HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264315301004 (1991)DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x17)
~.
PARCEL ID: 2643-153-01-004 DATE RCVD: ~- #.COPIES:r- CASE NO P168-91
CASE NAME: Braswell CDU Planners' ~_
PROJ ADDR: 0910 White Star Dr
OWNIAPP: Braswell, A. Darrell ADR~- C/S/Z:~- PHN:~-
REP: ADR:~- C/S/Z:~- PHN:~-
Email Addr: ALLOCATED HOURS-
FEES DUE:- FEES RCVD:~- % OVER: ~-
REFERRALS
REF:r BY~-. DUE;
I ~MTG DA~TE REV BODY PH I~ NOTICED ' DATE OF FINAL ACTION: ~-
r'I '~ No I J. BOCCReso: 92-24#342224
I I No
~- I No ~- BOCC Ord: ~-
REMARKS 2643-220-10-090 GF pZ;
HRG OFF:
CLOSED: ~ BY: ~ HO INDEX::~-
ADMIN:
PLAT RECORDED - pLAT (BK,PG):~-. ADMIN INDEX:. ~-
VRAPPROVAL DATEi ~ -VR EXPIRES:
CASE TYP:. CDU CASE TYPE:
CASE TYP2:`CASE TYPE:
CASE TYP3: CASE:TYP7:
CASE TYPO: _ Date Scanned:. 9/23/09
File Location: ~Boz 176
1
-,
,.
~. ,
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
PITKIN COUNTY
DATE RECEIVED: 12 20 91
DATE COMPLETED : /eL a2 (o /9 /
~~~~
PROJECT NAME: Braswell ~er~a-Dwel
Project Address: Tract 9, White Star
Is3-D~-bey
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2643-~~n~-oo-?n_n_on P158-91
STAFF MEMBER• ML
APPLICANT: A. Darrell and Kim Braswell
Applicant Address:_40 Norman Wav, Tiburon CA 94920 (4151 435-
6391 Local #920-2307
REPRESENTATIVE: Aseon Design Groun/Steve Conner
Representative Address/Phone:
________________________________________________________________
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: N/C NO.OF COPIES RECEIVED 4
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP:
P&Z MEETING DATE PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
BOCC Meeting Date o2 /a s// O~
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
q c~ PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
~~ ~/ / / / ~ VESTED RIGHTS: ES NO
Staff Level: 1041 Minor Hazalyd Review: Date of Approval
_______________________________________________________________
REFERRALS:
Attorney -Aspen Consol S.D.
Engineer Mtn.Bell
~ Housing -Holy Cross
Aspen Water -Aspen Fire
L Envir.Hlth. -Basalt Fire
Manager -Carbondale Fire
Div.Wildlife _Div.Water Res.
Caucus -Airport Manager
~C Zoning _CO Geo.Survey
Other: 1,JlukeStn rPni t~ ~-lo~rn,u~~o
~ Sc~cut~c~
DATE REFERRED:- ~~~a8~~/ IN
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED:
_ School District
Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
State Hwy Dept
(Glwd) (GrJtn)
Snowmass Vill
_ USFS (Carbondale)
USFS (Aspen)
_ BLM
City P&Z
Homeowners Assn.
IA~,S: d/d'
County -County Engineer _
Housing _Envir. Health
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: -J QA " ~Q~'~
t F' << F~-•-~
Zoning
~~~
#342224 03/44/92 15:<<^1 Rec ~.i'~^..bK 670 P6 950 Y
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty C1~ ~ Doc $,00 "'
~s
,.
RESOLIITION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITRZN COIINTY, COLORADO,
GRANTING APPROVAL FOR CARETAKER DWELLING UNIT
TO THE BRABWELLS ON TRACT 9 OF THE
WHITE STAR RANCH SIIBDIVISION
Resolution No. 92-~
WHEREAS, Darrell and Kimberly Braswell (hereinafter
"Applicants") have applied to the Board of County Commissioners of
i,i*.kin County, Colorado (hereinafter "Board") for approval to
construct an approximately 575 square foot Caretaker Dwelling Unit
pursuant to Section 3-8.13(c) of the Land Use Code on Tract 9 of
the White Star Ranch Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Board heard this application at a regularly
scheduled public hearing on February 25, 1992, at which time
~:~cic.nce and testimony were presented with respect to this
=.pt7.ication; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that this application conforms to
`_r'° requirements of Section 3-8.13 (c) of the Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does
=rr-•by grant approval to Darrell and Kimberly Braswell for a
:'-~zetaker Dwelling Unit subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions requested by the Housing Authority
shall be adhered to by the applicant:
a. The applicant shall provide a deed restriction, as
stipulated in Section 3-8.13 (c) of th.e Land Use Code, to
the APCHA for approval. Upon approval. by the APCAA, the
applicant shall record the deed with the Pitkin County
Clerk and Recorder's Office prior t~ submission of any
building permits for the dwelling.
FoytcG4 u~iu4i92 15:1 Rec $.OU BY. 670 PG 9S1 r.
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Crt~ Clerk, Doc 5.00 y
.~ ~
Resolution No. 92-~
Page 2
b. Prior to leasing the Caretaker Dwelling Unit, the
applicant shall notify the Housing Authority, and have
the prospective tenant complete the required
qualification forms and submit those to the Housing
Authority for approval.
c. The applicant shall provide to the Housing Authority a
copy of the executed lease at the time the unit is rented
and upon every renewal of the lease term.
d. Note: The applicant is not required to rent the unit,
however, if rented, conditions b and c shall be met.
2. The applicant may increase the size of the Caretaker Dwelling
Unit to 700 square feet, by modifying the deed restriction
with the Housing Authority.
3. The unit must comply with the requirements of the Zoning
Office prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. All material representations made in the public meeting and
in the application shall be adhered to by the applicant unless
amended by other conditions.
APPROVED by the Boar3 at its regular meeting on February 25,
1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By ~ i e
J es R. True, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Tim Whitsit
Couney Att ney
/_y~ _ ~
;ror Suzanne Ro c a ,
County Plann'ng Director
reso.edu.braswell
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Regular Meeting - February 25, 1992
THRU: Reid Haughey, County Manager
Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Directors%~~~~
RE: Braswell Caretaker Dwelling Unit ~/
FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner
REQIIEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct an
approximately 576 square foot attached Caretaker Dwelling Unit
pursuant to Section 3-8.13 (c) of the Land Use Code.
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the
applicant's request. The Land Use Code allows the construction of
an Employee Dwelling Unit if the applicant meets the criteria of
the Land Use Code.
The Board approved an Ordinance on October 29, 1991 which amended
Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code. The Ordinance permits the
Board to approve Caretaker Dwelling Units on non-conforming sized
parcels if the unit does not exceed 700 square feet; the resulting
FAR of the parcel conforms to the FAR requirements of the zone
district; a deed restriction is filed which meets the requirements
of Section 3-8.13(a) of the Code; and, the proposal is consistent
with the special review criteria of the Code.
APPLICANT: Darrell and Kimberly Braswell.
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Steve Conger, Aspen Design Group.
LOCATION: The Caretaker Dwelling Unit is proposed for the 10.10
acre site, Lot 9 White Star Ranch Subdivision, which is zoned RS-
20.
ISSUES:
1. The applicant meets all the requirements of Section 3-8.13 (c)
of the Land Use Code.
2. The Zoning Office has indicated that the proposed garage is
considered to be "connected" to the main house as opposed to
"attached". Therefore the proposed unit above the garage will
cause the structure to exceed the current maximum height limit
for accessory structures.
The applicant has also identified four of the required six
parking spaces within the "Limited Use Area" on the lot. The
approved Second Amended White Star Ranches Subdivision and PUD
plat map states: "...Septic systems and non-habitable
agricultural outbuildings are the only uses permitted in
'Limited Use Areas'."
3. The Environmental Health Department is satisfied that the
applicant's proposal to connect to the subdivision water
system and to construct an on-site wastewater disposal system
will compatible with the requirements of the Land Use Code.
4. White Star Ranch Homeowners Association President, Bayard
Hovdesven has reviewed the applicant's proposal and has no
objections.
5. Section 3-8.13(c) permits Caretaker Dwelling Unit of up to 700
square feet. Staff has added a condition that would permit
the applicant to expand the unit to 700 square feet, without
further review by the Board.
6. The applicant will need to meet the deed restriction
requirements for the Caretaker Dwelling Unit as required by
Section 3-8.13 of the Land Use Code and the Housing Authority.
ALTERNATIVES: The Board of County Commissioner's may:
1. Approve the applicant's request.
2. Deny the applicant's request.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends alternative 1 with
the conditions as noted in the attached resolution.
ais.edu.braswell
2
Q
z
z
0
q
c~
a
v~
W wo
~~ x q
'x z a
.~ a ~
~ ~o
JI ¢ ~,
~~ ~ ~
W W
~E
~~
x x
F.F.
r a.
O r,~,
~o
~r
a. E-
2
Q ~
:~
Q~
W
ca
z
0
W
m
U
C
~~
~~
9
~~
~ &
~ J
\ /~
~ //
_ /
- T- ~ -~
~~ / i' i
~ l j ii
~ /~ ~i ~~ ~~i i
/ i ///// ~
/// // //iii / //
/ / /~ ,/
/ / ~
~~ i~ /f~ ~$ ~\ I
~ ~ ~ ~ '~ i
~ °. ~$ ~~
I o C ~ 53$ _r ~,_ ~
~_?
~.
~~ ~
i ~_~ ~ a
~ ! ~\
~ ~ ~
~~ ~~
..:,a. ~'
~- i °e
~_ g -
~ ~
r -
f
i¢=gym
,~
- mU ~ 3
ww H~. u
z I`u ~ ~NJ \ \
I~ "~ ,\~ "s ~\`
-- - _~ \
~{ ~
I
I ~
i
/s i
~ ~,
N /
/ / ~~~
i /
/~
i ~~
~~ ~ ~ ,,,
~ i yi /
//~ ~ i
i
i / ,
'~ ~ I
oa / t
/ IQ
~ / j I~
i
\\
__i I
i
s~
x j~ o~
I?,4 $~
o~~ ~~
6 ::
S~
~~
~.?; <a
/'/ ~~\
/
~
\ ~
1 1
/ ~
I
~ / s
I / ~
i i
i ~
I~
~,
I
I
I
i
I
QI ,o
ai
~'
~ x
~.
_ I
c - _-' A _ _~ .. ~..
_ ~.
I
a-- -L _. _
~R
-p
=a
f„?;
~s_ ~
~g F ~~ ~ _____LL
/ /___-_-
~~ ^~ % r
O~
/ J
i
$~.
'~
v k-_
A~
~~
I
_ A
~N
ASPEN~PITKIN
ENVIR~IVMENTAL HEALTH ~EPAR7'1CAENT
MEMORANDDM
TO: Mary Lackner, Planning Department
FROM: Department of Environmental Health ~ - 4
DATE: January 31, 1992
RE: Braswell Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review
Parcel I. D. # 2643-220-10-090
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the
above-mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin
County Code, Title II, and has the following comments.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200:
The plans for the proposed residence do not include an area for the
on-site wastewater disposal system. The septic system should be
constructed with a capacity of 900 gallons per day. Soil
conditions are considered suitable under Pitkin County regulations
for a "conventional" home.
Therefore, it is our opinion that an individual wastewater disposal
system can be designed and constructed which should be adequate to
handle the expected flows from the main residence and a
studio/caretaker apartment without engineering design or major site
modifications.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205:
The parcel, Lot 9 White Star Ranch, is served by the subdivision
water system. we have certified this system as meeting the
subdivision review requirements for quantity and quality listed in
our memos pertaining to general submission and final plat for the
approved subdivision. The existing system meets the requirements
of the drinking water supply sections of the Land Use Code. There
should be no problems with the drinking water supply for the
caretaker unit or for the larger house being built. There are two
water storage tanks with a total volume of 13,000 gallons for the
water system and six-inch water distribution mains in the roads.
The previously submitted water supply analysis from the subdivision
water system design engineer indicated that there is adequate water
from the spring source. This system was designed with a build-
out capacity of approximately 4200 gallons per day, limited by
storage volume.
AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106:
It is our interpretatio
attached caretaker unit
wood-burning fireplace,
'130 South Galena Street
n from the preliminary plan review that the
is not to have and would not be allowed a
but may be permitted a certified wood stove
Aspen, Colorado S'16'1'1
3O3/9E0-SD7O
rery[IeEpaOn
Braswell Caretaker Dwelling Unit Review
January 31, 1992
Page 2
or gas-log fireplace. The plans for the main house apparently show
only one fireplace in the living room. The applicant or their
representative might want to consider the placement of a second
woodburning stove or gas-log fireplace in the structure. We
suggest that the employee unit be restricted to gas-logs or gas
appliances, if a fireplace unit is contemplated at all. The
additional development would then generate no more wood smoke than
those subdivision lots around it.
Summary
It is our conclusion that there should be minimal environmental
impacts resulting from the additional water demand, wastewater
disposal, and woodburning. Therefore, we have no technical
objections to the requested approval for the project.
M E M O RAND U M
TO: Mary Lackner, County Planning
FROM: Joanna Schaffner, County Zoning
DATE: January 2, 1992
RE: Braswell Caretaker Dwelling Unit
I have reviewed the above application and offer the following
comments.
ZONE: RS-20, twenty acre minimum lot size
SETBACKS: The proposed unit is outside of all required
setbacks.
FLOOR AREA: 15,000 square foot maximum
The proposed unit is measured at 576 square feet of floor
area, not including the overhangs or porch area.
The total house does not exceed 15,000 square feet.
HEIGNT: This garage is considered by~the Zoning Staff to be
"connected" to the main house as opposed to "attached".
(See office policy on connector units) As such, the
proposed unit above the garage will cause the structure
to exceed the current maximum height limit for accessory
structures.
However, the County may consider a new height restriction
for accessory structures as part of the new land use
code. Applicant may wish to wait for the new code or
redesign the structure.
PARKING: To fulfill the parking requirements of Ordinance 91-11,
• the applicant must provide six parking spaces. The
applicant has indicated on the "Partial Topographic
Survey" prepared by High Country Engineering that six
spaces will be provided. However, four of these spaces
lie within the platted "Limited Use Area".
The approved Second Amended White Star Ranches
Subdivision and PUD plat map states: "'Limited IIse' areas
of Tracts 2,4,5 & 6 can be used for the construction of
septic systems, septic systems and non-habitable
agriculture outbuildings are the only uses permitted in
'Limited Use Areas'."
Based on this notation, the four parking spaces indicated
by the applicant to be in this area are not permitted
uses.
Braswell
Page 2 of 2
OTHER: Zoning Staff questions how the applicant has only one
adjacent property owner.
To: Mary Lackner, Planning
From: Dave Tolen, Housing
Date: 9 January, 1992
Re: Braswell Caretaker Dwelling Unit
The following constitute our comments on the above referenced
application.
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
complete and record a Deed Restriction in the form attached here.
2. Prior to leasing the unit, the applicant shall notify the
Housing Authority, and have the prospective tenant complete the
required qualification forms and submit those to the Housing
Authority for approval.
3. The applicant shall provide to the Housing Authority a copy of
the executed lease at the time the unit is rented, and upon every
renewal of the lease term.
4. Note: The applicant is not required to rent the unit, however,
if rented the above conditions 2 and 3 shall be met.
WHITE STAR RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 3810
Aspen, Colorado 81611
,Wr 2 21992
January 20, 1992
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attn: Mary
Deaz Mazy,
Thank you for sending a copy of the Braswell Cazetaker Dwelling Unit, Parcel 1D #2643-
720-10-090, dated 12/28/91.
We have examined the plans and have no objections.
~v~/"~
Bayard~ovdesven, President
White Star Ranch
Homeowners Association
rfwv~wc~.~. . `1 t~tv~
7HE ASPEN gESlGN SOUP
720 E. Durant Suite E-8
ASPEN, COLORADO 51611
(303) 9253021
6HEET NO. OF
cucuur>EOer ~ wTE 1Z•1~•~i
CHECKED BY 4A~
h'~ ~--f'~Y'~1H.4~.R_Yl~fi~v_.rraw
~,rUr.~'BThtr
_' ._
r~ma:c+rr~irywb+.wms+cvcaN ~ry,.s<.s~x~;.o~.+; ~.r~aa~nacrosu;~~~m~.za.em
JOB ~T.~1~1 - 1 ~ O LO {y
Wr' µ
THE ASPEN DESIGN GROUP SXIEET"°. OE
720 E. Duarnt Suite E-8 CALCULATED BY DATE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 9253021 c"ECKE°BV DATE
VAO W CL A4115'agY 5.X) xsl lvmdl®o IM„6Mm, W n XIXiI. to ONei f MAXE NLL EPEE 1 N6715•f38p
December 19, 1991
Mary Lynne Lackner
Planner
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Mary:
My wife, Kimberly, has spoken with you regarding our application
for the approval of the construction of a caretaker's unit above
our garage which is attached to our home. As per your
instructions, we are submitting the enclosed package for the
approval process.
Our property is loacted at #9 White Star Ranch Subdivision in the
RS-20 District. We have followed all of the guidelines and
ordinances set forth in Section 3-8.13, Ordinance 91 of the
Pitkin County Land Use Code. Please refer to the enclosed Floor
Area Tabulation Table {and footnotes) as calculated and
represented by our architect - Aspen Design Group.
Enclosed are 4 copies of proof of ownership, site plan & vicinity
map, and conceptual drawings. Also enclosed is an addressed and
stamped envelope to our only adjacent property owner, Dr. Patrick
Lally.
If there are any questions or any other information required,
please contact Kimberly or myself at 40 Norman Way, Tiburon,
California 94920 or call on (415) 435-6391. Thank you for your
assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~e
A. Darrell Braswell
~~ ~ -
P1tE-Al'PLI('r'1'lUN CONFERENCE SUl1}IARY
PROJECT: .urc~2~f
Al~PLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE'S PRONE: Cy ~S
OWNERS NA?(E:
- Ca 3 ~-( i
k„or Nr, v 7 /q~/
,'~'(.Ay~fE ~' D~iTE
C3o3J9do-S09o ~I~~ ~l
~.
a~~3o'~
SOMTSA.RY
'-~Uy~~/L- z~~uE-l' U
~r/,~
- !""v'
/U/j ~ _
~ 1- , fi/>
- ~ od 0 ~T_
.~C/t2 in//~.it£ /J'/7l/ /~rL(~O ~r ~etflvPfn7n
3, Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of
reports requested:
Policy Area/
RPfw[[al Aa nh
~'~v- Noa~fh _
Hownu _
~Oh!/Jq _
<• Review is: (Piz Only)
Comments
r
/~Si~Nr Oq~ro~n
lr/2s'I~i I/ D/rr,~ina riv/%a p`1 ~p!-{e
U .,~
.y1, r ~
/aCOlG~P .rOJ ~w h ~,~. /` <t,r 07 ii ~r•'
CC/8000 Only). (Piz then to CC/BOCC)
5• Public Bearing: (YES) (NO)
6• Did you tell applicant, to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS? YE (NO) Disclosure of Ownership: YES :(NO) ,
7', what fee was applicant requested to submit: ~ -~- ~Q S~bn~.~(Te~l
.. ----e-
8• Anticipated'date~ of submission:
9,
.~ez v' 3 2,o D .
COM}fENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS: raon~i.i c( itiiYU.f f~ o ~n~/ wJ/j/p-
r /' - v~ , , t , L
• ~.in~~~ !+~ ~/ IP~C.Y Q.r ~ l ~ T~,Q AOLDV2n-l A' -(-( o
a.
^'t
1. Type of Application: r~
2. Describe action/type of development be ng requested:
uc.cpu,~o n„
_(r~l-- ---- nt.
1i'ARKAN'I'I' DLED
'1'1115 lllsIsU, Made this 2nd J;,y of llecember , 19 91 ,
between
NANCY 11L'LLER AND AP.'T SNYDEI:
Cfd~1`ifornia "Coumpur Los Angeles ;IndSuueof
EF~F4--&R5, grantor(s), and
DARRELL BRASWELL AND KI.4BEP.LY BP.ASWELL AS
JOINT TENANTS. NOT TENANTS-IN-COi`41~101V
~/ P / n.ti,
R~nndcr.
urarnuru•s srnnlr
whose Icgal address 40 Norman Way, TiUuron, California 94920
California
of the County of i'lar 1n and S4'tlc of $JIAE TCI}~ gr:udccs:
1V ITNIiSS, tlral the gr:uuor(s), fur and in conxidcrnlion of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ~ $ 10.00) -and O the
good and valuable considerat'ion -------------------------- -DVi,CAtZS,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowleJged, haV ~ granted, bargainedI, sold and conveyed, and by these presents
Ju gram, bargain, sell. convey an(I conlirm auto the grmtecs, their heirs an(I assigns forever, nut iu tenancy in common but
in joint mnauq', all the real pmpcny togcUur with improvements, if nny, ximatc, lying anJ being in the County
of PLtkLn nmI SI:IIC Of CUIUraJU, dCSCrI bCJ 85 follows:
TRACT 9, WHITE STAR RANCHES SUBDIVISION AND P.U.D.,
according to the Second Awended Plat thereof recorded
in Book 20 at Page 65.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORAllO
(~
I~nn
J/
( I
l ~
also known by street anJ nund,cr as 0910 White Star Drive, County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado
"hOG HTHEI2 with all and singular the hcre(lit:nncnls anJ appurtenances thereunto bclouging, or in anywise appcrlnining, the
reversion mul mvcrsions, rc m:rinJcr ar~(I rcmainJcrs, rents, issues :uul pnrlits thereof, and all the csuuc, right, title, iutcrest, claim anJ
dcmmld whatsoccer of the grantor(s), either in law or aluity, of, in mul to the above bm gaiucJ premises, with the hereditamenls and
;q,puncnanccs.
TO Ii AVE AND TO HOLD the sail premises above bargainedI :md described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantees. their heirs
an(I assigns li,rcrcr. And the grantor(s), for t11elR SC(VeS, their heirs anJ personal represcalativcs du covenant,
grant, bargain nnJagrcc Io and wish the gruuccs, their hcils and assigns, that :d the lime of the caseating mul delivery of Ihcsc
presents they are well scizcJ of the premises above Conveyed, hn V e good, sure, j,crfca, absolute and in(Icfcasiblc csurtc
of inheritance, in law, in fce simply and ha V EquuJ right, fall power an(I lawful mtlhorily In pram, bargain, sell and convey the same in
manner aI1J fOflll tIfOI'CS:rld, and that the same arc fret :uul dru- Gom all limucr anJ other gr:nus, bargaws, S0IC5, IICIIS. hLCCS,
assexsmems, enonlnbmnccs .ILJ restriclimis or wluuevcr kills or namrc socvcr, except See Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
1"he grantor(s) shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEPEND the above-bargained premises in the yuiel and peaceable
possession of the grantees. Ihe~ he rs :uul assigns, :Igainst :dl and every person or per s'Ia~3l illy claiming the whole or any pan
.'
Ihcreo .
I W :SS WIi L'IZEOF he n t r(. ha V2 executed this d~ n the ('rte scl forth above.
NA C LL R ART SiV DER
s rArE or ~~~~N IA
1 ss.
nmm,.o( Los Angeles J
'fhc furcgoine-instrunsnt was ocknuwlcJgcJ bclittc me this ~~ ~{ i
by iVancy 11e11er and Art Snyder.
n1y conunission expires /Il~ i.:.~r ~ A
i JOfiTfE P. RE D
Notcry Public-Calli'omla
'- ® LOS ANGELES COUMY
~ My Commlzslon [xplrr
March 13, 1495
,.~~ .~ -
'If in DcnrcL insert "(,ih' :uW."
fir, + ~, , ,r,. ,-,
day of November , Iv 91 ,
19~->~' . R'imcss my bond :unl of licial scat
11 n ,
, '~.,~., .'A' r~'<„r~
-` Nvr. rfLhlic '-
Nn. 921. Rcr.$-RG. tvnennrv rr ur.en w~ Joim'IFnnnbl ^r.~JfirtA IbbliaLinp, Sfl25 lY. LiL A.e. LuArwrxnl. ('U Pa114 - OaJ) DJ~G9IXI 6~fl6 ~4ljl