HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.273513300017DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN TAE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x17)
w, ,
rHrt~.c~ w: ~u vv w-w ~ ~ ~ - ..
ASE NAME: Towning 1041 Special R Appr
-- 8 GVYICS.I IiNJC MV Irvyo-oc
Planners ~r
PROJ AODR: 0960 Castle Creek Rd
OWNIAPP:. Towning, Herbert R. ADR~- GS2:~r PHN:~-
REP: ADR:~ C/S/Z:~-,PHN:~-
Emall Addri ALLOCATED HOURS:r
FEES DUE:- .FEES RCVD:~~ % OVER: ~-
REF:r~ BY~-., DUE:r-
MTG BATE r'-R-E-V` ~BODY PH NOTICED ~ DATE OF FINAL ACTION: ~-
NO....__ ~ BOCC Reso: 81-78 #234806
~..- No - , BOCC Ord: ~-
REMARKS ' PZ: 83-8
HRG OFF:
CLOSED:- BY: ~- ~, HO INDEX:.~~
PLAT RECORDED~r' PLAT (BK,PG):~- ADMIN INDEX:
VRAPPROVALDATE::~- ~VREXPIRES:~~
I. .. _._... - -- -i
CASE TYP2s. CASETYPS:-
CASE TYP3i~ CASE~TYP7:
CASE TYP4:.' DateScanned: 6/24/09
File Locatlonf. IBox 172
~--.
r
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
Pitkin County ,~
STAFF: -I~f~`~l~tr7~ f~[C~',C~' ~'N~GZ`~" f ~' 1'1 y'
APPLICANT:- T ~,~ ,f',h/>.~yrrf
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:-_ J` .. O ~ d~~ .J- ~iL..~~C ~' ~ r't
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
5 Step: Subdivision
___.__ GMP ~~
Lot Split
PUD
2 Step: Special Review
Rezoning
1 Step: P & Z Review Onl
Employee Dwelling Unit - Special Approval
1041 Hazard Review - Special Approval (_
BOCC Review Onl
Subdivision Exemption
DATES CERTIFIED COMPLETE:
REVLEW BY P & Z REVIEW 6Y BOCC
General Submission
Detailed Submission
Final Plat
No. ~/5 - N
FE
RE
RRALS:
\
/
7~ C
ounty Engineer Building Inspector U:S. Forest Service
X Environmental .Health. County Manager State Forest Service
Trails Director Col, Div. of Highways Div, of Water Resources
Col. Geologic Survey Fed. Aviation Admin, Sanitation District
Division of Wildlife Mt. Sopris Soils Water District
Water Conservation Bd. Holy Cross Electric Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Mountain Bell State Planning Office School District
Fire Marshall County Attorney Environmental Coord.
Housing Director Other, ~ °~
~
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW Genera}-Submiss -~~n
-: `'~' " ~ ~ `"' ~ ' ~ ~~` ~ ' ~'~~
i ,
, - 1~
~~~{t~ ~
_{ -
1
1. ~~1d D
C
~
~
~ ,~ ,~, ~.~<
~ -
c
~
~'
~~
~~
~
1 v~ ,
>
~
~
J ~
~
~
.._
er~~-o-
1
y
~~V
I
4U 7
~ ~ ( .. ,~ voc~
<
l A.~l~~ 1 ~rA
Ll
,
<~.
(~e. ~~ /~
c~-C L'
~ Q
tel
,T c
1 ~ _._
.
~
i.~tlaV
~-:4 r
~L
~ ~~
~ _
.
(
,
.~ . ~
1 j (~~or) j .
..
~-= =~
r,
T~'~;~
~ti7 i~l
~ ~~ f n i~_~~ A-'~-- ~~.U.~1 ."~ ., i,- }}
l Lc~ 1 ,~~ ~ ~ ~9-. ,~ ~-~ ~. ~~ C}LJ AO_(i;
r `~ C~11VA ~~' ~ ( ~~, ~~~~ `~C('Q `.1 ~w Cvli ~ I„~~.~- ~11) n~~'~ i~. '. .1 ~~ fV ;•1 'l' ~'1 r1~ '•;f
i". F4: ~
h ~
~ ~
-,1 _ ` 11 ~ ~ ~ ~
~.
~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ' 1
-1 ~• a ,,,:~ ,1~ w,r~ ti 0.~n
~ ~~ ~
:1 I
~n C~P I1', !~'irr' __~ (' r~ytll (~
{i
`~". f'i'i ~ O_~.t ~ ~~ J' ~ o ' ' ~ i r
~6CC-R~i~fid-- Genet(~al"-~abm~rss~ia
)U~I~. ,1; c,~p ~~ ,p i, .Cr -' pr1', ~,.f -~,/ t~r :;.t.OEtl,,
~; ~
~ -~-
~~~_!„
.1~ _ _
i..,~,: n ~ i. v. ~ ~ P ~ , i „~-l ~ ~1 e~~ i :. J~ tl G~ .
~~~( ~ _~~t>r~9_<V'~ C~l~~ ~1- --~ ~~ ~ ~~-L n -- I,~~ ~~ ~~-~0 2 ~ 0C~ ~('~ ln~I ~"~
Cl~t`-"~6~ ~l ~~r~ ~'< Q C d Cl ` - ``,~~ r Cl ! ~• ' a_ ~/~` -~~ ~ Q I,-D f ('} n „~~{t ~, ~ "-~-r r,. ~ ~~',. _ ~~
05~~ LIC-.~4 ~,~f~~, ~~ i~>ili k,;c r% ' ~ I -I~~Q ~ fl;r„v~.:~/ ~ - ~,•.:_~ 'L%~r
~.-, V Z.vls.,,~ j,-~_ v~ w r. ~-~- C. - So -~ 1 O-~t-' i-l ~'_. C,~-{ ( ~ c `>' ~ C ~ A l ; 'l.C ~ q~,; , , ~ ~
~~; /oi ~ 1 '; n -~~;-a t . ~ - v ~- '. i 'j • - l . R2501 Ut10fl ISO. _ -~~
~ , ~ ~~
P & Z REVIEW -Detailed Submission:
BOCC REVIEW -Detailed Submission:
BOCC REVIEW -Final Plat:
Resolution No.
ROUTING: County Engineer County Attorney
Bldg. Department Housing Director
Environmental Health Environmental Coordinator
Other
-_
RESOLUTION 0f THE
PITY.IN COUNIY PLANNING AfdD ZONING COfdh1ISSI0N
GRAIE~fIf1G FiNAI_ 1041 SPECIAL RLVIC.':1 AI'PRCVAL
-~
FOR A SIIdGL.E FAMILY RLSIDENCG
ON THE "fOWfdING PAR%EL
Resolution fdo. t33 - ~/
~d ~'r. 1,
d
41HERLi{S, Herbert R. Tov;ning, representing Lilia N.V., a Netherlands
Antilles Company, is the ovrner of a parcel of land, more specifically described
in Attachment "A", and
ldl!EREAS, the 5.09 aci°e parcel was subdivided prior to the institution of
the AF-1 zone on the site, and
WHEP.GAS, final approval can be given for this request by the Planning ~u,d
Zoning Commission as per Section 6-E~.1(e) of th^_ Land Use Cede, and
h!HFREAS, the site is in an area of geologic hazards for to~hich r~itijation
techniques have been recrmn,ended by Dr. Nick Lampiris and Lincoln--Je'dore, and
WHFRCF~,S, an 'ir~riyai:.ion ditch uphill frem the proposed b<~ildinn, site is a
potential hazai°d if it sho!~id breach; and
WHEREAS, the build5n,;~ site is sloping end ranges from 15 percent to nearly
^r ~-; t
.~(1 ih. c ~ f. In -ile Unpel' SeCtl OYIJ alUi pl'eSBI?tS 50!ile s10,^. t~ Stdf)l1lt:V ::r'nil PINS, alid
hlHEREAS, the Colorado Geologic Survey concurs with the reconunendai-ions in
the Lir~co~li~-OeVure and Laro;~~~iris r,=sports and suhstant~iates i;fra~t fol lowing Lhe
recommendations should result in no adverse geologic effects, and
41HGREi1S, the vreil permit issued for this property 'is for use inside the
dwelling unit and cannot be used for irrigation purposes, and
WHEREAS, the proposed structure is set back on the parcel as much as possible
and efforts will be made to retain as many of the er,isi:ir.g frees as possible, and
4liIERE,'S, the applicant has vernally committed tc eliminate th,~ ,;rn-I:ing
turnout area on Castle Creek Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, GE IT RESOLVED by the PiLl:in County Planning and Zoning
Conrrris;ion that 1041 special review approval is hereby granted for the consT.ruct-ion
of a single faniil,y residence on the Town~ing parcel order the following cond~it.-ions:
1. The foundation be engineered by a licensed structural engineer in
accordance vrith the subsurface soil report.
Z. Tide use of e>;tended concrete re'ta~ining walls at the rear of the hou:c
and the prohosed rock deflection screen.
3. Piping or l'in'ing of the irrigation ditch to prevent further breaching.
'this work slwuld be coordinated with the ditch owner.
,_.
-?-
4. A Couni:y Road Access Permit must be obtained prior to driveway con-
struction.
5. No access permit will be given for a parking area on Castle Creak
Road.
6. The well water can be used inride the house only ar:d not for irrigation
purposes.
7. bacteriologic and chemical tests on the well must be performed and
meet state standards before the issuance of a buildii,g permit.
B. The final design of the septic system be reviewed and approved by tl~e
County Sanitarian.
9. /111 disturbed cut and fill areas will be reseeded with natural grasses
and as many of the relocated trees as possible. The lar~dscapin9 4rill
be finished the su!nmcr following construction.
10. Driveway be regraded so tfet it is at Castle Q•eek Road grade 20 f>et
prior to entrance on the County road.
Approved by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular
meeting on fehruary 22, 1983.
PITKIN COUPlTY PL./;P;idiNG AiID ZOMIidG
. , CCMfi; SSIOiJ
cy ~ - - _ _ __---- -- -----
P1icl~uel 6a~~.ra~n, Acting Chairman
ATT!_ST:
Levis Sc+inlan, Dee~,ity CoGmty~ iaerk
,- -
~,~~,; Uzi ~ ;e,;;,'3
SXIIII3TT "n" To wnrre~r.'.rY nrl:l~
A t:.ract of land bei_r.g part of the Beatrice Pl.accr, U.S.14.S. 1;0. 11426 situaCed i.n
the t;W r--;, and the SL+'4 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 We.^>t of thr_ 5th
Principal Me::idi.a:n, Pitkin County, Colorado and beir:g more fully descril,ed as
fol] o~.as:
Aeginni.ng at Corner IFo. 1 nf. sai.•d rir_atrice Flacer U.S.M.S. ^lo
i
' . 11425;
wi[h the
her t. e:r:i_v
on
ir.t ersect
Thence N 31`07'17" E 49L. S4 feet to the point o! i
boundar}. line of th" County road;
id Westerly boundary
l
"
dine;
~.
ong sa
W 141.25 feet a
1'hencc S 1G"10':11
ri th arc of c::rve t:o
e
Thence 272.75 feet zlong said hesterly boundary line an
the ].eft hrr_ang a radius of 10852.12 feet;
boundary line and the
l
arc of a
reverse c,:xve
y
T},ence ]45.3 feet along said wester
to the right having a radius o1 41.20.25 feet;
S l7°::'?'S3" W 47.96 feet a).nng sri,d westerly bound:~~i-_y
h li,:e;
h
ence
T
n bounda; lin_• and the
.6 feet along said ses'cerl.y `}'
252 .,rc of a e
curve -.- t
.
Thence
right having a radius of 5161.3% feet; the
e nd
li arc of a comround r,urv r_
n
Thence 316.;13 feet alun}; .aid Westerly boundary
to the right }:avir.g a radius of 917.45 feee;
1 / V { 7 ,
Thence h ~~5 26" W 335. 59reet;
.
Thence N 4/,"07'06" E 638.70 feet to the Point of P,egi_nning,
Coc:nt:y of Fitkin, State of Colorado•
- \ ~ r
~~-
- --° RCCORDtiU AT 2:02`1'.M. 13 AUCUS'1.', 1981 LORL'1"1'A 1SANNIiRr RLCORllI:R (~'\
\_,
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY '
~si4~~)~3 COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, y00~~~~ ;,,,"~~'`
RRCliI"!'ION f/
GRANTING GEtdERAL SUBMISSION APPROVAL
FOR A LOT SPLIT AND ATTACIiED CARETAKER UNITS
ON THE
Resolution No.
WHEREAS, Hans B. and June Cant~re the owners of a parcel of land
located~in Lot 13 in Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 W. of the 6th
P.M., and
WHEREAS, the parcel contains 179,732 square feet and would be divided to
form two lots of approximately 86,000 and 94,000 square feet, and
WFIEREAS, the R-15 zone requires 15,000 square feet minimum lot area and this
is a low-density alternative, and
41HEREAS, a minimum of seven off-street parking spaces shall be provided
on each lot, and
WHEREAS, two of the four units will be deed restricted employee units, and
WHEREAS, both. parcels shall be restricted against further future develop-
ment, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Board of County Commissioners
at their 1°egular meeting on July 27, 1981 at which time the recommendations of
the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Planning Office, referral agencies and
members of the general public were accepted,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, Colorado, tt)at approval fora lot split and two attached care-
taker units be hereby granted subject to the following conditions:
1. Utility provisions being finalized.
2. Both parcels restricted against further residential or commercial
development.
3. Applicant agreeing to provide a trail easement.
4. Applicant agreeing to provide road easement fora 60 foot right-of-way.
.. J',/.. ~ ... r r ....
Approved by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting
on August 10, 1981.
\ti ~,~,
I~:
,~` i
.. ~=
AR~'E ~ (~
±.. •.
.~
a ..
.~
C unxy,,C,1er
APPR01'ED AS TO FORM:
County At orney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMh1ISSI0IJERS OF PITKIIV
COUNTY, COLORADO
~ r
/ f ~~
Bob Child, Chairman
r
MEMORANDUM
T0: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: Towning Special Review
DATE: February 8, 1983
Location: A tract of land being part of the Beatrice Placer, U.S.M.S. No.
11426, situated in the NW; and the SW; of Section 13, Township
10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. (on the west side of
Castle Creek Road about 1 mile south of Aspen), more specifically
described in Attachment A.
Zoning: AF-1
Parcel Size: 5.09 acres
Applicant's
Request: 1041 special review approval to build a single family residence
of approximately 7,000 square feet plus an integral enclosed garage
of approximately 1,000 square feet in an area of geologic hazards.
Referral
Comments: County Engineer's Office
Recommendations of Lincoln-De~ore and Dr. Lampiris should be
adhered to. The applicant states driveway site distance is in
excess of 350 feet, which is adequate. The driveway should be
at Castle Creek Road grade 20 feet prior to its entrance on to
the County road. The applicant will need a road access permit.
Environmental Health Department
"Water is to be supplied from an existing well drilled in 1981.
The indicated quantity (10 to 14 gmp) is adequate, although for
this large a structure, a water storage tank is recommended.
Bacteriological and chemical quality should be demonstrated to
meet state standards before a building permit is issued.
An on-site sewage disposal system of conventional construction
and design should be able to be constructed to conform to County
regulations. Percolation rates are within acceptable limits and
the slopes are not excessive. Care should be taken to locate
the system away from the well. Due to the amount of subsurface
moisture and the potential strong subsurface seepage patterns from
the west and north indicated in the Lincoln-Devore Geologic Report
we would strongly recommend and may require a subdrain along the
uphill boundaries of the site to incorporate drainage provisions
for the leach field into design requirements, or that a separate
uphill subsurface drain be provided as a curtain drain uphill of
the leach field. This is particularly important on a site such
as this, as the well is located downhill and within the seepage
patterns from the leach field. Without such a measure, there is
some potential of contamination moving from the leach field to the
well with the rest of the subsurface seepage characteristic of
this site."
Division of Water Resources
"Well 119607 is indicated to be the source of water. This well is
limited to use inside one single family dwelling. Outside use for
lawn and garden irrigation and watering livestock is prohibited.
The proposal indicates an irrigation ditch uphill from the proposed
building site is a potential hazard if it should breach. We would
concur with the consultant's recommendation that the ditch be
improved to prevent such problems. We ask that the owner of the
ditch be contacted and that this proposal be coordinated with the
ditch owner.
~~
Memo: Townin9 Special Review
February 8, 1983
Page Two
Our major concern relates to the site plan which includes a
landscape plan. The landscape plan calls for apple trees, turf,
and other plants which require irrigation. Landscape irrigation
is not an allowable use of the referenced well. Use of the well
for this purpose could result in curtailment of the use of the
well. No other water source is mentioned in the review.
We cannot recommend approval of this proposal as presented since
the landscape plan would apparently require illegal use of the
well. We would be happy to review additional information concerning
this proposal."
Colorado Geologic Surve
"We concur with the findings and reiterate the recommendations in
the Lincoln-DeVore and Lampiris reports. If these recommendations
are observed there should be no adverse geologic effects. The
rockfall retaining wall above the structure should be designed on
the basis of the largest credible rockfall event which can reasonably
be expected to occur on the tract."
Planning Office
Review: The two most significant geologic concerns associated with this
site, according to Nick Lampiris, consulting geologist, are the
outcroppings of rock on the steeper sections of the property and
in the cliffs above and the slope stability problems of the sloping
building site. The slope ranges from 15 percent to nearly 30 percent
in the upper sections. The geologic map shows no faults or other
geologic hazards associated with these rock units.
A gulley exists to the north of the homesite, which heads at the site
of a past breach in an irrigation ditch. To ensure that further
breaching of the irrigation ditch does not jeopardize the homesite,
Lampiris recommends that the ditch be piped. There are no running
streams on the site, the ground water table is not high within
close proximity to the homesite and bedrock is considerably below
grade on this site.
An extensive subsurface soils investigation has been undertaken
by Lincoln-DeVore and detailed foundation recommendations made
for the proposed construction of the residence. Lampiris has
further recommended that concrete retaining walls be incorporated
in the rear of the house. The applicant has commited to follow
these recommendations and to add a rock deflection screen about
20 - 30 yards above the structure. It should be noted that this
rockfall potential is not severe, but precautions are being taken
because the possible occurrence could be quite damaging. In fact,
Lampiris' statement concerning this hazard was, "it is my opinion
that, with the presence of a good stand of aspens behind the
house and the fact that very few boulders over the last few
centuries have come as far as this site, this is a minor rather
than a major problem, however, every precaution should be taken so
that rockfall hazard is at a minimum." Attached is the applicant's
commitment to follow these recommendations.
Through the referral process, the Division of Water Resources
informed us that the well permit issued for this property is
for use inside the dwelling unit. The applicant's original
submission incorporated a landscaping plan which would require
irrigation water. A revised plan has been submitted using only
the natural vegetation existing on the site. The parcel is covered
quite heavily with aspen trees and the natural vegetation is, in
the opinion of the Planning Office, very adequate and even preferable
to the introduction of extensive new landscaping.
,, ,.
Memo: Towning Special Review
February 8, 1983
Page Three
In consideration of site design, our comments are that the
access proposed appears to be the most logical offered by the
site. The driveway follows a visible natural grade on the
parcel and will not be a visual intrusion from Castle Creek
Road. The house is set back on the site as far as possible,
considering its proportions. An 8,000 square foot structure
cannot be made invisible, but we would encourage retention of
the maximum number of trees possible.
A parking area/turnout pad is requested by the applicant. The
Planning Office feels strongly that approval of the necessary
access permit should not be given for this. The County Engineer
has verified that his office would not support the request
either. The reasons we oppose such a parking area are the
visual impact of it and safety considerations. The turnout
would be directly across from the Music School entrance, cars
would likely back across Castle Creek Road onto the Music
School Road or they would back out onto Castle Creek Road. The
curve which was cut back to increase safety on Castle Creek
Road is only 150 feet from this proposed turnout. The second
concern is that a parking area right on the road would be more
of a visual intrusion than the house will be. As a practical
solution, extra cars can be parked along the driveway, which is
the easiest place for a pedestrian to access the house by
anyway.
Planning Office
Recommendation:
The Planning Office recommends 1041 special review approval for
construction of a single family residence on the Towning parcel
on Castle Creek Road under the following conditions:
1. The foundation be engineered by a licensed structural
engineer in accordance with the subsurface soil report.
2. The use of extended concrete retaining walls at the rear
of the house and the proposed rock deflection screen.
3. Piping or lining of the irrigation ditch to prevent further
breaching. This work should be coordinated with the ditch
owner.
4. A County Road Access Permit must be obtained prior to
:drive way construction.
5. No access permit will be given for a parking area on
Castle Creek Road.
6. The well water can be used inside the house only and not
for irrigation purposes.
7. Bacteriologic and chemical tests on the well must be
performed and meet state standards before the issuance of
a building permit.
8. The final design of the septic system be reviewed and
approved by the County Sanitarian.
I
..
~,
i ' - _..
... _ ~ ~ -
m
~ ~ United States Forest White River Aspen Ranger District
Department of Service National 806 West Hallam
- Agriculture p,,,-pGr Aspen, C~ 81611
aePir ~a. 1560
Dale February 7 , 1983
r
Peter Guy
Pitkin County Planning
and Zoning Commission
130 South Galena Street
~ Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Mr. Guy:
This letter is in response to your notification of
public hearing concerning the Towning 1041 Special
After looking at the site location and the proposa
residence is not adjacent to or would not have any
Forest land.
However, we would recommend you take the following
eration:
our office of a
Review.
L, we find the family
impacts on National
factors into consid-
1. Check with Randy Cote of the Division of Wildlife regarding
the location of the family dwelling. This area is on a
south-east exposure and within an oakbrush-Aspen type. This
area is within key winter range habitat.
2. The oakbrush is a volatile fuel type which burns very hot and
fast.
3. The soils in the oakbrush type are very unstable and any loss
of cover will make this area prone to soil movement and
slides.
I appreciate the opportunity to comment on this proposal.
Sincerely,
DENNIS E. BSCHOR
District Ranger
~~
$ Fs-szoo-i m pier
,.
. ~ .
., ,,<
;`...
x~' ~~
.u:T -
<
~~ .
-... APl'IiNUIX II
YR0~7ECT NUMD'rai
Section/1'ar.cul
3udD USE PPLTCATION FORM
g'O II1? CvMPI.I;TEU UY APPLICANT:
i
DATE SUUMI'1'TF.D
};Ar:tE Herbert R. Tewning (Lelia N.V.) ____ _
AuDla•:~s2100 West Loop, Suite 1100, Houston, Texas 77027 _~__________
YNONE
213-614-'x132
NAMF ol% pttoJr•.cT _ Towning Residence•
PROJECT ioCATION: (On attached sheet, -locate on zoning :.gyp, sho<+iny tx~undari.es
of any natural hazard and resource areas, any otl:~r special
reyulatory distriets, Section 5, Land Use Code; and locate
on appropriate CSU/F.r?A }laps any areas riot~covcred Ly the
a)wvc. )
TOTAL AREA 5.09acres
EXISTI}IG USE(S) VdCdnt
PROPOSED USE(S) New residence of approximately 7000 sauare~feat Dlus an in_ r~.'a~
(apprmamale square
footage for cacn) enclosed Qardde G. dDDrOXlmately 1000 snuara fast
PRESENT ZONING OF SITF. AF-1 _ ~• _,.
DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL Residential • _ ~ _ __
TO BE CO.Mt`~SiTED IIY `f11E PLANNING OFFICE .
TYPF. OF APPLICATSON:. REZONING SUBDIVISION
F.: D. EXEM1`TIOJI
• ~SPx.;IAL REVIEIJ ~ 35-acres + SUnDIVISIO`J
u I DING PERMIT RINlh'H
R1:VI}:W PIIASI?: PRE-APPi.~ICATTON ~.
GENF,ItAL SGBMLSSION P. C. AC'PIO}I DATE
' 'DOAt(D ACTTOii __ DATE
' I)ETAI.LI?D SI114MISStION ~ P.C. ACTIO.1 r ~ D::1'E
LtOAitU A(:'1'lU}! ' DA7'r•.
FINAL PLAT DUAIID AC.fI0i1 ~-~ DATi:
~j~
GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS
In accordance with the topographic map furnished with this report, Parcel II
of Beatrice Placer has an average slope in the area of 18° to 20° sloping
down toward the East. According to the geological investigations by
Licoln-DeVore pages 8-26 and Nick Lampiris pages S-7, the hazards associated
with the site are limited to slope stability, minimum rockfall potential
and an irrigation ditch above the property.
Several reccommendations were made to insure that a suitable and safe structure
might be located on the site.
1) To stabilize the structure and slope, a carefully and well-drained shallow
grade beam foundation system, consisting of continuous stem walls and
footings beneath bearittg walls with re-inforced cross connected walls, will
be engineered by a licensed structural engineer in accordance with the
sub-surface soil report.
2) In addressing the potential for rockfall, the reccommendation to use
extended concrete walls on the rear of the house will be initiated as well as
a solid railroad tie rock deflection screen which will be located approximately
20 - 30 yards above the structure.
3) Lampiris also reccommends dealing with possible breaching of the irrigation
ditch above the site. This will be treated with either a bituminus or P.V.C.
lining. More detailed study will be done prior to actual execution of the
system.
-4-
SCENIC QUALITY
The architects and site planners have located a building site which will
both minimize visual .impact and disturb the least natural features and
vegatation possible on the approximately five acre lot. The site is
heavily wooded and creates a natural visuai screen from Castle Creek Road,
the M~~sic School and adjacent neighbors. The building site is on one of
the least wooded areas on the lot, which will minimize tree removal. Scenic
views of the valley from the road will not be interrupted and installation
of electric service and telephone lines will be accomplished with a
minimal obstruction of views. The system of cut and fill balancing will
be practiced, therefore, topsoil removal will be saved and reused on other
areas of the site.
The structure itself will blend with the wooded character of the site by the
use of natural materials on the exterior, i.e., cedar siding, cedar shakes,
etc.
-27-
WATER SUPPLY
A well permit was issued by The Colorado Division of Water Resources and
a domestic well has been drilled by Collins Drilling Company. Per the
attached drilling logs, the well will yield ten (10) to fourteen (14)
gallons per minute of good water. Licoln-DeVore has also addressed the
water supply. See the attached reports by Lampiris page S-land Lincoln-
Devore report page 8-26.
-aa-
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
PO BOX 10935
ASPEN, COLORADO 81811
(303) 925-6020
September 29, 19P2
Jack Miller and Associates
601 East Hleeker
Aspen, Colorado E~1611
RE: Towninq Property
Dear Jack:
I have completed my investigation of that portion of the Towninq
property which will contain the single family dwelling as shown
on the accompanying map. The building site iG on the west
side of Castle Creek Road about one mi1.e south of Aspen in the
northwest quarter of the southwest quarter. Section ]?. T 10 S.
R P5 W. within the Aspen 7~•5 minute quadrangle, Pi*_kin Coun*y.
Colorado.
The site lies on an aspen covered moderate to qen*le dope
to *he eas*_, approximately 1.50 feet from the Castle Creek
Road There is a qulley fust to the north of the staked out
homesite which heads at the site of a past breach in an irri-
ga*_ion ditch. There are some moderate sized boulders on the
property, especially as one gets nearer the steeper portions
of the hillside: these boulders are of Maroon Formation which
outcrops on the cliffs above.
The geology of the site consists of colluvial material lying
on the bedrock formations, possibly interfingering with glacial
moraine material of Quarternary age. The underlying bedrock is
most probably Pennsylvanian-Permian age Maroon Formation, which
consists of hematite-cemented siltstones, sandstones, and some
shales. As mentioned previously, this unit outcrops on the
cliffs above the property. The geologic map shows no faults
or other geologic hazards associated with these rock units
in this vicinity although the Castle Creek fault zone is known
to pass down the Castle Creek Valley. probably near the present
course of Castle Creek.
Apparently the Maroon Formation in the cliffs above is somewhat
shattered or fractured into moderate to small sire bt.ocks
since this is what is visible on the steeper portions of the
slope, including the upper portions of the building site.
This is the most significant problem associated with this site•
the other being slope stability because of the slopine building
site. This slope appears to range frog 15% to perhaps ?n% at
the upper reaches. This in itself should not be a problem if
proper soils engineering is practiced• I have reviewed the
soils report conducted by Lincoln DeVore Tee*ina Lab which
. g_
September 79, 1987 ,
Towning Property
Page 2
indicates that with proper foundation design, a suitable and
safe single family dwelling may b.e constructed on the site.
I strongly recommend that in any cut at the rear of the building
site the foundation wall be in the form of a retaining wall
capable of replacing the support of soils removed during ex-
cavation. Zn addition, this retaining wall should extend at
least four fee*_ above grade and be of at least four inches of
reinforced concrete so as to stop any ®f the one to two foot
diameter boulders which occasionally roll down this hillside,
without significant damage to the home. There Ghould be no
doors or windows on this uphill facing retaining wall and to
further insure the safety of the home, there should be landscaping
at the rear of the house which would slow down, stop. or at
least deflect any rolling rocks. It is my opinion that, with the
presence of a good stand of aspens behind the house and the fact
that very few boulders over the last few centuries have comF
as far as this site, this is a minor rather than a major problem
however, every precaution should be taken so tha*_ rockfall
hazard is at a minimum.
The only other concern I have is that *_he irrigation ditch
above the property could breach, as it did into the pulley
just to the north of the site. and flood the home and do damage
to the foundation. To insure that this does no*_ happen. I
strongly recommend that this ditch be piped or otherwise designed
so as to prevent significant leakage or possible breaching in
the area just above the homesite.
Access to the home is not present, but is designed off the
Castle Creek road on a suitable grade through the aspens to
the site. It does not appear that major cuts will be necessary,
but that there might be some minor sloughing of material onto
this access in the future. This should be more in the form
of nuisance than a danger, but should be considered in the
design of this road. Perhaps some sort of cribbing will be
necessary 1f the cuts are greater than four feet in hei,ghth
along this access road. Water is already available from a
domestic well drilled by Collins Drilling Company to a depth
of approximately sixty feet with a yield of ten to fourteen
gallons per minute according to the Collins records. This
water should be very good and consistent over the years (see
accompanying copy of driller's records). The Lincoln DeVore
report should also accompany my report for its contribution
toward the overall picture.
Waste disposal should be through use of a septic system wish
an accompanying leach field in the vicinity of the area chec'<ed
for percolation rates as shown on the accompanying map. Per-
colation rates in the three holes as numbered on the map were
as follows: hole #1 averaged one inch in ten minu*es+ hole
#' averaged one inch in 8 4 minutes: and hole #3 ave*agPd one
lc -
September 29, 1982
Towning Property
Page 3
inch in 9.4 minutes. These are suitable percolation rates,
but Bob Nelson, the County Sanitation Engineer, should be con-
sulted for his specific recommendations. Bedrock is consider-
ably below grade on this site, and there are no running streams
nor is there a high ground water tatle within close proximity *_o
the site. Consideration should be taken of the road cut ad-
joining the Castle Creek Road so that affluent does not seep
out in this area.
In conclusion, it appears that this site is suitable for the
development of a single family dwelling and that more khan
usual numbers of r_esta and inves*.iaations have already been
conduc*_ed toward this end. If there are furth?r ruestioris.
please ~7o not hesitate to contact me.
Si~ cerely, A
Nic<h/o'/1^/eas/n,L-a~mlp/ir` i~~
Consulting Geologist
NL /Clk
- 7-
,~`
t,,,.
~;.
~;;
,..
~', .
1
r
Lincoln DeVore
1000 West Fillmore Sl.
Colorado SOrings. Colorado 80901
(303)G32-3593
Hnme Ollice
Aspen Properties
P. 0. Box 10502
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Jvn~ 1^, 1^31
RE: SUBSl1RFACE SOILS It!V!?STIGA'fIOPt
II ERRERT TOWt:IF!C RIiSiU.`~7:Cii
CASTLE, C,RGF:K ;:0:\D
ASI'Et!, COLORADO
Gentlemen:
Transmitted hererorith, are [he rnsnl[s of n Snhs•.Irfaee Soils Investigation
and Foundation Recommendations for [he proposed Herbert Towning Resldenoe
to be located approximately 1'.: miles south=••est of Aspen, Colorado. The
site is bordered on the east by Cnstln Creek Raod.
Reapec[fully s~rhmitted,
LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTI1tG LA 80RATORY, It: C..
Walter E. Vanderpoo
Civil Engineer
Crand Junction Office
Reviewed by:
State of Colorado
LD Job Ho. 39619CS
{d EV /
802 East BID Street rF~l. FioK t4[7 8G Rosomnm i=1 a:w
PueDb, Cob 81001 G:eneooA SC.nngs, Cob 81601 Montrose. Colo 8140:
(303) 5461150 1303} y456020 (303) 249-7838
E' C ~ 3n< t P82 P O. Box 1643
~;~.u•.d .llrrl(~liV1,. :oln C1501 Rock $pri 5, Wy0 82901
(30;1) 242 8068 (307) 382.2649
8•
ABSTRACT:
The contents of this report are e
subsurface soils investigation and fo~indntion recommendetiona for the
proposed construction of a single family residence.
The site is located approximately 1§
miles south of the town of Aspen, Colorado adjacent to Castle Creek Road.
Topographically, the site is a
relatively steep hillside with en average gradient of 18 Co 20 degrees
eloping down toward Castle Creek which passes the site on the east.
The fo~indation soils encountered in
the teat pile were noted to consist of approximately 1 foot of organic
topsoil deposited over silty gravel containing occasional cobbles and
boulder e.
The vcpetntion on the site and the
existing soli conditions indicate that [he site is relatively stable at
the present time. However, there is a high potential for some soil
creep on the existing slopes particularly d~irtng wetter (snow melt)
seasons of the year.
After consideration of the investiga-
tion and testing program described herein, it is recommended that
shallow foundation systems consisting of contiguous foundations beneath
bearing walls, taith opposing walls crossconnected for additional etiffnese,
be used to carry the weight of the proposed structures. Foundation
components resting on the silty gravel may he proportioned on the basis
of a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 200 psf. No minimum dead
load pressure will be required.
• '+~{~',
It is recommends :hat the proposed
•~ ~ structure be well balanced and heavily reinforced. The contact stresses
t
y-' beneath exterior load bearing walls should he balanced to within about
~,_. _
~ + 500 paf around the entire structure. Exterior walla should be crosa-
tied at regular intervals, with all reinforcing continuous. The croee-
ties should also be balanced. The criterion for balancing will depend
z
4~;'~ ~ upon [he nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade portions of
y_
F•.: ~ the structure should be balanced on the busts of dead load only. Multi-
S' story portions of the structure or those with basements should be balanced
~` on the basis of dead load plus approximately one-half the live load.
t-.'
I•
f;. All stem walls and cross-tied walls for continuous foundations eho•ild be
~. designed as grade beams capable of spanning at least 15 feet.
All floor slabs on grade must be
constructed to act independently of other structural portions of the
buildings.
Adeq~~nte drainage must be provided at
all times. eater should never be allowed to stand or pond above the
foundation materiels. A subsurface peripheral drain shall be placed
around [he exterior of the stricture at the foundation level, connected
[o the bottom of floor slabs or s~~rfacc of the ground with a gravel-vertical
drain on the exterior of the wall.
A Typc I Cement may be used in all
concrete in contact with [he ground.
Fiore detailed recommendations can be
fo:~nd within the body of this report. All recommendations will be subJeet
to the limitations set forth hrrein.
,.`
This laboratc has been informed that
the soils information developed in this rc~ort is to be used to design
the foundation for a one or two story residential building. The informa-
' tion may, or may not be valid for other p~~rposes. If the proposed use
!s changed or types of construction pronosed other than noted herein,
. the laboratory must be contacted to determine if the information in thla
report can be used for the new construction without further lnveetlgatlon
being required.
~~
r. 3_, ..
;~. '..
.,;. .
GENERAL:
The purpose of this investigation was
to determine the general suitability of the site for construction of a
afngle family residential str6ct~ire. Characteristics of the individual
soils found within the test borings rrerc examined for use in designing
foundations on this site.
A).tho~gh Lincoln-DeVore has not seen
;c.
~ti..' .
k: ,, .
is
t;. ; :.
i . '-
~ .'c
=, 'c._
a set of construction drawings for the single family residential structure
proposed, we believe that it will be basically a frame structure of more
or less conventional design. Foundation loads for a structure of this
nature are normally light to medium weigh[ in magnitude.
The topography of the site ie Chat
of a moderate to steep hillside, dropping generally to the east. The
elope gradient on this site is in ezces^ of 18 to 20 degrees at some
locations. The exact direction of surface runoff on this cite will be
controlled to an extent by the proposed construction, end therefore, will
be variable. In general, however, surface r~~noff will travel to the east.
Surface drainage is good; subsurface drainage fa fair to poor.
Erosion can be a significant problem
if drainage and vegetation are not carefully maintained. Vegetation will
probably be maintained In the immediate area around the b•.rilding site, but
epecisl care eho~ld be taken to maintain vegetation on the steeper slopes.
Runoff from these elopes should be carefully controlled to prevent erosion
from irrigation practices, sheetwaeh or seepage. It may be necessary to
provide culverts or drainages to prevent excessive erosion along these
steeper slopes.
~.~~
The fnandnti~ soils encountered at
iI w. ~ v
~~ I; this site were noted to consist of a thin veneer of colluvially deposited
1 .
' ,~ topsoil resting over loose to firm alluvially deposited gravel, cobbles
and boulders which have been transported [o the site by actions of Crystal
Creek in the past.
These all•~vial materials are believed to
• have been deposited over dense formational material of the Maroon Formation
of Pennsylvanian and Permian Age. The itaroon Formation can broadly be
described as a greyish-red to reddish-orange si.ltstone end sandstone, which
also contains beds or layers of greyish-red and pale maroon arkosic send-
atone. Material of the Maroon Formation Boas no[ encountered during our
subsurface exploration program and it is felt that formational material
w111 be sufficiently deep that it will not affect construction or performance
of the proposed foundation systems.
-/3-
j, .. .
BORINGS, LABOR ~ `RY TESTS AND RESULTS:
'h~ro test pits were excavated at this site
and were located as shown on the Test Pi[ T,ocati.on Diagram. These test
pits were located so that a reasonable profile of the aubaurfaee soils
coule be provided. However, it m+rst be noted that the site is relatively
steep and the proposed location of the h+rilding could not be accessed by
the available equipment. Thr_refore, vre most strongly recommend Chat the
excavation for the proposed structure he inspected Co verify the sail
conditions beneath the structure are similar to those encountered in
the teat pits. The test pits were excavated vrith a hydraulic backhoe.
Samples were taken by balk methods. .
The precise gradational and plasticity
characteristics associated with the soils encountered during excavation
can be found on the attached a+rmmary sheets. The representative number
for each soil group is indicated in a small. circle immediately below
the sampling point on the Test Pic Location Diagrams. The following
discussion of the soil groups vrill he general in nature.
The soil profile found on thin site
can be broadly described as a two layer system. The upper foot of the
profile was found to consist of colluvially deposited organic topsoil.
Beneath Chie surface layer, the soils vrere found to consist of loose to
firm silty gravel containing occasional cobble and boulder size rock
fragments.
Soil. Type No. 1 classified as a silty
gravel of coarse grain size. Soil Type No. 1 is non-plaetle, moderately
permeable and of medium density. In themselves, these soils will have
virtually no tendency to expand upon [he addition of moisture nor to
long-term consolidate undar applied foundation stresses. Granular materials,
may:
,r_.. such as these ,. o have a tendency to rapidly sr '.e under the initial epplica-
- lion of static foundation pressures, llo•.~ever, these settlements are
1,
characteristically fairly rapid to nature and should be virtually complete
by the end of construction. In any even[, if the allowable bearing values
given in this report are no[ exceeded, and if recommendations pertaining
:t
to inepectio reinforcing, balancing and drainage are followed, it is
~,.. .
felt that differential movement can be held to n tolerable megnltude. At
shallow foundation depths across the site, these soils were found to
hove an average allowable bearing capacity on the order of 2600 psf.
PJo [rre Errs water table was encountered
' in either of [he test pits excavated at this site. However, subsurface
moisture conditions were moderately high. Thrre is the potential at
1 this site far strong subsurface seepage froc: the higher ground to the
west and north. Additionally, the moist to tact condition of the soils
encountered indicates strong seepage acros, the site in general. Past
experience and observation in this wren inrlica[es that following seasons
of normal snow pack, seepage in the ^~ettr_r seasons of spring and early
.. summer will be considerably more intr.nse than those encountered during our
investigation. Due to the potential for senpagc on this site, a subdrain
system along the uphill boundaries of the site Ss recommended, as well
ae subsurface peripheral drains and under slab gravel drainage. blankets.
_/5.-
~, ~. .
;~
,, .
' CONCLUSIONS AN~+[tECODIIlEi4DATI0I:S:
~; "; ,, ,
Since [he exact magnitude and nature
i.
.,, ,
of the foundation loads are not precisely known at the present time, the
following recommendations must be somev~hat general in nature. Any special
loads or unusual design conditions should he reported to Lincoln-DeVore
r .,
E so that changes in these recommendatio-,s nay be made, if necessary.
r
p Hrnvever, based upon our analysis of the soil. conditions and project
characteristics previously outlined, the following recommendations are made.
The rclntivel.y steep slopes encountered
at this site prevented the placement of tie test pits within the proposed
building location. It must, therefore, be recommended that the open
excavation be Suspected prior [o the placing of forms Co verify that soil
conditions beneath the structure are like those encountered in the test
pile. Any changes in [he recommendations included !n this report can
easily be made at the tine of each inspection.
The prnpo~ed residence site is subject
to several engineering geology problems which arc mostly related to the
steep slopes and the high potential for subsurface seepage found on and
around the property. Nonetheless, use of proper building design and
eonetruction techniques will permit the safe development of this site.
According to information supplied to
'' us by our fi eld personnel, the site is to be partially leveled off and the
• building will be placed on the resulting I.ench with one side of the
proposed structure being notched into [he steep slope. ldlth this configura-
t1on, it appears that two different types of stability problems may be
encountered. First, there is the possibility of downslope movement taking
place within silty gravel foundation soils. Second, there is a possibility
of elope failure in the proposed cut into the hillside.
~;.:
T"e.~~
The snbsnrfac materials encountered on
Chia site are somearhat unstable and subject [o movement, both vertically
' and laterally. Lateral movement is felt [o co~siet primarily of e
gradual downslope creep. Rapid mass movements are not likely if proper
'; ~:
j,~• ~ drainage of the site is achieved and cuts and fills restricted. The
}';~. possibility of rapid movement must be recognized, hm,+ever remote it may be.
a.
•~'~' This gradual doomslope movement, ho~•revcr, cuill create a strong potential
for differential movement throughout the structure. Therefore, opposing
exterior load bearing walla should be cross-connected to provide additional
rigidity.
Regardless of the foundation type .
used, the stem walls should be carried across the building so that the
foundation will resemble a series of boxes. This will aid !n preventing
damage from lateral movement or do~rnhill. creep if either ehould occur.
Isolated interior pads should be avoided ~~herc possible at Chia site.
Where possible, interior loads sho,rld be carried on [he cross-Cie
foundation walls. Such a shallo,o foundation system may be designed on
the basis of a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 2600 psf as an
overall site average. No minimi+m dead load will be required. Reinforcing
in [hc tie beams would be the same as that in the stem walls and Chia
reinforcing would be designed basically for tension.
To help ensure Chet the structure
moves more or less as a single unit ratfrer that in a differential manner,
we would recommend that all stem walls he supported by a grade beam capable
of spanning at least 15 feet. This grade beam taould apply to both Interior
and exterior load bearing wells. .Such n grade beam should be horizon telly
reinforced continuously around the strncturr_ with no gaps or breaks in
reinforcing steel unless they are specially designed. Heems ehould be
-/7-
•
a~
r•'
t
..
~;'
reinforced at..
ath the
top and the bottom with .e major reinforcement
il ;
.
•
being located
near the
bottom of the section. All interior bearing walla
i.
~
should rest on a grade beam and foundation system of their own and should
'~ -
not be allowed to rest on a thickened slab section or "shovel" footing.
'
;,. [there the stem walla are relatively shallow,
vertical reinforcing will probably not be necessary. Hrnvever, where the
walla retain soil in excess of about 5 feet in height, vertical reinforcing
may be necessary to resist the active pressure of the soils along the wall
'.. exterior. To aid in designing each vertical. reinforcing, the following
equivalent fluid pressures can be utilized:
Soil Type No. 1 - Silty Cravel - 30 pcf
It should hr, noted that the above values
should be modified to take into account any surcharge loads applied at
[he top of the walls as a result of stored goods, live loads on-the floor,
machinery, or any other externally applied forces. The nbove equivalent
fluid pressures should also fie mod if led for the effects of any free water
table.
The bottom of all foundation components
should rest a minimum of 4 feet below finished grade or as required by the
local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen
soils.
If floor slabs on grade are used, they
should be constructed over a capillary break or gravel layer approximately
6 to 8 inches in thickness. The material for this capillary break should
be free draining and should not contain a significant amount of fines.
The capillary break should be provided e•i[h a free drainage outlet to the
exterior so as not to act as a water trap beneath the floor slab. A
vapor barrier should be placed between the slab end the capillary break
layer. •
/B -
~~ ::
1~.~~':
:. -.:
;. ,,
i
R.
iS.V .
,, .
..,.;
in: ; ~. ~~_~:
i.
i?
v
.,
r,r'r:', ~~ ~.
~r .;;:;
4.:'
Etl~.J
Y[ '
rl,t'- ,.
lli,: .
`;~: ~~,
.4;,,
~'~ ~ <,,,
,,,,~ :.
., ,:.:
i:.> .
`:
All floor sl. on grade must be
conetrueted to act independently of the other structural portions of
the building. These floor slabs should contain deep construction or
contraction joints to facilitate even l,realcnl;r and to help minimize any
unsightly cracking which could res~rit fro., differential movement. Floor
slabs on grade should be placed in sectio s no greater than 25 feet on
a aide. Prior to constructing slabs on tirade, nil existing topsoil and
organics must be removed from the huildinr interior Likewise, all
foundations must penetrate the topsoil layer.
Adenvate drainage must be provided 1n
the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the
goading of ureter. The ground surface armind the building should be
graded so. that surface water will be carried quickly away from the structure.
The minimum gradient within 10 feet oC tl,e building •.aill depend upon surface
landscaping. Bare or paved areas should nnintain a minimum gradient of
2%, vrhile landscaped areas ::hould maintni.n a minimum gradient of 57..
Roof drains must be carried across all bzckfilled areas and discharged
well away from the structure.
To give the building extra lateral
stability and to aid in [he rapidity of runoff, all beckfill around the
building and in utility trenches in the vicinity of the structure should
be compacted to a[ least 90% of its maxi.m•im Proctor dry density, ASTM D-698.
The native materials enco~rniered on this site may be used for backfillLng
purposes, if so desired. All beckfill nest be compacted to [he required
density by mechanical means. Plo water flooding techniques of any type
should be used in the placement of fill o~, this site.
If possible, the entire area should be
drained with a central system to avoid concentrating surface drainage. A
subsurface drain system is recommended nlo•,g the uphill boundaries of the
a ,•
~i9-
~~: •r;:
~,
~:.~::q~•~.
;.
•;
4~', ~
r i.:...
M.
., 1..
~;
Ic ` :~t •.
'•_
',~
,.,..
'v.. <' ,
i. ~ '..
,,,
~::: -
..,
site to inter., ~t as much seepage as possible. .,his drain system should
be made using an adequate discharge pipe, „ravel collector and sand or
fabric filter. An impermeable membrane is recommended on the downhill
aide of thr. drain to prevent water from [raveling through the drain and
into the Bite. It must be noted that difficulties have been encountered
with freezing et open end drain discharges. Also, snow removal has caused
drain problems in the past. This must 1>r. taken into consideration in
designing thr. drains as noted above.
Final grading after completion of the
backfill operation sho~+ld be such that natural drainage, existing prior
to the construction be disturbed as little as possible. In particular,
the drainage should not he such that outer is channeled along the newly
filled area which would result in accelerated erosion and damage in [he
backfill. A vegetative cover sho~+ld be nstabllshed as soon as possible
in the backfilled area to minimize erosion in general.
The slope stability of the Bite la
adequate at this time, but stability is marginal.. For this reason, no
cuts or fills sho+ild be made on the site in excess of 10 feet wltho+~t
specific examination of each proposed cut or fill base. The natural elope
should be disturbed ae little as possible and each cut or filltoa should
be drained. Slrna, hillside creep is the only movement anticipated !n
the upper 10 feet of the profile unless a deeper cut than recommended should
triggez a slide. Considerable amounts of ~•~ater Drill be present during
snrn~melt, and soil pressures and creep activity can be quite high in these
eeeaons.
Again, it is stressed that there 1e a
poten[inl for slope mover..en[ on this site. The recommendations
tontalned in this reportwtlingt eliminate or completely protect against
•~~20_
~'.• -
.
,..
`
potential slew ,movements. They will, hoe+ever educe the '
._~ potential for
F
r ..,.
damage to structures resulting from minor slope movements. The owner should ~I~.
t},`".., recognize the potential for elope movement on this site, if construction of '
i'~ ~ '
'. buildings is attempted.
J.,
~~'.: Walls on the uphill sides of buildings
~.,
~r should be designed '.o extend deeper into the soil and must be designed ae
~~~' ~`
,, a semi-retaining wall capable of restraint-~ soil on [he upper aid ea of the
tf`a building.
The er~~iivalent fluid pressure values
given above assume that the soil behind the c+all is in a drained condition.
An adequate drain system is recommended behind retaining walls In order to
ensure positive drainage of the retained soil. This drain system typically
~oould consist of a properly filtered gravel collector and discharge pipe,
with the pipe having a free drainage o~itle[ to daylight. An alternative
to this type of system would be to use an adequately filtered gravel
collector behind the wall, with "weep holes" through the wall to provide
an outlet for moisture. However, care should Se taken with this type of
installation so that moisture from "weep holes" does not saturate the soil
immediately in front of the wall. If positive drainage is not maintained
behind the walls, the equivalent fluid prr_ss~ire values sho~.~ld be inereaeed"
by at least 62.4 pcf.
The foundation soils on thta site were
noted to be relatively free of sulfates; therefore, a Type I Cement mny be
used in all concrete which will be in contact with the soil.
IC is extremely important due to the
nature of data obtained by the random sampltng of such a heterogeneous
material ae soil [hat we be informed of ary changes !n the subsurface
conditions observed during construction from those outlined in the body of
- Z/-
,;~•_ this report. onstructio^ personnel should be ,de familiar with the
..,,. ~ .r
+~: contents of this report and instructed to relate any differences immediately
if encountered.
..i
I[ is believed that all pertinent points
},
>~:~ concerning [he subsurface soils on this site have been covered in this
~~,_
report. If soil types and conditio•~s other than those outlined herein are
noted during construction on the site, these ..^,ho•ild be reported to Lineoln-
~',
jj DeVore so that changes in recommendatio,s can be made, if necessary. If
t:'.
i.:
K;; questions arise or further information is required, please feel free to
4
~ contact Lincoln-DeVore at any time.
~:
~.,
~~
~...; ~.
,• .
•..
c
~.
y
~.
i~ •'
i'
*~~s
• TEST HOLE No•
TOP ELEVATION
7: P. % TP ~,2
,.; r r ~ ° i ,. R
S;cry
G,PA/6G ° s••[rYGR.vrC
~Gry) c
LGn) F: 4M
crc.CsBBLEs
Bo [
/ acc, C.BB/er
O
°
' Qo ~6
'
S NiGN U°x/6.6
'
° 4Jez/¢6
~S 5
M..17d R6 '~ Me• i 7 t.
{! Ms%ar m
Rev w;>[.
.Jn'IlA.t'1 R O
10 ~ 10
IS 15
20 20
25 25
-30 30
h
W
W
LL
35 35-
z
40 40-
x -
- --
a -
- W
O -
DRILLING LOGS LINCOLN
"DeVORE GOLORADO~GOLORADO SPRINGS,
PUE8l0 , CLENWOOD SPRING! ,
EHGINEERS• GRAND JUNCTION ,NONTROSE,
GEOLOGISTS WrOMINO: ROCK 9PRING3
-2 s-
1
r.
t
k•~~ ~,
.
~,
'
'
~Z
,
a~~
~/ n,..
r;'1 ~St'~.
u .
~
gy 1
'
~...
~!y
~ . ,:A
'..~ nVp ~1~
Y` r ,~ '~,
' S
V Y 5; ~
~ ~ .14.5
` I~
\
~ ~
s. , i ~Nc~
'u: p
(' `,gyp. N~jr
•J
,.u :?ui:, ~,~ :~,:
~.
5~
•~ ~
N'
4uJ5
y~y~
3.~
~ __.. _ ~ .. fjy-..41-....4. .. .y A
~ `\
cyr \ \
•z, \~ \` '
i ~e ~ • .
c
~\ o~
\\ i
~\
\~ ~ J
~a
\\ \ ~
\ ~
~ J
\\.
~.
i
~
` `
~
`
~ \
.`
.
`
~'
.
,
` \
\
w
~
~
o!
.;,
s ;~
•
~~.\
'•\
\\ \\
'.
\ ` \
~ ~
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
~ \\
~ \\
~~ ~\\\
• J `\
~~
~~
1 Y ~ .~
~ \
\
,~ \ \
\
\
~ ~ ~
\
\ \ ~\
~ ~
'~
'~ \ \ 1
`: '} ''\ ~
\ ~ \
~~ .
~ ~ `,
1 ~ \ ~;
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ \ ~
~ \ \ ~\ \
\ \~ `\ 1 \\ \\ \\
\ ~. \ ~ \
~\ \\ N \, \ ~\ \\ \ \\ \
\ \ \ \ \
,\ ,,\ `,\
\ \
\ ~ ~ \ •~ \
~~
a
3~ i
~~ ~
•~
i v~ I'
W
.
~~
Ng
4~~~
` ~ F
ti N ~.
W
~~~.
i~ -.
d
r
;:.
~~ n
~a
~ R;
3 $
~ a`
a g~
~`
1
1
i ~
` •,
L
~~ ~.
~~~•~ s ~,c rr r A yEL (GMT
...Soil Sample
~;' ~ Pro~ect~<R3E.PT Tul/J;,va Rrt:DEN[E
;, Sample Location /~ / cAL
y
100
•
90
BO
~ ~a
60
~ 50
40
30
p' 20
10
0
100
Test No. ~9~/9-- (r.S.
Date_ 6-/o-R/
Test by S. D.
GRAVEL SAND SILT TO CLAY
Coarse Fine Co. Medium Fine _~o~iastic to Plastic
' ~r
_ - - - -_ }
~ ~ -- - -
- - -- --- 1 -
" ~i I -
- -- ~IiT~ - - ---
-- ~
,
I
- --
- - -- -- - - • i ~ i
il~
i ~ -
- -- -- - - - - - -
~L.- -- - - --
- - -- - - -- ~ I
~~Y i
~ i
__ .
i 1
'
1
1 i
-
- - ___ - - - i
I ~
- _
- - _ -- - I
- .. __- - - 1~
O 4.1 . o i
D~ame~er- (n}n
1~2^ ~4°~~ #4 #10 #20 #~40 #t100 #2DO - Sieve No.
Sample No.~Soi~ TYPL: Na /
Specific Gravity
moisture content~•6%
Effective Size O.O 34
cu --~ 65
Slw~ Size
. O1
% Passing
1 L/2
" 80.2
___
1. ~ 6z.9
__
3/4' S O
1/z' 9.¢
s/ti ' 44.4
4 36.7
10 3/. ?
z o zB. 6
2
) 40 7.~
cc 2.6 Loo zs.d
1 . 2 00 20. B
Pinenese Modulus 5.6
,0200
L.L. ~, P.I.- ,'~ .AO,S 3.~
~.
P ~ IIEARINO Pef .:lfuteo ppm
t.
LINL'OLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
r
~~' -26 _
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
1. Music School of Aspen
Aspen Country Day School
P.O.. Box AA
Aspen, CO 81612
2. Richard and Rosemary Furman
0960 Castle Creek Road
P.O. Box 4284
Aspen, CO 81612
3. Gordon Hardy
P.O. Box 1108
Aspen, CO 81612
4. Emanuel & Pat Papper
1 Grove Isle Drive, Apt. 1501
Miami, FL 33133
5. Richard I. Furman
1399 Southwest 1st Ave.
Miami, FL 3310
6. The City of Aspen
P.O. Box V
Aspen, CO 81612
7. United States of America
c/o U.S. Forest Service
Federal Building
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
-3-
~ p ~..
~`"~z.
o a..
.~,' ~~ .. I: ~1~
~_ :~~
\ 1 ]l A
~ I Rodrn Grounds u~ ~ I .,
~~ U~ ~ o~~\ ,OLP COURSE. ~'~'
~~~~~ ~ ~ "a ~ ~ V ' ~~~
I
I ~t
~;
~ i -~ , ~:
(cyl~n' ~ ;j~ , u=
\,
--ice ~ ~ ~ ~' '~; .;l
,-
~1'Yi~~ !\~ fin,
~ ~., Wate ~ ~ (1
l~ ~~ i I i Tank :- ~ )c.
~,
`~. ~~~~
/ .,.
li~', ~`
,,
1, .r~
;,
SGAL~
~. i"r2ooo
///.
o ''~ ~ ;~!'Ci
~ /4~~ /. ~ ervr ~ _ ~ ~'
l ~ ,, i ~•,~• , J.,;;
'' I. ~
• (\
i S
a~.~. ~1~ ,; ~ ~/~~ i-. J
y -~_.
~. p a (._ ~
'~~ :l ~ ~ S
i N i ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
i u ~ I
~ + ~ •~
//// ~
1 ~1 l '~j 4ab16~~ ~ 1 ~~-,
S'
~/ ~ ~, ..
\•
S%T£,CocATON D%AG,P.r/~ LINCOLN COLORADO COLORADO SPRING9,
HERB~Rr' T~wN%NC Rr!SiDENCE ~~ DpVORE PUEBLO, GlENW00D SPRINGS,
ASPEN CO,(,ORADO ENGINEERS• GRAND JUNCTION , MONTR09E,
GEOLOGIS75 WYOMIN07 ROOK 9PRING9
~L.
~n•~fRr`S~!ci': !'T t^.I II C:Pdi ~,: R'f~f'\ Yf""^. 't ~ti'1"~ • `~ .. ~ ~ f~ r. rT-~"r': :~:•'.':'~F :7~TR~_~ ]iti "S
II RJ~S Ryv. I6
r
Application must
be eomplute where
applicable. Type or
print in BLACK
I~ No overstrikes
or erasures unless
initialed.
COL ^RADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOU~"ES I
818 Cei ~ .~ Bldy., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Culora 20~
` PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
(!~) A PERMIT TO USE G~ROUNO WATER _
(/) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
FOR: I U'A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP .
1 REPLACEMENT FOR NO.
( )OTHER
WATER COURT CASE N0.
RECEfVED
APR 1 7198)
WATER Itr,~oURCES
SfATL tfl~l.$ER
fOte.
- mailing address
STREET ~ ~' / ! ~~/ ,' , ifs / ~1~i _// ,~
//~g l ,
CITY ~~,~'(/.~ li^~._ .. /'i~•:. ,,(~~~~
~/ ISUIOI (LIP)
TELEPHONE NO. ! / 2 - .-'i ~•'~-~' ,7i^~~
12) LOCA'I'IUN OF PROPOSED WELL
County ~l.~"~i'J.Y.'J
iy w % ul the 5 W Y., Section ! 3
Twp.~~ JS.. Rng. _~~ ~., ~2=P.M.
IN, 51 IE, WI
(3) NlATER USE AND WELL DATA
Proposed maximum pumping rate Igpml / ~ ~,E~Y.n
Average annual amount of ground water
to be appropriated (acre•feetl:
Number of acres to be irrigated:
. ~ ~
n
Proposed to[al depth Ifectl: ,~~`"/' /
Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from':
Owner's well designation
GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR:
(~() HOUSEHOLO USA ONLY
f 1 DOMESTIC 111
1 LIVESTOCK 121
1 COMMERCIAL 141
no irrigation 101
1 1 INDUSTRIAL (51
( 1 IRRIGATION 161
( 1 MUNICIPAL 181
1 OTHER (yl
DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN 1111 , ,
(4) DRILLER ) //
Name ~ n .O~ /~ ,C'j, . !,, , ~1dL
~'-
Street ~i
Gty~/LS'.~tt'!~/~it.ly:_~ ~6C:~"• J~i~~:)-
ISlale) /, ( ePi~ I
Telephone Nu. ~~.~.~Lic.-Nu. ~T
'FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DU NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN
Receipt No. ~ / ~~~~ /
Basin __ Diit.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause
no material injury to existing water ri0hts. The
issuance: of Ule permit dues not assure the applicant
that no injury will occur to another vested water
right or preclude another owner of a vested water
right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
APPROVED FOR HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY, FOR ONE
(I) 91NOLE FAMILY DbYELLING AND NOT TO BE
USED FOR IRRIGATION, THE RETURN FLOW FROM
THE USE OF THIS WELL MUST BE RETURNED TO
THE SAME STREAM SYSTEM IN WHICH THE WELL'
IS LOCATED.
Rio ASSURE THAT. THE RETURN FLOV! IS 1.O tiE
RETURNED JO 7HE•SAbIE Sl•RCAM SYSTEM, AN
1NDNIDUAL•WAS'Ir'E•WAl'ER DISPOSAL SYSTEM,
YJHEN l1SED, MUST 6L• OF THE NON•EVAPORATlF.~
TYPP_.
THE MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY GOVI:RNIdENT
SHALL HE CONSULTED W2D;Id LOCATING
THIS WELL, AND THEIR REGULATIONS
SHALL HE COMPLIED WITH.
Gi , ~f'11+..k ,., .
~.. ~-~ ;
e^,
1
is '~:' d. .
APPLICATION APPROVED
PERMIT NUMBER ~ 1 °~ 6 C 1
DATE ISSUED ~ AY 0 R 1981
EXPI ON DATE ~ ~ 0 ~ ~9~~~_.._.,~_
~~~~ i
-z9-
p N'AjE~(.v"-irk pfr•- =""~n~r:.- ,~- ~ .
f , l _ iO,.zh...,..
~occ~n~ ~~~cctn_9, ~n~.
BONDED LICENSED #634 INSURED
i/ CARBONDALE, COLORADO BOX 375 PHONE 963.2812
i
i _i___
~•/
' f --
S-
__-:_
_,
r ~
DATE--.-------~
PERMIT NO._~---
r
LOCATION - ~ 7`/~-~-----
L-stimaled Per Ft. Price
_Capacit
/ ~ r~
.t - - ~ d
/ ~ ~----
r-• ~~ C~
Due and payable open complelioa'' 6 TOTAL /~-r-/ ~ -,
a 145Ti~ bandlmg charge per month will be added 1 S da 'e frmn firm billin'•
°30
1t16P ..n./AZ G{~ ..c OH
COLORADO DIVISION OF a 9TS erman SOURCE9•
Musr eE SUBMITTED 300 Columbine Bldg..
e0 DAYS OF COMPLETION Denver. COlOredO 60203
E yyppK DESCRIBED HERE• yyELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALS/n~REPORT
TY-E On PRINT IN eLACIC PERMIT NUMBER -~- ~ ~ ' 3
t~ // r I~ 14 of the _~'- ~~' of Sec. ~
~-. ~~ e ~ Olf~ eCJ/iL~' ~ ~ P.M.
WNER ~~ _C.tl-
:LL 0 T.~ ~~, R.
rDRESS ~,/
//~ ~D. ~" fg~ HOLE DIAMETER ~y~
ATE COMPLETED //~~ to ~-~= ft.
_~ in. from -ll-
WELL LOG
to ft.
in. from
Loc.
Type and Color of Material
°rom Tc
,~I ~ I .,E~~~~s at.~d a-~'~ffr/s I ~/gyp
/ ~~
~L7/ W
~ ~~
~®F /
in. from
~~ ~'f_~ ~
/6/V/
DRILLING METHOD~~
CASING RE RD: Plai~ asing /7
'/ from _S,--LO ~ft.
Size & kind _1~---
from to ft.
Size & kind -~
from to ft.
Size & kind _----
Perfor~ d Casing
,~,~ '/ from ~ to ~ ft.
Size -~=-f.o& kind 1~-'
from to ft.
Size & kind ----
from to ft.
Size & kind __----
GROUTING RECORD ~~f ~~
Material ~ ~ - "
Intervals
Placement Method
GRAVEL PACK: Size
Interval
TOTAL DEPTH ~6~-~
Use additional Pa98s necessary to
TEST DATA - ~ 119 (J/
Date Tested a~
.~~ ft.'
Static Water Level Prior to Test ~
Type of Test Pump ~-
G~
Length of Test ~ /Jp`~
~~'~ Cam/
Sustained Yield (Metered) ~n
Final Pumping Water Level
-31-
~- Pump Make
Type ,_
Powered by
Pump Serial No. ~_
.~ z.
Motor Serial No.
Date Installed ,
Pump Intake Depth
.,;t~
HP ~ ~.
',
s: ,
Remarks
LA- n~ r_~ p-~~
WELL TEST DATA WITH PERMANEN PUMP
Date Tested ~,t7 _ ~ 8~
Static Water Level Prior to Test /
Length of Test` Hours
Sustained yield (Meteredl_ '~o~_~ GPM
Pumping Water Level ~ ~
Remarks ~ Do r [~
CONTRACTORS STATEMENT
The undersigned, being duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that he is the contractor of the well or
Pump installation described hereon; that he has read the statement made hereon; knows the content
~ ., thereof, and that t sa a is true his o kn wledge.
Signature fj' /L~ ~~r "
State of Colorado, County of
SS
Subscribed and sworn to before me this __ day of ~_ 19
My Commission expires:
-. , 19 _.__ , .
Notary Public
Y W+Y on both side •nd sipnW,
Wffl ERAND GREEN eoPia murtl be 10'~led wph the Sutra ErginePE PINK COPYf i for thta Owm,land YELLOW COPY it for the Drills. ~ '•
rZ2~
I)v(N OF FILE
,1J1 YI NiNOq AVENUE
6' Ai/(N. COI OAADO iIitT
CNFIE NNF OiFICF
)IXI N[N PERSON DRIVE
CN(YE NN E, WYOMING iA01
Dl[NWOOD ARINGS OifICF
r.o. sox fTi
il(MWppD SVRINGS, COLORADO it[DI
STEAMSOA7 OFfICE
q.0. !OI Sl)0
i/[A M[047 VII LAD F, COLORADO WOI
v 'GHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
°"` ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
2[20 ALCOTT STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80211
(JOJ) i5B~6201 -
Glenwood Springs
P.O. Box 219
Tel. 945-7755
NENNFIN q WgIG NI
WIl l11M t IOq AM
qµ oN 1. TOKEN
RIC NAgO D JO NNSON
f AANN J. TgLIEASE
lE0 M. EIS EI
M ARIL YN N. STONES
February 8, 1982
Sharon Lee
Caudill Gustafson and Associates
P.O. Box FF
Aspen, CO 81612
Oear Ms. Lee:
RE: Papper Residence
Section 5.25.02d of the
Pitkin County Land Use Code
At your request, Wright Water Engineers has prepared this letter
for the proposed Papper Residence addresssing the groundwater supply
concerns of Pitkin County as outlined in Section 5.25.02d of the Pitkin
County Land Use Code. This section of the code is applicable for
subdivisions that will be served by community, or individual, wells.
The proposed Papper Residence is to be located just west of the
Castle Creek Road about one mile south of Aspen and 500 feet west of
Castle Creek. The property lies within the northwest 1/4 of the south-
west 1/4 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 Vlest of the 6th
P.M. in Pitkin County.
This report contains an evaluation of the surficial geology and
groundwater availability appurtenant to the proposed property. The
evaluation was restricted to an office study utilizing the following
resources: 1~ U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Mapping of the Aspen
Quadrangle, 2~ Pitkin County Groundwater Geology maps, prepared by Wright
Water Engineers in 1977, 3) Environmental and Engineering Geology Mapping
of the Roaring Fork and Crystal Valleys, prepared by the Colorado Geological
Survey in 1974, and 4) the State Engineer's Office list of registered
wells dated 10/23/81.
Ms. Sharon Lee
February 8, 1982
-2-
A review of the State Engineer's tabulation of registered wells
indicates the existence of eight wells in the Castle Creek drainage
within a mile radius of the property. Pertinent data concerning these
wells is shown in the following table.
WELL OWNER
Peter Vought
Peter Vought
Ed Wachs
Edgar B. Stern Jr.
Robert 0. Roy
Andrew W. Burden
James T. Mctollough
Fred B. Gloor
WELL WATER •REPORTED
PERMIT N0. DEPTH FT LEVEL FT YIELD ~QPm)
5-49-001885 100 35 10
5-49-117833 35 20
5-49-034991 35 7 10
5-49-005466 12 7 20
5-49-004853 12 0 10
5-49-035755 35 8 10
5-49-071236 70 40 15
5-49;072148 55 28 15
T~is parcel is predominantly underlain by glacial deposits which
form the lateral slopes of the main Castle Creek valley bottom. This
glacial deposition probably overlays the Maroon Formation. The Maroon
Formation consists of reddish. arkosic sandstone with interbeds of silt-
stone, clays tone, and some conglomerate and limestone. The Maroon
Formation can yield water at rates of 5 to 20 gallons per minute (gpm)•
The glacial debris tonsists of large boulders in a matrix of sand,
silt and clay. Generally, the greater the clay content in the glacial
material, the lower the permeability.
The best potential source for a domestic water well located on the
Pepper property is contained in the Maroon Formation. Generally, a well
penetrating several feet of saturated Maroon Formation will provide a
minimal supply of groundwater. Production from fractured aquifers are
M
3y_
1
Ms. Sharon Lee -3-
/ February 8, 1982
dependent an recharge to the aquifer throughout the season because the
aquifer storage is limited. The recharge to the aquifer may vary
considerably throughout the year and from year to year, resulting in a
wide range of well yields in a given area. '
The Pitkin County Groundwater Geology maps show the property is
located in a major recharge area which is associated with the glacial
deposition of the Castle-Creek Valley.
Therefore, on the basis of our interpretation of the material, and
the experience of our office related to groundwater availability in the
Roaring Fork basin, we feel that an acceptable site for one well of low
yield, less than 5 gpm on a long term basis, can be located on Papper
property to service one single family residence. It should be recognized
that the well must penetrate the local groundwater table to a sufficient
depth to provide adequate drawdown.
The following comments address the groundwater supply concerns of
Pitkin County as outlined in Section 5.25.02d of the Land Use Code.
1. Based upon our evaluation and general knowledge of the area, we
anticipate that a well of proper location and construction can be
drilled on the property and would be capable of yielding a limited
amount of water on a long term basis. We anticipate the depth of ~f
the well to be less than 300 feet. Groundwater withdrawn from the
well can be considered tributary to Castle Creek. The water quality
should be acceptable. However, it would be prudent to drill a test
well prior to construction of the residence to absolutely prove the
availability and quality of water.
2, No problems are anticipated with regard to long term supply, pollution,
or long term maintenance.
_ >-
. -35-
: ~,
/. -4-
~/
/ Ms. Sharon Lee
February 8, 1982
3, A well yield of 5 gpm is generally sufficient to serve the inhouse
needs of a single family residence.
4, Pollutant sources can be disregarded because there are no major
waste discharge sites in the immediate area. Determination of
any local contamination due to leach fields would require a review
of soils test data.
5, The proposed well is expected to be capablThe pressure associatednwith
family residence on the Papper property.
the distribution system is dependent upon the engineering design of
the system.
6, We recommend that you apply for a well permit for the proposed well
with the Division of Water Resources, State Engineer's Office•roDedll
ing can be initially accomplished under a test hole permit app
by the State Engineer's Office. A final permit will have to be
issued prior to putting the water to beneficial use. Also, we
recommend that you consult the State Engineer. and possibly a water
attorney, regarding the necessity of a water supply plan, or a
decreed plan for augmentation for the proposed well. Recent demands
for water in the Roaring Fork/Colorado River drainage have caused
a change in policy regarding the issuance of well permits in the
Colorado River basin.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
WRIGHT WATERn ENGINEERS, TN'C.
J n .Blair
J
B ~ ~ li ~I~b<4w'1! w ti
y
Wil iam L. Lorah
JGB:WLI:ep
cc; Dr. and Mrs. Emanuel Papper
821-027.030
_i~_
'w
-36-
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION
The sewage disposal system will be adequate to accommodate the volume and
composition of the sewage expected and will comply with the Pitkin County
Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations.
The system will be a septic holding tank with feeders out to an absorptive
leech field which will comply with the perculation rate described in the
Lampiris report on page S-].
-37-
LOGICAL EXTENSION OF UTILITIES
The two utilities required at the site are electric and telephone service.
Holy Cross Electric can extend its service and suggests an overhead power
line to the site because of the steepness of the ground. This will not
interrupt any scenic vistas or downgrade the scenic quality because of its
location to the back of the property (see topographic map and letter on
Page 39)
Mountain Bell has existing overhead telephone lines on Castle Creek Road.
The lines will be extended to the proposed site by buryino the cable
with its location to be established by Mountain Bell., with minimal disruption
to plant life and topsoil.
-38-
HOLY CROSS Ew.:..ECTRIC ASSO~:~~IATION, I NC.
AREA CODE
1301 GRAND AVENUE 303
P. O. DRAWER 150
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
September 24, 1982
Mr. Jack Miller
Jack Miller Associates
P.O. Box 4285
Aspen, Colorado 81612
~R~~EIVEDSE~ 2 7 ~
RE: Parcel #2, Beatrice Placer
Dear Mr. Miller:
945 - 5491
945 - 6056
The above mentioned property is within the certificated service area
of Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc.
Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. has an existing overhead power
line near the subject property. The power line is located on the
City of Aspen property. The property owner will be responsible for
all expenses incurred in obtaining the necessary right-of-way ease-
ment from the City.
The power line is capable of providing the necessary power to the
lot, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file with the
Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado and to appropri-
ate contractual arrangements with Holy Cross Electric Association,
Inc.
The lot lies on a hillside where an underground power line would not
be feasible or practical.
If you desire any further information, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
HOL SS LECT C A IATION, INC.
Jef rey A. Franke, Staking Engineer
JAF:lsz
-39-
ROAD DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
The home site is a heavily wooded stand of aspens. The aspens range in size
from sapplings to 6" - 10" diameter trees. A driveway has been laved out to
side slope up the moderate terrain. By doing this, minimal vegetation shall
need to be disturbed. The location of the home is approximately 100 feet or
greater from Castle Creek Road. With the density of the aspen trees, the
home will be minimally visable from the road. The driveway entrance has a
visability distance in excess of 350 feet in each direction. Disturbed
areas along the driveway shall be re-vegetated with seedling aspens and
natural high altitude seedlings. At the entrance from Castle Creek Road,
along each side of the lane, large rocks and stones (2' - 5') will be
installed along the cut from 0' to 8' high to hold erosion and create a
natural retaining wall. Earth will be backfilled into the stone for
vegetation. Drainage will be swaled along the side of the road with a
culvert as required at Castle Creek Road.
-90_
~,.,,
MEMORANDUM
T0: Co my Attorney
y~nty Engineer
~Efi~ironmental Health
„C~1 rado Geologic Survey
vision of Water Resources
PLANNER: Colette Penne
RE: Townin9 Special Approval
DATE: November 24, 1982
:. ...
Attached is an application for Special 1041 Approval to build a single family
residence on property located just off of Castle Creek Road. The site
is located on land sloping in the range of 15-30Y .
Please review the application and return your comments back to the Planning
Office no later than December 15, as the item is scheduled to go before the
County P&Z on Tuesday, January 4, 1983.
Thank you.
~-
RICHARD D. LAMM
Governor
December 9, 1982
Ms. Colette Penne
Pitkin County Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Towning 1041 Review
Dear Ms. Penne:
JERIS A. DANIELSON
State Engineer
We have reviewed materials submitted concerning the above named hazard
review for a single family dwelling on 5.09 acres. Well 119607 is indicated
to be the source of water. This well is limited to use inside one single
family dwelling. Outside use for lawn and garden irrigation and watering live-
stock is prohibited.
The proposal indicates an irrigation ditch uphill from the proposed build-
ing site is a potential hazard if it should breach. We would concur with the
consultant's recommendation that the ditch be improved to prevent such problems.
We ask that the owner of the ditch be contacted and that this proposal be coor-
dinated with the ditch owner.
Our major concern relates to the site plan which includes a landscape plan.
The landscape plan calls for apple trees, turf, and other plants which require
irrigation. Landscape irrigation is not an allowable use of the referenced
well. Use of the well for this purpose could result in curtailment of the use
of the well. No other water source is mentioned in the review.
We cannot recommend approval of this proposal as presented since the land-
scape plan would apparently require illegal use of the well. We would be happy
to review additional information concerning this proposal.
Sincerely,
HDS/KCK:ma
2•
OF C~~O
~4' --=: - -- 'Qy
ie.::
N
**
.w 1876*
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
t ! .
1313 Sherman Street-Room 818
Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
al D. Simpson, P.E.
Assistant State Engineer
cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng.
Ralph Stallman
Rich Bell
r^*~ .-.a
~-SPEN~PITKIN `~
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Colette Panne, Planning Office
FROM: Bob Nelson, Environmental Health
DATE: December 14, 1982
RE: Towning Special Approval
--------------------------------------
Department
This department has evaluated the water supply and sewage
disposal and we offer the following comments with regard to
the requirements contained in pertainent sections of the
Pitkin County Land Use Code.
F7ater is to be supplied from an existing well drilled in 1981.
The indicated quantity (10 to 14 gpm) is adequate, although
for this large a structure a water storage tank is recommended.
Bacteriological and chemical quality should be demonstrated
to meet state standards before a building permit is issued.
An on-site sewage disposal system of conventional construction
and design should be able to be constructed to conform to
County regulations. Percolation rates are within acceptable
limits and the slopes are not excessive. Care should be taken
to locate the system away from the well. Due to the amount of
subsurface moisture and the potential strong subsurface seepage
patterns from the west and north indicated in the Lincoln-DeVore
Geologic Report we would strongly recommend and may require a
subdrain along the uphill boundries of the site to incorporate
drainage provisions for the leach field into design requirements,
or that a separate uphill subsurface drain be provided as a
curtain drain uphill of the leach field. This is particularity
important on a site such as this, as the well is located downhill
and within the seepage patterns from the leach field. Without
such a measure, there is some potential of contamination moving
from the leach field to the well with the rest of the subsurface
seepage characteristic of this site.
BN/co
130 South Osbns Street Aspen, Colorado 6161'1 303/928-2020
pitkin county
506 east main street
aspen, Colorado 61611
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Colette Penne, Planning Office
FROM: Ron Thompson, Assistant County Engineer ,Y,,
DATE: December 6, 1982
RE: Towning Special Approval
Recommendations of Lincoln DeVore and Dr. Lampiris should be adhered to.
The applicant states driveway sight distance is in excess of 350 feet,
which is adequate. The driveway should be at Castle Creek Road grade
twenty feet prior to its entrance onto the County road. The applicant
will need a road access permit.
RT:cd
~-- ~.~~,
RICHARD D. LAMM
GOVERNOR
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL Sl
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESC
?15 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SME
' DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)
January 5, 1983
Ms. Colette Penne
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Ms. Penne:
RE: TOWNING SPECIAL APPROVAL
I L
FICES
R~~yN~STRE
"Ti~17
..
z
fir'
+d'4J;~'I~'a~ JOHN W. ROLD
~1~, ~~~7 '~ ~, DIRECTOR
~i
~S ~[a S~~,
~~~`
We have reviewed the data submitted and the general and engineering geology
of the area.
We concur with the findings and reiterate the recommendations in the
Lincoln-DeVo re and Lampiris reports. If these recommendations are observed
there should be no adverse geologic effects. The rockfall retaining wall
above the structure should be designed on the basis of the largest credible
rockfall event which can reasonably be expected to occur on the tract.
Yours truly,
Jeffrey L. yes
Engineering Geologist
vt
JLH-83-003
cc: LUC
GEOLOGY
STORYOFTHEPAST...KEYTOTHEFUTURE
<...
PUBLIC HEARING
RE: Towning 1041 Special Review
y,,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission on February 8, 1983 at a
meeting to begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Commissioners' Meeting Room at the
Pitkin County Courthouse, 506 E. Main Street, Aspen to consider approval of
the construction of a single family residence in an area of geologic hazards.
The property is located on Castle Creek in the Beatrice Placer.
For further information, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street,
Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223.
s/Peter Guy
Chairman, Pitkin County Planning
and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on December 30, 1982.
Pitkin County Purchase Order #
,~
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on this _~'~"day of ~, 1982E d tree
and correct copy of the Notice of Public Hearing regarding
,. _ .. _ - _ n .. ,
was deposited into the United States mails, postage prepaid, and
addressed to the following:
~c e- auach~~
~L~~ ~~. ~
sue,
~ .,
k,.
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
1. Music School of Aspen
Aspen Country Day School
P.O.. Box AA
Aspen, CO 81612
2. Richard and Rosemary Furman
0960 Castle Creek Road
P.O. Box 4284
Aspen, CO 81612
3. Gordon Hardy
P.O. Box 1108
Aspen, CO 81612 -
4. Emanuel & Pat Papper
1 Grove Isle Drive, Apt. 1501
Miami, FL 33133
5. Richard I. Furman
1399 Southwest 1st Ave.
Miami, FL .3310
6. The City of Aspen
P.O. Box V
Aspen, CO 81612
7. United States of America
c/o U.S. Forest Service
Federal Building
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
3-
LAW OFFICES
GATES, HUGHES 8e KNEZEVICH
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SUITE 200
600 EAST HOPNINB AVENUE
LEONARD M. OArES ASPEN, COLORADO BI611
ROBERT W. HUG HES
RICHARD A. HN E2EVIOH
DEBORAH OUINN
December 15, 1982
BRADLEY S. ABRAMSON
Ms. Colette Penne
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Lelia N.V. / 1041 Review on Property on
Castle Creek in Beatrice Placer
Dear Colette:
AREA CODE 303
TELEPHONE 920-I~00
TELECO PIER 920-1121
At the request of Bob Hughes, who is the attorney for
Lelia N.V., a Netherlands Antilles Company, based upon your
inquiry as to the creation of Lelia N.V.'s lot, I thought that
the simplest way of laying out the Lelia N.V. property interest
in the Beatrice Placer on Castle Creek would be to provide you
with an abstract from the time in history when the property
interests were divided. I enclose herewith a mini-abstract
showing the initial conveyance made in December of 1971 and all
subsequent deeds to that property down to and including Lelia
N.V. This like information has previously been provided to
Richard Grice regarding other portions of the Beatrice Placer,
which were subdivided at the same time.
If you should have any questions with respect to any of
the enclosures or with respect to this property, please feel free
to contact either myself or Bob Hughes. I will be happy to get
together with you at any time.
Very truly yours,
OAT HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P.C.
.~'G
LEONARD M. GATES
LMO/mlp
Enclosures
cc: Robert Hughes, Esq.
~.lu is Tulle i~,_I.UI
- Itecmdnl at-__ _dcbcl~____11., ____ -._.- _
`• ~+\~.q r t0Y'E'.ttt3 Baflfl E'. T' ~ Recorder.
• - Reception No. 7 .l ai .
THIS DEED, Made this
day of
1981 ,between JAY ALLEN SIEGEL
of the County of BlOward and State of
Florida
Cir1D1SR30, of the first part, and LELIA N.~V., 3 Netherlands
Antilles Company, 8 Handelskade, Curacao
FI~L(ING STA M1[Ij/F'-yr',
STATE DGCU1dElYTARY FEE
~uN _ 3 ~sa~
~_ as
c/o Herbert R. Towning
x~hose legal address is/2100 West Loop South, Suite 1100, Houston, Texas 77027
/Netherlands pp~~tilllgggg ~axal~
of the Onuntg~C1YSLL~ =^d ~"`o_ot.Eblar~dv. of the second part:
\\'ITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration ----------ijOi~~tRS,
to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby
confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed$~C~YStShOe~spresents does grant, bargain,
.ell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, his 1JeiPS and assigns forever, all the following
described lot or parcel ofland, situate, lying and being in the
t'ounty of PITRIN and State of Colorado, to-wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
also Itnew+rea9treetawAflunJbeP•
~d~~~•
•~~
- / J
FF
,~
~hT'aa
TOGETHER with sll and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise apper-;'
raining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profile thereof; and all the
estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of,
in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the said
party of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, for himself, his heirs,
executors, and admit istrators, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with Lhe said party otthe second part,
his~Ct1`Sge~i~~~S~gns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized otthe premises
above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has
good right, full power anti lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as
aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes,
assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soeveJi EXCEPT genetal taxes for 1981,
payable in 1982; U.S. Patent Reservations of record affecting the subject pro-
perty; rights of way and easements for ditches, pipelines and flumes as recorded
in Plat Book 2 at Page 9, Ditch Book 1 at Page 40 and Plat Book 3 at Page 91; and
rights of way and easement recorded in Book 170 at Page 601, all as recorded in
the records of Pitkin County, Colorado.
gand the aboved bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, his
Aeus al~dG a~s~gns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim t whole or any part thereof,
the said party of the first part shall and will R'ARRANT A. FOREVER DEFEN he singular number shall ;
include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any g der shall be app abl t all genders. ~,
IN N7TNESS R'HEREOF, the said party of the first part h s hereunto se ha d d seal the day and year t9rst I ,
above Written.
/~~ f ~~~ / _ ISEAL)
_:(~ ~_ .. ~-'~ '~ SI GEL
"LfJR (SEAL] !,
STATE OF t'9t8R~t1ET
ss.
County of BROWARD JJJ ~ ~j
Theforegoing instrument u•as acknowledged before me this t-~s•~~T'•G~- day of'~ ~/~2~'
Is 81 .by JAY ALLEN SIEGEL, •rrl' ., ~
~ ' . ., 'I
Aty commission expires ~ /~' ~~`L '~'~ ~` C L• / ~ ~ J9~~M1V'tness my hand and offrcial seal.
-~.
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLOGIDA AT LARGE ~~Cc ~"; ~ ~• tt ~` .1 ~ f ~ r '
MY C01dMISSION EEPIRES NOV 11981 .,.'
)'OtJ):D jli$U GtNERAL ENS, UNDERIYRI?ERs _ -. ~~••, / ilT-y;- .. ---
NB.932A. WANBA\Tl'l1EEn.-Fur Pbmop.pha.Rer..nIBUJIorA PublirAi,q.U16J WerI 1h\Areoue,GolJen. ColonJO rM01-00JI11LOM~-f~W
' \ .
r -
r
EXHIBIT "A" TO WARRANTY
A tract of land being part of the Beatrice Placer, U.S.M.S. No. 11426 situated in
the NW 3y and the SW'y of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th
Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado and being more fully described as
follows:
Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer U.S.M.S. No. 11426;
ection with the
Westerly
Thence N 31°07'17" E 492.94 feet to the point of inters
boundary line of the County road;
25 feet along said Westerly boundary line;
S 16°10'51" W 144
Thence
Thence .
272.75 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of a curve to
the left having a radius of 10852.14 feet;
said westerly boundary line and the arc of a
t alon
28 f
reverse curve
Thence g
ee
198.
to the right having a radius of 4120.25 feet;
id westerly boundary line;
"
Thence W 47.96 feet along sa
S 17°29'53
46 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of a
252 curve to the
Thence .
right having a radius of 5161.37 feet;
id Westerly boundary line and the arc of a
l
compound curve
Thence on}; sa
316.83 feet a
to the right having a radius of 917.49 feet;
Thence N 45°52'26" W 385.59 feet;
Thence N 44°07'34" E 638.70 feet to the Point of Beginning,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
~~ t ~ / _
r
' l:eception No. 149u30 i?eggy E. Piiklich, Recorder
WARRANTY DEED
nuw ~~~ j PAGE D`h
:~::. ~........:..,r ~~:
.ih'~ _ g ~:,~~
~ ~ , po .-.
.._......7........._.......,
T::IS DEED, Slade this ~Rt}, day of December, 1971, between
SPAR CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DE~LOPY.ENT COMPANY, a Colorado limited
partnership, of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, of the
first part, and 2Qorman Smith, of the County of•San Diego and State
of California of the second part:
A'ITNESSETH
The said party of tiie first part, for and in consideration of
the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable considera-
tion to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said
party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed
and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by
these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto
to said party of t're second part, his heirs and assigns forever,
all the ~oilowir.g described parcel of land, situate, lying and being
_.. •~:.e County of Pitkir. and State of Colorado, to-wit:
,. tact of land situated in the Northwest Quarter and the
~ouci:West Quarter of Section 13, Township 10 South, Rangy
,.~ vlest of the 6th P.M. Said tract being part of the
L::ATiIICE PLACER, United States +iineral Survey No. 11426,
and bung more fully described as follows:
o3;Z:~:vIN; at corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer;
c::ence along line 1-6 of said Beatrice Placer North
33°=2'51" East 433.85 feet to a point on the North-
westerly right of way of Castle Creek Road;
~::ence along said right of way South 16°10'51" i4est
c2.2G feet;
::ence alonr, said right of way 272.74 feet along the
arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 10852.19
Beet;
u er.ce along said right of way 198.28 feet along the arc
c`_ a curve tc the riyiit having a radius of 4120.25 feet;
c:.er.ce along said right of way South 17°29'46" West 47.96
~cc:t;
tencc along said right of way 252.96 feet along the arc
c`_ a curve to the right having a radius of 5161.37 feet;
t:.encc along said right of way 316.33 feet along the arc
of a curve to the right having a radius of 917.x9 feet, the
core Of Which 'Nears South 30°11'36" West 315.26 feet;
thc::cc departing from said right of way North 45°52'26"
:'.est 385.59 feet to a point on line 2-1 of said Beatrice
Placer;
u.e:cc along line 2-1 of said Beatrice Placer .forth 44°07'36"
mast 638.70 feet to the Point of Beginning.
' bul;n~~:.J PAGECSJi'~i
'POGE.Ii~R with all and singular the hcreditaments and appurten-
ances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the re-
version and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and
profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim
and ce-.and whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either
in lace or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with
the hcreditaments and appurtenances.
.O iiA~J?;' AJID TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and de-
scribed, with the appurtenances, unto the said party of the second
part, his heirs and assigns forever. Ard the said party of the
~..rsc part, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant,
Grant, bargain 'and agree to and Wlth the said party of the second
part, 'r.a heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and
deiivcry of these presents it was well seized of the premises above
conveyesd, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible
estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple,•and had good right,
fu~l power and lawful authority to graat,.bargain, sell and convey
tae sa::e in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are
free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales,
_ier.s, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or
nature soever, except and subject to (1) general taxes for 1971;
(2) reservations and exceptions as contained in the United States
Patent recorded September 15, 1965 in Book 215 at Page 361 as follows:
ricat of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of
tae ~:.ited States; (:) rights of way of Holden Ditch and Flume as
~:c~•;a by map recorded December 17, 1890 in Plat Book 2 at Paqe 9, the
Castle Peak Ditch and Flume or Pipelines as shown by map recorded
April 11, 1907 is Ditch IIook 1 at Page 40, and the Castle Creek
2i?cli:.e as shown by map recorded May 26, 1966 in Plat Book 3 at
Pa,:: 5i; (4) azy tax, assessment, fees or charges by reason of the
inc~usion of the subject property in the Aspen Fire Protection Dis-
..rict; and (5) nay ether easements or restrictions of record; and
tae ~~ove bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession
c: t:.e said warty of the second part, his heirs and assigns agairst
a:< '"-.d every persor. or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the
-2-
• . ' ISuuntiv J PAGiU'~:1
tai:ole or ary part thereof, tha sai;. ;arty of thy. first part shall
a.-.ci t•:ill 4'7ARRA.\T A.VD r^OREVER llEP:':~: .
Ii4 l4IT:QESS j~TiiERc.OF, tine said •,rty of the first part has exe-
cured this Deed the day and year f •st above written.
,' ~ .~ •-:
~~.
•. ~_
. ~-
,ATTEST.
,. /a ~. -
~acrctary oz
Elactro-Cara-Industries,
Inc.
SPP.R CONSOLIDATED 71INIi1~ Ai~D
lliiVIiLOP"1EN'P CO.'dPA2dY, a Colorado
li:aited partnership, by
ELECTRO-CARL'-INDUSTRIES, INC.,
a California corporation,
~aneral Partner
,~
~~~~
B ~
President
STATi: Oi' CALIFORNIA )
ss.
CJliSTY OF LOS ANJ~ELES __ )
Tile foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th
G~.,! J= uuCe::lbc:r, 1971 by Llpnal[1 T T~ `(,yv~ r
~rosic~nc and Paul :41. La Cava as
S~cra~ary of Electro-Care-Industries, Inc., a California corporation,
as tea: oral : artrer of Spar Consolidated ',fining and Development Company,
a Colorado limited partnership.
r:itr.ess .ay 'nand and official seal.
'.y co.~.~ission expires January 24, 1972
2 OFFICIAL SEAL
°,~~!~~~~ SAU?;DRA N!. KI3Sii?;ER ~~ ~ li/ o
q f ~q
J~r •'n31'.Llo:•I UfHLC IV ~ _L~/ / /~% F/~~~~/
lG5 P":GEL`S CGUNTY ~ Notary PU 11C
{ N.r Co•omP":on E"nirv. l:.nwrv 7<, 1477 ~ }
-3-
_ _ r ,
_ aeo~;~~~ ~'acE~' ~ t~
Recorded at i.l'~ o'clock ~~.L4. ~-- t.JJ
4
Reception NO. 7b55$$ 'n Recorder
~~3 15 f~lr~~eh,
QUIT CLAIM DEED
THIS DEED made this February, 1974, between
NORPIAN SAfITII, also known as NORI4ALi R. SMITH, San Diego County,
California, party of the first part, and GOODCO, a Limited
Partnership, whose address is P. O. Box 4298, Aspen, Colorado
81611, party of the second part.
WITiIESSETH: That the said party of the first part, for
and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars to the said
party of the first part, in hand paid by the said party of
the second part, the receipt ~,ahereof is hereby confessed and
acknowledged, hath remised, released, sold, conveyed and QUIT
CLAIMED, and by these presents doth remise, release, sell,
convey and QUIT CLAIP•I unto the said party of the second part,
his heirs and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest,
claim and demand which the said party of the first part bath
in and to the following described lot or parcel of land situate,
lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado,
to wit:
A tract of land situated in the Northcaest Quarter
and the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 10
South, Range 85 T^]est of the 6==~ P.N.. Said tract being
part of the BEATRICE PLACER, i:nited States Mineral
Survey No. 11426, and being more fully described as
follows:
BEGINNIPIG at corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer;
thence along line 1-6 of said Beatrice Placer North
33° 11' S1" East 433.85 feet to a point on the
Northwesterly right of way of Castle Creek Road;
thence along said right of way South 16° 10' S1" West
82.50 feet;
thence along said right of way 272.74 feet along the
arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 10852.19
feet;
thence along said right of way 198.28 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 4120.25
feet;
thence along said right of way South 17° 29' 46" West
47.96 feet;
thence along said right of way 252.46 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 5161.37
feet;
thence along said right of way 316.83 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 917.49
feet, the chord of which bears South 30' 11' 36" West
315.26 feet;
thence departing from said right of way North 45° 52'
26" West 385.59 feet to a point on line 2-1 of said
Beatrice Placer;
thence along line 2-1 of said Beatrice Placer North
44° 07' 34" East 638.70 feet to the Point of beginning.
Pitkin County, Colorado.
TO HAVE AATD TO HOLD the same, together caith all and similar
the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in anlry~ise
thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest
and claim whatsoever, of the said party of the first part, either
in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of
the said party of the second part, its heirs and assigns forever.
' ~~ day of
~,
BOOK~U`.~~- i~1CC~~~~
IN WITNESS L~7fIEREOI', the said party of the first part has
hereunto set his hand and seal the day, month and year first
above written. ~ ,
a/a Norman R. Smith
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
-.y
;:J = day of February, 1974, by Norman Smith a/k/a Norman R.
Smith.
My commission expires:
Witness my hand and official seal
•.~
_ OFFICI/~L S~_dL
r
1'-~~ PAUL M. L,l CfiVA
.i•.icr`.~,~110V.5'f FU°LIC • Cd
'.t,_ CiORAIA ,
~1. .~•_•,~%! F.'..BUPAL OTICE Ifl j
~ _._ .
, _ lOi AnCE tL9 Mu...V ~
^ L''• C~ari~i: y'i [x-irc: IF~r. 11, 1975 Z
/' ~ ~
Notary Public
-' $c.cry Uon No........f.3 :... ~. ,. ,.,...,._ ...............,..~ul.ie...li an.e... _........accord '
ti )t,, ~, * ~^DKcS~ f;1t,f~
~.-
GOODCO, a Limited Partnership
whoss address is Aspen
County of Pitkin State of
Colorado foi the consideration of Ten
and other valuable consideratic
doIlara,ia hand paid hereby sell(s) and convey(s) to
JAY ALLEN SIEGEL „_ __ . _ _
whose address b Post Office Box 8128, Fort Lauderdale
:. _ . .
~ ._ -U--
and State of Florida 33310the followiaQ real property In the
County of Pitkin ,end State of Colorado, to w(t:
set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
is is a Correction Deed given for the purpose of correcting the des-
iption appearing in that certain Deed between the parties hereto
ted June 3, 1977-and recorded August 10, 1977 in
ok ~~ at Page 34g of the Pitkin County Records. The corrected
scription herein reflects the re-survey of the property by Tri-Co
nagement, Inc., pursuant to its survey dated February 23, 1977, whic
based upon the found location of the original stone monument for
rner 5 of the Beatrice Placer.
ie Grantor and the Grantee herein further agree that the description
the property set forth in that certain Deed of Trust dated
June 10. 1977 and recorded August 10, , 1977 in Book ~- at Pa
5~-of the Pitkin County Records, executed by Grantee for the bene-
~t of Grantor.•shall hereby be deemed to be corrected and amended to
~flect the description as set forth in this Correction Deed.
Grantee, by the written consent hereof, as also set forth in Ex-
it °A", hereby in all respects accepts this Correction Deed and a
the provisions hereof and to the amendment of the description in
d of Trust, as aforesaid.
with aD its appnrtenancea, and warrant(s) the title to the enure, subject to those excep
reservations, easements and restrictions of record as set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
ffigned this r~ ~ ~ day of November , 1977
...GOODCO.,...a...LimitEd..Psa trzez:SklxP...._....
Charles E• Goodhue, I
STATE OF ~ By: ~/~...
~s+ Martin Kirkpatrick
County of ~~ J Being all of its General Partners
~ The forePoinY instrument was acJcnowledyed before me thin ~~- `'~h
~~ day of Novembe;,;,,,,,,,' , 19 77, by Charles F. Goodhue, III and Martin
Kirkpatrick,,,.as,•tll~gGe~eral Partners of GOODCO, a Limited Partnership.
Witaese ~j;:)Zgn~;a _~~jfficihF~eal.
~ eleMer~ Iriv.e4d) i--++1(, y~~Lal4M Wn.ra er p~r+ono -w. Iwrt sun. er conc.: Y br p.r~a~ .otmt 1° nprweLLlhr of
~ eff10101 e.PO1V of Y Hforef O•m-fOet Wna bwvt eomo of rr.o u r. reulur olbrsrr•V-f.el of o/na, o.y~t llr er 4'ee'RF
~~ 70 O~ ; Of Ot~F~46f0 ~0 1L.0 10wR OVM O/ w,0~ OfI1W1 W Off lc Oll Y 1~0 ~0.160Y1 M OIEOr Of(IOa,I Of Oepl• Oyu
Nw eft. w..,..v Hwy-/!-.ti r.,~ ~'" 1U-141, C.a n. IMl Il, ..lf~.ry 1'uldnhin. 1'.,., IV1bU Smut \Ir.el. brw..q Cu1m.A0 -7•ir
,. .
s~De~~~ " 90
- ~,
._
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED AND MADE A PART '• -
''
OF CORRECTION DEED FROM GOODCO TO SIEGEL '"-
.,+
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ ~•".
r3
C.
•+.
A tract of land being part of the Beatrice Placer, U.S.MTS.~=
No. 11426 situated in the NW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of Section 13,
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian,
Pitkin County, Colorado and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer U.S.M.S. No.
11426;
Thence N 31°07'17" E 492.94 feet to the point of intersection with
the Westerly boundary line of the County road;
Thence S 16°10'51" W 144.25 feet along said Westerly boundary line;
Thence 272.75 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc
of a curve to the left having a radius of 10852.19 feet;
Thence 198.28 feet along said westerly boundary line and the arc of
a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 4120.25 feet;
Thence S 17°29'53" W 47.96 feet along said westerly boundary line;
Thence 252.46 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of
a curve to the right having a radius of 5161.37 feet;
Thence 316.83 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of
a compound curve to the right having a radius of 917.49 feet;
Thence N 45°52'26" W 385.59 feet;
Thence N 44°07'34" E 638.70 feet to the Point of Beginning contain-
ing 5.090 acres more or less.
Except general taxes for 1977, payable in 1978; and subject to
Building and Zoning regulations; United States Patent reservations
for ditches and canals recorded September 15, 1965~in Book 215 at
Page 361; rights of way and easements for ditches, pipelines and
flumes, including the Holden Ditch and Flume as shown by map re-
corded December 17, 1890 in Plat Book 2 at Page 9, the Castle Peak
Ditch and Flume or Pipeline as shown by map recorded April 11, 1907
in Ditch Book 1 at Page 40, and the Castle Creek Pipeline as shown
by map recorded May 26, 1966 in Plat Book 3 at Page 91; and rights
of way and easements as set forth in instruments recorded in Book
170 at Page 601; all as they affect the subject property, and
all references being to the records of Pitkin County, Colorado.
Accepted this ~~day of
STATE OF ~n~'~-~~-u-~'
COUNTY OF /~~,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1~~
day of November, 1977 .by sAY ALLEN SIEGEL. ~~
Notary Public
:.u;• ~~
My comm~siQnE~pir`~s': 7 -~.~ - 7~
J ~ ~:
-~ c~
'..
~/,~.~ .. Jam...`''
- a ..
~'-
11G`.~ ~l ~,uZ, .a _.L .v, ~.~~,
Recorded at..._..r....._....._...._...o'clock............M ......................................................._...................~
... ter, l ~ '
` Reception No.. i..'.:....."" ................... _........ ................Jules........e..........Recorder.
- sooK333 r,+c~348
GOODCO, a limited partnership,
whose address is Aspen
County of Pitkin ,State of
m AUG 1 ~ PAID
Colorado ,for the consideration of en ~r
and other valuable consideration 4~~~._.._,.-..--~,
dollars, in hand paid hereby sell(s) and convey(s) to s
JAY ALLEN SIEGEL
whose address is P.O. Box 8128, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33310
nxd:i8:tatax& the following real property in the
County of Pitkin ,and State of Colorado, to wit:
As set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
*THOSE EXCEPTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTIONS
AS SET FORTH IN EY.HIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO.
with all its appurtenances, and warrant(s) the title to the same, subject to*
damarvnnn nnanamm~m aan
B1fNX~i3' KY~l4XNY%KKX X' $X
Signed this 3 ~~'-
day of June , 1977
I; c rles ~ moo nue 111
~ -..By-O-- - ---/~ ---- -- -- -
STATE OF QQL@RMYKt; Martin Kirkpatric}
j ~ ~/~~~¢~ l~ being all of its general parts
Coun of J
i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of June. ,_~ , 19 77 , by Charles £. C,oodhue, III and Martin
KirkpatricYt; as the general partners of GOODCO, a limited partnersY
~~ My cotiuunlisaibn expires /J~!'rj, /~ 7 `j `
~~ ~Vitnese• "'~7laltd,apdofficialseal.
z~
-: _.
r ~ .__ ~ .. ..._ ......... .......
_ _ t; t ..) ~; ~ Nofur PuDlb ...
i a
•~ \`i'i "''Vi
8totrtory~L~k.~t.AD•~:-uD7 D+mra1 person or pereooa Du. Insert nun. or names: K D7 D.~n rather In roDrewntatfv. or
or[lefrl a;mlb er. attorpeY-hr-real Uasn Idsrt arms of ppeerson u ezeeufar attorner-ta-Lest or other uyre IV or Ae+artP
;~ [loo; U D/ {tt]oeY o[y43DOrofJon Nen lnnart name of ruU of[lur or ottlcan u fir DrsrWmt of oUrr ottloero of rock oor-
II ponUornsaUgt1t
N0. e9~. wvnrt, a.sA-.1Dert 1.r~-9ee. ue-f af. e.H .1. un -E~.Arurd Pueu.n~nr ce.. t8f~-u steal street. Dente,. cu~ur.do -res.
s
__
'~ ~ so~,~~3 MGt3~y
-.~..y 1
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED AD1D MADE A PART
o£ Deed from GOODCO to SIEGEL .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A tract of land situated in the Northwest Quarter and the
Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West
of the 6th P. M. S aid tract being part of the BEATRICE PLACER,.
United States Mineral Survey No. 11426, and being more fully
described as follows:
BEGINNING at corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer;
thence along line 1-6 of said Beatrice Placer North 33° 12' S1" East
433.85 feet to a point on the Northwesterly right of way of Castle
Creek Road; '
thence along said right of way South 16° 10' 51" West 82.80 feet;
thence along said right of way 272.74 feet along the arc of a curve
to the left having a radius of 10852.19 feet;
thence along said right of way 198.28 feet along the arc of a curve
to the right having a radius of 4120:25 feet;
thence along said right of way South 17° 29' 46" West 47.96 feet;
thence along said right of way 252.46 feet along the arc of a curve
to the right having a radius of 5161.37 feet;
thence along said right of way 316.83 feet along the arc of a curve
to the right having a radius of 917.49 feet; the chord of which bears
..South 30° 11' 36" West 315.26 feet;
thence departing from said right of way North 45° 52' 26" West 385.59
feet to a point on line 2-1 of said Beatrice Placer;
thence along line 2-1 of said Beatrice Placer North 44° 07' 34" East
638.70 feet to the Point of Beginning. ~ '
Pitkin County, Colorado.
Except general taxes.for 1977, payable in 1978; and subject to
Building and Zoning regulations; United States Patent reservations for
ditches and canals recorded September 15,'1965 in Book 215 at Page 361;
rights of way and easements for ditches, pipelines and flumes, including
the Holden Ditch and Flume as shown by map recorded December 17, 1890 in
Plat Book 2 at Page 9, the Castle Peak Ditch and Flume or Pipeline as
shown by map recorded April 11, 1907 in Ditch Book 1 at Page 4Q, and
the Castle Creek Pipeline as shown by map recorded May 26, 1966 in Plat
Book 3 at Page 91.; and rights of way and easements as set 'forth in
instruments recorded in Book .170 at Page 601;~a11 as they affect the
subject property, and all references being to the records of Pitkin
County, Colorado.
For ownership disclosure see following documents;
-~}3A-
ALTA Owner's Policy - Form B - Ammnded 10~1J-JO
OO1B
C4 ,
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLE
GIIARANTY COMPANY
__
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY
COMPANY, a corporation of Galveston, Texas, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in
Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys'
tees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by
reason of: -
t. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; ,
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4. Unmarketabil ity of such title _ ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,-Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its
duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. _
STEWART' TITLE
- ,y~pxMU~«M1,~ ~ OOA RA NSY COMPANY
.. ~., iF~ r~Syt lE Sb9 t,.
k Q: oavpR a
eW:
'~~~, 1908.;0 Chairman of the Board
` ~'yvTE % ASM~P'f !
'' .,..ems
President
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: ,
1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or
prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or
hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect
of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation.
2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of wch rights appears in the public
records at Dale of Policy.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters la) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, Ibl not
known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to she insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date
wch claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company
prior to the date such inwred claimant became an inwred hereunder; Icl resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; Idl
attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or lel resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured
claimant had paid value for the estate or interet[ inwred by this policy.
Po9 ~Y Serial No. o . 3 5 716 7
-Y3-
rriNDIT10NS AND STIPULATIONS
1. DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following terms when used in this policy mean:
lal "inwred": the insured named in Schedule A, and,
wbject to any rights or defenses the Company may have
against the named insured, those who succeed to the
interest of such insured by operation of law as distinguished
from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, dis-
tributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next
of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors.
(b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or
damage hereunder.
Ic) "knowledge": actual knowledge, not constructive
knowledge or notice which may be imputed to an inwred
by reason of ariy public records.
Idl "land": the land described, specifically or by
reference in Schedule A, and improvements affixed thereto
which by law constitute real property; provided, however,
the term "land" does not include any property beyond the
lines of the area specifically described or referred to in
Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement
in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or
waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the
extent to which a right of access to and from the land is
inwred by this policy.
lel "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or
other security instrument.
Ifl "public records": those records which by law
impart constructive notice of matters relating to said land.
2 CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CON-
VEYANCE OF TITLE -
The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of
Date of Policy in favor of an inwred so long as such inwred
retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an
indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given
by a purchaser from such insured, or so long as such inwred
shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made
by wch insured in any transfer or conveyance of wch
estate or interest; provided, however, this policy shall not
continue in force in favor of any purchaser from wch
inwred of either said estate or interest or the indebtedness
secured by a purchase money mortgage given to such
inwred.
3. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS -
NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY AN INSURED
CLAIMANT
lal The Company, at its own cost and without undue
delay, shall provide for the defense of an insured in all
litigation consisting of actions or proceedings commenced
against such insured, or a defense interposed against an
insured in an action to enforce a contract for a sale of its
estate or interest in said land, to the extent that such
litigation is founded upon an alleged defect, lien,
encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this
policy.
Ibl The insured shall notify the Company promptly in
writing lil in case any action or proceeding is begun or
defense is interposed as set forth in (a) above, (ii) in case
knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim
of title or interest which is adverse~'`~title to the estate
(continued and conclude
or interest as insured, and which might cause loss or damage
for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this
policy or, (iii) if title to the estate or interest, as insured, is
rejected as unmarketable. If such prompt notice shall not
be given to the Company, then as to such insured all
liability of the Company shall cease and terminate in regard
to the matter or matters for which such prompt notice is
required; provided, however, that failure to notify shall in
no case prejudice the rights of any such insured under this
policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by such
failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice.
(c) The Company shall have the right at its own cost tc
institute and without undue delay prosecute any action of
proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may
be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate
or interest as insured, and the Company may take any
appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether
or not it shall be liable thereunder, and shall not thereby
concede liability or waive any provision of this policy.
Id) Whenever the Company shall have brought any
action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by
the provisions of this policy, the Company may pursue any
such litigation to' final determination ¢y a court of
competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in
its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or
order.
lel In all cases where this policy permits or requires
the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of
any action or proceeding, the inwred hereunder shall secure
to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide
defense in wch action or proceeding, and all appeals
therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the
name of such inwred for such purpose. Whenever requested
by the Company, wch inwred shall give the Company all
reasonable aid in any wch action or proceeding, in effecting
settlement, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, or pros-
ecuting or defending such action or proceeding, and the
Company shall reimburse such inwred for any expense so
incurred.
4. NOTICE OF LOSS -LIMITATION OF ACTION
In addition to the notices required under paragraph
316) of these Conditions and Stipulations, a statement in
writing of any loss or damage for which it is claimed the
Company is liable under this policy shall be furnished to
the Company within 90 days after such loss or damage shall
have been determined and no right of action shall accrue to
an inwred claimant until 30 days after such statement shall
have been furnished. Failure to furnish such statement of
loss or damage shall terminate any liability of the Company
under this policy as to such loss or damage.
5. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE
CLAIMS
The Company shall have the option to pay or otherwise
settle for or in the name of an inwred claimant any claim
insured against or to terminate all liability and obligations
of the Company hereunder by paying or tendering payment
of the amount of inwrance under this policy together with
any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to the
time of such payment or tender of payment, by the inwred
claimant and authori~~he Company.
! on last page of this policy)
- yY-
/~
~, P ~ITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Continues, . .
(contirftie6 and concluded from reverse side of Policy Free)
6. DETERMINATION AND PAYMENT OF LOSS
lal The liability of the Company under this policy
shall in no case exceed the least of:
lil the actual loss of the inwred claimant; or
(ii) the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A.
Ib) The Company will pay, in addition to any loss
insured against by this policy, all costs imposed upon an
inwred in litigation carried on by the Company for wch
insured, and all costs, attorneys' fees and expenses in
litigation carried on by wch inwred with the written
authorization of the Company.
(c) When liability has been definitely fixed in accord-
ance with the conditions of this policy, the loss or damage
shall be payable within 30 days thereafter.
7. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
No claim shall arise or be maintainable under this
policy (al if the Company, after having received notice of
an alleged defect,'lien or encumbrance inwred against
hereunder, by litigation or otherwise, removes wch defect,
lien or encumbrance or establishes the title, as inwred,
within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice; Ibl in
the event of litigation until there has been a final
determination by a court of~ competent jurisdiction, and
disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as
insured, as provided in paragraph 3 hereof; or Icl for
liability voluntarily assumed by an inwred in settling any
claim or wit without prior written consent of the Com-
pang.
8. REDUCTION OF LIABILITY
All payments under this policy, except payments made
for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the
amount of the inwrance pro tanto. No payment shall be
made without producing this policy for endorsement of
wch payment unless the policy be lost or destroyed, in
which case proof of wch loss or destruction shall be
furnished to the satisfaction of the Company.
9. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE
It is expressly understood that the amount of inwrance
under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the
Company may pay under any policy inwring either lal a
mortgage shown or referred to in Schedule B hereof which
is a lien on the estate or interest covered by this policy, or
Ib) a mortgage hereafter executed by an inwred which is a
charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred
to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a
payment under this policy. The Company shall have the
option to apply to the payment of any such mortgages any
amount that otherwise would be payable hereunder to the
insured owner of the estate or interest covered by this
policy and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment
under this policy to said inwred owner.
10. APPORTIONMENT
If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or
more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is
established affecting one or more of said parcels but not all,
the toss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as
Valid Only If Schedules A and B are Attached.
if the amount of inwrance under this policy was divided
pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate
parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made
subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has
otherwise been agreed upon as to each such parcel by the
Company and the inwred at the time of the issuance of this
policy and shown by an express statement herein or by an
eridorsement attached hereto.
11. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLE-
MENT
Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under
this policy, all right of wbrogation shall vest in the
Company unaffected by any act of the inwred claimant
The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all
rights and remedies which wch inwred claimant would
have had against any person or property in respect to wch
claim had this policy not been iswed, and if requested by
the Company, wch insured claimant shall transfer to the
Company all rights and remedies against any person or
property necessary in order to perfect wch right of
subrogation and shall permit the Company to usethe name
of such insured claimant in any transaction or litigation
involving such rights or remedies. If the payment does not
cover the loss of such inwred claimant, the Company shall
be subrogated to such rights and remedies in the proportion
which said payment bears to the amount of said loss. If loss
should rewlt from any act of such inwred claimant, wch
act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that
event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses
inwred against hereunder which shall exceed the amount, if
any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment of
the right of subrogation.
12. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY
This instrument together with all endorsements and
other instruments, if any, attached hereto by the Company
is the entire policy and contract between the inwred and
the Company.
Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on
negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to
the estate or interest covered hereby or any action asserting
wch claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and
conditions and stipulations of this policy.
No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be
made except by writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto
signed by either the President, a Vice President, the
Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or
authorized signatory of the Company.
13. NOTICES, WHERE SENT
All notices required to be given the Company and any
statement in writing required to be furnished the Company
shall be addressed to it at its main office, P. O. Box 2029,
Houston, Texas 77001.
14. The premium specified in Schedule A is the entire
charge for acceptance of risk. It includes charges for
title search and examination if same is customary or
required to be shown in the state in which the policy is
issued.
S'I` E •~'A 12'I` '1` I'I` L E
GOA aA NTY COMI'A NY
- ys-
AL7A OWNE A'S PO LICE' - Amen tleG ~. ./1 ./ 70
.`
:_
SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 10281
Policy NO.:O 357167
Date of Policy: JUNE 8, 1981 AT 9:16 A.M. Amount of Insurance: $ 220,000.00
1. Name oflnsured: LELIA N.V., A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORPORATION
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
ZN FEE SIMPLE
:ODE 0012
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in:
",;.
LELIA N.V.,~A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORPORATION
4. The land referred to in this policy, is described as follows:
A tract of land being part of the Beatrice Placer, U.S.M.S. No. 11426 situated
in the NW ~ and the SWfy of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the
6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado and being more fully described
as follows: ''
Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said Beatrice Placer U.S.M.S. No. 11426;
Thence N 31°07'17" E 492.94 feet to the point of intersection with the Westerly
boundary line of the County road; '
Thence S 16°10'51" W 144.25 feet along said Westerly boundary line;
Thence 272.75 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of a curve
to the left having a radius of 10852.19 feet;
Thence 198.28 feet along said westerly boundary line and the arc of a reverse
curve to the right having a radius of 4120.25 feet;
Thence S 17°29'53" W 47.96 feet along said westerly boundary line;
Thence 252.46 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of a curve
to the right having a radius of 5161.37 feet;
Thence 316.83 feet along said Westerly boundary line and the arc of a compound
curve to the right having a radius of 917.49 feet;
Thence N 45°52'26" W 385.59 feet; ~,
Thence N 44°07'34" E 638.70 feet to the Point of Beginning,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
'• ti'I' I~,~~',112'1' '1' I'1' I.1:
CUAAA\TY PUNI'AN l'
- yL-
-. SCHEDULE B
Order No. 10281
Policy No.O 357167 1
This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to alien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed
by law and not shown by the public records.
S.Taxes for the year 1981 and thereafter, and any special assessment or charges
not yet certified to the office of the County Treasurer.
6.Reservations and exceptions as contained in the United States Patent recorded
September 15, 1965 in Book 215 at page 361 as follows: Right of way for ditches
or canals constructed by the authority of the United States.
7. Rights of way and easements for ditches, pipelines and flumes, including but
not limited to, Holden Ditch and Flume as shown by map recorded December 17,
1890 in Plat Book 2 at page 9, the Castle Peak Ditch and Flume or Pipeline as
shown by map recorded April 11, 1907 in Ditch Book 1 at page 40, and the Castle
Creek Pipeline as shown by map recorded May 26, 1966 in Plat Book 3 at page 91.
8.Rights of ways and easements as set forth in instrument recorded in Book 170
at page 601, as they affect subject.property.
9.Any tax, assessments, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of the subject
property in Aspen Fire Protection ;District and Aspen Valley Hospital District.
l0.Terms, conditions and obligations~as set forth in Agreement between Richard I.
Furman, Rosemary Furman and Jay Allen Siegel, dated May 7, 1981, recorded June 8,
1981 in Book 409 at page 449.
-,.;: ~ _ .
S'I'1~:~~'A12'1' 'I'I'I'LL
Page3 OUANANTY CONPA NI'
167]
~~~~
Z
C
n
Z
n '~
~
m
o O
r
~
m
ye-
:~ •
L•'NllORSI'P[GNT N0. _~
h':DUI;SH`tENT to Le attached to and forming part oC:
ORULR NO•' 10281 ~ CUPL`IL'CPIEN'C NO.: CC 8250
Schedule B-Section 2, Paragraph 11 is added:
11. Terms, conditions,and obligations as set forth in Agreement
between Richard I. Furman, Rosemary. Furman and Jay Allen Siegel,
dated May 7, 1981, recorded in Book at page ~
~~
In all other respects, said commitment remains unchanged.
(Siegel/Towning)
Part of Beatrice Placer #11426 ,
in NW'_SW; 13-10-85
STlWAR1~(CIT R ~ P ASPIiN, INC.
\11 l 1
gY~ '~~'
oria.cd Signature
Y9-
' "~. .
THIS DEED, Made this
day of
1981 ,between JAY ALLEN SIEGEL
9.16 A June 8, 1981
_ Recorded at _.____- o'clock-Tf.,
"-~~~3gs toretta Banner
Reception No. _-_y,y. _- --, ~,,
of the County of BLOWard and State of
Florida
CIJ1uNd0, of the first part, and LELTA N. V. , a Netherlands
Antilles Company, 8 Handelskader Curacao
Recorder. . - ~ Ib~V
FI LINC STAMP ,~Cf"
J~IiM .:r ..._,4
~~~ / I r•
:._ ~ ~~aa
STATE UGCUfdERTARY FEE
,lUN _;31981
c/o Herbert R. Towning
whoae legal address is/2100 West Loop South, Suite 1100, Houston, Texas 77027
/Netherlands ppntil11 gggg ~etta-~
of the Lonnt}•.oC11HLL~- and.Sta3a-ufPdw-•+do. of the second part:
N'ITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration ----------DOL-t~tRS,
to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby
confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyeds~do~vst,}I~~espresents does grant, bargain,
sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, his heirs an asstgns forever, all the following
described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the
('ounty of PITKIN ~ and State of Colorado, to-wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
a}ae kne..er ItS9t1'e'eE -nn dflve~er
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise apper-
taining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the
estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of,
in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments end appurtenances. i;
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the said I i
party of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, (or himself, his heirs, I,
executors, and admit Istrators, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said party of the second part, ~'~,
his~pl1~5~1~tlQals~gns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized of the premises ,
above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has
good right, full power anti lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as -
aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes,
essessmentsandencumbrancesofwhateverkindornaturesoeveriEXCEPT general taxes for 1981, '~
payable in 1982; U.S. Patent Reservations of record affecting the subject pro-
perty; rights of way and easements for ditches, pipelines and flumes as recorded '
in Plat Book 2 at Page 9, Ditch Book 1 at Page 40 and Plat Book 3 at Page 91; and,',
rights of way and easement recorded in Book 170 at Page 601, all as recorded in
the records of Pitkin County, Colorado.
SSand the aboved bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, his '~'
JieKS a11SdS a,4Fs~gns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim t whole or any part thereof, '
the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT A FOREVER DEFEN .The singular number shall
include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any g der shall be app abl t all genders. ~.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part h s hereunto se ha d d seal the day and year first ,
above written.
~'
l ISEAL]
i ,'~j~~i1~„ .~~ '' ~~ SI GEL
~~ ~! i7 /7 ~) ISEAL]
ISEAL] '~,~
STATE OF E6t9Rxt-DtY \ / ~/
I,~ ss. V
I ~ County of BROWARD
' Ii ~ ''7
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~>~C~~ day of~ ~~
...
I 1981 ,by JAY ALLEN SI~~ •,.I,.. .:
J,, ~, , ,.,art ~ •,,
' I ~~~',~+~ ~ / ~•; jgt'tnessa hand and official seal.
' blycommissionexpires /7~ _ -^~^'~.
i. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE Of FLORIDA AT LARGE ~ i `' y ~~~~h ~~
C U Fuurr PubLe.
it MY COMMISSION E%PIRES NOV 1 1991 -~ _ ~.~
' __j30NDED 1H6U GENERAL JNS UNDERWRITERS ~ 1-~ +
„ --- -
{_t [~_-
NO.932A. N'AaN~]Tl"UECn.-Fn Pb~nou,q,buR.,.ndanefore Publi.A,ry.1316l W.at utnA oue Gold<n.fobndo PM01-pM1S]f DM.-9.aU-
~50~
- ASPEN/PITKINPLANNING' DICE
130 South Galena Stre~:-~
Aspen, Colorado 81011
(303)925-2020
LANG USE APPLICATION FEES
City
00113 - 63721 - 47331 - 52100 GMPICONCEPTUAL
63122 - 47332 - 52100 GMPIPRELIMINARY
63723 - 47333 - 52100 GMPIFINAL
63724 - 47341 - 52100 SUBICONCEPTUAL
63725 - 47342 - 52100 SUB/PRELIMINARY
63726 - 47343 - 52100 SUBIFINAL
83727 - 47350 - 52100 EXCEPTIEXEMPTION
63728 - 47350 - 52100 REZONING
63729 - 47360 - 52100 SPECIAL REVIEW
SUB-TOTAL
County
00113 - 63711 - 47331 - 52200
63712 - 47332 - 52200
63713 - 47333 - 52200
63714 - 47341 - 52200
63715 - 47342 - 52200
63716 - 47343 - 52200
63717 - 47350 - 52200
63718 - 47350 - 52200
63719 - 47360 - 52200
GMPIGENERAL
GMP/PRELIMINARY
GMPIFINAL
SUBIGENERAL
SUBIOETAILEO
SUB/FINAL
SPECIAL REVIEW
REZONING
SPECIAL APPROVAL
SUB-TOTAL
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113 - 63061 - 09100 - 52200
63063 - 09100 - 52200
63062 - 09100 - 52300
63066 - 09100 - 52300
63069 - 09100
COUNTY CODE
ALMANAC
GMP
COPY FEES
OTHER
SUB-TOTAL .-
TOTAL
Name: ~-
Address.
Check No.
Additional
Phone:
-_ Project:
r
-~
Oate:
-~-
Na. of Hours: