HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264511401002HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC
July 22, 2009
Mr. Lance Clarke, Deputy Director
Pitkin County Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Lot 2, Davis/Donnelly Lot Split (4305 Snowmass Creek Road; Parcel ID
No. 2645-114-O1-002) -Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
Dear Lance:
I represent Chris Reither and Four Forks, LLC, owner of Lot 2 of the
Davis/Donnelly Lot Split ("the D/D Lot Split"). Lot 2 is slightly more than 149
acres in size. The purpose of the proposed Minor Amendment is to clarify the
language of the "floor area" limitations contained in the applicable approval
documents does, indeed, provide the right under current Land Use Code
provisions to build a"barn(s)" of up to 58 square feet per acre exempt from both
the calculation of floor area and the floor area limitations of the D/D Lot Split
approvals.
The General Submission approval for the D/D Lot Split was granted
pursuant to BOCC Resolution No. 90-25, while Final Plat approval was granted
pursuant to BOCC Resolution No. 91-93. Condition number 7 of Resolution No.
91-93 reads as follows: "The maximum total floor area shall be limited to 7,500 sq. ft.
in each building envelope (including barns, art studio and any other accessory
structures)." Everywhere the restriction is stated, it is relative to 7,500 square feet
of "floor area." For example, Resolution No. PZ-90-1 and BOCC Resolution No.
90-25, both at condition number 7, contains the exact language cited above.
Resolution No. 91-93, at condition number 12.a.(2), also states that, "... the
maximum total floor area for each lot shall be limited to 7,500 square feet within each
building envelope, (including barns, art studio and other accessory structures)." The
same Resolution (91-93) requires, at condition number 14.c., that a plat note be
added stating, "that the maximum total floor area for each lot is limited to 7,500 square
feet within each building envelope, (including primary residence and other accessory
structures)."
In consistent fashion, the Subdivision Improvements Agreement
(recorded in Book 664 at Page 996) contains a "Floor Area Limitation' with
similar language under its Article 9, which states that, "The total allowable floor
• 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 108 ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1
• PHONE: (970) 925-7819 FAX: (970) 925-7395
OOJ~~ ~ 6~ 13
Lat 2, Davi rl Donnelly L.ot Split - MinarAmendmeut Application
July 22, 2009
Page 2
area for each lot, including employee dwelling units, agricultural out-buildings and all
permitted accessory structures, shall be 7500 square feet." Finally, the exact language
of the Subdivision Improvements Agreement is included as the "Floor Area
Limitation' under Article 7 of the Deed of Conservation Easement. Any and all
references to size limitations are specifically stated as "floor area' limitations.
When Mr. Reither was purchasing the property in 2004, he was provided
with a written and signed confirmation from you (copy attached) stating that,
I [Lance Clarke] agree that the Davis/Donnelly Lot Split qualifies as a
County approved subdivision. Therefore, under the currently adopted
Pitkin County Land Use Code, Lot 2 of the Davis/Donnelly Lot Split is
permitted to develop the 7,500 sq. ft. of floor area that is specified in
Resolution 91-93. The County will calculate floor area for the property
based on the Land Use Code definition of floor area that is in effect at the
time of building permit.
Later in 2004, Jody Edwards (attorney) argued on behalf of Mr. Reither
that the D/D Lot Split approvals did not specify that the 7,500 square foot floor
area limit was to be based on the Land Use Code definition of floor area in effect
at the time of building permit; instead, Mr. Edwards argued this limit should
have been based on the rules in effect at the time of the land use approvals. Mr.
Edwards' arguments were unsuccessful as the County, with advice from the
County Attorney, maintained its position that the floor area limit is based on the
rules in effect at the time of building permit application. Consequently, Mr.
Reither was denied the right to develop 750 square feet of exempt garage and
4,000 square feet of exempt below grade space due to land use code changes
enacted between the time of the land use approvals and his purchase and the
time of his building permit application.
Mr. Reither then relied upon the County's determination in preparing
plans, submitting a building permit and developing a home without exempt
below grade or garage space. While Mr. Reither and Lot 2 of the D/D Lot Split
lost significant development rights as the result of Code amendments that were
duly adopted prior to his application for a building permit, there have since been
additional duly adopted Code amendments that clearly run in his favor. In the
current case, the Code now makes clear that up to 58 square feet of "barn' (as
such is defined and limited in the Code) per acre of land area is exempt and does
not count as floor area.
l1®~Jvn~
L.at2, Davin/DonnellyLat Split-MiuorAmendmentApplication
July 22, 2009
Page 3
As mentioned above, when the D/D Lot Split was approved, both lots
were then entitled to 7,500 square feet of "floor area," which at that time also
allowed the development of each lot to include another 750 square feet of garage
as well as another 4,000 square feet of below grade space because garage and
below grade spaces were not considered "floor area." However, when that rule
changed in 2000 making garage and below grade spaces count as "floor area;'
the County took the position that the ability to add such spaces above and
beyond the 7,500 square foot limit was lost (implicit in this position is agreement
that the ability to have such exempt spaces was previously allowed under the
terms of the approvals). If Code amendments can result in Mr. Reither losing
certain rights, then by the same principle, there is certainly the potential for Code
amendments that can and, indeed, have resulted in his gaining of rights.
In 2006, the Code was again amended at Section 6-30-130(a) to make clear
that on any parcel of greater than 20 acres but less than 160 acres, a "barn' of up
to 58 square feet per acre (approximately 8,640 square feet of "barn;' in the case
of Lot 2, D/D Lot Split) is "exempt from GMQS and does not count as floor area." It
is recognized that the language of the D/D Lot Split restrictions state that the
limitation on floor area includes barns, but in the case of Lot 2, the first 8,642
square feet or so of "barn' does not count as or amount to "floor area." Instead,
any barn square footage in excess of 8,642 square feet (58 square feet per acre) is
counted as floor area and would come out of/count against the 7,500 square foot
limitation. This position is further supported by current Code Section 5-20-80,
Measurement of Gross Floor Area, which states the following:
Gross floor area is calculated by adding areas included in the
measurement of floor area, pursuant to Sec. 5-20-70, and the following
exemptions from floor area: belozo-grade space, garages and carports,
pursuant to Sec. 5-20-70(g)(1 and 2). Gross floor area measurement
excludes barns, and floor area types exempt from the calculation of floor
area pursuant to Sec. 6-30-140 and Sec. 5-20-70(a-e),
respectively.[emphasis added]
To date, staff has taken a position that Mr. Reither's rights under the
current Code to build "barn' square footage that does not count as floor area
cannot be recognized without approval of a Minor Amendment to the
Development Permit approving the D/D Lot Split. As such, Mr. Reither is
seeking a "Minor Amendment" to re-confirm the official, written County
position taken in 2004, which held that, "The County will calculate floor area for the
property based on the Land Use Code definition for floor area that is in effect at the time
of building permit." In other words, Mr. Reither is seeking the adoption of
l~ ~ '. I f?
'. i•
Lot 2, Davis/Donnelly Lat Split- MiuorAmeudmentApplication
July 22, 2009
Page 4
language applicable to the D/D Lot Split making clear that, like below grade and
garage space at the time of the original approvals, and like virtually every other
property in Pitkin County, up to 58 square feet per acre of "barn' is not "floor
area' and does not count against the floor area limitations applicable to his
property.
Pursuant to Section 2-20-150(b) of the Code, a minor amendment to any
development permit is one that the Community Development Director
determines to meet the nine (9) criteria cited below. Each applicable criterion is
provided below in indented and italicized print, and each is followed by a
response demonstrating consistency and/or compliance therewith, as applicable.
(1) [The amendment] Is consistent with action(s) taken during previous
development approvals for the property; and
In light of the County's 2004 determination, the previous approvals for the
subject property contemplated development in accordance with the definition of
floor area at the time of building permit application. As such, the original
approvals allowed for development of up to 7,500 square feet of floor area, plus
spaces/structures that did not count as "floor area." For example, under the
original approvals one could have developed the full 7,500 square feet of floor
area plus 750 square feet of garage (attached or detached) and 4,000 square feet
of below grade space notwithstanding the fact that the language in the approvals
stated that, "The maximum total floor area shall be limited to 7,500 sq. ft. in each
building envelope (including barns, art studio and any other accessory structures)." In
other words, while the language of the approvals stated that the 7,500 square
foot limitation applied to "other accessory structures;' a detached garage of 750
square feet would not have been considered to fall within the limitation since
such a garage would not include any "floor area' as the term was then defined.
By the same token and using the exact terms of the 2004 ruling, Section 6-
30-130(a) of the current Code makes clear that on any parcel of greater than 20
acres but less than 160 acres, a "barn' of up to 58 square feet per acre
(approximately 8,640 square feet of "barn;' in the case of Lot 2, D/D Lot Split) is
"exempt from GMQS and does not count as floor area." It is recognized that the
language of the D/D Lot Split restrictions state that the limitation on floor area
includes barns, but in the case of Lot 2, the first 8,642 square feet or so of "barn'
does not count as or amount to "floor area." Instead, any barn square footage in
excess of 8,642 square feet (58 square feet per acre) is counted as floor area and
would come out of/count against the 7,500 square foot limitation. Accordingly,
;ni~~1{~(7~:
Lot 2, Davis/Donnelly Lat Split - MinorAmendment Application
July 22, 2009
Page 5
the proposed amendment is fully consistent with actions taken during previous
development approvals for the property in 1990,1991 and 2004.
(2) [The amendment] Does not change the use of the proposed development
between residential, commercial and tourist accommodation uses; and
The residential and accessory agricultural use of the property will not
change as a result of the proposed amendment.
(3) [The amendment] Does not change the basic character of the approved use of
land on which the activity occurs, including basic visual appearance and
method of operation; and
The proposed amendment will not at all change the basic character of the
approved use of land. The original approvals included a building envelope for
residential and accessory structures as well as a separate "Agricultural
Outbuilding Envelope' to accommodate a barn(s). The approvals also include
provisions requiring the use and maintenance of landscaping for visual screening
of residential and other structures. Also, since the approvals were originally
granted, Snowmass Creek Road has been designated a scenic roadway; however,
the approved building envelopes are not visible from Snowmass Creek Road.
Therefore, the proposed amendment is fully consistent with and does not change
the basic character envisioned with the originally approved uses, including the
basic visual appearance and method of operation.
(4) [The amendment] Does not constitute a new land development activity; and
As mentioned above, the previous approvals allowed for single-family
residential use as well as agricultural buildings (barns) on the subject property.
The approvals also allowed for development of an employee dwelling unit
attached to either the single-family residence of an accessory agricultural
structure (barn). The proposed amendment does not contemplate a new land
development activity at all; rather, it seeks to clarify that the current Code and
definition of "floor area' relative to "barns' applies to the subject property
equally and without bias in exactly the same manner that the current Code no
longer allows exempt garage and below grade square footage. The applicant is
not seeking to amend the building envelopes or approved uses of the property.
(5) [The amendment] Does not increase off-site impacts in the surrounding
neighborhood; and
L.at 2, Davif~Donnelly L.otSplit- MinorAmendmentApplication
Judy 22, 2009
Page 6
The amendment will have no off-site impacts in the surrounding
neighborhood. The property is relatively remote and well hidden from
surrounding properties. A barn is already allowed.
(6) [The amendment] Does not endanger the public health, safety or eoelfare;
and
The amendment will in no quantifiable or other way endanger the public
health, safety or welfare.
(7) [The amendment] Does not violate any Land Use Code standard; and
The amendment is fully consistent with all Land Use Code standards. In
fact, the amendment seeks to clarify that the current Code and definition of
"floor area' relative to "barns' applies to the subject property equally and
without bias in exactly the same manner that is applies to virtually every
property in Pitkin County of greater than 20 acres in area.
(8) [The amendment] Does not substantially increase the need for on-site
parking or utilities, or affect affordable housing generation; and
The proposed amendment will have no impacts relative to the need for
on-site parking or utilities, nor will it in any way affect affordable housing
generation. The County regulates parking and affordable housing requirements
relative to residential use/intensity; these requirements do not apply to barn
development. A barn will not generate increased needs relative to utilities either.
(9) [The amendment] Does not increase the floor area off the use by more than
five (5) percent or decrease the open space on the site by more than five (5)
percent.
The amendment will not at all (0%) increase "floor area;' as defined by
Pitkin County. Again, Section 6-30-130(a) of the current Code makes clear that
on any parcel of greater than 20 acres but less than 160 acres, a "barn' of up to 58
square feet per acre (approximately 8,640 square feet of "barn;' in the case of Lot
2, D/D Lot Split) is "exempt from GMQS and does not count as floor area." The
amount of open space on the site is already established through designated
building envelopes and wildlife conservation easements; these will not be
changed at all (0%).
L.at 2, Davi.clDonnelly Lat Split- MinorAmendment Application
July 22, 2009
Page 7
It is respectfully requested that you please confirm by approval of this
application for Minor Amendment to a Development Permit that: the current
Land Use Code provides the right to build on Lot 2 of the Davis/Donnelly Lot
Split up to 8,642 square feet of "barn' (as such is defined in the Code) exempt
from both the calculation of floor area and the floor area limitations of the
Davis/Donnelly Lot Split approvals; and the permitted size of a "barn' on this
lot will be dictated by the Land Use Code definition of floor area that is in effect
at the time of building permit. It is further requested that such approval be
granted three years of vested property rights.
It is hoped that this application and the requests contained herein can be
approved in a timely manner. Should you have any questions or require any
additional information, please contact Haas Land Planning, LLC.
Very truly yours,
Haas Land Planning, LLC
Mi Haas
Owner/Manager
cr. Chris Reither, Property Owner
c:/my dowmen[s/PitCo Applications/Aeither/Minor Amend Application Letter_7-09
PITKIN COUNTY PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT: Lot 2, Davis/Donnelly Lot Split -- Amendment to Development Permit/Subdivision Amendment
LOCATION: 4305 Snowmass Creek Road PID# 2645-114-01-002
ZONING: RS- 30
OWNER: Chr' er Four Fo, ~ Ll~
REPRESENTATIVE: Mitch Haas PHONE and EMAIL: 925-7819 mhaas@sopris.net
DATE: July 2, 2009 PLANNER: Lance Clarke, 920-5452
Type of Application: Amendment to Development Permit
Descripfion of ProjectNevelopment: Applicant wishes to amend floor azea restriction provisions of the approved
Subdivision/Lot Split for Lot 2 (Resolution and SIA). Applicant desires to build a barn on the property.
Land Use Code Sections to be addressed in letter of request (application):
Sec. 2-20-150(b): Minor Amendments
Sec. 1: Pitkin County Application Manual; General Application Information
Staff will refer the application to the following agencies: CDOW, 5nbwmass/Capitol Caucus
Review by: Administrative
Public Hearing: No.
FEES: $773 (make check payable to "Pitkin County Treasurer")
• Planning Office flat fee: $748 (non-refundable; based on 3 hours of staff time; if staff review time exceeds 3.6 hours, the
Applicant will be charged for additional time above 4 hours at a rate of $249/hour)
• Web Technology fee: $25
To apply, submit 4 cople3 of the following information, unless noted otherwise:
1. Summary letter explaining the request, suggesting the requested amendments, providing background on prior
approvals and permits, and addressing compliance with the Code sections listed above;
2. Proof of ownership of subject property;
3. Pazcel description, including legal description and vicinity map;
4. Total fee for review of the application;
5. Signed fee agreement (1 copy);
6. Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the representative (1 copy). All owners wishing to change
deed restriction must sign the application;
7. Copy of this preapp form (I copy)
NOTES:
- PLEASE SUBMIT ONE UNBOUND AND ONE-SIDED COPY OF YOUR COMPLETE APPLICATION. PLEASE
SUBMIT TWO-SIDED COPIES OFALL REMAINING COPIES OF YOUR APPLICATION (IF POSSIBLE). THE
PARCEL IDs SHOULD BE INCLUDED ONALL DOCUMENTS INCL UDED IN YOUR APPLICATION.
- ALL MAPS SHALL BE FOLDED.
- AT LEAST ONE COPY OF APPLICATION SHALL HAVE ALL DOCUMENTS AT NO LARGER THAN 11 ' X 17"
SHEETS.
- This pre-application conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The information
provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staff's interpretations based upon
representations of the applicant. Additional information maybe required upon a complete review of the application.
~~.. ,r b
VICINITY MAP - 4305 SNOWMASS CREEK ROAD
PARCEL ID # 2645-114-01-002
wad
~ °`'~'~ ~
~ _
~ ~'
Q
~~ ~fl~
'azcel Detail ~F pF QuI~RSµ.ip Page 1 of 3
Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer Property. Search ~ Assessor Subset Queue ~ A_ssessor Sales. Search
Clerk & Recorder ReceRtion Search
Basic Building Characteristics ~ Tax Information
Parcel Detail ~ Value Detail ~ Sales Detail ~ Residential/Commer_cial Improvement Detail
Land Detail ~ Phot~raphs
Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2008 Mill Levy
014 R013494 264511401002
Owner Name and Address
FOUR FORKS LLC
422 N WARSON RD
ST LOUIS, MO 63124
Legal Description
Subdivision: DAMS/DONNELLEY LOT SPLIT Lot: 2
Location
Physical Address: 4305 SNOWMASS CREEK RD SNOWMASS
Subdivision: DAMS/DONNELLEY LOT SPLIT
Land Acres: 0
Land Sq Ft: 0
2009 Property Tax Valuation Information
Actual Value Assessed Value
Land: 2,500,000 199,000
Improvements: 7,683,300 611,590
Total: 10,183,300 810,590
Sale Date: 6/6/2004
Sale Price: 1,600,000
~~ l~~o
ittp://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber-R013494 7/15/2005
?arcel Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential Buildin s: 1
Number of Comm/Ind Buildin s: 0
Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics
STORAGE AREA: 210
STONE PATIO: 455
2ND FLOOR: 1,847
ROOF DECK: 440
FINISHED GARAGE HEATED: 534
FIRST FLOOR: 4,810
Total Heated Area: 6,657
Pro erty Class: SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEMEN
Actual Year Built: 2006
Effective Year Built: 2006
Bedrooms• 5
Baths: 6.5
Quality of Construction: EXCEL T13+
Exterior Wall: STONE VEN
Exterior Wall: WOOD SD GO
Interior Wall: PLASTER
Interior Wall: DRYWALL
Floor: WOOD
Floor CARPET
Heat Type: FORCED AIR
Heatin Fuel: GAS
Roof Cover: PROPANEL
Roof Structure: GABLE/HIP
Neighborhood• ~ ASS-CAP CRK-FORK TO SHIELD
Super Nbad: SMASS CAP CRK
Tax Information
No Tax Records Found
~~~-i~~1
Top of ['age
ittp://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R013494
Page 2 of 3
7/15/2005
July 15, 2009
Pitkin County Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: 4305 Snowmass Creek Road Minor Amendment Application
To whom it may concern:
I hereby authorize Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) and Klein
Cote Edwards, LLC (KCE) to act as my designated and authorized
representatives with respect to the land use application being
submitted to your office for the property located at 4305 Snowmass
Creek Road (Parcel ID No. 2645-114-01-002). HLP and KCE are
authorized to submit an application for a Minor Amendment to a
Development Permit, as well as any other incidental reviews. HLP
and KCE are also authorized to represent me in meetings with
County staff, boards, and commissions.
Should you have any need to contact me during the course of
your review, please do so through Haas Land Planning, LLC, whose
contact information is provided in the application.
Sincerely,
Chris Reither
Four Forks, LLC
r~~ ~11?
;;'~ J :,
PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEES
PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and Four Forks LLC (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
L APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for a Minor Amendment to a
Development Permit for building of a barn, (hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 058-2001
establishes a fee stmcture for Planning applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition
precedent to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the
application. APPLICANT and COUNTY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties for
APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to
APPLICANT. APPLICANT agrees be will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make
additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred.
COUNTY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process
APPLICANT'S application.
4. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to
complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of
County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to
make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to
decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of its right
to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial
deposit in the amount of 773* which is for 3 hours of staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the
initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to COUNTY to reimburse the
COUNTY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such
periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that
failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing.
PITffiN COUNTY APPLICANT:
Cindy Houben
Community Development Director
Chris eit , Four F LLC
Signature
7-2Z - ZOo~
Mailing Address:
*: $748 =Planning Flat Fee; and $25 =Web Technology Fee
422 N. Warson Road
St. Louis, MO 63124
~~ l~~v
PITHIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
August 11, 2009
Mitch Haas
201 North Mill Street, Suite #108
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Four Forks LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
(CASE P075-09; PID 2645-114-O1-002)
Dear Mr. Haas:
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined
that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional
information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the
application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly.
If you have any questions, please call Lance Clarke, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5452.
Sincerely,
Bonnie Waechtler
Administrative Assistant
PITHIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
t 30 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
To: Snowmass/Capitol Creek Caucus
Colorado Division of Wildlife
FROM: Lance Clarke, Community Development Department
Re: Four Forks LLC Minor Amendment to a Development Permit
(PID 2645-114-O1-002; Case P075-09)
DATE: August 11, 2009
Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by
Four Forks LLC. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review the
application.
Please return your comments to me by Friday, September 11, 2009.
PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION MATERIALS TO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT IF YOU HAVE NO FURTHER NEED OF THEM.
ON OCTOBER 1sT, 2009 PITKIN COUNTY INTENDS TO GO PAPERLESS WITH
ALL FUTURE LAND USE REFERRALS. WE WILL BE SENDING OUT LETTERS
TO OBTAIN UP TO DATE CONTACT INFORMATION. PLEASE CHECK OUT
THE LINK BELOW FOR THIS LAND USE CASE REFERRAL.
httu://www.aspenpitkin.com/~dfs/debts/7/P075 09 app.pdf
If you require a paper copy of this application contact Bonnie W aechtler at
bomiie.waechtler~,co.oitkin.co.us or 920-5109.
Thank you.
PITKIN C~,.1NTY COMMUNITY DEVELC,,,,AAENT
Permit Receipt
RECEIPT NUMBER 00027997
Name: Chris Reither Date:7/22/2009
Project Address: 4305 SNOWMASS CREEK RD
Type: check # 2111
Permit Number Fee Description
0075.2009.PLAN PP- Flat Fee
0075.2009.PLAN PP- Clerk Tech Fee
Total:
Amount
748.00
25.00
773.00