HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264523200003.a
DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat(s)
PARCEL 10: DATE RCVD: [ --------- #COPIEC|��
CASE NAWE1Woodmw Minor mw*aza/m ........
_________
PROJADDR: 5980Soo*mnwsc/k,pu
DWm/APP ADR [VS/Z[ ---------
r -- - - ---'
EmailAddr
FEES DUE:1 FEES RCVD
REF: DUE
! mri
NTG DATE
REV BODY PH NOTICED
REMARKS[;q�(,
�0VER
r ------^�------
DATE OF FINAL ACT
` ]/)6n385
r ---------^-~-
uOCCR000
�
80CCOod � ------------
-- / ---__-'_ --^_-
PZ
HRG OFF fAp,oved
CASE NOFPGW-
''/
HO INDEX
ADMIN.
PLAT RECORDED[Ti/9/1995 (BKPG): ADM|N|NDCt|
YR APPROVAL DATE� �F-- VR�XPI �/ RES�|-- ----- --
'
CASETYP� C4SETyP5.
CASETYP2 --------�----^--- CA3[TYP6:[-----��' -----
—�—'�- ------ r -' ' -----
CASET,P0 | CASETYPT!
CASET`/P4| Dale Scanned. r--- l/l�nI
File Location: I FFBox#196
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
PITKIN COUNTY
DATE RECEIVED: 01/18/95 CASE # P7 -95
DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID# 2645- 232 -00 -003
STAFF MEMBER: RM
PROJECT NAME: Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Project Address: 5980 Snowmass Creek Road
APPLICANT: Raymond & Debbie Woodrow
Applicant Address: 5980 Snowmass Creek Road
Snowmass CO 81654
REPRESENTATIVE: i "
Representative Address /Phone:
---------------- - - - - --
FEES: PLANNING $ 425 # APPS RECEIVED 12
ENGINEER $ 62 # PLATS RECEIVED 12
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $ 62
TOTAL $ 549
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP:
DRC MEETING DATE
P &Z MEETING DATE
BOCC MEETING DATE
HEARING OFFICER MEETING
DATE:
REFERRALS:
X Attorney
X Engineer
Housing
Aspen Water
- Envir.Hlth.
x Zoning
Land Mgmt.
Airport Mgr.
Sheriff
City P & Z
Building Dept
DATE REFERRED:
RESOLUTION #:
INITIALS: V) DATE DUE: a
PLAT OR SITE PLAN RECORDED AT BOOK
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED:
County Attorney
Housing
Open Space Bd.
Other:
FILED:
_Aspen Consol S.D.
_Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
_Holy Cross
Aspen Fire
l( Basalt Fire
_Carbondale Fire
Div. Water Res.
X State Forest Ser.
CO Geo.Survey
CDOT
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
_ School District
USFS (Carbondale)
USFS (Aspen)
Div. of Wildlife
BLM
Snowmass Village
Risk Manager
Caucus
_ Homeowners
_ Open Space B and
_Clean Air Board _� Other: Ffcnd "2��cF.h'i -�-�`
Brush Ck.Metro Dist_ Other:
DATE: �21 ( 4 � - 17
PAGES) _
INITIAL:
_County / Ehg �Vli
Envir. Health
Zonin�
Applicant
Revised 05/16/94
li
4,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Woodrow File
FROM: Suzanne Wolff
DATE: September 27, 1995
ISSUE: The Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review was approved by the Hearing Officer on
March 16, 1995 to allow an accessory envelope for a barn and a shed. As a condition of
approval, the applicant was required to obtain a letter from Alan Czenkusch of the Colorado
Division of Wildlife (DOW) regarding the potential impact of the proposed structures on the
adjacent riparian area and the applicant was required to comply with any conditions imposed by
the DOW or the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. In subsequent site visits to the site to resolve
these issues, staff became concerned with the proximity of the proposed shed to the floodplain of
Snowmass Creek. The applicant was requested to provide a detailed floodplain analysis for
review by staff and the Floodplain Administrator. Tom Newland reviewed the analysis provided
by Wright Water Engineers, and is satisfied that the shed will not impact the 100 year floodplain.
I have reviewed the original approval, and have determined that no changes need to be made to
the conditions of approval. Mr. Woodrow has represented that the shed will not have walls on the
end which is closest to the creek and the floodplain, as shown on the plan in the file.
01! 1!n02
!,y
�
TO: Tim Malloy, Pitkin County Hearing Officer
FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office
RE: Woodrow 1041 Hazard Review
DATE: March 16, 1995
APPLICANTS: Raymond & Debbie Woodrow
LOCATION: 5980 Snowmass Creek Road; NE, NW, of Section 23,
Township 9 South, Range 86 West
ZONING /LOT SIZE: RS -30; 4.518 acres
ACCESS: The property is accessed from Snowmass Creek Road via an
existing driveway.
SITE DATA: The lot is essentially flat and is located between
Snowmass Creek and Snowmass Creek Road. There is an existing
residence and outbuilding on the property. The proposed structures
are located outside of the required yard setbacks.
BACKGROUND: A red tag was issued by the Zoning Officer on December
1, 1994, for earthmoving activity without a permit. Alan Czenkusch
of the Colorado Division of Wildlife and Mike Claffey of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers both visited the property to assess the
impact of the earthmoving on the floodplain and the riparian area
on the property.
WATER AND SEWER: Information was not provided by the applicants
concerning water and sewer for the existing residence or the
proposed barn and shed. The Environmental Health Department (EHD)
makes the following comments (attached):
a. Information shall be provided to the EHD stating the proposed
use of water for the barn, particularly whether water is to
be used for human consumption, and, if required, documenting
the location of the well and the quality and quantity of water
obtained from the well.
b. The floor plan for the barn shows floor drains for the horse
stalls. A no -fee septic permit can be obtained from the EHD
if there will not be a bath /lavatory in the barn. Otherwise,
a septic permit will be required. The septic system shall be
located a minimum of 50 feet from the high water mark (500
year floodplain line on the site plan) of Snowmass Creek and
shall avoid areas of groundwater.
11
O./
REQUEST: The applicants request administrative 1041 Hazard Review
approval to construct an equipment shed and a barn. The site is
encumbered by low wildfire hazard, the Snowmass Creek floodplain
and riparian area.
STAFF COMMENTS - 1041 REVIEW
Wildfire
The property is mapped in a low wildfire hazard area, though it is
located adjacent to Snowmass Creek in a riparian area. Since the
site was not determined to be in a "no" wildfire hazard area, the
applicant will be required to comply with the standards in Section
3- 807(C) of the Land Use Code. These requirements are included in
the conditions of approval.
Kelly Rogers of the Colorado State Forest Service states, "The
combination of low hazard fuels, close proximity to a fire station,
and adequate road and driveway access make this proposal a very low
risk from wildland fire."
The property is serviced by the Basalt Fire District from the
Snowmass substation.
No comments were received from the Sheriff or the Basalt Fire
District.
Floodplain
The property is encumbered by the Snowmass Creek floodplain.
Section 3 -804 of the Land Use Code prohibits development within the
100 year floodplain. The site plan provided by the applicant
depicts the 500 year floodplain line, and the proposed structures
are located outside of this area. The applicant noted in the
meeting that the floodplain line is not accurate, and that the area
where the improvements are proposed is above the creek (outside of
the floodplain) and on a level with the rest of the property. The
applicant shall revise the site plan to accurately depict the 100
year floodplain line, which would be less restrictive than the line
shown on the site plan.
Tom Newland, Pitkin County Floodplain Administrator, notes that
County floodplain permits will not be required because the
structures are outside of the 100 year floodplain area.
The applicants shall be required to establish a building envelope
to encompass the proposed barn and shed, as well as the "horse
area" shown on the site plan. The envelope shall be located at
least 20 feet from the 100 year floodplain line. All development
shall occur within this envelope.
Alan Czenkusch, Colorado Division of Wildlife, and Mike Claffey,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, have visited the site and determined
that the proposed location of the shed and the barn will not impact
the riparian area along the creek. Mr. Woodrow has agreed to
comply with any conditions imposed by the DOW and the Corps of
Engineers, including restoring the vegetation along the bank that
was disturbed.
FINDINGS:
1. The wildfire hazard can be mitigated.
2. The proposed barn and equipment shed avoid the Snowmass Creek
floodplain and the riparian areas along the creek.
RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 3- 801(B)(2) of the Land Use
Code, the Hearing Officer is authorized to approve a site plan and
application for a Minor 1041 Hazard Review. Based on the findings
referenced above, Staff recommends approval of the Woodrow Minor
1041 Hazard Review. Said approval is subject to the conditions of
approval listed below. This memo will serve as a reference
document authorizing approval of said application. The Hearing
Officer's sign -off on a 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan is also
necessary for completion of the review process. The Site Plan
shall be recorded in the Clerk & Recorder's office, and a copy
shall be placed in the file.
De Mi'J3] dF
1. The applicant shall record a 1041 Site Plan, prior to
submission of any building permit applications. All
conditions of approval shall be noted on the site plan. The
plan shall be modified in the following manner:
a. The signature block for the Hearing Officer shall be
added.
b. An acceptance for recording block for the County Clerk
shall be included on the site plan.
C. Add a vicinity map to the site plan.
d. The 1041 waiver shall state, "Applicant acknowledges that
he /she has been informed by Pitkin County of the
existence of 1041 environmental hazard areas that might
affect the property, any improvements, and the use and
occupancy thereof."
e. The survey shall be amended to accurately depict the 100
year floodplain line. The survey shall be certified by
the surveyor.
3
is .
f. The building envelope, as established by staff, shall be
depicted on the site plan. The envelope shall be located
a minimum of 20 feet from the 100 year floodplain line.
2. Prior to issuance of a septic permit, the applicants shall
provide documentation to the Environmental Health Department
stating the proposed use of water for the barn, and the
location of the well and the quantity /quality of the water,
if required.
3. A septic permit shall be obtained from the Environmental
Health Department prior to issuance of a building permit.
The septic shall be located 50 feet from the 100 year
floodplain line.
4. Woodburning devices are prohibited in barns or agricultural
buildings.
5. The applicant shall comply with the following landscaping and
wildfire defensible space mitigation standards:
a. Brush, debris, and non - ornamental vegetation shall be
removed within a minimum 10 foot perimeter around the
structure.
b. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and
horizontal continuity of the fuels a minimum of a 30 foot
perimeter around the structure.
C. Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation within the
30 foot perimeters shall be a minimum of two times the
height of the fuel. Maximum diameter of the clumps shall
not exceed 10 feet. All measurements shall be from the
edges of the crowns of the fuel.
d. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot
perimeter shall be pruned to a height of 10 feet above
the ground and ladder fuels from around trees and brush
shall be removed.
f. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters shall
have a minimum of 10 feet between the edges of the
crowns.
g. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be
trimmed and all branches within 15 feet of the chimneys
shall be removed.
h. The density of fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of the
structure shall be reduced.
i. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be
removed.
j. The applicant shall be responsible for the continued
maintenance of the defensible space vegetation
requirements.
6. The applicant shall comply with the following additional
wildfire mitigation standards:
C
a. The building envelope shall not be located in draws,
canyons or on slopes greater than 30%.
b. Roof construction shall be Class A, non - combustible
material (no wood shake /shingles) with no flat roofs.
C. Vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire
mesh with mesh , inch maximun.
d. Roofs and gutters shall be kept clear of debris.
e. Yards shall be kept clear of all litter, slash, and
flammable debris.
f. All flammable materials shall be stored on a parallel
contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any structure.
g. Weeds and grasses within the 10 foot perimeter shall be
maintained to a height not more than 6 inches.
h. Firewood /wood piles shall be stacked on a parallel
contour a minimum of 15 feet away from the structure.
i. Swimming pools shall be accessible to Fire Department
vehicles.
j. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
k. Wood fences shall not connect to the structure.
1. Any outbuildings or additional structures shall adhere
to the same standards as structures.
M. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an
approved container.
n. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48
standards and on a contour away from the structure with
standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around
any above - ground tank. Any wood enclosure around the
tank shall be constructed with materials approved for 2
hour fire - resistive construction on the exterior side of
the walls.
o. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 pound
approved ABC fire extinguisher placed in a visible and
accessible location.
p. Addresses shall be clearly marked with 2 inch non-
combustible letters and shall be visible and installed
on a non - combustible post.
q. Utility lines shall be buried.
7. The applicant shall comply with all conditions imposed by the
Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) and the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers regarding the riparian area on the property. The
applicant shall work with the DOW and the Army Corps
representatives to verify the required setback from the creek
and the location of the structures.
8. No development, including grading and landscaping, shall occur
outside of the approved building envelope, except for utility
and driveway extension and maintenance, and as may be
necessary to implement the wildfire mitigation measures.
9. A letter from Alan Czenkusch of the Division of Wildlife,
5
stating his opinion of the impact of the proposed structures
on the riparian area, shall be provided to the Community
Development Department prior to recording of the 1041 site
plan.
10. All material representations made by the applicants in the
application or in public meetings shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless amended by other
conditions. By signing this document, the applicant accepts
responsibility for compliance with the conditions of approval
listed herein.
Attachments
Date
1. County Zoning officer's Comments
2. Environmental Health Officer's Comments
3. Letter from Colorado State Forest Service
4. Memo from Tom Newland, Floodplain Administrator
5. Application
6. Floor Plans
7. Site Plan
! 'slQd
: � ? / /
Date
7'a 7� 9�
om
MEMORANDUM
TO: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office
FROM: Tom Newland, Floodplain Administrator
RE: Woodrow 1041 Hazard Review
DATE: September 26, 1995
I have reviewed the detailed floodplain analysis submitted for the site. The study, which
was conducted by a professional water engineer and is based on accepted floodplain
studies, concludes that the lowest floor of the proposed structures are at least 1 -foot above
the Base Flood Elevation. Based on the study, I am satisfied that the structure will not
impact the 100 -year floodplain.
I understand that when the planning office inspected the site this year during peak runoff,
Snowmass Creek appeared to be at or near the 100 -year flood event as described within the
accepted floodplain studies. This year's runoff event in the Roaring Fork River basin has
been categorized as a 15- to 20 -year flood event by the Colorado Water Conservation Board
(CWCB). However, this categorization applies to the river basin as a whole, and there is
a very good possibility that flood waters in localized areas of the river basin could have
reached the magnitude of a 100 -year event during a portion of the runoff period.
This concludes my comments regarding this application. Because the development is
removed from the 100 -year floodplain, no local or federal floodplain permits are required.
Please contact me at #5209 if you have any questions.
t3,
+r
I✓ 199
Aid b
� i
_ ,i
t
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
4
DENVER OFFICE
2490 West 26th Ave., Suite 100 A
Denver, Colorado 80211
(303) 4801700
(303) 4801020 FAX
August 30, 1995
Mr. Raymond Woodrow
5980 Snowmass Creek Road
Snowmass, CO 81654
GLENWOOD SPRINGS OFFICE
818 Colorado Avenue
P. O. Box 219
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
(303) 945 -7755
(303; 893 -1608 Denver Direct Line
(303) 945 -9210 FAX
RE: Snowmass Creek 100 -Year Floodplain — Woodrow Property
Dear Raymond:
At your request, Wright Water Engineers (WWE) reviewed the floodplain on the Woodrow
property located in Section 23, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M., at
5980 Snowmass Creek Road near Snowmass, Colorado. Based on our analysis, the location of
the proposed structures (shed and barn) would be outside the Snowmass Creek 100 -year
floodplain.
The analysis included review of the following:
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (panel
08097C0068C, effective date June 4, 1987);
• FEMA Flood Insurance Study, Pitkin County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas dated
June 4, 1987;
• 1988 and 1994 surveys of the property completed by Alpine Survey, Inc.;
• Field visit on August 1, 1995; and
• Field survey on August 4, 1995 and August 29, 1995.
The flood profile presented in the 1987 FEMA Flood Insurance Study for Snowmass Creek
identifies the flood elevations for the 10 -year, 50 -year, 100 -year and 500 -year floods. For the
100 -year flood, the flood elevation is approximately 3.5 feet above the thalweg of the creek.
A WWE field survey of seven different locations along Snowmass Creek, on the Woodrow
property, determined the minimum elevation from stream bed to the top of the bank to be
Raymond Woodrow
August 30, 1995
Page 2
approximately 4.1 feet. The stream bed elevation surveyed is approximately one to two feet
above the thalweg of the stream, which could not be measured due to high streamflows. In the
area adjacent to the proposed shed, the top of the bank is more than 6 feet above the stream bed
and approximately 8 feet above the thalweg of the stream. The 100 -year floodplain basically
follows the northerly /westerly channel bank and does not encroach onto the lower field adjacent
to the stream. The proposed locations for the shed and barn are outside the floodplain boundary
as shown on the attached Figure 1. The floodplain was plotted based on field analyses and
review of the background engineering data supporting the FEMA floodplain delineation.
Please call if you have any questions or need further assistance with this matter.
Very truly yours,
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
By:
l/ S
Michael J. Frj n, P.E.
Water Res rces Engineer
MJE /dlf
951- 117.000
Attachment
:i�11
r
A
O
w
m
0
0
ad o
N NE
�2
N
°�� W
°o s It
0a �
E a LL
od
CL `
W N
E
}
z
0
z
M
O
m
z
J
a
0
O
LL
W
}
0
0
7 2
w
W
IL
IL
O
O
Cy
N
Ol O
O
i W7 N co
Q > el
7 �
Q
�QC U W J
uj
O U O t
7
C
Q
O
9
O
0
a
N
0
O
V
h
C
r
CL
N
OQ
\
4 UI
`
�
/...
W
Z
QY "
X
^
1 \
1 \
.
1
1
\
\
1
E
iC
Q
U)
a
CL
N
l0 ;;
Q
vm
N G
E-0
.•
L C
a 0
O 00
a
i..
d O
O T
I
o m
°
CL H
Oa
CO
�0
CL
n d
.19
cm
O
p
C
I
"I
C N
O «
0
r , , 0
I
N
o
N
O
I
m
L
N
!112
r
A
O
w
m
0
0
ad o
N NE
�2
N
°�� W
°o s It
0a �
E a LL
od
CL `
W N
E
}
z
0
z
M
O
m
z
J
a
0
O
LL
W
}
0
0
7 2
w
W
IL
IL
O
O
Cy
N
Ol O
O
i W7 N co
Q > el
7 �
Q
�QC U W J
uj
O U O t
7
C
Q
O
9
O
0
a
N
0
O
V
h
C
r
CL
N
oh
:ON
X
X
r
1:16
AE
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
794.9
e,
ZONE X
PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 68 OF 325
cGNSAUM1
cowuM
coYYU111n
PANEL
"ME
MUMMA
NOMQN SUFFIX
Mn.%'OUN"
W.CDNRNARO ANSILL
..SYf15...
1MI .c
SNOIIMASSVILLAGE.
II.I OF ...
.tlMl.
0111 ..0
08097CO068 C
EFFECTIVE DATE:
JUNE 4, 1987
L' 6
13 !I II I I I Federal Emergency Management Agency
I��I1�
N
AV'
e\
k N
n
2
Z
r
L
r�
T L INE OF NE
W
0�
fil
W
`i
�s
�1
h •1
r:
t. .
,
" o .
r
X
r..
V kk,
h
.W
•`�a8
h�
K x
%'i/IA I /�,FPT�lA�l/ 2�,''T9�
k\\�
CP
�
I�
li
� .tip
ti
a.�
, CP
1 r 0
h
i' h5
, �p
1
11
� o
�0�
4
RBGW GT74 PM• �;�.-
I
,.,.
I,
of
v
■
a
ft
.j;iiMIb
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Suzanne Wolff
From: Tim Malloy
Postmark: Jul 19,95
9:41 AM
Subject: Reply to: Forwarded: woodrow
Reply text:
From Tim Malloy:
It sounds like we need to have Mr. Woodrow do a detailed floodplain
analysis.
Preceding message:
From Suzanne Wolff:
FYI... I also asked Newland if he has any data on the flow of
Snowmass Creek with this event and others in the past.
From Tom Newland:
from all reports, it appears that the flood event we witnessed this
year was a 15 to 20 event, not the big one (100 year). Did woodrow
do a site specific floodplain analysis to determine exactly where the
floodplain is on the property? If they used the approximate study on
the FIRM maps, this would not show tha \e 100 -year floddplain with any
amount of accuracy....
p 4,
O'3
U'.oIn11
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Tim Malloy
From: Suzanne Wolff
Postmark: Jul 12,95 12:07 PM
Subject: Woodrow
Message:
Francis went by yesterday, but didn't get anything on tape. We
looked at the site plan, and he thinks that the shed should be set
back 20 feet from what is delineated as the 500 year flood line,
based on what he saw yesterday. Whaddya think - should we still go
on Friday ??
t ciia�lio,
SECT /ON 11
5 14
TOWN5H
e
I 5tcTION 12
SECTION /3
`J SOUTH, 4 zANGE 66 WE5T, S /XTf f P. M.
J%
0 ..,
�* / APPR /MATE
- -- _; _ - - -- -
240
WE B_ 41AI,
WOOD -1
Curou/LD/NG
-,-
N - -
/ VftCff- As /�ESIGNvIT�D �i
C„
ALL FLA MATEiZIAL5 5HALL LSE 5TOf E>
Orl A FA4, ALLEL CONTCUK A MINIMUM OF 15 A
FEET AWAY FRCP -1 AN'( 5TKLYCTUK[f, ,
May 10, 1995
ASPEN • PITKIN
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Raymond Woodrow COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5980 Snowmass Creek Road
Snowmass, CO 81654
Dear Mr. Woodrow:
I have enclosed a copy of the letter that was submitted to the
Community Development Department by Alan Czenkusch of the Colorado
Division -of Wildlife (DOW). As stated in condition No. 7 of the
Minor 1041 Hazard Review that was approved by the Hearing Officer
on March 16, 1995, you are required to comply with all of the
conditions that are imposed by the DOW.
Alan Czenkusch also verbally provided the following requirements:
1. A 20' setback shall be maintained from the 100 year floodplain
line or the 500 year floodplain line, whichever is greater.
2: Revegetation of the disturbed areas shall not occur until Fall
of 1995. A site visit by Alan Czenkusch of the DOW shall
occur between July 31 and August 31 of 1995 to determine the
extent of the revegetation required and to establish -a
location for the sediment trap /polishing pond..
3. The pad and the riprap referred to in the letter shall be
removed in the Fall of 1995.
4. The DOW shall establish the number, type and location of all
vegetation required.
I spoke with Jim Breasted today about your site plan, and will
forward a sketch of the building envelope,to him to add to the site
plan.
Please call me at 920 -5093 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Su anne Wolff
0 iI�020
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 31611 • PHONE 303 920 5090 • FAx 303 920 5197
rMw�hrn,� DIRECT FAx Ling: 303 920 5439
State of Colorado
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
Department of Natural Resources
April 4, 1995
Suzanne Wolf
Aspen /Pitkin Planning
130 S Galena
Aspen, Colo 81611
Dear Ms Wolf
Here are our comments regarding the Woodrow property on
Snowmass Creek. They are in no particular order.
One basic criterion for all further work should be "zero
release of fines." This reach of Snowmass Creek enjoys good
water quality and it is a significant spawning stream which
contributes greatly to recruitment in the upper Roaring Fork.
This reach of stream also tends to be laterally unstable due to
the amount of bedload is is carrying.
At least some of the pad which currently constricts the
floodplain should be removed. If all of the proposed buildings
were nestled into the base of the hill, all of the pad could be
removed. There would also then be the advantages of those
buildings facing south, and being out of the 100 -year floodplain.
The 20' setback from the top of the bank should be permanently
fenced off and dedicated as a riparian buffer. Where necessary,
native riparian species should be re- established, including whole
willow -clump transplants. Off- stream stock watering should be
provided so that there is no need for stock to break down the
streambanks.
The present riprap, at the upstream end of the flat, seems
like overkill. Adequate toe -of -slope protection can be
accomplished (and therefore bank erosion controlled) without such
a massive pile of rock. This section of bank should be rebuilt,
to generally resemble the habitat work CDOT recently did just
below the Basalt upper bypass bridge (right bank). That is, the
rocks should be placed so as to produce an undercut bank, topsoil
backfilling the rock and contained by a membrane (mirafi 140 -N or
equivalent) laterally and underneath and by rock mulch on the
surface. The surface of the rock mulch should be approximately
at high water level. The topsoil should be heavily planted with
native grasses, forbs and shrubs. All finish grades should be at
or below pre- violation elevations. Excess material should be
removed to an upland site.
In the interest of water quality, the terrain where stock are
to be kept should be adjusted so that any stormwater runoff
drains into a sediment trap /polishing pond -- an artificial
wetland or some such.
X21
S Wolf, p 2
Finally, nothing should be allowed to be built within the 100 -
year floodplain that would be injured by flood waters.
As we discussed, some "fine tuning" of recommendations and
conditions will be required after the snow melts. It also occurs
to me that signoff should happen after at least one growing
season. Riparian transplants are not always successful.
Thanks for the opportunity to provide comments on this
situation.
SZ-er
Alan C e kusch
Aquatic Habitat Biologist
cc: Sealing, Konishi (DOW); Claffey (CoE)
u: I 1:�-122
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Rick Magill, Planner
FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, Zoning Officewy
DATE: February 7, 1995
RE: Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Parcel ID# 2645- 232 -00 - 003
I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the
following comments.
ZONE: RS -30, thirty acre minimum lot size
This parcel contains approximately 4.518 acres and is non-
conforming in size.
SETBACKS: The required setbacks for this parcel are:
30 foot front yard setback
30 foot side yard setback
30 foot rear yard setback
20 foot minimum stream setback
The proposed equipment shed and barn are not indicated on the site
plan, so compliance with setbacks cannot be determined at this
time.
An envelope should be established for the proposed structures which
avoids all required setbacks.
FLOOR AREA: This parcel is permitted a total of 15,000 square
feet of floor area. The proposed barn and shed will not exceed
this amount.
HEIGHT: Sufficient information has not been submitted to
determine compliance with County height regulations, however, it
does not appear that the proposed structures will exceed the height
limit.
OTHER: The proposed structures will require building permits
from Pitkin County.
i;:�r:n23
MEMORANDUM
To: Suzanne Wolff, Planning Office
From: Nancy MacKenzie, Environmental Health Department 1\ t Yv--
Through: Lee Cassin, Assistant Environmental Health Director a ---
Date: March 6, 1995
Re: Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Parcel ID # 2645- 232 -00 -003
The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the details of the Woodrow
application under the authority of the Pitkin County Code Land Use Code and has the
following comments.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Sections 2 -17 and 3 -1104:
"It is the policy of the County to insure the availability of a water supply of adequate quality, quantity, pressure and dependability for fire
protection and support of a proposed land use prior to approval of the use. The County shall require land uses to hook up to existing public
systems if serviceis available."
If well water will be used for human consumption at the barn, this Department needs adequate
information on the quantity and quality of water available. This can be done from tests of wells
present on -site by a water engineer's or well driller's report. The applicant must ensure that the
water quality is acceptable by having it tested by a lab such as Snowmass Water and Sanitation.
Water of acceptable quality and quantity has been obtained in other lots in this area.
Before a septic permit can be issued the location of the well must be indicated to assure that
setback requirements from the well to the septic system can be complied with.
A condition of approval for this application is receipt of information stating proposed
use of water at the barn and documenting the location of the well and quantity /quality
of the well.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Sections 2 -18 and 3 -1105:
"It is the policy of the County to insure that adequate sewage treatment facilities are available to serve existing and new developments. Public and
private sewage disposal systems and connectionsto such systems shall comply with the sewage disposal guidelines of Pitkin County Code Title X."
1
&.9OnN
Lots in the Wildcat area are served by individual septic systems. The rough drawing of the
barn submitted with this application shows floor drains for the horse stalls and no
bathroom\lavatory. This department has a concern because of the proximity of the barn to
Snowmass Creek. An on -site inspection was not done because of the deep snow in that area
this time of the year. We were not able to ascertain either if there is a suitable site for the
septic system a minimum of 50 feet from the creek or if ground water might be a problem.
If there is no bathroom\lavatory, the Environmental Health Department would do a no -fee
permit for the barn and design the septic system using a septic tank and dry well. It would be
important to first do a profile hole at the proposed site of the dry well to be sure there is no
ground water in the area of the septic system. The second concern is that the septic system
maintain a minimum 50 foot setback from the high water mark of Snowmass Creek.
If the barn will contain a bathroom \lavatory, all such systems installed within Pitkin County
require septic permits issued by the Environmental Health Department, and must comply with
the County septic regulations. To receive a Septic Permit, the applicant will need to submit a
Septic Permit Application and appropriate fee with a completed Soil Data Form including perc
test results and profile hole information. It must be possible to design an adequate septic
system before a building permit can be issued. The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health
Department will design the system for the applicant as part of the permit fee, unless an
engineered system is needed, which we determine based on site specific soil test results. An
engineered system is required if any one of the following conditions occurs: a percolation rate
faster than 5 mpi or slower than 60 mpi; maximum seasonal level of the groundwater table or
bedrock less than four feet below the bottom of the proposed absorption system; or a slope in
excess of 30 %.
The applicant will need to adhere to minimum horizontal setback requirements for placement
of septic system components which should be no problem on this lot depending on the
placement of the barn. The leach field will need to be located a minimum of 100 feet from
their well and from any neighboring wells. It is desirable to locate the system below the barn
so that the system can operate by gravity. The applicant should refer to the Pitkin County
Sewage Regulations for detailed information, or call our office to discuss this site.
Flood irrigation and/or water drainage from any ditch could impair the functioning of the septic
system by overloading and saturating the soils. This would severely impair the soil's ability to
absorb and filter water of the septic system. Measures to mitigate water drainage could include
but are not limited to culverting the ditch or creating diversion swales to move the water away
from the septic system. The system must be located at least fifty feet away from the ditch to
adhere to Pitkin County Code.
A condition of approval for this application is the receipt and approval of the septic
permit by the Environmental Health Department before a building permit can be issued.
2
ii;if!�2tJ
WATER OUALITY IMPACTS• Sections 2 -14 and 3 -705 and 3 -710:
"It is the policy of the County to preserve and protect its presentwater resources. To this end it is the policy of the County that no land use be
initiated which would adverselyaffect the quantity, quality, or accessibilityof the County's water resources;or which would occur at the expense
of establishedwater- dependentagriculturalactivities ;or whichwould result in increasedsalinization of water resources,loss of minimum stream
flows, further destructionof wildlife habitat, or major expenditures to reacquire or redistribute major water resources. It is also the policy of the
County to maintain a naturalvegetative buffer along its surfacewaters such that the surface and groundwatersof the area are not encroached
upon by land uses or other human activitieswhich could cause deteriorationof water quality or impair the natural treatment processesprovided
by meadows and wetlands."
The Environmental Health Department will be addressing water quality impacts only on down
stream water quality. This application is not expected to impact down stream water quality if
the minimum horizontal distances between components of the system and physical features are
in accordance with Section 4 -4 of the Pitkin County Sewage Regulations.
A condition of approval for this application is: NONE
AIR OUALITY: Sections 2 -13 and 3 -602:
"Only that development is permitted which will not contributesignificantlyto degradationof air quality in Pitkin County. Developments may not
constitute an indirect or direct air pollution source under Federal, State or County regulations."
This project is not expected to contribute significantly to degradation of air quality in Pitkin
County.
A condition of approval for this application is: No wood burning
device may be installed in barns or agricultural buildings.
CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: Section 2 -7
"It is the policy of the County to ensure that no use or development of land is permitted which is in violation of the laws of the County, the State
of Colorado, or the United States of America."
This Department is not aware of any issues of concern regarding other environmental health
laws.
... ENV:WP:LAND USE:264523200003.woodrow
01* 0=
FOREST
SERVICE
State Scrvices Building
222 S. 6th Street. Room 416
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
March 6, 1995 Telephone (303) 248 -7325
�
Suzanne Wolff f9�g 14. gC
Aspen / Pitkin Community Development Department
130 S. Galena Street w . 4,•_.,
Aspen Colorado 81611 t
Re: Woodrow 1041 Wildfire Hazard Review "
Suzanne,
\I ts
I have reviewed the building application for the equipment shed
and barn, submitted by Raymond and Debbie Woodrow, and visited
the site on March 1. 1 have the following comments with regard to
wildfire hazards.
The building site is rated as low hazard. Vegetation on the site
consists of scattered willow, cottonwood and spruce with an
understory of sedge and grass. The site is within a riparian area
that will not burn readily.
The combination of low hazard fuels, close proximity to a fire
station, and adequate road and driveway access make this proposal
a very low risk from wildland fire. My only recommendation to
further mitigate any fire danger would be to keep vegetation
cleared back within ten feet of the proposed structures, and to
maintain this ten foot area in low vegetation such as mowed
grass.
Thanks for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please
contact me if you have any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely,
Kelly Rogers
Asst. District Forester
cc: Steve Crockett, Pitkin Co. Sheriff's Office
Basalt & Rural FPD
rV *33td�01& 0wV,4
TO Rick Magill TO Suzanne Wolff
From: Tom Newland
Postmark: Mar 10,95 12:21 PM
Subject: Woodrow 1041
Message:
I reviewed the fax (thanks) and have found the location of the
proposed structures to be removed from the 100 -year floodplain. No
floodproofing or floodplain permits will be required.
Please call me if you have any questions.
w') ? U
JANUARY 17, 1995
DEAR MR. RICK MAGILL:
r
THIS LETTER IS IN REQUEST TO APPLY FOR AN EQUIPMENT SHED AND
BARN TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY RAYMOND H. AND DEBBIE A. WOODROW AT
5980 SNOWMASS CREEK RD. SNOWMASS, CO. 81654.
THE 10 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IS SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST a, NORTHWEST
y, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE SIXTH
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH OF THE COUNTRY ROAD.
EXHIBIT #1.
THE EQUIPMENT SHED IS TO BE A 36x70 POLE CONSTRUCTION SEPARATE
FROM THE BARN. EXHIBIT #2.
THE BARN IS TO BE A 64x70 POLE CONSTRUCTION. EXHIBIT #3.
ACCORDING TO MY UNDERSTANDING, THIS APPLICATION IS TO REQUIRE
A 1041 HAZARD REVIEW ADDRESSING CODE SECTION 3 -807 WILDFIRE
HAZARD AND SECTION 3 -804 FLOODPLAIN.
APPLICANT WILL POST A SIGN FOR EACH PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT
TO SECTION 4 -9 OF THE CODE.
INCLUDED AS REQUESTED IS A LIST OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
PRE- STAMPED, PRE - ADDRESSED, LETTER SIZE ENVELOPES, WITH ADDRESS
OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR MAILING TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS. EXHIBIT #4.
PLANNING OFFICE FEE DEPOSIT REQUIRED $215.00
REFERRAL FEE'S REQUIRED COUNTY ENGINERR $60.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH $60.00
TOTAL DEPOSIT $335.00
ENCLOSED FIND CHECK FROM RAYMOND H. AND DEBBIE A. WOODROW FOR
THE $335.00 AS REQUESTED.
APPLICATION IS TO BE REFERRED TO DOW TO ASSURE THE ABSENCE OF
ANY WILDLIFE HAZARDS.
ENCLOSED FIND 24x36 SURVEY COMPLETE 10 -17 -1994 SHOWING ACCESS
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AT 2ft. CONTOUR INTERVALS PROPOSED AND
EXISTING STRUCTURES (FOOTPRINT) AND VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT #5.
A -B -C.
INCLUDED IS PROOF OF OWNERSHIP. EXHIBIT #6.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER.
u
n
r
�
m
�
J
�d
rl
ww
b A
s
�
�\
0
-
W
W
-
N
�
�
3
�
S
0
°
�
N
�
I
f
rn
M�
on
h P
o, � ,
1� o A
1 \
\
t \
I \
1
uJ \
V \\
w
g W�
� � Z
O � 7
° Fti
i
E
E
O
a
4 6�
S%
P A-
Z
� M
O
� kk
I
�
J
�d
rl
ww
b A
Lu
�\
0
1
° o
-
Z4
0
T,
d�
I
�
J
1
�\
0
1
s;g
uj
� V
IK
I
1
W
s;g
of I
Ni O .9;m
NIA
� v u oi)�33
.
�\
0o z
kL
�t w
I ,
70001:
307721
n
777 18i 707027
ri
�
,r 77019
X00017 rr
30002
!07712
I `,� /� •7977•
I
� 9
�r
n I i
1
10001
OU7
� I /
S te„
40k7
a
.e
�d
Fa l .:
4Q 772
l�
401p
401072
i
i
40100 /
/ ( 401004
H n
Me a
/01006 ,
8
n
/J
oi I I;' IJd
/
/y
/
/y
L)
P
° R.
r
fL
D/PA /N
(� GiPrTC
/?Y'G D
11
V,
I
I
I
� I
i
i rJ
i
g I
/
IC„
M
/7
i
I � p S ,ti �►
o 0 l Ao
a
, \V 1/
a—s=
I'
s
o R
I[°
f4a I
�J
6Y' ov�iPRt�
t..l� :q33
ASPEN • PITKIN
December 1, 1994
Mr. Raymond Woodrow
5980 Snowmas Creek Road
Snowmass, CO 81654
Dear Mr. Woodrow,
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
CERTIFIED MAIL
I am writing to you because I have not been able to contact you by
phone. The zoning office has been informed of earthmoving activity
occurring on your property at 5980 Snowmass Creek Road. A driveby
inspection indicates that the lower bench adjacent to Snowmass
Creek has been regraded and that fill may have been dumped into
wetlands associated with the creek.
Pitkin County requires Earthmoving permits whenever grading
involves 50 cubic yards of dirt or more. Records indicate that no
permit has been issued for your work. A 1041 Hazard Review by the
County may be required because of the close proximity to and
impacts on the creek and its riparian habitat. In addition, a
permit from the Army Corps of Engineers may also be required.
Please call me at 920 -5105 by December 15, 1994, so we may discuss
the scope of your work and arrange for a 1041 Hazard Review, if
required, and an earthmoving permit. We would also like to arrange
a site visit with you or your representative to evaluate associated
impacts.
Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
T I Pi
oanna S. Schaffner
County Zoning Officer
cc: Tim Malloy, Deputy Planning Director
, ,.i0034
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 . PHONE 303.920.5090 • Fax 303.920.5197
Pnnm]on rzavclef paper
j PITRIN COUNTY
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: 9/8/94 PLANNER: Rick Magill
PROJECT: Woodrow Equipment Shed and Barn
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: self
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE /FAX: 923 -2119 / fax same
OWNER'S NAME: Raymond and Debbie Woodrow
RYil4"y�
1. Type of Application: 1041 Hazard Review
2. Describe action /type of development being requested: The
Applicant is requesting approvals for the construction of an
equipment shed and barn on their 10 acre property off of Snowmass
Creek Road (the northeast quarter of Section 23). The property is
mapped for low wildfire hazard. Snowmass Creek runs through the
land.
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types
of reports requested:
Code Section Comments
Sections: 3 -807 - Wildfire Hazard: mapped as Low Hazard
3 -804 - Floodplain
Referral Agencies
1. County Attorney
2. County Engineer
3. Zoning office
4. Environmental Health
5. State Forest Service
6. Sheriffs Office
7. Basalt Fire
8. Floodplain Administrator
9. Division of Wildlife
4. Review is before: Hearing Officer
5. Public Hearing: yes
6. The applicant needs to post a sign for each public hearing
pursuant to Section 4 -9 of the Code. (x)YES NO()
7. Please submit a list of Adjacent Property Owners: (x)YES NO()
8. The Applicant shall provide stamped, pre- addressed, letter size
envelopes, with the return address of the Planning Department, for
mailing to all adjacent property owners. (x)YES NO()
0;11;035
9. Number of copies of application packets td%06e submitted: 12
10. Planning Office fee deposit required: $ 215.00
Referral Fees required: County Engineer $ 60.00
Environmental Health $ 60.00
Housing Department $
Total Deposit: $ 335.00
11. Anticipated date of submission:
12. COMMENTS /UNIQUE CONCERNS: Staff will refer this application to
the DOW to assure the absence of any wildlife hazards.
13. FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION, PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Letter of request which describes the proposed
development and addresses the Code Sections listed above
(attached);
2. 24" x 36" Site Plan which includes proposed building
envelope(s), proposed access, topographic information at
2' contour intervals, proposed and existing structures
(footprints) and vicinity map;
3. Copy of this pre -app form;
4. Application fee;
5. Proof of ownership consisting of a current certificate
from a title company or attorney;
6. Agreement for Payment form (available at the front desk)
(1 copy only).
preapp_woodrow_n1041
000036
ooD i l! 6Ja
Silvia ilavis, Pit.l:in Cnty Merl:, D $.Clp
GENERAL WARRANTY DEED °
Raymond H. Woodrow and Debra Ann Woodrow, for the consideration of Ten and
no /100 dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells
and conveys to Raymond H. Woodrow and Debra Ann Woodrow, not as tenants in common but
as joint tenants with right of survivorship, whose address is 5200 Indian Springs Road, Post
Office Box 1357, Punta Gorda, Florida 33951 -1357, the following real property in the County
of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to -wit:
See Exhibit "A" consisting of two pages, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO,
with all its appurtenances and warrants the title to the same, subject to general unpaid taxes and
assessments for 1991 and subsequent years payable in 1992 and subsequent years; all as shown
in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin Colorado.
Signed and delivered �O ?H lr /)e 1991.
R nd H. Woodrow
5 Indian Springs Ro d
Post Office Box 1357
Punta Gorda, Florida 339511357
Debra Ann Woodrow
5200 Indian Springs Road
Post Office Box 1357
Punta Gorda, Florida 33951 -1357
STATE OF )
ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /O day of
Qec e.H bRr- , 1991.
Witness my hand and official seal.
NUOWt PUBLIC. STATE OF FLOiliDA.
MY CO JMISSION ERPINLS: JOLT' 1. 1994.
My commission expires. BONOEO TN"U NOTARY PUULIG UNOEIYWRl.P.;
y�P .. ....� . ..., .c .
Notary Ld6 ic1 C!
Addre'slit B
CLIrN"RWOODROwIOI7.NORA1.,DI:ED 1
i. / IWO
ASPENTITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
Agreement for Payment of Pitkin County Development Application Fees
Pitkin County (hereinafter COUNTY) and - Zgk e i
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLO S:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for
(hereinafter, THE
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Board of County
Commissioners Resolution No. 91 -08 and Ordinance No. 93 -1 established a fee
structure for Planning Office applications (including consultant costs) as part of
the application fee charged for THE PROJECT and the payment of all processing
fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it is impossible to ascertain the full extent of the
costs involved in processing the application upon initiation of case processing.
APPLICANT and COUNTY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties
to permit payment of an initial deposit and to permit additional costs to be billed
on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining
greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
County when they are necessary as costs are incurred. COUNTY agrees it will
be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process
APPLICANT'S application.
4. COUNTY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
COUNTY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
Planning Commission and /or Board of County Commissioners to enable the
Planning Commission and /or Board of County Commissioners to make legally
required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior
to decision.
J
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY
} ss. POSTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING
State of Colorado } FOR A PITRIN COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I yLl XJ t ✓/ " _
being or representing an Applicant for a Pitkin County Development
Permit, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and
accurately represents the sign posted as notice of the public
hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject
property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that
II �
the sign was posted and visible continuously from the 1 day
of i , 19 to the �• �� day of 19c J-
(Must be posted for at least 15 days before the public hearing).
Applicant's Signature
'Orr' to
before me
, 19_
D OFFICIAL SEAL.
res
gnature
i
r
GA
� W:
_
�i11�:n3`3
f
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
RE: WOODROW MINOR 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
I hereby certify that on this 7th day of February, 1995, a
true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was
deposited in the United States mail, first -class postage prepaid,
to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list
of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Aspen /Pitkin
Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the
Public Notice.
By: Suzanne Wolff
Administrative Assistant
frm.mailing
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: WOODROW MINOR 1041 HAZARD REVIEW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Thursday, March 16, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 10:00 am before
the Pitkin County Hearing Officer, Commissioners Meeting Room, 506
East Main Street, Aspen to consider an application submitted by
Raymond and Debbie Woodrow requesting approval of a Minor 1041
Hazard Review in order to build an equipment shed and barn. The
property is located at 5980 Snowmass Creek Road, in NE,NW; of
Section 23, Township 9 South, Range 86 West of the 6th P.M. For
further information contact Rick Magill at the Aspen / Pitkin
Planning Office, 920 -5062.
s /Tim Malloy
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Published in The Aspen Times on February 10, 1995
Pitkin County Account No. 00113.
THIS IS THE LIST OF ALL THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO 5980
SNOWMASS CREEK RD. SNOWMASS, CO. 81654
WILDCAT RANCH LTD
WILDCAT LAND CO.
555 E. DURANT #1F
ASPEN, CO. 81611
ARTHUR R. MARTIN
1101 ARMITAGE, UNIT 209
CHICAGO, IL. 60614
DOUGLAS ROBERT CASEY
P.O.BOX 8978
ASPEN, CO. 81612
VANTEX ENTERPRISES, INC.
1825 WEST MOCKINGBIRD LANE
DALLAS, TX. 75235
0 ;1042
lim
0
ASPEN /PITKIN
COMMUMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920 -5090 FAX 920 -5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Attorney
County Engineer
Environmental Health
Zoning
Sheriff
Basalt Fire
CO State Forest Service
CO Division of Wildlife
Floodplain Administrator
FROM: Rick Magill, Planning Office
RE: Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Parcel ID #2645- 232 -00 -003
DATE: January 24, 1995
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Raymond
& Debbie Woodrow.
Please return your comments to me no later than February 17.
Thank you.
u+i X43
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFIC11"
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090 FAX# (303) 920 -5197
January 24, 1995
Raymond & Debbie Woodrow
5980 Snowmass Creek Road
Snowmass, CO 81654
Re: Woodrow Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Case #P7 -95
Dear Raymond & Debbie,
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We
have determined that this application is complete. Our fees changed as of January 1, 1995, so
the amount you submitted is incorrect. Please remit an additional $214 to the "Aspen Planning
Office ". The correct fees are currently $425 for Planning, $62 for Engineering and $62 for
Environmental Health.
We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Pitkin County Hearing
Officer on Thursday, March 16, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 10:00 a.m. in the Commissioners
Meeting Room in the Courthouse. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me
within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered
final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for
unavoidable technical problems. The Monday before the meeting date, we will call to inform
you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject property with a sign within 15 days
of the public hearing and to remove it from the property within one week following the hearing.
Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting as proof of compliance with the Code
prior to or at the hearing.
I have forwarded a copy of your application to the Colorado State Forest Service for referral
comments. Please contact them directly at (303)248 -7325 to arrange for payment of their fee.
If you have any questions, please call Rick Magill the planner assigned to your case, at 920-
5062.
Sincerely,
Suz
Administrative Assistant
hearing.off
1,:1144
Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 9 20 -5090
I ty Land Use Application Fees:
00113- 63850 -041 Deposit
-03855 -042 Flat Fee
- 63860 -043 HPC 1 , - --
-63875 -046 Zo:ting & Sign Permit --
MR011 Use Tar
County �
ty Land Use Application Fees:
0011 - 63800 -03
-03805 -034 Deposit Z /
-63820 -037 Flat Fee - --
63825 -038 Zoning
Board of Adjustment
Referral Fe
es:
00113 63810 -035
00115- 6334 County Engineer
0 -163
00123-63340 -190 City Engineer
Housing
00125 - 63340- 205'.. --- -._. —_
Enviromental Health — - --
`-i
. S
Sales:
00113 63830 -039
-69000 -145 County Code
copy-Fees
1 r)
Other
Name:_ fi tvi>Sy
Address: 7
Total 3 - 3 S
1.� e
a :i q check.
Proje 9 7 9
Phone: - Z Case No: -
No. of Copies I Z ( L
r
-03805 -034 Deposit Z /
-63820 -037 Flat Fee - --
63825 -038 Zoning
Board of Adjustment
Referral Fe
es:
00113 63810 -035
00115- 6334 County Engineer
0 -163
00123-63340 -190 City Engineer
Housing
00125 - 63340- 205'.. --- -._. —_
Enviromental Health — - --
`-i
. S
Sales:
00113 63830 -039
-69000 -145 County Code
copy-Fees
1 r)
Other
Name:_ fi tvi>Sy
Address: 7
Total 3 - 3 S
1.� e
a :i q check.
Proje 9 7 9
Phone: - Z Case No: -
No. of Copies I Z ( L
De elop 1 ant commu nitJ
13 0 S outh Gana S went
(303
"'I do 81 11 t
9 20.509 0
Sales:
00113 -638 -039
-69o o 0 -145
City. Land Use A
00113 - 638 50 -pq ppjication
63 855 -04
Fces:
seposit
63860 -p43
638 75 -046
Flat Fee
hpC
Oil
zo ning r} Sign Pernut
ax
Count, Land
U,
00113.63g00 5e
-63805
Application Fees:
-034
Deposit
638 20 -037
-63825 -038
Flat F
Zoning
130ard0fAdjustment
Referral Fees:
_
00113- 63810 035
00123 -63 340- 19 163
00125- 633 40.205
c ounty it E ngineer
n$1°e
if s
Env ir °men tal Health
County Code
COPY Fees
Other
Address/0_J.. t
CaSS Date: / �� --
Phone: ��� p roject. (11/ eck:
�--� mot✓ /�
Cas
e No:
NO' of Copies
h
V)
on
CCNVDITI ) OF APPR
I RE-C( 7OATOF4 OP TH'S C,�I 5ITE SAN M-� m
SUDM :- N OF 5UIL0IF, FFR✓IT AFFJCATION.
'
Y. FRK)R TO I5?:%•f -CE OrA bCfrC F i ThE gt'!I.Z 1r
IIS
5K'LL Pr -Cr OCOUMENTA IOTT TOT -1r ENvlfpy-
4n
fvL1JTAL l$ALTH DEPARTMI:J4T5TATIW,'HE FW"C-
-
1 15C OF �, EX FOR THE &AA", ANC THE LCGATC'N OF
F
THE WEL- Anr' qC CJL&kWrrr,/0UALIT! OF THE WA - I ER
i
IF Km;uKro
°p A S'EPT` IC IrMvir JF!ALL DE ODTAA"W FFONI THE
r
ENVIRONMENT HEALTH GLFARTNIENT MOKTO
1-WA"Ct CY A Et,' LD'1•Y SIT. THE 9EFTIC
SHAL'_ 6E �-C aO FEET Fr l TI IW YEAR
FID:]OF�AIN L me
4 W LDb RU C O -'"CEh ARE rF*HIDITD IN Mg N-
OR Y•- , RICVLTURAL D ILaivGfi
r
rj. THE APPLIC- °t TALL COMP.Y WITH Tt -.^_. FOLLVWNW
I2
LA.M YA °!hG AND WILOc R! OEFE1vS,DLE J(+K.E
MITIC ATICN STANOARPE•
-
.A. D'C.�H, _e",I ANC NON•pRNAMENTA.
YECi°TP,T 1{3h S.WJ DE REM- WITHIN A
s
w,wl'a'M rD Fa�T rNaMETEf..AF' P THE
b�CL -TARE
��r
°' 5vEJ•.r ON by AL DE CKLLGEL' r DREPK UP
y VE TICA_ ML^ HOR@OU AL CCNUMUI"Y OF
'
5 < MIS41VI.'M OF A 3C F SS" rErJME' -k
^RTIJND HE STlc.X OKE.
a
•F °DING BETWEEN CLJMfS OF eKUe* A.ND
"F7oETATION W lI, IN - He 9C FYJDT ° MMETF�`
�6
. HALL D€ A MINIMV' Cr TWO TME� IE NEC+-
OF THE ° L'EL FAA <iMUN' OAMETFA OFTLJE
rWWM SHAT_ t'T SCr:D :o eL-
I�
MFASJREM 'IT^ >-!AL_
'SHE CADWNS OF 1 E -LjF-
C ALL F f TPF{�. A iG 3R.,a -. h' -. 1 -IF.
THE Do O Fr F7 N
P M
r
:irF OF f � A
EC'f -iE GICI,NO AN:
-AO✓E2 `: FRON ArJ.a IO 'eEES 4N ?JL. -Jr
Z
rr
?TALL 9E R @V.E7
E TREE 5ff. RKA 1CN WIT.11N TY_ 30 R X
° ERIM`,TE,- S ..ALL HAVE A MNIMUM OF ,C F_E
DETWEB`v T-IE _ WE5 OFHE CCJWNVS.
- ` A. DR K:i V4 C-`i F`cTGND 3 ERTHE KCoF
EAVES -5 4 DE TcMM ANC ALL DRANCHE`�
WI 5 F£ET OF THE C.1IN•Nryl S ALL DE
zEMO'✓ED
6. THE L 1 45.TY OF FJEL2 WITHN A TOO FOOT
PF:V� KOF--THE fl7n-KnJR.E S-A DE
N AL_ OEAOFA. oV SIN - .HE ICG =T PMO-ER
GHA-L ^.JE RrNI�
T THG ArP_ICANT : HA °vF_ JI.191 ICP Tia
�>IINL.JtC I.tA OF THE D?FEN°.JIDLE
.SPACE VSGIIATION 95njAEHAG4TS
6. T:aE AWL J:N' nj " GOMn_T A IT -I THE `;•:'u- .JN:N_
P.W'OI7KDNAI %, I RG N1:T1 57ANDAP_ -+_r.
A THE DUILDrw ENJEIOFE 51-1°'1. NDT DE LO�ATEC
'.N DRAW - c Y_'NN° COON 01OFC GKFI M
7 HAN 3O Ss
5 RG:f CONSTRLtTOh: bHALL DE CA?5 A, A
CO'dWnT16LE 'AATERI.AL (NO IIOOp -FAKE'
.`.»JINGLES) W'TH `JC FAT KOOF5
C.
"Ek.; bHAL ME SGREEINEC WITH C.'1R% ✓E
RE%jiSTANT WIRE NNFy -' 1d^.7- I/G INC3
MAXIMLA•A,
D 900FF5 AND Cv _1M .°d'1A1LL 3E KE= .'.LEAK OF
DECK
E VAR05 °>1!.L Dr KEFT CLEAK OF A_L LJTTPR.
..LASH ANC `_ANIMA&-E DEDR15
ovinn49
Akww -LTwys, Im.
Obel dncs ea+ iJJO
3w
5fc UN 1 SECT /CN
7tlWNZ�41P ^--wr; R.AA,GE CG Wf'E•T. 3/XTi! PNr
1�
llyy _
W
�
- CfJNOV /(J r/G 'f
F ALL FLA A ".ATE21A -5 SHALL BE 9TOCEE
C i A PARALLEL CDNRi)R A MINIMN+I OF 15
FEET AN/AY FROM ANY 'JTRLGTURE.
L- WEED5 AND GRAEf5E5 WITHIN THE IO
°CRIMETGR. 5HA.- eE NIAINT TJ A.
HEGHT NOT I.L')[E THAN G IWHES
=:2 WJ7D -WOOD PILEZ SJ.A_L CE 5T ACX,D ON
°. PARALLEL CONTOUR A MINIMLW OF IF - EET
Av[AY 'ROW 7 5TR'_C.T'JRE.
I tW iwNIONG KDL.; D`_PCE°$IDLE TD FIR;
DEPARTMENT VE- IJC_E9
FZ-CE SHALL Elm KEFT : AR OF DRLU ,J A U
DF�KIS
K. WOOD FEI C.ES ,SHAL CONJNELT TO THE
L AF Alll- 0-E g E AWE T. NA_STRLK At,
SHALL. qCT -'ERE TO SAE SAME ."ii.4NDARDS A.•
'SIRU(.TLlR.Eq
M. FUEL rA.NKg 514.ALL 0E INSTA U
GRCU40 WIT.i AN APPFOVLr Co TArJEX
N PROPAM£ rAVKS t -HALL 6fl IN9'I'AL�ED
.ACCORZON6 TO VFPA 4f .'TA -ZAXV5 ANC ON
A CON7, r- AWAY F@7M - HE 9TALCIURE W"Ti
bT7yNDAKD DEFEN ,je E 3PPCe V5SETATph
MI TIGATCT•. ARO.h`G ANY:g9'JVE• GRDLANO
TANK. ANY vWP ENLLO3JRE AN NE
TANK 5HALL DE CCMSTi4x wiTH MATERIALS
APPRC LD FOR Z H CUR RRE' R?E•IYVE
CONEST2C 0l 71 "E EX7Ef[101e SIOE OF THE
WA CS
E°LH S'RLCT_JRE 5HA HAVE A MINIMUM OF
J C"CTEN P L;NP APPNC7 ABC FIRE
% HEARIN OFF ICER APPROVAL
PJR5LMF1 9EGPON M D),E• OF THE rITKN.
.ATIC U9E CODE, T'rIE ITKIN 'YCfJIANOJNIT"
GF££(C DE'✓E10FMGNT 'JEr4R FlE -FA ING Or`CEK HERED"
A_rFFDA Ti - WOOROV. IC14 95 IEW 5:2 RAN T 'IF
TIA4,MfifiLd
I' I
5L`IS �Y ELARN� '
LrINGi 9HEf PJa{ED 11 P. ✓1J10L£ ANO
P ADDKZ5OE5 O HAI L DE C.LtWLY MAKI D W'ITft g, ; e
IF'Y NON. I CLAi'EUST'DLC L -- TTER^ll ANC -'AL.L
5E Vl5J1 LE ANN IN:WTALLED ON A, -
Co&VVMPL.e 1 �7
. LITIUTY LJI EL- SHALL DE DLKtD
7 - 'HE AMICMIT SHALL .'- 'J48'� WITH A.L ''I Z) - TNl
IMFCSED DY T-E 'oLlln-ow OIV'W'✓Jh ,y W:ID'IJFE , ccw
AND 7,E J;.9 ARM- CORPS 0 _FNfi'NEER9 �f�rG
T E riPARLAN ARFh ONTHE MOO MXJ" THE
gPPLICA•NT a ALL W AX, VTn T•- DOW ANC THE
.ARMY CCM- IC VERIFY T- F
RaWMO -,ET5KK FRCh1 T'- E A>iC TIRE
IOCATCI OP T.+E rR1CTL?SEg
DEVEIL IVCIUPNC -GCaq NC- NJD LA?:D
r- �PI+•G. 't�I LL OCJ J' OL.TSICE OFTI ArP @JF�:
LtJ'S lc E JVELOPC. ErC.EFC RTC JTIL'Y AND
DK'V!WAY EXTEN56 AND N141NTE1,.AN^,E AND A.=
MAY DE NEfX_fJA -lf °_' IMP.EMEN"'T:1E Wl' �FMZG
I.tITIC,A -ION MEA'a•'FJ°9
A. LTFSZ PRIM ALAN CZ_°N Y K;.r CFT:1E
9 ET DIVS;OH OF WILOUFE S; ADNC- -1K- OF•NGM :iF TLE
IMPACT OF THE rk(yO'.EP ST$..GTURES IN 71HE
RI FARAN APEA OHA-L 2E M, T
CG%SO4ITY OFITLOPME.sI- DFPARIT$NT PRICK';;
KY..ORC ffi OF `r.:7 IO41 REVIEW 5I7E PLAN
SWM"d F I IC .17. 917 CVlL!D C> FLL.) . LAIN
Dmw k'04 95 oH5 it ?ri F_+ TOE OF -vy-
I. LAWE� r r;5rs; I -£g a, ^rRP,F TL- THr' FLAT' WA'.
Fz F!AREC IIDER M IJPP)2 FON AND �i p19FLT
J'ON rIe O SURVEY- N "D- La -lvE2w Vw�onl
ALFiNE SJR•�'� Nc - - - --- ---
F
APFLIv.ANT- HEfF-DY - A_K' ALE*;&E THANE" H.AJE DEEM
NFMAED p FI TKM COL; T- Or T-IE K1 TE.�CE OF 104
r �
MN4: JVEN HAZAFO of GH
HAT MT Ar FECT'HE
PMOrEKIY, AN' IMFRO WENNTS ANO T-F 1-5E ANC �y
RECORDING CERTIFIWE
T. it P=AT . r - 14E ACCJROW" iC' l 717L r.AN wA^
ACCE°JEE' F. FLING IN THE 0rr!Ut OrT t rMK9j CLVNFY'
.��c K AND RF.00KDER ATfpj� CLg4:,5�c�M1� 3� "119
Pi�Y.ar• IiONy NO~i'7i.s�__- -!_.a�T
OWNCRI! AAYJVIONN ( DES81C U166MOW
TMM .lob Mf M_ .
C l -op -•
_W tXJDRpy ...i Ol .. R._JIEW'_ "I`F P ANy itl ''�K?lJRG1^.
c�
N b
1 A
_ yJ £
F ALL FLA A ".ATE21A -5 SHALL BE 9TOCEE
C i A PARALLEL CDNRi)R A MINIMN+I OF 15
FEET AN/AY FROM ANY 'JTRLGTURE.
L- WEED5 AND GRAEf5E5 WITHIN THE IO
°CRIMETGR. 5HA.- eE NIAINT TJ A.
HEGHT NOT I.L')[E THAN G IWHES
=:2 WJ7D -WOOD PILEZ SJ.A_L CE 5T ACX,D ON
°. PARALLEL CONTOUR A MINIMLW OF IF - EET
Av[AY 'ROW 7 5TR'_C.T'JRE.
I tW iwNIONG KDL.; D`_PCE°$IDLE TD FIR;
DEPARTMENT VE- IJC_E9
FZ-CE SHALL Elm KEFT : AR OF DRLU ,J A U
DF�KIS
K. WOOD FEI C.ES ,SHAL CONJNELT TO THE
L AF Alll- 0-E g E AWE T. NA_STRLK At,
SHALL. qCT -'ERE TO SAE SAME ."ii.4NDARDS A.•
'SIRU(.TLlR.Eq
M. FUEL rA.NKg 514.ALL 0E INSTA U
GRCU40 WIT.i AN APPFOVLr Co TArJEX
N PROPAM£ rAVKS t -HALL 6fl IN9'I'AL�ED
.ACCORZON6 TO VFPA 4f .'TA -ZAXV5 ANC ON
A CON7, r- AWAY F@7M - HE 9TALCIURE W"Ti
bT7yNDAKD DEFEN ,je E 3PPCe V5SETATph
MI TIGATCT•. ARO.h`G ANY:g9'JVE• GRDLANO
TANK. ANY vWP ENLLO3JRE AN NE
TANK 5HALL DE CCMSTi4x wiTH MATERIALS
APPRC LD FOR Z H CUR RRE' R?E•IYVE
CONEST2C 0l 71 "E EX7Ef[101e SIOE OF THE
WA CS
E°LH S'RLCT_JRE 5HA HAVE A MINIMUM OF
J C"CTEN P L;NP APPNC7 ABC FIRE
% HEARIN OFF ICER APPROVAL
PJR5LMF1 9EGPON M D),E• OF THE rITKN.
.ATIC U9E CODE, T'rIE ITKIN 'YCfJIANOJNIT"
GF££(C DE'✓E10FMGNT 'JEr4R FlE -FA ING Or`CEK HERED"
A_rFFDA Ti - WOOROV. IC14 95 IEW 5:2 RAN T 'IF
TIA4,MfifiLd
I' I
5L`IS �Y ELARN� '
LrINGi 9HEf PJa{ED 11 P. ✓1J10L£ ANO
P ADDKZ5OE5 O HAI L DE C.LtWLY MAKI D W'ITft g, ; e
IF'Y NON. I CLAi'EUST'DLC L -- TTER^ll ANC -'AL.L
5E Vl5J1 LE ANN IN:WTALLED ON A, -
Co&VVMPL.e 1 �7
. LITIUTY LJI EL- SHALL DE DLKtD
7 - 'HE AMICMIT SHALL .'- 'J48'� WITH A.L ''I Z) - TNl
IMFCSED DY T-E 'oLlln-ow OIV'W'✓Jh ,y W:ID'IJFE , ccw
AND 7,E J;.9 ARM- CORPS 0 _FNfi'NEER9 �f�rG
T E riPARLAN ARFh ONTHE MOO MXJ" THE
gPPLICA•NT a ALL W AX, VTn T•- DOW ANC THE
.ARMY CCM- IC VERIFY T- F
RaWMO -,ET5KK FRCh1 T'- E A>iC TIRE
IOCATCI OP T.+E rR1CTL?SEg
DEVEIL IVCIUPNC -GCaq NC- NJD LA?:D
r- �PI+•G. 't�I LL OCJ J' OL.TSICE OFTI ArP @JF�:
LtJ'S lc E JVELOPC. ErC.EFC RTC JTIL'Y AND
DK'V!WAY EXTEN56 AND N141NTE1,.AN^,E AND A.=
MAY DE NEfX_fJA -lf °_' IMP.EMEN"'T:1E Wl' �FMZG
I.tITIC,A -ION MEA'a•'FJ°9
A. LTFSZ PRIM ALAN CZ_°N Y K;.r CFT:1E
9 ET DIVS;OH OF WILOUFE S; ADNC- -1K- OF•NGM :iF TLE
IMPACT OF THE rk(yO'.EP ST$..GTURES IN 71HE
RI FARAN APEA OHA-L 2E M, T
CG%SO4ITY OFITLOPME.sI- DFPARIT$NT PRICK';;
KY..ORC ffi OF `r.:7 IO41 REVIEW 5I7E PLAN
SWM"d F I IC .17. 917 CVlL!D C> FLL.) . LAIN
Dmw k'04 95 oH5 it ?ri F_+ TOE OF -vy-
I. LAWE� r r;5rs; I -£g a, ^rRP,F TL- THr' FLAT' WA'.
Fz F!AREC IIDER M IJPP)2 FON AND �i p19FLT
J'ON rIe O SURVEY- N "D- La -lvE2w Vw�onl
ALFiNE SJR•�'� Nc - - - --- ---
F
APFLIv.ANT- HEfF-DY - A_K' ALE*;&E THANE" H.AJE DEEM
NFMAED p FI TKM COL; T- Or T-IE K1 TE.�CE OF 104
r �
MN4: JVEN HAZAFO of GH
HAT MT Ar FECT'HE
PMOrEKIY, AN' IMFRO WENNTS ANO T-F 1-5E ANC �y
RECORDING CERTIFIWE
T. it P=AT . r - 14E ACCJROW" iC' l 717L r.AN wA^
ACCE°JEE' F. FLING IN THE 0rr!Ut OrT t rMK9j CLVNFY'
.��c K AND RF.00KDER ATfpj� CLg4:,5�c�M1� 3� "119
Pi�Y.ar• IiONy NO~i'7i.s�__- -!_.a�T
OWNCRI! AAYJVIONN ( DES81C U166MOW
TMM .lob Mf M_ .
C l -op -•
_W tXJDRpy ...i Ol .. R._JIEW'_ "I`F P ANy itl ''�K?lJRG1^.
I