Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264326401001 (1987)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) N� Address Assignment Legend0 COUCON T Addresses Parcel Boundary Date: 2/16/2018 N Driveway Road Centerline 1:4,500 PARCEL ID: 2643-264-01 001/05- ~. DATE RCVD: ~- #COPIES:~ CASE NO P07A-87 CASE NAME: Stern Subd Exempt & Lot line Adj PlanneFs PROJ ADDR: 0314 Carroll Dr , OWN/APP: Stern, Edgar & Ziff, ADR~ C/S/Zi~- PHN:~- - REP: ADR:~ C/S/Zi~- PHN:~- Emall Addr;: '~ ALLOCATED HOURS:r- FEES DUE: FEES RCVD:~~ ` ` ~' /o OVER: ~- REFERRALS. ,` MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION: ~- ~~ ,~ No I~~~ BOCG Reso: 87-33 #287268 No ,.I .: ~r ~ No ~- BOCC Ord: ~_ REMARKS 264326103001 GF pZ; ~~ HRG OFF: CLOSED:~~ BY:~~ ' HO INDEX:~- ~ ADMIN: ,. ~- PLAT RECORDED~J ' PIAT (BK,PG): ~~ ADMIN INDEX: r VR APPROVAL DATEi,~ !.VR EXPIRES:-,. '.; '. CASE TYP:;_ :~ Subd Exempt CASE'TYPS: ` CASE TYP2: Lot Line Adj CASETYP6:. ' CASE TYP3c Special R CASETYP7:: :; ~. , - CASE TYP4: EDU Date Scanned: 10/5/09 .File Location:.-- Box 178 u"'....vsu." .suruv~t~a vuaua I PITRIN CODNTY / DATE RECEIV ED: ~/~ ~~~ DATE RECEIVED CO~M"i"'ETE: "~ I` PROJECT NA APPLICANT: Applicant . REPRES ENTA'r rv h.: . /Tl h h p/)O Representative Address%Phon Type of Application: I. GMP/Subdivision/PUD ,G (~ 5/1-16/-Q3 add/ ab~{3-r16y-o/-ooi CASE N0. STAFF: ~ 1. General Submission 20 $2,900.00 2. Detailed Submission 13 1,885.00 3. Final Plat 5 725.00 II. Subdivision/PUD 1. General Submission 12 $1,740.00 2. Detailed Submission 10 1,450.00 3. Final Plat 5 725.00 III. All "Two Step" Applications 10 $1,450.00 IV. All "One Step" Applications 5 ' $ 725.00 V. Consent Agenda Items 1. Minor Applications 0-2 $ 50.00 2. Major Applications More than 2 $ 100.00 VI. Referral Fees - Fnv' onm n a7 Health. HOUS1Rg, R in ring. Environmental Coordinator 1. Minor Applications 2 $ 50.00 (per referral agency) 2. Major Applications 5 $ 125.00 (per referral agency) "1.3 P&Z OCC MEETING DATE: ~A ^-~ PUBLI FARING: YFS ©O ~ ~ q DATE REFERRED: -~~-~-i~TTIALS: e/' REFERRALS: ~/ County Atty Aspen Consol. S. D. County Engr Mtn. Bell School District Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas Housing Dir. Envir. Coordinator State Hwy Dept (Glenwd) Aspen Water Aoly Cross Electric State Hwy Dept (Gr.Jtn) _ City Electric Fire Marshall Bldg: Zoning/inspectn Envir. Hlth. Fire Chief Colo. Geologic Survey _ County Mgr. Snowmass Village US FS Div. Wildlife FAA Div. Water Resources Mt Sopris Soil State Planning Off. Water Conservation Bd. Trails Dir. Other: Other: _________________________________________________ FINAL RW TING: DATE ROIITED: _____________________ INITIAL: County Atty Housing Director Other: County Engineer _ Envir. Health Other: Building Dept. Envir. Coordtr. e~ ~~`~ Recc ~~dat~o'clock~M ~~-~~~ - Reception No SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY RECORDER RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTING SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AND EMPLOYEE UNIT SPECIAL REVIEW APPROVAL TO EDGAR AND PAULINE STERN AND WILLIAM ZIFF Resolution No. 87-~~ WHEREAS, Edgar and Pauline Stern and William Ziff (herein- after "Applicants") have applied to the Board of County Commis- sioners of Pitkin County, Colorado (hereinafter "Board") for Subdivision Exemption approval to add approximately 5.6 acres to lot R-53 Starwood Subdivision and have also applied for approval of an existing detached modular employee unit on said lot; and WHEREAS, the Board heard the Applicant's proposal at their regularly scheduled public meeting on March 23, 1987, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to said application; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that this application meets the criteria for a lot line adjustment contained within Section 4- 2.2(a)(2) of the Land Use Code and also meets the criteria for an employee unit contained within Section 3-8.13 (d) of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant Subdivision Exemption and Employee Unit Special Review approval subject to the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall submit an amended plat for the Chairman to sign which meets the approval of the Planning Office and County Attorney. 2) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the main residence, the Applicant shall deed restrict the caretaker unit in conformance with Housing Authority Guidelines. Resolution No. 87- 33 Page 2 1987. BOOK vv~ ~ ~, .,E''_'iJ 3) The total number of woodburning devices for the lot shall be limited to one fireplace and one certified "clean burning" device. APPROVED by the Board at its regular meeting on March BOARD OF COUNTY C OF PITKIN COUNTY, By_ ATTEST: Pat Belfont, Depu County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: d T as F. Smith, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: /~ ~ ~/~ Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director AGENDA ITEM SUMMRIiY TAI: Eva rd of County C:onunission?rs F:._•yular Me?tiny - March ~3. 19;'7 F:'E: '.:t?rn '=:ubdivision E::ernption and Employ?«• Unit :_;~•?cial F?vi?w FF:iIM: Francis f:::rizmanich. Flanniny iiffic?GU ISSUE: Edgar '.aern is r?•questir,y :=.ubdivision E?:emption approval to add S•E, dCr~.s to Lot ~•~ of the '=;tarwood '=;ubdivision throuytr a lot line adjustor?nt. An ?%::istiny modular horn? is on th? ~.E• acr._•s? the aF•plicant is r?•3uestiny approval of this modular home as an employee unit. Thy=_ proposal generally rn??ts thc_• require- rnenis of th? Land Ilse Cvde• Th? staff is r._•commendin3 approval of th? :•rnF•loyee ~_Init and the lot Iin? ad justment• The staff is recornrilending that the standard Housing Authority de?d restric- tions b._• F•laced on the ?rnF•Ivy?? ~_Init, that an arn~•nded plat showing tha_ n«•w lot boundaries be submitted and that a limit of on._• f ir._•F•I ace and one cert if ied woodstvve 6e F•I ar::,d on the I of which is consistent with oth?r Starwood lot s• ALTERNATIVES: 1) Ttre Eoard may aF•E•rove itl? F•roj?•.t witl-r the conditions r?cornrnended by staff. ~) Th? E+oard may deny th._• application. ;) Th._• Eoa rd may approve the pro j?r_t conditions. RECGMMENOED flCTIGN: approv? this project that you direct us to with mod if ied The Planning staff r?commends that the Board with the conditions r?commended above and draft a r?sofution of approval. '_;TEF'N F MEMORANDDM TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Stern Subdivision Exemption/Employee Unit Special Review DATE: March 23, 1987 APPLICANTS: Edgar and Pauline Stern and William Ziff. REQOEST: The applicants are requesting approval of a Lot Line Adjustment to increase the size of Lot R-53 of Starwood Subdivi- sion. The present lot is 5.6 acres in size. The proposed lot line adjustment will add 5.6 acres to create a new conforming lot of 10+ acres. A modular home permitted in 1972 exists on the 5.6 acres which are to be added to lot 53. The applicants are requesting approval of the modular home as a caretaker unit. The application is attached. ZONING: AF-1. ACCESS: Access exists via the platted roads within the Starwood Subdivision. iiATER: Water is provided by the Starwood Subdivision water system. SEWER: Sewage is treated by individual septic systems. MAJOR ISSDES AND CONCERNS: I. Referral Agency Comments: 1. Environmental Health Department: In a memo dated March 9, 1987 (attached) Bob Nelson submitted the following comments: o Water Supply: The property is served by the Starwood water system which can serve the existing caretaker unit as well as any future residence. o Sewage Disposal: The existing septic system which serves the caretaker unit appears to be function- ing properly. A new residence may require an engineered system. o Air Quality: It is suggested that limitations be placed on the number of woodstoves or fireplaces which may be installed. o Water Quality: Care should be taken when con- structing the future main residence to avoid pollution of the small drainage through sedimenta- tion. 2. Housing Office: In a memo dated March 4, 1987 (at- tached), Jim Adamski recommended approval of the caretaker unit with the standard deed restrictions to be recorded if this proposal is approved by the Board. 3. County Planning Engineer: In a memo dated March 12, 1987 (attached), Tom Newland commented that he has reviewed the Lot Line Adjustment plat and recommends approval. II. Staff Comments: Lot 53 of Starwood Subdivision was approved for the separate development of a residence by Board Resolution No. 80-54 (attached). The proposed Lot Line Adjustment conforms to Sections 4-2.2(a)(2) of the Land Use Code which permits lot line adjustments based on the following criteria: "(A) That the adjustment creates not more than the original number of lot or parcels;" This proposal does not create any additional parcels or lots. "(B) That the purpose or effect of the lot line adjustment is not the creation of a new lot or parcel for development or resale purposes;" Lot 53 has been granted the right for separate development by Board Resolution No. 8--54; this proposal will not affect the developability of the lot. "(C) That in the case of conforming lots and parcels, any resulting lot or parcel shall conform to the minimum requirements for area or width established by the provisions of this Code;" and "(D) That in the case of existing nonconforming lots or parcels, any resulting lot or parcel shall not increase in nonconformity." This proposal involves a 79 acre conforming lot and a 5.6 acre non-conforming lot. The lot line adjustment will make the 5.6 acres lot conforming by increasing its size to 10+ acres. The 79 acre parcel will remain conforming at 73 2 acres. "(E) That all laws relating to the amendment of recorded plats are complied with." The applicant has submitted an amended plat which will be recorded if this application is approved. The Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Lot Line Adjustment because it meets the above criteria. In regard to the caretaker unit, the applicant is applying for approval based on Section 3-8.13(d) of the Code which sets forth the following criteria: "(1) The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Board that the proposed employee unit was completed and in existence prior to June 8, 1981;" The applicant has provided a foundation permit for the caretaker unit that was issued in 1972. "(2) The applicant must specify the applicable require- ments of Section 3-8.13 which can or cannot be met and the reasons therefore;" This application does not meet the requirement that care- taker units on conforming lots must be attached to or within the main residence, or within an agricultural outbuilding of at least 1500 square feet. The unit was constructed in 1972 before the caretaker unit regulations were adopted. "(3) The approval must require compliance with the otherwise applicable requirements of this section to the full extent practical;" The applicant has committed to deed restrict for the caretaker use unit and to rent it under the moderate income guidelines as recommended by the Housing Office. "(4) The approval must require the applicant to meet the health and safety requirements of the Uniform Building Code, as determined by the Building Inspec- tor;" The caretaker unit was issued a building permit in 1972. The staff recommends approval of the caretaker unit. The unit has been historically used to house a caretaker. Granting approval of this request will insure its continued use as a caretaker unit. The staff agrees with Bob Nelsons recommendation to limit the total number of woodburning 3 devices. The caretaker unit and a future residence should be limited to a combined total of one fireplace and one certified woodburning device as currently permitted for new residential construction. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends that the Board grant Lot Line Adjustment and Employee Unit approval to the applicants subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall submit an amended plat for the Chairman to sign which meets the approval of the Planning Office and County Attorney. 2) The applicant shall deed restrict the caretaker unit in conformance with Housing Authority Guidelines. 3) The total number of woodburning devices for the caretaker unit and any proposed future main residence shall be limited to one fireplace and one certified "clean burning" device. FK.STERN 4 ~'ITm~IN Gt~UNTe1 :.. 1 ":~" ~~ IJ~NU USh API'L.ICATION I'ORM ~d. I'I:OJECI' NUt-0UER __ Section/Parcel DATh SUISM I'1"fP.D ~ ~ t ~ ~- _ 1 TO CL' COMPLi:TP.D 13Y AVPL,ICANT: ~` ^- ( FEB 17 1987 NAME Polgar Company/William Ziff, c/o Sohn Doremus ~i(~I!( ,,. E4~~/~ A PuvNE 303-925-2811 NINtI; OP PROJECT Subdivision Exemption for lot line adjustment to Lot R-53, Starwood Seven, Starwood Subdivision PROJEC'P LOCATION: (On attached sheet, locate on zoning map, showing boundaries of any natural hazard and re•rource areas, any ocher special regulatory districts, Sectic,n 5, Land Use Code; and .locate on appropriate CSU/EI:A PSaps any areas not covered by the above,) 'fOTAI. AR°_A Lot l;n~ad~'ustment set forth on attached Exhibit C FXIS1'ING U93(S) _Single-family residential lots PROI'OSGD USG (S) Single-family residential lots_ (approximate square - - footage for each) R-53 - 5.618 acres; Polgar tract 79.267 acres YRU.SENT ZON.iNG OF' SI1Z' AF-1 CI:SCI<IPTION OP LAND USE PI20POSAL See attached Exhibit A incorporated herein TO llE COh;PLETED FiY 'ftfE PhANNING OFFICE 1'YPI: Or APPLICATI C?:: ~ Rli'LOI7I NG ~ SIIIIUIVIS ION P.u,D• ExEMPTION sPSCIAL, REVI1:w 35-acre ~ sUIID:vISION (~ IIulLnlrc Pr•.RrIIT ru:vlEw RL'VIEw PHASE: PF, 1.:-AI'PLZCATION ______ DA'C7 COMPC,E7';iD GBNl; I2AL Sl1GMIS5ION ___ P. C. ACTION D1~TT I30ARD ACTION UAfE DI31'P.I LED SUf3M I5 ZO?7 P.C. ACTION DATU DOP.RD ACTIOAI DA'CIi I'IIIAL PLAT I3OA1'.D ACTION DATE ~orem us & com Pant 608 east hymen avenue • aspen, Colorado 81611 telephone: (303) 925-6866 February 25, 1987 Mr. Francis Krizman ICH, Planner Department of Planning and Community Development City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 HAND DELIVER Dear Francis: This letter is in response to your request for further clarification in the matter of the Stern/Ziff Subdivision Exemption. ~z~~ Regarding the proposed Polgar Employee Unit, the only plane which exist are enclosed and were prepared last year for a living room addition. As I advised you over the phone, only a foundation permit exists for the original dwelling as the structure is a double-wide modular and was trucked to the site and, at that time, no further permits were required. Also, a copy of the building permit for this addition is enclosed. The dwelling consists of two bedrooms and 2 baths as well as a living roam, dining room, kitchen, small off ice. and entry hall. The square footage, including the recent addition, is approximtely 1,400 square feet. Since complete plane do not exist, Ann Bowman of the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority inspected the dwelling on February 24th. Aa a result of this inspection, she has suggested that we represent this employee unit to be rented under the Moderate Income Guidelines. I hope this clarifies the remaining matters on this application. Let me know if I can assist you further. Very Sincerely, attachments Doremua cc: Ann Bowman Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority ~~ ~ /- .f JTq(IV{~p ~ ~FOl.RT46N ~ W~,r ~ vv°e .c ST'Eitf~( 4?.QNCN :~SUQD)YI8)pH ~ , R-ppB-b ~ +a3 a ea AII o 1 ~--.__ a~ -..----~! G ~ ~ $E .I /4 NE 1/4 !S{.-~~-- ----. 1 11 I JEMJ;TJ9RY _I R-8(~ A-lfiND6D aQ,~ ~ ~ TRAG7' 2. ~ ~1'd36 .9C. aR.24q qc• A '4 x ~ `s ~ bTAQ1M100p gFTFFJ.I 11 _ _ ._ R 52 T icc¢~ --i - 26 e -- - _ " I 6^ e..~4 iie a~cu I I,.. `i ,..~. .'ax. F \~. \ I Rwr« sA ~~ r 9 l QS.~ ~. ~ ~~ R-5) t °a~ '~,~ STgRW000 ~ SEVEN ~~~~~ \ R-2~ . ~ S a4. R So ~ 3 R-n u. .. ~ ~~ ~ • ee..e. 1~.Rm' .... ~ ,INtit~ ST~W~OD ~ bid ~"`°°,,. _ ".:^w rp ~ •, to ,~ R~1o f~ 0.r ±4__.. _. ____ ,.~-~- ••~ ''6 C-Z I W 6m.r ~ e, R~~~ R-25-A i d R-9 S i..o . N e• ~ f J' • F... B ....__.-_ _.- ~ R 1 ~ 9 •+ r o-40v R^~r ~ ~ ) ~ ~ " R 21 I 0.4 ~ nm~ \ V C-j ~ur I L p0.~vE Buc >"_n_" _-_ `~~_ _.~~ 'yam • POLGAR TRACT --~- R-23-A ~ 1'150 r / ~~ 2-3 R-~- 4 / ~% / ~ae.c R Z .f=. .. ~ lM y i .s / : ~,,. r / ~-P 0-I ~ 4 2a a ~ --'--------.. EXHIBIT B VICINITY MAP STARWOOD - 26 25 QN ~ SCALE 1"= 400 35 36 NOTE:SECTIONS 35&26 ZONED AF-1 /~ ~/ J yg EXHIBIT A This proposal requests exemption from the terms "subdivi- sion" and "subdivided land", under Section 2.2(a)(2) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code, for a lot line adjustment in Starwood Subdivision, and also requests approval of an existing detached "Employee Unit" under Section 3-8.13(d) of the Code. In essence, it is proposed that Lot R-53, Starwood Seven (containing 5.618 acres) be enlarged and replatted to include an adjoining 5.657 acres, resulting in an AF-1 zone conforming lot of 11.275 acres, and that the present caretaker residence on said 5.657 acre parcel be designated as a legal Employee Unit. The Map attached hereto as Exhibit C indicates the locations and acre- ages of the properties for which this lot line adjustment exemp- tion is sought, and depicts all other information required by Code Section 4-2.3(a)(2). The proposed Employee Unit was constructed in the fall of 1972 (see Building Permit attached hereto), and since that time has served as the caretaker house for the Edgar Stern residence on Lot R-86-A, Starwood Fifteen. The caretaker house is cur- rently located on a 79 acre parcel of land commonly known as the Polgar Tract, which is undeveloped other than with the caretaker house near the northerly boundary thereof. Lot R-53 lies direct- ly between said Polgar Tract and Lot R-86-A. In December of 1986, Edgar and Pauline Stern sold Lot R-86- A, together with certain adjacent tracts and lots including Lot R-53 (all consisting of approximately 74 acres), to William Ziff. The Sterns retained ownership of the entire Polgar Tract, but immediately following final approval of this application they will convey the 5.657 acres to Mr. Ziff, who will then be the owner of all of Lot R-53 as amended and replatted (to be known as Lot R-53-A), including the caretaker house which serves his main residence on Lot-86-A. It should be noted that following such conveyance, the remaining Polgar Tract will be no less conforming at 73.610 acres. The final Replat of Lot R-53 (into Lot R-53-A) will contain dedication language customary to replats of Starwood Subdivision lots, particularly including a recital that Lot R-53-A shall thereafter be considered as one individual "Residential Tract" for all purposes of the Starwood Protective Covenants and Pitkin County zoning and other land use regulations. At present, Lot R- 53 is unimproved and is developable by right (ie. without special review) with a free market residential unit. Lot R-53-A shall, of course, continue to be entitled to this same development right. Exhibit A Continued Furthermore, the Applicants are prepared to guarantee and dedicate the caretaker house as a legal Employee Unit, pursuant to Code Section 3-8.13(d)(6), simultaneously with the execution and recording of the approved Replat. Finally, the Applicants respectfully submit that: (i) the lot line adjustment creates not more than the original number of lots and parcels; (ii) the purpose or effect of the lot line adjustment is not the creation of a new lot or parcel for development or resale purposes; (iii) the resulting lot or parcel does not increase in nonconformity, but in fact becomes conforming; and (iv) all laws relating to the amendment of recorded plats will be complied with. -2- ,R>st a B.I. _ BUILDINfi IhfSP~CTI~N DEPARTMENT ~; ~-~:..k'--'"""` ` ~ CIT""'')F ASPEN -.COUNTY. OF PITKIN[~°*COLORADO ~ ' ADDRESS GENERAL , OF ~OO,hs, ~St$rwood ~ CONSTRUCTION - PERM)T ""S':;~.-SIGNE6 ANO,VALIDATfD 8 Y BU14D1NG INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS. PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCR18~ BELOW Q . `CL AS$;OF.,,WORK: '-NEW ®-'ADDITION O -ALTERATION'O` REPAIRO . ,`. MOVED WRECK O. yy ~~ 'r,'.NAME tern ADDRESS nP-Colo. PHONE ~ _ `Be ~"'~`' " °' _ -- }~ LICENSE LICENSE , ; ME (AS LICENSED) Hans Stucker :.CLASS NUMBER , i• :., Aan~I1F COZO. :' '..~ .. INSURANCE ~' 'ADDRESS PHONE ~' O SUPERVISOR' ~? FOR`THIS JOB NAME DATE CERTIFIED' Y~ LEGAL ,,•.,-.. MetB'8 "and- BOUIIdS D@8 • StarNOOd Sub. . DESCRIPTION `Lot No. BLOCK No. .. ADDITION SURVEY- - ATTACHEDp DESIGN A uc. BY BY Centu Modular Homea PE No.' AREA (SF.)~~" NEIGNT N0. •, "s ~ TOTAL- OCCUPANCY '. AT GRADE ~ (FEET) STORIES - UNITS GROUP DI V, BASEMENT P'N' O GARAGE SINGLE ~ ATTACHED TOTAL TYPE 't FIRE I VNFIN.~ DOUBLE ~ DETACHED ~ ROOMS CONSTR. .... ZONE 11 DEPTH " - SIZE $PACING~ SPAN AGENCY AUTHB RIZE!D , DATE Z GRADE 36 FLOOR ~ VE BuIL DING I- REVIEW EXTERIOR ~" 'FOOTING SI CEILING ' 0 - ZE O IONING ~-l ~ Z EXTERIOR N CONC. B TH C NESS MA$'Y ^ ROOT T,y ~~ PARKING ~ K ~ O ~ A~ I ~ PUBLIC HEALTH SE! tiC T K SLAB 6GR BEA M$ M E RI AI FOY" - MASONRY ABOVE ( ABOVE ABOVE ENGINEERING - THICKNESS 1ST FLR. 2N0 FLR. 3RD FLR ~ XTERIO . ~ ALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ~"'~.,ABOVE ABOVE b SPACE 1ST FIR pND FLR - ~ . . 3RD FLR. REMARKS NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 9Z$-71J6 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR VALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM EVIL DING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING 0.ESOL UTION OR CITY IONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF WORK ARLIES. - SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FO0. ELECTRICAL, PLUMEING;AND HEATING, SIGNS, M ' PLAN TOTAL FEE SWIM ING POOLS AND FENCES. T,-, P E ~ PERMIL EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK i$ STARTED_ FIL D REQUIRED 7NS-ECTIONf SNALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. DOUBLE 11----11 CHECK 1_I ~ N/C AU flNAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON Alt ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCYPANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE .~ CASH .Q THIS BUILDING SHALL NOT eE OCCUPIED'UNTIL A CERTIFICATE, OF oCCUpANCr HAS BEEN IssufD. ~ BUILDING"DEPARTMENT PERMIT'SUIJECT TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. . s' SICsN ATURE . ~ ~ - _ OE ~ .,. I ~'~' - APPLICANT:./ (~!' ~/ /I A ROYAL Y' ~ f ~ , OAT! '~ ~ .°"" ~ THIS RM IS A PERMIT ONLY '- DATE - PERMIT NO. :a. LICM[L ~ -'~ ,RlC[IP[f AMOUNT WH , VALIDATED HERE'~~.~ '- 9/i5/ 2 'ii-197 ..,;., BUILDING DEPT. FILE COPY ^ ASPEN~PITKIN ENVI NMENTAL HEALTH [7EPA~ENT MEMORANDUM TO: Francis Rrizmanich, Planning Department FROM: Bob Nelson, Department of Environmental Health~~~ DATE: March 9, 1987 RE: Stern Subdivision Exemption This department has evaluated the water supply system, sewage disposal system, and other anticipated health or environmental implications of the referenced proposal in order to determine compliance with Colorado Department of Health regulations, local regulations, and those requirements of the Pitkin County Land Use Code under our jurisdiction. We have completed a site inspection of the employee unit to ascertain existing conditions and wish to offer the following pertinent review comments for your consider- ation: 1. WATER SUPPLY The created parcel, Lot 53 A, is served by the Starwood Subdi- vision water system and there should be no problems with the drinking water quantity or quality for the existing unit or for the house which may be developed in the future. There are large water storage tanks in the immediate vicinity and eight inch water mains in the adjacent road which were reconstructed in 1984. 2. SEWAGE DISPOSAL Lot 53 was separated from contiguous parcels under the same ownership by action of the Board of County Commissioners in 1980. Because of the anticipated soil conditions, the main house, which we expect will be constructed in the future, will be required by County Regulations to install an engineered sewage disposal system. However, it appears that the septic system for the modular house installed in 1972 is continuing. to function satisfactorily. While we have no permit for this on-site waste water disposal system installation, we would not require any changes or modifications to the septic system, so long as it continues to operate properly. 3. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS It is our interpretation that the employee unit, a detached modular house, and the main house which might eventually be constructed are each allowed a fireplace or noncertified wood stove. In addition, each structure would be allowed one certi- fied wood stove. This varies somewhat from the intent of the law in that there could be as many as three solid fuel burning 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 6'16'1'1 303/925-2020 -°1 .m,.. ~/ .,~ Stern Subdivision Exemption March 9, 1987 Page 2 devices on the lot, one a fireplace, one the existing non- certified wood burning stove, and one a certified stove which might be installed at a later date. it is suggested that if the proposal is approved, that some more restrictive limitation be requested from the applicant at this time, and that this be made a part of the real property records. If agreeable to the indi- vidual applicants and their representatives, the lot would then generate no more wood smoke than those subdivision lots around it. 4. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS Care should be taken in future planning of the construction to avoid the small drainage adjacent to the modular house and limit the sedimentation of this water course during runoff. M E M O R A N D U M T0: THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO FROM: J. LUCAS ADAMSKI, DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 4, 1987 RE: POLGAR EMPLOYEE UNIT -JOHN DOREMUS REQUEST John Doremus contacted the Rousing Office requesting that the Polgar Employee Unit be legalized and made a caretaker unit under the moderate income guidelines (see the attached letter to the Planning Office- dated February 25, 1987). I directed Ann Bowman to inspect the unit in Starwood which she did February 27, 1987. She reported that the unit is in very good condition and would be an attractive addition to the employee caretaker inventory. The unit is a two bedroom, two bath mobile home on a permanent foundation with a living room, dining room kitchen and an additional stick built family room. The present occupants have been caretakers for the Polgar home for eight years. The Rousing Office was impressed with the overall quality of this unit and highly recommend approval as a caretaker. This information was forwarded to Mr. Doremus and a copy of this memo upon your approval will be forwarded to the Planning Office. If the Planning Office also approves this request a deed restric- tion will be recorded for the Polgar Employee unit. ACTION NEEDED: Approval of staff recommendation. MEMORANDUM T0: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office FROM: Tom Newland, Planning Engineer RE: Stern Subdivision Exemption DATE: March 12, 1987 I have reviewed the application for subdivision exemption submitted by John Doremus on behalf of the Polgar Company and would like to forward to you the following comments: I have found the language on the proposed plat to conform with all applicable regulations. The access easement to the Polgar Ranch is correct, reserving a 40' wide strip for ingress and egress to the ranch parcel over the proposed lot R-53-A. The trail easement is also correct and properly platted. The dwelling unit requested for employee unit designation is a modular or mobile home. This fact may have some bearing on the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision on whether or not to grant employee unit status. There will be no foreseeable effect on the utilities and roads of the subdivision if this subdivision exemption is approved. UVUn~Ol~ r tf -- RESOLUTIOhI OF TIIE BOARD OF COU(ITY COt-0t41S'C101tii?RS OF P17KIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTIhIG SPECIAL APPROVAL FOR SEPARATE DEVELOPPIEIJ'f OF THE FOLLOIJUIG LOTS: Lot No. -Group One: R-49, Stanwood Seven R-50, Stanwood Sevin P,-51, Stanwood Seven R-52, Stanwood Seven R-53, Staro-rood Seven Group Two: R-BA, Stanwood One R-86, Stanwood One Group Three: R-61, Stanwood Eight R-74, Starvrood Eleven R-75, Stanwood Eleven R-76, Stanwood Eleven R-77, Stanwood Eleven R-78, Stanwood Eleven R-79, Starwcod Eleven Group Four: R-92, Stanwood Sixteen R-94, Stanwood Sixteen R-95, Stanwood Sixteen R-99, Starvrood Sixteen R-102, Stanwood Sixteen • R-103, Stanwood Sixteen Resolution tle. 80- JrF,I 4JHEREAS, an application has been submitted by the owners of twenty lots in the Stanwood Subdivision requesting special review approval for the separate development of each of those lots, and 4141[REAS, an application was made pursuant to Section 7-2.4(a) of the - Pitkin County .Land Use Code, and 41HEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Cormission reviewed the application at their regular meeting on April 9, 1960 and recommended appro- val subject to the following conditions: 1. The issuance of building permits shall be subject to the recommen- dations found in the Eldorado Engineering repm•t of January, 1980, and, 2. All buildings in wildfire hazard areas as detennined by on-site inspections by the State Forest Service shall be constructed utilizing fire resistant building techniques as follows: A. Roof soffitts shall be enclosed with fire resistant materials, and, B. Houses built on slopes employing stilt foundations shall have such foundations walled or enclosed, and ,~~ 3. Any and/or all lots may require special cnnineering in regard to soils, sewage and drainage which system may be additionally crpensive to satisfy the requirements of the Land Use Code, and VIHEREAS, the Board is satisfied that the action of the Conmrission is appropriate and v~ishes to affirm this action and accept their recoimrendations, WOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, that special review approval is hereby granted for the separate development of the following lots: Lot No. Group One: R-49, R-50, R-51, R-52, R-53, Group Two: R-8A, R-88, Starwood Seven Stanwood Seven Starwood Seven Starwood Seven Starwood Seven Starwood One Starwood One Group Three: R-61, R-74, R-75, R-76, R-77, R-78, R-79, Starwood Eight Starwood Eleven Starwood Eleven Starwood Eleven Starwood Eleven Starwood Eleven Starwood Eleven Group Four: R-92, Starwood Sixteen R-94, Starwood Sixteen R-95, Starwood Sixteen R-99, Starwood Sixteen R-102, Starwood Sixteen R-103, Starwood Sixteen subject to the following conditons: 1. The issuance of building permits shall be subject to the recommenda- tions found in the Eldorado Engineering report of January, 1980, and, 2. All buildings in wildfire hazard areas as determined by on-site inspections by the State Forest Service shall be constructed utilizing fire resistant building techniques as follows: A. Roof soffitts shall be enclosed with fire resistant materials, and, B. Douses built on slopes employing stilt foundations shall have such foundations walled or enclosed, and 3. Any and/.or all lots may require special engineering in regard to soils, sewage and drainage which system may additionally expansive to satisfy the requirements of the Land Use Cade. Approved by the Goard of County Conmrissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, at their regular meeting on June 9, 1980. BMRO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIiJ COUNTY, COLOR/ADO ,, Michael Kinsley, Chairman i:Ulhl~(~~~ t., :. ATTEST: . ,- :, /~ :7 is -:' APPROVEf~ A;;~TO. FORI.1: , Z~ 1 ' <, '• ~ •_ Coun,t~y, Attorney M E M O R A N D D M To: Ann Bowman From: Tom Smith Date: March 4, 1987 Re: Polgar Employee Unit Application I have received a copy of a memorandum from Jim Adamski to the Housing Authority regarding the above application dated March 4, 1987. The memorandum refers to the unit that is the subject of the application as a "mobile home" on a permanent foundation. Please note that the Pitkin County Land Use Code, Section 5- 504.1(m), defines a mobile home as follows: "A structure designed to be transported after fabrication and equal to or exceeding eight feet (8') in body width or thirty-two feet (32') in body length, excluding towing gear and bumper. Such a structure is suitable for human habitation on a year-round basis when provided with required plumbing, heating, and electrical facilities. Provided, however, that any substandard size units existing at the time of adoptions of these regulations shall be allowed to continue." Section 5-504.8(a), specifies that no mobile home shall be installed, maintained, used, occupied, etc., within any area of Pitkin County except within a mobile home park meeting the requirements of the code. Please review the Polgar employee unit application within the context of these limitations. If the structure is a mobile home within the meaning of the code, it cannot be approved as a caretaker unit, even if it otherwise meets the caretaker unit requirement. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. TS:sm cc: Jim Adam ski ~oremus & comPanY sos east hyman avenue • aspen, Colorado 81611 telephone: (303).925-6866 February 2, 1987 Alan Richman, Director Department of Planning & Community Development City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611, Dear Alan, FEB 1 71987 HAND DELIVERED Attached please find a Land Use Application and requesite material for Pitkin County, requesting a Subdivision Exemption on behalf of Polgar Company and William Ziff. We have submitted an original and two copies as required. If you wish additional copies, or have questions concerning this application, please call me at 925-6866. I would appreciate a call from you, in any case, when you find the application complete and name the staff planner who will make the review. Si rely /~J~y~" r~Lf ohn Doremus pt/JD Attachments ABPEN~PITKII~"""~EGIONAL BUILDI~ DEPARTMENT '506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 8161'1 303/925-5973 INSPECTION RECORD ADDRESS 0252 Caroll Dr.-Starwood OWNER Starn GENERAL CONTRACTOR Owner/Lalande LICENSE NO. BUILDING PERMIT NO. 9D9fi DATE ISSUED 5/~/RF, POST THIS CARD AT OR NEAR FRONT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE SITE TYPE OF INSPECTION SUB-CONTRACTOR DATE OF INSPECTION INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE W w Spread Footings ~ :/.~- j ~ ; %~ ~~ T Z Walls or Other ~ ,~j DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL INSPECTED AND APPROVED U Temp. Serv. ~ W Groundwork Rough ~~ ~ = Groundwork Q w Rough (stack) Z Gas Piping Q Rough Heating FRAMING INSPECTION TO BE MADE WHEN ALL ABOVE INSTAL E BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED Z Frame ~ ~~~~ ~ J Insulation (p iZ(/CL(.(; n Spec. Cond. Lath or Wallboard FINAL -BUILDING INSPECTION TO BEM OVE INSTALL ONS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED Final Building Elect. Service 0 Final Plbg. Z Final Heating LL Final Elect. C. O. -BUILDING READY FOR OCCUPANCY THIS CARD MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT WITH NAMES OF CONTRACTORS AND ALL INSPECTIONS SIGNED BY INSPECTORS BEFORE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CAN 8E ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OF THIS BUILDING PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION AND ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS NOT PERMITTED. REV. B/81 ~..~ ,+ DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE RNOW ALL LAN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby cer- tifies as follows: 1. Lot R-53, Starwood Seven, is presently owned of record by William Ziff, 2000 Ocean Blvd., Manalapan, Florida 33462, sub- ject to the following: (a) U.S. Patent reservations and exceptions. (b) Starwood Protective Covenants recorded in Book 211 at page 231 (as amended). (c) Agreement Regarding Private Roads recorded in Book 294 at page 124. (d) Rights of way for all ditches and laterals. (e) Articles of Incorporation of Starwood Home Owners Association recorded in Book 200 at page 297 (as amended). (f) Easements shown on Plat of Starwood Seven recorded in Plat Book 3 at page 250. (g) Agreement recorded in Book 342 at page 510. (h) Holy Cross easement granted in instrument recorded in Book 429 at page 888. 2. The adjoining 5.657 acre parcel is presently owned of record by Polgar Company, a partnership of Edgar Stern and Pauline Stern, P.O. Box JJ, Aspen, Colorado 81612, subject to the following: (a) U.S. Patent reservations and exceptions. (b) Starwood Water District water tank easement, and other utility line easements, as granted or reserved in Easements Agreement recorded in Book 527 at page 485 and rerecorded in Book 527 at page 830. (c) Starwood Home Owners Association pedestrian and bridle trail easement as described in instrument recorded in Book 527 at page 499. (d) Easement for access road to Polgar Ranch, to be created and reserved in Protective Covenants for Polgar Ranch. TO: County Attorney County Engineer Housing Director Environmental Health FROM: Francis Krizmanich, Planning Office RE: Stern Subdivision Exemption DATE: February 20, 1987 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by John Doremus on behalf of his client Edgar Stern, or Polgar Company, requesting subdivision exemption for a lot line adjust- ment to Lot R-53, of Starwood Seven Subdivision containing 5.618 acres to be enlarged-and replatted to include an adjoining 5.657 acres, resulting in an AF-1 zone conforming lot of 11.275 acres. The applicant also requests that the presently existing care- taker unit on said 5.657 acre parcel be designated as a legal employee unit. The present zoning of the site is AF-1. Please review this application and return your comments to this office no later than March 9, 1987 so we have adequate time to prepare for its presentation before BOCC on March 23. Thank you. Dear ~' ~}/I ic~- /' This ins to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application.. We have determined that your application IS NOT complete. Additional items required include: / A. Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed) Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/POStaae (one copy) Additional copies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the Code, or other specific materials A check in the amount of $ Your application is complete and we ave scheduled ~ it for review by the ~'K' CJ on ~ We will call you if we need any additional information prior to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a copy of the memora ndum.. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee.. _ B.. Your. application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you o-nytnhe next available agenda. If you have any questions, please call 'I /`~~~~-<~-~ the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, ASPEN/P ~`RIN PLANNING OFFICE C ~ ~,~ ~ 4_ Y ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (/303) 925-2020 l ~.-.~ „ ~ _ . „ hxaf ehxs£ vExaE ofX,E I i ~. :r . ~/ i k n M ti k i rY~ H:~ ~' ~5 '- w~eS.y V. ,' ~ l ~ ~7 C ~ 0~.~ ~;~ I G <. 1 • 1 V ~ ^ (Tim ~ "a~ / .+• i ! ~ ~ ! ~ /~~/ ~~~~ ,, ~~. ', ~, a a.). Fa.. ~ '`. o E K o of T X A ~~ k a~ ~J ~ U A rt~ ! ~ `~~ ~ ~J 1 ~9~ _ ~~S 7 dSYaC . e, N ,x ~ ' o, ' r Ei Xe t° ~ ~~ X e~ ~ ~~ ~` °' %ar " ~ --->`,,, ~~ ~ ^~ ~~ ~ ~/ ~• I ~~ ~, ~1 ~j o ~~ -~~#~ . ~. - ~ ~ ~ ;- ~. c °a ,~ ~ I P v d; ~ _I ~ r ~\~ '\ ~ 3 n I L I \~ __- t- r ___ \~ tl~_ __._ ___. :__._.~ r.Q_I __ I __. ___._ d ..__- .i ti~I d \ 3 ~ el F ~~ ill 7 i ti. m el!1 9 ~ .Z„ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~'aV ~ Z ~ ~ /~~ ~` i U 4~'~'! pry of ,'' ~ :} ~~? `'~ ~ ~' ' kT? ~~ .~. •; ~~ ~~ m, ~ 'lL. ~ _ ~AA ~.M1 i w I'~ I (nom V eo x S i ~~ ~~ A1EN/PITKIN PLANNING OF~CE~ ~-~~~~~~'~ 130 South Galena Street , Aspen, Colorado 81611 "~ F' `y-3 --_ ~~C ~7~-G% ~; (303) 925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES ( ~/Lj _,~ ~ City 00113 -63721 - 47331 - 63722 - 63723 - 63724 - 63725 - 63726 - 63727 -63728 - 47332 - 47333 - 47341 - 47342 47343 47350 47360 REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 -47380 00123 -63730 - 47380 00115 -63730 -47380 COUOty 00113 - 63711 - 47431 - 63712 - 47432 - 63713 - 47433 - 63714 - 47441 - 63715 - 47442 - 63716 - 47443 - 63717 - 47450 - 63718 - 47460 REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47480 00123 -63730 - 47480 00113 -63731 - g7g8p- 00113 -63732 -47ggp PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 - 09000 COUNTY CODE - 63062 - 09000 COMP. PLAN - 63066 -09000 COPY FEES - 63069 - 09000 OTHER r ~, . Neme: ~ ~'%C f -' ,~~,, 374: 1' Y 1 Adtlress: ~-L~ - ~~'OX.~Z?-' 5 ~' ' ~ ~~, 6,i/ Check It ~ i~ ~'' ~ i Adtlitional Billing: GMP/CONCEPTUAL GMP/PRELIMINARY GMP/FINAL SUB/CONCEPTUAL SUB/PRELIMINARY SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING SUB-TOTAL GMP/GENERAL GMP/DETAILED GMP/FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS I f ~~_ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH `~.f Q J HOUSING ENVIRONMENTAL COORD. ENGINEERING s~ Lj Q~ 9UB-TOTAL %r~' S', !7Q SUB-TOTAL _ TOTAL ~±~-:-~` `-' i)Q Phone: ` Project .,C~~Pi r'2 ~~I ->-el / Y 'r' ~ >> 7 I l ~ - Date: -~ / ~ k \ /! of Hours: ~ ~`.~