Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
pitkin.planning.273707207001 (2)
DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice,Acceptance Letter,Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) "�➢ �`�; r ..r�us.w. a<�+.. ,.vrv. r�r ..w.,tM :e x..awnrriie+_{. �y H MR 4 �rC .A.cr'S d iy ..pE{.l h .. • bi• NA • • • e . I {N� .,,AI- ,• rc++C M.3s ww{�+MWHM�N"MNr!un tl e owl •• p{u Mk.ri�EU+ . 1.._ .. ..� •�yy... 1{'AM'� , . :x✓ f ... M .l)f `Y"s"f3Na�i w ,....., - .. ...._._ .. ''Vs., CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET Pitkin County No: Staff: /�i iC&/d PROJECT NAME: sv�cF/vim �r�0 �1 � APPLICANT: % ne, o she ��� dU'co-a Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Phone: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (fee) I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (5 step) 1 . General Submission ($2,630) 2. Detailed Submission ($1 ,720) 3. Final Plat ($ `660) II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (5 step) 1 . General Submission" ($1 ,580) 2. Detailed Submission ($1,310) 3. Final Plat ($ 660) � III. SPECIAL REVIEW/REZONING (2 step) ($1 ,180) T. 1041 Hazard Review IV. SPECIAL APPROVAL (1 step) ($ 660) 1 . Employee Dwelling Unit 2. 1041 Hazard Review 3. Other / REFERRALS Date Referred: County Engineer Aspen Metro S.D. Col . Div. of Hgwys. _County Attorney County Sanitation Fed. Aviation Admin. Building Department Water District Mt. Sopris Soils Environmental Health Trails Director State Planning Office Housing Director Holy Cross Electric, U.S. Forest Service Fire Marshall Col . Geologic Survey Div. of Water Resourc } County Manager Division of Wildlife Rocky Mtn.Nat. Gas County Environmental Coordinator 'Water Conservation Bd. —Other School District Mountain Bell FINAL ROUTING: Date Routed: County Engineer Building Dept. Environmental Health County Attorney Housing Director Environmental Coord. Other DISPOSITION: COUNTY P&Z REVIEW - General Submission: BOCC REVIEW - General Submission: Resolution No. P&Z REVIEW - Detailed Submission; ` .,. .. eh... .• .: -:.A u.. nt: . .. i. .-a:..4 Iu. rvL.;e+'. 2+. W.vx On l.. `i..ci BOCC REVIEW - Detailed Submission: BOCC REVIEW - Final Plat: w _ wv.p!en _.. ... .w .m.,..c t-.d n 8 Resolution No. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET Pitkin County' �y No: Staff: 7�1_�71/ //Ulc i PROJECT NAME:, APPLICANT: Phone REPRESENTATIVE: Phone. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (fee) I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (5 step) 1 . General Submission ($2,630) 2. Detailed Submission ($1 ,720) 3. Final Plat ($ 660) V1 II " SUBDIVISION/POD (5 step) 1. General Submission 2_, . Detailed Submission ($1 ,310) 3. Final Plat ($. 660) II1. SPECIAL REVIEW/REZONING (2 step) ($1 ,180) 1. 1041 Hazard ,Review_ IV,. SPECIAL APPROVAL „(I step) ($ '660) 1 . Employee Dwelling Unit 2. 1041 Hazard Review 3. Other REFERRALS: Date Referred: County Engineer Aspen Metro S.D. Col . Div. of Hgwys. County Attorney County Sanitation Fed. Aviation Admin. Building Department Water District Mt. Sopris Soils Environmental Health Trails Director State Planning Office Housing Director Holy Cross Electric U.S. Forest Service Fire 'Marshall Col . Geologic Survey Div. of Water Resourc County Manager Division of Wildlife Rocky Mtn.Nat. Gas County Environmental Coordinator Water Conservation Bd._. Other School District Mountain Bell FINAL ROUTING: Date Routed: County Engineer Building Dept. Environmental Health_ County Attorney Housing Director Environmental Coord. Other ._ , DISPOSITION: COUNTY P&Z REVIEW - General Submission: `.:L. Y,.o-. `w-' �e[axx:a .n ago :.._sa,Fa*,§-4'f6's'?-a`.,n§•:: '4'.,N'i''.�� :.�t ... `"v'' BOCC REVIEW - General Submission: Resolution No. P&Z REVIEW Detailed Submission: . . ...... .. . ... .... ......:... ' ' _.. ....:t.:...•.:'.a::,e;c: �". .r.ea..;"�..:d: .«�:._ J.d:u is " a BOCC REVIEW -Detailed Submission: BOCC REVIEW - Final Plat: -" -.... ..a ^Nv..v.urt•.„ui"�rv.rMn4�'Ala`:'_i�yrSY.'n=LY4..:s+• �^ -, ,.. ,., .:..:............:..li r.w. -m':.'y'�.4:..['Hv •:''.C: r :. v.5.y. „p.. �•°d'Y. M3• ✓:U "ak."�tl'art:-4e:.b.iii.��r'{ti aU �Ae,' r .. p' �3'�cieWd2^iw ,n 4- .'�•�..-y'cfiT�h$u.^Jl{iM,a.-,-S 1 .v.'FE yti% 4 Resolution No. 6. F f nn r�. 1 , 4 I RESOLUTION 6.r THE V BOARD Or C6UNty to diuiDb ' i, S,173 GRANTING GENERAL SUBMfS' NICKLOS _SU8b'TV1Sr61I Resolution No. 83 WHEREAS, James M. Nicklos and Stella J. Nicklos (hereinafter 4 1 referred to as "Applicant" ) are the owners of record 'of 1o . 109 acres of, real property which is zoned 'R'-30 and' i m�- _s ore specifically described on the attached Exhibit "A" , and WHEREAS, ' the Applicants have requested general submission approval for a 2-unit subdivision of said prop'erty 'pur SUant to Section 4-6 (b) of the Pitkin County La'nd Use t6de, �and WHEREAS, a public hearing was h ld before the 'hoa I s erd of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado at their regular I meeting on June 13, 1983 at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the application. NOW, THERVPOpE, BEfT' RE`SOLV' h6by the Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grant general submiSS4 ion approval to the Nickles Subdivision sub-fect to the follow- ing conditions : 1. The property will be deed restricted against any further development and a note to that effect will be added to the plat. 2. The water tap will be. made on Hunter. Creek west of hydrant no. 865 and the water meter will be situated in a it with a remote reader below or adjacent to the Hunter Creek Road. 3 . The sewer service line for the new residence will fO t-le 8 inch trunkline 'in Placer Lane. connect 4 . The detailed and final plats' shall reflect a sixty (60) foot right--of-way for Hunter., Creek Road and a thirty (30) foot right-of-way for Red Mountain Road fr"om the lot side centerline. 5. All utilities to the new residence to be located on Lot 2 shall be located underground. APPROVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado at their regular meeting on June 27, 1983 . Ea BOARD OF, O.COUNTY-"C' S 1,MMISSIONER OF By: - ----------George Madsen, Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO F'OF�M.. ----------------- Lewis Scanlan, Deputy' County Clerk Wes 'Li g h t County�� �A' tt orney _i 1 F n yyF I t 1 Exhibit "A" i A TRACT OF LAND S17UP-TF-0 IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH WEST QU)N RTFR OF SECTION 7, TOWNSAIM 10 SOUTH , RAN<",E 84 WEST OF THE"5iXTf PF2INCIPl+L. MERIt71l�N PiT F"L I'N GdUNTY, COLORA00, MORE PART1'CULAI2LY BEGINNING AT STONE CORIzE , 13, M 5.15C4-7,' -r HC�10E S_ 41°20'00 E. 300 Ott FEET TO CC—NER 12 r c• P,.i, a.. . _ OF M..>. 15O4-7, 'S"HEP.[C .>�:-ff 40'00"W 266�22 FEET �7HENCF= NSry-°'4�"00°W3OQ, 3IFE ET, THENCE 548oL0100 W 134-O9 FEET THEhCE. N 13"4-i'OO"W 6545 FEET, THENCE N'4.2°30'00"W 2O0•0o FEFT, THENCE N3I'1500"w 3t1 - g,"i'HENCE N 5�3 o` E-.79r*•=7 FEET , THENCE S C4?4-7,00 E 581+-6{ FEET, THENCE" S 4$°4O'OO-W 10215 FEET 'TO THE POINT OF 6 IrtU ihG CON-MINING 1O•165 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. ".. � ... , a MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Nicklos Lot Split - Detailed Submission and Final Plat DATE: Octoberll, 1983 The general submission for this subdivision was approved by the Board on June 27 , 1983 subject" to 'the following, tTVI`ell�clol Hd i t i o n s 1 . The property will be deed restricted against any further development and a note tothat effect will be added to the plat. 2 . The water tap will be made on Hunter Creek Road west of hydrant 9865 and the water meter will besituated in a pit with a remote readerbe low or adjacent to Hunter I Creek Road. 3 . The sewer service line for the new residence will connect to the 8 inch trunkline 'in Placer Lane. 4 . The detailed and final plat shall reflect a 60 foot right- of-way for Hunter Creek Road and a 30 foot right-of-way for Red Mountain Road from the lot side centerline. 5 . All utilities to the new residence to be located on Lot 2 to_ shall be locate unde Kground. Each of the above conditions have been met either on the Plat or in the Subdivision Agreement attached for your review with one exception. The Final Plat does not contain the note- required by Condition #1 above 'intended to aillert interested parties of the deed restriction against further development.' The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the I 1 11 �, .-I I Detailed Submission on August 16, 1,983 "bubject to the submission of the Subdivision Agreement and Final Plat meeting all' the general submission conditions. I I The Planning office recommends your approval of both Detailed and Final Plat submissions subject to the addition of 'a note 'Eo the Plat to read: "This property is restricted by the Subdivision Agreement against further development. " .... a ;....,. _.._. L.,. '.,t. L.. h_.. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 5 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1983 , by and between James MI.,_ Nicklos, and Stella J. Nick los (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the owners") and Pitkin ,Ceunty, Colorado, (hereinafter, referred to a-s "the County" ) . W I fi N E S SE T H WHEREAS, the, Owners',,nave submitted to the $County for subdivision approval, execution_ and recording a ,final ,_ plat of the Nicklos Lot Split consisting of two (2) lots situated on , certain real property in Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described, on Exhibit "1" attached ,hereto and incorporated herein ,by this reference, and WHEREAS, the County has fully considered the final plat and, .is willing to grant approval of and execute the plat upon Owner' s agreement to the, conditions^ contained a herein, all as required by virtue of thex ,subdivikson regulations of Pitkin. County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Owners are 'willing tir accept these conditions- and. to enter into this agreement with the County to provide for the same; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto stipulate and agree as follows.: 1. At such time, as any new improvements are constructed on Lot 2 i'n the subdivision, the water tap will be made on Hunter Creek Road west of Hydrant #865 , and the. water meter will be , situ ad in a, pit with a remote; reader . te,..,d ... �.,. ., below or ,adjacent to. Hunter ''Creek Road 2. At such time as a residence is `constructed on Lot.. 2 of, the subdivision, the" sewer'' service: line for that, new', residence will be connected to the eight 'inch trunk line' in Placer Lane. 3 . All utilities for ;any new residence constructed on Lot 2 shall be located under ground. I. 4 . No lot in the subdivision may be further subdivided so as to create any more lots or any lots of smaller area than are; indicated on the plat of the subdivision. 5. On execution of this agreement by all parties hereto and' recei t b the Count of appropriate g' P Y y ppro riate recordin fees, the County agrees to approve and execute the ,final plat and to authoaze the recording of the same in the real, property records of Pitkin County, Colorado'. THE BOARD OF COUNTY C0MMj SSfONgRS OF PITKIN COUNTY, `COLORADO " BY Chairman JAMES M. NICKLOS STELLA J NICKLOS' ATTEST By «.. County Clerk, Secretar sy to ' Board of County Commi sioner,s APPROVED AS TO FORM: By .. county Attorney (NOTARY' VIE) } k - _ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) S§. COUNTY OF PITKIN_ ) , subscribed and sworn tobefore met , this day noledged subsowf ' 1983', . by and Board, " of Count 'the Chairman and Secretary, respectfully, of the ectfull Commissioners of 'P :tkin y County, Colorado. Witness by hand and'' offical seal. M commission exp ires: My address is: Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS ) SS. COUNTY OF ) Acknowledged,day subscribed 19$3 , by JAMES �`NYCKLOS` and before me this a of STRLLA J. NIC L'6S. Witness by hand and official seal. My commission expires: My address is: Notary Public ... F I ! 1 I I ) y h _ 3 EXHIBIT " 1" TO THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT DATED BETvEtN 1983 JAMES M. NICPIOS and STELLA J. NIChLOS , AND, N 'COUNTY, CC3LCRAD rr,w A parcel of land situated in Section 7 , Township 10 South, Range 84 4dest of the 6th P.M. , Pitkin` County, Colorado , said parcel being a part of the Brown Placer U. S.M.S . No. 15047 , and being more fully described as zo, lows: Beginning at a point on Line 2-3 of said Placer , whence corner 2 of said Placer, bears _ N 04047 'W 83 . S6 ` feet. thence S 04047 ' E 584 61 feet along 'said 1- e '3 th`ence S 48°40 ' W 102 . 15 feet to, corner 13 of said Placer, thence S 41120'E 300 . 00 _feet to corner 12 o£ sai3 Placer, thence Line 12 1I S 4.8°40 ' W 266 . 22 feet along or said Placer; thence N 54°40 ' G4 308 . 31 feet to the point of intersection d with Line 13 14 of said Placer; thence S 48°40 ' W 84 . 09 feet: along said Line I11 3 14';w +thence -departing` said Line N 13°41 ' W 65 . ,45 311 29 feet, thence N 55030 ' E , 796 . 57 reet i, to' £he ponts of, W beginning.feeLt ' •thence N 42°30 ' W 200 . 00zeet; thence y 31 1 . ' r MEMORANDUM TO: County Attorney County Engineer PLANNER: Richard Grice RE: Nicklos Lot Split Detailed Submission_ DATE: July 7, 1983 Attached is a letter of application for detailed submission approval for the Nicklos Lot Split. - b ed turn your o the Planningase review he letter Offcegbyand Augustalhyo phat,�aeand may prepare for�itsnts presentation at the August 16 Count P&Z meeting. Thank you. „.,:. .......: 1.awx., ,rf.a;�.uvx:s,�#.u^+ 4-�n�.eUxu n: ,n"4wd^v$,ziskw.d`.o-cti Gt �..+,.,'' >•'."' �w r MEMORANDUM TO: County Attorney, Wes Light County Engineer, Ron""Thompson PLANNER: Richard Brice RE: Nicklos Final Plat , DATE September 6, 1983 ---- - ------------- -- - - � .:_... ._. .:.�a._s...�a.�,.+..,z :�nw�rns�v"Wia9+r7r's'�+vw.w� aF • :uCr t.`i-e^��,c�' ....3t ?n T: .. ;. -:E. Attached is material submitted to the Planning Office in con- nection;with the detaile inal plat su` mission of James and Stella Nicklos £or a Lot Split on real property located off of ,.• �M Hunter Creek Road near PTright `Road and Draw Drive. _ _ Please review the materials and return your comments to the Planning Office by September 27, 9831 so that we may prepare for its presentation at the October 11, 1983 meeting before the ._..�,..,n Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners: Thank you. Oe\A C) ---------------------------- h i 777, .e . , , t7 u *77 .MYLskWxiF, MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM Grice, Planning Office .. Richard , RE: Nicklos Lot Split - DetailedWSubmission DATE: August 16, 1983 The general submission for this subdivision was approved by the Board' on June 27, "1983 ` sub3ect to the following five conditions: " i. The property will be deed restricted against any further development and a note to that effect will be added to the plat. 2. The water tap will be made on Hunter Creek Road west of hydrant #865 and the water meter will be situated in a pit with a remote. reader below' or' adjacent to Hunter Creek Road. 3. The sewer service line for the new residence will connect to the 8 inch 'trunkline in Placer Lane. 4. The detailed and final 'plat shall reflect a 60 foot right-of-way fo"r 'Hunter Creek`' R"I'd and' a 30 foot right- of-way for Red Mountain Rdad` from the lot side centerline. 5. All utilities to the new residence to be located on Lot 2 shall be located underground. " The Planning Office is not aware„_.of any new issues that might affect this " _w Proposed subdivision other than the five points identified by the gnng of the general submission"`agproGal and none the Bifrthen rareferral atigencies have identified any additional issues. Gideon Kaufman, i1n, -his, attached letter, does argue that the 60 thatta 45wfooter ghteoffwayHte-I`-- 60Road is unnecessary and foot be equate. The County has adopted road design standards for "local access roads" which requires a 60 foot minimum right-of-way. Hunter Creek Road is classified as arlocal access road and therefore the right-of-way must be 60 feet in width. Since there are no additional to recommends enditionroval of the etailedssubmissionssubject ltonthe ing Office e a MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning 'Commission FROM: Alan Richman RE: Your Next Agenda DATE: .October 4, 1983 The items on your agenda for October 18 are as follows : ' 1. Golf:"'Course"Properties (?) "(Richard] 2 • Reudi South $hore`betailed "Subin'issioiiRic �_,. . 3. Urs Additional Dwelling 'Unit (Col,ette)' " 4 . Code Amendment - Illumination (Richard) S. Discussion Item - P&Z Attendance Criteria 0. Meens 1041 (Colette) Please, also note that there will be a work session on October 11 involving the following items: 1. Housing Authority Master Plan Presentation (Gail, Alice} 2 . Highway 82 Future hand Use Plan (Glenn) y °:a 1 ' PITKIN COUNTY .pL7�JN7�"1�NC5'1"O�tT�IG"�� 7'TSaIO�I IMYN G. MM,If(L, 11 .11.C0. i ' .4. ±,.. ".♦ '.� . y - . RECOf�D £7FPq �1�t�"�''�' "' 100 Leaves REGULAR MGEtIhG SEPTEME3ER, 198 PRESFNT: MvICFLAEY,MI ALTCRNATE. ALTERNATES:' nM F;ESER CLFif�K SNIYTH" , ,Corwents The Commission unanimously agreed to appoint Gassman as Chairman for the r6rra* der Of the year. No vice-chair was appointed. Smyth 1,12 indicated that he would absta n from al proceedings today as he was representing a private application.application. The Commission unanimously agreed to`change"their regular meting dates during the month of November to the 8tli"and' nd Caskey requested that a site inspection be scheduled for those Commission members who have not yet visited the Ruedi South Shores property. Assistant Planning Director Alan Rjchmail indicated that�plas4rier Ric`tiard Grice could schedule such an inspection prior to eetai""le"'ct'`°sXmission review of the application. to the that such for the Aspen Skiing Company on an infrequent 2asa ,y explained y present a conflict of interest with respect r 8undeck GMP application. Tne Commission generally agreed that such was not 1 .. representative of a conflict"'"parti.cularlyY"as the "application was submitted by the owner'of the restaurant and not the Skiing Company- Minutes • f Minutes. The minutes of 6 Se £ember T�83" were reviewed and approved as amended. --------- �a Public The Commission convened a public hearing to consider the 1983 Cormercial CM .Hearing: applications. Alan Richman introduced the Sundeck %IAIIIur"aii£"`Expaiis on, ttie:only 1983 lication that rquired 'on review approval The. applicant `has"proposed to G^ZP 1andetnof sto86ges arecfeetpofskitchen' on Aspen Meuntain, as `follow"s: eight hundred expand existing space, 'sax hand ed and forty (640) `square e g area, and five hundred and eighty (580) square feet of stairwell, _. � .., . . hall and lockers. Referral comments were generally supportive; the Department of Environmental Health has addressed waterjsewer 'services, and the Environmental- Coordinator has addressed visual impacts. The "Housing Authority indicated that the Proposed expansion may generate as many as twelve (T2) additional employees on the basis of the kitchen expansion. The applicant has indicated that no additional employees would be generated asl_the expansion'was only intended to rectify existing overcrowded conditions; the applicant has nonetheless agreed to house five- (5) employes. Richman felt that the" )ieusin off e ( " '_ 11"g ( employees was sufficient and that such would sat- 'sfy the housing requirements of the Code. The Planning Office recommended special review approval subject to the following ( four 4 conditions. - the applicant will con-ply with all of the representations made in the 1983 �". „ Comm rcial SIP application for Sundeck Restaurant expansion - this approval is limited to operation of the restaurant during the winter only, accessory to the ski area. Any change' in the'times of operation beyond the ski season shall'be subject to the special review approval of the Board of County Commissioners, based upon the recOM--ndations of the Commission - the applicant will submit an engineered plan for on site wastewater disposal modifications meeting the specifications of the Environmental FFealth Department prior to approval of restaurant plans, or issuance of a building permit - the applicant shall doe'd rrstrict" two, (2) studio npartt;rnts and one (1) two-bedroom apartnxunt, all as represented in the application Plmvainq & Zoning q=jiss.ion 20 ScpLc,1if)cr, 1983 - 1 1 � ' PITECIN .G6U�`I'Y'j''�.f1't3I737�C At717 Z"0t�"LI7G"GIT,',aTl'�N _", RECORD OF PROCEE[ IN69 1od Leaves ' rmxu [.I:xUnert e.e.♦'1.cn.' - .... _,.. . .. .., a .. the applicant, explained that the restaurant employs Jim Curtis representing ,,_ approximately thirty (30) indi"viduals. The existing kitchen was not 11.111, considered sufficient to Nerve" existing`seatirg capacity, and the expansion was proposed to provide greater work space: Curtis felt that the expansion would`generate no More than two (2) or three` (3)" adctit' aria o ees and ve"` °'" " " ` `°`"' "" Y ry possibly none. He noted that the Housing Authority standard for calculating employee generation was based'upon a new, in-town `restaurant facility, a "stand ard which was not considered pertinent to the Sundeck application. Zasacky then moved to recommend special review approval of the application subject to the four (4) conditions of the Planning 'Office;' fhe motion included a finding that the deed restriction of housing units for five (5) employees would satisfy the housing requirements of Section 5-300 of °the"code. Gassman seconded and the motion passed unaniiiously. c _ Gassman then opened the hearsng'for'public comtient. Ile, noted that the Commission .e did not feel it was necessaryr`"to conduct a site inspection'of the subject properties as each member was famili an1' 'Sundeck Iar with the three (3) sites, and 'he ssked if and ohn1 McBride,e epd to resenting �bo h the Phi Jim Curtis, xrSkinCo tinganclthiecar Rash applications had no such objection. ications, Alan Richman then submitted to the record the Planning Office MneMro of 20 P �, Se tember 1983 alf referral comments, the recommended score sheets, and the Land Use Code as amended to date. The three ("3) applications have requested a total of seventeen thousand, nine hundred• afi thistp-two' (.17,932)square feet of comrercial space as follows` - Sundeck: two thousand and e14ht"y`(2;'d00")" square feet to expand the existing restaurant facility situated on Aspen Mountain specialty ash: five thousand and twelve "e de alt, sits and n the o�offices,'OT2) "square feet to provide fora new building, situated in the ort Business Center, to house a carwash, auto P Y P - Phoenix Ski Co: ten thousand, eight hundred and fort n, y (10,8: O)- square" feet for anew building, also situated in the Business Center, for the manufacture and warehousing ofs) is and accessory oy£ ce space. This new building would, replace the existingPhoenix Ski Co faciht also situated in the Business Center The annual commercial quota provides for a total of twenty thousand (20,000) cN and (1,000) square foot exemption was previously granted the deductedeck nest" from the quota,osenc o, e an existing"deck, which exemption is nonetheless qu o that nineteen thousand (19,000) square feet was } available for allocation this year. The Car Wash and'Phoenix Ski Co. 'applications ,..._._ .,.� ,•. s , projects would be located on previousl'py sub'r".dmped lotsµ the Sun ck'"atian asboth required no additional review other than the co etztion for an allocation application re ired s ecial review as such,was re resent' ive of an accesso use in the AF 1 zone district. Richman reviewed the Pl .. anning Office score sheets for each application, each of which scored above the minimum threshold. Sundeck Gassman then asked for comments on the Sundeck application. County"Sanitarian �, Bob Nelson explained that he recently inspected the septic system on "the Sundeck Property; Nelson was unable to determine the exact size of the system although the septic `tank'was estimated at between two thousand (2,000)' and four thousand .. .4,000) gallons in size, in addition to a drywell. Although the septic system .. M , was considered inadequate under existing regulations, it has been functioning due to the limited use of the restaurant. Nelson was supportive of the proposed expansion as such woul jrovoZ the applicant upgrade the systemCinnconjunction withdid therexpansiont antticipated to occur in the sp ring of 1984. Gas n asked fr ,Phoenix asked fnthe1cmanufacturc ofskiss would on hresultn in any noxiouslf rues. Jaya aLussan Pluvt>,�g & Zoning galMnission 20 September, 2983 - 2 PITfC1TJ CObN'!`Y`p2a�llit" 'tlb-tC�IIit 4IS5Ig1V RECORD OF PROCEEDWGS 100 Leaves _.; /MN 4 C. president of the Company, explained that the m6unufacturing operation would utilize resins that do not r �" eoxS produce any`-'fumes whatoever: McCarth noted that the C '` Y ompany employed eleven (11) individuals 'and that twenty-seven (27) parking rpacos were proposed. The parking was considered somewhat excessive and he suggested'that' 'some number of spaces be deleted Clark Sn th representing the applicant, explained tha'f-the' apphcati8h initially provided for a parking reduction as twenty-seven (27) spaces was not considered necessary; as such would require an additional fee, however the request was deleted and .a. .,wM .�..,... , parking was compliance with Code requirements. The Commission generally p g provided in bgrconsidereda redefuturi datg would be appropriate for the site such was to Parkin' rhowever, "a's" he app3:i.cation woulcl'�iave to be'scored as submitted. 'Car Gassman then asked for comments on the Car Wash application Clark Smyth, Wash representing the applicant submitted plans for sand `and'gre'ase'traps. He also noted c .. that the application would provide fo'r a waste oil dump: Bob Nelson noted that the Sanitation District would require pre-treatment prior to allowing a tap into the District system. Gassman then opened the hearing for comments on all thre'e, (3) applications; u,_ . . ,�,., _. Curtis, explained that the Sun$ecTc expansion was proposed'in an effort to upgrade ' an older structure. G1ith' re'spect to septic services, the napplicant has agreed to H qu1 with all requirements; it was anticipated that those Tree uire nts with which theapplicant must comply would be determined within the buildingpermit Smyth noted that the Phoenix 5si Co. application would provide for energy conservation. The Car Wash application would provide open space and landscaping, neither of which was required by the Code, and trash would be containerized. Applicant John McBride explained that the southwest corner of the 'Business Center has been designated for use by various automotive-related facilities: The Car Wash application was representative of an effort to cluster such "uses in a specific area of also serve tBusinesse the subject frromm the�res dential uses. The application would TheComm�sman siona proceea. d for ced al comthent s; there beingnone ` the hearing was closed. p applications with the following result; the Sundeck application was awarded forty-six (46) points, the Phoenix Ski Co. application forty-nine and six tenths (49,6) points, and the Car Wash application forty-seven and six tenths (47.6) points. McCarthy then moved to direct the s Planning Office to draft a resolution establishing the ranking for the 19$3 unanimously. above, Otte seconded and the mot' passe Commercial GMP submissions as noted ab d y, , } Gassman requested that the Planning office investigate the parking reduction associated with the Phoenix Ski Co. application, including a`method to provide for its review, for the subsequent agenda. Riciman agreed to do so. ` the quo aZ developmente was indication, perhaps, GMP applications management to fully utilize Otte noted that the three 3 Commer not the quota available, an indication, erhaps, that a growth mama em�nt lam for Aspen Planner Colette Penne introduced the Aspen Racquet Club; a special review Racquet application. '111e applicant has proposed to modify the most recent special review ;Club approval for the redevelopment of the clubhouse to provide for two (2) additional indoor tennis court. The applicant indicated durin ._. ' „ g the review of the previous application, that two (2) additional indoor courts were anticipated for a second phase of the redevelopment; a substantial cost savings would be realized, however., by full construction at this time, and'it was on this basis that another application P1<I.Iuling & Zoning Crnuniss.ion 20 SanttmJ)cr, 1983 - 7 T PT7'auN COUNTY P( 11tT 1Wi 7d�}U '"�ONI[ CU AIS,!5,ION ) RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 160 Leaves raw• a.r.evreri.e.e.a;.cn. ,.... .. ,:......., was submitted. A total of eighteen thousand (18,000) additional square has been proposed as follows: fifteen thousand, eight "hundred `and evcntp=six ( 18,E376} square feet of court area, °oW& thousand, five hundred and twenty-four (l,524) squard feet of solar entry gallery, and sax hundred (600) square feet 'of lower n .. circulation area fFeferra7' co[itnts were generally supportive, and the Planning Officehe arrecoom nndedtapprowelve d12)ub ect to the following three 3 conditions -' 'PP 7 � 5 � ) ( parking spaces, for a total of'saxty-three (63) spaces for, the project - the two 2) p ( ) feet ( dryweh„ an Sarin A be increased to de th 'of two 2 - all conditions of the earlier approvals be retained to [reset existing rrnmbership; there are five h' (2) additional courts were necessary Applicant Tom Somers explained that the two unclsed ('500 club mscbers at tYv.s time, and industry standards call for one (1)' indoor court for every one hundred and twenty-five (125) members. The application prove des for access on Stage Road, lies with FAR re P epresent's" full'builil out of the subject applicantprovide for the tv76'(2 additional courts at this and the comp quirements, and r prop rty. Construction on the previous approvals has already commenced,s brie "The desired to existing bubble structure would be removed upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new structure. Steve g representinged t6 ",shield P explained twenty (20) construction of the berms eand rassoc associated earthamoving would be achievedat ae approximately eve a cost opt roxamateld twochundredtthousand dollars ($20000®)t from Highway- 82 would to remove thebubble struedttare prior to teenis issuance ofethepfinaltC6 ifibe requires McCarthy su cafe of and with the lighting of faciilit' -C er`hth hat there tfi� structure Occupan He also expressed 9 g y g explainedthere would be no reflective glass on the structure rather most of it was re resentative of solar e collectors. The application provides for the removal of the highest`story of the building, solar heat would now be limited to the solar gallery, and approximately _ sixty percent (606) of the glass would not'harc any'back `lighting. The application does not provide any lighting for the outdoor tennis courts. -s outdoor tennis courts would represent a lighting , reiecC vapp oval g �lthetapplication 'one that would require additional special Otte expressed some concern with the changes that have been proposed in a the special review application now before the Cormu ssion,, the color rendering of the project presented by the applicant was not consistent wifh the application itself, and it was not known how these changes would be fully d6d.L 'kited. He : suggested that a written sagrary be provided, identifying the changes proposed in the application, for the benefit of the Building 'T�opartn-ent. Conger explained that the special review application now before the C6 mission was ninety-five percent (956) identical to the color rendering; the'oiil)i substantial changes involved changes to the"roof structure the 'removal of glazing, and an extension of,the corridor on the front"offt}ie'ba ldiii g. Zasacky then moved to recommend special review approval subject to the three (3) conditions of 'tfie Planning Of ice and further,` subject to the following additional conditions: - the applicant shall remove the bubble structure prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy - no exterior tennis court lighting was includccl in this reviow`; sodium/mercury-- vapor lights shall be precluded from use in the parking, lot - the application shall corroly 'vnth tfie TAi r quiremen s of the zone - the applicant shall provide an acces;� easearc?nt for. the benefit of Park Meadows ah£inallCcrtificate oficant shall Occu}anyConst ruct and pave th3 bike path prior to the issuance of Planning 4 Zoning Calve ssion 20 Septur ,per, 1983 - i�: ..•n=;H .a�z"s"�" "��',vm,Nis.*'" r,'„''�"'dh:,r..k.w-,u 7di;xt:yt. � . -. .. , •-�{ PITKIN COUNTY P t.TNNING'ItND ZONING CCMI.;�,�rON. ' } RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS -lob Le aves eaves rarti t.r.xnrrxrt e.x.a i.cn... :.:.' ' Otte seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Reso's The Commission unanimously approved a reso3ution in sup of the joint City- so Planning Office. The &mission also appi& a resolution recommending the o adoption of the Pitkn"County"'3zo*dd Standards and Specifications and Road'Management Plan subject to the following amendment:the"daleti:on of the old load standards and specifications. ---------- There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. i h •. . r •.i T a F r — a PLuini.ng & Zoning Camdssion 20 Septr. nr.x r, 1,983 - S i MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Meeh§` 1041 Special Review DATE: October' 4, 1583 The Planning Office requests that you table this application. it is' a 1041 Review which is specifically concerned with proximity of a proposed dwelling to an avalanche run-out. It is a one-step review, ' which requires that complete information be presented to you'for' action. 7n this Case, the Colora$o 0eological '5urvep' s comments have not 'yet arrived acid theyare 'a"primary e"fet ent of our review. �: '"6 In addition, Ron "Thompson "of the County `Engzneer' s Office feels -. a w., .. - ,. that more information is necessary to "proper Ty `evaluate tie hazard and its mitigation. " w mow:, r,� � i •5; MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission . FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Stapleton Lot Split - General Submis"siorl DATE: October 4, 1983' Zoning: AF-1 PARCEL SIZE: 20. 15 acres APPLICANT' S REQUEST: A lot split into to Section two parcels of 10+ acres pursuant 4=6(a) REFERRAL' COMMENTS: The County Engineer ' s Office identified no engineering concerns With the project. They suggest two reminders to the property owners , these being: (1) any new, driveways intersecting Owl creek Road must meet County standards and 2 ,. ( ) there may be an effect from the possible owl Creek Road realignment. Environmental Health performed a site inspection on August 2, 1983, and determine that the., Land Use Code 11 - requirements regardin4'-i ter supply and sewage dis- posal could be met at the proposed building site. They list a number of steps to improve::the water supply and to' iacorpora"te a feasible on-site 'sewage disthislmemoran ysstem. These requirements are attached The Colorado Division of Water Resources points out the existing house' and another residence not on this property share a spring decreed in Water Court CaseNo. W-1066. `This spring is also the proposed source for the new residential site. A well has been constructed for domestic and livestock use (Permit No. 93875) . Most springs are considered to be surface water and subject to administration. We • `" could not recommend approval of this proposal if the spring was the only potential sourco-bf water available on the property. However, since.,a household use only well permit could be issued for Lot W, which would be exempt from administration, this proposal is acceptable. "I£ it is preferable to use the spring -for water quality or other -re 961 ";'M"'tthe we "have no objection provided potential 'purchasers arethat legalspringaware may not be entirely reliable { r1 standpoint and that it may be necessary too construct hahoseh,old use only well at some time in the future. The Division further for a suggests the following arrangements shared water supply: the 1 • in comml. occessltobtheowelld on an outlgt he I common b all owned Y property owners' using the � and the right to establish and maintain a pipeline shall be provided by easements twhere nee�essary. MEMORANDUM: STAPLETON LOT SPLIT October 4, 1983` PAGE TWO 2 . The well should`be jointly owned by the lot owners. 3 . Covenants and/or other mechanisms should establish a lot owners association wi".h' powers to make decisions concerning management' and operation ` of the well. A joint mainteria'nce agreement is a! :ion. required part of sucYi an association. PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW- This application for a lot s lit ' pp p is' being made p P r 4 6 (a) which allows for the divisio ,., pursuant to 'Sec ion _of" nd"`la in tYe � =1`"tone into no more than of a thantwosingle-family lots when the 'parcel is part of an ongoing agricultural operation (and is ,_ classified as agricultural "lands_ 'by the'`County` Assessor) . The evidence submitted to verify the agricultural use is the for lowing 1. This land has belonged to the Stapleton` family (the present owners and their direct relatives) for a period of' over seventy-five (75) " years.` 2. The Stapletons have had an ongoing agricultural operation on this 'pro'pe'rty for well over thirty- five (35) years and they established their primary residence on this particular parcel of land "in approximately 1968. 3. There has been an ongoing agricultural operation on this property by Sam and Liz Stapleton dating "back to 1948. In '1957, the Stapletons sold over " '50 head of sheep and ' had 'approximately 175 head of cattle. This land has been ri irgated and the Stapletons have 'the water rg)it'` for irrigation purposes with the first priority right fr'om.. approximately 1`$$'9" out of 'the Weser Willow 'Ditch. Although hay and alfalfa" is grown today, the last year that the same was sold commercially wa's '1972 or 1973 The .approximately 250 tons of alfalfa and e sveral �ax tons of .oats that are "'grown each "`season"are now ».... .. ., . . ... used exclusively by th'e $t"ap7etons for tlieir .. own cattle. The Sta `Ietoiisave" ' a Service Permit which givesthem 'accessto�ins excess of 5, 000 'acres of land. :"The permits are for 51 head of cattle,''which``would include as one head a cow with her calf. 4 . This land is assessed and taxed as agricultural land and a letter from' he County Asse`ssar's Office dated Ffa'`y 9, ITS$ , "attests to this fact. 5 . The Stapletons have filed copies of Schedule F which bI ranchers' farffier8' an' uired by the a ntern1` 1e enueServices re a agriculturalStapletonsha e for their oerationfor over ns - he P , thirty five (35) years. The' 1980-19$2 `returns were attached to the application. ,, The Planning Office is convinced ooff the viability of the agricultural operation `and `su orts the applicant 's ability to apply for subdivision approval through the provisions of Section 4-6 (aj :' a M t P eempFux v a wliwv :,..dj s,:°A!4 k, WFyAY:Y3' MEMORANDUM: ST'APLETbN �T"ST" u October 4 , 1983 PAGE THREE The Staplet6hs' professed purpose in requesting this lot split is to add increased value to the property .and therefore, increased borrowing ability. It is their further intention not to offer the new parcel for sale, but rather to use it in their estate planning and to perpetuate independent family owner- ship of the two separate parcels. A general building location has- bee' indicated on the plat which was chosen to minimize visual impact from Owl Creek Road. As Indicated in the referral agency comments,' certain conditions will be made on use of the spring for the, water supply source and the to mee+- County'toeAdiirds. Utilityy extensionsystem can be =will be under- count standar g new building site. As per Section 5-300.3 of the Land Use Code, the . housing requirement of this Section "5-M'0' shall be waived for residential developments on lots formed by a lot split as defined in Section 4-6, provided, however, that such waiver shallbe granted for a given parcel of land' only once and upon further subdivision of either lot full compliance with the, housing requirements established in Section 5-300 shall be' met. Section 5-510.2 (c) allows for "the construction of 11 a single-family home on a lot formed by a lot split as defined in Section 4-6. 11 PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATIT14d The Planning Office recomifrhs approval of the General Submission application for a' lot split pursuant to Section " " 4-6 (a)" Vfor an ongoing agricultural operation with the following conditions: 1. If the spring is to be the water supply source, the red made aandtheeimprovementsarequiredwater supply as listed by the Division of Water Resources be Environmental Health Department be metthe 2. Unless a household use well permit is secured for Parcel W, language must be added to the plat for consumer protection purposes stating that such 'a well may be necessary is the future. 3 . Verification of the acceptability of the proposed sewage 'disposal system by the Environmental Health Department at Detailed Submission. 4 . Driveways intersecting Owl Creek Road must meet County standards. 5. Utility extensions, to the new home site shall be placed underground. 130 South Galena Street Asoen. Colorado "13164! 3o t i 1 I ASPEN PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEP;LTH DEPARTMENT August 9, 1983 Mr. Sam Stapleton ' P.O. Box 98 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Re: Possibilities of On-site Water and Wastewater" 'Facilities for a Proposed "TWO Lot Su division Dear Mt. Stapleton: As a result of our site inspection of August 2, 1983, we feel that the requirements of the"Vitkin County Land L)se `Code ' regarding water supply and; sewage disposal can be met at the proposed building site. . Water is proposed to be supplied from an existing spring flowing at a seasonal rate of 6 to -20+ .gpm which 'surfaces across Owl Creek Road from the property. The water runs 'on the osurfaceverr about one hundred (100) yar"ds "t "-o 'acollection ffer tank of 800 gallons and then into the distribution system. " the water supply and totasssthusan further evapluatingoitmforve use at the proposed lot. 1. The spring storage tank lid is a piece of wood at ground surface. The tank top 'should"be raised to eighteen" (18) inches" Above 'ground and fitted with an overlapping concrete or 'metal lid. 2. A proper 8creened overflow should be installed on the spring storage tank rather than the current situation. 3 LLegalleasementstforrthetmaintenance andlrepairnofhwater line s y 9 g p r lines. be documented. 4 . Additional water storage should be provided so that each of the three (3) houses has sufficient flow -,during peak demand storage is allte/residence. ) :The total pP Y g /m g q g ons. 5. A booster pump may be required for the proposed residence as the calculated direct flow pressure; arsuming' a two:-inch (2") PVC line to the house is 25 paunds-per square inch. (The minimum pressure required is 20 psi. ) 6. The the area kwhere e to tthe he sspring surfaces 'And torage tank should bana uphill t app"i6vedxtended pringbox and collection system constructed at that point. OR 130 South Galena Street Aspen, 0oloredo Bisti ` 30'3%925=`2020 r Mr. Sam Stapleton August 9, 1983 Page Two- As an alternative touspring modifications a tftatment and "disinfection'-system should, be installed at each house to properly filter and chlorinate the rin ing water before use. M An on-site sewage disposal system is feasible.. It may be possible todo a conventional system if the obseR;ed water table can be towered from four (4) ee't, beneath the sur€ace to eig`h"t or nine feet. We would recommend that this be acoompli'shed ' by' culverting the small. streams on each side of the uiiding site .„., W for a distance of fifty feet (50) �on eizEi side of the` -building site and/or installing a deep curtain drain around ,the area to intercept the migrating groundwater. In any case; the soils should demonstrate, an .acceptable' per cola tion rate: Further, permeability of this type of soil . is listed by the Soil Conservation Service as rapid, and if the water table cannot be lowered significantly, in our opinion, an 'engineered mou_11nd should1. be an acceptable alte'rnative to convehtional soil absorp tion on trenches or" a bed, Should you have further questions, please call. Sincerely, Robert F. N@ison � Environmental Health Officer RFN/co cc: Richard Grice r l e _ k -- 4 ���Fr MpB�}1�16 Iltry ��j'''' A ASSESSORS OFFICE $06 E.MAIN STREET. ASP a ' ' „ EN. CO�DRADO 8i811 '` I T . K ' I May 9, 1983 N C To- Mr. Sam P. Stapleton umdv int. 0 Mrs. Elizabeth 0. Stapleton undiv. int. U P. 0. box 0$ Aspen, Colorado 81612'. N T Dear Mr. & Mrs. Statpletrn: Y This letter will evidence the fact that your land located in`Sectirn 34=9=�i5arsd sec. 3-10�5 on_Owl Creek, described in fax"Schediie #�.,7 is assessed as Agricultural Land. Respectfully, Dorothy+M. Mikkelsen Pitk` ' CcLmty Assessor Cj," k/ner Deputy Assessor w C t RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ESTABLISHING � THE RANKING FOR 1983 COMMERCIAL GMP SUBMISSIONS WHEREAS, on August 1, 1983 , the Planning Office did receive „ the following applications, for Commercial ,GMP allocations: NAME NAME NEW SQUW FOOTAGE 'APPLIED` FOR'. Sundeck Restaurant. 2,080 AABC Car Wash Building 5,012 i AABC Phoenix Ski C4omp'an'y Building 10, 840 and; WHEREAS, according to the reports of the Building Inspector, 1, 160 sq, ft. of commercial, space was built during the previous twelve (l2) months as a result of GMP exemptions which the Land Use Code requires be deducted, from the available quota, leaving 18 , 840 sq. ft. available, for allocation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 20 , 1993 , before the Pitkin County Planning and `Zoning Commission at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the three applications; and WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearingthe Commission members voting thereon did establish their individual scoring of the three GMP applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED_ by the Planning and Zoning Commission of, Pitkin County, Colorado, that it does hereby establish the following ranking of Commercial GMP applications ,for 1983 : NAME TOTAL SCOEE AABC Phoenix Ski Company Building 49 . 6 AABC Car' Wash Building 47. 6 Sundeck Restaurant 46,, 0 And in support thereof, incorporates by reference ithe Commission' s individual score sheets for all applicants. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Pitkin County Planning 'and Zoning Commission does hereby forward said ranking to the Board. M ..,__._ ns .,ri,_...,,..--s---•,- ,�;-rr- ,sa „< .. --:`.�.,`^'»^!p:,. ..., r`-"--,--.--_"^-«, . r,n+.. .: Nlh r i Resolution NO. 83- Page Two Of County Commissioners for their action in allocating square footage ...., to applicants, in the order off` t�ieir rank', Y y ._. g s= .g Cyommission at APPROVED b the Pitkin Count Planning and 2onin its regular meeting on October 4, - 1983. PSTfCIN COtT'NT Pf1LD7 fT5'G' By Michael Gassman, Chairman ATTEST: Lew Scanlon, Deputy County Clerk s , I i t�• nM. 3aYic n.xroa�p.�p».,e5+t ett«.a3ka.4,a :,.. ti a..mom d 1 •W • .V. M NO m t 7 A ro N rt C H z O Fl (D vi E Trot N Q p N• a O' N• K H 'W fr tD a W t3• w c n n r ' rt to a a n O E rt e HF . n H ro H N• P.X H O N O R+ m (Dft P. O,O F�-� rGt a ro H N• y ro (D rr O v aw n ro a �qy rt k n a m r rt fD N tb r N O r'i h7 (D "J (o N• a w• m to rt cr a W o p O O n a 'N• (a (Dw 0 1-A irk x W "ft 0� fN'f h• N F N H P. (D 0�,. D tfi b•- N A F.- N N 4i W IN IN IN IN. IN (N co a: Fl. wLQ (o Q IN IN (N (W IN IN IN IN IN IN O ro H rt el „ rt, CD [V 1 I y 0 N IN IN (W IN 1N IN (N IN IN ro T K � � z o y 0 W IN Ito IW IW IN IN IN IN I N IN y H o t " z r N IN IN IW IL, IN It" Ito IN N lb (A tD° (A H a 0 z c ty rn: a N C r.. rt, r m ' n ro° N r O I� IC IO ( I I I N I I I I I I r r * rD ro royro� t✓ ammw �o N "Cro� w N yy'y y + ° m 0 rt�r n r yy i0 M N (t (D K yo L� m Lart � ron rrP• o 0 q 0 � O 01 N r H N m a y aol £ N .a. N O _ � r• w " w w r • Ir �m rt rt m `` 4 .. Ir ro w y G N y b C ro w w N G rt t� r• r r• m tt ', Irn Iw Iw r i r m ^ rw • Y �y I C w � ai ro o U a W tJ F+ 10 On Ln 4a w_. toH At '10 N n a P� a 0 H w• rt Cn lTJ O ro xo En rt cn H .c m W M $ K CH . H. O O H • H:3 t7 M O H FN' W ro �H H rt W ct ... (Da H W 0 PV 0 (D O H 0• (D H (D (D a F+ x h (t m m (D `� ar 0 m� C ro P. a r• m m & & a a 0 H a p O :j 0 W F'•. 4G. (D CDP- 0 Fh m En rt 0 a P, a 0 rt, rt 0ro H (A (D P. W W G CC �U < (D A p, a rt �. 0 Fl• rt 0 to 7 r H. Ff N IN (W �w IN (N IN IN IN �N OD (4 W H n 0 0 IH IN IW IN IN �N I.N IN IH �N H 0 ro fi u N N .'Otl 4 ro z IN IN Iw (N IN �N �.N IN �N �N H O., ., II E z cn chi r N t0 rI D- F3 n m N IN (w Iw IN IN IN H z ro z N N IW IW (N (N IN IN N N a 3 I H CD En,. H a 0 z m N N N H N ? oD rn co ro a G. ft rt w N H XP H F- H H TO Fb N- ro H` JN H H ro � J�n � I:pr. O J�o CD �� I� ININIt, IN) Im N �ol •IN i Q -. .. .._. —r.v:...._�;-...rw--.r�w.aw.r .. ---'�..�'."+we+.'a.Y n ... .. .v':w w.� N d.:. X F 'r• . � I I S * A ro MyK1 � F:,i 4 H N� coCD N a w G yyy W ro o o tr P. m ° to O O r m0rt 'm Pi Ho m w rt to6) z x ((DD O Fa-' O w � G F' H N Ea 0 El ic N. LQ (n tv N o A O w ' O th N r- N N I � r. � ~ N w O ct rt m w r � w N � a m r n m O N tr P. m w w Iro rt ;c 1 i ^ f D. W N F-' KD 01 N to tri n ro w to rrt 'En N troi A C :3 r- N tD P. �< C K O r� ".�M' 1D N r• i7' �t2 by C K K m rt w N N = 'K O "L. rt X � C r• H H• n • O fD O �3 0, (D', K YD fD N t O K. F H. r M O N K rt H. tb, �Hv O N �j K t7 H• CA ''d CD fD r• N P. _m M rt rt' C7 W O :3 0 :1 n W P. k (D (D P. A rn N a a 0p rn 0 ul rr rr a H.ro N � o m rr+ v rt a ro . a w H - K w ft Q r• ko IN ( W IN IN IN to I..N IN IN IN SD co W O N W "N N N H c� O U W O 3 IN IW IN (N LN IN IN IN IN IN ......._ y H H ty z IN I IN IN INItoItolN N N N W CK w i O z m N ro r rt N Fk w �-� .a r N r N t-• r N co- }-F N IN I� IN ( N I'm NI N N00 N .. ( I I I IN x i= , LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON 1. KAUFMATI A PFOFESMONA:0000 tjWA j4' BOX 10001 GIDEON 1. KAUFMAN 611 WEST MAIN STREET' ASFEN,COLORA06'91'6TV - "` "' TELEPHONE DAVID G. E'ISENSTEIN AREA CODE 303 ' July 6, 1983 925-8166 HAND' DELIVERED Alan Richman Planning Office 130 S`. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Nicklos Lot Split Detailed Submission Dear Alan: This letter shall, serve to address the conditions Compisssi Commissioners on the Nicked honing" Commission 'and County laced b the P1'ahning a is re ared it will have a notation split When the final plat los to prohibiting any further development on the lot. A subdivision agreement ' will' be hhdrante8water2tape the approval which will reflect: 1) entered into after final e on the Hunter Creek Road west of , y sewer line will connect to the 8 inch trunk line at Placer Lane and 3) that ail utilities to the new residence located on Lot 2 ' will be placed underground. The new plat has been updated .to comply with the requirements of detailed submission. One request by the engineering department was for ;a 60 foot right of way for the Hunter Creek road. I' had the surveyor draw both a 50 foot and 45 foot right of 'way to show what I b671i- e' to be the excessive size of a 60 foot right of way. of elevation off 'In addition there is a dramatic drop the the road which would'lpreclude expanding the road onto the Nicklos ,property. I don t believe a'Yoad th'e size' of Hunter' Creek needs a 60 foot right of way. Therefore I would request a 45 foot right of way instead of 60. I believe I have addressed all of the requirements of the P&z and County Commissioners. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GID80N I. KAd MAN, a Professional Corporation w By Gide n Kaufman " GK/ks pq , A G E N' D A . ... .. PITRIN COC7NTY PLt�I� ING AND"Zf7NING OMC�fI5uICSN Tuesday, October 4 , 1983 9: 00 AM. Commissioners Meeting Room Ptkin County-Courthouse," Regular Meeting C V I. COMMISSIONERS 'COM II. MINUTES IIL PUBLIC HEARINGS \"A. ` Meens 1041 Special Review �. Melamic Lot Separation (Resolution Only) IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Stapleton General Submission V. RESOLUTION A. 1983 GMP Allotment ' VI. DISCUSSION ITEM 6 A. Wally Mills Property` Exchange • Highway $ ) Concerns " VII. ADJOU MEETING o r ems , O)J ) )j Jdl a { pltkln c6cm. ty tht5 e6st""i4i ri street' aspen, colorado 61811 M E M 0 R A N D U" TO: Richard Grice FROM:_.Ron Thompson 4� DATE: July 12, 1983 RE: Nicklos Lot Split - betailed 'Submission ` a . Per the Survey -'w' plat submitted it is noted th'a't a 60 foot right o�-way for Hunter Creek Road already exists, 30 feet either side of" center Lane. _. , This right-of-way should be reflected on fhe final plat. 'A other items appear in conformance: '"` ' I s I of i g „"”,It 3t< .e•?'F_ yyyy yqp -gym"�,,. gyry j'i' + nF '' � Qsp�ii6 �1l/ 7'LACdi I�Y,�i y�`+�'1•yry7'">_^,..»+;. �. I . I 13U Sou`tfi'(iilena 5-tjeet` �' (303) 975 2b2 f6"Ci' ' �V , C � . . _ ;.LANb USE APPUC-ATjtrN-'F_ S 'C1ty .A'. , . -00113 63721 I ' 63723 - 09'If -`521�yG'..,.: I- 63724 - 63725 - 47347 5Y11Yti `LPL A , � � " I.� ' r��6',3726 -.47343-"""�'2�'b`UN. .�,.:,�$a �,�w�,.:.,��,,w.mz.,,.«,�,�.. ra•..,h,,.ry ..<.- a I �. 63727 • 47350 SUBT AT County 00113 637'ft Otl t2150 lr,M14P"/G`E�AL ` j.. 63712 - 47332» 63'7i3` = 4 `333 '='5220 F�I j 63714 47S4f '=�'2°�b�i 4 " 63717 47350:- t5' 60 '63718 d7$g0- Ta2200 52 6 SP CfA APpBt V'Ar : .. 4 -•- mow, 637"t9 4�360 ..-., •. ,,,,..a. . f PLANN1Nd"-WIC j U0113 " 6°30 0000" 522w00 CfYre a # ss z .:,, , t, 63063 09000 :-522'0D' "„=AC1V11\NAC " SUB-TOTAL MAL Name. Phone gitdreu: Project t Addi tionaf i0 ng`: i' S >V^ +'T",A•yp('}l'a,�w`P �l 'E P" Y G.µ'.., M ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OPk=10E I 130�outK OaCena Street Aspen;Colorado M11 (303) 925.2020 R ' LAND'USE'APPLICATION FEES I City '.. . .., - 00113'; 63721 - 47331 5f100 GMP/CON'CEMAi " ¢ 63722, -'47332 = 52100 `GMP/PRELTMINARY 63723 47333 52109 GMP/PCNAC ` " � 63724 - 47341 52100 SUB/C'ONCEPTUAL, , w 63726 -47343` -52100` .:.-.: B�FP h -1NAaY 63727,. =47350 =BZ100 EXCEPT7EXENI'PTION' R 63720<.._w493'5U"" 52ib`U-. .... �'`EZY1'N7N�:F..__...«_... .,,.�,.,..,�. . 63729, 4736ti -`521O4 `$PE'CTXt;REVIEW 1 r SOB=TOTAL County,. 00113 ;- 63711 --47331 -52200' -- GMP/OEN'ERAI: 63712 - 47332 - 52200 GMP/DETAILED.. '63713 - 47333 -=`52200_ „ GM!37M-ATw..v..,.. w.h .... w:.- ., f. p... ._._':... 63714 47341 '52200 S'�B/GEA�1"fi,KL' w 63715, 47342 - 220b SllB7bIAIU �.. 63716 - 41343 =52200 SUBIF7NX�"'° �• G � 1 4 637'17` =14735b S^6 1VE "�.rr. : 63718' - 47350 -32200' , . . r1EY0NINt;""'",,.„.__. ._„a, i ! 63719 -47360 :;52200 - 9PE61AldPPR"OV1iL i, SU'B-TOTAL, PLANMNG'OFFICE5ALES' , ". 00113 1:, 0f1000 52306 63063 09000' 5.2200 ALIG�A(6dCbbE..., ;�t i — '.a,'.. 63062 09000 -=00666 .-: 6MP 63066 -'090110 63065' = OgoOb,.. SUO=TOTAL © '"Oro 4 I TOTAL dC O 19t7 I Nam �y"*�l�f t:,?'i2 �✓.� t>t : , "—Phone- Address: lJfll<[-.C15 Pro7eCt: l 4 Check No Additional_ dlin9: 4.No. of Hours: , 1 1=' r l I I I, flit � o 1 ii I . f i 1"�" If li ,rSJlq'r§`rh ,ih�p loll"" �'�I�S lil, MaRP fi! 11)i,. fi " it iin, oUTr',.'v. {l(lO.fdi"! IrI� l,l) 1, I,{1�� !1� _ - - -. 1 j 'IMI r 11 1} 1 v, f r 1 1 { r " Jilt � k'6! 1 Jain l p1Y It au } I. 1 fit ql 1 'y \ 1 llii { 1, a dt� ', t ?� 1 c fit � JI a r I, r 61p r fi c If m , t l i 4 I. I YI.IPI h„h`d I If i A i al If It "III' ifl q I if i i c - I ` If, y tI 1 A hh E 11 r r 1�1( Yd 1 i; 1 A� Y It 1 1 h e i ff a , n , l f f I ly t 11 I ' ✓rS A hil , i l a, AUMAN''l,M 4-. iffbMllf'olt"M1tSY6tkf 1'VNA!104YII�u,YaW! — ,dd +Iq^rUnY'buF 1AW�4'W+WIM✓A\UM RIVrt ,k xi�rtpYXWN�d+N!!>NWNNIMM1I9U#Po I'� ,':. F ldsMVN 0^dViFW11 OF'VYP.�,i�itYllRl4ttAll i01 61tI lALh �MII�I°IPNM%NYUtINNMr%pLld prVp"P"MIYA1p �I If I t 1 1 f \ Dos 4' 3 ,.,, .. -. ,,.. .., ,..� .. , ,.:.,. - " hqqy�!�..�wryy�.,g";:� pm�'�a nl �tr ll lZ;, p "" ""' �Y ,n'✓k,,vf.,ery. q . .. . .. , ,. ,,.� �" Wg� 7q �d ,,I�,,,i _.. .I I ", ', •,7 , [ ; I:u 11�, �q^!pun Ri a YG„ �,w,^' ,.�i V� ,`�rwl�a GI %'?� �fim, i� 4 irrc,:a ��,�ld " �mM �" Nd <�ni¢yl�;, um urmu 4M��� `Flit ", Sill%gla�iyt I;R71{{ Ili �{A11Fq�tllt 'ItlilpIg p'".c!}t� \,as Alga 4111i4 Ir4jd )u a+��rEla � I 11"illrtq(4 OWN 1i111110MIMOII1� n'�{a NilP� ��111 ��11 N`luifh fn �Ic'IFfil`� Ida I��IBNA �1�� 4� j ' I I t'i ill 1At Ilia- ` I i I I r 1 I 1 i r r t I i r I /':ii 0 1 4. I' It I " x, 7 r r, r r r r 1 t r 1 a{ I 1• 4 `' I t i i F L 1 i ! `f fti R 1 li { it t I /lam I I P. � 'vll I' I ,1'•tl � {{I r fl 1 ? F ft99 �1 I 1 S. 71u1 nl i.. ,v 1. 7 It n it l } I kJ 1 ( v J I In a I F d a c Vv 0" 1 1` laplNil40y r �, ;1. l ' v; ' 1 �alalt,a at.l taa tnl 'raaauu maalralailvu'W,1„`Ihoj „a 1 ,ttl111AP OW { ammal�owymlMIMIK((on7r�a"1Ct h idW�WU�`AW141Ilow a x"wi'm 11 a Ia14NhIY"MAX'6n*0104 j kkAII l0tl3.9x , R / Ilk PA A It h 1 iypl II`il 'I.L. IP '; 1 Poo5 I( I �mr lrne lr 4 I ,1 r. Ue i , Iill , 1; �� Wd,u j;l;}rp 17 ill llait ii IT i��^ ;� l�l 1� (j, 11 ��ri,il �/i s (; I' 1 1 f �} V 1 �'' it �i�` �i "4 , r ,l `I; `")! 11 I } A�b;)1 In Iy U "4 R ! `1�1� ::' 1� ION t�� I,yl lit 11��iV i. 1;"AiV e yy 1 ;tt }vu� � } s ( I � 1 i( 1 , r ,i I� IT 1f,If 1 TIT ,1 IT y TI f IT IT If 1. c i I } tl ti; 1 , t i , i 1 t , v i i 'I I n i 1 i i � I I ; a, A fl 1 } n 1 { ; I 1 r I i r Il t F I ,. 1 if I 1 n � OS00- 4ll , i