The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutbocc.res.030.1995 I � , ,�. �:� t�'�, . ':ecY.�1�1�i.5,y i..--.1... a�i... - . `. ... ... . . .,a:r�r� <k•,•c;..�� ti.vr"..;v�.n.a:<va...a . . a r . �.wr.:`4�,t` �t'��y�. �.�� vN: 387186 P-799 P-SS0 11/k�9/95 lIb:34A F'G 1 OF 10 RF_C DOC IVf ,, SIL,VIA DRVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK R RCCORDER 0.00 ;�!^�>{ �/-� .�'0. ,- ��,.`^.`�S: R£SOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _7•.'�!� OF PIT&IN COUNTY� COLORADO GRANTING GENERAL SUBMZSSION/PLANNED ' "' ' UNIT DE9ELOPMENT, SPECIAL REVIEW AND 1041 ENVIRONMENTAL �fii•: �; ''�} HAZARD REVIEW APPROVALB� AND AWAADI2iG THE 1993 METRO RESIDENTIAL ;.�'� 1 GROWTS MASAGEMENT ALLOTMfiNTS FOR TNE JAMES E, MOORE FAMTLY _;r•',,'•'' PUD PROJECT LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE A$PEN �+' "�y% ' PUSLIC SCSOOL CAMPUS I• ti'c �`' i 1 j';� . �4 ! Resolution No. 95- �d f r �`• !' :sl`;>`''�. . -�- RECITALS ':`�' . . � '�si!%i,,�,=K • 1. The James E. Moore Family (hereinafter "Applicants") have �; k 1` applied to the County for General Submission, Planned. Unit : 'sl��. � Development, Special Review, and 1041 Environmental Hazard Review. F � The applicants have also applied for residential growth management � �.�`�� allocations from the 1993 metro area pool. Zn addition, the }�,.``�` applicants have applied for Rezoning and several amendments to the ��.l�;,�? Pitkin County Land Use Code. The requested code amendments and i �f;` . .. rezoning have been granted pursuant to Ordinance #95-�: � °�-' �" " Z. These land use aations are requested in order to '' �',�' accommodate the James E. Moore Faraily PUD project which includes ' �� the following elements: `j� •,:ii * 40 free-market single-family residential lots; %it * 31 Affordable single-family detached residential units; * Ski Club Facility ( approx. 2,00o sf structure); � �� * Ski Lift from High School area to the top of Powder Bowl; ? � * Baseball field, running Track, and other recreational ; ; _�;,,� facilities for use by the public schools; � ' �* Substantial improvements to the roads and parking areas on ''�' �r • the Public School Campus (see attached site plan); and * Multi-use trail system. I 3. The subject property is approxiraately 215 acres in area �.r ��, and is described in the attaohed "Exhibit A". The property is currently zoned AFR-1 (i19 acres) and AFR-10 {96 acres) , (see '`� � Ordinance #95-� for description of previous zoning). ! ' � " M1'� 4. The subject propezty has legal access from Maroon Creek � 'i � Road as well as at specific points along Glen Eagles Drive and �„ Upper Meadowood Drive (the approved project takes all access from ; Maroon Creek Road and does not utilize the Glen Eagles Drive or •#� • Upper Meadowood Road access points). k 5. The Moore Family submitted an applicatioh in 1993 t•' requesting a total of 39 residential growth management allocations. � The subject property has been deemed to be within the "Metro Area° � for purposes of growth management competition. The 1993 metro area �.� � residential pool contained 24 al].otments. Tncluding the Moore application, there were two applications submitted for the 1993 '� :`�. Metro Area residential growth management competition. The other -. �'',,� .�;; application was submitted by Fabienne Benedict for the Benedict � = Stillwater Ranch project and requested 4 four allotments. The Moore k!.: �t application received a score of 87.5 from the Planning Commission i � ; while the Benedict application received a score 83.25. ��;� :.!. !'��,. • -,� + 'ti � � ;;�' �i � ._;,,. , _ .. ._ . . ... .._ - �� Y. � �_ ., . �,� - . ' • - . r l� ,> . � , . � -• � . - . � � . . .. � h .�y . � � � . ' . . �; - . � _.. � . . . .. . � . � .. . . '$'` . �� . � ... . . . . . . . � � . . . . ' ' i . . ' . ..- _- _- - ' . _. � . . . ' { . . ��? . , . . . . . 'f �"�``.�f':T�.' . - � • . �f. � �,iN��. � � � .. c r' • • �. � ,�'�'"• ��ceY�+�r.5,�i(e�ra._ .-i�.�. -� . .. .... .F. �. � ..�_.�r�.....,�.....,.,o.........,�...��_......_ .,...._.. � r� rn Pt s�.:F :;�`�;.'� ,;�,;,. ":,r Reaolution No. 95- � �' ,� f�: Page 2 'r�;�. °-", ��;��, yC "_ C 6. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the `'�T'=.'`�>. W i;:' .. �, = Applicant's request at public meetings on February 3, 1994; �, � .�;. � ; February 10, 1994; Auqust 16, 1994 and October 4, 1994. The � -.s••,.�•-, Planning Commission found the application to be consistent with the m `i �'�rs � applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. °' .,4 , t ;, 7. The Board considered this application at pub2ic meetinqs m s � f � on Januar 10• Januar 24• Januar 31• Februar 13• Februar 21• �r�"r• � _ Y . Y . Y , Y � Y � � .� '. � ` and February 28, all in 1995. The duly noticed public hearing was � " � ' opened on January 24, 1995 and was continued at each of the �"'�"_"� �' subsequent meetings and officially closed on February 28, 1995. -a ' j _ Throughout these meetings, evidence and testimony was oEfered by i i��; the applicant, Staff, and members of the public. [.�n •�ir, = •- �;-�('�~-. 8. The Board finds that the applicants' request is ��` aJ consistent with the applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land � �F.;�. Use Code, if the applicant adheres to the conditions identified in ,�y '�� . this resolution, iD �' ` �' � � - � ��: NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOL�IED by. the Board that it hereby N '�d' grants general submission, planned unit development, special �-- review, and 1041 environmental hazard review approval for the Moore 6 . ,,j, • Family PUD project. � - D FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED the Board does hereby award 24 n �� residential growth management allocations for the Moore Family PUD � � project. These approvals are subject to the following conditions: r� ' i . °. 1. Structural mitigation for potential avalanche hazard sha12 be o ,�.�',. provided to protect free-market lots 2, 3, and 4. � � 2. The entire area encompassed by single-family lots shall be m rezoned from AF-2 and AF-1 to AFR-1. 3. Building envelopes for all lots shall be established at �� detailed submission. "�� _ 4. Circulation in the area of the High School shall be designed � � `�r to conform with the layout shown on the "Future Conditions" plan. A detailed design showing how this circulation will i; , � function shall be provided at detailed submission. � 5. The structures on affordable lots 25 throuqh 31 shall be � '� ' limited to 16 feet in height, as measured in the Pitkin County , Land use Code. " "�i i 6. At detailed submission, the Applicants shall provide detailed �+ studies for the height and mass of the structures on p4I � affordable lots l0 through 24. '" • 7. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a "'� �, �} � landscape plan showing the intended landscaping on the �°` �' . . t.:'.i .t�}', '� 1 - � . . . � � �i�. . . � . �� l��i _ �. �� . . i�.4� . � �. z y� .- � -, � n :.�.� 1 ti , „r.r. . •;�r z.i 'j S' ��.13x��Y t,t�ti0 .\ . t,h: . . _ ..l , .. . .. . . .... . . . ... � x�.5 �M � . . ' � . . � , . . . . . ` . t w.�:� � . . . � . . . ' . . , . � ..' � ��` � � � . . . .. � 1j - . . ... . ' �..� . ., ' . . . f .. � .. �' � . .. . . � ..,�`�: : .. .\r .I . .' . . . , .. . . . . - .. i. .. ... . . . . � ' . '1' � - . . . " . . , ' . ' ... .-. ..—... � � .,� .._ ... _ . _ . � • � . ' � . . -�,:1� . . . . . � . . . . .' . � . ... . • .. a ,.��S� . . . . . � . _ .:,f. ' . .. . i�� _ ____ _._ _ ,.�..,.i. �:,. .��.�. r�;>�.} ... ._.., .. ,... ��_.., �... ti:�:r,�:��,si�, . _ ��., �;�E'�TM�v��ti,. ,:n.�;., � - Resolution No. 95- 3b ;F ,.. �` '� Page 3 .,:- k; : � ;,�; . .°,::I - i;�.- u affordable lots and in all common areas. In particular, this �:=. "� plan shall show the folZowing: �'� �`7 �y'I`;.-:•�... ' - a. All street trees to be planted including species and � ; ':``i�. .4.•�<...�� size. � �.{..: - ,'!:. b. Screenin between affordable lots 25 - 31 and the `�' " 'f g f;;�;%.:: ,, + adjacent homes in the Meadowood Subdivision. m ``�A?.t-,::.:• __ '._:-.I - � 'y� . - c. Screening between the proposed running track and the � j adjacent Meadowood Subdivision. •n t f ., 1..� I d. Screening between affordable 10-17 and the adjacent homes '� j in the Aspen Highlands Subdivision. .�- F`�� .;,.q: . e. Screening between affordable lots 21 and 24 and the :,��, adjacent roads and parking areas associated with the High �-. School and the Ski Club Facility. � � ` m a� f. Screening between affordable lots 25, 28, 29, 30, and 31 � � ' and the road and parking lots serving the Middle and � - Elementary Schools. �' s 'A3 g. Screening east of single-family home located near high �� school entry road (immediately north of Glen Eagles D � Drive) . � 8. At detai2ed submission, roadways and other utility corridors � ` and facilities (including the ski lift) shall be sufficiently G' �'��' staked to identify areas which wou2d be disturbed and trees �� which would be removed as a result of the installation of � these facilities. The corners of the building envelopes in the free-market lots shall also be staked. Tree removal on � individual lots shall be limited to the building envelope and shall be addressed in the covenants and restrictions for the , subdivision. ' i . 9. The Applicant shall submit conceptual plans and elevations � �i` showing a "typical" affordable housing unit. These plans shall = i, reflect the results of the height and mass studies discussed �,, in condition number 6 above. � , ._ 10. The Applicant shall pursue connection to the City�s central `� � � water distribution system as a first priority. S. r �',`i`• 11. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide either a letter from the City of Aspen demonstrating a commitment to �`" ' serve the project with domestic water, or a detailed water � . rights and engineering analysis demonstrating that a private water system can be constructed to serve the projects domestic � ��': water needs. The water rights analysis shall clarify what � �� ; proportionate share of the total water rights in the Stein- � � Arlian Marolt ditch that the Applicant holds. The Applicant �4 � + i i .� . �� '�f� j t j'•'v ; E� � i� , ; �. _ �.A:w.��._..:_�... _..,��;w _.,,. .�,� .F...�.,� .�..�.�...,we��.x V.... .�. =;5 � , �. . � �;L � • 1C . . .. _ � .. �� 4 . � • •. .. - . '. - . . { � ;J �\ .. �., ' . . . . . . - � .. . . �� . . - ' ., •� � � . - . . � t. � � .. . � . .. � _ , r . . . .. � � ' 1 . . '. . . . . � . . l� '" . . . . . . .. \. �� . . . � ' � . . .. . � .. . . . � 1 . . . . ' ' . ' . . . . `- i . .. .. . �, � - .. ' . � . . . . . . . { , '��: . . . ' '. � . _ . . . . . . . . , � dDt • �� ;� y . , h . .�Ir.J' .� 'J�'h' ll'6'... . ... . . ... _ . . .T r . . . ...i.n tt�.•�.Kr•'r� ...iY.ttiMi<sMb�Y�trN..en�srl...wStaH�c•.snr !C/ �. i ri�i'S�'"AI°� ' r:t�6� ��yi.; . �., 9 ;��'.�; Resoiution No. 95- �d_ , f Page 4 ;�1 y_ `; ,�y ,.�: < t� ` �' ;- shall also specify all facilities that will be used to convey , �,� r, .i• � �� raw water from these ditches to the suhject property. � ; .� ' � �;;�.I ,, t i If private water systems are pursued for both the Moore and � �'"'`;`�_r� � Aspen Highlands projects, the Applicant shall agree to � :, cooperate in sharing water system facilities, wherever �ir - possible, in order to minimize the visual and environmental � �,;;f;,.'. :. �'`� impacts associated with the installation of these facilities. � ,.-.;� �? �o f ' - • The engineering analysis shall identify all facilities (if any n> •: '. ) to be shared between the As en Hi hlands j ` r p g pro eet and the 'D � Moore project. A letter of "agreement in concept", signed by � i.,�r�;,;_`.' - representatives of both the Moore family and Hines Interests �,� ' . Ltd., identifying all private water system facilities to be ��; , shared and outlining the specifics regarding who is .. x g,l responsible for construction and maintenance of these � , facilities shall be provided at detailed submission. A final � -'i�: . executed agreement shall be recorded with the Final Plat and � z; , � �� •. .... .. accompanying documents. The engineering analysis sha11 also �� . include any technical in£ormation deemed necessary by the City µ : Water Department, to demonstrate that the private system will �, '�„ function adequately. This requirement is intended to ensure �� ,; that the private system is compa�ible with the City system in D ;�3 • the event that these system are connected in the future. v 12. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a � "commitment to serve" letter from the Aspen Consolidated � Sanitation District (ACSD) . ❑ ..;�;;. 13. The Applicant commits to fund a proportionate share of the � ongoing sanitary sewage collection system capacity study beinq � conducted by the ACSD. The Applicant also commits to pay a proportionate share of any collection system improvements necessary to serve the project. Funds for the collection " system capacity study shall be deposited with the ACSD prior to detailed submission. Funds for collection system � , improvements shall be provided in accordance with the ` ` , � subdivision improvements agreement, which shall be prepared prior to final plat review, w �_�__ .r �. . 14. All sewage collection system improvements shall be designed d: in accordance with the ACSD line specifications and shall be i located within the rights-of-way for the subdivision road � � system. At the Applicant's expense, plans and speciEications for the, proposed sanitary sewage collection system shall be � reviewed by the engineer for the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation ` �l'��,! District. � - i 15. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall be required to +' ' 1 provide "will serve letters" from Holy Cross Electric and �� ;�,, Rocky Mountain Natural Gas. � � 16. All utilities shall be extended underground. ftt� .� � . �1 �� :�'� � � � ��i: �_�. _.�,�:1_ . ._..�.:�,,.. ..��,- - w�� .,� �.. _ �� '�� I ` � �53� _ .. . y� � ��4 y, ^ -' ��t ' t ' �� , �, -. , � . -.� . . . . - . . . . . � .✓.." ... �.1 � . ... �. . � . . .. . . , . . .. . � . � . ' - � � . - - i� . .. . ' . . � � .._. . ...._ _ .� ..�... � . . . . . . t . �. � . .� "`" " ' . " . . .. ., . . . . '. . ��i�• � . , - � � . . � . � . . ..��. _ . . .. - `'��'�.:�.�. . .:�.._ : ....._. ' ., , -. - .. ,:x�!�"•<�,r, . . ��.:Ff4t:.�',J � ti Resolution No. 95- �� ' '�.rY Page 5 t} 9 . . . . .,�`r . ,��..,i� � � � 17. At detailed submission the A licant shall `x'-'��''� • - � � PP Provide a i•;..r:, '! comprehensive storm water drainage plan. This plan shall �,-.J include calculations for sub-basin areas, flows, sizing of m �;g:',.:�•:.° � culverts, detention basin sizing, drainage at all underpasses, `� �� ` L� � drainage of all parking areas, clean outs and grit collectors � - ,'{ ' for parking lot drainage systems. `� � � . i.. �.; j 18. The Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan at m '�?'• . - detailed submission. this plan shall establish erosion control � �, '" methods to be used during site grading of all common areas and � . <.`:�` affordable lots. The erosion control plan shall establish + guidelines to be followed during the development of individual � �� free-market lots. These guidelines sha12 be made binding on � � the general contractor for each individual lot. The erosion w `�r' :.. control plan shall also address soil stabilization and interim '� �-��`� ; revegetation measures, including the revegetation of %,�}., ` � stockpiled topsoil. = _ • �� 6 ��. 19. The Applicant shall adhere to the following standards for � �i';:� development in areas where slopes exceed 15 percent. .n ' ;^' N a. Cuts shall not be made into slopes steeper than thirty 6 � � percent (30�J unless mechanical support is provided. •• °`' W -0 b. Cuts and fills, and grading and scraping shall be D ' confined to the minimum area needed for construction. � � c� c. Steepness of cut and fill slopes shall be the maximum � �,�; which will insure stability and still allow revegetation. : '�� 0 d. Development plans shall include reasonab2e but adequate '� control measures. Large tracts should be developed in small, workable units without leavinq large areas for � .. lonq periods. e. Use mulches or temporary cover on exposed soil areas and �� re-establish permanent vegetation and install erosion , .'}' ' ?�_� control measures as soon as passib2e. p : f, Incorporate natural drainage patterns into the ��. ` development plan., Culverts, sediment basins and other � j engineerinq measures should be used where necessary to i, _ I contro2 erosion. � 9 ;� � g. Soil absorption sewage disposal systems shouZd not be < <•:, placed on slopes steeper than fifteen percent (15$) . � ,, 20. All soil retaining struatures shall be designed by a Colorado �� registered professional engineer. Plans for such structures shall be provided at detailed submission and shall require r 'y"`'• � approval by the County Engineer. ,� ;��;} � ��1 f , f `�' , I I,1,. ' - - — ��w .�.��..� .,_..,......_a.._..� �,4�....��:��::.��.,�..,�....m......:u�;,:.,,.�:: � 4� f �y: — ��:.__.. t: . �� .� � / . .. ' . . . ��Jn � � . '�� . . . � . . e � 5-. . �.�. . �'t . . . . . ' ' .. , . . . . . �` ,S. " � - � . . . . -t J . �1 . �� . . - .. �. � . �;.. _ .. _ .. � , � ♦ . . . . . . . � . ,.5. l , , , - . : ' _ __._ , ; . ( �. . _ ' . ,��-�' - • . ' ,,� - i�? �'�;�.. ., .. .,�....�.�.. ' ', � . ' ;;��`�;;; i1j' 7 Resolution No. 95- _.��} , 'f� Page 6 � � ', ,. - � ��:. .� � .• w : 21. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall be required to obtain all necessary State and Federal permits. G� i� •; _ � ;.. �,. - 22. All roadways shall be constructed to the standards outlined � `��`_;_`_y:t in the Pitkin County Road Standard Manual or better. � , , 23. The Applicant shall commit to fund the road improvements and ` , f - '•1 travel demand management measures as contained in the �m � : ;, application. The Applicant shall also participate in funding � �-" ;4 . ; _''� the installation of left turn lanes on Maroon Creek Road at � , the intersections of both the upper and lower access roads for +�; ;': � the School Campus. u �,f•. "; ��; 24. The Applicant commits to mitigate any increase in PM-10 cn = attributable to the project (including that associated with N ��r^ any increase in vehicle miles traveled VMT) . The Applicant t'� � shall work with County Staff to establish enforceable and .- verifiable measures for mitigatinq the increase in PM-l0. The a �� PM-10 mitigation plan shall be submitted at detailed � � ` �`� submission and shall require approval by the Board of County �. ! Commissioners. The PM-10 mitigation plan shall be referred to the Aspen/Pitkin County Environmental Health Department and " the Air Quality Control Division of the State Environmental 6 + ' Health Department for their comment prior to Board review and � . � aPProval. D a 25. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a detailed � transit plan addressing the following issues: �' . a. The level of transit service that is to be provided by o � the Applicant including hours of operation and season of 'n � operation, frequency of service (headways), vehicle types 0 and capacities. b. Where transit vehicles will be stored and maintained. ' c. Whether spare transit vehicles will be provided to � �-: account maintenance down time, etc. ! .�„� � . . :�_� . d. Route/s to be served. - e. Promotion strategies for transit service. ' � f. Management and operations plan for transit service and � intended provider. �.� . . ,�;i .: In order to monitor the effectiveness of transit service the applicant shall also provide the following information in the `•� '` detailed transit plan: g. Baseline traffic volumes, current transit ridership in v{-• the Maroon Creek Valley. ��' ;;� h. Traffic counts entering and exiting the Moore project ` ! ;� 1 � . �t.. 7 I f, � � :.ak �M'�tiL+4.4t�s:..."�%S4v.l-�> ' ' .�.u�+..�.v+� ��:..'�s.4(.:-ii Y.��. L.-a.:vS.o,1`:rc �. � . . . . . .. .. . .£le� � ..er1..f �S�r.u` ��1 /�.�'r'S'.. . . ,. ys u` r�: � � _ ��i . . . . . . . . . . . � .-. � .. . � �s f4�,.. � - �R . ' . � . � . � . � . ��Fp 3.�(��', � _ _ _ . . . . ��r y � `^' . . . . . tt �,� . .. - - 1. . - . . � ... , . ' . . .� . . . .. . ' , .. �•. : .' � ' . . .. 4..�.".. . '� � � �. . . � .. . ' � . , . � . - ' .. . . . � ..� . ' .. . . .. . . - ' - . , . ... -� . - . . . - . � � i . � � . . . . . . . . . � � . �7 - . � �. . . � . � . _. . .,... .. . ._. .._ ... ._ _ . . � . . � ! . . , . �', � � . � . . � � . � . . � . � . .. .. � . . '. . . .. -. !1�.f�' . . . . ' . �� • . . � � � . . ..,.,. � � " . �_�LY...... ' � � • , � . . . . � w :��i�•�`��,�. �. Resolution No. 95- �_ "�� _ ;`:. Page 7 • ,L,; h i,; �, ±� •'+a �� ,:5 after construction. �..�:� � i. Ridership of the proposed transit system. This ��'�-�� - information should be summarized for peak and off-peak � !�'•'•':i.T: season, peak AM and PM hours and by daily ridership. .� ` i-+, IC�:,...•: . � "i'"..' ..,- j. PM-10 levels. °' �t'..• :.� �`' ;.,.. .• ..�( � 26. Tn the event the monitorin ro ram shows that traffic ��`' '• 9 P g m �'�;"-';, ` mitigatian measures are not accomplishing the desired results, i ==_--== mitigating any increase in PM-l0 and generating vehicle trips ,Jn R.r: ' in the range projected in the traffic study included in the i° �f :� application (284 vehicles per day), the Applicant shall be required to provide additional mitigation to accomplish these �' objectives. � ��,� m '� 27. All homes on the property shall be designed with positive `Y; drainage away from the foundation on all sides. � ?'? \ � .... �.0�.! � 28. The Applicant sha12 conduct on-site soils investigations for ,°u � all building envelopes located south of the "flume." This � �, information shall be provided at detailed submission and shall cn r be used to determine which lots will require engineered ,... �� foundations. All foundations shall be designed in accordance e with the specifications for Seismic Zone II. � D ' 29. Low water (xeriscaping) concepts and plant materiaZ shall be � � used in landscapinq the property in those areas where soils � may be prone to supersaturation (south of the flumej. In all � r;ti. � other areas, landscapinq shall be limited to native plant species. O ;� 30. The Applicant shall adhere to the following wildfire . mitigation measures: � a) A 10 foot perimeter around all legal structures � - shall be clear of tall grass and brush. The grass in this , ,. ' perimeter shall be kept mowed and only small plants or � � ' shrubs shall be used for landscaping. 4 -�- �, . b) Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the vertical i. and horizontal continuity of fuels a minimum of 30 fAet perimeter around the structure. Within the 30 foot perimeter, spacing of clumps shall be a minimum of two � �� '', ' times the height of the fuel. All measurements should be � � from the edges of the crowns of the fuel. `�'� 'u,. c) Spacing between the clumps of brush within the 30' � 1 foot perimeter shall be a minimum of'two times the height � of the fuel. All measurements shall be from the edges of the crowns of the fuel. i �' � �i d) All branches shall be pruned from trees and brush � ' � = � ,�i {4,; � �I i 1 aJ . ! .,�a+w�rw..�—�-+r..�...zw.+.Pr+Wta:S:af.ewG�.Jiur,r'J...w. .�.c .�. +....r...�,. .s,. _ na..i..ai'Jc"o:f,+,..-+w.."�'.""""�' "4tr��d ' -�--w �._�- , �� ; � w � � .. �� - . . � . . i', . � . '� r � . . . �� . . - . . . ' � , , _ . . . .� 4 J ^ ,. _ � S^ '� . : : .7`. i . . 1 _ , ' .. , / �: , w. ,,�.�;,,�- . ,F. , -;?�' .. , �, +�d. -r .:�... ,._ ..... .. . . .. '. � . . � J�. . .:.usC.:..u�iSt'ii:LG6'L�iits�4SS31DIbe:S'L3�isi.`�SNdSn ��..��p`�r: :��.'�, 4`i z M Rflsolutiori No. 95— �� r� Page 8 � ;:r., k� „��:�• �� ;�., -..:. ' within the 30 foot perimeter to a height of 10 f'eet above +, %#.;�'-<;� t` the ground and ladder fuels shall be removed around trees ' y";.r.,a� � and brush. • . ..� W . . _ss'�'..: . "�Z r: . e) All branches that extend over the roof eves or are � � '�,�.`•...� within 15 feet of the chimney shall be trimmed. o, I �` - ,i, o, j ,, � , f) The access drive shall meet mittimum County driveway � i, . � � standards. �, '. ....,;_:: _ ! i y,, :: ' g} The owner of the .Jn '� � , property shall be responsible for � i the continued maintenance of the defensible space � s�� ' vegetation requirements. .p �s � � � �� h) The address shall be clearly marked and visible from �� q the roadway with a minimum 2° letters. � ��1 ' x i) There shall be an on-site water storage tank of not ; ; �,, ir : ; less than 1,000 gallons. � � j) Roof materials for all structures shall be Class A, � �' "-.� non-combustible (no wood shakes or shingles) material ,�n (,�'', approved by the Underwriters Laboratory with no flat N � � roofs. � :t:> 9 e . 31. Use of the Smuggler Lane connection between the Moore property � , and the Highlands Base Villaqe shall be limited to emerqency D �, - service vehicles, shuttle busses, electric carts, pedestrians, � bicycZes, and nordic skiers. Signs shall be posted indicating � _ this restriction. In addition, the subdivision covenants shall w ;'� ` address this restriction and methods for how it will be � { enforced. 3 o �,, �i � ;� 32. Lighting shall comply with the County standards in place at ,... the time of building permit. Further, there shall be no street 's _ lightinq nor shall the recreational facilities provided £or ''Y �• the school be 1it. }: ! - 33. The Applicant shall be allowed to sel.ect the occupants for � :`,�y:;. those affordable housing units which are provided over and �' ±t - above the required housing mitigation for the project, provided these occupants have been deemed to comply with the , a� Housing Office standards for employment, income and assets and ' ; have been approved by the Housing office. ' � � 34. The alpine ski easement shown along the east property line ,.,• . shall be extended to the proposed ski lift along the north side of affordable lots 15, 1G and 17, or in another �- ' . acceptable location in this vicinity. �F 4;. � APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1995. ,�k� � ,��s >;;! BOARD OF COONTY COMMI68IONEAB � I �ti • � � � �L:c t,i:: � � ,� �� ' i . .1 - . � . .. ��:4"7 '1. �� - --u..�.-��swc,Y,.:.a�.�..u:e.�.,.,��...u.�:_...�-- . . �. . . i�.`�''t�'� . J .w.:l::c�;E ier..r++k.•�.�w`w.f .l.r�....r,. .i;..J. ✓� w_IU.w.':: �F✓ ./ .. ... .. . . . � . _ . ��1ay � � � � � � � . � � -. . � � � � _ . . ,�_ _ � »_.. . . . , . . ... � . � � - �°� c � .. .. . . � ' �.. ' .. �. " . f � , ~ , t. - �r . .r. ; , . ` 1 �� . . . � �.. . � � . ' � ' I � . . . . . i � t �. - ' , . r��, ,f. . v�!f � ,_ , . .. _ � � . _ , � ; .. ; , � ,� >,� . _ ,�` ' ' , , `• , �? d - ,;: ,l ' � � ` '. ,T .'� • a,L1G.'ridll'eai�� <•. .� •:�c'F�. r3Eb,.. ..�a.v�i. . s...�. .. . .. - . . . ' 1.. . . . _ . Resolution No. 95- ,�� . f . ri Page 9 ,:,:.: f�n OF PITKIN COUNTY� COLORADO F �" . , . ;l°j' t !7i1' 7/ � `'' �r- i _ _ : BY� ' c•d., � Michael C. Ireland, Cha rman ,� _ . . . � .�K;�. .,.t:. � . - � � . . .�.i�i ,:l V ATTEST: y{� f '^'�9 � . . � . . � "k"h . . . . h.� h .� _ Je ette Jone , �^ De uty Count Clerk ��2 . . . . �.-.,,�' r..'. APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENTo � � � . . . � � . - . � y:��i :� .. . � �., �• . `� �u,�,,� �q : John Ely, Suza ne Konchan, `�- County orney Communrty Development Director ! �! ?�'`` - . . . � reso_moore�ud � . . � . : .. . � . . � � _ .. ��`.. .. � � � � � . . . . . � . . -�� :;. . . . � � . .. . . . . . . _ .. . . ' __. .. . , ' , ! 387186 B-799 R-158 11/@9/95 10:34A PG 9 OF 10 .- � � i ;:: ' , , _ , _.::. . ;,:,,:�, _ si: i< .�; .'. . \ r , .. �. . � .. . �, .., . -: 't ..: .. -,�� . ,, . , , . ,._. . . .. . ., .: 4:> �: ii� �_ 1� :( i. � ' ' ri I�I.��. � ,1't � �' , � �,' �' :�4 ii �y-� i� ►�� , , � � � : k� , k 1 .. �v'}��. W / '(, -.i - ' _ ��q _ . t t � _ :f ��T �,}" , , . ;,. t � , � i �� '�47 - _ .. � . . , ,..� . �. . . , �: � ?� .. ,': . . , . , .. - - ..:; :�; :-. : �. .: :r i.' :�r ! , t i � 1 ,. r � � � - - .. _. ... ._ . .._ -- . ,., r , -, ,,,_� � _.. , . _ :.'_ ,_` ` . : , ,- �� ,,�, � ' .. .r _ � . � �� , '�:1, _, ..� �; .� y`-s��0,:�.�$e1��:'�J�ltkr�ht�a'+,-;"l � , r,-. �'"2'{�•:;. �.�:f.�r.r VI�A��_.1�i',... � � ... . . . d'i'- n . ._._...�:_ n � { • F.XN161T A , �, �,� ;�� n,x 61.4 Nac:�358 � �."+' 3'- r"�'+`�� :;;.� ��.;� •,:. Ei JAMES E. MOORE AND ALBF.RTA L. MOORE . '�•'� - � . � ',�'v��.'; . . . PROPEkTY SOUTH OP SCHOOL �: .. 'p� _ .. ) ',Yy .. _�v Y. •'i,4,_ >",�, -$ ��yr �t•A:: r��.•-�� -;?Y - � �.� I�Z r '4 'r y..� C� ' ' r��' � , 4 ..�. , %f f � �. .. .. . �.. .� . .�.. �.: - ,. - . �. . . � , W . �� i .. . '..' .. . ��..: a• �... ��..� ". . � �• �' ��'t'in connectioa'vitd tAe above d'eecrioed p� perty. �''" . ' '° '�`-,� � ,i:: � ; � k ;J ' F.r.ceptinq the easemente and tcactF of land described as �,.,;�-.•'- � I fO110V6, CO-V�t: � � if'��"� .g. jl } . � �•.::[� �. h. (1) A tract of land conveyed to Aspen School District sy.'c;' � . No. 1 Re. by deed dated Decembe[ 30, 1964, and [eco[ded as 7 �;`. Document No. 119586 in Book 210 a[ Page 561 oE the Pitkin 7 i:�l ` County recorde; , ' � (2) A tract of land conveyed to Aapen School District 1 I No. 1 Re. by dced dated January 4, 1965, and recocded ae ��r �� . P�cument No. 119700 in Book 211 at Paqe 150 of the Pitkin y� Covnty �ecncds; i � q (3) A tract of land conveyed to ]lspen School Distcict � ' a �' � No. 1 Re. by deed dated Auquet 9, 1971, and �eco[ded ae 2 , ; Document No. 196788 in Book 256 at Paqe BB7 of the Pitkin County records: � � F. (4) A tract of land conveyed to Aspen School Disttict � No. i Re. by deed dated Auguet 9, 1971, and recocded as i ';t;7s Documen[ No. 146789 in SooF. 256 at Page 689 of the Pitkin ,i County records: � � j ; � (5) A tract of land conveyed to Cocpotation of the . � � . Pcesiding Bishop oE the Chucch of Jesus Chcist oE Lattet i � Day saints, a Utah Cor�ocation Sole, by varranty deed dated ' � ,i.:, July 7. 1977, and [ecocded as Document No. 19527� i.n �An� � • 731 at Paqe 623 oE Che Pitkin county ruaocd�: � � - F �� . . . � n'� ` . . '- (6) Easewent Aqreement between James E. Moore and i Albecta L. Moore of Aspen, Colorado, Fi[st Pa[tiae, and � Aspen School Districi No. 1 Re. oE Pitkin County, Colorado, � R �� Secand Party, dated May 31, 1977, and [eco[ded as Aocument � No. 195723 in Hook 331 at PaTge 619 of the Pitkin County cecords: � � (7) Tcai1 Easement becveen James E. Moore and Plnerta : ; L. ::ooce of Aspen. Colorado, as Firet Pa[Cies, to Aspen n.' . ' 8chool District No. 1 Re. of Pitkin County, Cnlorado, as f '� ! ° Second Pa[[y, dated July 7, 1977, and recorded as Dor.uwent �- No. 195725 in Book 331 at Page 622 ot the Pi[kin Coun[y r:' t± cecocde; ` ' �: �,� . (8) A tract of land conveyed to The City oE Aspen, a � �j t�:; - � . � . Monicipal Cocpora[ion, by deed dated Decembec 28, 1977, and � - , , � ' . � � � reco[ded as Document No. 200626 in Book J41 at Paqe 127 oC � � ��` • � the Picktn County records. � r� �. , r, , All of the above descclbed 2roper[y contafns 7,70 AGGeN; �10[& O[ d �� less. . _ `�;ri� : i � _:.. :, _ __ .:_ '.__. _ .;; ! ; , i .;87186 B-799 G-159 11/09/95 10:34A PG 10 OF 10 ' � : •,Rt�l,.. � I , . . . :. ...... . :..: . __ . ....._.. _.. :; ' t�:�" ....., . _...,,.. .:,._ _...._�.....� .,_.�.. __.___.,-_•. . . _� ' . ,, .i_ •^. . . , . . . � . _ � r: �.' . .. � - . .. . . .- I . . . �� . _ "., 4 - . . 1 � . � ' .. � - . . . . .. \ ' . / li1y..�, . . . ., . C �� . i'�'"^•/.. . . 1b�Y� .. ' `� . , r ,� ,w� . ..'Rf��.-c.o;r..... �..;�.:..� � . . ... .�, �+C�� .-. _.,... ft�,Yes'.=T�.�i�l�ua7:�'Nd11�sY,7&`7�s�[��`"'iFGW�.��i�Y't'�';�'�L't`r'i:' 1�+ v! , `i �+�`��'. ,� '-' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO1+IldISSIONERS ' ' ' � % -: . 5 OF PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO GRANTING CiENERAL SIIHMISSION/PLANNED ;'_, .t, IINIT DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL REVIEW AND 1041 ENVIRONMENTAL ;�`.�•� __� L ; ..,, HAZARD REVIEW APPROVALS, AND AWARDING THE 1993 METRO R8SID8NTIAL Zr GROWTA MANAG$MENT ALLOTMENTS FOR TIiE JAMES E. MOORE FAMILY �' '`" r ; � PUD PROJECT LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ASPEN s s'.' --. -� PUBLIC SCHOOL CAMPUS y l Reaolution No. 95- ��6 � Y : RECITALS +f ; _� , 1. The Jamea E. Moore Family (hereinafter "Applicants") � + � have applied to the County for General Submisaion, Planned Unit :g� . F Development, Special Review, and 1041 Envizonmental Hazard Review. ;�� The applicants have also applied for residential growth management �_� � � allocations from the 1993 metro area pool. In addition, �the � applicants have applied for Rezoning and several amendments to the . �, � Pitkin County Land Use Code. 3 1� 2. •These land use actions aze requeated in order to ��} , � 4 accommodate the James E. Moore Family PUD project which includes ' i ' the following elements: f �" �J' . * 40 tree-market single-family residential lots; '"'�,.. � � * 31 Affordable single-family detached reaidential -`�� y �Q unita; � �� * Ski Club Facility ( approx. 2,000 sf structure); * Ski Lift from High School area to the top of Powder Bowl; x * Baseball field, running Track, and other recreational � facilities for use by the public schools; � � * Substantial im rovements to the roads and :;; �1 p parking areas on ; , � v the Public School Campus (see attached site plan) ; and F ` =� ' * Multi-use trail system. { :A� r � �� 3. The subject property is approximately 215 acres in area `� , ..� and is described in the attached Exhibit A . The property is � # currently zoned AF-2; two acre minimum lot size (approx.72 acrea) � � ,� � and AF-1; ten acre minimum lot size (approx. 143 acres) . R 7,� t � 4. The subject property has legal access from Maroon Creek Road as well ae at. specific points along Glen Eagles Drive and �, ' Upper Meadowood Drive (the approved project takea all access from �;: Maroon Creek Road and does not utilize the Glen Eagles Drive or . � � Upper Meadowood Road access points) . - � � , . j- i . ,; _. ��,. � � 1�/^c5/19% 01:18P FG 1 OF 11 R@EC�@ DOC NOT � s� � 398334 pITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECQRDER �' t i l � � 1 SILVIA DAVIS � � i • c:.:-----°•-----�°^----- ----�---°----_y_...�� -.�...,.::... .. . . ..-z,.:.�. � - �..._. , �.z:,..,.�`._.,...��:..w��... �'}� � ` , . �,�}� . ., . �,-,.,. .. i . - .. . , .,._ ., .... ' y�f � y �. a�� .. —. . �. � - . .. . � � . . -.� � . �� c � . . . . . . �, . .._' . ..i\ � � .�. . . � . . . .. , � .� - . , . \ � ,� � � . . � . � ' � .. � � . � -. ' � . . ... . . . � . ' � �� . . . • , . . . . . . . . � . . . .. . . ' . . . ��: . ' _ .. . . . . . . ' . ' .. , . p�Y ' _ . . ' . . . . . ' �� ♦f ' • 'a�' � .� � . .. � , y�d. ;a� t�., YI�,j, '.�"1'�� "A' .:SF��, , ;.`. � S"•�"�4:�'��('�6:�K'LF37f�.��r�>� . ��oR._. ..ur�G��tdEt��e:._ �.. .,t^t,'.. ,t� d:.'. �.L'- /F.- �+:'�5�, a ,t^s•.i�� i; � ; yi: { .. . ' / . . � , yy. r Raeolution No. 95- .� Page 2 ! , ,�� . t t• __ � r�, fY=•.`:, , � • 5. The Moore Family submitte8 an app7.ication in 1993 �'.;,,:?3 i requeating a total of 39 residential growth management ya•''�ti�y,r: allocations. The subject property has been deemed to be within the "Metro Area" for purposes of growth management competition. The h� -� `� i=.�;•. 1993 metro area residential pool contained 24 allotments. ;,�;:;;'.�'. f� Including the Moore application, there were two applications "�"•'Y�=` '�` f submitted for the 1993 Metro Area residential growth management � competition. The other application was submitted by Fabienne ':r :'• t Benedict for the Benedict Stillwater Ranch project and requested 4 ;1,} ; i four allotments. The Moore application received a score of 87.5 '"?°'``�' ,,r,,. ,... i from the Planning Commission while the Benedi.ct application '� � received a score 83.25. }-•a� : t' : � . � - . . . a��': . 6. The Planning and 2oning Commission considered the ` �, „ Applicant's request at public meetings on February 3, 1994; February l0, 1994; August 16, 1994 and October 4, 1994. The ;�`' �Planning Commission found the application to be conaistent with the applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. <i�? , 7. The Board considered this application at public > { meetings on January 10; January 24; January 31; February 13; � � February 21; and February 28, all in 1995. The duly noticed public hearing was opened on January 24, 1995 and was continued at each r;f,�, of the subsequent meetings and officially closed on February 28, � j . 1995. Throughout these meetings, evidence and testimony was offered by the applicant, Staff, and membera of the public. 8. The Board finds that the applicants' request is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Pitkin County �t Land Use Code, if the applicant adheres to the conditions ,� � • ;;� '� identified in this resolution. r -- - ;i DiOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it hereby �u� , grants general submission, planned unit development, apecial. �{ review, and 1041 environmental hazard review approval for the �' Moore Family PUD project. g i j k, :r'.. FURTHER, 8E ZT RBSOLVBD the Soard does hereby award 24 residential growth management allocations for the Moore Family P1JD � project. These approvals are subject to the following conditions: rr. �. I� 1. Structural mitigation for potential avalanche hazard shall be ji �` . . �i�S.�': ,;1 provided to protect free-market lots 2, 3, and 4. ` '" } � i f ,� , � � ��' � 4 399334 1@/25/1996 @1:18P F'G � OF 11 J � i��' � �� . .:.:' .t._� „ ` c a ' r.,:;'. x c:•.;«.,_ .:.:.� .....:::�.__ . ._ ....,._ — ---- �. •n :.si m�?,..:,�ta�u......t ,.�v` �.a �._...:... .+.___•--._..�.�..�_�..,....`... � -- - �� . ' , . ' . . . - .. - � . � . . . � ' � . � �� ,: y . . �. � . _ . . . . � . . . � . .�A, .�� , - - i � , , ,; 4 } � - : , � , , � �, �, . r ��; • - , . w �1��A''" .,� . ''� .. � ' � . - ,;�:� . ' .. � ._ . .,...__._.._..�..:.,a,�,_.�.�._.,�,..� ... ,• . _ ��ur' ��". � r �. ,., � � � Reaolution No. 95- � �� Page 3 '�,'�t �q; % p, i ;� . y;:�,. ,i � �. - R�?=..,: '� 2. The entire area encompassed by single-family lots shall be r,._',�':;-�� ` rezoned from AF-2 and AF-1 to AF-3. ' �'' �y-.� ',J;,`,: 3. Building envelopes for all lots shall be established at j`-'� 's:. � detailed submiesion. � "s`�`':' f ::� � _ ' 4. Circulation in the area of the High School shall be designed i ,.�r. �• ' i to conform with the layout ahawn on the "Future Conditions" �' ,}� � pZan. A detailed deaign showing how this circulation will � + function ahall be provided at der_ailed submissiori. � �� ' 5. The structures on affordable lots 25 through 31 sha1J. be �� limited to 16 feet in height, as measured in the Pitkin x�� 2: County Land use Code. �'�' :s�; 6. At detailed submission, the Applicants shall provide detailed •�"� studies for the height and mass of the structurea on� `� affordable lots 10 through 24. 7. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a landscape plan showing the intended landscaping on the �� i affordable lots and in all common areas. In particular, this � . plan shall show the following: " � . .� a. All street trees to be planted including species and � aize. b. Screening between. affordable lots 25 - 31 and the - adjacent homes in the Meadowood Subdivision. �` � c. Screening between the proposed running track and the < i � � adjacent Meadowood Subdivision. ` � �=-.".: _ ::t d. Screening between affordable 10-17 and the adjacent �' homea in the Aspen Highlanda Subdivision. , •� �F e. Screening between affordable lots 21 and 24 and , the 9 � a ,'; adjacent roads and parking areas associated with the : High School and the Ski Club Facility. ' �.):� ,. . f. Screening between affordable lots 25, 28, 29, 30, and j 31 and the road and parking lots serving the Middle and �� Elementary Schools. `..z' � �" a� �, � ,{, ,, 398334_ _ 10/c5/1996 @1:i8F' PG 3 OF 11 _ e� ji ��,, ��., i .. � � � ,', � � `- �........�.-��-�t,��n,:�.:1��r.-sw��+a,a:�s:. I.,�- . F, ..� _..:�,. .;:..,. �F^ �� i �; r �� µi�� ' - ' . . � . .��'�� y..�. . . . . � . . � . .. .. . - � -�� `.:r�_,";. , .. -/: . �'`,� � . ` , � ... . � . _ l_ . . . ka- � . .�-• � . . � . . . . , . � •:i . . . � � . � . . � . . . . 'a,r• . . . . . : `, . . . . . � .. �� . . . .. . . �. . ... � � . ..� . ' .. � . - � . . � . . . ' . . . . . . . .. . , .. . � � . � ;. ,.. . - .. . +.�, ; .. ; . .-. . . . . � . . ' .. � . . .. , . . `�fi�w . _ :r�!. .�d�J :F��..:�l,1 L.�;'� ..� .. .: . •.. . . . `` 3 1 . . i.lN....[u i.i.....w.n.�waw+....� ._..f_.... ..��.� .R� . _fl�4�.f �,, i Resolution No. 95- 30 {' �? Page 4 �j� �" � � �',.. � �.^�. � Screenin east of sin le-famil home located near hi h ��`�%�`•'� 9• 9 9 Y 4 i.;+�;. - ( achoo2 enCry road (immediately north of Glen Eagles �1 iZ i Drive) . � � �. :s,:;,�,5:' 8. At detailed submission, roadways and other utility corridors ,..,.,.,:f and facilities (including the ski lift) ahall be sufficiently� ��s � -- - staked to identify areas which wouTd be diaturbed and trees R�,,, which would be removed as a result•of the installation of � these facilities. The corners of the building envelopes in ��, 4; the free-market lots shall also be ataked. Tree removal on � individual lots shall be limited to the building envelope and ,� shall be addressed in. the covenants and restrictions for the 4 subdivision. ��` ` . ,,.ti. ' 9. The Applicant shall submit conceptual plans and elevationa showing a "typical" affordable housing unit. These plans . shall reflect the results of the height and mase studiea } discussed in condition number 6 above. } 10. The Applicant shall pursue connection to the City's central � . water distribution system as a first priority. 11. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide either a � letter from the City of Aspen demonstrating a commitment to , :h:-i serve the project with domestic water, or a detailed water � � righta and engineering analysis demonstrating that a private � water system can be constructed to serve the projects� ' i I domestic water needs. The water rights analysis shaZZ cZarify what proportionate share of the total water rights .in the Stein-Arlian Marolt ditch that the Applicant holds. The � ' � Applicant shall also specify all facilities that will be used �{ -_� �' � to convey raw water from these ditches to the .subject property. ' If private water systems are pureued for both the Moore and ,� �. Aspen Highlands prvjects, , the Applicant shall agree to ;,�;1 cooperate in sharing water system facilities, wherever +1_. possible, in order to minimize the visual and environmental - '� impacts associated with the installation of these facilities, The engineering analysis shall identify all facilities (if !� �'' any ) to be shared between the Aspen Highlands project and l�. �; r j�` " i � � � y 398334 1@/25/1996 �D1:18P F'G 4 OF 11 , it.,,��4 . � �. . .. .__.�... _�.,_ _.__._�. ,..,,. _ . . . � . . ' .. . � i � . ' '�.. ,�.�,.:�l,t.,v...r..w.�::,'va '� . � . �`yg��,+u i� ��'(;�b � . .. � . a . �tio': +�_ . �. � � �. . � � . . . � � i` ,` . •� . � .� .. �' : . . - .- ,s - ` . . - - � � � � . � .. . '--� . .i. �z � . . � . �.:._ �. . . .� � .. . �. . . . � . . � � -. - . -. . � �� I � .��. "r��l . . � � . - . � . . . � . . . .�. � , � � � �- - . . .. . . . . . . , . . .� _ � ""7'". ... . � . �. .. _. .. -- , . . . . .. . . ; . ;.��l,'�w - • �. .. . ._ � . :_ , . ` , .. , .�.. � . , - ,: � � . x �Or. . �3�,.:u$u�.-1,e._ i•4c,: ,�.. ....., . ,,..... ...._._....>�_..,.,,_.__.. .. _ .. __ _ �t^'v.'�. re.,:,. �;:.* x ; � � Resolution No. 95- � a .,;• Page 5 . > *�!� t; ;S. , . . . �:��. � ti.': the Moore project. A Ietter of °agreement in concept°, aigned r�.•;,, ., by representatives of both the Moore family and Hines '•:••,1!a Interests Ltd., identifying all private water syatem '`•,;"":� .�.i"Z'.>i facilities to be shared and outlining the specifics regarding ct,. , i who ia responsible for construction and maintenance of these `j`r `'' ' facilities shall be provided at detailed submisaion. A final �f r: executed agreement shall be recorded with the Final Plat and � Y :' accompanying documents. The engineering analysis ahall also �X , � � include any technical in£ormation deemed neceasary by the i _ j City Water Department, to demonstrate that the private system �� '� will function adequately. This requzrement is intended to � � enaure that the private system is compatible with the City system in the event that these system are connected in the '�'� future. �y �., � 12. At detailed submission, the Applicant ahall provide a �`„ "commitment to serve" letter from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) . � .. ; ' - i 13. The AppZicant commits to fund a proportionate share o£ the � ` ongoing sanitary sewage collection syatem capacity atudy � being conducted by the ACSD. The Applicant also commits to "j pay a proportionate share of any . collection system improvements necessary to serve the project. k'unds for the collection system capacity study shall be deposited with the �� '°� ACSD pxior to detailed submission. Funds for collection system improvements shall be provided in accordance with the ' subdivision improvements agreement, which sha11 be prepared - . pzior to final plat review. ` �� 14. All sewage collectian system improvements shall be designed ,� • -�� in accordance with the ACSD line specifications and shall be �`'�- located within the rights-of-way for the subdivision road system. At the Applicant�s expense, plans and specifications � _ for the proposed sanitary sewage collection system shall� be reviewed by the engineer for the Aspen Conaolidated � " Sanitation Diatrict. ":i ;>�� 15. At detailed submisaion, the Applicant shal]. be required to } . j provide "will serve letters" from Holy Cross Electric and Rocky Mountain Natural Gas. . ' �s.: �;, 16. All utilities shall be extended underground. ��i _ , _ `.. } ,�� '- 399.'.34 10/G.;/1996 01:i8P PG 5 OF 11 „ ' ��,' i• . A ,,, .. •.` W�•.J'�.'.YlsS M�'.ry. {,Kt'nVwSf.��NE�I*W l�r.'lUF�S....:•r'i-'N �.� ... i. _. ... .w uA�..v: LU,�v4YUV,�iuGn.�wi�*L'.'Ni ss�a=•� t / . , � � � � . . . . ' . . . �.: Y w '.. . "t . � .. . _ . , _ .. . .. . .. I('Y -T�: . �. . .. . . � � .. +�7 ' � .. . ��. . . � ` . � . <.5_f ; i . . . .. . . . . . ' . . . . . � �. .. , ' . � . . . � . / . � . . . - . . .' : .. . ' ._,._._ �i.' . : . � . . , . . .. .- � �� ( . ,:,. .. ._ .. ._... . ��. . . � � - . . � . . . . . . �• . . ' .. f�v '�. • - . ,•'��,,e� �_� -��. r � , d '�'.' .. . . ul.Y.kL`�c.ekLFi�L4LGi�•�LSh!:-Lfi'�I?1G,�lY'3i&7.GtVN�72519�'('v� ��M, . �..:f�ti S.YH�`•.:.:. e��i...., ' .. 3.. .,.. - ..w 1. .. . r, ,F.� ,r,F�ri�,.��`� . 7 � Resolution No. 95- ��D_ t Page 6 �+ ?c' '�� ::��.: ,.. . ;'�v��' � . i�r�". � � � . `i'' '0+..� . : ".':.'}.� - 17. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a '. . comprehensive storm water drainage plan. Thia plan ahaZl ;'��''�,,z,� include calculations for aub-basin areas, flowa, sizing of ;x;_�..�� 4 � culverts, detention basin sizing, drainage at all �',sr �.. ,� underpasses, drainage of all parking areas, clean outs and ;,y� � grit collectors for parking lot drainage systems. .f �tl ' ..____ . . . ��R� ' , 18. The Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan at s � detailed submission. this plan aha12 eatablish erosion ` '� ' �� control methods to be used during site grading of all common � 7 areas and aEfordable lots. The erosion control plan ahall ,�d �, • establish guidelines to be followed during the development ot ' individual free-market lots. These guidelines shall be made �a . binding on the general contractor for each individual lot. � ' The erosion control plan shall also address soil '3'� . - stabilization and interim revegetation measures, including the revegetation of stockpiled topsoil. � ' A. ' � 19.: The Applicant shall adhere to the following atandards for � development in areas where slopes exceed 15 percent. - . a. Cuts shall not be made into slopes steeper than thirty percent (30°s) unlesa mechanical support is provided. �,�j. b. Cuts and fills, and grading and scraping shall be !' confined to the minimum area needed for construction. c. Steepness of cut and fill slopes shall be the maximum • which will insure stabzlity and still allow !� . revegetation. i . � ^ . � d. Development plans shall include reasonable but adequate t control measures. Large tracts should be developed in �' small, workable units without leaving large areas for , �; long periods. ' y � '� ;` , e. Use mulches or temporary cover on exposed soil areas - and re-establish permanent vegetation and install r�'' � ' ' erosion controZ measures as soon as possible. �M ! f. Incorporate natural drainage patterns into the •i ��' � development plan. Culverts, sediment basins and othez {� �� 3 ti i£ �.� . 398334 10/25/1996 @1:18P F'6 6 OF 11 - - il �4 . � �1,, �� ,. �,� � °y'��if�.f�Lii{.'��}OtSS8h1�{'-0d'wr'� �w.Ya:i+w.=w�-'..-+-+-7-�'..u.,.� � . _ � � .:nJ..wiw+ ..�..kl.t � '� d / . . � � � . . .. � � ,i� 4. � �.Fr -` - r��,. ` t' ' ,�y.. ' • � � • _.. �� , i ;: . . / � - , ,�';� . ' : ?t'=y ._ , .. � Fi� . � . . � , . , .., �✓,.'..::.._.,c�._,ic�,:... � ,.... � ,. ,,., .i. �... „s:c.�c.t-MM��:e:.:;a'un,roroacat�.•�,s.�+a�rxs,w�..-tn r"��f""�.�., _ y-�,��e�. -�+'. r "1 Reaolutioa No. 95- � '� ;% Page 7 �,.. �<� � ;=tt�� "�;� engineering measurea should be used where necessary to `x' •. • � control eroaion. " �:�'� . . . �.,i••f• ,,"Z�.r. i g. Soil absorption sewage disposal syateme should not be i';;� .c..�~ placed on slopes steeper than fifteen percent (15%) . '�"'>�'.• "ti:. ' rti� :' f , 20. All soil retaining structures shall be designed by a Colorado ,.�`±�;;,,� -- registered professional engineer. Plans for such structures �,.�y.. ;`� . shall be provided at detailed submission and shall require �k� , t .� approval by the County Engineer. {� ��?�. - �y� 21. Prior to building permit application, the Applicant shall be ��,� '- . required to obtain all necessary State and Fedexal permits. � �` �>. k'f7'. . 22. All roadways shall be canstructed to the standards outlined � � � : in the Pitkin County Road Standard Manual or better. � :3 � e. . 23. The Applicant shall commit to fund the road improvementa and �� travel demand management measures as contained in the '�`� ' application. The Applicant shall also participate in funding the installation of left turn lanea on Maroon Creek Road at •r the intersections of both the upper and lower access roads � for the School Campus. '�� - 24. The Applicant commits to mitigate any increase in PM-10 attributable to the project (including that associated wzth any increase in vehicle miles traveled VMT) . The Applicant shall work with County Staff to establish enforceable and verifiable measures for mitigating the increase in PM-10. The �`g` PM-10 mitigation plan shall be submitted at detailed submission and shall require approval by the Board of County � � ��• n Commissioners. The PM-10 mitigation plan ahall be referred to �" the Aspen/Pitkin County Environmental Health Department and '• the Air Quality Control Division of the State Environmental " ' Health Department for their comment prior to Board review and �� aPProval. � , R �,• ,.�;i i 25. At detailed submission, the Applicant shall provide a � detailed transit plan addressing the following issues: . a. The level of transit service that is to be provided by " the Applicant including hours of operation and season <! �` t� : �. . . � � .,.',r eY � r p . ... . .. _ ._. _...._ ..__ .. . - -.- .. - - --� - � 1( ; 398334 1�T/2:,/i996 01:i8P F'G 7 OF 11 � �i '`y` I �! {4 �ytl' � �j , 1 t , �..,..,�... .___ _. _.. . : ... . ..........a.......:. ...w....�.��:u�..,._•_:F,:........,.��_.�...._>:..�..,......_�.�,.,.�_ -_ � r . : . � �� c;.'_ 3 • - ` " � � ,.,, ,- .. " � . t, j ��', � l, � : � \ 1 � ` ; , . .. . , � . . .4��,�: � _ ��µ ,-,_, . , ;�� ._ , `..<t.�+. - , . .. �]�{}� , �... �[q� ., � , ` ,. �.��:? �.��„� �i; l+`IiAr. .. s.w4YNti�.�'��l .4:t'._ S'�,i:lp.. .., �'.%li'.� � ♦...�' o � .. . . 47{',t �'1:� ii 5�, { �. !.�, Resolution No. 95- �� k;�- r Page 8 ��. .�_, r;.,. of operation, frequency of aervice (headways), vehicle t' `"�� ..�i,, �.:. . types and capacities. , 4,'�,'t':i r, � �r c b. Where traneit vehicles will be stored and maintained. `'` � i: � 1 c. Whether spare transit vehicles will be provided to ,."`��.µ. : account maintenance down time, etc. j: _:.- _. � '� � � d. Route/a to be served. �y s�, , ' e. Promotion strategiea for �ransit service. `f . �_�,� .r : , f. Management and operations plan for transit aervice and ;F��ty;. intended provider. + ' '�'� e .a . In order to monitor the effectiveness of transit service the �°" ; !- . applicant shall also provide the following information in the �� ' j detailed transit plan: • `# , g. Baseline traffic volumes, current transit ridership in � the Maroon Creek ValZey_ h. Traffic counts entering and exiting the Moore project � aEter construction. ':� i. . Ridership of the proposed tranait aystem. This � information should be summarized for peak and off-peak season, peak AM and PM hours and by daily ridership. j. PM-10 levels. � 26. In the event the monitoring program shows that traffic � �• ` mitigation measures are not accomplishing the desired t results, mitigating any increase in PM-10 and generating ?' vehicle trips in the range projected in the traffic study ; included in the application (284 vehicles per day) , the �� Applicant shall be required to provide additional mitigation 9 '� to accomplish these objectives. R� '`:' 27. All homes on the property shall be deaigned with positive ' .i drainage away from the Eoundation on alI sides. �"� , �� or,: 28. The Applicant shall conduct on-site soila inveatigations for "'� sk�%; � all building envelopes located south of the ��flume." This � � � ; � . � . . _ .... � s I( 1�'. . _ _ _ i 398334 10/25/1996 �7:18F FG 8 OF il ;'� I �� ,- {' �� .. � . . . . . . . =Y ; ��,'. I�—�- u�A.u+...v:m�—.a.�e..,.:..c.+.xv.....:•�., es.», w., ._ .. ��.i�•• xL+-..cirv�LykN.<�n,�tuir..! av.::\"j��Y� ! ./ . _ . `.' ��r��l_ _ ' _ . � .. � . � t� �,. � � . ,t . : .. . . yry .. . , . . .. . . . . .�� . . ' . � � � . .. .. � . !,�.' . .. . ' � . . . � .. . ... . � . ' �� . � . � � . . . , . � i . . . . . . . - .. � . . . . � • . .. . - . . .. � . . I � . . . -- � . . . .. __ .. . - ,.� . . . . , . � A'd_ . . � . . . . � . . . . . . _ � .. . . � . . � �: . . . ... . . � . . . . . . � � . r�f�� .h• . �� 1 J ''r . ' � � � '��.�.1{��e��t_�YS7ti' , �r:�$'.Y1i'..JF�.:. �' . . 'J�i..i�� O-n-ppzi`in�' A 4~„��li� �'` � �(I. � ry7. .� Resolution No. 95- � � ,: Page 9 T+, �C� � , �- �,. �. k information shall be provided at detailed submission and �l �'� ` (��:`:�... shall be used to determine which lots will require engineered t�f;,,'.ti.;�.}, Eoundations. All foundationa shall be desi '•`: �' - gned in accordance �i_, .: with the specifications for Seismic Zone II, � ; ,.::s: r;:;_•' �. • 29. Low water (xeriscaping) concepts and plant material shall be �r z;;�`J:= _ _ -_� used in landscaping the property in those areas where soils ,,,� -'� may be prone to supersaturation (south of the flume) . In all �':^�'•:'" � other areas, landaca in shall be limited to native lant F�L'i.-�=°.. � p. g p �.,`y:,' � species. `` ' ,�� `: 30. The Applicant shall adhere to the following wildfire L �` mitigation measures: �:.,,. , ., ,r., a) A 10 foot perimeter around all legal structures ;:�� . shall be clear of tall grass and brush. The grass in :,:� this perimeter shall be kept mowed and only small �, plants or shrubs shall be used for landscaping. =�3 � b) Vegetation shall be reduced to break up the � ivertical and horizontal continuity. oE fuels a minimum � of 30 feet perimeter around the structure. Within the � 30 foot perimeter, spacing of clumps shall be a minimum �'.� � of two timea the height of the fuel. All measurements should be from the edgea of the crowns of the fuel. c) Spacing between the clumps of brush within the 30 foot perimeter shall be a minimum of two times the • � height of the fuel. All measurementa shall be from the j � edges of the crowns o£ the fuel, � j - � .�� -:;� d) AZ1 branches ahall be pruned from trees and brusk � _ within the 30 foot perimeter to a height of 10 feet 7 . above the ground and ladder fuels shall be removed '� . � . � around trees and brush. ' � q ,'+ e) All branches that extend over the roof eves or are ` "`�;+� � within 15 feet of the chimney shall be trimmed_ � /• � '. � f) The access drive aha11 meet minimum Count y i ! driveway standards. '•'�" , �� , �+r .�x � , • ' '" ' � } ' 398334 1@/25/199E 01:i8P F'G 9 OF il _... � ��',., � � (i t� ��';� . . x) , , k� . , �4 � ' y . �.�.. - ��.N.�...�,�..�..�.��:��.�wa.:. �_��. .__, .�.� �.�.�a � ' � �, _ �# ,. -. ; �;� , '� . `" � : �, , .. . , . . .�. 4 � ; . � . ` , ,,.: �-. : ' �, , . _ { : _. , . _ . �: � : ' ,:�"��' , . .,..�. . . ��"' .. . �.{ � � �.-�yy�"�(�.J ,R� p��r' y �,rj �� t��7q��,,�v�� y i,'s�.�4:...�.+��,CJe�4�H��ti.h• �:!S.�i��'t.,4.� �i'.y�'. yt�iti% . - .�t.:'�' >_..we.. �,WR'��.}�}�.tit9�-�YOATitin.W�Y��IlC �rfi±,kl'': : \.' • ) +� 3 Reaolution No. 95- � �.�._ � , 1 Page 10 '"-. �' ,.� �; �. ;�: � r„� :,� , g) The owner of the property shall be responaible for t` :;,,,�i.� the continued maintenance of the defensible space �,� `- vegetation requirements. +t '�'-i: I � ! h) The address shall be clearly marked and visible ��` .?,� �f: from the roadway with a minimum 2" letters. .r~ �:.'.: �. – �,� . i) There shall be an on-aite water storage tank of � � not Zess than 1,000 gallons. `� : ij) Roof materials for all structures shall be Class A, non-combustible (no wood ahakes or shingles) ��i - I material approved by the Underwriters Laboratory with c:y'� , r no flat roofs. ,_ ! �Y? 31. Uae of the Smuggler Lane connection between the Moore �,� ,� � � property and the Highlands Base Village shall be limited to p,• � emergency service vehicles, shuttle busses, electric carts, � pedestrians, bicycles, and nordic skiers. Signe shall be � posted indicating this restriction. In addition, the subdivision covenants shall address this reatriction and + methods for how it will be enforced. �. ' ' 32. Lighting shall comply with the County standards in place at :��.: the time of building permit. Further, there shall be no street lighting nor shall the recreational facilities provided for the school be Zit. 33, The Applicant sha11 be allowed to select the occupants for those affordable housing units which are provided over and • �j above the required housing, mitigation for the project, ` t . �,A provided these occupants have been deemed to comply with the —; Housing Office standards for employment, income and assets � • .� and have been approved by the Housing Office. g� . . 34. The alpine ski easement shown along the east property line � shall be extended to the proposed ski lift along the north � �( : side of affordable lots 15, 16 and 17, or in another ■�' •'+',� acceptable location in this vicinity. . , � APPROVED RND ADOPTED ON TfiE 28Tfi DAY Ol? FEBRUARY 1995. #i� �: ' ' �� , ' � � , HOARD OF COUNTY CO2R+lISSIONERS �� ' .} •- 3 1 i� '1 ; 398334 10/'�:,/1996 01:18R PG 10 OF li '• � ,S �i �� , r: . � � , . ��,. -w,..✓.a�u.umutetria+�.L:.t4:ef:�+�.Yy(±.YIw%+�r':u•!+anwww...+-�W..+.rr.-u .. ... .. ......+..:�...,_r...s i.u-.�....... '.�,a:f .�..._s..�.._ ...e�....r+�... ........... ..�..w1.+>.•_uiaw..eu'., t. �.,� ...� .. . .. y !:: � . ' + / .. -.. . , . . ..:� . ' . . . �' . . l J . . . . `... . � F� �LR . �� . . .. .- ��.. 7�. 1'� .. .,1 . . � :l . . t � S ... . . . . . . . � .. . ` . - � i ; . . . . ��%�' �� . . . . . . f .�� . . ' ' - . . � '. . . ' � , � . . �� . � ..'f� ' ' .,�$. . � . . . . . , . . . .. . . ... .. . - '" �. .. . � «Ln. . . . . . . . <��FT, _ . '. . f. . , s>� ._ , .. _ �,� — ....�� r � , ' �:�4: » �t,� ¢�'' , x + �.�'�;:'' .:Sidi�. ��'�'��ia. : e�.. .,t�•:i�.��,, a'�S.t�. � ,: �� Reeolution No. 95- ?Q '' _��y j� .�� :�Al' ^�i� � Page 11 l,.�- �,� :��'. . . � � _ . . � � . � . . :�,j•�,.;'. ' OF PITRIN COUNTY, COLORADO •�'• . . . . . . .. . . �y!r �. . . � , ( � . � � _� y� . �� ... . � . B]/: .�I--` v� � � : ..� � , arnd, Chairman ��r,: s. n5�....� t?,�-�...� �`�.,�yr � � i �� AT ST: ��_'� � i. t� • _.'' I � ��v..,'. Je nette Jones, '� .,' . . . . . y�K ,�� D uty County C rk k��'� :a>;.';`. ` APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED A3 TO CONTENP: ' '�'. `;: � r ;�..i n �' �(i`" '�'� . � _ „ w' ` , John E , Suz Konc an, 3d, County Attorney Community evelopment Director ;�+ '�'��reso_moore�ud . . . . . . . ' j `.; � � � . .: � .�. � . .�, � , ,: . � .: ,.,:. �� ' �� . . � , , � . G 3�t � . ', +�! ,, i; :� l�`. ry �, ;"� q+ , 2 (' t � , i-... ��.�. ,�� ,� i :I ;. ;; � .' ::._ ..-, _.._. . .. , ...- • ---._. . . ._: _._ . . . .: . ' � - -'-' ---- ` -- 10/25/19% 01:18P PG il OF'1! � ;,i � 398334 "I' �t' !rl i {,i .i . . . � . � . . �=L' - �, ' :I� i`:�- � .� - , ;. �, \ �'Rf# ' \ .', . � . ' .., .. _ .{ {� � h�- t'� ::4(F ;. ��' ;� ` ' ' f ' r ��` I t � X a F ,1 F ( �: � �' �t•. y� ` 1 r �. � � �.� � i • .s�.: '�S i � j�:�y f :� � , �: I �.; _ � - - . _ �.; , - . <�#� � � ;,�- ' .. _.�*�?r .- ,