HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.con.229.2010 CONTRACT #191._
V-Q/D
EMERGENCY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
TO APPROVE THE 2011 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE
COLORADO WORKS PROGRAM AND THE COLORADO CHILD CARE
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
RESOLUTION NO. 080 -2010
RECITALS
1. The Colorado General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 97 -120 in response to the passage of
the federal "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996"
and thereby adopted the Colorado Works Program and the Colorado Child Care
Assistance Program.
2. Colorado Revised Statutes 26 -2 -715 requires the Department and the County to enter into
an annual performance contract identifying the County's duties and responsibilities in
implementing these two programs.
3. Nothing in this MOU shall create a legal entitlement in any person to assistance provided
pursuant to the Colorado Works program or the child care assistance provided pursuant to
the Colorado Child Care Assistance Program.
4. The parties understand and agree that the services and assistance contemplated in this
Memorandum of Understanding are subject to available appropriations by the General
Assembly and the County, and neither party shall be obligated to provide services or
assistance if adequate appropriations have not been made.
5. Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners desires to continue the Colorado Works
and Colorado Child Care Assistance Programs as funding allows recognizing the vital
role they play in helping low income families work towards self sufficiency.
6. The MOU was not received in a timely manner to meet the due date of June 30` and it is
in the best interest of our citizens that we expedite this MOU so we can be assured of
continuing these programs without interruption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin
County, Colorado:
Approval of the Memorandum of Understanding for the Colorado Works Program and the
Colorado Child Care Assistance Program covering the period July 1, 2010 through June 30,
2011.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED ON JUNE 23 2010 AND
SET FOR CONFIRMATORY PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 14 DAY OF JULY, 2010.
NOTICE OF CONFIRMATORY PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES
WEEKLY ON THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2010.
CONFIRMED AT A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 14, 2010.
. . . ,�.��..�.�, �.�, . ,. .. „� . .�.,.�...� , .
PUBLISHED BY TITLE AND SHORT SUMMARY, AFTER ADOPTION, IN THE ASPEN
TIMES WEEKLY ON THE 25TH DAY OF JULY . 2010.
0
�
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�_ �` � -_..�. �; = 7
� _--::�-
John El �i' orney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
MANAGER APPROVAL:
./��/ �.�,�-
Hilary Fletc r, County Manager
��
�
�
�
(ATTACHMENT A)
0
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
The State of Colorado Department of Human Services
and
The Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado
This Memorandum af Understanding (or "MOU"} is made this 23rd day of
�June, 2p 1 q , between the State of Colorado Department of I-luman Services
{the "Departrnent") and the Board of Cour�ty Commissioners of Pitkin
County, Colorado (the "County").
WHEREAS, the Department is ihe sole state agency having the responsibility to
administer or su�ervise tt�e administration af the human services programs set fvrth in CRS 26-1-
201; and
WHEREAS, the CoIorado Generaj Assembly enacted Senate Bill 97-120 in response to
the passage of the federal "Personal Responsibi(ity and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of
1996" �nd thereby adopted the Colorado Works Pcogram (the "Works Progra��n") and the
Colorado Child Care �1.ssistance Program (the "Child Care Program"); and
WHEREAS, CRS 26-2-715 requires the Department and the County to enter into an
annuaE perfarmance contract identifying the County's duties and responsibilities in implementiilg
the Worfcs Pragram and the Child Care Program; and
WHER.EAS, nothing in this MOU shall create a legal entitlement in any �erson to
assistance provided purs�iant to the Works Program or the chitd care assist�nce provicieci
pursuant to the Child Care Program; and
WHER.FAS, the parties understand anci agree that the services and assistance
cont�mplated in this MOU �re s1�bject to avaiiable appropriations by the Ge:ieral Assembly and
tha County, and neither paRy shall be obi�gated to �rovide services or assjst�nce if adequ�te
apprapciations have not been m�de; and
3
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
1. MOU MEETS P�RFORMA,NCE CONTRACT REQUIREMENT.
The parties hereto specificalty agree that the provisions of this MOU in their entirety constitute
compliance with the provisions of CRS 26-2-715.
2. TERM.
The terrn of this MOU will be from July l, 2010 to and inctuding June 30, 2fll 1.
3. DUTXES UF THE COUNTY.
Subject to the other Iimitations set farth herein, including without iimitat'ron those contained in
subsections 4(b.5) and 4(d):
a) The County shall administer and implement the Works Prograrn and the Child Care
Program using fair and objective criteria and in compliance with federal law; and
b) The Gounty sha(1 not reduce the basic assistance grant administered pursuant to CRS 26-
2-709, except as otherwise prov.ided by law; and
c) The County shall not restrict etigibility or the pravisions of services, nor shall it impose
sanctions, in a manner inconsistent with �'a�t 7 of Article 2 of Title 26, C.R.S., ar the
State plan submitted by the D�partment to the �ederal government pursuant to CRS 26-
2-712; and
d) For the term oFthis MOU from Ju1y 1, 201a, to June 30, 241 t, the County shal] achiev�
woxk participation rates equal to the federal{y required participation rate rninus any
emptoyment credit, case[oAd reduction eredit, or other credit against such rate Eor a fisenl
year that may be stibsequently adapted by the federal government, and the County will
also achieve a participltion rate fQr twa-parent families that is ec�ual to the �•equired
�ederal participation rate minus any employment credit, caseload reduction credit, or
ather eredit ag�ir►st sueh r�te f�r a fiscal year that may be subsequently adopteci by the
federal government. '1`he percentages containecf in this paragraph (d) repc•esent the
maxim�im work participation rates ta which the County may be held du►•ing the term of
this MOU. By agreeing to these r�tes, the De�artmet�t acknawtedges that, to the bcst of
its knoavledge or ability to know at the time this M(Jt1 is executed, achievement of tl�ese
�
rates will allow tlie Department to meet any wortc participation rates imposed on the
Department by the federa! government; and
- e) The parties acknowlec�ge that the work participation rate is, as of the signing of this
MOU, the only performance goal identified pursuant to CRS 26-2-712 (4); and
� The County shall maintain the records, and shall permit the Department, its d�ily
designated agents and/or appropriate representatives af the �ederal government, to
inspect the records and shall make such records availabte to the Department as specified
in CRS 26-2-717. The County shall also continue to report to the Department as
required by CRS 26-2�7i6, 717, and shall report to the Department in the future as
reyuired by law; and
g) The County agrees to provide the Department with written infarmation as specified
herein. The County may, in its sole discretion, change the way in which it implements
the Works and Child Care Programs in any manner consistent with state and federa[ law.
The County agrees to provide the Department with updated written information, when or
if changes to these Programs are made. The County agrees to provide the County
policies adopted by the County as reyuired by CRS 26-2-'716 (2.5). The County agrees
to providc the information and policies specified in this paragraph (g} to the Department
within thirty (30) days of their adoption by the County, and agrees to submit
amendments to its policies in accordance with this paragrap� (g); and
h) The parties expressly agree and understand that information and policies provided by the
County to the Department as set forth in paragraph (g} above are for informational
purposes and are provided to assist the Department in discharging its responsibilities
with respect to these Programs. Nothing in this MOU gives the Department the
authority to a�prove, deny or require any County policies not otherwise required by
statute or n�le. The County acknowledges the Department's right to review, comment
upon or request reasona6le additional information or clarification oP any such County
policies or records. Such requests shall be made in writing ancl directed to the County
department of social services directar. The County assez that it will consider such
comments in its im�lementation of these Programs without being obligafed to
incorporate in its 1'rograms �ny Department comments or suggestions.
�
�
- 4. DUTIES OF THE DEPARTMENT.
a) The Department shall oversee the implementation of the Works Program statewide, and
' in connection therewith, shall develop, in consultation with the Counties, standardized
forms that shall streamline the application process, delivery of services, and tracking of
participants; and
b) The Department will rnonitor the County's provision of basic assistance grants, and if
necessary, perform those duties set forth in GRS 2b-2-712{5)(e}; and
b.5) The Department shall oversee and is responsible for the development,
implementation, maintenance, and enhancement of the Colorado Benefits Management
System (CBMS) and its application relative to the Colorado Works Program. As CBMS
is a system that utilizes decision tables run by a rules engine for determining eligibifity
and amount of benefits, to the extent allo�ved by law, the counties shall be held harm(ess
for erroneous decisions made by CBMS. Without limitation, this applies to erroneous
eligibility decisions, erroneous determinations of amount of benefits, erroneous
decisians resulting in overpayments and subsequent claims, and erroneous decisions
resulting in underpayments and subsequent supplennental payments or restorative
bene�ts. This hold harmless also applies to any legal or recovery actions resulting from
erroneous, inaccurate, or inadequate CBMS controlled noticin� to Colorado Works
househo(ds. The State will hold counties harmless and not take recovery action against
a cottnty for any claim including a legal claim that is defined as a system caused error.
This hold harmless does not apply to any errors, claims or otherwise caused by the entry
of inaccurate data into the system, failure to foElow clear, reasonable, lawful instructions
wit� available training provided by CDHCP&F, and CDHS, or failure to follow program
rules forma�ly adopted by the St�te Bo�rd of Human Services. This hold harmless does
apply to CBMS training And data entry rutes and/or any rules that are part of the CBMS
rules engine.
c) The Department shall develop and provide training for Works Program staff as rec�usred
by CRS 2b-2-712(7); and
d}(i) Actio�s subiect ta sanction or remediation. Subject to the other limitations set
forth herein, inc�uding those contained in subsection 4{b.S) of tl�is section, the
'�J
Department may impose sanctions or develop a remediation plan as provided in this
MOU if the actians of the County result in the County:
(A) Failing to maintain the minimum cash assistance grant to a family in which the
single caretaker of a child under six years of age has not compiied with work requirements
due to an inability to obtain needed chiid care as determined by the County or in violation of
federal law.
(��)
(B) Misusing federal or state Works Program or Child Care Program funds, including
receipts or recoveries chat are not reported, where a federal or state law or regulation
enacted before the use of the funds requires the funds to be spent in a different way.
County Works Program and Child Care �'rogram funds that are misused will not qualify
toward meeting the County maintenance of effort or County share requirements.
(C) Failing to satisfy work participation rates as contained in this M4U.
(L7) Tn vio(ation of s#ate or federal law, redueing the basic assistance grant, restricting
eligibility ar the provision of services, or imposing sanctians in a rnanner inconsistent
with state law or a state plan, which is in connptiance with federa! law.
(E) Failing to compiy with any other provision of the Colorado Works Program if such
failure causes the pepartment to incur a federal fiscal sanction.
Limitations on Sanctions for Failure to Meet Work Participation Rate.
(A) if the Department is sanetioned by the federal government for failing to meet the
state work participatian rate, the Depar�me�►t may impose a sanction on the County as
provided in paragraph 4(d)(iii) of this MOU, except that the Department may not impose
a sanction e.�pon a County if the County has met the federa! work participation rate for the
federal �scal year for which the State has beec� sanctioned. However, if the fedet•al
government does noi sanction the Department and the County fails to achieve the
negotiated work participation rate for the County, then the provisions for a remediation
plan contlined in paragraph 4(d)(iv) apply. In any case in which the Department is
considerin;; a sanction or remediation pian for the Coiinty due to the County's Failure to
achieve its work paeticipation rate, the Department shall fii�st follow the praceduces for
determining wi,ether the County made a good faith effort to achieve its work
participatian rate as outfined in paragrlph (B) of this pa�•agraph {ii},
(B) The Department shall not impose a sanction on the Cvunty �or the County's failure to
meet its work participation rate if the Department determines that the Co�.�nty made a
reasonable and good faith effort tawards meeting its work participation rate. In rnaking
this determination, the Department, without limitation, shall consider documentation of
the following: Implementation of a County defined and approved process far moving
clients throagh the welfare to work system using the full range of countable federal work
activities, implementation of a County procedure fox encouraging partioipation at the
reyuired number of hours, such as incentives for meeting individuat responsibility
contract (IR.C) hour commitments, an assessment and an IRC for alt Works program
participants, accurate and tirnely data entry in CBMS for all Works program participants,
including proper coding and wark participation data tracking, any other documentation
which may demonstrate gavd faith effort, and County identificatian of problems in
perforrnance and implementation of an action plan to improve perforrnance. In
determinir�g whether the County made a reasonable and good faith effort toward meeting
its work partrcipation rate, the Department shall also consider the operational capacity of
CBMS. The County shalt be held �armless for any CBMS programming irregularities,
missing or incomplete functianality necessary to supporE work programs and vvork
participation documentation and/or implementation probiems attributed to the
Department that affects documentation for work participation. The Department shall
investigate and make a determination as to whether the County has made such a
reasonable and good faith effort prior to imposing any sanction ar remediation plan for
this reason. The Department shall not sanction or develop a remediation plan for the
C�unty's failure to meet its worlc participation rate unless the Department has found that
the Caunty did not make a reasonable and good flith effort towards meeting its work
participation rate.
(iii) S�actian Procedures when Denartment h�ts been Sanctioned. 1n any instance where
the Department determines that the County has �'ailed in an obligati�n specified in paragraph
4(d)(i) of this MOU, ct�using the Department to incur a Fscal sanction �nd the Department is
consiclering a�scal sanction against the County, the Department si�all proceed as follows:
{A} The Department shatl providc the County thirty (30} days written notice of the
proposecf sanction befoi•e imposing any fiscaf sanctipn. Such written notice s13a11 inclucte;
�
/
1) All of the reasons for the imposition of the sanction; 2) Documentation specifying
how the sanction was calculated, ancl doctiitnentation supporting the amount of the
sanction; 3) A specific indication of what canstituEes a remedy or correction that will
allow the County to avert the sanction, if any remedy or correction is possible; and 4) An
acknowledgem�nt that if the County remedies or corrects the sanctionable action as set
forth in the notice, a sanction will not be irnposed by the Depactment. The corrective
action contained in the notice shall be specific to thc action giving rise ta the sanction,
and shall not extend beyond such violation. Upon receiving such notice, the County shall
have the opportunity within thirty (30) days to contest, explain, offer evidence of
mitigating factors, and/or subnnit a plan to correct the alleged failure before the
Department impvses the sanction.
(B) If the County corrective action plan has not eliminated the perforrnance problem, the
Department shaU negotiate a Caunty remediation corrective action plan (RCAP) with the
board of County commissioners for the County. The RGAP shall be designed not as a
punitive measure, but, instead, as an ef�'ort to further the mutual goa! of the Department and
the County to achieve successful operation of MOU-related programs. The negotiated RCAP
shall include a sufficient depioyment of resourccs, which may include fiscal resources, over a
specified period of time agreed to between the Departrrient and the County to meaningfully
attempt to correct the performance prob[er�. If the agreement includes deployment of fiscal
resources, the County shall determine the source of such fiscal resources. Such fiscal
resources expended by the County shall nat be considered a"financ�a! sanction" as
contemplated by CRS 26-2-716(4)(b). The amount of the resources committed shall be:
Mutually agreed upon, adeyuate to meaningfuliy attempt to correct the performance problem,
and shall not exceed i�e arriount far a fiscal sanction caiculated by the Department in
paragraph 4d(iii)(A). The RCAP shall be agreed to within thirty {3Q) days of failure of the
corrective action plan specified in paragra�h 4d{iii){A). In the event the Department and
County cannot agree to a RCAP, the Department shall be authorized to proceed with the
sanction against the County as identified in paragraph 4d(iii)(A).
(C } If the County fails to correct the action, and a sanetion is i►nposed, the Department
may impase a sanction for the fAiiure of the County in an amount no greater than the
fiscai sanction imposed by the federal government against the Department. Additionally,
the amount of said sanctian cannot exceed the funds spent by the Department for a
sanction incurred because of the County's Failure to meet its obligation. IP the
Dep�i�trnent has incurred a sanction due to the failure of rnore than one County to meet its
obligations, the Cotmty shali only be sanctioncd for its share of the sanction incurred by
the De�zrtment.
�
(D) The Department agrees to provide the County with ail documents received from the
federal government refated to any prvposed or imposed federal sanction within twenty
(20) days of receipt by the Department, together with all Department documents related
to the actions giving rise ta that federal sanction, or which relate to the sanction process.
(iv) Reraediation Procedure. In any instance whece the Department deterrnines that the
County has failed in an obligation specified in paragraph 4(d)(i) of this MOU, the
Department has not incurred a fiscal sanction and the Departrnent is considering a corrective
action for the County, the Department shall proceed as follows:
(A) The Department shall provide the County thirty (30} days written notice af the
proposed corrective action. Such written notice shall include: I) All of the reasons for
the corrective action; 2) Documentation specifying how the corrective action was
determined, and documentation supporting the justification of the corrective actian; 3} A
specific indication of what constitutes a remedy or carrection that will allow the County
to ave�t the corrective action, if any remedy or correction is possible; and 4) An
acknowtedgment that if the County remedies or corrects the performance problem
identi�ed in the notice, a cor.reetive action will not be imposed by the Department. The
corrective action contained in the notice shall be specific to the performance problem
giving rise to the corrective action, and shall not extend beyond such performance
problem. Upon receiving such notice, the County shall have the opportunity within thirty
(30) days ta contest, explain, offer evidence of rnitigating factors, and/or submit a plan to
correct the aileged failure before the Department imposes the corrective action.
(B) If the County corrective action plan has not eliminated the performance problem, the
Department shall negotiate a County remediation correetive action plan (RCAP) with the
board of county commissioners for the Cotmty. The RCAP shall be designed not as a
punitive measure, but, instead, as an effoc�t to further the mutuai gaal �f the Departmerit and
the County to ack�ieve successful operation of MOU-relateci programs. The negatiated RCAP
shali include a sufficient deployment of resources, which tnay include ftscal resources, over a
specified period of time agreed to between the Department and the County to tneaningfully
attempt to correct the performance problem. tfthe agreement includes deployment of fiscal
resotrrces, the County shall determine the soti�rce of such fiscal resources. Such fiscal
resources expended by the County sha11 not be considered a"�nancial sanction" as
contemplated by CRS 26-2-716{4)(b). Tl�e amount of the reso�irces committed shall be:
Mutually agreed upon, adequate to meaningfiilly �ttempt to correct the performance pro6lem,
and shal! not �xceed the amount of resources idenliCed in the corrective action i;otice
specified in p�ragraph 4d(iv) {A). 1'h� RCAP shall be agreed to within thirty (3fl) days of
failure aFthe corrective action plan speciCed in paragra}��14ci(iv)(A). En the event the
/O
Department and County cannot agree to a RCAP, the Department shall be authorized to
proceed with the co�rective action for the County as identified in paragraph 4d{iv)(A).
(C) The Departrr�ent agrees to provide the County with all dacuments received from the
federal govemment related to any performance problem within twenty (20) days of
receipt by the Department, together with aIl Department documents related to the actions
giving rise to the performance problem, or which relate to the remediation process.
e) The Department (or its duly designated agent) may assume the County's administration
and implementation of the Works I'rogram and the Child Care Program if the County
deliberately or consistently fails to meet its obligations under this MQU or under federal
or state law pertine�nt to the Warks Program or the Child Care Program. The Department
shaIl provide the County thirty (30) days written notice before assuming these duties.
Upon receiving such notice, the County shall have the opportunity to contest, explain,
offer evidence of mitigating factors, ar to correct the failure before the Department
assumes the duties; and
� The Department shall allocate the amount of moneys that are provided to the Caunty as
part oF the Cour�ty's block grant for the purpose of its administration and implementation
o� the Works Program pursuant to the formulas described in CRS 26-2-714. Payment of
all money so allocated shall be made to the County in accardance with CRS 26-1-
122(3)(b}; and
g) The Department will, in consultation and in conjunction with the County, develop or
modify automated systems to meet the reporting require�nents of CRS 26-2-717.
5. DISCRETIONARY MATTERS REMAIN THE SAM�.
The parties agree that all portions of Part 7 of Article 2 of Title 26, C.R.S., and Part $ of Article 2
of Title 26, C.R.S, that grant discretion to either party regarding the administration of the Works
or Child Care Programs in the County shall not be affected by tf�e execution of this MOU.
l�
6. SEYERABILITY.
To the extent that this MOU may be executed and performance of the obligations of the parties
may be accomptished within the intent of the M4U, the terms of the MOU are severabte, and
should any term or provision hereof be decIared invalid ar become inoperative for any reason,
such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof. The
waiver of any breach of term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or of
the same term apon subseguent breach.
7, INTEGRATIUN OF UNDERSTA,NDING.
This MOU is intended as the cornplete integration of the understanding between the parties
concerning the matters negotiated between them and incorpQrated in this MOU. Na prior or
contemparaneous addition, detetion, or other am�endment hereto shall have any force or effect
whatsoever unless embodied in writing. No subsequent natation, renewal, addition, deletion, or
other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written amendment
exeeuted by the parties.
The parties, however, recognize the nature of the relationship between the County and the State.
This relationship is governed more broadly by pertinent provisions of the Calorado Constitutian
and of state statutes �nd rules, including lawful rules promulgated by the State Board of Human
Services. The parties furthar recognize that this MOU is not intended to supersede or change the
relationship between the County and the State as established by any leg�l authority.
8. NU THIRD PARTY BFNEFICIARY.
Except as herein provided otherwise, this MOU shatl inure to the 6enefit of �nd be binding tipon,
the paz•ties and their respective successars and assigns. Tt is expressly understood and agreed that
ihe errfarcement of the terms and conditions �f t�tis MOU, and ail rights of action reiating to sueh
enfarcement, shall be strictly reserved unto the Department and the County, to the extent
permitted by law. Nothing contained in this MOU shall give or 1i1ow any clAim oe right of
actiun whatsoever by any other third person. It is the express intention of the Department and
the Couztty that any such person or cntity, other than the Dep�rtment oc the County, receiving
serviccs or benefits under this MOU shall be cleemed an ir�ciden#al bc�lc�ciary only.
/ �
0
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
� A. Disputes arising prior to the executian of the MOU
If the parties are unable to reach agreement concerning the inctusion of, ar wording of,
provisions of the MOU, either pacty may refer the dispute to the State 13oard of Human Services
for resolution pursuant to the provisions of CRS 26-2-715{3).
B. Disputes arising after the execution of the MOU
The parties shall work in good faith to resolve a dispi�te arising from any provision of this
executed MOU. If the parties are unable to resolve such dispute, any of the following options is
availabte:
1. Either party may ask the Covernor to review a disputed issue. Such review must
be initiated by notice provided to the Govemor and other party by cer�ified mail, Such
notice must indicate that the parties are deadlocked on the dispute, and further
negotiations between the parties are not likely to be productive. Such notice si�alt also
contain a copy of the executed M�U, an outline of the issue(s) invalved and a summary
uf the parties' res�ective positions. The Governor may establish a review pracess, and
shall provide a non-binding resolution based on the actians and equities of each situation.
The Governar has the discretion to decide whether or not t� review the dispute ar
whether to delegate the review of the dispute to a third party not directly involved with
the dispute. The Governor nced not state a reason for refusing to review a dispute or for
delegating it to a third party.
2. By agreement of both parties, the pacties may refer the matter to a dispute
resolution panel for non-binding mediation. The dispute resulution paneE wil! consist of
three membars: One selected by the County, one selected by the Department, and one
selected by the other two members of the paneL The part�es shall provide the panel with
the information necessary to consider the dispute. Each party shall �,ay for i�s own costs
anci attarney fees, and shall share eqtially in any fees paid to panel members. 'i'he panel's
decision sha11 be made by a majority vote of iis members.
/3
0
3. By agreement af both parties, the parties may request that the State Board of
• Human Services mediate a dispute arising following the execution of the MOU. ]f the
State Board agrees to such non-binding mediation, the provisions of CRS 26-2-'715(3}
concerning time limits and final effect of the State Board's decision shall not apply.
None of these options shall be a jurisdictional prerequisite to legal action by either party.
KAREN L. BEYE
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPA TMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
�� � . � ��'�..�c� ac�..,-
Executive Director �
COUNTY OF �� COLORADQ,
by t rough the BO OF COtJNTY COMMISSIONERS
� .;�e-�..�c,.� �°.��..� �---�.
Geor�e Newman,.rChairman �
0
TE: /� � �S �
Counry Clerk to the Board
l�
l