Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
pitkin.planning.264511100003 (2011)(1)
DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat copies (11x17) Parcel ID: 2645- 11 -1 -00 -003 Application vale: wi 1u, 1 1 Description: Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review Project Address: 4001 SNOWMASS CREEK RD, SNOWMASS, CO 81654 Property Owner: ASPEN HIGH MESA, LLC Address: PO BOX 1308 HOUSTON, TX 77251 Owner's REP: JENNIFER DOLECKI -SMITH Address 312 -E AABC ASPEN, CO 81611 REP's Email: jennifer @escapegardendesign.com Case No: P076 -11 Planner: Mike Kraemer # Copies: 1 Allocated Hours: 5 % Over Hours: 6 Owner Phone: REP's Phone: (970) 920 -3700 Referrals: FIRE DEPT - BASALT Other Referrals: Comments Due Date: 11/16/2011 Meetings: 1st Meeting: 2nd Meeting: 3rd Meeting: Meeting Date: Review Body: admin Public Hearing? yes Notice Date: 10/16/2011 Meeting Notes: Approvals: BOCC Resolution #: P &Z Determination #: BOCC Ordinance #: HO Determination # Admin Determination #: 095-2011#584410 Other Information: VR Approval Date: 11/11/2011 Plat Recorded Date: 11/16/2011 VR Expires Date: 11/11/2014 Plat (Bk, PG) B98 P78 #584413 Remarks: Application Type: Activity Envelope Site Plan RECEPTION #: 584410,11116/2011 at 02:21:18 PM, 1 OF 3, R $0.00 Doc Code DETERMINATION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION OF THE PITHIN COUNTY, COLORADO, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE ASPEN HIGH MESA LLC ACTIVITY ENVELOPE AND SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative Decision No. ql:�--2011 RECITALS Aspen High Mesa LLC (hereafter referred to as "Applicant") has applied to the Community Development Director of Pitkin County, Colorado ( "Director ") for Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review for expansion of the turning radius at an access point off Snowmass Creek Road and for stabilization of the uphill driveway cut. 1. The parcel is at located 4001 Snowmass Creek Road. PID #: 264511100003. (Legal Description — Attachment A). 2. The parcel is approximately 202 acres, is in the RS -30 zone district, and is conforming in size. 3. Previous land use decisions apply to the property in the form of GMQS approvals from 1986. These approvals are not applicable to the current application. The Lot is currently developed with a single family residence and ADU. 4. The Application was referred to the Basalt and Rural Fire Department. The District provided comments on the expansion and was supportive of the request. 5. Public notice was published in the Aspen Times Weekly on October 9, 2011. An affidavit of public notice was mailed on October 7, 2011. No objections were received within 30 days. 6. The Director finds that the proposal meets the standards of the Land Use Code for Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review specifically Section 7- 20- 20(c)(4). APPROVED by the Director, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the current or prior applications or in public meetings or hearings and shall consider those representations to be conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2. All previous land use approvals apply to the parcel, however, these approvals do not need to be furnished at access permit submittal. 3. Prior to submission of the future access permit application, the Applicant shall be required to submit for approval by the County Attorney and Community Development a Site Plan with an Activity Envelope in accordance with Land Use Code Section 2- 30 -20(g) and Application Manual Section 2.1.12. The above referenced approvals shall be a condition precedent to finalization and recordation. 4. Boulder retaining walls over 4' shall be engineered with drawings submitted in association with the access permit. Page / of 2 5. No development shall occur outside the approved activity envelope. 6. Prior to commencement of any earthmoving or other construction activity, the Applicant shall stake the corners of the activity envelope and install construction fencing around the construction site. The fencing shall remain in place until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. All areas disturbed by construction shall be re- vegetated with native vegetation within one growing season of the project's completion. 8. Statutory vested rights for the approval contained herein are granted pursuant to the Pitkin County Land Use Code and Colorado Statutes, subject to the exceptions set forth in Pitkin County Land Use Code, § 2 -20 -170 and C.R.S., § 24 -68 -105. The statutory vested rights granted herein shall expire on November _ _��_ 2014. 9. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval, or any subsequent permit(s) or approval(s) related to this property, or vested rights associated with this property. PUBLISHED AFTER ADOPTION FOR VESTED REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS in the A spen Times Weekly on the day of OOV 2011. APPROVED by the Director, this _LL&4day of ODl 2011. 1 in y Houben, Community Development Director P11)# 264511100003 P0076 -11 Page 2 of 2 Attachment A Legal Description Section: 2 Township: 9 Range: 86 LAND IN NW4 OF SEC 2 -9 -86 DESC BY MB BK 572 PG 171 A _ -. -- -------------------------------_ .TRACT B_ EING PART OF SEC 2 & 11 -9 -86 DESC BY MB CONT 201.330 AC MIL BK 572 PG 165 BK 572 PG 168 SNOWMASS CREEK 4001 Snowmass Creek Road Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review 9 -9 -11 1. Letter Of Authorization 2. Parcel Description and Vicinity Map 3. Proof Of Ownership 4. Legal Access and Applicable Land Use Approvals 5. Standards Report 6. Pre - Application Conference Summary Sheet 7. Plans- Lla, Llb, Llc 8. Scenic View Protection Exhibit 9. Engineers Details and Specifications 10. List of Property Owners within 300'of 4001 Snowmass Creek Road 11. Agreement to Pay Form 12. Application Fee 1 OnnCO1 �' �� 9 September 2011 1, Mindy Hildebrand, authorize, Jennifer Dolecki -Smith of Escape Garden Design, and Escape Garden Design, to Act on my behalf for the Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review process as it relates to the retaining and landscaping of the entry driveway at 4001 Snowmass Creek Road. Her contact information is as follows: Jennifer Dolecki -Smith Escape Garden Design 312 -E AABC Aspen, Co 81611 UrIIMIK IIIc I►I►Z►7 1 n /e Mindy Hildebrand, Aspen High Mesa, LLC 000002 l'd e£17 l l L l OL deS b a.. N� avroi IAH �n BAH 1 U �normaaslCapiEo l', �: • RS-3D e 4 ! a 000003 Legal Description: Section 2 Twp 9 Range 86 Land in the NW4 of section 2 -9 -86 described t r MIB Book 572 PG 171 a Pond 4001 Snowmass Creek Road AR R�yg OWN FOX RWw �ROmng fart Rrvr' AR- .fi \_ \_ . RS-30 k �0 . > 7a Qp O Snov�ealGa rol R • Ro vg Fort Rmw t Vicinity Map r 212212011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC. Commitment Transmittal 220 East Cody Jane Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: (970) 927 -9299 Fax: (970) 927 -8288 www.titlecoroddes.mm Commitment Ordered By: Gary Feldman Joshua & Co. 300 South Hunter Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-205-2222 Fax 970 - 925 -8821 Inquiries should be directed to: Susan Hass Title Company of the Rockies 220 East Cody Lane Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: (970) 927-9299 Fax (970) 927 -8288 Commitment Number: 0703190 -C Buyer's Name(s): Aspen High Mesa, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Seller's Name(s): W illadean Doolin LaPlante Property: 4001 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowntass, CO 81654 Sections 2 and 11, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado COPIES / MAILING LIST Aspen High Mesa, LLC, aColorado limited liability company Willadean Doolin LaPlante Brian Sherry Pinnical Properties & Development, LLC 100 Elk Run Dr. Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: 970-927-6564 Fax 970 - 927 -6568 Adam Gillespie, Esq. Gillespie Law Offices, LLC 100 Elk Run Drive, Suite 129 Basalt, CO 81621 Phone: (970) 927-6549 Fax (970) 927 -6568 Email: GillespielawOffices @gnail.com Bob Staradcj Mason & Morse Real Estate 514 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-925-7000 Fax Gary Feldman Joshua & Co. 300 South Hunter Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970-205-2222 Fax 970 - 925 -8821 gnf @rofnet Curtis B. Sanders Sherman & Howard, LLC 201 N. Mill Street Ste.201 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970- 925 -6300 Fax 970 -925 -1181 Email: csanders@shermanhoward.com TITLE CHARGES C: /Users / ... /Commitment_(s) (1).html 1/7 or - nn 4 2/22/21011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCIQES, INC These charges are based on issuance of the policy or policies described in the attached Commitment for Title Insurance, and includes premiums for the proposed coverage amount(s) and endorsement(s) referred to therein, and may also include additional work and /or third party charges related thereto. .f applicable, the designation of "Buyer" and "Seller" shown below may be based on traditional settlement practices in Pitkin County, Colorado, and /or certain terms of any contract, or other information provided with the Application for Title Insurance. 2. COMMITMENT for TITLE INSURANCE issued by TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC. as agent for CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Reference: Commitment Number: 0703190 -C Prepared for: Gary Feldman Joshua & Co. 300 South Hunter Aspen, CO 81611 Inquiries should be directed to: Susan Hass Title Company of the Rockies 220 East Cody Lane Basalt, CO 81621 4001 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass, CO 81654 SCHEDULE A Effective Date: January 31, 2011, 7:00 am Issue Date: February 18, 2011 Policy (or Policies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Policy Amount: (6- 17 -06) $13,250,000.00 Premium: $19,840.00 Proposed Insured: Aspen High Mesa, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is: Fee Simple C: /Users / ... /Commitment _(s) (1).html 2/7 oU UJZ) $19,780.00 Owner's Policy Premium: $0.00 Loan Policy Premium: Additional Lender Charge(s): Additional Other Charge(s): $20.00 Tax Certificate: $60.00 Total Endorsement Charge(s): TBD Charge(s): $19,860.00 TOTAL CHARGES: 2. COMMITMENT for TITLE INSURANCE issued by TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC. as agent for CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Reference: Commitment Number: 0703190 -C Prepared for: Gary Feldman Joshua & Co. 300 South Hunter Aspen, CO 81611 Inquiries should be directed to: Susan Hass Title Company of the Rockies 220 East Cody Lane Basalt, CO 81621 4001 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass, CO 81654 SCHEDULE A Effective Date: January 31, 2011, 7:00 am Issue Date: February 18, 2011 Policy (or Policies) to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Policy Amount: (6- 17 -06) $13,250,000.00 Premium: $19,840.00 Proposed Insured: Aspen High Mesa, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is: Fee Simple C: /Users / ... /Commitment _(s) (1).html 2/7 oU UJZ) 21221-2011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC and Title to said estate or interest is at the Effective Date vested in: Willadean Doolin LaPlante 4. The Land referred to in this Commitment is located in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and is described as follows: FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE SCHEDULE A CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Land referred to in herein is located in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and described as follows: A tract of land being part of Sections 2 and 11, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado and being more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the Northwest Corner of said Section 2 bears NO3 °04'43 "W 1,831.65 feet; Thence S19°27E 197.00 feet; Thence S43°27E 181.40 feet; Thence S18 °23'E90.00 feet; Thence S39°O8'E 133.20 feet; Thence S73 °51'E 116.63 feet; Thence S57°00'E 110.67 feet; Thence S46 °33'E 65.00 feet; Thence S 17° 14'E 848.11 feet; Thence S31 °4741 "E2,452.35 feet; Thence S58 °04'30" E 331.20 feet; Thence S06°5623" W 234.36 feet; Thence 527°2929" W 410.94 feet; Thence S20°04'S8" W 403.05 feet; Thence SOI °22'16" W 629.64 feet; Thence S06'2612" E 773.37 feet; Thence S 18°38'E 136.00 feet; Thence N86°3TI7 "E 917.11 feet; Thence East 214.13 feet; Thence S89°53'44" East 931.38 feet to a point on the centerline of Snowmass Creek Road; Thence following said centerline the following courses and distances: 622.39 feet along a curve to the left having a radius of 1,100.00 feet (the chord of which bears N12°5953 "W 614.12 feet); Thence 333.20 feet along a curve to the right having a radius of 1,175.00 feet (the chord of which bears N21 332.08 feet); Thence NI2 °5735" W 356.99 feet; ThenceNl2°38'01 "W 497.24 feet; Thence departing said centerline, S77°21'59" W 118.57 feet; Thence N 12 °22'47" W 1,274.95 feet; Thence N26 °4715 "W 882.00 feet; Thence N42 °50'51 "W 1,418.95 feet; Thence N68 °2603 "E 102.78 feet; Thence N43 °4740" W 958.10 feet; Thence S46 °50'Ol "W 287.23 feet; Thence N46 °16'W "W 18.95 feet; Thence N57°33'00 "W 66.62 feet; Thence N47 °3742" W 66.79 feet; Thence N55 °13'06 "W 61.75 feet; C: /Users/ ... /Commitment_(s) (1).html 3/7 0 66vv6 2122121311 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC Thence N3651'59" W 59.44 feet; Thence N39°15'59" W 408.05 feet; Thence N47 W 151.62 feet; Thence N57 0 32'32" W 132.99 feet; Thence N29 W 143.57 feet; Thence N48'171 VW 114.25 feet; Thence N57°3937" W 43.20 feet; Thence N59 W 267.89 feet; Thence S31 °33'W 218.09 feet to the Point of Beginning. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B - SECTION I REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOW ING A RE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to wit: 1. Deed from W illadean Doolin LaPlante to Aspen High Mesa, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. NOTE: Duly executed real property transfer declaration, executed by either the Grantor or Grantee, to accompany the Deed mentioned above, pursuant to Article 14 of House Bill No. 1288 -CRA 39 -14- 102. 2. Resolution or Statement of Authority by Aspen High Mesa, LLC a Colorado limited liability company, authorizing the transaction, executed by the managers or members set forth in the Operating Agreement. NOTE: Review Operating Agreement for authority of party(ies) to act on behalf of said limited liability company and complete the transaction contemplated herein. The Owners Policy, when issued, will not contain Exceptions No. 1, 2,3 and 4, provided that: (A) The enclosed form of indemnity agreement or final affidavit and agreement is properly executed and acknowledged by the party(ies) indicated and retuned to the Company or its duly authorized agent, (B) The Company or its duly authorized agent receives and approves an ALTA survey properly certified by a registered surveyor or engineer, and (C) Applicable scheduled charges in the amount of $60.00 are paid to the Company or its duly authorized agent. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B - SECTION It EXCEPTIONS Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the C: /Users /..JCommitment_(s) (1).html 4/7 0 d) f r" r" 7 212212011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. Any loss or damage, including attorney fees, by reason of the matters shown below: I. Any facts, right, interests, or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circunntance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 4. Any lien, or right to alien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed bylaw and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. Right of the Proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Paves 67. 319 320. 326, 483, 488 and 541. 8. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Paves 67 , 320. 326, 483 and 488. 9. Any and all water and water rights, reservoir and reservoir rights, ditches and ditch rights, and the enlargements and extensions thereof, and all laterals, flumes and headgates used in connection therewith. 10.A11 right, title, claim, demand or interest which may be asserted by the owners of adjoining property in and to subject property or by the owners of subject property in and to adjacent property, based on adverse possession or otherwise, due to or resulting from the failure of the fences located on subject property and adjacent property to follow established boundary lines. NOTE Upon receipt of a surrey acceptable to the Company or it's duly authorized agent indicating that there are no fences encroaching onto or from the subject property the above exception will be deleted I I.Right of way for Snowmass Creek Road, whether in fee or easment. I2.Restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter clause, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sey sexual orientation, fau filial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as contained in instrument recorded January 22, 1963, in Book 200 at Pave 595. June 29, 1979, in Book 371 at Pave 551, re- recorded April 20,198Z in Book 425 at Pave 362, February 4, 1983, in Book 439 at Pave 968 as amended by instrument recorded December 20, 1984, in Book 478 at Pave 553 and December 21, 1984, in Book 478 at Pave 691 I3.Easement and right of way for electric line and related appurtenances, as granted by Robert N. Jensen to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc, by instrument recorded April 25, 1985, in Book 485 at Pave 130 said C: /Users / ... /Commitment_(s) (1).html s/7 JJ(J�J`�J 2/22/2011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC easement Demg more par[rcutany aescnoea merem. 14.Resolution No. 86-27 by the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission recorded September 18, 1986, in Book 519 at Page 151 and the Jensen 1041 review Plat recorded September 18, 1986, in Plat Book 19 at Page 11. IS.Tems, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Resolution No. 89 -57 by the Board of County Conmssioners of Pitkin County, Colorado recorded June 21, 1989, in Book 595 at Page 343 and in the Occupancy and Deed Restriction and Agreement Caretaker Affordable Resident Dwelling Unit recorded June 29, 1989, in Book 596 at Page 353. 16.Tems, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Resolution No. 89 -57 by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado recorded October 20, 1989, in Book 605 at Page 515 and in the Occupancy and Deed Restriction and Agreement Agricultural Caretaker Resident Dwelling Unit recorded February 6, 1990, in Book 613 at Page 488 17.Eesement and right of way for electric line and related appurtenances, as granted to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., by instruments recorded May 20, 1991, in Book 646 at Pages 596 598 and 600, said easements being more particularly described therein. 18.Tems, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Easement Agreement between Robert V. Kenna and The Quad Ill Trost Dated June 16, 1997 recorded October 10, 2001, at Reception No. 459632. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note 1: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3 -5 -1, Paragraph C of Article VII, requires that "Every Title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the Title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed." (Cap Protection) Note 2: Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of this Commitment may be deleted from the O wnees Policy to be issued hereunder upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The Land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single - family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials may have been famished by mechanics or materialmen for propose of construction on the Land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 13 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materiahnen's liens. D. Any deviation from conditions A though C above is subject to such additional requirements or Information as the Company may deem necessary, or, at its option, the Company may refuse to delete the exeption. E Payment of the premium for said coverage. Note 3: The following disclosures are hereby made pursuant to § 10-11 -122, C.R.S.: (i) The subject real property may be located in a special tardng district; (ii) A certificate of taxes due listing each tapng jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurers authorized agent; and (iii) Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note 4: If the sales price of the subject property exceeds $100,000.00, the seller shall be required to comply with the disclosure or withholding provisions of C.R.S. §39-22 -604.5 (Non- resident withholding). C: /Users / ... /Commitment_(s) (1).html 6/7 fen���9 2/22/2011 TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES, INC Note 5: Pursuant to C.R.S. § 10-11 -123 Notice is hereby given: (a) If there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate then there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geotherrnal energy in the property, and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owners permission. Note 6: Effective September 1, 1997, C.R.S. §3410 -406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorders office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin ofat least one -half inch the clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. Note 7: Our Privacy Policy: We will not reveal nonpublic personal customer information to any a #emal non- affiliated organization unless we have been authorized by the customer, or are required bylaw. C: /Users / ... /Commitment_(s) (1).html 7/7 nr,rrn; n " ; � 4�14 r , ' 3(V/ F OLOTION OF"TBE BOARD OF COUNTY CDMMISSIONSRS OF PITRIN COURYr, COLORADO, GRANTING AN ALLOCATION IN THE 1986 DOWN VALLEY RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPETITION Resolution No. 86- 9 WHMUM, on June 1, 1986, the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office did receive three (3) Down Valley Residential Growth Management Applications; and WHEREAS, the applications received were as follows: Application Name Allocation Requested Aspen -!lass Ranch 3 Free Market, 1 Employee Unit The River Road Ranch 1 Free Market, 1 Employee Unit Jensen 2 Free Market Units and WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission") held a public hearing on 2, 1986, to review the above Growth Management Applications; and WHEREAS, the Commission scored the above projects as follows: Aspen -Mass Ranch 80.20 Points The River. -Road Ranch 92.20 Points Jensen 91.30 Points and has forwarded these scores to the_Pitkin County Board of -- County Commissioners (hereinafter "Board ") pursuant to section 5- 520.5(a)(4) of the Pitkin County Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1986, the Board held a public meeting on said applications and did review the scores forwarded t(: it by the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office has calculated the available Growth Management Quota for 1986 to be ten (10) units RecmW at V k g a-3 F�_ Recwft No LORETTA BANNER PITKIN COUNTY RECORDER 000011 or.Oe RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING THE JENSEN 1041 WILDLIFE AND GEOLOGICAL HAZARD REVIEW Resolution No. 86 -27 WHEREAS, on September 2, 1986, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission ") reviewed an application submitted by Robert N. Jensen (hereinafter "Appli cant"), requesting 1041 Wildlife and Geologic Hazard Review approval for two (2) residential homesites on a 269 acre parcel located on Snowmass Creek Road adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Windstar property, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on September 2, 1986, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the aforesaid application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby approve the Jensen 1041 Hazard Review for the construction of two residential homesites on the property described in Exhibit "A ", subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, the Appli cant shall record a 24" x 36" mylar site plan which meets the approval of the Planning Office and County Attorney. Said site plan shall include the Building Envelopes and access drives as represented by the Applicant. 2. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geologic reports dated April 14, 1986, and July 7, 1986; prepared by Nicholas Lampiris; and attached hereto, as r+ Uv01 � ti OD � y m a Ul ox 00 MC Am e a en ,.� -- rn RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING THE JENSEN 1041 WILDLIFE AND GEOLOGICAL HAZARD REVIEW Resolution No. 86 -27 WHEREAS, on September 2, 1986, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission ") reviewed an application submitted by Robert N. Jensen (hereinafter "Appli cant"), requesting 1041 Wildlife and Geologic Hazard Review approval for two (2) residential homesites on a 269 acre parcel located on Snowmass Creek Road adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Windstar property, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on September 2, 1986, at which time evidence and testimony were presented with respect to the aforesaid application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby approve the Jensen 1041 Hazard Review for the construction of two residential homesites on the property described in Exhibit "A ", subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, the Appli cant shall record a 24" x 36" mylar site plan which meets the approval of the Planning Office and County Attorney. Said site plan shall include the Building Envelopes and access drives as represented by the Applicant. 2. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geologic reports dated April 14, 1986, and July 7, 1986; prepared by Nicholas Lampiris; and attached hereto, as r+ Uv01 . Jensen 1041 Hazard Review Resolution No. 86 -27 Page 2 BOUX 519 8*152 Exhibits "B" and "C," respectively. 3. To mitigate wildlife impacts, all dogs on the property shall be kenneled. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on September 16, 1986. ATTEST: PITRIN COUNTY PLANNING Barbara Noriis, Records Administrator Assistant FE.10 AND ZONING COMMISSION By &A Peter uy Vice Chairman noUU�_3 eorx 519 ma9.5:3 EXHIBIT "A" Resolution 86 -27 LCG CESCPIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTIONS 2, 3 AND 11, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 NEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2 (A BRASS CAP FOUND IN PUCE) BEARS N 03 N 1831.65 FEET: - THENCE S 19'27' E 197.00 FEET: THENCE S 63'27' E 1s1.40 FEET; THENCE S 18 E 90.00 FEET; THENCE S 39 E 133.20 FEET: THENCE 5 73•S1' E 116.63 FEET: THENCE S 57 E 110.67 FEET: THENCE S 66.33' E 65.00 FEET; THENCE S 17 E 868.11 FEET: THENCE S 31'67'61' E 2652.35 FEET: THENCE S 56'06'30' E 331.20 FEET: THENCE S 06 N 236.36 FEET: THENCE S 27 N 610.96 FEET: THENCE S 20'04 W 603.05 FEET: THENCE 5 01.22'16' W 629.64 FEET$ THENCE S 06 E 773.37 FEET$ THENCE S 18.38' E 136.00 FEET; THENCE N 66 E 917.11 FEET$ TMENCE EAST 214.13 FEET; THENCE S 49 E 931.39 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SNOWMASS CREEK ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: 622.39 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1100.00 FEET (THE CHORD OF AHICN BEARS N 12 W 614.12 FEET): 333.20 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1175.00 FEET (THE CHORD OF WHICH BARS N 21 W 332.06 FEET); N 12 W 356.99 FEET; I B TOTHERICHTWHAVING2A F RADIUS l OF ' 298.20 FEET (THE OF WHICH BEARS N 05 E 169.62 FEET). N 24 E 349.05 FEET. 177.16 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT. HAVING A RADIUS OF 408.92 FEET (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 12 E 173.79 FEET), N 0 0 . 22'52 • W 2061.63 FEET, 212.26 FEET ALONG A CURVE 70 THE LEFT. HAVING A RADIUS OF 222.37 FEET (THE CHORD OF MUCH BEARS N 27 W 204.30 FEET). N SS'04'22' W 60.00 FEET: THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID CENTERLINE. N 21 E 327.50 FEET: THENCE N 00 E 323.96 FEETA THENCE H 00'25'45' E $45.69 FiP.T: THENCE S I9'SS'03' N 172.45 F':iT: THENCE S 41.00' W 966.60 FEET: THENCE S 68 W 1062.22 f' IT. '- THENCE N 43 W 1249.47 FEET: THENCE 5 00 E 613.07 FEET: THENCE N 31 W 388.26 FEET; TMENCE N 3 W 708.60 FEET: THENCE N $1 W IS4.80 FEET: THENCE N 44'S)' W 558.40 FEET; THENCE N 4 8 . 54' W 277.20 FEET: THENCE S 31•33' W 245.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2 80-00 ACRESor MORE I� OJ?_�'r ULUX J.1.J rHgt 17q Nicholas lampiris, PhD CANSUlTINOGEMOD P.O. BOX 10975 ASPEN. COLORADO 61612 P631962-2600 9254020 ASPEN OFFICE April 14, 1986 Brooke Peterson 315 E. Hyman Suite 305 Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Jensen Property /Driveway Dear Mr. Peterson: Exhibit "B" Resolution #86 -27 I have viewed the driveway accessing the upper meadow where the Jensen improvements are. The driveway is cut in Quaternary age glacio- fluvial terrace deposits which consist of poorly sorted and poorly graded clays, silts, sands, gravels and cobbles. Although the driveway is a little steep, approaching eight to ten percent grade in one stretch, it is well constructed with a good base. There is no evidence of slumping or other instability at this time an the cut bank side of the road. The underlying bedrock in this area is the Cretaceous age Mancos Shale which dips approximately twenty degrees to the south, or generally into the hillside. On balance, this is a positive factor, but the eroded surface of the shale beneath the glacial deposits probably slopes into the valley. This, In conjunction with an irrigation ditch which crosses the hillside above the steeper part of the access road, could cause instability and potential failures along the road cut. This potential, of course, would be magnified if the ditch itself were to fail. My recommendations are to irrigate this section of the pasture on the terrace above the road carefully, and to leave water in this particular ditch for as short a period of time as possible. Obviously, the ditch should be well maintained so as to keep the potential for failure at a minimum. In the fall, after the irrigation season is over, this portion of the ditch above the road should be made to catch and carry as little spring runoff as possible. Despite possibly decades of irrigation at this site,_I saw no significant signs of instability along the access road and expect little trouble with mass wasting, especially if the above recommendations are followed. Please contact me if there are further questions. SSii nce' /^r'ell-1y, / Ni holas Lamp Xr N1 /cik Consulting Geologist fin 5 cou DIZ) mF1013 Nicholas Lampiris, PhD COMMTIM CEOLMIST P,O. sox 10935 ASPEN, COWRAO061612 PDX963.5600 9256020 ASPEN OFFICE July 7, 1986 Brooke Peterson 315 E. Hyman Suite 305 Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Snowmass Creek, 1041 Study Dear Mr. Peterson: Exhibit IIC" Pzge 1 Of 2 solution 486 -27 I have completed my geologic investigation of Lot 12 of the Jensen property in the Snowmass Creek valley. The roughly triangular shaped lot is approximately 70 acres along the west side of the Snowmass Creek Road. This is within the SE 1/4 of Sec. 2, T 9 S, R 85 W of the Sixth P.M., within the Woody Creek 7 1/2 minute quadrangle, Pitkin County, Colorado. None of the property goes beyond the base of the steep hillside to the west. The building site as shown on the accompanying map is near the west central portion of the lot. The topography of the proposed site consists of irrigated pasture interspersed with groves of scrub oak. The site is quite flat and is more than 80 feet away from the base of the steep hillside. There are no existing structures on this site. The geology of the site consists of surficial deposits of glacio- fluvial origin of Quaternary age. This is in the form of poorly sorted silts, sands and gravels on a terrace above the present level of Snowmass Creek. :Underlying this material, perhaps 50 to 100 feet below the surface, is the Cretaceous age Mancos Shale which in this general area dips approximately 15 degrees to the south.: There are no other geologic structures which could adver$ely affect this site. The building site as depicted is far enough away from the base of the steep hill to the west so ;as not to be affected by any gravity related phenomena there. There are no significant gullies an that hillside which could have an affect on the building site. ._This is van excellent site for the development of a single family dwelling, but high ground water conditions should be expected, ospeciaily during irrigation season. It will still be necessary to have a soils engineering study prepared to insure proper foundation design and to protect -against potential high ground water conditions. 000016 W July 7, 1986 Snowmass Creek 1041 Study Page Two eoou 519 ma IM M Exhibit "C" Page 2 of 2 Resolution #86 -27 Access to the site should be easily attainable off the Snowmass Creek Road on grade to the site, but several culverts may be necessary because of the irrigation system in place. Water for domestic use should be available through the drilling of a well to a depth of perhaps 100 feet. Waste disposal should be available through the construction of a septic system with accompanying leach field in these permeable soils. Once again, the complicating factor may be the potential for high ground water; the Pitkin County Sanitation Engineer should be consulted for his specific recommendations. Please contact me if you have further questions. Sincerely, Nicholas Lamp' iris' Consulting Geologist encl. NL /clk oJuv �_ RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE SCORING FOR THE 1986 PITKIN COUNTY DOWN VALLEY RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPETITION Resolution No. 86 -24 WHEREAS, on June 1, 1986, the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office did receive three (3) Pitkin County Down Valley Residential Growth Management applications submitted pursuant to Section 5- 510.5(a)(1) of the Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the applications received were as follows: Application Name Allocation Request Aspen-Mass Ranch 4 Units The River Road Ranch 2 Units Jensen 2 Units and WHEREAS, the quota available for allocation in 1986 is 12 units, since according to Section 5 -510.2 of the Code, the 24 unit annual Down Valley quota must be reduced by the 12 units built in 1985 pursuant to exemptions from the quota system; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 1986, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission ") did conduct a public hearing pursuant to Section 5- 510.5(a)(3) of the Code, requiring a public hearing be held in order to review growth management applications; and e 003110 S � _ 8 1986 Down Valley Residential Growth Management Scoring Resolution No. 86 -24 Page 2 review the growth management applications and gave consideration to evidence and testimony presented at said hearing. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby establish the following scoring of the Pitkin County Down Valley Residential Growth Management application submissi- ons: Project Name Total Score The River Road Ranch 92.2 Jensen 91.3 Aspen -Mass Ranch 80.2 AND IN SUPPORT THEREOF, incorporated by this reference the Commission's Tally Sheets as Exhibit "A -1," "A -2," and "A -3," attached hereto. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Commission does hereby forward said scoring to the Board of County Commissioners for their action with respect to the granting of a 1986 Down Valley Residential Growth Management Allocation. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED by the Commission that since the above scores are all above the minimum threshold and the quota available exceeds that requested, it does hereby recommend to the Board that the following allocations be granted subject to the applicants' receiving approval of their respective associated reviews from the Board of County Commissioners: r"nn1 1986 Down Valley Residential Growth Management Scoring Resolution No. 86 -24 Page 3 Project Name Allocation of Units The River Road Ranch Jensen Aspen -Mass APPROVED by the Commission at September 16, 1986. ATTEST: Barbara Norris, Records Administrator Assistant FK. 15 2 Units 2 Units 4 Units its regular meeting on PITEIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION By Peter u Vice Cha rman �juU2u 000021 ¥ k (} � f � � § � lit ƒ §)' ®$»� §\; J hie ASS¢. . j \ q \ \4 = »left .| � — /f ag o 4 / | (\ ��" ��t2 & \(\ � 0 \C\ /2 !! ¥ k (} � f � � § � lit ƒ §)' ®$»� §\; J hie ASS¢. . j \ q \ \4 = »left .| � — /f ag o 4 / | (\ ��" ��t2 & \(\ � 0 \C\ /2 ƒ \: !�} $ \ |` / 0 \G§/] : ' •� .. _ . Cb # ! •,; � :.�:, )!` , \; { ow r \.a , . ;\ | \ : ,! \ \ . . . ` � ! zx £ ` ƒ \: !�} $ \ |` / 0 \G§/] RICHARD D. LAMM GOVEm R August 13, 1986 PI -87 -0001 o �` - PI -87 -0002 PI -87 -0003 * JOHN BOLD d P EGTO" ♦ (B T6 f COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING - 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 60203 PHONE (303) 666-2617 Mr. Francis Krizmanich Pitkin County Planning 506 East Main Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Krizmanich: RE: DOWN VALLEY RESIDENTIAL GMP, GEOLOGIC REVIEW We have reviewed the materials submitted on the three proposals involved in the Down Vally GMP Competition and the general and engineering geo- logy of the three sites. We concur with the general findings and conclusions found in the various reports presented for the tracts and their respective development propo- sals. Of the recommendations offered by Nick Laupiris on the various sites, all should be observed and incorporated into the detailed development plans. We would like to reiterate the cautionary note he made concern- ing the building setbacks from the steep slope of the river valley at Aspen -Mass Ranch and the care required in locating the individual sep- tic systems on this parcel. The clustering concept causes the effective density of the four unre- stricted units to be about 2 -2.5 acre /unit. Additional consideration needs to be given to the wells downslope of the proposed septic fields and the potential for partially treated sewage to "daylight" on the steep slope just below the proposed structures. In summary, we feel that there are no geology - related problems associated with any of the three proposals to render them infeasible, but careful attention will be required to resolve the septic waste disposal issues on the Aspen -Mass Ranch tract. Yours very truly, Jeffr/yL./ Sr. Engineering Geologist dir:JLH -87 -012 GEOLOGY STORYOFTHEPAST ... KEYTOTHEFUTURE ;i ;I i Retaining 2- 30 -20: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURE (g) Criteria for Approval (1) GENERAL Noted (2) SITE PLAN This site plan complies with all applicable provisions of this Land Use Code and all prior development approvals applicable to the subject. No Activity Envelope exists for the access drive. An activity envelope for the access drive shall be established during this process. (3)ACTIVITYENVELOPE See Responses to Sec. 7- 10 -50. (4) SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS N/A (5) SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS FOR MINOR PLAT AMENDMENTS N/A (6) WATER CROSSING OR DIVERSION N/A (7) GMQS EXEMPTIONS A VAILABLE THR 0 UGH ADMINISTRA TI VE REVIEW N/A (8) SATELLITE RECEPTION DEVICES N/A (9) AGRICULTURAL STAND N/A (10) SIGNS N/A (11) TEMPORARY USE, OTHER N/A (12) TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL USESISPECIAL EVENTS N/A (13) DEMOLITION EXTENSIONS N/A (14) CERTIFICATE OF NO EFFECT FOR PR OPER TY ON HIS TORIC REGIS TER N/A (15) CERTIFICATE OF APPR OPRIA TENESS FOR PROPERTY ON HISTORIC REGISTER N/A (16) DEMOLITION CERTIFICATE FOR PROPERTY LISTED ON HISTORIC REGISTER OR LISTED ON HISTORIC INVENTORY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT N/A (17) MINOR AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N/A (18) MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N/A �Uv0 -.I 7- 10 -50: SITE PLAN AND ACTIVITY ENVELOPE (a) Since the area that this site plan review focuses on is the existing driveway, the location of the new Activity Envelope is pre determined. While taking into consideration a realistic space to accomplish this design, we will also minimize the impact on constrained areas by establishing a conservative Activity Envelope. (b) A realistic, but conservative Activity Envelope is proposed which we believe to be in compliance with the Land Use Code and in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan for the area. (c) The Activity Envelope proposed in this Site Plan Review is designed to accommodate moving the existing retaining wall into the hillside 3', construction of a retaining wall to support the existing road cut on the uphill side of the road, and the excavation necessary for these activities. It also designed to accommodate a guard rail on the down hill side of the road should that be desired in the future. Concurrent with this application we are applying for site plan review as it relates to a ranch gate. In the event that the ranch gate is approved and is allowed to move forward, this Activity Envelope will also accommodate it, though no special considerations for the Ranch Gate were needed to be made to determines this activity envelope. (d) The site is located in a scenic view protection area. The retaining contained in this site plan review improves upon the character of this location. See the Scenic View Protection Exhibit. (e) N/A (f) The natural grade, topography, vegetation and drainage of areas outside the defined areas shall not be disturbed except as specifically permitted in the Land Use Code. Prior to any development activity, the boundaries of the Activity Envelope shall be identified with construction fencing which shall remain in place until development has been completed. (g) N/A (h) Noted 7- 20 -10: SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING (a) Grading and Fill Placement As part of this application, an activity envelope shall be established for this work. Additionally, an Access Development Permit has been asked for by the County in lieu of an Earth Moving Permit (b) Clearing, Grubbing, and Vegetation Removal All Activity relating to this proposal shall take place within the activity envelope as established in this application. (c) Tree Removal and Mitigation Vegetation removal shall be as minimal as possible. Nothing with a caliper over 6" shall be removed. (d) Protection of Natural Terrain In addition to the safety measures that this application addresses (see 7 -20 -20 C4d), the goal of our work in is to provide visual relief from existing scaring and river rock boulder wall that was created for the establishment of this driveway access. The new retaining will be Colorado moss rock granite that will blend into the natural surroundings with native plantings. (1) REVEGETATION Revegetation with native plant material similar to that adjacent to the work will be completed during the first planting season after construction. See plant list and seed list on sheet L 1 a. (2) TOPSOIL There is no existing top soil to be saved. The existing surface is either, already a cut, existing river boulders or a minimal amount of poor sandy soil. (3) WEED PREVENTION A maintenance program will be in place at the time of completion. (4) UTILITY INSTALLATION N/A (5) EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (a) 1. This work shall eliminate erosion control problems in the area of work. If practicable, all soil shall remain on site. 2. Natural vegetation and soil cover will be left in tact to the best of our ability. Minimizing disturbances is a focus for this area since one of the goals is to enhance the native setting. 3. All cuts and fills are designed to control erosion and stabilize the slope with boulders and vegetation. 4. Natural drainage patterns shall remain in tact. 5. N/A (b) Mitigation measures identified in an approved erosion, sedimentation, or Stone water management plan shall remain in place until re- vegetation is viable. 7- 20 -20: STEEP AND POTENTIALLY UNSTABLE SLOPES (C) Thirty (30) Percent or Greater Gradient (4) EXISTING ROADS AND DRIVEWAYS Through the Site Plan process, an exception for minor road and driveway improvements may be permitted to existing roads and driveways that traverse previously disturbed slopes equal to or in excess of thirty (30) percent, provided that the applicant demonstrates that all of the following conditions are met: (a) As can be seen in the letter from Nicholas Lampris, Engineer, dated, April 14 1986, the driveway was in place at that time and was constructed prior to 1993. (b) The current driveway services an existing ranch and residential structure. The use shall remain the same. (c) The existing driveways traverses a previously disturbed slopes equal to or in excess of thirty percent. (d) The improvements to this driveway shall be minor in scope and shall be the minimum required to ensure the safety of both the general public and safety agency personnel. There are three areas of concern that will be addressed in this construction; n nr _ nULu" 1. The turning radius for a large trailer is such that, to make the entrance and exit to the ranch safely, and without interfering with Snowmass Creek Road, there exists a section of wall that needs to be pushed back into the hillside an additional three feet. This will allow a large trailer to make the turn without imposing safety issues on the road. This section of road has a rise and a curve when traveling from the west to the east making it particularly difficult to see a vehicle in this driveway intersection. The additional space on the uphill side of the driveway where the radius will be increased, shall remain gravel and herbaceous plantings. The maximum height for this area is 10 feet 2. The sight lines from the driveway shall be improved by cutting the hillside on the west side of the entrance back 20' and removing an existing service berry. 3. The cut hillside on the uphill side of the driveway shall be retained to reestablish the natural vegetation, eliminate the scar, and retain the slope. The toe of the wall will be a minimum of 16' from the down hill edge of the existing asphalt allowing for adequate access. The additional space on the uphill side of the driveway shall remain gravel and herbaceous plantings. Given these parameters, retaining in this section shall not exceed 7'. (e) As seen in the attached letter from Nicholas Lampiris, Engineer, dated April 14, 1986, the uphill side of the driveway appears to be stable. Proposed improvements will stabilize the existing scar, and greatly decrease the potential for slope failure. n. PITKIN COUNTY PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY LOCATION: 4001 Snowmass Creek Road PIDN: 264511100003 ZONING: RS -30 SIZE: 196 acres OWNER: Aspen High Mesa LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Jennifer Dolecki PHONE and EMAIL: 618 -1019, iennifer a)escaRegardendesign.com DATE: August 31, 2011 PLANNER: Mike Kraemer, 920.5482 Type of Application: Activity Envelope and Site Plan Review Description of Project/Development: The Applicant is desirous of expanding the radius of a residential access point off Snowmass Creek Road and stabilizing an upslope side of the driveway. Because the expansion of the access point is on steep slopes, Site Plan Review is required. Land Use Code Sections to be addressed in letter of request (application): Sec. 2- 30- 20(g): Activity Envelope Criteria for Approval; Sec. 7- 10 -50: Activity Envelope; Sec. 7- 20 -10: Site Preparation and Grading Sec. 7- 20- 20(c)(4): Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes; Staff will refer the application to the following agencies: Basalt and Rural Fire Department Review by: Community Development Director Public Hearing: No. However, the Applicant shall post a public notice sign on the property at least 15 days prior to the date specified for the Administrative Decision pursuant to Sec. 2- 20- 100(a)(3) of the Land Use Code. In addition, the Applicant shall mail notice (by 1' Class mail) to all property owners and mineral estate owners within 300' of the subject property with the return address of the Community Development Department (form of notice to be obtained from the Community Development Department). The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County, as they appear no more than 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. A property owner receiving the public notice shall have 2 weeks from the date the notice was postmarked to submit comments or objections to the Community. FEES: $1,639 (make check payable to " Pitkin County Treasurer ") • Planning Office flat fee: $1,560 (non - refundable; based on 5 hours of staff time. If staff review time exceeds 6 hours, the Applicant will be charged for additional time above 5 hours at a rate of $312/hour) o Web Technology Fee: $25 o Public Notice Fee: $54 To apply, submit 1 copy (unbound) of the following information, unless noted otherwise: 1. Summary letter explaining the request, providing background on prior approvals and permits, and addressing compliance with the Code sections listed above. 2. 24" by 36" and 11" by 17" Activity Envelope and Site Plan and standards report as designated in Section 2.1.1 and 2.1.12 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual; 3. Previous Land Use Approvals (if applicable); 4. Scenic View Protection Exhibits as designated in Section 2.1.12 of the Pitkin County Land Use Application Manual (show how the access will look from Snowmass Creek Road); 5. Proof of ownership of subject property; 6. Parcel description, including legal description and vicinity map; 7. Total fee for review of the application; 8. Signed fee agreement (1 copy); Uu�;01 9. Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the representative (I copy) 10. List of all property owners and mineral estate owners within 300' of the subject property (I copy) 11. Copies of this pre -app form NOTES Y PLEASE SUBMIT ONE UNBOUND AND ONE -SIDED COPY OF YOUR COMPLETE APPLICATION. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO -SIDED COPIES OF ALL REMAINING COPIES OF YOUR APPLICATION (IF POSSIBLE). THE PARCEL IDs SHOULD BE INCLUDED ONALL DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN YOUR APPLICATION. Y ALL MAPS SHALL BE FOLDED. Y This pre - application conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staffs interpretations based upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon a complete review of the application. ➢ The Pitkin County Land Use Code and Application Manual is available on -line at httn: / /wxryv. aspetmitkin. com /depts /7 /planning, cfin ,J �.91lUJJ r N p 3 cis 9 m CO 8 iglu'! o� m7 ' / ;n O m i 3Rg 3� 4 EZ �' F n a 3 E 0 d � =`s gW - a=I 3 8 iglu'! I (P/ �n II ii r r i P` J P a' ri 1y a g I I 1 o� m7 ' / ;n O m i I (P/ �n II ii r r i P` J P a' ri 1y a g I I 1 I I a I a o m5 me �p 9 F / O m 3Rg 3� 4 EZ �' F n I I a I a o m5 me �p 9 F o I I i Q FF I s rF u 4 R � V X11 d) Mesa Rc.Ilcl1 4001 ' nowmass Creek Road v 7 I ry z w a o 0 a ro s' m m w p 'i �r \1 it Entrance Landscape 0 0 1tl�, g �a X I a 3 6 / O 3Rg 3� 4 EZ �' F n a 3 E 0 d � ggb 5 � K y i d E o I I i Q FF I s rF u 4 R � V X11 d) Mesa Rc.Ilcl1 4001 ' nowmass Creek Road v 7 I ry z w a o 0 a ro s' m m w p 'i �r \1 it Entrance Landscape 0 0 1tl�, g �a X I a 3 6 F , P � oP 2 C7 Q;. C_: C.J C:, CO F m O t � d N 0.' Iii: h Mesa Itianc �l e s c n P e a 1001 Snovvmass Creek Road Entrance Landscape 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I� o High Mesa Ranch - - 4001 Snowmciss Creels Rona EnLrance T,cndscripe E S C A P E 1.° O CD O C> 03 m Scenic View Protection Exhibit 0 S C H M U E S E R G O R D O N M E Y E R , I N C PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS 0o Re a/ O Q ypAVlp S O J� ?' 0:= 35231 u 0C) 77 HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL 1- BOULDER RETAINING WALLS DESCRIPTION August 19, 2011 This work consists of constructing boulder retaining walls (rockery walls) at the locations and to the dimensions shown on the plans. These walls are formed of interlocking, dry- stacked rocks without reinforcing steel, mortar, or concrete. MATERIALS Rock for Boulder Walls. (a) General. Furnish hard, angular, and durable rock that consists of intact blocks without open fractures, foliation, or other planes of weakness. Conform to the following: (1) Rock has sufficient hardness so that it cannot be scratched with a knife or scratched only with difficulty (2) Apparent specific gravity, AASHTO T 85 2.5 min. (3) Absorption, AASHTO T 85 4.2% max. (4) Los Angeles abrasion, AASHTO T 96 (500 rev) 40% max. (5) Coarse durability index, AASHTO T 210 50 min. (6) Sodium sulfate soundness (5 cycles), AASHTO T 104 10% max. (7) Freeze -thaw loss (12 cycles), AASHTO T 103 10% max. (b) Sizes and shapes. Furnish angular rocks that are generally cubical, tabular, or rectangular in shape. Conform to the following: (1) The minimum rock length is shown in the Rockery Wall Design Schedule in the plans. (2) Rock width and height are greater than or equal to one -third of the rock length. (3) The minimum rock dimension is 18 inches. (4) The minimum cap rock weight is 200 pounds. (c) Color. Furnish rocks with a color indigenous to the area. Submit at least three (3), 12- inch samples of rock to be used for wall facing rocks that are representative of rock color for approval by the Owner, or Owner's Representative. Furnish rocks free of machine - made scratches, mars, or other damage to the visible face. Li v v ,:, t HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL -2- BOULDER RETAINING WALLS Bed Course Material. August 19, 2011 General. Bed course material for the leveling pad shall consist of cinders, sand, slag, gravel, crushed stone, or other approved granular material. This material shall meet the following gradation requirements: Sieve Size Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves 75 mm (3 inch) 100 4.75 mm (No. 4) 20 -65 75 0.200 0-10 Filter Material. General. Filter material for the granular rock backdrain shall consist of free draining sand, gravel, slag, or crushed stone. This material shall meet the following gradation requirements: Sieve Size Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves 75 mm (3 inch) 100 19.0 mm ( ") 20 - 90 4.75 mm (No. 4) 0 -20 75 µm (No. 200) 0 -3 Geotextiles. General. Geotextile material placed between the retained soil and the granular rock backdrain shall be nonwoven and shall conform to the physical requirements in the following table. Geotextile rolls shall be furnished with suitable wrapping to protect against moisture and extended ultraviolet exposure prior to placement. Each roll shall be labeled to provide product identification sufficient for inventory and quality control purposes. Rolls shall be stored in a manner which protects them from the elements. If stored outdoors, they shall be elevated and protected with a waterproof cover. The Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certified test report from the producer, containing all data required to verify compliance with the specifications listed in the physical requirements table. Unless otherwise stated, all applicable property values given in the physical requirements represent minimum average roll values (MARV) in the weakest principal direction (i.e., average test results from any sampled roll in a lot sampled for conformance or quality assurance testing shall meet or exceed the minimum values in the table). Stated values are for non - critical, non - severe conditions. Lots shall be sampled in accordance with ASTM D 4354. -. viJ� ?U. 9 HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL -3- BOULDER RETAINING WALLS August 19, 2011 Fibers used in the manufacture of geotextiles, and the threads used in joining geotextiles by sewing, shall consist of long chain synthetic polymers composed of at least 95 percent by weight polyolefins, polyesters, or polyamides. They shall be formed into a network such that the filaments or yams retain dimensional stability relative to each other, including selvedges. Securing pins shall be made from galvanized steel wire or other approved wire material, 0.091 inch or larger in diameter. They shall be U- shaped, with legs 6 inches long and a 1 inch crown. Property Requirement Test Method Crab Strength; N Ohs) 800 (180) ASTM D 4632 Seam Strength, N (lbs) 710 (160) ASTM D 4632 Puncture Strength, N. (Ibs) 360 (80) ASTM D 4833 Trapezoid Tear, N (lbs) 225 (50) ASTM D 4533 Apparent Opening Size (AOS) , A ©S less4han 0.297 mm ASTM D 4651 US Std Sieve fgreater tluin No. 50 sieve) . Permeability, cm/s , k fabric > k soil I ASTM D 44491 . UltravioleflDegradation at 500 hours I . S09'a strength "retained: I ASTM D43SS . ' Values apply to both field and manufactured seams, if required. 2 A nominal coefficient of permeability may be determined by multiplying permittivity value by nominal thickness. The k value of the fabric should be greater than the k value of the soil. U is l +' � �';• t� HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL August 19, 2011 -4- BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Approval and Qualifications of Boulder Wall Installer. Prior to the start of wall construction, submit the following: (a) References citing satisfactory completion of at least three (3) boulder walls of similar height and face area. (b) A summary of the experience of the primary equipment operator responsible for placement of base, facing, and cap rocks. General. Survey as required to verify the limits of the boulder wall installation. The following definitions apply to boulder wall construction: (a) Base Rock: The base rock is the lowermost rock in the boulder wall, and bears directly on the soil /rock subgrade. (b) Facing Rock: The facing rocks comprise the bulk of the boulder wall and are stacked above the base rock. (c) Cap Rock: The cap rock is the uppermost rock in the boulder wall section and "caps" the boulder wall. Boulder Wall Construction. (a) Embankment Construction. All embankment shall be placed prior to foundation excavation to create a cut -wall condition. (b) Foundation Excavation. Excavate a foundation trench at least 6 inches below the bottom of the wall base rock, running the full length of the proposed wall. Deeper embedment may be required where a toe slope is present or where a leveling pad is specified. Excavate the foundation to a minimum width equal to the specified base rock width (B') plus 12 inches to include the Filter Material (Special) behind the wall. Foundation excavation shall be performed in accordance the following requirements: (1) Excavate the foundation in sections such that the wall can be constructed in one shift or one day's work, unless shoring is provided for the purpose to support the excavation. (2) Exercise care during excavation of the back cut. Stability of temporary cut slopes is the responsibility of the Contractor. v v J + HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL -5- BOULDER RETAINING WALLS August 19, 2011 (c) Rock Placement. Place the first course of rock (base rock) on a layer of bed course material fill that has been placed on firm, unyielding soil or bedrock with full contact between the rock and the subgrade. Excavate any loose, soft or otherwise unsuitable material present at foundation grade and replace with bed course material as required to provide a firm, unyielding subgrade. Compact the bed course material to a density of not less than 95 percent of maximum density determined in accordance with AASHTO T 180. As the wall is constructed, place the rocks so that there are no continuous joints in either the vertical or lateral direction. Stockpile a sufficient number of rocks to provide good selection for placement. To obtain a better fit, place rocks which do not match the spaces offered by the previous course in a different location. Avoid placing rocks which have shapes that create voids with a linear dimension greater than 12 inches. Except in isolated cases, place each rock so that it bears on at least two rocks below it. Locate at least one bearing point a distance no greater than 6 inches from the average face of the boulder wall. The allowable tolerance for base rock widths is 6 inches; however, do not place two or more consecutive base rocks with a width less than specified on the plans. Slope the top surface of each rock towards the back of the boulder wall at an inclination of at least five (5) percent. The minimum boulder wall thickness is based on minimum base rock width, as specified on the plans, and allowable face batter. All rocks, including the base rocks shall be placed. Securely place facing rocks so that the rocks are unable to be moved with a pry bar after the wall is complete. (d) Voids. Where voids with a minimum dimension of 6 inches or greater exist in the face of the boulder wall, chink the voids with smaller rock. (1) If there is no rock contact within the wall thickness, chink the void with a smaller piece of rock. (2) Chinking rocks do not provide primary structural support for the overlying rock. (3) Chinking rocks can not be moved or removed by hand after the boulder wall is complete. Reset loose chinking rocks until securely placed or grouted in place. Do not allow grout to be readily visible from the face of the boulder wall. UU�sJ42 HIGH MESA RANCH BOULDER WALL rem BOULDER RETAINING WALLS August 19, 2011 (e) Wall Drainage. Install the granular rock backdrain (Filter Material (Special)) between the wall and the back cut face being supported. The granular rock backdrain layer is at least 12 inches thick, measured horizontally from the back of the base rock to the face of the back cut. Place granular rock backdrain concurrent with boulder wall so that at no time is either more than 24 inches higher than the other. (1) Separate the crushed rock from the back cut by Geotextile (Drainage) (Class A). Overlap the non -woven geotextile at least 12 inches at all seams. (2) Cap the granular rock backdrain with at least 12 inches of native, relatively impermeable soil. Place non -woven geotextile between the soil cover and the granular rock backdrain. BASIS OF PAYMENT The cost of the wall shall include all items necessary to construct the wall, complete in- place. These items include, but not limited to; mobilization, hauling, surveying, labor, equipment, embankment, excavation, wall rock, bed course material, filter material, geotextile and topsoil. r r(' i fl;^ @ n UjU'U40 AK SFALR® TPINtld' aCYR4I£O GTA)flP Alto 1W .VYCM1T FACmL GMIS 1� P (muaJ WFM K AFlY1r ftD CpaY WIFAaI J • n. nYFI bG>,LY, pf FOLf4lNIkW MXR MJ S /[FRA >kW 1plIV f�CL C/aIX/A'4' M1IYK FIGId'FU:R AT —TEM apx AY /1 /icfYm CaAaW tw — EM91A cAtYVm t MU TMCE 8I>7(RJ CI MKK HtO4NY3 PMLL4P/ SUPfYW! _ MA S�AFRI ttW/X/ fY.yIT fdAAA —E A a Ma IAOI, Al¢WLE LACE TGl° [Y MY'K 4MES )OM/p5 FME L'ET.GV /AHE .2�GGL /NCORR£CT SEC77ON PROPERT/ES NOTES' T. LYYdTMRT Aq'.MAYAM Kk'E BIfE NO Gt° .P]1'J6 ALCMOVd TO NiSEt:J FECAKI,IXS /PACE FAw Aow xuiWAVlr er esoxxxm surAME APY I+TxA; WxxxaATaw, AYI ATwarc Aau � THE SRF AW SIMPE SPECxYA OdmF )IM1 FKJT AaY(6 fM[Y SE/AW SfiPaTlfn 9Y IAYYRXIG WTOdlfa NO MNCV/T M1CC.YS MOGSIIl1'I W .YfNAL'f lQ2'C AY1tS 2 A YNpRHI IIXfA.M'E C✓ 0 V.06 WY BF 4H® 10 Aa' ANM atR" KCX MIT!/f ![¢ AC1T' MIN Waxes a tr T-n' MIW ACpaPlD slsE Anar xmTN (� EMIEAS s =x: Tw APxAamnmr cwla sa ade Aoos Wr a lsen fAaun xocna AOE N cmcrF Ar nM fans ov Aar m soT ea�nTTAEer fury aa¢ Anus Ma Mn/I6 led nlw a s fu LE el¢ Ax9 cw Anc{s m naF n�Em NaZTF axxA6G/ d ,A�r auFw nWr nxx xMa TAE [PM1S! a9EMgY [F TIE aISE Ntl aV aXM 6 /L9£MGAAV lO NC' fKf CY .NGQAY. A M[AE [QAC SYI. M OII¢RxR' W4Va9ETd.P[MTInV AX CbNaV6 Mf E1K'aMFAIA COV/K'/ lYE F/EdEE4 fAP A.PHAFNU[ AELAIYEMOp'6 OS F.NAMN] TIE ff/dABllfa fYC M NL SIYT aY Ar TGSI } IA'M6 OF MAAWT£FM( (LEIS A/ aSLYNME a/IICf A}£S IO A PMl/EC/m LY//TET M OnHN Pf➢.Y4KNJ n4WC!' SIM.C9TA°E AT (nP' PoMS a THE .PX'xENI M9.fI TLtl iF£/ (INCI �' ® SUBTIIY 0` TEWWAM'Wl SLYYT d AE Nom' NY 0` NE L'aARIGIIM E ro Nor cn�aiACeF ACCA'fAET W sTmrs ExCFID1w TM' NTAiAS snaM ax 2r xenrtxT' amew TABIf wTT.gVI MpP MB'!rp AffaJIW. BY nE 1M51EDP. ROCKERY DESIGN TABLE rYl xu Wx. � H (TT) YIN 8 xOtlt Mom 0 (m u• <w fE9EAxfE ,W. pOtl( xIXt{R (1B) w nocK cw Aax -_- - snt nE a,aawN xo aT 'Mp - IYOIEHIE (a1MMLE) y$ •.o � Zoo (CL(Sf N INV.t° LP anM liter aC:C 3 BA 3.0 a, Zm Z � � IEpCXD AM.I � e -' � Lur saEWms xAtE uroar .0 Axx seE AAOIEA' a9a, IAE Ra2'rym.) cetvAAx Aocx eluaav, 4E /MiCC/ SPfCOM' aW Mmr � .• . RMDAARa FTF® (s• /xN nwarasr) r -0 xMATA - r -0• yr/ ROCKERY sEe AncxTm axw RRE WALL TYP ICAL ryTrl SECAON TMCE 8I>7(RJ CI MKK HtO4NY3 PMLL4P/ SUPfYW! _ MA S�AFRI ttW/X/ fY.yIT fdAAA —E A a Ma IAOI, Al¢WLE LACE TGl° [Y MY'K 4MES )OM/p5 FME L'ET.GV /AHE .2�GGL /NCORR£CT SEC77ON PROPERT/ES NOTES' T. LYYdTMRT Aq'.MAYAM Kk'E BIfE NO Gt° .P]1'J6 ALCMOVd TO NiSEt:J FECAKI,IXS /PACE FAw Aow xuiWAVlr er esoxxxm surAME APY I+TxA; WxxxaATaw, AYI ATwarc Aau � THE SRF AW SIMPE SPECxYA OdmF )IM1 FKJT AaY(6 fM[Y SE/AW SfiPaTlfn 9Y IAYYRXIG WTOdlfa NO MNCV/T M1CC.YS MOGSIIl1'I W .YfNAL'f lQ2'C AY1tS 2 A YNpRHI IIXfA.M'E C✓ 0 V.06 WY BF 4H® 10 Aa' ANM atR" KCX MIT!/f ![¢ AC1T' MIN Waxes a tr T-n' MIW ACpaPlD slsE Anar xmTN (� EMIEAS s =x: Tw APxAamnmr cwla sa ade Aoos Wr a lsen fAaun xocna AOE N cmcrF Ar nM fans ov Aar m soT ea�nTTAEer fury aa¢ Anus Ma Mn/I6 led nlw a s fu LE el¢ Ax9 cw Anc{s m naF n�Em NaZTF axxA6G/ d ,A�r auFw nWr nxx xMa TAE [PM1S! a9EMgY [F TIE aISE Ntl aV aXM 6 /L9£MGAAV lO NC' fKf CY .NGQAY. A M[AE [QAC SYI. M OII¢RxR' W4Va9ETd.P[MTInV AX CbNaV6 Mf E1K'aMFAIA COV/K'/ lYE F/EdEE4 fAP A.PHAFNU[ AELAIYEMOp'6 OS F.NAMN] TIE ff/dABllfa fYC M NL SIYT aY Ar TGSI } IA'M6 OF MAAWT£FM( (LEIS A/ aSLYNME a/IICf A}£S IO A PMl/EC/m LY//TET M OnHN Pf➢.Y4KNJ n4WC!' SIM.C9TA°E AT (nP' PoMS a THE .PX'xENI M9.fI TLtl iF£/ (INCI �' ® SUBTIIY 0` TEWWAM'Wl SLYYT d AE Nom' NY 0` NE L'aARIGIIM E ro Nor cn�aiACeF ACCA'fAET W sTmrs ExCFID1w TM' NTAiAS snaM ax 2r xenrtxT' amew TABIf wTT.gVI MpP MB'!rp AffaJIW. BY nE 1M51EDP. ROCKERY DESIGN TABLE rYl xu Wx. � H (TT) YIN 8 xOtlt Mom 0 (m MN. qlf snrE ex e M ,W. pOtl( xIXt{R (1B) w nocK exY xopf , mo xo aT 'Mp INp , ea •.o R, Zoo �000 f BA 3.0 a, Zm ]aoo ROCKERY DESIGN DATA: AMG9Rn Nac. x - sr (AS.cxEO) arESMnt � - ao T'g (ASRAiEA/ R.u' an xtxiq � - ,sa frf WZrr RAx.Yd AglSSixE - zAM fsF (a(CWTm) I4WW GyI SYME fCiP !61'iN P�N�' OKY. ACA[Y. YaE aI,TfAWY bf LKFA,fA(b, C"C 44 OES �V TASE COMLIVT Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to AVERYO 5160 Use Avery® Template 51600 i Feed Paper expose Pop -up EdgeTM 1 BECK PAUL & GLENNIS REV TRUSTS 2928 SNOWMASS CREEK RD SNOWMASS, CO 81654 DAVIS BRADLEY D PROVISOR JANIS 34 LAIGHT ST #3 NEW YORK, NY 10013 FEITSHANS FRED R 2754 ROSCOMARE RD BEL AIR, CA 90077 FOUR FORKS LLC 422 N WARSON RD ST LOUIS, MO 63124 QUAD III TRUST MYLER DAVID J TRUSTEE 211 MIDLAND AVE #201 BASALT, CO 81621 LAURENTIIS RAFFAELLA DE 2754 ROSCOMARE RD BEL AIR, CA 90077 WINDSTAR LAND CONSERVANCY C/O RMI ATTN MARTY PICKETT 1739 SNOWMASS CREEK RD SNOWMASS, CO 81654 PABST IDA V LIVING TRUST PO BOX 247 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ZABRISKIE ADELAIDE W & JOHN L PO BOX 586 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 f'), r, v�J _ '� nu alfiaa�� dSt00nllbeSMuwM151'JC�wtlBJ:e 110z'L4 P r SIC) uIxVdNadW tLOZ 146uAdco uoponpw, luawafuelue a41 uo Bulpuadap 96ue4p Aew Apwnme a41 uo9eluaswdw legal a lou sl pue palpldap swnleal a41 10 uogeluaswdw 1e ,LjdwB a sl 06ewy5utmwp /dew s!41 O A3lotlas SIAVC S 198 = 1 oll sMaod anod 3 M —� oos o9v o NI/Ml N 9NIAll A £Ofv tlol lSStld vo e ° oot. i 1 nal 9N'VJI A VO11SStld Q I 99ZE U M o38d sNVHS113d i j AONVAH3SNOO oNVI HVISONIM mo o. OOSE U � h y r m I \o USE M3a 3otl .� 31NSIastl2 i' j' V08Z j i sszz i l �� X46 zoszl a sv� REZ Q.: PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF LAND USE APPLICATION FEES PITKIN COUNTY (hereinafter "COUNTY ") and VA i (, Me 1� � (hereinafter "APPLICANT ") AGREE AS FOLLOWS:St%µr 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for Ac-* oa %-4-L4:r .�•���a � (hereinafter, the "PROJECT "). ACCVFSS �� AZT c400 l f cx��^�8S �,vA� . 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Pitkin County Ordinance No. 30 -2009 establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. The fee structure is based on the COUNTY'S policy that development shall pay, in full, the cost of development review in the COUNTY. Fees have been set to be consistent and fair to the public and to reflect the expense incurred in providing such services to the public. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed PROJECT, it may not be possible at the time of application to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. 4. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that fees charged for the processing of land use applications shall accumulate if an application includes more than one type of land use review. 5. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the Planning Commission and/or Board of County Commissioners to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 6. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay abase fee in the amount of $ SCi 0 which is based on Thours of staff time, and if actual time spent by staff to process the application exceeds the average number of hours by more than 20 %, then the COUNTY will bill the APPLICANT quarterly for the additional time spent. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. PITKIN COUNTY Cindy Houben Community Development Director ( LICANT") By: Tf ewt i4ir "14c&; `�-srSA) Print Name and Title (if applicable) Date: R • [ a. I I Mailing Address: Cu At (,9A f' r n r -+�v�) PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public that on November 11, 2011, the Pitkin County Community Development Director granted approval for the Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review (Case P076 -11; Deter. #95- 2011). The property is located at 4001 Snowmass Creek Road and is legally described as a tract of land being part of Sections 2 and 11, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6` P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2645- 111 -00 -003. This site - specific development plan grants a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes. S /Cindy Houben Community Development Director Pitkin County, Colorado Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on NOVEMBER 24, 2011. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review (Case P076 -11) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Aspen High Mesa LLC (PO Box 1308, Houston, TX 77251) requesting to expand the radius of a residential access point off Snowmass Creek Road and stabilize an upslope side of the driveway. Also requested is construction of a 6' gate and the lower portion of the driveway. The property is located at 4001 Snowmass Creek Road and is legally described as a tract of land being part of Sections 2 and 11, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6 °i P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2645- 111 -00 -003. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. For further information, contact Mike Kraemer at (970) 920 -5482. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on October 16, 2011. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subject property A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, by November 16, 2011. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. http: / /www.aspenpitkin.com /Portals /0 /doc s /county /Com ° /u20 Dev /Planning /Land_Use_Applicatio ns /.pdf PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review (Case P076 -11) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an application has been submitted by Aspen High Mesa LLC (PO Box 1308, Houston, TX 7725 1) requesting to expand the radius of a residential access point off Snowmass Creek Road and stabilize an upslope side of the driveway. Also requested is construction of a 20' high ranch gate. The property is located at 4001 Snowmass Creek Road and is legally described as a tract of land being part of Sections 2 and 11, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6 P.M. The State Parcel Identification Number for the property is 2645- 111 -00 -003. The application is available for public inspection in the Pitkin County Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611. For further information, contact Mike Kraemer at (970) 920 -5482. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on October 9, 2011. Attention All Property Owners within 300' of the subiect prooerty A property owner receiving this public notice who wishes to submit comments or an objection shall submit those to the Pitkin County Community Development, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, by November 9, 2011. If any objections to the development application are received the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Hearing Officer. http:// www .aspenpitkin.comIPortals /0 /docs /county/ Com% 2ODev IPlanningILand_Usq_Applicatio ns /.pdf County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE & } SS. MAILING PURSUANT TO State of Colorado } PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE CODE SECTION 2 -20 -100 I, ' being or representing an Applicant to the Pitkin County Development Department, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 2 -20 -100 of the Pitkin County Land Use Regulations in the following manner: By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by fast - class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail at least 2 weeks prior to the public comment deadline to all owners of property within 300' of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on -, 2011 (which is 30 days prior to the deadline of �, 2011). The names and addresses of the adjacent property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the public comment. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous lace on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) on the 2011, which is at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public comment deadline. A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. OW2, 8001 Applicant's name Si afore Signed before me this� &day of � 2011 b My commission r I Use Avery®Template 5160 Bend along line to I Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edger" AVERYO 5160® 1 BECK PAUL & GLENNIS REV TRUSTS DAVIS BRADLEY D FRED SHANS ED R FEIT FELT HANS F ED 29"28 SNOWMASS CREEK RD PROVISOR JANIS 34 LAIGHT ST #3 ARE RD SNOWMASS, CO 81654 NEW YORK, NY 10013 BEL AIR, CA FOUR FORKS LLC LAURENTIIS RAFFAELLA DE PABST IDA V LIVING TRUST 422 N WARSON RD 2754 ROSCOMARE RD PO BOX 247 ST LOUIS, MO 63124 BEL AIR, CA 90077 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 QUAD III TRUST WINDSTAR LAND CONSERVANCY MYLER DAVID J TRUSTEE C/O RMI ATTN MARTY PICKETT ZABRISKIE ZA RIS ADELAIDE W &JOHN L 211 MIDLAND AVE #201 1739 SNOWMASS CREEK RD 586 BASALT, CO 81621 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 I Z Etiquettes faciles a eler A. p O O i Sens de Repliez la hachure afin de i www.avery.mm Utilisez le gabarit AVERY 5160 2 chamement reveler le rebord Pop-up"r 1- 800- G0-AVFPV 2316q� O 2502 o2259 \ ` f t 2504 ADELAIDE i ADELAIDE W _� &JONN.L 2563 \ 2730 - - i -- - - -__ ` \ 23117 256 I 2928 BECK PAUL REV IS R TRU STS i EV TRU 'j00r % o 2926 \ SS ��2 1601 —. \.\ DUADIII TRUST th \ QP . n III/ / I 1 I I f i '•� WINDSTAR LAND CONSERVANCY I I f t t i i i N 0 450 900 1 . 1 W E Feet 5 This map /drewinglmage is a graphical representation of the features depicted and is not a legal representation. The accuracy may change 3 depending on the enlargement or redoction. (`�r e...e..:oxu. nic rW. So? 3 ]'. C(¢fkRE 3502 3500 FEITSHANS FRED R 37f Q 001 4_104 PABSTIOA V LIVING TRUST LCI I DAMS BRADLEY ee I o ` 1 0 � o o J 1� 1 1 1\ I 1 1 � I J 1 1 Etl9iWO i y 1 � \1 \ \ \ �i / i I� FA ` EX411NG CRIi0.M IYP. PEVV�CCMWn TIP. GRADING & LAYOUT PLAN September 28, 2011 P 19 2V U C 2 Sao UC z 0 0 s -0 co �a) o w U3 0 3 _U)� =°o C� SUL. pwEeECam: oa vAOi.ra_ o,ew„ / PrmeosEO wnaw000 N,11'�ILE ne. �� EAt WEVBINGVHiEiRlIIX1 ,r.,eraa rmaN / uvxoawace wawrm / PaaPmry ura GRADING & LAYOUT PLAN September 28, 2011 P 19 2V U C 2 Sao UC z 0 0 s -0 co �a) o w U3 0 3 _U)� =°o C� SUL. pwEeECam: oa vAOi.ra_ o,ew„ LC 9lEET nv.eEie L -1 ellf ttieb. ,i w nn.wwy PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX# (970) 920 -5439 September 29, 2011 Jennifer Dolecki 312 E AABC Aspen, CO 81611 Jennifer ci,escapevardendesign.com Re: Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review (PID #2645- 111 -00 -003; Case# P076 -11) Dear Ms. Dolecki: The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice by U.S. Mail to all property owners within 300' of the subject property with the return address of the Community Development Department (copy of notice will be mailed to you by the Community Development Department) by October 9, 2011. The names and addresses shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the mailing. Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Mailing and a photograph of the posted sign as proof of compliance with the Code. A property owner receiving the public notice who wishes to submit comments or objections to the Community Development by 9 °i day of November, 2011. If any objections to the development application are received by this date, the Community Development Department shall continue the application to a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2 By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) on the 25 °i day of October, 2011, which is at least fifteen (15) days prior to November 9, 2011. This must be submitted prior to any approvals being granted. If you have questions, please call Mike Kraemer, the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5482. Sincerely, Bonnie Waechtler Administrative Assistant Encl: Affidavit Code Section 2 -20 -100 PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5526 FAX# (970) 920 -5439 MEMORANDUM To: Basalt & Rural Fire Protection Department FROM: Mike Kraemer, Community Development Department Michael.kraemer ci co pitkin co us Re: Aspen High Mesa LLC Activity Envelope & Site Plan Review (PID 2645- 111 -00 -003; Case P076 -11) DATE: September 29, 2011 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application submitted by Aspen High Mesa LLC. The Pitkin County Community Development Director will review the application. Please return your comments to me by Wednesday, November 9, 2011. htt / /www.aspenpitkin.com /Portals /0 /dots /county /Com %20Dev /Plannin[, /Land Use Ap plications /P076 11 app pd1 If you require a paper copy of this application contact Bonnie Waechtler at bonnie.waechtler na co.pitkin,co.us or 920 -5109. Thank you. Michael Kraemer From: Bill Harding [bharding @basaltfire.org] Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 10:52 AM To: Jennifer, Susan Pearson, Michael Kraemer Cc: bbenton @basaltfire.org; bbishop @basaltfire.org Subject: RE: 4001 Snowmass Creek Road Susan and Mike, After reviewing the planning referral documents and site observation in conjunction with Jennifer Dolecki - Smith who is representing the applicant I offer the following. The application as I understand is for activity envelope and access permit to improve the driveway from Snowmass Creek road to the residence. I took note of geotechnical concerns as referenced in letters provided by consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris dated April, July 1986 respectively. The entry way as it presently exist poses a significant collision hazard due to proximity of a blind corner and increase in service volume since it's original construction. The applicant points out the difficulty of negotiating trailers and farm equipment utilizing three point turn options that due to time delay places drivers at greater risk of collision. Widening and flaring out this section as proposed would benefit everyone including emergency response personnel negotiating with large apparatus. The retaining wall as proposed and engineered by SGM, (that took into account Mr. Lampiris correspondence improves access to the home site and the Fire district is in support of the proposal. The one concern I observed is that the brush on the downhill side of the driveway prior to the open meadows at the top is overgrown and poses a significant hazard to drivers in wildfire event. I recommend that the applicant reduce the fuel load using best practice approaches in fuel mitigation. The applicant could consult with a wildfire mitigation expert to develop a mitigation plan that will meet the needs of mitigation but maintain esthetic concerns of the County and nearby residents. The brush on the uphill side will be mitigated for this purpose through the normal construction activity during retaining wall construction. I appreciate the time Ms. Dolecki -Smith provide to help me assimilate this proposal. If I can be of further assistance please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, Bill Harding, Fire Marshal From: Jennifer [mailto.jennifer @escapegardendesign.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 20113:09 PM To: 'Susan Pearson' Cc: Bill Harding Subject: 4001 Snowmass Creek Road fW Z I E S C A P E ( l Dt t tor .N Sttt ornecrr.uNr Hi Susan, 1 met with Bill Harding on site today. It was a very positive meeting. He will be emailing you tomorrow morning to sign off on the plans. I should also have the engineered drawing you are waiting for tomorrow. The additional Check for $162 is in hand. Talk to you tomorrow. Jennifer Jennifer M. Dolecki- Smith, RLA Escape Garden Design, LLC 312 -E AABC Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -3700 (970) 618 -1019 Email secured by Check Point Please don't print this e -mail unless you really need to. Under Colorado's Open Records Act (CORA), all e -mails sent by or to us on this District -owned e -mail account may be subject to public disclosure. PRIVACY NOTICE -- This electronic message transmission contains information from the Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District that may be confidential or privileged. I£ you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and please delete the original message. 2 Name: Project Address Type: Permit Number 1111W.W41111Jl_V I 0076.2011.PLAN rIIUM PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00031461 Escape Garden Design Site Dev Date:9/19/2011 4001 SNOWMASS CREEK RD check # 2105 Fee Description PP- Flat Fee PP- Clerk Tech Fee PP- Public Notice Fee Amount 1,56000 2500 5400 Total: 1,63906