The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.planning.273514207009 (2)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) PARCEL IDt, 2735-142-07-009 .DATE RCVD: ~- # COPIES: ~ CASE NO P180-93 CASE NAME: Jones CDU Planners PROJ ADDR:0335 Glen Eagle Dr (CDU 0333) Lot 9 Aspen Highland OWNIAPP: Jones, Whipple Van ~ ADR~- C/SIZ:~- PHN:~-. REP: ADR:~~ C/S2:,~- PHN:~- EmailAddr: ALLOCA7EDHOURS:r FEES DUE:- FEES RCVQ:~~ '- %OVER:'. ~- REFERRALS! REFt~_; ~~ DUE:- ', : BY~r , . D DATE OF FINAL ACTION: T C E 0 I D Y PH N R E V B O M T G D A T E I ~~~------ `~~ ' ~ ~ - ''` `-'' ~-' - ` ~ - ~ - . ~ N0. _ ____ --~` -~~-- ~' ~~- '' -~~ '. BOCC Reso: ss-7a # 3E ~ 9 99/ . , . ~ - ~ ~- No ° ~- .: BOCC Ord: ~ REMARKS ' PZ: ~. HRG DOFF; '. CLOSED:~~ BY: ~~~~ HO INDEX: , ADMIN: ~- ~~ ' PLAT RECORDED~~ I PLAT (BK,PG);~~ ADMIN INDEX: ~- VRAPPf2QVALDATEa~~-~ ~VREXPIRES:~~ .,. I Y~r,s ',~ ... TYPih ~~ CDU _CA5E , CASE j'YP6: , CASE TYP2~;. CASE TYP6: ' * CASE lYP3fq CASE TYP7: ! CASE TYP4:; Date Scanned: 9/15/09 i t ~' :I; . File Location;. ~. ,Box 775 R s • ~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET PITKIN COUNTY DATE RECEIVED: 12 30 93 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF MEMBER: TM CASE # P180-93 PARCEL ID# 2735-142-07-009 PROJECT NAME: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Project Address: 335 Glen Eagle Dr APPLICANT: Whipple Van Ness Jones Applicant Address: 7273 Mission Hills Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Andrew Dorf Representative Address/Phone: ------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING $ 207 # APPS RECEIVED 15 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 15 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 207 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: DRC MEETING DATE P&Z MEETING DATE PUBLIC HEARING: NO BOCC MEETING DATE 3 ~5 PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO ESTIMATED TIME FOR BOCC: REFERRALS: ~~~-~ Attorney -Aspen Consol S.D. School District Engineer Rocky Mtn Nat Gas USFS (Carbondale) Housing = Holy Cross USFS (Aspen) Aspen Water -Aspen Fire Div. of Wildlife Envir.Hlth. -Basalt Fire BLM _~_/_ Manager Carbondale Fire ~ Snowmass Villa e us C V Zoning -Div. Water Res. auc Airport Mgr. -State Forest Ser. Caucus Sheriff CO Geo.survey Homeowners City P & Z -State Hwy Dept. Open Space Bo x ~ Building Dept -Clean Air Board ~ ~ Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: ~?Af DATE~DUE: r ~ J ' , ---- -_-_-- - _- ----------- RESOLUTION #: PLAT OR SITE PLAN RECORDED AT BOOK FINAL ROUTING County Attorney Housing Open Space Bd. Other: FILED: Revised 04/06/93 DATE: PAGE(S) _ /// 97 INITIAL: -County Engineer Zoning Envir. Health Applicant DATE ROUTED: ~.c,~~~~ ~ j 3 ,,~, .. 369991 B-f5O F'-407 i~0/i.?/94 1^:4OF' F'G 1 OF 3 REC DOC SILVIA DAVIS F'ITF'IN COUNTY CLERF:: ?~ RECORDER 0.~?~? RESOLUTION OF THE HOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSS'ONERS OF PITRIN COIINTY COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE JONES CARETAKER DWELLING UNIT Resolution No. 94-~ RECITALS 1. Whipple Vann Ness Jones hereinafter "Applicant", have applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter "Board", for approval of a caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code. 2. The Applicant's lot is zoned R-30 and is approximately 5.47 acres in size. 3. Said parcel is specifically described as Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision 2nd Filing. 4. The Applicant proposes to deed restrict the caretaker dwelling unit pursuant to ordinance 91-11. 5. The Board heard this application at a regularly scheduled meeting on March 15, 1994, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to this application. 6. The Board determined that the proposed caretaker unit meets the criteria established in Section 3-8.13 (d) of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant approval for the Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit detailed plans of the proposed garage/caretaker unit and as-built drawings of the existing residence to the Zoning ~,,, v., 369991 B-"r''5~1 F'-4t~8 i?5/1^/94 1~:40P F6 2 OF Resolution No. 94-~ Page 2 Office for review. The Zoning Office will review these plans to verify whether the proposed unit meets the net livable floor area limitation (700 square feet) and to ensure that the cumulative square footage of all structures on the property does not exceed 15,000 square feet. 2. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a certified topographic survey not more than one year old in order to verify that the proposed structure does not violate County height regulations. The survey shall also depict the number of parking stalls on the property. 3. Prior to building permit application the Applicant shall submit a landscape plan showing screening between the proposed garage/caretaker unit and the adjacent residence to the north. This plan shall also identify the location of the two additional parking stalls required. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to building permit issuance. 4. Prior to building permit application, the applicants shall record a caretaker deed restriction on the proposed accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (d)(3) of the Code (Ord. 91-11). 5. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide documentation of a commitment by the Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District to serve the proposed caretaker unit with water and sewer. 6. The proposed caretaker unit will be subject to County regulations regarding wood burning devices and fireplaces. 7. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide a soils analysis of the proposed building site to determine whether engineered foundations are necessary. 8. The proposed caretaker dwelling unit shall be subject to all other applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. 9. The applicant shall comply with all material representations made in the application, on the revised floor plan and in the public meeting. X69991 8-75~) P-40y' t),°,/1~/94 12:4UP P6 3 OF 3 Resolution No. 94-~ Page 3 y APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 13TH DAY OF c Deputy Clerk and APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ ~ Timothy E. Whits' , County Atto BOARD OF COIINTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITRIN COIINTY, COLORADO By ~~~~~ Robert W. C it , Chairman Date S ~~ APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: L_ Suza a Ronc an, Coun Planning Director ~)~u tea. g..lo~H que4cr C, HILL JO9EP!) fiOWAAR JD6~EFYf ~ ~EB11YA9ta p11L7K B. 8A11DER9 d uw ovpeES ? KRABAC1iER, HILL 1Yt EDWARD ~ ~~ ' rxafESamwx eOReowwswn ' ' ~ ,eNOMe P90F68SIONAI SUIl91Na .1111 ~~~ ~ 201 NORiH MILL STflEEi ~~ 'I',,i ' AS.THPA. GOLO@eD0 61s11 I I f ~, ~,, TEIEP)gNE ~ GAR60NUAlE OF ~ ~ PDS19QS7116 I 242 MAIN 9TRiE:'. SU11;1 9 ~, IELEWYIER i (:AR9tOHDAL6.COLOH~~E1916Lf -1 Q06) 9251181 { T616TXONE , i I : '. W09J 9633900 i -7KLEC{1PIER '. 't30919~69131 i j ""1 ~ I l i i i. .1 26~ 1994 ~dl}Y.~ 6 Gi), BC~4~:Lo~adO $1611 ~ ~ k. j I Mr. ., 9 In adds City of s~:rvice La~9ds Hater ~ Sanitation DiaticiC~~ ester Serv~.ce ~ or ~ta~cer pnit at 335 Gien 8agles Drivla L, ~cated on It'*ot ~ I of pn H3.ghlands Subdivision, Filing Ho. ~ i j~oYemus: ~ aankis Water & Sanitation District (rHii "SD") will prod ~.de to ;the proposed caretaker unit in the .garage on LaY;I 9, ~'g}~landa Subdivision Filing No. ;2. Although j~the rniaental agreement between HWSD an¢ :he City of Aq yen ~h!23, 1961, has imprecise language,'if is my opinion!~he u#~it will have to pay City tap fees ~ ul der various naa{}is, ( flees, plant investment fees, etc.) The credit fo~124 ~~s!in Filing No. 2 was for the 16 vil~s and Lots 1-$;;as already connected to the District w er the Agreement;h~as 'yon,, the HWSD has a separate tap fed ..n addition to 17:he 4~3spfen tap fees which will also have ; tc be paid prio~~ to ~ g provided to the caretaker unit.I She H9iSD tap fe? is 2a~ of the total tap fee charged bi.he City of As~i:n. 9f !the tag fes for the District can made to Doree.~nt 1~o#t's office in Aspen or through the ~ i :~y if they .~.ve ~re; to collect the HWSD fees as well Gill. ch T understan~@ is )ls~nented) . ! Intact ma if you have any questions. lY iyours, L , P.C. ' i i, i ~ ' ,' , r. ~ Ii ~i yor~Imuti.01 r AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - May 10, 1994 THRII: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit FROM: Tim Malloy, Senior Planner SUMMARY: The Board reviewed this application at the March 15, 1994 regular meeting. At that meeting, the Paynes, an adjacent property owner, expressed opposition the proposed location and size of the garage/caretaker unit. The Board voted to table approval of the Applicant's request to allow time for the Applicant and the adjacent property owner to work out a mutually acceptable location and design. The Applicant has met with the Paynes and they came to a compromise with respect to the location of the proposed caretaker unit. The Applicant's representative has informed Staff that the proposed structure will be located roughly 25' closer to the existing residence on the Jones property. The Applicants representative indicated that they would submit a revised site plan and a landscape plan showing the new location of the structure. However, no drawings had been submitted for Staff comment at the time this memo was prepared. Staff has attached the Planning Office memo and draft resolution from the March 15th meeting for reference. REQIIEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area. The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 700 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location fairly distant (90 feet) from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. LOCATION: Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision, 2nd Filing. ZONING: R-30, 30,000 square foot minimum lot size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit subject to conditions shown in the attached Planning Office memorandum and draft resolution. ~~~ ~ 2 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - March 15, 1994 THRII: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit FROM: Tim Malloy, Senior Planner SLTM24ARY: Staff recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit subject to conditions shown in the attached memo and draft resolution. REQIIEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area. The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 7Q0 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location fairly distant (90 feet) from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. LOCATION: Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision, 2nd Filing. ZONING: R-30, 30,000 square foot minimum lot size. ISSIIES: The Applicant has not provided adequate information to verify whether the proposed caretaker unit meets the floor area limitation (700 square feet) or the County height restriction. Staff has requested that the Applicant submit detailed plans of the proposed garage/caretaker unit and a certified topographic 'survey in order to verify compliance with County height and floor area restrictions. 2. The cumulative floor area of the existing residence and the proposed garage/caretaker unit (13,812 square feet) is very close. to the threshold for special review (15,000 square feet). The Applicant has not provided adequate information to verify the square footage of the existing residence. Staff has recommended that the Applicant be required to provide as- built drawings of the existing residence to verify that the property does not exceed the 15,000 square foot special review threshold. 3. The proposed garage/caretaker unit is intended to be located in an area of the property where a significant amount of fill was deposited last summer. This fill was deposited without the required County permit. 4. The proposed garage/caretaker unit will be visible from the adjacent residence to the north. The application does not discuss screening or landscaping to minimize the impact on the adjacent residence. Staff recommends .that a landscape plan be required as a condition of approval. 5. The existing residence on this property has 7 bedrooms. Staff does not have sufficient information to determine whether this residence was constructed prior to the adoption of the County's 5 bedroom special review requirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit subject to conditions shown in the attached Planning Office memorandum and draft resolution. wjcum cdu 2 MEMORANDUM T0: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - March 15, 1994 THRU: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director FROM: Tim Malloy, Planning Office RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area (1575 square feet per floor). The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 700 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location roughly 90 feet from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. APPLICANT: Whipple Van Ness Jones APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Andrew Doremus LOCATION: Lot 9, Aspen Highlands Subdivision 2nd Filing. ZONING: R-30, 30,000 square foot minimum lot size. SITE DATA: The lot is approximately 5.47 .acres in size, and is therefore, conforming as to area in the R-3o zone. According to the Assessors office, there is an existing home on the property which is approximately 10,662 square feet in size. The floor area ratio in the R-30 zone district would allow a maximum of 30,975 square feet on this property, subject to special review approval for any square footage over 15,000. According to the Applicant's representative, the existing residence contains 7 bedrooms. The existing residence does not have a garage. Parking is generally handled under a large portico at the front entry and in the driveway which is a large loop design. There is also a small parking area where the proposed garage is to be located. The property currently receives sewer and water service from the Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District. The Applicant proposes to utilize the existing water and sewer service for the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. The proposed caretaker unit will be located directly off of the existing driveway serving the main house and will require no driveway extension. The proposed unit is located outside of all required setbacks. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments from the various referral agencies. The Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District was also referred but they did not forward any comments. 1) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: The Environmental Health Department offered the following comments: The Applicant's proposal to provide water and sewer via the existing Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District service is acceptable. The applicant needs to provide written documentation from the District verifying a commitment to provide service prior to building permit application. The proposed unit is not expected to create any significant air quality or water quality impacts. The Environmental Health Department notes that the Applicant will be required to comply with County regulations for wood burning devices and will be required to file a permit with the EHD for any gas log or other decorative appliances prior to building permit application. The Environmental Health Department memo is attached for reference. 2) HOOSING: The Housing Office reviewed the application and recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. They recommend that detailed plans of the unit be provided so that the floor area of the unit can be verified. They also commented that the Housing Office prefers units to be at least partially above grade. Staff has verified that the proposed unit will be partially above grade and would have a private yard space as a result of the proposed design. The Housing Office also notes that a caretaker deed restriction must be recorded for the unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13(a)(4) as amended by Ordinance 91-1i. The summary memo from the Housing Office is attached for reference. 3) ZONING: Joanna Schaffner commented that the floor area of the existing structure has not been verified. As built plans of the existing residence should be provided along with detailed plans of the proposed structure prior to building permit application in order to verify that the total square footage of structures on the property does not exceed 15,000 square feet. Joanna also notes that the plans submitted for the proposed unit are not drawn to any scale and the exact floor area of the proposed unit has not been verified. She also states that the height of the structure has not been verified 2 due to inadequate information. The proposed structure is intended to be located on fill which was deposited last summer. This fill raised the grade by as much as 6 feet. Joanna points out that the height of this fill will have to be deducted from the total allowed height according to the methodology for calculating height in the Land Use Code. Zn order to accurately verify whether the proposed structure meets the maximum allowed height, the Applicant will be required to submit a certified topographic survey not more than one year old. This survey must be submitted prior to building permit application. The Zoning Office memo is attached for reference. Joanna also notes that the caretaker unit is not eligible for the 750 square foot garage exemption. However, the property currently does not have a garage and is eligible for this one-time exemption. However, a portion of the exemption may be taken up by the existing portico. Staff will clarify this at the board meeting. 4) COUNTY ENGINEER: The County engineer states that the proposed caretaker unit should have little or no impact on the local street system. He recommends that a soils analysis be done in the location of the proposed garage to determine whether engineered foundations will be necessary. The County Engineer's memo is attached for reference. 5) MAROON/CASTLE CREEK CAUCUS: Staff received a letter from Bob Francis summarizing the comments of the Caucus executive committee. The letter indicates that while the Caucus ordinarily supports caretaker dwelling units, they are concerned that the proposed unit will be converted to a dwelling unit. They cite the fact that the overall structure is relatively large and is located a considerable distance (90 feet) from the existing residence as supporting their concern. The Applicant's representative indicates that the purpose of the proposed garage is to provide vehicle storage for the property. There currently is no garage on the site. STAFF COMMENTS: Resolution 91-11, amending Section 3-8.13 of the Code, gives the Board the authority to approve a caretaker unit up to 700 square feet in size on any lot in the R-30 zone. Section 3-8.13(d), as amended, allows caretaker units to be located in an approved outbuilding provided that the unit meets the following conditions: 1. The total floor are of the principal and caretaker unit shall not exceed the allowable FAR of the applicable zone district. Response: As-built drawings of the existing residence along with detailed plans of the proposed structure will be required 3 prior to issuance of a building permit to verify compliance with the FAR standards. 2. There shall be provided one (i) off street parking space for each bedroom within the principal unit and one (1) off- street parking space for each bedroom in the caretaker unit. Response: The application includes no information regarding parking or the number of bedrooms. Staff discussed this issue with the Applicant's representative and was informed that the existing residence has seven (7) bedrooms. There is currently no garage on the property. Parking is generally handled under a portico at the front entry and in the driveway, which is large loop design. The proposed garage will accommodate 6 vehicles. According to the Applicant's representative one of these stall could be dedicated to the caretaker unit. This leaves 5 stalls for the existing residence, two less than the number of bedrooms. There is ample space on the property to accommodate the additional two stalls required. Staff would recommend that the site plan for this property identify where theses two stalls will be located. 3. The applicant shall record a "caretaker" deed restriction as described in Section 3-8.13(d)(3), as amended by Ordinance 91-11. The applicant is aware of the deed restriction and has agreed to so restrict the proposed accessory dwelling unit. 4. The caretaker dwelling unit restriction may be removed by the property owner upon approval of the Board, subject to the requirement that the dwelling unit is removed or modified. If modified, the remaining improvements must no longer be capable of occupancy as a dwelling unit and must meet otherwise applicable Code requirements. Response: This requirement will apply if and when the applicants decide to eliminate the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. OTHER ISSUES: The proposed garage/caretaker unit is located relatively close to the adjacent residence owned by the Paynes. Since the structure will be constructed on fill it will be visible from this residence. The application does not include any discussion of landscaping to minimize the impact on the adjacent property. The Applicant's representative indicates that they have had discussions with the adjacent property owners regarding screening. Staff would recommend that a landscape plan, showing screening between the proposed structure and the adjacent residence, be required as a condition of approval. The existing residence on this property exceeds the County's 5 4 bedroom threshold for special review. Staff does not have sufficient information at this time to determine if the existing residence was constructed prior to the adoption of the 5 bedroom restriction. Staff will provide additional information on this issue at the Board meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the requested caretaker dwelling unit subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit detailed plans of the proposed garage/caretaker unit and as-built drawings of the existing residence to the Zoninq Office for review. The Zoning Office will review these plans to verify whether the proposed unit meets the net livable floor area limitation (700 square feet) and to ensure that the cumulative square footage of all structures on the property does not exceed 15,000 square feet. 2. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a certified topographic survey not more than one year old in order to verify that the proposed structure does not violate County height regulations. The survey shall also depict the number of parking stalls on the property. 3. Prior to building permit application the Applicant shall submit a landscape plan showing screening between the proposed garage/caretaker unit and the adjacent residence to the north. This plan shall also identify the location of the two additional parking stalls required. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to building permit issuance. 4. Prior to building permit application, the applicants shall record a caretaker deed restriction on the proposed accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (d)(3) of the Code (Ord. 91-11). 5. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide documentation of a commitment by the Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District to serve the proposed caretaker unit with water and sewer. 6. The proposed caretaker unit will be subject to County regulations regarding wood burning devices and fireplaces. 7. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide a soils analysis of the proposed building site to determine whether engineered foundations are necessary. 8. The proposed caretaker dwelling unit shall be subject to all other applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use 5 Code. 9. The applicant shall comply with all material representations made in the application, on the revised floor plan and in the public meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum from 2. Memorandum from 3. Memorandum from 4. Memorandum from 5. Letter from the 6. Application, an the Environmental Health Department the Zoning Office the Housing Office the County Engineer Maroon/Castle Creek Caucus d accompanying materials memo_bocc_jones_cdu MEMORANDUM To: Tim Malloy, Planning Office From: Chris Chiola, Environmental Health Department ~~ Through: Lee Cassin, Senior Environmental Health Officer Date: February 17, 1994 Re: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review ParcellD # 2735-142-07-009 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review application under the authority of the Pitkin County Code, Title II, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200: •n is the policy of the Coumy to ensure that land is not committed to any use and that no use is initiated whhout adequate evidence that facilities to collect, treat and dispose of anticipated types and quantities of waste water are available or can end will be provided with suitable capacity, quality of discharge, suitable point of discharge and dependability'. The applicant has agreed to serve the project with community sewer as provided by the Aspen Highlands Sanitation District, but still needs to provide documentation "...that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the ,~ service agency is capable of serving the development... as defined in Section 5-200.2 of the Pitkin Coun Code. This documentation is a condition of approval for this application. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205: 'h is the policy of the County to ensure that land is not committed to any use and that no use is initiated without adequate evidence that a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability is available to support the use intended.' The applicant has agreed to serve the project with water provided by the Aspen Highlands Water District. The applicant needs to provide a "...letter of intent to service the proposal.." as defined in Section 205.2 of the Pitkin County Code as a condition of approval. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-22 and 5-107.2: •n is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end ft is the policy of the Coumy that no land use be intiated which would adversely effect the quantity, quality, or aceessibiliry of the County's water resources; or which would occur at the expense of established water-dependent agrieukural activities; or which would resuk in increased salinization of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistribute major water resources. tt is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative butter along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows and wetlands.' The Environmental Health Department will only be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality. AIR ~UALITY• Sections 2-17 and 5-106: •ony that davelopmem is permhted which will not contribute aignficanty to degradation of air quality in Pitkin County and is not a direct or indirect source of air pollution. This project is not expected to contribute significantly to air quality degradation. Emissions for this project will have a negligible impact on the quality of air in the non- attainment area and mitigation measures are not required. The applicant must file afireplace/woodstove permit with the Environmental Health Department for any gas logs or decorative appliances before the building permit will be issued. Metropolitan areas of Pitkin County which includes this site may have two department certified devices and unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances per building. New homes may NOT have wood burning fireplaces, nor may any heating device use coal as fuel. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-2 •It is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America' This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. ...Jr ENV:WP:UNO USE:JONES.CAflE M E M O R A N D II M T0: Tim Malloy, County Planner FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, County Zoning DATE: February 9, 1994 RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Parcel ID# 2735-142-07-009 I have reviewed the above referenced application, and offer the following comments. ZONE: R-30, thirty thousand square foot minimum lot size This parcel contains 5.47 acres and is conforming in size. SETBACKS: The required setbacks for the R-30 zone district are: 30 foot front yard setback 15 foot side yard setback 20 foot rear yard setback The proposed structure lies outside the required setbacks. FLOOR AREA: The existing floor area has not been verified by the Zoning Staff. This parcel is permitted a total floor area of 30,975 square feet, however, a Special Review is required for any floor area over 15,000 square feet. The proposed caretaker unit is not permitted a 750 square foot garage exemption as stated in the application. The plan submitted by the applicant is not to scale, therefore, the net livable square footage cannot be calculated at this time. HEIGHT: Sufficient information has not been submitted to determine compliance with County height regulations. PLEASE NOTE: The applicant has raised the grade directly beneath the proposed structure by almost six feet. This earthmoving was done last summer, without required permits from Pitkin County. Pursuant to the definition of building height, the amount of fill will be deducted from the total allowed height requirement. A certified survey not more than a year old is required prior to submittal of a building permit application so that accurate height calculations may be made. The survey submitted is not clear as to what the grade elevation is under the proposed structure. The garage as shown on the site plan is not to scale. TO: Tim Malloy, County Planner FROli: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: February 25, 1994 RE: Jones Review for a Caretaker Dwelling Unit Parcel ID No. 2735-142-07-009 After reviewing the above-referenced application, the. Housing Office recommends approval of the proposed Caretaker Dwelling Unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Board of County Commissioner Ordinance 91-11. Section 3-8.13(d), Caretaker Units - Outbuildings, states: The Board may permit one caretaker dwelling untt not to exceed 700 square feet, to be located within a property approved outbuilding on any lot wtthin the R-30, AF-1, AF-2, RS-20, RS-30 and RS-160 zone districts .. . The applicant states that this unit is to be 699.5 square feet. Since this is so close to the maximum, this should be checked closely upon submittal of the floor plans. The unit must also contain a kitchen as defined below: For Accessory Dwelling Unfts and Caretaker Dwelling Units, a minimum of atwo-burner stove and oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. The applicant must also comply with Section 3-8.13(a)(4), added per a Code amendment enacted with Ordinance 91-11, which states: The applicant shall by deed restriction or other permanent commitment running wkh the land, guaramee that the caretaker unit not be required to be rented; not be condominiumized or sold; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limtted to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who quality as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by said Authority; be rented for terms not less than six (6) momhs 'rf rented. The caretaker dwelling may be occupied by members of the immediate family even though they may not qualify as an employee of the community. "Immediate Fatuity' shall mean a person related by blood or marriage whc is a first cousin (or closer relative) and his or her children. The Housing Office is unsure of the location of the unit as to if it is all below grade. Although the applicant can do this, the• Housing Office prefers the unit to be partially above grade. Prior to building permit approval, exact floor plans of the caretaker dwelling unit and a signed and recorded Deed Restriction must be submitted to the Housing Office. The floor plans must state net liveable square footage as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing office's Guidelines. A copy of this deed restriction can be obtained in the Housing Office. U+ord\referrat\lones_o.cdu MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Tim Malloy CC PCSKB From: Bud Eylar Postmark: Mar 07,94 4:36 PM CC Bud Subject: Jones Caretaker Message: Tim, I have reviewed th i) The addition of the on the local street, ad additional trips will a area. 2) If the garage. undertaken to determine necessary to handle the e application and have the following comments: caretaker unit should have little or no impact ding only seven trips per day. However, the dd to the VMT within the Aspen Nonattainment is approved, a soils analysis should be whether engineered foundations will be loads and soil pressures. Bud -___=====X=====---------- ~~~~f~ . ~ ~'LY~~iCt/J' ~ ATTORNEY AT LAW PAOFESSIONAI CORPORATION 106 SOUTH MILL STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-6750 FAX 925-6751 FFt32~ February 23, 1994 Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department Attn. Tim Malloy 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Whip Jones' garage/caretaker unit Dear Tim: The executive committee of the Maroon/Castle Caucus has reviewed the above application. The following are our comments. As you may know, in the past the Committee has generally not had any problems with caretaker units, provided that the units were placed in the employee housing "pool" and governed by the standard employee housing restrictions. Our concern has always been that the caretaker units indeed turn out to be genuine employee housing units. In this case, however, we have some specific concerns. We note that the garage and caretaker unit are both relatively large. We also note that the garage appears to be a considerable distance from the. house. In the past, most of the caretaker units we have seen which are integrated with garages have beer, in connection with attached garages. We feel that having the garage close to the house, or part of it, integrates the unit into the structure, and lessens the impact therefrom. Here, we are concerned that the long-range intent for the garage/caretaker unit is to improve the entire structure into a dwelling unit. In that regard we note that people typically locate detached garages very close to the principle residence. Obviously, people don't want to park their cars, only to end up having to walk a long way to the house. In this case, the only reason we can fathom for locating the garage where it is would be the homeowner's expectation that the garage would eventually become more than just a garage. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me. 'ncerely, Robe A. ranci~ Chairman RAF/som -~` AGENDA ITEM SIIMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners ~ ~ ~° Regular Meeting - May 10, 1994 THRII: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit FROM: Tim Malloy, Senior Planner SUMMARY: The Board reviewed this application at the March 15, 1994 regular meeting. At that meeting, the Paynes, an adjacent property owner, expressed opposition the proposed location and size of the garage/caretaker unit. The Board voted to table approval of the Applicant's request to allow time for the Applicant and the adjacent property owner to work out a mutually acceptable location and design. The Applicant has met with the Paynes and they came to a compromise with respect to the location of the proposed caretaker unit. The Applicant's representative has informed Staff that the proposed structure will be located roughly 25' closer to the existing residence on the Jones property. The Applicants representative indicated that they would submit a revised site plan and a landscape plan showing the new location of the structure. However, no drawings had been submitted for Staff comment at the time this memo was prepared. Staff has attached the Planning Office memo and draft resolution from the March 15th meeting for reference. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area. The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 700 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location fairly distant (90 feet) from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. LOCATION: Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision, 2nd Filing. p~pMS VY~' ''~ vC~ic.x~ ~ Zn,,,L..~ ~ ~ , ~~ w.:~ Goes eovr,pl ~-. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO TIM MALLOY From: Joanna Schaffner Postmark: May 09,94 3:14 PM Subject: Jones ,~ ~' Message: This complies with Net Livable Floor Area. Although I do not have enough information to verify compliance with County height regs, it appears that the proposed structure will comply. See me if any other questions arise. ----------=====X=====___------- r. na 1adTT~ 3/I4/9I BOARD OFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERS FROM• TOMAND MBRBIB PAYNIs' $~ JONES 6 CAR GARAGEAIVD CARETAKER IIMT Whip Ins watch dogged the aubdivlslon for?S years and is now proposi>;g to do somtthtr{g directly eonttstry to the covenwtts to which he has obliged other homeowners to cotrfona a He proposes a separate buiJdltt~ far from the main residence. adjacent to the propesry line and In closer Droximity to both neighboring houses than his own. 6. We do not object to a caretakers unit per se, but the mere magtninrde of a 6 car ¢at+o~s is hnpproprtate. c. We bu1Jt our home I7 years ago with a apec~c passive solar orientation to the southwest ~'he proposed location of the new building puts it directly to our view plane just on the other side of our fence. E Tsven though we have discrassed the proposed structure with both Whip and Andrew Dontmrs, without drawn plans detailing height, overaJf dimensions and exact location, we are utuun of exactly what they have i» mind We feel Jt would be improper, under airy circumstances, jot eonstrucNon of a 6 car ' garage in a long atand/ng rasidentfo! subdivision without submitting drawings ` for the Impacted adJacettt »elghbors 1o have an exact understanding of what is ~ to be built. We would propose that: I. h5rarct plate be made available for revtew ?. The strucwre be relocated closer to the owtter's house, and not the two adJointnlg neighbors 3. The size of the garage be reduced to a more manageable and appropriate dimension 4. Appropriate bermittg ottd landseopittg be required by the owner/bullder to presetvs the private wooded longstatuiing characteristics ojthe subdlvtalon In conelustotR we feel this changes a ?S year pattern in the Aspen Highlands subdtvfston atta-secs a dangerous precedent for allowing accessory buildings whJeh are too Jorge and too jar away from the morn dwelling. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - March 15, 1994 THRU: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director ~}'i RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit FROM: Tim Malloy, Senior Planner SUMMARY: Staff recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit subject to conditions shown in the attached memo and draft resolution. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area. The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 700 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location fairly distant (90 feet) from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. LOCATION: Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision, 2nd Filing. ZONING: R-30, 30,000 square foot minimum lot size. ISSUES: 1. The Applicant has not provided adequate information to verify whether the proposed caretaker unit meets the floor area limitation (700 square feet) or the County height restriction. 5 Staff has requested that the Applicant submit detailed plans of the proposed garage/caretaker unit and a certified SCI topographic survey in order to verify compliance with County height and floor area restrictions. (~ 2. The cumulative floor area of th exis ing residence and the proposed garage/caretaker unit 13,8 square feet) is very close to the threshold for sp ci review (15,000 square feet). The Applicant has not pro ed adequate information to verify the square footage of th existing residence. Staff has l ~ )S GtY~ ~a~ ~y1 as~essor3 records 7Or Pnc ~s~ ~ res ~ 10, 662 ~31k= recommended that the Applicant be required to provide as- built drawings of the existing residence to verify that the property does not exceed the 15,000 square foot special review threshold. 3. The proposed garage/caretaker unit is intended to be located in an area of the property where a significant amount of fill was deposited last summer. This fill was deposited without the required County permit. 4. The proposed garage/caretaker unit will be visible from the adjacent residence to the north. The application does not discuss screening or landscaping to minimize the impact on the adjacent residence. Staff recommends that a landscape plan be required as a condition of approval. 5. The existing residence on this property has 7 bedrooms. Staff does not have sufficient information to determine whether this residence was constructed prior to the adoption of the County's 5 bedroom special review requirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit subject to conditions shown in the attached Planning Office memorandum and draft resolution. a~~~ ~a~ 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Regular Meeting - March 15, 1994 THRU: Reid Haughey, County Manager Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director FROM: Tim Malloy, Planning Office RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval for a caretaker dwelling unit to be located within a freestanding garage which the Applicant intends to construct on Lot 9 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision second filing. This application is being processed pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (d) of the Land Use Code. The garage is proposed to be a two story structure approximately 3150 square feet in area (1575 square feet per floor). The upper floor is intended to be utilized as a garage while the lower floor will accommodate the caretaker dwelling unit, a large storage area and a mechanical room. The Applicant indicates that the proposed caretaker unit will comply with the 700 square foot size limitation. The Applicant proposes to construct the garage/caretaker unit in a location roughly 90 feet from the existing residence in an area of the property where a large amount of fill was deposited last summer without the necessary County permits. APPLICANT: Whipple Van Ness Jones APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Andrew Doremus LOCATION: Lot 9, Aspen Highlands Subdivision 2nd Filing. ZONING: R-30, 30,000 square foot minimum lot size. SITE DATA: The lot is approximately 5.47 acres in size, and is therefore, conforming as to area in the R-3o zone. According to the Assessors office, there is an existing home on the property which is approximately 10,662 square feet in size. The floor area ratio in the R-30 zone district would allow a maximum of 30,975 square feet on this property, subject to special review approval for any square footage over 15,000. According to the Applicant's representative, the existing residence contains 7 bedrooms. The existing residence does not have a garage. Parking is generally handled under a large portico at the front entry and in the driveway which is a large loop design. There is also a small parking area where the proposed garage is to be located. The property currently receives sewer and water service from the Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District. The Applicant proposes to utilize the existing water and sewer service for the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. The proposed caretaker unit will be located directly off of the existing driveway serving the main house and will require no driveway extension. The proposed unit is located outside of all required setbacks. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments from the various referral agencies. The Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District was also referred but they did not forward any comments. 1) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: The Environmental Health Department offered the following comments: The Applicant's proposal to provide water and sewer via the existing Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District service is acceptable. The applicant needs to provide written documentation from the District verifying a commitment to provide service prior to building permit application. The proposed unit i.s not expected to create any significant air quality or water quality impacts. The Environmental Health Department notes that the Applicant will be required to comply with County regulations for wood burning devices and will be required to file a permit with the EHD for any gas log or other decorative appliances prior to building permit application. The Environmental Health Department memo is attached for reference. 2) HOUSING: The Housing Office reviewed the application and recommends approval of the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. They recommend that detailed plans of the unit be provided so that the floor area of the unit can be verified. They also commented that the Housing office prefers units to be at least partially above grade. Staff has verified that the proposed unit will be partially above grade and would have a private yard space as a result of the proposed design. The Housing Office also notes that a caretaker deed restriction must be recorded for the unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13(a)(4) as amended by Ordinance 91-11. The summary memo from the Housing Office is attached for reference. 3) ZONING: Joanna Schaffner commented that the floor area of the existing structure has not been verified. As built plans of ~ „_,'~the existing residence should be provided along with detailed ,~ ` ~ UT'" "plans of the proposed structure prior to building permit V`~ application in order to verify that the total square footage l~~l.i ` \ of structures on the property does not exceed 15,000 square (l). `I_wl@(J~ feet. Joanna also notes that the plans submitted for the proposed unit are not drawn to any scale and the exact floor ~t~ ~ area of the proposed unit has not been verified. She also ~~~'• 5 tates that the height of the structure has not been verified ~ L~„~~~~~1~ ~R' 2 '~'~c~oQ.~'\y~,,~X . ~c~ ~~c, due to inadequate information. The proposed structure is intended to be located on fill which was deposited last summer. This fill raised the grade by as much as 6 feet. Joanna points out that the height of this fill will have to be deducted from the total allowed height according to the methodology for calculating height in the Land Use Code. In order to accurately verify whether the proposed structure meets the maximum allowed height, the Applicant will be required to submit a certified topographic survey not more than one year old. This survey must be submitted prior to building permit application. The Zoning Office memo is attached for reference. Joanna also notes that the caretaker unit is not eligible for the 750 square foot garage exemption. However, the property currently does not have a garage and is eligible for this one-time exemption. However, a portion of the exemption may be taken up by the existing portico. Staff will clarify this at the board meeting. ~ SK 4) COUNTY ENGINEER: The County engineer states that the proposed caretaker unit should have little or no impact on the local street system. He recommends that a soils analysis be done in the location of the proposed garage to determine whether engineered foundations will be necessary. The County Engineer's memo is attached for reference. 5) MAROON/CASTLE CREEK CAUCUS: Staff received a letter from Bob Francis summarizing the comments of the Caucus executive committee. The letter indicates that while the Caucus ordinarily supports caretaker dwelling units, they are concerned that the proposed unit will be converted to a dwelling unit. They cite the fact that the overall structure is relatively large and is located a considerable distance (90 feet) from the existing residence as supporting their concern. The Applicant's representative indicates that the purpose of the proposed garage is to provide vehicle storage for the property. There currently is no garage on the site. 3TAFF COMMENTS: Resolution 91-11, amending Section 3-8.13 of the Code, gives the Board the authority to approve a caretaker unit up to 700 square feet in size on any lot in the R-30 zone. Section 3-8.13(d), as amended, allows caretaker units to be located in an approved outbuilding provided that the unit meets the following conditions: 1. The total floor are of the principal and caretaker unit shall not exceed the allowable FAR of the applicable zone district. Response: As-built drawings of the existing residence along with detailed plans of the proposed structure will be required 3 prior to issuance of a building permit to verify compliance with the FAR standards. 2. There shall be provided one (1) off street parking space for each bedroom within the principal unit and one (i) off- street parking space for each bedroom in the caretaker unit. Response: The application includes no information regarding parking or the number of bedrooms. Staff discussed this issue with the Applicant's representative and was informed that the existing residence has seven (7) bedrooms. There is currently no garage on the property. Parking is generally handled under a portico at the front entry and in the driveway, which is large loop design. The proposed garage will accommodate 6 vehicles. According to the Applicant's representative one of these stall could be dedicated to the caretaker unit. This leaves 5 stalls for the existing residence, two less than the number of bedrooms. There is ample space on the property to accommodate the additional two stalls required. Staff would recommend that the site plan for this property identify where theses two stalls will be located. 3. The applicant shall record a "caretaker" deed restriction as described in Section 3-8.13(d)(3), as amended by Ordinance 91-11. The applicant is aware of the deed restriction and has agreed to so restrict the proposed accessory dwelling unit. 4. The caretaker dwelling unit restriction may be removed by the property owner upon approval of the Board, subject to the requirement that the dwelling unit is removed or modified. If modified, the remaining improvements must no longer be capable of occupancy as a dwelling unit and must meet otherwise applicable Code requirements. Response: This requirement will apply if and when the applicants decide to eliminate the proposed caretaker dwelling unit. OTHER ISSUES: The proposed garage/caretaker unit is located relatively close to the adjacent residence owned by the Paynes. Since the structure will be constructed on fill it will be visible from this residence. The application does not include any discussion of landscaping to minimize the impact on the adjacent property. The Applicant's representative indicates that they have had discussions with the adjacent property owners regarding screening. Staff would recommend that a landscape plan, showing screening between the proposed structure and the adjacent residence, be required as a condition of approval. The existing residence on this property exceeds the County's 5 4 bedroom threshold for special review. Staff does not have sufficient information at this time to determine if the existing residence was constructed prior to the adoption of the 5 bedroom restriction. Staff will provide additional information on this issue at the Board meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the requested caretaker dwelling unit subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit detailed plans of the proposed garage/caretaker unit and as-built drawings of the existing residence to the Zoning Office for review. The Zoning Office will review these plans to verify whether the proposed unit meets the net livable floor area limitation (700 square feet) and to ensure that the cumulative square footage of all structures on the property does not exceed 15,000 square feet. 2. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a certified topographic survey not more than one year old in order to verify that the proposed structure does not violate County height regulations. The survey shall also depict the number of parking stalls on the property. 3. Prior to building permit application the Applicant shall submit a landscape plan showing screening between the proposed garage/caretaker unit and the adjacent residence to the north. This plan shall also identify the location of the two additional parking stalls required. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning office prior to building permit issuance. 4. Prior to building permit application, the applicants shall record a caretaker deed restriction on the proposed accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (d)(3) of the Code (Ord. 91-11). 5. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide documentation of a commitment by the Aspen Highlands Water and Sanitation District to serve the proposed caretaker unit with water and sewer. 6. The proposed caretaker unit will be subject to County regulations regarding wood burning devices and fireplaces. 7. Prior to building permit application, the applicant shall provide a soils analysis of the proposed building site to determine whether engineered foundations are necessary. 8. The proposed caretaker dwelling unit shall be subject to all other applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use 5 Code. 9. The applicant shall comply with all material representations made in the application, on the revised floor plan and in the public meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum from 2. Memorandum from 3. Memorandum from 4. Memorandum from 5. Letter from the 6. Application , an memo bocc Jones cdu the Environmental Health Department the Zoning Office the Housing Office the County Engineer Maroon/Castle Creek Caucus d accompanying materials ~ , ~~ r ~o {~Lt~l ~ ~ ~ I ~p~~`cu~'io-~ `~~-~ 611 em~r~ ~(~i ~~1} G S~e ~c--- 7~'d~w1i'h ~~ifr-~ o-r1l''`~~ie. ~~~-- ~~~~~ Mod ~ fb ~~ -b ve~-~ ~ {~ ~ ~~ MEMORANDUM To: Tim Malloy, Planning Office From: Chris Chiola, Environmental Health Department ~~ Through: Lee Cassin, Senior Environmental Health Officer Date: February 17, 1994 Re: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Parcel ID # 2735-142-07-009 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review application under the authority of the Pitkin Countv Code, Title II, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200: •n is the policy of the County to ensure that land is not committed to any use and that no use is initiated without adequate evidence that facilities to collect, treat and dispose of anticipated types and quantities of waste water ere available or can and will be provided with suitable capacity, quality of discharge, suitable point of discharge end dependability'. The applicant has agreed to serve the project with community sewer as provided by the Aspen Highlands Sanitation District, but still needs to provide documentation "...that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the service agency is capable of serving the development..." as defined in Section 5-200.2 of the Pitkin County Code. This documentation is a condition of approval for this application. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205: •n is the policy of the County to ensure that land is not committed to any use and that no use is initiated without adequate evidence that a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure end dependability is available to support the use intended' The applicant has agreed to serve the project with water provided by the Aspen Highlands Water District. The applicant needs to provide a "...letter of intent to service the proposal..." as defined in Section 205.2 of the Pitkin County Code as a condition of approval WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Sections 2-22 and 5-107.2: •n is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its present water resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no land use be initiated which would adversely enact the quantity, quality, or accessibility of the County's water resources; or which would occur at the expense of established water•dependent agricultural activities; or which would resuit in increased salinization of water resources, loss of minimum stream flows, further destruction of wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistribute major water resources. k is also the policy of the County to maintain a natural vegetative buffer along its surface waters such that the surface and groundwaters of the area are not encroached upon by land uses or other human activities which could cause deterioration of water quality or impair the natural treatment processes provided by meadows end wetlands.' The Environmental Health Department will only be addressing water quality impacts on down stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality. AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106: 'Only that development is permitted which will not contribute sign'rficantly to degradation of air quality in PRkin County and is not a direct or indirect source of air pollution. This project is not expected to contribute significantly to air quality degradation. Emissions for this project will have a negligible impact on the quality of air in the non- attainment area and mitigation measures are not required. The applicant must file afireplace/woodstove permit with the Environmental Health Department for any gas logs or decorative appliances before the building permit will be issued. Metropolitan areas of Pitkin County which includes this site may have two department certified devices and unlimited numbers of decorative gas appliances per building. New homes may NOT have wood burning fireplaces, nor may any heating device use coal as fuel. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2-2 •n is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the County, the State of Colorado, or the United States of America.' This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health laws. ...Jf ENV:WP:LAND USE:JONES.CARE M E M O R A N D U M TO: Tim Malloy, County Planner FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, County Zoning DATE: February 9, 1994 RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Parcel ID# 2735-142-07-009 I have reviewed the above referenced application, and offer the following comments. ZONE: R-30, thirty thousand square foot minimum lot size This parcel contains 5.47 acres and is conforming in size. SETBACKS: The required setbacks for the R-30 zone district are: 30 foot front yard setback 15 foot side yard setback 20 foot rear yard setback The proposed structure lies outside the required setbacks. FLOOR AREA: The existing floor area has not been verified by the Zoning Staff. This parcel is permitted a total floor area of 30,975 square feet, however, a Special Review is required for any floor area over 15,000 square feet. The proposed caretaker unit is not permitted a 75o square foot garage exemption as stated in the application. The plan submitted by the applicant is not to scale, therefore, the net livable square footage cannot be calculated at this time. HEIGHT: Sufficient information has not been submitted to determine compliance with County height regulations. PLEASE NOTE: The applicant has raised the grade directly beneath the proposed structure by almost six feet. This earthmoving was done last summer, without required permits from Pitkin County. Pursuant to the definition of building height, the amount of fill will be deducted from the total allowed height requirement. A certified survey not more than a year old is required prior to submittal of a building permit application so that accurate height calculations may be made. The survey submitted is not clear as to what the grade elevation is under the proposed structure. The garage as shown on the site plan is not to scale. .._.. TO: Tim Malloy, County Planner FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: February 25, 1994 RE: Jones Review for a Caretaker Dwelling Unit Parcel ID No. 2735-142-07-009 After reviewing the above-referenced application, the Housing Office recommends approval of the proposed Caretaker Dwelling Unit pursuant to Section 3-8.13 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Board of County Commissioner Ordinance 91-11. Section 3-8.13(d), Caretaker Units - Outbuildings, states: The Board may permk one caretaker dwelling unR not to exceed 700 square feet, to be located within a propery approved outbuilding on any lot within the R30, AF-1, AF-2, RS-20, RS-30 and RS-160 zone districts .. . The applicant states that this unit is to be 699.5 square feet. Since this is so close to the maximum, this should be checked closely upon submittal of the floor plans. The unit must also contain a kitchen as defined below: For Accessory Dwelling Units and Caretaker Dwelling Units, a minimum of atwo-burner stove and oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. The applicant must also comply with Section 3-8.13(a)(4), added per a Code amendment enacted with Ordinance 91-11, which states: The applicarn shall by deed restriction or other permanern commttmern running with the land, guarantee that the caretaker unft not be required to be rerned; not be condominiumized or sold; not be occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to occupancy by not more than two (2) adults, and related children, who qualify as (and have been found by the Housing Authority to be) employees of the community under such guidelines as may be from time to time established by said Authority; be rerned for terms not less than six (6) months 'rf rerned. The caretaker dwelling may be occupied by members of the immediate family even though they may not quality as an employee of the community. "Immediate Family" shall mean a person related by blood or marriage who is a first cousin (or closer relative) and his or her children. The Housing Office is unsure of the location of the unit as to if it is all below grade. Although the applicant can do this, the Housing Office prefers the unit to be partially above grade. Prior to building permit approval, exact floor plans of the caretaker dwelling unit and a signed and recorded Deed Restriction must be submitted to the Housing Office. The floor plans must state net liveable square footage as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Office's Guidelines. A copy of this deed restriction can be obtained in the Housing Office. U+ord\referral\jones_o.cdu MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Tim Malloy CC Bud CC PCSKB From: Bud Eylar Postmark: Mar 07,94 4:36 PM Subject: Jones Caretaker Message: Tim, I have reviewed the application and have the following comments: 1) The addition of the caretaker unit should have little or no impact on the local street, adding only seven trips per day. However, the additional trips will add to the VMT within the Aspen Nonattainment area. 2) If the garage is approved, a soils analysis should be undertaken to determine whether engineered foundations will be necessary to handle the loads and soil pressures. Bud ----------=====X=====___------- i/ (~Q~L!~~ , ~J " ~~Qi%~~J' /ATTORNEY AT LAW PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 706 SOUTH MILL STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-6150 FAX 925-6151 FEB 2 5 February 23, 1994 Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department Attn. Tim Malloy 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Whip Jones' garage/caretaker unit Dear Tim: The executive committee of reviewed the above application. the Maroon/Castle Caucus has The following are our comments. As you may know, in the past the Committee has generally not had any problems with caretaker units, provided that the units were placed in the employee housing "pool" and governed by the standard employee housing restrictions. Our concern has always been that the caretaker units indeed turn out to be genuine employee housing units. In this case, however, we have some specific concerns. We note that the garage and caretaker unit are both relatively large. We also note that the garage appears to be a considerable distance from the house. In the past, most of the caretaker units we have seen which are integrated with garages have been in connection with attached garages. We feel that having the garage close to the house, or part of it, integrates the unit into the structure, and lessens the impact therefrom. Here, we are concerned that the long-range intent for the garage/caretaker unit is to improve the entire structure into a dwelling unit. In that regard we note that people typically locate detached garages very close to the principle residence. Obviously, people don't want to park their cars, only to end up having to walk a long way to the house. In this case, the only reason we can fathom for locating the garage where it is would be the homeowner's expectation that the garage would eventually become more than just a garage. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me. 'ncerely, Robe A. ranci~ Chairman RAF/som o/ Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 2506 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone/Fax (303) 925-3816 ANDREW DOREMUS 600 W. FRANCIS ST. ASPEN, CO. 81611 REFERENCE: LOT 9, ASPEN HIGHLANDS F2 JOB NO. 10045 MARCH 15, 1994 DEAR ANDREW: AT YOUR REQUEST, I WENT OUT TO W.V.N. JONES RESIDENCE AT LOT 9, ASPEN HIGHLANDS, FILING NO. 2, IN NOVEMBER, 1993 AND SURVEYED THE RECENT FILL AREA ADJACENT TO LOT 3. I DETERMINED THAT THIS FILL AREA AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP IS 5.8 FEET ABOVE THE ADJACENT UNDISTURBED GRADE. WE THRUST THAT THIS WILL MEET WITH YOUR APPROVAL AND THAT WE MAY BE OF FURTHER SERVICE TO YOU. SINCERELY YOURS; DAVID McBRIDE RI,S--1612 9 ,, .. F, ~,_, ,w DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: ~,~' y` 6 OWNER'S NAME: Y 1. Type of Application: 2~ Describe action/tyrbe pf development 3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: 6. The applicant needs to post a sign r each public hearing pursuant to Section 6-3.4 of the Code. (YE ) (NO) 7. Did you 1 applicant to submit list of AD ENT PROPERTY OWNERS? (~ (NO) Disclosure of Ownership: YE (NO) 8. Number of copies of the application to be submitted: 9. What deposit was applicant requested to submit: •~~ ~~,7 ov ~' dt - lQ'Y1 l u'~15~ D~'%GC ~ Zc7/7 ~ ~ ~NI/lY~l'1 1 ~~,y~ N eview is before: (PEI Only) ( CC Onl (PEI E BOCC) 5. Public Hearing: es (No) At: ( ) OC (BOTH PEZ E BOCC) 35 ~ ~ PITRIN COUNTY PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY Policy Area/ Referral Acent Comments 10. Anticipated date of submission: ~1^~,3"'Q3 11. COMMENTS/UNIQIIE CONCERNS: To aDDly please submit: 1. Proof attached agreement to pay form - preapp_proto Whipple Van Ness Jones, the owner of Lot 9, Filing No. 2 of the Aspen Highlands Subdivision is requesting permis- sion to build a caretaker unit as part of a detached garage which is to be constructed in early 1994. Lot 9 contains 5.47 acres and is zoned R-30. The Jones' residence is shown as a 10,662 square foot structure in the records of the As- sessor. The f.a.r. in the R-30 zone district is .13, which would allow a maximum of 30,975 square feet on the lot, sub- ject to Special Review for all square footage over 15,000. The proposed garage will contain a maximum of 1575 square feet, 750 square feet of which is exempt from the f.a.r. calculation for the lot. The caretaker unit will contain a maximum of 700 square feet of net liveable area, as de- fined by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The combination of the principal residence, garage and caretaker floor areas will therefore not exceed the 15,000 square foot Special Review threshold. Utility service will be provided through existing under- ground utilities on Lot 9, while water and sewer services are proposed as additions to the service to the existing residence. Although Whip Jones has owned the home on Lot 9 since 1975, he has had no need for a caretaker due to his utiliz- ation of employees of the Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation. The sale of Aspen Highlands to the Hines Interests Limited Partnership in December of 1993 means that Highlands employ- ees will no longer be available for routine maintenance and caretaking duties. In addition, Whip Jones will no longer have the duty to manage the Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation and its associated interests, which will leave him much more time to travel. A literal interpretation of the Pitkin County Land Use Code would require that Whip build the detached garage in order to create an existing accessory unit before an applic- ation for a caretaker unit would be appropriate. Based on conversations with the planning office, it is apparent that there are concerns with the existing language in the Code, and that an amendment to the Code is a high probability. If the Code is not amended, then an interpretation is request- ed which will give permission to build the caretaker unit if a garage is constructed. It is the applicant's belief that a more complete review is possible if the Board of County Commissioners reviews the caretaker unit application in the context of the proposed garage, although it is recognized that a garage could be built without review by the BOCC. In order to reduce the visual impact of the garage and caretaker unit, the proposed design allows placement of the caretaker unit beneath the garage. This configuration sig- nificantly reduces the height of the garage and works well with the existing grade on the site. In addition the care- takers will have direct access to their own private yard area and to the storage area provided in the crawl space of the garage. It is anticipated that the caretaker unit will be highly energy efficient since it will be partially earth sheltered and will not have the large vertical spaces that would be associated with the more typical arrangement above a garage area. The caretaker unit has been designed to the maximum permissible size in order, hopefully, to attract a caretaking couple and to provide the best possible living arrangement which reflects a sensitivity to adjacent prop- erty. As indicated by the attached conceptual plan, the caretaker unit has been designed with windows on the south and west to allow passive solar gain and the entry of natural light. No windows have been planned for the north side, which will minimize heat loss and will allow additional pri- vacy for the adjacent property owner. The attached survey for the property (Figure 4) shows that the garage structure conforms to the setbacks in the R-30 zone district. The height of the garage structure will not exceed 20 feet at the mid point of the roof or 25 feet at the roof peak. No variances from County regulations are required or requested as part of this application. Whip Jones is aware of the recent BOCC conversations regzrfling use of caretaker units and that there is a potential for changes in the deed restriction governing use of care- taker units, particularly in regard to use by guests who are not family members. In consideration of this concern, Whip will abide by any deed restriction that will be in place at the time the unit is ready for occupancy in the Summer of 1994. Although the current deed restriction is somewhat ambiguos as to use of caretaker units, the only anticipated use of the caretaker unit is for caretaking purposes. It is possible that the unit might be occupied by family mem- bers if the caretaker(s) were not available for an extended period of time, but this is a use currently allowed by the deed restriction. In no case will the unit be used for other than caretakin purp ses. Thank y o yo r consideration of this request. If you need ad on 1 i formation, please contact me. ~~r~~cc~ ~a-~3-~3 Andrew Do mus Figure 1 - Vicinity Map North J- C N v Q 0` a r • Pi L ~~ i .^ ~ r. x z i ~ ~7 r 1 r ~ { D t _ > O c.. i C t,. C :A :!: TJ '.N . ' ~ nur ' ~ ;n ~ T. ~ C. ~ r r,r -~ ~ z . ,,,: >~ :~. -o = ~- r .~ ~ c ~., ~ ~? 'm a 1 C ~ ~ ~ ~ N C n ~NI j m A O ~ . ^_ ~ ~ N 2 ~ y T O N v ~ N ~ ~ Q OJ O y N T O ~ ~ Q, a o `< n m ~^ c ~ ~~ r ~ ;;~ `. C J ~ ~ O P . m 'l < N `J ~ ~ S r C C m r ~ ~ •_ L ti A - ~ ~ w ~ V. C C y O • ~ • • W ^ D D__ D .^ r- C T C T C -~ c. x V .-• r ~.. ~; O. .,:., I i D .~.. C D -,,-,r n Jy N .r V C C N Ir f+ r N1 k a~ ~a~v~-c r.-a G~ - w t c . k ~ • • • • f ~ v.r ~:- .-.. ~+~.. ~ r -G J v C ~+ T .-` O C C 7 G r` 7 .:• `az' I O A T T 7 T ~ D :n ~~ > > z- D .:~. r (T Z/ T Y+ 1 T .. .,..... .'..a': I: k P ~+ k ~. ~q I~ F~:~ lrj i} ~`. le t p~ trf F~ 970 y 111 l Z 31 0 O C z N ~. i N '° f s ~ 1 v ~~.. ~' FI I FIGURE TWO PROOF OF OWNERSHIP s%!%~F's.r'~~ N ~AI ~_ '~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~d 1~ 0 ~ 3~3- 35 ~ 33' Kqt' to G~ZS 'P(.ll_1-. (G'x17~) pnoral '1fG~s+E 'S' DEGP 1575 a~~ ~ 45~X 35~ SIZE - or•(E (S'-O ~ ~ ~~l4tZA~ E ~ ~s~e se,Fd oPnou~ Gc~kt'Pr'c.l~4L ~4~( fat ,p. 70o Sq • FT . c~.I~F~T4CEz 4N IT' ~rr~+a~ ficFVSC~ -rc r+aee ~l 'xi~~ I ~SM~~ L. •'~, _. ~Np -~ cfloo SQUPdC~ ~'r ~p v~/INGbutt~~ ®~ ~. CIaE i GR~ c.tP To G4t?.AG-~ 1~-~lf~ FIGURE THREE CONCEPTUAL PLANS CONSENT TO REPRESENTATION REGARDING A CARETAKER DWELLING iJNIT That the undersigned, Whipple Van Ness Jones, being the sole owner of the property described as Lot 9, Filing No. 2 Aspen Highlands Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado hereby consents to the submission to the Aspen/Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Department, by his representative, Andrew J. Doremus, an application for a Caretaker Dwelling Unit for the subject property. Executed this 23rd day of December, 1993. ~~~~--vim Whipple Van Ness Jo s Jones\consent.doc .~ f.~, .~ ~TRT ~F ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS -- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION Tom and Maybelle Payne 325 Glen Eagle Drive Box 9878 Aspen, CO 81611 q5?ev ~lbNr.nr~as Sit, Lu (la(~ (M{q~vw~ Gt-ce~c ~d ~s~, tc, &~t~q John Atkinson 373 Glen Eagle Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Betty Weiss 435 Glen Eagle Drive Aspen, CO 81611 ~Ylf~ (~~ ~i~ ~~~ ,~.~~~~~ a ~D ~o ~a ~Is`1S ~~I~Y-z-f~~~. ~;,}~~, ~,llower~ ,5p~ F~ Lc~~ ,svwv,rver ~1 o wi(~ f, ~(, ~Q f. (t 6 amt a~S ~~~} will ~~~ bei~ ~~~now~tol +aY_,: _la'~wv~A hc~ r2y~Ne t SuWu ~; u ~~~+~ ~"W~. ~tcrv~5 ~vio%}~ ypwc. l~rv~ (a-~strudd FAR GiI brrep~ = ~ g'f~ S.~ (s(~ec~ ~u(~ ~vev IS,om ~f~tY ~n gtSR rc~' ~ BAR W ~C ~ /C~~ ~ ~' (~~w~~,~ 1655.x: 0 3t~ 1'a~8~2 t~s (04 asG4S~'C'TT ~ ~SZ7 S~ 0-t ~'q~~d 1~ ex~ ~IYA~. ~~ I lUl~ "' S$5 5~ o~ ~LYa~ P1~rW-~~ crmswmed e~ciish~ i~o w; ~ra~} ~'~ouse) . `~~~ ' e X11 • e~ ~~~~ ~~ a ~~ , , Wc~v~ f~ ~ fli~la~, ~ ~~ C~~~~ bc~ vin Y~l 1 {MU~~_({~dvY~2 COYWYnI~TIM Ta ~NVC ~(tbY TO FiNi~ W~i~ ~QIn~2~ - 1~r~~}QC.9 ~^ ~• CIx1 v>n t~ecs~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~t~ Ir c~~- ~ raw i~rev~us zri~l I~ (~- a t3 C~ Vv~ ~o~~ ~U~UI~~ ~~ ~P, ~~ a-ti ~~Fi,~pl rc ~ C~~~ Ginn ~~~~~J~ Sfi'uY.~~~ w~n~ r ~{ IYPrV C'IUNA~ ~b~~ v~ ~~ ~~ cccn Pr -b ~ ~cx~ ~ ~~ ~1-. lG~-•. ~rY/y~ ~ ~~~s C~. 6 Prev~PU tAn ~aru~ (1 ~r~ c1~u~ ~ Z~~e~d`^ pr_w~ r cn w-~ ~ I _r a Q1-I1 - , ~ ~ (1V- ~ ~ or Y~51 ~' Pn~CL wl ll vii- S?-'ur-~(ti~: To wo~~ Vv~T'~ 1 Yles 61n ~SC~rM ~o ~ii~P~ln ~n,,~r.~., --. ~ - s~~e P~ ~d ~~~ c~f~~ . ~ ~~~ ~d ~ ;~` ~ ~d f-~ c~ ~~~~ ~ r ~~ds ~pro~ w~~ mm~ ~~~'~P ,~ CTom ~h~b ~~m }~~~ s ~ ~ `°"~ ~ ~w~~ ~vr~wv~5 rep la~ia-~, ~ sib ~~c,-~v~ve p ~e5 j wh ~ {xwe dis~s~ed ~5~~cbGe ~~~~~~3 -~~11~~iC- ~ • • PIIBLIC NOTICE RE: JONES CARETAKER DWELLING IINIT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 15, 1994 at a regular meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Board of County Commissioners, District Courtroom, 506 East Main Street, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Whipple Van Ness Jones requesting approval of a 700 square foot Caretaker Dwelling Unit to be located in a detached garage. The property is located at 335 Glen Eagle Drive, Lot 9, Filing No. 2, Aspen Highlands Subdivision. For further information contact Tim Malloy at the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 920-5095. JRobert W. Child, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Published in The Aspen Times on February il, 1994 Pitkin County Account 00113. •. ~ t ~~ ~,,~ 3 X819 ~~, M1 • BENDER: Complete items 1 and/or 2 }or additional servicea. I 8150 wish TO reC8lve the • Complete items 3, and 48 & b. fpJlowing eervicee (for an extra / ~t your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can feel: ~ /` this.card to you. p Httach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the beck if space 1. ^ Addressee's Address ~ does not permit. y • Wdte "fletum Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. • ThaReturnReceiptwillshowtowhomthearticl~wasdeliveredandthedate 2. ^ RBStrlCted D@IlVery e dekvered. __ .Consult postmaster for fee. _ 3. Article Addressed to: 4a:~ Article Number ~ /~/'- Jd ~M A~i~rhsuvi - - `! 351 13 4b. Service Type o ^ R stared ^ Insured 3y3 GCevr C,~c~e ~1~ H ( ertified ^ COD w /f / Q /~`/ ^ Express Mail ^ Return Receipt for ¢ ~ ~~t C U V / Merchandise_ 5. 7. Date 8. Addressee's and fee is Di AU.S. aP0: 1281 rM1 _._.___ - _ _. SENDER: q Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional servicea. • •' Complete items 3, and 4a 6 b. ~ t your name end address on the reverse of this form so that we can ~ his Gerd to you. ` ech this form [o the front of the mailpiece, or on the back it space O tloes not permit. r • Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number • The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date G delivered. 3. Articl~e/Ad-dre/s/sad,, to:e 4a. Art E ~]H/ f~/~/.SJ 4b. Sel y ~i35 ~~~ 6~Gle /~ ~ RECEIPT O N Y6 .U E c w 7 O Y m L H I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra feel: Z 1. ^ Addressee's Address y 2. ^ Restricted Delivery o Consult oostmaster for fee ~ `I ~ tr y~~~•~ ~d L/~/~ ^ Express Mail ~ \ ` D 7. Date of Deliver a - r26 5. 'gnature I _ dresse 8. Addressee's Ad i „~i J and fee s paid) F ~ 6.~Signatu A ntl > 38 r m 5<< l3dt ^ Insured ^ COD „E ^ Return Receipt for ~ Merchandise _ / w .y o dress (Only if requested ~ m ~ P9 ~rm 11, December 7991 eU.S.GPO:tsa2~29-102 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT I -- - -.`- r' -- yo ENDER: _ _. __ __ _.: _... p Complete item3 1 and/or 2 for additional aervices. I 8150 Wlah t0 IBCBIVe the ' • •' Complete name 3, and 4a & b. ~ following services (for an extra o •t your name and address on the reverae of this form so that we can feel: ' ~ j '.his card to you. •Y ` • ._ech this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the beck i does not permit. f apace 1. ^ Addressee's Address ` m W m t • Wdte"Retum Receipt Requesta8'onthe mailpiece below the article number. 2 ^ Restricted Deliver ~' • The R t R i ill e urn ece pt w show to whom the article was delivered a C tlelivared y nd the date m . o ___ Consult ostmaster for fee. o m 3. Article Addressed to: 4a Article Number - ~ r . ~jt __/ E ~'1 ~/qC/r e ~ ~ ~ ~j/+P .Service Type Re i t d ^ I m ~ , .. J/CV g s ere nsured ry /~ ~V/~//_`/ ~ ~- " C v / Certified ^ COD ~ "( ' / ^ Express Mail ^ Return Receipt for ~ \ p - Merchandise Q 7. Date f Deliv ry ` - ,E G<t/7~/ o Z ~ 5. i nature (Addressee 9 ~' B. dresse 's Address (Only if requested y ~ and fee is paid) m ~ 6. Signature IAgentl - H 0 w' P~'nrm 811, December 1991 nu.s.ofw:tsez DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5197 MEMORANDUM TO: County Engineer Housing Environmental Health Department Zoning Maroon/Castle Caucus Aspen Highlands Water & Sanitation District FROM: Tim Malloy, Planning Office RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Parcel ID #{2735-142-07-009 DATE: February 7, 1994 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Whipple Van Ness Jones. Please return your comments to me no later than February 25. Thank you. ~..: -... ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 FAXJf (303) 920-5197 February 7, 1994 Andrew Doremus 600 W. Francis Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Case #P180-93 Dear Andrew, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, March 15, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M. Should this date be inconvenient for you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to all adjoining landowners at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the hearing by first-class mail, return receipt requested, and to post the subject property with a sign within 15 days of the public hearing and to remove it from the property within one week following the hearing. Please submit proof of mailing and a photo of the posted sign as proof of compliance with the Code prior to the hearing. If you have any questions, please call Tim Malloy, the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5095. Sincerely, SuzanCne Wolff Administrative Assistant n«~.~~ `w~ Y ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 January 3, 1994 Andrew Doremus 600 W. Francis Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Jones Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review Case /iP180-93 Dear Andrew, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is incomplete. Please submit the following items in order to complete the application. 1. Provide elevation drawings; 2. The building plans are not adequate to verify the square footage of the proposed uses within the structure. If you have any questions, please call Tim Malloy, the Planner assigned to this case, at 920- 5095. Thank you. Sincerely, SuzSuz~olff Administrative Assistant I ---------- ~.: ASPENIPITKIN PLANNING OFFICE b ~e s +` ;~_ 5~~~ ~-o~-ob~ (~> e2o-soso LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: -63250-134 -63270-136 X3280-137 -63300-139 -s331o-1ao -s33zo-1a1 .s333o-150 -63432-157 -63432-157 .00100-0000011070 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 .63336-152 -63337-153 -63338-154 .63339-155 COUNTY: -83184128 .63n4127 -63184128 X3194129 -63204130 X3214131 -63224132 -63234133 -63244149 -s3aso-las -63235-148 REFERRAL FEES: X3364143 00115 X3340-163 00123 -63340-190 00125 -63340-205 GMPlConceptual GMPlFinal SUB/Conceptual SUB/Final All-2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Stag Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Permit Use Tax for Sign Permits Exemption Misr Major Devel. Sign'rf. Devel• Demolftan GMP/General GMP/Detailed GMP~nal SUg/General SUB/Detailed SUB~nal All 2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Check Engineering -County Engineering -City Housing Environmental Health PLANNING OFFICE SALES: County Code -s3oao-122 -ssooata5 aner copy Feea) TOTAL