPLICATION {~(~ R C ~ ~~.~ Od DATE COMPLETED GENERAL SUBMISSION P.C,.~ ACTION DATE ',_ .:HOARD ACTION DATE DETAILED SUBMISSION P.C. AC°MON" °' DATE ' :."" BOARD ACTION...... DATE FINAL PLAT $OA)tb` AC"TTON~ ~ ~'" DARE ~ .. 4• e a. z..,_•-: } y t ~ ~ .. ., , -r Px ..~,1~ 2x.Jti ~~,., '4 t~vhm' r h rs!1;.3~9.,.''~ ."~#".,'. ~~,, d...". i. din • ~ ~ , ,., 7COUNTY LANA USE pPFLICATI.ON FORM PITKIN ., .... ''"" ~ ~ CERTIFICATION LOCAL REVI CONDITIONS • STUDY REQUIRED YOLIGY FACTOR "' n_" „ , ING STAFF YES NO DATE AND RECOMMENDA- • INITIAL , TIONS PA GS DS FP Extension of Rocky Mt. " """ "`°' utilities, Natural Gas water and Aspen/Holy Cross Electric sewer • Mountain Bell • Municipal. Water S Sewer Dist„s, Public shops, County • 'garages, yards Manager ' Recreation Sites City Recreation °`"'"`"`"" Director, General Tax Cost/ County Finance Benefit Officer Contribution to Housing . x Housing Stoc` " ' Coordinator Man-made Safety Wildlife Preservation Enezgy Conservation Water Resource ,, Impact Final Plat •~, Contents <N~,~^~~~~~ ~~~ Building Official _ Colo.Div, of "~ Wildlife Building • Official District Wates' Court County Engineet AttorneY,Plan° Wing Office l 4 it ;j _. ,> a .-c-,-..-4, ----..^_-^.-^ -°--.~. s 5 ' ', •• % i _..v.f, ' ~ j. ~ '. ' r F 4 ... ...... n ~ asa. ..._ r.v. .. ... .. ".~"r u Appendix k3 .• PITKIN COUNTY LAND USF AP~CATION ~ d SIVDY REQUIREII POLICY FACTOR p~GS DS, FP 11.. ._._ 13. •_ _ _ - 14. _ ._ _ ,, Road/Trails. Design & Con- struction Impact on Road system Maintenance provisions I?rainage Impact on Transportation Impact on Public Facilities/ Services. Solid Waste• Disposal Collection Fire & Police Protec,tian, Response Service Sanitary Land Fills Hospital Capacity Library Sub- station Site • Post Office • Substation , Site v ING County Engin- eer County Engineer ------ County Engineer I ..~,~ ...,.~ sa. • M "p CERTIFICIATION CONDITIONS a YES NO AND INITIALS DATE RECOMMENDA- ~ • TIONS ; ;~ ~~ ~a ~~•j C i ~ a Planning Office County Engin- inee; Sheriff/ Ffre Dist. County Enginee~^"•~~-- Hospttal Board Library Board Postal • Service r~E y Q. PITKINgCOUNTY LAND llS~.PPLICATION FOR~"i r w~. .. ~~a ~q..,~.~w.~., ~. . ,e - -- ., - N CONDITIONS. CERT FICATIO AND STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR.. INGASTA~FFI~- YES ~ NO xscoruasrroA- ', `°" IN21`iALS, .DATE TIONS 4. FA GS DS FP .Agricultural Planning Conservation Office. _ _ _ Scenic ~ Planning 5• Quality ,ffice - ,. _ ~ Water Supply _ E fi• _ . mental _ Health Sewage Dis- Environ- • ~' - _ '-"' posal mental ,. :;. Health Noise Environ- a• ,_. _ --- mentak Health ;, _ ,- _ ,r ..~ Air Quality nviron- u .t E. 9• _ -- mental Health l ri i Historic/ ca sto H 10. _ -'-- Archaeological Society Resources ,. ,. , ~~ ' ~`` ' _ __ . . w . • ' ` pppendA,.x C4 ~, USE APiLICA~I`SN FOR¢4 " PITKIN,COUNTY, L ,e•~, ~. , ~-.. . , ' ~ yy < ~< F '•.~~.-~ r Hmi t_nl .. r~ .y;.' •. ~. A ' .. t V.•tj 4;~; i SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESiDIREb'$Y 12EV~^~~ASR .• a licant for a development zequizing a'Permit under i ' Direr T!s~ ~y p~ nsihle for showing c'obformartce with any applicable J ~licieseof Sect onr2~as lr.sted below The applicant shall submit.those { ~ . ", ..W.. ~ hces and"tfie th theme Po hca- requiFements necessaz`y'to show conformance Wi rt sutiiission of the app ",_ related general regulations of Section 5 ~P° ~6`a.' same to appl Pubmiss,ion contents, the Planning Office shall distribute ro riate referral agencies which` hall indicate its certif ca- tion or non-certification of ,the proposal as being in Conformance with policies and as satisfying submission re2juiremontsAand~raeVYuew guidelines" ' of relevant general'Y`ei~ulationsa. Referral age'ftciesshall"also indfurther whether further study sn a later review phase is re"qu red and any recommendations or conditions, attach ng cdmments `~nd•returning same to the Planning Office. :..". ,._•.. ,., ,„„ ,~, ~~ OCAL REVIEW""" CERTIFTCATIONY CONDITIONS a,, ..,,, AND IES NO STUDY REQUIRED ~ POLICY FACTOR • NG STAFF yNITIALS,, DATE RECOMMENDA- TIONS ~_ ~ ------ 1. PA GS DS FP* Not inconsi taut Planning with Master~Pla Office _ _ _ _.. Rate of Giowth _. _ :., _: .. 2. r _ _ _ 'Hazard 5 Resourc Planning Areas Office Geologic Hazards Floodplains Riparian ~'. Areas Wildlife l Wildfire, i •' Radiation • SoilsJEroson County Ex- %' t en s iott -° Agent $, Extractable Planning -- - Resources office ~~_"_ r ~ . ~~~ '~ Mineral, Vegetable Other ~ ' i *' PA mere-Application"~°`` " ''"'`"DS =Detailed Submission GS n General Submission FP =Final P1aC ' _ 1- °< 6 ''. ~ i ` a i w .. _1 -. ~~. ~~ ... _, ~. zm.~wm"~~++,w >,~eu.vm'~Wkut..GCked.w,. o.w9¢+uwrut'~-"U~-W,~gda+RdlfN`GAb~' ~. w .~ , 7itto Insuranc©Co ,_ ' $ '~ 536 fast Main Streor ~ ',. Sox 22`3ti ', `:, Aspen, Colorado 81611_.. ,,. (3031925-1768 ~; C E R T I F I C A_T I O N O F T I T L E described rea~].tlro ertt situatedrin ththe„following • p p y e County of Pitkin, Stateof Colorado are as, follows. Title is vested in: WILLIAM W. COCHRAN and BONNIE C nCOCHRAN r~~, ~, i..,, , _ Legal Description; Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Williams Addition to the City and Townsite o£.Aspen, County ' of Pitkin,~State"of Colorado,. Copy of Warranty Deed is attached for ,reference only. Certified to August 21, 1980 Transamerica Title Insurance Company " By L~ T.J. ohnson ~' Escrow Officer ~~ 'r. 2 `- .. °' ~. , ., e.,. ~ i ~ ~ ~, a ~_.._.... ...- ... ~...... ......„r. r„s.. t'„~ w,.c;w.„ ~+w ~„~..: w ~.. x, <:.`.,a Ytssi4,..tt~ -S^: ,wte-a=.. ri~;as~'k ~ ,~; ~ata'd` Fes // l { .. / d ti • n~ F„ ~ ~ .:L ~i AGR3iEIIE~I^ • THIS AGRFED4EIdT, made this 30th day of April , 1976 }, einafter "DeLise") and _~er, } ~.. N:_. b and between DONALD DeLISE , WILLIN2, C. COCFIRF~N and BON4vYE C FCOFI1rI (hereinafter collectively ,..,,,~Waaaw~a~ lwx~..,4:4 ~ yr,rw ~:!, v,. nu.,o . _: ~ r,,.cm "Cochran"), W I T N E S S E T H Y7HERE1IS, DeLise is the, owner of real property located in _ .~-~~ ,. __ , ~ 4. the •Nt•71/4 SE1/4 Section ?, To~ariship IOS. , Rarige `34 S9. of the 6th P.M., County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.. (hereinafter referred to as "DeLse's„ property°), and • ,, ~.. , WFFEFtEAS Cochran is th,e o aner of Lot 1 "Block 10 Wi .r y.~..~_r~. ~~ _ ,, _ lliams Addition to the City and Townste of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado ,(hereinafter referred to as "Cochran's •, .~~ property"), and WFIEREA,S, a dispute has arisen betv~een the parties concerning the location of boundary line of the propert;~ o~rned by tho parties and, the parties desire to settle such d%spute on the terms and conditions, here}Wafter stated 4.r. avM aw/~ F.. ? .S b dYSi i_ 4 `r Y . .i.-... . r. w q :. ....:->.. ~ .. -: " ':'~.; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter,. set forth, the parties hereto, agree as follows: 976 1. DeLise shall„ pay to Cochran on .April 30 1 the susa of $1,500 in cash or certified, funds. 2. DeLise shal•1 deliver to Cochran for recording an ",,. MU ~rsw„ax:-asw^r.wwweaaW~`»~r.branN:i~,:ua»x.~;e ..,_ ,easement deed_in the form attached hereto as.1/xhibt A. 3,. Cochran shall permit AeLse to separate the building currently constructed on..the DeI,ise's property and Cochran's property, such separation to be Made at,the;stake in place on • • , said property. Concurrently, with the separation of said building, ~ a ~- „~,', ' ,` ~ ~' DeLise will close,the end of the building on the Cochran's ~.~,...,r~ .. .~<...., ._ ~., .a.:.... property by constructing a wall on said, end_of the, building which wall will be sufficient„to glaose the bu~il to the ~~ 1ng, weather and which will be consistent with the pxesent construction., ,h~s. a ,u wa, .. .~~<.y ~ ~-: of the building. 4. DeLise shall commence the_const,ruCtion required by paragraph 3 hereof on or before April 1 .,1976 and complete said construction on or before, .April 30 1976 and shall, pay all costs related,thereto. 5. The ,severance. of th,e building and .construction of the. walls required hereunder shall be, accomplished in a manner that will. leave an open space of approximately 2' between the walls. p greement shall 6. The arties do not intend that this A„ constitute a location o£ the boundary line between. DeLise's property and Cochran's property, provided, however, that in the event that such boundary line as subsequently determined shall result in the improvements owned by either party encroaching upon the property of the other.,. then the. parties hereby grant to the other an easement for such encroachment. 7. Each party hereby releases and discharges the other party, their heirs, administrators, successors and assigns from any and all claims, demands, liabilities, causes of action, losses and damages of whatever kind or nature which heretofore have b2en or may haves been sustained by them or either of them, arising-out of, in connection with, or incurred by reason of the dispute concerning the location of the boundary Line between their property or the.' roanh- .existence of enc ments upon. the property of either of them. a -2- ,~~~; `. 8. This Agreement is entered into for ,the ur ose o• t • _ m., ~,., ~:,., P_ p ~ •he compromise and settlementxhof d ~ muted claims and is not to be .,v _ .. .w. P:. ~i .~.g.. a ... v:.~ .. construed s.n any manner a5 1nC11Cd~-1 VF-' or ^rCL~I ~4~ l.V C:MV 1 asy. ~ r~. ~• of the respective claims or defenses of~the•parties hereto. ,.. , 9, The within Agreement shall be binding upon and inure. to the, benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, personal ~, ,. representatives, successors and,assigns. 10;. This agreement may be executed in"an}+ number of counterparts, each. of which shall be deemed•„ancorginal hereof, and all of 4~hich shall be deemed torvconstit~teOne and the same instrument: 11. The parties agree to execute and ,deliver such, other documents and instruments,asry,may be necessary or appropriate. to carry out the full intent and purpose of this Agreement. p have. executed $N fVXTNESS SJHEREOF, the arties hereto,,.. this Agreement the day and year first above'., written. • Ao ald ehi~y~~S Willam`~yG Cochran bonnie C. Cochran Executed this Si'% day of ~-!r-~~- 197,6. State, of C-~l~"'~"`" ) County of /~~,~"~"- ~ ss. ' g g ,wledged before me ~', • The fore oin instrument was ackno. I this f -' day of ~ - ~.~_, 1976 by nonald DeLise, , Witness my hand and official seal, My commission expires:~j~` ~ •~ ~..-i ~~ r ~""'`-7` >lNotary--public n "r~ r d 1 ,~ ,.. y .. .~ 6 ! .. .a "" _ ... _.. .~.., ..:. .t.~.."~x.«.,~.vam..,:;SA,,,*'s...w,?..i.;E.i„a..~,...t1~,io...:~~r"i~x.6:,T t ~.-~$'~-"+~3-vcl.`.~^i`.-~`''w ~. ' ~/,~'' ... I30AI2D 01 COUNT`l CCMMISSLON~RS AGENDA i' "`~" j, June ?.2, 19$1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~x4,, ~~~ ~~ ~~~ d~ . 8:30 a.m. ~cecutive Session - Social Savzces Nuchael~Schultz, Dire AS~'[~ % ~~, . 6~flei~~li1~~ 4~ g,45 Social Services Public Session Michael S..hultz ~` i 9:00 Court Priorities, Rsimdeling, etc., Judge Litwiller, Tim Fautsko .. ,~ 9:30 Public Hearing - $odstone Volunteer Fire Dept. Sp~ial Events Liquor License ~, 9:40 Public Hearing - W/J Rodeo Special Events Permit Liquor License, Asperi • Lions Club -Luella ,Hansen, Clerk arx3 Rcrorder :; .., , ., 9:45 N~anager's .Letter -Curt Stewart, County Manager 10:0 Public Hearing - Nlobil~c~ o°3ePa~t I~bb~e~ Eng~izeeringrice, Planning 10:15 Brush Creek Road Larid q g , 10:30 Public Hearing - Flockhart Ae;ditignal naelling Urfa -,Jack Johnson, Planning -~- ~ Richard Gzzce 11: b0~ hran Additional I)aeYling Unit -,Continuation -1 , , ~ „ ,,.,,,~ y , , ; .,, ,,..~.., ~~;o „, : , __. able X Quarter Circle Detailed SuYanzssion Richard Grice 11.30 Ib ~ i. , .. ~ ~ 11: Sp MFG Contracts for ;Community Center Kitchen -Gene Dlarsh 22:00 Little Annie Continuation,,.::.. (Lunch will I~ provided for B0.:C) / 1 001./ Resolutions and Contracts ~. _.~~, ~ ~, • ,~ ~ .i,, . ..,, r_ . ~,~ .. „~ I ~ a Ni.riutes Dutch Flats Ipt $ lit -Jack Johnson _ Jack,Jghnson Ame.~a'ment for Special Review Use, Elam Grayel Pit n, ~,.., a ,_, ' Na}~lor Tpt Split -Jack Johnson M As,~^`n Skiing Corporation Snocanak_irg -Richard Grice Land Use Code Amendments -Richard_Grice , Waiving Special Review Fees for F~nnloyee I>,ae5.7.ing'Uru.ts -Richard Grice it~rth Star Grazing Contract -Mark Fuh er 1:15 First Reading and Set Public Fearing LaYid Use Code Amendment -Sandra Stuller, July 27, 1981 at 10.00 a m Y~~.x ,.•~~~. w,_ ,K-, • Tr, ., ~~._•, 1;30 Forest Service and Public Service Discussion Jack Troyer, Bob Child. 2:00 ~ Land Use Code Amenc>rr°nt -.Ledge Preser~~aton Clause -Sandra Stuller 2:30 Ballot Issues.,- Curt Stewart, T ... p ~ nning 3.00 Nilson Subdivision Exem tzon -Alan Richman, Pla 3:20 Public C~cnent 'Woody Creek Road`- Slahley Nadel 4:00 Joint Meeting -Cancelled 4:00 South 7th Street„,Request for Public.D~ication -a Peter Vought, Keith Hefner Bob Child 4:20 Dk>wzt~iinai.rc Charter at Sandy Field -Jim Belfont ' ~-: ~` {4 t.. t. ¢! .' - ~ :.~ ,, o ti x ~ ~- : a, ,~ ~ ~ a i ~ ^'T~~ t`' w ~ "T ^~ n~, [~ -. .. ~- .Q ~~ iy C ~. rc ~... ~~.. I. s.,... ,. .. a.. _ . , ' I - ~- °d«. h ~- rAo- ,~. ,.- {.. .^~~ i p ~ f. ~~ i ~ ,. ~~C ~ ^ `~ Z2,-~-,a~w~es d~ MEMORANDUM '.Jr i 1 ~ f~g1 T0: Board of County Commissioners FROi4: Ri=chard Grice, Planning Office RE: Cochran Additional Dwelling Unit - Special Review -,t?ublic Hearing DATE: April 23, 1981 ~ i - :- e i .i _... ,~: m+ri- .. an. _F r .e rn4--,.-n.. ._ cps ..,. .w nt -x.r. .e. "I wL~ We have received the attached application and related supplemental lette"rs requesting special review approval for the legalization of a bandit, unit. rat~o,tthesapplicationaalso requests~thatcthe ~OCChs'ponsorUa c~oderamendment' applied to the approvajdeter any requirement that the FToor Area Ratio be for Section 3-8.13 to of existing caretaker units.." The subject property consists of two Williams Addition., lots (7526.25 sq. ft.) zoned R~15. The size of the total, improvements according to the Planning Office's calculation i§ 2865+ sq ft ', of which 778 03rsq. ft. are contained within 'th,e bandit unit. The FAR limit for this lot is, 1204.2 sq. ft. ,, ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . _ . .~~ .~. ~. ~ _ a ~ ~ ~, REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: Jim ~~larkalunas of the Aspen Water Department is opposed to the construction of additional dwelling um is in the 6Ji11iams Addition because the waterlines "are in very poor condition" and the wal=e pre`~~1Tr""~"9s"chronically low. "The s ., ::. Water Department never rece~vedwthe Plant Investfient_ Fees, as far as I know." Heiko Kuhn of Aspen Pietro Sanitation District simply agreed ,,,_ that the ;unit is already served. No coimnent was received from ,the County Engineer regarding parking. However, it is cle`ar`from~'t`he plat that no parking is available on the property. tJe can only assume that cars are currently parked in the right-of-Way. The County Environmental Healtyh Officer has no objections "as the dwellings are served by P1unc`ipal Water°and Sewer lines." PLAPJNING OFFICE , v •p _ q ` RECOMMENDATIOPJS: This a pTication does not meet the code re uirements for additional dwelling units in the fo"~ owing ways: ` X 1) The FAR limit is exceeded. 2) Parking is not only inadequate but non-existent. 3) The shed which contains this unit violates the setback requirements oh two sides and in fact illega7Ty en- croaches into the adjacent 'hotA Nothing in the re- a~ Y ~nvokesnlife~Whealthaandnsafe~ytbacks This violation co~icerhs. 4) Public water facilities. are ai,ready over-burdened in this area. 9 p ;,. ~ s The Plannn Office, therefore, recommends denial of thi special review a Plicaton. The code amendment proposes to eliminate FF1R limits for bandit units. The FAR limits needto be maintained for ~e£y ~a~s aiell as~~~'~o provide for enough life, healt~iand sa~ space :and light to maintain quality of life. We also re- commend denial of the code amendment. ,.... ~~ ~~;. ~ ~ : ~ ~. , ~.~- _, ;,, is ari ng Apr~l 23~c1981 Additional Dwelling Unit - Special Review - Public He Page Two PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMBNDATI6N: The P &~Z Commission received this application at their regular meeting on February 18, 19$1 and voted to unanimously endorce the„above Planning Office %'ecot~men'dations of denial.,, of the Special Review request as well as the code °amehdment": H h. ,. v_ ...;~.~ , ~~~, avs .. wt~r.~.~ .t*a c'u;•,a"ar~~G~',"k ,.~; ,~ara~,„., rra4~a~ ~+~, ,fan »c'YFxtw w k p, m ~~ r x ., RN W Cg7 MAIN rT R~~~ h, { ~ ~ ~ ~ .LI `~ `+ j ~ ~. :v ,:~. .. ~ ~: .p ~. t 4 ~ _ ~ I rG a ~,T'F, t3 COLOH/.D'>F1fbi1 ~. ,. August 2II, 1980 h'.x. Richa?"o U Pitkin ~ount'y Planning Offi City Ha17. 130 South Gal Aspen, Colora rice JCSay .of' Aspen ce ena Street do 81611.. Re: Cochran Applica.ta.on,for Caretaker Unit Dear Richard, You will find enclosed" several documents necessar for for the a roves the applcaticn of my client, fnTii~iam (oc~"nran, Pp -- of his caretaker unit on his property on Sprixce;Street: o ..,~, . . , s. _.,.n _~ - , :. ~ - , ~ _ .. First of a11,you will find the Appendix B, Land Use .,. ^4. , _ :,, a ~,. ,. , .., :, ~ .~.: ,. Application form, duly filled out. SecandlY, you will find a copy of the tt1~ insurance ": " certificate i.ssued,by Tra'nsAmerica Title Insurance Company', k ~.. , ~" . disclosing the ownership of the property. `Phir_c?1y, you will find a copy of the plaa'of Block, 10 of Williams Addztion, where t]ie subject property is locat"ed. ,~ M..a ,.. .. .. ..._ .. r the sourthly, you will find a. list of the adjacent owners to p operty owned by my client. finally, you will fi"ndymy firm`s checl. in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00, as the Exemption Application fee ~_ ,, ~~ -_ , . ~ .._ .., ~;~ , .y. ~.... _. . ~~,,, ~ ~ ,. ;..-; I: have ordexed the improvement sur~~ey from Alpine Survey's and I iaill furnish the same t~ you as soon ,as I: receive it. . .. ~... There is ade uate otf street parYcing for the single q and accessory unit, as is requ~.red by the appropriate' resolution. In addition, as this is an existing unit, I believe it is a~ ro riate to state that the res~ai.ercand Light InhavesspokenawitheFioly'Csoss~ElectricoComp~"nybeThe1Aspened. Metropolitan Sanitation District, and -the Aspen i ~~ h ~.. r ... N...:. s-. ,.a ~F ~,~ ~ '. y <" _ 4.. I _ i ~~ Dlr. Richard Grice August 28, 1980 Page 2, ~p e;it, and they have told me„that, as thg property DE artm presently has all of its utilities, there wile. be no increased burden on„their servzce§. ~,. , f, ,.~ ~.: .~ ~, My client has also reviewed the prapdsed' agreement rE- roblems garding the restrictions~on"the'prope`rty, end have no p with the same. ~ _ S would appreciate it if you would, review this submission and determine if we: are in a posS.tion to seek final. appro~5al iy 4.~tmm _ [.e. .v.-~ ^.n ~. .. L, ,_ from the respective County authorities.,_ „ Awaiting your reply, I remain _, s _.,,. ,. BAP:jo enclosures cc: . Mr .. William Cgchrar_ ,. ~ r ~~_ *.~+-~e-- ... _ _ _ .. .,. . ,..,~s.c .. x..e..nwn,:. tars«m.,.w.K.,::+.a..3..«.,.~ua.~a.:x`.:1~~`,~ , r. ~' . ,. a.a 1 "b,~ ~, e ..fin m .~,~ ~... .. In s...v S.a~bv' Novc;mbcr 25, 198q . , - . ~,». `its of 7~speri , ' Y CountycofrPit}in/C Planning Office 130 South Galena ' Aspen; Colorado 81611 Re: Application for William Cochran _ wr~wr ro.aF. ., .,-.., ..~ .r." ~ .u.. Dear Richard, As you requested, enclosed pi.ease find the following .t. copy e~f the ltpdated F~djacent Owners' list, as comp~lefe as Steuart Title Company can make .t. Flease allow this letter. to serve as my formal request to the Soad of County Corimissioners o^f S~itkn County that Title'. II, Sect on 3"-8.1.3 be amended to`y deter pp"~ rGquireiYient.,, ,_ that the Floor Area Ratio be applied t'o the _a ~-ov~l of existing caretaker units. Aspyou know, I beaieye that the CUue pr_esent].y allows approdal of existing unit: with- out reference to the Floor Area Ratio; but I; am making this request anyiaay, as it is my understanding that the above referenced application. will not be processed, unless I do. Ji Gvith respect to the "policy cons-deratons" which must be addressed., plea>e find enclosed, a copy o~"my~letter of August 28, 1980, wherein I believo those icon~iderations have"been addressed. If, upon examination, you stir feel this is not sufficient.; please contact'me. . - ,. Finally, I have calculated the total landAarea of lots 1 and 2, );lock 10, Williams Add%tion to beymS~even "~~ousand:, Five huad.red Twenty Six point twenty five ('~,52'6.25~ square feet. The total area of._the improvements, that is the ,,, ', main house and the unit in dispute is by m~ calculations, - ~.M~ ~. Threl to Two Thousand, Nine~Ituriared Thirty One point Seventy derie (2,931.73) square L-ect. These ca7.culatidns were ved from the improvement survey prepared by Alpine Survey's. ' II would hope that you and the Planning staff would give due Consideration, to the fact that we are dealing with an ~. u~.~ -m tw~i Y V aV.+ existing unit why ch has boon used as a d~oe~.'~ix~g unit for a number of years prior to the institu~+onaof~the Floor Area _r . ,~ - ,_ ~ I i '. _ .,_, ... . -. - - . .. « . . ~ <<....ar'M :~ r my, ~. nc~t4tt mtvami { ~e ~?in..¢ y~,~.was..M';,v",k,~' n,r..~;"~,.C~,w.a.u4^, ,}...rvai.~.~ acua .:3ah"~r~a~ ~'. :; ~, i ~, •. ,,..~ ~ ..~a Mr. Ri.ghar~l Gri.cc IVOV~:rnl>r,^r. 25, 19f3U Page 2, ~; Ratio. Ply client is not seeking to have a unit which ho can sell., condominimze or do anyt$ing with, other £han~ ' ',. { supply'empl.oyec housing. `ht is anon-Cgn£ormi.ng`structure i!. and shpuld he heated as such as with any other dwelling unit. h;e are not secking'£o wea`~Cen't$e County's position with respect to *he?7oor area Ratio, but Z do feel that it is unfair. t-.p apply this retroaotively to e`xisti.ng units. z wou1~ think that safe, permanent empToyce housing. would j... - be o£ greater concern.,,,., 'i'Yiank you for your time anal consideration. vr~., rc ~rPrv i-.ru 1. V . ~ '' e B~1P: jO enclosures rc: jtiTi:Lliem Cochran - r. ~,:~,. I ,..- ~ ~~:f-t h ,'$. "k: ^)M1 S..~'. 7+,7. fin ~'{nf. :._'"f Y+, $ ...Y%?~1:~ ., .. . . ....: _,_.. ,. ,w, to ., ,f:.;, .}~ .._ ,a., 'F... fL' ,. ~. ,'a: }}r I I4EMORANllUt4 T0: RIr; FROM: JIM SUBJF.C1"": CQC s .._ . h* .. i p, ASPI'sN lJAILR 1)dl'AR9MI]N'L' - PLANNING DATE: Dl;Cci°,ui,. ~.,, ~--- I gather from reviewing the application that Cochran ~rishes toysubdivtde or .,, .. legalize an existing bandi unit,'and that he is present y Meng se4~'viced b the existn water service line. Therefore, no additionaY. load would b . g y .~„ .,. ~, ,m.. ~ _ e placed upon the water unlit in that area. However, please be advised that should he wash to construct additiona], units on the pzdperty, it is my recommendationGthat hc'he discour`~agec~"": The water 'lines in this area (Shc ham's Addition) are in very poor condition [date pressure in this area is chi onically loin. ~` The' inere~ ed demand wou ~d only further ..,. . . aggravate an already serious condition.,.,. ' s ~ i, Furthermore., if the unit in question is, in f?c,t, a bandit unit; the Slater ' Department never received the Plant Investment Fees, as faY as, I know. { i ~ t., < < r ~. .,,...,....- _. ., . wn+.s..n ~ a. l3..^- .•yv 1. ~.n C)'1, rw. 'kn .rmwa ',r ,wv~~m,.lr,.vb $. e Y' 6 ~ " a .,,.: ~ r._ .. ._ ~ lac _.~ 3 :~ r i i~.' F1PPL*,JZ~ B, .... r... i ~ i + _.. .. .. PROJECTNUMBER .;~ F ~ L b7~dbtl kiQ 6t L~E,L d Section/Parcel „~ ~'{ ~'1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM DATE SUBMITTED .... .. ar' t:i r. .;~vt.'~,..,J a'.f:iJN'ii 4 ..t ..~ .~, rv.. i.::. R. r.Z " ~ 1 ._.-~ _. ... ,. .. .W -, __i~ aF...~;wn.,..:...m3ew~.t,~k?n.we$^:.Fx'wib;4'xti+%N~.:zhVVk^Aa'A /sA~+~'drv~a~~~"~ s m .,~3rv~h TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: NAME L'J1 ADDRESS ,c/o Brooke 611 Tdest Main_S'treet, Aspen, Colgrac PHONE (303) 925-8166 rr ... , v. v. YF"- ...~ ....~ N-. ... ..:.. .... ...... ,.t .. .w, jw ..~ _. z a i NAME OF PxoJECT Approval of Caretaker unit.,_at Lots 1 and,._.2, Block 10, Williams Add~,tion, i y an. Townsite o, ASpen`,'State o CO,ora,,.O PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, to^ate on zoning map, showing boundaries of any natural hazard and resource urea's, any other `special regulatory distric*_s, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate on appropriate CSU/ERA'Maps any areas not covered by the above.) TOTAL AREA Inapplicable ExISTING gsE(s)presently existing caretaker unit which is separate structure from_princpal unit. r„r , ti i= :~ . ~~. t =. ,,~ PROPOSED USE (S) Unchanged ~ ' ,. i_ (approximate square _~otzge for each) PRESENT ZONING OF SITE. R_15 DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL ~n~rnzval~ t~f Ca rat Aker nnit at ThtS 1 and 2 _ ~~_ F.,. ,,,' 4 ,.q. ,. y. ire •., Block 10, Williams Addition, City and Townste of Aspen, State' of Colorado, also known as_548 5priice Street., ..~ r„.m,., P~ .. , , ~,~- ,, .., ~ . ~ ~..1,, .. r, ,,~ u ~ - m . _ . .. ~ ..,r, . ,, .. Q_: ..y , .L~l. 4' 1. r-r.,y v. yrvad!=,{,Y ~..." < ,. f _ t ~ S'~ t1 ~. Q W r.NetY TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING OFFICE i, , TYPE OF APPLICF~TION: R^nZONING ~ SUBDIVSSION ® P.U.D. - EXEMPTION 35-acre + SUBDIVIS SPECIAL REV ,~ t B~ I~ DING PERM~T REVIEW ~ ~ ION REVIEW PHASE: PRE-APPLICATION '~ ~ ~ -'T" Ot7 DATE COMPLETED ,,,. ~ GENERAL SDBMISSI~N"~ P. C. AC ZON DATE '~~BOARD ACT I ON DATE ' DETAILED SUBMISSTOy g,, g P.C.jACTTVN '" DATE ~'° ~ BOARD ~ACT~ON DATE FINAL PLAT BOARD 'ACTION .. DATE .. "'~y -]'-'-7 _ ...4 ~ •.~:; x., e~,.y x«h oa.r.i Nrmtia .„u,.o+~ This is to certify that the owners of th follocaing described real ro ert s" ituatecl in tie ounty off` Pitkin State of Colorado are a's follows: Title is vested in: WILLIAM 47. COCTiRAIQ`~ahd.,~b`~~`~.~C"..,„mm~b~RAN~,.~~,,.w~,,,,..~,~.,,..a ,~.,.,,.,,, ~, . Legal Description: Lots 1 and 2, Block 30, Williams'Adcfiton to the City and Townsite of Asperi, Ca`ounty" ` '' ~"` ` "` " """" of Pitkin, 'State of `Colorado: Copy of Warranty Deed is attached for 'reference only. '.Certified to August 21, 1980 Transamerica Title Insurance Company gy ~ ~JV v T.J. ohnson Escrow Officer ~_~,,_ '. :.~, A FACT COQ`"L RAf~GE 84 COUNT`f', C~Cc To Tl-~E CWT`(... ¢ 4:_C `,'rIK.~S 2PrW Co':~ t~t,i. ;~ ~. .° ~ ~; C:, 'y -_ i t~CL: i 1' W 9.~ --~. OF T1-1~.. ,, ~ _. ~~ - _~..... '~ i ~ ~A & ;SiS C:r= 31=~::';~~~ ~S.C C' ~. "H~t'~,~;°' -SCX~°! 1'E 9:40 i Deco-L:.rV1' ILS.°~. ' 1 ~-- --- ' ~v \ O 2 P i I 'A \ ~-----------'-- ---- N I ~ w v` ----'---- -- - I ~ ~ b O v o --- C O ~ \~ ~ I ~~ 4 t v I ~ --- ! ---- ~I I I i 1 I ~ i ~ ~ I I I ! I 7 ..~. 't' ,_ -~,..~... Z-----..~.. ti :~".c~ oY ~- _..,.z_ - .oaf n.l~ ~~ ~6~ ~, ~N, ~ rc L^1 N _~ t ~_... a ~5 il A ;. ~ ~ E r 2J~ t d • 33......o'clock "1: pr r P M., PAC . e ,. ~©~ . e~,.. ,. . . ,., ne` ,i- ul . , _;,~ -, ~, -, r. 4538 ie $a J , Recorder ( t Reception No ~- ~'/ '~ t .. ., ..,". i:.~ ,>-..,r+u},F. n., .w ~wT'',~'~. saes' ~,~k~>xx~f~w! _• ~ ?Y ,.. ~S ~ P s,,~~1. f. ~,". ~ - ~ FILING STAMP THIS LFEP, Made this 18th day of April , 1075 between THOMAS D. KAS SLER iTAtE ~1ClYENt1iR'( EEE ,... of the City of Aspen County of Pitkin and State of APR ~' ~ PtIIU Colorado, of the first part, and WILLIAM W., COCHRAN and BONNIE C:~~COCHR~AhT~" ,. . 11613 Brandy Hall Lane ~^~'--"-'~ City of ,..., y g Y ate of of the ~ of the second part: Count o{ MOnt Omer and St Mar land y WITNFtSSF.TH, that the saidparty of the first part, for and in consideration of'the sum of , TEN ADID NO/100 010.00) and other valuable cons~der~t~oin ~ r ~ r, ,, o,..,,DOL~AIt`~' and other good and valuable considerations to the said party of the first pact in 'hand paid by the said parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is ,hereby confessed and acknowledged has granted bargained, sold and c~ilZ''eyed,. and by these presents does giant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said parties o~ 'ae~o'nd par't,' their heirs and a~asigns forever, not in tenancy in common but; in 7omt tenancy `all the following described' lot or .., ~ ,~ • -~, e parcel of land, situate, lying And being in the City of'AspenG~`ounty'of P1tjCin and Stgt, -.. ,_ .. r ~ ._.. , ., of Colorad~2, to wit: Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Williams Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin State of Colorado. ' , ._~ k 9 ak $ ,k r, ~ with .all and singular the hereditaments and appurten Snc eats eissues and pi•, fits thereofy ane ~ap -and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remand d ~* "all ~tnte, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of fne said par1~ty of~ the first part either in law or ""V" ~ equity, of; in and to the above bargained gr2yrnises, with 4the hereditaments axitt appurtenances' * `~' ~ TO HAVE AND TO HOLb the said premises above, bargained and described with the appurtenances, vnto~~$he~~ a.« ~.. x ~: ~,. said parties of the second part, their heirs and~~asstgns fdi•ever And the said party o'"~ t1~ie iirs't part, for Himself, hia ~c heirs, executors, and adminxstratois, does edvenant gr'a'nt bargain find agree'to and with the said parties of the g w n+ second part, their heirs and asst'ns, that at,tlie time of the enseahng and~elrvery ot~`these'Preserits, he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, a§ of good, sure perfect, absolute and indefeasible estai:e of inheritance, in law, in ~ ,. ~ fee simple, and has'gdad right, fullpower and~lawfvl authority to grant bargain sell and convey the same in mannet ~ ,. and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all foimer~.aoPthsr grants Bargains sales, lien's, x,e. t .w. ,~.,. a+ taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nat~1•e so'e've e e 1.975 real ~e5 tate tax S' right of the Proprietor 'of a Ve~n or Lode to ~tJ~ t ~an~ remove fiis~ore there.-~ a from, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect ~~te prem~``ses hereby granted, and Right of Way for Ditches and Canals cons,t~rucfed{by the authority of the IInited State ,~„ ,-,~; ,~„,,,w,, ~ti,~„,w„„„, December 24, 190s~ as i~sexved in United States` Patenttof record, recdrded 2, in"Book 5~ at Yage'516; party of the first paYt makes no warranty as to the exact status of Williams Addition as a subdivision, and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable poss~ession'~o~~til"ie said paitea o~ the second part, the G. ,au ,.~.,.~. ,.,:., ,,..... survivor of them, their assigns ~Atid the heirs and assigns of such survivor, against all anil ehd"i~`peY'sbrC'diw l`3erpo~is' lawfully claiming dr to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND The ysingular number shall include the'plura'~ tiT`e ~plura~ the singular and he Use of any ,,, _ ..,.,, ,,. ... '~..... .,r.- F..ri,fia >.ak'w N.:„r:.].v e..•r.h:-E gender shali_ be applicable to all genders. firstlab we wrEk3 WIiEREOF the said arty of the first pares as~ler~nto s~h~ an ~d~ the daY [SEA ~I Signed, Sealed and Delivered m tho Presence of ,~ ~ L] - • Thomas D. ~K'assler .,. , .........[SEAL] ....~._-: ......... ..,... . [SEAL].. ~` STATE OF COLORADO, ' ' County of Pitkin U ~ s n 5 ~ ' 1 ss ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bafare me. this t C~ day of ~~ N`~ ~ ~ 19-~~ ~ /; . - , C ~ •~ = by+ Thomas D. Kassler ~ : p - .:- i --t - .i ~ ~~'~ ~}. a My Commission expires ~ c ~ 'J~ `>,', ~ tl'1 ] fitness my hand and` 6ff~¢ial soA9 -. ~ eo ' » i.. ~. .. ~ ~V 7J .L o y ... (~ r X ~ Y O ~ ~ o ~ll iw ~ m m ~ \ ~_' ~ ~ ~ cv p m ~ • :.~ f~i ~ w a' ~ ~ k rt a ~ W ~77 ~ ~ :-J ~ ~ ~ f p l n ~ ill N• Y :' C n .h' ~ ~ o M `~ ~ O y v rt 'r, f• ( ~ 7 G m 9 ~ ~ '~) ~ ~ e+ ~G ` N M 'l7 W ~ ' ro ~ w c m r ~ N ',ti , 4 • ~ tl... R: ~' ~ ~ m ~ W N ~ ` ` i f-' rt e. a: o. i/ G w i. d ' 0 0 H N !O y x o !~ H x d r z ., ~. j: . , . .. ;:,~. , ,. ..: ,,,, „<Ae:es ~amom..~x;~v.'~Up 4- ~w5x.~,~r-.1~.+':un~°,raa~,a~~~:~ a ~~^?'.,~,:e.~:~.,,~:d: ",1?..4'~.'+;ia e~,sY; .~f~ a'F~~vt-if~'E..", ° ~ •Improtrement Surveil - S P RU CE ST. ymo me vv 4V SCALE !" = 10' BASIS OF BEARING ~ FOUND REBAR W/ ALU. CAPS L.S. 7734 COR. L07` I TO THE SW COR. LOT 4" S 00° 40'00" W A SURVEY MApE UND1 OF LOTS ! & 2 ,BLOC COLORADO.THE TL'JO ENTIRELY WfT'HIN TN PROPERTY 'THE LOCL iMPROVEMENTS,EAS KNOWN BY 1~'E AND E ARE AC;CURAT~LY SH ALPLNE SURVEYS SEPTEMBER r s ,1980 ;TI~i~ATE -IFYTHAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY MY SUPERVISlOw ON SEPTEMBER; 10, WILLIAPAS ADDITION PITKIN 'ORY HOJSE WAS FOUND'TO BE L' 30UNDARY LINES OF THE A80VE ~N AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUd ENTS,RiGHTS-OF-WAY (N`EVIDE 30ACHMENTS EY OR ON Yl~`f"= ~~ p~ by~ ~w. i 50 FT. N VJ :PICT'S 1980, AUNTY, ~ATED SCRIBED 71NGS ;E OR ~rlsEs ---- ,. ~3 r .i a A lTLA~ Or " ~~"•tiD SITUATED IN 7 5.~. 1/4 ZOF ~,~.CT-ON 7, Td.ti'NSl RLt~G'= 84 WEST OF` SUE CaT1- NTY ~Dt2AC0 L`ti'iN~` ~R. wa of TuE T'--1~LX~f~ 4 , ~t~~1C ~ ICS d~ TtlE W ICI-LAMS At~D1TIC~l~ To TI.iE CITY OF A~-SEN. _r _ :'~ :~ r Y' ' ~' ?: ~:' •~ -~ ~, -mss. ti0.: i I' `.U 9.~ -- -- .-. --F=.a .--a ~~_ _ .,, .J~.~~. ~tl~7~~ i. r} ~ -~ l L. C r "1 ~. -55~"4a'E tZ~o.. r ~,.' 'll'E 9.~ r ~~v ~ i oQ /2 ,~ t ~~~ 1 • ~~ \ i ~ )~ ~ 3 O i r <. ~~ 4 v ~G' i a.J~`JEYO i 1.1;x.".54' C r ~1/.~-~:- ~ ~G {'{. . Y ~: ~`- -~ :60'~ ~--. p./~ r i r 5 ~ { i i t :~ i ,-..x. ~ .:~ 6\ r°i y ~:~ W '~. r`is~r. .' '. w ~ ,.. $. ( ~. ~ '. ~l ~!, GiY.,,i _~. ~. r ,, ,.- - -_ }/. - - - .{' Recorded at ... ~'~$ P M AU ~, , .... Rec ....o'el~ock.._.._...... 3 gust-..;.1976-.~~~;; i';...-.LUCKJ~~ eption No.. ~. + ~~ ~~~13, r ~ ....,-.. 11,1 ]..G'- ~.1I2-ne,.~ :::... Recorder. ~ ~ ~` _. - Margaret B: Cochran I whose address is 9307 Linden Avenue, Befhesda STATE DOC99fENTAAY,k'~'~ f County of Montgomery ,state of {l,l~ ~ 5 PAID ($1OM00)land 'other valuable, teons~derations'of Ten dollars ~,~+,y-_~~~ LL.;~:-_..:_.--•- ~R~~~9s in hand paid, hereby sell (a) and convey(s) to Margaret B. Cochran (above address) and William W. Cochran II and Bonnie C. Cochran, alT,as joint;"tenants ' i I, whose ae~dressis' 35$3'East,Barra ,' Camarillo County of I Vent ,and State of California the ~ `a property in tH urn follawing re ~ e j _, County of Pi tki n ~ ,and State of Colorado, to wit,: I Lotis 3 and 4, Block 10, Williams Addition .to the City 'and Townsite of I Aspen, County of P'itkin, State"of Colorado. I I l i - I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I I '' - ~I ~ ~ I. 1 I II ~ II. II ,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ', r I with all its appnrtenances,'and warrant (s) the title to the same, subject to right of the pro- prietor of a'vein or lode to extract atld remove his ore £lierefrom,'should the same be found, to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and the right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States patent of record; recorded December 24, 1902; in Book 55 at Page 116; pa"rty of the first part makes'no'15arranty as''to the, exact status'of Williams Addition as a Subdivision. ~ Signed this day of MARGAR~ B. C'OCHRAN I i I .I ; •P4Ai2Y'tkNfr STA3'.E~F`, The foregoing inst~rument•was acImowlec~gJed before me this Z~" ..:.. ~.- day of 5 y i i , ~9 ~ G , by Margaret B. Cochran i My commission expires j~3°~ 7~ Witness my hand and official seal. . ~l . .-- `T No '; ~1e/~ N. KNCGN ~ ~. Statutory dckttowte ~~~~ - ~~...'.: ...'~... - ,,, ~_ ~ 7c` ~1~uD11c ~gmeni.=T2by'natursl'DersoA or persons here'inedit'Lame'or Hain 's; It'1~y Dei`•son e'cfing f,i ~cepresentattve 'oY I o(flctal capactty or as attorney-fn-fact then Insert nam8 b1 person ae'ezecutor attorney-fa-fact or other capachy or deem•fp- oa •'lE h offticer o1 corperation then insert name of such oftfcer or'o(ricars as the prehddent or otheF ottlcers of such edr- rRNtG f .. 'a 'o m O 0 ii • M ~ i~ G G ~ . o ~ ; ~`~ ;o ~;x w "U (D ~ ,y ~ ft N .~ y ~t ~ ~ ~:n ~ ~ I~ O V ~~/ ~~ :x e~: o n • :r '' o a i F-' i CL i ~ . r 'r ' w,'"va v'.C ' p O '~ •ly y z o 3i ~i ~ I t ~ ~ ~ ~ b C ~ +" t. a A H N j... .. m ~ ~ ~ ~ • G ~ H N ~ ~ j ~° y ' z o ~ ~ ~ ~ _ n m .* ~ p ~ `roi ~ o N . ~ hl ~ i • O O % ~. yy 1l ~ 1 O s K l , d ~ c q ~ } i. .. ,,. ,. ~ i ~. ;: i .. . _ ~. ,... .. _ .,~ , ~_ _ . ~. .. +, .. ~ ,,, ._,, ~ ..u,,. i ~ . newau a"V k ,.~" s { , ~'}~,CL ~~/X .Reception No i' r: ti ~ ~,'' THIS DEED, Made this t35 .,,,-...o'ctocx , P.. M April Julie Hane X539 D. .l 19 79 ,between THOMAS D. KASSLER ,, of the City of Aspen County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, of the First part, and MARGARET B. COCHRAN 11613 Brandy Ha1I Lane City of Marylanc of the Gaithersburg County of Montgomery ' and State pf'fbtm'ado; WITNBSSETH, That the said party of the first part; for and in cons`ideratioiti TEN AND NO/100 ($10.00) and other valuable consideratitlt to the said party of the first part in hand paid by'the said patty of~`the second confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and eonveyed and by . u,: .. .»a. ~ ~e..v°w sell, convey and confirm, unto the said paity`of the second par2;`~is ~`ie~rs an ~1ATE DOCiM~NiAAY FEE APR. `~ .~ Pa1O ~:. ~. a_.. _... described lot or parcel of land, situate, Tying and being in the City Of Aspen _and State`~of Colorado, to='tvit: ... -' .,, ~ ,... ` Y..,: . County of , Pitkin j i Lots 3 and 4, Block 10, Williams Addition to the City and Towrisite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. ~ TOGETHER with. all and. singular the hereditamen appertaining, and tTie reversion and reversions, remainde. the estate; right, title, interest, claim and 'demand what or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, wT TO RAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above'. said partyof the second part, his heirs and assigns forever executors and administrators, does covenant, grant, barg; his heirs and assigns, that at thetime of the ensealing an above conveyed, as ~of good, sure, perfect, absolute and in. has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from e7 ,. ~~ assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nat right of the Proprietor ofµa'Vein oriLo~ should the same be found to penetrate o'. ',Right of Way for Ditches and Canals con States,' as reserved in Un~i.t'ed S`fates Pa' ~ ~ in Book 55 ate Page 116; par"ty of the f~. ~~status'of Williams Addition as a sEibdiv ~ and the above bargained premises in the genet and peaces ~ and assigns against alb and every person or person"s TaJit"~ ~. said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT Al the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of~any ge ~1,. IN WITNESS WITERD'Oh';'tkie 'said pa`rty~of the fir; ~'~.' first above written. I ; } ss. ,a thereto belonging, or in anywise , hereo and al ts, issues ahd profits i~ ~ fr, ~ ~ "`T'-- urty of~ the first part, either in law i fi :,:.~ end appurte5an~es. - ` red, with the appurtenances, unto the if the first part,' for himself, his heir's, with the said party of the second part, e~sents; he iawell seized of the'premses nheritance, `in law, in fee simple, ~an3 I~~~ g ~ k Vey th"e same in manner and form as ~.,row:,w: .p l ~. ~.:~ ~a~ a intersect thepremises hereby granted, an ~~ , rt>cted by the authority of the United nt of record,. recorded December 24, 1902, t$parf makes no warranty 3s' to t$e exact ion, ~. possession of the~~said~party of the secondpart~his heirs , 1 ,-., u, ,i, v..~ n' j., ' claimiflg or to claim the whole or any `part thereof, the I"ORE'G'ER DEF'E~IND '~he singular number shalYincTude r shall be applicable to all genders. ' iart~h/as~hereunto "s`¢t hishand'°and seal the day and year / ~...:.~ ~__.. ~~-::...[SEAL] Thomas D.'Ka`ssler" i_ ,., , . ~,by Thomas D. Kassler. ~, My commission expires ~~~ ~~ -" ~`-- ~' }` i ~ ~,l 3 ~, ,. .. ...: ,. f .,, .._ de]ivery FILING STAMP' 18th day of April ..............:: .. ..:.............,............,.................... [SEAL] .. 4~ 1~'c~,,, Y day of CQ~/i`t~.. c .: r... . ; G, ' ~~ 7 ..... i i . F- ~ ' r"- t 19 . Witness my hand artd offScial seal ` . ', • ~. ,~ w~ i i_- ~ • J' '~ m. r y. l.%~SC w y ... G~ M ~ oo .~, 9 „ ~ i'z1 . w: w ~ w 5;~~ l7 K y CL N N b (D rt N rtK' ~ ~ ~ ro m r ~ r!c~a o r r a O ~° t"n~ O n trl oily : m:7 w x m p;ng: a w m:w ••' o w r :^ im v , kca co ~:m r :rt rn :w r m 1 . ' ' .i '~ p ~ A A ~~ O C. ~ ~ M Cl \ 's] ~; t!~~ ~ n '~ . ~ 2,' w ~ ~ ~-. ~ ~" H I~~ .'ly ~ :O ~' ~ k'~ c ro CJ I ~ T iii ~%'\ ~ ~ m p ~ H id A '12 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ : ~ ~ U ~ .H .b U n :L`~ O r i e ' ~ `• Y : y : z ~ ,~ o ' x K ,. E E ~ ~ G : 6 • r O{ ~ a~ `Y ~r .... i. I. 6 ', ;. I... ~. ,,, ,~. , . ~. ..w Appendix B ;, ,,, ~, ~~~~~~~ f PITKiN "CO`(7NTY L~i:;ll USE '~~'~T:I'ChT"I'(ft7` PO`R~I F~. ~{ 1. 2. 3. Directions: Any applicant for a development requiring a permit under .~. Chis code sha1l~~Be responsible fdr shoiai`ng conf"~oimance'with any applicable policies of Section 2 as listed below. The applicant shall submit those requirements necessary to show conformance with these '~' ''"''` 3i „_ policies and the related general regulations of Section 5 Upon submission of"the applica- tion and all submission contents, the Planning office 5halY distribute same to appropriate referral agencies which shall indicate its certifica- tion or non-ceYtification of the`"prop'os'al as Being in conformance with policies and as satisfying submission requirements and .review guidelines of relevant g .. whether furtherestudYeinlatlater'rev.few~al agencies shall also indicate Y _ phase is required and any further theoPlanning Officecondi,tons, attach.:ng comments and returning same to OCAL'RRVI~W- ... W,. CE TIFTCATION .. .~...~• .,. iCONDITTOr STUDY REQUIRED `.POLICY FACTOR. NG STAFF ` YES. NO AND ` INITIALS DATE RECOMMENE TIONS PA GS DS FP* Not inconsistant Planning with Master Pla Office - - - Rate of Growth - - - , - Hazard '& Resouro Planning Areas Office Geologic Hazards Fioodpians Riparian A-yeas Wildlife _ Wildfire Radiation SoilsJErosion County Ex- tension . Agent ~ '., , . . -- Extractable . Planning _ _ Resources office ~ Mineral _ ~ i Vesetable Other ~ I ___ --~ ..,.r~....~... n.vu uJ Jer -- _ e, u m ssxon GS = General SuSmjsson FP = Final plat -.~ ~. , _ .;:, fS ' 'A- .,S s+= ~~ STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR' LOCAL REVIEW- CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS ING STAFF YES NO AND INITIALS' DATE RECOMMENDA- TIONS ..... 4. PA GS DS FP :Agricultural .Planning Conservation Office 5. _ _ Scenic Planning Quality :;ffice ~ 6. _ ~ Water Supply Environ- ' mental ' Health 7. + Sewage Dis- Ehviron- posal mental Health S. _ _ Noise Environ- _ mental Health 9. _ - Air Quality Environ- mental Health 0. _ _ FIistoric/ Historical _ Archaeological Society I Resources ..._ .~ APP. B ~.. B Appendix B ~ PITKIN C.OUN'1'Y LAND USC APPLICATION Fp~RM r „ „ .,. , . , ~ c, ~ , -. t ~ .- STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACTOR LOCAL .REVIEW- CERTIFICIATION CONDITIONS ING STAFF YES NO AND INITIALS DATE RECOMMENnA- TIONS 11, PA GS DS FP Road/Trails County Engin- Q ~~,`'~ ~A i Design & Con- eer struction ~ Impact on ' ~ Road system Maintenance provisions 12. Drainage County j ~ _ .; Engineer ,, 13. Impact on County r _ _ _ _ ±- Transportation Engineer L ' 14. Impact on Public .. Planning Office • _ _ _ Facilities/ Services Solid Waste County Engin= Disposal & ineer Collection_ Fire & Police Sheriff/ Protection, Fire Dist. , I Response Service Sanitary County Land Fills. Engineer Hospital Hosptial Capacitq Board Library Sub- Library station Site Board Post Office Postal Substation Service a Site J ti_ _ -_ _~__.~_ i i I I ~~1 ~ STUDY REQUIRED ~, 15. '~ _ _ _ 16. i7. 18. _ _ 19. _ ._._ _. 20. PA GS DS FP POLICY FACTOR LOCAL REVSEW- :; CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS ING STAFF YES NO AND. INITIAL DATE RECOMMENDA- TIONS Extension of `-'Rocky Mt. " ~~ utilities, Natural Gas ~ ~~1\i~y water and Aspen/Holy ~ ~ / sewer Cross Electric „(y~ Mountain Bell L,y Municipal Water & Sewer Dist.s Public shops, County garages; yards Manager ` Recreation Sites City Recreation Director General Tax Cost/ County Finance $enefit Officer Contributior. to Housing r~~ Housing Stock Coordinator /w• ,1!c Man-made Hazards/ Safety _ _ _ I Wildlife Preservation Energy Conservation Water Resources Impact Final Plat Contents Building Official Colo.Div. of Wildlife Building Official -----__: District Water Court County Engineer, Attorney,Plan- ning Office ..,_. , pe ~ a,,: ,.. ;,. ~ r.. _:. .,, .~......: ~. „ , . ,. t ~, , : ~ , ;.: , ~. .. i .... ,,, r' s k ~~~ " p Asper/P~~k~ ~'~.~in~ Office 130 soiatta galer~~ stree.,t ' ~ a~pen;~c®.Iorasl~ .~1fi1,1 ~ ~~ October'i, 1980 ' Mr. Brooke Peterson 611 West Main Street Aspen, CO 816II _ , Re: Cochran Application for Additional Dwelling Unit "' ~- Dear Brooke: Enclosed you will find""the informat~on~ou have subm~t~ed i^egarding'the _..,..~ oc ran applic con unction aviation for an additional we1~ling utti~;'p'the"'Planning Office, in I tfi the Buiiding'KI"nspector'`s 0#fice,has determined the existing improvements to tie in excess of the zone districts a"~"i'owabie floor"yarea ' ratio, Since Section 3-8 13 of the Pitkin County 'LanZl``Us~e~'Code provides that all additional dwelli'n ~ "" `" g amt`s must be .w~i~'tfiin fie allowable' FA's, we are Tte~jectirig thfis application as inconsistent~wit~i"the'L'and U'se Code. Tf you have an ., _,_ .. ~- ~.._ ,„r , ,~.,.... ~.w ~ ~.... ; ux ~_ w ~ N._ .., ,..-_.;, y questions, please feel free to contac~'me at 9 ~`~` 2~ 2ozo Yo s truly, • f' ,. ~, Richard H, Grice Assistant Pianner ,.. v. cc: Bill Druedng, Zoning Enfohcement Officer` `" _. .' ,._ .-_ ... ..>.~, .~... ~,~ a~f;~. „d.,, .a ,. ,._ , ti_ n T. r' v- ~ ~, LAW OFFICES BROOKE A. PETERSON 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 67671 13031 925-8166 July 20, 1981 Richard Grice Planning Office County of Pitkin/City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Richard, I p ~`~~?- ~. 2~ 9981 Asa~N ~i~~s~ ~~;' ~c~t~s~ o~~ic Enclosed please find an affidavit from Thomas Kassler, the former owner of the real.. property now owned by my clients, William and Bonnie Cochran. As you can`te1l from this affidavit, Mr, Kassler's testimony is that the build- ing in question was used as a dwelling unit well prior to the enactment of regulations applicable to the property. He also stated that the building was used as a dwelling unit by various workers from at least 1969 onward. I would hope that this would satisfy your concerns and the concerns of the County Commissioners. Perhaps this matter concerning bir. Cochran's application can be resolved forth- with. Please contact me if you have any questions. Yours very truly, BAP:jo cc: VTilliam Cochran PUBLIC N01'ICE RE: Cochran Additional ,Dwelling Unit - Special ;Review _ -. - ~.. NOTICE IS ,HEREBY GIVEN that:a public hearing will b~erh~l,~beTgrBeT_a~e _ ,_ __ , ~.. Pitkin County Board af'Cqunty Cortum ssi,oners on Tlonday, P . V.w ,_ ~ Meeting hooman"'t~ie Pitkin County Courthouse, 11:00 A.M. ~n the Commissioners 506 E. Main 'St'reet, Asp„err, to' co' approvalsfor~an addit~OPenl.dw~orofurthertted by William Cochrian requesting ~' located at Lots 1 and 2, Brock 10, Williams Ac~~ition, , ext. 2p6,~gn co`htact the plannrng Off~ce> 130 South Gal na, Aspen, 925 202 > informat, s Bob Child ' Chairman, Board, of Lounty'Commi,ssioners `` ti -_._.. _, ... ,. ,.. '.;.,:.., u.a., . ,.rtiwt:....,,baamca a;:Y~:'.: .,s;'x~la»~sG'~:.~4,&~.~,13}~c~.<~:"~:~~YUui ~F n-~ ° '- WILLIAM W. GOCHRAN, II ATTORNEY AT LAW 37D VALLE DEL SOL LOS ALAMOS, N.NI. 87544 (5051 672-9091 Mr. Richard Grice Planning Office, City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81511 Dear Richard: January 21, 1981 ~~. PATENTS, TRADEMARKS & COPYRIGHTS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR ;~~,~; ~ ~ ~8i YII~U ~yl'9'e~ 'y '. It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone today. I have taken your advice and contacted Mr. William Drueding and arranged for him to inspect both of my houses (534 and 548 Spruce St.) to confirm that they are not duplexes. I do not know how that misconception arose, but I certainly want to do everything I can to show the County that they are not duplexes. I have enclosed copies of the deeds for both 534 and 548 to show that they do not have the same ownership. As I explained on the phone, my'mother (Dlargaret B. Cochran) is a half owner of lots 3 and 4, while Bonnie and I own the other half. Bonnie and I own all of lots 1 and 2. This, arose because my mother was the original owner of lots 3 and 4, and she gave us half`ownersliip in lots 3 and 4 at the time we purchased 900 E. Hopkins (John Richard Apts.) since we put up more money. T have also included a copy of the original deed which shows that my mother was the entire owner of lots 3 and 4 at the time we originally purchased the property. With regard to the floor area ratio of lots 1 and 2, as I stated on the phone the main house was built in 1892 and the Sugar Shack was built shortly thereafter. These buildings existed long before any of us were born. I don't think they should be subjected to the floor area ratio plan. Another matter which has arisen with regard to my application is the existence of a complaint in the building inspector's office. Mr. Drueding informed me today that the complaint was initiated by the building inspector's office themselves. What apparently happened was that Brooke Peterson (in my behalf) submitted an electrical hookup permit at approximately the same time he submitted a preliminary application for employee housing. When the building department could find no building permit which corresponded to the permit for electrical hookup, they issued a complaint, not realizing that an application had been submitted for employee housing. This was a case of bad timin which has apparently adversely affected my application. I hope that this clears up some of the misapprehensions with regard to my property and my application for employee housing. I want to do everything in my power to comply with County regulations and ordinances. As I stated on, the phone, I have always considered the Sugar Shack to be a legal unit. My reason for applying for employee housing was to benefit my caretaker and the renters of 548 Spruce by providing separately metered electrical and gas service so that there would be no confusion as to who owes how much of_ the monthly utility bills. Unfortunately, this cannot be done even; with legal pre-existing units even if such hookups would provide safer utility service. I hope you understand my situation and my willingness to work with you. I would like to resolve this matter as expeditiously as possible. I do not have the monetary means to pursue this matter to a much greater extent. If can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address which is my home or at (.505) 667-3302 during working hours. enc a/s xc - Brooke A. Peterson, Esq. William L. Drueding Sincerely, 1N~ ~~~ William W. Cochran II .tl Aspen, Colorado 81611 ;, ,: ~ . , ,. ` Re:, T,ist bf Adjacent Own~r5`for ~ .,, _,-•:. ». Cochran Property. _ ,,, .; ,.a :, ~ ;;, q ~, _4._ r i Dear Pat, As I discussed with you on the telephone; 'Lots 3 and ~ /7 ~ / 4, Bloclc'16 of"the Williams Addition are at the p"resent"" ~ ~ ~ ~ /'~ ~ ~} .„. , , time titled in the names of Niarga~et"B". ""~ocTirarl~, William ~ w. Cochran III' and 8annie C~ Cochran ~,RQ' ~ M y omission of their names from the list of adjacent propert owners was "not intend d w ~~, y e in any ay to 'confuse or hinder the Planning Offrce In fact, as `you said,` I"may ~ '~~ ~ ~. y ~ » area is incluc~'ec'C ~in ~an~ g l t ~ computin the floor area rat g io Please advise {me Aas to how we might proceed~~in this matter ~P ~~ Thank you for your time and consideration: ., ~~.. BAP:jo cc: Richard Grice ., ;. s ,: :, . ~~. z t r rr.> ] ~:_ i ', ,. ,.,> . . ~._. , ,'r.:. 9-~,-,-,~-. , . I I Y . I. I 1 .. ._. ~. .q. ~-. OWNERS 1. 9, ,. '.. t 6;,. fit,. OF' LOT, ,° S ADJACET~'T"'TO'' a _ t..: I. „.. LOTS 1 and 2, i ,: ', BLOCK ,10, WILLIAMS ~'ADDITIOONS~ ~, ,' B1ock, 10, sots 5 and 6 ~, -Vaughn, Max E. and'Alibe L 51 ., 8 Spruce°Street, Aspen, Colorado $1611' Block 3, Lots 13, 14, " 15, aid 16,' - _Skufca, Ella V., pO, ; Box 124, Aspen C , , oloraco $ll Block' 3, Lots 17, anti 18 - a ' Delese, Donald L and bottnic Vincent P ~ ~ I , .O. Box 249 5, Aspen, Colorado 81611 B ock 3 L ots 19, and „ ~ 20 - Colorado~81611s~ P'~' Box 2357, Aspen, Block 3, Lots 21, and `' 22 L - w ~. ,. Ogharc~bal,"P3ary S, P.O. Box 251 and Busch, ,Jon L.,- P.O, Box 4503, both of Aspen Color d , a o 81611 Block 3, Lots 23, and 24 - Grifth, Angeline and Ra - Y. 53b Wa"lnut Street A ' , speh ; Colorado 81611 t$ ~'0~ ~rlf'~~'~1~, , ~ - ~ , ': v .., .u :. :. .. .::. «::, 1:.:.... .~ . ., r_ tl. I a. ~.. E ~. °: , «.,. . ~~_. . ~..: ;d ~ r i ~ ; ._ a .. ~- .?!G, ,.`+.^~.'~«.'barti •y'*:m^a+e,x ~i ,xy;,, b~•A_rosn..,5, .. ani hx. a.,, r X v,aa+=a ~~ :t v,_ 4i.a, ; rUb'>:a1" :,....~ ;wrkx~m~po-s~nsss'3`'m?yy~,}M1k?;;xsewi^h""tww'~it«..»rerr.~r~+e:»4.~i ' LAW OFFlCES V (w ,'i, ....,.. 'i BROOKE A. PE'Y'ERS61V ' 617 WEST ~dAIN STREET ' ~. ASPEN', OOIORADO 8t6t1 ` ~' ''" '' ~~' (303)S26-8166 ~' November 25, 1980 Mr. Richard Grice PlannngfOfficen/City of Aspen' 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 e: Application for TnWil~iam Cochran Dear Richard, As you requested, enclosed please find the following cop~'of the updated Adjacent Owners' list, as Complete as Stowart Title Company can make it. Please allow this letter to serve as m~ formal request' to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County that Title II,'Section 3-8.13 be amsnded to detex any requirement that the floor Area Ratio be applied to the `approval of existing caretaker units. As you know, I believe that the Code presently allows approval of existing units with- out reference to the Floor Area Ratio, but I am making this request ariywa as it is my and ' erstanding that the above Y be rocessed unless I do, refer[eitharespectatoothei1policY p ~onsi' cs must be addressed e find enclosedeYatc hich , pleas opy'of my letter of August 28, 1980,. wherein I'believe those 'c'onsiderations have 'been addressed'. I'f; upon examination, `yo'u` st'll feel this ' is not sufficient, please contact me. Finally, I have calculated the total land area of Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, tailliams Addition to be Seven 'Thousand, Five hundred Twenty Six point twenty five (7,526.25) square feet.' The total area of the im rovements t main house and the unit in dis ute is b m 'calculations, ' ~ .t 4 ,.+' equal~to Two Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Ohat is the ne point Seventy Three (2,931.73) s uare feet. These calculation derived from the improvement survey p'~ep~red"by,s were Alpine Surveys. I would hope that you and the Planning staff would. give due consideration to the fact that we are'dealirig with"an existing unit which has been used as a dwelling 'unit for a number of years prior to the institution of the ~'1'oor Area T - ,. ur ~~rf_ ,ven. as u~kxW;:rzt:,~ t ~ 3 i ~ ~ ~:~ ~, ~ ~ t:~, a: ".,. i~ i_ _ {: Mr. Richard Grice ` November 25, 1980 ~ `' Page ,2 , , ;, ~! Ratio. My client is not seeking to have a unit which he can sell, condomirimize or do anything with; other than ~. ,. .,,. supply employee Housing. It"is anon-con,formirig structure and should be treated as such as with`any other dwelling unit: We are not seeking to weaken the County's position p _ , ittisrunfair to applyltHisAretroactwelytto''existngtunts. I would think that safe; permanent employee ,,housing would be of greeter concern. Thank you for your time and consideration.; I! .,_. .,. Yours very truly, BAP:jo enclosures cc: William Cochran R ._ , ~ f I<, _. ,. ~,~ ,~, _ .._ _ . r {: ).'. ~ I ' ~ 1 ' a q 4 .~~ -i ~,. t yj .r .~ i.. I.. I; LAW OFFICES .. ~, - ~ ~, BRO~I~E `A: `PETERSON '„ 617 WEST MAIN STREET` ' ' ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 '' ', (3037 9'256766 ~ ' November 7, 1980 Mr. Richard Grice Pitkn County/City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Cochran Application for Additional Dwelling Unit Dear Richard, Pursuant to my conversations with. Sandra Stuller, the oun client Wiorney, I am resubmitting the application of my lliam Cochran 'for the a on his pro pproval of his caretaker perty on Spruce Street. e process this submission and let ine know if any others'items are.needed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to co'ntact'me. Yours very truly, BAP:jo enclosures cc: William Cochran t 3 ,d' ~ i} t, 3.:,.. ., .,: ..., r4Ln'yf -:~ on "h, .~,~ is ~. _. `~_ ~ . - L44~~d~FICES°-.. t. ~ ~ { ~ ~. - _._ BROOKE A. p"~'TE1tSON 611 WEST MAIN STREET ', ', ' ASPEN.COLORA0081617 ~ i (303) 9258166 ~~ August.2$, 1980 Per. Richard Grice Pitkn County/City of Aspen "' '" Planning Office City' Hall ' 130 South Galena Street ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Cochran Application for Caretaker Unit Dear Richard., You will find enclosed several documents necessary for the application of my client, W"11iam Cochran, for the approval of his caretaker unit on his property on Spruce'Street: "' First of all, you will find the Appendix B, Land Use Application form, duly filled out. Secondly, you will find a Copy of the title insurance certificate issued by TransAmerica Title Insurerice Company, disclosing the ownership of the property. Thirdly, you will find a copy of the plat of Block 10 of Williams Addition, where the subject pope y Gated. rt is to ,.. Fourthly, you will find a fist of the adjacent owners to .. v_.. .:_. -_. ,w ~~ the property owned`by my 'client.` Finally, you will find my firm's check ~n the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.~b0), as the Exemption Application fee. 3 I have ordered the improvement survey from Alpine Surveys and 2 will furnish the same to you as soon as I 'receive it. There is adequate off street parking fog the snghe' and accessory unit, as is requirecT by the a resolution. In addition, as this is an eXi believe it is appropriate: to st"ate that the and visual character o£ the neighborhood wi 4etropolitaen with Holy Cross Electric Comp I have spokn Sanitation District; and "the A opriate ng; unit, I es`ent scenic be'mantaned. The Aspen n Water 'and .Light ".xY`6v N ~ `mJ. '^w{i ll .} `y-d 49'F4%YM t sz `"'Jn w4. ~^ +~ l iX ~3a ^~ ~ 'i" ~: £1f lL CM ^ ~ , . A. .k ,.~ F5. ..5... . t M . 'C':- ~ ""dY .--.~.x ~ c ~,~, ~~ ~ '. i, .. v ! i, Mr. Richard Grice August 28;' 1980:: Page 2, Department, and they have told me that, as the' property presently'has all of its utilities, tfiere will ke'no` "' increased burden on their services. My client has also reviewed the proposed agreement re- garding the restrictions on the`prope~ty, and have no problems with the same. ~. ~ pp _,. ,,. ~ y ~~ PP~, from~the respectivelCountp author toeStorseekwfinal aubro'val~n is ;, . ~ ~:._ Awaiting your reply, I remain , ~~ ,-,. ~ ,~,.. o- «. ~,.,~~; ~ , r ~I BAP : j'o k'. '....