HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264326101002DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x17)
...PARCEL ID: 2643-261-01002 ~. DATE RCVD: ~- #QOPIES::~- CASE NO 1988
CASE NAME: Ukraine EDU Planners 1..~
PROJ ADDR: 0536 N Starwood Dr
OWN/APQ: Ukraine John ADR~ GSIZ~ PHN:~
REP: ADR:~~ GSIZ:~ PHN:~
Email Addr: ~ ~~ ALLOCATED HOURS:
FEES DUE:-- FEES RCVDt ~~ ~ °/a OVER: ~- -
`PL
-VF
Approval-EDU
". CASE TYP4[~
File Locations Box 177
RESOLIITION OF THE BOARD OF CODNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL OF
THE IIRRAINE EMPIAYEE DWELLING IINIT ON LOT 84R, STARWOOD FOURTEEN
Resolution No. 88-3~
WBEREAS, John Ukraine (hereinafter "Applicant") has applied
to the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado
(hereinafter "Board") for approval of an employee dwelling unit
pursuant to Section 3-8.13(d) of the Land Use Code, on Lot 84R,
Starwood Fourteen Subdivision; and
WHF.RF.AR, the Board heard this application at a regularly
scheduled and duly noticed public hearing on April 12, 1988, at
which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to
this application; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the dwelling was constructed
in 1974 and that approval of this application does not constitute
the Board's endorsement of overcrowding on the property or in the
neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does
hereby grant approval of this application subject to the
following conditions:
1) The Applicant shall record employee deed restrictions
to the satisfaction of the Aspen/Pitkin Housing
Authority prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
2) The Applicant shall have an inspection of the employee
dwelling unit by a County Building Inspector to insure
that the structure meets Uniform Building Code
Standards.
3) The entire property shall be restricted to one
fireplace and one certified clean burning woodstove.
APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on April 26,
~-
Resolution No. 88-~,~
Page 2
1988.
ATTEST:
J nette Jo s, Deputy
unty Cler
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas F. Smith, County
Attorney
FK.UKRAINERESO
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
BY.
Fred Crowley,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
.'
~~~, ~ ~~
Alan Richman, Planning and
Development Director
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
T0: Board of County Commissioners
Public Hearing - April 12, 1988
RE: Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit Review /~
FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office ~~~~//.ti~~-q~
ISSUE: John Ukraine has applied for approval of an existing 800
square foot employee unit that was constructed in 1974. The
applicant can meet the requirements of the Land Use Code. The
Planning staff is recommending approval of this application
subject to the conditions outlined at the end of the attached
memorandum.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) The Board may approve this application with the
recommended conditions or you may amend the conditions
as you deem appropriate.
2) The Board may deny the application.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning staff recommends that the Board
direct staff to draft a resolution approving this application
subject to the conditions outlined in the attached memorandum.
FK.UKRAINEAIS
T0: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office j
RE: Ukraine Employee Dwelling Uni~ ~ ~/~~~
DATE: April 12, 1988
APPLICANT: John Ukraine.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to convert an
existing dwelling into an employee dwelling unit. The property
is Lot 84R Starwood 14 and contains 2.26 acres. Amain residence
and detached caretaker unit currently exist on the property. The
owner intends to demolish the existing residence and construct a
new home and requests permission to retain the caretaker house.
The application is attached.
LOCATION: Starwood Subdivision.
ZONING: RS-20 PUD.
ISSUES AND CONCERNS:
1) Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority: In a memo dated April 7,
1988, Jim Adamski submitted the following comments:
The applicant is requesting approval of a detached caretaker
unit that was constructed prior to June 1, 1981. The unit
is located on Lot 84R, Starwood 14, Pitkin County. The
existing structure is 800 sq. ft. The applicant is willing
to deed-restrict this existing bandit Unit in accordance
with Section 3-8.13 (D) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code.
The applicant would like to remove the existing home and
construct a new home on the site but retain the existing
bandit caretaker unit, undisturbed and detached where it now
exists.
Housing Office Recommendation: The Housing Authority
recommends approval of the application. The deed
restriction must be recorded prior to the issuance of a
building permit (a sample deed restriction is attached).
2) Environmental Health Department: In a memo dated April 7,
1988 (attached) Bob Nelson submitted the following comments:
Sewage Treatment: Because of anticipated difficult soil
conditions, the replacement system will probably be required
to be some sort of engineered system. IT should be possible
to construct a system which complies with County
regulations.
Water: The parcel is served by the Stanwood Subdivision
water system. There should be no problem serving the main
residence and employee unit.
Air Quality: It is our interpretation that the employee
unit, a detached modular house, and the rebuilt main house
which eventually will be constructed are each allowed a
fireplace or noncertified woodstove. In addition, each
structure would be allowed one certified woodstove, under
current regulations. This varies somewhat from the intent
of the law in that there could be as many as there solid
fuel burning devices on the lot, one fireplace, one the
existing non-certified woodburning stove, and one certified
stove which might be installed at a later date. It is
suggested that if the proposal is approved, that some more
restrictive limitation be requested from the applicant at
this time, and that this be made a part of the real property
records. If agreeable to the individual applicants and their
representations, the lot would then generate no more wood
smoke than those subdivision lots around it.
Water Quality: Disturbed soil areas around the homes and
driveways should be revegetated to avoid erosion and
sedimentation impacts to nearby irrigation ditches.
3) STAFF CO1~II+IENTS: The applicant is requesting approval to
retain a caretaker unit which was constructed in 1974. The
property is a 2.26 acre Stanwood Lot which is zoned RS-20
PUD (20 acre minimum lot size). The lot is substandard as
to size and current regulations permit only one residence on
a non-conforming lot. According to Section 3-8.13(d) of the
Land Use Code, the Board may approve employee units which do
not meet the standard requirements as follows:
"(d) The Board may approve as an employee unit attached
to or within a principal unit, or detached, a single
residential dwelling unit which does not meet the
requirements of this Section 3-8.13 (a) or (b), under
the following conditions:
(1) The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Board that the proposed employee unit was
completed and in existence prior to June 8, 1981;
(2) The applicant must specify the applicable
requirements of Section 3-8.13 which can or cannot
be met and the reasons therefor;
(3) The approval must require compliance with the
2
otherwise applicable requirements of this Section
to the full extent practicable;
(4) The approval must require the applicant to meet
the health and safety requirements of the Uniform
Building Code, as determined by the Building
Inspector;
(5) The Board must determine that, notwithstanding
the inability of the applicant to comply with the
requirements of this Section, approval of the
application will not result in, or constitute the
Board's endorsement of, overcrowding on the
property or in the neighborhood; approval of a
dwelling unit for which insufficient utilities or
other necessary services are available; and visual
impacts out of character with existing
neighborhood;
(6) The applicant shall, by deed restriction or other
permanent commitment running with the land,
guarantee that the employee unit shall remain a
rental unit; not be condominiumized; not be
occupied by the owner or spouse; be limited to
occupancy by not more than two (2) persons per
bedroom (which includes children), or in the case
of a studio, no more than two (2) persons who, if
adults, qualify as (and have been found by the
Housing Authority to be) employees of the
community under such guidelines as may be from
time to time established by said Authority; and be
rented for terms not less than six (6) months; and
(7) The applicant must provide the Board with proof
that all adjoining landowners have been notified
at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the
hearing by first-class mail, return receipt
requested, of the date of the Board's hearing on
the application and of their opportunity to
participate in the hearing. In addition, a
visible sign shall be posted at least fifteen (15)
days in advance of the hearing at the entrance of
the property providing notice of the pendency of
the application, the date of hearing, and the
right of the public to participate."
In response to the above criteria, the staff has the
following comments:
Criteria #1 - Existence prior to June 8, 1981 - The Planning
staff has found a building permit issued in 1974 for the
residence. Warren Conner, of the Assessor's Office has also
confirmed that the unit was constructed during 1974.
Criteria #2 - Requirements which cannot be met - The
applicant cannot meet the minimum lot size requirement. In
the RS-20 zone a detached caretaker unit and main residence
would require 40 acres (20 acres per residence).
Criteria #3 - Approval must require compliance with
applicable regulations to the full extent practicable - The
applicant has committed to deed restrict the unit in
conformance with employee guidelines. Because a normal,
conforming 20 acre lot would allow only an attached 500
square foot unit and only one fireplace and one woodstove
would be allowed, we recommend that only one fireplace and
one certified stove be allowed for this property.
Criteria #4 - Uniform Building Code - The staff recommends
that the unit be inspected and brought into compliance with
current UBC regulations if necessary.
Criteria #5 - Overcrowding - The Board must determine that
approval of this application will not result in overcrowding
on the property or in the neighborhood. The caretaker unit
and main residence have been on the property since
approximately 1974. The staff has not received any
objections to this proposal. Utilities and services for the
unit are in place. The construction of the new main
residence may require replacement of the septic system for
the caretaker unit.
Criteria #6 - Deed Restrictions - The applicant is willing
to accept the standard employee unit deed restrictions.
Criteria #7 - Notice to Adjacent Landowners - The Planning
Office sends written notice to adjacent owners. The
applicant is required to post a sign on the property at
least 15 days in advance of the hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends approval of this
application with the following conditions:
1) The applicant shall record the employee deed restrictions
prior to the issuance of any building permits on the
property.
2) The applicant shall have an inspection of the employee unit
by a building inspector to insure that it meets Uniform
Building Code Standards.
3) The property shall be restricted to one fireplace and one
certified woodstove.
FK.UKRAINE
4
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: FRANCIS KRIZMANICH, PLANNING OFFICE
FROM: JIM ADAMSKI, HOUSING DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 7, 1988
RE: UKRAINE EMPLOYEE DWELLING UNIT
PARCEL ID#2643-261-01-002
The applicant is requesting approval of a detached caretaker
unit, that was constructed prior to June 1, 1981. The unit is
located on Lot 84r, Starwood Fourteen. Pitkin County. The
existing structure is 800 s.f. The applicant is willing to deed
restrict this existing bandit unit i accordance with Section 3-8.
13 (d) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. The applicant would
like to remove the existing home and construct a new home on the
site but retain the existing bandit caretaker unit, undisturbed
and detached where it now exists.
HOUSING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: The Housing Authority recommends
approval of the application. The deed restriction must be
recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit (a sample
deed restriction is attached).
OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT
CARETAKER
EMPLOYEE DWELLING UNIT
THIS OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT (the "Agree-
ment") is made and entered into this day of by and
between corporation (herein-
after referred to as "Owner") and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Authority, a Colorado corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Authority") organized pursuant to the Colorado County Housing
Authority laws, as set forth in C.R.S. Section 29-4-501, et. seq.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Owner owns a square foot
dwelling (the "Dwelling") which is located on the real property
(the "Real Property") described as follows:
For purposes of this Agreement, the Dwelling, the Real Property
and all appurtenances, improvements and fixtures associated
therewith shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property"; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement imposes certain covenants upon the
Property which restrict the Use and Occupancy of the Property to
Employees and their families who are either employed by the
project or who are employees of Pitkin County and fall with the
Housing Authority Guidelines established and indexed
1
by the Authority on an annual basis.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, paid to the
Authority by the Owner, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by the parties hereto as
follows:
1) The Owner hereby covenants that the employee dwelling
unit described above shall at all times remain a rental unit
and shall not be condominiumized. Use and occupancy of the
employee dwelling unit shall be limited to housing for
qualified employees of the project or employees of Pitkin
County whose rental rates are in accordance with rental
guidelines established by the Housing Authority of the City
of Aspen and Pitkin County or a successor thereto. The
owner of the unit shall have the right to lease the unit to
a qualified employee of his own selection. Such individual
may be an employee of the Owner, or employed as a resident
caretaker, provided such person fulfills the requirements of
a qualified employee. "Qualified Employee" as used herein
shall mean any person currently residing in and employed in
the City of Aspen or Pitkin County for a minimum average of
30 hours per week, nine months out of any twelve-month
period. An employee occupying the unit who is employed in
Pitkin County shall meet the income and occupancy
eligibility requirements established and applied by the
Housing Authority with respect to employee housing.
2
2) Verification of employment of person(s) living in the
employee unit shall be completed and filed with the Housing
Authority Office by the Owner of the unit prior to occupancy
thereof, and must be acceptable to the Housing Authority.
If the Owner does not rent the employee unit to a qualified
employee the unit shall be made available for occupancy in
accordance with the Housing Authority Guidelines, provided
the Owner shall have the right to approve any prospective
tenant, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or
withheld.
3) The employee dwelling unit is limited to occupancy by
not more than two adults and related children. Resident
adults must qualify as, and have been found by the Housing
Authority to be, employees of the community and residents
thereof as referred to above.
4) No lease agreement executed for occupancy of the
employee dwelling unit shall provide for a rental term of
less than six consecutive months.
5) These covenants shall be deemed to run with the land as
a burden thereof for the benefit of, and shall be speci-
fically enforceable by, the Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, the Housing Authority of the City of Aspen
and Pitkin County, or the duly authorized designee of the
Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, by and
appropriate legal action including but not limited to
3
injunction, abatement, or eviction of non-complying tenants
during the period of the life of the last surviving member
of the presently existing Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, Colorado, plus twenty-one years, or for a
period of fifty years from the date of recording hereof in
the Pitkin County real property records, whichever period
shall be less.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
instrument on the day and year above first written.
OWNER:
BY:
NAME:
Mailing Address:
STATE OF COIARADO)
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 19 by
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
4
ACCEPTANCE BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
The foregoing agreement and its terms are accepted by The
Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
AND PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
BY:
Chairman
Mailing Address: 530 E. Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
STATE OF COLORADO)
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 19 by
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
lua: Ukraine/care
5
MEMORANDUM
T0: Francis Rrizmanich, Planning Department
FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health
DATE: April 7, 1988
RE: Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit Exemption
Parcel I. D. # 2643-261-01-002
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the
above-mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin
County Code, Title II, and has the following comments.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200:
The existing on-site wastewater disposal system, installed in
1974 and serving both residences on the lot, is located under the
footprint of the proposed new main house. If current plans are
followed, it would be required that the existing septic system be
abandoned and backfilled.
Using our previous evaluation of the home site and the general
soil conditions as they correlate with the reported
characteristics of the area soil types (indicated on the Soil
Conservation Service maps), it would appear that most of the lot
may be unsuitable for septic tank-absorption systems. The soil,
Type 82 E, is the predominant soil type on the site. It is
characterized as a silty clay loam to clay loam with slow
permeability and a high shrink-swell potential. In addition,
there is a large amount of runoff saturating the area soils
during the Spring. Typically, this type of soil presents some
major problems and difficulties in the construction and continued
operation of conventional septic tank-sewage disposal systems.
Because of the anticipated soil conditions, the replacement
septic system, to serve both main house and the employee dwelling
unit, will probably be required by County Regulations to be some
type of engineered-design sewage disposal system. There is
little land area available for a gravity-flow sewage disposal
system on the steeper slopes below the house. It appears, on
initial assessment, that the septic tank effluent might have to
be pumped up to the flatter portions of the site along the South
property line. Such systems typically are expensive and require
large areas of ground, but it should be possible on this lot to
construct some sort of on-site wastewater disposal system in
compliance with Pitkin County regulations.
Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit
April 7, 1988
Page 2
Alternative sewage system designs, rearranging the preliminary
plans so that the existing system would remain intact, would also
be considered by this department. For such types of design, we
would request that the applicant open the existing septic tank
and seepage pit for inspection. If it appears that the existing
system is operating in conformance with regulations, we would
consider incorporating the septic system as a part of some design
to serve both the employee dwelling unit and the proposed
reconstruction of the main residence. Additional waste water
disposal capacity would appear to be necessary, in any case, for
the reconstruction. Our comments above would apply to any new or
modified sewage disposal absorption areas proposed on the lot.
(Other pertinent regulations:
Title X, Pitkin County Code - Pitkin County Regulations on
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems
Chapter 25, Article 10, C.R.S. 1973 - Sewage Disposal)
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205:
The parcel, Lot 84R Starwood Fourteen, is served by the Starwood
Subdivision water system and there should be no problems with the
drinking water quantity or quality for the existing unit or for
the house which may be developed in the future. There are large
water storage tanks in the immediate vicinity and eight inch
water mains in the adjacent road which were reconstructed in
1984.
(Other applicable regulations:
Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations)
AIR QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106:
It is our interpretation that the employee unit, a detached
modular house, and the rebuilt main house which eventually will
be constructed are each allowed a fireplace or noncertified wood
stove. In addition, each structure would be allowed one certi-
fied wood stove, under current regulations. This varies somewhat
from the intent of the law in that there could be as many as
three solid fuel burning devices on the lot, one a fireplace, one
the existing non-certified wood burning stove, and one certified
stove which might be installed at a later date. It is suggested
that if the proposal is approved, that some more restrictive
limitation be requested from the applicant at this time, and that
this be made a part of the real property records. If agreeable
to the individual applicants and their representatives, the lot
would then generate no more wood smoke than those subdivision
lots around it.
Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit
April 7, 1988
Page 3
(Other applicable regulations:
Resolution 86-91 -County Woodburning
Resolution 85-14 -County Variance
Title III Pitkin County Code - Air Pollution)
Water Ouality Impacts - Section 2-22 and 5-107.2:
Care should be taken in future planning of the construction to
avoid the small drainage areas adjacent to the westerly property
line. Sediment from disturbed areas around the houses and
driveways should be detained on the property and revegetation
efforts should be utilized to provide long term runoff controls.
it is important, in these erosive soils, to limit the amount of
sedimentation discharged into adjoining irrigation ditches during
runoff.
Summarv
It is our conclusion that, with careful site planning and proper
engineering, there should be only minimal impacts from this
proposal. Therefore, we have no objection to approvals for the
two single-family building sites.
ASSESSORS OFFICE
Dorothy M. Mikkelsen Assessor Pitkin COldllt~/
506 east main street
aspen, Colorado 81611
March 22, 1988
Mf~R 2 3
ro-
Pitkin County Planning Department
Court House
506 E. Main St.
Aspen, Colorado
Dear Glen:
The records of the Pitkin County Assessor's Office, shows
that the improvements presently situate on Lot R-84 Stanwood
Fourteen Subdivision were constructed during ]973 and 1974
and are assessed under Property Tax Schedule # 42-3786.
Respectfully submitted,
Dorothy M. Mikkelsen
Pitkin County Assessor
by-
Warne J. Conner
Deputy Assessor
,~z~Nxyn~~,l k ~~
t, ~. >~,
'~ 10 3 9 1
~
i ~~ P Y~~y
rLN ,
.a
N Y~t
1
pVT~ .i-:
~
;
~~
PERMIT APPLICATION
~ -BUILDING,
~
~
~
:
.,
h•
.
_
~ , ,
~.
'^!t ~ :~~' ~ JUfISdICtiOr1 Of PTT
'
KIN HOi7NTV
'
. o
`~#
,,, ..
tlunt trocomp/et~A,htinberbd spaces on/Y. _ _ -
,.
C
~ 1,'. fA r,... yyti '~ -
y~ L /'y~ iii" - -
t
$T S
di
i
i
on
ub
v
s
,, +: tars
a~o
~ ~ ~
k5i1 -eLR'
`~ p )T
•
`~ gACT ..
~[[[ wiiw Cx [D ax[[Tl
.
`
14 Stanwood Subdivision
..
~~w'[`Jt •x ~.; MALL ADDN[tt - 3V ~ rxOw[
'le lfi's'~83>,~TB lot. _ As ena Colo.. O
= ^Qp c l:x .'.:1 .i.;.:. MAIL woea[tt rxoN[ ue[Na[ No.
haL Co. Goleta, Calif.
11cM r~{r, ~a[e oM 9 y} ",~. MAIL eoDwua rxox[ : ue[xt[ No.
Et T~. sItrabacher .602 E. H n As en Colo.
y~w,~' '. Mwll ADDII [!f
1
II
[
[
N rMOM[ LIC [Nf[ NO.
`~
~
J
v
y
.i :[ '
~ vk L[ND{11 k ~ _`) '1'I ~ - M11L ADON[3! [II/,NCM
L ~' _ -. Res idence
}aN 8`; Clauof work:. NEW ^,AODITION ^ ALTERATION ^ REPAIR ^ MOVE ^ REMOVE
hl ,..
9. oescribework: Concrete exterior. shell w/flame artition
--
~(~:.,
';:: t
10 Change of use from -
Change of use to
11 Valuation of work: S ~ 57, 835.A0 pLAN CHECK FEE 81. ~J5 PERMIT FEE 163.50
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: type o1 Occupancy
' Cons[. Group I Dlvislon
51za of Bma.2 313 No: or 1 Mal.
(Total) Sq. Ft. Stones Occ. Load
Flre Vsa
1 Flre Sprlnklars
AYr_LICATON IICCEIiEO aV' HECKED aY-.
vLANS
C iLM DfON ISSUANCE av : Zone III 20Da ~- RagYlred ^~rK ^NO
~`AAf
///
~/~ No. of
1 OFFST BEET PA RKINO SPACES
2
/ ,/ Vnib
lli
D Covered DrICOVHee
we
ng
NOTICE peelal APProvels Required Reghed Not Requlnd
-- SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.FOR ELEC RICAL, PLU ZONING - -- -^~
ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. HEALTH oEPT. .ZO.Z
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC-
TION AUTHORI2E0 IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN80 DAYS; OR IF FIRE DEPT. -
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDEb OR ABANDONED FORA 501E REPORT ~ ~ -
PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANV TIME AFTER WORK IS CON-
MENCE D
- OTHER (SPeclry) '
.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND E%AMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRVE AND CORRECT. ~
ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS
TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT; THE GRANTING OF A' PERMIT DOES NOT
H '
E
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL T
PROVISIONS OF ANV OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING. -
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
~~
IDAT[)
cTDn oN 1v Txowlx [D 6c[Ni
w
/.
w[ or cox T
w rv
C
a -
(
~
~
g
~
~
w ur owN[l1 ey lLO[wl Dwi[
WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION cK., M.o. cnsH PERMIT VALIDATION . cK. M.o. cnsH
cnLam~o
ARCHITECTS S~ CONSULTANTS
P_0. BOIi 1246 ASPEN, CO 81612 " d~,(2 I
{303}925-7846
PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIRECTOR-ALAN RICHMAN
PLANNING STAFF-FRANCIS KRIZMANICH
RE: APPLICATION TO SECURE EXISTING CARETAKER UNIT AT
LOT 84R STARWOGD FOURTEEN, PITKIN COUNTY.
MR. JOHN UKRAINE IS THE OWNER OF LOT 64R, STARWOOD FOURTEEN IN
PITKIN COUNTY. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS AN EXISTING MAIN HOME
AND A DETACHED CARETAKER UNIT. BOTH STRUCTURES WERE BUILT IN 1974.
MR. UKRAINE WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING MAIN HDME AND
CONSTRUCT A NEW MAIN HOME. HE IS NOT PLANNING ANY WORK DN THE
EXISTING DETACHED CARETAKER UNIT AND WOULD SIMPLY LIKE TO BE
PERMITTED TO RETAIN THE EXISTING CARETAKER UNIT, UNDISTURBED AND
DETACHED WHERE IT NOW EXISTS.
SECTION 3-8.13 (D} OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CODE PERMITS SUCH A
STRUCTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS LISTED THEREIN.
THIS STRUCTURE DOES MEET EACH OF THOSE CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED
BELOW.
(1) THE STRUCTURE WAS BUILT PRIOR TO 1981
{~) THE STRUCTURE CANNOT MEET THE FOLLOWING RERUIREMENTS DF
' 3-8.13: (A} -1 THE STRUCTURE CURRENTLY EXCEEDS 500 SQ. FT.
OF TOTAL FLOOR AREA. (THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS APPROX. 800
SQ. FT. )
(3} (4} (5) (7} CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE
(6} THE APPLICANT IS WILLING TO HAVE THE UNIT DEED RESTRICTED AS
IN ACCCORDANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
MEMORANDUM
T0: Francis Rrizmanich, Planning Department
FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health
DATE: April 7, 1988
RE: Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit Exemption
Parcel I. D. # 2643-261-01-002
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the
above-mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin
County Code, Title II, and has the following comments.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2-7 and 5-200:
The existing on-site wastewater disposal system, installed in
1974 and serving both residences on the lot, is located under the
footprint of the proposed new main house. If current plans are
followed, it would be required that the existing septic system be
abandoned and backfilled.
Using our previous evaluation of the home site and the general
soil conditions as they correlate with the reported
characteristics of the area soil types (indicated on the Soil
Conservation Service maps), it would appear that most of the lot
may be unsuitable for septic tank-absorption systems. The soil,
Type 82E, is the predominant soil type on the site. It is
characterized as a silty clay loam to clay loam with slow
permeability and a high shrink-swell potential. In addition,
there is a large amount of runoff saturating the area soils
during the Spring. Typically, this type of soil presents some
major problems and difficulties in the construction and continued
operation of conventional septic tank-sewage disposal systems.
Because of the anticipated soil conditions, the replacement
septic system, to serve both main house and the employee dwelling
unit, will probably be required by County Regulations to be some
type of engineered-design sewage disposal system. There is
little land area available for a gravity-flow sewage disposal
system on the steeper slopes below the house. It appears, on
initial assessment, that the septic tank effluent might have to
be pumped up to the flatter portions of the site along the South
property line. Such systems typically are expensive and require
large areas of ground, but it should be possible on this lot to
construct some sort of on-site wastewater disposal system in
compliance with Pitkin County regulations.
Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit
April 7, 1988
Page 2
Alternative sewage system designs, rearranging the preliminary
plans so that the existing system would remain intact, would also
be considered by this department. For such types of design, we
would request that the applicant open the existing septic tank
and seepage pit for inspection. If it appears that the existing
system is operating in conformance with regulations, we would
consider incorporating the septic system as a part of some design
to serve both the employee dwelling unit and the proposed
reconstruction of the main residence. Additional waste water
disposal capacity would appear to be necessary, in any case, for
the reconstruction. Our comments above would apply to any new or
modified sewage disposal absorption areas proposed on the lot.
(Other pertinent regulations:
Title X, Pitkin County Code - Pitkin County Regulations on
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems
Chapter 25, Article 10, C.R.S. 1973 - Sewage Disposal)
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2-6 and 5-205:
The parcel, Lot 84R Starwood Fourteen, is served by the Starwood
Subdivision water system and there should be no problems with the
drinking water quantity or quality for the existing unit or for
the house which may be developed in the future. There are large
water storage tanks in the immediate vicinity and eight inch
water mains in the adjacent road which were reconstructed in
1984.
(Other applicable regulations: -
Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations)
AIR_QUALITY: Sections 2-17 and 5-106:
It is our interpretation that the employee unit, a detached
modular house, and the rebuilt main house which eventually will
be constructed are each allowed a fireplace or noncertified wood
stove. In addition, each structure would be allowed one certi-
fied wood stove, under current regulations. This varies somewhat
from the intent of the law in that there could be as many as
three solid fuel burning devices on the lot, one a fireplace, one
the existing non-certified wood burning stove, and one certified
stove which might be installed at a later date. It is suggested
that if the proposal is approved, that some more restrictive
limitation be requested from the applicant at-this time, and that
this be made a part of the real property records. If agreeable
to the individual applicants and their representatives, the lot
would then generate no more wood smoke than those subdivision
lots around it.
Ukraine Employee
April 7, 1988
Page 3
(Other applicabl
Resolution 86-91
Resolution 85-14
Title III Pitkin
Dwelling Unit
regulations:
- County Woodburning
- County Variance
County Code - Air Pollution)
Water Quality Impacts - Section 2-22 and 5-107.2:
Care should be taken in future planning of the construction to
avoid the small drainage areas adjacent to the westerly property
line. Sediment from disturbed areas around the houses and
driveways should be detained on the property and revegetation
efforts should be utilized to provide long term runoff controls.
It is important, in these erosive soils, to limit the amount of
sedimentation discharged into adjoining irrigation ditches during
runoff.
Summarv
It is our conclusion that, with careful site planning and proper
engineering, there should be only minimal impacts from this
proposal. Therefore, we have no objection to approvals for the
two single-family building sites.
,_--- -
caLOmso
ARCHITECTS S~ CONSULTANTS
P_0_ BOX 1206 ASPEN, CO 81612 "P.? C i
(303}925-7806
PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIRECTOR-ALAN RICHMAN
PLANNING STAFF-FRANCIS KRIZMANICH
RE: APPLICATION TO SECURE EXISTING CARETAKER UNIT AT
LOT 84R STARWODD FOURTEEN, PITKIN COUNTY.
MR. JOHN UKRAINE IS THE OWNER OF LOT 84P., STARWOOD FOUPTEEN IN
PITKIN COUNTY. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HA5 AN EXISTING MAIN HOME
AND A DETACHED CARETAKER UNIT. BOTH STRUCTURES WERE BUILT IN 1974.
MR. UKRAINE WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE THE EXISTING MAIN HOME AND
CONSTRUCT A NEW MAIN HOME. HE IS NOT PLANNING ANY WORK DN THE
EXISTING DETACHED CARETAKER UNIT AND WOULD SIMPLY LIKE TO BE
PERMITTED TO RETAIN THE EXISTING CARETAKER UNIT, UNDISTURBED AND
DETACHED WHERE IT NOW EXISTS.
SECTION 3-8.13 {D} OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CODE PERMITS SUCH A
STRUCTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS LISTED THEREIN.
THIS STRUCTURE DOES MEET EACH OF THOSE CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED
BELOW.
(1} THE STPUCTURE WAS BUILT PRIOR TO 1981
{2} THE STRUCTURE CANNOT MEET THE FOLLOWING P,EQUIREMENTS OF
' 3-8.13: {A} -1 THE STRUCTURE CURRENTLY EXCEEDS 500 SQ. FT.
OF TOTAL FLOOR AREA. {THE EXISTING STRUCTUP.E IS APPROk. 800
SQ. FT. ?
(3} (4} (5} (7} CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO BE IPJ COMPLIANCE
{6} THE APPLICANT IS WILLING TO HAVE THE UPiIT DEED RESTRICTED AS
IN ACCCORDANCE Y~lITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
MEMORANDIIM
TO: County Attorney
Housing Director ~~72a 2 y,9
Environmental Health ' ~-"hi
Building Inspector
FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office
RE: Ukraine Employee Dwelling Unit
Parcel ID# 2643-261-01-002
DATE: March 24, 1988
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by Jim Colombo on behalf of his client, John Ukraine, requesting
approval of a detached caretaker unit which was constructed prior
to June 8, 1981. This application is being made pursuant to
Section 3-8.13 (d) of the Land Use Code.. The property is located
on Lot 84R, Starwood Fourteen in Pitkin County.
Please review this material and return your comments no later
than April 6, 1988 in order for this office to have adequate time
to prepare for its presentation before BOCC.
Thank you.
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, Colorado 81611
March 21, 1988
Stanwood Architectural Review Board
c/o Ellie Bricken
Dear Ellie:
The Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office has received an application to
approve a caretaker unit on Lot 84R of Stanwood 14. Our office
has scheduled this application for review by the Board of County
Commissioners on April 12, 1988. If you have any questions
regarding this application, please call me(9c2S-o20o2 O~
Sincerely,
Francis Krizmanich, Planner
FXK:nec
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING oeelce
130 S_ Galena St[eet
Aspen, OD II1611
(303) 925-20 0
Da CC_ .3 /ft~t . ~~$
~A, f
Dea[
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application_ we have determined
that your application IS 1~ oomplete_
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage. (one co py)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applicz-
tio n
Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the amount of $
A.. Your applicatiog, is co~Iete and we ha e ~ h~y}~led it for
review by the /^ on sl.-~ We will
call you if we need ally additional inform tion prior to that
date. -Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and
ke available a Dopy .of the memorandum.. Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a 53.00 fee_
_ B_ Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time_ When we receive the materials we have.
requested, we will place you on the next availkable agenda.
If you have any questions, please call ~rAhG~S 1,r12Md('~.~•
the planner assigned to your case_
Sincerely, ~fi~i~~e~-/
ASPBN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
CASEIAAD SUMMARY SHEET
PITRIN COIINTY
DATE RECEIVED' .3 ~ ~J1S
DATE COMPLETE:
PROJECT NAME
Project Addr
APPLICANT' U
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE:~I~t///lam 1NG91~/ ~~
Representative Address/Phone:
PAID: YES /NOl AMOUNT
1) TYPE OF APPL~ATION:
1 STEP: /'// 2 STEP:
CEL ID AND CASE NO.
STAFF MEMBER:'
.e ~.
2) IF 1 STEP APPLICAT~ION/GOES TO: t
P&Z ~ BOCC PUBLIC HFAUTNG DATE: rr~ n-
3) PUBLIC HEARING IS BEFORE:
~~ P&Z BgOCC r N/A ~./~
DATE REFERRED: o~ - X~ INITIAIS: /(.Y~
STAFF LEVEL: 1041 HAZARD REVIEW: DATE OF APPROVAL
REFS/BRATS:
~/ County Atty
County Engr
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
City Electric
Envir. Hlth.
County Mgr.
Div. Wildlife
Trails Dir.
Aspen Consol S.D.
Mtn. Bell
Envir. Coordin.
Holy Cross Electric
Fire Marshall
Snowmass Vill.
FAA
State Plan. Off.
other:
School District
Rocky Mtn Gas
State Hwy Dept
_~ (Gr
ld on/
Co o Geo Survey
USFS
Div. Water Res.
Other'
FINAL ROOTING:
County Atty
Housing Dir.
Other:
DATE ROUTED:
County Engineer
Envir. Health
INITIAL'
Building Dept.
FILE STATUS AND IACATION:
March 8, 1988
Pitkin County Planning Department
Planning Director- Alan Richman
Planning Staff- Francis Krizmanich
RE: Authorization for representation far County applications
Gentlemen,
As the owner of Lot 84R Stanwood Fourteen, Pitkin County, 1 authorize
Colombo Architects and James Colombo personally to represent me in
all necessary applications to the County that relate to the aforementioned
property. Specifically, I authorize Mr. Colombo to represent me in my
current application for employee housing designation of an existing
caretaker unit on the property.
Sincerely,
J n Ukraine
cc:
Colombo Architects
Garfield & Hecht P.G.
LIST OF AJOININ6 PROPERTY OWNERS
DR. GEORGEHODOR
600 HARDSCRABBLE RD.
CHAPPAQUA, N.Y. 10514
STERN MOUNTAIN RANCH SUBDIVISION -LOT 8
J~ ~ b~.1,~L~ Y~
b~-~,~- 7sza
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
JOSHUA SASLOVE
720 E. OURANT
ASPEN, CO. 8161 1
MR. LESLIE TOWNE
1872 BARRVCOURT
MERRICK, N.Y.
reaaro~ rr
Recorded al -
o'clock - _ M..
WARRAivYY DEED
Jack Ingold and Jeanne Ingold
~„~~„~.~
whose address is 805 Irwin Ct.
Hillsborough, CA 94010
*E~t,„t~-of ,~tate~
,for the consideration of
and other valuable
- TEN - dollars i~tX, sell(s)
1'17KIN ICNTY RECORpER
Nov ~ I el FN'81
and convey(s) to John M. [Acraine and Linda V. Ilksaine, in Joint Tenancy,
whose legal address is P. O. Box 10844
Aspen, CO 81612
C-elmtyef -e1~Stetecf-
the following real property in the County of Pitkin
Colorado, to wit:
~'.
Lot R-84
h I STAF&a")OD FOUP.T~1
l~ i' ~~ County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
~ it
STATE DUCUMENTARYfEE
s ~z ~
ti~~o
also known by street and number as 0572 North Staxvx3od Dr. , Aspen, CO 81611
and State of I I.
with all its appurtenances. and wartantlsl the title to the same, subject to general real estate taxes for
1987; and those reservations, exceptions, easeritents and restrictions set forth
~ in Exhibit A attached hereto.
i
I
~, Signed this p?~ day of pctp]~er
i /~~
'~ STATE OF f7u{"~/~
County of ~~/(,// ~ ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c~/1~~L~Aay of a'to~=r 19 E7 I~~~i
by Jack Ingold and Jeatute Ingold.
My comrni~,<ion,expiees ~D/I~/~ ~ .Witness my hand and official seal.
~~ ` D.S/.+pr7rnCy/~u{]C~ ; 1.'Ui1G~-- ,I
~ , (((~~~+++ ~G,• SE OND JUDICIAL CIR IT
tr PUpL ~ ` ~~
' .,•If ,in C)el!ver, ~rlseit j~ilf and."
/~!~ D f 0 ,
-- r~
uu~~ __- ___ -- -- -'-__..
_.. _--- -
No. R97. Rtv. ]j-65. WARRANTT DEEU ISkorl Forml arad'~rtd Pulditihmp. 5825 N'. 6rh Aix., Wcewood. CO 90211- (30)12)3-6900 12-85
rcecor0er. BOOK FJ~U PAGEIbe~
~~294633