HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264316200014, 264316200021DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P &Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (IIXIT)
DATE
CASE NAME:IBosely Minor 1041 Hazard Review
PROJ ADDR:I0179 Liberty Ln S -T -R 16 -9 -85 0301 Liberty Ln Woody Crk
OWN /APP: Fosely , Mary Ann ADRF C /S /Z:F PHN:
REP: I ADR:F— CI52:F PHN
Email Addr: I ALLOCATED HOUF
FEES DUE: F— FEES RCVD:F— %OVER:
REFERRALS
REF: BY[ DUE:
MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION:
No
F F— No
F No
REMARKS no vesting
CLOSED: BY
CASE TYP: Minor 1041 Hazard Review
CASE TYP5:
CASE TYP2: I
CASE TYP6:
CASE TYP3:
CASE TYP7: F—
CASE TYP4: I
Date Scanned: 1/27r
BOCC Reso: F—
BOCC Ord:
PZ:
HRG OFF:
HO INDEX:
ADMIN:
PLAT RECORDED 5/3111990 PLAT (BK,PG): 624 P25 #323109 ADMIN INDEX:
VR APPROVAL DATE: F— VR EXPIRES:
�dw
Ile Location: IFF Box #212
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
Pitkin County
DATE RECEIVED: 4/16/90 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 2643- 162 -00 -014 & 021 P46 -90
STAFF ME14BER: � S
PROJECT NAME: Bosely Minor 1041 Hazard Review
Project Address:
APPLICANT: Mary Anne Bosely
Applicant Address: P O Box 26 Woody Creek CO 81656
REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Davis Davis Horn. Inc.
Representative Address /Phone: 300 East Hyman Suite B
Aspen CO 81611 5 -6587
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $113. NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 3
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
P &Z Meeting Date
BOCC Meeting Date
1 STEP:
2 STEP:
PUBLIC
HEARING:
YES
NO
VESTED
RIGHTS:
YES
NO
PUBLIC
HEARING:
YES
NO
VESTED
RIGHTS:
YES
NO
Staff Level: 1041 Minor Hazard Review: Date of Approval
REFERRALS:
4 V�Attorney
Aspen Consol S.D.
— School District
ngineer
Mtn. Bell
Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing
Holy Cross
State Hwy Dept
Aspen Water
—
_ Fire Marshall
(Glwd) (GrJtn)
nvir. Hlth.
Snow Vill
_ Zoning
_�
Manager
FAA
_ CO Geo. Survey
Div. Wildlife
Div. Water Res.
_ USFS (Aspen)
Caucus
_ USFS (Carbondale)
Other:
Q 4
INITIALS: EL
DATE REFERRED:
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: 't I INITIAL
County Attorney _ County Engineer Zoning
Housing _ Envir. Health
_
other:
r i
�UCU01
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bosely File
FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planning Office
RE: Bosely Minor 1041 /Category 2 Exemption
DATE: May 4, 1990
LOCATION: Lots 9 and 12 of Section 16, Township 9 South, Range
85 West; accessed off of Liberty Lane, off of Woody Creek Road,
north and west of Little Texas Subdivision.
ZONING: AF -2
REQUEST: Mary Anne Bosely is requesting approval of a minor 1041
Environmental Hazard Review /Category 2 Exemption. She is
proposing a building envelope for construction of a single family
home on a lot which is 2.5 acres in size. The site is
characterized by two distinct potential building envelopes. The
first building envelope is located on a dry bench between Liberty
Lane and a slope which drops off to a heavily wooded area
adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. The second potential
building envelope, (preferred by the applicant), is located
between the slope and the Roaring Fork River floodplain. An
existing driveway links the two potential building envelopes. The
lot is currently vacant. The second envelope described is the
subject of this review.
1041 REVIEW
The site is impacted by slopes in excess of 30% and floodplain
hazards. In addition, it is located within mapped deer winter
range. Finally, while the site does not contain mapped wildfire
hazard, the applicant has been asked to address wildfire hazard,
due to the existing density of the vegetation within and adjacent
to the proposed building area.
Vegetation on the site consists primarily of willows, evergreen
trees and aspen trees. There is some juniper and scrub oak
located on the slope and some sage on the upper bench. The
applicant agrees to minimize the amount of vegetation removed
from the site. However, all of the vegetation within the
building footprint and some of the underbrush and trees
obstructing views of the river from the building footprint will
be removed. The applicant indicates that riparian vegetation
will not be disturbed. Staff notes that the applicant will be
required to establish a 20 foot stream setback, which is to be
maintained in it's natural state. The setback is to be measured
horizontally from the mean identifiable high water mark of the
River. The setback will be noted on the site plan.
M
While wildfire is not mapped as a hazard, the applicant intends
to mitigate possible wildfire hazard by adhering to the following
wildfire safety guidelines:
The applicant agrees to:
1. Maintain a minimum 10 foot fire break between combustible
structures and vegetation; and
2. Bury power and telephone lines.
Though the site is mapped as deer winter range, Randy Cote has
indicated that mapping for the Woody Creek quadrant is
inaccurate. New mapping, which has yet to be adopted by the
County, was recently submitted by the Division of Wildlife to the
Planning Office. The updated map has deleted lands located
between the Roaring Fork River and Upper River Road from wildlife
habitat areas. Based upon discussions with Mr. Cote and new
mapping, it is concluded that wildlife is not a concern on this
site.
The proposed building envelope is located outside of the mapped
slope and floodplain hazard areas. The existing driveway crosses
steep slopes. If the driveway does not currently meet County
driveway standards, improvements to meet standards will be
necessary prior to issuance of a building permit. Current
standards require a driving surface of 8 to 16 feet, with a grade
which does not exceed 12 %. If improvements are necessary, and
can be made without impacting slopes exceeding 30 %, a "major"
1041 review will not be required. If improvements impact said
slopes, a "major" review will be required.
It has been determined that wildlife is not an issue on the site.
While wildfire is not a mapped hazard, the applicant has agreed
to mitigate potential wildfire hazard to some extent.
BUILDING PERMIT EXEMPTION REVIEW
Pursuant to Section 18 -2.5 of the Code, the applicant has
addressed proposed water supply and waste water disposal for the
site. Bob Nelson, having reviewed the site, indicates that
either an engineered septic system or a leach field on the upper
bench will be required. The applicant commits to install a
system which meets the approval of the Environmental Health
Department.
The site qualifies for a residential exempt well, and Mr. Nelson
has indicated that water should be reached with a shallow well.
The applicant agrees to have well water quality and quantity
reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department.
FINDING:
1) The proposed building envelope is located outside of 1041
2
��� X03
hazards which exist on site.
2) The applicant has provided a site plan for sign -off. Prior
to recording, the applicant agrees to amend the site plan in
the following manner:
a) The 100 year floodplain elevation shall be clearly
delineated, as determined by a certified engineer.
b) A note shall be added which indicates that a 20' stream
setback shall be established and maintained in it's natural
state. Said setback shall be measured horizontally from the
mean identifiable high water mark of the river.
3) The County Attorney is satisfied that the property was
legally created and has not merged with any contiguous lots.
4) The applicant has addressed the category 2 exemption
criteria for land use.
5) In the event that slopes in excess of 30% must be disturbed
for driveway improvements, development of the site will be
subject to a "major" 1041 review.
Sections 5- 400.3(b) and 5- 400.5(b) of the Land Use Code provide
that the Planning Director is authorized to approve a site plan
and application for a Minor 1041 Hazard review. Based on the
findings referenced above, Staff recommends approval of the
Bosely 1041 Minor Hazard Review and Category 2 Exemption. Said
approval is subject to the recommendations listed below. If you
agree with Staff's recommendation, please sign this memo, which
will serve as a reference document authorizing approval of said
application. Planning Director's sign -off on a 1041 Review Site
Plan is also necessary for completion of the administrative
review process. The Site Plan shall be recorded in the Clerk &
Recorder's office. A copy shall be placed in the file.
OF APPROVAL:
1. The applicant shall provide the following mitigation for
potential wildfire hazard:
a. Maintain a minimum 10 foot fire break between
combustible structures and vegetation;
b. Bury power and telephone lines
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
install a waste disposal system and water well which meets
the approval of the Environmental Health Department.
7
�vu,�64
T � r
3. Prior to recording, the applicant shall amend the site plan
to include the following:
a. The 100 year floodplain elevation shall be clearly
delineated, as determined by a certified engineer.
b. A note shall be added which indicates that a 20' stream
setback shall be established and maintained in it's
natural state. Said setback shall be measured
horizontally from the mean identifiable high water mark
of the river. A note shall be added to reflect this
requirement.
C. The applicant shall amend the title to reflect the fact
that the review is a "Minor" review.
4. In the event that the driveway is improved such that
improvements encroach on slopes exceeding 30 %, a "major"
1041 Review will be required.
5. All conditions are to be shown on the site plan.
Amy Margerum, Planning
Director
ELS
MEMO_BOSELY_1041 MINOR
4
ER: Aspen, Colorado 81612
(303) 925 -6727
May 21, 1990
Alice Davis
Davis -Horn Inc.
300 E. Hyman Ave., Suite B
Aspen, Co. 816U
RE: Bosely 1041
Dear Alice:
This letter is to provide additional certification and information regarding floodplain
mapping and driveway configuration for the Bosely parcel in Woody Creek, Colorado.
F000dplain
I have reviewed the 1041 Site Plan generated for the parcel by Aspen Survey
Engineers Inc. dated April 12, 1990 (Job #6123). I also spoke with surveyor Dave
McBride who demonstrated the methodology used to determine the 100 year floodplain
boundary.
Within the limitations of the methodology used, (the 100 year flood elevation was
derived from the Federal Emergency Managment Agency (FEMA) flood profiles for
their Flood Insurance Study dated June 4, 1987) relating flood elevation to the
elevation of the stream thread, I do certify the "approximate" 100 year flood boundary
shown on the Aspen Survey Engineers map. I would note that:
1. The flood boundary actually continues to the north and south
property boundaries.
2. Any residential structure on the site should have a lowest
habitable floor elevation at least 2 feet above the base flood
elevation.
3. A more precise flood boundary could be determined by a site -
specific river - section survey and Hec -II computer analysis. The
FEMA profiles are generally accepted for flood insurance and
local regulatory purposes.
Driveway
Again, based on elevation information provided by Dave McBride of Aspen Survey
Engineers Inc., I find that:
1. The driveway intersection with the local street meets all Pitkin
County requirements related to grade (maximum 2% for the first
20 feet) and sightlines.
2. The driveway meets County grade standards for the next 150 feet
from the intersection (under 12 %).
UUI,J1J6 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 • (303) 945 -1004
1 1, -
May 21, 1990
Bosely 1041
Page 2
3. The remaining driveway to the lower bench of approximately 190
feet exceeds Pitkin County maximum grade standards.
I hope this provides you with adequate response to your questions. Call me if I may
provide further assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
SCHMUESE / R , GORDON MEYER, INC.
j y W. Hammond, P.E.
Principal, Aspen Office
JH /ja 90119
f
Davis Horn -
PLANNING • APPRAISING • REAL ESTATE CONSULTING
April 13, 1990
Ellen Sassano
Aspen - Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
APR 1 61990
RE: Bosely Minor 1041 Environmental Hazard Review and a Building
Permit Exemption Review to Construct a Single - Family Dwelling
Unit
Dear Ellen:
I represent Mary Anne Bosely who is seeking Minor 1041 Hazard
Review pursuant to Section 5 -400 and Building Permit Exemption
Review pursuant to Section 18 -2.5 of the Pitkin County Land Use
Code.
The unimproved subject site is located adjacent to the Roaring Fork
River in Woody Creek as depicted on the vicinity map (refer to
Attachment 1) . The site is approximately 2.5 acres in size and is
zoned AF -2. The parcel is characterized by two distinct potential
building envelopes. The first building envelope is located on a
dry bench between Liberty Lane and a slope which drops off to a
heavily wooded area adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. The second
and preferred potential building envelope is located between the
slope and the Roaring Fork River floodplain. An existing driveway
links the two potential building envelopes.
Minor 1041 Environmental Hazard Review
The site is impacted by slopes in excess of 30 per cent and
floodplain hazards. You also requested that the applicant address
wildfire and wildlife hazards.
As depicted on Attachment 2, the proposed building envelope is
located outside of the mapped slope and floodplain hazard areas.
The driveway crosses steep slopes, however since the driveway has
been in existence for more than 20 years, a 1041 review for the
driveway is not a development consideration.
The proposed building envelope as depicted on Attachment 2 is
located within a mapped deer winter range. Despite the mapping,
wildlife habitat should not be a factor in the 1041 environmental
review. In a discussion with Randy Cote of the Colorado Division
of Wildlife, he indicated that the mapping for the Woody Creek
quadrant is inaccurate. Randy informed us that the Division of
ALICE DAMS, RM I GLENN HORN, AICP
300 EAST HYMAN • SUITE B • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 30.3/925 -6587
Udu'>uJ
t
Wildlife recently sent the Aspen - Pitkin Planning Office a new set
of wildlife overlays deleting lands located between the Roaring
Fork River and Upper River Road from wildlife habitat areas. Based
upon our discussions with Randy and the new mapping, wildlife
hazards do not affect the subject site.
Vegetation on the subject site consists primarily of willows,
evergreen trees and aspen trees. There is some juniper and scrub
oak located on the slope and sage on the upper bench. The
applicant will minimize the amount of vegetation removed from the
site. There are no plans to remove any vegetation from the upper
bench or slope. All of the vegetation within the building
footprint will be removed and some of the underbrush and trees
obstructing views of the River from the building footprint will be
removed. Riparian vegetation will not be disturbed. Due to the
location near the River and based upon historical data on the area,
the natural brush is not a significant wildfire hazard.
Nevertheless, in order to mitigate possible wildfire hazard, the
applicant proposes the following conditions which are based upon
the Wildlife Safety Guidelines for Subdivision and Developments:
1. Maintain a minimum 10 foot fire break between combustible
structures and vegetation; and
2. Bury power and telephone lines.
Building Permit Exemption Review to Construct a Single - Family
Dwelling Unit
Section 18 -2.5 establishes a procedure to exempt single - family
dwelling units located on meets and bounds parcels from the full
building permit review procedure if a proposed building site lies
outside any area of state and local interest. To qualify for such
an exemption an applicant is required to address proposed water
supply and waste water disposal systems.
Bob Nelson of the Aspen - Pitkin Environmental Health Department
indicates that either an engineered septic system or a leach field
on the upper bench will be required. The applicant commits to
install a system meeting the approval of the Environmental Health
Department. Quality and quantity of water should be adequate as
there are not any historical water problems in the area.
The subject site will qualify for a residential exempt well.
According to Bob Nelson, there is a plentiful water supply in the
area which can be reached with a shallow well.
Please refer to the following attachments to assist you in your
review:
1. Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map.
2. Attachment 2 - Minor 1041 Environmental Review Plan.
vG Ju'7
3. Attachment 3 - Letter from Mary Anne Bosely authorizing
me, Alice Davis to represent her; and
4. Attachment 4 - Proof of ownership and proof that the
subject site has not merged with adjacent parcels.
Thank you for being so helpful in assisting me in preparing this
application. Please call me if you need any additional
information.
sinnc
Alice Davis
Planning Consultant
90 -016
MI
LZJ I
=
'
a []Ells
Con*
o
m$
M
s
ce
A
I�
a
H
o >.
I
Y
Mary Anne + Bose ly }
Box 2
W oody Creel, Colorado 81656
5wla�v.fi 1 a �1'Q� c
\,- cam-..
v�� :.)�2
_J
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION
NORMAN E LARKINS
PRESIDENT THE ASPEN PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, SUITE 102
600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
LYNN M DYCIO ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
MANAGER
TELEPHONE
ASPEN
(303) 920 -4050
BASALT
(303) 927 -4741
DENVER DIRECT
1303)595 -8463
TELECOPIER'
(303) 920 -4052
Board of County Commissioners
Pitkin County Courthouse
506 F. Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 1041 Certificate -- tracts owned
and 12 of Section 16, Township 9
6th P.M., Pitkin County, Colorado
`1
Order No.A90 -008
A90 -009
by Mary Anne Bosley in Lots
South, Range 85 West of the
Based upon a search of the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder
for Pitkin County, Colorado, Aspen Title Corporation hereby certifies that at
no time since January 1, 1972 has title to any tract adjacent to the property
described above been held In the same name or names as said described property,
EXCEPT as follows:
The tracts acquired by Mary Anne Bosley by the Warranty Deed
from William Kluchko and Jane Kluchko recorded May 18, 1980,
in Book 389 at Page 390, and by the Warranty Deed from Edward
R. Carroll recorded in Book 575 at Page 896, were created
sometime prior to January 1, 1966.
Neither tract has been owned at the same time by the same
person as immediately adjoining tracts since January 1, 1966.
This certification Is neither an abstract, opinion nor guaranty of title
and Is Intended specifically and exclusively for the use of the Board of County
Commissioners of Pitkin County In determination of "merger of title" or lack
thereof as said "merger" relates to the applicable statutes, ordinances and
restrictions of jurisdiction. It Is understood and agreed that Aspen Title
Corporation neither assumes, nor will be charged with any financlal obligatlons
or liability whatever on any certification contained herein.
Authorized Signature
U Jl�
EAGLE COUNTY:
EAGLE COUNTY TITLE CORPORATION
THE VAIL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, SUITE 301
953 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
VAIL. COLORADO 81657
1303) 06 -6423
AFFILIATED OFFICES
GRAND COUNTY:
THE TITLE COMPANY, INC.
FRASER VALLEY CENTER /FRASER
POST OFFICE BOX 415
WINTER PARK. COLORADO 80482
(303) 726 -8077
SUMMIT COUNTY:
SUMMIT COUNTY ABSTRACT COMPANY
108 NORTH RIDGE STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 510
BRECKENRIDGE, COLORADO 80424
(303)453 -6120
I� 575 �• !�!►,�;
11 tkk t \11111114
BN 304924
SILVIA DAVIS
r 1+ PIP ik rkTT RECORMI
:Lin ..k al.lrw p.wr•w1
1 wrseu OEI 14 2 IL PN'88
ro.t office All 26. W.Ay Creek. W. ,
81656 ,
Pltkin I— pr....
Ten Dollars 010.001 and other
xoPd dad vsl"blr <qulMtat ton aaaL.er.
. e.1.r14.�..r.44 LR4. �Ir..M4. r.l rr{ n�Y N.wxY .al.�l..•.+MN r41MwY1rry W. a.a{
..� ... -. wl.rrx•.nr.. rlr Warr.. bar \x.rlw"rw Lr.vr .Uw nJlr'Rnr aa.w. .,r rr. +rw�
•n w1 n, -..w -�-. r....1. r Pitrin
Sao attached Exhibit "A" attached hen to and "de a part hereof
0 14M
„w.. (vacant 1and1 .. Rs
Ip.11Wa.W Lm. ..,,i•. +. rM r.rxv.a- wwx•bafw ..o.• 1
.♦ -rY. .'w -.s.1. _. •. �. a4 i ..w1. 1 +1.q .+1 JIw ..,a rVY ..:. .1xr .IM..YI I.eW +4xx.n . \w
her ldnodr1
his f
wl...w ... n•r .. ..x. +i „ ".. ,1w �....r...lw.w. be is .d
" .- ..J..r... i.are.r..wr r1 \•.Fw Y.a.rl rl w. wrwwa..
for Pnd xvhlr.r r” w. 1.x,cpti.n{ to Title hated an Skhlblt 4" attached
b.artn end n,d,- a part hrr,,I. M
p. I ma wl. .10."1 gIq.W1UMH11 \ilw Hr yy.WJ,..n.v.rl4p. riM.M .. .. n
.. her .. ..m -i.. .• .s..w.r..aar..... w.'x•rv..»r..w wanwwlw..�
....rd a.. FJ ..w L....tr trO a.M
I f F
et .�/Yt l��.�
Edwd R. Carrell ,•
1
., VI •, La.Wll.. � .
Yttkln
Nth 0ctobrr 1 '
� .Ird x. nrPll
UUCJ.
EXHISLT "A" (p.1 of 2) ea 5J SW
C ,,•• r. rho Land !n the I 'te of Colorado. County of Plfkln
11 'ad asi
A tract of land being part of Lot 9, Section 16, Township 9 Scutt,
Pw'nn 87 Nest of *he 6+h P.M. sold fract Is me a fully dOSCribed as
fol lcvs:
Beginning at a point whence the Iworth 1/4 Corner of said Section 16
Deers N 15.44'45" E 1209.49 feat(
+hence N 87-41' N 407,81 feet to the center of the Roaring Fork Plvw)
thence N 5.27' E 200.30 fast along Ma center time of the Roaring fork
Rlvnrl
thence S 87.41' E 465.39 foots
theme S 20.43' N 210.77 feet to Me point of beginning,
TCGEINER WITH non- exclusive *aseasnts and rights say to use, together
with the Owner or owners of land adjacent to such saseaant and right of
way, for Ingress and *grass to and frog the county road cowwonly known
and referred to as "River Road ", and froa and to subject property, as
created, deflned and 8061:11sh*d by the Deed from Walter C. Matthew to
Harold and Mary Lou Johnsen recorded January 31, 1962, In Book 176 at
Page 399, and tt.* Deed from Lloyd G. Speckman to Edward R. Carroll
recorded August 12, 1971, In Book 256 at Page 999, one of sold
easements being war and across portions of Lots 9 and 12 In Section
16, Township 9 South, Pangs, 85 West of the 6th P.N., and being 60,00
feat In width and lying 30.00 feat on each side of the following
deeerlbed centarlln*I
Beginning at a point on the East IIna of sold Lot 9 whence the
North 1/4 corner of said Section 16 bears N. 0'11'34" E. 556.99
feett
thence S. 89"50 N. 192.21 feet]
thane arcund a curve to the left whose radlus Is 50 feet a
distance of 94.25 fasti
thence S. 0 E. 171.78 feats
thence around a curve to the right whose radlus Is 400 feet a
dlsfwce of 145.79 feet,
thane S. 20'43' N. 62.81 featl
theme around a curve to the Taft who radius Is 240 feet a
distance Of 144,02 feet)
thence S. 13.40' E. 106.26 fast,
thence wound a curve to the right whose radius Is 442 feet a
distance of 55.02 feet,
thence 5. 6 E, 379.01 feats
thence :toting on a Dewing of S. 83 W, around a curve to Inv
to f •nose radius Is 30 feet a distance of 168.50 fast,
and the oth*r of mid saminonts being 20.00 feat In width and Iting
10,00 fast on each side of the fol losing dosrribed centarl ins,:
(font l nued)
our J 9.
O
a
l
11.11,Nfi .. t.. �P.l of 21
I7:JM 575 ::a8'J9
4 IT IRIrtl - continued
r+rolnning at a point .ndnpa the north 1/4 cf seld Sectlon 16 A ^an N.
c•i4 E. 746.99 tact,
thence N. 69 E. to the Nut line of the County goad.
UUL;jiU
O
I.
- I ,
IY"'X 5-11-5 .... SIT)
KXHTD 'B'
EECEPTIONS TO TITLE
I The lien for ISBS real property taxes due and payable in
1989.
2. All rights to any and all minerals, ore and metal, of any
kind and character, and all coal, asphaltum, oil, gas and other
like substances In or under sa id land, the rights of ingress and
egress for the purpose of mining, together with enough of the
surface of the same an may be necessary for the proper and
convenient working of such minerals and substances, as reserved
In Patent from the State of Colorado, of record.
J. Restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter
clause, but omitting restrictions, if any, based on race, color,
religion or national origin, as contained in Instruments recorded
July 26, 1961, In Book 194 at Page 521, and August 12, 1971, in
Book 256 at Page 999.
4. Easement and right of way to lay, maintain, operate, repair,
alter, Inspect, protect, remove and replace pipelines, valves,
valve boxes and other gas distribution and related facilities, as
granted by Walter G. Matthew to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Com-
pany, Inc, by instrument recorded October t9, 1961, In Book 195
at Page 426.
S. Those covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements and
other limitations which are a burden to .ubject property, and set
forth In the Deed from Walter C. Matthew to Harold W. Johnson and
Mary Lou Johnson recorded January 31, 1962, In Book 196 at Pay,
199, and the Deed from Lloyd G. Speckman to Edward R. Carroll
recorded August 12, 1971, in Book 256 at Page 999.
6. Any question, dispute or adverse claims as to any loss or
gain of land as a result of any change In the riverbed location
by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion,
relictlon, erosion or avulsion of the center thread, bank, chan-
nel or flow of the waters in the Roaring Pork River lying within
subject land; and any question as to the location of such center
thread, bank, bed or channel as a legal descripthn monument or
marker fur the purposes of describing or locating subject lands.
7. Any rights, interests or easements In favor of the State of
Colorado, the United States of America, or the general public,
which exist or are claimed to exist In, over, under and /or across
the waters and present and pest bad and banks of the Roaring Purk
River.
s
I O
I 1 Z
I 1
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 87611 P�/ _ 2 0
(7 /
(303)920.5090
LAND USE APPLICATION
FEES
c;?1. -/6�Z —Oa 0 /5�,
City
00113
-63250 -134
GMP /CONCEPTUAL
-63270 -136
GMP /FINAL
-63280 -137
SUBICONCEPTUAL
-63300 -139
SUB/FINAL
-63310 -140
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
-63320 -141
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
REFERRAL FEES:
00125
-63340 -205
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
-63340 -190
HOUSING
00115
- 63340 -163
ENGINEERING
SUBTOTAL
County
00113
- 63160 -126
GMP /GENERAL
-63170 -127
GMP /DETAILED
-63180 -128
GMP /FINAL
-63190 -129
SUBIGENERAL
-63200 -130
SUBIDETAILED
-63210 -131
SUBIFINAL
-63220 -132
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
-63230 -133
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
-63450 -146
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REFERRAL FEES:
00125
-63340 -205
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
-63340 -190
HOUSING
00113
-63360 -143
ENGINEERING
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113
-63080 -122
CITY /COUNTY CODE
-63090 -123
COMP. PLAN
- 63140 -124
COPY FEES
�-
V Uv J �
-69000 -145
OTHER
l
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Name'
F' Phone:
Address:
�l
P; ect
�l Y�'I U (
/
'(PP f�GO
216571, -
Check # ? /���
Date z
Additional billing:
#ofHoum:
li
5 A0
a ft -�
BOSELY 1041 SITE PLAN (MINOR!.
PLAT NOTES
r:lrr... RIiM l.. •:x; ,:u Rsar. Srl. =.n '.w :r.:a.:'
a, weG. ry Gm pia m G emus rna -. rla uruur. Ract
wava . • alas: cte arr.R Ra n+al vc: eaalax' '
iGIRMO xr e2 WSm10iJ1aG Ruse �a..^Qn:
a. m scar e;lme arena mtt R arGCae`m eauratam :i
r. s piReR/J. srsn nu emRR Rut R ww.�o RaeazcerGU^
ragl }R fRY i'1a1fRtR81 IDiQI H:ER Ae1 N ffi RSYR.
ssmreRan a'3NEI1]I OT RttCI1W Su \ #a A'114:LF •a l
IIWIF Y:i R aFavli6
CERTIFICATE
.o
aQ uRx a
`Yn•
i
1
I j
i
1
i
�
p
r fG 1
1 1
e'CO ✓. 256 P4u: 395 �
ACRES
1
I
�
4 -------- - - - - -- J
CERTIFICATE
aQ uRx a
`Yn•
i
OESCRI °T Cr,
Yn aElW rw. rt u^ e .1-1, ie.
G lE 6 r V M. Y a 1NRC S MYE LLl (£GCH'W' 5 F20K
Bt W W R A Po�M V£ i+E i' .
R...1 x `0 9 .F£' TC �{ 9IR� Cf TiE � QM RIlET
CL� .15`T'E 2C0 T. - ^A+ ILML � lE.. _ f li 141M•G 65 F 2A: M`.Q
a.w .rc6 Iw! rp ,r
nrtin @wry
SIAF Q tTIJAKT
YYG Yx NiLf' �N 4�9
,aPI:I,G6 6AR1 lii @W' I m YfNUN O�iT. r M.4 MGN W
4 AIG axM' i YlM® wM1 iM IGd N9 Aw M GR F -N OAiI�GrIN
i
fiRac Rnc ro vlRn
@MY bW
LEGEND 8 NOTES
�s RQYw me . ��w. mal�Y A
w tlM1t 01 �K Y�TPT .iRY�p M1O 8R Y i^A
.� �N M R w1�iG n< Gov ax
�i °LANN1NIF' i'.EP.FTMEA'T A=PRGV':�i_
y141 . =R
• .. c,aaamra *.Ex .w+m. iY�1RT R••.x..
� � YiaRYi Q •�G. WlMG N.e rvr Yart
°'"•` - cPK t RECGROER ACCErfANCE
T � x vI�Q Y M I`RIn 9MV np xpava .rn"SI C'aQi
V • n19"�m V iN wF VR1yKIQ i..
_!_ JI Lj
&4
ZATF �RGf RDNID 11
Jos No
w�i1i a•O
000019