The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.res.108.1978 . `-MTIfYYilYIi�P�YtiiiYXWWYw'W�� ....... .... . . ..,..��,•.�. '=r' _ z .v7:�� ' . j j. � � : �d " 7 I : A �' �' PITRIN COUNTY � rj . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS "* .a � . . . :��. � : RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD �� OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COITI3TY, COLORADO, � TO ENGAGE IN A CONTRACT WITH PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, � - QUADE, AND DOUGLAS, INC. TO PERFORM PORTIONS OF A TRANSIT � ti DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM-MALL/PARiCING STUDY ;r� � :: � Resolution #78-_� � �; WHEREAS, PITKIN COUNTY, by and through its governing body, the � Board of County Commissioners, is authorized under 30-11-101(f) CRS `�� 1973, "to develop, maintain and operate mass transportation systems," '�` and; �� ; WHEREAS, PITKIN COUNTY is authorized and empowered to contract �' for and receive a federal grant under 29-1-203(1) CRS 1973, and; ` ;� WHEREAS, the Urban Mass Transportation Administration approved ` � on November 22, 1977 a Technical Studies grant of $15,932 for the i development of a Transit Development Program, and; . , `. ,1 WHEREAS, �on July 24, 1978 the City of Aspen and Pitkin County i � approved the selection of Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. �i � to assist in the development of the Transit Development Program and iii{{{ Mall/Parking Study. . \ k NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners � � of Pitkin County, Colorado: = 1. That Pitkin County does duly ratify and approve this Agree- � - � - ment with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglass, Inc. 3 (attached hereto and incorporated by this reference). .� 2. And that Robert W. Child, Chairman of the Board of County � r �; x� Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, is hereby authorized �. s to execute the same on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners �'� � of.Pitkin County, Colorado. � ..r'y.'��- _i11 � ti � . ;�t�. i• �� .- '.�: /�. !'.. �{,, . , DATE,: �:�= �/ e f��.�� BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS � ""t 7 �' PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO '�' . � .� �:, tir�t.1�a-'��'�x;..; . . . . � A��`�p i^' �,`f" � - f � w � ,''(:� k M� BY.RObert W. Child C�""� , ��k1� L . . � El ,za�i�-Sti�wart Chairman � 1 Depu�y.Cduii�y�-Clerk ?; APPROVED AS�TO FORM: �;�` �. � i .. ' �/J�l �y /y �� - . t :. S Sdndra M. Stuller County Attorney ;;`` i� � i,! [: i �:'��'�.: �'� ' , y,:.:; ��1� ' '� ` � ` .x�•'.. . . - r . . ' . � a, ;fi� � • �'`�r:V.•� . � � l)*�. " . :j:��:.. � AGREEMENT a This Agreement is made this ' day of , 1978, � �,�. between the City of Aspen, State of Colorado (hereinafter referred ': ;j . . • ` }._ to as "City"), a municipal corporation, and the County of Pitkin, I� �'c �� State of Colorado (hereinafter referred to as "County"), and � ;� '� � � Quade and Dou � ;,..- Parsons, Brinckerhoff, glas, Inc., Consulting Y , iY = Engineers and Planners, 110 Plaza, New York, New York 10001, q '�{;- (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant") . � �'• The County is a recipient of funding from the Urban Mass � -�: . � f'= Trans ortation Administration .;,. p , (hereinafter referred to as "UMTA") , „;�.= under Section 9 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act as amended, "� �:' �� to complete a Transit Development Program for the Pitkin County t ��'_ ' region. The "County" desires to engage services of the � � }�-� - "Consultant" to perform certain portions of this study funded by said "JMTA". The City and County further desire to engage _ services of the "Consultant" to perform certai.n portions of a . � '4 _ mall/parking study for the �,spen downtown area. Accordingly, the parties to this Agreement in consideration of the mutual - covenants and stipulations set out herein agree as followse ARTICLE l: AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY � k: "County" will act as lead agency for purposes of this � Agreement, �vith responsibility for administration and compliance � {.� _ with the terms and conditions herein. The "City" will contribute, ,:� wa . - in addition to the staff time necessary in the development of �;':� _. the Transit Development Program and Mall/Parking Study, a non- refundable sum of $3,077.50 which will be deposited in a Transit !� = Development Program and Mall/Parking Study account established �� l;. �.- by the "COUnty" to pay the "Consultant" for performance of the ?' - work set forth in this Agreement. " ARTICLE 2: CONTRACT DESCRIPTION j�.�. The services to be performed under this contract by _ "Consultant" are described in Appendix 1, Scope of Work. , ahis is a cost plus fixed fee contract. In consideration - s � E::: . ' of the performance by "Consultant" of the services to be rendered ;, i^.;;• ,,i,,R.'y �':!;:sr".:.'� t U'; .!� . a� � L J�,. � ��J �. :-:. . �.j• t':� .� �r �'a'r'^• tiu:. ;i_- as described in Appendix i the "County" agrees to pay "Consultant" ; a fixed fee of $1,986 lus the actual cost of � p performing such U ;:l• work, for a total not to exceed $22,087 (without the prior `:j. �' approval of the "County" as provided in Article 3) all as further � , described in Appendix 2, "Cost and Price Analysis," a,copy of .' ;�;" f� = which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. _? :';- "County" shall be responsible for furnishing available :�j �;. ,r; '�= data and other related information as necessary for "Consultant" :3 1�= to accomplish Scope of Work as defined in Appendix 1, attached r'( - hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part =� - . hereof: • � ;:c, '; ;:�, _ Curt Stewart, Aspen/Pitkin County Transportation Planner � _ will be designated as Project Manager for the "City" and "County" � �� ' and will be responsible for coordinating all aspects of this ` �,::. -- Agreement with "Consultant." ARTICLE 3: PERIOD OF PERFORI�1AtJCE �� The period of performance of this contract shall be from � _ the date of approval or signing of this contract, whichever is � = later, to 140 days after the date of the contract. '� _ - If during the course of the study herein contemplated the � � � - need to change the Scope of Services should arise, for whatever ;� _ reason, whichever party first identifies such need to change � . . � _. shall notify the other party in writing, as provided for herein, � � = and the representatives of the parties shall �meet, within seven -- i (7) working days of the date of such notice, to discuss the need :� . . � . ','{'A for chan e so identified and to set the :� g proposed action to be _ taken by the parties. Any change in the Scope of Services, ;� - mutually agreed to by the parties shall also result in a mutually y _ agreed to change in the allowable contract costs. If the mutually _. agreed to change in allowable costs represents a change of more than ten (10) percent of the allowable costs per Article 2, the - p�rt�es sh1�1 also adjust the fixed fee to refTect the syreed to � changes in Scope of Services. The provisions herein contained :. and applicable to changes in scope shall also be applicable to s` __ changed conditions as may be discovered during the course of �� i -. the study program herein provided. - 2 - - - `. . ,. .. ;� ` < ,_ • ' �. . . .. � ' � ' .: -. •.t. . . .. " ._. . . _. �s., . . i,:fn�-'n'�„5;a.. )�`,-: ;f`., . '�+ ?;'� " . L � L-�j' t � � . � R�SJ�.. ARTICLE 4: �tETHOD OF PAYMENT �' i� • (a) Invoices "'' .:,i '� ;�j Once each month, "Consultant" shall submit to the :;'i �� w� "County" an invoice supported by a statement of costs • a.j ''i' �. �i . incurred by "COnsultant" in the performance of this . r� . �; � contract and a statement of fixed �ee due, calculated ,'��i; � tr:. � y��.� . ��''+ as a percentage of the total fixed fee based upon a !' �S ratio of work completed to the total scope of work. ai� s:1 �. (b) Payment � �� After receipt and app�odal of the charges, the .� ri, . �� ; i�i � . "County" shall make payment within 30 days there- a:� , I-i �'; after to "Consultant", provided, however, that the ?; �±.� " .total of the periodic payments sha1T not exceed r� �r � ' the costs and 90 percent of the total amount of t� °I� fixed fee speciPied in Article 2, until the "County" � ::; � received and approved the release as provided in �� subsection (c) below. ,,� . ; ;�_ (c) Financial Statement � �_ � Prior to final payment under this contract, � . "Consultant" shall execute and deliver to the "County": � (1) an assiqnment to the "County" of refunds, rebates, � credits or other amounts, including any interest � • thereon, properly allocabZe to cost for which the � � ; „� _ "Consultant" has been rei.mbursed by the "County" I� � i' � � under this contract; and �� !k (2) a release discharging the "County" for all ��` c liabilities, obligations and claims arising out ��-� of or under this contract except for specified � claims for payment in estimated amounts where the � iT amounts are not susceptible to exact statement by � � � . "COnsultant". f` �� ARPICLE 5: TERMINATiON FOR DEFAIILT OR FOR CONVENIENCE OF COUNTY �, _ - (a) The per£ormance of work under the contract may be k � termi.nated by the "COUnty": " ''�'; � r,:� � (1) whenever the "Corisultant" shall default in per- H,- fi= �: , formance of this contract in accordance with 1 _ .. . . . � , ��S � _ -3- . . . _ . .+ � . . . ,„: ,,,,,.,�:4 ,. .. _ - . ��' . n . _ • �., .. - — . .,, . --- ` _...-. . • ,.... . ..'r. j _ �� -�,;;Z1,:.,ur,- ).�.'"��'r:..%,u�i^ i _._.__._..__. � - :,..-_.:.., ��.�'t i:' - � ,.:��.,..4,�� , ' , � • L , I' � • ��,^��. / Y � �' '. �"_?t.i,,, • ita terms, and fails to cure or show cause why ;� '` such failure to perform should be excused within `�� ?.� ;;':� ten (10) days (or longer as the "County" may �° a11ow) after receipt of a notice specifying ;:a ?:; . ` � the default £rom the "County," or • ;;'j ' (2) whenever Eor any reason the "County" shall '�j r�; �', . determine that termination is in its best ';( interest. i�!i ;a ''� ��:� �;�- "Consultant" shall not be in default by reason of any '`� ."; • :=1 . ;� ;i= failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its f �- ternts if such failuse arises out of causes beyond the control -k �'= � and without the'fault or negligence of the�"Consultant°. Such t ¢� 1� . . ;�_ causes may include, but are not restricted to, aqts of God, ` {� natwtal disasters, strikes or freiqht embargoes,' but in every �� . �.� 4 ;;-- case the failure to perform must goi�eyond the control and with- � %j ' - y�= out the £ault or negligence of the "Consultant". Upon request ?� of the °Consultant°, the "County" sha7.1 ascertain the facts and '�� failure and, if he shall determi.ne that any failure to perform �� '�_:. • constituted excusable delay, the project schedule shall be :� � . reVised accordinqly and notice of default withdr�wn. �:� {b) Notice of Termination + � In such event of terminat3on, the "County° shall ' � " del.iver to "Consultant" a written notice of � t termination, specifying the reasons therefore, � �• and the effective date of such termination. The !� j�x , _ effective date shall not be earlier than the date � of delivery of the notice. !� ra "��` �' (c) ' Termination Procedure `� � • r #` � . ikl 3. After receipt of the notice of termination, unless , � r ` otherwise directed by the "County", "Consultant" � E (� ; shall: �' a � • .. •` (1) Stop work under the contract on the date specified '{ * . ' in the notice of termination; - (2) Place no further orders for materials, services •�a' �,f'y p , or facilities; - (3) Terminate all orders and subcontracts to the . . - 4 - .. .. , . ,. . . �.. -. . , � , _ ,� . , '_ . .. . " _ _ ... ", • _ . _ .- ;�,:` .:_ _ ^ t^'>;�e�.:!:�;�' �'".. .._,,,._ ,_. Y , =., - _ . L '�%1. � �y�'� 1�. extent that the relate to the �� y performance of -1 work terminated by the notice of termination; : � �s �? (4) With the approval or ratification of the "County" kzto the extent it may require, settle all out- ' �� . standing liabilities and all claims asising out ;; � of such termination of orders or subcontracts, �' i� � ,:, „`� �� the cost of which would be reimbursable !_,! . � � � '� in whole or in part in accordance with this ',ii '� contract. � �;:j �, � - � • !� ,.. � (d) Termination Payment ,,I "=` � ' After the receipt of a notice of termi.nation, • ?ty '� ;� - "Consultant" shall submit to the "County" his � � � termination claim in the form of a final invoice � � el . �� in accordance with Article 4, including costs incurred � ? `,=ti a � ; �'? � to the date of termi.nation and including costs !, , xf aa � incurred because of termination, but not to exceed iq y1 � 90 percent of the total shown in Article 2, provided . � however, that in the event of default by "Consultant", '. '3 no extra costs incurred because of termination shall � i . - be paid to "Consultant"; and the final payment will be less the amount of the fixed fee paid to "Consultant" � i.n accordance with Article 4. Such claim must be �•' submitted rom tl but in no event later than three �;__ • P P Y� # ,� : months from the effective date of termination, unless � £ one or more extensions are granted in writing by the � • "County". Upon "Consultant's" failure to submit a �t claim in the ti.me allowed, the "County" may review � the fnformation available to hi.m, and determine the � _ amount due the "Consultant", if any, and pay the � �; . "Consultant" the amount as determi.ned. �' : Ee) Settlement • : � ;+ . �., Subject to paragraph (d). "Consultant" and the �� , ! � "County" may agree upon the whole or any part of the ; �' '� ; �s�.. . amount or amounts to be paid, including an allowance �_ �_ for the fee to "Consultant" by reason o£ the termina- � .� . r ;� tion of work. ;� . - 5 - �' -.._ - . _ • , .. , . . .. . , . _ •- _ . . ' - , . ., , , , .:, • . _ ... � � - . �.. :c �._.. _ __.. _ =*.,� }"',.._ '-~*:i F.,'L'�i}�.:t;.:;. 'i. ..;'P+:.. �� }�- - . ` ,. � k•�:Ea,. r�.. ' t��^. (f) Remedies - i "Consultant" shall have the right of appeal from any ; � _ I �'� determination made by the "County" under paragraph :`i "•' (d) or (e) above, except that if the "Consultant" i; , ?\{ � has failed to submit his claim within the time � : •�.� is ' provided in paragraph (d) above and has failed to �:� � ,, `� properly request extension, he shall have no such �� t� right of appeal. In any case where the "County" has � � . �,� made a determination of the amount due under '';� _� . `,i . �� pazagraph (d) or (e) above, the "County" shall pay i�� +y . `' ' "Consultant" (1) the amount the "County" has i� � �; Yt. • determined if there is no riqht to appeal or if no t� ,�. timely appeal has been taken, or (2) the amount i� 3� � finally determined on such appeal if• an appeal has ;� y� .i ,.,t been taken. � ,;, . . , 'y�� ' , � . S . . �� (g) Method of Appeal ;� Subject to paragraph (f) , if "Consultant" disagrees ;� with the "COUnty's" determinations under paragraph '� ..�� (d) or (e), he can appeal this decision in writing � - to the "County". Such appe.al must be made withi.n 20 � � days of receipt in writing of the "County's" ' � determination. The "County" shall have 20 days in �. . which to respond in writing to the appeal. The s�- "County's" response shall be final and conclusive unless within 30 days from the date of receipt of , ' ti such response, the "COnsultant" submits the dispute � � to a court of competent jurisdiction. � . . � ARTICLE 6: REQUIRED CLAIISES � � "Consultant" shall be subject to the provisions outlined G __ in Appendix 3, Required Provisions, attached hereto and � i! � incorporated by reference to this contract. . ''. , � �� 'i . � ARTICLE 7: PROGRESS REPORTS • � ':S �-• "Consultant" shall make monthly progress reports to the `t �i . •: '; � "County" in writing concerning work tasks accomplished to date i;: f;. and overall contract progress. Three (3) copies of such reports ?+: �' shall be submitted. �}-- ;< � iq }`,�� • . •• _ 6 ^ . .. .;�• • • . ,_ • . . { - . . . . � . � , _... � . - . _ . , . ..,:,. . ,. .. . _ . .,+ . . . . � _ :y._ _. . . . . .. _. .._.. �- �_ � ��n"'r::::r�r . _�#-..F ' ��%i�'L5- . � .. ..�:,.:�i. � � . - . L . . . .. "'.�..�'. ARTICLE 8: SUBCONTRI�CTS t :i;`. ,� . Assignment of any portion of the work by subcontract must ,';:. ; i be approved in advance by the "County". The "County" will not <;; be liable for the cost assigned without such approval. � ' ARTICLE 9: RIGHT5 TO DOCUMENTS ' All plans, specifications, documents and materials �.' ;i , ; relating to this Study developed by the "Consultant" during the `'' i� course of this contract shall accrue to, and vest in the "County." �'� ;;i ARTICLE 10: RECORDS !i� i;+ "Consultant" shall maintain complete and accurate books, ��! %r,i records and documents concerning the actual time devoted to and �`� � in . . - direct�and indirect costs incurred in the performance of this �;� • contract. ARTICLE 11: PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONALS : � i� The principal professionals identified iri Agpendix 1 are :y' considered essential to the performance of this contract. ; �i - In the event of death, disability or inability of one ' of these professionals to perform, the "County" and "Consultant" � ; shall mutually agree on another psoEessional to perform that � � - professional's work tasks. ! . , - ARTICLE 12: GOVERNING LAWS . - This contract shall be construed under the laws of the ' � State of Co7.orado. ' � ARTICLE 13: URSA13 MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION APPROV.AL ; `"` This contract is contingent upon approval by the Urban ' � � - Mass Transportation Administration. Such approval sha1.1 be �.ti' �' - indicated by written endorsement by an authorized employee of � � ?; � �- the IIrban Mass Transportation Administration or "County", t' ,{ ' � - acting on the authority of the Urban Mass Transportation Administra- r . � '�= tion, provided, however, that if such approval is not received � I, within si,xty (60j days of signature by the "Connty" and "Consnitaat", the latter will not be bound to this contract. � �' : - ACCEPTANCE BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �: ,ey: The foregoing Agreement, and all its terms arid conditions, � E- � i? ;;'� were approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin � �- • Coanty, Colorado, at its regu2ar meetinq held September, ' `� i� _ 7 - _ _ . • i:� r . . .. �,.v. ' _ .. . . , :�, - .. . . � .. . . . ... . . . .. .. ::[Ft: . � ' - ... ... . .. . _ . .. .. . „ . . .r��. .. .... . . � _.. lXl .�. �.: . . . . ,.. � . ... . "" . 'Yk.�?`•��'..�'iC,� . -;-sr��, . . �� .;-_ Rs� ' .. _. �f. � .. .. .. . r .... . . . _ . . . . . ..- . . .. . . . :1 � - , � . . �� . . . � . . � ��,�� ': - • 1978, reserving to the Etoard, however, the provisions •of Article �; 3 notwithstanding, the right to terminate the same, withou� �i penal�ty, wben and if funds necessary for the payment for� the.year � �� . '��I 7.979 h�rein called for are not appropriated (all as required• ' . . . � i i ..�. by the provisions of C.R.S., 1973, Section 29-1-113). In the � . i.:: ". . event of termination pursuant to this reservation, the ;� i " . "Consultant" shall recover any and all payments due and cwinq �,j ; under the terms of this Agreement at that time. ; In witness of this Agreement, the parties have set their ' ,� `�� hands this day o£ September, 1978. P2TRIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS i. By: �`� -�/��yGCil Robert W. Child . Chairman � '( ATTEST: � '� �f7.c��-� : Elizabeth Stewart ' Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . �/•..�-.,. ,�ka�(' =z�-' . 'Sand a M.'S"Stuller . County Attorney _ ' CTTY OF ASPEN � . ------- � ( . $y: <�``r Stacy St,andley __ Mayor ; lan.. _ ' C..,/ ATTEST: �I .I � / , , � / ��? t,�'r�,� 1 vJ s',�t7�.�.cv-.1 tc.'r; , • Kathryn $. Hauter City Clerk . • . ' - '8 - . . " ' �- 1 � � � �'�- ,. � w ;1 •. ,�, _ �:�„ _ , .,.:,.,-- ,_ _ . _ r } :.� :.;:i,,::"*�k*'��,'—�'„k�,',_" _�<.f:,,,..,:. 'r �;��;:�' i . �;a'; ' ' , � .., . . . .. , ' ��" • ` • + n• ; • y� 4. t� APPR0�7ED AS TO FORM: �' - . . � , . . , . ,:. e;. .�. � . �. . . : � �-.'��i . _ sI, — �• �i Rona d W. Stock :f� City Attorney , � . �'' !�� . �{� :. II � Parsons, �ranckerho f, Quade and u `: ;.. ' ' Douglas, Inc. .,_ �1 , ! � ; ,;.: Consultant '�. i � � . � Approved on Behalf of the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION , , - , , , .. : ` _ • � x _ . . ., . � ; _ ; 9 . - - • < � ��_ a . _ .��: `,r _ . . . . . �? � _ � - . . . . _. ;y...._ _�;.u, . . Y��,r.Y1f'�.� ,�....: •*Y_ _..�__ - ��.,� . . �' .6,;,:��t', . i.`�.,��,:... , � 'y ,.:ktii�;. . . P�yJ�:::'t,�. ��`�,' APPENDIX 1 � 3COPE OF W�RK GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT CONSOLTANT shall be responsible for assisting County of ' - Pitkin and City of Aspen staff in the conduct of the PITKIN I. COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (UM2A Project No. CO-09-0022) and the MALL/PARKING STUDX (Addendum 1 to UMTA Project No. CO-09-0022). The overall work programs for the TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM and the MALL/PARKING STDDY are attached to �` - this APPENDIX 1 as ATTACHMENT NO. 1 and ATTACHMENT NO. 2, respectively, and by this reference are incorporated herein ;' and made a part hereo£. Spceific tasks of CONSULTANT, as such !: tasks relate to the overall work programs of the TRANSIT �; DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM and the MALL PARXING STUDY, are detailed �; below. � f'. _ SPECIFIC RESPONSIHILITIES OF CONSULTANT �: - . �i �: PITKIN COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ._ UMTA Prq�ect No. CO-09-0022 !' !1 Task 1: TDP Study Administration. No CONSULTANT involvement. !� Task II: Transit Goals and Objectives Identification. No ' CONSULTANT involvement. `{ , Task III: Description of Pitkin Countv's Transit Service Area. f No CONSULTANT involvement. Task IV: Present Transoortation Systems and Services. CONSULTANT �; 's�31 determine what data are needed re�garding present transporta- � _ tion systems azid services i.n order for the Study to be conducted according to the work program for the TRANSIT DEVE70PMENT PROGRAM attached hereto. Such determinati.on will include requirements for data pertaining to existing physical facilities (road _ capacity, rail facilities, buses, pedestrian facilities, etc.) > , and data pertai.ning to usage patterns (transit ridership, ' _ vehicle volumes, etx.). Upon deterneination of data requirements, and as the product of this Task, CONSULTANT shall prepare a -. brief inemorandum detailing (1) all data necessary for study performance,with indications regarding data priority, and (2) _. recommendations £or alternative means of acquiring necessary - data including use of reports and secondary source materials as well as primary data collection, where necessary. All actual _ data collection and the preparation of the Technical N:emorandum _. resulting from this Task describing present transportation systems and services will be the responsibility of City/County staff. CONSUI,TANT shall review sta£f work and provide comments and recommendations, as appropriate. - Task Vs Transit Alternatives - Capital Development. The basic - purpose of this Task is to develop and provide a link between the TAS/TSM praject and the TRANSIT DEVEIAPM.=NT PROGRAM_ • CONSULTANT shall have three pri.mary functions in this Task: (1) � _.. assistaace in the development o£ technical responses raised by � _. relevant reViewing ageacies (UMTA, FHWA, CODH, etc.) regarding the findings and recommendations of the TAS/TSP4 Study; {2) final _. deiinition of the recommended capital development alternative (busway) as described in the TAS/TSSI Study, including required - capital facilities (busway, maintenance facility, buses, inter- cept lots, etc.); and (3) description and listing of possible _ short-range (five-year) alternatives to the recammended busway development. `� • -. � ". _ � . • . ,_ • ��:�.ri•�.,., ' 'c'r.6'r.i-�: '..� .�r,t�:1i.' - . . -- _�. �... . V T(l� "� I[ }�� . • � t4 ' ��T:".:::1:�- � .�4-,..:a:� iic' The product resulting from this Task will be a Teohnical . Memorandum which will describe, in appropriate text and graphic format, the recommended busway program. This detailed defini- tion of the primary capital development program will be developed in order to provide a base from which management, organi2ational and financial packages relating to the busway program can be " . developed in subsequent Tasks. While much material will be ' summarized from the TAS/TSt4 report. certain additional aspects � of the program will be defined: particularly relating to �unport systems, including bus maintenance facilities, parking areas, etc. The memorandum will also list possible alternatives to the - busway, including a "no build" low capital intensive program consisting of a county-wide public transit system generally ,i. identical in all respects to the primary capital development alternative but with the busway and its associated capital facility requirec�ents deleted from the progsam. Task VI: Transit Alternatives - Management and Organizational S stems. Consultant shall be responsible for developing. descr bing and comparing a number of options for organization - and management of transit services in Pitkin County. At the minimum, such options shall include (1j the present, Eragmented ! system of both public and private ownership/management; (2) consolidation of City and County services with continued frag- mented operation of private systems; {3) consolidation of City ' and County services with independent consolidation of private operators into a single private system; and (4) total consoli- dation of all services. It will be assumed that management and ; organizational systems will be identical for the primary cagital ± development alternative (busway) and for the "no build" option. � This Task will be accomplished by CONSUI,TANT in three � steps. First, criteria £or comparing management/organizational ; alternatives will be defined. Such criteria will include i economic effici.ency, service effectiveness, equity concerns, institutional/legal feasibility, system flexibility/expanda- tir biZity, potential consumer attractiveness and others which may � be developed during the course of the Study. Each option shall be clescribed fully, including appropriate details regarding ownership, potential revenue sources, jurisdictional responsibi- lities, service areas and other pertinent details. Finally, CONSULTANT will evaluate the series of management/organizational � options with respect to the criteria developed initially and . � prepare a priority ranking iadicating which alternatives appear to hold the greatest promise for implementation in Aspen and y Pitkin County. . The product resulting from this Task will be a TechnicaZ Memorandum which outlines the nethods and findings of the three- `A step process outlined above. .The memorandum will provide CONSULTANT recommendations regarding prefersed options tor transit system management and organization in Pitkin County. Task VII: Transit Alternatives - Financial Structure. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for developing, describing and comparing a number o£ options for Einancing transit services in Pitkin County. _ Examination of financing options will be accomplished for the primary capital development alternative (buswayj , and for the "no build" alternative. Financial alternatives will be developed separately for each of the two basic management/organizational ' options defined in Task VI (fragmented service and consolidated • service) . It is expected that CONSULTANT shall utilize sig- , ' nificant City/County staff services in performance oE this Task, particularly the services of the County Economist and City and . _ County Finance Directors. As in Task V2, this Task will be accomplished by CONSULTANT - in three steps. First, criteria for comparing and evalnating £inancial options will be defined. Such criteria for comparing - 2 - �• . . . _. ' - _ . • • - .. _::x.,, a.. _,y,..,, . . _.. _. �rar�rrrr�+.. �rr .. �x�� . . . ' � ., �. .� . . V t } ��ti,. . :4J�:_�:�. and evaluatinq financial options will be de£ined. Such criteria will include likely £unding levels, institutional/legal feasibility, political acceptability, permanency, equity, collection methods, p�tential community acceptance, and other criteria which may De defined through input from technical and citizens' groups in Pitkin County. CONSULTANT shall then develop a list of financial alternatives, keyed primarily to the estimated capital and operat-. ing cost requirements and projected revenues associated with the busway proqram. Financial alternatives will be described fully, and each of the potential funding sources identi£ied in the TAS/ TSM Study will be included in the definition of financial options. These potential funding sources will be categorized according to _ (1) transportation-related sources, (2) �onventional non-trar_spnr- tation-related sources, (3) special non-transportation-related _ sources, and (4) bonding sources. Finally, CONSULTANT will evaluate the series of financial alternatives with respect to _ the criteria developed initially and prepare a nriority ranking indicating which alternatives appear to hold the greatest promise _ `for implementation in Aspen and Pitkin County. 'The product restulting from this Task will be a Technical _ Memorandum which outlines the methods and findings o£ the three- _ step process outlined above. The memorandum will provide ;; _ CONSULTANT recommendations regarding preferred options for tr.ansit _ system financing in Pitkin County. Task VIII: Application of Other Transit Improvement Alternatives. The purpose of this Task will be to define and finalize the proposed Transit Zncentives Program which will accompany the implementation of the capital development proqram. Included will ;� be full descriptions of various programmatic elements which represent, individually and as an integrated package, inducements to the use of public transit in Aspen and Pitkin County. Many ;( o£ the automobile disincentive strategies which were developed i and included in the TAS/TSM Study will be included here, speci- _ fically placed in a short-range, five-year context. Additional � - concepts, as developed, will also be defined for incZusion in : _ the Transit Incentives Program. As a minimum, the following �� - types of alternative'programs will be evaluated and combined in ` a complete package of programmatic actions desigried to improve � the efficiency and effectiveness of transit operations in the � Roaring Fork Valley: • � � o transit marketing programs • i o economic disincentives to automobile use - _ o parking policies � � ^ � o land use/development options '`• o reuse or revitalization of existing facilities � - o supplemental para-transit services ' o "spreading" peak demands for recreation facility use o highway design/traffic operational policies o peripheral intermodal transportation transfer facilities and policies 0 other measures aimed at providing incentives, to transit use The product of this Task will be a Technical Memorandum which identifies those transit measures which appear to have � qreatest potential for implementation in connection with the • capital development program in Pitkin County. Task IX: Alternative Transit Y7ork Program Package Selection. � - Based on the recommendations developed in Tasks VI, VII and ' _ VIII, CONSULTANT shall develop a series of alternative five- - year transit development programs. It is expected that the - pri.mary capital development program (busway) and the "no build" option will be the focus of the transit work program package which includes final definition o£ the o=ganizational, operational - �nd financial programs which together describe the overall five-year - transit development program. � Y ` . .. - 3 - ��' •��e4�:.: . jl'�`':1.,�::, . f F < t , — r � '-' ' , �_ti'r•r°.tj,1c::;:j.. . ,.�,�.,�., . . _ . '" . '"_.._ . .. . ., y . :.;. .l� . f: 7,}� �y� . :?�"�;'.': r,.;F�'s � .sr'"�:: .:{r;,�: The methodology for conducting this Task will consist of several steps. First, CONSULTANT shall array the various alter- native management/organization, financial and transit incentive programs, as defined earlier, in a matrix evaluation format. Combinations of alternatives will then be analyzed in terms of ' their ove.rall service effectiveness, cost and institutional efficiency, physical and socioeconomic impacts, and implementa- bility when 'combined with the busway capital development program . � and the "no huild" option as recommended in the TAS/TS!°I Study and further de£ined in Task V. These fully defined program options shall comprise the basic set of TDP alternatives. CONSULTANT shall then present the TDP alternatives to relevant agencies and the community-at-large. There shall be a naximum _ of two such presentations at meetings orqanized by City/COUnty staffs. Finally. CONSULTANT shall pzovide recommendations = regarding transit work program packages which appear to have greatest potential for implementation in Pitkin County. The product from this Task will be a Technical Memorandum describing the methods used in this Task and presenting the � recommendations and documentation for transit work program I package selection. Task X: Five-Year Transit Development Proqram. Based upon � CONSUI,TANT zecommendations developed in Task IX, and further ; based upon input received from relevant reviewing agencies and public bodies, CONSULTANT shall develop the final transit ! work program as a staged five-year development plan. The product + - to be prepared in this Task shall be the draft five-year Transit � Development Program which will include a year-by-year implementa- � tion plan detai2ing the capital development program, transit system organizational and management strategy and a financial � plan £or transit development and operation in Pitkin County. � Task XI: Publication of Final TDP Document. Upon final review y� and comment, CONSULTANT s a1Z prepare the inal TDP dra£t incorporating revisions forwarded by the City/County Project - Coordxnator. The product of this Task will be a camera-ready � report which will be printed and distri,buted as appropriate. � CONSULTANT shall be responsible for complete preparation of all camera-ready copy, including typed text and graphics, all � final printing. Distribution shall be the responsibility of � -. Pitkin County and/or the City of Aspen. � MAI,L/PARKING STUDY � ADDENDUM 1 � ; UMTA Project No. CO-09-0022 ` f , Task 2. CONSOLTANT shall review existing parking supply (on-and- '' o�reet) and its relationship to apparent demand. This will ` be carried out based on available data supplied by City/County - staff and usinq reasonable assumptions. Task II. CONSULTANT shall assess the parking-related impacts of proposed mall extension in terms of space reduction, accessi- . bility to shopping, etc. Task III. CONSIILTANT shall develop alternative policy responses - to�fie proposed mall extensi.on. At least three options will be � e�lored: . o Do-nothing (i.e., reduce total parking supply) - o Supply substitute spaces through garage construction at _ Rubey Park or through establishment of parking facilities at other locations including intercept lots,and shuttle service to downtown as appropriate �-: o Reorganize remaining parkinq through physical alteration, , t:. or throuqh changes in parking policies • �' •---•-. . . — 4 — ';;. - .. �. _ ' `�'. ' `. - . - . _ . . � . . - , . ... •. ` . . „ .. . ``� , -. .. .. > - .,:. .. _.;',{ v�k, -- )'' .: I� . . dlslBilllYlilf�ifYllYllf�� . .__.. ,....» 1 •.:1 1„ !^-: =r,��a',,�,. _ �t <�� ' , , _ �. =. ....... . - . . . � � . . . . . . . . Ts . � . L�� *1• Each of the alternative possible policy responses will be outlined ;� with respect to necessary parking actions, implied parking supply �( changes, congestion impacts, accessibility implications, required - or implied transit actions, circulation pattern changes (if - appropriate), impact of parking action on adjacent neighborhoods, ��' - impact on goods deliveries and cost/funding implicatians. �. G Task IV: CONSULTANT shall conduct a brief investigation of the I: ea�sibility of underground parking at Rubey Park. Thi.s will focus I; " on developing a concept with respect to size, operation and _ i; financing alternatives. Consideration will be given to � condominium, employee, shopper and skier parking; bus terminal; �" _ rental car; gas stat,ion; etc., options. (This will not be an �� , - - engineering or financial feasibility study. Reasonable assumptions will be made and cost estimates will be based on data supplied i - by City/County sta£f and brief studies of comparables, as ;�' appropriate.) i . � I�'.. Task V: As the product of the MALL/PARRING STUDY, CONSULTANT ,� shall prepare a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing the methods, findings and recor.unendations developed in Tasks I through IV above. The purpose of this Memorandum will be associated with the proposed mall extension in suitable fashion ' to assist relevant agencies in making necessa•ry decisions. _ , . � : _ - %.. - - ; ,.. , . ,, _ . . . . .,�- .., ., _ � � _ .. _ 5 _ � . . • � . _ . _ , €i + . , � . . . . . �� ' . � . . � ' .� , . � � .... . t�� _ �"' � . . . � ` . .. ' . . .. .�.. - ?,� . - . . . . - � � • . � . . ... - - ' '%� .. � . .�:'"' � ° �.�. .. . . - * _ ..'�..i'�j: �;i:-: y7 4�,�'�� . . . .... _ . . . . . . . . �� :.';i-�: L ' �.� � . A�j��:�:.� • � f'l.:. ' ;y�'�.�}:". . ,';l"�. � CONTRACI PRICING PROPOSAL Olhee o(Man�:�eme��t�nd 11udNet " (RHSEAXCI►AND 1)tiVEl,plStilF.'NTJ Apprur�l Nu. :9-1{UIN4 TAis brm is!w .�.�brn/i)�ul.e..u..w.A<.wr ar pixinp J.0/w<FI'R 1-l.xo7-31 i �wryi.e.!.nd I��ce n4 �o.u1 rwpq � !n/�ubu�m��on fo��hr ppunnJ f..m S9 u mtAon�e.l br�F�cmvuunR olfiver. � . r+.re w orrt.oe wnues.r.oio■xe.�ns�o.e ru.�n�eo . � PBQ&D, Inc. Pitkin Count p :hoe+edna.00nss ,Y Tt'dT15jt �f'VE�O IIIEfIt � 2323.P1. Broadway, SLite 4�0 Program - Technical Assistance . Santa Ana, California 92706. . . - . . - ans�orysl u•o we.�a.qo-�wne�e woet es�o a rarro+Nea to�ot.u.ow+r o�rROros.0 eor•t soUCJUna+No. � . As en, Colorado, and Santa Ana Californiai 22 087 ' DETAII DESCRIPiION OF �OST ELEMENTS TOTAL REFER. - 1.O�EQ�u1Ilq�l(/Ir�ue w E�'4.iil A) , EST COST(S J E57 COST' ENCE- � � I.�UlCM4SFD IAR3 " , �.SU�COMiI1�CitP IIEMS a OIMER—f11�w MAtEBK ' . /7)10UI1 Si�ND.uO CD/.w�EKMt RFMS I (!1 IMF�DI`/ISION�I i�wMSlEIIS(A!NI I Ibn�tNel :,�i:::";�'.:...-. I TOTAL DlRECT•MATERlAL , I.M11i[�l/y0�[RMEwO' (1V�I %Xf � b+vs) . ESTIMAiED RwTF/ E5T ��''�``.:2'��-:� ].DsfCT4W�(Spiri�j/ MOURS MOUR ' COST (SJ � I " . n i r � _ W• F � � • � 56 13.25 742 I �_ D. K Cushman i � � S. L. Dartieison , j 1~ : � ! !^ ' TDTAL DIRECT 1.�BOR t'�;� ,:�:> e` 10,000 i i , ��1 �.�ql OvE1NEAD/Sp•%)O�Orrtarrf�r Cni Gwnr1� •..O!l 4iE I t45E�e � EST�COST(f/ �. � � i Em lo ee Benefits• eneral and �� <L. administrative �3p, q � k . ....'. . ..... ¢ 70TAL LABOR 0�'ERIfEAD -';x •�a�� Z .-;::y� : a;..� � - s.arccu�icstr.c/1.d.e.'a�dd�...k.i G..Y......�i.��rlt+i:.�.�1 [sr cosr fsl . , � Y TOTAL SPEClAL TEfTf�G 0.SIEC4�FOUIrMEM/1�1'nH�beRr J/(tn�iii�w E'brbit AJ . 7.it�vEt II/J,'nr��b.qr)!G:w d•w4...wn..�br1 S bN./�7 .esT tOSi If l . t TRANSqRTATON � ��6Q . r.rca au.o�su�s�sTEHa • 1470 _. .� � 'YOTAL TXA�'EL Z,630 � ; �.comuu�nrsire..,�i-o�7.�.-••�u Esrcosrrs� � . er ins - ecreation ransportat�on Econom�cs 450 . nau - itizen Partici ation Techni ues 175 rorec cuvsu�r.�xrs f I +.onu�ouea msn�1�...;,..,E.bi:r A) , 2 "E � > ; �4• � TO7:tL O/RECT COST.i.�0 O!'EFHE.tD + s /1.GENE�AI�NO�OMWISltAtivE C1�ENSE(Rwn i ��/d�e�!.\p, )� . � 17.�OTµ7�(5• �;. tor.+t Fsrraeren curr ZO,l0T + • . �� R�a��■an ,a of Cost E ements 3 and 4 1 986 � ��• 7"OT.�L E571 UA7F,D COST A�'D FEE(1R YNOFJT � ' 1 UPTIU�AI.WRN m QCipl�ef i7'1 � (if9ff�l�I�w��A.I��I�MYIN..� . • eva i•u,.�„ _. �oen-wi . + . . . �' , ` ' '" � ' . • .. . ':R.-.:��.. .: , .. �_ i�,�' L Z�,i�'.r. ' . . ix..r�+y-� . . ,�9 s��`..;:'�F t ' . .�y� ' ' . .. . . ' L ,�'� '�{� - . . . . . . . p . . � . ,�4��.. . . .. . � �'�.�. . APPENDIX 2 .+ ii CONSULTANT COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS _�: TDP WORK PROGRAM TASR COST . , ' -. . , .. :i � TASR I - TDP Study Administration -0- �� . . I� . - TASK II - TranSit Goals and OUjectives Identi- � ' fication -0- TASK III - Description of Pitkin County's !� Transit Service Area -0- i ,;) TASK IV - Present Transportation Systems and ''i ` Services $ 877 ;� �• TASR V � - . Transit Alternatives--Capital � Development $1,753 TASR VI - Transit Alternatives--Management � � and Organizational Systems $1,402 � � � TASK VII - Ttansit Alternatives--Financial ' _ 4 Structure , $1,578 :r . ' � TASR VIII - Application of Other Transit Improvement Alternatives '$2,278 TASK IX - Alternative Transit Work Program Package Selection $3,330 � TASR X - Five-Year Transit Development Program $4,207 TASR XI - Publication of Final TDP Document . $3,155 Mall/Parking Study $3,507 TOTAL ' $22,087 �. . • � i : , ,' : . . � , � 's � - . .- # ' i; +, y - , , . . . . ? w`•• - _ - _ • . `.' . •• .., _ ._ , .. .,� - - N�� ._ , . ;:;. _ �:� , �; � .�� . �4 '�� - �'��Y!: .. ��}'. �;a. _ a i;�?: I • ; APPENDIX 3 ' <; ' REQUIRED PROVISIONS � • a; (a) Audit and Inspection of Records . , � - �. "Consultant" shall permit the authorized representative _ ;� of the "County", the U.S. Departir.ant of Tran�;ortatior_, a.nd � the Comptroller of the United States, to inspect and audit ! ;r ::� all data and records of "Consultant" relating to his ' . ,� . i # performance under the contract up to three years after � '1- � � completion of this contract. i �# (b) Interest of Members or of Delegates to Congress � � I No member of or delegate to the Contress of the United ; ' i States shall be admitted to any share or part of this } A i. contract or to any benefit arising therefrom. (c) Prohibited Interest � - No membar, officer or employee of the Public Body or o£ a _ local public body during his tenure or one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. (d) Ec�ual Employment Opportunity ' 1 $ In connection with the execution of this contract, "Consultant" � a shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for • � - employment because of race, religion, color, sex or national S origin. "Consultant" shall take affirmative action to insure 4 , - that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated ? during their employment, without regard to their race, � � • i religion, color, sex or national origin. Such action shall � include but not be limited to, the following: employment, ; _ upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitinent or recruitment � � t advertising; lay-off or termination; rates of pay or other j forms of compensation; and selection for training, including � ; � � - apprenticeship. ' (e) Minority Business Enterprises � � In connection with the performance of this contract, "Consultant" � will cooperate with the "County" in meeting his commitment•s - 1 - .- ' ' - . . ' . . ,;, , -- -. ' _ . - -,._ ._ .?'i�;':�'.��_•.. ��'�:.;G.:�'. .. .._.____,. .. ,�w�.�.r r�,rrrw�mm�rwhr��wwwrr� .". �..y,., , ��:i"<tr�.'''tt}S: . _ . . H; - . � . . , . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . 1� � . � � ' - � . . - - .. L-. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. �' ' . � . .. A;''. and goals with regard to the maximum utilization of minority ' business enterprises and will use his best e£forts to ensure that minority business enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to compete for subcontract work, if any, under this contract. � . i .- i•' '" ' t •;Y:. �• , � , � ��:.K .' . . _ Z _ + t _ . . - � ^4 F - ... � � - : ' • : �� ° ,�