The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.planning.273512315001 (2)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) PARCEL ID: 2735-123-15 001100 DATE RCVD:. ~ # COPIES: ~ CASE NO 1973 CASE NAME: Adams Rezoning Planners PROJ ADDR:! 107/125/201 S 7lh St OWN/APP; Adams, James S ADR~ C/S/Z:~ PHN:~ REP: ADRr~ C/S/Z;~ PHNc~ Email Addrs ALLOCATED HOURSr FEES DUE: ..FEES RCVD:~- %OVER: REFERRALS REF:~~ BY~- DUE:~~ MTG BATE REV BODY PH -`. NOTICED '. DATE OF FINAL ACTION: BOCC Reno: :~ ~ BOCC Ord: ~- REMARKS'. 2735-122-00-003 GF PZ: ; ~ _ HRG OFF: CLOSED:r- BY:I HO INDEX: ADMIN:.,.~~ PLAT RECpRDED~-r PLAT(BK,PG):~~ ADMIN INDEX: ~+.~, VR APPR,OVAL DATE(-r '. VR EXPIRES':~~ i.r ~,~ CASEiTYP:''Rezoning CASE TYP5: ", CASE TYR2 CASE TYPB: '. CASE TYP3:< CASE TYP7: ~.~ ' CASE TYPO; Date Scanned: ~ 7/28/09 ~~ Flte Locadon:~ Box 170 T0: Pitkin County Planning Commission FROM: Herb Bartel, City/County Planner SUBJECT: Rezoning Application - Adams DATE: February 19, 1973 LOCATION: On the west side of 7th Street (extended), just outside the southern city limit boundary and extending from 7th Street (extended) to Castle Creek. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: 1.367 acres (59,556.81 sq. ft.) PRESENT USE: Vacant and unimproved PRESENT ZONING: R-15, Residential PROPOSED ZONING: AR-2 (PUD), Accommodations and Recrea- tion District PROPOSED USE: Development of a maximum of ten (10) multiple- family dwelling units. Several units may be offered for sale. WATER AND SEWER: Aspen Water Department mains are installed in 7th Street adjacent to the property and although not in use, the city has indicated water will be made available. The property falls within the boundary of the Aspen Sanita- tion District and said district has indicated the area can be served. ZONING HISTORY: This property was zoned R-15 (with duplexes as a permitted use) in June of 1955 at the time of original zoning. In Pitkin County duplexes were deleted from the R-15 zone district in July of 1970 through an adopted Zoning Code amendment. PLANS FOR THE AREA: The 1966 Aspen Area General Plan has recommended a residential/planned unit land use in the area of the applicant's request: A designation recommended of all develop- ing residential areas of urban character including those east of Aspen along the Roaring Fork, Red Mountain, Castle-Maroon Creek area, Owl Creek area any additional undeveloped land necessary for urban resi- dential use in the future. The intention is to promote interesting and efficient utilization of land for residential pur- poses incorporating a variety of homesites and building types, encourage preservation ,, - 2 - of the natural landscape and creation of useable open space, and to allow open recreation uses including golf courses, riding grounds, parks and trails. Application of this desig- nated use is recommended on an indi- vidual project basis following review of precise development plans. Prin- cipal uses include single family and multi family dwellings plus the asso- ciated uses allowed in the rural resi- dential category. In addition the plan refers to the area of the applicant's request in the following statements: A 15,000 square foot minimum lot area is designated for land presently zoned R-15 Envisioned uses include single and multi family dwellings as allowed under the planned unit approach . And finally, although it was never included as part of any subsequent zoning code amendment, the 1966 Plan encouraged the inclusion of multi family residential land use in areas designated Residential/Planned Unit primarily in order to lessen land area coverage and increase the amounts of open space for each project. COMMEAITS: The applicant's summary statement is attached so that the primary reasons supporting the request are incorporated herein. Generally these supporting reasons would constitute a valid basis upon which to consider granting a zone change with an increase in density. However, at present, with the questions of satisfying exisiting public facility deficiencies unre- solved (ie, hospitals, transportation, land requirements for public buildings), and the impact of existing high density zoning on natural systems and master plan revision yet unsolved, any zone change allowing an increase in density would be un- timely. In its last several rezoning approvals, the Planning Office has not recommended any increases in residential den- sities for these stated reasons, and it is for these reasons that the staff recommends against any density increase in regard to this specific request. There is an existing unknown in addition to those factors mentioned above which indicates that zone changes in the area p R - 3 - of the applicant's request may be correct at a later date. If the future highway and transit access to Aspen were to be constructed in this area it would constitute such a sig- nificant change in condition, with increased volumes of traffic and noise, that a zone change for the area bounded by the new highway or transit right of way on the south, Castle Creek on the west, the city limits on the north, and 7th Street (extended) on the east, would be warranted. In keeping with a "no density increase" policy it could be expected that the area now used for primary highway access should undergo a density reduction. On the other hand, if the plan recommendation calling for a shift in density from the city to outlying activity centers was followed this would reaffirm our recommendation to hold the present density level in the area of the applicant's request. The staff recommendation against a density increase at this time does not include restricting land use to the present R-15 permitted uses. A change in zoning to PR, Planned Residential District would seem correct because of the fol- lowing considerations: 1. PR would require development of the property via an approved (by the County) PUD plan. 2. PR would allow a use change to a 4 unit multiple family dwelling which would be in keeping with the predominant land use in that area of the city. 3. One 4 unit multiple family dwelling would fit on the site better, causing less land coverage by buildings and parking. 4. PR, which would allow multiple family dwellings (as in AR-1), but the same density as in R-15, would constitute a valid transition zone between the two. In summary, the planning staff recommends that the zoning be changed from R-15, Residential District to PR, Planned Residential District and that development proceed according to a County approved PUD plan. WRITTEN STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF REZONING APPLICATION OF JAMES S, ADAMS 1. Legal Description of Subject property. A tract of land being part of the SWy of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows; Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.97 feet; thence S79°20'E 312.46 feet; thence S09°37'E 60.51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60.00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111.00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78.10 feet; thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50'49"W 18.97 feet; thence N79°20'W 367.21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556.81 square feet, more or less. 2. present Use of Subject Property. Unimproved. 3. Present Zoning. R-15. 4. proposed Zoning. AR-2 Planned Unit Development, subject to the hereinafter-described limitations and requirements. 5. Statement. (a) Proposed Use of Subject Property. It is the appli- cant's desire that the use of the subject property be contractually restricted to the development of a maximum of ten (10) multiple- family dwelling units, and that the location, density and type of buildings and dwelling units be governed by a Planned Unit Development Plan to be submitted to the County planning authorities under the provisions of the Pitkin County Subdivision Regulations. (b) Zoning History. The subject property was originally zoned R-15 in 1955, with duplexes a permitted use. The Aspen General plan adopted in 1966 recommended that the subject property, and all adjoining property in Pitkin County extending westerly to the Maroon Creek Bridge on both sides of State Highway No. 82, continue to be zoned R-15 with duplexes a permitted use. The same zoning was in effect when the applicant herein purchased the subject property in 1969. In July of 1970 duplexes were eliminated as a permitted use in the R-15 District in order to combat the urban sprawl occurring on the golf course property. However, the following year this golf course property was annexed into the City of Aspen, and under the City's R-15 zoning duplexes were once again permitted in the golf course area. In sum, immediately following the applicant's acquisition of the subject property, the permitted density thereof was cut in half as a result of a use change the philosophy of which (1) was not really appropriate for nor intended to affect the subject property, and (2) was rejected shortly thereafter by the very municipality whose boundary-densities it was designed to protect. It is submitted that the 1970 use change was accomplished with little or no consideration of the uses or densities appropriate to the County lands lying southwesterly of and adjacent to the City of Aspen and easterly of Castle Creek. It is further submitted that the original, as well as the General plan, R-15 zoning of the County lands lying easterly of Castle Creek was ill-considered, particularly with respect to the portion of such lands (which includes the subject property), lying northerly of the old Midland Railroad right-of-way. These lands adjoin a portion of the City of Aspen which was then zoned T-Tourist (now AR-1) for high density development, and yet these lands were given a low density R-15 designation. Traditionally, high and low density zones have been regarded as incompatible unless special geographic features are present,, and it is for this reason that the R-6 zone is ordinarily inserted as a transition zone between such districts. This applicant believes that both the original zoning of and the General plan recommendation for these lands were in error in not providing for a density transition zone, and ttat R-6 zoning would at that time have been - and under present con- ditions would most certainly be - a more appropriate density -2- designation for these lands. R-6 zoning of the subject property would permit approximately ten (10) dwelling units, and it is for this reason that the applicant seeks a limitation of ten (10) units under the present rezoning petition. (c) Geographical, Neighborhood and Social Justifications. The subject property lies parallel to and approximately ninety (90') feet to the South of Line 7-8 of the Aspen Townsite. All access routes to the subject property originate within the City, and the property is contiguous to Seventh Avenue as extended southwesterly. The availability to the subject property of essential utility services has already been confirmed by the distributing entities (see letters attached hereto as Exhibit A), and here again all such utility lines will originate within the City. Furthermore, the subject property is part of a fairly narrow strip of County lands which is bounded on the North by the City line, on the West by Castle Creek and on the East by U,S, Forest Service property. The subject property thus has a much stronger geographical affinity with the City than with the lands in the County lying westerly of Castl@ Creek, and the potential development thereof should most logically be considered on the basis of its harmony with adjoining City uses and its compatibility with the City's expanding housing needs. As stated in the Introduction to the Aspen General Plan, "In the assignment of character and intensity of land use for each area, political boundaries are much less important considerations than are the natural features of the land, its relation to neighboring uses and to circulation and community facility provisions." As p^e viously discussed, all of the lands lying within the City in the neighborhood of the subject property carry the high density AR-1 zoning designation. At the time these lands and the subject property were initially zoned, and even when the General Plan was adopted, the neighboring City lands were being utilized -3- primarily for low-density residential purposes, with a few lodges scattered throughout the area. However, the character of this neighborhood has undergone a radical change in the past 5-7 years, experiencing a substantial influx of multiple-family dwelling units for long-term occupancy, and an increase (on a smaller scale) in tourist accommodations as well. Moreover, current planning strongly suggests that both the new highway approach and the mass transit system will enter the City on either Main Street or over the Midland Railroad right-of-way. It should also be noted that as presently contemplated, the City's "Green Line" legislation (and probably the County's as well) will encourage higher density development on lands located immediately North of said line than would otherwise be planned or permitted. Such legislation will have a significant effect on properties lying adjacent to the subject property. The above-described changes in the circumstances of the lands neighboring the subject property constitute a sound and persuasive basis for reconsidering the most appropriate and beneficial use of the subject property at the present time. In fact, the authors of the General Plan expressly contemplated and approved the periodic reevaluation of the recommendations set forth in the plan when they stated in the latter part of the Introduction that "It is the duty of the planning commission to determine at what point in time a particular section of land should be rezoned for intensive urban use." And is seems clear that the rezoning requested hereunder is "generally in accordance with the Plan," in that under the Land Use portion thereof the plan provides that "residential densities shall generally be more intense close to Aspen", and that "residential use of an urban character is projected for the south side of the valley between the ski areas and the river." As indicated above, in recent years Aspen's high density residential core area has expanded to within a very few -4- yards of the subject property, and the particular character of the neighboring development suggests a real demand and need for long-term multiple-family housing. It is submitted that the use of the subject property contemplated by this application is far more compatible with the present use of the neighboring City lands than would be the development permitted under the existing zoning, and that the proposed use will far better serve the social needs of the Aspen community for medium- priced long-term housing. Because of the proximity of the subject property and the importance of the eventual use thereof to the City, the applicant respectfully requests that this Application be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen for consideration before it is finally acted upon by this Commission. (d) Summary. The applicant wishes to emphasize that this petition does not seek high-density zoning for the subject property, but rather the low-medium density which would be allowed if the land were zoned R-6. And R-6 zoning would provide an effective transition area between the high-density City lands to the northeast and the low-density County lands lying to the West of Castle Creek. Castle Creek is a natural geographical boundary for this sort of density buffer zone as well as for urban vs, non-urban residential land uses, and it is the applicant's belief that the Aspen General Plan was in error in failing to recognize these considerations in its recommendation for this area. In addition, the almost total orientation of the subject property toward the City rather than the County, and the significant changes which have occurred in the use of the neighboring City lands and in the housing needs of the City, warrant serious reconsideration of the uses to which the subject property should most properly and effectively be put. The AR-2 designation is not sought for purposes of increasing density, but in order to permit lower cost multiple- family dwellings and greater land use site planning flexibility in -5- the development thereof through utilization of the Planned Unit Development concept. Respectfully submitted, am s 'S . ams ~' orence P. dams -6- ~~ ,~=mar- 9 ASPEN Sf',NITA r {ON D!S i t21Ci" P. O. Box 528 Tele. 925-3601 ASPEN, COLORADO SI611 Mr. Jim Adams Box 744 Aspen, Colorado 81611 November 6, 1972 Dear Jim: Per our conversation concerning your property at 7th and Hopkins, known as the Adams Tract. This property is within the boundary of Aspen Sanitation District and can be served by the facilities of the Aspen Sanitation District. Sincerely, 7 e /9 C int Sampson J//Y- Executive Director _. .II _•.. November 9, 1972 James S. Adams P. 0. Box 744 Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Pir. Adams: Be it known to the Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission that Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., is the certificated public electric utility south of Colorado State Highway 82 and west of the western city limits of Aspen, Colorado, and has the capacity and ability to serve the proposed ten (10) condominium units. This letter in no way intends to show that a commitment has been made by Mr. Adams to comply with our standard extension policy. Sincerely, HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. ~ o_ Clemons M. Ropf, System Engineer CMK/ep- 6, ,, °s ~` ~ .` ~~ ~~ _ _. -,~- November 20, 1972 James Adams P. O. Box 744 Aspen, Colorado Dear Jim: In the event your project at Seventh and Hopkins is approved by the county commissioners the City water utility will be available to you. Sincerely yours, 3 Dennis Veede~i-- Acting City Manager DV:mw F r ~ . h.9> ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 2059 ASPEN. COLOPA00 8161' (303) 925-2323 November 13, 1972 Pitkin County P & Z Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gentlemen: In connection with Developer pursuant closure Act, Rocky hereby states that i.ng subdivisions a County, Colorado: filings of Statements of Record by the to the Interstate Land Sales Full Dis- ;Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc. it will supply gas service to the follow- ed projects, all of which are in Pitkin Adams Tract 7th and west Hopkins 8 to 12 Units. Sincerely yours, ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. L r !' 1 ~C. '~Q/u District Manager WCC/mg _. ~.___. _ _~_ _.__ _ __ _ .. _._r - ,__ ., .. ,___ _-,___.. ~* JOSIgX G.HOLLANO OON O. ETTER SiEPXEN X, XPRT JgME$ T. MORAN JOXN L. J. MART NENNETX D. XVBBARO WILLIAM p. EM BREE,JR. ROBERT L. VER SEHURE JAM ES L.WXIiE GOROON G.GREINER PAi RICH M, WESiFEL OT ROBERT H.OURNgM,JR. LPVOE M.MAE R,JR, H. 6RE60RY AU SiIN ROB ERi P. pA VISpN L. WILLIAM SCHMIDi, JR. JOHN FLEMING NELLV JAMES P. LIN pSAY FRANK H. MO RISON EO WIN S. KAHN WILLIAM C. MCCLEARN $qM VEL P. GVYiON JPY W.LRAC EY, JR. JOXN S. CASiE LLANO JOHN ALLEN MOORE DEN NI$ M.JAC NSON BEN E. CXIDLAW RO BE Ri E. BENSON PME$ E.HEGARiV DONALD O. NIN ONEN FIELD C. BENTON RICNPRO M. NOON OAVIO BVTLER CHARLES T. BRgNOT J. MIC HAEL PARLEY RO BE RT T. CO NNERV WARREN L,TOMLINSON XARgpON REATTY B RULE T. BUELL HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 EO UITAB LE BUILDING ]30 SEVENTEENTX STREET DENVE R,COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 292-9200 CABLE ADDRESS HOLHART, DENVER iH UR C.pPI LY MIC HPEL O.M iIN F REV c. Ro Np pAVID G.OwEMR N UN DEM C N LTER W.G R, BRVCE W RAVL N RIG VE2 RPM1OV L ARCELR JPCM L JOSEPH N MES STEVEN M NNON G RANPM M. CLARNSJ R, JONN p, COOMRE DAVIp G LMER EUGENE F McGVIRE JV DIiH BONNIE NOZLOFF SOLOMON N. RPRON MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING P. O. BOX 112 B, ABPEN~ COLD RA00 81H 1~ TELEPHONE 925-34]6 AREA CODE 303 February 20, 1973 Mr. Peter Guy, Chairman Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Guy; Please consider this writing a formal withdrawal of the rezoning application submitted to the pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission by James S. and Florence P. Adams under that certain Letter of Intent dated December 27, 1972. I would appreciate your advising me if any further actions will be required on the part of the Adams' in connection with this withdrawal. Respectfully submitted, James S. Adams and Florence p.//A~J,dams~,, BY isy~G~ls-~,CG Hrtnytr c; .° llal,~ for Holland and Har , their torneys in fact ACD:mm cc: Mr. Herb Bartel, County planner Mr. James S. Adams ~~ ~~~ /, ~ V ~~ ' ~U ~ HOLLt~.ND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW SOO EQUITABLE BUILDING JO G DO p NV EPNE XnRT Ax ]30 SEVENTEENTH STREET rvrvEr xL DOx m D. EMDRE E~JP, gODE RT ER scHVpE DENVER. COLORADO 00202 ITE GpRpON G. GREINEp M W PA R mN M wssrFELOT X.DURXn m,JR. <LAU OE M MPE R~Jq. pNE ' TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 292-9200 P. DAV ISON MIG FEGORT q VSiIN n e R io n F InG NE Ur scX MID i,JR. E Axrc x M OpIS ON MESP GgBLE ADDRESS HOLHgRT. DENVER MccLEAgN W p gnCEq JR. Sw MUEL R~G UriOrv T MOUNTAIN PLgZq BUILDING JOnrv A E JOHn s. c ANO p m JACNSON H P. O. BCX 1128 ASPEN COLD RgDO 81611 MEE E H Tr , , F [Ep GeENTON EN ONEN O TELEPHONE 925-34]6 gREP CODE 303 DAVID BVTLEq pl Cryggp M mICX AEL FARLEr gLES T ~n oT Nsorv RoaE qr r. coNNEgv aa~=E: a~°«I NARApDrv aEATrr February 20, 1973 .HDaED N. ~_ xAQ` O C VNSEL lLr. Peter Guy. Chairman Pitkin County Planning ~ Zoning Commission Pitkln County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Blr . Guy : ~uR~ILY siEVErv m rvnON JEFFREY <. PONO JOHN O. COOMRE JOXN VNOEM CAPLSON EVGENE F McGVIRE BRVCE W. SATTLER LIN DELL L. GU MPER RANGY L. PA PCEL SOLOMON N. aAPON JOSEPX N. OE RgI5 ME5 ROaE PT J. MOIR G RAXAM M. CLAPM~JR. MARN R. LEVY OAVIO G. PALM ER JEAN NETTE P. METER Juortn eonmE rcouoFF R. apooNE JACrcson m1c NAEL o. mARrlrv aglrroN wXI WgLTER W. GPRNSEY. JP. RPVL N. ROO RIGVE2 JA<rc L. SMITH Please consider this writing a formal withdrawal of the rezoning application submitted to the pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission by James 8. and Florence p. Adams under that certain Letter of Intent dated December 27, 1972. I would appreciate your advising me ii any Yurther actions will be required on the part of the Adams' in connection with this withdrawal. Respectfullq submitted, Jame® 3. Adams and Florence p. AAdams By ~s~,~-' Arsqur c. Daily ror xoilana ana Hant, their attorneys in fact ,~\.~ ACD:mm cc: Mr. Herb Bartel, County Planner Mr. James 9. Adana -~ -~ ~ ..' December 27, 1972 Mr. Peter Guy, Chairman Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr, Guy: Please consider this writing a formal Letter of Intent with respect to the proposed rezoning of the real property more particularly described as follows, to wit: 1, Legal Description, A tract of land being part of the SW4 of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.97 feet; thence S79°20'E 312,46 feet; thence S09°37'E 60,51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60.00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111,00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78.10 feet; thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50'49"W 18,97 feet; thence N79°20'W 367,21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556,81 square feet, more or less. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a topographical and boundary survey of the subject property prepared by Tri-Co Management, Inc, under date of August 29, 1972, 2, Present Zoning. The entire tract described above is currently zoned R-15, 3, Requested Zoning, It is the desire of this petitioner that the subject property be rezoned R-6, 4. Proposed Uses. Low density residential housing in accor- dance with the densities presently permitted in the R-6 District. I have just today learned that the By-Laws of your Commission ~a~~~..~ ~~~ ~~s/~'at~ lpv~4µ-~J ~B'kc 1KC1JlB~[Lvj ~/R/GL ~~ ~~~~ C~B.."e2sc~a 7 .c.~. ~S'~s ~ ~~x ~~~ d~,p4~1 ~c q ,~nt6~; ~,~'zli ~ j~ac [,i~~N ~rAeJC~UC7c .cu-~ fT(,G.9it~rM a,-ic%!'i~••s eu-~/ ~ ~ ~ . c'~~ ~ oc. ~:Sfiiy ~lulL I'~+~+'~ dw~ a..~1'c Gi.I~I L~~ 6-r. D .~Eus. !J Cart .4t.Z%/li t~'-c.a~'a ~ ~ „yam yuu~f 1 ~ . ~ ,L,,aFi~~` 1 ~/_ ,,~~//'' sr-~ co-rcfa.~c d - . ~f~j~ ~ ~ ~1 ~~~`~ , C~~~ ~~~~ ul~ Y'`~ __ 1~~ ~~~~u~-~~t~.. .~ C m in m 3 w~ W `~ r c a 'c c a N m X31 .. ~~ DVC024(0333)(2-U5940~EOva)PD 02/17/73 0333 3~ ICS IPMRNCZ CSP ZCZC 2133430035 NL TDR1 EfJCINO CA 100 02-17 0333.4 EST Pins MR PETER GUY CHAIRMANPITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZON1ivG COi'ii~iISSION ASPEN CO B1611 REGARDING THE HEARIJG OfJ REZONING THE AUAirS PROPERTY AT SEVENTH AND HOPKINS AS A NEARdY PROPERTY OWHEIi I A'i OUCJCERNEll ABOUT REZONING THIS LAND IN A PIECE MEAL FASHIOiJ S1wCr. 1 HAVE iv0 Iuc:A WHAT MR AUA"S PLAiJS FOR HIS PROPERTY IT iS JIFFICULI' FOR ME TO COMMENT Oiu "IHE PARTICULAR ISSUE I AM i~OT AGAINST REZONING BUT I THINK THE WHOLE AREA SHOULD BE REZONED AT THE SAME TIME IN THIS WAY THE SURROUNDING ROPERTY VALUES WOULD BE PROTECTED SINCERELY MRS ELSIE KI~NKER 17S'33 tlURBANK BLVD APT 2 ENCIi40 CALIFORNIA3 91316 9~'S'-/7, j TELEPHONED ,..TM~v~, 33 ,. I BYtklC~~2 s~~7 l~4iz D '~-3 i TO BFj 7liPi cob. lo, 197j County Commieaionera Pitkin County Planning and ?oning board Dear Sira: I would like to be counted as NOT approving highe^ density for thn J,u:es Auams Traot within a iow density residential area. Sincerely yours, ,~~~~ ~ , / ~/ ~- Owner, Y,lip ana Rurl ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~' ~^~~ February 15, 1973 Pitkin County Planning and7,oning Commission Pitkim County Co,..missioners Dear Sirs: I want you to know that I am aainst increasing the density on the James Adams Tract. ~espectrully, Tore. Sylvia Maurin R ~~ ~~ ~~1~ I~~ nV ~~ BO$ u~3 Aspen, Colo. Feb, llt, 1973 Office of Building Inspector Attn. Pit';in Planning & Zoning Commission Box 694 Aspen, Colo. 81011 Dear i~iembers of the Planning & Zoning Commission In regards to your notice, dated Feb. 3, 7973, concd~i.ng the public hearing a,-Wending the Pitkin County Zoning t~1ap from iirl> to Ak-2 by request of James S. Adams, I definitely object. In mlY opinion, this is not necessary at this time. This is one of ti7e few areas left in Aspen ;hat has not been invaded by multiple housing. Allowing spot zcning in this region will only open the door fcr other requests of a sirLilar nature in the near future. I~r. Adams tras atrare of the R-15 Zoning trhen he purchased the land. Also, he has had a sign since last fail listing this o*_~berty for sale. Is this zoning c!-.ange for his benefit to raise the resale value of his purchase? Secondly, this property has river frontage. Does this ch<uige of zoning allow development along the river bottom? This is one of the few streams l.;ft without any development. Yours truly, R-~ ~~ Z- Lo -Z3 /~L February 13, 1973 Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear "4r. Chairman and Members of the Commission: We received notice of a request by James Adams for a zoning change from R-15 to AR-2 for his property. We feel that this change is not necessary nor would it lend itself to the surrounding lots and homes which have always enjoyed a quiet and peaceful atmosphere - Ple have so few of these particular areas left in Aspen and feel that the remaining ones should be preserved. Very truly yours, .IAlJ1.~.C.J Cherie Oates y ~'1 "? ~ ~ ~~ J es Gerbaz -~~ r ~- ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~3 ~~ ~ , ~. Pit'~in County Planning and 'oninF_ Commission "he Pit':in County Commissioners Dear Sirs: Aspen, Colorado Feb. 12, 1973 I wish to out myself firmly on record as opposed to rezoning the Jarres Adams Tract from '215 to A?2. This is in effect spot zoning of one piece of land, 59,576 sq. ft ., toward higher density within a low density residential area. This would not be compatible wit'r. tk:-e existing use of the lsnd. "r. Adams knew the 315 zoning when he bought the land and that the property owners were quite sstisfied witk: that zoning. This area is line a country lane and is much sdmired as is by residents and visitors. It would be regret able to see a development similar to the wall of Villa townhouses breai the openness of what is left of the Castle Creek bank. As a property owner whose land ,djoins the Adams Tract on the north from 7th St. to Castle Creek, I am strongly against spot zoning of the Adams property for increased density in one small sector of a large area of 317. respectfully, S -' i' 7 C-~C«a~.; r , 4~L;' j it - i ~;leanor Berger Bealmear °lj !`'est I"din Aspen ~v ~° ~~3 ~,r ,~,~ February 4, 1973 To the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission: To the Pitkin County Commissioners: I would like to express my strong opposition to the proposed density increase or. the Adams property on South Seventh Street. It seems to me that the zoning chaos we have inherited from the peat, which wa era only now trying to straighten out, is the result of precisely this kind of spot zoning in conformity to no over-all plan. Citizens of this valley expressed their opposition to random growth very strongly in the last election. It is time now to grant no increase in density until we have a plan Por the valley stating where, when and if further development should take place. Tha Adams property, on the bank of Castle Creek, is in a particularly sensitive area. An unfortunate mistake was made when the Villa Townhouses were allowed to create the entrance to Aspen in the form of a solid wall. Unless such development is stopped, this wall could continue along Castle Creak to the base of Shadow Mountain. Surely this ie not the way Aspen wishes to announce its presence. It is worth noting that Mr. Adams opposed the temporary increased public use of the area in the Form of the Aspen Theater Institute Childran~e Workshop in the neighboring barn last summer, but now proposes a permanent change that would nearly triple the density. I hope that the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning and County Commissioners will recognize the threat to this area such upzonirg would portend, and allow Mr. Adams to develop his land within the existing boundaries of R 15. Sincerely, ,~ tictP_ ~~p_~ ~ Bruce Barger 901 Weet Main Aepan "..., Cv I i ~T l J J`F C~,: / ~ ~ l .~C.~L ~ X ~.- ~~) . t: i (//~" / ~ `/~VJ7 -~y~~, C~Et~,~;.~~.t,.- ^r ,~E.~~ ,~v~~~~, cy(.~.c~~Fi~, _-t ~ ciCl=~ . C~. c \ / .'L/v ~~C"~1 % .,~( /,~` ~~'(i4; y fL'/Lli~Li~ ~ ~~~lti~i.~'.1 I ~/-~r-_ ~7 -~,.~ f.[i1.•~_ ~~~ -/- . ~ 1 ~//( `~ p -Lys ~~~ ~(<.y_~7 i iJ J ~~ J' - _ C/- ~~ >,~ ~~ v. ~, i ' L _ 1 / Y j / . ~v~' ~~o ~/iv+~- ~ 1 ,~-,. ,~%~ r f ~ -, M1/ l r"~'.~ ~ cam. •- ~' li{. 1. i C-=1' L- ~ ( (1 T / / L '\/ ~L ~ / t -S _i // CJ ' C L i ~ f.%L. -f~i - ~ ~.. ~ - ~ i ~ ~ % i ~ ~ i C ~-t -1 G3 r~~ f ~~-z~` ~~ ~ / - ,~% // CT a ~ ~~ y t2~ ~. ~ t r it' ''`~_ '~ `" ~ ~i ~~ ,- ~, ~ ~, ~ p/ December 27, 19?2 Mr, Peter Guy, Chairman Pitkin County Planning ~ Zoning Commission Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr, Guy: Please consider this writing a formal Letter of Intent with respect to the proposed rezoning of the real property more particularly described as follows, to wit: 1,' Legal Description. A tract of land being part of the SW~ of Section 12, lbwnship ZO South, Range 85 West oY the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.97 feet; thence S78°20'E 312.46 feet; thence S08°37'E 60.51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60.00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111.00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78.10 feet; thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50'49' 18.97 feet; thence N79°20'W 387.21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556.81 square Peet, more or less. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a topographical and boundary survey of the subject property prepared by Tri-Co Management, Inc. under date of August 29, 1872. 2. Present Zonin The entire tract described above is currently zoned R-15. 3. R~gues_ted Zoning. It is the desire of this petitioner a t e su 3ect property be rezoned R-6. 4. Proposed Uses. Low density residentlal housing in accor- dance wi~b the densities presently permitted in the R-6 District. I have dust today learned that the By-Laws of your Commission Mr. Peter Guy December 27, 1972 Page 1Wvo establish December 15, 1972 as the last day upon which rezoning requests to be considered in February oP 1873 were to have been delivered to qou. I have long intended to apply to you this winter for rezoning of this property, but have simply been laboring under the impression that my letter of intent had to be submitted on or before January 1, 1873 so as to provide at least thirty (30) days published notice of the hearing date to be scheduled in February. I apologize for not being more familiar with your schedule, but would earnestly request that you consider granting an exception in this case. I will be more than happy to bear any and all additional costs which the County may incur in connection with the handling of this exception, including extra publication expenses. I would appreciate your serious consideration of this application. Respectfully submitted, J s dams cc: Mr. Herb Bartel January 9, 1973 Mr. Peter Guy Chairman, Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Guy, After a preliminary meeting with the staff of the County Planning Department, and at their suggestion, an additional course of action was proposed regard- ing our original rezoning request on the Adams tract at 7th and Hopkins Street. Since the property in question could be better de- veloped under a PUD concept with mulitiple family dwellings allowed, we request that the board con- sider, AR-2 Zoning in place of R-6 Zoning. I mus emphasize that this sug,plimentarv request is being made to allow development flexibility and not to increase density beyond the R-6 limitation Sincerely, JIM DAMS cc: Herb Bartel ~ ~~ ~. ~r ,;. ~ December 27, 1972 Mr. Peter Guy, Chairman Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr, Guy: Please consider this writing a formal Letter of Intent with respect to the proposed rezoning of the real property more particularly described as follows, to wit: 1. Legal Description. A tract of land being part of the SWy of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.97 feet; thence S79°20'E 312,46 feet; thence S09°37'E 60.51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60.00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111,00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78.10 feet; thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50'49"W 18,97 feet; thence N79°20'W 367,21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556.81 square feet, more or less. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a topographical and boundary survey of the subject property prepared by Tri-Co Management, Inc, under date of August 29, 1972. 2. Present Zoning. The entire tract described above is currently zoned R-15. 3. Requested Zoning. It is the desire of this petitioner that the subject property be rezoned R-6. 4. Proposed Uses. Low density residential housing in accor- dance with the densities presently permitted in the R-6 District. I have just today learned that the By-Laws of your Commission Mr, Peter Guy December 27, 1972 Page ~vo establish December 15, 1972 as the last day upon which rezoning requests to be considered in February of 1973 were to have been delivered to you. I have long intended to apply to you this winter for rezoning of this property, but have simply been laboring under the impression that my letter of intent had to be submitted on or before January 1, 1973 so as to provide at least thirty (30) days published notice of the hearing date to be scheduled in February. I apologize for not being more familiar with your schedule, but would earnestly request that you consider granting an exception in this case. I will be more than happy to bear any and all additional costs which the County may incur in connection with the handling of this exception, including extra publication expenses, I would appreciate your serious consideration of this application. Respectfully submitted, ~, .,_ Ja es S. Adams cc: Mr, Herb Bartel ~ ~ ~ f , ~rt .. ~ ~ ~t ~{+ t ~~.~ `~, December 21, 1972 Mr. Peter Guy Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission P. 0. Box I Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Peter: Friedl Pfeifer and I both appreciate the consideration rendered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their Wednesday meeting. Once again I apologize for the lack of communications and our tardiness in getting on the agenda. Best regards to you and your Board throughout the holiday season-and new year, MASON & MORSE, INC. r ~' f ZZ'~ ., '~. :.. ' Edward W. M Nse, President EWM/jl n~asan~~oRSe INCORPORATED run aFlCe: POST OFFICE BOX O ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE. 303 925-7000 POST OFFICE BOX 5039 S NOWMASS BRANCH ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE: 303 923-3020 POST OFFICE BOX 701 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO 804]7 PHONE: 303 879-0694 I •' ~a~'`~ ~~~ s en Toda P Y' P. O. Box BB Aspen, Colorado 8161 I (303) 925-4066 PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO ~ G5. County of Pitkin ) I, _~O'f~ ~e$1~ ~T__ _______ do solemnly swear that I am Lhe ~~ l.~ Q~ ____. of ASPEN TODAY; that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in who~4e or part, and published in the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and un- interruptedly in said Colmty of Yiikin, for a period of more than fifty- two consecutive weeks nest prior to the First publication of the annexed legal notice or advertiselneut; that said newspaper hxe been admitted to the United States mails as secondtloss madter under the provisions of the Act of March 3. 187!1, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal nobiees and advertisements with the meaning of the laws of the S~tnte of Colorado, That the annexed legal notice or ttdvertisomenl was published in the regudiar and entire issue oY every number of said weekly news- Paper for the Deriod of __._~____.. __ conseo olive insertions; and that the first publication oaf said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated So.~,__I~_ _ A. D., 19~~ ~_ Subscribed and swm•u to before me, x notary public in and for the County of Pitkin. State of Colm~ado, this _ dny of A.D„ 19_____.. Notary Public My commission expires t. lapel Daatxipli0n A h«t al letld Mktp part of tM sww m s«netl lx. TowtRnb~lo SouM, R OS Wpt of tM Nh Prim ckRl May~b Cnkin C Colas. Oo,mMe h11Y OfWlbd 4 MllOws:. BNpmkq M a twins wMn<e Carnes Na 7 of IM OrgkRl been Townih Msrs N OD Opn% A' C• W 371.' feet, sai! ppiM abo Eelnp r«arA Gar- ner No. t3 M 1M "NOgon TfacN': iMeles S 11 papreea p' W 1M.% feet; then<e S A tkgreae 30' E 717A6 feet; iMnte S Ot Oapretl 3T E 10.51 feet; thence N a6 esWaes 7Y E 1800 feet; tMnp N N eeWa« tl' E 111.W feet: Iltante N 13 sprees SY E 7810 /M: ihMw 5 p Oeprees li' W 7fS hat: thence S 11 e% D'. N". W.1897. feaF 1hNtn N A Oeo.ea fB' W 70.71 r«r ro. the cobs M tlpknMtO• aMaininp Or.~-1t WtMra /M. mba or leas. A mep M 111! «p 76 p file ens ttMY M exemine0 w the. oNice Of tln Pltkin CounlY BuiMip DepRlment, -NkM Coun- u~n,:i Ons•hou~• caa.so. arinB. At such Marlnp all p%aatM In Mterep maY appear sttl Be MsM if you an mee itif n0 t vw ~er urygi0 to ititta yav views BY latter. The Nprkq if f2hepltkq as • lOlnt PWIIO HNfkq M tlta PIYkIn.000nty Plen• nkw sue ZOnip CMeniaalOn an0 tM Bosrd of Countyty Cammixronen Of PHkM CountY• [olOradO Copy of Notice R i ~.~.° LEGAT; . rNOTICE NOTICE OF' PFJBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a`Public Hearing is scheduled in the District Courtroom, Courthouse Pitkin County, Aspen, Colorado, February 19, 1973 at 8:00 P.M, to consider am-nending the Pitkin County Zoning Map from the present R-15 to AR-2 a parcel of land owned by James S. Adams and described as follows: 1, Legal Description. A tract of land being part of the SW~ of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence Corner No, 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.97 feet; thence S79°20'E 312,46 feet; thence S09°37'E 60.51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60.00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111.00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78,10 feet; thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50''49"W 18.97 feet; thence N79°20'W 367,21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556,81 square feet, more or less. A map of the area is on file and may be examined in the office of the Pitkin County Building Department, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado during usual business hours. At such hearing all persons in interest may appear and be heard. If you are unable to appear personally at such meeting you are urged to state your views by letter. The Hearing is scheduled as a joint Public Hearing of the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado Peggy E. Miklich County Clerk and Recorder Published January 17, 24,31, Feb. 7, 1973 - _ _ _ - -- ~/ q~ 'LEGAE NOTICE ~ ~, ~~ ~ NOTICE OE PUBLIC HEARING ~" ~ ' ` ,~f~ Notice is hereby given that;ar::,Public Hearing is scheduled in the ~llistrict Courtroom, Courthouse Pitkin County, Aspen, Colorado, February 19, 1973 at 8:00 P.M. to consider ammending the Pitkin County Zoning Map from the present R-15 to AR-2 a parcel of land owned by James, S. Adams and described as follows: 1, Legal Description, • A tract of land being part of the SW~ of Section '' 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 7 of the Original Aspen Townsite bears N00°29'42"W 324.24 feet, said point also .being record Corner No. 13 of the "Holden Tract"; thence S14°40'W 149.9? feet; thence S79°20'E 312,46 feet; thence S09°37'E 60.51 feet; thence N46°38'E 60,00 feet; thence N24°43'E 111,00 feet; thence N15°52'E 78,10 feet; • thence S80°23'W 25.21 feet; thence S14°50''49"W 18,97 feet; theme N79°20'W 367,21 feet to the point of beginning, containing 59,556.81 square • feet, more or less. A,map of the area is on file and may be examined in the office of thePitkin County Building Department, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspeh, Colorado during usual business hours. At strch hearing all persons in interest may appear and be heard. If you are unable to appear personally at such meeting you are urged to state your views by letter. The Hearing is scheduled as a joint Public Hearing of the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado Peggy E. Miklich County Clerk and Recorder Published January 17,,24,31, Feb. 7, 1973 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is scheduled in the District Courtroom, Courthouse Pitkin County, Aspen, Colorado, February 19, 1973 at 8:00 P.M. to consider ammending the Pitkin County Zoning Map from the present R-15 to AR-2 a parcel of land owned by James S. Adams and described as follows: A map of the area is on file and may be examined in the office of the Pitkin County Building Department, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado during usual business hours. At such hearing all persons in interest may appear and be heard. If you are unable to appear personally at such meeting you are urged to state your views by letter. The Hearing is scheduled as a joint Public Hearing of the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado Peggy E. Miklich County Clerk and Recorder Published January 17, 24,31, Feb. 7, 1973 January 23, 1973 Mrs. Patsy Newbury Office of Pitkin County Building Inspector Aspen, Colorado 81611 In regard to Jim Adams rezoning request scheduled for Public Hearing, February 19, 1973, the follow- ing is a complete list of property owners within a 500 foot radius of subject property. Also attached is a map with references to all property owners. 1. Opal Narolt, Box 423 - Aspen 2. Jack De Fagter, Box 182 - Aspen 3. Bruce Berger, Box 482 - Aspen 4. Stanford & Ellie Bealmear, Box 498 - Aspen 5. Joe Hauser, Box 447 - Aspen 6. Joe & Anna Horgeson, Aspen 7. Erwin Knirlberger, Aspen 8. Mr. & Mrs. Richard Long, Box 1185 - Aspen 9. Miss Gene Fry, Box 626 - Aspen 10. Mrs. Gertrude Meyer, Box 719 - Aspen 11. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Smith, Box 657 - Aspen 12. Mr. & Mrs. Fred Braun, Box 634 - Aspen 13. Mr. Robert J. Kavanaugh, 920 E1 Dorado Rd. Esconido, California 92025 14. Mrs. Dorothy Shaw, Box 510 - Aspen 15. Mr. Flans Gramiger, Box 57 - Aspen 16. Mr. Adolph Petersen, Box 271 - Aspen 17. Mr. ~ Mrs. William A. Gilner Box 1101 - Aspen 18. Mrs. Folena Nicholson, 701 W. Main - Aspen 19. James P. Lorier ;;<,x~za ,> >,~r~- ~.~,-~.uy. ,~ac•~t 20. Scandia Apts. James W. Paul Clayton Meyring Susan Gruber Box 654 - Unit A 720 W. Hopkins % Clayton Meyring Aspen Unit C - Aspen 720 W. Hoplins Unit E - Aspen Carl Maughan Murr Watts, Jr. Box 1801 - Unit B % Clayton Meyring Aspen 720 W. Hopkins Unit D - Aspen 21. 700 Hopkins Ave. Apts. % George Madsen, Box 87 - Aspen 22. Mrs. Elizabeth Paepcke, % Bell, Boyd, Lloyd, Haddad & Burns, 135 So. LaSalle St.,Chicago, I11. 60603 23. Stanford Johnson, Box 406 - Aspen 24. Mrs. Sylvia Maurin, Box 15 - Aspen Page ~ 25. Keith Hefner, Box 2150 - Aspen 26. Elsie Rinker & Audrey E. Clifton 17938 Burbank Blvd. - Apt. #2 Encino, Calif. 91316 27. Mr. & Mrs. George Marolt % Celia Marolt Box 553 - Aspen 28. Mr. James Gerbaz & Mrs. Cheri Oates Box 72 - Aspen 29. Villa of Aspen, % Ron Windemuller Box 679 - Aspen Sincerely, JIM ADAMS E~`- ~~~p-~ ~.e/ 1..~ d` y~j0 R••1 ~~ 0 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(( (Plus posta~o) SENT TO "~ POSTMARI( / C -J r - ~ ~'T ^- jY OR DATE ~ p ~ , , ~ /~ i ` STREET pND N0. ,r _ J.~ / P~ ND ZIP CODE S i. TII ODNAL SERV~I L' S FOR p0 IONAL FEES _ RETURN 1 Shows tP whom antl tlate tlelireretl ........... l5@ With delivery io adtlressee only ....... ... 65@ RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, tlate and where tleliveretl .. 35g SERVICES With delivery to adtlressee only .........._ 65g ADDRESSEE ONLY .........._ .................... _....... _.......... 50@ DELIVER TO _ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regvi red) ~~~~~---~~~~-~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~ YS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOfl INTERNATIONAL MAIL nGP0:1972 0 - 960-443 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(1 (plus p®sta~e) ~ SENT 70 POSTMARK OR DATE STRE T AND N L~ E y-A~~-ry/~,~ C! ' P.O., STA T D iIPMJ CODE /' / ,ems / /~ { S%. 1~ ~R~-v DP NAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES _ RETURN 1. Shows to whom antl tlate tleliveretl ........... IS@ With delivery to addressee only ......._... 65@ RECEIPT R, Shvw ` e tlelivere0 .. 35@ tl ~ e ~ SERVICES h delive r' Odr ssee y Y ._......... 85g ta _ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ._._._...__..........._ ............ ..._._ 50@ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~........... _........ PS Form ____ Nn INCIIRANCC rnvcnerr PROVIDCO- __ _ __ _ _ JOVV _ __. __ _ .___ _.__. _.__, Ayr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL >GPO:1B42 O-480-493 _ ~ _~ F_\_--- / w f&&c ~ 4 ~ o.d yfy . v: ~ ` L ~` ~ ~` r N n a. ' ( r 1 D' o' Pte.: W~ 6' ee i v W f.i .Z C 1 .? .~ :~ 6~1~G~~~ ~ ~° V Ll") E`1 1'~- O z N l~~ y1-0~ IC-1 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(4 (plus ~ SENT TO J/y P~ STREET gNDyN/O~///r`~R V//~ STATE ANU ZIP CODE P~ /d' f~ y ' OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDIT OeES I RETURN 1. Shows to whom antl date hliveretl 15Q RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .. 65¢ 2. Shows to whom, date antl where tlehvered .. 35Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .. .... 852 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3054 (plu; tt YY11 ~1~T 30 - ~ . ~' (~~ STREET AND NO ~} ~ _ ~/ L.(1 S TE AND ZIP CODE P0 J, , ~ I+...,,. OPTIONAI SERVICES FOP ,OITI AL FEES - _ _ RETURN _ t Shows to whom a tlate tlelivera0 15Q RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only fi5Q 2. Shows td whom, tlate antl where tleliveretl 35¢ SENVICES With delivery tc atltlressee only .. 852 SPECIAL DELIVERY~(extra fee regw red) ~~~ _.... ,V O PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVENAGE PROVIDED- (see Z Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ;: cvo: 1B. Ktl:hlYi hUK laKllhltU MAI LsEnr To /9. , ~ , ~$TREET AqD N0. ~, y~~ ~y7 P.O., STATE ~PjD ZIP RECEIPT ~ With delivery to addressee only SERVICES ~ Shows [o wham, Oate antl where tleliveretl .. _ Wrth delivery to atltlressee only .... - - -. .. __ DF.L IVER TO AUDRESSEE ONIY .._... ........ - _ SPECIAL UELIVERY (extra fee regw red) ~~~~~~~~~~~-- ~~~~~-..... PS Ferm un malo nurc rnvrharr Domnncn pr. 1971 °°°° NOT FOfl INTERNATIONAL MAIL , c :'°I ~,a Ia~aJ 1w~ ys~0 Ic-1 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regvi red) PS Form 3000 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (; Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL r, cPO: RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3051 (plus pa SEAT TO ~ •- POST _ _ _. _ - '_~ ___.~ OPTIONAL FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t Shows to whom and dale tlehvered ...... 15Q RECEIPT With delivery [o addressee only ....... fi5Q SERVICES T. Shows to whom, date antl where tleliveretl .. 35¢ With delivery to addressee only ...... 85Q - - __ _ DELIVER TO ADCRESSEE ONLY .......... _...._ 50.2_ SPECIAL DELIVERY -~ ~- - (extra fee required) ~~~~~~--~ ...... ~ PS Form 3000 A 9 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See o. Pr. 1 71 NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a cro: t99z c RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3051 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(4 (plus post. SENT TO -. ~ SENT i0 ~I POSTMAR c-,P - _ ~f~~J k ~ ~ _ ~ _ CA a.~ - ~I1~ ~.! OR DATE ~" STREET A NO/„ J -~ STREET AND „, {57 L~ C~ ~~ __._ ~' C~J _~ j ~(_l C fr L ' N ~.;J P.O, STATE AN Z P DE C~ P.O., ST iE AND ZIP CODE . ~ ~~Y.L r, -~'' ~ ~ ~~ '7 -_ - - - - 3'W,.. TIONA SERVICES fOR~A001Tl Ot~fEES Ik.. OPTIO L SERVICES~'OR ADDITIONAI FEES -- _ -_ PETURN ' 1. Shnws to wham antl date tlelivere0 .. 7 RETURN ' Shows to whom and tlate tleliveretl .... 15Q Wdh delivery to atltlressee only ._ f Wlth delivery to atltlressee only .... fi5Q RECEIPT y, Shows to whom, tlate and where tleliveretl .. ' RECEIPT y, Shows to whmn, date antl where tleliveretl .. 35Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ._ F SERVICES _ _ -. With delivery to addressee only ...._.... 85Q -- _- DELIVEP TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .__. ! . DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50Q O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ~-~~ ~~-~~ O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regvi red) ~~~~~ -.... Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- r~i PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PflOVIDEO- Apo 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other n GPO :1942 O - 46 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIE RAIL-30<~ (p RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(4 (plus po TO SENT i0 _ - ;, ~ ~ POSTI 1 rr ~ {n <~~ C <~._-~ -I~ ~ `'y '1 x'1"7 tJ7/1 _./. OR L T r~ N0. ~/ i (~ STREET A~ N0. - __ _.___ _. _- _ _..__~--y. .__ _. P.O., E A D ZIP CODE ~ P.O., ST E AND ZIP CODE ~ e;~i P ~ OP.TIONAL SERVICES FOP ADDITIONAL FEES Io.... 0- IONAL_SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEEB RETURN 1. Shows to whom and Oate tleliveretl ... 15¢- RETURN 1. Shows io whom and Gate dehyeretl .....~ 15Q With delivery to atltlressee only _.. fi5Q With delivery [o atltlressee only .... fi5Q RECEIPT RECEIPT "- SERVICES 2. Showz to whom, date antl where tleliveretl .. 35¢ Y. Shows to whom, date antl where tlehvered .. 35Q With delivery to adtlresse_e only .... fi5Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 85 _ . DELIVER TO ADDfl ESSEE ONLY _ _ _502 . DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ~._ _ .~.~ 502_ O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regw red) -..... .._ ~ O SPECIAL UELIVERY_(extra Fee regw red) __. .... r7i PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- ~ PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PflDVIDED- Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „ c APr• 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See oe •~ GPO :1892 O RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3014 (plu RECEIPT FOR CERTIF ED MAIL-3051 (plus p S T... 0 . SENT i0 -~. r. -~-, v, PO'. STB,6ET qN/D,~ryr% ~~ - STRE~S~ANO NO G7 PO., STATE AND OE = '"~ P~~D ZIP COD ~-- .-- ~ ,~ rte.... OPTION~L SERVI S POR ADDITIONAI FEES 1..,,,, / = ___ OP ONAL SERVICES FOP ADDITIONAI FEES RETURN 1. Shows io whom and date Celiveretl 15Q- RETURN 1. Shows to whom and tlate tleliveretl _ ISQ Wdh delivery to addressee only ... fi5Q With delivery to addressee only __._.... fi5Q RECEIPT RECEIPT SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date antl where tlehvered .. 35¢ Z. Shows to wham, date antl where tlehvered ., 35Q With delivery to addressee only .... 85Q BERVICES_ With delivery to addressee only ...... _.... BSQ _- - - - _ _ . _ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ._.... -- ..... 50_2 _ . DELIVER TO AOOPESSE_E_ONLY -~~- - yO SPECIAL DELIVERY-(extra fee regw red) ~.... ._. ....... O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regw red) . ~""" 502 r PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- Zi PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PflOYIDEO- Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „ppE Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ~•cPO (5972 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3014 (All SENT TD ..~, RECEIPT F '~' ~ "' . >_ ~%~ ~ ,r.,, I (rj SENT, CR CERTIFIED /~ p STq ~ AND jt10. ~ "-~ -_ ,. (/~ M~IL~JU 1 ,~ ~S ~ STREET AND p -r~- ~ J ~ (Plus p P/.O/JySSjgTE qND ZIP CO/Df~/~ - - ~ ~~ / --- ~ -~?= OR _ l+-.J P.0 5 TF AND - ____ __-I _ __~JO'PGT~I_ON7iL SEgVICES FOR ADDITIONAI FEES ZIP CODE - I~ p ~~ 0 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3051 (plus I SENT TO ~ ' , PL E ~e 4V _ STfl EET~YO. r ~ v / I..{ ~Y ~ ~1-/~~~.~ / / r ^ ' W P.O., ST qN0 ZIP CODE // P , I'~.,. _ i pPTIONAL ~ERVICES FOR ADOITIONAI_FEES m U antl tlate tleliveretl ... 15Q t Shows to who RETURN RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ... 65Q 2. Shows to whom, date antl where tlebveretl . 35Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only _.. 85Q - _ ___ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........ .... ...... SOQ Q -SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ~ -~~~ Zy PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See z A po. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL :, cPO : l a1~, RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(1 (plus l.~l ~~. 0 z STREET~NfI NO _ L_~ P.O., ST AND ZIP CODE /y,.I ZONAL SERVIBE~FON ADDITIONAL-FEES _ _ RETURN 1. Shows ~ta whom antl tlate tleliveretl 1St! RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .. .. 65¢ 2. Shows to whom, tlate antl where tlebveretl .. 35Q SERVICES With tlelivery to atltlressee only ... 85Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ~ _..... ....... 50Q _ - - ~`:_ - __ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requ ed) ~~~~-~~~~ ~-~~ -~~~~~~~~ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (; Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „GPG, RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3011 (plu: Q7 r- z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3014 (p /yam W SENT T~O7 -~ / ~~lL. (r ~/ r' r' ___ ~. STR N :~ / ~ Lj) / (.' _- ® P.O., S ANO ZIP CODE ^ ~ 'a3»t ~~'e' t. - - I~ ~PTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL EEES RETURN 1 Shows Ta whom antl date tleliveretl .. 15Q RECEIPT With delivery to adtlressee only _ . 65¢ 2. Shows to wham, date antl where tlebveretl . . 35Q SERVICES With tlelivery to adtlressee only .. . BSQ DELIVER TO gDDRE55EE ONLY _.._._ 502 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regm red) ~~~ ~~~~ -~~~~~~~ `~ PS Form 3000 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- npr. 1971 NOi FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „ r RECEIPT FOR CERTIFI D MAIL-301 (plus p ~NT TO -~r-~ / PO a~neF VAnu Nu ` -- • /~-~~~J j , _ ~ - --- _ P.O., ST AND ZIP CODE __ - _ _ OP ZONAL SE8V1 FSEG 08 ADDITIONAL TEES NETURN 1. Shows [o wham and Gate tle0reretl ~... 152- RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only __ . ' .. 65Q 2. Shows to whom, Oate antl where tleliveretl . SERVICES . 35Q Wilh delivery to atldressee only ......_... . 85Q DELIVEB TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - -- _ - - _ ...._ _... .. - - - . 50 2 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regw red) ~~~ .. _ _ PS Ferm 3000 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See A yr. 1971 NOT FOR INTEANATIONAL MAIL a GPO: 1st; RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(1 (plus SENT. _ ~ l I i// STRE¢Y~,ND N ~ ~~~ - P.O., S E ANO ZIP CODE -'y ,J / / /-~ ~. ~ /NPIIONAL $E~ICES FOP ADDITIONAL FEES L•~ 4.;~J (v,. EE~~0 R-1 N z ~I i~ C J Q z O c.~~ t,Y:d l~'°'" z Q tea. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(1 (piu 5 NT TO " TREET ANO N0. ~~ ~ } .STATE AND ZIP C P O / / ~ ' J J~ OPTISNAL SERVICES FOR AOOITIONpI FEES RETURN 1 Shows to whom antl tlate tlelivered 15Q RECEIPT With tlelivery to atltlressee only .... 65Q 2. ShoWS to Wham, Rate antl Where Oeliveretl .. 35Q SERVICES With delivery to atldressee only ...... 85Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..._ ._.__.......__... 50Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ~cPG: RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(1 (plus SENT ~ I STRE NO - ~ C <'[ -~~- ~ ~, P 0 E ND ZI GOUE / 9 - _ ONAL SERVYCES FOP p0UIT10NAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom antl tlate tlebveretl ..._ ._. I5 RECEIPT With deb ery to addressee only ......... . 65Q 2. Shows to whom, data antl where tleliveretl . . 35Q SERVICES Wilh delivery to adtlressee only ..... ..... . BSQ DELIVER TO ADURESSEE ONLY ......... ............... .. 50 2 SPECIAL UELIVERY (extrv fee regoi red) ~~~ ._............_... . _ ra roan 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (Se, npr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL s GPO : 19' RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30x4 (plus I 6IflEEi D N0. T~ / -zr> C s/ P.O , ~A~ A~ZIP 0~ - - ~ j ~, '~ -C/ ,y act _ _ _ TIONAL SERVICES FOR p001TIONGI FEES - RETURN t. Shows to wnvm and Eate tleliveretl ....__.. _ 15¢ RECEIPT With tlelivery to addressee only ..... _..._ 65Q 2. Shows tR whom, tlate antl where tleliveretl .. 35Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ._......... _ - _ -_ 85Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..._.._, ...._.._.._ - 50Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ~~~~~~~~~~~.... .................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO :199; RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30¢ (plus pi SENT T POSI T i.~ , „ .. _ J ~ OR P 0 STp/T RND ZIP CODE C L •vz / Y __ _ TIDNpI SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAI FEES RENRN 1. -Shows to whom add tlate Eehveratl - ._ 15Q RECEIPT Wilh tlelivery to addressee only .. _..... 65Q SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, tlate and where tlebveretl .. 35Q _ _ With delivery to addressee only ...... _.... R5¢ _ DELIVER TO ADDfl ESSEE ONLY .....__ .. ... _...... 50d SRECIgL UEU VERY (expo Fee requ red) ~~~~...._ ................ PS Ferm 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See of Apr. 1971 NOT FOA INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO :1912 C RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3061 (plus pL S NT'i0 `` ~ POSI _~~1~L ! - r/ -- P o sTnr~, rvD zIP coDE L > s v~ _ ~TIONAL SERVICES i0R pDU1TI0NAL FEES RETURN ' 1. -Shows td whom end Eah delrveretl ..... 15¢ RECEIPT With tlelivery to adtlressee only ._... 85Q SERVICES 2. Shows to wham, tlate and where tleliveretl .. 35¢ - _- _ With delivery to adtlressee only ............ 85Q DELIVER TO AUDRESSEE ONLY - -- _ __ ..... _50d_ SPECIAL -DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOED- APr. 1971 3800 (See of NOT FOA INTERNATIONAL MAIL „ceo:191z o RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3014 (plus SENT TO ~ )Y r~ ~'~_. STREET~NO NO P 0. E ANU ZI~ODE S ~? fr-~ca-C /~_ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- 1 Apr. 1971 NOT FOA INTERNATIONAL MAIL „ GPo 1 ~ ~ • O ~ O ~ ? o m >< o ~ o ~ n W D r O O O off' w L7 ~~ MoD ~ - +~ a cc ~a~~s ~ rz'np Cv \ $ .al ~J In a -. ,. n 3~m~m''$ a ~ S .s. : a ' T3 0 ~ry~~~4 y ~ g+ .C+ ffffffQ ,'+fa JJ ~/ ~ ~ a n C ~ tS~ ^ y ~~ ' `~, N O \ Fi r. ro x o • i ~ ~~a.(~ In 01 wr .H a r '- ~ wn~ ly (D O O w F' ~: nr>=ti Z :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V.._ ~° ITS ~~ i [C - ?? ~~~ +1 c~ c'~ ~- I-" O z le," 0 z l" ~ C~ Q C:'~ ~' 0 z i r~ ~r n' '' V , I I I~ ~ (~ 3. II u I~ C~ f ~~ ~ T ~~ W ~ "~' fa i t o z No. ~~AQ5335 a b ~' W 0 0 0 zz O H SIC .^ A ra a ~~ = m H n 0 as o~ z'^ ~9 A 3 ao O 4 n ,. N O i m n m TT O A n Tm N T m a C N ~' ~7 C.:; ,r,.. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(~ (plus I 6E T i /l ~ ~/" - ~ PI S~RAET~AAf10 N0. - _ ~ 1~~ r r a/ ~ ,~/~~ i ~ P.O., S AT AND ZIP CODE ti~w- v ~~% i~~ !' (T `~~ ~'f/ ~gl. ERVItEi FOP AOOITIONES RETURN k. hows to whom and Dated Weretl ....... 15Q RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ...._...... 65¢ 1. Shows fo whom, tlate antl where tlelveretl .. 35¢ SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .._...._.. 85Q _-_ __ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ......_._......_ ..............__._..._....._ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ~._..._._ ........................ _ - PS Ferm 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See APr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „GPO: ]a9 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30f4 (nllEc SEILLT TO P STREET NDM N0, _ _ H ~7 /1 < ~ / LL' . / Z.. n P 0., S7ATE IP CODE J e~-L- z v __OPT AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES - RETURN t Shows to whom ~anG tlate tlehveretl ... 15¢ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .... ... 65¢ ' ~' Shows to wham, tlate antl where tlehveretl . 35¢ SERVICES With tlehvery to addressee only ... .. 85¢ _ DELIVEfl TO ADDRESSEE ONLY -- __ .......__. ......_..... 50d SPECIAL DELIVEFY (extra fee regm red)~~~ PS Fa.n. [V- Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ee a GPO :199 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30({ (plus n ID l _ mtu U N0. ~ P.O, STAT AND ZIP CODE ~~~/ _ _ OP NALL SEgVI RETURN f. Shows t RECEIPT Wih SERVICES 2. SRaws fi y to atldressee only .......... tlate antl where tlelivered .. v to atltlresseo gym„ ..__._.__ oy,.~~sar ... .. PS Form ...................... Apr. 1971 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 3 GPO: 199: RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30r (nlus t SENT 70 ~~~~J ~ ' PI -L .~ L~ry+ STREET AND NO ~ !J (° ~ J ~ ,h J E D ZIP CODE / ~ .~,J i ~ r J~ ~.. ~_ _ ' DPTIDNA S VICES FON AD- TIONAI FEES _ RETURN t. Shows to whom antl Eate tlehveretl ... _.. ... 15¢ ' RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .._..... 65¢ SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date antl where tlehhveretl .. 35¢ With delivery to atltlressee only ............ 85¢ . DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY SOd _ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requ red). Apr. 1971 3800 nU INSUNANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ,r cno:le9z FORFDR C~RT~D MAI P.O., STypC N ZIP RECEIPT S o wham Snc pate IleliVeletl . e _ ERVICES ~• --- DELIVER i0 D _.- Shows to fY to adtlre herponlY .......~,,, Wilh whom , tlate and w tlelrve l , 65Q A lvered . DRES_SEE p ry to atltlressee °e NLY ~ Y. SPECIAL DELI - . 35¢ VERY ( PS Form - _........, extro lee re ~~~~~~~~~"" ~- 9m red). _-_--_~_- RS¢ -- - SOp- APr. 1971 3800 . NO INSURANCE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~ NOi FOR INTERN ~ MAOED_ Ory ATI A (See ol, ~~ GPp; 1992 p ti A