HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.272929300018 (2)LIM
DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat(s)
l
PARCEL ID: 2729 - 293-00 -018 DATE RCVD: 1 1125/1999 #COPIE& 8 CASE NO PO08 -99
CASE NAME: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights Planners Tamara Pregl
PROD ADDW Bobcat Ln Redstone S -T-R 29 -10 -88
OWNIAPP: Daniel Christmas ADR 49 Lake Street CISM Tupper Lake, NY 12 PHN: (518)359 -9771
RE . Daniel Dattola, Redstone La ADR Box 1019 C4S4Z: Dolores, CO 81323 PHN (970) 882 -7707
En1mT Addc I ALLOCATED HOURS
FEES IRS: 1110 + 110 clerk FEES RCVD 1220 % OVER
nFERR" Forney, Zoning, Crystal River Caucus,
REF 2/1211999 OYfTKT DUE: 3/15/1999
MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACT10N: 4/14/1999
4 BOCC No 1 311311999 BOCC Raw 99 -71 #430753
No F BOCCOM:
RBNARKS no maps PZ �—
HRG,OFF
CLOSED: 4/20/1999 BY: TKT NO INDEX:
ADMNk f
PLAT RECORDED[ — PLAT (BILPG).j ADMAN tNOM
VR APPROVAL DATE 4/14/1999 VR EXPIRES. 4114/2002
CASE TYPc Extension of Vested Rights CASE TYPE:
CASE TYPE CASE TYPE:
CASE TYM CASE TYPT:
CASE TYP4-1 Date Scmmed: 9/1/11
File LocaVorc IFFBox #196
,y
ti• �
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITION COUNTY,
COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE REINSTATEMgNT OF VESTED
REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO DANIEL CHRISTMAS
Resolution No. 99 --Z/
RECITALS
1. Daniel Christmas ( "Applicant ") has applied to the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
(`BOCC ") to consider an extension of vested real property rights pursuant to Section 4- 140.30 of
the Land Use Code.
2. The property is located adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, south of the bwn of
Redstone, and is more specifically described in the attached Exhibit "A."
3. The property is zoned RS -30 and contains approximately 36 acres.
4. The BOCC heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on April 14, 1999, at which time
evidence and testimony were presented with respect to this application.
5. The BOCC has determined that the proposed development meets the criteria established in Section
4- 140 -30 of the Land Use Code, however, the BOCC has determined that the applicant's request is
in fact a reinstatement of vested property rights and shall be noted as such. The BOCC has found
that the reinstatement of vested property rights is appropriate and the request for an extension is
considered effectively a request for reinstatement.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
that it does hereby grant a reinstatement of vested property rights to the Christmas property, subject to the
following conditions which shall run with the land and be binding on all successors in interest:
1. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations made in the application and in the
public meetings.
2. The conditions of this resolution shall replace all conditions of approval established in BOCC
Resolution No. 96 -5.
Wildfire mitigation shall be as follows:
Defensible Space:
A. The area around the structure shall incorporate landscaping with wildfire defensible space
considerations as follows:
NOTE: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be necessary where the
natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these conditions.
1111111 11111 111111 IIII 1111111 111 1111111 III 111111111 IIII
430783 08/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
1 of 7 R 0.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
Resolution No. 99 -�
Page 2
Brush, debris, and non - ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a minimum 10 foot
perimeter around all structures. Vegetation in this area shall be at 6" or less (i.e. mowed
grass, low- growing perennials). No vegetation taller than 6" shall be planted in this area.
�. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal continuity of the fuels a
minimum of a 30 foot perimeter around a structure built on flat ground.
3. Spacing and thinning of existing vegetation within the 30 foot uphill and to the sides and 37
feet downhill shall be a minimum of twc tines the h. - ; = -ht Oft-he fuel. Maximum diameter of
the clumps shall be two times the height of the fuel. All measurements shall be from the
edges of the crowns of the fuel.
4. All branches from trees and brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be pruned to a height of
10 feet above the ground and removal of ladder fuels from around trees and brush.
5. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeter shall have a minimum of 10 feet between
the edges of the crowns. This does not apply to mature stands of Aspen trees where the
above recommendation for removal of ladder fuels have been compiled with. In areas of
aspen regeneration, the spacing guidelines shall be followed.
6. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all branches within 15
feet of the chimneys shall be removed.
7. The density of fuel within. a 100 foot perimeter of the structures shall be reduced where
natural reduction has not already occurred.
8. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be removed.
9. The Applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of the defensible space
vegetation requirements.
Structural Design and Construction Req uirements:
}. q A.
Roof construction shall be Class A, non - combustible (no wood shake shingles) material
with no flat roofs.
B.
All vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh of one quarter inch
maximum.
0 C.
Projections (Heat Traps):
1. Projections at the roof line (which include but are not limited to eaves, cornices,
soffits and roofs over open decks) shall be sheathed with materials approved for
1 hour fire - resistive construction.
2. For projections below the roof line (which include but are not limited to exterior
balconies, decks, porches, cantilevered floor projections, and bay windows) the
open space between grade and the underside of projections below the roof line
r
UJJ0J2
111111111111 IIIIII IIII IIIIIII III IIIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII
430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
. _: � s a as n a 02 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
'Resolution No. 99, Y1
Page 4
D. Weeds and grasses within the 10' perimeter shall be maintained to a height no more than 6
inches.
Miscellaneous:
A. Firewood shall be stacked on a parallel contour a minimum of 15 feet away from any
structure.
B. Propane tanks shall be installed according to NFPA 48 standards and on a contour away
from the structure with standard defensible space vegetation mitigation around any above-
ground tank. Any wood enclosures around the tank shall be constructed with materials
approved for 2 hour fire - resistive construction on the exterior side of the walls.
C. Fences shall be kept clear of brush and debris.
D. Wood fences shall not be connected to the structure.
E. Fuel tanks shall be installed underground with an approved container.
F. Each structure shall have a minimum of one 10 lb. ABC fire extinguisher.
G. Addresses shall be clearly marked and visible with minimum 2" non - combustible letters
and shall be visible and installed on a non - combustible post.
H. Any outbuildings or additional buildings shall adhere to the same standards as structures.
Access:
A. Access roads shall be built to County Standards.
Utilities:
A. Utility lines shall be buried.
4. Outside illumination shall comply with County lighting standards in effect at the timeof building
permit issuance.
5. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildlife mitigation measures:
a. Fencing shall comply with the Pitkin County fencing requirements.
b. All garbage /trash shall be kept within bear -proof garbage containers.
C. Dogs are prohibited.
d. All structures shall be setback from the edge of the bench so they are not visible from Kline
�— Creek.
430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
4 e; 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
Resolution No. 99 --[
Page 5
6. The Applicant shall comply with the following standards for development on slopes of greater
than 15 %:
A. Adequate mechanical support shall be provided for cut slopes.
B. Adding water which may decrease slope stability shall be avoided.
C. Adding weight to the top of the slope shall be avoided.
D. Disturbed slopes must be contoured so that they can be revegetated.
E. Steepening of existing slopes shall be avoided.
F. Confine cuts, fills, grading and excavation to the minimum area needed for construction.
Prior to the submittal of anv building permit applications, the Applicant shall obtain a septic
permit from the Environmental Health Department. All sewage disposal systems must be designed
by a registered professional engineer. Sewage disposal system shall be located within the
approved building envelope.
Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications, the Applicant shall provide
documentation of an adequate domestic water supply on the property. In addition. the Applicant
shall submit information which documents the location of the well in relation to the proposed
septic system. Quantity and quality of said supply shall meet the approval of the Environmental
Health Department. The well site shall be located within the approved building envelope.
9. No development, including grading, landscaping (including berming) and vegetation removal or
disturbance shall occur outside of the designated building envelope, except for utility and
driveway extension and maintenance, and as may be necessary to implement the wildfire
mitigation measures required elsewhere in this document.
10. All areas disturbed by construction shall be revegetated with native shrubs and grasses to limit
water consumption and additional runoff within one growing season of the project's completion.
11. A fireplace/woodstove application must be filed and approved by the Community Development
Department prior to the issuance of a building permit (if necessary).
12. Prior to the submittal of any building permit applications,an access permit is required from the
County Engineer.
n
1 13. Prior to the issuance of an access permit, the Applicant shall submit a road improvement plan to
the County Engineer for approval. The improvements shall raise the standard of the road with a
minimal amount of environmental damage.
14. The required road improvements shall be completed and approved by the County Engineer, prior
to the submittal of any building permit applications.
V hra
t.. 6 J — a ..e —f
11111111111111111111111111111111 HIM III IIIII IIII IIII
430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
Page 6
15. The Applicant shall participate in the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision Road Improvements
District, as it presently exists. If this District is not functioning at this time, the Applicant shall
join such an improvements district or association, should one be formed.
16. The Applicant shall comply with the codes and requirements of the Carbondale and Rural Fire
�^ Protection District.
17. The primary residence shall be limited to 1,200 square feet of above grade floor area, as defined in
the Pitkin County Land Use Code at the time of building permit issuance. Subgrade space shall be
no greater than the footprint of the primary structure. The garage and accessory buildings shall be
limited to a cumulative total of 750 square feet of above and/or below grade floor area.
18. Development of 30 inches above or below grade within the required setback requires approval of
a variance by the Board of Adjustment.
19. The vested rights for the approval contained herein shall expire on April 14, 2002.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 13TH DAY OF
MARCH 1999.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1999.
VESTED RIGHTS NOTICE PUBLISHED ON THE � DAY OF 1 1999.
ATTEST:
i
LG je. >.oik)
D putty Clerk 4 and Recorder
BO_CC OF COUNTY CONI P IISSIONERS
PITKIN COUNTY, LORADO
Lam'. ✓
oc
J
i Leslie J. Lamo ,
Chair
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John Ely,
County. orney
Case #P8 -99
PID 92729- 293 -00 -018
(1u,? J
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
4. '7 - 99
Cindy Houben,
Community Development Director
1 111111 11111 Oil 1111 !111111 !II 1111111 III 11111 1111 IN
430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
6 of 7 R 0.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY eO
71
EXIIIB77 A
')rdtr Number: 0oC21332 -
LECAL DESCRIPTION
A parcel of land situated in the SW 114 of Section 29, and the N 112 of the ha
114 of Section 32, Tovrship 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.N., County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado, being more paz:'*C:larly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said N :12 NW 114 of Section 32; thence
Westerly along the south line of said N 112 NW 114 750 feet, more or less, to
the centerline of Big R1ine Creek: thence Northerly along the center line of
Big Rline Creek 1,365 feet, more or less, to the North 1_ne of said N I11 NW
114; thence Westerly along said North line of said N 112 NW 114 610 feet, more
or less, to the Southeast Corner of a tract of land referred to as Tract No. 6
and particularly described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 306 at Page 811 of
the Pitkin County records; thence North along the East line of said Tract 6,
474.29 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Tract 6, which point is cc :ncidenta_'
with the southeast Corner of Tract; thence North 12 degrees 46 m.-lutes 43
seconds East 164.50 feet along the Easterly line of said Tract 5 to the
Northeast Corner Of said Tract 5 which point is coincidental with the southwest
Corner of the South end of Bobcat Lane as established and dedicated in the
filing of Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision No. 3; thence Northeasterly 30 feet
along the Southerly end of said lane to the Northeasterly corner thereof,
thence Easterly 310 feet more or less to the center 0f Big Kline Creep; thence
Southerly along the center line of Big Kline Creek 570 feet, more or less,
thence North 65 degrees C minutes 0 seconds East 1005 feet, more or less to the
East line of the SW 114 of said Section 29; thence South along said East line
of Section 29, 1865.5 feet to the point of becinn..
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
i I"III I'III "III' 1'11'1'1'11 "I II'I"I III "III �"I I")
430753 05/06/1999 01:25P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
7 of 7 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
lu [ OIJI [91.111111001
TO: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
Regular Meeting — April 14, 1999
THRU: Cindy Houben, Community Development Director onoq
FROM: Tamara Pregl, Planner
RE: Christmas Reinstatement of Vested Rights
SUMMARY OF REQUEST The Applicant is requesting an Extension of Vested Rights for a period of
three years pursuant to Section 4- 140.30 of the Land Use Code. Technically the request is for a
reinstatement of vested rights, as the vested right has already expired.
APPLICANT: Daniel Christmas
REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel Dattola of Redstone Land Company
LOCATION: The property is located adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, south of the
town of Redstone.
ZONINGILOT SIZE: RS -30; approximately 35 acres
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Referral agency comments are incorporated throughout this memorandum,
and are attached for reference. Referrals were received from Attorney's Office and Zoning. Comments
were not received from the Crystal River Caucus.
BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property was granted 1041 Hazard Review and
General Submission approval by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) pursuant Resolution No.
96 -5. The 1041 site plan was recorded in Book 39, Page 99. The following are issues were addressed as
part of the initial 1041 review:
The property is mapped for elk production area, critical habitat, and winter range, as well as summer,
winter and overall range for bighorn sheep. Kevin Wright of the Colorado Division of Wildlife
conducted a site inspection as part of the initial 1041 review and had concluded that the proposed
building site does not lie within elk production area or critical habitat. The elk production occurs
along the ridges and benches to the south and west, and across Kline Creek to the east. The proposed
building site does lie within elk winter range (although use is minimal) and bighorn sheep summer
and overall range. Most of the sheep usage occurs along the ridges to the east and south of the
building envelope. Mr. Wright had offered a number comments in his letters dated February 2, 1995
and May 12, 1995 regarding development on this site. Mr. Wright's comments were made conditions
of approval of the initial 1041 application and have been included as conditions of approval for this
review. Mr. Wright's comments can be seen in Attachment B.
• The property does contain slopes of 30% and greater, however, the proposed building site contains
slopes of 12 to 16 percent. The property does contain areas mapped for potential avalanche,
iU' J . 7
Christmas
April 14, 1999
however, when Jeffrey Hynes of the Colorado Geological Survey reviewed the initial 1041
application, he had noted in this letter dated July 20, 1995 (Attachment C) that the proposed
development site is not adversely affected by potential geologic hazards.
Kelly Rogers of the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) had reviewed the 1041 application on June
12, 1995 and had rated the wildlife hazard on the building site as medium. Mr. Rogers had indicated
that the vegetation on the site consists of a mature aspen stand mixed with occasional conifers. The
understory vegetation is composed of grasses, a mix of snowberry and serviceberry brush and down
deed aspen trees. Mr. Rogers had noted that aspen forests of that type do not readily bum, except
under very dry conditions. Mr. Rogers had indicated that the defensible space and structural design
standards as outline in the Land Use Code should be adequate to mitigate fire hazards on the site.
These standards were added as conditions of approval for the initial 1041 and have been brought
forward as conditions of approval for the reinstatement of vested rights. Mr. Roger's comments can
be seen in Attachment D.
The zone district allows for a primary residence of 15,000 square feet with a 4,000 subgrade
exemption and a 750 square foot garage exemption. However, as part of the initial 1041 review, the
applicant proposed to construct a small "seasonal use" cabin, not to exceed 1,200 square feet in size.
Hence, approval was granted by the Board to the subject property with a primary structure not to
exceed 1,200 square feet of above grade floor area. In addition, subgrade space was limited to the
footprint of the primary structure and the garage and any accessory buildings were limited to a
cumulative total of 750 square feet of above and /or below grade floor area. It is staff s position that
this limitation in square footage for the primary residence, accessory buildings and garage, and
subgrade space must remain as part of this application; otherwise, an application to modify the initial
development approval would be required.
During the initial 1041 Hazard Review, the CSFS, the Carbondale Fire Protection District and the
County Engineer had expressed significant concerns with respect to the adequacy of the access road.
With regards to the improvements required to bring the road to acceptable standards the concern
raised by staff was that the level of construction might be unacceptable given the resulting
environmental damage. However, the County Engineer determined that improvements to somewhat
higher standards than that of the present road are possible without significant environmental impacts.
Conditions of approval for the initial 1041 with regards to the road included the following:
• Prior to the issuance of an access permit, the Applicant shall submit a road improvement
plan to the County Engineer for approval. The improvements shall raise the standard of the
road, with a minimal amount of environmental damage.
• The required road improvements shall be completed and approved by the County Engineer,
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
These conditions of approval have been brought forward as conditions of approval for this
application as well.
It has been noted in the application that some maintenance work has been done to the existing access.
Joanna Schaffner, Zoning Officer, has indicated that no permits were issued to the applicant for any
improvements on the road. However, due to weather, staff was unable to conduct a complete site
visit to determine the extent of work done on the road. The applicant has been made aware that any
i.3
Christmas
April 14, 1999
further improvements to the road require permits. The applicant may also be required in the future to
address the possibility that certain improvements of the property were undertaken without permits.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL
EXTENSION OF VESTED RIGHTS: The following is a review and analysis of the proposal relative to the
applicable standards of Section 4- 140.30 of the Land Use Code. In reviewing a request for the extension
of vested property rights, the Board shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
The applicant's compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the date of
application for extension or reinstatement of vested rights.
Response: There were no conditions as part the initial 1041 approval which required performance prior
to the date of application for extension of vested rights.
2. The progress made in pursuing the project to date, including the effort to obtain any other
permits, such as building permits, and the expenditures made by the applicant in pursuing the
project.
Response: There have been no efforts made to obtain building permits and the vested right to the
approval expired in January of this year.
3. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the County as a result of project
approval, such as impact fees or land dedications.
Response: There have been no benefits received by the County such as impact fees or land dedications.
There were no land dedications required.
d. The needs of the County and the applicant that would be served by approval of the extension or
reinstatement request.
Response: The needs of the Applicant would be serviced as an extended time frame for development
would be allowed that is vested in some respects from future regulatory change. The extension would
seem to serve no County interests. .
5. An extension or reinstatement may be in the fora: of a development agreement duly authorized
and executed by the applicant and the County. Reasonable conditions may be imposed by the
Board when granting any such extension or reinstatement.
Response: The applicant has indicated agreement to reasonable conditions imposed by the County.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BOCC adopt the following motion, `to approve the
Christmas Extension of Vested Rights for a period of three years, subject to compliance with the
conditions of the attached Resolution."
tJUL °J.
Christmas
April 14, 1999
Page 4
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Draft Resolution
B. Colorado Division of Wildlife
C. Colorado Geological Survey
D. Colorado State Forest Service
E. Zoning Office
The application and site plan have been attached separately
carevmIN /06/99
Attachment B
STATE OF COLORADO
Roy Romer, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Perry D. Olson, Director
6060 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 60216
Telephone: (303) 297 -1192
5 -12 -95
Pitkin County Planning
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Rick:
REFER TO
` pW RAp
1 P.
�`V OF
For Wildlife -
For People
I refer you to my 2 -5 -95 letter to you regarding the wildlife
review for Dan Christmas' lot in Redstone Ranch Acres. I have
attached a copy for your convienience. The current proposal has
not changed since I reviewed his proposal for him earlier this
year.I have 2 additional comments:
1. No dogs be allowed during construction of the cabin as
construction workers tend not to monitor their dogs and the
dogs run loose and may chase wildlife
2. Any commercial guide services if they extend onto
National Forest for the purposes of big game hunting would
need to be permitted through the U.S. Forest Service.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment
questions, please give me a call.
Since r ly,
i
K vin Wr1
District X
e Manager
If you have any
,
44Y 1 61995
r'
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Kenneth S21azar, Executive Director
WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hegberg, Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Chairman • Felix Chavez, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member
Louis F. Swift, Member • George VanDenBerg, Member • Larry M. Wright, Member • Thomas M. Eve. Member
STATE OF COLORADO
Roy Romer, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Perry D. Olson, Director
606 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80216
Telephone: (303) 297 -1192
2 -5 -95
Pitkin County Planning
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 816
Dear Rick:
1
:y
Aea��tl
REFER TO
For Wildlife —
For People
Daniel Christmas' lot in Redstone Ranch Acres along Bobcat Lane
lies within an area currently mapped as an elk production area,
critical habitat, and winter range. Upon site inspection of the
lot and proposed cabin site the site does not lie within an elk
production area or critical habitat. The proposed site lies
within a narrow band of aspen /spruce -fir between a steep drop to
Kline Creek and the subdivision road. Calving on this site is
unlikely. Elk production occurs along the ridge and benches to
the south and west and across Kline creek to the east. Prior to
the subdivision being built elk may have calved along some of the
benches within the subdivision; but due to the homesites,
disturbance, and dogs elk no longer calve in this area of the
subdivison.
The cabin site as currently proposed and flagged does lie within
elk winter range, although use is minimal, and bighorn sheep
summer and overal range. Most sheep usage if any occurs along
the ridges to the east and south of the building envelope. The
proposed site is immediately adjacent to an already existing home
to the south and will clump disturbances.
Impacts to wildlife should be minimal as currently proposed and
with the following recommendations:
1. Maintain applicant's commitments and intentions as
outlined in his 10 -6 -94 proposal to you (I- VIII).
2. Maintain native vegetation outside building envelope;
thinning as outlined in his letter section V. is O.K. as
long as some snags (5 /acre) are maintained for cavity
nesting and snag dependent species
3. No dogs; if dogs are allowed, limit to 1 dog with a
kennel restriction and kennel be constructed before C.O. is
issued
4. All garbage be kept in approved bear proof garbage
containers (American Bear Society specs)
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, James S. Lochhead, Executive Director
WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Thomas M. Eve, Chairman • Louis F. Swift, Vice - Chairman • Arnold Salazar, Secretary
Jesse Langston Boyd, Jr., Member • Eldon W. Cooper, Member • Rebecca L. Frank, Member
William R. Hegberg, Member • Mark LeValley, Member
5. All fencing be 42 4 strand or less with a 12"
kickspace between the top 2 strands. Any rail fencing be
the round type 3 rail or less with at least 18" between 2 of
the rails
6. Cabin should not "hang over" the edge of the bench
overlooking into Kline Creek
If you have any questions. please give me a call.
Since ely,
G,
Kevin Wr'
District' W '_dlife Manager
Carbonda
cc:Daniel Christmas
Attachment C
S TATE OF COLORADO
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Division of Minerals and Ceology
Department of Natural Resources
1 313 Sherman Street, Room 715
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone 13031866 -2611
FAX .3031 8b6 -2461
July 20, 1995
Mr. Rick Magill
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Mr. Magill:
Re: Christmas 1041 Review
M. : 17J
PI -95 -0019
7"-
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
Rov Romer
Gosemor
lame, 5 Lochhead
E,ecwne Dvector
shchaeiB Long
Dna +ion Dveaor
bid'co'an
State G'60g,t
and Dvector
We have reviewed the supporting materials submitted on the above referenced site,
conducted a field inspection of the parcel and evaluated the general and
engineering geology of the area.
The proposed cabin site is not adversely affected by potential geologic hazards
and should perform well under the intended use.
One correction needs to be made in the covenants /restrictions Mr. Christmas has
offered: The slope restriction should be 30 percent not 30 decrees.
Given this one minor change, we have no objection to the approval of this
building permit.
Yours very truly,
Jeffrey L. yn
Senior Engineering Geologist
JF?: 3: \ldt
June 12, 1995
Rick Magill
Aspen/ P- Community Development
130 South 7alena Street
Aspen, CO 81511
t
Re: Christmas 1041 wildfire Hazard Review
Rick,
Attachment D
W FOREST
SERVICE
State Services Building
222 S. 6th Street, Room 416
Grand Junction. Colorado 81501
Telephone 13031 248 -7325
I have reviewed the Application for 1041 Hazard Review submitted by Daniel
Christmas, and visited the proposed building site on June 8th. I have the
following comments in regard to wildfire hazard.
The building site is rated as medium hazard. Vegetation on the site consists
of a mature aspen stand mixed with occasional conifers. Understory vegetation
is composed of grasses, a mix of snowberry and serviceberry brush, and down
dead aspen trees. The slope of the building envelope is about_ 15e, although
most of the surrounding area is much steeper.
Aspen forests of this type do not readily burn, except under very dry
conditions. The only significant risk would occur when the grass and forb
layer is cured and st'_11 standing, such as in late Sectember or early October.
Under these favorable burning conditions, the relatively steep slopes on this
site would contribute to fire intensity and spread. However, any fire
occurring on this site would probably be limited to a low intensity ground
fire, and would probably not spread into the tree crowns. The defensible space
and structural design standards as outlined in Pitkin County Code section 3-
807, C, should be adequate to mitigate fire hazard on this proposal.
I do have some concerns regarding access to this site. The existing road does
not meet either CSFS or NFPA standards for grade or width, and does not
provide for dual ingress /egress. In the event of a major wiidland fire in this
area, it would be almost impossible for a fire truck to negotiate this road,
especially with residents trying to evacuate. It is therefore even more
important that prospective residents know and understand the risks associated
with developing this site, and that the defensible space and structural design
measures as outlined in the land use code be implemented.
Please contact me if you have questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
elly Rogers
St. District Forester
Steve Crockett
")aniel Christmas
on Leach
r
Attachment E
I Joanna Schaffn er,_0k45_P M 3/9/99 -, Christmas Extension of Vest
X- Sender: joannas @comdev (Unverified)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 21:45:07 -0700
To: tamarap @co.pitkin.co.us
From: Joanna Schaffner <joannas @ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
I have reviewed the above referenced application and offer the following
comments.
1. In Resolution 96 -5, Wildlife mitigation condition 4d, requires that all
structures be setback from the edge of the bench so they are not visible
from Kline Creek. Is this condition satisfied by developing in the building
envelope or might development in certain areas within the envelope violate
this requirement? Can this area be better defined?
2. The language in condition #12 should be clarified. A basement is
different than subgrade area. One you see, and one you don't (in theory).
Which is intended here? Let's talk about this one.
3. You might want to include the standard language about the 30 inch rule
as it pertains to driveway improvements.
4. The applicant states that maintenance work was done to the existing
road /driveway. I don't know what kind of work was done, but it appears that
no permits were issued.
Printed fo Tama Pre <tam arap@co.pitkin.co.us> 1
L
C
is
I I
r
4L
f
• u
i
4�
01/25/1959 15:21 9708827758 REDSTONE LAND COMPAN PAGE 02
RFINSTATEMRNT OF VESTED PROPERTY T HTS s= ITF [A
Tkte criteria for reinstatement of vested property rights ate given in Code Section 4-
140.30 and are addressed below.
1. The applicant's compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the
date of application for reinstatement of vested rights:
The applicant is in compliance with resolution 96 -5 to the best of his knowledge
2. The progress made in pursuing the project to date, including the eflbrt to obtain any
other permits, such as building permits, and the expenditures made by the applicant in
pursuing the project as follows:
The applicant has not applied for a building permit because he is seelcing to sell the
property. However the applicant had some percolation test done and maintenance
work done to the existing roadldriveway.
3. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the County as a result of
project approval, such as impact fees or land dedications.
The applicant has paid his impact fees and a vested property fee.
4. The needs of the County and the applicant that would be served by approval of the
reinstatement request:
The applicant feels no planning or land use changes have occurred since the original
resolution 996-5 was approved. Therefore vested rights should be reinstated.
5. Any reinstatement may be in the form of a development agreement duly authorized
and executed by the applicant and the County. Reasonable conditions may be imposed
by the Board when granted any such reinstatement:
Acknowledged
0. = 8
tJS.+i
.
j
PITKIN COUNTY
PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: January 20, 1999
PROJECT: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
LOCATION: A X 35 acres property on Bobcat Lane adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision.
i
APPLICANT: Daniel M. Christmas PHONE: 518- 359.9771
FAX: 518 -359 -7035
PLANNER: Tana Pregl PHONE: 920 -5103
1. Type of Application: Extension of Vested Property Rights
2. Description of Project/Development: The Applicant is requesting approval for the reinstatement
of vested property rights, as the vested right is about to expire. The parcel was granted 1041 Hazard
Review approval by the Board of County Commissioners in January of 1996.
3. Areas in }vhich the Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested:
I
ddressed in letter of request (application):
4 tension of Vested Property Rights
4-50 Procedure
5 -50 Submission Contents
4. Staff will refer to the following agencies:
a. County Attorney
b. Zoning Office
o, Crystal River Caucus j
d. Redstone Ranch Acres Homeowners Association
S. Review by: BOCC
6. Public Hearing? Yes, at BOCC. A public notice sign shall be posted on the property at least 15
days prior to the hearing pursuant to Section 4-90 of the Land Use Code. Staff will mail notice to
adjacent property owners.
I
7. Adjacent property Owners: The Applicant is required to submit a list of adjacent property
owners (one copy). Envelopes for each owner shall be addressed and stamped.
T 1 —1 A 0
T0'd ObbS£0L6S[L3TST6
0i A3Q WOO NINi1d/N3dSb W08d Tb:ST 666T -OZ-Wf
1
4- 140 -30
Section 4 -140
VESTING OFIPROPERTV RIGHTS AND EXPIRATION OR REVOCATION OF DEVLOPMENT
APPROVALS
i
Subsections;
4- 140-10 Central
4- 140.20 ! Term of Vested Property Right and Expiration of Development Approvals
4- 140.30 Extension or Reinstatement of Vested Property Rights; Reinstatement of
Development Approval
4- 14040 I Applicability of Other County Regulations
4- 140 -50 Public Notice
4- 140-60 Judicial Review
4- 140-10 General
A. A vested property right shall attach to and run with the applicable real property
upon approval of a Site Specific Development Plan.
B. Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan may be made with or without
conditions, and the failure to fully abide by the terms of any conditions of approval may result in a
forfeiture of vested property rights, and may result in revocation or suspension of the approval.
C. : The vested property rights procedures in this section shall apply to any site
specific development approved on or after January 1, 1988. The procedures shall not apply to
any site specific development plan or other land use appiication approved prior to January 1.
1988, and the. law applicable on the date of approval shall apply to such projects. (Ord. 95-6 § 3
(part), 1995: prior code § 4 -1401)
D. I Forfeiture of a vested property right and revocation or suspension of a
development approval shall be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners after public
hearing, in accordance with this section. Notice of the hearing shall be published and mailed to
the owner of t a applicable real property no later than ten (10) days prior to the hearing.
i
(Ord. 97.1 S. Aµtended, 04/23 /1997)
4- 140-20 Term of Vested Property Right and Expiration of Development Approvals
Development approvals for single family and duplex dwellings and associated lots and
parcels, including the awarding of Residential Growth Management, Quota System Allotments
therefore, shall not expire, but may be revoked or suspended if terms and conditions of approval
have not beep met. However, the vested right shall expire three (3) years from the date of
approval, unless extended pursuant to this section. All other development approvals shall expire
three(3)yea from the date of approval (concurrently with the vested right), if. the approved use,
building or structure has not been established or commenced, or the term of the vested right has
not been extei ded pursuant to this section. (Ord. 95-6 § 3 (part), 1995: prior code § 4 -1402)
(Ord. 97 -15, Amended, 04/23/1997)
I
4-14 xtepsion or Reinstatement of Vested Property Rights; Reinstatement-of Development
Approval
(4 -140) 1
i7J01
J �. /u
Z0'd 0"SEM6S£BTST6 01 AW W00 NDUId /N3c8d W02Jd Z17: ST 6661 -0Z-Mr
• I
i
I i
I
4-1 40 -301
J/7 eft/1 67 01 WSW Property; n9ftts or reinstatement or
forfeited or e�pired vested property rights, or a reinstatement of a suspended or revoked
development approval, in accordance with this section and Sections 4 -50 and 5-50.
A. i In reviewing a request for the extension or reinstatement of vested property
rights, the Board shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria
-� I The applicants compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the
/ date of application for extension or reinstatement of vested rights;
Cf � 2. I The progress made in pursuing the project to date including the effort to obtain
any other permits, such as building permits, and the expenditures made by the applicant in
pursuing the project; ,
I
3. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the County as a result
of project apprpval such as impact fees or land dedications,
4. The needs of the County and the applicant that would be served by approval of
the extension or reinstatement request.
S.
An extension or reinstatement may be in the form of a development agreement
duly author¢eh and executed by the applicant and the County. Reasonable conditions may be
Imposed Dy th! Board when granting any such
extension or reinstatement. (Ord 95-6 § 3 (part), 1995)
I
B. In connection with any request for reinstatement of a vested property right after
forfeiture or reinstatement of a suspended or revoked development approval, the Board shall
determine the; financial impacts of the investigation and may require the Applicant to pay the
r reasonable costs of investigation and enforcement of the violation which caused the forfeiture.
i (Ord. 99 -15, Ardiended, 04/23 /1997)
4- 140-40 Applipbitity of Other County Regulations
The establishment of a vested property right shall not exempt the applicant from
requirements (or Final Plat approval, building permits or other necessary permits or approvals
applicable subsequent to the approval of the Site Specific Development Plan. The establishment
of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of the Uniform Building Code, Fire
Code, Plumbing Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code or other requirements necessary for the
protection of the public health, safety and welfare. (Ord. 95-6 §3 (part), 1995: prior code §
4 -1403)
(Ord, 97 -15, Argended,04/23 /1997)
I ;
4- 140 -50 Publit Notice
A,soorp as practicable following the date of a Site Specific Development Plan approval or
reinstatement of a vested right after forfeiture or of an approval after revocation, and in no event
later than fourteen (14) days following such approval, the County Clerk or the Planning Office
shall cause said notice to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Pitkin County
advising the qublic of the approval and the creation of a vested property right. The property
description shall be published with such notice. (Ord. 95$ § 3 (part), 1995: prior code § 4- 1404).
If the vested right is forfeited, notice of such forfeiture shall be made in like fashion, and notice of
reinstatement shall be made in like fashion.
I - , . , .11
(4 -140) 2
A
i
. ASPEN/Prjj<iN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Pitkin County Development Application Fee Policy
Pitkin County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Ordinance No. 97-48,
and 98 -7 ]pas established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications.
A flat feel or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of
application submitted. Referral fees for other County departments reviewing the
application will also be collected when necessary. One check including i the
deposit fot Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each landluse
application, made payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required
application fee. red
A flat feel is collected by Planning for Staff Approval which normally take a
minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not
refundablei
A deposit is collected by Planning when more extensive staff review is required,
as hours arie likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual
staff time ipent will be charged against the deposit. After the deposit has been
expended, l ithe applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours.
Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application wi11
be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed) to pay application fees as
required, n11 new or additional applications will be accepted for processing ul* il
the outstanding fees are paid. Outstanding balances must be paid before a Land
Use Takings Determination is heard before the Board of County Commissioners.
In no case , will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case
processing have been paid. After the final action on the project, any remaining
balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant.
Applications which require a deposit must include an
The Agreement establishes the applicant as being
responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application.
The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment
submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. and
The complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side
tb0'd 01;1bS£0A6S£8tSt6 01 n3G W00 NINlId/N3dSU WOad £1:0 6665 -M -Wf
Community Development Department
Pitkin County
1998
PLANNING APPLICATION FEES
The categories of review processes and base fees for the processing of land use applications shall;
be as follows: j
I
CATEGORY FEE
LAND USE AP LICATION FEES
Major Deposit $2,220.00
:Minor Deposit ! 1,110.00
Administrative Aeposit 460.00
Flat Fee 255.00 I
Hourly Rate 1 185.00
LAND USE RH#ERRAL FEES
HOUSING, CO,( NTY ENGINEER, and ENVIRONMENTAL
Major 5320.00
Minor 160.00
COUNTY CLE�K ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
Major $640.00
Minor j 300.00
Insigne cant 110.00
A. The following guidelines shalt be used for the administration of the fee structure set forthlabove:
I . Fees ehargell for the processing of applications .which fall into more than one category shall be
cumulative; ]while the fees charged for the processing of applications within the same category shall
not be cumulative. In the event that the fees which result from cumulating are found by the
Community] Development Department to be excessive in relation to the number of hours it is
anticipated Jo require to process the application, the Director may waive the cumulating requirement.
2. All deposit based land use applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Paymier" of
Developmerst Application Fees.
3. The Community Development Department staff shall keep an accurate record of the actual tine
required forthe processing of the land use application and Additional Billing shall be trade ;
commensur with the additional costs incurred by the County when the processing of an application
by the Comnnunity Development Department takes more time than is covered by the Base F In the
event the prpcessing of an application by the Community Development Department takes less time than
provided foi in subsection A, the Community Development Department shall refund the unused portion
of the Base Fee.
4. Additional Billings shall be based solely on processing time spent by members of the Community
Developrnept or its designee in the processing of an application.
5. Additional Billing shall be computed at the rate of $185.00 per hour of additional Community
Developmeht Department staff time required. Refimds of unused hours shall be made at the rate of
! $185.00 pez hour of time.
6. The Corntnimity Development Department Director shall establish appropriate guidelines fe* the
collection *Additional Billings as required.
_..
OWN
i
7, This g� gg
1: rrmr addlK�'1 U1`rY��ll�} �£tPft(IP GAf�tjr bioa'gvP ltaari�tg pcvrvxr rail �4ov[s
any adjustm ts be necessary, they shall be changed to become effective on January 1.
S. The Community Development Department shall identify, prior to or at the time of submission of a land
use application, whether an application is to be referred to the Engineering, Environmental Health,
Wildlife Officer, or Housing Departments or whether a County Clerk Administrative Fee is rered.
The Community Development Department shall also identify whether an application constitutes a
minor or a n*jor referral, based on the number of hours which will be required to review the I
application. and charge the applicant for each referral accordingly. Additional Billings and kefunds
shall not apply to the computation of referral fees.
In the event that staff determines that special expertise is required to assist the Community Devdfiopment
Department in the review of a permit application such costs will be bome by the applicant.
i
' A
1 ai-39899 02/08/96 04:14P PG 1 OF 6 REC DOC
S3LVIA_DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 0.00
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITSIN
COUNTY COLORADO, GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE CHRISTMAS 1041
HAZARD REVIEW AND GENERAL SUBMISSION
Resolution No. 96- S
RECITALS
1. Mr. Daniel Christmas, hereinafter "Applicant" has applied to the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter `Board", for approval of 1041
Environmental Hazard and General Submission Review for the construction of a single -
family residence.
2. The Applicant's lot is zoned RS -30 and is approximately 36 acres in size.
3. Said lot is located adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision, south of the
town of Redstone, and is more specifically described in Exhibit A, attached.
4. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application on October 3,
1995 and found that this proposal complies with the criteria set forth in the Pitkin County
Land Use Code.
5. The Board heard this application at a duly noticed public hearing on January 24,
1996, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to this
application.
6. The Board determined that the proposed development meets the criteria
established in the Land Use Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, that it does hereby grant approval to the
Christmas 1041 Hazard Review and General Submission application, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a 24" X 36"
mylar 1041 Hazard Review Site Plan which meets the approval of the Community
Development Department and the County Attorney. The Site Plan shall include the
following 1041 Hazard Review Warning and Disclaimer:
"Applicant acknowledges that he/she has been informed by Pitkin County of the
existence of 1041 environmental hazard areas that might affect the property, any
improvements, and the use and occupancy thereof'
a. The building envelope shall be depicted on the Site Plan (see Exhibit B,
attached).
n P r
EJJt J�.. J
Resolution No. 96--,7—
Pap 2
2. The Applicant shall adhere to all material representations in the application and in
the public meetings and hearings.
3. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildfire mitigation measures:
Note: Actual vegetation manipulation to meet these conditions may not be
necessary where the natural vegetation patterns have already fulfilled these
conditions.
a. Brush, debris, and non - ornamental vegetation shall be removed within a
minimum 10 foot perimeter around the structure.
b. Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical and horizontal
continuity of the fuels a minimum of a 30 foot perimeter around the
structure. (for greater slopes ref. CSFS Safety Zone chart. Page 13,
Wildfire Guidelines For Rural Homeowners).
C. Spacing between clumps of brush and vegetation within the 30 foot
perimeters shall be a minimum of two times the height of the fuel.
Maximum diameter of the clumps shall be two times the height of the fuel.
All measurements shall be made from the edges of the crowns of the fuel.
d. All branches which extend over the eaves shall be trimmed and removal of
ladder fuels from around trees and brush.
e. Tree crown separation within the 30 foot perimeters shall have a minimum
of 10 feet between the edges of the crowns. This does not apply to mature
stands of Aspen trees where the above recommendations for removal of
ladder fuels have been complied with. In areas of aspen regeneration, the
spacing guidelines shall be followed.
f. All branches which extend over the roof eaves shall be trimmed and all
branches within fifteen feet of the chimneys shall be removed.
- g. The density of the fuels within a 100 foot perimeter of the structures shall
be reduced where natural reduction has not already occurred.
h. All deadfall within the 100 foot perimeter shall be removed.
The Applicant shall be responsible for the continued maintenance of
defensible space.
j. Roof construction shall be Class A, non - combustible (no wood shakes or
shingles with no flat roofs.
r� ^y4
I i
;w , " - r ,
f J..i�' -L)
Resolution No. 96--G-
Pap 3
k. Vents shall be screened with corrosive resistant wire mesh 1/4 inch
maximum.
4. The Applicant shall comply with the following wildlife mitigation measures:
a. Dogs are prohibited.
b. All garbage shall be kept in bear -proof containers (American Bear Society
specifications).
C. All fencing shall be 42 ", 4 strand or less, with a 12" kickspace between the
top two strands. Any rail fencing shall be the round type, 3 rail or less with
at least 18" between 2 of the rails.
d. All structures shall be setback from the edge of the bench so they are not
visible from Kline Creek.
5. There shall be no disturbance, including grading and vegetation manipulation,
outside of the building envelope, except for construction of the parking area,
improvements to the access road, and wildfire mitigation measures.
6. Prior to the issuance of an access permit, the Applicant shall submit a road
improvements plan to the County Engineer for approval. The improvements shall raise
the standard of the road, with a minimal amount of environmental damage.
7. The required road improvements shall be completed and approved by the County
Engineer, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. Prior to the issuance of a septic permit the Applicant shall submit information to
the Environmental Health Department which documents the location of the well in
`relation to the proposed septic system. Quality and quantity of the watet' supply shall meet
the approval of the Environmental Health Department.
9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall obtain a septic
permit from the Environmental Health Department.
10. The Applicant shall obtain a fireplace/woodstove permit from the Environmental
Health Department, prior to the issuance of a building permit, if woodbuming devices are
to be installed.
11. The Applicant shall participate in the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision Road
Improvements District, as it presently exists. If this District is not functioning at this time,
the Applicant shall join such an improvements district or association, should one be
formed.
MY^'L•
v �Ji J
Resolution No. 96,y
Page 4 ;
12. The primary structure shall be limited to 1200 square feet of above grade floor
area, as defined in the Pitkin County Land Use Code at the time of building permit
issuance. Basement space shall be no greater than the footprint of the primary structure.
The garage and accessory buildings shall be limited to a cumulative total of 750 square
feet of above and/or below grade floor area.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1996
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PM1IN COUNTY, COLORADO
By
James R. True, Chairman
ATTEST:
Je gffiette Jones,
�
Deputy Clerk and Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John Ely, Attorney
i
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Cindy Houben,
Community Development Director
res_xmas.doc
rL�Mj
I
n,.. - 3
V lYi J _
, tA
389829 022/08/96 04:14P PG 5 OF 6
1 N
,i
. .,
?o W4L'ra.:'/ "sed _from Aeeri4sn SCeiat °^ i . -
7 try ro ....e _alEduca-
a H. Beck and Sogaie - C. See AM ic'r._. tenants.
A parcel of lard situatad is the s" of Seetier. 79, and t' s A of
Prin the cip sl Heri of Sectiar 32, TennsRiP 10 South, Banga 3S West of t* Sth
eiydi=, Count? of Pi'_:: -, State o; Colorado, being yore
Particularly desc:ibad as followat
9eginning at the acutheast CC or o: said ,ys�H7M1 -_ See:i.� 3 :, t "eyes
taetarly alcrg t_'.e Scud: lln m c: said v:.,q•, h 7:0 fast, mere o_ lava,
to the cartarli -e c: Sic_ ;!line Creek! t- `erica Northerly afar; :] a aartar
lire of Big ilira c_aak 1,365 fast, nc;a or :sa;., to the Nor-.L lire
of said N4"h: t ants Westerly Slang Said Norte. 11 -s Of sa "d `thaws!
610 feet, ;nor* or lass, to the Southeast coa-ar of a tract of lard
:farad to as Tract No. 6 and rartic::larly dasezi ed is Warranty
Coed record*d is Book 3o6 at ?age 611 of the ?itkia County raa - at
thanes Sort`. along %ha East line of Said Tract S, 474.29 feet to t.':a
Nart::eaet'Ca:Zar o! said Tract 6 vhiah Point is coi_mcidar_ta' vii:
the Southeast Cora_ of Tract 'St t�enca Ne °� 2':• East 1
feet along the Eastarly lire of said Tract 5 to the Nort"east Cr_ — „er
Of said ::set which oai -t is cciacidaatsl wit' s ac west C:r-ar
Of '-'@a South an e_ Set Lan* as tetabllahad era dedicatad is the
filing of P.adsta -a, Ranch Arrsa Subdi 3icn No. 31 tha. ^.ca Ncr= �aastsrly
30 feet alcr-q the Scucha�lY end of said lane to is Ncr:'.sastariy
ear -er thereof,
thence Easterly 310 feet Mrora or lass to the canter
Of Big iii. a Crank: them: Southerly alarq the canter 'iris of Big
ilina Creek 570 fast, mere ar 162SI t::anee Mort„ 65'0'0• rase 1,005
feet, Mors or loan, to the East line of the 3w} Of said See`i_: 291
thence South alt-; said Uat line of Sactic. 29, "369.5 feet to Wm
Point of beginn —
CCtRr:•; C? ?ZTT :1
STA or CCLCRI:.Q
cJtlt�'J�..
N v
o
lokf
JI i
rN
le
/
ii le
zw Of
LL
�-
qp
LL
co
co
i
M � '
J6, - - -- � / / ,8WWI b �
01/22/1999 19:39 9708827758 REDSTONE LAND COMPAN PAGE 03
01/22fI999 03:1, 5193597035 CHRISTMAS s, aSSfk: PAGE 01
Jatwary 22, 1999
AapenJPitldn County Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 3 161 t
i' ' .,.
Dear Sir
1, Jennifer L.B. Grisi, as Via President of Redstone Land Company and owner of the
property or my Agent, Daniel W Dattola, give penniesion to process Application 4 -140
Extcnsion of Vested Property Rights
L.B. Grim, Via President ,
oe Land Company
Daniel W. Dattoia, Regional Manager
Redstone Land Company
"We no
kar+srde d at o'cks k
N1'ARRANTY DEED
si
TITS DEED, Made This / day of FEBRUARY
WALTER E. BECK AND SOPHIE G. BECK
of the acid County of and State of COLORADO
REDSTONE LAND COMPANY, INC.
1996 ,between
. grantor, and
whose legal address is 49 LAKE STREET
TUPPER LAKE, NY 12986
of the mid County of and State of NEW YORK , grantee:
NTTNE_SSET'll. That the grmnor for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($1u. VU) nrvu aoansso,
GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION DOLLARS, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herchy
sckrowledged. has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and b) these prescnu does grant, bargain, cell, come) and confirm, unto the
grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. all the real propcm together with improscments, if any, situate, lying mid being in the mid
County of PITKIN and State of Colorado described as follows.
SEE EXHIBIT "A"
as known b) meet and number as:
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditamenu and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining. and the reversion
and reversions. remainder and remainders. rents. issues and profits thereof, one all the estate, right. title. interest, claim and demand what -
soc%er of the grantor. either in law or equip. of. in and to tnc above bargained premises, with the hcreditamcnts and appurtenances.
TO 11AVC AJNl) TO HOLD the mid premises above bargained and described. with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and
assigns foreser. And the grantor. for himself. his heirs, and persona! represcmmivcs, doo covenant. grant. harFa n. and agree to and with
the Framec, his heirs ens assigns, the; at the time of the cascading and dciiyen of these ptc,ents, he is well seized of the premise} nbave
con%cved. has Food, sure. perfect. absolute and indefeasible estate of mhentarec, in law, in fee simple, and has good right. full power and
lawful authonq to grant, hargam, sell mid conve., tic same in manna and form as aforesaid. and that the same arc fret and clear from all
former and other grants, bargains. snits, hens, tales. assessments. cncumhranccs and restrictions of whatever kind or nature socver, except
1996 Taxes not vet due and payable, and additional exceptions contained on
Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
The grantor shall and will WARRAN'TY AND FOREVER DEFEND the above - bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession
of the grantee, his heirs and assigns. agarnst all and even pcm n or persons Inwiulh claiming the whole or any pan Werwf. The singuiw
number shali include the plural. the plural the singular, and the use of an) genaer shall he applicable to all genders.
IN N7TNESS 11TD3REOF, t grantor has executed this aced on the sale se; forth above.
WALTER E. BECK SOPHIE G. BECK
State of COLORADO 1
) Si
County of 13
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this S+ day of ri (.:•i' :r,i s�
b)' WALTER E. BECK AND SOPHIE G. BECK.
My commission expires Witness my hand and official sal. /
i Notan
f
alreart Tale at Aapie. ins. - nir N. at :I :LlSL:
\a 932A N'ARAA \T1' DEEII (For ITaapnphir Rwwd)
I
,
I:
,I9 96 ,
AlTi7 V * Ga
KV=111713 i lCON &397
101 Wes County Line Rood
LftM CO 60126
s
rL•'"M.
EXHIBIT A
Order Number: 00021332 -C2
LEGAL DESCRIP77ON
A parcel of land situated in the SW 114 of Section 29, and the N 111 of the NW
114 of Section 32, Township 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.Y.., County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said N 112 NW 114 of Section 32; thence
Westerly along the South line of said N 111 NW 114 750 feet, more or less, to
the centerline of Big Kline Creek: thence Northerly along the center line of
Big Kline Creek I,365 feet, more or less, to the North line of said N I12 NW
114; thence Westerly along said North line of said N 112 NW 114 610 feet, more
or less, to the Southeast Corner of a tract of land referred to as Tract No. 6
and particularly described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 306 at Page 811 of
the Pitkin County records; thence North along the East line of said Tract 6,
474.29 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Tract 6, which point is coincidental
with the Southeast Corner of Tract; thence North 22 degrees 46 minutes 43
seconds East 164.50 feet along the Easterly line of said Tract 5 to the
Northeast Corner of said Tract 5 which point is coincidental with the Southwest
Corner of the South end of Bobcat Lane as established and dedicated in the
filing of Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision No. 3; thence Northeasterly 30 feet
along the Southerly end of said lane to the Northeasterly corner thereof;
thence Easterly 310 feet more or less to the center of Big Kline Creek; thence
Southerly along the center line of Big Kline Creek 570 feet, more or less;
thence North 65 degrees 0 minutes 0 seconds East 1005 feet, more or less to the
East line of the SW 114 of said Section 29; thence South along said East line
of Section 29, 1869.5 feet to the point of beginning.
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
", :.3
EXHIBIT b
Jl` ^y
I
EXCEPTIONS
ORDER NUMBER: 00021332 -C2
1. The effect cf inclusions in an } general or specific water•
conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or
inclusion in any water service or street improvement area.
- Righ of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his
ore therefrom, should the same be found tc penetrate or intersect the
premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded
September 22, 1903 in Book 55 at Page 124 as Reception No. 68477.
�•
An undivided one -half interest cf all o_'_, gas and minerals upon, in
or under said '_ands with the richt to prospect for, and remove the
same as reserved in Deed recorded June 7, 1957 in Book 161 at Page
434 as Reception No. 105200.
4• An easement for continued use and maintenance of ditches and
pipelines crossing the subject property, as reserved in Deed recorded
June 19, 1959 in Book 186 at Pace 58 as Reception No. 168169.
5• This policy does not insure title to land comprisin
bottoms of rivers and is subject to any build up or loss
alonc Big Kline Creek, caused by the processes of
relictio:, or caused by man made chances in the flow of
the course cf the river ba-k cr river channel; also
free and unobstructed flow o`_ t water of said river.
g the shores or
of prcperty
accretion and
water or in
subject to the
�a
vwixiu ^rnixcs
T
C 7 1 /
ATTACHMENT B
General Location Map
A 33
`, �A. ''9n•,rtArt.tut�� w„I� xw.l...l I •�� � ', 0./ \�� � `� S
� I F �����..- � I 1' I `I• `\ ♦ +, xxhe L.
:k
S
•!'! - -iW' i i .r•f ��-- =JTIi- 1 '../; ��-.. `a a' ``�
\ • •`• �' �I • w t • �� / it II J� -.
J° WRRAO °M. q it
M ESA N \mRw • M� '✓ ;'' "• .r%f e I Y i N I d co `� \)� . 1 °/
_•✓ Ir ^< `f•.+Yr.. mm Pmux!ANDS :
Y ' } `�; ni • ' `,�� -� • • %�' �� •, w�..s n•n " r f i1 ;�� C I - " "_
RIVER t,'.r + ":• NATIONAL "' r j " FOREST n '
1 W )
We
J
r «. .
fin., ''YY , 1 I ij I , �; .•
l / >
1 C
Y .
1x•.11 �\ NATIOf`}�4L.
teee
t
IArr 1 ' �f/; , ' i L f /! 1 ' � '.... `� I 11 i, .., - �• -1 ' � •''
' ;`. \`V'•'� .., n 4 ; _ �" ,,f`_ -�^ - -1_, .'� -ii I \ •'.Y•.w 1, NMOON p�y� SIIONMAss QI•� OE,' S� ��,1
ice, /�. `• ia � ;1 T� 1 1 h` .'i:'•, / �1 f 1 `\ •• [, 1 'Y; l.�Ir.. �Of4�e� ,`.
• 1 � �— )) - y ( r ANILlAM75 l i { •
.III •'1 [Nw. j .�''• 1]] GIRMIIE� GO —._ _ .- \.-� :`- (:
1 � (rraR It,
FOREST
9 5
y' - - "\ 1 ` ♦ t'I RAGGE S
it
1 , 1 177 '!-
818 H RI r � l WILPERRESS
PITKIN COUNTY
PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: January 20, 1999
PROJECT: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
LOCATION: A 35 acres property on Bobcat Lane adjacent to the Redstone Ranch Acres Subdivision.
APPLICANT: Daniel M. Christmas PHONE: 518- 359 -9771
FAX: 518- 359 -7035
PLANNER: Tamara Pregl PHONE: 920 -5103
1. Type of Application: Extension of Vested Property Rights
2. Description of Project/Development: The Applicant is requesting approval for the reinstatement
of vested property rights, as the vested right is about to expire. The parcel was granted 1041 Hazard
Review approval by the Board of County Commissioners in January of 1996.
3. Areas in which the Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested:
Land Use Code Sections to be addressed in letter of request (application):
4 -140 Extension of Vested Property Rights
4 -50 Procedure
5 -50 Submission Contents
4. Staff will refer to the following agencies:
a. County Attorney
b. Zoning Office
c. Crystal River Caucus
d. Redstone Ranch Acres Homeowners Association
5. Review by: BOCC
6. Public Hearing? Yes, at BOCC. A public notice sign shall be posted on the property at least 15
days prior to the hearing pursuant to Section 4 -90 of the Land Use Code. Staff will mail notice to
adjacent property owners.
7. Adjacent Property Owners: The Applicant is required to submit a list of adjacent property
owners (one copy). Envelopes for each owner shall be addressed and stamped.
Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
January 20, 1999
Page 2
8. What fee was the applicant requested to submit:
Planning Office (deposit) $1,110 (additional hrs are billed at a rate of $185/hr)
Referral Fees required:
County Clerk $110
Total Deposit: $1,220
9. Application fee and the agreement to pay form (2 copies) shall be submitted with complete
application.
10. Number of copies of the application and maps to be submitted: 8
11. For a complete application, please include the following in each packet:
a) Summary letter explaining the request and addressing all Land Use Code standards listed above
(under #3).
b) Consent from owner(s) to process application and authorizing the representative (if applicable);
c) Proof of ownership (from a title company or attorney licensed in the State of Colorado);
d) Parcel description, including legal description and vicinity map;
e) One (1) 24" X 36" Site Plan attached with the `original' application and for the additional
applications, 11" X 17" Site Plans;
1) Copy of this pre -app form;
g) Copy of Resolution No. 96 -5.
NOTE: This pre- application conference summary is advisory in nature and not binding on the County. The
information provided in this summary is based on current zoning standards and staffs interpretations based
upon representations of the applicant. Additional information may be required upon complete review of the
application.
n - 7
UJ i
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920 -5090 FAX (970) 920 -5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: Attorney
Zoning
Redstone Ranch Acres HOA
Cryastal River Caucus
FROM: Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department
RE: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
Parcel# 2729 - 293 -00 -018
Case #P8 -99
DATE: February 12, 1999
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Daniel Christmas. The
Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners will review this application April 14, 1999
Please return your comments to me no later than March 15, 1999
Thank you.
ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920 -5090 FAX # (970) 920 -5439
February 12, 1999
Daniel Dattola,
Redstone Land Co.
Box 1019
Dolores, CO 81323
Re: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights.
Case #P8 -99
Dear Daniel,
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that
this application is complete. After a more detailed review of the submittal information, additional information
specific to the application may be requested in order to adequately review and process the application. The
planner in charge of the review will request the information from you directly.
We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, Plaza
One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen, on Wednesday, April 14, 1999 at a meeting to begin at 3:00 P.M.
Should this date be inconvenient for you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After
that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be
allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a
copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject property with a sign at least 15 days of the public
hearing and to remove it from the property within one week following the hearing.
Please submit the enclosed Affidavit of Notice by Posting as proof of compliance with the Code at the hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Tamara Pregl, the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5103.
�iticerely ��
Tenley Tay r
Administra e Assistant
iJUy''J
,0112211999 13:39 9708827758
01/221999 D3;11 519351U36
.r
REDSTONE LAND COMPAN PAGE 01
CNRIST'roY,S �, ��:�i: Fw�AE d2
A5PEN/Pr KIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PITKIN COUN'T'Y (bereinaft COUNTY) and )L 9 rt •_t
(hereinafter APPLICANT") AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted tc COUNTY an application for
1
J6 A
(hereinafter, 7M PROJECT").
3 APPLICANT understands and agrees flat Pitkin County Resolution
No. 9652 establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of
all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application'
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project. it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full
extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLTC kNT and
COUNTY flttirher agree that it is in the interest of the patties to all APPLICANT to
make paymer}t of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be
billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be
benefited by ,retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments
upon notiGcoon by the COUNTY when they are necessary at eoeta ate inassrred
COUNTY s it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its
full costs to Process APPLICANT's application.
4. BOUNTY and APPLICANT Avd)er agree that it is Impracticable for
COUNTY sofT to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
Planning Cominission and/or Board of County Commissioners to enable the
Planning Coirunission and/or Board of County Commissionssra to make legally
required fln*gs for project approval. cutlass current billings are paid in full pric
to decisiom
rti'd BVOA ,6LSetSt6
A&
O1 Ala WW NIN11d/N3dS!! WMf st•:sr 6661 -0d-wr
t .01/22;1993 13:39 9708827758
ill •'2'-' W;11 5185`�37C35
, W2 �Ci1L11
REDSTONE LAND COMPAN PAGE 92
✓-71P.i FTWi S A51 F47E Qi
S. Thmfbty, APPLICANT apes that it consideration of she
COUNTY's waiver of its right to collect fbil toes prior to a determination of
application cotnpietenew, APPLICANT shalt pay an initial deposit in the amount
of S I- �Q— w'hich is for - _._,_' hours of Planning staff time, and if actual
recorded costy excetetl the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional
mo lthiy billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the;
application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such poriodle
payments sham be ruade within 34 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further;
agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds fcr suspension of
processing.
PITKIN COMY APPLICANT
Cindy Roubets Prior Yame
Community 1)evetlopmeat Director
Signature AGENT FoR PANift,A1.CMPISTMAS
Data:-..1. {.
Maine; Address-
qA Wit _.._.
a:lw9pa+Ver+sAy►p�y da
Vitt"
pl I " +3C .,A'':.' NI'.dild'N3d5b lY.�tl: i ^:4i 22v,C..i�t_�bf
- A
01/22/1999 13:39 9708827758 REDSTONE LAND COMPAN PAGE 01 ^ .
01/22/1999 03:11 5193597035 CHRISTMAS 4 4SSW PAGE Gl t
Jawary A I9"
AspeWPiticin County Planning Department
130 South Ord4m Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Sir:
1, Jennifer L.B. Grisi, a Vice Presidmtt of Redstone Land Company and ownat of the
property or my Agew, Daniel W Dattola. give permission to process Application 4 -140
Extension of Vested Property Rights
L.0. Chid, Via president
ate Land Company
Daniel W. Dattola, Regional Manager
Redstone Land Company
January 22, 1999
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
F7101012 MI, 1111 i RIMS 1511.1. 1 1 161 , 10 1 1 11 =1
Dear Sir:
I, Jennifer L.B. Grisi, as Vice President of Redstone Land Company and owner of the
property or my Agent, Daniel W. Dattola, give permission to process Application 4 -140
Extension of Vested Property Rights.
�J
Je 'fer L.B. Grisi, Vice President
dstone Land Company
Daniel W. Dattola, Regional Manager
Redstone Land Company
3 Uj ".3
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: CHRISTMAS EXTENSION OF VESTED RIGHTS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on April 14, 1999 at a
regular meeting to begin at 3:00 PM before the Board of County Commissioners, Plaza
One Conference Room, 530 E. Main St., Aspen to consider an application submitted by
Daniel Christmas, requesting approval of reinstatement of vested property rights as vested
rights granted in January 1996 have expired. The property is located adjacent to Redstone
Ranch Acres Subdivision and is described as a parcel of land situated in the SW '/4 of
Section 29 and N'' /� of the NW '/4 of Section 32, Township 10 South, Range 88 West of
the 6` PM. The application/resolution are available for public inspection in the
Community Development Department, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 81611.
For further information, contact Tamara Pregl at (970) 920 -5103.
Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk
Board of County Commissioners
Published in the Aspen Times on March 13, 1999
Pitkin County Account 002.02
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
RE: CHRISTMAS EXTENSION OF VESTED RIGHTS
I hereby certify that on this 9th day of March, 1999, a true and correct copy of the attached
Notice of Public Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first -class postage prepaid, to
the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property owners which
was supplied to the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on
the Public Notice.
By
Tenley Taylor Adm . Assistant
U;' a r
— rJ
ATTACHMENT C — LIST OF ADJOINING r
LAND OWNERS p
STEWART TITLE
OF ASPEN, INC.
620 E. HOPK NS • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • (303) 925.1577 • FAX: (303) 9251384
January 13, 1995
Daniel Christmas
Christmas & Associates
49 Lake Street
Typper Lake, New York 12986
Re: Walter E. Beck and Sophie G. Beck
Property in Sections 29 and 32, Township 10 South, Range 88 West
Our Order No. 21521
Dear Mr. Christmas:
Listed below are names and addresses of all owners of real property
adjacent to the Beck property:
Dr. Edward James Bertagnolli
3081 Oak Street
Lakewood, Colorado 80215
James C. Gardner
316 4200 Drive
Crawford, Colorado 81415
Robert and Betsy Wedemeyer
0381 Bison Lane
Redstone, Colorado 81623
James W. and Joy F. Ziegler
725 Vine Street
Denver, Colorado 80209
Rande Boik
201 Raintree Trail
St. Augustine, Florida 32086
White River National Forest
P.O. Box 948
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Although we believe the facts stated are true, this Certificate is
not to be construed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion of title,
nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart
Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with any
financial obligation or liability whatever on any statement contained
herein.
Sincerely,
eter P. Delan
Y
Senior Vice Presi e t
x
9onm7E2wA pa d>OD�£rrc p3 n c ?�� ° `<mn ? n a iS
m sSn°a�3 = -O pf7 ?_ a c =: x ° - «3E > '< sgn2w 3°mm - mm °nc�•" ^S
o z L°_ ° c
ReR ,p_ O yaS�sme D 3_R_a��Q ° 3 . 3Qn sn"�o �_= v3 ° = °
2q �+�n QnG:<'
3S ^�c� °SSSS -Z -9 .fin° a a ie n�ncbO �. D o '
3 3 So
,am 3`�o E� CO `'3u va �a 3t. mia" m 'a °0��.5coim�G�xza °e �m3m9- o
_3 Gn-�O`
�v a 2 n ac m3 3w3 3 °-�' _m z 9 p S'
c'RpSmYSYy `^ ,Z y _�a OSy wN33F2 2caEnono a ao py.
>o ar _nQ m mc a =E:nPc 3' ng app n =ap
ma G ^R 3` _ o ma Two_ cQ
Ad'_v3,�o ° v ?�o� m3 a PanOm
m o?o' nRa <a.
g
.'nf�3R 2 - nQ :`aW nee 3 < ne O n a
1 a 7< D2
- IMP
ZI 5P >c nm
O �n
S ° as . - -`-`Q n
n o
^3��
3 °e
Fs
3 - a°'`7,Nm 9g
33 w' 9v = v
2 oe
p'�3aP D a3 o3
3 :3p? s s Nna
u 6enn W O wax.'
ynp==wSt
s
o n msoe
0
° �P 3 na
s - a; n 3 ,Nx
oo. - soe
u 3e < + ;ua
5 m<PS9
vm
eve
n
$'gin
P °
nn
�3
R
qnR
o-o-c
a
g o
,c
.�irv�;mr3� Ow N
w � m3 Z p e� £ mi � �
g 5r
$cn-F.nla -"z Q Him
z A3- < y nn
sAmn �i Pn ° H
aOzoi o n
A
r
v me �yA
A
pw 2 < C
>xy��p1nN _
exa91 mAn A ` 9y mnA D_JA
2QE co-4 ^3 <o,$�xp �+�mao.m� <tm'a
n3 �� - Oart y Z
q2aav a n ° m3 3 o oV;j s "a Zym
>xZ
tl e 'Z <'o
A
ea -, m,.C'n m mE L ^ 3 an, p
a Fam ^a3enn°3 c3C n = ' k.M
�o �° 3 r < >m>
- v + °' P - '1460 9CA
3•Q
E jbd y3=m nn - -J_ v w 6W A mJ9
o $ Sc
°3°°T 3 + o TC2£ e
1 S v ? O c3 a
e - 3 n_ 3 T n �- n2-c acP3a
°- `n D
$a. amnmE °o'o n
P v vn p`8mo-2 %?o-n�a -a
n �1 !`��, G un ' g 5 _ A 6Oi ` �n S p � n " w a -- pn a wp
8 A FPSTO ° 79a n n - 6� <n A 6 A J «n nP�SymQR9n
'aaS_ o ado m ; fin • y ^ x a= _m32`Rm as '`�'� m w °A = a n to A m T °N. °P -3 hr
n am "dpc > aa-
za�� 4 °u` -Q �_ = e
a Pn "rsd v: r n: mm� r ESQEnan2�' o n ' = �Oy 3 Q °a
_ PS RyR �$° 9m�o r�ynR R �$a m3T e� 3o- �n L,On «��aa'nO62
��nn ^ m3 °�D2 O y < nEnTC n'`.�nSS1AT3'- � `rR m�mZyZ y O 3S56�o- c
Fn3a �m « -mnnEa A9 - 12 2 p _S. m -m SC °m II = + SM1�m tnp 3 v a na 2�
Sc n Q`�3° r8 » +n e� Vin. W 00 0 v'y R m3 °3
;Q3$ -R a nm °awn ^mm < gg•' 3 °u ?m x a _� " , a on m e'< wzo v P 25 3£
n o 3 0 o3mS 1v 'R
r z' 'q'O a m m N 3Rg m m �c P
3 <_ my A �ao -Mm z �n a, m_ mn e3 ° n ° - °en - TF n n ol s naa 3
3 s 2n Om -Z n°-'p�..m c , -r - o-n`a ae'u- ^nn2_ --a
3 p 3n 'q S a3 °•a + Wg ,'^�3' `3om ° r
5A_ R9 3 amD v 5 ni ° fin' M4 3.. n O_
n vnl°in 33 ' n33;7n r m 3 AY � e° an. a a3o wnm3 3' � �mR °� nn1_ n
$S3 - �eo o�n�:�n' -WC � 1O'�+60 w� Ro � 973m =Q�n =a 6)�m ?. i�:�S 4��
a x i Oo o a z 3 =30noxvv��3WC
3 o�°,W m5 .m��"n ^ So T2nogo� < - x�e in^
�
m ay - yO - a an "p omnm C s« SB +�ajam3
--11Q <A •c �mo 2 9z_i o0 Z F: n g %o-a o"s=wn 8m , _nmc�m j�y1
t (( m ��A yp2 a� ate, o ID0 - X. �. G.va`wncEm3 ^c ^- 3P ?c`O'°�snRm��n
Aa P2- pn
ZZa�A Sic 3 :onn TzOyzm }° ^ -c3 a r.
O A�n2 D A
nv 2 yR p n'a ° ? n «p 1 ? A - vmz °-1 ° m Erp� �OSa�g °Oe _ = a�mu ^ 3 mma
n? n_ 20 v'" o_ aR.a3 3
az5> Owz' n P3.:Zc m &20mC �n 'p,D Na mypFOiAdn R--°e ?° e_rq_ e o a vn + `a R QS
-1«t] n`< e an? n'n °n 2 on ONO r mCme P
z0 !!qq ^ mon vN -_ ^ocp 8 0a
A y :° OiO�On 'Dq NNNDr2av c a 3
n Ompx m'V°an . .'o pY °c .. z ypDy ro ° +Qn 9
S ?n2 �i OF TDAmZ�n�2 a n R v[n ° � n
O n a pm Q 9 n� 6 C
p a_m mo 3i 3�n Aa�og -1 N_n a� oom"' NP° e_. P_cm•C`SP
An < 2� 3 o �� ]] aa p �- �- ? A A- !Q �' m LOU �e xp P_
�Oiem y O n `$On Q v`e 3. p Snm �� P <a P ' < - "- ° t 3 ^� n -oa ° :OCAS -m 6an�o 2 o-
A ao w" �-+ n- nm -i <= ^ m�g m2 - NS oanS =_n y
$�z sC0 Sm aZ pn $+ a d- o
O A�An S N OG � '.rzT O p a9�S��p u rvC(i 2 aSu °'�p'Sw+R9 Im°
2 mS O- _ a Pm Sn �. � «CA > r u _'O a It
Portac ° G - A3�-�O R
zF °Fnny _ 3p a°c+o-cSmo�p= °moy?` -"o f ='a B.SnA 3 �£ a�o:go
D m +� « a•n �+ m m - 20m�Z 4, Zan +�e
>m >0n
u v0 n< nDmr em 3sao uan _N Imm »=o "
m _O MOa - a m� A - Y
-3ao SY+ i00 <.Qn p' n_' naa +2n °io'- 'CSpza_ -a' .Q oym °'i? n x'
noc>•tl o Q3 n p n ?'y + m awnne on�g F 030r -a _ E a a «�_ m
�G. .. a c 33 2 a n'na 3nS�n u im ni °n�a�om -2 o (3 n�oc ' nm 5 nnc < m m z v at au0o
yna P3a�e+ qQu_ m^.v`J n be� nm 24 O^ Awm m N_T +e O .. O m 0
3 -
S�N9 on2�00 o1..0a0 ^3.1 p�^erE n < `° �n >_�'£oym0 _ a o
r, � +� - c 5 Pp3 ^a 3v �u C° °? _ ° `$e0y �n 92DZ C�3 -^ n =xC -n _A o <ma
p D . <. 2n3 -z1n n °6'S a °r "n9 « ^'a 3 o 3O C 8_ r �O Qnm n aa a - -
n oa ' > 3m3u - o 2 = - s KG o m ng3 Fa2a nn . a m Dy [n tttnnn a i' n'^C
D m ap _Im O 2 A 6nQ pa«Z
o�S n Via. m � 3 n A 3 3 o m c �og� A Oaf_ a
�c °O -5 w "oac - - O - �_OyyP�gF ^d2nnS Tnc po- r SO+i m n9 n a = �'° z
nap -° co-J � c x'm`3 S<mnm msF rcn o- o 3su-: °Dw -iym ^Rna an n -
a ?my - -_J ny OC Cm. ° O = nmmCwa S2a inC S < i m e °q A YAGZSD >- �'1^I'3 w . $ e?A 3 rvz
a p � m P 6 Cm� aWa D p�pa fX E C3 29 C: a m n =`F n � 2n° o_yp � nip
= Y n p =nn S< a` ^ 3 3 Q °.3< ? +o0 n S 3. m
-o3
mm :_tie °Ca "3 �g 2n zmEa 3 nma .^mDn 7�meS 3� �2n02n W,a-e 3c tee n e`o �s
°3 v e . ^`_ X Z_ 9w -n'n� 22ry >m� �D� 3PgQer> el 33em
' !a: R
v +v .. eErs =ono _z o> O n - o mw wv la^
zm2 n
m nnn a-m o BsSn u ors aa� °_ ° +" �aaz n :33:333o'a no. -" . =so
go m m nom nnT n m A p ` 53 o$° 33
�'�no@ -pp. �• ` e. R u4 o- ° $ + < ° F -O 4 n` a �wem zi $ ma�o2v
+ o a Pe o� -' ,- O- Cp o £ yen C
_'R a_a y RF q+
«FI + l2.w�n
C iD
Saturday Sunday, May 11, 1999. 771e Aspen Times 7-C
CiD
PUBLIC NOTICE
OF THE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED
QUESTIONS TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO. AT THE GENERAL
EJECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON
TUESDAY, MAY 4, 1999
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT at the
general election to be held In the City of Aspen
an Tuesday, May 4, 1999, between the hours of 7
a.m. and 7 p.m. there shall be submitted to the
qualified, registered electors of the City. of
Aspen the election of Mayor and two (2)
Comellmembers of the City of Aspen.
The following are the Candidates for the office
of Mayor (vote far one):
Rachel E Richards
Michael O'Sullivan
Helen Kalln Klandemd
Bill Stirling
The following are candidates (or City Council;
Two (2) seats are open (vole for two):
Roger Haneman
Tom McCabe
Tim Semrau
Bruce Meyer
Jake Vickery
Tmry Hershey
There will be submitted proposed questions to
the registered electors of the City of Aspen m
NO. 1 - RECREATION FACILITIES
OF ASPEN DEBT BE INCREASED
0, WITH A MAXIMUM REPAYMENT
�24.1000111.00. BUT WITO NO
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AND
LYING CERTAIN CITY RECREATIONAL AND
FACILITIES, INCLUDING. BUT NOT IJMIT-
OF A SWIMMING POOL AT
( CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW CLUBHOUSE,
PRO-SHOP, NORDIC CENTER, AND RESTAURANT
AT TIM CITY'S MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE;
( RENOVATION OF THE CITY'S EXISTING ICE
RINK AT THE ICE GARDEN; AND
(CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION OF BASF,
BALL/SOFTBALL FIELDS, TENNIS COURTS. BAS.
KETBALL COURTS, TRAITS AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS, ANCILLARY PARKING FACIIJTIIES,
LANDSCAPING, AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY PARK SYSTEM
INCLUDING:
( ISELIN PARK;
( MOORE PLAYING FIELDS;
( THE ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT CAMPUS;
( PLUM TREE PARK;
( WAGNER PARK;
( YELLOW BRICK SCHOOL PARK:
( RIO GRANDE TRAIL:
( CEMETERY LANE;
SUCH DEBT TO CONSIST OF THE ISSUANCE
AND PAYMENT OF SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS,
PAYABLE FROM THE EXISTING ONE PERCENT
SALES TAX OF THE CITY DEPOSITED TO THE
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUND OF THE CITY;
WHICH BONDS SHALL BEAR INTEREST AND
MATURE, BE SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION, WITH
OR WITHOUT A PREMIUM, AND BE ISSUED,
DATED AND SOLD AT SUCH TIME OR TIMES, AT
SUCH PRICES (AT, ABOVE OR BELOW PAR) AND
IN SUCH MANNER AND CONTAINING SUCH
TERMS. NOT INCONSISTENT HEREWITH, AS
QUESTION NO. 2 -
EXTEND THE EXISTIN
SHALL THE CITY OF ASPEN AS% SALES TAX
AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE No. 81, SERIES OF
1989, EARMARKED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AND DAY CARE BE EXTENDED BEYOND ITS
CURRENT EXPIRATION DATE OF JUNE 30, 2000,
TO JUNE 30, 2010. (THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT TO
BE COLLECTED IN 2000 FROM THE EXTENSION
OF THE .45% SALES TAX, AS CALCULATED, IS
$2.200,000.00)7
QUESTION NO. 3 - EXPANSION OF TRUSCOTT
PLACE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT:
Shall the City of Aspen be authorized to sell or
enter Into a long term lease with the
Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for up
to 3 acres of the dirt storage area Immediately
adjacent to the Truscott Place Affordable
Housing site for the expansion of the current
Truscott Place Affordable Housing?
POLING PLACES
Precincts I - Pitkin County Library, 120 N. MITI
Precinct 2 & 4. Aspen Youth Center, 455 Rio
Grande Place
Pmcmos 5, 6, 7, 9 - Christ Episcopal Church,
536 North Street
An eledor Is qualified If he or she Is eighteen
(I8) years of age, a citizen of the United Slates,
and he or she hen resided In lice state of
Colorado and City of Aspen, thirty (30) days
Immediately preceding this election. and has
registered to vote.
Those electors who are otherwise lolly quali-
fied to vote on said questions at such election,
but who are or will be unable to appear at the
polling place an the date of the election may
apply In writing or In person at the office of the
City Clerk, at the Aspen City Hall, 130 South
Galena, on or before April 30, 1999.
The votes Cast shag be recorded on voting
machine and mid election shall be held, con-
ducted and the returns thereof shall be
returned, Canvassed and declared, as nearly as
may he In the manner prescribed by law for the
general election of municipal officers.
IN WITNM WHEREOF the City Council has
caused this notice to be given as of this 20th
April 1999.
Kathryn S. Koeh,
City Clerk
Published In The Aspen Times April 24 and May
1, 1999. (Saw
PUBLIC NOTICE
PROPOSED ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY
HOUSING OFFICE 1999 GUIDELINES
CITY OF ASPEN/PTIRIN COUNTY, COLORADO
The AspeNPltkln County 1999 Affordable
Housing Guidelines an ready for adoption and
final approval. The schedule for the hearings are
W follows:
Organization Dal 2ndRdg. &
TIme&Plaee Beading Pg0
Housing Authority 4/7/99 5/5199
Plaza 1 Mtg. Room
Sill E Main, Aspen
$:00 P.M.
BOCC 5/12/99 5/26/99
Plena I Mtg. Room
530 E Main, Aspen
City Council 5/10/99 6114/99
130 S. Galena Aspen
5:00 p.m.
A copy of the proposed Guldellnes has been
filed at the Housing Olflce at .5,10 East Males.
Lower Level. Aspen, Colorado, and Is open for
public Inspection. Citizens are Invited to make
written or oral comments with regard to the Tom-
posed Guidelines at the public hearings.
ASPENBITKIN COUNTY HOUSING OFFICE OF
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By Frank Peters,
Chairlmraon
Published In The Aspen Times April 24, May 1.
1999.(3R97g)
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE 488 CASTLE. CREEK ROAD REZONING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing
will be held an Tuesday, May 18, 1999 at a meet-
ing to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Room. City 11.11, Aspen, to consider an applica-
tion submitted by ['aid Anderson. 309 M AABC,
Aspen, CO 81611, requestingg rezoning of the
property from R45A PUD to R -ISA. The proper
ty Is legally described m a tract of land located
In Sections 12 and 13. IS 105, R85W of the 6th
PM. For further hdormul... Contact Chris
Bendon at the Aspen /Pitkin Community
Development Department, 130 S. Galena St..
Aspen, CO. (970) 920-5072,
chrisb®cLaapen.co.m.
a/Bob Blalch,
Chair, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
The annual his return of the Aspen Airport
Business Center Foundation Is available at the
address noted below, for Inspection during nor -
mai business hours by arty citizen who requests
It within Igo days alter publication of this notice
of Its availability. The Aspen Airport Business
Center Foundation, 303E. AABC, Aspen, CO
81611, The President Is John P. MCBrlde.
Telephone (970) 9252102.
Published In The Aspen Times May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
/ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the Boats of County
Commissloners of Pltkln County, Colorado, at Its
regular meeting on April 14, 1999, and after a
duly- noticed public hearing, adopted the (ollow-
Ing Ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMM4SSIONF.RS OF PITKIN COUNTY.
CULORADD, GRAETONG APPROVAL
ORDINANCE. OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 340.110, RS-20/PUD AND 8530 /PUD
ZONE DISTRICTS. TO ALLOW "ARTS AND
CRAFTS STUDIOS' AS A SPECIAL REVIEW USE
ORDINANCE a96
Notice of Public Hearing published in The Aspen
Times on the 27th day of March, 1999.
Copies of the full le# of the Ordinance are avel-
able for public Inspection during regular once
hours in the once of the Clerk and Recorder, 530
E Main St.. Aspen, Colorado 81611. Phone: (970)
9205180.
Jeanette Jones.
Deputy County Clerk
Published In Th e As T im es an May L 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
YNOTICF. IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE GENERAL
PUBLIC:
On March 24.1999 the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado.
adopted Resolution 9960 granting approval for
the Alderman 1041 hazard review and general
submission. The subject property is located
across Highway 133 from the Crystal River
Country Estates being part of Section 16,
Township 9 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian. This approval of a site spe-
cllle development plan hududos a vested pr.p-
edy right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68. CRS.
Jeanette Jones,
Deputy County Clerk
The" Published In The Aspen on on May 1, 1999.
y PUBLIC NOTICE
' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE GENERAL
PUBLIC:
On April 14.1999 the Board of County
Conanholonem of Pitkin County, Colorado,
adopted Remlu loo 99-71 granting approval for
the relnstatement .f vested real property rights
to likerel Christman The subject property is
located adjacent to Redstone Ranch Acres
Subdivision more specifically described m a
parcel of land situated In the SWI /4 of Section
29, sod the NI /2 01 the NYA14 of Section 32,
Township 10 South, Range 811 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian. This approval of a site spe-
cific develop rou plan Includes a vested prop-
erty right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, CBS.
Jeanette Jones,
Deputy County Clerk
Pu in The Aspen Tones on May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public
that an April 20, 1999 the Hearing Officer of
Pltkln County granted approval for the 1041
Hazard Review and Scenic Overlay application
for the 408 West Reds Road, LLC property
referred to as 408 West Reds Road, and
described as Lots 4 & 5, Block 1. Red Mountain
Subdivision and Parcel R, a tract of land In the
HE 114SE '14.1 Section I, Township 10 South,
Range 8 5 West of the 6 6th PM. In addition the
applicant was granted a minor plat amendment
to remove the lot line between Lots 4 & 5 which
the proposed residence would straddle. This
site slecine development plan grants a voted
property right pursuant to 'nlle 24, Article 68,
Colorado Revised Statutes.
S/Lance Clarke
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Pitkin County, Colorado
Published In The Aspen Imes on May 1, 19%.
on
ar the
In the
to
Pitkin County, Colorado
Published In The Aspen Times May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
X NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general Public
that an April 20.1999 the Hearing Officer of
Pitkin County granted approval for the Scenic
Overlay and Ridgellne Review application for
the Shapiro property referred to as 24' 2438
Juniper HIII Road, and Is descried as Lot 9,
Block 7, Brush Creek Village Subdivision. This
site specific development plan grants a vested
property right pursusnl to TIlle 24, Adlcle 68,
Colorado Revised Statutes.
S/Lance Clarke
Pitkin County Hearing Officer
Pitkin County, Colorado
Published In The A Times o May 1, 1999.
y PUBLIC NOTICE
P NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the general public
that on April 20, 1999, the Hearing Officer of
Pitkin County granted Scenic Overlay approval
for the Whipple & Brewster Corp. property
referred to as Parcel 5, Pioneer Springs Ranch
and is described as a tract of land situated In
Section 28 and 29. Township 9 South, Range 85
West of the 6th PM. This site specific develop-
ment plan grants a vested property right pur-
suant to Title 24, Article 68. Colorado Revised
Statutes.
S/Lance Clarke
Pltkln County Hearing Officer
Pltkln County, 1. C01
Pub li s hed In The Aspen Times on May 1. 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
From the Office of the Tom Isaac
Pitkin County Assessor
Colorado law requires the county assessor to
hear challenges to personal property valuation
beginning no later than June 15, 1999. The amen
sor will be available at the Pitkin County
Courthouse during business hours (8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m.) to hear objections and protests to val-
uathres Ior the 1999 ses".reenl of personal
property. Current valuations will become final
unless protests are [lied with the assessor by
the end of business July 5.
Objections to taxable valuations for 1999 must
be postmarked Out later than June 30, 1999.
Objections presented In person will be accepted
through July S.
Information for requesting a review of valua-
tions and [or filing objections Is available at the
assessors office.
Note: Colorado law (395109, C.R.S.) requires
all persons owning personal properly on
January 1, 1999 with a value greater than $2,500,
to mpon the same to the comfy prior to April
a5, 1999.
Tom lame,
County Assessor
Published I The Aspen Times May 1. 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE :: CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE TEXT
AMENDMENTS: LODGE PRESERVATION PRO-
GRAM.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing
will be held on Tuesday, May 18. 1999, at a meet -
Ing to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen
Planning sod Zoning Commisslon, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 So. Cudena St.,
Aspen, to consider an application submitted by
the City of Aspen Community Development
Department requesting ad.,tion of a revised
Lodge Preservation Program for properUn des-
Ignated with a Lodge Preservation (LP) Zoning
Overlay.
The proposed code amendments would affect
the following Sections of the Municipal Code:
26.04, 100- DeMltlons:
26.28.320 - Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP)
Zone District:
26.32- OlfSlrcet Parking; and,
26. 100 - Growth Management Quota System.
These Sections relate to Sections 26.104,
26.710.320, 26.515, end 26.470, rezpe Uwly, of
the reorganized land use code cureently under
formal review. The proposed code amendments
would create a growth management exemption
process for lodges In this zone district to
expand or redevelop, allow all dimensional
requirements of the property, including parking,
to be established pursuant the Planned Unit
Development (PUID) process, and redefine the
`lodge` definition to occupancy periods of one
month or less. For further Information, contact
Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,
Aspen, CO (970) 9205072,
chrlsbilcLaspen.co.m.
B m
Blalch, Chair
Axpcn As p and m Z oning . Comission
P ublished in the a Aspen en Times on May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: CRY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT: MINUR PLANNED UNIT DEVEL-
OPMENT (PUD) REVIEW.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing
will be held on Tuesday, May 18, 1999, at a meet-
Ing to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hail, 130 So. Galena St.,
Aspen, to consider an application suhmlUed by
the City of Aspen Community Development
Department requesting adoption of a Minor
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Review
process. The proposed code amendment would
affect Section 26.84 -Planned Unit Development
UUD) - of the Municipal Code, which relates to
Section 26.445 01 the re- organized land use code
currently under formal review. The proposed
code amendment would allow for a simpler and
shorter land use review for properties In the
Lodge Preservation Program, designated with a
Lodge Preservation (LP) Zoning Overlay. For fur-
ther In. .... - on, contact Chris Bend.. at the
Aspen /Pilkln Community Development
Department, 130 S, Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970)
920-5072, christift.aspen.m.us.
sBob Blalch, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commimlon
Published In The A spen Tones on May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE TO CREDITORS
ESTATE OF DINE N. MAROLT
Probate No. 98 PR 40, Division 3
All persons having claims against the above
named estate are required to present them to
OLIVE N. MAROLT or to the District Court of
Pitkin County, Colorado, on or before August 23,
1999, or said claims may be forever barred.
Maxwell S. Marolt
c/o OATES, KNEZEVICH &GARDENSWARTZ, P. C.
Attention: Richard A. Knezevich, Esq.
Attorneys [or Personal Representative
533 East Hopkins Avenue, 3rd Floor
Aspen, Colorado 81611
April 24, May 1, 8.
Notice Is hereby given that the Board of County
Commissioners of Pltkln County, Colorado ,
hereinafter the "Board: shall make final settle
ment for the work contracted In be done on the
project known as the Health and Human
Services I4VAC and the Airport HVAC Projects
hemlmftm the "Proje L" to Marla Custom Sheet
Metal, Inc, hereinafter the "Contractor," on May
10, 1999.
Any person. copartnershlp, association of per.
sons, company or corporation that has fur-
nished labor, materials, team hire, sustenance,
provisions, provender, or other supplies used or
consumed by the Contractor or his subcontrac-
tors In or about the performance of the work
contracted to be done or that suppiles rental
machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent
used In the prosecution of the work, whose
claim lherelor has not been paid by the
Contractor or his subcontractors shall [lie with
the Board written verified notice of such claims
at any time up to and Including the time of final
settlement first stated shove or [.,ever walve
any and all claims, without limitation, pursuant
to 1973 CRS 3628107, as amended, against the
Board of County Commissioers. Pitkin County,
Colorado end the Project.
All claims must be addressed m follows:
Board of County Commissioners
c/o Temple Glamler, Project Manager
76 Service Center Road
Aspen CO 81611
Published in The Aspen Times April 17, 24, May
1,1999. (385m)
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALE
Public Trustee No. 99-8
To Whom It may Concern: This Notice Is given
with regard to the following described Deed of
Trust:
Grantor (Borrower): Harry Michael Fox
Original Benencdaryr First Western Mortgage
Corporation of Texas
Current Owner of the Evkkmcc of Debt: The
Troy HIII Federal Savings & Loan Association
Date of Deed of Trust: July 3. 1979
Recording Date of Deed of Trust: July S. 1979
Original Principal Amount of Evidence of Debt:
$127,700.00
Outstanding Principal Amount of Evidence of
Debt as of the dale hereof: $97,186.97
County of Recording: Pitkin
Book and Page No. or Reception No. of Recorded
Deed of Trust: In Book 372 at Page 66 and nur-
mant to Modification of Note and Deed of Tout
dated July 3, 1979 and recorded July 5, 1979 In
Book 372 at Page 70
Legal Description of Real Property
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEIIEIN BY REFERENCE
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HFAWN IS ALL
OF THE PROPERTY ENCUMBERED BY THE
LIEN OF THE DEED OF TRM.
THE IJEN FORECLOSED MAY NOT
RE A FIRST LIEN
The Troy HIII Federal Savings & Loan
Amoclatlon, the Owner of the Evidence of Debt
secured by the Deed of Trost described herein,
has filed written election and demand for sale as
provided by law and In said Deed of Trust.
THEREFORE, Notice Is Hereby Given that 1 will,
at IA00 o'clock In the forenoon of Wednesday,
May 26, 1999, at the South front door, Pllkdn
County Courthouse, 506 East Mein, Aspen,
Colorado, sell at public auction to the highest
and best bidder for cash, the said real property
and all Interest of the said Grantor(,).
Grantor(s)' heirs and assigns therein. for the
purpose of paying the Indebtedness provided In
said Evidence of Debt secured by the Deed of
Trust, plus allorzeys' lees, the expenses of sale
and other Items allowed by law, and will deliver
to the purchaser a Certificate of Pu¢hme all m
provided by law.
THE LAW FIRM OF CASTLE BARREIT DAFFIN
& ERAPPIFA LLC IS ACTING AS A DEBT COL
LECTOR AND IS ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A
DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL
BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE
Dated: April 6, 1999
Thomas Carl Oken,
Public Trustee in and for the County of Pitkin,
Colorado.
By Carol L Foote
First Publication: APdI 17, 1999
[eat Publication May 15, 1999
Name of publication: The Aspen Times
Attorney. Castle, Barrett, Dalfin & Frapplea LLC
Caren Jacobs Castle
1099 fifth - Suite 2300
Dmvea Colorado 80202
(303) 2985251
EXHIBIT A
A parcel land, as shown an Tract B m the
Exemption Plat thereof recorded In Book 7 at
page 19, located In Section 2, Towtumpli
South, Range 85 West 01 the 6th Principal
Meridian and being part M H.E.S. No. 112. Said
Parcel Is fully described as follows:
Beglnning a Point whence Comer No. 1 .f H.E.S.
112 bears N. 21'24' E. 919.50 leer; thence N.
71'Sr W. 31.41 feel: thence N. 29'47' W. 60.56
feet; thence N. 9'34' W159.44 lest; thence N.
7 °38' E 88.831eet; thence N.11'29' W.118.91 (eery
thence S. 71'57' E 223.00 leer; thence S. 21'06'
W. 85.00 feet; thence S. 7'3T W176.00 leel;
thence S. 0'14' E. 85.00 feel: thence S. 75'12'W.
62.72 feet to the point of beginning.
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
Published In The Aspen Times April 17, 24, May
1, 8, 15, 2 2 1 (38579)
PUBLIC NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO. 15
Series of 1999
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN
INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KANSAS STATE BANK OF
MANHATTAN AND THE CITY OF ASPEN.
WHEREAS. the City Council hereby finds and
determines that the exm.tlon and delivery Clio)
Installment purchase agreement dated as of
March 31, 1999, between Kansas State Bank of
Manhattan and the City of Aspen Is appropriate
and necessary to the function and operations of
the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the obligation of the City of Aspen
to make payments under the Installment pur-
chase agreement shall be from year to year only;
shall constitute currently budgeted expendl-
form of the City of Aspen; shall not constitute a
mandatory charge or requirement In any eruu.
Ing budget year; and shall not constitute a gen.
eral obligation or a multiple fiscal year or Indl-
met debt or other finandal obligation whatmev.
er of the City of Aspen within the meaning of any
constitutional Or statutory limitation or requlrc
ment concerning the creation N Indebtedness,
nor a mandatory payment obligation of the City
of Aspen In any ensuing fiscal year beyond any
fiscal year during which the I ptm-
Chose agreement shall be In e@ecb and
WHEREAS, the Installment pumhme agreement
shall not directly or Indirectly obligate the City
al Aspen to make my payments beyond those
appropriated for an fiscal year during which
the Installment purchase agreement shall be In
effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE R ORDAINED BY THE
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, C04
ORADO:
Section 1.
That the City Council has determined that a true
and very real need exists for the construction of
Improvements described In Exhibit A of the
Installment Purchase Agreement dated m of
March 31, 1999, between the City of Aspen and
Kaneaa Stale Bank of Manhattan.
Section 2
That the City Council has determined that the
Agreement, substantially In the form presented
to this meeting, Is In the beat interests of the
City of Aspen for the acquisition of such
Improvements, and the City Council hereby
approves the entering Into of the Installment
Purchase Agreement by the City of Aspen and
hereby designates and authorizes the City
Manager or Mayor to execute and deliver the
Agreement on the City of Aspens behalf with
such - changes thereto as the Mayor or City
Manager deem approprlam, and any related
documents, Including any Payment Request
Form rnpimung funds from the Vendor Payable
Account, necessary to the consummation of the
transaction contemplated by the Agreement.
Section 3.
This ordinance shall not have any effect an
existing litigation and shall not operate as an
abatement of any action or prOceeding now
pending under or by virtue of the ordinances
amended as herein provided, and the same shall
be construed and concluded order such prior
ordinances.
Section 4.
It any section. subsection, sentence, clause.
phrase or portion of this ordinance Is for any
reason held Invalid or unconstitutional In a
court of competent Jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and Inde-
pendent provision sold shall not affect the valid-
fly of the remaining portions hereof.
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held
on the fifth day of May 1999, In the City Council
Chambers, Aspen City Hail, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
m provided by law by the City Council of the
City of Aspen on the 26th day of April 1999.
John S Benrv'Nsi
M
ATTEST:
Kathryn S. Koch, Clerk
Asp
Published In The Aspen Times May 1, 1999.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN
AND DESIGNATED AS THE'BURLINGAME
RANCH" ANNEXATION.
WHEREAS, on January 20, 1999. the City
Manager of the City of Aspen did me, on behalf
of the City of Aspen, with the City Clerk of the
City of Aspen a Petition for Annexation of tern -
lory to the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the petition. Including accompany -
Ing copies of an annexation map, has been
reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and the
City Engineer and found by them to contain the
Information prescribed and set forth In §31 -12-
107, C.R.S.; and
WHEREAS, the owners of one hundred percent
(100 %) of the area proposed to be annexed,
exclusive of streets and alleys. have consentz�
In writing to the annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by rmolullr
(Number 6. Series of 1999) at Its regular meeting
on January 21, 1999, did find and determine said
Petition for Annexation to be In substantial com-
pliance with the provisions of §31. 12.107, C.R.S.;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by resolution
(Number 19. Series of 1999) at Its regular meet -
Ing on March 8, 1999, Old find and determine, fo-
lowing a public hearing, said Petition for
Annexation to be In substantial compliance with
§§ 31 -12 -104 and 31 -12 -105, C.R.S.: and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find
and determine that approval of the annexation
of said territory to be In the City's beat Interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CRY COUNCIL OF THE COY OF ASPEN, COL
ORADO
Section 1. That the tract of land described In
the Petition for Annexation, commonly referred
to as the "Burlingame Ranch', and as shown on
the annexation map. Is hereby annesed to the
City of Aspen, Colorado.
Section 2. The City Clerk of the City of Aspen
Is hereby directed as follows.
(a) To file one copy of the annexation map with
the original of this annexation ordinance In the �.:.
office of the City Clerk of the City of Aspen.
(b) To certify and file two copies of this annex-
ation ordinance and of the annexation map with
the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pltkln,
State of Colorado.
(c) To request the Clerk and Recorder of PlUm,
County to life one certified copy of this annexa-
Don ordinance and of the annexation map with
the Division of Local Government of the
Department of fecal Affaln, Slate of Colorado.
Section 3. The City Engineer of the City of
Aspen to hereby directed to amend the Official
Map of the City of Aspen to reflect the br undary
changes adopted pursuant to this annexation
ordinance.
Secd 4
on . That If any section, subsection, sen-
tence, clause, phrase or ponlnn of this Ordi-
nance Is for any reason held Invalid or unconstl-
tutlanal In a court of competent jurisdiction,
such portion shall be deemed a separate, dls-
find and Independent provision and shall not
affect the validity of the rem ming punlom
thereof.
Smdon 5. That this ordinance shall net have
any effect on misting litigation and shall not
operate as an abatement of any action or pro-
ceeding now pending under or by virtue of the
ordinances amended as herein provided, and
the same shall be construed and concluded
under such prior ordinances.
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held
on the IOIh day of May 1999, In the City Council
Chambers. Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUB-
USHED as provided by law by the City Council ° ,
the City of Aspen on the 26th day of April 19'.
John S. Bennet ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn S. Koch. City Clerk
Published In The Aspen T ones May 1, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
ORDINANCE 09
Series of 1999
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING
THE NOLAN LOT SPLIT, L017S K,I,M. & N.
BLOCK 56, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,
Prnm COUNTY, COLORADO
Copies of this ordinance are available In the
office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 130 South
Galena, Mpen, during normal bualness hours.
FINALLY adopted, posed and approved this
261h day of April 1999.
John S. Bennett,
Mayor
ATTEST;
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Published in The Aspen Times May 1, 1999,
111111101i1sL1140
TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, COMMONLY KNOWN
AS THE'MOORE FAMILY PUD"; FINDING
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 31-
12- 107(1), C.R.S; ESTABLISHING A DATE, TIME,
AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 31-
12-104 AND 31 -12 -105, C.P.S.; AUTHORIZING
PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SAID HEARING;
AND AUTHORIZING THE INSTITUTION OF
ZONING PROCEDURES FOR LAND IN THE AREA
PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED.
WHEREAS, on March 29, the City Manager of
the City of Aspen on behalf of the City of Aspen,
the James E. Moore Family Partnership, LLLP.
Mark B. Whitson, the Aslrl Corporation, Thomas
H. Bailey, Robert M. and Nancy L Beevers, the
Zoom Flume, TLC., Kevin L. Patrick, and Patricia
D. Better, constituting am hundred percent of
the owners of the property proposed to be
annexed, did file with the City Clerk of the City
of Aspen a Petition for Annexation of territory to
the City of Aspen, whereby real property
ASPEN/PITION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920 -5090 FAX (970) 920 -5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: Attorney
Zoning
Redstone Ranch Acres HOA
Cryastal River Caucus
FROM: Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department
RE: Christmas Extension of Vested Rights
Parcel # 2729 - 293 -00 -018
Case #P8 -99
DATE: February 12, 1999
Attached for your review and comments is an applicatioi
Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners will F
Please return your comments to me no later than
Thank you.
tted by Daniel Christmas. The
application April 14,1999
Ncvse a� CeCUV-j to-/V"
-,.. -1-
•101310[1] 741 tal"T
TO: Tamara Pregl
Planner
FROM: Daniel W. Dattola
Redstone Land Company, Regional Manager
DATE: January 22, 1999
Enclosed please find check #2191 in the amount of $1,220, and our application along with
copies requested.
Please call me at the Redstone Land Company office at 970 - 882 -7707 if you have any
question or need additional information. ✓1 r ✓ r j j , i
Thank you.
UJU'E'3j
2614
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920 -5090
Pitkin County
ADDRESS /PROJECT
CASE /PE IT#. r' LM 'I"I NOFCOPIES: tJ
DATE: ( INITIAL: Ile
i °'
5
Land Use:
172
Board of Adjustment
159
County Land Use Code
/0't?
173
Deposit
174
Flat Fee
162
Zoning and Sign
169
Public Notice
Referral Fees:
RBI 15
Access Permit
179
County Clerk
�f
193
County Engineer
194
Environmental Health
198
Housing
190
Land Management
196
Wildlife Officer
Building Fees:
170
Board of Appeals
135
Building Code Sales
105
Building Permit
100
Contractor License
120
Electrical Permit
195
Energy Code Review
115
Mechanical Permit
150
Plan Check
110
Plumbing Permit
130
Reinspection
151
Aspen Sanitation
152
AVFD Fire Marshal
Other Fees:
155
Use Tax
165
Copy
Performance Deposit
185
Park Dedication
186
Parking Cash in Lieu
166
GIS Maps
RBI 16
Road Impact Fees
TOTAL
ADDRESS /PROJECT
CASE /PE IT#. r' LM 'I"I NOFCOPIES: tJ
DATE: ( INITIAL: Ile
i °'
5
G.7
L
Cn
n�
k./ I" V ( I v ' I
6'
A
m
trt 1�
-J S
6
i;wi s
t,
\
y bon -- _ � ♦ ^.. — __ �
n
_ M
01
��Z e
1 D
� �r�"'z �S'C� wyt.� E� M`v� z_� �� i �,• o �. Z� 6 8
zZ .-, Z fn 4 SivAd�R��� °rkA
l.r.
�� rn
Td
W
BY
tz
.np c' C4Y" TA[ CAI
y� a
rr0(G��I W " _ : I ` - ",�_/ •`~\.,,4}�C4r, i ?Nr�.�c
R V m
Ar, °li �m �s
NLWT 4 19 . ^ .. •. � 3 r
' ' '?•�� out
F
U
"
Z p '
I
T _ kJUTH I
o.
fir
qh