The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.planning.264320406008 (2)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat(s) # COPIES: NO :ASE NAME: Alpine Logistics Scenic Overlay Review Plan PROJ ADDR: 2438 Juniper Hill Dr Lot 9 Bilk 7 Fig 1 Brush Creek Village OWN /APP: Alpine Logistics Inc. ADRF— C /S /Z:j PHNT tEP: ADR:F— C /S /Z:�— PHN:r Email Addr: ALLOCATED HOURS FEES DUE: F FEES RCVD:F /o OVER: REFERRALSI REF:— BYF— DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH — NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION: F F— No I t� BOCC Reso: F— I-- F-- o r F— I-- No F—- BOCC Ord: REMARKS no vesting PZ: HRG OFF: CLOSED: BY: �� HO INDEX: ADMIN: Staff Approval PLAT RECORDED PLAT (BK,PG): n/a ADMIN INDEX: VR APPROVAL DATE: F— VR EXPIRES: CASE TYP: Scenic Overlay Review CASE TYP5: CASE TYP2: CASE TYP6: CASE TYP3: CASE TYP7: CASE TYP4: Date Scanned: 2/20/2012 File Location: IFF Box #214 i- —_ i I CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET PITKIN COUNTY DATE RECEIVED: It 5192 DATE COMPLETED PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2643 - 204 -06 -008 P 7 -92 STAFF MEMBER:— ES PROJECT NAME: Alpine Logistics Scenic 0_v_erla Project Address: Lot 9, Block 7, Filing 1, Brush Creek Village a 5�3 % .Tech ��n ��— /fi // bri v APPLICANT: Alpine Logistics, Inc Applicant Address: P.O. Box 276, Aspen, CO 816122 REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Rappaport �r7�jd /ne L09_LSTIGS� _Z/1L- Representative Address /Phone: ,IA_t4 e. Aspen. CO 81611 920 -1134 PAID: (YES) NO AMOUNT: $200 NO.OF COPIES RECEIVED 2/1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: P &Z MEETING DATE PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO BOCC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Staff Level: 1041 Minor Hazard Review: Date of Approval ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ----- -- - - - - -- REFERRALS: No C>R C - on /y OhC he e✓ �¢wc Y Attorney Engineer Housing Aspen Water Envir.Hlth. Manager Div.Wildlife Caucus Zoning Other: _Aspen Consol S.D. _Mtn.Bell _Holy Cross _Aspen Fire _Basalt Fire _Carbondale Fire Div.Water Res. _Airport Manager _CO Geo.SUrvey DATE REFERRED: l /P-(o N cE FINAL ROUTING: County Housing Other: DATE ROUTED _County Engineer Envir. Health FILE STATUS AND LOCATION MOM d4- /(p _ School District Rocky Mtn Nat Gas State Hwy Dept (Glwd) (GrJtn) _ Snowmass Vill USFS (Carbondale) _ USFS (Aspen) BLM City P &Z omeowners Assnr 'IALS: Zoning TO: Alpine Logistics File FROM: Ellen Sassano, Planner RE: Alpine Logistics Administrative Ridgeline Review DATE: April 20, 1992 REQUEST: Glenn Rappaport requests scenic ridgeline review and approval for construction of a residence which is proposed on Lot 9, Block 7, in the Brush Creek Village Subdivision. APPLICANT: Alpine Logistics Administrative Ridgeline Review LOCATION: Lot 9, Block 7, Brush Creek Village Subdivision ZONING: AF -1 ACCESS: Juniper Hill Drive STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to construct a 3,223 square foot single family dwelling with a detached garage of 528 square feet. The lot is located within a mapped ridgeline area. Photographs of the proposed building site, as seen from Brush Creek Road and Highway 82, are attached to the memo. Section 3- 1.13(D) (1) of Ordinance 90 -07 authorizes the Planning Director to approve development within the mapped scenic overlay area when development is found to have an insignificant impact on the visual quality of the ridgeline or overlay area. The Planning Director may approve development with conditions upon a finding that: a. Development cannot be seen from the designated corridors (Highway 82 in this case), or b. In the case of additions or remodels of existing homes, visible development is thirty percent or less, of the existing square footage of the structure; or C. For areas not mapped within the scenic overlay, but included in ridgeline mapping, such development shall not break a ridgeline. The proposed residence is located within a mapped ridgeline area but, as evidenced by attached photographs, the residence will not break the ridgeline as seen from Brush Creek Road or Highway 82. While the home will not break the ridgeline, it will be visible CUA002 from the Highway and Brush Creek Road. The house will be a two story structure with board n' batten siding and a metal roof made of either standing seam or metal shingles. Staff recommends that the metal be a matte material which is dark in color (charcoal, dark grey, black or brown) , and non - reflective. The height of the home will comply with County height standards. The applicant proposes to paint the trim around the doors and windows in evergreen, a primer red (oxblood) or aspen yellow. Staff recommends that earthtone colors be used and that aspen yellow be deleted from the color palette, at least on those portions of the home which will be visible from public viewplanes. In order to minimize visual impact of the residence from the Highway and Brush Creek Road, the applicant has committed to the following design strategies: 1. A narrow building profile will be presented to the public viewplanes (Brush Creek and the Highway). The smallest dimension of the rectangular structure will face Highway 82. 2. The lower level of the home will be sunk into the hill as much as possible without incurring major structural expenses (due to highly expansive soils). Site grading will be minimized by "sitting" the building on its' foundation. The applicant intends to minimize the amount of disturbance to natural topography and vegetation. 3. Given the configuration of the lot, its' soils conditions, topography and areas of surface drainage, as much as possible has been done to move the structure away from the Highway 82 viewplane. 4. A landscape plan will be presented at the time of building permit application for review and approval by the Planning Office. 5. Light sources on the exterior shall not be seen from the public rights -of -way. FINDINGS: 1. The proposed residence is located within a mapped ridgeline area but, as evidenced by attached photographs, the residence will not break the ridgeline as seen from Brush Creek Road or Highway 82. 2. Given the configuration of the lot, its' soils conditions, topography and areas of surface drainage, as much as possible has been done to move the structure away from the Highway 82 viewplane. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve the Administrative Ridgeline Review for a residence on Lot 9, Block 7, Filing 1, in the Brush Creek Village 0000013 P, I Subdivision. Approval shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The house shall be limited to a maximum of two stories in height and shall comply with County height standards, not to exceed 28 feet to the peak of the roof. 2. Roof materials shall be dark in color (charcoal, dark grey, black or brown), and non - reflective. If metal materials are used, a matte surface shall be utilized. 3. Earthtone colors shall be used on the exterior of the house. Yellow shall be deleted from the color palette, at least on those portions of the home which will be visible from public viewplanes. 4. The smallest dimension of the rectangular structure will face Highway 82. 5. A landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit application for review and approval by the Planning Office. 6. Light sources on the exterior shall not be seen from the public rights -of -way. Exterior lighting shall comply with County lighting standards. 7. Revegetation of areas disturbed by construction shall occur within one growing season of construction. 8. All material representations made in the application shall be adhered to. MEMO_alpinelogistics _ scenov UU000 APPROVED: Plannina Director ME A —r Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Board 130 S. Galena ■( A L P I N F Aspen, Co. 81611 L 0 G I S T I C s 1 / 15 / 92 1 N C Re: Scenic Corridor Review Lot 9, B1k. 7, Filing 1 Brush Creek Village, Pitkin Co., Colorado. Dear Board Members, The following is a letter of request submitted on behalf of Alpine Logistics inc. the owners of Lot 9 in Brush Creek Village. We are proposing to build a single family residence of 3,223 sq. ft. gross area, with a detached garage of 528 sq. ft. The house will be a two storey structure with board n' batten siding and a metal roof made of either standing seam or metal shingles. The color of each is intended to be the natural color of the material with the addition of a clear sealer. The trim around the doors and windows will be painted, either an evergreen, a primer red (oxblood), or aspen yellow. Only the center portion of the residence (pitched roof), will approach the height limit, while the lower portions of roof, which will either be flat or slightly sloped for drainage and should not exceed 25 ft. in height. With regards to the specific Scenic Corridor criteria, we feel that: 1. The building has been sited in a small draw and faces east. We have tried to maximize the sun exposure and views while presenting a narrow building profile to the view planes of the scenic corridor. 2. The soils on Lot 9 are extremely expansive. We are attempt- ing to sink the lower level into the hill as much as possible without incurring unrealistic structural expenses. 6 0 X 2 7 6 A 5 P E N C 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X T E L 3 0 3 9 2 0 i 1 3 4 ODUVUS i Letter to County P & Z con't 1 / 15 / 92 page 2 ■( A L P I N L L o c I S T I C S N C We are also concerned about excessive site grading and are trying to "sit" the building on its' foundation so as to minimize the amount of disturbance to the natural topography and vegetation. 3. The building has been designed as a rectanguler structure which presents its' smaller dimension to Highway 82. In this regard it is hopefully minimizing its' impact on that corridor. 4. The proposed structure does not break a ridgeline. 5. The proposed structure is sited about halfway down the slope of the lot and pushed back into the draw in order to minimize the visual impacts on the neighbors and protected view planes. 6. Given the configuration of Lot 9, its' soil conditions, topography and areas of surface drainage, as much as possible has been done to move the structure away from Hwy. 82. 7. Existing vegetation shall be maintained to the greatest extent possible. No irrigated meadows are being proposed and a landscaping plan will be submitted for approval by the P & Z. 8. Light sources on the exterior shall not be seen from the public right -of -ways. 9. This particular site will not allow much in the way of berming because of its topography. 10. The entire site falls within the view plane of either Hwy. 82 or Brush Creek Rd. 11. A 1041 Review is not required. Thankyou for your consideration. Glenn H. Rappaport B O X 2 7 6 A S P E N C 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X T E L 3 0 3 9 2 0 1 1 3 4 606606 F A. ^ K w F 5 1 K f- • w P /ALPINE LOGISTICS mill-ml JAN 13 1992 0 Pitkin County Board Of Adjustment 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 R 8 / 5 / 91 .- �-"F, ��43_aoa -off -W� Re: Lot 9, Block 7, Filing 1 Brush Creek Village Pitkin Co. , Co. ■( A L P I N I L 0 G I S T I C S Contiauous Parcels: 3 O X 2 7 6 A S P E N C 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X / T E L 3 0 3 9 2 0 1 1 3 4 Uul,�u� Lot # Owner Address 2, Blk. 7 Joseph D. Coffey Box 6486 Catherine Goodwin Snowmass Village, Co. 81615 8, Elk. 7 Victor Liss 628 Heather Ln. Darlene Liss Bryn Mawr, Pa. 19010 10, Blk. 7 Thomas F. Gaffney 4279 Echo Rd. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48013 5, Blk. 7 Stanley Bialek Box 4291 Aspen, Co. 81612 1, Blk. 7 Michael A. Vernon Box 9704 Suzanne E. Schaub Aspen, Co. 81612 14, Blk. 7 Michael Herron Box 3052 Aspen, Co. 81612 3 O X 2 7 6 A S P E N C 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X / T E L 3 0 3 9 2 0 1 1 3 4 Uul,�u� r e V' � jj: uWFi ��. , r ...�- v�r•%p��/"'J/i�- �.'lh�t�� Sj•� �, _� �Li .. t t ,% L. PINE L0GISTICS 000015 JAN 13 1992 wu° Ay G R.6 if !c JAN 13 1992 0 v l E w F F e M h R u S U G IG f 4 44 A L PANE LC) T� 000011 S. o A o JAN 13 1932 juOuI2 NORTH ELE ®�ISII Il f r NJI II II 1 , I I , I I I I f I I I I I I EAST ELEVATION 0 1 .IL - ` f I h I flial. 1�' t ®�ISII Il f r NJI II II 1 , I I , I I I I f I I I I I I EAST ELEVATION 0 1 .IL ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 730 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81617 LAND USE (303) 920 -5090 City APPLICATION FEES 00119 00125 00123 00115 County 00113 00125 00123 00113 63250 -134 - 63270 -136 GMP /CONCEPTUAL - 63280 -137 GMP /FINAL -63300-139 SUB/CONCEPTUAL - -63310 -140 SUS/FINAL - -63320 -141 ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS -� REFERRAL FEES: � -63340 -205 -63340-190 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH '63340 -163 HOUSING ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL -63160 -126 -63170 -127 -63180 -128 - 63190 -129 -63200 -130 -63210 -131 63220 -132 - 63230 -1.33 -63450 -146 REFERRAL FEES: -63340 -205 -63340 -190 - 63360 -143 PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080 -122 -63090 -123 -63140 -124 -69000 -145 GMP /GENERAL GMP /DETAILED GMP /FINAL SUB/GENERAL SUB/DETAILED SUB/FINAL ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HOUSING ENGINEERING CITY /COUNTY CODE COMP. PLAN COPY FEES OTHER lc„1� SUBTOTAL _- Name: l TOTAL Address. �¢Iy -1C✓ phone: Check x COOGS received: GUUJi5 Project: �c Date: I IQ-(� PolHours: ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920 -5090 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City COPY FEES 00113 - 63250 -134 GMP /CONCEPTUAL -63270 -136 GMP /FINAL TOTAL -63280 -137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63300 -139 SUB/FINAL Project: ff -63310 -140 ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS -63320 -141 ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS/ Date: Z_ / -� 7 _ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63340 -205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340 -190 HOUSING 00115 33340 -163 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL County 00113 -63160 -126 GMP /GENERAL 33170-127 GMP /DETAILED -63180-128 GMP /FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL 33200-130 SUB/DETAILED - 63210 -131 SUB/FINAL 33220 -132 ALL 2 -STEP APPLICATIONS 33230 -133 ALL 1 -STEP APPLICATIONS ' CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 33450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 33340 -205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 33340 -190 HOUSING 00113 43360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 33080 -122 33090 -123 33140 -124 39000 -145 Name: / Address: -D (1 Check # Copies received: ii III, CITY /COUNTY CODE COMP. PLAN COPY FEES OTHER` SUBTOTAL � TOTAL Phone: Project: ff Date: Z_ / -� 7 _ I � 1� _.. _ ._. � � �., � I -1 �.. �j v �i i '. I. '. ��"�, -. a.e�� C .��R� >��,,, . 6, �.. /J p i � �,,._..� I.�f�r„M��ex.4 nP. / Ain /i a��..... _.. r,'9 p�P d�u3 - -zcx� - oC� -c�D� /oq poc)"j, c 9 IM j /oq poc)"j, c 9 I 0(9 N � � � S Pin Z(�` -i3- ZUz� C5C9-C�O `� Ck A L. f) t � -e L VdIq - Z�