HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.con.170.2010ABATEMENT FROM OCTOBER 13, 2010 BOCC REGULAR MEETING
THAT HAD BEEN STIPULATED .
NO RESOLUTION REQUIRED
CONTRACT # D � o?o/ 0
�S�k �'o � L
S�i eeQ� �e �` �o g �ECEIVED • .
anamowRc
eeeoNance
�
�u� r2
. P�kin Courdy
FOR ASSESSORS AND COUNTY COBMNSS�OPIERS USE ONLY . AgSesSOP
(SeetlwmL�SacSOnNmuslbacomP7em� ofWsseetlanbyCro
�YD�mtarahateme�R ormfimtlflei V�m sedion 3�7af1tshe0 ba eckC �m D��mUle paNS�m�s
EamG ofmia611 wmnisabne+s w8ie assaecor. as ap�yoV�=¢. wlWn akma�tlu aF1M tlffie offlA�r6 cuW 7�tlOR 499-t-113(1.�. CRS
sewon tn: Wr�n Mutua�� �e�me �°Dm��� or and Petitioner
i
Cou a�6aize the assessor by Resolutic
n,r mmmisstoners of -- _ _. �.,i �...e�a�t anv such c
or foi of Iand or
v� yc.u...n. r•••r°v� ° -
The asseaor and padtioner mutually agree tn the valuce and tax abatemerttlrefund of:
TaxYeu �.�9 . � TaxY�r�
. ctmi e�"� T�S ae �— � .
o� }��`ST � y-`u l �"°`- �1� -�— '��`_ !-)t�
��a� 0 �(o�. .�. ��. �I� �
ncar�aem�a �" 72 �°In '� I �l. ��` �.1�! _�—
NotalTetot�lmmiwuRmesnal4uludeacwe0hderesLPa�s andtxsassocvateCwBhlatearA/orEellncN��.PHY�e��II
¢ppGmble, flasewNnctiham�mlYtreas�neriacfiillpsymeMNfomu9on. -
,�"�/� �1 �1� 1 za �a .
� _ � _, .
secson rt+: Decisioirof tha County Commissioners
(y,usf pe comylaNQff3ectlon 01 doos not a00�ri
WHEREAS, The Couhry Commissioners of � Counq�, Stste ot Co.lorado, ata dury and lawfulN
caQedregularmeetingheldon - I f .atwhiehmeetingtherewarepresentthefolbwm'gmembers:
. . Ma� . Da7 Y�' . .
wdh �tice of such meetA9 and an opportunity to be preserrt having been 9iven to.the ta�WeYer arM the Assessor
ofsafdCountyandAssessor (beingP�� notpresenyand
Namo
p�tloner � (bein9Pmsen4-nofPresenY),andWHEREAS.Thesaid
Name
CouMy Comrttissioners have carefiilb conside2d the within petrtlon, and are fully advised in relation the�eto,
NOW BE IT RESOLVED,'Riatthe Board (agrees-does nof agreeJ with the recommendation of the assessor
and the petition be (approved-approved in part-Benie� witb an abstemenVrefund as fotlows:
'/,(A ��� � 1 �� � Yea Pssess�Vatua : 'f�MAbffieIReME
�zk
• . C ha7rpe�son Mtlw Boua of Co�sb ��°
� CauMy Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk ofthe Baerd of CouM�'
� � � herebY ��Y that the above and feregoin9 order �s truly
reeord of the pmceerLn9s of the Board of Coutl� Commissioners.
1N yyITNESg VYHEREOF,1 have he2urrto set my hand and affaed the se� ��°�d Cou�fiy, .
Uus � d�`! � � . . �
. MoMh �'� `_ _ e....wr��mn
No9e AbatmnmLS➢ti�+tlpn 51.000 P�'s7eEWe. D�+Y�. mxvt ba sudNttea in tlupOmie W me Prope�LYTmcPdmi�istratorforreview.
Secffon V:
of the ProperLy Ta�c Admini
(FOr a0 a6afametM1S 9�rNanS'1�00�
The action of tlie BoaM of County Commissioneca, relative to the w�lhN P�.on, is hefeBy
❑qPP��d�APDro�edinpart$ ❑Danietlfirthetoflowingreason(s):
:�
:y
r �t-,'
> ;;
oec�
PetitioneYsNertta: SG.L.. �A�X
PetiNoner'sMal6ngAdtlress: 363 � fR�'us' �' �
�/�S�eN ' � � S/6// '
�YOI'Tam .°,lab 9PCOde .
•` " � . ,CI.cIt . .
�. FE7'I'I'ION FORABATEMENT OR REFUMD OF T�S
� ' � Date Received �
. (Ikeassrssafs a�comrtussiwms' offie 8tmry!)
Sectlon i: .PetiHoner, please complete SeWon I oNy.
o� � io aoio
pApM Day Year '
RECEIVED
JUL 12 20b
Pmdn caurdy
AflBlaOr
�SCFImULEORPARCEL 810fBER(3) PROPERTYAO➢RESSORLEGALOFSCWPf10NOFPROPER
?�35/�4�3 3a3 W F�uwus sr- Rs•v<��c S/6!/
Rsa3
' Petitioners�testhatthetaxesassessed�gainstfheabovepropertyforthepmpertytaxyeara-�8 ara
_� incorredtortha following reasons: (Briefly descnbo the tirciunstances surrowding the inmrtect value ortmc '
Attach additionel sheefs'ff hecassary.) .
. �� ����
�
PefiHonar's eslimata ofvalue: $�'j.fd, O�Q - �G�} _. �
Velue Year
Petitioner requests an abatemeM or refund of the appropriate taxes. � �
I dedare, under D�4' � P�+J�Y in the second degree, that this petition, EoSetFrerwith anY �mPe�YU19 e�dvbits
or s�femerds, has been (irepazed or nramined by me, and to the best of my Imowledc�e, i�omu�tion aztd helief, 45
true. cortecC and comPiete. � . � . . .
� � oaytime Phone Numher (9�� �`t� a`a3 7
Pe5tlome'.9grefure , . � .
BY Daytime Phono Number.f 1
qgenfsslg�aCUe! .
•lettarota9en�7/m16[Ce etlacGed wh¢n Potitioa b Su6mlibtl laJ an epanf.
If the baaN of county commissioners, pursuant to secFton 39�I0-174(4), orthe property imc adminis4ator,
pursvantto sedion 39-�716, denies the pstition for refiu�d oaaba�mert of taxes In whole or in paN, the
petitioner may appeaFto the board of assessmeM3ppeals pu[suantta iha provisfons aF sectlon 39-�125
within ihirly days oYthe ecrtry of any such dec�sion, § 39-70-1745�9), C.R.S.
seaion n: Assesso�s Recommendation
.. � . (FwASSessotsllaeONy�
. ' TmcYeaz . '
� e�el . . �osaeA � Ta�
., pliginei
conemaa
�
� -
5e � Z
L.I Assessor rewmmends approval as ouflined abova
Noprotratwasfiledforii�ayear: � �eayroms�mesmm,P�.mmenseopyormewon.�
'�, � Assessor recommends denial Turthe Yollowing reason(s):
Appraiser Recommendation for an Abatement
Assessor Generated ❑
Ta�ayer Generated _j
To: Tom Isaac, Pitkin County Assessor
From: Micah Hayward
Date: 8/16/2010
Petitioner: Joel Sax
Schedule #: R000283
Parcel #: 2735-124-23-004
The appraiser has completed a review of the referenced property, as of fhis date, and hereby
submits a recommendation as stated below:
❑ Deny
❑ Approve as Submitted
! � AbatemenURefund Different than requested
Value
� g,� Original value: $ NA $ NA
54.76 Corrected value: $ NA $ NA
4,g2 Refund: $ NA $ NA
The basis of this recommendation is: The actual value for the subject property was reduced via 2010 appeal
based on comparable sales of similar homes in the immediate area. The 2009 value should equal the
2010 valuation. Please see attached comparable sales spreadshee 1 1 (�
�jcc 5��e�. � �orw. o-+� � '� o� �b�te�,,..e�..t 1arw.
Chief Appraiser Approval:
Assessor Approval:
MalnMnw I M�aMtqDM: �1W 16� 2010 �' 1dq ��� r
F7dmlMni,ACCOin[Seath1 X (KCwitR000297`
� occa.t S oh.br: 4!J �od� �l ox„rcnts t� sabs Ld �d�o � rax f�
. ;�, � �,
asdanle,zmo « � ► �► 8 s
Remarb Pro[eR ModdSumnsY
� ProtestDaFe ReviewlMnihv � Maket Ovmride Ncome WerrNe RecairYedYalue
R�� AccouMYalue �6�147,80� �U f6�147,BW
i➢!+� $
LocaHOn ResidenCal �I,O�,bW
7ffOB t �+�
PafcdqlY�Ler2T3512423 7ffpB2 Sg�
� �:: 1 TaxMes0U1-I-FlPS-OOI
�
Ownns
�
�'
Ydue InFo
�a��(zoio•arxeu-a:sessaaaa� fs,wo.uoo '
eu�ed zazs,e+u
raxarexooi r��evr:zs.m
rax 1lccmt ealence
Refwd
P/e-0aY
Totd Due
Lad PeY�� DatG
Lart Peymnt Nrou�
�. W
f0•W
�.�
ln e, 2010
f6,159.84
;;y .
PhotoJSketd�/MeP
i f� �' � �» � � � �CJ
af i
arow�smw��Mea� ,
3
n
N
^ 3
\�
D
c
�
0
0
�
0
A
A
�
�
�
V
�
�
K
9
e
�
-�
w
N
�
w
w
�
H
w
e
a
0
0
�
�
� �
.'1 O
w
0
�
N
v
d
�
m
�
0
�
N
�1
�i
..
w
>
6
�
�
�
�
�
Q�
y
C
C1
�
r
e�
z
y
4�
�
�
C�
C]
r
en
�
m
y
�I
[�
F�1
'�
m
y
<
�
r
e�
�
�
z
�
.�
�..:,
�
�
�
�
N
O
�
N
u
/
��
� 4
�
�
�
�'
. ,
n
� �
�
�
A � ,
Z��l� � e�l �n�cs(w.� ,a�
JOEL SAX
303 W FRANCIS ST.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
Tom Isaac RM #202
Pitkin County Assessor
506 E. Main St.
Aspen, CO. 8161 l
May l 2010
RE: PRO 3E`RTF� CI PST.,,ASPEN,�CO g1611N0. R000283
RECEIVED
JUL 12 2010
Pilicin CourrtY
p,eaessor
Dear Tom:
� appeal for the above named Property. I have also enclose oses m
Enclosed please find my for Re Finance Purp )�
an appraisal done by Nancy M�on-Savoid for Wells Frago Bank (
February of 2009.
raisal, g) what 26 year old
laced on a 6,000 s.f. lot, and D)
I disagree with the �al'�tion based on: � $ 5 040 000 valn plsan aPP
homes in the West End have sold for, C) o�er
verbal dis�e h�� �o have been valued at o $6 m 11 on whether it be nn 2008 or any ve no
idea how on what so ever. To value our house at $2 a sq. ft.
year. That is a incorrect figure with no supp
(house @2,750s.£) is an unrealistic figure and can not be supported• �t before the
The appraisal3ate, Feb 18, 2009 is a much more realistic figure for that time, j
000 a8er being on the mazket for almost two
decline of the housing mazket started here in Aspen. About a month ago the Davis Home at 200 .
First St (corner of l and Bleeker) was sold for $4,300, lans etc.one year after ours. When first .
years. It was built by the same builder, using t1�e S�e P u,ent bad. The house is 5,700 sq. ft•,
listed, this home was listed for $5,500,000 before the economy
double the size of ours (2,750s.t.)
To value our home for $1,303,000 more in 2009 than in 2008 or 2007 is just plain wrong
I appreciate you takinS the time to read this and re appraise our home. It is our feeling that at the
time of your appraisal the house should have been valued at $5,200,00 not $6,128,800
970-925-2837
AOL Emai1 Iied me.
Mike, thank you for your time yesterday and the information you supp
Pag�Ed�EIVEQ
JUL 12 2010
�iticin Cou�b'
Rss�?�r
I do have a question as to comps on my home. et they are larger or same size
The following are homes that were valued less than mine, y
R000622
R001022
R001080
R001233
R012171
R017020
R000105
401 W. BLEEKER
635 WG�LLESPIE
121 W. BLEEKER
404 W. HALLAM
407 W SMUGGLER
918 W HALIAM
2�2 W. HOPKINS
4,209
3,826
2,840
2,925
2,158
2,536
2,560
2,640
5,844
5,490
3,415
4,668
4,166
4,664
3,175
3,998
11 %less)
�(45 % less)
(24%less)
(33% less)
(24% less)
( 49% less)
(35% less)
COMp SIZE
34% IARGER
28o� �qRGER
SAME SIZE
SAME SIZE
23%less
10% LESS
g% LESS
6% LESS
EXPLAIVATION �, of each comp. �ess than mine
1) The heading Sq. Ft shows the heated sq.
2) TIME ADJUSTED sho t he homes are much Ia ge w�th each home being
and in some cases (3) houses
LE5S the comp house was charged for taxes than mine o� smaller(2) the comp
3) The last cotumn (Comp Size) shows how much larger (3)
are in sq. ft• There are (2) the same size.
When you have homes
As you can see, there is a vast difference �� „ome� shoutd have bee valued at $5,200 000
homes. I still maintain (see your file) the my
as the "time adj. price, especially using these 8 comps.
Again,
Thahk you for your time.
Joel Sax
925-283
P.S. Sure hope you enjoyed taking care of the entire office after I gave the rest of the crew
the rest of the day off (as a tax payer)
Tuesday, May 04, 2010 AOL: JoeldSax
AOL Email
Subj: RE: QUESTION RE: SCHEDULE # R000283 303 W. Francia St
DBte: 5/6l2010 11:18:07 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: Micah HavwardCcilco aitkin.co.us
To: JoeldSax(�Daol.com
Hiloel,
Page 1 of 2
RECEIVED
JUL t 2 2010
Piqcin CouMY
Aaaes.4o�
Thank yo� for the additional info. I believe an adjustment is warranted based on the comparable sales
but in order to do so we ask for a interior inspection of the subject property. Since we are no longer
relying on the "mass appraisal" statistical model and are basing the value on the most comparable sales
it is important to get a feei for the subject property and choose the best comps as your fee appraiser
did. I know the home was built in 1984 and remodeled in 2003 but would like to make sure our records
and adjustments are correct. Please let me know a good time to come out and inspect the property, I
am pretty available the rest of this week.
Thanks, talk to you soon.
Micali L. Haywazd
Cedified Residential Appraiser
Pitkin Counry Assessors Office
506 E. Main St. Ste. 202
Aspen, CO 816i1
970-920-5169
----- _ __.___
From: JoeldSax@aol.com [mailto:JceldSax@aol.wm]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:08 PM
To: Micah Hayward
Subfect: QUESfION RE: SCHEDULE # R000283 303 W. Francis St
Mike, thank you for your time yesterday and the information you supplied me.
i do have a question as to comps on my home.
The following are homes that were valued less than mine, yet they are larger or same
size
R000285
LARGER
R000622
LARGER
R001022
SIZE
R001080
SIZE
R001233
less
R012171
(24°10 Iess)
R017020
300 W. BLEEKER
401 W. BLEEKER
635 W.GILLESPIE
121 W. BL�EKER
404 W. HALLAM
4,209
3,826
2,840
2,925
2,158
5,844
5,490
3,415
4,668
4,166
(5% less)
(11 %less)
(45 % less)
(24%less)
(33% less)
407 W. SMUGGLER 2,536 4,664
10% LESS
918 W. HALLAM 2,560 3,175 ( 49% less)
T,,...�,�,.. �,r,�, �F �M(1 4(lT • TneIARaY
COMP
34%
28%
SAME
SAME
23%
9%
� t�tivtu
" UL 12 2010
Iticin County
Asseeaor
N
�
m
0
�
n
A
�
O
z T
z �
a y
m
Z
,
N
� Z
a '
a m
� T
a
3
<
x �
�a v
m
�Q q
w
� m
N
�
41
m
D
O
�
�
D
9
-.
�
�
9g
S�
e
�
a
F
n
PITKIN COUNTY_TAX NOTICE
�� '- ■• I
Subdivision: CITY AND TOlMSITE OF ASPEN Block: HI�� C � I �, �
42 Lot: H AND:- Lot: ISubdivision: CITY AND
TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 42 Lot: H AMD:• Lot: �PEN TRAILSTRICT I
I
_ , �,
�--�
� � , � ,
a
��: R4 tls�—,— � —.
tt � _.
PITKIN COUNTY LIBRAAY i
CITY OF ASPEN
_ - � ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION
'_ ` `G ASPEN SANITATION DISTRICT i
T � ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL
� ~ " �` ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRIC7 I
- CpLppqpp MfN CALLEGE
3.923
0.502
0.278
3.76�
�.s2a
6.078
1.5�
0.168
1.280
9.355
3.997
�.252
0.300
IiVV 1 1 1
YIAW ST., SU
COLORADI
$ (970) 920-51'.
kinassessur.oi
- 1.428
- 0.001
- 0.102
• 0.480
- 0.611
�i�
E .� .. .-vs . . ._ -.
288�5�
2037700
PERSONALPROPERIY
EXEMPTION - DISABLED VET.
OR SENIOR HOMESTEAD
NETTOTAL
4825200
COLORADO RIVER WATER CANS i,
ASPEN HISTORIC DIS7RICT �
♦ I I
229W�+ SEWER CHG/CITY LIEN!SPECIAL IMPRi
162200
TAX IXEI�'TION CREDIT �
- �960 " A miil le�y is the tax �ate per S1,C00 of
Without state �e9�slafrre funding wur school
.��9� m ip ��.y wpultl have been �D �
IS YOUR ADDRESS CORRECT? �
Please check the box on the coupon for change of address. ��
I
� SAX JOEL D �'�� J
0 303 W FRANCIS ST ?�
�� ASPEN, c� e�s>>-�sso �
W
RW
valuation.
�..3J�
oR
9205175
p78. �s
5196.42
569.00 '
$1,474.11
$450.07
$2,143.34
s590.43
$65.86
�501.82
$3,667.63
$1,567.03
$77.63
$117.62
- 241.�
inx �
.
;5,828.76
$5,828.76
�11,657.52
Make chachs pa,wable to: PITK�N COUNTY TREASURE�
?ost-dated checks are noY accePted.
if your real (^c, oersonaq property taxes will be paid by your
mortgage co:noany, pleasa do not dupNcate paymert.
If you have so!d ?his propertV, please forwerd 1hi5 s,tatemen�
to the r.ew o�N�°r or refum �t to this office marked �P�°Pem'
sold" (and inciude the name ar.d address of H�e new ownei
if known).
��TAiY � OP °ORTION POR YOUR RECORDS.
FO MSFORADD�ONALSNDF RMATION. TAX NQ����
RECEIVED
JUL 12 2010
���