HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.272920104033DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x17)
Recorded 2:49 P.M. Oct 16, ]979 Loretta Banner Recorder Reception No: 23.88: 6
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY ~~~~~~
COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
GRANTING GENERAL SUBMISSION APPROVAL FOR
THE MORf~IS SUBDIVISION
Resolution No. 79- IfS
WHEREAS, Chuck Morris is the owner of record of Lot 29, Redstone Subdivision, and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested General Submission approval for a two unit
subdivision of said parcel, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed this application at
its regular meeting on August 15, 1979, at which time they recommended approval
of the General Submission request, subject to the following:
1. Certified plat survey requirements shall be met at Detailed Submission.
2. The applicant will consult with the County Engineer and County Attorney
to determine appropriate language for the dedication of driveways to
the public utilities.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Corrrnissioner of Pitkin County, Colorado, has
reviewed the recommendation of the Commission, and the evidence and testimony
presented with respect to the application,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boardiof County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, Colorado, that it does hereby grant General Submission approval.
for the Morris Subdivision subject to the following:
1. Certified plat survey requirements shall be met at Detailed Submission.
2. The applicant will consult with the County Engineer and County Attorney
to determine appropriate language for the dedication of driveways
to the public utilities.
Approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, at
its regular meeting held October 9, 1979.
• .~ :; ,
'A7~TEST: •..
:!
~.
.~
.~
~: `i)eputy Clerk and Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
J~O epF`E~dwa s, Jr., hai` rman
~~~
-r~~
ounty Attorney
MEMORANDUM
T0: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - Detailed Submission
DATE: December 12, 1979
This is the detailed submission review for the Morris Subdivision which you
will recall is a division of Lot 29 of the Redstone Subdivision into two parts.
The general submission was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on
October 9, 1979 subject to the following conditions:
Certified plat survey requirements shall be met at detailed submission.
2. The applicant will consult with the County Engineer and County Attorney
to determine appropriate language for the dedication of driveways to
the public utilities.
The detailed submission does include language requested by the County
Engineer and County Attorney for the dedication of driveways to the public
utilities. In fact, that language has been now been adopted as part of the
Land Use Code.
Both Pat Dobie and Sandy Stuller have reviewed the survey. Sandy notes
that the plat should not have the approval block for the Planning and Zoning
Commission as that requirement has been removed from the Code. Pat Dobie comments
that the plat is acceptable as shown.
The Planning Office recommends you approve the detailed submission subject
to the condition that the applicant will have the approval block for the Planning
and Zoning Commission removed from the plat.
;h ~..t
Aspen/Fitkin ~l'anning Office
130 south galena street
aspen,. colorado~81611
September 19, 1979
Rear Admiral Clyde B
2339 Franklin Avenue
Seattle, WA 48102
Stevens, U,S.N „ Ret,
East
Re: Morris Subdivision - General Submission Public Hearing
Dear Admiral Stevens:
In response to your letter of September 14, 1979, please be advised that
Mr. Charles Morris has filed a subdivision application with this office to
divide an 18,270 square foot parcel in the original Townsite of Redstone into
two parcels. The fathering parcel would be 10,000 square feet and the newly
created parcel would be 8,000 square feet. 'The property is zoned R-6, which.
requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, so both parcels would still
be of a conforming size and consistent with the size of other parcels in existence
within the original Townsite.
In accordance with the Pitkin County Land Use Code, each subdivision applica-
tion is required to have a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners
where the Board will either grant approval or denial of the general submission
application after Fearing any testimony or evidence given by the applicant
and/or any interested parties. The Land Use Code also requires that written
notice of the hear~.ng shall be delivered or mailed to adjoining landowners
within 15 days of i;he hearing date. I assume, 6y Mrs. MacDonald receiving thy:
notice, that she must own property adjoining the Morris property.
I hope the above has satisfied your inquiry. However, if you have any
further questions ur concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me (303-9252020,
ext. 283).
Very truly yours,
° Carla Schuck
Administrative Assistant
CS:cs
-~.
~.
REAR ADMIRAL CLYDE B. STEVENS, U.S.N.. RET.
2339 FRANKLIN AVENUE EAST
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102
September 1~. 1979
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 5. Galena 5t.
Aspen
Colorado 81611
Gentlemens
I am writing on behalf of Mrs. Lucille R. MacDonald to whom
you addressed a copy of a Public Notice in a letter
postmarked September S0, 1979•
The Public Notice is titled: "Re: Morris Subdivision --
General Submission Morris Subdivision is described as
"(a tract of land lying and being situate within the NW4,
NE; of Section 20, Township 10 South, Range 88 West, 6th
P.M., known as Lot 29, Redstone Subdivision, Pitkin County
Colorado, as shown on Redstone Subdivision Plat dated
October 5, 1936)•°
She would like to know the specific purpose of the hearing
to be held September 2$th, who requested the hearing, and
any other facts that are pertinent.
We thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
C.B. Stevens
~.
MEMURAII DUht
T0: Board of County.Commissioners
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - General Submission
DATE: September 13, 1979
The attached application requests general submission approval for the sub-
division of an 1&,270 square foot parcel of land within the original tovmsite of
Redstone into two parcels, the fathering parcel would be 10,000 square feet in
size and the newly created parcel, ,8,000 square feet. The property is zoned
R-6 so both parcels would still be of a conforming size and consistent with the size
of other parcels in existence within the original townsite.
This application arcs submitted on the June 1st annual subdivision application
date as the entire County is subject to this submission date. As you kriow, sub-
division proposals flan the Crystal P,iver Valley are not subject to the GMP quota
competition process.
Also in your pac{:et you will find a letter from real estate broker, Joe
Nazzaro, vrhich provides us with an estimated fair market value of 518,000 for the
new lot. This information eras submitted in order to demonstrate that the proposal
is non-exclusionary and Cher°efore not subject to ~;he 50% PMH requirement of the
Land Use Code. As this estimated fair r:!arket value is only slightly above the allows
maximum of $17,600 for Ph1H lots, the Planning Office does agree with the applicant
that the proposal is non-er,clusionary.
This application aras referred to nine state and local agencies. The follo;•ring
is a surnrnary of the referral conments received:
1. h1ountain Bell has reviewed the application and requests that the
driveways he dedicated for use by the p.ahlic utilities.
2. Bob Nelson, County Sanitarian, has reviewed the proposal and continents
that both water and sewage treatment will be provided by the Redstone
Water and Sanitation District. The District is currently encouraging
additional rratar and server taps to lower its costs. Lab does not expect
any other negative environmental impacts. -
3. The Colorado 4Jater Conservation Board has commented that the parcel of
land is not in the floodplain.
4. Ray Jung^ of the Colorado Geologic Survey has reviewed the application
and made a site inspection of the property. Ray comments that, "Geologi-
cally, the proposed Morris Subdivision is located on a debris fan and,
thus, may be subject to debris flooding. 4Je suggest that a qualified
engineering geologist investigate the site to determine if debris flooding
can be adequately mitigated. 4+'e would be glad to assist in the review of
the document prepared from this field review." The Planning Office finds
this information ar~d opinion somwhat confusing in that the CSU maps do
not indicate any geologic hazards associated with the site and we have
conducted a site inspection without observing obvious problems. In
addition, rY~e are puzzled by the fact that the Redstone Inn would also be
located within this potential debris fan. The Planning and Zoning
Commission did feel that the requirement for a qualified engineering
geologist study is an unnecessary burden upon the applicant.
5. Pat Dobie, County Engineer, comments, "Considering the location of this
property and the availability of services, I see no problems with this
application. I would, however, upon reviewing the survey plat, consider
the possibility of requesting additional right-of-way on Redstone
Boulevard." -
The Panning and Zoning Cor:unission reviewed this application at their regular
meeting on Aunust 15, 1979 and recc!runended that you approved the general submission
for the Morris Subdivision subject to the following:
~. A
Memo to (3000
Fier Morri s Sub.
°` ` ' September 13, 1979
Page Two
1. Certified plat survey requirements should be met at detailed submission.
2. Applicant will consult with ,the County Fngi.neer and County Attorney
to determine appropriate language for the dedication of driveways
to the public utilities.
P
f
MEMORANDUM
T0: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - General Submission
DATE: August 10, 1979
The attached application requests general submission approval for the
subdivision of an 18,270 square foot parcel of land within the original townsite
of Redstone into two parcels, the fathering parcel would be 10,000 square feet
in size and the newly created parcel, 8,000 square feet. The property is zoned
R-6 so both parcels would still be of a conforming size and consistent with the
size of other parcels in existence within the original townsite.
This application was submitted on the June 1st annual subdivision application
date as the entire County is subject to this submission date. As you know,
subdivision proposals from the Crystal River Valley are not subject to the GMP
quota competition process.
Also in your packet you will find a letter from real estate broker, Joe
Nazzaro, which provides us with an estimated fair market value of $18,000 for
the new lot. This information was submitted in order to demonstrate that the
proposal is non-exclusionary and therefore not subject to the 50% PMH requirement
of the Land Use Code. As this estimated fair market value is only slightly
above the allowed maximum of $17,600 for PP1H lots, the Planning Office does agree
with the applicant that the proposal is non-exclusionary.
This application was referred to nine state and local agencies. The following
is a summary of the referral comments received:
Mountain Bell has reviewed the application and requests that the
driveways be dedicated for use by the public utilities.
Bob Nelson, County Sanitarian, has reviewed the proposal and comments
that both water and sewage treatment will be provided by the Redstone
Water and Sanitation District. The District is currently encouraging
additional water and sewer taps to lower its costs. Bob does not
expect any other negative environmental impacts.
The Colorado IJater Conservation Board has commented that the parcel
of land is not in the flood plain.
Ray Junge of the Colorado Geologic Survey has reviewed the application
and made a site inspection of the property. Ray comments that, "Geologically,
the proposed Morris Subdivision is located on a debris fan and, thus,
may be subject to debris flooding. We suggest that a qualified engineering
geologist investigate the site to determine if debris flooding can be
adequately mitigated. We would be glad to assist in the review of the
document prepared from this field review." The Planning Office finds
this information and opinion somewhat confusing in that the CSU maps
do not indicate any geologic hazards associated with the site and we
have conducted a site inspection without observing obvious problems.
In addition, we are puzzled by the fact that the Redstone Inn would
also be located within this potential debris fan. The Planning and
Zoning Commission may feel that the requirement for a qualified
engineering geologist study is an unnecessary burden upon the applicant.
Pat Dobie, County Engineer, comments, "Considering the location of this
property and the availability of services, I see no problems with this
application. I would, however, upon reviewing the survey plat,
consider the possibility of requesting additional right-of-way on
Redstone Boulevard."
Memo to Pitco P and Z
Re: Morris Sub.
August 10, 1979
Page Two
We recommend you approve the general submission for the Morris Subdivision
subject to the following:
1. Certified plat survey requirements should be met at detailed submission,
and
2. Applicant will consult with the County Engineer and County Attorney
to determine appropriate language for the dedication of driveways
to the public utilities.
4
P
I
T
K
I
N
0
U
N
T
Y
506 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Richard Grice, Planning Office
FROM: Patrick Dobie, County Engineer
DATE: July 25, 1979
RE: Morris Subdivision
r~,~
Either my referral packet is incomplete or the
applicant failed to provide a map showing the
boundary lines (existing or proposed).
Considering the location of this property and the
availability of services, I see no problems with
this application. I would, however, upon reviewing
the plat, consider the possibility of requesting
additional right-of-way on Redstone Blvd.
Concerning the flood hazard, this lot is one of
the few in Redstone where this hazard doesn't
exist.
;~ F,.'
'~R'~~:
P
I
T
K
I
N
C
U
N
T
Y
~~.. Y
60~"L: MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO~CiSRAD0 61611
M E M O RA N D U M
T0: The Planning Office
FROM: Mark A. Danielsen, Housing Director
DATE: July 19, 1979
RE: 1979 G.M.P. Applications
Attached is a summary of all the applications made
for the June 1st deadline under the G.M.P. Each
application is summarized specifically with respect
to the housing requirements. Each application has
been scored with respect to the Pitkin County Code,
as amended by Resolution 79-38. Recommendations
are thus made with regard to the application con-
formance with the housing requirements and the points _
awarded. Total points are given in the last column.
The applications have been divided into three
serarate categories: Crystal River, Do~+mvalley, and
Aspen Metro area.
,,
.._ Y
] ~
~
!
G ~
E1 H \ N \ 01 l0 N V~
a
~ w
a~
o i
a i ~ i m
~
GG~~
~
{
a~
~ I 1 N 1 N
ea
1
w •q
pG~~
C1 '$ tlP H '.~ L. ~ I dP dP
Wa °a a o~° ~ i 1°n
,~ I z
w w
'
H a a N ~ o ~,
H r.[; a r ,k
z o w `o ~ ~ m v ~
'
a N ~+
H a a x '•+
as
U RC H H H tl'1 N- l0 M r-1 ri
H N .-1 ~
H E Z a a
D
y -
~
~
H ~~ ~
a
}
yi z z ~
N i i ~
N
~ ~ ~.~
i
N
!
~' k+ 'l. z N j
p
r7a U r
~~ ~
z~
H Q La 1 1 ~D ~
7 1 •_.
~f N
f
A W H H ~ . ?L~$
O O 1 m •C
UI
O ~ U N ~~
x
"' I 1 1
a '•1 w
~' w
N
li Z
P r•I .-1 1 1 1 1 to
w ..1
w
`~
a 1 rt
~ ~
•
H
f' O 1
1 I o
m
•~ ~ ~r N o a
. 1 N ri p
~
~
]
~
+
:
E WP
Ha
i'
i
i
i
i
i .
r
~
x_
~ 5~a +
~ ~N
• w ~ w .u~ ~
as
H ~ 1 I
ww
~ ~ ~
~
O ~ 1-I N O .-I N N .•-I 1 I
a °m a
a
a -
a N
~2 H
H
H~ N N t(1 aT N ~O N r
y
z~
EO+ 'J ~ N ri l0
~ s ~
a ~ H a H
H w
a cn a 7 a
~ a .
H a
H ~ ~
F a
E r
; ~ ~
~ ~ +
m ~ ~ ~ > ~,] z W Z W
a r o r~ s w ~ w ~ H ~ a a
H
w d u
i
a
° a s
~ a s
~ o a
° a
~ o ff m
~ cn U tJ- H
~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ° ~ w '~ ~ ~ a
a
,+.`
w
ro
0
o~
o
ro •~
U J-1
•~ A
r-I rl
ro ~ -.
a
•.+ ~
A to
1] ri
tr~ ro v
Uro
+~ •~1.~
e w~
• ro a-
w +~
H 'Z, a
II II
~ ~
2 2
O
C
U ~ H
N 3-I ~ r0-I
3 ~ ~ ro
O O q •~-I
a~H~
un u
a~ ~
b
~'
O
H
a
w
ro
N
a-1
•.1 C.
•O
.1.1
bro
y U
w ,.°1
U rj
p,oo
rn n
~~
M
ri •rl
Mctnorandur~
1979 G.M.P. Applications...
July 19, 1979
PAGE TWO
I. Crystal River:
These applications do not come under either the allocation
quota or competitive point systems of the G.M.P. There is no
specific unit allotment for the area, and subdivisions are ex-
empt from the 50~ housing requirement. The exemption is based
upon the subdivisions being considered non-exclusionary.
A. Wild Rose Ranch Subdivision:
T is is a lot split of some 28.7 acres in an AF-2 zone.
The applicants desire to build a second residence. Both owners
of the property have been in the. area for 10 years or more; and
subdivision is requested so that both owners may live there.
As both the application purpose and ownership are represented
to be non-exclusionary, recommendation is for approval.
B. Morris Subdivision:
T is is also a lot split of 18,270 sq.ft. in an R-6
zone. The appraised value of the land being r2'latively minimal,
this is seen to be another non-exclusionary application. Re-
commendation is for approval.
II. Downvalley:
r
These applications are in active competition for the 1979
allotment of 10 units. Of these, five -may be free market and
at least five must be restricted housing units. There are
four competing applications in this area.
A. As en Villa e:
T is application involves 45 units, of which 25 would
be multi-family low income housing units. i'he applicant has
represented that while he may not be .the actual developer,- he
will be responsible for seeing that it does get built (rather
than merely offering the lot). The 25 units has been repre-
sented also to be a composite of averaging a variety of (1-2-3
bedroom) units so as to allow a proportion ow the project to
be 4~~ low income people.
Since the application is made for a :Larger number of
units than the allocation, and since it receives the highest
number of housing points, recommendation is made for approval
of the application subject to:
1. Maintaining at the minimum, the ratio (46B) of low
income people served by the project for any units built;
2. Applicant does take the responsibility of project
manager for seeing that the low income units• are built in a
tidy fashion with any free market units.
.B. As en River Valley Ranch:
T is application seeks to subdivide six lots, each
containing 2 free market and 2 restricted lots. All restricted
lots to be under the "low income" category. Lots 5, 9, 15 are
in the AF-1 zone; therefore, as each contains less than 40 acres,
•~
P
A
•'V
Memorandum -
1979 G.M.P, Applicatio~~
July 19, 1979
PAGE THREE t~.
..>F
Y
the maximum mix would be only one free market and two restricted
units. This would be necessary to have three units on less than
40 acres, while conforming to the code of maintaining the minimum
50$ low.income type housing requirement. The application does
not state the type of units to be placed on the other lots.
Therefore, the ratio of people 'in restricted units to total
number of people in the project cannot be calculated. As
Resolution 79-38 requires this information for point allocation,
no scoring can be made, and no points given.
C. White Star Subdivision:
T is application desires to subdivide a total of six free
market lots and six lots for low income ownership (p,3). There
are two existing units in the free market section.
The application cannot receive points as given. It is
stated that the lots will be for ownership under the low income
guidelines. It is then stated (p.25) that the criteria used for
calculating points is based upon a 1,000 sq.ft.' three bedroom ,
unit. This is not valid. Under the "Housing Price Guidelines
for 1979" (as well as 1978), it is seen that a three bedroom
unit is not affordable by persons of low income, hence the
"N/A" in the column--not applicable.
The maximum ownership housing achieved by persons in ,
the 'low income" category is a two bedroom unit, carrying a
- ratio of 2,7 people per unit. Points calculated on this basis
is:
Free Market Units, 6 x 4 = 24 persons
- Low Income Units, 6 x 2.7=..16.2 persons
Total = 40.2 persons
Points = 16.2 divided by 40.2 = 40$ Low Income
Housing Ratio = 9 points
In the summary I have given a liberal interpretation and
allowance of points under the information provided in the applica-
tion. However, should scoring be-done only on-the basis of
information contained in the application, no points can be given,
for the housing scenario is not applicable as stated in the
- .application. -
D. Easement Acres Subdivision:
This application is made for a total of six units and
complies with the housing requirements of the G.M.P.
The applicant states that phasing would occur if approval
is given as follows:
1979 - Duplex containing 2-two bedroom units, both
restricted under the moderate income ownership category guidelines;.
' 1980 - One free market unit and one single family restricted.
unit; under the middle income ownership guidelines;
1981 - Two free market units, both single family.
The applicant will construct all units. Points have been
given in accordance with the code requirements and Resolution 79-38.
..
r,
p
v
~
MGmoYandum ~
1979 G.M.P. Application"rv'
July 19, 1979 '`"' `'
PAGE FOt)R
III. Aspen Metro Area:.
These applications are in active competition for the 1979
allotment of 9 units. Of these units, four may be free market
and at least four must be restricted housing units. To maintain
the 508 housing requirement, if all 9 units are to be built,
then five units must be restricted. There are only two appli-
cations for this area: '
A. Aspen Racquet Club:
- The applicant requests to separate a 6 acre parcel from
the parent 19 acre parcel. The purpose is to build a duplex
containing a four bedroom free market unit and a four bedroom
employee unit, The employee unit will have a minimum of 1200
sq.ft. and will be rented under the "low" income price guidelines.
There is no such guideline for a 4 bedroom unit at this time.
Looks like I'll have to work on that! The applicant wants to
give priority for tenancy to employees of the Racquet Club. I
believe this to be appropriate and the type of responsibility
.the Housing Authority seeks to cultivate in employers. The
- applicant also wants the right to convert at any time from rental
limitation to resale restriction. This is also seen to be fair
and reasonable, for the point system does not dif£eren_tiate
between rental and ownership units.
B. Pfister Subdivision:
T is applicant was awarded 13 units under the 1978
G.M.P. Though the units awarded were unspecified, the applicant
is required to maintain the proportional mix of free market:
restricted units in the application under which the points
were given. However, as the units were unspecified, any
:reduction of units from the total application of 67 units
~onld not be realistic. Hence ratios and points are based
upon the entire project ratios, and not the project less 1978
units.
Should this application. receive the 1979 G.M.P. allot-
- meat, approval shou'_d require that a minimuri of 61~ of the units
builft be restricted--the same ratio as .given in the application.
s
1
- .. - „ ~:.
- .
r
~.
RICHARD D. LAMM
GOVERNOR
~~~~
,o
*.
*` e¢6 '*
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SHER MAN STREET
DENVER,COLORAD080203 PHONE 13031839-2811
July 16, 1979
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Mr. Reents:
RE: MORRIS SUBDIVISION, PITKIN COUNTY
We have reviewed the preliminary plat and attendant information on the above
referenced subdivision application. Additionally, the subject property was
inspected in the field on July 10, 1979.
JOHN W. BOLD
Director
Geologically, the proposed Morris Subdivision is located on a debris fan and,
thus, may be subject to debris flooding. We suggest that a qualified engineering
geologist investigate the site to determine if debris flooding can be adequately
mitigated. We would be glad to assist in the review of the document prepared
from this field review.
Sincerely,
~."~ >
alter R.~nge `
Engineering Geologist
WRJ/ba
cc: Land Use Commission
GEOLOGY
STORY OF THE PAST ...KEY TO THE FUTURE
Aspen/Pig
130 s
aspen
T0: Colorado Geologic Survey
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Colorado State Engineer
Pat Dobie, County Engineer
Mark Danielsen, Housing Director
Bob Nelson, County Sanitarian
Holy Cross Electric Company
Mountain Bell
Crystal Valley Caucus
FROM: Jim Reents, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision
DATE: June 14, 1979
ng Office
reet
1611
Attached please find General Submission application for Morris Subdivision.
This application is scheduled to be presented before the Pitkin County Planning
and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, August 1, 1979. Therefore, may I please have
your written comments concerning this application by Monday, July 23, 1979.
If you cannot meet this deadline, please contact me immediately, 925-2020, ext.
226. Thank you.
P4EMORAPJDUM
RICHARD D. LAMM
Governor
C
~ -~ .:
C ' O
* ~~ %+r
I xvt` ~F
* /8T6
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street- Room 878
Denver, Colorado 80203
Administration (303) 839-3581
Ground Water (303)839-3587
July 10, 1979
Mr. Jim Reents
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Morris Subdivision
Dear Mr. Reents:
C.J. KUIPER
State Engineer
This is to acknowledge receipt of preliminary plan material for the
above referenced subdivision. The Redstone Water District has been desig-
nated as the source of water and a letter of commitment for service has been
submitted. Information provided indicates that the District has sufficient
water available to serve this development and we recommend approval of the
Morris Subdivision.
Very ly yours,
~~ /~
Jeris A. Danielson
µty State Engineer
jAD/GDV:mvf
cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng.
Land Use Comm.
P
I
T
K
C
U
N
T
Y
506 E. MAIN STREET
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Jim Reents, Planning Office
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
FROM: Bob Nelson, Lee Cassin, Department of Environmental Health
DATE: June 28, 1979 /~j~ ~~M
RE: Morris Subdivision
This office has completed a preliminary review of the
referenced proposal regarding water supply, sewage disposal
and environmental impacts, and would like to offer the
following comments.
Water is to be supplied by the Redstone Water and Sanitation
District, Sewage treatment will also be provided by the
Redstone Water and Sanitation District, which is currently
encouraging additional water and sewage taps to lower its
costs.
Other environmental impacts are expected to be minimal,
including impacts on air and water quality and noise levels.
No new roads will need to be built.
308 e~~utH C,~~LENn /~ ~ - T}-IE F
THE ASf'ErJ A(?CAUFS ~~ ~S ~~f
AiPEN, COLORnCX) 81611 ~'XC~uS~~ ~ S" ~~
(303) 925-6750
~ N ~~ ~..Qti._ Flo..-- L l L~i~~
JNVE MOY
JCSEPHl~ rJIaZZARO
ROBERT N O'NElll. JR.
BILL FTtEBBLE
JOSEPH B WILSON ti
1.4r. Charles 14orris
l;ox 756
Easalt, CO 81G21
a2arch 27, 1979
Re: Estimate of value on proposed lot, Redstone, CO
Dear !~4r. Morris,
ESiAI~E
Regarding the proposed creation of anew building site at the
rear of a lot currently known as #29 Redstone Subdivision, I have
come up with an estimated fair market value of X18,000.00 for the
new lot.
Iviy estimate of value is based upon comparisons with other properties
recently sold in Redstone.
Sincerely,
/J/L/t// ~ 2 /'
`7
/ /
Jo Nazzaro~
r ker l
JN:dl
Append X P ~~ j' ~' 1
flTiCi_N COUV'L'Y LAi~ll I:,}?~^aF'YLiCAI'IC7:J 1'Ok2Yi
STUDY REQUIP~ED ~
P+~LICX FACTOR ---- r
LOCAL BFV IEW- --
CERTIFICATION
coNnrrroms
INf, STAFF YES NO AND
INITIALS llATli RliCOiM7ENDA-
'PIONS
4. PA GS DS FP Agricultural Planning
Conservaticn Office
5. Scenic Planning
Quality Office
6. Water Supply Environ-
_ _ _ _ mental
Health
~
7. Sewage Dis- Environ-
posal mental
Health
_
~_-_
8. Noise Environ-
_ _ _ mental
Health
9. Air Quality Environ-
mental
Health
0. Historic/ Historical
Arci~aeological Societ7
Resources
npp~t,dl;~ x •..
PITxIN t:ouN7°t Lain uSE APPLICA~i'IOtt I~GI<7•t
AJ'1'. ;;
STUDY Y.EQU7RED ~ POLICY FACTOR LOCAL REVIEW- CERTII'IC.GITION CONDITIOfS
INC STAFF YES NO ANll
INITIALS DATE RECOP~fEFlDA
~_ TIONS
Pet CGS llS 1?P
11. / Road,rTralls County Engin-
Dersign & Con- eer
struation
Impact oa
Road system
Maintenance
provisions
12. __ _ _ _ Drainage Count
Y
Engineer I
13. _ _ __ Impact cu County
Transportatiori Engineer
14. _ _ _ _ Impact ou Public Planning Office ~~ ~
Facilities/ f
Services ~
Solid Waste County Engin-
Disposal & ineer
Collection ~
1
Fire & Police Sheriff/
Protection, Fire llist. f
Response
Service i
i
Sanitary County
Land Fills Engineer
Hospital Hospti.al
Capacity Board
Library Sub-
Library i
i
station Site Board
i
Post Gf.fice Postal
Substation Service j
Site
Append i;t IS ``.°
P 1.TKIN `:OU M1Y LAND USi', ,1PP7.f(:A'I'IOD! POiti~1
STUDY iUiQCIJ )ZED
PA DES llS FP
15. -
16.
17.
18. --
19.
20.
I'OLTCY i~ACLO[2 ( LOCr] 2T'IiIW- CIRCIP'CCAl10N CONUI'f1UfvS
iNG 511;'1' YL~ NO ~ 1ND
INITIAL DATh. RIiCOPDiF.ND;1-
--"-- ~- T70N:i -
Extension of ~ ~ocky MC.
utilities, Natural Gas
water and
" Aspen/11o1y
sewer Cross Electric
`Mountain Bell
/Munir.ipal Water
l
& Sewer Dist.s
Public shops, County
garages, yards Manager
Recreation Sites City Recreation
Directs>r
General T3X Co$t/ %Onllty I'lnanCC
Benefit ~ Officer
Contribution to Housing
Housing Stock Coordinator.
Man-made Hazards/ Building
Safety Official
Wildlife ~ Colo. Div. of
Preservation Wil.dlif.e
Energy ~ Bu.ilding
Conservation Official
Flater Resources
Impact
Final Plat
Contents
District Water
Court
County I;np,~inee~
Attorncy,P.lan"
Hint; Office
Redstone Water " "
Sanitation District
REDSTONE,COLORADO
51623
play 28, 7979
lIlx. R•icJwhd dice
506 £aat 0.'ain. S~t.
R.~pen., Co-[a2adn 87677
aea2 (R2. r~ii.ce:
7 ura.~ a.~ked .Gg (ll~i. CJu~ck, iTlo~vria -to give you, .the gv~w,L
Rad-icy. o.~ The Red.~,toae GI¢tz~c and Sanitation. ~1iit~ict on.
~xtte~c and aetue~i dn~taGlatian.~ ¢t h.i.~ Redatone, /ytopelLti.e.~.
~ Shia Pam gin. *ame ,The Redatone lJate~c and Sanit¢tian
Fli~.th ict han encounvyed m¢te~c anal ~eure~c ~, .the main.
22.agon b wa ¢ Ra-tent,i.mL ,to handle ¢ goad many, mone
cuatomeJi~~ ura -in..t~UVC helry -to keep 4/te. coat doom .~a2
-i.#'~ u~e~r.~.
UAL /~ ~~~
STOR£ iJ ' RlL~ SAR,7TRT~OR ~7STa.~CT
U An> c.
wane Pd,~~eic, £nyineeh
APP/dh
CC: Chuck. lRa~vri~
THE I 1 L ESTATE The printetl porhons of this Iorm
approved by the Coloratlo Real Estate
Commission (SC2o- t2-77)
, ~, s
L1D. 308 S. Galena -The Aspen Arcades -Aspen, Colorado 81611 -Phone 303/9256750
RECEIPT AND OPTION CONTRACT
(RESIDENTIAL)
March 9 ,7979
RECEIVED FROM Charles R. MOrris Jr. and Rosl I. MOTriS ~ purchaser (as joint tenants),
the sum of $ 1, 0 0. , ;n ,ne roan pf Persona e e to be held by e a state Brokers, Ltf~ker, in his escrow
or trustee account, as earnest money and part payment for the followin described real estate situate in the I(pActnna Vj i I agP County of
Pitkin cpl-radptowit ~~ #29, Redstone Subdivision, as recorded on the
plat thereof.
with all improvements thereon and all f fixtures of a permanent nature currently on the premises except as hereinafter provided, in Neir present condition, ortlinary wear
antl tear excepted, known as No. v.i lc~ +~cu-~w.ai. w
which ro ert urchaser agrees to buy upon the following terms and conditions, for the purchase
$ 1 ~08. C~ hereby receipted for, $ 14, 000.00 plus Customary c
at closing. See Exhibit A.
Cost of any appraisal for loan purposes to be obtainetl after this tlate shall be paid by
as
1. It a note and trust tleed or mortgage is to be assumed, the purchaser agrees to apply for a loan assumption if required antl pu rchaser agrees to pay (1) a loan transfer
fee not to exceetl $ NSA and (2) an interest rate not to exceed ~ % per annum. Ii the lender's Consent t0 a loan
assumption is requireQ this contract is expressly conditioned upon obtaining such consent without change in the terms and conditions of such loan except as above
stated.
Ii a securetl or unsecuretl loan is to be carrietl by the seller, set ter shat I not be obi igatetl to carry said loan for any person or entity in I feu of the purchaser nametl herein.
2. Price to inclutle any of the following items currently on the premises: Lighting, heating and plumbing fixtures; all outdoor plants, wintlow and porch shatles,
venetian blinds, storm windows, storm tloors, screens, curtain rods, tlrapery rods, central air contlitioning, ventilating fixtures, attachetl TV antennas, attached mirrors,
linoleum, awnings, water softener (if owned by seller), tirepla a screen and glace, built-in itche appliances, w II to wall carpeting refri r Or
Franklin stove kitchen range an~ oven piano anc~ ot~er small misc. items.
all in their present contlitioq free and clear of all taxes. liens antl encumbrances except as providetl in eearagraph 4; provided, however, that the tollowmg fixtures of a
permanent nature are xcluded from this sale: ROCking chair China C10Set 'L trUT1kS and the COnteritS Of
the South ~`hed
3. An abstract of title to said property, certified to date, oracurrent commitment for title insurance policy in an amount equalto the purchase price, at seller's option
and expense, shall be furnished the purchaser on or before Ma rrh 93 , 79_~ 1 seller elects to turn isA s itl title insurance commitment, seller will deliver
the title insurance policy to purchaser after closing antl pay the premium thereon. 'k ~e reVBTSe Slr~e
*4. I be merchantable in the seller, except as stated in this paragraph and in paragraph 10. Subject to payment or tentler as above providetl antl c rrCE
with the other terms itions hereuntler by purchaser, the seller shall execute and deliver a good and s~ fi f warranty deetl to
said purchaser on or, Dy mutual agreement. at an earlier date, conveying said r and clear of all taxes, except the general
taxes for t9, payable January 1, 19, and ex
tree and clear of all liens for specialimprovements now ether assessetlo antl clear of all liens antl encumbrances except easements /or telephone,
electricity, water and sanitary sew cept
yotl-eebJt.~to building and zoning regulations, antl restrictive covenants of record.
Any encumbrance required to be paid may be paid at the time of settlement from the proceeds of this transaction or from any other so
5. General taxes for the year of closing shall be apportionetlto tlate of delivery of deetl based on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment Prepaid rents,
water rents, sewer rents, FHA mortgage insurance premiums antl interest on encumbrances, if any, and none
shall be apportioned to date of delivery of tleed.
6. The hour and place of closing shall be as designated by The Real Estate BPOkerS . Ltd.
7. Possession of premises shall be delivered to purchaser on ~'R n4fPT• of Tl r~ P
subject to the following leases or tenancies'.
none
If the seller fails to deliver possession on the tlate herein specified, the seller shall be subject to eviction and shall be liable for a daily rental of $ 50.00
until possession is delivered.
8. I n iDe event the premises shall be tlamagetl by Lire or other casualty prior to time of closing, in an amount of not more than ten per cent of the total pu rchase pace,
the seller shall be obligated to repair the same Defore the tlate herein providetl for delivery of tleed. In the event such damage cannot be repaired within said time or ii
such damage shall exceetl such sum, this contract may be cancelled at option of purchaser. Shoultl the purchaser elect to carry out this agreement despite such
tlamage, such purchaser shall be entitled to all the credit for the insurance proceeds resulting from such damage, not exceetling, however, the total purchase price.
Should any fixtu res or services fail Detween the date of th is agreement and the tlate of possession or the date of tlel ivery of deed, whichever shat I be earl ter, then the seller
shall be responsible for the repair or replacement o/ such fixtures or services with a unit of similar size, age antl quality or an equivalent credit.
9. Timeis of the essence hereof, and if any payment or any other condition hereof is not made tendered or performed as herein provided,there shall bethe following
remedies. In the event a payment or any other condition hereof is not matle, tendered or performed by the purchaser, then this contract shall be nu It and voitl and of no
effect, and both parties hereto released from all obligations hereunder, and all payments matle hereon shall be retained on behalf oithe seller as liquitlatetl tlamages. In
the event that the seller fails to perform any condition hereof as providetl herein, then [he purchaser may, at his election, treat the contract as terminated, antl all
payments matle hereunder shall be returned to the purchaser; providetl, however, that the purchaser may, at his election, treat this contract as being in full force and
effect with the right to an action for specific performance antl damages.
10. Except as stated in paragraph 4, if title is not merchantable and written notice of detect(s(is given Dy the purchaser or purchaser's agent tothesellerorseller's agem
within Me time Derein providetl for delivery of tleed and shall not be rentlered merchants Dle within 30 days after such written notice, then [his contract, at purchasers
option, shall be void antl of no effect and each party hereto shall be releasetl from all obligations hereuntler and the payments matle hereunder shall be relu rnetl
/orthwith to purchaser upon return of the abstract, if any, to seller, provitled however, that m lieu of correcting such defect(s), seller may, within said 30 tlays, obtain a
commitment for Owners Title Insurance Policy in the amount of the purchase price reflecting title msurance protection in regard to such tlefecys), and the purchaser
shall have the option of accepting the then existing insuretl title in heu of such merchantable title The seller shall pay the full premium for such owner's title insurance
policy, and the abstract, i1 any, shall be returned by the purchaser.
11. Adtlitipnal Provisions:
See Exhibit B
12. Ii this proposal is accepted by the seller in writing on efore ~'IA P(`}l ~ rl . 19~~, this instrument shall become a contract
between seller antl purchaser and shall inure to the b f the heirs, suFCessors and assigns of such parties.
tr R. M rri Jr !' ~- _ ~ - ~~ '~ /Agen, Real Estat Brokers
Purchaser ~dte
_ . x
>1 n L Morris ~ ~~(~ 1 Ry -+ ~ ~ -
Pu~chaaer - ~ -~ ~~ -, ' -oa~e J eph A. Nazzaxl ~
Seller accepts the above proposal s day of March 19 'T9 a d agrees to pay a comet? iomot ~ °/ of the gross sales price for
services in this transaction, ane~agrees he event olforfedure of payments mane by purchaser. such payments sball be drvitletl between the sellers broker and the
seller, pne-half thereof to sail broker, t to exceetl the commission, ono the baton ce to the Seller 1 ~- -_ ,~ _
Jess E~ Kitts selle/~. /y~ (~ 'ini re Kitts 5e°a~
PUrcDa52r5 Address ~'y' 706 Basalt, W1621 -
Sellers Address 235(' Oakland St. Aux'ora. CO 80010 _ _
*3. Purchasers state their position that an abstract of title does not,
in their opinion, warrant clear title. However, purchasers will accept
an abstract of title from sellers to the property in order that purchasers
may use the said abstract for a credit against a title insurance policy
to be purchased by purchasers prior to date of delivery of deed. In the
event sellers are unable to furnish an abstract of title to the described
premises to the buyer, then seller agrees to credit buyer $80.00 on the
closing Settlement Sheet.
*4. Title shall be merchantable in the seller, except as stated in this
paragraph and in paragraph 10. Subject to payment or tender as above
provided and compliance with the other terms and conditions hereunder by
purchaser, the seller shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient
General ~9arranty Deed to the purchaser on May 5, 1979, or by mutual agreement
at an earlier date, conveying said property free and clear of all taxes
except the general property taxes for 1979 payable January 1, 1980, and
excepting also any future assessment for any special improvement or special
improvement district whether or not said Irr~provement District or Special
Improvement is or is not presently in existence or that said special
improvements are or are not in place or under construction. Also conveying
said premises free and clear of any easements except gas, water, electricity,
telephone or television easements or sewer easements and free and clear of
any Deeds of Trust or other security interests. Ebccepting any and all
special district levies and excepting all U.S. Patent Mineral Reservations.
Subject nevertheless to all building and zoning regulations and restrictive
covenants of record.
Sellers reserve unto themselves whatever mineral rights they currently
have. F1~rther sellers guarantee that if said mineral rights are developed,
the surface of the subject property shall not be disturbed. Sellers
agree to purchase surface protection insurance on the property for the
benefit of purchasers.
EXHIBIT A
The balance of approximately $65,000.00 in the form of a
negotiable promissory note secured by a first deed of trust on
the subject property, executed at the closing by the purchasers
in favor of the sellers, said note being for a term of 30
years. Principal of said note shall bear simple interest at
a rate of 10% per annum and shall be paid in 360 monthly
installments of $570.43 including interest on the then unpaid
principal balance. The first installment on said note shall
be due and payable on June 1, 1979. Said note shall be
assumeable by a qualified third party. Qualification shall be
determined by conventional banking standards at the time of
the assumption.
If the purchasers obtain subdivision approval on the subject
property as described in Exhibit B of this contract, the first
note and deed of trust held by the sellers shall be amended as
follows:
1. The existing first note and first deed of trust shall
be restructured at purchasers expense, into two
separate first notes and first deeds of trust. Both
new first notes and deeds of trust shall have
identical interest and amortization terms as the
original note.
a. The newly created first notes and deeds of trust
shall be secured on the newly formed lots.
1. The newly created building site at the rear
of the subject property shall have a note in
the amount of $13,000.00 on it.
2. The lot on which the existing home is located
shall be secured by an amount equal to the
remaining principal balance of the original
first note less $13,000.00.
2. In the event that the purchasers hereunder should
elect to sell, or build on, the newly formed rear
lot, the following conditions will apply:
1. If the purchasers hereunder wish to sell or
build on the newly formed rear lot within six
years of the closing they shall notify the
sellers in the writing of their intention to
do so. The sellers shall have the following
options: Sellers hereunder have the option to:
a. accept a prepayment of the said note and
execute a release upon acceptance of said
prepayment. If a prepayment is elected
by sellers the purchasers hereunder shall
be liable to pay a prepayment penelty of
90 days interest on the note to be released.
b. Subordinate their note to a construction
loan and permanent financing from any
reputable lender.
c. In the event of a sale of said rear lot
allow the new purchaser to assume the
first note and deed of trust.
Sellers hereunder shall have 30 days from date
of receipt of purchasers letter of intent to
notify purchasers hereunder which option they
wish to elect.
2. If the purchasers hereunder wish to sell
either lot after six years from
closing the purchasers hereunder shall have the
right to prepay the first note with a pre-
~~~~~~ payment penalty of 90 days interest on the
remaining balance.
EXHIBIT B
1. Purchaser desires to apply to the Pitkin County Commissioners
for permission to subdivide the subject premises so as to
provide for two single family dwellings. Sellers hereby give
their permission for the Purchaser to make such application,
provided that if said application is not approved by said County
Commissioners within 30 days from the date of the deposit of
$1,000.00 hereinabove provided for, then in that event Real
Estate Brokers shall deliver said deposit to the Seller as his
sole and separate property. If this contract is successfully
closed the $1,000.00 of earnest money shall be applied to the
credit of the purchaser towards the down payment required.
2. If the purchasers hereunder are successful in their application
for subdivision purchasers hereunder warrant that they will not
create a new lot which would in any way violate Pitkin County
zoning regulations in regards to minimum size and setback
requirements.
3. Not later than March 19, 1979, sellers shall provide the
purchasers with a recent boundary survey which shall indicate
in the field the exact location of the property corners. Cost
of said survey shall be the responsibilty of the sellers.
4. The terms of this contract shall not merge in any Deed, Mortgage
or Note but shall survive all of the same and be binding
nevertheless on the parties.
5. Sellers shall have right to investigate credit worthiness of
purchasers. Sellers shall have 5 days from date of acceptance
of this contract to raise objection to the credit worthiness
of purchasers and declare this contract null and void.
Purchasers have provided verified credit references with
tender of this contract.
6. The Real Estate Brokers, Ltd. recommend that all parties to
this contract seek legal counsel and that an attorney examine
the title to the property involved.
7. Sellers warrant that at the time of closing all plumbing
fixtures and services will be in good working condition.
Purchasers shall have the right to inspect the subject
property prior to closing.
I~~I~11
C ~ `~ ~
. -, _
-,
E_
Your Reference ____
No. 7301055=1 C
Sheet 1 of 4
.AMOUNT PREMIUM
OWNER g_$0 000.00 S_ 289.00
M012TGAGF. S__ 65000_00___$_ 20.00
ADDITIONALCIIARGES S 25.30
COST OP TAti CEI21'IFICATE S- 5.00
~ SURVEY COSTS S -
TOTALS $ 339.30 _
CC's To:
Form 100.30 $25.30
COMMITMENT TO INSURE
Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a Califoruia corporation, ]terein called the Company, for a
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or
interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums
and charges therefor; al] subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the conditions and stipula-
tions shown on the inside of the cover.
Customer Contact: ~ttY Ennis _ gy ~' _~ ~/~/)YGI/u-)
Phone: 925-1766 7 AUIHORI ZEO SIGNATURE
The effective date of this commitment is February' 27 , 1979 at-8:00 A M
At which time fee title was vested in
WINIFREa L. KITTS and JESS E. KITTS in joint tenancy
SCHEDULE A
1. Policies to be issued:
(A) Owners':
CHARLES R. D10RRIS, JR. and I~SLWi I. ?~JRRIS
(B) 11lortgagee's:
WINTERED L. KITTS and JESS E. KITTS
urm Na. (:-Id2.i Rer. 7-1 .6
_i
i
7301055-1
#2 of 4
a ^5
.t - ~_ -
SCHEllUhE A-Continued
~ ,
A
,c (
,
.• ti
2. Covering the Land in the State of Colorado, County of Pitkin
Described as:
A parcel of land situated in the Northwest n of the Northeast '< of Section 20,
Taanship 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M. more particularly described as
Lot 29, Redstone Subdivision according to the map filed in the Office of the
Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County in Book 2 at Page 24.
Form No. C-012.2
9"
- --~ i
~~ .-
73o1os~-1
#4 of 4
.. ,.,r-----••~-.
SCHI3llULE I3
.,. .. ,
THE POLICI' OR POLICIES TO IIF, ISSUED IiEREUNDER \VILL NOT IATSURE AGAINST:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disc]ose and which are not shown by the public
records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore m• hereafter furnished, im-
posed by ]aw and not shown by the public records.
5. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer
service, or for any other special taxing district.
6. Right of the Proprietor of a Vein or Lxie to extract and rerrove his ore therefrom,
should the same be found to penetrate ar intersect the premises hereby granted,
as reserved in United States Patent recorded March 30, 1893, in Book 55 at Page 39.
7. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the LJnited
States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded Dlarch 30, 1893, in Book 55
at Paae 39.
8. Easement and right of way for ingress and egress for the sole purpose of making
repairs to and for the maintenance of the Redstone iVater System as reserved by
L. R. MacDonald in the deed to Norma C. Kenney and John M. Kenney, recon3ed
September 15, 1945 in Book 171 at Page 69, in which the specific easement is not
defined.
Farm No. Cdt?.t Rer. 1-IP-45
.-. ..._ .. .. I
T. ('1';r:ND 1 X 6
I ,~~
~ ~•' +/ L^"ND USE F.PL'LJ !:A'L ION FORM
4LIU~j. ay
('l..n
P;{UJE3C'2 NUMBEF< ~ ___ ___
Section/Parcel
llA'CE SUT3;4I°I'TED
TO BE COi~iI'LE'1'ED BY" AlP~PT~L<:/ANT:
NIv"SSE L-h-twl~'l` 2- !%a~!IL.J-----.,
7':DDRESS. ck ~~ LS aSo~t-T -C~~ _ _
PHONE -_L°1 ~ - ly/OS"~ ^------
NAME OF PxOJICT i~~r, ~ :'~- (/J ~,_
PROJECT LOCATION: (On attached sheet, locate on zoning map, showing boundaries
of any nab~ral hazard and resource areas, any other special.
regulatory districts, Section 5, Lard L'se Code; and locate
on appropriate CSU/EI.A P'.aps any areas aot covered by the
above.)
TOTAL AREA
EXISTING iJSE (S) ~ l~FS
PI20POSED US'E (S) ~ --- ----'-------
(approximate square
footage for each) _-_~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,7 ,f-a-~ ~~ {~. __
PRESENT ZONING OF SITE /~' -
DESCRIPTIO."] OF' LAND USE PROPOSAL C.OI .Y? nn, (- C_F R1SC.,~¢. tiles-A~/ .
TO BE COMPLETED BY TIIE PLANNING OFFICE
TYFE OF' APPLICATION: ~ REZONItdG ~ SUBDIVISION
P.U.D. EXEMPTION
SPEC IAL I2EV IRGi 35-acre i- Sl1BDIV ISION
I~ BU~pEI LD7(ytiG I'ER:•7IT REV I]'W
REVIEt~ PHASE: FRE-F,PPL"ICATION ~ 10 ~ I _ _ _ DAi'E CO}dl'LETL:U
GENEE2Ah SUf3idISSION ~ P.C. AC'T'ION DA'1'}i
..__-------_ EtOA RD ACTION ----~_~--~ DA"iE
I-iETAILEU SUBMISSION F.C. ACTION ~ lltl^li
~---'---._- I:OF.RU AC'PI O!J ------~ DF.`E'i;
FINAL }'LAT B(iARD AC'I'lOCJ _---_-_--~---- llATE
Ao~~»nd ix P
PITKIP7 COUNT'i LA'" DSI: APPLICATION P'Git?I
:iUh MAP.Y (iP F]ND IiS~~S FiI:SiiJSaED IIl' I:rV iIfS': PHASE
Directicns_: Any applica~a for a development requiring a permit under.
t3-ii.s code shall. be responsible for showing conf:~rmance with any applicable
policies of SectionL a:; listed below. The applicant shall submit those
requerements necessary to show con&>rmance with these policies and the
related general regtaations of Sact.i_on S. Upon submission of the applica-
tion and all submission contents, the Planne.nq Office shall distribute
same to appropriate referral agencie;? which shall indicate its certifica-
tion or non-certificate-on of the proposal. as being in conformance with
policies ana as satisfying sul~missicn requirer-~ents and review guidelines
of relevant general regulations. Referral agencies shall also indicate
whether further study in a lamer review phase is required and any further.
reccmmendations or conditions, attactiinq comments and returning same to
the Planning Office.
1.
2.
3.
OCAL 1tEVIEW- CL'RTIFIC~^.T ION ' CONDITION
STUDY REQUIRED POLICY FACT_Oi2 NG STAFF YES NO pNp
IIdITIP,LS llATE RECOn1.9END
TIONS
PA GS DS FP* Not inconsistant Planning
with Master PIa Office
- -- - - Rate of Growth
-- - - - Hazard & Resourc Planning
Areas Office
Geologic
Hazards
Floodplains
Riparian
Areas
Wildlife
Wildfire
Radiation
Soils/Erosion County Bx-
tension
Agent
Extractable Planning
- - - - Resources Office
Mineral
Vegetable
- -- Other
i
^ ra = ere-epp11C8tiOn llS _~ lieta 11 ed Submission
GS = General Submission FP = Final. Plat
3
,-
~~ ~
# 6 Water Supply: Redstone Water and Sanitation District.
Hookup is current.
# 7 Sewage Disposal: Redstone Water and Sanitation District.
Hookup is current.
#11 Re: Pat Doby
Redstone Boulevard runs in front of the existing house and lot. A
road runs behind the existing lot and house that is maintained and
plowed by Pitkin County or Pitkin County's sub-contractor.
#14 Extension of Utilities, Water and Sewer:
1) Holy Cross Electric: Current hookup.
2) Mountain Bell: Available service at this time.
3) Municipal Water and Sewer Districts: Current hookup.
4) Also has propane gas hookup for heating.
,~% ;~ ~__
r / ~ #.-, I
(?.. 1 J~i~,, ~ 1 ~
~ /1 // rI L ' ! ~,
/ ~ ~ 1
r'!/ 4
_ / ti
i I ~/ ~( 1 --t ~ x'/78, a
i Q ~/.~ °.~ -~X I ~p
o / o ~,,~'
(-9 ~>,
,v ;
7~89.~ ~
x -- :__ i ~ ~ i !
i.
? ~ J ,~
x
\ ~- ~~ ~ ~: ~ ~ 1 ~\\ 7ig3.r it
71 -3' - -- -- -- --- -~~ - 1~
-- ~'~ ~~
~ ~ r~
_ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
/ -~ ~ ~. a `
J ~
// T' _ ~ ~
~~~
:~ ~
-" ~ `~\ ~ ~
~` \
~~ /~ _ \
~i ~ _~ <:
~, -: ,,` ~
it
~~~~ U \
~.
~ ~H
- ~ -,
~ ~~ '
q ice,
-~. ~ i \ ~ -
,__ ~\
_ _-~ ~ ~ `
~"
\ ~ \ ~
1.
~~.
.....~. ~ .~;:.. :4+.n
~....
v,,-s..- . -~ rr1
•v ~
Redstone Water
Sanitation ®istrict
REDSTONE,COLORADO
81623
!luzy.28, 7979
ll12. R~iciw/zd ~~ri.ce
505 Fv~'t rrktirt s.t.
R.~pen., Co-Gonndo 87617
Deah 7/~2. rd2ire:
` I\ ~'~r
t
3 wa.~ a~kerl Gy. lZ2. Chuck lllo~uii~ .ta gi.ve ynu, #Jze. gzn.~rv.C
Pali off. The Red.~'tone G7ateJZ and San,i,tat i.on, a~tlLi.ct art
~w.te~. and ~ewe2 .in~.ta,Uat+:an.~ at h,i~ Redritone p2apenti.e.~.
/dt..th.i.~ point .in, .t,inte , The ~'edytorte Glat~i anal San,itati.on
11iotlri.~t han encaunrged arateh anal ~eurelz -fnp.~, -tJze main.
2eaaon 4 a pa•terttLol .to handle ¢ good mwud. mane
cuhtamz~r.~j.u`'io dn, .tlyut help..to keep..the coot down. ~n
.it'A troe2~.
Ue~ui- .t~m,(tp yoult~,
STORE. !J ' RIU7 SRR.7TATgWi D?STR.7CT
U~,~~
Duane P~~z, fitgine.e~c
DPP/dh.
(L: Chuck !!(a~uri.~
~..,'Er<.W 'F'A-ty alM+~n.t~firla...+..v'°IR'~t'._....sa:J~.~....a~....-, .~.+~~_~.,,,r< __ ~T
. J w»".. ~~.. ,
_:,
,i
308 SOUTH GALENA ~ ~Q..nn~N' `T~`""`~- ' '""S ~~~~ 1 S
THE ASPEN ARCADES _~!( ~ TME ~A~
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ro EXC%l~St ~~ Sc~~ V~ ~p~Ja[~,
(303) 925-67W nY0 ` V ~{ ~ A A _
JANE MOY
JOSEPH A NAZZARO
ROBERT N O'NEILL. JR
BILL PREBBLE
JOSEPH B WILSON
I2arch 27, 1979
P.4r. Charles Morris
1';ox 756
Easalt, CO 81621
Re: Estimate of value on proposed lot, Redstone, CO
Dear Mr. Morris,
Regarding the proposed creation of anew building site at the
rear of a lot currently known as #29 Redstone Subdivision, I have
come up with an estimated fair market value of $18,000.00 for the
new lot.
My estimate of value is based upon comparisons with other properties
recently sold in Redstone.
Sin, ly,
C
et
J Nazzar
ker /
JN:dl /
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pat Dobie, County Engineer
Sandy Stuller, County Attorney
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - Detailed Submission
DATE: December 4, 1979
Attached please find plat submitted by Chuck Morris as the detailed submission
of the Morris Subdivision. This item is scheduled to come before the Pitkin
County Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, December 19, 1979. Please
let me know if this submission is satisfactory, as soon as possible. Carla has
the mylar if you need it. Thank you.
MEMORANDUM
T0: U'3t Dobie, County Engineer
.Sandy Stuller, County Attorney
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - Detailed Submission
SATE: December 4, 1974
Attached please find plat submitted by Chuck Morris as the detailed submission
flf the Morris Subdivision. This item is scheduled to come before the Pitkin
.County Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, Oecember 19, 1979. Please
let me know if this submission is satisfactory, as soon as possible. Carla has
-the mylar if you need it. Thank you.
MEMORANDUM
T0: Pat bie, County Engineer
andy Stuller, County Attorney
FROM: Richard 6rice, Planning Office
RE: Morris Subdivision - Detailed Submission
DATE: December 4, 1979
Attached please find plat submitted by Chuck Morris as the detailed submission
of the Morris Subdivision. This item is scheduled to come before the Pitkin
County Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, December 19, 1979. Please
let me know if this submission is satisfactory, as soon as possible. Carla has
the mylar if you need it. Thank you.
Richard:
The plat:
1. Should not have the approval block for
the Planning and Zoning Commission. That
requirement has been removed from the Code.
2. The plat language re: dedication of rights
of way for utilities is the correct language
adopted by Pitkin County as found in
BOCC resolution No. 79-133 and is OK.
SMS
/ ~.i .~ {:
PUBLIC NOTICE
Re: Morris Subdivision - General Submission
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Board
of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, on Monday, September 24, 1979,
at 9:30 A.M. in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Pitkin County Courthouse, 506
East Main Street, Aspen, to consider the general submission application of the
Morris Subdivision (a tract of land lying and being situate within the N4J„ NE',
of Section 20, Township 10 South, Range 88 ldest, 6th P.M., known as Lot 29,
Redstone Subdivision, Pitkin County, Colorado, as shown on Redstone Subdivision
Plat Dated October 5, 1936). Further information may be obtained from the
Planning Office, 130 South Galena, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223.
/s/ Joseph E. Edwards, Jr.
Joseph E. Edwards, Jr., Chairman
Board of County Commissioners of
Pitkin County, Colorado
Published in the Aspen Times on August 23, 1979.
CITY OF ASPEN
MEMO FROM R[CHARD GRICE_e
Ch®onlQa %~6fF~~ ~Z~~Cec,..,}-{J/~o~o71y0wr,~F~J
3 ~ M~~c.~
~ P~ "„_.~-d S p 2.~.-~ s- ~~
x(60
/ G. w~~-~
(~~ ~RaNCiS~v
Y l.~ f' ~ l ~
~~~,~~~ ~ak~'-F,
y ~ ~d_3
~dC!~a iJ' ~ ~IV~
~O ~ 'r/- :~LN
~~°sV~~P
1 C~ Uer~
® ®,
Is I ~ ~ 1~~
%..1~,..,-~..
1~~~> < / ~ (; ~
_~,Q
-Uti~/,ti ~;~L
~_
,;
~~
/' t /
S4~-ci. ~ ~~K ~~,
lz~'1~.
~1~ ))
l
s-~-wf~. r
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
County
00100 - 63711 09009 - 00000 Subdivision/PUD
63712 Special Review
63713 P&2 Review Only
63714 Detailed Review
63715 Final Plat
' 63718 Special Approval
63717 Specially Assigned
City
00100 - 63721 09009 - 00000 Conceptual Application
63722 Preliminary Application
63723 Final Application
63724 Exemption
63725 Rezoning
63726 Conditional Use
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00100 - 63061 09009 - 00000 County Land Use Sales
63062 GMP Sales
63063 Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Other
Ifi t ` ~"
i - ~ ``~ -
Name: i'c!t1 ~ , h:. r Project: ,~li.~ - ~"; . . ! ; '"r
r t
Address: ~ f'~ Phone: t/ r ~ -
Check No. Date:
Receipt No. P