The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpitkin.planning.264320406013 (1993)DOCUMENT LAYOUT THIS FILE MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER Summary Sheet Resolution for the BOCC and /or P &Z Ordinance for the BOCC and /or P &Z Determination for the Hearing Officer Administrative Determination Staff Memo Application Public Notice, Acceptance Letter, Referral(s) Letter Site Plan Miscellaneous Plat(s) WPARCELIO. CLOSED:F — PLAT RECORDEDF -- VR APPROVAL DATE: File PLAT(BICPG): n/e P ' CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET PITKIN COUNTY DATE RECEIVED: 10/12/93 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF MEMBER: RM CASE # P146 -93 PARCEL ID# 2643 - 204 -06 -013 PROJECT NAME: Mullen /Bielec Scenic overlay Review Project Address: 2653 Juniper Hill Dr; Lot 12A Block 7, Filing 1, Brush Creek Village Subdivision APPLICANT: Michael T. Mullen & Rosa Bielec Applicant Address: P.O. Box 1287 Aspen CO 81612 923 -3890 REPRESENTATIVE: Peter Dobrovolney Representative Address /Phone: P.O. Box 1669 Basalt CO 81621 327 -3369 ------------ ------------ FEES: PLANNING $ 207.00 # APPS RECEIVED 4 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 4 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 207.00 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: X 1 STEP: 2 STEP: DRC MEETING DATE P &Z MEETING DATE PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO BOCC MEETING DATE PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO ESTIMATED TIME FOR BOCC: REFERRALS: Attorney _Aspen Consol S.D. _ School District Engineer _Rocky Mtn Nat Gas USFS (Carbondale) Housing Cross _ USFS (Aspen) Aspen Water _Holy _Aspen Fire _ Div. of Wildlife Envir.Hlth. Fire _ BLM Manager _Basalt _Carbondale Fire _ Snowmass Village ✓ Zoning _Div. Water Res. _ Caucus Airport Mgr. Forest Ser. _ Caucus Sheriff _State CO Geo.Survey ✓ Homeowners BraSk City P & Z _State Hwy Dept. _ Open Space Board Building Dept Air Board _ Other: I� _Clean DATE DUE : hI 3 DATE REFERRED: -D - - - - -- INITIALS_ � - - -5 - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- RESOLUTION #: DATE: PLAT OR SITE PLAN RECORDED AT BOOK FINAL ROUTING: County Attorney Housing open Space Bd. Other: FILED: OU0001 or N DATE ROUTED: _County Engineer Envir. Health PAGES) INITIAL: Zoning Applicant Revised 04/06/93 MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Suzanne Konchan, County Planning Director FROM: Rick Magill, Planning Office RE: Mullen /Bielec Administrative Scenic Overlay Review DATE: November 3, 1993 APPLICANTS: Michael Mullen and Rosa Bielec SITE LOCATION: 2653 Juniper Hill Drive; Lot 12A, Block 7, Filing 1, Brush Creek Village Subdivision. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Peter Dobrovolny REQUEST: Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 3 -1.13 and Ordinance 90- 07, the Applicant requests approval of an administrative scenic overlay review for an addition a single family residence. Section 3- 1.13(D)(1) of Ordinance 90 -07 authorizes the Planning Director to approve development within the mapped scenic overlay area when development is found to have an insignificant impact on the visual quality of the ridgeline or overlay area. The Planning Director may approve development with conditions upon a finding that: a. Development cannot be seen from the designated corridors as defined in Section (B)(1), or b. In the case of additions or remodels of existing homes, visible development is thirty percent (30 %) or less, of the existing square footage of the structure, or C. For areas not mapped within the Scenic Overlay but included in Ridgeline mapping, such as development shall not break a ridgeline. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicants propose an addition of a sitting room and an exterior deck to their 3,996 square foot home. In the process of remodeling, 31 square feet will be removed at the Lower Level and 242 square feet will be added to the Main Level, for a net increase of 211 square feet. The proposed deck will be 216 square feet in size. The existing residence breaks a ridgeline (see attached drawing). The structure was built in 1983 and predates Ordinance No. 90 -07, Scenic Foreground Overlay and Ridgeline Review. The residence is within the ridgeline mapping, therefore, the proposed addition is now subject to review under said Ordinance. 000-002 t M E M O R A N D U M TO: Rick Magill, County Planner FROM: Joanna S. Schaffner, County Zoning DATE: October 25, 1993 RE: Mullen /Bielec Scenic Overlay Review I have reviewed the above referenced application, and offer the following comments. ZONE: AF -1, ten acre minimum lot size This parcel is non - conforming in size. SETBACKS: Required setbacks for this parcel are: 100 foot front yard setback 30 foot side and rear yard setback It is not clear whether the proposed addition encroaches into the required 30 foot rear yard setback. The applicant states that the deck will encroach into the rear yard setback. Board of Adjustment approval is required before a building permit can be issued for development within required setbacks. There appears to be an existing encroachment onto Lot 11. HEIGHT: Although this structure has not been measured for compliance with County height regulations, it does not appear to exceed the maximum height limit. FLOOR AREA: This parcel is permitted 15,000 square feet of floor area before Special Review is required. The proposed addition will not cause the residence to exceed 15,000 square feet. . uW04 1. ouoi ,j- 11� 7 Z J O V m t K `9 0 SD 4� -�z �ca o� REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW SCENIC OVERLAY AND RIDGELINE REVIEW Lot 12A, Block 7, Filing One 2653 Juniper Hill Road Brush Creek Village Subdivision Pitkin County OWNER Michael T. Mullen Rosa Bielec 2653 Juniper Hill Drive Brush Creek Village, Pitkin County 923 -3890 Submitted on behalf of the Owners by Peter Dobrovolny 927 -3369 October 12, 1993 OULJ06 Property Description Brush Creek Village is a subdivision whose County approval predates Ordinance No. 90 -07, Scenic Foreground Overlay and Ridgeline Review. The subject property and its improvements are visible from the Highway 82 and Brush Creek corridors, as seen in the attached photographs, taken from the parking lot at the intersection of these two corridors. The existing residence breaks the ridgeline as viewed from both corridors. The first residence constructed on this property was built in 1978. A major remodel with significant square footage added was constructed in 1983 - the structure appearing in the photographs. Proiect Description The current owners propose relatively insignificant remodelling and additions to the existing residence. Included with this request are drawings describing the existing building and the improvements to be made. Included also is a Title Commitment Policy and an Improvement Location Certificate. Request For Administrative Review Request for Administrative Review is made pursuant to the following item of Ordinance No. 90 -07: (D) Planning Director Sign-Off (1) The applicant shall demonstrate that development within the mapped scenic overlay is insignificant and will not impact the visual quality of the ridgeline or overlay area. In this case the Planning Director may approve development with conditions upon a finding that: b. In the case of additions or remodels of existing homes, visible development is thirty percent (308) or less, of the existing square footage of the structure, As described in the floor plan drawings, the existing residence contains 3,996 square feet. In the process of remodelling, 31 square feet will be removed at the Lower Level and 242 square feet will be added at the main level, for a net increase of 211 square feet, representing an increase in floor area of 5.3%, well below 30%. The added deck will be 216 square feet and will require a Board of Adjustment variance. By way of explanation, building setbacks have changed since the date of the first construction. The deck is designed so that the current encroachment into the current setback will not be increased. Though not falling within the definition of building square footage, if the deck area were added, the total increase in floor area would be 427 square feet, or an increase of 10.7%, still well below 301. Mullen - Page 2 Response to Scenic Overlay and Ridgeline Review Criteria The following are item by item responses to the review criteria for development with the Scenic Overlay and Ridgeline mapping: (1) Being remodelling to existing development, the use of existing topography or natural vegetation for screening is not proposed. See the included freehand sketches, developed from the photographs included, which show the addition. The location, on the southwest corner of the existing residence, adds little to the bulk of the building breaking the ridgeline. (2) No innovative architectural techniques are proposed as the intent is to make the minor addition architecturally compatible with the existing building. Exterior finishes will be synthetic stucco, identical in color to the existing residence. See also (1) above. (3) The additional development has minimal effect on the existing visibility of the height and bulk of the building. (4) The existing building breaks the ridge line as viewed from the public corridors below. The addition is located so as to minimize extent by which the building breaks the ridge line. (5) See (4). (6) See (4). (7) The proposed remodelling and additions contemplate no changes to natural vegetation as they are within the basic footprint of the existing building. (8) No facade or landscaping lighting is proposed. Light fixtures to be added for illumination of the new deck will be selected such that the light source is shielded from view. (9) No land forms or earthmoving are proposed. See (7). (10) There is no scenic viewplane identified in the vicinity. (it) No 1041 review is required. In summary, the existing residence breaks the ridgeline as seen from the view corridors below. The remodelling and additions are well within the guidelines of (D) (1) b., as described above. The remodelling and additions are as compatible with the intent of Ordinance 90 -07 as is the existing structure, which predates this ordinance. Your expeditious review and processing will be greatly appreciated. Please call me information or clarifications you may require. Sincerely, * S4VtA;"e1 Peter Dobrovolny SunUp Ltd., Architects Mullen - Page 3 0 uCju3 of this application for any additional vLf-::W F?.aA � I&HWH 82/M5H 6955K, ?DAD IOK%L -tiaJ GLo F- UP JI �V:I FRorn SPUME L-00t IO-) (15C0 MM L 5) JUNO 0 c ca c. '� I ` � Via. r po�•e. - ,,,, r�, , �� : Ems 6,00';. 5olti nre, av- C0. c..s•*l9'7�. �• \ 1 f (,1r1 t 5<2.1 Ck'V-''D 4..'1.1,'Q a Y2oN CAP - POWQ,- pole, We's 2"16.0 Note; The real property described hereon does not lie Flood Hazard Boundary, L6 al Description: Lot 12, Block 7, Brush Creek Vill county, Colorado. IMPROVEMENT LOCUTION CERTIFICAI I hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certlfl Michael T. Mullen , that it is not a I survey plat, and that it is not to be relied upon for t Ing, or other future improvement lines. I further certify that the improvements on the above de 7 June 1993 , except Utility connections, are on of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encro Promises by improvements on any adjoining premises, exc is no a arent eviden Q or sign of any easement crossin parcel,�xCOpt as not . BY r �'di N••�< y n y, n,�`come P.L.S. ,DSO) i 0 •. 1. -�.�t I I 9 (� pou.�Qr pel j•oaZT �Sf>, kP. thin the limits of a 100 Year , Filing No. 1, Pitkin u e was prepared for survey plat or Improvement establishment of fence, build cribed parcel on this date, irely within the l,oundaries :hments upon the described A as indicated, and that there or burdening any part of said UCATION cERnRcnTE L/ ES IN SPA�'�' 'DKCY LINCICOMC (L,S. 1411%) tom .H i I i i I W lb— t�ki- 1'��J3 0S:21HM FKUM MIH Inuesments Inc. TO 9273408 P.07 American Lend Title Amciatlon Commitment - ' `led 10/73 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY N STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPAN valuable consideration, hereby commits toI Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Irt•Stireii or interest covered hereby in tli'etlan n ::r,nt premiums and charges therefor; all'sub and Stipulations hereof.fyy`,, This Commitment shall be effective of the policy or policies committed either at the time of the issuance of ti This Commitment is preliminary to liability and obligations hereunder sl or when the policy or policies corn failure to issue such policy or polici valid or binding until countersigned t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Comp, become valid when countersigned by < with its By -Laws. This Commitment is e ST Countersigned by. Mail 165 l ,'r, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in med, in Sc dy,[a A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate o in chadule A, upon payment of the mromistops'�i06heiAles A and B and to the Conditions 'the identity. of,j#a proposed Insured and the amount been inserted iff Schedule A hereof by the Company, tment or by supsequent endorsement. ,a 78 of sub- �polioy or policies of title insurance and all r..4, e and termmatiesix^ months after the effective date hereof for shall issue,�,,tahhichever first occurs, provided that the the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be Lhorized off�cBr or agent. IS caused this _Cpmmitmant to be signed and sealed, to iorized officer or,''agent of the Company, all in accordance e,asof the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." "kRy ` TITLE ,4CL �, �',N TY CO MRAIiY ^l., _ 10tl I lF W. �p9PQt,,h A 999. : o -tr- VM. S",ja ,r r.r,mr•.• Serial No. C-1601 351831 o w a�J President 10 -08 -1993 03:23PM FROM MTB Invesments Inc. TO SCHEDULE A ORDER NUMBER: 00019877C2 1.. EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 1993 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: A. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY PROPOSED INSURED: MICHAEL T. MULLEN B. ALTA LOAN POLICY PROPOSED INSURED: FIRST COLORADO MORTGAGE COMPANY, IT'S SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS C. ALTA LOAN POLICY PROPOSED INSURED: D. 9273408. P.02 AMOUNT OF INSURANCE $ 495,000.00 $ 395,000.00 R 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: CIBACORP LIMITED, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lot 12A , Block 7, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, FILING NO. 1 County of Pitkin, State of Colorado OWNERS: MORTGAGEE: TAX CERT. FORM 100 OuML2 $ 1,317.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00 $ 50.00 �• 9IG-TA-TURE STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 E. Hopkins ASPEN, COLORADO 303 925 -3577 FAX 303- 925 -1384 81611 10 -08 -1993 03:24PM FROM MTS Invesments Inc. TO ORDER NUMBER: 00019877C2 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: 9273408' P.03 ITEM (A) PAYMENT TO OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS OF THE FULL CONSIDERATION FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED. ITEM (B) PROPER INSTRUMENTS) CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD, TO WIT: 1. Release of Deed of Trust dated May 29, 1984, executed by Herbert S. Klein and Marsha L. M. Klein, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to secure an indebtedness of $243,000.00, in favor of Aspen Savings and Loan Association, recorded June 1, 1984 in Book 467 at Page 239 as Reception No. 259927. NOTE: The beneficial interest under said Deed of Trust was assigned of record to Commerce McGehee Mortgage, Inc. by Aspen Savings and Loan Association recorded June 14, 1984 in Book 467 at Page 932 as Reception No. 260264. 2. Evidence satisfactory to Stewart Title Guaranty Company of the following matters regarding Cibacorp Limited: A - Proper incorporation and good standing in the Jurisdication of Incorporation. B - The contemplated transaction does not violate any by -laws of the subject corporation. C - The contemplated transaction does not violate any law, ordinance or regulation in the Jurisdiction of Incorporation. D - That the proper person(s) have been regularly authorized by the appropriate corporate resolution to act on its behalf. Corporate Resolution authorizing the proposed sale and indentifying the person(s) authorized to execute said instrument. 3. Deed from vested owner, vesting fee simple title in purchaser(s). 4. Improvement Survey of the subject property, completed in the last six months approved by Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., this survey is to be retained in the files of Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc, and Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. reserves the right to add further requirements and /or exceptions to this commitment upon receipt of said survey. 5. Indemnity and Affidavit as to Debts, Liens and Leases, duly executed by the borrower and approved by Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. 6. Deed of Trust from the Borrower to the Public Trustee for the use of the proposed lender to secure the loan. UuCj13 10 -08 -1993 03 :25PM FRC MTB Invesments Inc. TO 9273408 P.04 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS ORDER NUMBER: 00019877C2 THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY: 1. RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES WOULD DISCLOSE AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 6. UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. 7. ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ANY UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. 8. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 9. An undivided one -half of all minerals in subject property as reserved by Robert M. Burlingame in instrument recorded August 26, 1959 in Book 188 at Page 390. NOTE: Quit Claim Deed conveying right of surface entry to owners of record from Robert M. Burlingame as to rights reserved above, as set forth in Deed recorded December 10, 1965 in Book 217 at Page 352 as Reception No. 122744. 10. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States and all the coal and other minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same, as reserved in patent for that portion of subject property lying in Lot 4, Section 28, Township 9 South, Range 85 West, recorded April 17, 1937 as Reception No. 88970 in Book 162 at Page 549. 11. Restrictions which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter clause, buttomitting restrictions, if any, based on race, color, religion or national origin, as contained in instrument recorded January 19, 1966 in Book 218 at Page 206 as Reception No. 123147, and First Amendment thereto recorded October 20, Continued on next page 000J14 10 -0e -1993 03:27PM FROM MTB Invesments Inc. f❑ 132'(3408 P.Ob CONTINUATION SHEET SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ORDER NUMBER: 0001987702 1972 in Book 267 at Page 975, and Second Amendment thereto recorded February 22, 1979 in Book 363 at Page 717 as Reception No. 212102. 12. Agreement between The City of Aspen and Elay Corporation recorded August 8, 1967 in Book 228 at Page 269 as Reception No. 128105. 13. Easements reserved in instrument recorded January 19, 1966 in Book 218 at page 206, which are described therein as follows: "Perpetual Easements ten feet in width on each side of the boundary line along the entire perimeter of each lot for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, operating, replacing, enlarging and repairing electric, telephone, water irrigation, sewer, gas and similar lines, pipes, wires and conduits and walking and bridle trails; provided, however, in the event more than one lot or tract as shown on the plat is sold in one unit at one time, to be used as one unit, said ten -foot easement shall be around the perimeter of said lots or tracts sold as a unit and not around each individual lot or tract." 14. Terms, conditions and obligations as contained in By -laws of Brush Creek Landowners Association, Inc., recorded November 17, 1975 in Book 305 at Page 483 as Reception No. 179390 and in Articles of Incorporation of Brush Creek Landowners Association, Inc., recorded November 17, 1975 in Book 305 at Page 492 as Reception No. 179391. 15. Easements and rights of way as shown on the recorded Plat of Brush Creek Village in Book 3 at Page 62 and Amendment thereto recorded September 27, 1981 in Plat Book 6 at Page 31. 16. Terms, conditions, obligations and restrictions as set forth in Agreement regarding road use and maintenance, between Morgan Merrill and the Brush Creek Village Landowners Association, recorded March 21, 1989 in Book 588 at Page 236 as Reception No. 309841. 17. Terms, conditions and obligations as set forth in Decree creating Brush Creek Village Water District, recorded September 19, 1989 in Book 602 at Page 204 as Reception No. 315213, and Order Correcting Boundary Description of Brush Creek Village Water District recorded March 26, 1990 in Book 616 at Page 898 as Reception No. 321210. 18. Terms, conditions, obligations and restrictions as set forth in Continued on next page uU0015 CONTINUATION SHEET SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ORDER NUMBER: 0001987702 Easement Agreement regarding access through Cozy Point Ranch recorded September 29, 1992 in Book 689 at Page 972 as Reception No. 349110. 19. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Agreement between Herbert S. Klein, Marsha L. Klein and Richard Arnold and Pam Arnold for purpose of easement obligations, road maintenance and water well sharing recorded May 13, 1985 in Book 486 at Page 962 as Reception No. 268557. NOTE: Provided that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. records the documents of conveyance in the proposed transaction the status of title will be updated from the time of this commitment to the time of said recording. If said update reveals no intervening liens or other changes in the status of said title Exception No. 5 herein will be deleted; if said update reveals intervening liens or changes in the status of said title appropriate action(s) will be taken to disclose or eliminate said change prior to the recording of said documents. NOTE: Policies issued hereunder will conditions, and exclusions set forth i form. Copies of the 1990 form Policy terms, conditions and exclusions, will request. 0 u6u16 be subject to the terms, n the ALTA 1990 Policy Jacket, setting forth said be made available upon ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Aspen, Galena 8 617r (303) 920 -5090 a..11YY LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY: - 63250 -134 - 63270 -136 - 63280 -137 - 63300 -139 - 63310 -140 - 63320 -141 - 63330 -150 -63432 -157 -63432 -157 - 00100- 00000 -31070 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -53335 -151 -63336 -152 - 63337 -153 - 63338 -154 - 63339 -155 COUNTY: - 63160 -126 - 63170 -127 - 63180 -128 - 63190 -129 - 63200 -130 - 63210 -131 - 63220 -132 - 63230 -133 - 63240 -149 - 63450 -146 - 63235 -148 REFERRAL FEES: - 63360 -143 00115 - 63340 -163 00123 - 63340 -190 00125 - 63340 -205 PLANNING OFFICE SALES: - 63080 -122 - 69000 -145 ouco 1, Name: Address: Check #: GMP /Conceptual GMP /Final SUB /Conceptual SUB /Final All -2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Permit Use Tax for Sign Permits Exemption Minor Major Devel. Signif. Devel. Demolition GMP /General GMP /Detailed GMP /Final SUB /General SUB /Detailed SUB /Final All 2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Check Engineering - County Engineering - City Housing Environmental Health County Code Other (Copy Fees) �� n TOTAL 1/ .Phone: Projw .'ov !I'm' 'wl'ord w 1.1, r p►vb Z(_QLj3 --Zoq-o(.o- 013 casp plqb-9s