HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273511400801 (2)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x1'1)
PARCEL ID: 2735-114-00-801 DATE RCVD: ~ # COPIES: ~ CASE NO P008-95 _
CASE NAME;; Aspen Chapel GMOS Exempt & Scenic Overlay Planners
PROJ ADDR;', 0077 Meadowood Dr
OWN/APP: Chapel of the Prince ADRr- C/S/Z:~- PHN:~-~.
REP: ADR:~~ C/SIZ:~-~~PHN:~-
Email AddrC ALLOCATED HOURS:~~
FEES DUE: FEES RCVD:~~ ^/a OVER: ~-
REFERRALS
~''-M-T~G-D~A`TE-' ~RE`V~'B'O~D"'Y PH ~~--~"N'"O'`T-''IC--E'D..`. DATE OF FINAL ACTION: ~-
I_ I N0 I BOCC Reso:
~~ ~: No ~- ~. BOCC Ord: ~-
REMARKS PZ: 95-56
HRG OFF:"'
CLOSED:~~ BY:,~- HO INDEX: "~
- ADMIN: ~~
PLAT RECORDED... PLAT (BK,PG):~~ ADMIN INDEX:
VR APPROVAL DATE: ~- '~ VR EXPIRES:-
CASE TYP:„ GMOS Exempt CASETYP5:..
CASE TYP2:~: Scenic Overlay CASE TYP6:'
,~i
CASE TYP3:?. CASE.TYPT..
CASE TYPO:. Date Scanned: 7/24/09
File LOCation-..1Box 170
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
PITKIN COUNTY
DATE RECEIVED: 01/18/95 CASE # PS-95
DATE COMPLETE: PA RCEL ID# ~~%7'IIN'Gy" ~o
STAFF MEMBER: RM
PROJECT NAME: Aspen Chapel GMOS Exemption & Scenic Overlay
Project Address:
APPLICANT: Chapel of the Prince of Peace
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: Gideon Kaufman Kaufman & Peterson 925-8166
Representative Addre ss/Phone: 315 E Hym an
Aspen CO 81611
--------------------
FEES: PLANNING ----------------------
$2040 # APPS -----
RECEIVED 9
ENGINEER $ 62 # PLATS RECEIVED 9
HOUSING $ 62
ENV. HEALTH $ 62
TOTAL $2226
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: X
DRC MEETING DATE
P&Z MEETING DATE 7 PUBLIC HEARING: NO
BOCC MEETING DATE Z PUBLIC HEARING: ES NO
HEARING OFFICER MEET -- ---
ING DAT -
REF~'RRALS :
Attorney
-Aspen Consol S.D. -
School District
ngineer -Rocky Mtn Nat Gas USFS (Carbondale)
Housing ~7~ply Cross USFS (Aspen)
ildlif
f
i
---~~~ Aspen Water V Aspen Fire e
W
v. o
D
~/ `Envir.Hlth. -Basalt Fire BLM
/ Zoning -Carbondale Fire Snowmass Village
Land Mgmt. -Div. Water Res. Risk Manager
/y~bt ~~fi
/~
Airport Mgr. -State Forest Ser. d
~ Caucus
o
~
Sheriff CO Geo.Survey wcdG
Homeowners
City P & Z CDOT Open Space Board
Building Dept -Clean Air Board Other:
ist
o
D
-Brush Ck Metr _ Other:
DATE REFERRED:_~ C
n,
l
__ INITIALS: D'w DATE DUE: a ~-U
--------------------
RESOLUTION #: --------------
DATE:
PLAT OR SITE PLAN RECORDED AT BOOK PAGE(S)
FINAL ROUTING
County Attorney
Housing
Open Spacp~~
Other: '' ``
FILED:
DATE ROUTED: NI~,UI INITIAL:
-County Engineer Zoning
Envir. Health Applicant
Revised 05/16/94
i
38@739 B-779 P-0'T~ @4/04/95 @1:47P PO 1 CJ~" 3 REC DOC
SI~LVIA DAVIS PITJ{IN COUNTY CLERK ~ RECORDER @. @@
t
,~ RESOLIITION OF THE HOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITRIN COIINTY,
COLORADO, GRANTING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT QIIOTA SYSTEM EBEMPTION AND
SCENIC OVERLAY APPROVAL TO THE ASPEN CHAPEL TO CONSTRIICT AN
ELY 900 SQIIARE FOO/T ADDITION
Resolution X95- 5 (~
RECITALS
1. The Aspen Chapel Trustees, (hereafter "Applicant"), have
requested a Growth Management Quota System Exemption and Scenic
Overlay approval to construct an approximately 900 square foot
addition to the Chapel.
2. The Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners (hereafter
"Board") finds that the Chapel represents an essential community
facility and is therefore eligible for a Growth Management Quota
System Exemption for Essential Community Facilities.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application
at their regularly scheduled public meeting on March 7, 1995, and
recommended approval of the Chapel addition.
4. The property is described on Exhibit "A" attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners that it hereby approves this application subject to
the following conditions:
1. The addition shall be built according to the plans presented
by the applicant and shall be limited to approximately 900
square feet.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the existing floor
area of the Chapel shall be verified by the Zoning Officer.
d
38x739 D-779 F'-c:., 04/24/95 01:47F RG 2
.. ~
~~ Resolution No. 94- S
Page 2
G ,3
If the structure exceeds the allowable Floor Area Ratio, a
variance from the Board of Adjustment shall be required.
3. The Applicant shall enter into a water service agreement with
the City of Aspen prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 1995.
ATTEST:
~~ i
Jeanette Jones,
Deputy Clerk and Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jo ^ly,
cting Co ttorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By: ~- - ~~
M' ael J. Ireland, Chairman
te: ~/-% y
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Suz a Konchan,
Community Development Director
slw/fk:aspen.chapel.reso
38m739 B-779 P-272.,, .)4/24/95 Qi1:47P F'G 3 OF
~• : ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT A
A part of Lots 15 ana I6 in Section I1, Township IO South, Raage
85 West of the 6th P.Ji., described as follows;
Beginning at a point from which the Southeast corner of said
Section 11 bears South 3°12' East, 1566.7 feet;
:hence North 80°33' West, 95.T feet;
thence North I3°50' West, 109.6 feet;
thence North IS°03' East, 230.3 feet;
thence Nortli 25°03' East, .71.5 feet;
thence North 37°07' East, 50 feet;
thence South 2°53' East, 407.4 feet;
±hence South S7°07' West, 50 feet to the point of beginning
AGENDA ITEM SIIMMARY
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Regular Meeting - April 5, 1995
THRU: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Director ~(,
FROM: Francis X. Krizmanich, Deputy Director
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
APPLICANT: Aspen Chapel Trustees
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Gideon Kaufman
ISSUE: The trustees of the Aspen Chapel (Prince of Peace) have
requested approval to construct an approximately 900 square foot
addition to the Chapel. A Growth Management Quota System Exemption
is requested for the addition. Scenic overlay Review is required
because the Chapel is within the mapped Highway 82 scenic overlay.
LOCATION: The Chapel is located at the intersection of Maroon and
Castle Creek Roads.
ZONING: The property is zoned R-30 and contains approximately 1.14
acres.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed this application
on March 7, 1995, at which time they unanimously voted approval of
the proposed project. The Meadowood Homeowners' Association also
recommended approval of the proposed addition. The Planning staff
also recommends approval of this application pursuant to the
attached draft Board resolution.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Regular Meeting - April 5, 1995
THRU: Suzanne Konchan, Community Development Director
FROM: Francis X. Krizmanich, Deputy Director
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
APPLICANT: Aspen Chapel Trustees
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Gideon Kaufman
ISSIIE: The trustees of the Aspen Chapel (Prince of Peace) have
requested approval to construct an approximately 900 square foot
addition to the Chapel. A Growth Management Quota System Exemption
is requested for the addition. Scenic Overlay Review is required
because the Chapel is within the mapped Highway 82 scenic overlay.
LOCATION: The Chapel is located at the intersection of Maroon and
Castle Creek Roads.
ZONING: The property is zoned R-30 and contains approximately 1.14
acres.
REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS:
1. Zoning: The proposed addition lies within required setbacks.
The proposed addition also appears to exceed the allowable floor
area ratio (FAR) for this site. This project will require review
and approval by the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment.
2. City of Aspen Water Department: The Water Department notes
that a water service agreement may be necessary. The Water
Department also encourages the applicant to consider upgrading its
existing service connection.
3. Meadowood Homeowners' Association: The Meadowood Homeowners'
Association recommends approval of this application.
4. Environmental Health Department: No conditions of approval
were recommended by the Environmental Health Department.
STAFF COMMENTS: This application requires Scenic Overlay approval
and a Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Exemption for Essential
Community Facilities. These reviews follow:
1
GMQS EXEMPTION FOR ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Section 3-1512 of the Land Use Code provides an exemption from the
Growth Management Quota System for Essential Community Facilities.
The criteria for an exemption and staff comments follow:
1. Provides a basic or fundamental public service upon which the
community is dependent upon for support.
Staff Comment: The staff opinion is that the Chapel does provide
a fundamental public service by providing a public place for
religious services.
2. Will be available to the general public.
Staff Comment: The Chapel is open to the general public.
3. Serves primarily the local community.
Staff Comment: The Chapel primarily serves the local community.
4. Provides facilities in response to growth and is not itself
a growth generator.
Staff Comment: The Chapel expansion is in response to community
need for religious services and classroom space.
5. An applicant shall demonstrate the mitigation of demands for:
a. Additional affordable housing;
b. Transportation services and parking; and
c. Basic services such as water supply, sewage treatment,
fire and police protection and solid waste disposal.
Staff Comment: The proposed expansion provides for an improved
learning/teaching environment. No additional employees are
expected to be created by the proposed expansion; additional
affordable housing is accessible to public transportation.
Additional parking area should not be necessary for this expansion.
Basic services to the Chapel exist. No expansion of service is
necessary; however, the staff notes that the Aspen Water Department
has identified the need for a water service agreement with the
Chapel. A condition of this review should be that the Chapel enter
into a water service agreement with the City of Aspen.
6. An applicant shall demonstrate the development has negligible
adverse impacts on:
a. Air quality;
b. Water, land and energy resources; and
c. Scenic quality.
2
Staff Comment: The staff does not foresee any adverse
environmental impacts resulting from this project.
SCENIC OVERLAY
The Chapel is located within the Highway 82 Scenic overlay. The
Scenic Overlay criteria and staff comments follow:
1. whether the development has utilized existing topography and
natural vegetation, such as ridges and hills to screen
buildings to the maximum extent possible.
Staff Comment: The proposed addition is approximately 900 square
feet and is integrated into the base of the existing structure.
Existing landscaping and berming should substantially screen the
addition from Highway 82.
2. Whether the development has been designed to complement the
natural topography of the land, including, whenever possible
and appropriate, the utilization of innovative architectural
techniques such as earth sheltered design natural materials
and coloring, non-reflectability and clustering of structures
on the least visible portions of the site.
Staff Comment: The addition is integrated into the existing
structure. Materials will complement the existing Chapel.
3. Whether the development's height and bulk has been designed
to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the visibility of
buildings from the highway and public viewplanes.
Staff Comment: The addition is proposed within the existing
building footprint. No additional height or bulk will be apparent
with this addition.
4. The proposed structure shall be placed so it does not break
a ridgeline, unless there are no alternate building sites on
the lot.
Staff Commettt: The addition does not break a ridgeline.
5. Whether the proposed development has avoided the location of
uses on the highest ground or most visible portion of the site
as viewed from State Highway 82 and public right-of-ways,
identified in Section (B)(1).
Staff Comment: The addition avoids the highest ground and the most
visible portions of the site.
6. Whether the development has been located outside of the
designated Scenic Overlay, or on a suitable site at the
greatest distance possible from State Highway 82 and
3
identified ridgelines.
Staff Comment: The addition is at the edge of the mapped Scenic
overlay.
7. Whether the development has been landscaped in accordance with
the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor landscape guidelines and
has preserved natural vegetation, to the maximum extent
possible, including the avoidance of development within
irrigated meadows. Existing vegetation shall be maintained
to the maximum extent possible, while using existing
vegetation to screen development. A landscaping plan shall
be submitted by the Applicant and approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Staff Comment: The site has previously been landscaped in
accordance with Highway 82 landscaping guidelines as part of a
review for the parking lot expansion. The addition preserves
existing vegetation. The staff opinion is that additional
landscaping is not necessary for this addition.
8. Whether the development's exterior lighting has been designed
in such a manner that light sources, such as facade and
landscape lighting, will not be seen from public right-of-
ways as identified in Section (B)(1). In addition, an
application shall be consistent with the lighting regulations
identified in the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
Staff Comment: The plans submitted do not show additional exterior
lighting. The applicant addressed this criteria at the Planning
Commission meeting by indicating that no outside lighting is
proposed at this time, other than recessed lighting to be used at
the new entryway of the Chapel.
9. Landforms and earth moving shall generally not be acceptable
as the sole measure of compliance with these regulations.
However, they may be utilized in conjunction with other site
techniques designed into the development plan. These methods
may be acceptable when utilized as one of several methods to
complement and enhance development, rather than as the single
device for screening development from view from the State
Highway 82 Corridor and as mapped.
Staff Commeat: Landforms are not proposed. Perspectives provided
by the applicant indicate that the addition will create
insubstantial visual impacts as seen from Highway 82.
10. Whether the development has been designed so as to avoid, to
the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane identified
on the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan and Down
Valley Comprehensive Plan.
4
Staff Comment: The addition avoids mapped scenic viewplanes.
11. In the case where 1041 Hazard Areas may be in conflict with
preservation of scenic areas, the Board acknowledges that 1041
issues take precedence over scenic concerns. These issues
shall be reviewed on a case by case basis.
Staff Comment: There are not any 1041 issues affecting this
addition.
SIIMMARY: The staff opinion is that the proposed addition to the
Chapel complies with both the GMQS Exemption for Essential
Community Facilities and the Scenic Overlay review criteria.
RECOMMENDATION: The staff and the Planning Commission recommend
approval of this application to the Board of County Commissioners,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the existing floor
area of the Chapel shall be verified with the Zoning Office. If
the structure is over the allowed floor area, a variance from the
Board of Adjustment will be required. Side yard setback variances
may also be required.
2. The applicant shall enter into a water service agreement with
the City of Aspen prior to the issuance of any building permits.
slw\fxk:aspen.chapel.bocc
5
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Francis Krizmanich, Planning
FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, Zoning Officer
DATE: February 13, 1995
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
Parcel ID# 2735-114-00-801
I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the
following comments.
ZONE: R-30, thirty thousand square foot minimum lot size
This parcel contains approximately 1.14 acres and is conforming is
size.
SETSACRB: The required setbacks for this parcel are:
100 foot major road setback as measured from the Maroon
Creek Road right-of-way
30 foot front yard setback
15 foot side yard setback
30 foot rear yard setback
Access to the site (ie. front yard side) is on the East.
The proposed addition lies within the 30 foot rear yard setback
(West side).
The site plan which was submitted does not appear to be correct in
that there is no road between Maroon Creek Road and the chapel.
Therefore, compliance with the 100 foot major road setback cannot
be determined. However, it appears that the proposed addition will
encroach into this setback.
FLOOR AREA: Sufficient information has not been submitted to
determine compliance with County floor area regulations. The
existing floor area is 5,843 excluding decks and overhangs. The
allowed floor area is 6,456 square feet. It is believed that once
decks and overhangs are included in the total amount of existing
floor area, the structure will exceed the amount of allowed floor
area.
The applicant is proposing 910 square feet of floor area. A
portion of the new development would be included in the existing
floor area calculation as it is located under a portion of the deck
which is counted in floor area calculations. Therefore, the
proposed floor area is somewhat less than 910 square feet.
As the existing structure is already over the allowed floor area,
any new development must receive approval by the Pitkin County
Board of Adjustment before a building permit can be issued.
HEIGHT: Sufficient information has not been submitted to
determine compliance with County height regulations, however, it
does not appear that the proposed addition will exceed the maximum
height limit.
MEMORANDUM
To: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office
From: Chris Chiola, Environmental Health Department Asren.PlTxly
E~VIRON\IEtiTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Through: Lee Cassin, Assistant Environmental Health Director
Date: ,February 17, 1995
Re: Aspen Chapel GMOS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
ParcellD # 2735-114-00-801
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the
Aspen Chapel application under the authority of the Pitkin Countv Code, Title Il, and
has the following comments.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-17 and 3-1104:
'h is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability
for fire protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to hook
up to existing public systems if service is available.'
The application shows 'no or minor changes to the use of the water supply system.
A condition of approval for this application is -None.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-18 and 3-1105:
'K is the policy of the Counly to insure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new
developments. Any proposed system must be shown to be financially feasible considering a reasonable tax base and other legal
criteria prior to approval of any land use.'
The Aspen Chapel is provided sewage disposal with public sewer as provided by the
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. There are no changes to the amount of sewage
to be added to the District's collection lines.
A condition of approval for this application is -None.
WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-14, 3-705 and 3-710
'k is the policy of the County to preserve end protect its presentwater resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that
no land use be initiated which would adversely affect the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which
would occur at the expense of established water-dependent agricuhural activities; or which would result in increased salinization
of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildl'rfe habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or
redistribute major water resources. It is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface
waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which
could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows end wetlands.'
130 SoeTe GaLeNA STReeT AsreN, CoLOxnoo 61611 PHONE 303.9205070 Frx 303.920.5197
vim o~ rc~ba ~,~.
Aspen Chapel
February 17, 1995
2
The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts only
on down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream
water quality.
A condition of approval for this application is -None.
AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-13 and 3-602:
'k is the policy of the County to permit only that development which will not degrade air quality.'
This project is not expected to contribute significantly to air quality degradation in Pitkin
County.
A condition of approval for this application is -None.
CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-7 •n is the
policy of the County to consider whether approval of uses or development of lands within Pitkin County is consistent with
applicable laws of the United States of America and the State of Colorado.'
This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental
health laws.
The following conditions of approval for this application are -None.
... USE:273511400e01.espen.chepel
MEMORANDUM ``y'
TO: FRANCIS KRIZMANICH, COMMUNITY PLANNING OFFICE
FROM: PHH, OVEREYNDER, WATER DIItECTOR w"."'_"C
DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1995
SUBJECT: ASPEN CHAPEL GMQS EXEMPTION
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced application. The City of Aspen
presently provides water service to the Chapel and the surrounding Meadowood Subdivision.
While the Meadowood Subdivision has an existing Water Service Agreement for Filing 2, there
is no corresponding document to provide water service to the Aspen Chapel. We would
encourage the Prince of Peace Chapel to cleaz up this administrative procedure to ensure
continued potable water service and fire protection for this essential community facility.
Water Department staff has reviewed the proposed improvement plans and does not have any
unresolved questions with regard to payment of tap fees associated with the classroom, study,
or additional bathroom. However, we would encourage the Chapel to clarify their commitment
to annex to the City at a future date, pursuant to existing City policies for water service.
The Water Department is proposing to install a new 8-inch water main and fire hydrant in
Meadowood Drive opposite the Chapel during the summer of 1995. An easement will be
provided by the Aspen Valley Hospital for the line and hydrant. The Chapel's current water
service connection is to a 12-inch water transmission main located in Castle Creek Road. The
reliability of this existing service is less than if it were connected [o the water distribution system
to be completed this summer. Fire protection to the Chapel will be improved by the new
hydrant.
The Water Department encourages the Chapel to consider upgrading their service connection to
the new 8-inch main in Meadowood Drive concurrent with its construction this summer.
Without this new connection, water service to the Chapel could be subject to substantial
interruption due to scheduled improvements for the 12-inch transmission main necessary if the
City elects to serve the Moore and Highlands projects.
Unfortunately, such a connection would need to be the financial responsibility of the Chapel
since service connections are performed at the property owners expense under the Municipal
Code. Water service will continue to be provided at current levels of reliability for the existing
and expanded Chapel facilities in the absence of this new connection. This may be acceptable
since there aze no residential uses of the property. If an upgraded service connection is not
provided, Water Department staff will attempt to accommodate uses of the Chapel with
temporary water service during any scheduled maintenance of the water transmission main.
cc: David Bellack
Larry Ballenger
Neal Goldborough
PO:rI
/phi12/ehapel.eunt
BROOKE A. PETERSON
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN'
ERIN L. FERNANDEZ"
ROBYN J. MYLER°'
'ALSO ADMITTED IN MARYIIW D
^ ALSO ADMITTED IN FLORI W
'^ ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK
OND CONNECTCUT
Mr. Rick Magill
Community Development
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAW OFFICES OF
KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C.
315 EAST HVMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
January 16, 1995
TELEPHONE
(303)925-8166
FACSIMILE
(303) 9251090
Re: Aspen Chapel-Prince of PeaceIGMQS Exemption for an Essential Community Facility, Scenic
Overlay Review
Deaz Rick:
Please consider this letter an Application for GMQS Exemption for an Essential Community Facility
and Scenic Overlay Review for the addition of approximately 900 squaze feet to the Aspen Chapel.
This application is submitted by Gideon Kaufman pursuant to Sections 3-1501 (L), Section 3-1512
(Essential Community Facility), Section 3-42Q and Section 3-604 (scenic overlay) of the Pitkin County Land
Use Code (see Exhibit A, Authorization) on behalf of the Chapel of the Prince of Peace at Aspen, the
property's owner (see Exhibit B).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property in question consists of approximately 1.14 acres located in Pitkin County, Colorado,
as described in Exhibit B. The present building consists of a chapel, one multi-purpose classroom, and one
study for the professional leaders of the different religious congregations. Presently the classroom is used
by approximately forty children of a particular faith regardless of the vast variety in their respective ages.
There is only one joint study for the Christian Minister(s) and the Rabbi(s) which requires that all religious
study materials be taken home after each use. In response to the needs of the community the following
improvements have been authorized by the various congregations.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvements are for the purpose of adding one additional classroom, one additional
study, and a bathroom which meets the requirements of the American Disabilities Act. These improvements
will enable the communities' religious leaders to provide a much needed, essential service to the community.
It goes without saying that children of ages varying from six to sixteen need different programs and that
trying to teach everyone in one classroom is at best chaotic and at worst a wasteful exercise. Two classrooms
will afford the ability to at least separate the very young children from the more mature ones. The addition
of a study will also allow the different religious leaders space in which to consistently store their teachings
0621.EIF
Mr. Rich Magill
January 16, 1995
Page 2
for religious ceremonies and classes without the need for transportation. Both additions will facilitate their
teaching curriculum.
The proposed improvements do not create additional cars or employees since the size of the different
congregations will not be increased. The proposed improvements will have no scenic impact as reflected by
the enclosed site plan which shows that the basic structure remains intact. All but 48 squaze feet of the
proposed improvements will take place within the existing footprint of the building and as such 1041 concerns
are not an issue.
Ten copies of the site plan and vicinity map are attached for your review and dissemination as well
as ten copies of the Preapplication Conference Summary.
REVIEW REOUJREMENTS
Pursuant to Code Section 4-601 (D), an application for a Growth Management Quota System
Exemption for an Essential Community Facility requires referral to Section 5-6 for submission contents and
Section 3-1512 for review standards.
ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES - SECTION 3-1512.
A. General. The applicant is eligible for a GMQS exemption for this development application
because the proposed improvements provide a basic and fundamental public service upon which the
community is dependent for support. The Aspen Chapel is available to the general public primarily providing
the local community with a place of worship for diverse faiths and religious beliefs. The proposed
improvements are in response to the needs of community and its children. The improvements are not growth
generators.
B. Mitigation of Service Demands. The improvements are needed for the purpose of providing
more efficient religious teachings to the existing students and required ADA handicapped access. Therefore,
there is no increased demand for affordable housing, transportation or parking. The basic services such as
water supply, sewage treatment, fire and police protection, and solid waste disposal remain essentially the
same except that a disability access bathroom will be added.
C. Mitigation of Environmental Impacts. The improvements have no adverse impact on the air
quality, water, land and energy resources, and scenic quality.
SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR PARCELS FOR ESSENTIAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES - SECTION 4-609.
As required by this section, the applicant will prepare and record with the County Clerk and Recorder
a final plat approved by the Planning Director consistent with the submission requirements in Section 5-4 and
any conditions of approval.
0621.ELF
Mr. Rich Magill
January 16, 1995
Page 3
SCENIC OVERLAY -SECTION 3-420 AND SECTION 3-604
The intent of the SO (Scenic Overlay) zone is to establish a scenic resource area proximate to State
Highway 82. The small expansion of the Aspen Chapel proposed will scarcely be visible from Highway 82
as it essentially fits within the same basic footprint of the present structure. The aesthetically pleasing, rural
approach to Aspen and Snowmass Village will remain unaffected. The development within the mapped
Scenic Overlay is insignificant and will not impact the visual quality of the overlay area.
SUMMARY
The Aspen Chapel provides an essential community facility which needs some expansion to meet the
needs of the community. Such expansion is eligible for a GMQS exemption and such expansion does not
affect the scenic resource of the area.
Very truly yours,
KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C.,
A Professional Corporation
By:
G'
C'rideon k. Kaufman
ELF:jeh
Enclosures
0621.ELF
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Francis X. Krizmanich, Planning Staff
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
DATE: March 7, 1995
APPLICANT: Aspen Chapel Trustees
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Gideon Kaufman
ISSUE: The trustees of the Aspen Chapel (Prince of Peace) have
requested approval to construct an approximately 900 square foot
addition to the Chapel. A Growth Management Quota System Exemption
is requested for the addition. Scenic Overlay Review is required
because the Chapel is within the mapped Highway 82 scenic overlay.
LOCATION: The Chapel is located at the intersection of Maroon and
Castle Creek Roads.
ZONING: The property is zoned R-30 and contains approximately 1.14
acres.
REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS:
1. Zoning: The proposed addition lies within required setbacks.
The proposed addition also appears to exceed the allowable floor
area ratio (FAR) for this site. This project will require review
and approval by the Pitkin County Board of Adjustment.
2. City of Aspen Water Department: The Water Department notes
that a water service agreement may be necessary. The Water
Department also encourages the applicant to consider upgrading its
existing service connection.
STAFF COMMENTS: This application requires Scenic Overlay approval
and a Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Exemption for Essential
Community Facilities. These reviews follow:
GMQS EXEMPTION FOR ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Section 3-1512 of the Land Use Code provides an exemption from the
Growth Management Quota System for Essential Community Facilities.
The criteria for an exemption and staff comments follow:
1. Provides a basic or fundamental public service upon which the
community is dependent upon for support.
1
Staff Comment: The staff opinion is that the Chapel does provide
a fundamental public service by providing a public place for
religious services.
2. Will be available to the general public.
Staff Comment: The Chapel is open to the general public.
3. Serves primarily the local community.
Staff Comment: The Chapel primarily serves the local community.
4. Provides facilities in response to growth and is not itself
a growth generator.
Staff Comment: The Chapel expansion is in response to community
need for religious services and classroom space.
5. An applicant shall demonstrate the mitigation of demands for:
a. Additional affordable housing;
b. Transportation services and parking; and
c. Basic services such as water supply, sewage treatment,
fire and police protection and solid waste disposal.
Staff Comment: The proposed expansion provides for an improved
learning/teaching environment. No additional employees are
expected to be created by the proposed expansion; additional
affordable housing is accessible to public transportation.
Additional parking area should not be necessary for this expansion.
Basic services to the Chapel exist. No expansion of service is
necessary; however, the staff notes that the Aspen Water Department
has identified the need for a water service agreement with the
Chapel. A condition of this review should be that the Chapel enter
into a water service agreement with the City of Aspen.
6. An applicant shall demonstrate the development has negligible
adverse impacts on:
a. Air quality;
b. Water, land and energy resources; and
c. Scenic quality.
Staff Comment: The staff does not foresee any adverse
environmental impacts resulting from this project.
SCENIC OVERLAY
The Chapel is located within the Highway 82 Scenic Overlay. The
Scenic Overlay criteria and staff comments follow:
2
.._,
1. Whether the development has utilized existing topography and
natural vegetation, such as ridges and hills to screen
buildings to the maximum extent possible.
Staff Comment: The proposed addition is approximately 900 square
feet and is integrated into the base of the existing structure.
Existing landscaping and berming should substantially screen the
addition from Highway 82.
2. Whether the development has been designed to complement the
natural topography of the land, including, whenever possible
and appropriate, the utilization of innovative architectural
techniques such as earth sheltered design natural materials
and coloring, non-reflectability and clustering of structures
on the least visible portions of the site.
Staff Comment: The addition is integrated into the existing
structure. Materials will complement the existing Chapel.
3. Whether the development's height and bulk has been designed
to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the visibility of
buildings from the highway and public viewplanes.
Staff Comment: The addition is proposed within the existing
building footprint. No additional height or bulk will be apparent
with this addition.
4. The proposed structure shall be placed so it does not break
a ridgeline, unless there are no alternate building sites on
the lot.
Staff Comment: The addition does not break a ridgeline.
5. Whether the proposed development has avoided the location of
uses on the highest ground or most visible portion of the site
as viewed from State Highway 82 and public right-of-ways,
identified in Section (B)(1).
Staff Comment: The addition avoids the highest ground and the most
visible portions of the site.
6. Whether the development has been located outside of the
designated Scenic Overlay, or on a suitable site at the
greatest distance possible from State Highway 82 and
identified ridgelines.
Staff Comment: The addition is at the edge of the mapped Scenic
Overlay.
7. Whether the development has been landscaped in accordance with
the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor landscape guidelines and
has preserved natural vegetation, to the maximum extent
3
possible, including the avoidance of development within
irrigated meadows. Existing vegetation shall be maintained
to the maximum extent possible, while using existing
vegetation to screen development. A landscaping plan shall
be submitted by the Applicant and approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Staff Comment: The site has previously been landscaped in
accordance with Highway 82 landscaping guidelines as part of a
review for the parking lot expansion. The addition preserves
existing vegetation. The staff opinion is that additional
landscaping is not necessary for this addition.
8. Whether the development's exterior lighting has been designed
in such a manner that light sources, such as facade and
landscape lighting, will not be seen from public right-of-
ways as identified in Section (B)(1). In addition, an
application shall be consistent with the lighting regulations
identified in the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
Staff Comment: The plans submitted do not show additional exterior
lighting. The applicant should address this criteria at the
meeting.
9. Landforms and earth moving shall generally not be acceptable
as the sole measure of compliance with these regulations.
However, they may be utilized in conjunction with other site
techniques designed into the development plan. These methods
may be acceptable when utilized as one of several methods to
complement and enhance development, rather than as the single
device for screening development from view from the State
Highway 82 Corridor and as mapped.
Staff Comment: Landforms are not proposed. Perspectives provided
by the applicant indicate that the addition will create
insubstantial visual impacts as seen from Highway 82.
10. Whether the development has been designed so as to avoid, to
the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane identified
on the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan and Down
Valley Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Comment: The addition avoids mapped scenic viewplanes.
11. In the case where 1041 Hazard Areas may be in conflict with
preservation of scenic areas, the Board acknowledges that 1041
issues take precedence over scenic concerns. These issues
shall be reviewed on a case by case basis.
Staff Comment: There are not any 1041 issues affecting this
addition.
4
SIIMMARY: The staff opinion is that the proposed addition to the
Chapel complies with both the GMQS Exemption for Essential
Community Facilities and the Scenic Overlay review criteria.
RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of this application to the Board of County
Commissioners subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the existing floor
area of the Chapel shall be verified with the Zoning Office. If
the structure is over the allowed floor area, a variance from the
Board of Adjustment will be required. Side yard setback variances
may also be required.
2. The applicant shall enter into a water service agreement with
the City of Aspen prior to the issuance of any building permits.
3. The applicant shall address exterior lighting plans prior to
the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners.
slw\fxk:aspen.chapel.pz
5
PITKIN COLJNTy
BHE-APPLYCATION CON$E*R NCE SIIt~iAF2Y
.
DATE'__ _~..I/~. ~~ PI+ANN~3'R/• ~.tU~ i'wsi ! ~f
PROJ3CT•. ,,_~~D2st ~~DG~ /Y~~Gf"GD•"I
APPLIC3y' $ :4E?$rSNTr~.TI4E: ~~~po//d1// Gild
REPRSSE~'_.~',C1VI"3 PT_iONE: 9ZJ PI~Xy, ~= 9z.~~/c 9p
opt ~ s ~, ~,:z~
svrr~~RY
i. Type -. ~_nnleatioa:
z. Descr~:e action/type of development heinq requested:
/(/l~ G:.: i~~~~OGt/ J~ ~'G( ~~~~ C-~iylof2U~t.G~ ~G!!J~
ends Sect'_pa(?olicv Area Comments
% dl7 3-l s" ~ ~ ~sS~ ~~.~.~i ~~~r~ s
Referral ~crencies
11~~~r~fy~~r61~~%
r - .~ r
~[2L-~.
~ -e-~c ra~.~~~x'r' ~2d~lCrS
Comments
4. Review is be£aze: .(P&Z Only) (HOCC Only) P&Z then to B )
5. public Hearinr,: Ye (Na) At: (P&Z] (Hatt (BOTH PEZ ~ HOCC]
6. The applicant needs to post 3 sicn each public heating
pursuant to Saction 6-3.4 of the Code. (YE5 (NO)
7. Please submit a list oP Adjacent Property Owners: YE (NO)
8. Adjacent Property Owners shall be notified by mail, return
_~.-'--`nr-ia~~-~~~_ _ _~ ~ni i,R~l ~~m~ Nr~-fi r_i ,r.~a icH iii i~-~a ntr ~N~ 1^v=.h T-='.°-~Ilf-
3. ?,seas ~.n whits Applicant has been requested to respamd, types
of repartW rac=ueated:
~
i ~~g~
s.
Disc
.,_~.~rz of OWCSership: y~ ~ (Np) ~~~
10. Nu:
I s of copies of the application to be submitted: ~~
11. Plr
' -c' T:ry office fee deposit required; $ ~9S~v homes
Re
L --~;.1 Fees required; Cqunty Engineer $ O
EnvironmentaY Health $
Housiag Departaeat $
Total Deposit: $~f
l2. ?.at ;^;3ated date of submission: '
13. COI: ~.,,,;g/IINTAUE CONCER..VS:
~- 7T -Ml7 T ~, r ~ r ~~
14. FOI'. .: C;,7bL...D~u HPPLIC~T_CN, PLrr,SE YC..L'bE TEr, FOL,,OAY.YG:
~^ / f'
~ //
/T ~~
rtL
~
t
:i_tr~
~
~~
- g
,~
/
Ipl /-G
~:: ~'J~V~~FI
..
V ~~~~~ ~r`~`
r
Pr°aPP_4eae.-_c~za
ni• i nr~-.' - - nl ~ nrt n~~rt unlit i-i 'n ir'ii ilrnii .^1-~ci~i hi'C L_,~_~j ~f
PITRIN COIIpTY
YORE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE 5UNxiI~RY
~i
,~
PRGJ2c.^ • ~*~
?P?LI _~.T?
R~PR~S E1:
Si7~sMAltY
1. Ty;~ ~ -y:lic3tion: /yI/~rov Sl..G~iCG ~CU~r~
Z. Desc^i ~;.~tian/type of developtaent hezag requested: ~ ~
~G~L '~%c/~ C.rilC'/ !L®f f7~'~~-P G -GAG /ilk Jf~ri~•~.
3. Areas. ;rhich Annlicant has been requested to zesaand, types
of re,oz~:. .. _-guested: i
Cade Seet_ . ,:%`4o11,c~ Area comme^ts
___ - i
_-~,. - -
Referral P _r;~i~s comments
-- .__
3. Review ~ nefore: i~_zr'~t~ 4~C86--A$lg) Ep.s~ t#en bo-$6e8)
5. Publi4 ?:~=_.,ing: (Yes) (~o At: (P6Z) (Fact) (HOTS Y&Z & 80CC)
6. The apt !:.,:.;ant needs to post a sign for eat public hearing
pursuantitc ~~ctiou 6-3.4 of tte Cade. {y85) ~~
7. Please~s~'s„spit a list pp Adjacent Property Owners: (YES) NO
e. Adjacea. '?roperty Owners shall be notified by mail, return
.''
....,
',
PITKIN COUNTY
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
OWNER'S NAME Aspen Chapel a/k/a Chapel of the Prince of Peace
Meadowood, Aspen, Colorado
ADDRESS
PHONE None
REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME Gideon Kaufman
ADDRESS 315 E. Hyman Avenue,
PHONE 303/925-8166
Aspen, Colorado 81611
PROJECT NAME Aspen Chapel - GMQS Exemption/Scenic Overlay
PROJECT LOCATION
(Street Address and Legal Desaipfion)
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735 - 114 - 00 - 801
LOT SIZE 1.14 acres PRESENT ZONING
EXISTING USES chapel
PROPOSED USES
{Include appropriate square footage)
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: Addition of 900 sq. ft. for additional classroom,
study, and bathroom
All information above must be completed and a copy of the pre-application conference sheet
included otherwise application will be deemed incomplete. All blueline maps should be folded.
---------------------------------------------- --
To be Completed by the Planning Office:
Type of Application:
_ EDU (701-1x00 sq. ft.) General Submission
Caretaker Dwelling Unit R
(700 sq.tt or less)
Other Dwelling Unit
(R~ or R-15 Zane District)
X
1041 Env. Hazard Review
Subdivision Review
Rezc~:_^c
ctre_
Scenic Overlay
Special Review
Subdivision Exemption
GMQS Exemption
Planned Unit Develoc^~ent
BROOKE A. PETERSON
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN'
ERIN L. FERNANDEZ"
ROBYN J. MVLER"'
' A150 ADMITTED IN MARYLPNO
A150 ADMITTED M FLORIDA
'•' A150 ADMDTED IN NEW YORK
M'D CCRNECTICUF
Mr. Rick Magill
Community Development
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAW OFFICES OF
KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C.
315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 91611
January 16, 1995
TELEPHONE
(303) 926-8166
FACSIMILE
(303) 925-1090
Re: Aspen Chapel-Prince of PeaceIGMQS Exemption for an Essential Community Facility, Scenic
Overlay Review
Dear Rick:
Please consider this letter an Application for GMQS Exemption for an Essential Community Facility
and Scenic Overlay Review for the addition of approximately 900 square feet to the Aspen Chapel.
This application is submitted by Gideon Kaufman pursuant to Sections 3-1501 (L), Section 3-1512
(Essential Community Facility), Section 3-420, and Section 3-604 (scenic overlay) of the Pitkin County Land
Use Code (see Exhibit A, Authorization) on behalf of the Chapel of the Prince of Peace at Aspen, the
property's owner (see Exhibit B).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property in question consists of approximately 1.14 acres located in Pitkin County, Colorado,
as described in Exhibit B. The present building consists of a chapel, one multi-purpose classroom, and one
study for the professional leaders of the different religious congregations. Presently the classroom is used
by approximately forty children of a particular faith regardless of the vast variety in their respective ages.
There is only one joint study for the Christian Minister(s) and the Rabbi(s) which requires that all religious
study materials be taken home after each use. In response to the needs of the community the following
improvements have been authorized by the various congregations.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvements are for the purpose of adding one additional classroom, one additional
study, and a bathroom which meets the requirements of the American Disabilities Act. These improvements
will enable the communities' religious leaders to provide a much needed, essential service to the community.
It goes without saying that children of ages varying from six to sixteen need different programs and that
trying to teach everyone in one classroom is at best chaotic and at worst a wastefiil exercise. Two classrooms
will afford the ability to at least separate the very young children from the more mature ones. The addition
of a study will also allow the different religious leaders space in which to consistently store their teachings
az1.El.r•
Mr. Rich Magill
January 16, 1995
Page 2
for religious ceremonies and classes without the need for transportation. Both additions will facilitate their
teaching curriculum.
The proposed improvements do not create additional cars or employees since the size of the different
congregations will not be increased. The proposed improvements will have no scenic impact as reflected by
the enclosed site plan which shows that the basic structure remains intact. All but 48 square feet of the
proposed improvements will take place within the existing footprint of the building and as such 1041 concerns
are not an issue.
Ten copies of the site plan and vicinity map are attached for your review and dissemination as well
as ten copies of the Preapplication Conference Summary.
REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to Code Section 4-601 (D), an application for a Growth Management Quota System
Exemption for an Essential Community Facility requires referral to Section 5-6 for submission contents and
Section 3-1512 for review standards.
ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES - SECTION 3-1512.
A. General. The applicant is eligible for a GMQS exemption for this development application
because the proposed improvements provide a basic and fundamental public service upon which the
community is dependent for support. The Aspen Chapel is available to the general public primarily providing
the local community with a place of worship for diverse faiths and religious beliefs. The proposed
improvements are in response to the needs of community and its children. The improvements are not growth
generators.
B. Mitigation of Service Demands. The improvements are needed for the purpose of providing
more eflicient religious teachings to the existing students and required ADA handicapped access. Therefore,
there is no increased demand for affordable housing, transportation or parking. The basic services such as
water supply, sewage treatment, fire and police protection, and solid waste disposal remain essentially the
same except that a disability access bathroom will be added.
C. Mitigation of Environmental Impacts. The improvements have no adverse impact on the air
quality, water, land and energy resources, and scenic quality.
SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR PARCELS FOR ESSENTIAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES - SECTION 4-609.
As required by this section, the applicant will prepare and record with the County Clerk and Recorder
a final plat approved by the Planning Director consistent with the submission requirements in Section 5-4 and
any conditions of approval.
iwzrr•.re
Mr. Rich Magill
January 16, 1995
Page 3
SCENIC OVERLAY -SECTION 3-420 AND SECTION 3-604
The intent of the SO (Scenic Overlay) zone is to establish a scenic resource area proximate to State
Highway 82. The small expansion of the Aspen Chapel proposed will scarcely be visible from Highway 82
as it essentially fits within the same basic footprint of the present structure. The aesthetically pleasing, rural
approach to Aspen and Snowmass Village will remain unaffected. The development within the mapped
Scenic Overlay is insignificant and will not impact the visual quality of the overlay area.
Si.1MMARY
The Aspen Chapel provides an essential community facility which needs some expansion to meet the
needs of the community. Such expansion is eligible for a GMQS exemption and such expansion does not
affect the scenic resource of the area.
Very truly yours,
ELF:jeh
Enclosures
KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C.,
A Professional Corporation
1,
13y ~;
Uhideon .Kaufman
,\
0621.L[F
.rari,~F '95 ~31~58PM GRkFIELD & HECHT,P_v,
Chapel oi<'the
0077 Mead
Aspen, Col
Jaauary ]
Rich Magill, Planner
Community 15evelopment .
130 5, Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Aspen Chapel, a/Jda Chapel of the
bear Mr. Magill:
Please accept this letter as authorization to
GMQS Exemption for an Essential Community F.
Chapel of the Prince of Peace at Aspen.
it A
P.? ~ '
rince of Peace
Wood Drive
'ado 81611
6, l9ss
of Peace at Aspen/Authorization to Apply
Fmvt & Petersoa to process an application for
y and Scenic Overlay Review on behalf of the
Sincerely,
CHAPEL OF PRIN~ OF PEACT~`
Trustee
~r
onrsv
».
Recorded ot.....~^~1 P Jttne 17, 1970 - t r
.' ~ ~ (~~E
I ~.J
Reception No._14.Q9.81. .......F.'e~K.Y....B,..Miklich.,....._ :.::::.........Recorder.
BXHIBIT B-1
Tors DFSD, Made this .ZOT-'P dny of ~dxEPt~t~G. ,19 Gg
behv<en MEADONOOD, INC. , a Colorado
COl'p01'at1011
a eorporatien duly organized and existing under and by vhtue of the laws
of th< State of CO 101'ad0 of the first Part, and '
CRAPEL OF TIFF PRINCE OF PEACE AT ASPEN,
a Colorado corporation
a <orpontion duly organized anJ existing under and by virtue of the laws
of the state of CO for ado of the second parry
RRCORDRR'S STAMP
SP.Tf DOCDS!f11T6Fr RF
JUN i'1 147d
l O
WITNESSETFi, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the smn of
TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration xxRRkk~kRSc
to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second pxrq the receipt whereof is bcreby
confessed and acknowledged, bath granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain,
sell, eonrey and confirm, onto the said party of the second Para its successors and assigns Lorever, all the following
describ<d xr parcel of Und. sit nalc, lying and being in the County of Pltkln
and Slate of Colorado, to-wit
A part of Lots 15 and 1G in Section 11, Township 10 South, Range
SS {Vest of the 6th P.M„ described as follows:
thence South 87°07' West, 50 feet to the point of beginning
Deginning nt a point from which the Southeast corner of said
Section 11 bears South 3°12' East, 1566.7 feet;
thence North 80°33' FYcst, 95.7 feet;
thence North 13°50' {Vest, 109.6 feet;
thence North 18°03' East, 230.8 feet;
thence North 25°03' East, 71.5 feet;
thence North 87°07' East, 50 feet;
thence South 2°53' East, 407.4 feet;
TO GETIfER, with all and singular lbe heredilamenls and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise
appertaining, anJ the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all
the estate, right, ling interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the sail party of the firs[ pare either in law or
equity, o!, in and to fhc above bargain cd premises, with the hcrcditamcn le and nppurtenances.
TO RAVE AND TO HOLD Ibe said premises above bargained and described, with the nppurtenances unto the
sail party of the s<cnnd part, its successors and assigns forever. And the said
h1EADOW00D, INC.
early of ILe first parq for itscl f, its socn•ssors and assigns, dolh mven:mq grant, bargain anJ agree to and with the
said party n! the second part, its successors and assigns, that a[ the lime of the enscaling and delivery of these pres-
arts it is well scizal of the prrmises shove convcynl, as of good, sure, perfecq absolute and indefwsible estate of
in bcrilancq in law, in fee simple, an!I bath Rood righq full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and
con vcy Ibc same in manntr and form nforesaid, anA that the same are free and clear from aII former and other
granlz, hnrgains, Salrp, lira 5, I:IS<9, a55f5sment9 xnd inctnithrancf9 Of tVhatCVCr kind or nahtre 5ocvcr ex0ept
tars for 19GS due and payable in 1969;
and Ule above bargain rd premiss in the quiet anJ Peaceable possession of the said party °( llte second part, its suc-
cessors and assigns against all and every peeron or persons Iawhilly claiming or to claim the whole or any part
th<rcof, n~c sail party n! the first part shall and will WARRANT AND pOl2L• VR.R DEPEND.
IN WITNESS WIiEREOR, The said party n( the first part Farb caused its corporate name to be hercuulo suL-
xcrihud by ila President, and its corporate seal to be herewrio affixed, attested by its
srcrdary, the Jay and year first above written.
AU<st: TtT)ADhtVhflT] TTi (`
s.ar,a.r. }4x Iliam J': ism ex•s r.~an.s.
sTnT( or coLOanno,
~' "• [,f'iuhl)y of....._Pitkin '"~
- '(hpfLrcgoinj{:rinfsido rut was acknowledged before me this '2o day of ~pp~.~,n,~.~f--
t9=,~;N •~?'•I •~ n ~•. •'r _~ ~ William J. Chambers as Yresident and
.t ,~:: .,^ a9 Secretary of
hlrAb0YfO0U 71YC
:. yt ~ ;; t. •, °\, • -' .7~- a corPOration
::
O '~ '
' ' ` •. r' hfy notarial commission expires nct"'-~• ~ , { •~
'iflr ••'••....... ' r 413
Witness mY hvul~d'n mist seal
. `,, ~( ~(I t.
1"'h
_ G ._5....... a ~a~.
'f ,.n,n, , au .n [.U.1.. .CA. ~
" NoL.rv PuLlie.
30
6LRCK SHRCK ~ ALPIhIE LUCa1SI1L5 1r~L. "J "'"
- PoSt•It`-' od tax/~Ifansrniltal memo 7Fi71 .orp+a•~ w 'S
r_. Te f „e,,,~IO ~.1 M1JYJ f`H+4n rw°"~G. R 4 FT
co. ~.
s ~
' near w'°"'~ X20•! 13
PITRIN COUNTY Fe,. 4~~•iog0 c.aw
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DA7'E• SU 94 PLANNER:
PAOJECT:,~,.,_,.._._ Prince or raa.=~ ~.+.~., ....~..;...._-•• --- ----
Community.Facility and Scenic Overlay Review _
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Rappapart_.___..____._.._..
REPRESENTATIVE's PHONE: __ - - ---
OWNER ~ S NAME : ,~_
SUMPIARY
1. Type of Application: GMOS Exemption for an Essen'~al Community
Fa~~ility. ant scenic Overla~.Rey_iew __-.-.___.-
2. Describe action/type of develogment being requested:_
W;9ries,•.,to...conatruct addition to chapel and,,.a caretaker unit.
Ch'_ a is located in the HF7Y_82__Scenic Corridor.
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types
of reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral _Agent Comments
Code Section 3-1.13 - In_ letter of _request~ please addre~
eeeniC overlay Code criteria as.,shown...in Resolution No. 90-07 ,.
attaohedl_ _
8ection_ 5-510.20_...- Please address all_.,criteria___ address
caretak..er unit as mitigation fOr employees
Refer to.~ HOUSing Env. Health.~_.-. Zoning.
_ __atty, Engineer,,,___
...Castle/Maroon Caucus y ply g BOCC
4. Review is belore: Administrative (BOCC Onl ) ~--)
S. Tublic Hearing: jv^s) (No) at (BDCC) 1BOTu PE^ E EOCCI
6. 9'he applicant needs to post a sign far each public hearing
pursuant to section 6-3.4 of the ;ode. (YES) (xoJ
7. Did you tell applicant to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERB? (YES) (NO) Disclosure of Ownership= jYE~ (HO)
s. Number of copies of the application to be submitted: 10
9. What deposit was applicant requested to submit: Si 894.00 +
165.00 referrals., Deposit_is based on 12 hours of__tme at n rate
of 5157.00/hour. If the application takes morn or less_ time to
process than_the allotted 12 hours, the deposit_will be refunded,
or additional hours will be chai•y:ed, accordingly'.
,. ~ gq`~
~'`~ ~
ZO
. •pplicntion det?osiX_9) Copy of this pre-app Yorm__•.p Nytania..iu~•'
SS.~pay form....__-~w"~ -- - ----- ~,
` + Glenn - Planning Commission meetings are currently beinu
scheduled into April - Once we have a complete application. from
yQU you should,,,anticioate,a four__.to_six month proce.ssina poriod
(worst case). _? auaaest that~_ou fake your„_propossl to tha
Cnatle/Haroon Caucus for feedback prior to the Planning.Commiasion
review. My.,..guess is, that if there are any issues associated, with
~i(ls casc,._the Caucus or Meadowood,will,.be the vroup9 to bring thorn
Also, i,am assuming that the,. improvements will take plat.
within the existing footprint, and that 1041 hazards are not An
issue hare._.Please advise,i_~ I am mistaken. __
--- ---~--.. ._ coUbt
- frm.pre app. y
lo. anticipated date of submission;
11. COMNENT3/UNIQUE CONCERNS:
or
Sitn__.P,~an 4)
anes_•5.)_•6) one
~plication; 8)
10) Agreemant-
Jlf,l,15 '95 a1~58PM,GRRFIELP & HECHT,P_G,~I,
e_
1?athi ' it A
Chapel of the prince of Peace
007? Meado ood bttve
Aspea, Colo~ado 51611
P.?, ='
7anuary
1995
Rich Mag'~ll, Planner
Cotnmuairy Development
130 5. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado S 1611
Re. Aspen Chapel, allc/a Chapel of the
of Peace at Aspen/Authorization to Apply
Dear Mr. Magill;
Please accept this letter as authotiratioa to
GMQ3 Exemption for an Essential Community 1;
Chapel ofthePriace of Peace at Aspen.
iaa & Petersoa to process an application for
and Scenic Overlay Review on behalf of the
CHAPEL OF
OF
Trustee
0~9 9I 9
~~ ' P June 17 1970 .. 7~ PACE 30 -~
Recorded at.... ~........o doek.......7...M• . .......................R........,......, ..............~~..~:i.~•°%
wr'
Reception No...~::.~ .14.09.81. ......R.eg>;Y....E,..l•Siklich.,....._ :.::...........Recorden
I~ EXHIBIT B-1
THIS DEED, Tfade this .ZOT-'~ day of f~°~~>t~E7e, ,19 6&
Ue0`°"" MEADOSYOOD, INC. , a Colorado
corporation
a eorPomtion duly organized and exislinR under and by virfvc of the laws
of the Stitc of Colorado of the first part, and
CHAPEL OF T7TE PRINCE OF PEACE AT ASPEN,
a Colorado corporation
a <orpomtion dvh~ organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws
of the state of Co lorad0 of the second parr,
ST2TE OCCOFfEttTAAT RE
;JUN i'i tY7a
z7 -
WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first 9arq for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration xx&£dickkRSs
to the said D.vty of the first Dart in hand Paid 6y the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby
conicssed and acknowlMged, bath granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain,
sell, convey and confirm, onto the said Darty of the second Part, its successors and assigns forever, all the following
described xr parcel of land, siumtq lying and being in the County of Pitk i^
and Slate of Colorado, to-wit:
A part of Lots 15 and 1G in Section 11, Township 10 South, Range
85 Rest of the 6th P,M „ described as follows:
Beginning at a point from which the Southeast corner oi[ said
Section 11 bears South 3°12' East, 1566.7 feet;
thence North SO°33' SYCSt, 95.7 feet;
thence North 13°50' iYest, 109.6 feet;
thence Nm•th 18°03' East, 230,8 feet;
thence North 25°03' East, 71.5 feet;
thence North 87°07' East, 50 feet;
thence South 2°53' East, 407.4 feet;
+.hence South 87 °07' West, 50 feet to the point of beginning
TOGETHER, with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise
appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues xnd profits thereof; and all
the estate, righq title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, zither in law or
equity, of, in and to the above ba rgaisd premises, with the hcreditnments and appvrtcnanees.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with [he npOVrtemnccs unto the
said party of the second parq its sucecssore and z signs forever. And the said
h9EADOWOOD, INC,
party of the first part, for itsN(, its sucressors and assigns, cloth covaianq granq bargain and agree to and with tlm
sail party o[ the second Part, its successors and assigns, that at lho lime of the enscaling and delivery of these Dres-
arts it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, svrq perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of
in beet tancq in law, in fee simple, and bath good right, toll Power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and
con vcy the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and dear from all former and other
grants, bargains, s:Ics, liens, taxes, assessments xnd inannbmn<cs of whatever kind or nature soever; eXCept
taxes fee .1968 due and payable in 1969; ~
and the above 6argaincd premises in the yuict and pca<eable possession of the said party of the second part, its suc-
cessors and assigns again st xIl and every person or persons lawfully claim inq or to claim the whale or any part
thrrmE, the said Party of the fuse par[ shall and will WARRANT AND F012EV LR DEFEND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said party of the first part bath caused its iarpomte name to be hereunto sub-
scribed by its president, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by its
secretary, the day and year Eirst above written.
Attest .,r. n.,..n,....., ....,
5 pAT,1r OP COLORADO,
r S9.
'v . ";y2F~d ly of ....Pitkin
Eh~fLre(,o ui{sp: .it lv nt was acknowledged before me this -20~ day of ~j.~f-.r
I A~„6,8 •~;}'7 •T •, r ; ~ ~ William J. Chambers as President and
't r '•: oE' as Secretary of
~i llbb~01y00D .~ XIkC ~iS:
., s •• ., ~ ~~ ~4 a corporation.
,~y -' ~`• +, hfy notarial commission expires w'~• , 3
i. ,'sin •.\~ "r Witness my hand mtd~Fficial seal.
no .,. J (~~
' c~1/ (~j
'' ,
I~i„L, rY 1'uLlic.
EXHIBIT B-2
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
January 5, 1995
Ron Garfield
Garfield & Hecht
601 E. Hyman Ave.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Prince of Peace Chapel
Dear Ron:
ATTEidT1C~i R0~1 G,i,Fvii6't
We have reviewed the documents you furnished in
connection with the captioned matter.
The document recorded in Book 249 at Page 30
reflects the combination of two properties reflected
in earlier documents and contains, by our calculations,
1.14 acres.
Sincerely .yours,
a es1~~-Reser
JFR/ml
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A PQBLIC HEARIITG
State of Colorado } FOR A PITKIN CODNTY
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
follows:
~ •
being or representing an Applicant for a Pitkin County Development
Permit, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and
accurately represents the sign posted as notice of the public
hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject
property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that
the sign was posted and visible continuously from the ZZ ~~ day
4
of ~Y! ~~ , 19 9t,' to the ~~ day of ~ , 19 I
(Must be posted for at least 15 days before the public hearing).
~ ~ Applicant's Signature
1
~~
Subscr.' ~ed and s orx~ to before e
this da f 19
by ~, ~'
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
M commission expires : PN~n_~$edc.d Tn
P.O. @ox 38'77, Aaipen, I
IMy Carrnie~ion E~Y'ee
~~
Notary Pu ic's Signa ure
Address
E. LEGARE COX
NOTARY PUBf.1C, STATE OF COlQF1AD0
~~~~,~! CNrs~c L
Y
OF MAILING
RE: ASPEN CHAPEL GMQS EXEMPTION & SCENIC OVERLAY
Public Notice.
I hereby certify that on this 21st day of February, 1995, a
true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was
deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,
to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list
of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Aspen/Pitkin
Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the
By: Suzanne Wolff
Administrative Assistant
frm.mailing
PIIBLZC NOTICE
RE: ASPEN CHAPEL GMQS E%EMPTION 6 SCENIC OVERLAY REVIEW
NOTICE 28 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Wednesday, March 29, 1995 at a regular. meeting to begin at 5:00 pm
before the Board of County Commissioners, District Courtroom, 506
E. Main St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by the
Chapel of the Prince of Peace at Aspen requesting a GMQS Exemption
for an essential community facility and Scenic Overlay Review
approval for improvements to the Chapel facilities. The property
is located at the intersection of Castle Creek and Maroon Creek
Roads; a part of Lots 15 & 16 in Section il, Township 10 South,
Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. For further information contact
Francis Krizmanich at the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 920-5103.
s/Michael C. Ireland. Chair
Board of County Commissioners
Published in the Aspen Times on February 24, 1995
Pitkin County Account 00113
e
PITRIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS, 3RD FLOOR
Vincent J. Higens ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Christina Davis
President 303-925-1766 303-925-6527 FAX Vice President
ADJACENT OWNER'S STATEMENT
Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the
State of Colorado, hereby certifies the attached list is a current list of
adjacent property owner's as obtained from the most current Pitkin County
Assessors Tax Rolls.
NAMES AND ADDRESSES BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT PROPERTY: CHAPEL OF THE PRINCE OF PEACE
77 MEADOWOOD DR.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
SECTION 11, TOWNSHIIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF 6TH P.M.
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
SEE LIST ATTACHED HERETO
~` B '3 ~~s!
C;~,. ,
OE1 ~ t i~...Y
s_ .:t;,er,~r
AUTHORS IGNA R ` ~~
~ae~eoT P~~~:
r-1.1nI~~ 1.1= F-r:rac~ - t:a-wv=tit. ~:X- Trt
r"7 I.W=FtLY:MdxIU LiFi:
li:~C-t1J, i:zl £31611
(!C:{'!(~r F'F_FUY,~J[jC)17 l:;d~~
l~k:.:1 E~~iF=F7`J
i x:Y~3 i ~ 1394i:i S`FAllJvi: A '~ r.~i 11 ~ i x~ gt ~ 1
..__.-
i:kY=Y=fJ._ rr fFiF FR:O~Kaii: C.1 Pf~f-`I:1, :~(.~1'IC)N 11,
Tt.~nq`,~~-I1F' 1.ii S, RfaIV=~_ E:1:-'i W, f=1a_L.Y IlE='9:~~IE{E7J BY
hd-"_"IEfi AND }~'JlJhllx~.
t"-_t:::e ~r°1. FG:iai'.:ti' liiX: CkalF_:is~f:`4/~3 DCIC TYF4_: ~~tY~S F4:l:C~:: ?~V
[:':KE1 i=`F-C.1-K3if~-I-tAI`JI) /B~°f : ~ x x x x ~ FS;D: 11 bCx M ~ flC: ~ ~. 4 i'i ~ '.~ : i ~
E:_XET'1'T-{:}-LF;ti~f-IFI=S Fti:T: 1194~d~ F=15D: _Wfi3:iC~ AC:: p.fx:x~ SF: lf%~'92
Y1EF=dz: F:'7_JII_T F11:?,7L_K~TE_[? YFJ1f F~J:[I_'T S:~'i
FH~~:r.S•=F~1:7 01. /i rli5':3 l_ST [J-Y-'d`J ~:E i~1/1iJ/°~i
'rr~:_r~E~~~ E~+FArE
FIl'r::IN CS:XJIVTY
`~:.k. F NRIN S'T
A~ETJ l7.7 F31.f~1.1.
i x_iS 014i'41 STATt~;: A ,^•_~r'' =l`-i 1'.'3 i x t E~~4
LANIJ r=F:i]M 'Tl-k:Y`Y-~ ESTATE
bf-_TI~tEF=N F=f:I~~M.;E: OF= FE:F~(~~ C;FY-Y ti]_ °<
C'FtJd E#='Ar:;E
I:4`: ~>3+:ri~ FG:Cf._A, IX:1:: I:~-1TE: IK1C TYFt: SF~!_ES Ff~ICE:
EXE_>•F' I"- ~-?:)_.P~F1Y--L_FY~Q) f-X;l": I~ ~ x') AtiD: 3'.Z(i AC:: 3. «,:iq ST~:
(~JI'AI_. VF-Y_L1E:: 8~'2~3',_Vi
4~ j
i~
`r'EI~i E~JIL_T ACkt!tvTF7~ YEF-1r: NUILT
A~iE::S':iFI7 LSl C~-kY`N:~ piili>/S~
L~CI:TF•}_. i~=4-JV ~~f='F~(~#C ix:k9 i~:L3i'£3 Sl'FlTL~:A :'?;~i il~+ C>t:~ ix~l
i-i ('raftf7_ !:~ Li~dD I(J ;;(l,C:[C7N 11-1C:-f~~. ~10C]F2E CN=t?J
F~:::: C!fSS' F'Ci: i~'~~ L'C7(; LY11'E: IkJC: Tl'}=E: SFaLES Ffi1:CE: 9~ ~
(_Y,EI"PT-{_~_1_NTY-LF1ND F-df;T: :';'x"~x><:1 A:3D: 8~i:'~] AC:: 64.8iG ~: O
"f OT F~I_ VAI_.l k' 3~£3 i „°i:%ti t
`r'FF~? FdJIL:I AIh71_~l"LJJ YEF~h 1:~I;LL'(
i~__::#~._EU i~iJi;1J5.'_ L_5f (::1-KYV(:~: i~i.Ji.i~/~Y=i
kV~Y_4'~iTt~i_, 1=EFStY M. FY><(I ~fEHSilE Ft, fx_>f3 ~x"i~;1~~£3 STATte_:A 2i"ti 11~+ iii l><:~1
C/O HIM1l-S IIVTF~FS~~F~rS
.`.-i:~':?9 a (i-'1'F1iiF WAY
f~_:~_KJI7~;fiJ, T7C i"ri$'if~
ra_f : L...o1: e. ~< E~
r:~~sr f~r I_f= ~o"r E.,, E-iL.l:rlr, >>_
E#:::; :,--,-,~r{. F i~:t_~rl°~4 Ul7t; DATF_:ir~/:?~:~;F~3 CICT~ T'(FE: I~INY 5F~1_ES Ff;IC1:: 8~i.,lxx~,~xx~
`:~:[P,I:~I_F= f="At1. fd:~5. - L.FY•JiJ f1C~f: `:i:><:xx~w:~ A:iD: E><+:~xi FX~': Ct.ixxj ~: f~tx:k~Y
SII`•M:9_.E FFb'I FSia--If'1=filRRia'1 Ai:f: Ei+~S:?E~7 ASI): 11.3f~'iCi FY:;: it, t;x;xi f~F=': .`.'i~~': ;`i
`rEfY± [~JIL'I' i:' FttklL_C'.+rE=L~ Y~Yi [_NJ:EL"r Fs4
'--ta'-J:.`?'~[i pl.itijiq:', LSI l:kJ(-Y`X:if~ Cul/11194
FkIAS, C1lUGT; FYJC1 1'K1FiIl._YtJ
ifxj f~=1aI:>L..M>JOOL? I:N;I:~E
F~tiF=4=TJ, C:X] C31611
.a ti i l i x i t'EFU]04+J1J41D iX~
%_~ Cx:>~}3'~~ S'fATL1S:A '.''7.~i 114 iii U:>:i
E9..)::: I_C~1: _~
fila~A_l5 1°I/E, F=]:LLIVC~ :_`
E~:::: iy~kl f'I~:ili'Bi' I1CC, IX-aTE:l.iiiCX~I£11'~ UCIC TYPE: WD'](1LE:i Ff~II:;F_: 9'~4fr~},ftiKi
3I~~-~_E F=AM. Fi=S. - IJ~`lU (Y_:T: ~Nx:xxit:i ~iD: 5144L: Hf~': O.iMx: ~d=: ~f.69
SIhA~~ FFV"I FEi--II"~fit7VE7'I FV;f: :`F3i.M:><? A'a'f3: 3hi5YJ AC:: i~,fx;x:~ 5~: ~'_fi`ii'
rF~Ji LaJ1L:1" ~i FUhll_I<~TETJ YE:Pii E4JII:T ~i
Fx ::]1=:5'~,'GD pl /oi /`;:s L'~T C#~!`ahl~ i N}l i i /94
flT:i='~N V111_LEY Hi_~=;F=~I"I"F-1L ~~~N} i>139:28 S7E1"R1S:A 2i'i`~ 1.'3 iii &:ii
F'F1FiCEL. G;
~,.+m~:i i:~~1LF Gfz'ET3': F:f?
r'-1: f'E.I.•J, l'77 Ei 1.61.1.
t a:g i"-r ~~ ia\i}Tl._f? Cf~f~:k:: FJ i
r:x==F_y-T,i VALI.".F:•r' Firk~'ITf~i_ '~..llj
F1 fFY-=Y.'f QF= IJlIJf1 IN "I`I-fir' fi~rJ 1/~ C:F= f}f~ S~J 1/4 C:~I= 'fNE
hA+l i.ir} C1F TFF ~I 1/4 Of= E~:C`fT.f.TIV 1'~', TOw1'+k~}-IIF=' i.i~ S
fif4`1:=~- E~ W, CF 'Tl-£ fiTl-1 Ff2:fNC;:[F'AL I`1FFIUIFaIV
C1R...hJTI' C;F' F'I"fK:1:IV. ALSY] t hYk+~V F~} F'AF.iX_.L C
[:_XF=TGIF='1"-CY-K-1RI-fFV:4_F'-LE11Vli FY~,1: i~axxx~j A:iC): is".~;Cx:x) AC: 1Y.1Ci S'F=: ii
E=kE-I~f=`T--C~~~II"FaH_f._-Ihl='S AC'f: i"~14:_"~i ASD: :rY:~y'~`i:~? AL: i~.~x_x'-i SF=: ~i
"TOTAL. VFILUE_ ~2,f}1~,1=~i
YF_~~F: E+UIL.'1' 7i' ALLlI.~`I"F_I1 YF_F~z L~J:[L"f E3"i
ti~.~Y_~;SFJ1 i±1 it~7./S'3 LOT' C7-IRIU~ 01/1Li/~'i
~5~ ~ ~~
` ~'~~~~- P~~~'b',~-~`~-
Chuck and Marilyn Frias
100 Meadowood Dr.
Aspen, CO 81611
,,_~~>~
~~
Thomas Estate
Pitkin County
506 E. Main St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Moore Open Space
Pitkin County
506 E. Main St.
Aspen, CO 81611
----~.
-- sno'tsn------~--
T i B Wau htal
Perry M, and. err e B
c/o Hines Interests
5238 Stamper Way
Houston, TX 77056
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
Agreement for Payment of Pitlrin County Development Application Fees
Pitkin County (hereinafter COUNTY) and Aspen Chapel
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for
Aspen Chapel - GMOS Exemption and Scenic Overlay
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Board of County
Commissioners Resolution No. 91-08 and Ordinance No. 93-1 established a fee
structure for Planning Office applications (including consultant costs) as part of
the application fee charged for THE PROJECT and the payment of all processing
fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it is impossible to ascertain the full extent of the
costs involved in processing the application upon initiation of case processing.
APPLICANT and COUNTY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties
to permit payment of an initial deposit and to permit additional costs to be billed
on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining
greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
County when they are necessary as costs are incurred. COUNTY agrees it will
be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process
APPLICANT'S application.
4. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the
Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make legally
required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior
to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the
COUNTY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of
application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount
of $ z,049.00 which is for 12 hours of Planning Office time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional
monthly billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of
the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic
payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.. APPLICANT further
agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of
processing.
PITKIN COUNTY
APPLICANT
ASPEN CHAPEL a/k/a Chapel of the
Prince of Peace
By:
Suzanne Konchan
County Planning Director
_~
F _
By: / ~ ` t;) ~~l ~tt :~/:: lit',/_ L1s~~.
Mailing Address:
601 E. Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Date:
2
ASPEN/PITKIN
CO TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Attorney
County Engineer
Environmental Health
Zoning
Aspen Water
Aspen Fire
Maroon/Castle Caucus
Meadowood Homeowners' Association
FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
Parcel ID ~t2735-114-00-801
DATE: February 3, 1995
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by the Chapel
of the Prince of Peace.
Please return your comments to me no later than February 20.
Thank you.
~..
..~
ASPEN/PITKIN
CO TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
~2 ~~~
Tflr County Attorney
County Engineer
Environmental Health
Zoning - "
Aspen Water
Aspen Fire
Maroon/Cast aucus
Meadowood Homeowners' Association
~%
-l~ft6lbli Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay Review
Parcel ID tl2735-114-00-801
DATE: February 3, 1995
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by the Chapel
of the Prince of Peace.
Please return your comments to me no later than February 20.
Thank you.
ASPEN/PITK`s... COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT'fiLPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5090 FAX# (303) 920-5197
February 3, 1995
Gideon Kaufman
Kaufman & Peterson
315 E. Hyman Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Aspen Chapel GMQS Exemption & Scenic Overlay
Case #P8-95
Dear Gideon,
The Planning staff has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that this application is complete. Please provide 12 additional copies of the
application and plans for distribution to [he Planning Commission and Board members.
This application has been scheduled for review by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning
Commission on Tuesday, March 7, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:00 p. m. Should this date
be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter.
After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the
application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the
meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application
is available at the Community Development Office.
We have also scheduled this. application for review by the Board of County Commissioners at
a public hearing on Wednesday, March 29, 1995 at 5:00 P.M. Please note that it is your
responsibility to post the subject property with a sign within 15 days of the public hearing
before the Board of County Commissioners and to remove it from the property within one week
following the hearing. Please contact me at 920-5093 one week following the Planning
Commission meeting for the hearing date. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by
Posting as proof of compliance with the Code prior to or at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Francis Krizmanich, the planner assigned to your case.
at 920-5103.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Wolff
Administrative Assistant
saidoJ 30 `ON
- :O;q 3sEJ
-r-- '-----le1QL
ssaippd
v~~u
iagl0
saa3.~doJ
aPoJ flunoJ
~[eaH leluawoa?nug
9n?snoH
aaauu9ug ~1?J
xaauc8ug~~Nno~
Sbi-00069-
6£0-0£8£9sa1~S
SOZ-Ob££9'SZi00
06l-Ob££9'£Z100
£91-Ob££9'STL90
S£0'Oi8£9'£ii00
:saa,3 !¢aaasa~
0 1ebg
-___----' ~uaw7snC}d 3 P 8£O~SZ8£9"
L£0'OZ8£9'
---`---- __. 2uwoZ
- ----
-
b£0'S08£9'
_
- __-__ aa3 1E13
- ----
- ££0-008£9'£1100
------
_ _ l?sodaQ ue .Cluno~
~- ~. ,.r :saa3 uo!lualtddt+ as11 P
~a.asn ilo~ '
9b0'SLS£9"
~~ ,g8u?cez
---- `- JdII
_ aa3 tel3
---'- Zb0-SSS£9'
ib0-OS8£9'£ii00
~ itsodaQ
ea!-d
o
~~ d~ asf1 Puu`I ~1l~
p
:saag u
060S'OZ6~ £~uadsd
it9t8 open°I a
;aaa~S enale~ R;nOS 0£t
;nawl~ ~daQ ;uamdolanaQ
f~-unmmo~ n!T[;!dNadsd
__ 9
saido~~o oN
~- :onl asep
O D ~ 1`7~-rp ,tfi -lYlo,L
ragip
saa3.(dop
aPo~ ~iuuo7
_~ =-_-_y ~-_ =
-Z~
giteaH IEluauiorrnu~
8igsnog
raaui8ug ~itJ
raaui5ug,t)uno~
ssarppy
StrI-00069-
6£0-0£8£9-£[I00
:Sa~Cs
SOZ-Ob££9-SZI00
06I-Ob££9-£ZI00
£97-Ob££9-SiI00
S£0-OI8£9-£II00
:saa3 teaaafa~
-------- ____, iuawisnCFV3opreog
-------- _- $u~uoZ 8£0-SZ8£9-
L£0-OZ8£9-
-~ '-'- aad lej,3 b£0-508£9-
` cz ~~% 3!sodaQ E£0-008£9-£II00
:saa,~ uo~~ea~tddd asn P~8'I .finno~
xey asp i I02IInI
inurad ~!S ~ 8a[uoZ 9b0-SL8£9-
~~ £b0-098£9-
aa3 ie13 Zb0-558£9-
Irsodaq Ib0-OS8£9-£II00
:saa~ uo~;eaydd~ asn pueZ'~1lJ
060S-OZ6~£0£)
TI918 op~-~oio,~ ~uadsd
;aa.~;S enaje~ q;nos 0£l
auam~cedaQ ~uawdo~anaQ
~~unuimo,~ urn;ld/uadsd
~c.ls
~~ /f,~v,~ s~,~c p««' F~x~7~2~E5 Folz T~~ 7vo
ruT'Daa2', C/[o~/T/rvCo Goc,4-TIoNS SH~Uti/ CAN Tl-/'i~
T~ I
~itl~ p6N~r</ % F/ uT'~rz,~ " Tj U /G t I3rE s u s P!-%~t/J/{/)
4l r Tf'f IN i r~ ' N~ v F~1~tT1a'7 Tz o o r= 7 o rF. c i~ <kri'~
.oar' `1 s 0 uric ~ Lo cik.f2 ~ ,
TIC ~ a,u c~ 'F ~~T'~z~ . "~' „ /5 ~ D a vN ciCo off-
/~N 2 v i L L 7~2 e r,~ /; cry N d V/ S 1~3G ~ G ~,4s2 ~_
~~Sk ~/v~C M~ ,4 CA G ~ /F yon /~ v~ .~
('u/~f/7o,Ys,
/may /L,~l U/_
~ --~"
l
~ • ..
Hubbell Super-Lok reflectors with mounting adapters and protective wire guards are designed
{Dr multi-purpose use in dry locations with incandescent lamps.
Hamry Duty Reflectors -Durable, white LEKTROCOTE® finish.
Fast, F~sy Installation -Super-Lok mounting socket adapters are cast aluminum and
have an easily accessible thumb screw locking feature. No tools required. Hub tapped Yz'
N.P.S. for mounting stem.
protective Wire Guards -Welded, corrosion resistant, steel wire with center tamping access.
Add; i tonal Design Features -Swivel aligner mounting adapters offer installation versatility
porcelain medium base socket.
C
n
Dimensions
Weght
Number
l Watts Flnlsh Diameter Height
og
Cata
In.
mm
in.
mm Iba. kga.
STANDARD DOME
-214
HP-216 150
200 Lektrocote
Lektrocole 14ye
16'F 359
426 6'/e
8 174
203 1'h
2'/. .7
1
ANGLE REFLECTOR
RP-410 100-150-200 LeMrocote 10'/z 267 9%a 251 1'6 .6
l
The following accessories are available for use with Super-Lok reflector. These accessories
....,el b nrrfPrP.d CP.DaratelV.
,~,,,,,. ..,, _.__._ _ __ Weight
Vatalog Description IDs. kgs.
Number
HV Cast aluminum Super-Lok head with medium base socket '~ 2
tapped'/z'vertical pendant mounting Fits all reflectors.
AL-4• Swivel aligner drilled for''h' conduit. Fits 3'/.• to 4' outlet box. 'A _1
31 ° maximum from venical.
flCi-14 Basket guard for 14' reflector with relamping center. '4 .9
'C.S.A. certrfied
iaenn nt available combinations of Super-Lok reflectors and socket head assemblies.
_~_~ ' - lona
Dl
Dlmenaiona W
ht
i mens Weight
t
l
C e
g Catalog Diameter Height
a
a
og
b Diameter Height Number lbs Yge
er
Num
IDs.
kga.
mm
In
In. mm . .
In. mm In. mm .
STANDARD DOME -'/~ THREAD VERT FAOUNTING ANGLE REFLECTOR-'/z' THREAD VERT MOUNTIPIG
RP-214-fiV 14'/e 359 8 203 2 .9 RP-410-RV 10'/z 267 9'/e 232 2'/. 1
RP-216-RV 16'/. 425 9'/e 232 2'F 1.3
Fabricated in drawn steel with LEKTROCOTE~ finish, Hubbell Coverlite reflectors convert
existing outlet boxes or lamp sockets to direct downlight reflected on glass globed sources
without need of additional wiring. Constructed of corroson resistant metal and clear glass.
Ibbell Haymow fixtures provide economical lighting for non-hazardous, semi-permanent
applications. Medium base socket.
Weight
Catalog
Number Description Iba. Y.gs.
COVERLITES - 150 WATT MAXIMUM INCANDESCENT LAMP
C-114-K 14' reflector and keyless socket mounts directly to 3'/.• or 4' outlet box. 2 9
HAYMOW FIXTURES - A-23 100 WATT MAXIMUM LAMP
HO
uwn For 4' round outlet box mounting with clear glass globe and plate.
r....ndnn rccictant clamq-qn wire guard. _ 1'~z 2
~ ®L
_O
177
A
r ~I
~'i'~
STANDARD DOME
ANGLE REFLECTOR
1'h"
( im)
~ 3'G." y{
te1 mm)
RV
T ~ _
1 /. ~~
(3 i m)
AL-4
.-~-r-°~°r'~.
C-114-K
1 i
1
HO HWG
Htul Lighting, Inc.
~J
4
JI J Wall lumimaire with die cast
fff"`~~~ aluminum louvers and glass
~, enclosure.
For mounting to vertical
switch box only.
7652 requires remote
e 12V transtamer.
7552 has integral transformer
. q for 120V feed.
Supplied with lamp.
• Color Black or white.
Lamp Lumen A B C
7652 Wall ®" 1 18W S8,12V 264 3Yz 6'/< 2'/e
7552 Wall ®' ~ 1 18W S8,12V 264 3'/z 6'/< 2'/e
• - Surface mounted luminaires with
~~ ', , ~ ~ shielded Ilght source-
'. t'
e
'~z ~
~, Tempered spread lens with
internal reflector and guard-
1 For mounting to vertical switch
- box only.
~ q 2180 requires remote 12V
transformer.
2180T has integral transformer
w> 1 A for 120V feed.
2180 and 2180T supplied with
20W G4 lamp.
Color. Black
2173 Wall ®" 1 SOW PAR20
2173P Wall ~ 1 9W PLC
2180 Wall ®' 1 20W G4,12V
2180T Wall ~ 1 20W G4,12V
2273 Wall 1100W A-19
Lumen A B C
560 3h 7'/,e 3'/e
575 3/z 7'/ie 3'/e
350 3'/z 7'/ic 3'/e
__
350 3'fz 7'/.c 3'/e
1750 6'/~ 11 "/Ifi 8'/2
BEGA
0
29
x
S Y rW
a ~ a
~° ~~ U~
~7 ~~
xa
~O o~
O OD N
~a
z
~ J
~, ~ Y I I~ ~ Z
~ ~ -~ ~m
------------------- ~ ~ ~ ~'cai
w I
C9
------------------- Q
F- 1
--------------------
z
Q
Z
=F
~~
J _
J
H
C7
WZ~
F~
~ X ~
W C~
Q Q
______ _ ________
______ 0 _____ ____ ~ ~
m m
a
O I
U
3 i
o ~ O
I
U
W II Q Q
o~
a°
--------------- ---
O
J
oa
(J
2
Q Q
d
1
d
~Ik~
• O
_
p
~
O
ci p
¢ ~
~G
U ~ M ~
° -~
Q
z J - I~
°oo
(n U N N
~ Z ~~
U
Q W
C1 Imo) x
.J N O Q
CII Q ~ ~-
J
W
d
Q
Z
v
z
w
N
Q
O
0
/
~J J
~o
o~
g
v
F-
Q
m m
I
I
I
~- -- --
~ ~
d!
J
~
_
O m
_ Q ~
~
m
Y
~ U
~
J
N J
W
Q f.I1
U m
W '~
m =
F-
Z U
W
p Z
Z O
41 U
d. N