Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.246533401016 (2011)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and/or P&Z Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P&Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat(s) RECEPTION#: 622409, 0 811 41201 5 at 12:01:53 PM, 1 OF 9, R $0.00 Doc Code ADMIN DECISION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ADNIINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE PITIM COUNTY, COLORADO, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE SCHIRALLI ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND RIDGELINE REVIEW Administrative Decision No. AL'Y_ - 2015 RECITALS Sandra Reta Schiralli (hereafter referred to as the "Applicant") has applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County, Colorado ("Director") for Activity Envelope and Ridgeline Review for construction of a single family residence on a vacant lot with vested property rights. The Applicant has also indicated that the future residence will be 8,250 square feet in floor area. 2. The property is located off Sopris Mountain Ranch Road and is identified as Lot 39 of Sopris Mountain Ranch. PID#: 246533401016 (Legal Description, Attachment A). The parcel is approximately 35 acres, is in the RS -30 zone district, and is conforming in size. 4. The parcel has received multiple previous land use approvals. In 1991, the Lot received 1041 Hazard Review approval and General Submission approval pursuant to P&Z Resolution No. 91-55. The vested rights for this approval expired and the BOCC reinstated vesting periods pursuant to Resolution No. 96-312 and Resolution No. 99-2001. Most recently, the Lot received 1041 Hazard Review approval pursuant to Hearing Officer Determination 12-2005 for construction of a single family residence up to 15,000 square feet in floor area with use of TDR's. The 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan was not recorded in association with this approval. Vesting has also expired with this approval. 5. Extensive ridgeline exercises were conducted as part of this review. The Applicant erected story poles and Staff reviewed those poles along West Sopris Creek Road to understand if a future residence would obstruct a ridgeline as viewed from this Road. The latest height pole analysis did not obstruct a ridgeline as viewed from West Sopris Creek Road. An additional ridgeline review will need to be conducted again at Site Plan Review. 6. Objections were filed against the application but have been rescinded. The Director finds that the proposed Activity Envelope will avoid slopes > 30%, is located within a severe wildfire hazard area but the hazard can be mitigated using construction and landscaping techniques outlined in the Code, and is adjacent to sensitive wildlife area (elk production) on the hillside above the envelope. The Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has commented on the application and agrees with the location of the proposed envelope and that it should not have significant effect on the elk production in the area if specific conditions outlined below are adhered to. Wildlife conditions outlined in previous approvals will be carried forward in this approval. 8. The Director further finds that the Applicant has requested to construct a future residence of up to 8,250 square feet of floor area. Hearing Officer Decision No. 12-2005 granted approval for Page ! of 9 construction of a 15,000 square foot residence. This approval is no longer vested and the Lot is subject to the current Land Use Code which limits development in the Emma Caucus area to 8,250 square feet of floor area. Because TDR approvals do not lapse, Special Review to develop 8,250 square feet of floor area is not required and the Lot has the right to develop this amount of floor area. 9. The Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife (CPW), Sopris Mountain Ranch HOA, Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District, and Emma Caucus were referred on the application. No comments were received. 10. Public notice was published in the Aspen Times on January 221, 2015. The Applicant mailed the public notice to the adjacent property owners on January 211, 2015. No comments were received within 30 days. APPROVED by the Director, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the current or prior applications or in public meetings or hearings and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2. No calculations for height, bulk, setback, size, floor area, or any other building and zoning requirements have been conducted. These requirements will be considered at the time of building permit review. Structures represented in the application might not be permitted under building and zoning regulations. 3. Prior to recordation of the Activity Envelope plan, all Community Development fees shall be paid. 4. Prior to submission of the site plan application, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development an Activity Envelope Plan in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2-30-20(g) and Application Manual Section 2.1.1. The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation. 5. Site plan approval is required prior to submission of any building permits. Approval of this activity envelope does not ensure approval of site plan review. 6. At Site Plan Review, story poles shall be erected that represent the future residence and ridgeline review will be conducted again. The future residence shall not obstruct a ridgeline as viewed from West Sopris Creek Road. No structural development, with the exception of fencing, in excess of 30" shall occur within the setbacks of the Lot. Landscaping in the form of berms shall not exceed four feet from the most restrictive grade. Any external development located within setbacks mandated by County zoning regulations shall require a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of a landscape envelope within such setbacks does not assure approval of a variance. Page 2 of 9 8. At building permit application for the new residence, the Applicant shall surrender one (1) original TDR Certificate and a copy of the deed(s) evidencing the Applicant's acquisition of the Certificates (if applicable), in order to develop up to a total of 8,250 square feet of floor area exempt from GQMS from a base of 5,750 square feet. 9. The lowest floor elevation for all future structures shall not exceed the 8497' contour line. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit application, the Applicant shall: a. Complete a fireplace/woodstove registration form with the Community Development Department, if necessary. b. If necessary obtain a County access/driveway/turnaround permit acceptable to the Aspen Fire Protection District and County Engineer. c. Submit a drainage and erosion control plan for review and approval by the Planning Engineer. All slopes steeper than 2:1 shall utilize erosion control blankets. d. Submit a construction management plan for review and approval by the County Engineer showing the locations of staging, material storage and employee and construction traffic parking. e. Pay the applicable road and employee housing impact fees. f. Obtain a permit for construction of the OWTS. 11. The Applicant shall adhere to the following severe wildfire standards: A. DEFENSIBLE SPACE The area around all buildings/structures, limited by property boundaries that may limit a property owner's ability to comply with this section, shall incorporate landscaping with wildfire defensible space considerations as follows (note: actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions): 1. Brush, debris and non -ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum ten -foot (10') perimeter around all structures. 2. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels at a minimum of a thirty (30) foot perimeter around a structure built on flat ground. (For greater slopes, reference the CSFS Safety Zone chart in Wildfire Guidelines For Rural Homeowners, which provides general guidelines that may be modified by a wildfire expert acceptable to the County). 3. Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation up to the thirty (30) foot perimeter shall be a minimum of two (2) times the height of the fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall be equal to the height of the fuel. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fuel. 4. All branches from trees and brush within the thirty (30) foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height of ten (10) feet above the ground with removal of ladder fuels from around trees and brush. 5. Tree crown separation within the thirty (30) foot perimeters shall have a minimum of ten (10) feet between the edges of the crowns, except for mature stands of aspen trees where Page 3 of 9 ladder fuels have been removed. In areas of aspen regeneration, understory shrubs and down and dead materials shall be removed.\ 6. All branches that extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within fifteen (15) feet of chimneys shall be removed. 7. The density of fuels up to a one hundred (100) foot perimeter of the structures shall be reduced where natural reduction has not already occurred. 8. All deadfall up to a one hundred (100) foot perimeter shall be removed. 9. No new conifer trees shall be planted within ten (10) feet of a residence. 10. No flammable mulches shall be placed within two (2) feet of a residence. 11. The property owner shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space vegetation requirements. B. ACCESS 1. Access roads and driveways shall be built to County standards; however, these standards may be increased to mitigate wildfire hazards based on comments provided by the Colorado State Forest Service, the Sheriffs Department, local fire protection districts and/or a person approved by the County as an expert in wildfire area designation and mitigation. Where feasible, looped routes of access/egress to a public road shall be incorporated in the design of a proposed development. Looped routes of access/egress is defined as two (2) or more dedicated access roads to the main artery/highway for widely separated ingress/egress; looped drives with one (1) entrance point or divided single entrances do not satisfy this condition. Where this is not feasible, the Community Development Department may approve vehicular turnaround areas a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) feet apart installed between the road intersection and its terminus. Turnaround areas shall be the same standard as cul-de-sac turnaround pads; these may be incorporated into the proposed driveway entries. 2. New dead-end streets shall not be permitted, except for cul-de-sacs and other turnarounds accepted by the applicable local fine district. 3. Cul-de-sac turnaround pads shall have a minimum of a thirty (30) foot drivable surface inside turning radius or a hammerhead or other T -turn area acceptable to the applicable local fire district. 4. New driveways and access roadway shall enter the roadway at a ninety -degree (90a) angle for the first twenty-five (25) feet of the driveway. 5. Fuel breaks as recommended by a wildfire expert approved by the County may be incorporated into the design of access roads or driveways. C. WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE SAFETY 1. Private ponds may be used for fire suppression purposes if approved by the Community Development Department and the local fire district. 2. An individual structure water supply and storage shall be accessible to fire department vehicles within 100 feet of the exterior of the building(s) through the use of a hydrant meeting the policies of the Basalt and Rural Fire district. The amount of storage capacity shall be determined by the fire district with a minimum of 5000 -gallon storage capacity pursuant to the square footage of the largest structure. Increases in square footage will result with an increase in storage capacity minimums. Page 4 of 9 3. All buildings shall be sprinklered with an approved automatic sprinkler system. These sprinkler systems shall be supplied by stored water having a minimum capacity of the sprinkler demand times 30 minutes. D. ROOFING MATERIALS, ROOFING VENTS AND PROJECTIONS AT AND BELOW ROOF LINE Unless the wildfire expert has recommended a different method of construction, roofs and projections at or below roof line in Severe Wildfire Hazard Areas shall be constructed according to the following specifications: 1. Roofing Materials: a. Class A covering or Class A Assembly as defined by the currently adopted building code. b. No wood shakes or shingles. C. Projections at the Roofline, including Soffits, Rafters, Porch or Deck Roofs, Fascias, or Other: d. One (1) hour rated material or any material underlain by 5/8" Type X gypboard or equal, or e. "Type IV" Heavy Timber materials, per the currently adopted building code. 2. Decks, Decking, Cantilevered Floors, or Other Projections Below the Roofline: a. Construction with noncombustible or one (1) hour rated material, or material with flame spread <25 (tested to ASTM E84 and listed for exterior use), or 3. Conventionally framed deck with waterproof surface and underside protected with 5/8" Type X gypboard or equal (decking as "a" above), or 4. "Type IV" Heavy Timber materials: joist and beams minimum 6"x10", columns minimum 8"x8", decking minimum 4" in depth, or decking as "a" above; or equivalent log construction, or 5. Enclose projection vertically to ground with one hour fire resistive materials. Railings must be constructed of noncombustible or "Type IV" Heavy Timber materials. Exterior of the Structure, Including All Walls a. One (1) hour fine resistive rated materials, or b. 5/8" gypboard underlying combustible materials, or C. Cement stucco, minimum 1/4" thickness. d. All glazing to be tempered glazing; and e. Doors to be metal or wood 1 '/4" thick minimum. 2. Foundations a. Foundations, skirting, and crawl space openings shall be fully enclosed and constructed with materials approved for one (1) hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls and shall extend from the top of grade to the underside of the floor decking or walls. E. All Hazard Areas Roofs with less than a 3:12 pitch are not permitted in Low, Medium, or Severe Wildfire Hazard Areas unless they comply with the following: Page 5 of 9 1. All roof coverings shall be constructed of non-combustible materials and installed on a Class A roof assembly. 2. All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. 3. Protrusions above the roofline, such as parapets, shall be prohibited. 4. Roofs shall be installed as required by the adopted Building Code and shall have a minimum pitch of 1:48. 5. All roof designs, coverings, or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshall prior to submittal of a building permit application. F. MAINTENANCE AND MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS a. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. b. Roof vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh, with mesh one-fourth ('/a) inch maximum. c. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash and flammable debris. d. All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel contour a minimum of fifteen (15) feet away from any structure. e. Weeds and grasses within the ten (10) foot perimeter shall be maintained to a height not more than six (6) inches. f. Firewood/wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of fifteen (15) feet away from the structure. g. Swimming pools and ponds shall be accessible by the local fine district. h. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. i. Wood fences shall not connect to other structures. j. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container. k. Propane tanks shall be buried, if possible, or installed according to NFPA 58 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any aboveground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for two (2) hour fire -resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls. 1. Each structure shall have a minimum of one ten (10) pound ABC fire extinguisher. in. Addresses shall be clearly marked with two (2) inch non-combustible letters and shall be visible at the primary point of access from the public or common access road and installed on a non-combustible post. n. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District. 12. The Applicant shall comply with the following general conditions regarding wildlife: A. Manipulation of vegetation outside of the Activity Envelope is prohibited. B. Mesh or woven wire fences are prohibited. All fencing shall be wildlife friendly. C. Wood rail fencing shall employ three (3) rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed fifty-four (54) inches in height above ground level, and twelve (12) inches in width (top view), and shall have at least eighteen (18) inches between the lower two (2) rails. Page 6 of 9 D. Wire fencing must be three (3) strands or less. The top wire should be a twelve -point -five (12.5) gauge twisted barbless type at a maximum height of forty-two (42) inches. The middle strands (which may be barbed) should be located a minimum twelve (12) inches apart and from the top wire preventing entanglement when mule deer jump over. The bottom strand should be sixteen (16) inches from the ground. E. Tall overly mature trees and standing dead trees (snags) should be retained at the rate of two (2) to five (5) per acre whenever possible as nesting and perching habitat. F. Fruit bearing trees and shrubs shall be prohibited within the Activity Envelope. This does not include pre-existing native trees and shrubs. G. Development shall be clustered to the maximum extent possible to minimize impact on wildlife. H. Access shall be provided to the Colorado Division of Wildlife for trapping, tagging, studying, or otherwise managing wildlife. I. Trash/garbage shall be kept in an approved bear resistant container or enclosure. J. Bird feeders, including hummingbird feeders, shall be hung away from any deck or window, and be at least ten (10) feet from the ground suspended between two (2) trees or posts. All seed feeders shall include a seed catchment pan to catch discarded seed. K. Horse grains, pellets, and cookies shall be stored in bear resistant containers. L. Pet food shall not be left outside. M. All future structures shall utilize round handled door knobs. N. Construction is not permitted between May 15' and June 30th. O. Dogs are prohibited during construction on the property. P. With the exception of construction, the property is limited to one (1) dog that shall be kenneled within 25' of the residence. 13. No development shall occur outside the approved activity envelope with the exception of vegetation removal necessary to comply with the wildfire mitigation measures described above. No structures shall be permitted outside of the approved building envelope. Applicant shall be required to obtain an Earthmoving Permit for any work outside the approved envelope. 14. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or other construction activity, the Applicant shall stake the corners of the activity envelope and install construction fencing around the construction site within the perimeter of the building envelope. The fencing shall remain in place until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 15. All areas disturbed by construction shall be re -vegetated with native shrubs and grasses within one growing season of the project's completion. 16. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 2-20-1 0 and CKS., § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on July M 2018. 17. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval, or any subsequent permit(s) or approval(s) related to this property, or vested rights associated with this property. Page 7 of 9 PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Amen Times Weekly on thea3 day of 2015. APPROVED by the Director, this QLday of 2015. Aat�U4 a�u �aa C dy Houben, Community Development Director PIDR:246533401016 P004-11 Page 8 of 9 Attachment A Legal Description Subdivision: SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH Lot: 39 Section: 33 Township: 8 Range: 87 PARCEL 39 BEING PART OF S2SE4 OF SEC 33-8-87 & SW4SW4 OF SEC 34-8-87 CONT 35.03 AC M/L DESC BY MB BK 611 PG 833 AKA PARCEL 39 Page 9 of 9 Vinson&Elkins Walter B. Stuart wstuart®velaw.00nn Tel +1.713.758.1086 Fax *1.713.615.5018 March 27, 2015 Via email• michaeLkraemer@pilkincounty.com Mike Kraemer Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan for Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 Dear Mike: I am in receipt of Glenn Horn's letter of March 26, 2015 and attachments. Don Fleisher, Sally Sakin and I, who are neighbors, have no objection to the modified drawings. However, we want to go on record as registering a continued concern regarding the height of any building on the property. We believe that a one story home will have less adverse impact on the Ranch. Please note our concern in your records. We will be following any proposed building activity with the height issues in mind. Sincerely, �AJ� t4UL Walter Stuart cc: Glenn Hom Vinson d Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law Abu Dhabi Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston London Moscow New York Palo Alto Riyadh San Francisco Tokyo Washington nn U 344a090%000 000001 ice, 1001 Fannin Street. Suite 2500 Houston, TX 77002-6750 Tel +1.713.758.2222 Fax +1.713.758.2346 wwwmelaw.corn Walter B. Stuart 1001 Fannin Street Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77002 February 20, 2015 Pitkin County Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Notice of Objection to Schiralli Application Ladies/Gentlemen: Please be advised that the undersigned property owner at 1975 Sopris Mountain Ranch, located within 300' of the Applicant's property, objects to the application of Sandra Schiralli for an activity envelope. A copy of the application is enclosed with this notice. The objection is based on the visual impact of any building on the property, soil issues and for other reasons. Please continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. Please send all correspondence to the address below. Sincerely, Walter Stuart Walter Stuart 1001 Fannin Street Suite 2500 Houston, TX 77002 Tel. 713 7581086 000002 Davis Horn - PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING ftkin County MAR 2 6 2015 CW"U*Deveicpment March 26, 2015 Mike Kraemer Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan for Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 Dear Mike: We represent Sandra Schiralli ("Applicant") in her land use application for approval of an Activity Envelope. We have modified the Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan for Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 based upon discussions and a site visit with Walter Stuart, a neighboring property owner. The attached drawings include the following modifications. 1. The west side of the Activity Envelope will be limited to landscaping. 2. A new Landscape Envelope is proposed to be located on the northwest side of the Activity Envelope. 3. The Activity Envelope #1 has been extended to the east. These changes are intended to provide a larger area for a house to be developed further to the east in the area which is screened by existing coniferous trees located north of Sopris Mountain Road. The changes also create a larger area for new trees to be planted to the north of Activity Envelope # 1. As you know, the establishment of an Activity Envelope does not entitle the owner of Lot 39 to submit a building permit application to Pitkin County. The owner of Lot 39 will be required to submit for Site Plan review approvals prior to submittal of a building permit. The Applicant will ALICE DAVIS AICP S GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 970/925-6587 • FAX: 970/925-5180 adavisOrof.net ghom@rof.net agree to the following conditions being incorporated in the Pitkin County approval of the Activity Envelope. 1. The Applicant, her successors and/or assigns shall erect four story poles to simulate location and the height of the proposed structure(s) as part of the Site Plan review process. 2. The Applicant, her successors and/or assigns agree to plant coniferous trees between proposed structure(s) and Sopris Mountain Road (within approved Activity Envelopes) to compensate for the loss of trees with six inches or larger diameter as required by Section 7-20-10 (c) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code (see Attachment 1). A landscape plan depicting the location of the coniferous trees will be submitted as part of the Site Plan review. Please review the proposal in this letter and call me if you have any questions, comments or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED GLENN HORN AICP cc: Sandra Schiralli Carol Hood Walter Stuart 00000 000005, W N N M Z "E .04' ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33.34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO BENCHMARK: FND REBM AND YELLOW CAP /14111 AT ELEVATON 8361.13' n a + Y A ! >• PROPOSED ADDITON TO I M M a M Aa ACTIVITY ENVELOPE n 1 N g (LWOSCAPING ONLY) aP A e 0.08 ACRES 0.10 ACRES LEGEN AAvxN.arrNN. erF MAr r Cs, Mo"M N rMH o,.n r n me r rwr.,.Ar n®n... w ro. n.m n.w.>n..wmr mNe.u.� m�,i..ar•N.In..eta.n Ow.W / SAAINI! SCIWUW vnlmF muxrr cpNrNrSTr DEYaDPMSxr DLRSGTDR M.mA. fn.kae ws Ir eM nM"MI w19T.. p h 11Yx, 1'y{Y FMMr/ DRHECTDn I®blo M RemVYle lnMf BMT M1ON�,rtM bMV nMalAe IP.M gIM"b' oltlw fMY MRYF9.e fWW, R�IJM._ m _4.Fr Imm�eeee_ rMun nurser OeM eM RwvNw ROAD 5 pR15 MOONTAIN GRAPHIC _- ICTIMTY ENVELOPE /2 nUTV AND uNDSCAPINC) 1•\ IF' i1.R N n P � + MPYB, n TIP _. n PROPOSED ADDITION TO ACTMTY ENCLOSE /1 �_M — (BUIIDESq ACCUTY AND W •" lANpSCAPCMINC) 0.10 AO2E5 +/— ^+ "F PROPOSED ACTIVITY ENCLOPE /1 q vc:. •ry TY AND UNOSCAPING)0.955 ATMES +/— PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 35.03 AC +/— PROPERTY DF FNFMCIN A PARCEL OF MD BEING PMT OF THE S/2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC11ON 33, MD THE SWI/4 OF THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 34. IYYlMSFNP 8 SW RANGE SJ HEST OOfF THE 6TN PPoNNOPAL MFRRIIM AND BE]NG MORE NLL11 OESCRIWD M FOLLOW£ BEING AT THE SWTN WEST COMER OF SAID SECTION N. THOl 094 'E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SWTH UNE OF SAID SECTION U. THENCE 42071'00T 7BB.70 FEET: THENCE N52'50'043'W 2SOOO FEET. THENCE NN='00'W 1075.75 FEET; THENCE 45310'1)13'W 531.04 FEET: SO115'DON 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SECTION 33: THENCE S89T1'M'E 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 35.03 ACRES MORE M LESS. NOT": DATE OF WRWY: OCTOBER 23M1. 2014 UNEM UNITS USED TO PEWMM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SIFRVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OWIRMEW MM OF SOPRIS MWNTAIN RANCH RECMDED IN PUT BOOK M AT PAGE 2£ THIS PROPEI IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATONS. RESTRICTION£ COVEMMTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECCIRD M IN PLACE THIS SIMMEY WAS PRO+MED WHT OVT THE BENEFIT OF A TTX COMMITMENT. THEREFORE MY EXCEPTIONS TO ITE TUT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAYS NOT BEEN RESEARCHED SY HIGH CWNMY ENONEERING. INC. F ATIONS SHOWN HEREON ME BASED ON NWTH AYOKCM VERTICAL DATUM OF 1808 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMMK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MM. FWNO RUM AND I OW CM /14111, ELXVATON 8.181.13' CWNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLMADO. CONTOUR INTERVAL EWALS 1 FOOT N89'51'05"W 1374.28' coR m SECTION T.BS, R.8T8, 8TH PM N89'54'05"W 137.11' SCALE EMraY) 1 W � tl M1 C C5 I' SITE 0 r }Fy10 EV1 SHEET 1 OF 4 H IF 2 ZGUtW r =3 Z j=p W s O ;IRS U 0 Y S PRCJECT NO 21E17�040 SHT 1 000006 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND WHO PMT OF THE SI/2 OF THE SET 1;4 OF SEGTON RAN¢NE51 �A FM THE SM PPoHpP�AL SECTION Nq ®NO IYONENLLY DESCRIBED AS FpLOWS BEING AT THE SOUTH NEST COIRNM OF SND SECTION 34: THENCE 09VUT IVAI FEET KONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 311 THENCE N2021.00'E 708.70 FIT: THENCE 116230.00'W 2BO.00 FEET, THENCE NWWOO'W 1070.70 FEET: THENCE N531DOI'W 531.04 FEET: SOT'35.00'W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION U THENCE SBISVWE 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING ].SOT ACRES MORE OR LESS COUNT' OF %MIN. STATE OF COLORADO. NOT": DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD. 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED M PERFIXiM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OVFRWEYI MAP Of SOPRS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECOROE0 IN PLAT BOON W AT PAGE 20 THIS PROPERTY IS WB,ECT TO RFSERVATMS, RESTRICTKKIS MM NMTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WTHWT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT. THEREFORE. MY E11CFPTIMS M TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY NIDI COUNTRY ENCINEWING INC ELEVATIONS SHOYM HEREON ALE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VTRTCK DAVM OF 19M (NAND BB) REFERENCED FROEI BENCHMMN AT NOTED PROPERTY CO ER CH MAP. FOUND REBAR AND YOLOW CAP 014111. ELEVATIM 8181.13' CONTOUR INTERVK EWALS 1 FOOT. LEGE 1?]0 N[INY MAIJII Cp111,111 J !Mf OMIM9 MIYI mIRM � EMGOt 9WIYVN .-...--.. -.---.. uwx rouwac e9uWMo DMNImr Npwn.sro+wac. we IMw ti e..i vnmi.. M wun Fanryam. moieawwwmwsl P.vi^. a m. PNn (vnF •. VMIuu 6. iY M .M w.l ..u. w impv tic w wMM N n.I V �YY P.MnY. Owrp I SWORE 9CMANW PRI(IN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OIP.ECIOR 9..M�.Rww9. _ara iasl.rmwp w IIMEe. w DIRKTOR Atm4� br RetnNly lw.v0.ly [m Yq.wPI���.aWY1b�V Mp..IM1IMO.. .a A.ma.al.9.wTaFrA sau..b, a_+sA_ Tub GVk Rtl RI ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33.34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY UNE EXISTRIG I PATH PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 35.03 AC +/- 2S• NNE SCAPE ENVE� /2E! S19712'00'E 25.0' 25• CODE wT,vELOPEELoRt E S195Y00'E 178.90' BENQIMARN: END REBAR AND YELLOW CAP /14111. ELEVATION 8361.1• EX8811NG CROSS WL4FRT 'E______-___ PONT OF BEGINNING EXISTING ROADWAY o-xi:•TETea>� 60.0• Row BASED CIN W OF EASIING ROADWAY EJOSTING PATH \ 1 34 ?5 .7 A7 •40 Ns.?6 '°•9 44 3.4 '33 26 N .,II l37 z8 17 m 21 J N�P 1 4i 46 48 .43 0 .35 y N -11 49 36 TOR N STORY ?9 DOLE P 47 150 53 POLEo- 75 N 51. 01 N 52.54 55. PROPOSED ACTIVITY MV OPE /I (BUILDING. UTIUTY AND LANDSCAPING) i 127 56 58 57. a.95o ACRES +/_ 61 ; 69 59. z 60 68 741 y .6566:67 74• 73 72 .71 77. 75 :. 80 8891 81883 87 8 g6 78 X55 l08 90 9 1 92 93 94• 98 - •10 lq lb. 99 104' .1 .107 lo6 111 110 109 N 5' 1zy 113 .._, .A N N u1 116 7 N7pCY00'E 9 121 •11] STORY 2'x"10' 4' .127 125' i13 POLE 1i6 PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 5 /\\\ 12 25' ADDITION M 9UI1 0, ACCESS. UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE ENVELOPE \\ 3 \\\ STORY S34'40'49'W POLE 30.09' 9 10 • N i >-To-le GRAPRIC SCALE (aTmX 1 NaG - FJ M1 SHEET 2 OF 4 N, 11 PROJER NO 21417M.G0 SHT 2 Davis Horn - PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING January 21, 2015 Mike Kraemer Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Amendment to Schiralli Activity Envelope Review with Vested Property Rights Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 - PID # 2365-334-01-016 Dear Mike: Davis Hom Incorporated represents Sandra Schiralli in this request for land use approvals for her property on West Sopris Creek Road in the Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision. The applicant is requesting approval for an Activity Envelope with Vested Property Rights. The lot previously obtained 1041 Site Plan Review approvals but the vesting for that approval expired on April 19, 2008. The property was also approved as a TDR Receiver Site. We determined there are significant ridgeline problems with the Activity Envelope which was submitted in January of 2011. During the summer of 2013, we extensively studied the entire 35 acres parcel to find an Activity Envelope which was hazard free and did not break the ridgeline. Several of the sites which were selected broke the ridgeline as viewed from upper West Sopris Creek Road. Another site on the west side of the property was within a significant drainage area where it was not possible to build. We located an area further west which was dry, however the surveyors determined that the site was off the property to the west of the west boundary. Each of these sites required the development of a long driveway. In the fall of 2014, we studied the proposed Activity Envelope located in the aspen trees, proximate to the Sopris Mountain Road as depicted on the attached Activity Envelope Plan. We determined that a house located in this Envelope will not break the ridgeline. Additionally, the Envelope can be accessed with a relatively short driveway as depicted on the attached Preliminary Driveway Plan Profile. ALICE DAVIS AICP S GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 970/925.6587 • FAX: 970/925-5180 adavisOroS.net ghom®roUnet 000007 The attached letter from Jonathan Lowsky, Wildlife Biologist, indicates the proposed Activity Envelope complies with the Land Use Code Wildlife standards. We sent out the public notices for this new Activity Envelope today. Please contact me if you need any additional information. Thanks. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED GL HORN AICP Attachments Activity Envelope Plan Jonathan Lowsky's January 21, 2015 Wildlife Letter 00000:3 WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC January 21, 2015 VIA EMAIL: whom a rof net Glenp Horn Davis Horn Inc. 215 S Monarch Street, #104 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Amendment to a Development Permit — Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 Dear Glenn: In 2010, I provided you with an ecological assessment of a proposed activity envelope for residential development at Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch. Since that time, the activity envelope has been relocated north-northwest of the former location (Figure 1). The current activity envelope is situated adjacent to Sopris Mountain Ranch Road near the northwest comer of the parcel. Vegetation within the activity envelope is dominated by Gambel oak shmblands on the east side and aspen forest on the west side. In 2010, I conducted a detailed assessment of the Rocky Mountain elk production habitat mapped by Colorado Parks & Wildlife (CPW) in order to field verify those areas that provided suitable habitat for elk calving. The results of that effort are described in my 2010 report. The 2010 evaluation revealed that some of the area mapped by CPW is indeed high quality, active production habitat, while other areas are unsuitable. CWS visited these areas with John Groves, CPW District Wildlife Manager in 2010. We visited the proposed activity envelope on May 18 and 27, 2010 and walked the area surrounding the site with particular emphasis on the aspen habitat. We agreed that the aspen on the Property ((D on attached Figure 2) was unsuitable active calving habitat and that most of the aspen within the % mile buffer is not suitable for elk production. We concurred that the aspen stand to the north that is primarily on Lot 37 (Q2 on Figure 2), is a high quality stand with many of the parameters that are typically associated with elk production habitat but relatively small in extent. There is also aspen habitat due north and within a % mile of the Property that is suitable production habitat as well (Q on Figure 2). Section 7-20-70(d)(7) of the LUC requires a minimum 1/4 mile buffer between any building or structure and production areas. Figure 2 depicts the extent of the field verified elk production area on and around the Property as well as the '/, mile buffer extending from the GPS delineated boundary of that habitat. Area Q (potential habitat but small in extent) is north of the new activity envelope and across Sopris Mountain Ranch Road. Area ® is also suitable but has been verified as active production habitat. It is separated from the Property by a steep south -facing slope. Given the topography of the activity envelope, the location of Sopris Mountain Ranch Road 0100 Elk Run Drive, #128 - Basalt, CO 81621 •970.927.4549 • jonathanN»coloradowildlifesciencemm • http://wloradowildhfesdence.mm 000009 Ecological Assessment I Ipdate - Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch lanum 21, 2015 paw 2 and the lack of suitable conditions in the aspen on the Property in combination with adjacent residential development on Lot 41, development of a single family home on the proposed activity envelope is unlikely to result in any significant impact on elk production and a reduction in the prescribed'/4 mile (1,320 feet) buffer is appropriate. Mr. Groves stated in an email dated June 2, 2010 regarding the 2010 activity envelope (Exhibit A): I agree with this assessment. The proposed activity envelope should have minimal impact on elk production due to the poor quality of the aspen stands located inclose proximity. The lot does provide important fall/spring transition range as evidenced by the amount browse and tracks and scat in the area. In order to minimize disturbance outside ojthe activity envelope I do recommend that no dogs are kept onsite, or that there is a I dog limit with kennel restrictions. Mr. Groves provided the following statement in an email dated December 31, 2014 in support of the new location (Exhibit B): I agree [that the new location is an improvement over the previous location]. This is probably a better spot than the original proposed location and should result in less disturbance. Conclusions The site assessments, field observations, and GIS analysis revealed the following: The new activity envelope is further from the field verified elk production habitat and adjacent to Sopris Mountain Ranch Road. As a result, it is substantially less likely to result in the direct or indirect loss of important wildlife habitat (i.e., elk production habitat). 2. Except for production habitat, the CPW Species Activity Mapping (SAM) data pertaining to the Property are relatively accurate given the scale at which they were created. a. There are no winter concentration areas, severe winter range, or migration corridors within a '/4 -mile of the Property. b. The proposed activity envelope is within '/4 mile of habitat suitable for elk production. i. There are no existing structures nor are there any structures proposed within the production area buffer. ii. Given the topography of the site and the adjacent residential development, it is unlikely that the proposed residential development will have any significant effect on elk production. iii. CPW concurs with the CWS assessment that a reduction ofthe '/4 mile buffer is warranted and that the proposed activity location will have less impact on wildlife. 000010 Ecological Assessment l Ipdate - Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch lanuary 21, 2015 Pagc 3 3. The proposed activity envelope was established with significant consideration of wildlife habitat and activity. The envelope's boundaries were established based on input from John Groves, CPW and Jonathan Lowsky, CWS. 4. No raptor nests were found or otherwise known within '/4 mile of the proposed activity envelopes. 5. No rare, Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate species will be affected by the proposed residential and infrastructure development of the Property. 6. No structure is proposed within rare, Threatened or Endangered species critical habitat. Potential Effects of the Proposed Project Given the above assessment, the proposed development will not adversely affect wildlife or important wildlife habitat. The habitat of rare, Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate species will not be affected. The proposed development will not result in the direct or indirect loss of any significant mule deer or elk winter habitat, production area, or migration corridors. Recommendations to Minimize Ecological Impacts 1. The activity envelope should be as small as possible to minimize the loss of any additional native vegetation. 2. Black Bears: a. All refuse containers should meet or exceed the Wildlife Proof Refuse Container/Dumpster Enclosure Standards described in Pitkin County Ordinance # 010-2001 and the 2004 amendment to that ordinance. b. Fruit -bearing trees and shrubs should be avoided in any landscaping within the residential lots. c. Pets should not be fed outside. d. Wherever possible, lever style door handles should be avoided on the exterior of the house. e. Bird feeders should be avoided from April through November. f Composting should be restricted to yard waste (e.g., leaves and grass clippings). Food waste will be prohibited within compost. 3. Domestic Animal Controls a. When outside, all dogs should be leashed or restricted to a fenced enclosure (i.e., kennel or run) adjacent to the residence. b. Dogs of guests should be required to comply with these restrictions. c. Contractors should be prohibited from bringing their dogs on site during construction even if kept within their vehicles. 000011 Ecological Assessment l 1pdate - 1nt 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch lama 21, 2015 Pagc 4 4. The following fence restrictions would reduce the ecological impacts of development: a. Fences on the Property will be compliant with §7-20-70(c)(4) and §7-20- 70(cx5) of the LUC: i. Wood rail fencing shall employ three (3) rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed fifty-four (54) inches in height above ground level, and twelve (12) inches in width (top view), and shall have at least eighteen (18) inches between the lower two (2) rails. ii. Wire fencing must be three (3) strands or less. The top wire should be a twelve -point -five (12.5) gauge twisted barbless type at a maximum height of forty-two (42) inches. The middle strands (which may be barbed) should be located a minimum twelve (12) inches apart and from the top wire preventing entanglement when mule deer jump over. The bottom strand should be sixteen (16) inches from the ground. 5. Native vegetation: a. Native vegetation, particularly aspen should be preserved to the maximum extent possible except where management is necessary to reduce wildfire hazards or to improve the condition of a given stand. b. Landscaping should be restricted to the activity envelope. c. An orange safety fence should be placed around the activity envelope during construction to prevent any unnecessary vegetation disturbance during construction. d. Vegetation disturbed outside the approved activity envelope should be revegetated according to the current Pitkin County Revegetation Guidelines. e. Following construction, naturally occurring vegetation should not be disturbed outside of the activity envelope except as necessary for normal agricultural and ranching activities. 6. Noxious weeds should be managed by means of an Integrated Weed Management strategy according to the current Pitkin County Weed Management Plan. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC il� onathan Lsky, MS ogisv?rincipal 000012 Ecological Aswssmenr 1 Ipdate - Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch January 21, 2015 Page 5 BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC (CWS) is a small wildlife and ecological consulting firm based in Basalt, Colorado, specializing in wildlife research, management, and monitoring, ecological assessments, wetland & riparian delineations, conservation easement baseline inventories, ecological planning, habitat management, and ecological restoration. CWS applies a scientifically sound approach to biological resource studies and management. Our work combines professional integrity and strong academic training with extensive experience working for government, private, and non- profit clients. With an extensive network of professional coflaborators that includes plant ecologists, foresters, hydrologists, and soil scientists, CWS leverages the coflective knowledge of experienced professionals working toward practical, effective and cost saving solutions. CWS provides expert services to a diverse array of clients. Since we are a small company, personal attention is ensured. We combine frill in-house GIS (ArcGIS) with real time, sub -meter GPS to provide state-of-the-art spatial data, analyses, maps, and presentations. We have prepared Biological Assessments and Biological Evaluations, and contributed to EAs and EISs. CWS has worked with large private firms such as Jacobs; Carter & Burgess; Mead & Hunt; Parsons; CH2MHILL; SE Group; and SAIC as well as city, county, state, and federal agencies such as City of Aspen, City of Glenwood Springs, Pitkin County, Colorado Department of Transportation, and Roaring Fork Transportation Agency, and the U.S. Forest Service. CWS has prepared over 60 conservation easement baseline and Present condition reports for 8 different conservation organizations in 5 western Colorado counties. Owner and Wildlife Biologist Jonathan Lowsky, M.S. Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, has a broad range of knowledge. With more than 24 years of professional experience with federal (US Forest Service), state (Colorado Division of Wildlife), and county agencies as well as two major universities (Colorado State University and University of Washington), Jonathan's career has focused on a diverse array of wildlife from bighorn sheep, elk, and songbirds to northern goshawks, flying squirrels, small mammals, and spotted bats. Mr. Lowsky's experience includes biological assessments and evaluations for NEPA compliance, conservation planning, GIS mapping and modeling, wildlife research, and ecological monitoring design and implementation, as well as wetland and riparian delineations, evaluations, and restoration. He has authored management plans and conservation easement baseline inventory reports and published scientific papers. An expert birder, experienced tracker, certified wetlands delineator, trained fluvial geornorphologist, and passionate observer of wildlife, Jonathan has spent countless hours studying and appreciating Colorado's diverse ecological communities. A detailed description of Mr. Lowsky's professional experience and references are available. For additional information, please visit our website at www.colorado"dlifescience.com. 000013 7/15/20102:57 AM EXHIBIT A Jonathan Lowskv From: Groves, John [John.Groves@state.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 7:48 AM To: jonathan@colowildsci.com Subject RE: Lot 39 Sopris Mtn Ranch Jonathan, agree with this assessment. The proposed activity envelope should have minimal impact on elk production due to the poor quality of the aspen stands located in close proximity. The lot does provide important fall/spring transition range as evidenced by the amount browse and tracks and scat in the area. In order to minimize disturbance outside of the activity envelope I do recommend that no dogs are kept onsite, or that there is a 1 dog limit with kennel restrictions. John John Groves District Wildlife Manager Carbondale 970-947-2933 From: Jonathan Lowsky[mailto:jonathan@colowildsci.com] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:03 PM To: Groves, John Subject: Lot 39 Sopris Mtn Ranch May 27, 2010 VIA EMAIL: john. rg ovesna state.co.us John Groves Colorado Division of Wildlife 1500 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Schiralli Property, Lot 39 Sopris Mountain Ranch Dear John; The purpose of this letter is to confirm your conclusions regarding wildlife habitat on and within close proximity to the Schiralli Property at Sopris Mountain Ranch (Lot 39). We visited the proposed activity envelope on May 27'h and walked the area surrounding the site with particular emphasis on the aspen habitat on May 18`h and 270'. The activity envelope is situated on a small sagebrush dominated knoll or rise. We agreed that the aspen on the Property ((D on attached Map 1) was unlikely to be active calving habitat and that most of the aspen within the '/4 mile buffer is not suitable for elk production. We did find that the aspen stand to the north that is primarily on Lot 37 (02 on attached Map 1), was a high quality stand with many of the parameters that are typically associated with elk production habitat. This stand is approximately 925 feet to the north and of the activity envelope and across Sopris Mountain Ranch Road. A portion of this stand is within the '/4 mile 000014 7/15/2010 2:57 PM buffer. There is also aspen habitat due north and within a '/4 mile of the Property that is suitable calving habitat as well but is separated from the Property by a steep south -facing slope (© on attached Map 1). Given the topography of the activity envelope, the location of Sopris Mountain Ranch Road and the lack of suitable conditions in the aspen on the Property, and adjacent residential development on Lot 41, you believe that development of a single family home on the activity envelope is unlikely to result in any significant impact on elk production and that a reduction in the prescribed'/4 mile (1,320) foot buffer is appropriate. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC skY Wildlife Biologist/Principal Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC 7100 Elk Run Drive, Suite 128A • Basalt, 0081621 • 970.927.4549 •info®colowildsci.com • www.ColoWildSci.con, Checked by AVG - www.ava.com Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2913 - Release Date: 06/02/10 03:57:00 000015 EXHIBIT B Jonathan Lowsky From: Groves - DNR, John <john.groves@state.co.us> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:06 PM To: Jonathan Lowsky Subject: Re: Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 I agree. This is probably a better spot than the original proposed location and should result in less disturbance. On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Lowsky <ionathan( coloradowildlifescience.com> wrote: Hi John, The owner of Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 has finally agreed to move the proposed primary and secondary activity envelopes away from the field verified production habitat above (south of) the property (See attached Fig 1 Lot 39.pdf). The new activity envelopes are within the degraded aspen close to the road. This will result in the shortest possible access road and fragment the habitat less than previous proposals. The proposed site is not visible to any animals using the draw on and adjacent to the west side of the property, the higher quality aspen in the northwest portion of the parcel, or using the small, wet valley on the south side of the parcel. I think this is probably the location for the activity envelopes that will impact the least amount of good quality habitat and result in the least possible disturbance to production and transition habitat. I also attached a map from 2010 depicting the previously proposed activity envelope. When you have a moment, would you kindly let me know your thoughts? Thanks, Jonathan Lowsky, MS Principal Wildlife Biologist/Ecologist Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC John Groves District Wildlife Manager -Carbondale Colorado Parks and Wildlife 970-947-2933 000016 Lot 39 Sopris Mountain Ranch 11 000017 I Figura 2. Rocky Iii Elk Field Wrgied Production Mabdat J O N W 09'31"E .04' LEGEN .�mt Nne NC M ortMv..n.ImVrvvmmnb..Kb. r.M aa�rry rnrl. T . "..m, T.,ry �aM�• w M R .m ..v ...r d bvN br ..r ww > rNw.. xr. N 41rw Imm IuuN. w M mortC ^tlOMM m.wa NPwn� Me Wwv Nry wMm. Owrcrl WIMIE SOURIW PTYUN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR M 1aM.Y [m'/m M9 N Owi mYai N MRM M Ye IIYIn (onh Gn_/lY MWprw lWSO tli_MM �M eMCb Wlnxo- rnmMnro DIRECTOR AmaWYe M RmNYn TiNAWNRr Emlq we M�.va A.4aM aN_mn W as MM Yn CmY�.PP �rrgp4. CMrt FM RxoNv m aWM..rNMIRr.N f� 00 019 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ----�- 5 MOUA0NTAIN R0 ___ _____ lNCHMAM: PND ROO ,.�50 - JD YELLOW CAP #14111 f ELEVATION 8361.13'------------- _ ACTVITY ENVELOPE E2 JW.TY AND LANDSCAPING) 5 +/- ACTIVITY ENVELOPE P ACCESS, UA3TY AND BG) O.BS ACRES +/- GRAPHIC SCALE PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH ^ 35.03 AC +/- 3 ,N N O h� A PARCEL OF LAND BEINIG APART OF' INE S1/2 OP THE SET/4 OF BECTON RANGE 8J WESS'TN(Y41HE BIN GmRBIgpj M dAN3µ0 eEANc�IPIORE6NLLti DESCRIBtD AS IpLOWS: BMG AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34. THENCE 8854'.14'# 13] 11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH ME OF SAID BECTON 34. TENCE N2(Y2I'N'E 7M.70 #EEE TENCE N6250'CO W 280.00 FEET, THENCE NW=' O'W 1078.78 FEET, THENCE N53't D'W'W ST.04 FEET. WIIS'W'W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH ME OF SAID SECTION M. THENCE S8851'34E 137458 {HET TO TIE PONT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 38.03 ACRES MONS ON LESS. COUNTY CF %MIN. STATE 6 COLORADO N89'51'05"W 1374.28' NOTES: DATE OF' SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD. 2014. MMEAR UNITS USED TO PETKpM TBS WRVEY NETS V.S. WAVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECOROm OVERVIEW MAP OF SOPNS MWNTAIN RANCH PECpRDE) IN PUT BOP( W AT PAM 28. THIS PROPEFT Y IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTTCTONS. COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS DF RECORD M w PLACE. TNS SURVEY WAS PREPARED wTHWT DE BENEFIT aF A DTE CDMMHMENT. THOUIPO ,ANY E CEPDOMS TO TITLE MAT MAY 1iTECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NAVE NOT BEE! RESEMCNED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENpNEEWNG, Pi . ELEVATIONS SHOWN IEJEON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMENICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF IHEB (NAVO 88) R6ERENMD MOM BENOMW MI( AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. POUND REBAR AND YELLOW CAP /14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS I FOOT. CORNER SECTION TES. R.87W. BIN PM N89'54'05"W 137.11' ��n-2o-u �i'� � �� SHEET 1 OF 4 u' PROJECT NO 3T917M.00 SHT E 000020 AJ3,,PARCIL a _AND BEND PART /OF TIME SI/2 OF INE SEI/4 OF SECTION RNM3 AND VESTF �OME 61H PRIN�Al'ECMf1EgAN u,D BFINGRM NLL BFINC AT TIE SOU1H WEST COINER a SAq SECTION N: THENCE 99Ti4•NJE 137.11 RET ALONG TIE SOUTH UNE OF SAO STICTION 31: HENCE N207I'OO•E 789.70 FEET: THENCE N62WOD'W 280.00 RET; THENCE NS8o0'OO•W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N531O'00'W 531.01 RET 501.35'DO'W 1221.13 FEET TO TIE SOUTH UK OF SAID SECTION 33: THENCE S891 UT 1371.28 FEET TO TME POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 35.0 ACRS MORE OR LESS COUNTY C0 PRION. STATE OF CLLORADO DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 2A81. 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TD PERFORM TMs "VEY REM U.S. SURVEY RET. THIS SURVEY 15 BASED ON TIE RECORDED ONR\EW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PIAT BOOR 30 AT PAGE 28. TMs PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TD RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR N INCE TNS SURVEY WAS NEPARED RTTMOUT TLE SCRIPT OF A TITLE COMNTMENT. TEIISORE, ANY DODWtaxs To TTIE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY NOH CO MIRY daNEERNc. INC ElEVATCNs SNOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON MORTAL AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1950 (NAVD 06) REFERENCED FROM BEROMMARI( AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND RESAN AND YELLOW CAP 014111. ELEVATION 8381.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT LEGEN lsrnxc wr M1E 80tH Dlsma Yuw caxmw - eED,. msTMR MWW cavlouM — aRnDrE MIIAOAF mMMRa mR WM M Omn YM, -e b NM faMY ✓Te drtvu>emYawXY UW MiMMEIFe popeYY. ++YMween�aN.enega,®me amnntrlNM. W PeAMinn M W OYAIn (bu^M1 NPMaN^JM iv F JnY xry ave wPnW Nn YtisMb M eJMI++M Nme wrJ,.E a � RED Mwb. m w atpnM MIeJm. mrYm na wnme mJ YNra sY e�amM. ONar 15A1MIE SCNMIW FIiNN muxlr cpMNluxlTr DEvaDFMexr DIRecTDR YIW.�9.RY tmYpw NOM SanixMw NJOMON W tlw111W fumlY Fmunu4Y PeJ.NmeM wiwo.lN_ena �Mn Mum NxMM,n wpMn Y. DIRECTOR AcM evnim TYMma FWR WM��n¢41N bl�q FXaalRigoaM Ane x..sea a.N cNNR ✓roan. SUN awomN, a _ oeM._ m, ux. _ aY aM a.NM_ seeaNsme Ovk LM R101d> ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 3334, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO BOA' ROW \`. PROPERTY BASED 0. OF EXISTING � UNE ROADWAYAY BdCHMARK: dD ROAR AND YELLOW EASTING CAP 011111, IMATICN B361.T5' ROADWAY _ CROSS –CULVERT o ` saTSB71'E_______ SIBS, POINT OF BEGINNING SETS 31 E505.68 �� II _�–_ �:emm "STING PATH �\ 1 1 `m l// $• 0 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #2 11\\ (ACCESS. GRNG) E%ISAU 0.90 ACRES 5 PARCEL 39 '' SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH posp0 j z 0 35.03 AC +/— �\ ��TI?9 o-8 ��omm E�omm !0 32 34 z5 3DB \7 }6 40 14 33 w / 44 B/ ?6 5 18 i7 33 37 45 46 41 .43 4i J35 \i 1?8 48 ` 49 j6 19 � S1932'00'E � 47 515p t 7fi.80' jl, `o. 53 15 / �2 �, PROPOSED ACTIVITY dVEOCEA 54 (BVIING, UTILITY AND %0N1 G) ]4 117 56 . .59- SE 57• D.9S0 AGES 13 11 6\61 68 •70 7 64� 6566 74, .73 72 •71 I' 7� 5 >a 5 77 �sOm� `9 9D . 208 96 94 wJ§2 91 �Smme •1p` Tal 160 99 104• 111 1io 109 X1 19 14 313 31 >1 1 / 316 N]0'Oe'OOJE ug. 31 .Ke 024. ,117 231.36' 'u7 5 it3 �Smm� �s�omm �s�mmm. LT�Om� wOm� M!M IMMOm=!M T' :� wm 0�IM!M EMmmMM w'®mMM !T'OmMf= MTMmmMTM �smmm• lT�mm� ��mmm �smmm ��mmm �i�omm �T Oma �s�omm• ��Omm lTs�m� ��osa �wi•Ommi �SOmm Eiom� lSOmm �J7mmm �Omm dOmm tTs©mom. 000020 AJ3,,PARCIL a _AND BEND PART /OF TIME SI/2 OF INE SEI/4 OF SECTION RNM3 AND VESTF �OME 61H PRIN�Al'ECMf1EgAN u,D BFINGRM NLL BFINC AT TIE SOU1H WEST COINER a SAq SECTION N: THENCE 99Ti4•NJE 137.11 RET ALONG TIE SOUTH UNE OF SAO STICTION 31: HENCE N207I'OO•E 789.70 FEET: THENCE N62WOD'W 280.00 RET; THENCE NS8o0'OO•W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N531O'00'W 531.01 RET 501.35'DO'W 1221.13 FEET TO TIE SOUTH UK OF SAID SECTION 33: THENCE S891 UT 1371.28 FEET TO TME POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 35.0 ACRS MORE OR LESS COUNTY C0 PRION. STATE OF CLLORADO DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 2A81. 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TD PERFORM TMs "VEY REM U.S. SURVEY RET. THIS SURVEY 15 BASED ON TIE RECORDED ONR\EW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PIAT BOOR 30 AT PAGE 28. TMs PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TD RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR N INCE TNS SURVEY WAS NEPARED RTTMOUT TLE SCRIPT OF A TITLE COMNTMENT. TEIISORE, ANY DODWtaxs To TTIE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY NOH CO MIRY daNEERNc. INC ElEVATCNs SNOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON MORTAL AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1950 (NAVD 06) REFERENCED FROM BEROMMARI( AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND RESAN AND YELLOW CAP 014111. ELEVATION 8381.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT LEGEN lsrnxc wr M1E 80tH Dlsma Yuw caxmw - eED,. msTMR MWW cavlouM — aRnDrE MIIAOAF mMMRa mR WM M Omn YM, -e b NM faMY ✓Te drtvu>emYawXY UW MiMMEIFe popeYY. ++YMween�aN.enega,®me amnntrlNM. W PeAMinn M W OYAIn (bu^M1 NPMaN^JM iv F JnY xry ave wPnW Nn YtisMb M eJMI++M Nme wrJ,.E a � RED Mwb. m w atpnM MIeJm. mrYm na wnme mJ YNra sY e�amM. ONar 15A1MIE SCNMIW FIiNN muxlr cpMNluxlTr DEvaDFMexr DIRecTDR YIW.�9.RY tmYpw NOM SanixMw NJOMON W tlw111W fumlY Fmunu4Y PeJ.NmeM wiwo.lN_ena �Mn Mum NxMM,n wpMn Y. DIRECTOR AcM evnim TYMma FWR WM��n¢41N bl�q FXaalRigoaM Ane x..sea a.N cNNR ✓roan. SUN awomN, a _ oeM._ m, ux. _ aY aM a.NM_ seeaNsme Ovk LM R101d> ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 3334, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO BOA' ROW \`. PROPERTY BASED 0. OF EXISTING � UNE ROADWAYAY BdCHMARK: dD ROAR AND YELLOW EASTING CAP 011111, IMATICN B361.T5' ROADWAY _ CROSS –CULVERT o ` saTSB71'E_______ SIBS, POINT OF BEGINNING PARCELID:2465-334-01-016 SETS 31 E505.68 �� II _�–_ �. _____--• I It 11 "STING PATH �\ 1 1 `m l// $• 0 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #2 11\\ (ACCESS. GRNG) E%ISAU 0.90 ACRES 5 PARCEL 39 '' SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH posp0 j z 0 35.03 AC +/— �\ ��TI?9 o-8 ap a !0 32 34 z5 3DB \7 }6 40 14 33 w / 44 B/ ?6 5 18 i7 33 37 45 46 41 .43 4i J35 \i 1?8 48 ` 49 j6 19 � S1932'00'E � 47 515p t 7fi.80' jl, `o. 53 15 / �2 �, PROPOSED ACTIVITY dVEOCEA 54 (BVIING, UTILITY AND %0N1 G) ]4 117 56 . .59- SE 57• D.9S0 AGES 13 11 6\61 68 •70 7 64� 6566 74, .73 72 •71 I' 7� 5 >a 5 77 p 1 8:88 87 3 8 / 0 `9 9D . 208 96 94 wJ§2 91 93 J9B�je7 1pl •1p` Tal 160 99 104• 111 1io 109 X1 19 14 313 31 >1 1 / 316 N]0'Oe'OOJE ug. 31 .Ke 024. ,117 231.36' 'u7 5 it3 libu PARCELID:2465-334-01-016 9 30 IhID-H GRAPIRC SCALE II -A -W IA +IRI SHEET20F4�-EMs: t J Z_ WSJ W - W Z �^uus u i51§ 4 C W jW u � 6 e U FS _U QZ C � � 3 0 �wUs<w SUM.W M. a2 VWF Om Z C m O 6 PROJECT NO 21417,WE.00 SHTz 6 0 o / 7 \\o 8 9 30 IhID-H GRAPIRC SCALE II -A -W IA +IRI SHEET20F4�-EMs: t J Z_ WSJ W - W Z �^uus u i51§ 4 C W jW u � 6 e U FS _U QZ C � � 3 0 �wUs<w SUM.W M. a2 VWF Om Z C m O 6 PROJECT NO 21417,WE.00 SHTz A PARCEL W LANO BOEPNG [PART /GP THE 51/2 OF THE M/4 CF SECTION �� YESP�D4 ME O1N TICN N. PRINCI A 01, MEEPoDIM ANDTomm BEINGG MPOAE NLL BENC AT THE SWIHW5W CORNER ON SAD SECTION 34; THENCE 8954'34'E 13).11 FEET ALONG TE SOUTH Ua SOUNE SAD SECTION 34: THENCE N20E1.00'E 789.70 FEET; THENCE N6290'00'W 280.00 FEET; TIECE N88%XYO0'W 1078.76 FEET: THENCE N5310'00•W 531.04 FEET: SO115'00'W 1221.13 FTCT TO THE SOUTH UNE OF SAD SECTION 33. TENcE s8951.342 1374.28 FEET M THE POINT a BEGINNING. CONTAINING 35.67 ACRES MORE OR 165. COUNTY 4 PTNIH. STATE M C ADC). NOTED: DATE OF S IRTET: OCTOBER 23RD. 2014. UNEM UMTS USED TO PVWDRM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SDANEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OMVEW MAP ON SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED N PUT BOON 30 AT PAGE 28, T9S PROPERTY Is SUB.ECT TO RESERVATIONS RESlRICTONS. COVENANTS AND EASEMENIs Of RECORD m N PLACE. THIS WRCEY WAS PREPARED WTMWt THE BENEFT OF A TTE COMMITMENT. TERETORE ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TRE THAT MAY A CT THE sUI ECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENOINIDDNG. INC. EINATONS SHOWN ORTVER HEREON ARE BASED ON NH AMERICAN 11Cµ DATUM CT 19M (NAW •a) R[IERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOW PROPERTY DORMER ON YAP. FOUND REBM Aro YE11OW CAP 114111, ELEVATION 63B113' CONTOUR INTERVAL MW 1 FDOT. LEGEND oes7NR wT uc Rm p51Mf YAM cp W W OJ1 WSTIG Wa cWIIdM p'.6P°[ NIUONY 4q tlo .5m•M.NwN/wiu•MnIrNnMMROF fdMY✓h WNMwYs.YiYl w n4XA.n.P w Pw..,.,.nMwwwM...<x.�YMawYY. uY,M. p o,eNA.m M N1Atln My. �P.'e Pa M F M' wIr• wM11tlW ar•a,IM aMYIMnM Owkr/ W1MIE $EJURIW PTDx COUNTY cOMNUxm DEVEIaMEN1 DiREtTM 11.Am•, u..+..Nsre�.......c.ee�..r w W.,ew r....m.�-.a omEclDx AmPtarce hr 0.e�oMhw 11.MMY E.M.N aw I-.Yn •wqM In I.V Y PY Vy Y R-6el .m AXI: a e. cwm a Ran WwaTaar. Y_.nYt_ 000021 ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPUM LBE EXISTING PATH I BENCHMARK: MD REBAR AND YELLOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' EASING CROSS CULVERT ---------------- POM a BEGINNING �s •Pkp�. `4 BOO' ROW BASED ON M OF EXISTING ROADWAY EAS71NC ROADWAY EXISTING PATH O ACTIVITVSSMVELCPE 82 (ACCESS. UTEITY AN LMOSCA 0.950 ACHES +/- PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH STo0B0D% 35.03 AC +/— `1�\ ` ?9 ;o ;8 \\ \ 3y 32 ?4 #5. 1 •TH '00142 42 40 14 •33 26 / .37 2.837 11 45 41 46 ,43 42 •35 48j6 19 49 0 51932'00'11 47 5�5 53 175 60' 1 PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 s 5 N. s P 52, 55' PROPOSED AC 54 TNTY ENVELOPE PN#1 (BUEDNG UTILITY MD UNSCAG) ` 34 `27 56 6 57. 0.950 ACRE Y/- 13 / Il 5 63 62 6l 6759• 60 68 69 '70 64 6 66 74 fl 72 •72 5 / 75 . 80 .81 83 84 85 / 77 ` � 79 .89 6288 9467 86 is 208 91 9'2 93 •987 .1% no� lol 100 99 104-.;P sso 109 A }u 1A 113 lit 116 N70W U0`E 1 9- .121 .117 234.36' 127 11j' i23 lib e SHEET20F4 GRAPHIC SCALE (WRQ) IW - EU R �I u O z 9 � a�f o ¢ LL 2 ) V € u w¢ W ES I�W� aN U UI al = m O J < PROJECT NO, 21141740.00 SHFE 2 0 \\ 7 8 \\ 9 10 e SHEET20F4 GRAPHIC SCALE (WRQ) IW - EU R �I u O z 9 � a�f o ¢ LL 2 ) V € u w¢ W ES I�W� aN U UI al = m O J < PROJECT NO, 21141740.00 SHFE 2 000022 PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 Soo, W LEGEN A1SK Nf VIE evaP mEc Naval ParMiN mw Dant viol mRan ENA]af PPE4m.Rr ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO GRAPHIC SCALE S53'09'31"E 531.04' - \\\ BENCHMARK: NO R BAP SOPRIS M0 __ — \ AND YULOW CAP #14111 \ AT M.EVATON 8361.13' \� \ —— r ----- - S87'59'31"E I 17 7R' u. ni.•.Itirf c. PM.t...,. ui....,•„d... m. r.. wpa. NN. v. P•HUM�.NN...N uww •PW.P•.m m M Mn.M �sMar MM....eNe. <aeo,Mr •uaE My y> IT Mn NVN. a mN NPOM •IbNM mm.uM FFo•M� w rMav W+. MNrNY. OMrgr I SAMMIE 501AN W PITKIN COONTY COMMINIIY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR M.W MY EMOA M9 M M, rMwl q0 Na•a F Ne Aln laMlr famwiY oM`w+N PPeNM Irw_ AW N _ _, MMMNm A�AAM. x• �wi•�xpaw DIKECiON ANNPMIIa Iw 0.emnlMw tM AmMV emaoo.Ms w ea.raom a ira M n Wn:NP.an WY,eA„JMfa.Iv>nMi. SYn alftlwW.N�e'J�l.,r 4 n,rN_N>� MbY�aP • CMK"PNmEs 11 \ 11 �\ D � N N9 M� ♦ � M 91 l yf° A PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 35.03 AC +/— A PARCELTHO(R SLAN/D BEING PPMWTI �O' THE gst1T/12 W THE SEI/4 W %CTON R�N(ML BT MESTMOP4 ME BIN SPBN AI MOtldAN ANDroBEING'ME N LY OUCRISM AS PCLLOWS: BEING AT THE SOJVH WEST CORNER CP SAID SECTION 34. THENCE 89Ti4'34'E 137.11 PTET ALONG THE SWTH LINE OF SAID SECTIO4 34. THENCE N2011'00'E 789.70 RET: 1HENCE N62WOWW 2BOOO RET: THENCE NN'DO'W'W 1079.78 RET; THENCE N5310'W'W 531.04 RET. WISS'00'W 1221,13 RET W THE SWM WE OP SAID SECTION 33: CONTAINING 35.03 U M fIE OR �E PONT OF BEGINNING. CWNIY OF PITON. STALE OF CCLgHAW N89'51'05"W 1374.28' ACTATY ENYTO.OPE #2 nUw AND LANDSCAPING) ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 ACCESS, UTRITY AND 4G) 0.95 ACRES +/— NOTES: DAZE K SURVEY: OCTOBpi 23R0, 2014. MNLAR UNITS USED W PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE u.s. SURVEY RET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE KOMODO OVIF MAP W SOPAS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED N PIAT 8001( W AT PAIL 28. THIS PROPERTY a WMCT TO R VATONS, R[91MCTIONS. COVENANTS ANO EASEMENTS OF RECORD W IN PUCE THIS WRY WAS PREPARED WTHWT THE BENEFIT OF A TTLE COMMITMENT, THOWORE, ANY E%CEPTIONS TO TRE THAT MAY AFFECT THE wILECT PRCVNTY HAVE NOT BEER R ARCHm BY HIM CWNWY ENONEERNG. INC. ELEVATIONS MOM NEWON ARE BASED W NM M AAEMCM N TICAL DAWN OF 1BSB (MAYO BB) REFERS = MW BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPIJ T COiNEi ON MM, FWNO REBµ MD YELO'M CAP 014111, ELEVATON BMIAS CCROTR INTERVAL EOIALS I FOOT. COt1ER SECTION In, RS". BM PM N89'54'05"W 137.11' SITE q W'. It-pt4 NF1; `f / SHEET 1 OF 4 U z z p Z a ;s O Z � Oo Z u° u -UI iuLL Z W'�W u <a } <Wm = 5G F m0:s Z n Z1 0 01 O dui U 0 D x i 804 W oLa UUO uO= NVI w U W E ZZZ = W 20 0 0: �D Z O 1 0 a. Q YQ� PROJECTNO 2IM7`40.CD SHT T SLOPELEGEND iss-m OIA1Y1 111II1 W RAINA BIFWESSTIOFA THE 6T1 PRNgP SM $MERIDIANE O1 JI'V10 BI]1ND M 8 SOJ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING AT ME SOUTH WEST CORNEA OE SAN SECTION 34: MENGE 8954'M -E 137.11 FEET ALWM ALONG ME SUNE OF SAID SECTION 34: MENGE 420]1'00•[ )69.)0 FEET BODICE N62'S0W-W 280.00 FEET. TIENCE NNW N -W 1078.76 Flit; MENGE N531D'00•W 531.04 FEET 501'35'O0•W 1221A3 FEET M ME SWM INE W SAID SECTION M. 11ENCCEE MMI'M*E 1374.28 {EET TO 11E PONT a BEgNHING CONTANING ]5.0.1 ACRES NIS OR IE55. COUNTY W PIMIN. STATE OF COLORADO. DAZE IF SURVEY: WTGBER 23RN, 2014. WEAR UNUS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. WRAP PEET THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON TIE RECORDED OARVEW MAP OT SONES MOVNTNN RANCH RECORDED N PUT ROOM 30 AT PAGE 2B. THS PROPERTY IS SNB.ECT TO IESENVANCNS R6INCBWs, COVENANTS MID EASEMENTS O RECORD OR IN PLACE" THS SURREY WAS PREPARED VMOIT TIE BENEFIT M A NBE COMMITMENT, MEREFO E. ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE MAT MAY AFMCT THE WBUECT PROPERTY NAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HCH CONTRY ENGINEERING. INC. EIFVATIONS SHC M NEREOI ARE BASED ON NCNM AMENLAN MERDCAL DAVM M 19W (NAM W) REFERENCED FROM BEMCSWIAR% AT N0TED PROPERTY CORNEA ON MAP. FWNO REBAR AND TELLOW CAP /14111, E ATCN 8381.13' CONTO R INTERVAL EOVAS 1 ROUT LEGEN yq..�..mm.wFmwalw.Ii.riu.I..alloab� rax.M.va..w�mmra YvvO tiP CaiNMAa1R IM NMM1.AM1 WPPWMb. W CNr NmVmaY tlmd. tlm w.YW aw YM 4uy nWYwb MFmn.mYArY s9NMtlJm�wW aW.y.mo rava... rM Amwemnmwb>mW maws � �mr Wsra ✓na.n Oo NSAMMIEY Rl. VITgN COUNTY CONNVNILV DEVEItWNENT DIREIIOR nmw. [msw Ns Am er nb�l wa mws M ue Ybw O+Y 4nmuiv m.smm,. Dtft C M .bMY 6nM� Ni Am 0� mNM b AW q F me elks .I Ye OnY .b AON� ah fan1Y a14N. Mb a fab�b. •a 6Y,� gttF bW Rewrbr 000023 SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 hq�N-, m� m LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH qc SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM SIV COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ` 6 ♦ 60.0' ROW BASED ON ♦ ♦♦ CL ♦ PROPERTY OF EXISTING ♦x� ♦ URE ROADWAY - ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ BENtlWARN: NO MAR AND YELLOW _ - - - E%ISTNG ♦ CAP p411t, MI ANN 6361.13' ROADWAY ♦ \ &';TNG ♦♦ \ CROSS N ART ♦♦♦ ° SBTuB'J---------_ ♦ \ 61.68' PANT OF BECMNINC �-'!• _ - - o 0 S6J5931-E 305.66' I --` ----- EXISTING �E = PAIN I 1 \♦ � 11 11 : 1 A � � n 1111 ;£ AC7INTT ENMLOPER 3 Z n 1 (ACCUBU7Y AND LANDSCAPING) E°$TITM E58, 0.950 ACRES W PARCEL 39 \ 0 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH �\ �" go p0% ? 3 1\1 e 0 .< 35.03 AC w «m �yrae 31 ♦. $ m ' 1 P00 32 25 7\\ / °30 109 TT� .40 }6 VYV 7 nem �.a ,WOO 44 34 •33 26 s 9 1♦ 0 -u W 28 :7 ?S m `11 0 45 41 •43 37 N. 11 = a 46 4i .35 `u8 48 49 36 z97 A 0 s19°i47 5�5p o. 53 ?5 \\. / \\ 1]6.6D'70.60' 52, 55, PROPOSED ATY AN ENVFS.OPE p }' "\ SSE (BVILDMC, UT AND UNOSCAPINGJ \ 24/ � ♦ `27 56 58 57. 0.950 ACRES +/- 13 a ♦?Y 6\36,62 62 59' 60 . ¢9 •7° 9 64 9 65 06 .67 74 73 72 .72 7 75 .80 .8183 84 85 / / 9 z Qy W 77. ` 90 '79 .89 8288 9487 86 9s n6 zo8 10 1 g' 91 92 93 .987 .107 rc � "SSii y SO lol Ido 99 104-A* I11 uo 109 10 u < DO"S ll}, 123 Li: m Tt yyEE w f 11t 0000116 470b6'00'E i a. 0. as 119 1 21 .are .217 2]4.x• 12 Us 4m .127 125' ��3 m li6 p 'p J 1wwECT NO GRAPHIC SCALE 3I �T1N.00 (sF�l �e � mWcv •p 9 W SHEET3OF4 m m ,PmNa�e sFEra PRELIMINARY DRIVEWAY GRADING PLAN I PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 gN ------ ------ �` CRDs ------------- OP �' q/� 3 CULVMT LL EDGE OF PROPERTY WAdL ROAD UNE 80- 94- 639P 93M 6370 T 0360 00002 LEGEN pvINO 1p! Ib[ RM p]5101G Y.A1 LOiIIp.R DSING W(F gM1PM NKVO40 .lR CVI16M ® wmb501 Wyl cOlfYix pMIK Box.G.nr ;6 /-6' TALL WALL E 6' TALL WALL AC-nl E NVE OP ` 9z �j ROW \ 1 I 13 �SWNE ` 6' TALL WALL _ a 1 Z TALL 6'TAU- WALL WNL 6' TALL -� •TALL ncnYlTr II.Yc 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y TALL WALL 23 ?9 i8 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ` ' � 20 A PMC41 OE UND 6DNG PMT Qf 1ME 51/I DF TME SEI/4 Oi gC11DH \ \ 3J AMD R ppEP TE SWI/ Oi GN x. TOW G M 6 M. R 8)�0M5 6M M OPAL IERIdM MD BEWG YDNE Fl1LLY \\ \ \ACnVITY `� \`� -32 % G AT THE s N HEST CORNER M SM M"M x: 1NENOE 6931'xt 137.11 E ALONG ME s M UNE OP 6AO 6EOTDN x: 24 25 VELOPE M M N2071.00'f 769.70 RET: MENM N6M'DO•W 2w.M RCT: '40 T M N66n0•DO•W 1076.76 RET: 7ENCE Ns]10•D0•W 931.01 RCT: 'WW •33 SOI•. M1.13 RFT M TE SWM LINE OE sw sEC110N M. TflICE s6PS1•x•E 1]7�.ze fFET To 11E PgNr oP BEp1W1G. I 44 34 [ 26 CIXR RW1 13.0.1 AQiF$ M M IEss. ' Co IY ar PMN. VAN M cQDRADD. ' 28' 17 •31 � 45 4? 46 _ .41 0 35 80- 94- 639P 93M 6370 T 0360 00002 LEGEN pvINO 1p! Ib[ RM p]5101G Y.A1 LOiIIp.R DSING W(F gM1PM NKVO40 .lR CVI16M ® wmb501 Wyl cOlfYix pMIK Box.G.nr ;6 /-6' TALL WALL E 6' TALL WALL AC-nl E NVE OP ` 9z �j rA L ` L ` 6' TALL WALL AC-nl E NVE OP ` 9z 7 5 �\ ArmnTv �\ l6P.006e'VC MSTA14.9).R) R R MELEV.9ya615 S 4WD sw9 .erlmm.enolaY.Im n,u. i..e.� wm,�m a rox mYr ae..eee✓..s.m�.R+ i,®m..n mn mpm Onm me VNwn...MF.wwemeN...N F. Y.OYamwm7 WaM. Pe P.+w. a.m. roe.wm. AYuam Y �. F.m •w.b..mEYN w.b..Yw awW�Ra Nem. a.m.W b1�Fn�imr>mRW WwV •YWn� V �NawFMM' OAR.. ORM / LNNIE 60YRIW m., oelle�paRa.e ...me 1n rnnp Y.xoY wr reaR n.Yw.W wuY qw w.F m.+r rmmunp M1AynM Yviv RY�Cm'a��. aut}t m •.eRnN.. Y, mRew..mF.n DIRECTOR Ag4et N ReroMrm n.wr.a.�r. w w eaa.vomaro rae n oe m1m awe L'nyp fdmYMAFNne el ftlw.v,n�oW4,� in.tli_Y.A_FM tttl PYewraAmn axNn Oxly atl RRR.6n . GRAPHIC SCALE Y Irnrl SHEET 4 OF 4 P ECTNO. 114175 SHT4 SLOPE LEGEND I— Toa (ss wWA1w nuN 1ss ri PROPEEETYDESCR I PTI ON A PARCEL 01' �ND SONG PART OT �ME1SE .ANDDTI(opAp%&gA8��OUTH�DGE I DEING � DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS HONG AT THE SWM WEST CORNER M SAID SECTION 31: THENCE 8951'31•E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH IRR: O SAID SECTION 34; TENCEN2071D0'E 7011.70 FEET. THENCE N62W'W'W 28000 FEET: TENOE NBDTO'O0•W 1078.78 FEET. THENCE MSTO'CO'W 531.01 FEET SOIM'00•W 1221.13 FEET TO TE SOUTH UHE a SAD SECTION 33: THENCE S8951'31•E 1371.28 TO ME POINT 6.i BEGINNING, CONTAINING 35.3 ADZES OR 1X55. COUNTY OF "IN. STATE a CCUMADG. NOTES: DATE M SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD, 2011. WEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVXY 15 BASED ON THE RECORDED OVERVIEW MAP DF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PLAT 800( W AT PAM 28. TES PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESFAVAMMIS RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS W RECORD OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE SOWGT OF A TTX COMMITMENT. TIEPEDRE ANY EXCEPTIONS TO DTIX THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUS E PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIM COUNTRY ENGINEERING. W. ELEVATIONS SHOWN NEEON ARE BASED W NORTH AMERICAN NRTCAL DATUM OF 1888 (NAVE SS) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND MAR AND YELOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 0361.13' CONTOUR INTURVAI. EWALS 1 FOOT FLE—GEN775 L TK bT Yf eRW d51M0.A4t WXTPA —.pp1 MS4R4 MMP RWRII eNlanrt ePwWAer Aw.M•.`Me�r AaMNM.MA.YWamA W MWe mM(YatirA.a.M..�u Nae.rtlu m1YANRN W.PVM.w11A�ovPnPR NFa1�NADNIPq Nd, n w W M• Y u. HMn 4uNv �4Y W. m �a F.n wv MRu. w MM MY w sYw a EDN^.^+ W W nW y Y A. AanMdY. a WMypa.M mllgMbn,,.eu� MywwMN• �v d � oAemv. 6ANv / SAIMIE SCHAN W ITT9N c"Ntt connuNm DEve1DPNENT 01REc7aR mvYmt U.®N�YY• �M uwiro DIR CTOK AnMenm M ReuNNo IH Amar 6.4• wP nM � .zwe n. MMM F w 6.w a w (MM1 a Ro,r au. c..n a WNA�, TED amis.m, a_oma Ebk.IL RemrEn 000025 PARCEL ID:2465-334-01-016 SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP�W LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH" SECTION 33.34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM sil6 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO `\ 80.0' ROW / ♦ ` BASED ON W PROPERTY `♦ MISTING/ \ WE ROADWAY ♦\ BENOMAPK: NO R®AR AND Yt110W D087MG \♦ CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8381.13' ROADWAY EXISTING CROSS \\ C CULVERT _ _ �\ 851 BD3 PCNT°F BEDINNWG `1 -� 58759']1 E 305.66' j`_ , EgSTNG 1e8 A .� - �\ w III ` \♦\\, "�_�c �i 11111l , `'sJ Z 1 !�� . `\ ` 1111 `4 ACTIVITY ENVTLOPE #2 1 (ACCM UIEITY AND LANDSCAPING)''- -- DDBATH ; 0.950 ACRES +/- ��♦ `) D•' G O 4/ W PARCEL 39 �' s \, M1,: W g 0 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 5,°G�pOj \ �'VI ;�7 u 35.03 AC +/— ` / .9 z0 >e \ �� w 6.w w \\ / <1 14 35 \7 \\\ / Z �g _ ._ - 40 34 •33 z6 i6 ♦�\\ 3; E�`m p O H. .37 28 i7 3i \U 5 / �;, U i 45 41 46 •43 41 .35 `i29 4? 4P 36 19 m 7 p `o. s1152'oD'E 47 51; � ?5 / 176.00' 52, 55. PROPOSED ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 12 S4 (BOLDING, UTWTY AND LANDSCAPING) ` 14�\ 1227 56 57• 0.950 ACRES f/_ lj / n \, `3 y 63 6x .6759 60 68 69 •70 8 64` 6546 76. .fl 72n 7� u Qy 77 75 78 000 7986. 892 8 893 87 8 86 9s5 a� 108 ib Ii > sJ 90 91 9z 93 94 •98 7 1017 0 Q 30 103 160 99 104• in 110 109 pp= U Q o. \,3 115 114 ?33W Q 112 N N w E o' 116 N70-08 Co'E i 1 O .117 231 3E' i 03 4'C�I 127 125 113 O m 116 yp J ■ FRCUECTNO. GRAPHIC SCALE i 21417M.00 (nrSHEET 3OF4 w d m m^ SHT3 PRELIMINARY DRIVEWAY GRADING PLAN �pqRR q cRoss ---- CULVERT PR OUNTp�N R -' - O� EDGE OF PROPERTY 6' TALL --%74 ROAD UNE WALL i -/-�- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A PARCEL O U D BTT�pE(1EETNTG PART // TE SS1/E W ME SE11M/4 a SECIIj FANµ 87 A OWS: BTI SPWPo44 P II@ 34. aI1N P 8E NLLY BSMG AT TE SWM HEST CDRMER OF SAD SEOTON N: THENCE 893 '34'E 137.11 FEET AILIIG TE S W IRE 6 SAD STSTW M. TENCEN202t'00'E 789.70 RET: MINCE N62WWW 280.00 FEET: IMM NWVO'OD'W 107&'!8 FEET. MINCE N5310'00'W 831.04 FEET: SCI1'DD•W 1221.13 FEET TO NNE SOUM UK OP S/8D SECTION 33; TENQ Ma I'MTI 'E 1374.28 FEET TO E KMT a MMNwG. CWT INO 35.03 ACRE MME OR IE85. CO9NTY GE P . VAX OF COIfMADO 0410 8040 8340 8360 8310 " 8360 LEGEN oaslRpR pnr uxE LVy �9 uaI]R Ni1pIR RWr pSIMG WA CCMNR ® MW 040 YA[N PN' lOA ® MO164➢ Wd CWIWR pq,dS pWxOMY 0' ROW ` WALL �SWAIE ` 2 WAIL 6' TALL IYALL 6' TML �'+� T ACTNTY ` �ENYIELaPe ` 2' TALL WALL ` z3� ?9 18 ` 20 ACTIVITY \000 32 '4 �5 *1 VELOPE .40 3.4 •33 ?6 28 17 '37 4? •a1 42 e35 0000 IV 45 46 - LLL WALL w TALL WALL B' TALL WALL 2' TALL WALL b a _S' TALL wALL ALL _ 3'T WALL ` - 6' TALL 2' TAIL -- WALL WALL 2' TALL ACTIMTY / - WALL ENVELOP 82 ` 14 AB' TALL WALL _ , {2• ��J 6TALL , ` WALL 6' TALL WALL - , \\ 7 6' W� 36 \\ 21 \\ � iW.0000•YE MSTAd4y9.RT MELEV.64 5 ^ Y 1 J 00002 3040 Owe s•ao PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 i3 N NVbuMMM.YEaM ti'Y I'�RFea F�rmN N MIM fa Ap p W R4bsawWauNMM n.FN npp.,Mexw FMn...,YnFu.mmY. wa MraW emNNWNaM. FM dllY Mm. win �w•mY.. m,�F.v.n w...FeX ur.�.m.dwra w�x11 M Irw Imn NnN.. w tlW •opvN nMNeWi rwwes+Opuu.mw M Maf d.nY ertgM. DYnMr/SAMMIE 90 w pIIKIX CdIN1Y COMMVNT' OA/PLOMIM 010.lCIpR 11Y RR.WY4al1e W wean �wY.N+N MT'e•mMMRN.fdrnY [mn.+R� YrMpp Rav M_OR d _,� xaMa m IYdWb rt¢•W xrmdYw b. DIRERO0. A®eurce Em Remrmnp .[Mv EnNlyepYplrr ORn eame�m rn Rnp In ae ellYa d M 6n N. vara MRF. pmmaudNe.a e m.M�RMa�NeN bi�wp anuVln OMF M18 R4mNer GRAPHIC SCALE (w F99T 1 t ye4. Po R SHEET 4 OF 4 PROJCCTNO 2191746 SHT4 Davis Horn• PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING January 17, 2011 Mike Kraemer Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope Review With Vested Property Rights Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39 - PID # 2465-334-01-016 Dear Mike: Davis Horn Incorporated represents Sandra Schiralli in this request for land use approvals for her property on West Sopris Creek Road in the Sopris Mountain Ranch Subdivision. The applicant is W requesting approval for an Activity Envelope with Vested Property Rights. The lot previously obtained 1041 Site Plan Review approvals but the vesting for that approval expired on April 19, 2008. The property was also approved as a TDR Receiver Site. Attachment 1 is a Vicinity Map WOO which shows the location of the 35.03 acre property. 0 0 This land use application includes the following sections. • Background; • Site Description; • Project Description; • Land Use Approvals; and • Summary. BACKGROUND On April 19, 2005, the Pitkin County Hearing Officer approved Determination No. 12-2005 which granted approval for the Schiralli 1041 Hazard Review as well as Special Review and GMQS Exemption for use of TDRs for additional floor area up to 15,000 square feet. (See Attachment 2 for the approval resolution.) The approved 1041 Hazard Review Plan was not recorded, but has been used to create the current Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan. The vested property rights for these approvals expired on April 19, 2008. In July, 1991, the property received 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission approval through the Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 91-55. Subsequent extensions and ALICE DAVIS AICP S GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 970/925-6587 • FAX: 970/925,5180 000001 o4 4 _ ® reinstatements of vested right pursuant to BOCC Resolution Nos. 96-312 and 99-2001 were also ® granted. These three documents are found in Attachments 3, 4 and 5 to this application. • In November 1991, approximately 31 lots in Sopris Mountain Ranch, the subject subdivision, ® were granted 1041 Hazard Review approval and were given a vesting period of 15 years. The ® vested property rights for these 31 lots, therefore, did not expire until 2006. The subject property, Lot 39, was not included as one of these 31 lots, though confusion did exist over time as the County and the owner both, at different times, thought Lot 39 was one of these 31 lots. • As summarized above, the most recent approvals for the subject property were obtained in 2005 • and vesting expired in 2008. This approval allowed 15,000 square feet of floor area for the site with TDRs. Since that time, the Snowmass Creek Caucus and Pitkin County have limited the allowable floor area in this valley to 8,250 square feet. ® The current proposal moves the proposed Activity Envelope #I immediately south of the building ® envelope approved in 2005 due to new input from the Division of Wildlife and information in a new report from Jonathan Lowsky of Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC. The previously proposed 1p access envelope is also moved slightly south (now Activity Envelope #2) to avoid a stand of ® aspen trees, a condition of the 2005 approval. The new proposal also reflects a reduction in the allowed floor area from 15,000 square feet approved in 2005 to a much lower allowed floor area of 8,250 square feet. Please refer to Attachment 6, an aerial photograph of the subject property ® which shows the previously approved building envelope and the newly proposed Activity ® Envelope #1. Topography and vegetation can be seen on the photograph. ® This application and all the supporting documents will also reflect current Code language and S terminology. SITE DESCRIPTION Attachment 7 depicts the proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan. A slope analysis of the ® Activity Envelopes is found on page two of the Plan. As required, the slope analysis shows slopes between 0 and 15% in grade, 15 to 30% in grade, 30 to 45% in grade and over 45%. The property rises gently to a relatively level bench where the new building envelope is proposed. This level area is less visible from West Sopris Creek Road as the slope rising below the bench • creates a visual buffer. There is also a knoll on the property and the two proposed Activity Envelopes have been sited behind the knoll which also limits visibility from Sopris Creek Road and the roads within Sopris Mountain Ranch. Additionally the envelopes have been sited below • certain elevations to further limit visual impact and impact on wildlife habitat nearby. The site is accessed off West Sopris Creek Road. S s 2 s a 000002 fl PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting the necessary approvals to develop a single family home and accessory uses up to 8,250 square feet. Hearing Officer Determination No. 12-2005 granted Special Review approval to use four Transferable Development Right (TDRs) for additional floor area on the subject site. The County approval of the property as a TDR receiver site does not lapse. Therefore, this application does not need special review approval as a TDR receiver site. However, due to zoning changes in the West Sopris Creek Valley, floor area is limited to 8,250 S square feet. The proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan depicts two Activity Envelopes. Activity Envelope #1 will contain the buildings, utilities and landscaping while Activity Envelope #2 will © contain the access driveway, utilities and landscaping. Activity Envelope #1 has been moved }J south from that location approved in 2005 to avoid oak brush vegetation which is important to E.., deer and elk in the area. Activity Envelope #2 has been moved east to avoid a stand of aspen trees as that was a condition of the 2005 approval. The line of the edge of this stand of aspen has co been added to the Activity Envelope Plan to demonstrate that the Envelope does not encroach upon the aspen trees. The access drive will enter from the north side of the property and will ® follow the topography to the west and hook around to the south to connect with Activity Envelope #1 where the structures will be located. LAND USE APPROVALS ® The following sections address the land use approvals identified in the pre -application conference. The pre -application conference summary sheet appears as Attachment 8. The applicant is seeking the following land use approvals. ® • Activity Envelope Criteria for Approval (Section 2-30-20 g); Activity Envelope (Section 7-10-50); • Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes (Section 7-20-20): • Water Courses and Drainage (Section 7-20-30); • Wildfire Hazard — Mapped as High Wildfire Hazard (Section 7-20-60); • Wildlife — Mapped as Elk Production Area (Sec7-20-70); S ® Vested Property Rights (Section 2-20-170) are also requested. The above referenced sections of the Land Use Code are addressed below. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with the applicable requirements in these sections of the Code. Activity Envelope Criteria for Approval s Section 2-30-20(8)(3) An application for designation of an Activity Envelope shall be approved if it complies with the standards and criteria established in Sec. 7-10-50. If the applicant chooses to apply for definition of an Activity Envelope separately from approval of a Site Plan , the Activity Envelope shall be w 3 000003 designed to accommodate the largest home and related septic field possible on the site pursuant to Table 5-1 after the use of TDRs or a GMQS allocation to increase house size. The definition of �i an Activity Envelope based on a maximum house size and septic field shall not create any presumption that a Site Plan for a house at the same size can or will be approved pursuant to this Land Use Code. The applicant may specify that the Activity Envelope is being created for a house Q smaller than the maximum allowed under Table 5-1, and in that event the Activity Envelope will be designed to accommodate a house and septic field of that size. Where the property contains Constrained Area s, the Community Development Department staff shall follow those Priorities for ® Locating New Activity or Development listed in Sec. 7-10-60. Actual siting of the septic field shall require final approval pursuant to the Environmental Health and Natural Resources On -Site Wastewater Treatment System regulations. ® The proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan is depicted on Attachment 7. The two Activity Envelopes have been designed to avoid constrained areas to the maximum extent possible. As shown on the slope analysis in Attachment 7, much of the land in the Activity Envelope is 0 to 15% in grade with a section between 15 and 30% in grade. The home will be located above a slight knoll which will minimizes the height, bulk, mass and visibility of the proposed home. Site Plan approval is not being requested at this time but the Activity Envelopes proposed will accommodate any reasonable possibilities for a future Site Plan as a Site Plan is not proposed at this time. ® Activity Envelope Section 7-10-50 �r ® The intent of this Chapter 7 is to allow activities and development to take place where they comply ® with the provisions of this Land Use Code and with the Pitkin County Comprehensive Plan for the area. Compliance will generally involve avoidance of "Constrained Areas" through the ® identification of an "Activity Envelope," as well as approval of a Site Plan. For purposes of Chapter 7, "Constrained Areas" include all areas included in each of the following categories, as defined ® and regulated by this Land Use Code: (i) Areas of Statewide Interest listed in C.R.S. 24-65.1-101 at. ® seq.), (ii) steep and potentially unstable slopes, (Iii) water courses, drainage channels, and areas subject to erosion, (iv) floodplain hazard areas, (v) geological hazard areas, (vi) severe or low to ® moderate wildfire hazard areas, (vii) wildlife habitat areas, (viii) river and stream corridors and wetlands (ix) irrigated lands for food or crop production, (x) historic preservation areas, and (xi) archeological resource areas. The Site Plan process incorporates an "Activity Envelope" approach in which the County staff works with the applicant to determine which portions of the site (if any) would permit the proposed activity or development to be conducted in compliance with this Land Use Code and in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan for the area. In general, this process will involve both a determination of (1) which portions of the site are not available for development because of the existence of Constrained Areas, and (ii) of the remaining portions of the site, which areas would ® accommodate the activity or development so as to minimize impacts on surrounding properties, ® maximize compliance with the requirements of the development standards in this Chapter 7, and maximize compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. In general, the defined Activity Envelope for development of primary uses shall be large enough to accommodate the proposed principal use of the property and traditional permitted accessory structures, Infrastructure (roads and septic systems), and uses, but should not be significantly larger than the area needed for such structures. In the case of a site with few Constrained Areas, the defined Activity Envelope may include more than one potential building site for a new single family home. The defined Activity Envelope may include non-contiguous areas (including separate areas for septic fields, landscaping, driveways to public roads, mitigation measures required in 4 s fD UU0004 ® connection with any provision of this Chapter 7, and/or areas to be disturbed only during construction on the property — including staging areas and materials storage areas). Construction ® of trails will not require an Activity Envelope analysis except as required by Sec. 7-20-50. • Clearing, grading, grubbing, earthmoving that exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards, or changes in the ® natural drainage of the site shall occur only after an Activity Envelope has been defined and all applicable local, state and federal permits have been obtained. In addition, Site Plan Approval is ® required if these activities will occur on a property within a Scenic View Protection Area. Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review for a Stream Restoration Project shall adhere to all development standards in 7-20-40 and 7-20-80 and shall be reviewed by the BOCC as set forth in Table 2-1. Once an Activity Envelope has been defined, the natural grade, topography, vegetation and • drainage of areas outside the defined areas shall not be disturbed except as specifically permitted in this Land Use Code. Prior to any development activity on the parcel, the boundaries of the Activity Envelope shall be identified with construction fencing, and such fencing shall remain in place until development has been completed. Q While it is preferable to obtain approval of an Activity Envelope as part of the Site Plan approval process, applicants who are not prepared to submit a Site Plan for a specific structure may request ® approval of an Activity Envelope separately. Prior to the Issuance of a Development Permit, the applicant shall be required to apply for and obtain approval of a Site Plan confirming that the proposed development is consistent with the defined Activity Envelope and with other standards in this Land Use Code not considered at the time the Activity Envelope was defined. ® The standards in this Chapter 7 shall be used (1) to identify the Activity Envelope on a property, (ii) to review and approve the Site Plan for proposed development, and (Ili) to regulate development ® within the Activity Envelope pursuant to the Site Plan. Development Standards in this Chapter 7 ® which are to be reviewed as part of Activity Envelope and Site Plan review are set forth in Table 7-1 ® This section of the Land Use Code explains the Site Plan and Activity Envelope review and approval process. The applicant is only requesting Activity Envelope Plan approval at this time, • and has followed the applicable process outlined in this section to prepare the Activity Envelope Plan. The key site planning considerations on the subject site are avoiding constrained areas ® which include wildfire, nearby wildlife hazards and slope. Also, developing an Activity Envelope which is compatible with neighboring properties and consistent with the Pitkin County Master • Overview Master Plan and applicable Emma Area 2008 Master Plan has been important. The • proposed Activity Envelope Plan is based upon these critical factors and the proposal reflects the most appropriate areas for the proposed uses. As called for in the Emma Area 2008 Master Plan, the size of the proposed home has been reduced from the 15,000 square feet previously • approved. The site is approved for 8,250 square feet of floor area. The proposal is consistent with the applicable vision, goals, objectives and implementation measures of the Plan. Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes ® Section 7-20-20 The following provisions shall apply whenever steep slopes or potentially unstable slopes occur within the Activity Envelope, but do not apply when the Activity Envelope have been defined to ® avoid such areas. Please refer to Attachment 7, page 2, a slope analysis of the property which depicts slopes in the categories identified in this section. The slopes in the Activity Envelopes are less than 30 percent. s 5 • 000005 Slope Delineation Slopes shall be delineated within the Activity Envelope with two (2) foot contour intervals. Slopes between each two (2) foot contour in each of the following categories shall be designated by a distinct graphic pattern. (1) Slopes that are fifteen (15) percent or greater, but less than thirty (30) percent; (2) Slopes that are thirty (30) percent or greater, but less than forty-five (45) percent; (3) Slopes that are forty-five (45) percent or greater. Forty-five (45) Percent or Greater Gradient ® Development is prohibited on slopes with a slope gradient equal to or exceeding forty-five (45) percent, except: (4) Where: The lot is In a legally platted subdivision, recorded prior to 1972, and There is no alternative building site that avoids areas of slope exceeding forty-five (45) percent, and An engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado demonstrates that the site can be engineered so that there is no hazard posed by the location of development on such slopes, and The proposed development complies with all standards in subsection (c)(1) below applicable to slopes of thirty (30) percent or greater; and �✓ (5) As provided in subsections (c)(3) or (c)(4) below. (b) Thirty (30) Percent or Greater Gradient Development is prohibited on slopes with a slope gradient of thirty (30) percent or more, except as ® follows: fl (1) NO ALTERNATIVE BUILDING SITE If there is no alternative building site available on the parcel with slopes of less than thirty (30) percent, development (but not roads or driveways) may be approved by the Community Development Department through the Site Plan process subject to the following development ® standards: ® An engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado shall be required to demonstrate ® that the site can be engineered so that there is no hazard posed by the location of development on such slopes. To the extent possible, the development shall be designed so as to: avoid adding water to the site that would cause decreased stability; avoid removing the toe of the slope without adequate mechanical support; avoid Increasing the weight load on top of the slope; re - contour disturbed slopes so that they can be re -vegetated; avoid steepening of existing slopes. Any development approved pursuant to this section shall be conditioned upon compliance ® with the engineer or geologist's recommended mitigation measures. Following Site Plan review, and prior to the application for a Building Permit, a precise engineer or geologist approved mitigation plan shall be submitted by the applicant that shows the area of disturbed slope, any re -grading required and the exact size and location ® of all mitigation devices. The mitigation measures must be determined by the Community Development Department to be the least visually and ecologically obtrusive alternatives. • (2) PARCELS WITH SOME AREAS OF LESS THAN THIRTY (30) PERCENT SLOPES ® 6 U100006 If a parcel contains areas with less than thirty (30) percent slopes that are accessible by a road or driveway that meets the requirements of this Land Use Code, but such areas (after exclusion of Constrained Areas) are not large enough to develop the floor area permitted by underlying zoning, then areas containing slopes of less than thirty (30) percent must be utilized to develop as much of the floor area as can feasibly be accommodated. Areas containing slopes of thirty (30) percent or greater (but not exceeding forty-five (45) percent) may then be used for development of the remainder of the permitted floor area. The resulting area specified for development should define a contiguous area with slopes of less than thirty (30) percent to the maximum extent practicable. Development on slopes equal to or exceeding thirty (30) percent (but less than or equal to forty-five (45) percent) shall be subject to the development standards in Sec. 7-20- 20(c)(1)(a) through (d)., and shall minimize disruption of natural terrain as viewed from any of those roads identified in Sec. 7-20-120(b). (3) MINOR SLOPE ANOMALY Through the Site Plan process, exceptions for minor changes in slope -development may be permitted on lands that have a slope equal to or in excess of thirty (30) percent when the slope is due to the presence of a minor natural or minor man-made change in the gradient of a continuous slope, provided that an engineer or geologist licensed in the State of Colorado demonstrates that the slope's ground surface is not prone to instability or failure and that the proposed development will not cause greater instability or increase the potential for slope failure. (c) Less Than Thirty (30) Percent Gradient Development is permitted on sidkes with less than a thirty (30) percent gradient. (d) Additional Standards All activity and development on slopes with a gradient of thirty (30) percent or greater shall comply with the following standards. ' (1) DENSITY SLOPE REDUCTION If more than thirty (30) percent of the total land area of parcel is encumbered with slopes of forty- five (45) percent or greater, the maximum permitted density of development on the parcel shall be reduced pursuant to Sec. 5-10-20. This standard is not applicable. (2) LIMITS ON CHANGING NATURAL GRADE The original, natural grade of areas within the Activity Envelope shall not be raised or lowered more than four (4) feet at any point for construction of any structure or improvement, except: (a) The site's original grade may be raised or lowered a maximum of seven (7) feet if retaining walls are used to reduce the steepness of man-made slopes, provided that the retaining walls comply with the requirements set forth in this section. (b) As necessary to construct a driveway from the street to a garage or parking area, grade changes or retaining walls up to seven (7) feet may be allowed. U'00007 ►1 The applicant will comply with this standard. (3) GRADING FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING PADS DISCOURAGED • Separate building pads for accessory buildings and structures other than garages, such as tennis courts, swimming pools, outbuildings, and similar facilities, shall be discouraged except where the ® natural slope is twenty (20) percent or less. ® This requirement will be met. ® (4) LIMITS ON GRADED, EXCAVATED, OR FILLED MAN-MADE SLOPES ® (a) Where grading, excavation, or filling is necessary, grading, excavation, or filling to create slopes of twenty-five (25) percent or less is strongly encouraged. ® (b) Graded or filled man-made slopes shall not exceed a slope of fifty (50) percent. (c) Cut man-made surfaces or slopes shall not exceed a slope of fifty (50) percent unless �r a soils engineering or a geotechnical report is furnished stating that the site has been investigated and that in the opinion of a qualified professional a cut at a steeper slope will be stable and not create a hazard to public or private property. ® (d) All cut, filled, and graded slopes shall be recontoured to the natural, varied contour �+ of the surrounding terrain. ® The applicant will comply with the preceding standards. ® (5) GUIDELINES FOR RETAINING WALLS (a) Use of retaining walls is encouraged to reduce the steepness of man-made slopes and to provide planting pockets conducive to revegetation. Retaining walls may be permitted to support steep slopes but should not exceed four (4) feet in height from the finished grade, i except for (i) a structure's foundation wall, or (ii) as necessary to construct a driveway from the street to a garage or parking area, or (iii) as otherwise expressly allowed by this Land Use Code. ® (b) A retaining wall should not exceed seven (7) feet in height. Retaining walls greater than four (4) feet in height shall be supported by appropriate engineering and reviewed and ® approved by the County Engineer. S (c) Terracing should be limited to two (2) tiers. The width of the terrace between any two four (4) foot vertical retaining walls should be at least three (3) feet. Retaining walls higher than four (4) feet should be separated from any other retaining wall by a minimum of five (5) horizontal feet. Terraces created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped ® or revegetated with native vegetation. (d) Retaining walls used to support existing road cuts may exceed (a), (b), and (c) of these guidelines. The applicant will comply with this requirement. (6) STANDARDS FOR RETAINING WALLS 8 ® p 000008 ® (a) Retaining walls shall be faced with stone or earth -colored materials similar to the ® surrounding natural landscape. . (b) All retaining walls shall comply with the adopted building code, except that when any provision of this section conflicts with any provision set forth in the adopted building code, the more restrictive provision shall apply. The applicant will comply with these standards. (7) DETENTION/STORMWATER FACILITIES Where detention basins and other storm and erosion control facilities may be required, any negative visual and aesthetic impacts on the natural landscape and topography shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. ® The applicant will be in compliance with this standard. (8) UTILITY CUTS Utility cuts on any slope with a gradient of fifteen (15) percent or greater shall be reviewed through the Site Plan process. ® The project will be in compliance with this standard. (9) REVEGETATION REQUIRED Any slope exposed or created In new development shall be landscaped or revegetated pursuant to the standards and provisions set forth In Sec. 7-20-130 as well as the revegetation standards in the Pitkin County Revegetation Guide, the Pitkin County Landscaping Guidelines maintained by the Pitkin County Public Works Department, and the Roadway Landscaping Guidelines included in the Pitkin County Asset Management Plan, as applicable. In the event those documents contain . inconsistent requirements with regard to a particular area of land, the stricter provision shall govern. The applicant will comply with this Code standard. a Water Courses and Drainage • Section 7-20-30 There is no water course in proximity to the subject property. West Sopris Creek is the closest ® water course and not in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This section demonstrates ® compliance with the Land Use Code standards for Water Courses and Drainage. (a) Applicability d The water resources standards in this Sec. 7-20-30 are applicable to all development. 9 ® 0000O9 N (b) Encroachment or Channeling Encroachment or channeling activities in a river, stream (including intermittent streams), pond, wet ® meadow, or wetland are also subject to the requirements of Secs. 7-20-40 and 7-20-80 of this Land • Use Code, as well as all other applicable state and federal statutes and regulations (including, but not limited to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting requirements of Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act). The applicant will not alter any rivers, streams, ponds, wet meadows or wetlands on the site or in the site vicinity as there are none in the site vicinity. Historical drainage patterns off site will not be impacted. (C) Drainage i (1) GENERAL Activities and development shall provide for: (a) Maintenance of historical flow patterns and runoff amounts to reasonably preserve the ® natural character of an area and prevent property damage attributable to runoff rate and velocity Increases, diversions, unplanned ponding and/or stormwater runoff; (b) The unimpeded flow of natural water courses and ditches; ® (c) Adequate drainage for allloyy. points; ® (d) A drainage system designed to account for an entire drainage basin capable of accommodating runoff from a proposed development and, where applicable, the runoff from ® areas adjacent and upstream; • (e) Maintenance of drainage systems; and . (f) On-site treatment of stormwater by use of best management practices designed to detain and allow infiltration of runoff prior to discharge to any water body. ® (2) Runoff Volumes Runoff volumes and peaks within a development site and In areas affected by runoff from a ® development site shall not exceed the runoff levels attributable to the undeveloped site as determined by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. This standard will be met. Historic flow patterns and runoff amounts will be preserved and the ® proposed project will not negatively impact these patterns and amounts. (d) Groundwater ® Activities and development shall not result in the introduction of any contaminants to groundwater, ® or interfere with any recharge area or aquifer. ® The applicant will comply with this Land Use Code standard. (� (e) Irrigated Areas Activities and development shall: (1) Not adversely affect the adequacy of water supplies available for the irrigation of agricultural lands; and 10 ir'� EE''!! jj1l (2) Not adversely affect the exercise of any existing and decreed irrigation water right. Water rights and irrigation will not be affected by the proposed development. (f) Irrigation Ditches Activities and development shall: (1) ACCESS Provide for access to Irrigation ditches by ditch owners and to the public if a ditch is to be, or is part of the Pitkin County Open Space and Trails System or other public property. (2) PREVENTING LEAKAGE Ensure that no building shall be constructed Immediately downhill of a ditch unless the ditch can be placed in a culvert, lined, or otherwise treated to avoid leakage of water downhill towards the building. • (3) AVOID FLOODING Design land uses to avoid flooding problems from flood irrigation. (4) AVOID SEEPAGE Place basements and soil absorption on-site wastewater treatment systems in locations where they will not be impacted by flood irrigation or seepage from irrigation ditches. ® Irrigation ditches on the property will not be affected by the proposed plan. ® (g) Sedimentation Activities and development shall: (1) CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION Provide adequate sedimentation control throughout all phases of development. (2) SEDIMENTATION Retain sediment produced by soil disturbances on site where the disturbance occurs and prohibit run-off Into any water body, wetlands, or riparian area. ® (3) REVEGETATION ® Revegetate clearing and grading as soon as possible, but in no event longer than one growing season after conclusion of development on a site. The applicant will comply with these standards. • (h) Water Quality (1) All land uses shall comply with those setbacks required by Sec. 7-20-80 and those setbacks required by Table 5-1. ® (2) Activities and development shall comply with all state and federal statutes and regulations concerning the protection and enhancement of water quality (including but not limited to the requirements of all state and federal permitting programs). (3) Activities and development shall be consistent with maintenance of the Stream Classifications for the Roaring Fork River watershed, as identified in Section 208 of the Roaring Fork Watershed Management Plan, and shall comply with state regulations pertaining to maintenance of those classifications. I1 ® 000011 The applicant will comply with these standards. (i) Efficient Water Use Activities and development shall emphasize the most efficient use of water, including, to the extent permissible under law, the re -cycling and reuse of water. The applicant will comply with Code standards. Wildfire Hazard Areas Section 7-20-60 The subject site has been mapped as having low to severe wildfire hazard areas. As before, the applicant will abide by the numerous wildfire conditions previously approved by Pitkin County. The applicant will comply with all applicable wildfire mitigation measures detailed in the Pitkin County Land Use Code and any new requirements which may have been adopted since these approvals were granted which will minimize wildfire hazard. The applicant will comply with this Code section. Wildlife Habitat Section 7-20-70 (a) Wildlife Habitat Areas The west and south sides of the subject property are mapped as a wildlife habitat. In the previous review and approval, the Department of Wildlife required that the Activity Envelope be located east of the aspen trees on the property as these delineate the edge of the wildlife impact area which is located west of these trees. This condition of the 2005 approval required that the Activity Envelope be moved to avoid the stand of aspen trees. The currently proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Site Plan reflects this condition of the previous approval. As a part of this current land use application, Jonathan Lowsky, a wildlife expert with Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC, completed a full new Ecological Assessment of Residential Development for the subject site dated September 7, 2010. The report includes information from recent and previous site visits, including several site inspections with the Colorado Division of Wildlife. During a recent site visit with the Division of Wildlife, it was determined that moving the previously approved building envelope (Activity Envelope #1 in the newly proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan in Attachment 7) south and up the hill toward a level bench would create a superior location for wildlife protection. Attachment 6, an ortho photo, depicts the relocation of the Activity Envelope slightly to the south. This new location completely avoids the oak brush which serves as forage for deer and elk and is more sensitive to the needs and patterns of wildlife in the area. Lowsky's new report therefore recommends the relocation of the Activity Envelope to this level bench and the applicant has made this change in the current request. Not only does moving the Activity Envelope back up the hill create a superior location in meeting the needs of and protecting wildlife, it becomes even less visible from West Sopris Creek Road and the roads within Sopris Mountain Ranch. Lowsky's report is found in Attachment 9 to this application. 12 000012 w • • • The applicant has considered the following General Principles and Standards in identifying the Activity Envelopes. • • (b) General Principles Delineation of the Activity Envelope, and the location and design of activities and structures within the Activity Envelope, shall be based on consideration of the five (5) principles listed in • subsections (1) through (5) below. These principles shall be evaluated not only on a site specific basis, but should also be used to consider the location and role of the property in the context of • larger habitat and wildlife patterns. Implementation of these principles may also include ® consideration of connectivity between other parcels and the cumulative effect of the proposed activity or development in light of other activity in the area affecting related habitat areas. ® Approved development shall: ® (1) Maintain large, intact areas of native vegetation and habitat area by preventing fragmentation ® of those patches by development. �^ (2) Protect rare landscape elements such as locally rare vegetation, unique rock formations, sheltered draws or drainage ways, or other features, and guide development towards areas of �rf landscape containing more common elements. (3) Maintain connections among wildlife habitats by identifying and protecting corridors for ® movement. (4) Contribute to the regional protection of rare species by protecting their habitat locally. • (5) Minimize the combined and cpmulatrve impacts of activities and development on wildlife species, wildlife habitat, wildlikiii6yement, and unique landscape elements. • The proposed Activity Envelopes include Activity Envelope #1, where the structures, utilities • and landscaping will be located and Activity Envelope #2, which will include the access drive, • utilities and landscaping. As mentioned previously, Activity Envelope #1 is moved south and up ®the hill to avoid oak brush vegetation further removed from wildlife impacts and Activity • Envelope #2 is moved east to avoid a stand of aspen trees. The proposed Activity Envelopes maintain large, intact areas of native vegetation and habitat areas, and protect the aspen grove to • the west used by the wildlife in the area. The connections among wildlife habitats and corridors have been considered and are maintained with the preservation of the land outside the proposed • Activity Envelopes to the west of the site and on the west side of the site. (C) General Standards • The standards in this section apply to all wildlife habitat areas shown on the Species Activity Maps ® or field verified by a wildlife expert approved by the County, or by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. ® (1) When existing native vegetation must be altered within the Activity Envelope, the applicant may be required to prepare a habitat mitigation plan acceptable to the County. Such mitigation • plan may substitute (in a nearby area on the subject property) vegetation equal in type and • quantity to that being removed to mitigate effects on wildlife species. Should there be no opportunity on the property for habitat mitigation or restoration, off-site mitigation benefiting • the same species may be required, or financial mitigation may be paid into a County habitat • mitigation fund should such a fund be established in the future. • (2) Manipulation of vegetation outside of the Activity Envelope is prohibited. ® 13 • 0 ® (3) Mesh or woven wire fences are prohibited outside the Activity Envelope. • (4) Wood rail fencing shall employ three (3) rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed fifty-four (54) inches in height above ground level, and twelve (12) inches in width (top • view), and shall have at least eighteen (18) inches between the lower two (2) rails. • (5) Wire fencing must be three (3) strands or less. The top wire should be a twelve -point -five (12.5) • gauge twisted barbless type at a maximum height of forty-two (42) inches. The middle strands (which may be barbed) should be located a minimum twelve (12) inches apart and from the top wire preventing entanglement when mule deer jump over. The bottom strand should be • sixteen (16) inches from the ground. (6) Tall overly mature trees and standing dead trees (snags) should be retained at the rate of two • (2) to five (5) per acre whenever possible as nesting and perching habitat. • (7) In areas of high black bear activity, fruit bearing trees and shrubs shall be prohibited within • the Activity Envelope. This does not Include pre-existing native trees and shrubs. • (8) Development shall be clustered to the maximum extent possible to minimize impact on wildlife. ® (9) Access shall be provided to the Colorado Division of Wildlife for trapping, tagging, studying, or otherwise managing wildlife. • (10) Trash/garbage shall be kept in an approved bear resistant container or enclosure. ® (11) Bird feeders, including hummingbird feeders, shall be hung away from any deck or window, and be at least ten (10) feet from the ground suspended between two (2) trees or posts. All • seed feeders shall include a seed catchment pan to catch discarded seed. ® (12) Horse grains, pellets, and cookies shall be stored in bear resistant containers. • (13) Pet food shall not be left outside. ® The applicant will agree to all the applicable wildlife mitigation above. The site's wildlife • hazards have been studied extensively during the previous reviews and in the current land use ® application. The Department of. Wildlife's previous recommendations were made conditions of approval and the applicant still agrees to these conditions. The new recommendations of the • Department of Wildlife and Jonathan Lowsky, wildlife consultant, have also been incorporated 1' into this proposal as the applicant has agreed to relocate Activity Envelope #1 to further enhance • wildlife protection by avoiding oak brush important to deer and elk in the area. According to the • DOW, the wildlife impacts are on the west side of the property. The aspen grove on the western boundary of Activity Envelope #2 (previously the access envelope) and the areas west of the ® aspen grove will be preserved and will not be disturbed. This was a critical consideration in the • location of the Access Envelope previously approved and is still reflected in the current proposal. Vested Property Rights Section 2-20-170 The standards and procedures to obtain Vested Property Rights appear in this section of the Pitkin ® County Land Use Code. The applicant is seeking Vested Property Rights for the subject site. ® According to Section 2-20-170 (b) (d) an Activity Envelope approved pursuant to Section 2-30- 20(8)(3) constitutes a Site Specific Development Plan. If the proposed Activity Envelope Site 0 Plan is approved, it will be vested for a term of three years. • ® 14 • • • 000014 i® ® Summary This land use application has addressed and met the Land Use Code standards identified by the Pitkin County Community Development Department in the Pre -Application Conference Summary Sheet found in Attachment 8. The subject site, Sopris Mountain Ranch Lot 39, received land use a approvals for building a single family home and accessories structures in 2005 and the vesting expired in 2008. The new request is for a much smaller, 8,250 square foot home while a 15,000 square foot residence was previously approved. The newly proposed Activity Envelope Plan is similar to that approved in 2005, but reflects a re -location of the building envelope (Activity Envelope #1) to the south to avoid oak brush important to wildlife in the area and moving the • access envelope (Activity Envelopes #2) east to meet a condition of the original approval by avoiding a stand of aspen trees to the west of the Activity Envelopes. The new recommendations of the Colorado Division of Wildlife and Jonathon Lowsky's current ecological assessment of the property have been met as the new locations completely avoid a stand of aspen trees and some • oak brush which are forage for deer and elk in the area. The new location is also less visible from the nearby county road, West Sopris Creek Road and from all roads within the Sopris Mountain ® Ranch Subdivision. p The following is a summary of the Attachments to this land use application. 1. Vicinity Map 2. Determination No. 12 of 2005 Approving the Schiralli 1041 Site Plan Hazard Review, Special Review & GMQS Exemption for TDRs for Additional Floor Area up to 15,000 SF; 3. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 91-55; ® 4. BOCC Resolution No. 99-2001; 5. Resolution No. 96-312 granting a three year extension of vested property rights; 6. Aerial Photograph of the Subject Site; 7. Proposed Schiralli Activity Envelope Site Plan for Lot 39 Sopris Mountain Ranch Inc.; 8. Pre -application Conference Summary; ® 9. Ecological Assessment of Residential Development for Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review by Jonathan Lowsky of Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC dated Sept. 7, 2010; 10. Letter Authorizing Submission of this Land Use Application; ® 11. Fee Agreement; ® 12. List of Property Owners Within 300 feet of the Subject Property; and 15 • • i • 13. Proof of Ownership. • Please contact me if we can provide any additional information or if you need further • clarification. • • Sincerely, i DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED • • • GLENN HORN AICP • • • Q • • i • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • 16 • 0 • 000016 2600 ATTACHMENT 1 vicani+y maP Supris A+n. 2an� 350 This rnap/drewing Is a graphical represenlalion of Me features depicted and Is not a legal anch Lot 39 dependngon The accuracy my change depending on the enlargement or y chanlge Copyright 2010 City of AspmJPifidn County ATTACHMENT im Z MA I.RMINATION OF THE HEARING (II I P I R ((1 I Ill, ('ONINIVNITI' DEVELOPMENT DLPARTMENT OF PITKIN COUN'l N , ( ()I ()R% DO, .11'I'ROVIN(:'EIIE SCIIIRALLI 1041 IIAZAIZD REVIEW, SPECIAL IZEVIEX1 x\i) (, l,i k, 1:\LMI'TION FOR USE OF TDRS FOR �i ADDITIONAL FLOOR :1RI� I P l ( 115,01111 SQUARE FEET Delermin:uloll \u. J�-2005 Sandra Schiralli ("Applicant") has appltc,l i,, tiic Pitkin ('aunty I learing Officer ("I learing Officer") +�+ for 1041 Hazard Review, Special Rei ict\ and t \ It,tti Lvemption approval to reestablish a 1041 approval and utilize TDRS for additional Il. a tUca till to 15,000 square feet on a parcel within Sopris Mountain Ranch. w The property is lot 39 of Sopris Mountain Ranch mid i, le-ally described in Exhibit A. The property is zoned RS-30 PUD and contain., >.0 acres. 4. The Hearing Officer heard this application at a duh noticed public hearing on April 19, 2005 at which time evidence and testimony (N err pres¢nted x\ ith respect to this application. The Hearing Officer finds that the development is compatible with the character of Sopris Mountain Ranch, and it otherwise constctcnt N\ ith the Special Review criteria for a TDR receiver site and applicable 1041 Hazard Revie" critena ol'the Land Use Code. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED i,\ the Pitkin County Community Development Hearing Officer that he does hereby approve the tiohuallt 1041 Hazard Review, Special Review and GMQS Exemption for the use of TDRS for additional floor area subject to the following conditions, which shall run with the land and be binding on all SUCCes,or, m interest: 1. The Applicant shall comply with the pro\ istons of P,',Z Resolution No. PZ-91-55, and BOCC Resolution Nos. 96-312, and 99-2001 unless othcn, tse replaced or amended by the conditions of this approval. 2. At time of building permit submittal, Applicant ,hall submit to Community Development the s required executed, irrevocable certificates of a TDR- and a recorded deed evidencing the sale or transfer of the certificates to the lot o\sner. far additional Door area up to a maximum of 15,000 square feet. ;. Prior to submittal for any building permit~. the-%ppltcani shall record a 24 X 36 inch mylar 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan and Plat Anicndnunt in accordance with Sections 5-70-040, 5-40 and 5- 60-040 of the Land Use Code. A principal and accc,s envelope shall be depicted on the site plan a encompassing all proposed development I he .1 ,pen tice prove located on the western portion of the parcel shall be removed from the acces', cm chqu (ht the site plan the Applicants shall delineate the slopes within the principal cm chq), that arc above 15`%x. Community Development %0 shall approve the site plan prior to rccoid;dum II!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII5099-16 qI�'1t:,t LILVIA DAMS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 0.00 U 4• int 000018 O 4. No development, including grading, excavation, fill placement, hcrnnng. land capu,p, cmn or ranch gates, and vegetation removal or disturbance shall occur outside of the approved hu,ldmg [and/orj development envelopes except for access (in order to construct nccessar.N pullout` for fire safety) and wildfire mitigation. Construction, staging, parking, utility and drnrNA;,c extension and maintenance shall occur within approved building envelope, or access ivewas ch 5. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or construction activity, the Applicant shall stake the corners of the building envelope and install construction fencing around the perimeter of the building envelope. The fencing shall remain in place until issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. No vegetation shall be damaged or removed outside the building; envelope. ® 6. The Applicant shall comply with the 2001 Wildlife Protection Ordinance No. 010-2001 for waste storage. Compliance with the condition shall be verified by the Pitkin County Wildlife Biologist prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. ` ® 7. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall construct a 10,000 gallon ® water storage tank (or other approved storage mechanism) within 600 feet of the principal ® residence, or other Basalt Rural Fire Protection District (BRFPD) location. Additionally, the in water the tank shall be made available to the neighboring parcel to the east. to the satisfaction of the BRFPD. 8. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin ® County Land Use Code, § 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on April 19, 2008. �t✓ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 509976 ® SILVIA e:f 4 DAVIS pIIIIIIIIIIII�iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Page: ag/200 5 11.27•• R 0,00 D 0.00 UU,0019 S,Illtilll) iIIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIVIII III II II IIII 0. O Page: 35099 eof 4 5 1 .27f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY on the 20°i day of March, 2005. APPROVED ON THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL 2005. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the Aspen Times Weems on the _IaUay of 2005. APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Ely, County Au® e P018-05 246533401016 000020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING OFFICER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By �- James R. True, Hearing Officer R. DateDS oS C APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: in y Houben, Community Development Director *M94L'8 R' "Silvia ..avis, Pitkin" Cnr-Yq"Clerk;``0 , S 0 # LEGAL OESCRIPTION PARCEL NO. 39 # A parcel of land being part of the S1/2 of the Scc"1/4 of Section 33, ® and the SWI/4 of the SWI/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meri.dian. Said parcel is mare fully described -as follows: J Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 34; thence S 890 54134" E, 137.11 feet along the South line of said Section 34• thence N 20°21'00" E, 789.70 feet; thence N 62050'00" W, 280.00 feet; thence N 68000'00" W, 1078.78 feet; thence N 53010'00" W, 531.04 feet; - thence S 01035'00" W,, 121.13 feet; to -the South line of said Section 33; thence S 89'51'34" E, 1374.28 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 35.03 acres of land more or less. # # # # ijFU0021 �`, - •-• �. a-iYi ti�:'8 7U b1' • 'Javis, Pitkin r rRec i4 PG 289 ^-Y Cler6:, Doc s•qp ® RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING 1041 HAZARD REVIEW AND GENERAL SUBMISSION APPROVAL FOR LOT 39 OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Resolution PZ -91- f ATTACFWENT3._ WHEREAS, Robert and NancyBean „ (hereinafter Applicant") have ® applied to Pitkin County for a 1041 Hazard Review approval to ®® construct a single family residence in a wildlife and geologic hazard area pursuant to Section 5-400 of the Land Use Code; and iWHEREASe the property is located south of West Sopris Creek Road within the Sopris Mountain Ranch subdivision which ® is more specifically described in Exhibit "A"; and ® WHEREAS, the Application was considered by the Planning and ® Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission" at a duly noticed public hearing on June 1s, 1991 and which was continued to July 16, ® 1991, after the Commission conducted a site inspection on July 2, 1991; and s WREREAS, the Commission had concerns regarding the close ® proximity of an elk calving area to the proposed finds that the Division residence, but ® Of Wildlife recommendations adequately addressed their concerns; and WHEREAS, the Commission approved 1041 Hazard Review and recommended General Submission approval to the Board of County ® Commissioners on June 18, 1991 on a vote of 3 to 2; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution 91-06, the Commission has the authority to take final action on 000022 li. '417 ./12/91 10:38 Rec" F.P6 290 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cle'r'k, Doc'f:00 Resolution No. PZ -91-.5-5 Page 2 ® General Submission applications for single family dwellings; and WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the application has a complied with the criteria of the Land Use Code for 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission regulations. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning ® Commission that it hereby grant 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission approval to the Applicant, subject--to.—the following_----_ conditions: 1. The applicant shall file a 1041 Hazard Review Map for Planning and Zoning Commission chairman's signature prior to issuance of a building permit. The site plan shall be revised to indicate a reduced building envelope of only two acres in size, the relocated access driveway .. away from the aspen stringer and the building envelope �r shall not be located higher than the 8497 contour elevation. 2. The applicant shall mitigate wildfire hazards in the ® following manner: ® a. The applicant shall provide a water storage tank of no less than two thousand (2,000) gallon capacity be placed on the property near the building site for Fire Fighting purposes. ® b. Driveway(s) shall be no less than twenty (20) feet in width from the roadway to the building site. C. The applicant shall install a residential sprinkler system and automatic fire alarm system at the time of construction. d. The applicant shall. abide by the guidelines for wildfire mitigation, as shown in the Colorado Forest i Service publication, "Wildfire Safety Guidelines for Rural Homeowners." They are as follows: o An external water supply for fire fighting shall be provided (small pond, cistern, well or hydrant) o All roofs shall be kept cleared of debris; ?700023 SilvisDavis,'F1 10:� 38tec s-00 664.., 291 Y Clerl,,, Doc $.qp Resolution No. PZ-91_ ® Page 3 • o Firewood shall be stacked on a contour away from the building; s o The base of buildings shall be kept clear of weeds and debris; o At least one (1) ten-pound ABC-class fire extinguisher shall be placed in each structure; o Roof coverings shall be of a non-combustible (metal, tile or asphalt) Underwriters Laboratory approved material; _.. o All power and telephone lines shall be underground within the driveway. 3• The Environmental Health Department shall approve of water well yield, provision for domestic supply, septic system design and location prior to issuance of a building permit. 4• A domestic water supply with appropriate water rights granted by the Division of Water Resources shall be ® established by the applicant prior to signature and recordation of the 1041 Hazard Review Plat. 5• The following conditions of the Division of Wildlife shall be adhered to by the applicant: a a. No construction or site work is to take place between December 1st and June 30th of each year. b• The maximum height of the residential structure shall not exceed a lowest level floor elevation of 8497 feet, as related, to the site plan dated September 10, 1990. The home and all structures shall be placed below the meadow and the knob by an isolated group of spruce trees. structures The roof line of all shall be below the knob and meadow located above the homesite. C. The driveway shall be located in the oak brush, and entirely out of the aspen stringer. d. No dogs shall be allowed on site. e. All fencing shall be 42" in height or less, and shall be 4-strand or less. 000024 f9- +�•• w1 i '12/91 10: -2 Pec 2 • Hf' ! �•• PG 292 Silvia Davis, Piti.in Cnty Clerk, Doc s.00 Resolution No. PZ -91-56' Page 4 P. Native vegetation shall be maintained outside building envelope. g. All livestock/horse grazing be located in the common area at the base of the ranch. No grazing shall be allowed on this parcel. 6. The following conditions of the County Land Use Engineer shall be adhered to by the applicant: a. The 1041 Hazard Review map shall be amended to include the following note: "The provisions of the "1041" land use regulations do not in any way assure or imply that lands designated as removed from hazard areas will be free from hazards". b. The applicant shall receive an Access permit from the County Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. C. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all ranch roads used to access the property (with the exception of the driveway) shall meet Class V Country Access Standards. 7. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of Nicholas Lampiris's report dated March 21, 1991. S. A detailed site survey including geologic and engineering analysis shall be submitted on the new access road prior to signature of the plat by the Planning Commission Chairman. 9. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 16, 1991. PITRIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION By— Jim-Res yJim ReserChairman Date / 7 • d . y r i000 ?25 Silt'. Davi Pitkin Cnty,Clerk� ice l�J 293 Resolution No. pZ_91_ SS Page 5 ATTEST: DbWle 8Okahan �6�J! Planning Office Manager APPROVED AS TO PORM: T Wh is county Ansy raso.1031.boaa 000026 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Snsa s lcona#:aa Coon y Planainq�Diraator �y'� r x ,...,•.yam .:moi ►moi va av:.�et Kec 7q BK,! 64 PS 294 F. ...luta Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cl_rk, Dom_ COO a ® LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL NO. 39 ® A parcel of land being part of the S1/2 of the SEI/4 of Section 33, and the SW1/4 of the SWI/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. Said parcel is more fully •1 • described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 34; thence S 890 S 54134" E, 137.11 feet along the South line of said Section 34; thence N 20021100" E, 789.70 feet; thence N 62°50'00" W, 280.00 feet; thence N 88°00'00" W, 1078.78 feet; thence N 53010100" W, 531.04 feet;, thence S 01035,00" W,, 1221.13 feet; to -the South line of said S Section 33; thence S 89051134" E, 1374.28 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 35.03 acres of land more or less. �i S 000027 ATTACHMENT_^ RESOLUTION OF THE BOAR D 01' P t OIINTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, (;RANTING APPROVAL FOR REINSTATEMENT OF VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR SCHIRALLI 1041 HAZARD REVIEW Resolution No. &L-2001 RECITALS 1. Sandra Schiralli ("Applicant') has applied to the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC-) to comsidcr an Reinstatement of Vested Real Property Rights pursuant to Section 4-140-30 of the Land Use Code. 2• The property is described as Lot 39 of Sopris Mountain Ranch. 3• The property is zoned RS -30 PUD and contains 35.02 acres. 4• The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on May 9, 2001, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application. 5. The BOCC has determined that the proposed development meets the criteria established in Section 4-140-30 of the Land Use Code• and therefore found the reinstatement to be appropriate. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners that it does hereby grant a Extension of Vested Property Rights for the Schiralli 1041 Hazard Review subject to the foilo%%ine conditions, which shall rum with the land and be binding on all successors in interest: 1 • The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and in the public meetings. 2. The conditions specified in the Lot _ e. Sopris Mountain Ranch 1041 Hazard Review and Extension of Vested Rights appro%a:s : s recorded at Reception Nos. 339417 and 40038 shall remain in affect unless mo,ii,icc 'n the conditions of this approval. 3. Prior to submission of any bu;ld:ne rermit applications, the applicant shall submit a 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan com;.l :n_ :,,th the provisions of Section 5-70-040 of the Lan.'. Use Code. The site plan shad he ,,,, 't„ttcd in digital format for integration into the County's GIS system. 4. The Applicants shall comply A itl: v, m❑ landscaping and wildfire defensible ;pace mitigation standards: liVi X11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 4`"" • :16/14/200111:50R RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI °� a 00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY Co 000028 RawluNun Nn. �L-2001 Page 1 a. Brush, debris, and non -ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum 20 foot perimeter around the structure. b. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a minimum thirty-foot (30') perimeter around a structure built on flat ground. c. For a distance of 15 feet around all structures, vegetation shall be maintained at 6 inches or less in height. d. For a distance of 100 feet in every direction, shrubby material shall be thinned. Shrubs shall be thinned so that clumps are no larger in diameter than 2 times the height. e. Existing trees shall be thinned for a distance of 100 feet around the cabin. Tree crown separation within this perimeter shall have a minimum of 30 feet between the edges of the crowns. All branches from trees within this perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet above the ground or half the total height of the tree, whichever is less. f. All branches that extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the chimneys shall be removed g. Remove deadfall within 100 foot perimeter shall be removed h. The Applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space requirements. S. The Applicants shall standards: comply with the following additional wildfire mitigation a. Roofs shall have a Class A, non-combustible roof system. Wood shake/shingle roof coverings are prohibited in all wildfire hazard areasRoofs with less than a following: unleupitch are not permitted in 1041 Wildfire Areas ss they comply with the foll i. All roof coverings shall be noncombustible materials as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 Section 1504 and installed on a Class A roof assembly. ii. All roof coverings shall have a surface that shall facilitate the natural process of clearing the roof. iii. All roof designs shall facilitate the natural process of clearing roof debris. Protrusions above the roofline, such as parapets, shall be prohibited. iv. Roofs shall be installed as required by UBC 1997 Chapter 15 and shall have a minimum slope of 1:48. V All roof designs, coverings, or equivalent assemblies shall be specifically approved by the Fire Marshal prior to submittal of a building permit application. h. Vents shall he screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh with mesh 1/4 inch maximum. c. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris. d. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and flammable debris. I II'lll'llll "III' I'l1I' I'I'� III"II'll III "II' II'I II'I 453443 06/14/2001 11:50A RESOLUTI DAMS SILVI 2 or 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Rae/ur/OM No. &-2001 Pogfr e. All flammable materials shall be stored on a ® parallel contour feet away from any structcontoura minimum of 15 f. Firewood/wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 ® feet away from the structure. g. Swimming pools or ponds shall be accessible to Fire Department vehicles. h. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris. i. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure. • j. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container a k. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above -ground tank. Any wood enclosure around the tank shall be constructed with materials approved for 2 hour fire -resistive ® construction on the exterior side of the walls. ® 1. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound approved ABC fire extinguisher placed in a visible and accessible location. ® m. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non-combustible letters and shall be visible and installed on a non-combustible post 6. Native vegetation must be maintained outside of the building envelope as long as it complies with all required wildfire mitigation criteria ® 7. The Applicant shall submit a Positive Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to be reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Engineer prior to building permit submission. ® 8. Floor area shall be limited to 5,750 square feet exempt from growth management. Floor ® area shall be calculated based on the definition in effect at the time of building permit submittal ® 9• Pursuant to Ordinance No. 022-2000, the Applicant is subject to the Fair Share Requirements and shall pay a road impact fee as calculated at the same time as building permit issuance. 10. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in the Pitkin County Land Use Code § 4-140 and C.R.S., § 24-68-105. The statutory • vested rights granted herein shall expire on May 9, 2004. 1111111 IIIII 111111111111 IIIII illi 111111 III 11111 IIII IIII 455443 06/14/2001 11:50R RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI AA 3 of 4 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Resolution AV AL -1001 ,i Page I lei b • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 3 rr DAY OF lfijag4a 3000, .200/ APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 9TH DAY MAY, 2001, VESTED RIGHTS NOTICE PUBLISHED ON THE—E DAY OF TI'N 2001. ATTEST: y ee R Dean, DeputyClerk and Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: John E1 C y Attorney Case 034-01 PID# 246533401016 BOCC OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY,, COLORADO Michael C. Ireland,1`�/� Chair Date: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Cindy Houben, Community Development Director 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN 486443 06/14/2001 11:80A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 0.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 300031 W0+L.YLN DAVIS �u'" N ' PI7..•'"c: ievXF ' PO -L-1 + ® UNTY CLERK.i RECORD RESOLUTION OF I , ivBOARD OF COUNTY COD'Zri IISSIONERS OF PITM . COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING A T'>EIREE �� E.�cTENSION OF VESTED RIGHTS FOR LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNM TN RANCH' Resolution No. 96--3L—A_ AiACFWBT r I. Robert and Nancy Bean (hereafter• Applicants) have applied to Pitkin County for an Extension of Vested Rights pursuant to Section 4-140 of the Land Use Code. 2. The property is known as Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch and is described on)Exhibit "A" attached. The Board heard this application at their regularly scheduled public hearing on October 9, 1996. 4. The Board finds that as Extension of Vested Rights is appropriate and consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners hereby grants a three year Extension of Vested Property Rights to the Applciants, to December 18, 1999, subject to the following conditions: I. The conditions of appioval contained in the planning and Zoning Commission's Resolution PZ -91-55 and the 1041 site plan recorded at Book and Page 1Y 7 shall remain in full force at.i effect except as modified herein. 2. To further mitigate wildlife impacts, all garbage containers shall be ofa "bear proof" design as approved by the American Bear Society. 3. To mitigate wildfire hazards, the area around wildthe structure shall incorporate landscaping with fire defensible space thinning for a distance of 40 feet uphill and to the sides of structures, and 47 feet on the downhill side. In this thinning create Crarnbel oak/servicebeny clumps that will be spaced (minimum) a distance equal to two times the height The diameter of these clumps can be as wide as two times and height For example, if the shrubs are 10 feet tall then the clump diameter can be 20 feet with a 20 foot spacing between clumps. The vegetation between these clumps must be grass, flowers or forbs. Allowing woody vegetation to return to these spaces would negate the effects of creating the defensible space n:f 'tl i wa ... 7*7 clumps. The lower limbs on the shrubs should be removed up tohalfthe total height of the t ® sterns to eliminate ladder fuels. Ladder fuels are vegetation which may allow a fits to bum from ground level to lower shrub or tree branches. ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN TRF A WEN TMVqon the 7th day of September, 1996. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMB PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION IN THE ASPEN TIMES WEHKLY ONS �'Y 496.1997. BOARD OF COCo — PITIM� i COUNTYU 9 CCOLORADOSIONERS OF * ATTEST: Y"M,c&acCnzw- DZ r�tOv6 E• ette Jones, Deputy Clerk and Recorder ei ! APPROVED AS TO FORM. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: John-MY Cmdy Houben, • County Community Development Director ® Case.#P69-96 Parcel M #2465-334-01416 000033 ` ,� 2 W365 1212"'996 02:16P PG s OF „ S #33941- '.2/iC/91 10:38 Rec s.pq Silvia :,K 64 FG 294 .,avis, Pitkin Cnty Clerl;, per_ s.o j 0 LEGAL OESCRIPTION PARCEL N0. 39 + A parcel of land being part of the S1/2 of the SE1/4 and the SW1/4 of the SWI/4 of Section of Section 33, 34, Township 8 87 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. Said parcel is South, Range described as follows: more fully •1 Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 34; 54134" E, 137.11 feet along the South thence 5 890 Iine of said Section thence N 20021'00" E, 789.70 feet; thence N 62050'00" 34; W, 280.00 feet; thence N 88000'00" W. 1078.78 feet; thence N 53°10100" W, 531.04 feet;ID thence 5 01035'00" W,, 1221.13 feet; to -the South line Section 33; thence S 89051'34" E, 1374,28 . of said feet to the pain: of beginning. Said parcel contains 35.03 acres of land more or less. IILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII S 5ge: 4 of ® R 0.08 i::z7- D 8.00 s� FYI �° 000034 �` �£000� - � i, �r pl ' ��� �+ ��� ��� � 'r :k`y �+h � � F �y� ", �',c _ � yam, •..' w��,'i� �L; �, . � �,� + _ � iMA�.�; J..a _ - � � � ',� �_ .,� w -4 .� +rr �� _� Parcel SCHIRALLI ACTIVITY D T rrK T N OnTTNTV ENVELOPE rnT nRADO LEGEND AND NOTES • FWND RE4R 3 CAP ANDED L It TAI I I 09 FAMRS BRASS CAP LINES IN SPACE LAND SURVEY$ T ! 3 A�.)'e An P N. r. meni N 7 PLAN W+E g 0 50 AS,rII 20D SCALE: 1'.100' VICINITY MAP SECS. 33 @ 34, T.8 S.. R.87 W.. 6th P.M. ACCEPTANCE FOR RECORDING THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO ON THIS DAT OF A D 30_ IN PLAT BOOK _ AT PAGE AS RECEPTION NO CLERK AND RECORDER LEGAL DESCRIPTION A p0rcel of land being pore Of the 51/2 of the SEI/4 of Section 33 o d the SWI/4 of the SWI/4 of Section 34. ToRnahip 8 South flan ga 87.W. al of the 61 It &I P,,ncip.1 Men dion, and being sora (.I de.cribed as (ollON: / Baayi ni g ut the SouthA..t Corner f .a d Sec non 34, thence S 89 54 30 E / 13] II feel along the Sa. th line f .vid Section 34. thence N 20.21 00"E 789 70 feet: thence N 62. 50'00'W 280 00 feet. thence N 88'00'00'W 1076 78 feet: thence N 53'10 00'W 531 04 feet. S 01.35'00-W 1221 13 feet to the So. th IION of / old Section 33: Rb nca 5 89.51 34-E 1374.28 feet to the point of beginning. contain ing 35 03 acres so e r Iva. / Parcel 41 DISCLAIMER \ \ ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS EXIST THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE PROPERTY ANY IMPROVEMENTS. AND THE USE AND OCCUPANCY THEREOF. \ \ WAIVER \ THE PROVISIONS OF THESE REGULATIONS DO NOT IN ANYMAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT AREAS OUTSIDE OF DESIGNATED HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS. OR THAT APPROVED MITIGATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ANY PROPERTY APPLICANT SANDRA SCHIRALLI REARING OFFICER APPROVAL THIS SCHIRALLI ACTIVITY ENVELOPE PLAN 'C O / 4O HA9 BEEN RppEVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PI TKIN COUNTY HEARING OFFICER THISN€TERAy/O�NDZ�OHOITISN5O6-RESDIUTIONLNOF THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER 5 OFFICE PITKIN COUNTY HEARI HIS OFFICER VICINITY MAP SECS. 33 @ 34, T.8 S.. R.87 W.. 6th P.M. ACCEPTANCE FOR RECORDING THIS ACTIVITY ENVELOPE PLAN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO ON THIS DAT OF A D 30_ IN PLAT BOOK _ AT PAGE AS RECEPTION NO CLERK AND RECORDER e ' �ATTACHMENT 8 • PITKIN COUNTY PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Mike Kraemer PHONE: (970) 920-5482 EMAIL: michaelk(a),co.pitkin.co.us LOCATION: Lot 39, Sopris Mountain Ranch OWNER: Sandra Schiralli REPRESENTATIVE: Davis Hom, Inc. DATE: May 10, 2010 ZONE: RS -30 PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 EMAIL:adavis(a),rofnet ghom@rofnet 925.6587 Type of Application: Activity Envelope with vesting Description of Project/Development: Applicant desires to establish an activity envelope with vested rights. The property was approved as a TDR receiver site in 2005. Pitkin County Land Use Code: Sec. 2-30-20(g): Activity Envelope Criteria for Approval; Sec. 7-10-50: Activity Envelope; Sec. 7-20-20: Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes; Sec. 7-20-30: Water Courses and Drainage; Sec. 7-20-60: Wildfire (mapped high hazard) Sec. 7-20-70: Wildlife: (mapped elk production area) Review By: Community Development Director Public Hearing? No. However, the Applicant shall post a public notice sign on the property at least 15 days prior to the date specified for the Administrative Decision pursuant to Sec. 2-20-100(a)(3) of the Land Use Code. In addition, the Applicant shall mail notice (by I" class mail) to all property and mineral estate owners within 300' of the subject property with the return address of the Community Development Department (form of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County, as they appear no more than 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. A property owner receiving the public notice shall have 2 weeks from the date the notice was postmarked to submit comments or objections to the Community Development Department. Staff will refer application to: Basalt and Rural District, Emma Caucus, Sopris Mountain Ranch HOA, and CDOW. FEES: $3,199 (make check payable to "Pitkin County Treasurer") Planning Office flat fee: $3,120 (non-refundable; based on 10 hours of Staff time; if staff review time exceeds 12 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time above 10 hours at a rate of $312/hour) Web Technology Fee: $25 Public Notice Fee: $54 To apply, submit 1 copy (unbound) of the following information, unless noted otherwise: 1. Summary letter explaining the request, providing background on prior approvals and permits, and addressing compliance with the Code sections listed above. 2. 11" by 17" and 24" by 36" Activity Envelope as designated in Section 2. 1.1 and 2.1.12 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; Page 1 of 3 A 3. Previous Land Use Approvals (if applicable); 4. Proof of ownership of subject property; 5. Parcel description, including legal description and vicinity map; ® 6. Total fee for review of the application; a 7. Signed fee agreement (1 copy); 8. Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the representative (1 copy) • 9. List of all property owners and mineral estate owners within 300' of the subject property (1 copy) 10. Copies of this pre -app form The Pitkin County Land Use Code and Application Manual can be found at the followine fink: • • h!W://www.aspenpitkin.com/depts/7/planning.cfm a NOTES: PLEASE SUBMIT ONE UNBOUND OF YOUR COMPLETE APPLICA77ON. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO-SIDED COPIES OF ® ALL REMAINING COPIES OF YOUR APPLICATION (IF POSSIBLE). 24" X 36" SITE PLANS MUST BE FOLDED. a PARCEL ID MUST APPEAR ONALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN YOUR APPLICATION ➢ This Pre -Application Conference Summary Sheet is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The information provided in this Summary Sheet is based on current zoning standards and the staffs interpretations based upon representations of the applicants. Additional information may be required upon a complete review of the application. • ➢ The Pitkin County Land Use Code is available on-line at www.aspenoitkin com. • • Page 1 of 3 • 000039 ATTACHMENT -1 Ecological Assessment of Residential Development for County Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review Schiralli Parcel Pitkin County, Colorado September 7, 2010 Report for: Davis Horn Inc. 215 S Monarch Street, #104 Aspen, CO 81611 000040 Report By: COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC Jonathan Lowsky, MS 0100 Elk Run Drive, Suite 128A Basalt, CO 81621 Page intentionally blank. W I(RldGrc^l:min ,ml 9�«ronrn/—S�h,�all Tarcrl 09',2010 ® Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS ...............................................................................................................................1 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................1 ® .. 4.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS -§7-20-70............................................................................ 2 ® 4.1 Significant Mountain Sagebrush, Aspen, & Mountain Shrub Dominated Habitat ................... 2 ® 4.2 Nest/Roost Buffer................................................................................................................................ 2 4.3 Intensive Use Buffer........................................................................................................................... 2 4.4 Rare, Threatened & Endangered Species......................................................................................... 2 4.4.1 Bald Eagle (ST, G5/51B,S3N)................................................................................................................... 2 4.4.2 Canada Lynx (FT/SE, G5/Sl).................................................................................................................. 2 v✓ 4.5 Important Waterfowl and Wading Bird Habitat Area................................................................... 3 4.6 Wildlife Migration Corridors, Severe Winter Range, & Winter Concentration ......................... 3 i✓ 4.7 Production Areas................................................................................................................................3 "., �r 4.7.1 Production Area Buffer...................................................................................................................... 4 as► .,A► 4.8 Black Bears........................................................................................................................................... 4 Yli 4.9 River/Stream Corridors & Wetlands................................................................................................ 5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................................... 5 6.0 POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................ 6 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO MINIMIZE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS .......................... 6 0 8.0 LITERATURE CITED............................................................................................................. 8 ® MAPS............................................................................................................................................... 9 PHOTOS.......................................................................................................................................15 • APPENDIX A: CDOW NDIS UNGULATE SEASONAL ACTIVITY AREA ODEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................19 APPENDIX B: STATE OF COLORADO THREATENED & ENDANGERED VERTEBRATES........................................................................................................................... 20 EXHIBITS......................................................................................................................................22 O • • 0 • COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I Table of Contents ® 000L142 Alk W,ldh e & E"A .../AJplV..... 09 ?, 20M Maps Map 1. Location Ma 10 Map 2. Aerial view with major vegetation............................................................................................11 Map 3. NDIS mapped mule deer seasonal habitats.............................................................................12 Map 4. NDIS mapped Rocky Mountain elk seasonal habitats...........................................................13 Map 5. Field verified habitat suitable for elk production....................................................................14 Photos Photo 1. View south from the activity envelope including the swale or saddle and a portion of the potential production habitat (Area@)..........................................................................................1E Photo 2. View west from the activity envelope including the aspen stand determined to be unsuitable for elk production (Area iD)........................................................................................ 1f Photo 3. Southerly panoramic view of activity envelope looking from east to south to west including the potential production areas OO & ®..•.•••.............•••.•• .. .. . .•••• li Photo 4. Northerly panoramic view of activity envelope looking from west to south to east including the aspen unsuitable to production (area D) ............................................................ 1£ COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I Maps I�00043 — see„vie 1.0 INTRODUCTION u9 7. 2010 This report presents an evaluation of the wildlife, wildlife habitat, and ecological resources of the Schiralli Parcel (the Property) and assesses the effects of the proposed action on those resources. This analysis addresses significant, present wildlife use of the Property, evaluates potential effects of development on wildlife and other important ecological resources, and recommends actions to reduce ecological impacts. This report provides all Wildlife Habitat Area and Vegetation Protection information required by Pitkin County for Activity Envelope and Site Plan Approval. Constrained Areas as defined by the Pitkin County Land Use Code (LUC) addressed in this report include: critical wildlife habitat; severe winter range, and/or winter concentration areas; wildlife migration corridors or habitat; wildlife production, birthing or calving areas; important waterfowl and wading bird habitat areas; significant mountain big sagebrush, aspen, and mountain shrub dominated habitat; and rare, imperiled, sensitive, threatened, or endangered species critical habitat (§7-20-70). 2.0 METHODS This assessment is based on: 1) A site evaluation of the Property and surrounding area; 2) GIS analysis of current Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) Species Distribution Maps; (3) On-site consultation with John Groves, CDOW District Wildlife Manager; and (4) the author's experience in recognizing, avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating potential impacts of development and recreation on wildlife and other ecological resources in the West Sopris Creek area. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The Property is located approximately 5.6 miles southwest of downtown Basalt and 8.6 miles southeast of downtown Carbondale in unincorporated Pitkin County, Colorado (Map 1) and is situated in the North-Central Highlands and Rocky Mountain Section of the Southern Rocky Mountains Steppe - Open Woodland - Coniferous Forest - Alpine Meadow Physiographic Province (Bailey 1976, Omemik 1987, Bailey 1995, Bailey et al. 1998). Elevation of the Schiralli Parcel rages from approximately 8,180 to 8,450 feet above mean sea level. The Property is moderately sloped with steeper areas on the west side of the Property. The proposed activity envelope encompasses a relatively flat area at the top of a rise just to the north of a small valley or swale on the southern end of the Property (Map 2; Photo 1). Two unnamed intermittent streams meander northward on the western side of the Property. Aspects are primarily northerly. Existing vegetation at the site of the proposed activity envelope is comprised of primarily of Gambel oak dominated mixed montane shrubland with a small aspen stand on the west side of the Property and small areas dominated by sagebrush. Wet meadows dominated by grasses, sedges, rushed and forbs occur in the Swale described above and on the west side of the Property with a variety of native forbs and mixed native and non-native grasses. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 11.0 INTRODUCTION 1144 c Lrolorual I vrrrmrm- 3d va//, Paan/ 4.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS - §7-20-70 09 7, 1070 4.1 SIGNIFICANT MOUNTAIN SAGEBRUSH, ASPEN, & MOUNTAIN SHRUB DOMINATED HABITAT The Property encompasses a portion of what was once a significant mountain shrub plant community but has been significantly fragmented by the residential and infrastructure development at Sopris Mountain Ranch. 4.2 NEST/ROOST BUFFER A nest search was conducted during the site assessment and no raptor nests were located. No raptor nests are mapped or otherwise known by CDOW Q. Groves, personal communication) on or adjacent to the Property. 4.3 INTENSIVE USE BUFFER No intensive use is proposed on the Property. 4.4 RARE, THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES No Endangered, Threatened, or Candidate wildlife species are known or suspected to occur on the Property. No structure is proposed within rare, threatened, or endangered species critical habitat. 4.4.1 Bald Eagle (ST, G5/S1B,S3N) Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were listed as endangered under the ESA in 1978 but had recovered sufficiently by 1995 to be downlisted to threatened status. This species is also state -listed as threatened. Because of its successful recovery, there is a current proposal to delist bald eagles from the ESA, but protections would remain under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and the Bald Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagles are listed as Threatened by the state of Colorado (CDOW 2010a). According to CDOW data, in 2001 there were 51 known nesting pairs in Colorado, and approximately 1,000 bald eagles winter in the state (CDOW 2010b). Bald eagles depend on large roost trees that allow them a wide field of vision for prey. Food sources include fish, small mammals, waterfowl, and carrion. There are no mapped or otherwise known bald eagle sensitive habitats in the project. No known bald eagle nests occur in or adjacent to the project area. 4.4.2 Canada Lynx (FT/SE, G5/Sl) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a final rule on March 24, 2000 listing the Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the coterminous United States as a "threatened" species under the Endangered Species Act (Federal Register: 65 FR 16052). The proposed critical habitat plan for lynx released by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2006 omits Colorado, New Mexico, and southern Wyoming (Federal Register: 50 CFR 17 2005). The revised critical habitat designation for the Canada lynx announced on February 24, 2009 again omits Colorado (74 Federal Register 8616). CDOW defines Canada lynx potential habitat as follows: "Those areas having the highest potential of [Canada] lynx occurrences in the state. These areas usually contain positive, probable, or COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 14.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS -§7-20-70 000045 Q"ddl J, e Gro%¢n/ 9"",/" /— ./w WG r"'I 09 � 2010 possible reports" (CDOW 2010e). The Property is more than 0.3 miles from the nearest potential lynx winter habitat and 0.7 miles from the nearest potential denning habitat as mapped by the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. Lynx may pass through while dispersing from natal areas but are unlikely to remain for extended periods. In Colorado, optimal lynx habitat consists of mature Engelmann spruce -subalpine fu forest stands with 42-65% canopy cover and 15-20% conifer understory cover (Shenk 2006). 4.5 IMPORTANT WATERFOWL AND WADING BIRD HABITAT AREA There are no important waterfowl or wading bird habitat areas or colonies in the vicinity and no nesting habitat was found during the site assessment. Development of the proposed activity envelope will have no impact on this resource. 4.6 WILDLIFE MIGRATION CORRIDORS, SEVERE WINTER RANGE, & WINTER CONCENTRATION Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) occur on the Property throughout the non -winter months and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus) occur on the Property in spring and fall as they migrate between summer and winter range and occasionally in summer (Maps 3, 4). CDOW NDIS maps include the Property within both mule deer and elk summer range with no winter use. The site assessment confirmed that most of the CDOW habitat mapping is accurate. There are no migration corridors, severe winter range, or winter concentration areas within a '/4 -mile of the Property. 4.7 PRODUCTION AREAS For mapping purposes, CDOW defines elk production areas as follows: "That part of the overall range of elk occupied by females from May 15 to June 15 for calving (CDOW 2010c)." PRODUCTION AREA: That part of the overall range of elk occupied N females from May 15 to June 15 for calving (CDOW 2010d). CDOW includes the following disclaimer with all of its NDIS digital data: Care should be taken in interpreting these data. Written documents may accompany this map and should be referenced. The information portrayed on these maps should not replace field studies necessary for more localized planning efforts. The data are gathered at a variety of scales: discrepancies may become apparent at larger scales. The areas portraved here are graphic representations of phenomena that are difficult to reduce to two dimensions. Animal distributions are fluid; animal populations and their habitats are dynamic. The seasonal elk habitats are mapped at a 1:24,000 scale and often need to be confirmed and/or modified (i.e., field verified) to reflect more micro -scale conditions. Colorado Wildlife Science conducted a detailed field study of the Property. This site assessment revealed that although Sopris Mountain Ranch and adjacent White River National Forest lands do indeed contain elk production habitat, the NDIS mapping was very coarse. Seidel (I 977b, a), studied elk calving habitat at various sites in the White River National Forest. He found that cow elk prepare a distinct birthing bed and, for the most part, return to that bed each year. All birthing beds examined were in mature aspens with a thick understory of shrubs such as chokecherry and snowberry. All beds were located on COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 140 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS -V-20-70 U' --3046 R'rid4fr&Eroloyrml. I...rrrrOov 2010 southeast -facing slopes within approximately 183m (200 yd) of a water source. Personal observation of calving behavior in Pitkin County by CWS has largely confirmed Seidel's assessment except that the aspect variable described by Seidel seems to be less important than the understory variable. Active elk calving habitat in Pitkin County is known to occur on variable aspects, but there is always significant woody understory vegetation which provides calves with hiding cover. The aspen forest on and around the Property was thoroughly evaluated. This evaluation revealed that some of the area mapped by CDOW is indeed high quality, active calving habitat, while other areas are unsuitable. CWS visited these areas with John Groves, CDOW District Wildlife Manager. We visited the proposed activity envelope on May 18a' and 27h and walked the area surrounding the site with particular emphasis on the aspen habitat. We agreed that the aspen on the Property (O on attached Map 5; Photo 2) was unsuitable active calving habitat and that most of the aspen within the '/4 mile buffer is not suitable for elk production. We concurred that the aspen stand to the north that is primarily on Lot 37 (0 on Map 5), was a high quality stand with many of the parameters that are typically associated with elk production habitat. There is also aspen habitat due north and within a '/4 mile of the Property that is suitable calving habitat as well (O on Map 5; Photo 1). 4.7.1 Production Area Buffer Section 7-20-70(d)(7) of the LUC requires a minimum 0.25 mile buffer between any building or structure and production areas (Pitkin County 2006). Map 5 depicts the extent of the field verified elk production area on and around the Property as well as a '/4 mile buffer extending from the GPS delineated boundary of that habitat. Area Qz (suitable habitat) is approximately 775 feet to the north of the activity envelope and across Sopris Mountain Ranch Road. A portion of this stand is within the '/4 mile buffer from the proposed activity envelope. As stated above, area ® is also suitable production habitat but is separated from the Property by a steep south -facing slope (Map 5). Given the topography of the activity envelope, the location of Sopris Mountain Ranch Road and the lack of suitable conditions in the aspen on the Property, and adjacent residential development on Lot 41, development of a single family home on the activity envelope is unlikely to result in any significant impact on elk production and a reduction in the prescribed'/4 mile (1,320) foot buffer is appropriate. Mr. Groves, stated in an email dated June 2, 2010 (Exhibit A): I agree with this assessment. The proposed activity envelope should have minimal impact on elk production due to the poor quality of the aspen stands located in close proximity. The lot does provide important fall/spring transition range as evidenced by the amount browse and tracks and scat in the area. In order to minimize disturbance outside of the activity envelope I do recommend that no dogs are kept onsite, or that there is a I dog limit with kennel restrictions. 4.8 BLACK BEARS The Property lies within excellent black bear (Ursus americanus) habitat and bears are COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 1 4 0 WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS - V-20-70 000047 If Idbt, c E'1"',I L".1- t,GonO, Paml 09"2010 common in the area, particularly in the fall. The CDOW accurately maps the Property within a black bear fall concentration area. Fall Concentration Areas are defined as those parts of the overall range that are occupied from August 15 until September 30 for the purpose of ingesting large quantities of mast and berries to establish fat reserves for the winter hibernation period (CDOW 2010e). 4.9 RIVER/STREAM CORRIDORS & WETLANDS A ls` order intermittent tributary of Dry Creek runs northerly across the Property (Map AERIAL). The proposed activity envelope is more than 710 feet from the mean high water mark of the creek. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The site assessment, field observations, and GIS analysis revealed the following: 1. Except for production habitat, the CDOW NDIS data pertaining to the Property are relatively accurate given the scale at which they were created. a. There are no winter concentration areas, severe winter range, or migration corridors within a '/4 -mile of the Property. b. The proposed activity envelope is within '/4 mile of habitat suitable for elk production. i. There are no existing structures nor are there any structures proposed within the production area buffer. ii. Given, the topography of the site and the adjacent residential development, it is unlikely that the proposed residential development will have any significant effect on elk production. iii. The CDOW concurs with the CWS assessment that a reduction of the '/4 mile buffer is warranted. 2. The proposed activity envelope was established with significant consideration of wildlife habitat and activity. The envelope's boundaries were established based on input from John Grove, CDOW and Jonathan Lowsky, CWS. 3. No raptor nests were found or otherwise known within '/4 mile of the proposed activity envelopes. 4. No rare, Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate species will be affected by the proposed residential and infrastructure development of the Property. 5. No structure is proposed within rare, Threatened or Endangered species critical habitat. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 15.0 CONCLUSIONS Ju��43 & Eolbmlra/ I«rnnxul-S, hnnlb Pmal 6.0 POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT Given the above assessment, the proposed development will not adversely affect wildlife or important wildlife habitat. The habitat of rare, Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate species will not be affected. The proposed development will not result in the direct or indirect loss of any significant mule deer or elk winter habitat, production area, or migration corridors. 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS TO MINIMIZE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS 1. The activity envelope should be as small as possible to minimize the loss of any native vegetation. 2. Black Bears: a. All refuse containers should meet or exceed the Wildlife Proof Refuse Container/Dumpster Enclosure Standards described in Pitkin County Ordinance # 010-2001 and the 2004 amendment to that ordinance. b. Fruit -bearing trees and shrubs should be avoided in any landscaping within the residential lots. c. Pets should not be fed outside. d. Wherever possible, lever style door handles should be avoided on the exterior of the house. e. Bird feeders should be avoided from April through November. f. Composting should be restricted to yard waste (e.g., leaves and grass clippings). Food waste will be prohibited within compost. 3. Domestic Animal Controls Dogs running at large pose a significant threat to wildlife. Although dogs are rarely successful in catching the many animals they chase, they do occasionally kill wildlife. More often, they injure the wildlife enough to cause their eventual death. Packs of dogs are much more efficient hunters, and have been known to kill adult mule deer and elk. When dogs are unsuccessful in catching the object of their chase, the potential prey has had to expend significant energy in order to evade the dog. This expenditure of energy, particularly in winter when food is scarce, threatens the survival of that animal (or group of animals). In particular, pregnant wildlife and newborn animals do not have the reserves to repeatedly expend in avoiding dogs. a. When outside, all dogs should be leashed or restricted to a fenced enclosure (i.e., kennel or run) adjacent to the residence. b. Leashes should be required whenever a dog (except working ranch dogs) is on common roads, open space, or other common property. c. Dogs of guests should be required to comply with these restrictions. d. Contractors should be prohibited from bringing their dogs on site during construction even if kept within their vehicles. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 16 D POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT A'ddbf' & E,'4""/. 1. rmeni— SrGnalG P"'/ 09 e. Residences should be limited to a maximum of 1 dog except litters less than 6 months old. 4. The following fence restrictions would reduce the ecological impacts of development: a. Fences on the Property will be compliant with §7-20-70(c)(4) and §7-20- 70(c)(5) of the LUC: i. Wood rail fencing shall employ three (3) rails or less, be the round or split rail type, shall not exceed fifty-four (54) inches in height above ground level, and twelve (12) inches in width (top view), and shall have at least eighteen (18) inches between the lower two (2) rails. ii. Wire fencing must be three (3) strands or less. The top wire should be a twelve -point -five (12.5) gauge twisted barbless type at a maximum height of forty-two (42) inches. The middle strands (which may be barbed) should be located a minimum twelve (12) inches apart and from the top wire preventing entanglement when mule deer jump over. The bottom strand should be sixteen (16) inches from the ground. 5. Native vegetation: a. Native vegetation, particularly aspen and riparian species plant communities on the Property should be preserved to the maximum extent possible except where management is necessary to reduce wildfire hazards. b. Landscaping should be restricted to the activity envelope. c. An orange safety fence should be placed around the activity envelope during construction to prevent any unnecessary vegetation disturbance during construction. d. Vegetation disturbed outside the approved activity envelope should be revegetated according to the current Pitkin County Revegetation Guidelines. e. Following construction, naturally occurring vegetation should not be disturbed outside of the activity envelope except as necessary for normal agricultural and ranching activities. f No livestock, including horses, should be kept, pastured, or corralled on the Property to avoid additional loss of wildlife habitat. 6. Noxious weeds should be managed by means of an Integrated Weed Management strategy according to the current Pitkin County Weed Management Plan. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 1 70 RECOMMENDATIONS TO MINIMIZE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS koj00C,50 U rldhp & L,,1,va/,-1 mrrmen, — Srhrra// Pmrr/ 09-.2010 8.0 LITERATURE CITED Bailey, R. G. 1976. Ecoregions of the United States. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Bailey, R. G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd edition. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. Bailey, R. G., United States Geological Survey, and United States Forest Service. 1998. Ecoregions of North America. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. CDOW. 2010a. Colorado Listing of Endangered, Threatened and Wildlife Species of Special Concern — Species Pages. Available online at htip: //wildlife. state. co.us/ W ildlifeSpecies/SpeciesOfConcem/ThreatenedEndaneeredList/List OfThreatenedAndEndan eg redSpecies.htm. CDOW. 2010b. Colorado Species Distribution Maps - Bald Eagle. Available online at http://ndis.mel.colostate.edu/ftD/data/sam/bald eagle.zin. Natural Diversity Information Source, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. CDOW. 2010c. Colorado Species Distribution Maps - Elk. Available online at http://ndis.nrel.colostate.edLVftD/data/sam/elk.zip. Natural Diversity Information Source, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. CDOW. 2010d. Colorado Species Distribution Maps Metadata - Elk. Available online at htti)://ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/fti)/data/sam/meta/elk.htm]. Natural Diversity Information Source, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. CDOW. 2010e. Colorado Species Distribution Maps Metadata. Available online at htjp://ndis.mel.colostate.edu/. Natural Diversity Information Source, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. Federal Register: 50 CFR 17. 2005. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the Contiguous United States Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx; Proposed Rule. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. November 9, 2005. Pages 68294-68328. Omemik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118-125. Pitkin County. 2006. Pitkin County Code (July 2006). Title 8, Chapter 7, Section 7-20-70. Pitkin County, Aspen, Colorado. Seidel, J. W. 1977a. Elk calving behavior in west central Colorado. Pages 3840 in Colorado Division of Wildlife, editor. Proceedings of the Western States Elk Workshop. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. Seidel, J. W. 1977b. Elk calving habitat. USDA Forest Service Handbook 2509.25 — Watershed Conservation Practices Handbook, zero code, Ch. 10, and Ch.20. Region 2 Amendment No. 2509.25 — 99 — 1. Effective March 22, 1999. Colorado Division of Wildlife and USDA Forest Service, Grand Junction, CO. Shenk, T. 2006. Lynx Update, November 17, 2006. Available online at httD:i/wildlife.state.co.us/NR/rdonlvres/56F725F 1-39DD-45 E2-8F6F- SEE51AD03E2F/0/LvnxUpdateNov92006.pdf. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC 1 8.0 LITERATURE CITED 000051 Erolggml Aibq///r!)/—Lbna//, P,,,/ 09 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COUNTY ACTIVITY ENVELOPE & SITE PLAN REVIEW MAPS SCHIRALLI PARCEL COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I MAPS `100052 OODU53 000054 000055 �lr • • U i!dlrje c^ Gndwrm/. 3 rc amen, - S,Luv/l p" "1 (9 7 2010 • • • • • • • • ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COUNTY ACTIVITY ENVELOPE & SITE PLAN REVIEW 0 ® PHOTOS C ® Schiralli Parcel 0 0 • a 0 • • s • • • • 0 0 s • COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I PHOTOS • 000058 I,%df(e&F' lvga 41 t - Sbins/!P ! Sq)l brr 7, 2010 production habitat (Area D). elk production (Area+O). 000059 Wddkf&Fs& /Ar t—S b,,.#, Parcel 097,2010 Photo 3. Southerly panoramic view of activity envelope looking from east to south to west including the potential production areas (1) & ®. CoLc;RADOWiLDLmESctENCE,LLC I PHOTOS Wild/h & F lw al A r— S,&i Iff Parcel 097, 2010 Photo 0. Northerly panoramic view of activity envelope looking from west to south to east Including the aspen unsuitable to production (area +O). COLORADO WILDLWE SCIENCE, LLC I PHOTOS 000061 Ir ldlf "-E/P + — P,,,,/ U97. ?010 APPENDIX A: CDOW NDIS ungulate seasonal activity area definitions ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK HIGHWAY CROSSING: Those areas where elk movements traditionally cross roads, presenting potential conflicts between elk and motorists. MIGRATION CORRIDORS: A specific mappable site through which large numbers of animals migrate and loss of which would change migration routes. PRODUCTION AREA: That part of the overall range of elk occupied by the females from May 15 to June 15 for calving. (Only known areas are mapped and this does not include all production areas for the DAU). RESIDENT POPULATION: An area used year-round by a population of elk. Individuals could be found in any part of the area at any time of the year; the area cannot be subdivided into seasonal ranges. It is most likely included within the overall range of the larger population. SEVERE WINTER: That part of the range of a species where 90 percent of the individuals are located when the annual snowpack is at its maximum and/or temperatures are at a minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. The winter of 1983-84 is a good example of a severe winter. SUMMER CONCENTRATION: Those areas where elk concentrate from mid-June through mid-August. High quality forage, security, and lack of disturbance are characteristics of these areas to meet the high energy demands of lactation, calf reanng, antler growth, and general preparation for the rigors of fall and winter. SUMMER RANGE: That part of the range of a species where 90% of the individuals are located between spring green -up and the first heavy snowfall, or during a site specific period of summer as defined for each DAU. Summer range is not necessarily exclusive of winter range; in some areas winter range and summer range may overlap. WINTER CONCENTRATION: That part of the winter range of a species where densities are at least 200%, greater than the surrounding winter range density during the same period used to define winter range in the average five winters out of ten. WINTER RANGE: That part of the overall range of a species where 90 percent of the individuals are located during the average five winters out of ten from the first heavy snowfall to spring green -up, or during a site specific period of winter as defined for each DAU. MULE DEER CONCENTRATION AREA: That part of the overall range where higher quality habitat supports significantly higher densities than surrounding areas. These areas are typically occupied year round and are not necessarily associated with a specific season. Includes rough break country, riparian areas, small drainages, and large areas of irrigated cropland. HIGHWAY CROSSING: Those areas where mule deer movements traditionally cross roads, presenting potential conflicts between mule deer and motorists. MIGRATION CORRIDORS: A specific mappable site through which large numbers of animals migrate and loss of which would change migration routes. RESIDENT POPULATION: An area that provides year-round range for a population of mule deer. The resident mule deer use all of the area all year; it cannot be subdivided into seasonal ranges although it may be included within the overall range of the larger population. SEVERE WINTER: That part of the overall range where 90% of the individuals are located when the annual snowpack is at its maximum and/or temperatures are at a minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. SUMMER RANGE: That part of the overall range where 90% of the individuals are located between spring green - up and the first heavy snowfall. Summer range is not necessarily exclusive of winter range; in some areas winter range and summer range may overlap. WINTER CONCENTRATION: That part of the winter range where densities are at least 200% greater than the surrounding winter range density during the same period used to define winter range in the average five winters out of ten. WINTER RANGE: That part of the overall range where 90 percent of the individuals are located during the average five winters out of ten from the first heavy snowfall to spring green -up, or during a site specific period of winter as defined for each DAU. COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I APPENDIX ACDOW NDIS ungulate seasonal activity area definitions oO�JC?62 ii II1/A/)r c^ 1'.mlry,ml. i.rmrvnrnl- S, hrlal/ Pmrrl U9 � ip1(I APPENDIX B: State of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates AMPHIBIANS rw, Bujo boreos boreas SE 7Leopard og Acris crepitons SC mouth Toad Gastrophryne olivacea SC +� yy Frog Rana pipiens SC Wood Frog Rana sylvatica SC Plains Leopard Frog Rana blairi SC Couch's Spadefoot Scaphiopus couchii SC BIRDS Whooping Crane Grus americana FE, SE Least Tern Sterna antillarum FE, SE Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax troilln extimus FE, SE Plains Sharp -Tailed Grouse Tymponuchus phosianellus jamesii SE Piping Plover Charodrius melodus circumcinctus FT, ST �+. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocepholus ST M Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida FT, ST ... VW Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia ST `^ i✓ Lesser Prairie -Chicken T m anuchus ollidicinctus ST Y P P Western Yellow -Billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus SC Greater Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis tobido 5C Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SC Gunnison Sage -Grouse Centrocercus minimus SC A American Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus anatum SC Greater Sage Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus SC Western Snowy Plover Choradrius a/exandrinus SC Mountain Plover Charodrius montanus SC Long -Billed Curlew Numenius americanus SC Columbian Sharp -Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phosianellus columbionus SC FISH Bonytail Gila elegans FE, SE Razorback Sucker Xyrouchen texonus FE, SE Humpback Chub Gila cypher FE, ST Colorado Pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius FE, ST Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki stomias FT, ST Rio Grande Sucker Catostomus plebeius SE �A 11111110 Lake Chub Couesius plumbeus SE ® Plains Minnow Hybognathus placitus SE Suckermouth Minnow Phenocobius mirabilis SE Northern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus eos SE Southern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus erythrogoster SE Brassy Minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni ST COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I APPENDIX BState of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates J.63 nr z, Amo Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus ST Arkansas Darter Etheostoma cragini ST Mountain Sucker Catostomus playtrhynchus SC Plains Orangethroat Darter Etheostoma spectabile SC Iowa Darter Etheostoma exile SC Rio Grande Chub Gila pandoro SC 11I Colorado Roundtail Chub Gila robusto SC Stonecat Noturusflavus SC Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus SC Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis SC n M✓ Flathead Chub Platygabio gracilus SC MAMMALS w� Gray Wolf Canis lupus FE, SE Black -Footed Ferret Mustela nigripes FE, SE Grizzly Bear Ursus arctos FT, SE Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei FT, ST Lynx Lynx canadensis FT, SE a✓ Wolverine Gulo gulo SE River Otter Lontra canadensis ST vrr Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SE �^ Townsend's Big -Eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens SC tld Black -Tailed Prairie Dog Cynomys /udovicianus SC Bona's Pocket Gopher Thomomy bottoe rubidus SC a, VsI Northern Pocket Gopher Thomamys talpoides macrotis SC Swift fox Vulpes velax SC Yd REPTILES Triploid Checkered Whiptail Cnerridophorus neotesselatus SC Midget Faded Rattlesnake Crotalus viridrs concolor SC ® Longnose Leopard Lizard Gombelia wislizenii SC Yellow Mud Turtle Kinosternon flavescens SC Common King Snake Lampropeltis getulo SC Texas Blind Snake Leptotyphlops dulcis SC Texas Horned Lizard Phrynosoma cornutum SC Roundtail Horned Lizard Phrynosoma modestum SC ,® Massasauga Sistrurus catenotus SC Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis SC 0 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I APPENDIX 8: State of Colorado Threatened &Endangered Vertebrates ® If 'UhR Eo%,era/, I...... {Jain'Pmwl 0972010 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COUNTY ACTIVITY ® ENVELOPE & SITE PLAN REVIEW wr EXHIBITS r Schiralli Parcel w.+ .r yr i✓ ii a s a COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC I EXHIBITS 0 000065 gh 7/15/2010 2:57 PM Jonathan Lowsky From: Groves, John [John.Groves@state.00.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 7:48 AM To: jonathan@colowildsci.com Subject: RE: Lot 39 Sopris Mtn Ranch Jonathan, I agree with this assessment. The proposed activity envelope should have minimal impact on elk production due to the poor quality of the aspen stands located in close proximity. The lot does provide important fall/spring transition range as evidenced by the amount browse and tracks and scat in the area. In order to minimize disturbance outside of the Aft 111111110 activity envelope I do recommend that no dogs are kept onsite, or that there is a 1 dog limit with kennel restrictions. John s John Groves District Wildlife Manager Carbondale w 970-947-2933 rr low From: Jonathan Lowsky [mailto:jonathan@colowildsci.com] .. Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:03 PM To: Groves, John 0 Subject: Lot 39 Sopris Mtn Ranch May 27, 2010 VIA EMAIL: iohn.Rroves(a—),state.co.us O John Groves Colorado Division of Wildlife 1500 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Schiralli Property, Lot 39 Sopris Mountain Ranch Dear John; The purpose of this letter is to confirm your conclusions regarding wildlife habitat on and within close proximity to the Schiralli Property at Sopris Mountain Ranch (Lot 39). We visited the proposed activity envelope on May 27'h and walked the area surrounding the site with particular emphasis on the aspen habitat on May 18`h and 27th. The activity envelope is situated on a small sagebrush dominated knoll or rise. We agreed ® that the aspen on the Property (O on attached Map I) was unlikely to be active calving habitat and that most of ® the aspen within the '/4 mile buffer is not suitable for elk production. We did find that the aspen stand to the north that is primarily on Lot 37 (02 on attached Map 1), was a high quality stand with many of the parameters that are typically associated with elk production habitat. This stand is approximately 925 feet to the north and of ® the activity envelope and across Sopris Mountain Ranch Road. A portion of this stand is within the '/4 mile ® 1 uu U66 7/15/2010 2:57 PM buffer. There is also aspen habitat due north and within a''/4 mile of the Property that is suitable calving habitat as well but is separated from the Property by a steep south -facing slope (@ on attached Map 1). Given the topography of the activity envelope, the location of Sopris Mountain Ranch Road and the lack of suitable conditions in the aspen on the Property, and adjacent residential development on Lot 41, you believe that development of a single family home on the activity envelope is unlikely to result in any significant impact on elk production and that a reduction in the prescribed'/4 mile (1,320) foot buffer is appropriate. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC =sky Wildlife Biologist/Principal Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC 0100 Elk Run Drrve. Suite 128A • Basalt, CO 81621 • 970 927 4549 • nifoRcolowililm com • www ColoWildSo cont Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2913 - Release Date: 06/02/10 03:57:00 2 00, 006 ATTACHMENT�O Sandra Schiralli RETA Deepwater 121 Harrington Sound Road Post Office Bos HS 100 Harrington Sound Smiths Parrish Bermuda, HS02 HSBX June 9, 2010 Mike Kraemer Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope Plan Dear Mike: I am the owner of Lot 39 Sopris Mountain Ranch (Parcel ID # 2465-334-01-016). I authorize Davis Horn Incorporated to submit a land use application to establish an Activity Envelope for my lot. Please contact me at 441-293-7990 if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, �"W(ka Sandra Schiralli 000068 ATTACHM PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '' AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION FEES COUNTYPITKIN " S (herei after "A PLICANT") AGREE AS FOLLOWS: O 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for ��1� w eStc�( P , riv.n� ® R k'vs (hereinafter, the " OJECT��----- O 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 018-2004 O establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the COUNTY'S policy that development shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in the O COUNTY. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair to the public and to reflect the expense ® incurred in providing such services to the public. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed PROJECT, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. ® 4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees charged for the processing of land use applications shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type of land use review. 5. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to ® complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of ® County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners ® to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to O decision. O 6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of its right O to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay a base O fee in the amount of $ 3 I �t -_ �_ which is based on {?+ hours of staff time, and if actual time spent O by staff to process the application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20%, then the COUNTY will bill the APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments *shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such Oaccrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. ®PITKIN COUNTY S ok Sc11; r, I I. �.<n r� ® Zoin—dy Houben By: 0 mmunity Development Director -S rti Sch'iru�l,` � O Print Name and Title (if applicable) O Date: cz)('rA 1 O O Mailing Address: O �} C - I ur C" 0 0 • 0 6 7 �� � 7C I-1 i 40u I l � if- Sly . r1 %sy Peele Labels II n ♦sivIIIIIIIIIIII Send�Iqq Bneto'� " �� �P•UP Eudg"e'O •Averym Template 5160® 1 On Feed Pepar expose •GAN JUDY JOANN KATES TRUST HOSIER GERALD D REV TRUST MOUNT SOPRIS RANCH HOA INC ; CIO GAY LEWIS O BOX 3285 j#ASALT, CO 81621 PO BOX 12354 ASPEN, CO 81612 { 1802 CR 102 CARBONDALE, CO 81823 `STUART LETTICE B TRUST 50% STUART WALTER B IV TRUST 50% USFS FOREST SUPERVISOR •)IO WALTER B STUARTIVINSON & C/O WALTER STUARTNINSON & ELKINS 520 MADISON AVE 34TH FLOOR PO BOX GLENWO 48 SPRINGS, CO 81802 LKINS W300 FIRST CITY TOWER/1001 FANNIN NEW YORK, NY 10022 �$T OUSTON, TX 77001 L m� 12- 2300 -300Pett- 3 • voQr1S nlc�vni�in� Qau�h • 5 chl rale • • • • • Ii ® • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • 0100070 Otiquettes faciles b peler ; Replies A la hachure afln da i Sens de I- —k.. n...._u..rri www.averycom s-ann.rn.evcuv • • ATTACHMENT 13 • • • CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP • • o Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that o SANDRA RETA SCHIRALLI are the owner's in fee simple of the following described property: • PARCEL 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH • A parcel of land, Parcel 39 of the Sopris Mountain Ranch, being part of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 33 • and the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the Sixth Principal • Meridian, which parcel is more fully described as follows: ® Beginning at the southwest corner of Section 34, ® thence S 89°54'34" E 137.11 feet along the south line of Section 34; thence N 20021' E 789.70 feet; ® thence N 62°50' W 280.00 feet; ® thence N 68°00' W 1,078.78 feet; thence N 53'10' W 531.04 feet; 0 thence S 1" 35'W 1,221.13 feet to the south line of Section 33; • thence S 89051'34" E 1,374.28 feet to the point of beginning. ® COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO • ENCUMBRANCES: • • NONE ® This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. • PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. • BY: • ® authorized signature • CERTIFIED TO: January 11, 2011 at 8:00 A.M. ® Job No. ACCOM2548 • 0 • • PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public that on July 8, 2015, the Pitkin County Community Development Director granted approval for the Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (Case P004-11; Deter. #044-2015). The property is located on West Sopris Creek Road and is legally described as parcel 39 of the Sopris Mountain Ranch being part of the S %: of the SE '/. of Section 33 and the SW '/< of the SW '/. of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6'" P.M. This site-specific development plan grants a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes. S/Cindy Houben Community Development Director Pitkin County, Colorado Published in the Aspen Times Weekly, on JULY 23, 2015. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (Case P004-11) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Sandra Schiralli (P O Box HS 100, Harrington Sound, Bermuda HSBX) requesting to establish an Activity Envelope and Ridgeline Review with vested rights. The property is located on West Sopris Creek Road and is legally described as parcel 39 of the Sopris Mountain Ranch being part of the S %: of the SE '/. of Section 33 and the SW '/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6" P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2465-334- 01-016. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. For further information, contact Cari Anne Holcomb at (970) 920-5092. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on January 22, 2015. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subject property A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, by February 23, 2015. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (Case P004-11) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Sandra Schiralli (P O Box HS 100, Harrington Sound, Bermuda HSBX) requesting to establish an activity envelope with vested rights. The property is located on West Sopris Creek Road and is legally described as parcel 39 of the Sopris Mountain Ranch being part of the S '/z of the SE '/4 of Section 33 and the SW 1/4 of the SW/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6`h P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2465-334-01-016. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. For further information, contact Cari Anne Holcomb at (970) 920-5092. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 13, 2011. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subject property A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, by April 13, 2011. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. County of Pitkin - } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE & } ss. MAILING PURSUANT TO State of Colorado } PITIQN COUNTY LAND USE CODE SECTION 2-20-100 I, r Jt to (1 \"lxn , being or representing an Applicant to the Pitkin County Development Department, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 2-20-100 of the Pitkin County Land Use Regulations in the following manner: By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at least 30 days prior to the public comment deadline to all owners of property within 300' of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on , i (:,% 201 qwhich is 30 days prior to the deadline of 2 ('L-1 2015. The names and addresses of the adjacent property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the public comment. 2. By posting a sign in a cons lcuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) on the `s- 6 , 201 _!rwhich is at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public comment deadline. A photograph of the posted sign is a shed hereto. .e�"rVA rti SGA" r t I C Applicant's name ` Signatur (Attach photograph here) Signebefore me this�day of , 20 by WTI NESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: o /� Ct�44,2e VIA GAcourigAadminVPo \afdavit for Activity Envelope/Site Plan/Caretaker Dwelling Unit I ,f' y PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (Case P004-11) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Sandra Schiralli (P O Box HS 100, Harrington Sound, Bermuda HSBX) requesting to establish an Activity Envelope and Ridgeline Review with vested rights. The property is located on West Sopris Creek Road and is legally described as parcel 39 of the Sopris Mountain Ranch being part of the S % of the SE '/< of Section 33 and the SW '/< of the SW %< of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 87 West of the 6s' P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2465-334- 01-016. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. For further information, contact Cari Anne Holcomb at (970) 920-5092. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on January 22, 2015. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subject property A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, by February 23, 2015. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. 11 a ZGANJUDYJOANN KATES TRUST PO BOX 3285 BFSALT, CO 816213285 HOSIER GERALD D REV TRUST PO BOX 12354 ASPEN, CO 81612 STUART LETTICE B TRUST 50% STUART WALTER B IV TRUST 50% 2300 FIRST CITY TOWER/1001 FANNIN 601 LEXINGTON AVE 31ST FLOOR ST NEW YORK, NY 10022 HOUSTON, TX 77001 Sc.ht,rwlli AIA a,ili ok I - 2-1 -ZOIS MOUNT SOPRIS RANCH HOA INC 1802 CR 102 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 1 � � I 1 ^ I r 0 Cari Anne Holcomb From: Glenn Horn [ghorn@rof.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 20112:57 PM To: Can Anne Holcomb Subject: Schiralli Cari Anne: I just spoke to Michael Doyle. He is the Architect who works for the Sopris Mt. Ranch HOA. The HOA wants us to put up some storypoles. I told him we would do it, but are going to wait for things to dry out. The HOA may miss the comment deadline. It is okay with me if they comment after the deadline. Glenn Davis Horn Incorporated Glenn Horn AICP 97D-925-6587 Email secured by Check Point Carl Anne Holcomb From: Michael Doyle [mjdarch@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:15 AM To: Cari Anne Holcomb Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Attachments: Lot 39 memo to Cari Anne at Pitco.doc Hi Carl Anne, I spoke to Glenn Horn on this project and he said we had a deadline of April 13, 2011 to comment on their application. Attached please find a memo addressing this and asking for the right to reserve comment until story poles can be erected. Call or email with any questions or comments on this. Thank you, Michael Email secured by Check Point IN Carl Anne Holcomb From: Michael Doyle [mjdarch@sopris.netl Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:15 AM To: Cad Anne Holcomb Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Attachments: Lot 39 memo to Cari Anne at Pitco.doc Hi Carl Anne, I spoke to Glenn Horn on this project and he said we had a deadline of April 13, 2011 to comment on their application. Attached please find a memo addressing this and asking for the right to reserve comment until story poles can be erected. Call or email with any questions or comments on this. Thank you, Michael Email secured by Check Point 3 Cari Anne Holcomb From: Michael Doyle [mjdarch@sopds.net] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 3:22 PM To: Cari Anne Holcomb Subject: RE: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Cari Anne, I am available either of those dates you mentioned and will stand by to hear. A couple of the board members are concerned about this envelope shift and have requested that I ask Glen to put up story poles at both the existing and proposed envelope locations. I am in the process of requesting that now. Thanks, Michael From: Cari Anne Holcomb [mailto:CariAnne.Holcomb@co.pitkin.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 18,201112:24 PM To: Michael Doyle Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: RE: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Michael et at Glenn has informed me that the story poles should be up next week and the snow conditions have improved. We are trying to set up a site visit for next week, and thought it might be a good idea to have you join us. This is especially important because the site is very windy and there is a high possibility of the wind blowing the poles down—so we need to go while they are still up (its very expensive to have them reset). Right now we are shooting for Friday, May 270 at 9 AM with Wednesday, May 25v at 2PM as a back up date/time. It might be easier to call me. If I am not at my desk, please leave a message and I will get right back to you. THANKS Carl Anne Holcomb I Planner t 970.920.5092 1 f 970.920.5439 CariAnne Holcomb0co.uitkin.co.us From: Michael Doyle [mailto:mjdarch@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, April 11, 20119:15 AM To: Cari Anne Holcomb Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Cari Anne, I spoke to Glenn Horn on this project and he said we had a deadline of April 13, 2011 to comment on their application. I Attached please find a memo addressing this and asking for the right to reserve comment until story poles can be erected. Call or email with any questions or comments on this. Thank you, Michael Email secured by Check Point Email secured by Check Point Cari Anne Holcomb From: Cad Anne Holcomb Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:08 PM To: John.groves@state.co.us Subject: FW: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi John: Glenn Horn and I would like to set up a site visit with you, hopefully this week (maybe Friday), at the above mentioned site. The neighbors via the HOA have raised issues with the new, proposed envelope location, based on the recommendations which came out of your site visit with Jonathan Lowsky. The recommendations in this application are contradictory to some of the recommendations previously made by Kevin. Glenn and I were hoping that a site visit with the various stakeholders might lead to a resolution of the issues for this parcel. The neighbors are more agreeable to the old, previously approved envelope. Currently there are story poles up on the proposed envelope site. We would like to meet while these are still standing (wind at the site is an issue). We were hoping you would have some availability at the end of the week, either Thursday morning or Friday. I know you are very busy this time of year, but it is our belief that we can resolve the issues and avoid going before the BOCC. I appreciate your time! Carl Anne Holcomb I Planner Pitkin County I Community Development 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 t 970.920.50921 f 970.920.5439 CariAnne Holwarbidcaoitkin.co.us From: Michael Doyle [mailto:mjdarch@sopris.net] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 20113:22 PM To: Carl Anne Holcomb Subject: RE: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Carl Anne, I am available either of those dates you mentioned and will stand by to hear. A couple of the board members are concerned about this envelope shift and have requested that I ask Glen to put up story poles at both the existing and proposed envelope locations. I am in the process of requesting that now. Thanks, Michael From: Can Anne Holcomb [mailto:CariAnne.Holcomb@co.pitkin.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 201112:24 PM To: Michael Doyle Lp Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: RE: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Michael et al Glenn has informed me that the story poles should be up next week and the snow conditions have improved. We are trying to set up a site visit for next week, and thought it might be a good idea to have you join us. This is especially important because the site is very windy and there is a high possibility of the wind blowing the poles down —so we need to go while they are still up (it's very expensive to have them reset). Right now we are shooting for Friday, May 27' at 9 AM with Wednesday, May 25' at 2PM as a back up date/time. It might be easier to call me. If I am not at my desk, please leave a message and I will get right back to you. THANKS Carl Anne Holcomb I Planner t 970.920.5092 1 f 970.920.5439 Ca riAn ne. Ho Ico m bPco. oitki n. co. u s From: Michael Doyle [mailto:mjdarch@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, April 11, 20119:15 AM To: Carl Anne Holcomb Cc: R.A. John R. Nichols; Rob Rose; Walter Stuart Subject: Sopris Mtn. Ranch, Lot 39, Schiralli building envelope proposed relocation Hi Carl Anne, I spoke to Glenn Horn on this project and he said we had a deadline of April 13, 2011 to comment on their application. Attached please find a memo addressing this and asking for the right to reserve comment until story poles can be erected. Call or email with any questions or comments on this. Thank you, Michael Email secured by Check Point Email secured by Check Point 3 Cari Anne Holcomb From: Rob Rose [robrose@msepkg.com[ Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 10:25 AM To: Cari Anne Holcomb Subject: Schiralli lot 39 at Sopris Mountain Ranch. Hi Cari, I was glad to have met you last Friday. Thank you for your time I drove West Sopris Creek Road from mile marker 4 to the end of the road. The story poles at Lot 39 definitely break the ridgeline as seen from W. Sopris Creek Rd in this area. 4 of the 5 homeowners board of directors will be here at the end of June. Maybe we can have a meeting with the wildlife folks later when the board will be present on the ranch. What do you think? Best, Rob Rose robroseWroseok¢.com 1-970-927-6515 Fax: 1-970-927-6514 Rose Packaging & Design, Inc. Box 3316 4000 Sopris Mountain Road Basalt, CO 81621 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Email secured by Check Point 1 Parcel Detail Paget of 3 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail Photographs Tax AreaI Account Number 11 Parcel Number I2010 Mill Levy 016 ]R006953 246533401016 1 54.788 Owner Name and Address SCHIRALLI SANDRA RETA PO BOX HS 100 HARRINGTON SOUND BERMUDA HSBX Legal Description Subdivision: SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH Lot: 39 Section: 33 Township: 8 Range: 87 PARCEL 39 BEING PART OF S2SE4 OF SEC 33-8-87 & SW4SW4 IIOF SEC 34-8-87 CONT 35.03 AC Mil, DESC BY M/B BK 611 PG II 11833 AKA PARCEL 39 I� Location Physical Address: W SOPRIS CREEK RD BASALT Subdivision: I SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH Land Acres: 35.0299987792969 Land Sq Ft: I 0 Section Township Range 33 8 87 2010 Property Tax Valuation Information `&_:� ihttp://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=246533401016 3/1/2011 Parcel Detail Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 1,100,000 319,000 Improvements: 0 0 Tota:11-1,100,0001 319,000 Sale Date: 7/8/1997 Sale Price:425,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Due as of 9/14/2010 Year Balance Due II $0.00IIDelinquent Years' Balance Due II Balance Due Tax Year Due InI Tax + Special Assessment Amount 2009 2010 $17,053.76 2008 2009 $14,878.36 2007 2008 $14,923.56 2006 2007 $12,873.04 2005 2006 $12,447.96 Ton of Page Assessor Database Search O tU ions I Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page Page 2 of 3 The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable Z, http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=246533401016 3/1/2011 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. 3 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?PareelNumber=246533401016 3/1/2011 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439 February 23, 2011 Glen Horn 215 South Monarch Street, Suite # 104 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (PID#2465-334-01-016; Case# P004-11) Dear Mr. Hom: The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice by U.S. Mail to all property owners within 300' of the subject property with the return address of the Community Development Department (copy of notice will be mailed to you by the Community Development Department) by March 13 2011. The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the mailing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Mailing and a photograph of the posted sign as proof of compliance with the Code. A property owner receiving the public notice who wishes to submit comments or objections to the Community Development by 13`h day of April, 2011. If any objections to the development application are received by this date, the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) on the 29th day of March, 2011, which is at least fifteen (15) days prior to April 13, 2011. This must be submitted prior to any approvals being granted. If you have questions, please call Cari Anne Holcomb, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5092. Sincerely, Bonnie Waechtler Administrative Assistant Encl: Affidavit Code Section 2-20-100 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5526 FAX# (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM To: Colorado Division of Wildlife Aspen Fire Protection District Emma Caucus Sopris Mountain Ranch Homeowners Association FROM: Cari Anne Holcomb, Community Development Department Carianne.holcomb2co.vitkin.co.us Re: Schiralli Activity Envelope with Vesting (PID 2465-334-01-016; Case P004-10) DATE: February 23, 2011 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by Sandra Schiralli. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review the application. Please return your comments to me by Wednesday, April 13, 2011. httD://www.asi)enDitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/countv/Com%20Dev/Planninv/Land Use An plications/1'004 11 app.ndf If you require a paper copy of this application contact Bonnie Waechtler at bonnie.waechtlera,co.pitkin.co.us or 920-5109. Thank you. PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00038713 Name: Davis Horn Inc Date:8/11/2015 Project Address: 0 W SOPRIS CREEK RD Type: Permit Number 0004.2011. PLAN check # 5523 Fee Description PP- Planning Hrly Fee 1 Amount 3,250.00 Total: 3,250.00 Cn1"� ♦ c F w Communitv Develovment 130 S Galena St Third Floor Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-5109 To: Sandra Reta Schiralli 14471 MIRAMAR PRKWY #401 MIRAMAR, FL 33027 Planning Fees Mike Kraemer Invoice Date: July 8, 2015 Case Number. P004-11 Payment Terms _ Uuc ❑pun rccciht Hours Date Applicant/Description Unit Price Line Total; I u.uu 7/8/2015 Additional Flat Fees 325.00 3,250.00 Subtotal $ 3,250.00 Sales Tax Total $ 3,250.00 Make all checks payable to Pitkin County Treasurer Thank you! 130 S Galena St Third Floor Aspen, CO 81611 PITKIN COOUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELCIIENT Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00030487 Name: Sandra R Schiralli Project Address: 0 W SOPRIS CREEK RD Type: check # 588 Permit Number Fee Description 0004.2011.PLAN PP- Flat Fee 0004.2011.PLAN PP- Clerk Tech Fee 0004.2011.PLAN PP- Public Notice Fee Total: Date:2/2/2011 Amount 3,120.00 25.00 54.00 3,199.00 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 = 150 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE S1/2 OF THE SE1 /4 OF SECTION 33, AND THE SW1 4 OF THE SWII4 OF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE 89°54'34"E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N20'21'00"E 789.70 FEET, THENCE N62°50'00"W 280.00 FEET; THENCE N88'00'00"W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N53'10'00"W 531.04 FEET: S01 °35'00"W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S89'51'34"E 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 35.03 ACRES MORE OR LESS. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. NOTES: DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD, 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OVERVIEW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 28. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO , TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND REBAR AND YELLOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. "ILEGEN EXISTING LOT LINE 1011111111111111 � � ENVELOPE BOUNDARY Disclaimer Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas will be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any property. I CHRISTOPHER]. LACROIX ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR SANDRA RETA SCHIRIALLI PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR This Activity Envelope Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this t day oflafC_, 2P & subject to Administrative Decision No. 44-2015 recorded as reception No. 622409. CINDY HOUBEN, DIRECTOR fAi(, cx�- N (A -1 I * SEAL Acceptance for Recording e�''•••••••••'c1` ®LORA This Activity Envelope Map has been accepted for filing in the office of the; Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, at• o'clock, �` m, this day of jri plat book �. , page as reception number t4o_4 Ci A. RECEPTION##: 625989,12/30/2015 at 10:08:01 AM, 1 OF 2, R $21.00 Janice K. Clerk anNecorde�'t>cP%4w Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO - - - PLAT BK 113 PG 36 N N rn i� O Z " kvi 0 Wd A 0, LVA A kelu LOT 399PORIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33.34, TOWNSHI8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 ------------------------------ ---------------------- -'"""" - j--_____------ S53°09'31 "E _'---- - "-, 531.04' - "------------------ -- BENCHMARK: FND REBAR \\\ AND YELLOW CAP #14111- `\\ AT ELEVATION 8361.13'---- " ------------- - 4 �00:j i Q��QpPo rL O � 'T p0 & W� \N R`OP0 z0 N z Sp ENVELOPE #2 LANDSCAPING) U):)aQ zaoOz 1� 1.19 ACRES O j U UU � JmUp 0 O 0 ZZW 0 W o, 1-0 ' 4 .. rp Z � �� / Z� �> z ,S %ApUNTAiN ROAD i sOPR �00 LOT 39 0 PF VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 = 150 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE S1/2 OF THE SE1 /4 OF SECTION 33, AND THE SW1 4 OF THE SWII4 OF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE 89°54'34"E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N20'21'00"E 789.70 FEET, THENCE N62°50'00"W 280.00 FEET; THENCE N88'00'00"W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N53'10'00"W 531.04 FEET: S01 °35'00"W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S89'51'34"E 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 35.03 ACRES MORE OR LESS. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. NOTES: DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD, 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OVERVIEW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 28. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO , TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND REBAR AND YELLOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. "ILEGEN EXISTING LOT LINE 1011111111111111 � � ENVELOPE BOUNDARY Disclaimer Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas will be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any property. I CHRISTOPHER]. LACROIX ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR SANDRA RETA SCHIRIALLI PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR This Activity Envelope Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this t day oflafC_, 2P & subject to Administrative Decision No. 44-2015 recorded as reception No. 622409. CINDY HOUBEN, DIRECTOR fAi(, cx�- N (A -1 I * SEAL Acceptance for Recording e�''•••••••••'c1` ®LORA This Activity Envelope Map has been accepted for filing in the office of the; Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, at• o'clock, �` m, this day of jri plat book �. , page as reception number t4o_4 Ci A. RECEPTION##: 625989,12/30/2015 at 10:08:01 AM, 1 OF 2, R $21.00 Janice K. Clerk anNecorde�'t>cP%4w Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO - - - PLAT BK 113 PG 36 N N rn i� O Z " kvi 0 Wd A 0, LVA A kelu LOT 399PORIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33.34, TOWNSHI8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 ------------------------------ ---------------------- -'"""" - j--_____------ S53°09'31 "E _'---- - "-, 531.04' - "------------------ -- BENCHMARK: FND REBAR \\\ AND YELLOW CAP #14111- `\\ AT ELEVATION 8361.13'---- " ------------- - Z Z 00 LL, �00:j U (� ¢0ZP rL O � 'T p0 & W� ... Q(7WU2.t z0 N z PROPOSED ACTIVITY (ACCESS, UTILITY AND ENVELOPE #2 LANDSCAPING) U):)aQ zaoOz JZ W 1.19 ACRES O j U UU � JmUp 0 Q w= U 0 ZZW 0 W W 1-0 ZWZ= .. rp Z � �� / Z� �> z 0o o/ / aU� �00 U) Z N t 25' WIDE ENVELOPE #3 ` ` ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 (LANDSCAPING) (ACCESS, BUILDING, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING) 0.85 ACRES +/- o / / / / ` I b� PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 35.03 AC +/- N89°51'05"W 1374.28' S87°59'31 "E 1078.78' SW CORNER SECTION 34, T.8S, R.87W, 6TH PM N89054'05"W 137.11' a > UJ U ILw QXO� Z Z 00 LL, �00:j U (� ¢0ZP rL O � 'T p0 & W� ... Q(7WU2.t z0 N z Qol-' n 03 Dix 6 o U):)aQ zaoOz JZ W aox~u O j U UU � JmUp 0 Q w= U 0 U) W LO m� �, j 3r ,F M J Z Y 3 w 80.0 A u ` 0 U -ram Z U _ x a, Z w Q; E0 Z Ude 7- O�O O � > Z Fon 0 ZZW 0 W W 1-0 ZWZ= .. rp Z � �� 4 Z� �> z 0o aU� �00 U) Z N t O -ram �W U _ x a, Z O a' Q; E0 :3 �U o 0 00. U Z a 9 I~ < 2 :1 Z O a' Q; E0 Ude 7- U) � > V Ua ZZW 0 W W 1-0 t3 �� Z� �> z 0o aU� U) GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 320 PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 IN FEET } 1 inch = 80 ft. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN SHEET I OF,2 SHT I YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 ; 150 LEGEN ................... ......... I......... ............8000................... 8004---», .»..» :. :..........:.:....:. EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ENVELOPE BOUNDARY pK"t I w m a, 0 1 Pi iu 0 a, 1 0 61 LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33m34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft a > U IL W ¢aO�" z z I -Q G� 0 Ua O)o QpYt Z�QIal 1 ROP OVN� PSN M 0 N z S0PR�5 l zOpz DZ o �w�Lq -x -jw r QU CQ mOjcD fVLQLd U O Qm►X2 c O� 0v0 n LLG. Z mus 0 U MOUN'TAlN ROAD 6 SOpRiS W = 3� LOT 39 W < IL VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 ; 150 LEGEN ................... ......... I......... ............8000................... 8004---», .»..» :. :..........:.:....:. EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ENVELOPE BOUNDARY pK"t I w m a, 0 1 Pi iu 0 a, 1 0 61 LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33m34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-016 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft a > U IL W ¢aO�" z z I -Q ?0t9J 0 Ua O)o QpYt Z�QIal F,,0 , r IN tnUiw >-wi 0 N z �oH2 5O O o zOpz DZ o �w�Lq -x -jw r QU CQ mOjcD fVLQLd U O Qm►X2 w w U in J 7 a m w N J J C 0 L z a NNW Z ,a oa J Z a ,Q .0 w w �0No n LLG. Z mus 0 U 5U)< 6 z W = 3� z w W < IL z z�.Z° 0 m� O d OJ �Oz U 0 IL x J xU C 0 L U a < Z ,a oa J D 00 ,Q 5 rU V! n LLG. z> ZT*T w� r�� V (u x co i^ 'IL Z ° O PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN. THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN S H E ET 2 OF 2 SHT Z YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. PARCEL ID: 2465-334-01-01E ! \ In r N N L,_J N L0 O Z Op \ \ O` C� ` NT \ �n ' \ \ Q \ PROPOSED ADDITION TO ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 (LANDSCAPING ONLY) 0.06 ACRES +/- S53`09'31 "E \ 531.04' PROPOSED CHANGE TO ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1_., (LANDSCAPING OkLY 0.10 ACRES + EGE 8000 8004 EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ENVELOPE BOUNDARY UPDATE TO ENVELOPE BOUNDARIES Disclaimer Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas will be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any property. Owner / SAMMIE SCHARILLI PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR This Activity Envelope Map has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this day of _, , subject to Resolution No. recorded as reception No. DIRECTOR Acceptance for Recording This Activity Envelope Map has been accepted for filing in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, at o'clock, m, this day of in plat book , page as reception number Clerk and Recorder NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP GRAPHIC SCALE so 0 30 so 120 LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH EMW ( IN FEET ) SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM 1 inch = 60 ft. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO i ------------------ _ BENCHMARK: FND REBAR SAND YELLOW CAP #14111 AT ELEVATION 8361.13' 2 3 \\ 23 19 18 \\ 22 2.0 \ 4 z ?4 25 40 7 16 44 34 •33 z6 \\ z8 z7 5 .37 ;1 � 1 k1%46 43 44. .35 � 1x8 % 48 36 � 49 29 7 47 5X50 53 ?5 ` 52 . 54 55 iz 12 ` 66 58 57. 13 u 69 8 63 2 61 59- 60 68 .70 t., 66,67 7o- _73 _ 71 75 `. 8o .83--8z;13 _ g -a'? aio8 77 9 7Q . 89 88 94. 86 95 ib 914 92 93 •98 .107 •10 100 99 104.. a 1ki6 ul sio 109 3 1A 113 112 11g sib 1. 121 .117 -127 125. i23 lib PROPERTY DESCRIPTION S87°59'31 "E 1078.78' PROPOSED ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #2 (ACCESS, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING) 0.95 ACRES +/- PROPOSED ADDITION TO ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 (BUILDING, ACCESS, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING) 0.10 ACRES +/- PROPOSED ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 (BUILDING, ACCESS, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING) 0.95 ACRES +/- PARCEL 39 SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 35.03 AC +/— A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE S1/2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 33, AND THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE 89'54'34"E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N20'21'00"E 789.70 FEET; THENCE N62'50'00"W 280.00 FEET; THENCE N88'00'00"W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N53'10'00"W 531.04 FEET: S01'35'00"W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S89'51'34"E 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 35.03 ACRES MORE OR LESS. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. N89°51'05"W 1374.28' NOTES: DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD, 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OVERVIEW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 28. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND REBAR AND YELLOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. "IMSITE SCALE: 1=500' f SW CORNER SECTION 34, T.8S, R.87W, 6TH PM N89054'05"W 137.11' IR CO S ,N O C9 SHEET 1 OF 4 W z > OOrw U ° 00 0 W0 �Ir 00 2 ZUNz } L 0 0 P1ok0 �Z OP ? QW U — m U tY O m o ch 4 LL r r PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 SHT 'I Z d In Q ZZ �. a W 00 -JaI- 01 �Z 2 W Z WHO 1-oI o U . Z W z� W96U � w� IL =Z Nap W 4. H god. ��}} mom n IIr.I Z n IA W Of O W aVd U 0 = a t� 2 d PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 SHT 'I W d - Q Olie -JaI- �Z 2 0 V . .5 uvi cin � W � w� =Z W a� vWF�- �m 250 F- aVd ^ Z o d PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 SHT 'I TREENUMBER TYPEOFTREE DBH(IN) DRIPLINE(FT) 1 CONIFERIOUS 28 14 2 ASPEN 12 12 3 ASPEN 12 12 4 ASPEN 12 12 5 ASPEN 13 13 6 ASPEN 13 13 7 ASPEN 13 13 8 ASPEN 14 14 9 ASPEN 13 13 10 ASPEN 12 12 11 ASPEN 14 14 12 ASPEN 12 12 13 ASPEN 12 12 14 ASPEN 12 12 15 ASPEN 13 13 16 ASPEN 12 12 17 ASPEN 12 12 18 ASPEN 12 12 19 ASPEN 12 12 20 ASPEN 12 12 21 ASPEN 12 12 22 ASPEN 13 13 23 ASPEN 15 15 24 ASPEN 15 15 25 ASPEN 15 15 26 ASPEN 14 14 27 ASPEN 14 14 28 ASPEN 16 16 29 ASPEN 16 16 30 ASPEN 12 12 31 ASPEN 13 13 32 ASPEN 14 14 33 ASPEN 15 15 34 ASPEN 13 13 35 ASPEN 18 18 36 ASPEN 15 15 37 ASPEN 11 11 38 ASPEN 13 13 39 ASPEN 12 12 40 ASPEN 18 18 41 ASPEN 13 13 42 ASPEN 13 13 43 ASPEN 13 13 44 ASPEN 14 14 45 ASPEN 12 12 46 ASPEN 13 13 47 ASPEN 18 18 48 ASPEN 16 16 49 ASPEN 13 13 50 ASPEN 18 18 51 ASPEN 16 16 52 ASPEN 12 12 53 ASPEN 16 16 54 ASPEN 13 13 55 ASPEN 14 14 56 ASPEN 13 13 57 ASPEN 14 14 58 ASPEN 16 16 59 ASPEN 15 15 60 ASPEN 12 12 61 ASPEN 14 14 62 ASPEN 12 12 63 ASPEN 15 15 64 ASPEN 12 12 65 ASPEN 13 13 66 ASPEN 14 14 67 ASPEN 14 14 68 ASPEN 14 14 69 ASPEN 13 13 70 ASPEN 14 14 71 ASPEN 14 14 72 ASPEN 18 18 73 ASPEN 8 8 74 ASPEN 13 13 75 ASPEN 13 13 76 ASPEN 12 12 77 ASPEN 12 12 78 ASPEN 13 13 79 ASPEN 13 13 80 ASPEN 13 13 81 ASPEN 12 12 82 ASPEN 13 13 83 ASPEN 13 13 84 ASPEN 13 13 85 ASPEN 14 14 86 ASPEN 13 13 87 ASPEN 14 14 88 ASPEN 13 13 89 ASPEN 13 13 90 ASPEN 14 14 91 ASPEN 12 12 92 ASPEN 13 13 93 ASPEN 13 13 94 ASPEN 13 13 95 ASPEN 14 14 96 ASPEN 14 14 97 ASPEN 13 13 98 ASPEN 18 18 99 ASPEN 16 16 100 ASPEN 14 14 TREENUMBER TYPEOFTREEDBH (IN) DRIP LINE(FT) 101 ASPEN14 Qz 14 102 ASPEN 19 19 103 ASPEN 16 16 104 ASPEN 15 15 105 ASPEN 14 14 106 ASPEN 16 16 107 ASPEN 16 16 108 ASPEN 12 12 109 ASPEN 14 14 110 ASPEN 15 15 111 ASPEN 16 16 112 ASPEN 15 15 113 ASPEN 15 15 114 ASPEN 14 14 115 ASPEN 12 12 116 ASPEN 14 14 117 ASPEN 15 15 118 ASPEN 11 11 119 ASPEN 12 12 120 ASPEN 12 12 121 ASPEN 14 14 122 ASPEN 12 12 123 ASPEN 15 15 124 ASPEN 12 12 125 ASPEN 14 14 126 ASPEN 10 10 127 ASPEN 15 15 128 ASPEN 6 6 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF THE S1 /2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 33, AND THE SW1 //4 OF THE SW1 4 OF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRI CIPAL MERIDIAN AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE 89'54'34"E 137.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N20'21'00"E 789.70 FEET; THENCE N62'50'00"W 280.00 FEET; THENCE N88'00'00"W 1078.78 FEET; THENCE N53'10'00"W 531.04 FEET: S01'35'00"W 1221.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S89'51'34"E 1374.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 35.03 ACRES MORE OR LESS. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO NOTES: DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 23RD, 2014. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED OVERVIEW MAP OF SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 28. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM BENCHMARK AT NOTED PROPERTY CORNER ON MAP. FOUND REBAR AND YELLOW CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. LEGEN 8000 8004 EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ENVELOPE BOUNDARY UPDATE TO ENVELOPE BOUNDARIES Disclaimer Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the existence of environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof, the provisions of the Pitkin County regulations do not in any way assure or imply that areas outside of designated hazard areas will be free from hazards, or that approved mitigation measures will guarantee the safety of any property. Owner / SAMMIE SCHARILLI PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR This Activity Envelope Map has been reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Community Development Director this day of _, _ subject to Resolution No. recorded as reception No. DIRECTOR Acceptance for Recording This Activity Envelope Map has been accepted for filing in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, at o'clock, m, this day of in plat book . page as reception number Clerk and Recorder ACTIVITY ENVELOPE MAP LOT 39, SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH SECTION 33-34, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY LINE \ BENCHMARK: FND REBAR AND YELLOW Ir CAP #14111, ELEVATION 8361.13' EXISTING CROSS �\ CULVERT _------_--I_ ` S87'59'31 "E ` 61.69' r POINT OF BEGINNING f PARCEL ID: 2465-334-0 i i 60.0' ROW BASED ON CL / OF EXISTING ROADWAY EXISTING ROADWAY 31"E 305.66 - \ EXISTING PATH II 1 N �` S70'08'00"W 1 `o+25.0' F 11 1 a ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #2 \ /06 (ACCESS, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING)- EXISTING 9 0.950 ACRES PATH ti PARCEL 39 N19052'00"W "w 12519 10 �� �q` 0 pti SOPRIS MOUNTAIN RANCH 25.0 °° \ / \ \ 8 ♦ 2 \ 35.03 AC-+/- \\ �p9��A 23 22 19 20 lg 0 '0010 ♦ 2 \\ 25' WIDE 0810 �� ♦� 4 \\ C' LANDSCAPE 51p010 \ ♦U \\ ENVELOP #2E . \\\\ •32 24 2 ♦ o+ �. 11.. \ 040 5 7 ,p9 44 34 •33 26 UU r- 25.0' ♦ C 25' WIDE LANDSCAPE ENVELOPE #1 S19'52'00"E 176.60' 45% ♦♦ 46 8 43 8 ♦ 4. 28 i7 21 ♦ p 5 �\ .37 tr 41 0 \ 42 •35 �\ \ 49 ♦o 47 ; 515 53 ISAit 52 . 54\ ` 55• 127 ♦ 56 s8 �._. 33 2 61 ; 59• 60 68 64 65 66 .67 _ 74• It 36 oda ♦ \ \\ Qz 29 STORY POLE � ♦ rn 7 \\. STORY 00,R 0• \\� POLE Ul Z ♦ 15 (_ `r • IL C .7 O 1\\ 12 ♦ � 25' ADDITION TO BUILaING, a PROPOSED ACTIVITY ENVELOPE #1 } 1- } ACCESS, UTILITY AND \� (BUILDING, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPING) 1 LANDSCAPE ENVELOPE. 57. 0.950 ACRES +/- 13 6 11 g ` 7 75 1. 8o / • 81 82:83 77° 78 AD ♦ • 89 88 90 §1 9°2 93 9 •70 STORY S34'40 49 W 73 0 71 POLE 30.69' •10 1ofA 160 99 104- 3 iib ♦ 119..1 .121 ,117 .127 - 125' 123 1i6 84. 85 87 86 95 94- .98 ,107 •1 106 111 5' ��4 113 112 116 STORY POLE 110 log N70'08'00"E 234.36' 9 10 30 SHEET 2 OF 4 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. NOTICE ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. W Z Z o2�o U 00N� ZNZ r0 0 Sr60 rFoc0 _IZO 0 W Q U ' nT U 0: 0 J Z U _Z 0 1h ., N WOT" �. 01 OD WIF - o 0 ZMUS X(J 50 LL Z Z w ? io W W w IL _ 10 41 4 M O Z n z °n :) 0 W U 0 rZ a V 2 PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 SHT 2 oda 0 Qz oa 00,R fv Ul Z } (_ `r LLt � IL C .7 O Z WW W a (A U �4 } 1- } 1- (y) I✓ 0 } 0. PZ U d PROJECT NO. 2141745.00 SHT 2