HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.143.1978 �Y,ti r'�.,. " , .
� . � . .. . . �. � . - ,. . . .- ,y.'
r
<
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIQTIERS f;
�?>
OF PITICIN COUNTY, COLORP.DO, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL �,�;
$�.
OF THE ALTAMIRA RANCH SUBDIVISTON GENERAL SUBMISSION �;,;
F� -
F`a
Resolution No. 78 - /�{3 �;
•' �S'.
�. WHEREAS, application has been made by LeRo�!°iand Martha TrTater- �
_'r� man, owners of the Altamira Ranch, for the purposes of subdivicling �"
;�
their 125-acre parcel of Iand, located on the south bank of the Roar- �
��� ing Fork River southeast of Aasalt, into four separate interests ^� '
^,.,
: �
; .�
�-�' consisting of tpa 10-acre lots (one to be qi.ven to each of the two ta,
i'±
n:
3j; Waterman children) , one 40-acre lot, and the £athering parcel of y�
i, �-.
` 55 acres, and °`
��•: ��
'�`''� �AHEREAS, the Growth Management PolicY Plan sets a guideline :€.
�
,�
w�+ for deveopment of 34 units per year within the Downvalley area and
y1g A
;�:;� buildout on previously subdivided lots through October�Z978, was
�<� 29 units, and considering these f.igures and psojections, the goal t
�:; vrithin 1978 is to li.mit additional approval to 5 units, and Ys
�� •�
. �f WHEREAS, at its August 30, 1978 meeting the Pitkin County �
� Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the Board of County
�
` �:
.� Commissioners approve the Altamira Ranch Subdivision provided that �
� '
�' the following conditions are met at Detail�d Submission: �
��
1. Preparation of a complete hydsologic analysis, soil tests *�"
� and determination of_ exact elevation of the proposed home- ��
r:4;
sitie on Parcel 1, such that the homesite meets aAproval of ::,�
the County Sanitarian and Co],orado Geologic Survey Engineer, fi<
i ��•
2. Determination of slope and soil tests on Parcel 2 to deter- `� >
mine the suitability of the proposed homesibe, with the t:�
County Sanitarian's approval of septic system location and I„
the County Engineer's approval of the access rbad and `�"
building location, `i�
3. To the approval of the County F.ngineer, inclusion of a ?
statement releasing the County from responsibility for ,�
access roads, ;l
4. Fulfillment of Mountain Hell's request to dedicate ease- ';
ments, using the language specified in their referral comment, ;;
r�:
� 5. Adoption of convenants (a) deed restricting the two 10-acre
parcels exclu�ively to the �9aterman childern as gifts and F;;
(b) prohibiting further subdivision of the d0-acre parcel; r�
and
`�
� `.�
S9HEREAS, the Board of County Commisssioners held a public hear-
:y�
ing to consider 1978 downvalley subdivision and Growth Manaqement
Plan applications on November 13, 197R. d
;s
�a
�
p
1 •
. . �;fx.;'} 'Y=+ ,
:R�';;"�-i�Ta
.'L�
4� a '
Af
.� �;i'�A::'}�r� , � . . . .
C . �
-' .:.- :.:.�. ' .. .. - .. .:�:.-..
.- �. ......�. ........ ......�
.. N,.'.
- . . . . . . �. '
'(y.;
.�:
r>
!'r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED by the Pitkin County Board af Cortonissioners "
that the Altamira Ranch Subdivision be approved, provided that the following ;�
conditions are met at Detailed Submission:
i's
1. Commitment shall be made to provision of one free market unit or y
lot, and two units or lots restricted to low-or moderate-income � :
housing price and size guidelines. Lots or units to be restricted
in price and size (as low or moderate income housing) shall be deed �
restricted and covenanted prior to sale through the Pitkin County �
Housing Authority. Price, size, and income category shall be spec-
ified by the Housing Authority prior to Detailed Submission. Estab- `
- - lished guidelines will insure that units or lots covenanted as �
"restricted" shall in the future continue to be available to low,
moderate, and middle income residents through restrictions on
resale prices, size limitations, and improvement costs.
2. Free Market and restricted units or lots shall become available
to buyers or receivers at a one-to-one ratio; or, alternatively
the restricted units or lots shall become available at a faster
rate. �
3. Completion of tests to determine appropriate homesites on Parcels 1
and 2 (as delineated in 1 and 2 listed above).
4. To the approval of the County Engineer, inclusion of a statement � .
releasing the County from responsibility for access roads.
5. Fulfillment of Mountain Bell`s request to dedicate easements, using �
language specified in Moun�ain Bell's referral comnent.
�
6. Inclusion of a statement in deed restrictions giving jurisdiction �
to the County Animal Control Officer on all roadways and common �
areas far animal control.
7. Any 1041 reviews shall be s�tisfied at Detailed 5ubmission (speci-
ficalTy, floodplain hazard areas).
Recommended for approval by the Board of County Comnissioners, Pitkin '
County, Colorado, on this �( day of December, 1978.
Board of County Cortenissioners
of Pitkin County, Colorado �
�
::' �,�� By ��i e ;
, � .
. 1 ,,; '�, �`� R ert W. Child, Chairman
,:, _
� °-'ATT�$i'- � r"� �
` 9 � �
� �
: �) �•� � �
' '" ���. �tD,u�;f9' �,fz�
'• oun , erk and Recor er �- �
r,• .
�
: '_�I�RPROV•ED 'AS TO FORM: �
�
. x
q
. C'��.c�r�1)�,� J
ounty Attorne'y'
:,
�
S
ii
�f
�:
_€.
_ 2 _ :;�
�t
i .
. ., �,�.',yv.„�ea'_F;. .
'"�5`,:;
i