HomeMy WebLinkAboutpitkin.planning.264316401010DOCUMENT LAYOUT
THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER
Summary Sheet
Resolution for the BOCC and/or P &Z
Ordinance for the BOCC and/or P &Z
Determination for the Hearing Officer
Administrative Determination
Staff Memo
Application
Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter
Site Plan
Miscellaneous
Plat copies (11x17)
CASE NAME: Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review & General Submission Planiall
PROJ ADDR: 0109 Little Texas Ln Lot 8 LittleTexas
OWN /APP: Beetham. John & Mo ADRF
CIS /Z:F PHN:
REP: I ADR:F
CIS /Z:F PHN',
Email Addr: I ALLOCATED HOURS
FEES DUE:7 FEES RCVD:F % OVER:
REF: BYF DUE:
MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION:
�— P&Z No Ir BOCC Reso:
No
F No F— BOCC Ord: (—
REMARKS no vesting PZ: 90-11 #329116
HRG OFF:
CLOSED:— BY: F ` HO INDEX: I
ADMIN: F
PLAT RECORDED 6771990 PLAT (BK,PG): B24 P33 #323957 ADMIN INDEX: F
VR APPROVAL DATE: F— VR EXPIRES:
CASE TYP: 1041 Hazard Review & General Sub CASE TYP5:
CASE TYP2: CASE TYP6:
CASE TYP3: CASE TYP7:
CASE TYP4: Date Scanned: 117 /2012
File Location: IFF Box #212
0
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET S1 - ,. ;; 2 Z /e- , ,
Pitkin County
DATE RECEIVED: 2/16/90
DATE COMPLETE:
PROJECT NAME:
Project Address:
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2643 - 164 -01 -010 #P21 -90
STAFF MEMBER: m I,
APPLICANT:Mr. John Beetham and Mr. George Molsbar er
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE : Doug Harr
Representative Address /Phone: Ted Guy and Associates
Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: 113.00" NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1
�SS'7,ao-
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: @/ /
2 4
P &Z Meeting Date `, P PUBLIC
VESTED
BOCC Meeting Date PUBLIC
VESTED
Staff Level: 1041 Minor Hazard Rev
HEARING:
RIGHTS:
HEARING:
RIGHTS:
Lew: Date
YES
YES
YES
T YES
of Api
NO
NO
NO
NO
)roval
REFE LS:
- - -- - --
Attorney
Aspen Consol S.D.
School District
Engineer _
Mtn. Bell
Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing _
Holy Cross
_ State Hwy Dept
Aspen Water
Fire Marshall
(Glwd) (GrJtn)
_
Envir. Hlth.
Snowmass Vill
_ Zoning
Manager
FAA
CO Geo. Survey
—
Z Div. Wildlife _
Div. Water Res.
USFS (Aspen)
Caucus
_ USFS (Carbondale)
Other:
DATE REFERRED: 6k INITIALS: f Q
FINAL ROUTING:
DATE ROUTED:
County Attorney County Engineer
Housing^ En ir. Health
Other
Zoning
t �u� Pz` /
UtJL'v��,i
Of
#329116 28/90 10:53 Rec $. PK 6 PG 627
Silvia D:..is, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc.,, 100
I
RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING
GRANTING JOHN BEETHAM AND GEORGE MOLSBARt�ER A 1041
GEOLOGIC AND WILDLIFE HAZARD REVIEW APPROVAL FOR
LOT 8 OF THE LITTLE TEXAS SUBDIVISION
Resolution No. PZ -90 -II
WHEREAS, John Beetham and George Molsbarger are the owners
of Lot 8 of the Little Texas Subdivision, an unapproved
subdivision, more specifically described in Exhibit "A ",
attached; and
WHEREAS, Beetham and Molsbarger have applied to Pitkin
County for a Geologic and Wildlife Hazard review to construct a
single family house on slopes up to 50 %; and
WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
(hereinafter, "Commission ") considered the request at a duly
noticed public hearing on June 5, 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it
hereby grants Beetham / Molsbarger a Geologic and Wildlife Hazard
Review approval to construct a single family home subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a site plan for recordation
which meets approval of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
2. The applicant shall comply with recommendations made by
the Colorado Division of Wildlife. These conditions
shall be noted on the site plan as follows:
a. Kennel or leash all dogs;
b. Fences must not exceed 42" in height and three (3)
strand wire or four (4) pole or less;
C. Maintain vegetation outside the building envelope;
u u ICJ 0 2
#329116 12 A1 /90 10:53 Rec $.00 DK 636
Silvia I "Pitk:in Cnty Clerk 9 Dac 628
�. _ i�
Resolution No. PZ -90 -
Page 2
and
d. No development shall be done in the 100 -year
floodplain.
3. The applicant shall comply with following
recommendations made by the. Environmental Health
Department:
a. A site specific engineer designed sewage system
shall meet approval of the Environmental Health
Department prior to building permit issuance to
assure the integrity of the adjacent potable
wells.
b. Information on the well as to chemical or
bacteriological quality of the drinking water, the
maximum pumping rate, the yield, the water main
sizing, the existing or proposed water storage,
and a legally recorded permit for the well
construction or water use shall meet approval of
the Environmental Health -Department prior to the
approval of a building permit.
C. The applicant is allowed one fireplace and one
certified wood stove.
d. Construction hours shall be limited to 7:00 am to
7:00 pm.
4. The applicant shall address the following concerns
identified by the County Engineer prior to issuance of
a building permit:
a. The recommendations of Dr. Lampiris March 8, 1990
report (attached as Exhibit "B ") shall be followed
with respect to building placement and foundation
design.
b. The applicant shall assure the County the use of
the road will be maintained during construction.
C. The applicant shall grant a 20 -foot wide access
easement to the properties adjacent and to the
south that use the access road on the property.
5. All material representations made in the public hearing
and application shall be adhered to.
6. No development shall take place within utility
easements, without written permission by the owner of
t
0 01 GO003
#329116 12/28' 10:53 Rec $.00 PK 636 FG:
Silvia Davis,'1.itkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.O0w
Resolution No. PZ -90-
Page 3
the easement.
7. The following standards of Section 5 -401.2 of the Land
Use Code shall be adhered to by the applicant:
a. Cuts shall not be made into slopes steeper than
thirty percent (30 %) unless mechanical support is
provided.
b. Cuts and fills, and grading and scraping shall be
confined to the minimum area needed for
construction.
C. Steepness of cut and fill slopes shall be the
maximum which will insure stability and still
allow revegetation.
d. Development plans shall include reasonable but
adequate control measures.
e. Use mulches or temporary cover on exposed soil
areas and re- establish permanent vegetation and
install erosion control measures as soon as
possible after construction or within one growing
season after construction.
f. Incorporate natural drainage patterns into the
development plan. Culverts, sediment basins and
other engineering measures should be used where
necessary to control erosion.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on June 5,
1990.
ATTEST:
Debbie Skehan,
Administrative Assistant
PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
B y-J
JJM 8e6kST", VtMC*A F-MAJ
uu�JU�+
#329116 12/28/9,__ 0:53 Rec $.00
Silvia Davis, P :in Cnty Cl.er4::,
BK 636 PG
Doc $.00
Resolution No. PZ -90 -�
Page 4
APPROVED AS TO FO PM:
Thomas F. tkith
County Attorney
reso.1041.beetham
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
v . �..
GS'U0005
Resolution No. PZ -90 -�
Exhibit "A"
Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review
Legal Description
A parcel of land being located in Section 16, Township 9 South, Range 85 West
of the 6th P.M. Said parcel is more fully described as follows=
Beginning at a point whence the North one - quarter corner of Section 16 bears
North 12 0 15'35" West 2744.17 Feet; thence south 21 Fast 76.20 feet; thence
South 59 0 04' West 330 feet more or less to the Bank of the Roaring Fork River;
thence Northerly 75 feet more or less along the bank of the Roaring Fork River;
thence North 59 0 04' East 330 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
also known as Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision, an unrecorded subdivision
to w
ra
< , o
µ
P
0
m
< N
Y
U1 FJ
rt
.. m
r F
Y- v
L11
n rA
m X
'< m
n
n
m
T C.
W
a..
0
n o•
W
w 0•
e
cm
P
W
Nicholas [ampiriS
uowSUmwasmms/s
0793 VALLEY ROAD
nAn8VwnxLs, COLORADO u1o2s
(303) 963-3600 (24 HOURS)
Ted esv
23280 Hig�way-62
Basalt Cu 81
Site Evaluation -- Little
/�t your rarquest, I have evaluated the above referenced�lot
respect tz the geologic suitabi �ty for the de`/elopmeint
of a 5 family It is my understanding that
construction wiIl at'the upper level, with the rear
foundation wall just over the edge of the steep hill which
leads down to the flood plain of the Roaring Fork River. The
old home, sitting further back from the edge, will be razed.
The- upper level is a stream terraco formed by a higher, oldcr
leve of the river, during Duaternary time" The site is ('or
q4 I be when the home isr�emoved} mostly- open. witti some
grasses. The bank �own to:- th l level i - brush covered -
`with some trees e|I� ---�-' z/ �d �s��ore
The entire parcel contains silts, sands- cobbles and boulders
1aid down by-the streams dr�ainirg two different age glaciers.
The u--er level Containsma` derived from t h older
Sl-acier ''B" wblIe the lower level to the edoe of the river
d
'---- -_ ' ~ er-7-61-acier '
-�-� tnis marerzou
materi.aJ le far ���[ounda±i��o unless
i��b Ai - �����ihle''an��� �
this lot. the �pderl - kis thr,cretaceous*age Man as
| Shale, probably below the level of he river.
Construction on the edge of the steep hillside can bz
. ' �spe�ially if- �ther��is`a tie in to the flat area at the top
. o�E th���an����e��mos� of� the home will be built, In this
,
case it is v�� ��o c�ontrol�surf��c�and subsurface
� water in the vicinity of t�xe'home to Prevent tnstabIlitl/"
So ls engineeri��� imc�u'�in�|.a factor of safety analysis is
�`ecessary�for'prop�r fou�dation design n�tk�s bank edge �ut
g
satisfactory. r'esult �obtaimed, especially since tte
hank is only 25- 30 fee' high -And has- no indication of
erosion on it.
�4'
pB
<u
�+^
VU^^
�
p+^
�0
m
°03
1�
+c)
�
+�
z=
0
�&
z
�
IT
�
e�
7c
^
�
�
"
C _U
g0
�
�oo 0u,
| --`` --
]�%-4�~
Exhibit "B"
Nicholas [ampiriS
uowSUmwasmms/s
0793 VALLEY ROAD
nAn8VwnxLs, COLORADO u1o2s
(303) 963-3600 (24 HOURS)
Ted esv
23280 Hig�way-62
Basalt Cu 81
Site Evaluation -- Little
/�t your rarquest, I have evaluated the above referenced�lot
respect tz the geologic suitabi �ty for the de`/elopmeint
of a 5 family It is my understanding that
construction wiIl at'the upper level, with the rear
foundation wall just over the edge of the steep hill which
leads down to the flood plain of the Roaring Fork River. The
old home, sitting further back from the edge, will be razed.
The- upper level is a stream terraco formed by a higher, oldcr
leve of the river, during Duaternary time" The site is ('or
q4 I be when the home isr�emoved} mostly- open. witti some
grasses. The bank �own to:- th l level i - brush covered -
`with some trees e|I� ---�-' z/ �d �s��ore
The entire parcel contains silts, sands- cobbles and boulders
1aid down by-the streams dr�ainirg two different age glaciers.
The u--er level Containsma` derived from t h older
Sl-acier ''B" wblIe the lower level to the edoe of the river
d
'---- -_ ' ~ er-7-61-acier '
-�-� tnis marerzou
materi.aJ le far ���[ounda±i��o unless
i��b Ai - �����ihle''an��� �
this lot. the �pderl - kis thr,cretaceous*age Man as
| Shale, probably below the level of he river.
Construction on the edge of the steep hillside can bz
. ' �spe�ially if- �ther��is`a tie in to the flat area at the top
. o�E th���an����e��mos� of� the home will be built, In this
,
case it is v�� ��o c�ontrol�surf��c�and subsurface
� water in the vicinity of t�xe'home to Prevent tnstabIlitl/"
So ls engineeri��� imc�u'�in�|.a factor of safety analysis is
�`ecessary�for'prop�r fou�dation design n�tk�s bank edge �ut
g
satisfactory. r'esult �obtaimed, especially since tte
hank is only 25- 30 fee' high -And has- no indication of
erosion on it.
�4'
pB
<u
�+^
VU^^
�
p+^
�0
m
°03
1�
+c)
�
+�
z=
0
�&
z
�
IT
�
e�
7c
^
�
�
"
C _U
g0
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner
RE: Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review
DATE: June 5, 1990
Request: The applicant is requesting a 1041 Hazard Review for
mapped wildlife and geologic conditions to demolish an existing
residence on the property and replace it with a new single family
residence. The applicant is also requesting to be exempt from
the general submission requirements of the Land Use Code.
Applicant: John Beetham and George Molsbarger
Applicant's Representative: Ted Guy and Associates
Location: Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision
Zoning: The approximately 1/2 acre parcel is zoned AF -1.
Water: There is an existing well servicing the existing cabin.
It is not clear whether this is an adequate and legal water
provision to the property.
Sewer: The use and location of the existing septic system is
unknown. The Environmental Health Department questions the
adequacy of this system.
Access: The property access is from Upper Woody Creek Road to an
interior subdivision road. The applicant is proposing to use the
existing 10 ft. access easement crossing the property.
REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS
Environmental Health- In a memo dated May 9, 1990, (attached)
Bob Nelson submitted the following comments:
Sewage- Due to the anticipated high seasonal groundwater
table, the proximity of an irrigation well, rapid
permeability of the gravelly alluvial soils and the location
of the Roaring Fork River, a relatively sophisticated site -
specific engineer designed sewage system is needed.
Water- The existing well on the property has not been
11
�uU,.fu3
demonstrated to be an "adequate" water supply. There is not
information in the submittal as to chemical or
bacteriological quality of the drinking water, the maximum
pumping rate, the yield, the water main sizing, the existing
or proposed water storage, or a legally recorded permit for
the well construction or water use. The additional increase
in size of the residence on the property and the change from
a seasonal summer use to year -round occupancy could
substantially affect the quality of water available,
particularly during low flow periods of the late winter.
Air Quality- The proposed residence is allowed one
fireplace and one certified wood stove.
Noise- Construction hours should be limited from 7 A.M. to
7 P.M. so as not to result in the generation of annoying
noise levels in or around other properties in the area.
Water Resources- If the proposed changes and improvements
to vegetation and roof drainage are completed, the impacts
on water quality appear to be better mitigated and do not
appear significant.
County Engineer- In a memo dated April 30, 1990 (attached), Tom
Newland submitted the following comments:
Soils, Surficial Geologic Conditions and Radiation- The
recommendations of Dr. Lampiris should be followed with
respect to building placement and foundation design.
Drainage- There is concern with the building's placement on
slopes in excess of 30 %. However, as the proposed building
will be replacing an existing structure, the development
should not noticeably alter existing drainage patterns.
Internal Road Design- The applicant is using an existing
10 -foot wide driveway easement to the development. As the
driveway passes through the property to access other
adjacent properties, the applicant should assure the County
the free use of the road will be maintained during
construction.
The access roads within the subdivision are poorly defined
and inadequate as to width. It is recommended that the
applicant consider granting a 30 -foot wide access easement
to the properties adjacent and to the south that use this
road. This width of access is required under County
driveway standards. If a 30 -foot wide access easement
cannot be granted, a 20 -foot wide easement will suffice if
the County Attorney's office concurs.
Trails- It is recommended that the applicant consider
K
0
granting a fisherman's easement to the County along the
Roaring Fork River. This easement needs to be at least 5-
feet wide as measured from the high water mark.
Division of Wildlife- In a letter dated April 11, 1990 Randy
Cote submitted the following comments:
"My only concerns with this proposal is the riparian area."
The applicant has stated that 1) no development will be
done in the 100 year floodplain; 2) no vegetation will be
removed outside the building envelope; 3) fences will not
exceed 42" in height, 3 strand wire or 4 pole; and 4) dogs
will be leashed or kenneled.
STAFF COMMENTS
The following provision of the Land Use Code apply to this
application.
Section 5 -404 Wildlife Habitat Area
The site is within mapped mule deer winter range and critical
habitat. Randy Cote, from the Division of Wildlife, has informed
the Planning Office that the wildlife boundaries are general in
nature and that this is not an area of critical habitat.
The applicant's proposal should have minimal impact on the
existing wildlife resources if the Division of Wildlife's
recommendations are adhered to.
Section 5 -401.2 Geologic Hazard Area
The proposed building envelope is located on slopes exceeding
30 %. The Land Use Code indicates that:
Development shall be discouraged on slopes of fifteen
percent (15 %) and greater unless problems of stability and
erosion can be overcome. Any development approval shall be
based on a detailed site survey including geologic and
engineering analysis and shall comply with the following:
(A) Cuts shall not be made into slopes steeper than thirty
percent (30 %) unless mechanical support is provided.
(B) Cuts and fills, and grading and scraping shall be
confined to the minimum area needed for construction.
(C) Steepness of cut and fill slopes shall be the maximum
which will insure stability and still allow revegetation.
(D) Development plans shall include reasonable but adequate
3
UE.: �l�
M
control measures. Large tracts should be developed in small
workable units without leaving large areas for long periods.
(E) Use mulches or temporary cover on exposed soil areas and
re- establish permanent vegetation and install erosion
control measures as soon as possible.
(F) Incorporate natural drainage patterns into the
development plan. Culverts, sediment basins and other
engineering measures should be used where necessary to
control erosion.
(G) Soil absorption sewage disposal systems should not be
placed on slopes steeper than fifteen percent (15 %).
Response: The applicant is proposing to place the structure on
slopes of up to 50% instead of the flat portion of the property.
There are two flat benches on the property, one within the
floodplain where no development is proposed, and one where the
existing house is located. The applicant is proposing to bring
the house down the side of bank between the two benches.
Dr. Nick Lampiris, consulting geologist, has indicated that
construction on the edge of the steep hillside can be done,
especially if there is a tie in to the flat area at the top of
the bank where the majority of the home will be built. In this
case it is very important to control surface and subsurface water
in the vicinity of the home to prevent instability. Soils
engineering including a factor of safety analysis is necessary
for proper foundation design on this bank edge but a satisfactory
result can be obtained, especially since the bank is only 25 feet
to 30 feet high and has no indication of erosion on it. Dr.
Lampiris's letter dated March 8, 1990 is attached.
F91J51V 4
Section 5- 401(h)(2) of the Land Use Code discourages development
on slopes over fifteen percent (15 %). The applicant is proposing
development on slopes of up to fifty percent (50 %). There is a
flat portion of the property on which a part of the house is
proposed. Staff would like to direct the applicant to place the
house on the flat portion of the property to keep within the
intent of the Land Use Code of discouraging development on slopes
over 15 %.
There have been a few other homes within the Little Texas
Subdivision which have been remodeled and drop slightly down the
bank onto steep slopes.
It is recommended that the applicant consider granting a
fisherman's easement to the County along the Roaring Fork River.
This easement needs to be at least 5 -feet wide as measured from
4
l,'U1,�111
the high water mark.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office recommends to the Planning and Zoning
Commission that the applicant be directed to relocate the
proposed house on slopes not to exceed fifteen percent.
If the Planning Commission wants to approve this 1041, Planning
Staff suggests the applicant comply with the following
conditions:
1) The applicant shall provide a site plan which meets approval
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
2) The applicant shall comply with recommendations made by the
Colorado Division of Wildlife. They are as follows:
a. Kennel or leash all dogs;
b. Fences must not exceed 42" in height and three (3)
strand wire or four (4) pole or less;
C. Maintain vegetation outside the building envelope;
and
d. No development shall be done in the 100 -year
floodplain.
3) The applicant shall comply with recommendations made by the
Environmental Health Department.
a. A site specific engineer designed sewage system
needs to meet approval of the Environmental Health
Department prior to building permit issuance.
b. Information on the well as to chemical or
bacteriological quality of the drinking water, the
maximum pumping rate, the yield, the water main
sizing, the existing or proposed water storage,
and a legally recorded permit for the well
construction or water use need to meet approval of
the Environmental Health Department prior to the
approval a building permit.
C. The applicant is allowed one fireplace and one
certified wood stove.
d. Construction hours shall be limited to 7:00 am to
7:00 pm.
4) The applicant shall address the following concerns identified
5
by the County Engineer.
a. The recommendations of Dr. Lampiris March 8, 1990
report (attached) shall be followed with respect
to building placement and foundation design.
b. The applicant shall assure the County the use of
the road will be maintained during construction.
C. The applicant shall grant a 30 -foot wide access
easement to the properties adjacent and to the
south that use the access road on the property.
5) All material representations made in the public hearing and
application shall be adhered to.
6) No development shall take place within utility easements.
7) The following standards of section 5 -401.2 of the Land Use
Code shall be adhered to by the applicant:
(A) Cuts shall not be made into slopes steeper than thirty
percent (30 %) unless mechanical support is provided.
(B) Cuts and fills, and grading and scraping shall be
confined to the minimum area needed for construction.
(C) Steepness of cut and fill slopes shall be the maximum
which will insure stability and still allow revegetation.
(D) Development plans shall include reasonable but adequate
control measures.
(E) Use mulches or temporary cover on exposed soil areas and
re- establish permanent vegetation and install erosion
control measures as soon as possible.
(F) Incorporate natural drainage patterns into the
development plan. Culverts, sediment basins and other
engineering measures should be used where necessary to
control erosion.
(G) Soil absorption sewage disposal systems should not be
placed on slopes steeper than fifteen percent (15 %).
1041.beetham
0
%., ASPEN *PITKIN 1.01
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office,
From: Bob Nelson, Environmental Health Department,/
Date: May 9, 1990
Re: Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review & General Submission
Parcel ID #2643- 164 -01 -010
The Aspen / Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the
above - mentioned land use submittal under authority of the Pitkin
County Code Title II, and has the following comments.
SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION Sections 2 -7 and 5 -200:
The application indicates that the wastewater for this would be
disposed of by means of an individual septic system - absorption
field. From our evaluation of the home site with a site
inspection and by using the general conditions reported for the
soil types (indicated on the Soil Conservation Service maps) it
is the department's conclusion that most of lot would not be
considered suitable for any type of conventional septic system
under existing County Regulation. This is due to the expected
high ground water tables in the lower areas of the lot, and to
the placement of existing drinking water wells on the upper
portions of the property which require a minimum setback of one
hundred feet to septic system components.
There are, however, alternative engineering designs which
potentially could fit into the topography to the northwestern
portion of the lot on the lower bench, and which would conform to
Pitk�n County regulations. It is our opinion that the sewage
system for the parcel will be of the type requiring a relatively
sophisticated, site - specific engineering design. This is because
of the anticipated high seasonal groundwater table mentioned, the
proximity of an irrigation well, and the location of the Roaring
Fork River. Also likely is very rapid permeability in the
gravelly alluvial soils in the valley floor. We expect that
these geologic and hydrologic conditions on the building lot will
dictate that sewage system will be an engineered mound or a
system of similar design. A properly engineered mound design can
conform to local requirements, but is very costly. Variances
from setbacks from property lines and foundations are also likely
to be required.
ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS Sections 2 -6 and 5 -205:
Water is apparently to be supplied from a well serving the
existing residential unit. This well is apparently constructed
on the property southerly line and shown on the site map. This
130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/980 -6070
on
Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review & General Submission
May 9, 1990
Page 2
well, proposed to continue to be the water supply, has not been
demonstrated to be an "adequate" water supply. There is no
information in the submittal as to chemical or bacteriological
quality of the drinking water, the maximum pumping rate, the
yield, the water main sizing, the existing or proposed water
storage, or a legally recorded permit for the well construction
or water use. The additional increase in size of the residence
on the property and the change from a seasonal Summer usage to
year around occupancy could substantially affect the quantity of
water available, particularly during low flow periods of the late
winter.
AIR QUALITY Sections 2 -17 and 5 -106:
The proposed residence is allowed one fireplace and one certified
wood stove. We will assume that the applicant is aware of this
requirement and has an intention to comply. We have concluded
that, taken alone, the amount of air pollution produced from
development of this lot is not significant enough to affect air
quality. However, subdivision controls or restrictions, could
minimize the nuisance of road dust, and are suggested.
NOISE: Section 2 -23
There will be some short term noise generated from the construc-
tion of the dwelling should this proposal be approved. None of
the noise is expected to be of significance, if the hours of
construction are limited to 7 A.M. to & P.M. The magnitude of a
small construction project should not result in the generation of
annoying noise levels in or around the other properties in the
area. Further, it is anticipated that any construction noise
will be of relatively short duration and should not have long
term impacts on the immediate neighborhood. However, should any
complaints be received by this office the Colorado Noise Abate-
ment Law will be the response document.
WATER RESOURCES IMPACTS: Section 2 -22 and 5 -107•
The development proposal is small and we have concluded that the
application changes should not result in any adverse water
quality impacts from the replacement of the existing residence
with a new one. The application plans to retain the runoff on-
site and maintain historical drainage patterns. No further
erosion and sediment problems should result within the property.
If the proposed changes and improvements to vegetation and roof
drainage are completed, the impacts on water quality appear to be
better mitigated and do not appear significant.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mary Lackner, Planning Office
FROM: Tom Newland, Assistant to the County Manager
RE: Beetham /Molsbarger 1041 Hazard Review
DATE: April 30, 1990
I have reviewed the information submitted and would like to
forward the following comments to you:
Soils, Surficial, Geologic Conditions and Radiation: The
recommnedations of Dr. Lampiris should be followed with respect
to building placement and foundation design.
Drainage: I am concerned by the building envelope's placement
over slopes in excess of 30 %. However, as the proposed building
will be replacing an existing structure, the development should
not noticeably alter existing drainage patterns.
Impacts on Road System: The proposed development will be
replacing one single - family structure with another, and should
not significantly impact the existing County road system.
Internal Road Design: The applicant will be using an existing
10 -foot wide driveway for access to the development. As the
driveway passes through the property to access other adjacent
properties, the applicant should assure the County that free use
of the road will be maintained during construction.
I am familiar with the Little Texas "subdivision" through
previous submissions. The access roads within the subdivision
are poorly defined and inadequate as to width. It is recommended
that the applicant consider granting a 30 -foot wide access
easement to the properties adjacent and to the south that use
this road. This width of access is required under County
driveway standards. If a 30 -foot wide easement can not be
granted, a 20 -foot wide easement will suffice if the County
Attorney's office concurs.
Trails: It is recommended that the
fishermans easement to the County
This easement needs to be at least
the high water mark.
applicant consider granting a
along the Roaring Fork River.
5 -feet wide as measured from
UdLJ .1 _L6
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
3799 HIGHWAY 82
P. O. DRAWER 2150
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602
June 4, 1990
Ted Guy and Associates
Attention: Doug Harr
23280 Highway 82
Basalt, Colorado
RE: Easement Encroachment, Lot 8, Little Texas
Dear Doug:
(303) 945 -5491
FAX: 945 -4081
This letter is verification that Holy Cross Electric Inc. will
allow encroachment within our easement on the above mentioned
project, provided the owners meet all requirements of the
National Electrical Safety Code.
If I can be of any further service, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
Buzz Quaco,
Staking Engineer
BQ:rjm
W /0#90- 12313:78- 16:Little Texas, Lot 8
4
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Mary Lackner cc Tom Smith
From: Tom Smith
Postmark: Apr 27,90 10:34 AM
Status: Previously read
Subject: Beetham/ Molsbarger 1041
----------------------------------------------- ------------------------- - - - - --
Message:
This is a legal lot.
U U 6'_11 a
STATE OF COLORADO
Roy Romer, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Perry 0. Olson, Director
6060 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80216
Telephone: (303) 297 -1192
April 11, 1990
Pitkin Co. Planning
Attn: Mary
130 So. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re; Beetham /Molsbarger 1041
Dear Mary:
APR yJ
My only concern with this proposal is the riparian area.
REFER TO
The applicant has stated that 1) no development will be done
in the 100 year flood plane, 2) no vegetation will be removed
outside the building envelope and 3) fences 42" in height, and
4) dogs kenneled.
If these restrictions are placed, impacts will be minimal.
Sincerely,
Randy Cote
District Wildlife Manager -Aspen
RC /lmp
Ci ' . IA �3 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director
WILDLIFE COMMISSION, George VanDenBerg, Chairman . Robert L. Freidenberger, Vice Chairman . William R Hegberg, Secretary
Eldon W. Cooper, Member . Rebecca L Frank Member . Dennis Luttrell, Member . Gene B Peterson, Member . Larry M Wright, Member
THEODORE K GUY .,,.6SOCIATES PC
r ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Aprll 9, 1990
Cindy Houben
Pitco Planning Office
130 S Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
RE: Beetham 1041 application, Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision
Dear Cindy
Attatched are three site sections indicating the relative house locations with the following approval paths
With 1041 application approval in May
Lowest floor at site elevation 390
River side of house 169 feet from the southeast property corner
Patio and hot tub remain as drawn.
B. With administative 1041 application approval by staff
Lowest floor at site elevation 390
River side of house 164 feet from the SE property corner, as reviewed by Buddy in Jan
Patio and hot tub removed, five foot wide lawn area between house and undisturbed slope.
C. With no 1041 application approval
Lowest floor at site elevation 394, house raised four feel higher.
River side of house 164 feet from the southeast property corner
Patio and hot tub removed, no disturbance to slope between house and river.
Because the code only prohibits structural construction from the 309 slopes we will delete the patio and hot
tub construction so there will be no improvements built in the 309 slope area. The area that will be
disturbed is approximately five by fifty five. This 275 square feet represents 1.119 of the 24,750 sf of
the lot.
As you remember the homes on both sides of the Beetham residence have the same type of walk out lower
levels that we have proposed. Without the staff approval of the modified plans described in B. above the
Beetham residence will have greater visual impact and will stick out much more than with either A or B.
Please let me know if you decide to present this question to the Planning and Zoning commission on Tuesday, I
would like to be present.
Thanks for your assisstance and attention in this matter.
Sincerel Yours,
_ I
Theodore K Guy, President
THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC
tkg1TKG
89159 L27
L I I M 1
U U 4 i L , 1 23280 B STATE MIWAV a2 BOX 1640 `
I'tiI -CCU
C
BASALT. COLORADO 81621 (303) 927 -3167
�4
D 80813 �° velnr¢o iry us.a FORM NO LAND P0813
SITE EL
® 430
SITE EL
WEST 400
PROPERTY PATIO
LINE _ SITE EL, /
HOUSE LOCATION
AS SHOWN WITH -
1041 APPLICATION
DECK AND PATIO
ALSOINCLUDED.
c �p� 20
J
EAST
PROPERTY
LINE
s.w. FORM NO LAND P0813 Aaru (N
iw�7^�w' ✓RINTEO IN Y.3 P
® SITE EL
430
1
SITE EL
WEST
� 400
PROPERTY /�
LINE SITF Fl
HOUSE LOCATION AS
STAKED IN THE FIELD
WITH BUDDE,PATIO
HAS BEEN DELETED
e III_ �I„i
uvG1.1C2
FORM NO LAND -P0813
R
p
EAST
PROPERTY
LINE
r i
00 LEND -P8813 J d* ....... iv ...... FORM NO LAND -P8813
SITE EL
WEST 400
PROPER"n
LINE SITE EL
X40
HOUSE LOCATION WITHOUT
1041 REVIEW RAISE HOUSE
SO LOWEST LEVEL WALKS
OUT AND DELETE PATIO
C I n
jot �n
U'�J uuc'
EAST
PROPERTY
LINE
Ct, CYI �wc� "21 In
o� I t
rwo, a. Cmw
fi ELI -Fee( iu om)$ as 1rmU sea w1b 40.
al TdR p&& �k)03 he, c reA oAV6U�
ern 4JLOh M m. 5`xes - 4 nr )4� be
Aree...� �o�o
C U J Q,A I "S 40 &S Gv Ss
4/q too gorr��/
4,1 (a a N Cul 5 ,t rvt rssr o, tsoylA
iSSUEO
3•Z'1
OR WN
CHE KEO
THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
R 0. Box 1640
BASALT. COLORA91)B+1 B69 4
(303) 927 -3167
SHEET
I
OF /
THEODORE K GUY AW1810CIATES PC
ARCHITECTS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS a y+
To : Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
From: Theodore K Guy Associates PC
Date : March 16, 1990
Re 1041 Geologic Hazard Review
John Beetham /George Molsbarger's Single Family Residence
Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision
Applicant: John Beetham and George Molsbarger
Request 1041 Geologic Hazard Review to allow for a portion of their proposed residence to be
located on a 403 slope.
Location Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision, Woody Creek, Colorado
Zoning The property is in an established neighborhood that has been zoned AF -1 and granted a 90 foot
front yard setback variance and a 20 foot rear yard setback variance due to the
nonconforming size of the lot, Resolution No. 89 -47, dated October 3, 1989.
Background: The proposed building is a two story sinqle family residence built on the site of an existing
residence that shall be demolished. To keep the building in context with the surrounding
homes, the owner would like a walk -out lower level by which there will be a 8 foot high cut
into the hill. The house will use the existing Little Texas access road and the existing
electrical telephone, natural gas, and water supply. A new septic tank and leach field will be
Installed as shown on the Site Plan, Sheet Z1.
The basically flat site is bisected by a 25 foot wide step with a slope of approximately 40 %.
5 feet of the house will be on the 40% slope, 9 feet on a 202 slope and the remaining 46 feet
of the house will be on a slope of less than 5 %. No development will be done near the river or
in the 100 foot year flood plane.
Any new fences will be a maximum of 42 inches high with no more than three strands or rails.
All dogs on the property will be on leashes or kenneled. There will be no removal of vegetation
outside the building envelope.
Attached is a geologic site evaluation done by Dr. Nicholas Lampir:s, :ng the suitability of
the site for construction.
U u u "12 5
23260 8 STATE HIWAY 62 P.O. BOX 1840 BASALT COLORADO 81821 (303) 927-3187
M5
COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 2 6 5 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY LAND USE CODE:
2 -1 CONFORMANCE WITH THE ASPEN AREA GENERAL PLAN
The new residence In Little Texas conforms to the 1966 Aspen Area General Plan.
2 - 2 CONFORMANCE W T II OTHER LAW
The development and reconstruction will comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws.
2 -3 NATURAL AND MAN —MADE HAZARD _ - =_ RESOURCE AREAS
The new residence will be located in a long established neighborhood (over 40 years) and replacing an
existing structure, therefore it will create no material damage to a significant wildlife habitat or which
would endanger a wildlife species. The structure will be in compliance with all building codes, Including life
safety and there will be no change in the type of use of the property.
—4 5 -100 SOIL, —EICIAL 6COL061UMARACTERISTICS AND RADIATION
Dr. Lampiris, a consulting geologist (Report Attached) states that the soil is generally quite suitable for a
foundation. Any excess water will be carried away from the foundation with a foundation drain.
Construction at the edge of the hillside can be done especially with 75, of the foundation at grades of less
than 59. For best results on testing actual soils conditions, a soils engineer will inspect the site at the
time of excavation. If any modifications are recommended, they will be incorporated before construction.
A 12 mil minimum vapor retarding sheet, lapped and seated at all joints, will be installed under the slab
with venting if required, to prevent any potential radon leakage.
All utilities for the site are existing and servicing the existing building, therefore the public will need bear
no cost for extending utilities or services.
2 -5. 5 -101 DRAINAGE
All drainage will follow existing patterns. The house is located equaldistant from the north slope runoff as
the existing structure and is located above any runoff from the slope at the center of the site. The
relative small size of the proposed structure will not adversely impact the existing drainage. Refer to
attached Plan Z1.
2-6. 2 -22, 5 -107 ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR WATER NEEDS AND WATER RESOURCES
IMPACT
The new residence will use the well presently on the site that is feeding the existing house, no greater
extent of water shall be needed. Present drainage will not be affected and natural vegetation shall be
retained that there will be no deterioration to the water quality of, or withdrawal from, the ground
water.
2 -7 SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION
A new leach field and septic tank will be installed at the base of the hill, type and size subject to
recommendations from Bill Drueding, Aspen /Pitkin County Zoning Office. Location of proposed leach field,
septic tank, and existing wells are located on attached Plan ZI .
ut1U,J2Ei
C M
2 -8 2 -9 2 -19 IMPACTS ON ROAD SYSTEM ROAD DES16N AND CONSTRUCTION
TRANSPORTATION
The proposed building will be using the existing access road and will be a single family residence, the same
as the existing structure to be razed, therefore there will be no impact on the road system.
2 -10. 2 -25 L061CAL EXTENSION OF UTILITIES
The new residence will use the existing services and there will be no extension of utilities.
2 -11. 5102 EROSION
Natural vegetation shall be preserved on the site except that area outlined by the building foot print and
patio. Any surrounding areas disturbed through construction, which will be kept at a minimum, shall be
revegetated. Roof run off on the east end of the house shall be diverted to the flat front lawn in keeping
with the natural drainage pattern. Run off from the west roof shall be diverted to a dry well or to the flat
plane along the river.
During construction standard procedures including temporary diversion or retention structures will be
provided as necessary to prevent erosion and to maintain historic drainage patterns and quality.
2 -12 5 -103 COMPATIBILITY WITH HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOL061CAL RESOURCES
The existing building is not a historical building nor are there any within the neighborhood.
2 - 13. 5 - 10 4 HOrP I n 1BILIIY W T1 1 1 AGRI C ULTVRAL LANDS AND OPERATIONS
Land use and access will be the same as existing and will in no way affect agricultural lands.
2-14 IMPACTS ON TAXES AND MANAGEMENT OF NECESSARY SERVICES AND FACILITIES
The new residence will be an improvement over the existing one.
2 -15 HOUSING
The new building is to be a single family residence, replacing an existing single family residence and will be
the permanent residence of the owners.
2 -16. 5 -105 SCENIC QUALITY
The site is situated lower thcr " 82 and can not be seen from the highway except a glimpse as you
approach from the distance , ;l trees separate the site from the highway, as can be seen in the
photographs, "overall view Little Texas Subdivision. ", taken from across the river. The size of the
proposed residence and the way it will be set into the hill will coincide with the rest of the neighborhood.
2 -17. 5 -106 AIR QUALITY
The proposed building shall have one wood burning fireplace, replacing the fireplace in the existing house.
Use of the site will remain single family residence and therefore will not increase automotive or any other
type of air pollution.
lM
nff
The proposed design for setting the building into the hill will take advantage of natural insulation while
exposing the south west end. It will also enable us to lower the house to allow direct sunlight to more of
the surrounding area.
2 -23 NOISE
The use of the site is to remain single family residence, therefore there will be no increase of noise.
Construction will comply with Pitkin County Regulations regarding noise. No violation of the noise
standards will be required to construct the project.
2-24 COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT OR NEARB PUBL LANDS
The use of the site is to remain single family residence, therefore there will be no change in compatibility
to surrounding areas.
2 -25 GROWTH RATE
This project will not affect the growth rate as it is a single family residence replacing a single family
residence.
Uvu.i23
t
Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D.
CONSULTING GEOLOGIST
0793 VALLEY ROAD
CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623
(303) 9633600 (24 HOURS)
Fod Qu -
'12% HIS :JO
V 9.1
2_11't Ev 2130.
no t!s M—tawl.:�4 -Zr nk� 1Z ±177xv,
07 1 Sinai, family rusidonco. It is my undarstandinq Wat
nOnstr"Mon will he at the _..oar level, with We nea-
1 0. ju,L over the Woe of the stoop hill wnicn
lvy7y do _ n 7 to the Firon cLain of t`,_ oaring ? or} River. Th.-
11� rQnQ, BlQiog Torti nalv fncm enn srun, NIL! no rai:IA.
'Va wpq !-�Pl 47 a strCan to iormFd nV a
10 0 M5 -As river, o:. . r uUntannory 4,40. 152 oil? 1B to,
will be when the home is removed) mostly open with some
grasses. The bank down to the lower lave! is brush cuvered
with some tries as well. Small boulders are in evidence.
The entire parCal contaiFs silts, sands, coLblas an oudz
d tic-�
tn'Q OnN- h- the atropmo nrai-iw two dif"wr2no 7ge glici—o
7j 7 n 7- 0 , t"I zv!, -
W11C.O• lzwwr le.11 to tK2 Stan =1 the r1,C.
bank was tormed from a voungsr Claciar "E. You can see
this materiel in the trail cut down to the lower level. This
material is generally quite suitable for a foundation unless
it becomes saturated with water. Although not visible an
this lot, the underNino bedrock is the Cret%nyous age MnntDs
"P!-. a 752ni- uplow QhD ln�?! of hn , 1 nr,.
or thM TKOP Mr MW 7tVnM ML 'III j- 7 I
if thWa LA a tie in to the flat anew at Wo .. r•:7 oho b W 41hand .nrst ni the none wil 1, he built. in thic�
aAls tt Is YeM iwWrtant to Wnerml mur";:n and I;�K;Fyrfin-
via
W"M110MIOW LFIC&MMMg - -?atar oF snowtv ar:lvn-a LI
P-1771r, Mr nr r fo-ndivinr Aw"jq j
yn"iS54cVCrV rasull car ac ww� =MOCIA'" sincl
ho"K is only 25 :o 30 feat high And nas no inni:aQion ul:
arazimn an it.
LJ U J) A ?
11
waknr mr damostiq UTQ Fmcill he PIon1lobin to drillimc,
ONON ON thD TIM M a2cur VA[v F2nt halo" the leva: n:
ohs river. mccpm ro ch- Wta is 230111 attRLnahle oli th-�
Cownty rcad with no out noc ass ary. Waste 03MWK ShCU1:1
probnhQ be tmsprd thn vowd whe the steep slcpu can oa,
•mided. The sails will Percolate well but the Pitkin Count/
SnnitAtion Engineer should be consulted for his spvciji�
AoUtimnally, the home should be designs
to M thn aCC"M"1a&0n Of radon Q3S 50 ME iM 7en7MIn-
slardard M-nctirn in M2 17ata, It thnorn Era
-.1 - Fl -. f 1 15 ra 7 Vo in MI.
1,1 r)
Li Lic; Lj 0 U
ASPEN TITLE CORPOI3
NORMAN E LARKINS
PRESIDENT THE ASPEN PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, SUITI
600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
Lynn M. Dycio ASPEN, COLORADO 61611
MANAGER
V
r 7 i
SEP 121989
r1E000RE K. GUY ASSOCIATES, ?C
Order No. A89 -038
TELEPHONE
ASPEN
13031920 -4050
BASALT
1303192].4741
DENVER DIRECT
13031595 -6463
TELECOPIER
13031920 -4052
ADJACENT OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION, a corporattion organized and existing under and
by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado,
HEREBY CERTIFIES
THEODORE K. GUY ASSOCIATES P.C.
DATE: S 11, 1989
ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION
a Color o corporation
(SEAL)
By
LiL b Jai
EAOLECC NTY
EA411, CLII NT, TITI F CORPORATION
THE VAIL PROFESS AL BUILDING SUITE IM
953 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROADWEST
VAIL COLORADO 61652
1.31.16 643
AFFILIATED OFFICES
DRANO COUNTY.
TINE TIT, E COMPANY. INL
FRASER VALLEY CENTER FNASER
POST OFFCE BOX 415
WINTER PARK COLORADOGDA 2
=113 W11
SUMMIT COUNT,
SVMMR CW NTv ANSrMALT CD61PAV,
IM NORTH RIDGE STREET
FOST OFFICE BOX 510
SRECKENRIDGE COLORADO 9M24
IY3I153 6120
That it has made a careful and diligent search of the records in the
office of the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, Colorado, and has
determined that those persons, firms or entities set forth on the Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part
hereof, reflect the apparent owners of lots, tracts, parcels and condominium
units lying within 300 feet of the following described real property situate,
lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, to -wit:
A parcel of land being located in Section 16, Township 9 South, Range 85 West
of the 6th P.M. Said parcel is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point whence the North one—quarter corner of Section 16 bears
North 12 °15'35 West 2744.17 Feet; thence South 21 East 76.20 feet; thence
South 59°04' Nbst 330 feet rrlore or less to the Bank of the Roaring Fork River;
thence Northerly 75 feet more or less along the bank of the Roaring Fork River;
thence North 59 East 330 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
also known as Lot 8, Little Texas Subdivision, an unrecorded subdivision
This Certificate has been prepared for the use and benefit of the above
named applicant and the City or Town of A in the County of Pitkin,
State of Colorado. THE LIABILITY OF THE COM ANY HEREUNDER IS EXPRESSLY LIMITED
TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS CERTIFICATE PLUS $250.00
subject Property:
George A. Molsbarger
John J. Beetham
P.O. Box 17
Woody Creek, CO 81656
Norman, George D Jr
P.O. Drawer A
Lamesa, TX 79331
Troutman, Raymond
2627 Texas Street
Vernon, TX 76384
Killingsworth, Clifford A
P.O. Box H
Paducah, TX 79248
Purnell, Mark L & Kelly H
100 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Rayburn, Donald H & Robert A
P.O. Box 1532
Aspen, CO 81612
Andrew, Dr Leora Pate
7500 Tripp
Amarillo, TX 79121
Vbodv Creek Development Co
c/o Dr J Stirling Baxter
P.O. Box C
Aspen, CO 81611
Pitkin County
506 East Main
Aspen, CO 81611
uuC .)32
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090
March 22, 1990
Doug Harr
Ted Guy & Associates
P. O. Box 1640
Basalt, CO 81621
RE: Beetham /Molsbarger
Submission
1041 Hazard Review and General
Dear Doug,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that your application is complete.
We have scheduled your application for review by the Pitkin
County Planning and zoning Commission at a public hearing on
Tuesday, May 22, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 9:00 pm. The
Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a
copy of the memo pertaining to your application is available at
the Planning Office.
Doug, I noticed that we don't have a list of adjacent property
owners with their mailing addresses. Please submit this list by
May 1st.
A notice of public hearing shall be posted on a sign or signs
placed on the subject parcel of land at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing. It shall be the responsibility of
the applicant to post such sign or signs (on forms supplied by
the Planning Office) which shall be no smaller than 30" x 40" and
which shall be placed near each public or private right -of -way
bordering the property and to remove said sign within one (1)
week after the hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Mary Lackner, the planner
assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
Debbie Skehan
Administrative Assistant
�3/��
Gohvas vi *d 6W
NOTES /2p /.o"°f'
broom /t(
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -63340 -205
00123 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00113
- 63340 -19p HOUSING
- 63360 -143
ENGINEERING
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113 -63080 -122
- 63090 -123
- 63140 -124
-69000 -145
vu�tJ,i5
Name:
�) -90
S <
CITY /COUNTY CODE
COMP. PLAN
COPY FEES
OTHER
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Address: 7 d Phone:
Project:
Check p
Additional billmg: Date: 3
aofHolxs:
""'1r APPLICATION FEES
C'ty
00113
-63250 -134
G MP /CONCEPTUAL
- 63270 -136
GMP /FINAL
-63280 -137
SUB /CONCEPTUAL
- 63300 -139
SUB/FINAL
-63310 -140
- 63320 -141
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
00125
REFERRAL FEES:
00123
- 63340 -205
-63340 -190
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00115
-6 3340 -163
HOUSING
ENGINEERING
County
SUBTOTAL
00113
- 63160 -126
GMP /GENERAL
- 63170 -127
GMP /DETAILED
-63180 -128
GMP /FINAL
-63190 -129
SUB /GENERAL
- 63200 -130
SUB /DETAILED
-63210 -131
SUB /FINAL
- 63220 -132
-63230 -133
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
- 63450 -146
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REFERRAL FEES:
00125 -63340 -205
00123 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00113
- 63340 -19p HOUSING
- 63360 -143
ENGINEERING
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113 -63080 -122
- 63090 -123
- 63140 -124
-69000 -145
vu�tJ,i5
Name:
�) -90
S <
CITY /COUNTY CODE
COMP. PLAN
COPY FEES
OTHER
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
Address: 7 d Phone:
Project:
Check p
Additional billmg: Date: 3
aofHolxs:
ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
City
00113
- 63250 -134
GMPICONCEPTUAL
- 63270 -136
GMP /FINAL
- 63280 -137
SUB /CONCEPTUAL
-63300 -139
SUB/FINAL
-63310 -140
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
- 63320 -141
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
I
REFERRAL FEES:
00125
- 63340 -205
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
- 63340 -190
HOUSING
00115
-63340 -163
ENGINEERING
SUBTOTAL
County
00113
-63160 -126
GMP /GENERAL
-63170 -127
GMP /DETAILED
- 63180 -128
GMP/FINAL
- 63190 -129
SUB/GENER',L
- 63200 -130
SUBIDETAILED
- 63210 -131
SU^;FINAL
-63220 -132
ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS
os23u -133
ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
1 1-3
-63450 -146
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
/
/ i
I
REFERRAL FEES:
00125
-63340 -205
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
-63340 -190
HOUSING
00113
- 63360 -143
ENGINEERING.
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
"
00113
- 63080 -122
CITY /COUNTY CODE
- 63090 -123
COMP. PLAN
- 63140 -124
COPY FEES
- 69000 -145
OTHER
.� --
6 [j ' JJ J
SUBTOTAL
Li
O g
TOTAL
I l
/^
('—e Af
7 31
Name: / ? Gi
4 Q f
/
s. �c Phone: t
Addres
Project:
1 AL
Check #
Date: 4, l
( F
Additional billing:
#ot Hours:
L:
HYf
APPROVED 1041 HA74RO REVIEW BY
ook
JOHN BEUHAM I GEOR IEW GE MOLSBARGER
1041 REVPLAT
i 7-
I T
to
I
Poorz cope
000037
PARCEL 1D# 273503100045
PART' OF !'HE NI: I/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 3. ALSO DESCRIBED AS
PART OF LOTS I & 7 OF SEC'T'ION 3. TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH. RANGE
85 WEST OF THIS 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS N 40039'E 1003.8 FEET; THENCE
N 86046W 165.0 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHTOF•WAY OF
STATE HXjHWAY NO. 82; THENCE S 03'14'W 264.0 FEET ALONG TIME
EASTERN LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE S 86-46'E 165,0 FEET;
THENCE N 03"14'1:264.0 FEET, MORE OF LESS, O THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
Li 0
W911.04
THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES BEING INFORMED BY PITKIN COUNTY
OF THE EXISTENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS THAT MIGHT
AFFECT THE PROPI'XTY, ANY IMPROVEMENTS AND THE USE THEREOF.
THE PROVISIONS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY REGULATIONS DO NOT IN
ANYWAY ASSURE OR IMPLY THAT THE AREAS oursn.)E, OF DESIGNATED
HAZARD AREAS WILL BE FREE FROM HAZARDS OR THAT APPROVED
MITIGATION MEASURES WILL GUARANTET",THE SAFETY OF THE PROPERTY
4C)WNE
MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN Cl IARITABLEARUST
APPROVAL
THIS MASTER PLAN FOR 37925 (AKA 31925) HIGHWAY 82 WAS REVIEWED AND
APPR0;ZD BY THE PI KIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS
2013 BY RESOLUTION NO..-jO 2-AC/3
RECEPTION NO.
------ ---, 4411<
PITKIN COUNT AR 1 C0 'YCOMMISSIONE'RS
CABS_ 20 0 -
CLERK AND RECORDER'S
ACCEPTANCE
Cob THIS MASTER PLAN FOR 37925 (AKA 31925) HIGHWAY 82 WAS ACCEPTED FOR
FILING IN THE OFFICE OF TRE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
\k PITKIN, SIAFEOFCOLORADO, AT 121qy"O CLOCKFM I THIS tAv-y DAY 0
1 2013. RECORDED AT BK. 04 PG. 9 0 AT
RECEPTION NO. 5-9 41"S
71
RECEPTION#: 599333, 05/0812013 at
BY 12:44:64 PM, I OF 3, R $31.00 Janice K.
Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
COUNTY K and RECORDER PLAT BK 102 PG 90
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
RESOLUTION OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
GRANTING AND ARTERIAL HIGHWAY SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 31925 HIGHWAY 82.
RESOLUTION No. 03-2013.
N
VICINITY MAP
V-AIX. 1,2000
SITE PLAN
W,A&91. 420
Twzes
PAGE 3
TSTAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC
"41 landscape architecture. planning. resort design
412 North Mitt Street Aspen, Colorado 81611
t.9701925-2323 f.970/92o-i628
info@scaptanning.com www.scaptanning.com
i -I I ,
CHARLES CUNNIFFE
ARCHITECTS