HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.min.reg.12261978 ����`. ' . ' _
r.:�:�
- ,, .
:. . . , . ,.,.. �,:., • ,� , ,r. w• ��.
`�;.
r �!��
�.Fl,:
��
�a
�:�
PITRIN COUNTY it
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
J
. Meeting Agenda ��
December 26, 1978 ��
:<
. :�
9:00 a.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION '�
T
�
9:15 a.m. RESOLUTIONS/CONTRACTS: 3
' �
1. County Attorney Contract - SMS � _
2. White Star Subdivision - RG
3. Star Mesa Subdivision - RG �
4. Vagneur Subdivision - RG
5. ADAP Grant - DM
6. Resolution Adopting 1979 Budget - TO ,�
7. Resolution Appropriating Funds for 1979 - TO
9:30 a.m. SET P.H. TIMES/FIRST READINGS:(2/12/78) �
� y
�+ 1. Supplemental Appropriations to 197B Budget(1Q a.m.) �
I 2. Mollica Lot Separation(2:00 p.m.)
� 3. Racquet Club Special Review(2:15 p.m.) �:b0 �
,•� 4. Code Amendment: PMH Application Date Change� p.m.} �
c
� 9:35 a.m. ISI Proposed Project List - PAK �
� 9:45 a.m. Recommended Appointment of Dept. Head to PRS - PAIC :;
�7
10:00 a.m. P.H. Trailways Special Review - CS ;�
10:20 a.m. Trailways Lease - SMS �'�
�
� 10:30 a.m. P_H. Repealing Section 28.01 of Airport Regs - S2�S :�,
;�:
,� 10:40 a.m. Approval of Ambnlance Licenses - SbfS/BM �;�
.�
10:50 a.m. P&Z Alternate Position
:�
11:00 a.m. P.H. Grange Subdivision General Submission ;�
'�
11:20 a.m. Subdivision Exemption: Addition to Iselin Park - JR ',�
x
3 .
11:45 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. LUNCH BREAK^-DO YOUR OWN TAING :ff
, .
1:30 p.m. P.H. Highlands Ranch General Submission - RG �;
�T
1:50 p.m. Snowmass Plan Policy Statement - JW ,�
a
2:20 p.m. Land & Water Conservation Funds/Trail Development - JV ;'�
5a�zr ?
2:40 p.m. Decision on Planners �� for Civil Defense -. TO
�
3:00 p.m. Lift Ticket Users Tax Discussion M 4 ,
3:30 p.m. Denve?- & Rio Grande Railroad - BC/CS }
_ �
i
IS JOE EDWARDS t9ILL2NC TQ AGREE TO BE QN TIME? h
,1
{
i i
' ;
I
i
�:�r���
_ > _
PITKIN COUNTY ;�.
` f:>
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS if
Regular MeetinR December 26, 1978 �'�,
��
PRESENT: Chairman Robert W. Child, Michael Kinsley N�
---------- �
k+
County Kinsley moved Lhat the Chairman be authorized to aign the County Attorney's contract �
Attorney t'��`,
Contract with an amendment to allow the Attorney additional vacation time in lieu of comp time. �
.
- Child s�condeu and the motion passed unanimously. ��
---------- �
White Kins2ey moved approva2 of two resolutions denyfng the White Star and Star Mesa sub- °�. �
Star,
Star division applications. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
Mesa
` Vagneur Child moved to table the resolution denying the Vagneur Ranch subdivision application.
; Ranch
� Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
:,
* --------
fr :�
� Night Kinsley asked about the status of night flights at�:Sardy Field. Airport Manager poug
k Flights
�s McCoy said Rocky Mountain Airways is already flying at night, and Aspen Airways` lights
'� :�
� should be installed in two weeks. Stuller added that Rocky Mountain has tumed their
k
�
lights over to Pitkin County. �:
. l�DAp McCoy presented an amendment to the ADAP grant for land acquisition at the airport.
Grant
Ament- He expl.ained that this will remove parcels A and S (Van Orden and United Lumber tracts)
. ment
� from the 0-4 grant, and only the remaining listed parcels will be retained in the grant,
along with fencing and radios. Most of the parcels in the grant have now been acquired.
Child asked if this is in line with budgeted revenues and expenditures for the airport, i
x
Finance Director Tom Oken replied it is. McCoy also presented a certification as to !� �
resolution to adopt the 0-6 grant for parceZs A and S wh3ch ia under the emplanement
d3screGionary fund. Kinsley asked if doing so would preclude other options for those
funds. McCoy replied it would not, since the only other improvements needed at the
airport are lengthening and widening of the runway. Kinsley moved approval of the grant
amendment, the resalution accepting the amendment, and the certification as to resolution. ,�
Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
1979 Kinsley moved approval of two resolutions adopting the 1974 budget, and appropriating
Budget
sums of money for 1979. Oken explained that the appropriations resolution is done by
fund; in 1978 it was done by department using operating expenditures versus capital
Coffinissioners Meeting December 26, 1978 - 1 �
� �
;. : ;
; , . :. . ; ,; .
.. �:�'., r'<. .
:.�-��'Y�_ .
.:.t + � _ .
C.;•
. .c�� . . . . . . ' . , . . � � . . . ___.. ' _
_ s�e
i�,
fX
expenditures. He felt it would be preferable to do the appropriations by fund in 1979
f'r.
and control the budget administratively. Child asked i£ that wouId lessen control, c�
i::i
,<
Oken said it would not. He added that the budget document is binding and enforceable w'�
t;<
administratively; there will be more control added whenthe purchasing manual is `i�'
�;�
r�
adopted. Child seconddd the motion and it passed unanimously. K�
__.�_�� �
�
Minutes Kinsley moved approval of the minutes of October 23, November 6, November 10, �
November 13 and November 27, 1978. Child seconded, requesting a word amendment on �
the November 13th minutes. Kinsley accepted the amendment and the motion passed
unanimously. _
First Kinsley moved to approve on first readtng and set for pnblic hearing the Land Use
Reading:
LUC Code amendment for YMFi application dates for February 12, 1974 at 3:00, and to set
Amendment, �
; Set for public hearing the Mollica lot split at 2:00 and Racquet Club special review at £
% Public
`. Hearings z:15 on February 12, 1979. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Kinsley
then moved to continue today's meeting to 1:00 p.m., Thursday, December 28, 1978 to
adopt the supplemental appropriations to the 1978 budget on first reading, and to set
� the public hearing for Friday, December 29, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. Child seconded and the
y motion passed unanimously.
�
� � Treasurer's Child moved to approve the Treasurer's report for November. Kinsley aeconded and the •
� L Report
� motion passed unanimously.
�
z
� __--------
.i �
$ Grant Phyllis Kenny, Personnel Director, presented a Zist of possible pro�ects for which
jProjects
grant applications may be filed. She requested that the Board prioritize this Zist, �
�
and International Systems, Inc., the firm hired to do grant work, will be notified of ',� A
� the highest priority pro�ects. Kenny added that a pre-application for a IiUD co�unity ,�
development grant is being prepared now since the suhmittal deadline is Sanuary 15th. `
The Board agreed to review the proposed projects and return with priorities.
Personnel Kenny reported that the new personnal manual includes a change in membership in the
Revlew
_,Board Personnel Review Board. 'Lw+o employees have been elected Eor the Board, and the Com-
� Appoint-
ment missioners raust now appoint a department head. Of the three department heads that have
applied, John Young, Doug McCay and Mark Danielsen, the PRB recommended that John
Young be appointed. Kinsley moved to appoint Young to the Board. Child seconded and
the motion passed unanimously. Kinsley suggested that Kenny approa�h the Personnel
�
�
Commissionera Meeting December 26, 1978 - 2 �
� r
� �' .
7
_ .- . , .: _ .
�
, ,:: :
�: ���
r:M.°,;";:�,
a.y,,
i. -
.,:,,,,;;
�; a � — •
�.—•�_ - _ . —
A,
:. >
Review Board with the idea of putting a taxpayer on th� Board. Kenny agreed to do so.
4.".:
�K'
��������� ���.
1;:
Public The $oard convened a public hearing to consider an application by Trailways bus �j
Hearing: "d'
Trailways systems to locate their bus terminal at Sardy Field. Curt Stewart, Transportation k;
Special rT
Review Planner, explained that special review approval is required in the AF-2 zone, and 1041 `�
;�
review is necessary because the location is in an airport hazard area. He submitted ;y,x�'r`
for the record the Planning Office memo of December 20, 1978 and a November 13, 1978 �
letter from R.D. Smallwood of Trailways. Kinsley felt the wording on page two of the �
� �
memo stating the location of the facility is at the "edge" of the runway is inaccurate; k
he requested that the word "edge" be changed to "side". Stewart explained that a num- �` ,
�ber of sites were considered for location of the bus terminal, but the sirport seemed
to be the best alternative; f.t is accessible to other modes of transportation, and �i
maintenance facilities could be tied together. The Voorhees study, the Master Plan �
€
and the PBQ&D alternatives study all considered the possibil3ty oE locating the bus
F
- terminal at the airport. Stewart recommended approval of the application with the
� condition that Trailways work with the taxis, limousines and courtesy cars to help
p:
=� gat people to town from the terminal. Stewart noted that the Ski Corporation buses
4 returning from Snowmass Village will stop to pick people up on the highway, but will
'� not turn in to the terminal. Kinsley felt it would be too difficult for tourists to
�
move all their luggage and skis to the highway. McCoy said the ski buses are asaally
�
3 full anyway; he felt courtesy cars and cabs would be a more appropriate way to trans-
i
port people to town. He added that he,:is looking at installing a phone board for
`�; lodges with courtesy cars in the bus terminal. Kinsley requested that McCoy also e
�
- � install signs informing people of the varions transportation methods which can be
'� used to get to town. Stewart stated that the P & Z reco�ended approv3ng the Trailways .
�' application and reviewing it when the airport master plan work has been completed. 3
Stewart stated that there are 50�6 more cabs this year than last, so the cab company
feels they will be able to catry the bus passengers to town. Kinsley suggested having
the buses drive to Ruby park and unload passengers there and pick passengers up at
the sirport. Stewart said that would be unworkable because there would be no place to
unload the luggage. Child agreed, adding that at the airport passengers cauld use the
waiting room, phone and luggage space. Dick Rand, of Trailways, added that 3f pas-
sengers were dropped off in town they would expect to be picked up there too. Kinsley :�
asked how the Trailways' bus supply compares with the demand for bus service to Aspen. �
Rand repZied that the current equipment is at capacity; many buses are not used during
the week, but on weekends Trailwaya could use all the buses they have and more. Rand �
Commisaionera Meeting December 26, 1978 - 3
� 'F;
c�
F -�,�`..�kr
� ���F � � . . . . . � . . . . .. . " - . . .. .. -
.����
co�ented that their service would be more efficient if people came'to Aspen midweek "�
t'�u;
instead of always ott weekends. Most of the people who ride Trailways Yo Aspen are �{
not from benver, but are tourists who arrive in Denver at Stapleton Airport and then i�
:�
ride the bus to Aspen. Rand felt a midweek booking policy would help greatly to �n
Fr
reduce this weekend rush. Brian Stafford, Assistant County Manager, agreed that the i';`
�fi
ti:
weekend crunch is a big problem. There being no further public co�ent, the hearing ��
i>�
was closed.
Kinsley moved approval of the special review and 1041 review appl�cations for a bus ;�
" ��
terminal at the airport with the condition that the operation be reviewed at the t�
second meeting in August 1979. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously. �,.
---------- �
Tra32ways Doug McCoy presented a lease to Trailways for their space in the old terminal. He �4
Lease
noted that space in the termfna2 has been reserved for Bonanza, Murnane and Crested
�
Butte Aizways in the non-exclusive areas. Kinsley suggested allowing Trailways to �'�'
�.
�
use the maintenance area for buses. McCoy said that would be possible, although some
remodeling would be necessary. He noted that Bonanza, Murnane and Crested Butte
woutd all eventually like to rent space in the main terminal. Kinsley said it would
make sense for all three charter operations to use the same space. Rinsley asked
about lease of the bus load3ng area. McCoy said he planned on parking two buses in
fro�ht of the terminal, but he would like flexibility on the area for parking.
Stuller noted that Trailways has requested two minor changes to the lease: one
wording amendment, and a provision assuring two bus loading areas will be made available
�
to them. Kinsley moved approval of the lease with the two requested changes. Child '�
commented that the County is giving up a lot of circulation area and felt Trailways �
t
shoul.d be charged for the use of that space. McCoy said the problem is tying this
G
i
lease in with the FBO lease, since the FBO operators have control of some of the �' a
�
' terminal parking area; he could charge Trailways for use of the area in front of the
� terminal and for overnight bus storage. Rand said there would be buses stored at the
;
terminal on Friday and Saturday nights. Kinsley requested that Stewart figure out how
many additional cars and taxis this bus operation will generate, and figure out how
� their activity fits with the McDavid FBO lease. Child asked if vending machines will
� be available at the terminal. McCoy said they will be located in the non-exclusive
� area o£ the terminal, and are covered under the County's lease with the vending company.
�
� Child asked about the requirement For confidentiality for figures on the number of �
�
passengers and revenues generated from this operation; he felt the number of passengersf�
must be considered when the operation comes up for review in August. Stuller said
�
1�
Commissioners Meeting December 26, 1978 - 4 �
.d f
x �
. .., t;64�rT.p r. :. ' .
�A-`•'vak`,^::3 . .
s��� �Y�-�.,� � . . : ..
� ;,t~ . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _
� :g . . . . . � .
�,:
that refers to their fiscal reports; she saggested the Board request that separate �„ri`
figures on the number of riders and number of buses be furnished independent of the �`
��
revenue figures. She added that this lease will have to terminate in August if the [¢'
�
y.
special review approval ie renewable in August. Child asked about charges for snow- :.t
plawing. McCoy sald the area would have to be plowed whether or not the buses were �
1
�;
E�parked in front of the ter�rtinal, and since their rent ia already substantial he did
not charge extra for plowing. �'
Child seconded the motion for approval with the conditions that the two changes �
_ - ;,
requested by Trailways be incarporated into the lease, a termination provision be
added in case special review is not granted in August, and a clause requ3ring infor- =
�
mation on the number of buses and passengers be included. Kinsley accepted the amend- �
ments and the motion pasaed ananimously. McCoy asked if Trailways could now move into
the terminal space. The Soard repl3ed they could.
Public '�e Board convened a public hearing to consider the repeal of section 28.01 of the
Hearing:
Airport �rport regulations which prohibits jets from landing or taking off from Sardy Field
Regula-
tions before 8:00 a.m. Stuller explained that this clause is independent of the 7:00 a.m.
Amendment
curfew, and repeal is'advised because the FAA feels these types of regulations may be
discriminatory because some propeller planes are louder than same jets. She added that
the FAA feels noise regulations must be based on decibel levels, not on types of air-
craft. The repeal of this sectionwill leave intact the 7:00 a.m, curfew. Kinsley
clarified that the repeal of this section is the only appropriate thing to do, given
the fact that some propeller aircraft are noisier than some jet aircraft. Stuller
added that this regulations is in the nature of a noise regulations which relies on
the attribute of the plane rather than the total noise emission leve2. Kinsley asked
i
about the County's review mechanism on noise abatement procedures. McCoy teplied the ' a
noise abatement isn't scheduled for formal review; there have not been any noise
complaints between the hours of 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. There being no public co�ent, the
hearing was closed.
Child moved approval of the resolution repealing section 28.01 of the airport regula-
tions. Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
P
p & Z �Child moved to appoint Jim Dfartin as an alternate member to the Planning and Zoning �
�; Appointment
Commission. Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
; Grange The $oard convened a public hear3ng to consider the general submission application by
`: Lot Split �
i
i � �
z Commissioners Meeting December 26, 1978 - 5
�
i:
e,
, �?��
.e+N;:ry�i�i•:+
:i�-
,..,. -�.«>.w�.�..,�,.,,..,,�aeur va
,�,;�:�: _ ,
�, _ �
y T�.'
/Y.
Kel1y Grange for separation of a 60 acre parcel from his 147 acre tract. In their ���.
review, the Colorado Geological Survey comnented that no deve2opment was specified in �'`
p:
. y
the application so they evaluated the property on that basis. There are several ��`
i'F
geological constra3nts so an engineered foundation will be needed. Since no building ys:
site has been chosen the P & Z recommended that a �� '
, geological report be done on the
ti
prospective building site prior to issuance of a building permit. Kinsley felt the �
Board should also review that site. Grice noted that a review sould be sutomatic if i�
G
FS
the building site is in a 1�41 hazard area. The present application is very unclear E;
and the County Eng3neer had several complaints, most of which have now been corrected. �
Grice suggested that all these items be resolved as a condition of approval. Kinsley �
expressed concem about the location of the new dwelling since the area is very ,
visuslly vulnerable. Grice said the prospective buyer probably will not build for
i
another ten years. Kinsley asked when the Board would review the actual building �
site. Grice said they would not review it unless it is shown in a hazard area. �
�Kinsley said he would like to consider visual vulnerability at detailed submission,
�
and asked that the Planning Office make a recommendation on a building at that time. �
Grice stated that Gzange is reluctant to choose a site because he doesn't know where �
the prospective buyer wants to build; the ent3re tract is shown as high visual vuI- �
nerability on the CSU maps. He added that the buyer may wish to build on the east
side of the river, which would be less visible. There was no public coament.
X
Kinsley move@ general submission approval for the lot split with the conditions �
�
a
that a recoffinendation on the building enve2ope with respect to visual wlnerability �
be made by the Planning Office at detailed submission, a geologic engineer check the
building site prior to issuance of a building permit, and the corrections requested ,�
by Lou Buettner, City Engineer, in his October 20, 1978 memo be made. Child seconded ?
and the motion passed unanimously. �ti
�
-------�-- �g
§
City Jim Reents, o£ the Planning Office, presented a subdivision exemption application by �
of Aspen �
Subdivision the City of Aspen so they may acquire seven additiona2 acres of land north of Iselin �
Exemption �
Park and west of the Moore pool. He noted that this is allowed under section �
4.02.02(a)4 of the Code, conceming creation of community fac3lities. The land will
either be used for the construction of additional basebail fields or as open space �
!
for croas-country skiing. Kinsley asked about a trail easement. Stafford said one �
would 6e needed. Stuller asked if the City submitted a plat. Reents replied they
did noC; the CiLy Engineer did not have time to prepare a plat, bat acquisition ot �
:�
��
Commissioners Meeting . December 26, 1978 - 6 �
#±
�
'j:
�
-.��5��,.
p. fi.��1i'� - . - .
. �1sw_ . . . . . ' .. � .. . . . � . . . � .. . .. . .
..� -su. . . � ... . . . . . _
�!'
the parce2 depends on this exemption being approved this year for tax purposes. `'�`
Stuller suggested that the City be exempted from the pl.at requirement now, but that ��
t'
�"r
a plat be presented later with the neceasary trail easement shown and dedicated ro ;�
�;
the County. The p2at could also conta3n the condition that this area be maintained �
h
as a community facility area. Kinsley stressed that assurances are needed that a �s
1� ,
trail will be kept along the parcel. Stuller felt that could be done administratively.�
Kinsley moved approval of the subdivision exemption with the condltions that the �
h
land be used as a community facility, a plat be supplied in conformance caith the
� requirements, and a trail dedication be ehown with the cottdition that the trail will
be replaced or relocated Yf necessary as a result of construction of a community
facility. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously. a
--------- �
Ambulance Bill McCrocklin, of the Sheriff's Office, presented ambulance license appllcationa �
Licenses �
for 1979. The first application is from Mountain Ambulance; the Emergency Medical �
Services Council (EMS) recommended approval with waivers granted on the staff.ing, �
and radio requirements. McCrocklin noted that the changes requested by the EMS after �
inspection of the vehicle have been made, and they recommended that the three var-
iances approved by the $nard on November 22, 1978 concerning section 2 D (staffing),
3 E (co�unications), and vehicle desiga specifications be continued in 1979.
McCrociclin added that the waivers for staffing and radio requirements concern a pro- �
- posed amendment to the ambulance regulations which has been set for public hearing
on January 22, I979. Child moved approval of the Mountain Ambulance license with �
the two waivers and three variances noted. Kinsley seconded and the a�otion passed
unanimously.
The EMS also recomnended approval of the Mid-Continent Resources application with
�
waivers given on radio and staffing, as was done with Mountain Ambalance. Kinsley
�1
- moved approval of the license conditional upoa adoption of the two amendments to be �
cottsidered on January 22, I979. Chi1d seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
�
McCrocklin reported that the EMS recommended approval of the Anschutz (Snowmass �
Coal Company) license with a waiver granted for the radio system. He explained that �
this waiver is necessary becaccse the Anschutz radio co�unicates with the Valley View �
hospital in Glenwood Springs, not the Aspen Valley hospital. Ch31d moved approval
�
with one waiver. Kinsley secnnded and the motion passed unanimously. �
The EMS recommended approval of the Harrison-Western Corporation application with
y
no waivers. Kinaley moved approval. ChiSd seconded and the motion passed unanimously. '�
McCrocklin noted that Perini Corporation has not submitted an application for a �
e
u
�
Commissioners Meeting Decem6er 26, 1978 - 7 �
�
F
�:
::„�.�::'.
_ ! � �
� k., _; - • .
,v4._3�ir" .
� „-`''� . � � . . � -'
}.
i;
' ��k;y;:'.�.: .
idU
license, but the vehicle has been inspected and meets all requirementa. K3naley `a;':
moved approval sub3ect to receipt of an application and filing fee. Child seconded ;r
3
��
and the motion passed unanimously. it
5
t.;
McCrocklin reported that both vehicles for the Aspen Va12ey hospital initially failed N
�
the inspection, but this situation has been corrected. Kinsley moved approval of �
their 13censes with the candition that the main stretcher tie downs on vehicle #3586
�
�
he replaced, and that a f3ling fee be paid. Child secanded and the motion passed �
. unanimously. �
MeCrocklin stated thaC the County has received no application from Snowmass-W3ldcat
Fire Department, and after inspecting their vehicle the F,MS determined that the main �
stretcher tie down needs replacement. Child moved approval with the conditions that
an application be filed with the County, and that the main stretcher tie down be re-
placed. Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
McCrocklin reported that E.B. Construction, wotking at the Hunter Cree[c diversion
site, has not filed an application, and the EMS inspection determined that the
ambulance has no�.radio, no back boards, and no EMT available on the second shift.
The Board can either deny the application or approve iC based on E.B. Construction's
correction of these deficiencies. Staller recommended that conditional approval be
granted and if the situation is not rectified within ehirty days the license be �
. automaticalZy revoked. Child moved to grant conditional approval for a thirty day �
period, with the three conditions cited by McCrockZin to be corrected by that time
or the license will be revoked. Kinsley seconded and the motion passed unanimoasly. �
--------- �
Public The Board convened a public hearing to consider the general submission application �
Hearing: ,�
F�ighlanda by the Highland Ranch for a lot sp11t on their propezty located at the intersection
Ranch `
F
Lot of Castle and Conundrum Creeks. Richard Grice explained that the applicant wishes ta � �
Split '�
create one single-family homesite, and the area was evaluated by geologist Nick Lampiris�.
for flood pla3n, suitable building sites, etc. There ia a potential problem with the
sewage disposal system; an engineered, sophisticated sewage system will be necessary i
because this Iocation is so close ta Castle Creek which is part of Aspen's water supply. �
Herb Klein, representing the applicant, said an evapo-transpiration system is being �
considered by the prospective buyer. Grice teported Chat water availability has been �
�
shown, but the Division of Water Resoarces will not issue a well permit unless �
Highlands Ranch agrees to put back some of their water tights; a bui2ding permit will
not be issue8 until that is dona. The application has been reviewed by the Fire i
�
Department and the response time in summer months is estimated at 18 minutes. The
�
�
� �C
Commissioners Meeting December 26, 1978 - 8 'r;
i�
fi
i
;E•'`r,,��.
,..-
� i�,
u� �r. - •
�� �.� _
.y'
Colorado Geolqgical Survey commented that any house should be set back more than six �"
feet from the stream bank; Lampiris' reco�endation was for a six foot setback. `�
�
Klein said the buyet doesn't intend to build within six feet of the stream. Grice i
�
also noted that a soils report should be done prior to detailed submission in order �
to evaluate erosion potential. The Planning OfEice reco�ends approval of the general �
submission with conditions concerning soils reports, the sewage disposal system, �
engineering cownents, a well permit, and a deed covenattt against futare aubdivision �
r
of the ten acre parcel. Kleia commented tbat his client is wiliing to go aloag with
the covenant against future subdivision, a2thoagh he doea not feel that is required
by the Code.
Ki.nsley moved approval of the application with the following conditions: a soils
report be prepared by a qualified engineer to determiae appropriate homesites, an �
engineered sewage disposal system be approved by the County Sanftarian, the clari£i- �
cations requested by Lou Buettner in his October 25, 1978 memo be made, the ten acre �
parcel be deed covenanted against future subdivision, and proof of water in the form
�
of a well permit be provided. Child requested an amendment to state that City approval�
also be given to the sewage system. Kinsley felt that was unnecessary, since Bob �
Nelson would consider that. Grice asked if the requirement for soils testa to deter- �
�mine faundation design is deleted at this point. Kinsley replied it is. Child
seconded the motion, without amendment, and it passed unanimously.
Snocvmass .Toe Wells, of the Planning Office, presented the Snowmass Village HIaster Plan
VilY.:ge
Master Policy Statement which has been rev3ewed by the P fi Z, at the Board's request, and
Plan
approval without amendment was recommended. Bill ICane suggested if the Soard has
any reservations or requested changes to the plan, they draft a resolution stating �
these comments and it be presented to the Town Council. He felt that would be the � ,
most efficient method of response since the resolution would be attached to the Plan, �
�
and a record would be made of the Board's recommendations. Kinsley said he had �
considerations about the overzoning concept, although details may solve this problem, y
and felt it was inappropriate for Wells to both draw up the document for Snowmass �
V311age and review it for the County. Welle explained that he has not reviewed this �
document for the County; he is present as the Town of Snowmass Village planner. :� E.3
Y
- Kinsley felt a different member of the Planning Office should revlew and analyze the ;
�
Master Plan. He added that it is the Board's statutory respons3bility to thoroughly r
�
review this master p2an, since what happens in the future is based on this document. �
F
�'
9
u
u
�
December 26 1978 - 9 �
Commissioners Meeting � �k;
�;
f:
i
� . � ..,,:..;...�. „ E.- , .��.:- :......:-.�. :.��.,.�.._ . " . ..�'... � .... ... .
.,� 'Fu
!,:;��'fx:. .
t c; " •t` " .
S 'i,�4Y`��. . .
.j�FtAl�.;.t. . � . . . . -
i�
q:.
i•
Kinsley commented that the zoning of the area northwest of the rodeo groanda ts '�i-•
inappropriate. Wells replied that prior to the County's approval that land was with- f�`
�
o�
held fot possible future development, so Snowmass V111age's zoning doesn't differ �,_
from that. Child noted that the water agreement between the Coanty, Snowmaes Corpora- �
tion, and Snowmass Water and Sanitation Diatrict has only minimal reference in the �
Ck
Master Plan, yet it is a key document. Wells said it is the District's position �
�
that they will honor that agreement, although he did not feel it is a very strong �
document. Child £elt it would be strengthened if it were incorporated in the Master
Plan. Kane stated that the Plan tried to avoid overly specific plans and �ust set
general goals and objectives. Child did not feel the Board's resolution wou2d be
read if it were just attached to the back of the document. Wells said it would set ;
out the County's opinion, and the courts could decide the effect. Stuller stated -
the statute says the Master Ylan must be reviewed and approved by the Commissioners
to assure it doesn't undermine the po23cies of the County; she felt the Board should
pass judgment on the consistency of the Plan with County goa2s. She said she does
nat know the effect any comment on inconsistencies would have. Kane pointed out �
that Snowmass Village can zone, review development applications, and pass subdivision �
regulations without a master plan. Stuller replied there is a statutory requirement �
for cities and towns to adopt a master plan. Child felt the Board's questions re-
' garding the master plan are important enough to be embodied in the plan or attached
by resolution as an addendum. The Board referred the plan to the Planning Office
for comnent and requested their review be forwarded back to the Commisaioners. �
Caetle Jolene Vrchota, of the Planning Office, reported on the County's application for �
Creek
Trail land and water conservation funds for construction of the Castle Creek trail. �
Funding
Applica- Kinsley asked if there are any constraints on these Eunds. Stuller said they must � �
tion y
be appropriated to reczeational use open space acquisition, and no enclosed recrea-
tional structures can be constructed. Vrchota noted that the process for obtaining �
�
these funds is very time consuming, but felt since the property for the Castle Creek r
i
trail is now being acquired, this money could be used for development of the trail. �
She estimated the County should acquire half the funds in 1980 or 1981 and the �
easements should be completed by then. Vrchota presented to the Board a resolution
3
stating the County's couu�itment to the trail sysCem and the possibility of funding ',��'�
�
the Castle Creek trail in 1980; she said the County needs to prove the possibiZity
of funding is strong. Kinsley asked about trail priorities. Stafford replied the �
�
Commissioners Meetittg Decembet 26, 1978 - 10
�
t
�i
-� .. -. -- .,.,•.�...�..- .. ...._.... . .. ....._ ... . . _.. . . . . .. .
ii . .. ... _. . .. . . '."
. ... _,it'X',o ��; .
_•�i�,r:,� �
,��.wx,,..:.. _ ...,�... ., ��-r.,.
�; ;'� _
�:
� � .
g
� '�:
f;
Dean Street trail 3s the highest priority and this is second. He added that work on c_..
�
� the Castle Creek trail is very far advanced, and this application is designed ae a ,�a�
phased development up to Conundrum Creek. Kinsley moved approval oF the resolution. .��'
Child seconded, reserving the right to change his mind when the time comes to accept �
the money. Kinsley felt the Castle Creek trail will be much improved with the elim-
ination of two bridges. The motion passed unanimously.
- , Tom Oken repc�Led that ?;ill ?!cCrocklin, of the Sheriff's Department, has proposed
that he take part of the $5600 grant from the State provided for civil defense and
add it to his salary since he is in charge of civil defense. Oken said he would
prefer that the matter be handled by amending McCrocklin's job description, if
necessary, and determining the effect this would have on his salary in the wage
reclassification study. Phyllis Kenny stated she reviewed the AdmSnistrative Assis-
tant and Civil Defense Director positions with Sheriff Dick Kienast and McCracklin,
and she cannot recomcnend an increase in salary. She felt if McCrocklin, rather than �
Kienast, were appointed Civil Defense Director, the grade of his position could in-
crease. Don Davis, of the Sheriff's Department, stated the County is mandated to
cover civil defense. and $5600 is received from the State to set up a department.
The question concerns distribution of that money; Dick Kienast does not feel�
McCrocklin should be appointed civil defense director but feels the money shoald go
into the Sheriff's budget. Kinsley felt the maney should go to McCrocklin.
McCrocklin suggested that he receive $4000 and the rest be used for medical supplies.
Kenny pointed out that a regular employee doesn't usually receive additional money
for the3r required duties. McCrocklin replied that his job description only states �
he is responsihle for the police part of civil defense, but in effect he handles �
the entire civil defense program. He added that chese duties combined amount to q
�"
approximately 60 hours a week. Kinsley felt McCrocklin needs a new job description. �
McCrocklin said that would not compensate h3m adequately. Kenny agreed, since his 3
�i
duties fit into a Deputy III description and there would be no change in classifica- k
�
L'
tion. Child asked if the County could pay McCrocklin for his ooertime. Kenny "
�
replied his posicion class doesn't receive overtime. Child felt the Board could not p
ignore the wage and salary survey by allowing McCrocklin to receive the gtant monies.
Y
Stuller said the problem is that McCrocklin is doing a public service for private ;i
orgaa3zations, and the Board is trying to include that in his job classification. �
F
The civil defense director position�is an independent state responaibility andiihas �
t;
nothing to do wlth the Sheriff's Office. McCrock2in felt they have more clout by �
�
j:
i�
�
Commissioners Meeting December 26, 1978 - I1
(.
'a"-�=: e;'
;,,.,,;,F•>„�.�
,•:�,
s
, K .
�.
�_ ...�-�i�<� - .
�';=;,i�=�::: - -
,����-.:.
� ' �;'_
� having Kienast serve as the civil defense director. Kinsley moved to refer the matter .��I?
� L .
� to the Personnel Review Board, and requested that the Commissioners be given an 5
:�
� opportunity to review their recommendation. McCrocklin requested that the civil Fd
;a
2
defense function be evaluated as an independent position, and not tied to his public
3
safety job in the Sheriff's Department; he feit the two duties are di£ferent functions.:�
fle added that these two reaponsibilities amounY to a job and a half, and feared the �
PersonneZ Review Boaxd will try to lump them together as one 3oh which cannot be done "
in 40 hours a week. Davis asked if the funds for the civil defense director would be
appropriated to the Sheriff's budget regardless of the PRB recommendation. Kinsley
said they would. Child seconded aad the motion passed unanimously. � ,
a
__`_�_` �
Ski Lift Stafford presented a draft letter to Senator Dick Soash concerning ski liEt ticket
Ticket
User Tax user tax. The Soard agreed with the alternatives recommending the tax be instituted
nn a statewide basis, with no earmarking, and distribution and collection determined �
� . locally, and the tax be charged at a 7% rate. The Board disagreed with the suggestion
+ to round off the ercenta e so akiers would not have �
P g to bother with change. Kinsley
moved that the Chaitman be authorized to sign a letter consistent with these options
� recommended today. Child seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
� D S RG Curt Stewart pre�ented a proposed letter to the Tnterstate Commerce Commission re-
� Discon-
x tinuance questing that the Denver & Rio Grand's request for discontinuance of passenger train
,fi Request
s service from Grand Junction to Salt Lake City be denied. He felt the County should
�
� speak out in favor of aZternate methods to travel in this area. The D & RG wishes
� to discontinue Lhis link of service because they claim they lose too manq passengers
� on the route. Child said that is because passengers must take a one hour bus r3de to
catch the connecting train in Utah; he felt if service were improved ridership would x
�
increase. Kinsley felt the County bus system should be designed to complement the
train system to Glenwood Springs, and [he County should consider promoting that train
system as a good alternative to rental cars. IE service west of Grand Junction is
cut off, it precludes the future possibility of eventually bringing passenger train
service all the way to Aspen. Child agreed, adding that if this route disappears �
there will pzobably eventually be no train service to Glenwood Springs and an alterna- �
tive method of transportatinn to Aspen will be lost. �
Y
: , Kinaley moved that the Chairman be authorized to sign a letter requesting denial ,�+�
of the discontinuance request by D 6 RG. Child seconded and requested that carbon �
�
k
�
�Commiseionera Meeting December 26, 1978 - 12
� �t.
V "� .
i ... :..., ,.,._ ._ ._:_._..,. _... ... :....._ .. . _.,
� :_ .. :.. . ,:... . : ,
.,y�k.-. . .
y{
�:'���' � . �� . -
' �`T �,�t;•� - . . .. . .. -
y':
copies of the letter be sent to the City of Aspen, Town of Basalt, City of Glenwood �`
Springs, Board of Commissioners of Eagle and Garfield counties, and the Chambers of
Commerce of each co�nunity. The motion passed unanimously.
A continuaace of the December 26, 1978 meeting was held on December 28, 1978.
Chairman Robert W. Chi1d and Michae2 Kinsley were present.
— Supplemental The Board considered the first reading for the supplemental appropriations fox the
; Appropriations
1978 budget. Finance Director Tom Oken explained that he has not had time to prepare
a resolution for all these appxopriations. If the appropriations are not done by the
end of the year the County wi21 receive an exception in their audit opinion letter,
however the statute does not seC a specific time in which to pass the appropriations.
Oken reported that County Attorney Sandy Stuller has agreed to write a letter stating
that the County is not in violation since the statute does not apecify a time. The
Board canceled the public hearing set for December 29, 1978 and agreed to consider
the matter at the first meeting in January. They expressed their intent to pass the
resolution when prepared, noting that the process is being slowed by an administrative
delay.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted, APPROVED:
� ����/�( �Li�v�/•�.�5��
t ` ' ; ��LG1G i'
_ ( '
:;=i3z '�w��t�;..Deputy County Clerk Chairman Robert W. Child
{ :;
x�
G�"��� j�y .: � ' '/ .._t�.
- . 9 � � �.:r . , � � !�(/ �
� t T �' a f:;; ich el Kinsle
;-�r �� {
Commissioners Meeting December 26, 1918 - 13
� ..
_.__...W__..._..:.�w..».y,....,.�._ .;<,�.W _.M. ..�,.:. _..:, .>...:.....:. :... :,. : „ -
�! .. ..w._.,... _._..__.. . . .
1978 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBITS
December 26 Trailways Bus Terminal A Memorandum Dated December 20, 1978 from Karen Smith to
Special Review and 1041 Board of County Commissioners
Hazard Review
B Letter Dated November 13, 1978 from R D Smallwood to Karen
Smith
Grange Subdivision C Memorandum Dated December 20, 1978 from Richard Grice to
Board of County Commissioners
D Memorandum Dated October 20, 1978 from Louis Buettner to
Karen Smith
Highland Ranch Subdivision E Memorandum Dated December 20, 1978 from Richard Grice to
Board of County Commissioners
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 43 1978 EXHIBITS TO MINUTES
n, CO;;:.t'R'S
-':iH C0.
MEPIORANOUM • :"•.arin �xllibit3
• E�IBIT
. • T0; Soard of County Commissioners . '. "`L ' � ���'�
-- :�,. Iao•: � .
. FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office •
RE: Special Review and 1041 Approval of Traitways Bus Terminal ' . � .
at the Airport -
DATE: December 20, 1978 •
Attached you will find an application for locating the Trailways �
Bus Terminal at the Aspen Airport (Sardy Field). The application requires
special review as the airport itself is a special review use in the AF-2
zone district and any change in the nature of that use or level of
activity requires further special review. It also requires 1041 review �
approvai because it is a matter 7ocated within the Airport hazard area. .
Details of the operation are contained in the attached letter from R. D.
Smallwood dated November 13, 197$. '
The application comes to you after a good deal of analysis of alter-
' natives. Since 1973, Trailways has been aware that the in-town bus depot
location was on temporary lease basis from the City of Aspen. Late last
year, the City of Aspen approved a land exchange which meant that
• Trailways' relocation was imminent. So :e of the sites that were looked � '
at included the Airport Business Center, the Airport, the Wheeler Opera
Nouse, the City owned recreation building at the base of Lift l-A and
. ' the Mi11 Street Venture. Recently the City considered a proposal which
would have amended the Aspen Zoning Code to allbw Bus Oepot as a conditional
use in the Lodge-2 District. This was subsequent to an �ffer from the
Cantrups of a building to be used temporarily to house Trailways this
winter. While the zone district might appear to be appropriate because
of the intent of the uses to be housing tourist, high intensity activities
close to the commercial c�re, negative pubiic reaction was substantial
� due mainly to the fact that permanent residents are located within the
district. The other in-town locations proved to be infeasible for one
� reason or another. The Lift 1-A site as weit as Rubey both are Park
Districts with a Transportation overlay a�hi.ch would allow the use.by
right. Lift 1-A was rejected by Trailways as unsuitable on a long term
basis because of the steepness of the street approaching that site. It
is also located in proximity to several lodge or condominiums. Rubey �
Park is similarily unsuitable because of a lack of physical faciTities �
to house the ticketing and baggage storage operations. It was also I
thought to be subject to too much congestion with ski buses and the City '
and County public transit systems all accessing the site. Whi1e this is �
� desireable from a transportation consolidation point of view, the physical �
perameters of this in-town location simply do not work at this point in � ;:
ti me. � �i
Our preference has always been for the Airport as a permanent site
for commercial bus operations. �The physical features of the site lend
themselves well to accommodating in-coming and Qut-going buses, freight
storage, and connecting transportation. The proposed location of Trail-
ways at the former Bonanza facility works well in the sense that it will
• separate bus traffic from air traffic yet preserve a link with connecting
• transportation. Ticketing facilities can easily be located at the site .
as can baggage and freight storage. The buses wil] be able to be parked �
at the site, thus preventing one of the problems with in-town loca.tions
which was the nightly r.emoval of buses to another, more accommodating
parking facility thus involving more transit trips. �
The concept of Sardy Field as an area transpartation center has a
long history in community cornprehensive plans. It was first recognized
in the Voorhees Transportation Plan drafted in July of 1973. Chapter 6 ,
of�that Plan is entirely devoted to a discussio� of the Aspen Airport •
�l
i
+
as a transportation center with four principle functions: 1) Air Terminal,
2) Transit station - the key station on a proposed regional transit
! ' system providing,interface fo'r air, auto and transit t'ravel, 3) Aspen �
fringe area parking lot, .4) auto intercept point. Its lqcation was - , • ,
thought to be ideal for this consolidation of transportation functions
because of its proximity to Highway 82 and location midway between Aspen
and Snowmass. The Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Masterplan prepared by
, Isbill Associates in1974 further recognized •that the Airport was a logical
� • area for conso]idation of transportation functions. The final report of
the "Aspen/Pitkin County Transit/PSFI Alternative Study" dated June 30,
, 1977, recognizes these recommendations of earlier plans. That report
recommended that the County implement a short-range transportation plan ,
which would involve a busway from tte Lity of Aspen to the Airport with
additional bus service and mixed traffic to Snowmass. As you will recall,
this was the recommendation after considerable public scrutiny of many
' transportation alternatives for the communi�y, including light rail
transit between Aspen and Snowmass and total bus service between Aspen
and Snowmass. The conclusion was that bus service was the ideal mode
and that the community could afford to look at implementing the first
"; phase bus-way to the airport. On page 226 of that plan it notes: 1)
a limited system, in the near term, can alleviate the probTem where it is
most severe (the problem equaling traffic) i.e. on State Hi9hway 82
? between Aspen and the Airport where the congestion is currently the worst.
2) a limited system can leave some community resources available for other
program elements such as the TSM program, open space land acquisition which
will further serve as a control over future traffic problems. 3) a limited
system emphasizes the atirport as the key intermodel interchange and
� auto-intercept parking area. 4) the limited busway perserves the options
for the future in considering extensions that may be necessary to down-
valley areas.
� •
While we have not fully implemented the recommendations of this
latest report, we believe it is not premature to implement portions thereof.
A criticism of locating the Trailways bus depot at the Airport has been
r that there is not sufficient connecting transportation at this time.
; We believe that certain factors wi71 mitigate that oroblem for this winter.
Foremost among those is tfie fact that tfie City and Ski Corporation have
entered into agreements whereby City buses will provide transportation
�� to and from the Snowmass-Aspen Ski Areas. We. understand that as part of
; that system the Cit� buses wiil be stopping at the Airport at twenty
minute intervals, We believe this will make bus service more attractive
�� to arriving bus as well as air passengers. We wouid recommend further
'' that Trailways as a condition of approval, work out some service agreements
between the various lodges in Aspen and Snowmass with courtesy cars and
;t limousines and with whatever i:axi and limousine service is serving the
;, Airport this winter. We note also that location at the Airport may in
fact reduce some of the trips that would othe�•wise require inconing
� Trailways passengers to arrive in Aspen and then be transported to Snowmass.
Location at the Airport will mean that their return trip is not as
� substantial. In terms of the 1041 review, the ]ocation of transportation
related facilities is iisted in our Land Use Code as being compatible
with Airport uses and one that is recommended for approval. Further the
Code states, all uses at the Airport should be compatible with other
forms of transportation than the automobile and we believe that this is
the case as well. There are no problems with noise as the use is not one
particularly sensitive to noise. Hazard impacts are lessened by the ✓
location of the facility at the � of the runway rather than at either
of the ends. ��
We would recommend that you approve this application con�.itioned
• on a review of the operation after several months of`experience. That
review could be required either in the Spring or in Mid-Summer when some
experience with SunNner travel characteristics is obtained. We say that
so that more data can be obtained while watching the use in its interface
. with new transit connections�provided this winter and to observe the .
viability of taxi, limousine and courtesy car service. �Je also say that . . .
, � �
� y
because our work program for this winter involves reinitiat•iny the �lirport
Masterplan which has been through several drafts. The PJan is even more .
necessary.to be cnmpleted in view of increasing �demands for use of the •
Airport site and our desTre to enhance its characteristics as a multi.- - . ' .
model transportation center. Some of the new uses contemp�lated at this
point in time are a joint maintenance facility for the.City and .County
and new terminal facilities for the existing airlines as well as any
new ones which may in the future be permitted to land.
The P and Z on Plovember 21, 1978 reviewed this application and
. recommended approval with the comment that it be reviewed again in
mid-Summer following completion of the work on the Airport Masterplan. �
• . . i
ii
. ii
��
' li
tl
a ,
i
� � �
# } , �.a� 'I�1^c�.1�'VVii�.y�S
� i
e
R.D.SMALlW000 �
'�.�,.���� AREAOPERATIONSMANAGER :.�1Ar+D UF CO. C01�1Lt�R�S
PZTKIN C0.
*'�. I'-:blic He
� . � . ' � - �.o � E�IBIT � .
!',� November 13, 1978 ;.l•.,,��ct ' K�
�
�;6�;� _ . r-:i1. Ho.: _
±� Ms. Karen Smith � �
'�:
Planning d� Zoning Commission
`,�1 ' 130 South Galena Street Certified Mail No.: 116215
`� • Aspen, Colorado 81611
';';};� Re: Special Use Application for Traiiways
i;F;,s ' To Use Space at Aspen Airport for a
"
� Bus Terminal.
''y • �Dear Ms. Smith:
r..:�..,7. �
:'.r Please accept this letter as a special use application which would allow
Trailways to use space at the Aspen Airport (Pormally used by Bonanza
Airlines) for a bus terminal.
:t • ,
'.>s This facility would be used by Trailways for the handling of passengers ' .
and their personal baggage, and for the handling of inbound and outbound
�? package express shipment.
�,;t:
The facility would be open seven (7) days a week, year round and ope:ate as
,:;�, follows.
+'� ' (1) Frequency of 8uses ,
�..f
'�}� From April Ibth to December 14th of each year we would fiave one (1).
scheduled 6us arriving and departing Aspen daily unless the traffic
'�" flow increased to such a degres that would warrant an additional
..�� .
. schedule.
`:,;€; " From December 15th to April 15th of each year we will put on addition-
� al schedules to handle the heavy flow of traffic during the Ski
�y.;.
;;� . Season. For the 1978 - 1979 Ski 5eason we have scheduled two (2)
-'" buses daily in and out of Aspen on Mondey through Thursday of each
�'�'' • week. - '
`<�
On Fridays we have scheduled six (6) buses to arrive and two (2)
� buses to depart Aspen during the Ski Season.
<,i.
On Saturdays we have scheduled eight (8) buses to arrive and six (6)
r'' buses to depart Aspen during the Ski Seaso�.
i:': �
�`' On Sundays we fi ave scheduled two (2) buses to arrive and six (6) buses �
'4 to depart Aspen during the Ski Season. � i
;� . .
� . .
I
�
;
i
2430 CURTiS STREET D£NYER,COLORADO 80205 303-573-7005 .
.. . .. _ . . . .. . _ . . , . . . _.. .. _�,�_.. .__.. .�
. , . � .
�" � , , i
�
. ' - � _ f
. , � , ._ . , , f
' ' • • � i
. . � �
. rr £ �
. •V�
. �
. �
, • ,
(2) Plana foc i:ho Ouildin�.
Troilway3 pinna for the building are to in3ta11 c� tickct �ounter, •
install shelves in a �torar�e area (out of sitc of the Public) to
store incoming and out�oing baggar�c nnd expresn, intall two (2}
. telephone3 and a teleprintcr to handle ski reservationa, instoll ' .
' • ' odequate seatin9 to accomadate pa��engers, install a Trai.lways . - • .
sign behind the ticket counter. • ' � � �• '
(3) Siqnaqe �
� Trailways plans to install a sign on the exterior of the building ,
tam comply with the County Code. • •
(4) Interior Map of Suildinq �
Attached you will find a diagram marked exhibit "A" which shows
the interior of the building we are requesting to use.
(5) 5ite Map
The red X on the atta�hed site map indiciates the area we are request-
ing to use at the Aspen Airport. As indiciated on the map the area
• is away from tfie heavy traveled area to the main airport terminal
building and is located in an area not subjected to heavy traffic,
.however we would have access to the main terminal in the event a
. total ground transportation cent�r is established on the airport '
property.
� (6) Averaqe Amount of Freiqht Stored �
At any given time including incoming and outgoing baggage and express
we would have approximately SO pieces on hand, the exception would be
the Christmas/New Year holidays when there would be considerable more.
(7) AnEicipated Vehicular Tr.affic Related to Freiqht Pick Up and
' Delivery
Vefiicle traffic relating to pick up' and delivery of 6aggage and
express by customers would average 20 to 25 vehicles per day based
on past experience.
(8) Hours of Operation-Freiqht and Passenqers
� Our Terminal operating hours will be as follows.
(a) December 15th through April 15th, 7:OOAM to S:DOPM, 6:45PM to
11:OOPM Sunday through Thursday, 7:OOAh1 to Midnight on Friday
and Saturday.
(b) April 14th through December 14th, 7:OOAt4 to S:OOPP1, 8:45PM to
11:OOPh1.
' _ . .. .. ' . � . ..... . . .. '�
, � ,
. ' " ' i
. . �
• y' ' ' ' 'I�
.. . . • � .� ' � : i
' i �
�
� .
. �
x� � �
•J�
�
Busine�a hour3 for freight and pa,�engcr cu:.tomcr^. would not vary,
hoviever rt�o�t rill of our F'rci9ht cu.tomers tr�naact their business
between the hour� of �:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
� (9) Number of Employees. and When They 4lould be on Site .' ' '
_ The number of persons to be empioyed at this facility would depend
on the amount of business, however at this time we are planning on
three (3) full time employees and possibiy two (2) part time employees ' .
for the 1978 - 1979 Ski Season. The number of employees to be on duty
• at any one time would depend on the time of day and the number of
. schedules arriving and departing. '
(10) Where the Buses will be Stored Durinq Turn Around Delays
The two (2) daily buses would be parked in front of the terminal
• overnight, one viould be there from 9:00 PM untii 7:30 AM and the
� other would be there from 11:00 P�4 until 8:00 AM, these buses would
be parked whereby they would not interfere with traffic operating in
and out of the area.
The additional buses arriving Aspen on Friday and Saturday nights
' would be parked at a parking area away from the terminal to be .
designated by the Airport Manager. •
I would appreciate the Commissions attention to this matter at the e^rliest
possible date so that we can furnish the expected and necessary service to
our customers and the people of Aspen.
I will make myself available for any meetings or confer�nces that you deem
necessary regarding this matter. Please feel free to call me collect at
(303) 573-7005.
_ Yours truly, +
^ [ L
C� /�)'E�����
..�'"
� R. D. Smallwood
� Area Operatio�s Manager
RDS/sh
cc: Steve Jenkins
, - -- - - . � . _^_. . ....
. , . � .
• ' - . � i
� • • �• ' � . , • . r I
. , �
r �
. J E
� . . .
�
. . E X I� ,��T "A„
. �1 i . �1TI I � � � . � .
T��T.;: � � ; - . .
REST�,�nt'lS � ,� -� ._.-... .:�." -"-"�`+;� ' Z0' _--�
f) . , : „�•�1�-_ .. . _ -i_
' � �.
� ; '1005� <i , �N_��CI�U,SiVE AR'�A j
� �� �EXCLUSiVt� �� �
I�. ��-��- ='�;
��.�--.-- 1
`�:� _��-:.:_:.. .� � � �
� �z,.-; � , ,\�,
. � `�` � . CO�N i r
� � � � � � � � � ��i
NON-EXCLUSIV� ;���.A : . � . . \ . ,
�� � � � � . : . �--i3�--�-{ , '\ \ , �
. � ! r.,, :
. , ,� '' � �i, �
:;� ^ �.;
. ; , � �.:.,. r� � c s e \��
' � • . , i rrr` 1t � - Ri i \ :
. • . : Q! � IJ �' r ' !i � : NoN � \ . ,�
�d �,�, :I s .
� t 1 ;C.nCI.USIVL � o . EXCLUStLE � \ ti,,, �
. . ... . � ....�.�.�,,,,,,.,. _�� � . USE Y �
• • .
• . . ' t. �c-----__`.�-�j. :.. � ��� •,, ;�
. : ' � --- - � " �� _�^ a.O � �
- -----'^�"' •-... .. � . . ' • ' . •� ..
_ .�,—..----�-- . .._..� •z., �--- �-•- -,^".-r-.,� _ .
-�.,,,,��,,. ..�: ,,,�Q,,,--�<:
, � . .
r+....-...r..�...�. . � 'l. ..^7-•.. 't.--_ =`' � �I:..-.;�` �.,� ... �
� aEXC�usivr . I: - R�sr �o, .� � _ .
: + � us�. � : �� ----i��. ' -�� —
� ��-74 sa.fr �� _- . ��
=,�„�.-_..--. . - , _ ._.�
;x' - - - -..,..:�
. . _ � . : ! .
- • . � . � � . . ' � . . .� � . � � � � ---
. .. . . . .. . . . . _ .. . . . . � . . . . i-
. � . � . � �..�� . .�-. .� �SYOR�'�r SPACE : : � �
. . �. ,. .
� � � � �� � � � 765 sQ�- . � � � � . . .
� . 4s' :--��
. . . .
. , . : �
� . , • . , -
, , _ __
. , � �N\ ~�J�� �'�•� • . , � ' . � ' '
�y.--''•,o v> '� ,
. � O �\ `\\ . iN ' . . ' � . , •� .
� � Z . �
/
' ,��O \�� . ' � ' • ...
. . • . . . � . '��` . • • - .
�Y Q� � •
. .._.. .. _ . ..: � 5 _ , . � .�,.•� . . � �� . _ ..
O � S�N • oa ' =•�\ . . .
O -� . � . \• • ' :
... . ... . . . �� .� . . ;� \.. - - . '.. . � .:
' - • C�, \ ' . . -
. O ` . .
Z o � , .
OF2 • � .
. • . -� � ♦
� � �2 \
. � / .
�\ \
. . � ��1 ` j� � ,
. ' �+ -
• \ ,"� ° 3• JL� .
( �� �r y c.
' , ` `\ ' . V C� . �o � .
_.....,, .... .: • .. � _ < r�' 3y
- . . �•�L��� .r _.... .. ....
t\ .`... ` o Q\ > 3Q � :.. `,�
� a, ..C.f� ��
• , • ` \ . \ `�, � � � r��,
� V �
. . . p,. t �K '\ %
_ . •. ` \ O Q `1;�G 'S, �� z. (•; •�\ .
r
. .. . . . . . • N \ �i �c ~d � `\
� . . . �,t , � �� _ �\`�\ \�`�1 �p . 21Co,� �`
• - � � � � °. �'�' ` .\:
. . . -. . � �` .` ` � \t D , _� � ��
� � \' ` ` . . `YS� � Y¢ /
� ! � = .�
o ., , , �� � z� �
\ � . . . . \\ ` `` ` p� C N +l _'�\i
� � �,= "l
\ � ' s �
c .. ` ,y� ; z�,.f
�
� ' • . � . � \ � V . i� a
, � . . . � .
ti � • � � ` s 6
Q • . ' ' ' � \: -
� . � `. \ �
a . � � \� � � a�
� . ' . . • � '
. • � _ . � � i� ' �
° ' - � � !I,
- � � �
� � � N . . ';;.
;;;
�1 . . . O �- �,`,., . �,.��, ' ,I
� .. _ � �� \ �� c-' . f!
. ' . .. N � `�v� � '�
. . . . . . . . � . : ��
� . � � . . � � � . . � � � �I
. _ . . � , . ;�
. � -�-: .. �,.-.�-...,,�.-. - -..__... - -- _- . -- .- �----�-•��'-- ---- �
�, . �� . .
• - . , .
. _ . . • �� . • .
� . . . � . � • w:� . �. I
• . • � i
� .
. ' • �
MEMORANDUM
T0: Board of County Commissioners . : "' �`' �0• cof���'R's .
. . . . . ' r.rTxrrr co. .
FROM: �Richard Grice, -Planning Office �`O j�carin E .
� � EXHIBIT
RE: Grange Subdivision • ;.�
DATE: December 20, 1978 � -'• I'�O � �
. �
This application requests a 7ot split subdivision which if approved
will result in the creation of a 60 acre parcel. The father��9 parcel is
the 147 acre tract of land owned by �4r. Kelly Grange and his family in
the Crystal Valiey. The 60 acre parcel lies in the bottom of the Valley
adjacent to Highway 133 and consists primarily of pastureland. The location
of the 60 acre parcel is immediately south of the Penny Hot Springs.
The appTication was referred to nine state and local agencies for comment.
The most vital of the refarra] comments are now in and are summarized as
follows:
1. With regard to septic suitability and the proposed water system,
Bob Nelson, Coun�y Sanitarian, foresees no adverse impacts on
the environment should this proposal be approved. A preliminary
investigation revealed no problems with compliance with Pitkin
County regulations regarding individual septic tank systems.
The spring proposed for water supply has been tested for
• chemicals and bacteriological• quality. The bacteriological
quality of the water meets minimum requirements specified in the
primary drinking water standards of the State of Colorado and
the chemical qua7ity is acceptable. However, there are some
problems with certain chemicals which are above suggested
concentration limits. Bob expects that proper water softening
methods will greatly reduce these high concentrations mentioned
in his memorandum of October 25.
2. Mountain eell telephone has commented that they have reviewed
• the Kelly Grange subdivision plat and found that they will
require no additional easements or dedications on the plat. �
3. The Division of Water Resources has r�o objection to the proposal. (
They expect no adverse impacts on ground water resources and (
� recommend approval. -
4. The State Forest Service has commented that they do not see
. , significant wildfire hazards re]ated to the 60 acre parcel. . '
I
5. Colorado Geologic Survey has reviewed the application. CGS
noted that the application does not specify that development is �i!
proposed and therefore they had to evaTuate the property based E�'
on the assumption of no development. They noted several
. • geologic constraints incTuding: flood and debris fan activity f
from the small drainages on the east side of the subdivision, i:
potential hydro-compaction problems in the soils of the debris '�
fans, and at the north end of the property, slopes become I
extremely steep and any encroachment of this area would {';
require a thorough geotechnical analysis of slope stability
and problems. including rockfall. Furthermore; �hey suggest
' that the hot spring on the property should be evaluated to
determine if it could be a viable source of energy for space
• heating.
� (The Planning Office notes that the application indeed did not `
� suggest a building $ite. We understand from talking with the �
appl•icant that they expect a building site to be_selected on �
: the western side of the Crystal• River. It would seem a geologi.st's • � ;
' ' � report would be necessary prior to the issuance of a building ' �
. permit for a specific building site.) I
,
,
�
i _
�
. (
. 6. The County Engineering Department has reviewed the apptication .
and has found' numerous deficiencies with �he general 'submission ' •
. . • plat. Lou Beuttner's memo details these deficiericies �and is
. included in your packet. The applicant is currently working�
' with Pat Oobie to correct these deficiencies. � • �
The Planning Office feels that this subdivision is a reasonable
. request and provided the small technical problems can be worked out :
, prior to final approval we see no reason why it should not be ultimately
. approved,
The Planning and Zoning Comnission reviewed this application at their
regular meeting on November 22, 1978 and recortenended your approval subject
to the following conditions being met at detailed submission.
• 1. A geologic engineer should check the building site when one
is picked prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The clarifications requested by Lou Beuttner in his memorandum
" to the Planning Office on October 20, 1978 are fo7lowed on
' future submissions. •
�
' : �
• �
�
. u
i
� �{
. . � �
r�; � . � t. I -' �
Grange Subdivision Details
Studies required for this subdivision as checked in appendix B of the County
Iland Use form are as follows: � . • � •
. _�2 Hazard & Resource areas - The 60 acres according to planning office maps
. are free from geologic hazards. Flood-plains have not been mapped by the
County. The entire 60 acres can be and is used as pastureland, and is not• �
mapped as a wildlife or wildfire area. - '
• N4 Agricultural conservation - The 60 acres has been used historically as
. pastureland.
#6 Water supply - There is a cold sprin9, labeled A on the survey map,
which will supply the 60 acr•es. An irrigation ditch, labeled B, supplies
� river water to the 60 ac.res. .
#7• Sewage disposal - A septic tank system would be used. A percolation
test is to be performed on the property in the area between highway 133
and the Crystal river.
#11 Road/Trails - The 60.acres borders highway 133 and has a granted access
and existing road to this highway. A light-vehicle bridge, labeled C on
� 'the map, spans the river. •
#14 Extension of utilities, water E� sewer - �lls • indicated on the survey
map, tioly Cross electric crosses portions of the 60 acres, as does P1ountain
Bell's buried cable.
A water line fror� previously mentioned cold springs (A) crosses the '
, 60 acres and will supply the 60 acres.
x
� —
' �
E
�
�«. ,
i
�
��
,
,
;
. I
.
_ . .. ..... __.. ... ..
_ . . . ._ * �t'�
. � '�
,
UNiTED STATES
��. � DEPARTMENT O�' THE INTERIOR
�c GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
107'15� �+IfNWUnO SVR/N/i3 JL MI.
�06a'U^E. �O7 �cnauo��on t i�nri �09 12'30„ �10 _
34'15' -----�-�- � . rr✓t-u c-a— V / .
- � • ; : ' ' �
J�new�y
i�. � �CimGB�ound j ����� �?W R�'$' ����.
� `,'� , y�t,r .BMfI '1 '�'' - `nr I _ - '
�t.n.� ' ....�� ,caeb � � �j28 � , ,e.- `
. �� �e.:,-29 'r\\-,�iB..o__ -� ' _ � ,_ aj e--. v _.- '. —
$ ��'` — — —�-�-ti7<o0� a° -:�F'-oy ' -
o �_. _
i16oco�^N. — ---1 — ,�1� � _ �,' • . ` ;` _" _ .
oco -,'
.$ �,\ ,,, °ioa �(, ��+a '=rR a,�
o ��`l �
- � , ' „
�i i' a<a °o J'�'
: �I� , �� � � `a � I '�
(r �
1 c �` +es'o �'` + .
�� r � �� �'-� �`� � , 4 I
I �+ - - - 1 c°`�
�}���'o � -- s ; : �
ti�, ' p- (�'1�'�� �`�����_�. /� . � S araA lanthe �!
p-" Iltl \+�•� � " -_.' . � �P�� ��\ YC2 6EfOUl� �� .
e '�� _ { ..�� � J'1` �$� /� �_ .j '�.�• . , , l�
.�qs _ _�'�` �„` � �i� �_'.- �� _ ` .. � '\
� T�r i�L� .MM��} c i .4 �.
_ .` \\ o.GaB�ng.� !--k° -_ � � �
� ��. / ' 9uSIJt�Oe ( ' �;H _� - � .. >�Op •� �
e6O0� �0 ' ..J { I= �-, p. _ ' - ,\ .
'0 - .1 ,1 / ..�
`
� • �'•1 .� � „S �' � .. ` \ �'){=
T.9 5. `���� . ' =: �\ . •, r� "u.� w��a��o�� � I -.,_ '`� �. ��•.��. . .. • ' � \�•� '-
f
.t05. T eo� T � 1,vi � S�. ~ °,��_ � " � ,. � o. '\ +`'
t ���.
i' � - � � ;r `. Perney�'/)t Spri i , ° \C
�� - �� J+ • BM�'S9ifl! .._`.
_ � ..'t.;� N.• / 1 � . ; .—B?Op'
- ' b ^• � 1 - /��
� I �• 4�' J' \
o j
'r
'� - o . � . � ��I - j � =�. -�_��
" � _ I -4 . ` r _ � , .
_ _ , R ' (`./` ( . _'� ::1' \�: ,1
fG! �" I � Sd)S' � ;
-- C,�g<Sl j 1 y 1 m . `_ �
' v��� � . _ ` �` � . ,a G --1 � � :�
�-=- �� � _� �� u �.� � �� _ � �
_f;-�- L � � ` _ ,_ _� � _� -. °� � :���
U .� /:� ... L _ � +�, I
� - ,V.� \�•._ - (`1 ~�/1k� _-{� =_ _ `\`.-�__
__^�_ _ �� /9���•_ .] �/ J �y :,1 �, = Y� `�-"V�
..�� \ � 'y "� .b /�l ��: �1 .� �_ � —
�'`'�` 1 . �.� ' `/'q•�! : .�� _._ _ _i_."
'����.1 .� �b .� 4' . 1i '_
��'.:`— � . y� ' : h / / _ . � .� �� -1 _
�� ' � °a.gs�y'Cam�rou�. ' ,-. i �o ` " 9BOp '' ,
.. CO.� d� �;�b .�Hr � ) � __ i
p O. � 'O t O�74 ( N
1 )r /'-�.�
Q" � � ^ a'� _ � '�\ ! "`1��
! ' �r • / c ���� ��� / T1\ ',
U42 _ �. g � i�;,J.s M� " :\ � � � s\I..�—`;'1 �' i� r i
,�l/��-� ���`��`.• � � � __$ 8 I � !o�i� p - ���;!1
/ ti - -`�..(� 1 + - 0 ��y` ` $ r,• '!
--' � � '?; .'�/' i �04° _ � I />�` - ' � i
� j I n't 1 f�. S J . �(��� I
�`� =;�. �„r�'' - '� ,
` m `;.,�� �� i. <'<..:� � _� � �- � �
o '.P� � � ,�r�, - � ,�/'-�-`a' y ` `�-�
1 0 o�y�' � ) / $ ij- ���._" � �
f`•° \ � ( 5 } �.
l � \ "'�+j �Q'�r:Redstone3 '� 4�J-��'�� . �r �•� �
�,`' ` � ��_ \� � . � !li o Camng�a�M/" ^�,t�'��N^U� _ � r' .
^�\' '� �'�. �� %�;��A o 7� (�\\��� �� ?�� !H; I T ��� I;
% n � `: ! t ,51 � � �� \�» ,,��-��---__:r.---^---�---- -f.
dl , �<.� .`��_ ..-�.�v.•r , �.... . ,. , �, , ^> . ... . . . . '�
. . . . . . t . '.- ' � . .. �
. . - � � ' � r ' � � � .
• . . - ' - . ' �' � ' ' .
, . N��
• . /
•V
, ., i
�
� • . �
M E M O R A N D U M
TO:• I:aren Smith, Planning Office � �-'-�-�,�� �•1' ��• cc.;.::.t :, •
- - f` PITF(IN C0. �'
FROM:' Louis Buettnev�f/�Pu>>ii � ;;:;•;:' • •
� a a EXMIBIT
F2E: �:elly Grange Subdivision � � /
Subj
. DATE: October 20, I978 Er.��. ��
In reviewing the Grange Subdivision submission plat I found
the following items are missing:
1. �he property shown is the new parcel only. The total
ownership is missing and should be shown on the plat.
' 2. This drawing does not have a tie to a government monument
or an indicated starting point.
3. The plat should have a description in words as well as the
drawing.
4. The name, address and phone numbez of the applicant were
omitted. .
5. There is no location tie for locating the easements shown.
6. Does the Holy Cross Electric line have an easement?
7. The 40' contours do not show much to help in reviewing
the property. '
A word description was given to me for this submission. In
. checking this description I found:
1. There is either an error on the plat or there 'is an error
in the de'scription for the northerly line (N 84° 39' 00" E)
1367.90 feet or 1367.04 feet - the difference is 0.36 feet.
2. Incalculating the property boundary for closure I found that
the boundary would not close by over 100 feet.
In reviewing the report that accompanied the submission I
found:
' 1. There is no cold water spring shown on the plat as called I
for as being labeled "A". I
. �
2. If the irrigation ditch crossing the property is to be ,
used for the property irrigation, there will need to be {
water rights that must go with the property. I think we �
should know if there are any water rights and how much
goes with the property.
3. The septic test location between highway 133 and the river �
would lead ,me to beZieve that this is the only buidling �
• site. '
. 4. The report referred to a water line crossing the property.
ihere is no water line shown on the plat. .
5. The zoning .for this property was not stated in the report.
ro+rnrcrrrrru. ---- - — ..
' "� n,:+ C0. COhStt'R'S
i'iPi:IiV C0.
"c 1;caring �;chiblts
MEMORANDUM EXHIBR
,:: �,��� � ch
• . � T0: Board of County Commissianers � _ __, :r�. � ��g . �
• FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office � .
RE: Highland Ranch Subdivision - Filing !il - P.H. � _ • . �
• DATE: December 20, 1978
This application requests a lot split subdivision of a ten acre .
parcel for purposes of single family development. The fathering parcel
. is the 93 acre Highland Ranch located in Castle Creek Valley at the
intersection of Conundrum Creek. The ten acre parcel lies at the bottom
of the valley at the confluence of Conundrum and Castle Creeks. An .
inspection of the site conducted by myself revealed it to be an extremely
reasonable and suitable building site which is virtually flat throughout�
the majarity of the parcel. There are no significant geological hazards.
This subdivision involves none of the land which is suitable for agri-
culture owned by Highland Ranch. Uisibility will not be aproblem as the
. dense vegetation as well as its location in the bottom of the valley
wil] provide for minimum visability. This application was referred to
eight state and.local agencies for comment. The most vital of the
referra] comments are now in and are summarized as follows: .
1. With regard to septic suitability and the proposed water system,
. Bob Nelson, County Sanitarian, agrees with Wright Water Engineers
� that an adequate domestic water supply can be developed on the
parcel provided the well is properiy located and constructed.
Bob feels very strongly that due to the high perculation rate
discovered to exist in the alluviai soils, the septic system
will require engineering expertise to avoid pollution.
. 2. We received a comment from the State Engineer of the Division
of Water Resources in which they state that they agree with
. Wright Water Engineers about the physical availability of water
for the well. However, they.disagree that the affect of the
well is not injurious to senior water rights. They indicate
that Castle Creek is over appropriated at the present time and
any additional development of tributary ground water resources
resulting from new subdivisions would be injurious to senior
water rights. Wright Water Engineers have indicated that the
water rights on Highland Ranch could be used to augment
depletions from the proposed well. Their position is that a
, plan for augmentation approved by the district water court will
be necessary prior to the issuance of a well permit in Filing #1.
3. Engineer, Lou Beuttner, has reviewed this general submission '
and comments that he has no real problem with the application �
which is in fact the most complete submission that he has ever I
reviewed. He does suggest two areas of clarification which he I
would like to see. He requests that the plat be dated, that �
the area of parcel 1 be correctly indicated, and that a word �
description be placed on the plats. �
� 4. Bob Jacobs, Fire Marshall, has told us that the property is � '
located approximately 6:8 miles from the Aspen Volunteer Fire
Station and that this location provides a reasonable response
time of about 18 minutes, good weather conditions permitting.
5. Dave Shelton of the Colorado Geologic �Survey has commented that "
he concurs with Nick Lampiris' report with the exception of
two specific items. "We recomrnend. a greater setback'from the
stream bank, particularly in areas where the flow of the stream
is directed directly at the bank creating a significant potential
• for ban� erosion during high stream.flow. Secondly, we bel•ieve ' •
' ' � that sewage disposal through common septic, tank leach field • - • -
. systems may not be feasible due to'the potential for� high ground . '
. water in the area. If these items are adequately handled during '
the planning, engineering and construction of the area, we believe . ' .
that there is no geologic reason why this subdivision should not -
, � be approved." .Nick suggests that since the building sites are
located in an area of alluvial deposits that a soils engineering .
study should be required prior to the issuance of a building •
permit. . .
This application presents very few issues to the Planning Office. '
We feel that it is a reasonable request and provided we can work out
several small details prior to final approval, we see no reason why it
should not be ultimately approved. We suggest that you approve the
general submission as the Planning and Zoning CoRnnission did at their '
regular meeting on November 8, 1978, with the following conditions to • .
be met at detailed submission:
1. A soils report is prepared by a qualified engineer to determine •
the most appropriate homesites s,�and
2. A proposal for an engineered sewage disposal system should be
provided to the satisfaction of the County Sanitarian, and
3. The clarifications requested by Lou Beuttner in his memorandum
to the Planning Office of October 25, 1978 are follo�ed on
. ' future submissions, and
4. The applicants agree to deed covenant the property against future
subdivision of the ten acre parcel, and
5. That proof of water in the form of a well permit is provided.
�
�
. �
� 1
. . . �
: . .
; .
I
� .
;
,J'�: f . . . -. , . � � 1
�rL' • I .� l /y' .,�. �
f4 %/ ' l, ti u'rzr'n�•t' rc,_sc�, � I I � ' .
i�J/ �� , t � �f �i�•• .
�t . ( 1 � - � 1!'�.
. ;� -� i i '
f:''1.. �
; . . . � � � �� , . . ,:�
; � �: . � . . N �9•to�z1C ,�0.�7�'� :. ..+ r .)•� • . _
'�. � r.rrn ' � � ,•I 1 �i
� I i I I "'
�"".•' �� • � � i ! ��� si
' / . .
�. , .
/ I F'
( � / / / • +
/ G
• t f � �� . :���
�` N 23•IS'56'E 103i41'-� � � : n'•.
/ � r � ,, �
� . f��l •j�/5 15'Z�'04'W . �ji
��f, �/, �, 1�{
� : N ZB'32'Z7"E 147.�8'• � �, � �;
� ��
! � �n ` t�
._ r,
i. � ;:� � '� s.
� s N�r7'Z7'37"E �e6.1T_'- � � � �:� .
r. :-
((l� hi 7F'37'47"L'. 40.L.3'- . -��.:! �/
'( 1 , N6I'4i I<E 3�r.14�- it��^' rI .
� : 1 i.j.z. N :.°�'`.`'9'O'o"E 1_3.Gs.°�'- �,7�` t � (
� � j �
� -3 03'J�I!"W 74.4Z' �
,.��\ N fH'i5'Z/r-'L' i"I.Z4'- ; �
�� � `� � �, � ' :
� ' �I ' :
� i
�•/ �� � N Ir••5�,30„� •7Z70'- � f ` f! i.
/ . � � ��
� � .
� )t� � � � : C �--a OB'OG1 37"� Llo.
{; :, �
'�� �, e N Id'�Z'IC�'� !o I.�7'- - � • . +
� 1 � � :.` s
� � I .I
�.� ' N .'�'57'ZZ"E 45.T4-- �/� '
�''�� �. • c es� t�49•59'OI"C.��4.1�.� _� J/� O�^��` , � i
\ . � • i c slopc r � ,:
�\ � - . ��.� �/ 1 l� .� q�eater N < �t l'2S'00"W LE �t i'.
•n,.h. � / ♦ � ' m' �han E. .� r
� � / � � �' l �J% c I ! t
N�.O'12'If"E IGU.AT-- �- ' i . � IY. � �
: � ' , m 1 ;
��'� � .� � + �•`�OI'44'22"W il1 � '
i/ ' J 1, o ; _.
N 27'13'11"E lol.;^3'--- J . / � � � �
' j � � • ' 1 � F °� • !� ,
I / �/ _ � o
� V E �, +
' Ij r Best � ' �
N I I''�G'LT"E -11��p�- � u � buikUn � ,iI t
1
'� � sites g t a �
� f� � i �r -5zo•�a�z6'w i�a.u.,
/ / ; '�' % :
� � '� t
tv .'�O'40'S1•� 74.Z1�-- � � � �� ,
� � ,� �� � -�'J I I'20'OZ•W 28.6Z' '' i :
. . N 3`i'34'55'E 6S.7�J'-- �!� i"-�
�� .� � � \`�� � .-5 03'O.S'57'W 44.f5' �' ; �
p�ce� 'r-° : �
U 5G'Oio�48"E 56.7Z'//i.:'� ��` ��� � ._5 04'5 J'�iB"C :r+.l�' �� �
/ , / � .
/// �/ � �00 eat .i : �
�// �� C nfher build��9 rifGS . � %/ (W'��b+7ity �� I - fi CY.Y 30' 17'� 145.G,0' �� ' I
�i�'/� j hiyh 9r���) i 1 � t
IG'C �16.87' •" ��t/� %, 1 � .:I
. . , j� /;'j , . • � t/ �i ._.. ___N GYZi RL"w ��LOI' • .
` � �
�' / ��� ' �lb Fi 26'�^W U%G[T .; .,
�� / % i ,��i'' / %:3�4"TZ'Q7 k' ro?.Q7` � .� ,
/
�;i /� '�i '
�/i� / .�� . l��r'�-��-t� 3rY Za 00"W G,7.CX�' _ .
� � ' . fi t'/� . " �y C4�0��1 4 OrCf�Y t �
;,r• i i� ���~ l '�i �
�, i �� ,)� ✓ 1�,� .
; � . .-�'"� •
j j � �����,�� 1y� .� 3i^r��'oa"w i:°o.c�' � ' / ✓� .
1 � �—.r••�'..��'' 100Ycar{lnod(wa�i6i(hy ` • • . /•l� /�'�iwl ' ,
� \ ��. ,� . . ' •�
, ' � ''r.-. 1. �} 9�`���7'� .
x� '„ � /�:•' _�` � / _ �� 111�!'il'..11"Y' W CY)C7U' � .
..1..,,/rt.•' . ��-��.��,FI%/+. � � ...i�1""b' ,. %�t"Y .
. .•� � ' . " • •- ' •
�.�•�t' .� . ' . t7 . 1tt7:'..' ..�'ii.YJ' ... . .
_ ... .. _ - �! '�. ,'��-l:i'�.. ..., i,t' _ • . . .
� .'r'. ..�K ,. ,t: _ .. . ..
�
�
t
;
. ;
� .
The Aspea Times LOARD Ok' C0. COhihi'R'S
PITKIN C0.
BOX E Publie Hearing �ibits ';
Aspen, Colorado Da�o � `,
.: ...�..�.�__:. 1 ; �
• Sub�oet : �
Er_2i. No.: ..., 1�
PROOF OF PUBLICATION ,
STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of Notice
) ss. �`�
County of Pitkin ) •
I� tJ111i3R1 B. DUri3W3y do solemnly saear that
I am the 1�.t�h 1 i S h P r of THE ASPEN TIMES;
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, � _ �z ., --. _- `
and published in the County,of Pitkin, State of CoIorado, and has 1� f: ��'� �}'� ;;j
a general circulation therein• that said newspaper has been pub- �.
� �; � .
lished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin, 1 'yp�g�CNdfICE - "� ''
for a period of more than fiftytwo consecuti��e weeks next prior
� RE Speei�Rsv�sw. Trailw.�y�Bu�Ter:
to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisc- �i 'mmal ri ' `
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States � N����Y��'���
� ;,w�7lbeapublieL�MifsibitoMf6�H6�rdot:
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of �t�;.Cammisim�e�,�'D�le�mh�r�26�?
March 3, 18?9, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- 1978ac10:ooin.theComm�ia°�,M�`.;
' in�xoom Pitica►CwnhCwel6o�i't�m,
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal Rwiew'
y vkw�n�PP�i�b°6oe r8paid �,
notices and advertisements with the meanins of the ]aws of the '"�nd 10�1�pp�o!d m dlow:'h�i�"�ri
State of Colorado. lqte;their 6nr-uemin�l'�t t1u�°*�°r'
Hoomwt�dli sttbe PWethqrie-,�
", lo�ti6amU�� �t�
� ;. .UA[ee:Sed Dabe:a[th�A�Pi��7��,f
Th�t the annexecl legal notice or advertisement ��•as published ����:: h� .�;f� �,. .�
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekIy ti /d�t(�ld.(�a�±
(
� � ��a: Bu�edo,JCoapt�Cw�mi'i°°'a`i
�. YubLird 3a tbi A� i�s No�eenb�r?
newspaper for the period of 1 consecutiva insertions; and �,-�'Z.9 19'18. `� ; ;" '_
that the first publication of said notite was in the issue of said -' ' �` �� ' 4���'`� �''-� �.��
� newspaper dated November "L"� A.D., 19�8and that
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said news-
paper dated A.D., 19_
r
�/ /
;
.lC ./��i�Y�fi �llr e�lGlll� .
Subscribed and sworn to before me,.a notary public in and for
� the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this �__day of
A.D., 19� `
No ary Public
riy commission er_�ires , 3, 1°$0
i�
'i . �
� -
� _---....-------...._.___._. _.__.. _ ... .._.._..__.. ... _._. __..._....____.
/�-•��'�u
PE�C6VEr ;��.;:- ., i �:-.�;,
�1'11� 1����1� J'111�r�
BOX E : �AF•D OI' C0. COMM'R'S
pITKIN CO• ibits
. AsPen, Colorado --->>>.-ic Hearin6 �
. �e0�/�•-aj-�_��;� �✓e
;'t�'a j�ct : �L.S��""-_ � �
. -:i1. No.. .».. _ ...............
PROOF OF PUBLICA710N
STATE oF cor.oxnno ; � Copy of Notice
County of Pitkln )
I, _.,William.,R_._...i�unaWay... ao eolemnly. awear tt�at
I am Rhe ..•--P.11t11.1.3_Yl@T'........._............... of THE ASPEN TID'LES;
that the same Ls a weekly newspaper printed, in whale or in part,
and publ(shed in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has
� a �general circulation thereln; that sa.id newspaper hae been guU-
• 17shed continuously and utnterruptediy in sald County oP Pitkin,
for a pertod of more t,hen fifty-two cansecutive weeks next prlor
to the iirst publica.tlon of the annexed legaI noticc or advertise-
i ment; that ea.id newspaper has �been admitted to the United 3ta.tes
; mails as aceond-class matter under the provlslons o[ the Act of
� March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said ne�ws- ����""' "
t paper ts a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal ��� `, yxY�k'f ♦ :: +
i notices a.nd advertisements with the mea.ning of the laws of the F l4L1"111b'_��1,��
� Bta.te •of Colorado. r �+� :~ r" +�,1��,�
r �vlr"� 1
� That tlie annexed lega�l notice or advertlsement was published 1 NOTICE IS��C ;�hat�he �
in :the regular and entire issue oP every number of said weekly ��°f County .� �
�.County Colaado �r1LL aiqdUftf a:p e ;
aa 7Witl� D9�u6a 2d 1979
�8 Y
� n e w s p a p e r a f o r t h e p e r i o d o P 1................. c o n s e c u t i v e l n s e rt i o n s; a n d 10:30 A�[ie�• � "Roan� ..
'Pitkin Cuuot�� ��o "
that the flrst publtcatton of said aotice was in the lssue of said .84eet A�,tdom�idM!` �b
' ths MpanlPitidh Caua�j�T81�3 '�1y :
i `Ai�port'SeNI}tiao!rip[lin �, oo -
, November 16 78
� newapaper dated ..................•••••-•-••.........-•_••• A. D.. 19 .....••• and that �2B.OYafe�ldRe�uGtiooi•�71►e�: thi� .'
� �' iiliunwatWbe;toal�ieiti�teth'e AY�vr .
� the last�publication of sald notice wa9 in the issue of said news- �r
few�Fpiyu�`oely'to.i�� .'�4�e
,r saLtno�7 Ali[:euefe.r�pp `.�,l� ,
I: paper dated •••• �. D.. 19_... aaR,eegudlM�aftYPe:,. 1
........_.._..-•-••.............•--.... .... M� '
� 0�ld�pltLfla p .�
// • � O�:�!G�OYO�Y.A�007d .
�1 .��������<���t .... j � � �t = ��j � '
I Tt� so�n4� �
� �a
�. - -- , >'oF rrricu�r� . �
� Subscribed and swom to before me, a notary pubfic in d�ar pu���A� ,��r��r �* ;
' 18 1978 , r; r t �°�.r .. ; i .
[ .:,: :; :G :,a.�.-����
d
the Cotizty of Pitkln, State oP Colorado, this ....��....... day of �-�-�
-IJSfS�i/..1�i�%4:SQC/...l.... A.D.� 19..r<...�
v.k����:{./•�.-••...._.. . . . . -•.................
Notary Public
, My COtnmisslon explles .... ... � .. ..� � �^;� Q lp ;
INy COri�riii5:.ion�FXn}��P�' Rf�
i
i
I
I
� . _ . .._.__�__.___. ._....._._._......_.. ___.--•'----_.----__.._.___ . .. .
. _ .r..W� . _._
/�•,'i,
�The Aspen Times �
I��nRD or Co. Cohtra�R�s
PITKIN C0.
BOX E Pt;bl.ic Hearing Exhibits
Aspen, Colorado .�-���o : ..L�_.�_�i'�7�...
� ���,�;��t . :���!?���..�b .
,
,
L'-?i. IJo. : .._.....--l---..:--.._........
� PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF COLORADO ) COp�/ Of NOtIC@
) ss.
County of Pitkin ) .
I� ���i]li�m A, .1.)>>»Air� do solemnly sH�ear that
I am the Publisher ot THE ASPEN TIMES;
that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, _ _
and published in the Counly of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has ' ' :-=° °^-- •,
a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been pub- e"• br�.► �}�
tished continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitliin, � '•`^�.`
for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive w•eeks next prior �� pU�Cx��
� to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertise- ��ZtE (i ' bupd[ii�m - �;L
ment; that said newspaper has been addmitted to the United States ' �N�pub�U��'�Tt�tthan► .
mails as second-ciass matter under the provisions of the Act of E �h °����eB°''�d°t'
Cammfaioe�n.aa:D�eember.ZA� :-
March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said news- '�'�I�e���ntbsCaoimirim�,
lioom.Pltl�inCamej!Caiufbou�to.�::
paper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal ', � ��fot�t����
notices and advertisements with the meanins of the laws of the_ "���traitof�27��p�
State of Colorado. ':`wV"�7,�onmottl�s•PwmjHafB� ;
��°��i°�+o��od ae�'fuethi�infoem�
"�m he ewiew�d�t.t6s P1annLis'p� � ��
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement �vas published ' 6a'��0��"�►ah,H�11,e26. ; 'f
.: Z02D eiR 2�.9: , .. . ' , j'
in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly � ': �v Ro�et Gj����n ; :
' BanddfCount'�..C� ..
':PuWir6�d in fhe ATen''ISme�Norembsr �, �.
newspaper for the period of 1 consecutiva insertions; and ''-29,iB78,- . ., ,
that the first ..• =� -' :
publication o[ said notice was in the issue of said ` "
r-.;.
newspaper dated November G j A.D., 19�� and that
the last publication of said notice was in the issue of, said news-
�aper dated A.D., 19,
�� i
��U.r � /1.��/�,��G/��
.�
�
Subscribed and sworn to betore me,.a notary public in and for �
the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, this �,day of
� A.D., 19�
� /
Notary Public
A1y commissirn exQires Mv r.��-,„�;Siei� '"••-' � �
-�-�.� r. .». �. �qso
• � . . ... . .. ...... ... .. ........ .J