HomeMy WebLinkAboutbocc.res.138.1979 , €��� . ,
y.f�.4,'. .. . .
`s:r....
i
.._ � ._. , .:. � yi,�.:Ph�:
����,
Recorded at 9:55 A.Ni, Nov 13, 1979 Loretta Banner Recorder Reception No: ��.;`
2�.:�J�a�1 _ "^�"•'
,i�s
RESOLUTION OF THE BQARD QF COUNTY �J�9 �'ti�E183
COMMISSIONERS Of PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
GRANTING GENERAL SUBMI55ION APPROVAL i
FOR THE PFISTER SUBDIVISION ;
Resolution No. 79-� '
i
' • i
WNEREAS, an application has been submitted by Arthur Pfister for General
Y
Submission approval for a 67 unit PHM application (26 free market units and '�
'� � � :
41 PMH units) on 205 acres of the Pfister Ranch, and ;�
, WHEREAS, the applicafiion was reviewed under the Growth Management Quota {
� ;
System for the Aspen Metropolitan Area for 1979 and was awarded seven growth ;�
management quota ailocations pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Cortenission �
recomnendation, '�
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED by the Board of County Commissioners of �
Pitkin County, Colarado, that the General Sbumission subdivision application �
for the Pfister Subdivision be and hereby is approved, and �
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an additional six growth management quota
allocations, as requested by the applicant pursuant to Section 5-510,3(b),
to be constructed (along with the 1Q78 alTotment previously .awarded) and phased
� be and ex by are,g nt d i
y as described in the application,�,u�ject to �t�ie �following conditions:
• 1. The applicant shall agree to pave the mairt access road and dedicate
as a public right-of-way the road between Tiehack and State Highway 82.
2. Detailed Submission shall include plans, profiles and construction
specifications for all roads and utilities.
3. Certified plat survey requirements shall be met at Detai7ed Submission. � `
4. The Conditio�s found in Rea, Cassens and Associates, Consulting j
Engineers, report of July 9, 1979, with ali plans and specifications shall be �
!
reviewed and approved by the City of Aspen Water department.
5. The applicant will continue to maintain a minimum of 61% of the total
units approved as restricted units at lOQ% buildout, taking 9nto consideration �
phasing.
6. A transportat9on p7an that describes in detail the strategies to be �
F
used by the developer to increase transit use and discourage auto use. The �
plan should include a detailed description of the phasing of these strategies, �'j'-
F
a
t
!�
f
�,
!�. .+,.
:�•�Y;��jtf, /
M: �.lf�; . ,. . .
.. . . . , . . . ":r yP�,.:
.(YiSi��'�.,�
. f 1T��'w
�,379 �A�184
an estimate of their benefits, and clear cortmitments of when they wiil be
implemented by the applicant. Care should be taken to c7early define those
projects that are to be undertaken by the applicant and are not dependent upon ;
public funding assistance. This plan should clearly define those improvements �
that will be provided by the app7icant in tbe event there is no development of
— a busway between Aspen and the airport. This plan should provide, in part, �
the fol)owing: ;
,
a. A detailed description of the access control to be utilized in the '
f 3:. .
' ' development incTuding the methodology employed by access poirtt and
i
estimates of benefits to be achieved, �
} b. A detailed description of the proposed interior shuttle/collector �
�
vehicle service including description of vehicles and passenger �
capacities, days and house of operation, headw�ys, fares (if applicabTe), �
and methods of coordination with existing transportation services.
c. A detailed description of pedestrian and bicycle servTCes within the �
deve7opment, inc]uding access points to the existing trail and highway �
9
network. �
f d. A detailed description of inethods to restrict or eliminate peak hour �
� access to and from Highway 82.
7. OetaiTed Submission shouid include a cortmitment fran the app]icant
, that transit sensitive areas designated by the County within the Coundaries of
the development will remain in a condition so tbat they can be acquired without
the removal of buildings and otherwise to prevent substantiai increases in the �
public investment to acquire right-of-way for as long as the County deems necessary.
-- 8, Those sites identified by Colorado 6eo7ogic Survey as having potential �`
geo-technica} problems shouid either be excluded fran the aetailed Submission or
investigated further and methods proposed for mitigating the hazardous conditions
should be determineQ. �
4
- , 9. All streets, aveques and roads shou7d be dedicated to the pub7ic �
s
- utilities with the language approved by the County attorney and engineer. �
1 • 10. A timetable for the implementation of the fire-fighting water system �
�
r should be committed to. �
.� F
';,F 1]. The General Sbumission application filed by Arthur Pfister for the ��
; � <
c. Pfister Subdivision sha11 become a permanent part of the General Submission �
° ' approval and a11 representations contained therein sha11 not be deviated from, �i
�
_2_ �
�
f
� ,..:
_ _._w ��.r.��
�,�''�€rr.. .,
�vr��- . �
�� a,;
,�
�379 ����3.8�
P .
C
( �
� Approved by the Board af County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, ?
at their•regular meeting on November 12, 1979. �
`�~1�' t, . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �
� �: OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO,
, �S�ESTz�^�,,,C �
�,
r..> ,
— y *C�` ,�,f�� ,_� �..
! , � ����� , By
: .��'�: J E w ds, r., Ch n
��"O�puty,.:' erk'and Recorder
�� ; ,._
APPROG[D AS:TA FORM:
�' t ou`ty?A�orn��
._'{
�
�
• ,� :
�,,..�
; ,;S -3-
�
�� :
�,
� :.:
� '- .: „_.,... ...__... _ ___ _:__ ....,.:...��...,.. __
,