Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273511400801 (3)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) PARCEL IDi 2735-114-01-001 DATE RCYD: ~- # COPIES:- CASE NO P42A-88 CASE NAME: Pnnceof Peace Scenic Foreground Review P nners '. PROJ ADDRk. 0077 Meadowood Dr .~r ., OWWAPP:AspenChapel-Bout ADR~-~ C/SIZ:~~ PHN:~- REP: ADR:~~~ GS2~~ PHN~- Email Addri ALLOCATED HOURS:~- FEES DUE:.,-~ FEES RCVDp~~ % OVER: ~r REFERRALS ~ REF:r- BY~-,:. DUE:- ' ~,tt, try~ M~T~G DA'T~'E``-'' ~1'`R`~~E-''V~~-B`'O~''D~~Y PH N~OTIC'E"~D` DATE OF FINAL ACTION: ~- No ~ BOCC,Reso: ~- ' If1 ~ ~ NO ~ BOCC Ord: REMARKS PZ: 88-20 #303252 HRG OFF:. CLOSED:~r BY:;~~- HO:IHDEX: ~~- !. ADMIN: ~- PLAT REIORDED~~... PLAT (BK,PG); ~~ ADMIN INDEX: VR APPROV~IL DATE;;~~~ ~~. VR EXPIRES:-~ CASE TYP;~ 'Scenic Foreground R CASETYP5: - CASET(l?2:;'+ CASEYP6:` CASE TYP3!! CASE TYP7: '! ,...... i "..... CASE TYP4: DateSwnned: ~ 7/24/09 Flle Location: Box 170 * CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET PITKIN COUNTY DATE RECEIVED: -s/-S~p~ PARCE~j D ^AND ~y O ~jp DATE COMPLETE: ~73~-H~"~I-lJ©~ ~Of~-04 STAFF MEMBER: • ~ ~'" PROJECT NAME:$~ Project Address: APPLICANT: Applicant REPRESENTATIVE: Representative PAID: Phone: AMOUNT 1) TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~ 2 STEP: 2) IF 1 STEP APPLICATION GOES TO: ~~~^' Z~ P&Z BOCC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: VESTED RIGHT: YES 3) PUBLIC REARING IS BEFORE: P&Z BOCC N/A DATE REFERRED: ~~~~~ ~ INITIALS: NO STAFF LEVEL: 1041 HAZARD REVIEW: DATE OF APPROVAL REFERRA ~ty Atty County Engr Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir. Hlth. County Mgr. Div. Wildlife Trails Dir. Aspen Consol S.D. Mtn. Bell Envir. Coordin. Holy Cross Electric Fire Marshall Snowmass Vill. FAA State Plan. Off. other School District Rocky Mtn Gas State Hwy Dept (Glwd) (GrJtn) Bldg Zon/Inspt. Colo Geo Survey USFS Div. Water Res. Other FINAL ROUTING: County Atty Housing Dir. Other- DATE ROUTED: County Engineer Envir. Health INITIAL: Building Dept. FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: °. - ~~K ~"(1 Fac~737 3 Q ~ 2 5 2 RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COJNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING SCENIC FOREGROUND OVERLAY SILVI~ Cl,VIS APPROVAL TO THE PRINCE OF PEACE CHAPEL FOR ~17KIN CNTY i'iECORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT Resolution No. PZ-88-~°(L au~ z~a ~ u4 P~; ~aa WHEREAS, the Aspen Chapel of the Prince of Peace (hereinafter "Applicant") has applied to the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission") for Scenic Foreground Overlay approval to construct a parking lot adjacent to the Chapel (on a parcel of land as described in Exhibit "A" attached); and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed this application at their regularly scheduled public meeting on June 21, 1988, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to this application; and WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the proposed parking lot design conforms to the Scenic Foreground Overlay criteria. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it hereby grants Scenic Foreground Overlay approval to the Applicant subject to the following conditions: 1) The parking lot design shall be in substantial compliance with the plan presented at the June 21, 1988, Commission meeting. 2) The Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the County prior '~o construction. 3) The Applicant shall submit a performance guarantee for landscaping ;n a form and amount acceptable to the County Attorney. APPROVED by t'se Commission at its regular meeting on July 5, 1988. Resolution No. PZ-99-~L Page 2 ATTEST: ~6untytClerke// Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ti~~ ~ 1 V Thomas F. Smith, County Attorney eooK 571 PacE73~ PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION i ~~ ~~~ ~-- gy i APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ( ,Vl 1~1a ~ Richman, Planning Director FK.POPRESO eanK 571 Pac~739 EXHIBIT "A^ Aspen Chapel of The Prince of Peace Beginning at a point whence the southeast corner of Section 11, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.N. bears 3 degrees 12' East 1566.7 feet thence North 2 degrees 53' West 407.4 feet, thence North 87 degrees 07' East 50.0 feet, thence South 2 degrees 53' East 407.4 feet, thence South 87 degrees 07' West 50.0 feet to the place of beginning containing 0.47 acres, more or less. MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Prince of Peace Chapel - Parking Lot Scenic Foreground Review DATE: June 21, 1988 APPLICANT: The Aspen Chapel of the Prince of Peace. REPRESENTATIVE: Todd Southward. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Scenic Foreground Overlay approval to construct an additional parking lot for the chapel. The application is attached. LOCATION: The property is located at the intersection of Castle Creek and Maroon Creek Roads. ISSUES AND CONCERNS: 1) County Land Use Engineer: In a memo dated June 13, 1988, Tom Newland submitted the following comments: "Impact on Road System: Access to the parking area is from Castle Creek Road via the existing road to Meadowood Subdivision. No increase in traffic on the County Road system is anticipated since the proposed parking lot is planned to accommodate existing uses. Internal Road System: Parking lot standards appear to be satisfied by the submitted design. When the applicant is ready to place the parking lot improvements, an encroachment permit must be issued by this office before that portion of the work can commence. Earthwork/Landscaping: Upon direction from the BOCC, the applicant has applied for and received an excavation permit for placement of fill on the site. The application shall be reviewed by the County land specialist to determine a sufficient bond to insure proper growth of the proposed landscape improvements. The applicant should supply a performance bond in that amount to the County. If the landscape work fails, these monies can be used to insure proper growth. Scenic: The proposed site for the parking area is shielded from Highway 82 by a series of tall cottonwoods along Castle Creek road. The berming and landscaping proposed should complement this natural shield. Further, the proposed parking area should reduce visual clutter by providing concealed space for overflow parking that now occurs along the Meadowood and Castle Creek road rights-of-way." STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to construct an additional parking area for the Prince of Peace Chapel. The property is located within the designated Scenic Foreground Overlay, therefore, Planning Commission approval is required for this project. The Scenic Foreground criteria and the staff review follow: Criteria #l: Whether the development has utilized existing topography, such as dry ridges and hills, to screen buildings to the maximum extent possible. Staff: The existing topography of the site provides a good location for the proposed parking area. Criteria #2: Whether the development has been designed to complement the natural topography of the land, including, whenever possible and appropriate, the utilization of innovative architectural techniques such as earth sheltered design and clustering of structures in the least visible portions of the site. Also, whether the development's height and bulk has been designed to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the visibility of buildings from the highway. Staff: This proposal is for an approximately 28 space graveled parking area. No new structures are proposed. Berming and landscaping of the parking area is proposed to minimize its visual impact to Highway 82. Criteria #3: Whether the development has avoided the location of uses on the highest ground or most visible sites from State Highway 82. Staff: The proposed does avoid the highest ground and the most visible sites from Highway 82. Criteria #4: Whether the development has been located outside of the designated Scenic Foreground, or on a suitable site at the greatest possible distance from State Highway 82. Staff: The parking area is located at the edge of the designated scenic foreground. The staff opinion is that this is the best location on the property from the 2 development of additional parking. Criteria #5: Whether the development has been landscaped in accordance with the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor landscape guidelines and has preserved natural vegetation, to the maximum extent possible, including avoidance of irrigated meadows. Staff: The landscaping plan proposes approximately six 8 to 10 foot high Colorado Blue Spruce trees and reseeding of all disturbed areas with native meadow seed mix. The site plan illustration shows 13 spruce trees while the site plan legend indicates "approximately 6 trees". The staff recommends that all 13 trees shown be provided and that they be a minimum of 8 feet high. In addition, the applicant should provide a performance guarantee to the County to insure that the landscaping is provided as shown. Criteria #6: Whether the development's exterior lighting has been designed in such a manner that objectionable light sources will be incapable of being seen from State Highway 82. Staff: No lighting is proposed for the parking lot. Criteria #7: Whether any landforms and earth moving techniques designed into the development are utilized as one of several methods to complement and enhance development, rather than as the single device for screening development from view from the State Highway 82 Corridor. Staff: Earth berms are the primary method being used to screen the parking lot from the highway. The existing vegetation along Castle Creek road will be preserved and will aid in screening this project from the highway. Criteria #8= Whether, in the case of non-residential development, the use has been located on a large site and has been designed so as to preserve the vast majority of the site as open space. Staff: The applicant's property is approximately 2 acres in size. This application proposes to lease additional land from Pitkin County for the parking lot. The majority of the applicant's property and the adjoining County property will be preserved as open space. Criteria #9: Whether the development has been designed so as to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane identified on the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan. 3 Staff: This project is not affected by any designated Scenic Viewplane. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant Scenic Foreground Overlay approval to the applicant subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to construction, an encroachment permit must be obtained by the applicant. 2) The applicant shall submit a performance guarantee for landscaping in a form acceptable to the County Attorney and in an amount acceptable to the Planning Office. FK.POP 4 Aspen Chapel of the Prince of Peace The Aspen Chapel of the Prince of Peace respectfully submits for your consideration a proposal for increasing the capacity of parking at the Chapel. During services and special events our existing parking is filled to its limit. Overflow parking is forced to park along Meadowood and Castle Creek Roads causing problems of safety for pedestrians and visability for motorists. The Chapel's request is to lease a section of county land east of our building and construct a parking lot. This development is to compliment the natural features within the highway corridor so as to obtain an aesthetically pleasing rural approach to Aspen. The plan for this parking lot has been devised to meet the standards established in the Scenic Foreground Overlay. P.O. Box 1367, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-7184 Chapel Board: Lyle E. Yost, Hesston, Kansas--Chairman; Reu Glenn Martin, Denver, Colorado; Clarence Decker, Denver, Colorado; Walter Claasen, Newtoq Kansas; Preston Huston, Wichita, Kansas The development utilizes existing topography around Castle and Maroon Creek Roads and existing landscape of the Chapel. 2. The development has been designed to complement the natural topography and will incorporate a berm with natural vegetation to further hide parked cars from Highway 82. 3,4. The development is located outside of the Scenec Foreground and is not on the highest possible ground or most visible from State Highway 82. 5. The development is to be landscaped to utilize natural vegetation as much as possible and is part of the Chapel's landscaping clan to further enhance the area. 6. No exterior lighting is planned. 7. The development will utilize an exterior berm wall with natural and landscaped vegetation. 8. The development is located on a large site and has been devised to preserve the vast majority of the site as open site. 9. The development has been designed so as to avoid to the maximum extent possible any Scenic Viewplane identified on the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan. \~ ~ :~~e ss v \~ ~A. -% ~~ ~ ~. Road \\ ~ ~ - -~ 7 i~~ ~ ~ Existing ~ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ]/ i ~ / / ~ -y\~ ---- ~ \\~ iI i\ ~~ r ~\ _ ~ ~ p ~ II u ~ _ ~ \ ~ m 11.E ,~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~. ~' ~ ~+ ,, v J ~ .. 1 ~' i ~ 1 II 1 .~ ~ J/ ~ - -- - -- - -_ 11 1 ~~~ ~~ f. ~ ,~ ~ - ~ ~~ I ~ ~~ L__ - ~ $ ~ ., _~ Z \ 1 ~~ ) ~ I ~~ I ~ ~ `' ` i \I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ rn n ~ ~ ~ [~ J `~ C~ ~ N ~ N A ~~ m ~ ~ 1 MEMORANDUM T0: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Land Use Engineer RE: FriAnce of Peace Scenic Foreground Review DATE: June 13, 1988 I have reviewed the application submitted and would like to forward the following comments to you: Impact on Road System: Access to the parking area is from Castle Creek road via the existing road to Meadowood Subdivision. No increase in traffic on the County road system is anticipated since the proposed parking lot is planned to accommodate existing uses. Internal Road System: Parking lot standards appear to be satisfied by the submitted design. When the applicant is ready to place the parking lot improvements, an encroachment permit must be issued by this office before that portion of the work can commence. Earthwork/Landscaping: Upon direction from the BOCC, the applicant has applied for and received an excavation permit for placement of fill on the site. The application shall be reviewed by the County land specialist to determine a sufficient bond to insure proper growth of the proposed landscape improvements. The applicant should supply a performance bond in that amount to the County. If the landscape work fails, these monies can be used to insure proper growth. Scenic: The proposed site for the parking area is shielded from Highway 82 by a series of tall cottonwoods along Castle Creek road. The berming and landscaping proposed should complement this natural shield. Further, the proposed parking area should reduce visual clutter by providing concealed space for overflow parking that now occurs along the Meadowood and Castle Creek road rights-of-way. ~~~L~S~ l~~n~~~ MEMORANDUM T0: FRANCIS KRI~MANICN TOM NEWLAND FROM: JIM DUKE RE: PRINCE OF PEACE REUEGETATION BOND DATE: JANE lb, 1988 The disturbed area from this construction will amount. to about. 1/2 acre. Reseeding this area to dryland grasses will cost about $600.00 assuming supplemental water is available on site. Eight to ten foot spruce trees cost about $35/ft, totaling to $4,095 for 13 trees of an average I~ei yht of 9 feet. I f wildflowers are desired, Blue Flax, and Shasta Daisy seem to be the most successful and enduring in this region and :should comprise the bul k of any wildflower mi x. Ot17er species to consi der include pentstemmons, ast.c-rs, fireweed, and poppies. Grass seed should consist of native species or a standard dryland mix and be seeded at a rate of 35-50 lbs./acre, incorporated in the coil, and mulched. The seeding should also be fertilized with 250 lbs./acre of ammonium phosphate 118-36-00) at the time of seeding and watered for the first growing season. Trees will need to be watered for at least the first several years and possibly indefinitely. Installation of a drip system to reduce rnai ntenancc si~roul d be c:onsi dered. TI-,e est i mat.ed cost of $<1, 695 i ncl udi ng seed, mulch, Fer t i 1 i zer, and trees has been rounded up to $5,000 to account for wa t.eri nq and maintenance e:<penses. ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 92 -2020 Date: Dear \~ tG'~1 ~ ~" ~~- ~uU, ~~~~~~ ~~; This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of t captioned application. We have determined that your application ~ NOT complete. Additional items required include: ~. Disclosure of Ownership (one Dopy only needed) Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy) Additional copies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the Code, or other specific materials A cheek in the amownt of $ Your application is complete and we ha a scheduled it for review by the .1~,r7 on `- We will call you if we need any additional information prior to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a Dopy of the memora ndum.. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee. B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you on the next available agenda. --'I/ ~~ P If you have any questions, please call i~-/l.~,l/M .(~ , the planner assigned to your case. -~ Sincerely, PLANNING OFFICE 'A.Y ~ C w ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S_ Galena Street Aspen, 00 81611 (303) 925-2020 Harp- o !, RE. Dear ~_ %73~`~f35d t .~~,-- 37~'S' ;~; This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application IS NOT complete. Additional items required include: Disclosure of Ownership (one Dopy only needed) , Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/POStaae (one Dopy) Additional w pies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the ' / Code, or other specific material : ~d l/" A check in the amount of $ ~~~ A. Your application is complete and we have scheduled it for review by the on _ h'e will call you if we need any additional information prior to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a copy of the memorandum.. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee.. _ B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you on the next available agenda_ If you have any questions, please call ' the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE TO: County Attorney County Engineer FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Prince of Peace Scenic Foreground Review Parcel ID# 2735-114-01-001 DATE: May 25, 1988 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Aspen Chapel requesting Scenic Foreground Review to increase the capacity of parking at the Prince of Peace Chapel. The property is located at the corner of Maroon Creek Road and Castle Creek Road. Please review this material and return your comments no later than June 13, 1988 in order for this office to have adequate time to prepare for its presentation before P&Z. Thank you. ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street ~ ~5 ~ _~%y~-~% ~~% Aspen, Colorado 81611 ~ - (303) 825-2020 4~, /,~~-., LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 - 47331 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63722 -47332 GMP/PRELIMINARY - 63723 - 47333 GMP/FINAL - 63724 - 47341 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63725 -47342 SUB/PRELIMINARY -63726 -47343 SUB/FINAL - 63727 - 47350 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63728 - 47360 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63730 -47380 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 - 63730 - 47380 HOUSING 00115 -63730 -47380 ENGINEERING + SUB-TOTAL County 00113 - 63711 - 47431 GMP/GENERAL - 63712 - 47432 GMP/DETAILED -63713 -47433 GMP/FINAL - 63714 - 47441 SUB/GENERAL -63715 -47442 SUB/DETAILED - 63716 - 47443 SUB/FINAL - 63717 - 4]450 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - 63718 - 47460 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ Yf ~/~-x~' CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRA L FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47480 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63730 - 47480 HOUSING 00113 - 63731 - 47480 ENVIRONMENTAL COORD. 00113 -63732 -47480 ENGINEERING l(7-i°%~ PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63061 - 09000 COUNTY CODE -63062 - 09000 COMP. PLAN - 63066 - 09000 COPY FEES - 63069 - 09000 GTHER ~'I .'i Named 7 ' ~ '!~~ Adtlrese ~~t'n-P ~.~ I'~~c p ,~ Check k ~. v' Additional Billing: SUB-TOTAL ' x~ ` ~n SUB-TOTAL TOTAL Phone: 1~ j ry~~ ~~~~~~ ~ - ~<<~.7~- f ,P,,~~d Date: /.fir ~k'S3 _ ' # of Hours: ` ~~